Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Calculate and interpret a throughput accounting ratio (TPAR).[2] Suggest how a TPAR could be improved.[2] Apply throughput accounting to a multi-product decision-making problem.[
Throughput accounting, which can also be referred to as the Theory of Constraints (TOC), focuses on organisational constraints or bottlenecks which restrict production. The objective is to maximise output (or throughput) by converting raw materials to finished items as quickly as possible. These finished items are then despatched to customers as soon as possible (as in a JIT system). 1.1 Bottlenecks
The most important aspect of the theory of Throughput Accounting (TA) is that the speed of output of the factory is restricted to the speed of the bottleneck which is, in effect, the limiting factor or constraining resource. The objectives, therefore, are: Identify the bottleneck(s) Remove them, or reduce the extent to which they constrain activity.
1.2
Terminology
Throughput accounting uses three key terms: Throughput contribution Sales revenue completely variable costs. (Completely variable costs usually comprise direct materials only because labour costs usually include a fixed element). Conversion costs = all operating costs excluding completely variable costs incurred to produce the product. Investment = all types of stock, equipment costs, buildings costs etc. The purpose of throughput accounting is to maximise throughput contribution whilst minimising conversion costs and investment. 1.3 Throughput per hour
A company produces two products X and Y which have unit selling price and cost values as follows: Product Selling price Direct materials Direct labour Variable overhead Fixed overhead X 130 ___ 20 10 10 10 ___ 50 ___ Profit 80 Y 104 ___ 20 18 18 18 ___ 74 ___ 30
Fixed overhead costs are absorbed on the basis of direct labour costs. The direct labour cost is incurred at the rate of 20 per hour in respect of the time spent in the two processes. Process X A B 8 min 22 min ______ 30 min ______ The maximum process times available per week are as follows: Process A Process B 2000 minutes 800 minutes Product Y 30 min 14 min ______ 44 min ______
The first step is to recognise that this is a limiting factor problem with two possible constraints: process A time and/or process B time. Firstly consider the maximum numbers of product X and Y that can be produced: Product X Process A Product Y
2000 = 250 8
2000 = 67 30
Process B
800 = 36 22
800 = 57 14
As the maximum number of units of both products is limited by the time available in process B, we can see that process A is not an effective constraint. The traditional approach to this type of problem is to use the contribution per process B minute to rank the products. This gives: Product X =
(130 20 10 10 ) 22 90 22
= 4.09 per minute
Product Y
(104 20 18 18) 14 48 14
= 3.43 per minute
On this basis product X would be preferred. If the same problem is considered using throughput contribution as the basis of ranking: Product X
(130 20 ) 22 (104 20 ) 14
Product Y
On this basis product Y is preferred. Clearly since the ranking basis changes the decision, they cannot both provide an optimum solution. Which is correct? The answer depends on the variability of the labour and variable overhead cost. In the short term it is now more likely that the labour cost is fixed, so under these circumstances the throughput accounting approach probably provides the better solution. 1.6 Controlling costs
Whilst the measurement of throughput per hour is important, we must recognise the need to consider any costs associated with increasing the throughput.
Value added per time period Conversion cost per time period
where value added equals sales less material costs equals throughout contribution. Traditional efficiency measures are no longer valid as they encourage production for stock. Instead efficiency is measured by:
In principle there is little difference between throughput accounting and marginal costing, both relying on the contribution concept. However, they differ in their classification of labour and other costs.