Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Consequences
The open mapping theorem has several important consequences: If A : X Y is a bijective continuous linear operator between the Banach spaces X and Y, then the inverse operator A1 : Y X is continuous as well (this is called the bounded inverse theorem). (Rudin 1973, Corollary 2.12) If A : X Y is a linear operator between the Banach spaces X and Y, and if for every sequence (xn) in X with xn 0 and Axn y it follows that y = 0, then A is continuous (Closed graph theorem). (Rudin 1973, Theorem 2.15)
Proof
One has to prove that if A : X Y is a continuous linear surjective map between Banach spaces, then A is an open map. It suffices to show that A maps the open unit ball in X to a neighborhood of the origin ofY. Let U, V be the open unit balls in X, Y respectively. Then X is the union of the sequence of multiples k U of the unit ball, k N, and since A is surjective,
By the Baire category theorem, the Banach space Y cannot be the union of countably many nowhere dense sets, so there is k > 0 such that the closure of A(kU) has non-empty interior. Thus, there is an open ball B(c,r) in Y, with center c and radius r > 0, contained in the closure of A(kU). If v V, then c + r v and c are in B(c,r), hence are limit points of A(k U). By continuity of addition, their difference rv is a limit point of A(k U) A(k U) A(2k U). By linearity of A, this implies that any v V is in the closure of A( 1 U), where = r / (2k). It follows that for any y Y and any > 0, there is an x X with: and Fix y V (where V means the ball V stretched by a factor of , rather than the boundary of V). By (1), there is some x 1 with ||x 1||< 1 and ||y A x 1||< / 2. Define a sequence {xn} inductively as follows. Assume: and by (1) we can pick x n +1 so that: and so (2) is satisfied for x n +1. Let From the first inequality in (2), {sn} is a Cauchy sequence, and since X is complete, sn converges to some x X. By (2), the sequence A sn tends to y, and so A x = y by continuity of A. Also,
This shows that every y V belongs to A(2 U), or equivalently, that the image A(U) of the unit ball in X contains the open ball ( / 2) V in Y. Hence, A(U) is a neighborhood of 0 in Y, and this concludes the proof.
Generalizations
Local convexity of X or Y is not essential to the proof, but completeness is: the theorem remains true in the case when X and Y are F-spaces. Furthermore, the theorem can be combined with the Baire category theorem in the following manner (Rudin, Theorem 2.11): Let X be a F-space and Y a topological vector space. If A : X Y is a continuous linear operator, then either A(X) is a meager set inY, or A(X)= Y. In the latter case, A is an open mapping and Y is also an F-space. Furthermore, in this latter case if N is the kernel of A, then there is a canonical factorization of A in the form
where X/ N is the quotient space (also an F-space) of X by the closed subspace N. The quotient mapping X X/ N is open, and the mapping is an isomorphism of topological vector spaces (Dieudonn, 12.16.8).
References
Rudin, Walter (1973), Functional Analysis, McGraw-Hill, ISBN0-07-054236-8 Dieudonn, Jean (1970), Treatise on Analysis, Volume II, Academic Press This article incorporates material from Proof of open mapping theorem on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License.
License
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported //creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/