Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Executive Summary
The purpose of the report is to identify the objective of each and every condition of
the Securities and Exchange Commission notification, the impacts of the notification
in the annual report of Aftab Automobiles Ltd. etc.
Insuring the accountability of the board of director, true and fair view of books and
accounts and the independence of the external auditors. Aftab’s compliance report and
annual report shows that Aftab complied all the requirements. But it is difficult to
identify the actual impacts of the notification i.e. whether actually corporate
governance is insured. For example, we cannot know whether the independent
director was independent in his minds and activities. Most of the cases we have to rely
on Aftab’s declaration. For example, Aftab’s board report declares that financial report
prevented fairly and proper books and accounts have been maintained. We cannot
cheque all the necessary documents. We have to rely on board and the auditors report.
However, if all the requirements are complied such as independent director & audit
committee appointed, audit committee report to the SEC if necessary; external
auditors are really independent of the company, then it is expected that corporate
governance have been improved in a company like Aftab Automobiles Ltd.
We have analyzed each and every points of SEC notification company act 1994 and
IAS-1 relating to the requirements if the notification, Aftab’s annual report and
compliance report.
We think in addition to the compliance report disclosed in the annual report, SEC,
should require to be submitted in the SEC, elaborate compliance report with enough
explanation of the impacts of compliance or non compliance in the compliance details
duties and responsibilities to the directors and executives etc. Moreover independent
director should not be appointed by the board, it should be nominated by SEC or
register of joint stock company or in other ways.
Introduction:
The Securities and Exchange Commission Act 1993 provides that, the commission is
responsible for assuring the purpose insurance of securities, protection of the rights of
the investors and the development and regulation of capital and securities market. In
fact the ultimate objective of the commission is to create a organizational and
disciplined instrument in the investment and corporate sector. As part of the SEC role
SEC issued a modification in 2006 where it mentioned that the objective of the
notification is to enhance corporate governance listed with any stock exchange in
Bangladesh shall comply with the conditions of the notification or shall explain the
season for non compliances.
The main function of Aftab was it’s automobile assembly unit. But the production in
the assembling unit has declined due to discontinuation of Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
in CKD condition by Toyota Motor Corporation, Japan. You are also aware that
DGDP has been importing Toyota vehicles in CKD condition and assembling those at
their own facilities at BMTF, Gazipur since long. However, the Company has
assembled a total of 167 units of vehicles consisting of 101 units Hino Bus Chassis,
30 units CNG Hino Bus Chassis and 36 units Hino Mini Bus Chassis. An amount of
Tk. 65.32 crore has been contributed as net sales from this Unit to Company’s
turnover.
The Bus Body Building Unit of the company has completed fabrication of 128 units
of Hino Bus body and 23 units of Hino Mini Bus body, the net sales value of which
stood at Tk. 10.74 crore.
In the Paint Manufacturing Unit Paint” has produced 7.40 lac litres of paint products
and delivered to the dealers. An amount of Tk. 8.67 crore has been added to net sales
of this Unit.
From the Battery Manufacturing Unit of the Plant under the Brand name of “Navana
Battery” has produced atotal of 52,924 pcs. of Batteries for domestic and export
market. The Company sold 48,880 pcs. batteries which consists of Automotive,
Inverteraps and Solar Batteries. This Unit has contributed an amount of Tk. 21.20
crore of Company’s sales.
The Furniture Unit of the Company under the brand name of “Navana Furniture” has
produced office, home, industrial and medical furniture. From this Unit, an amount of
Tk. 24.64 crore has been added to Company’s turnover.
Corporate governance:
1.1 Board Size: The Directors of a company are Aftab’s board size
interested by law with the management consists of 6 member.
of the business of the company. To
direct the company and make effective,
efficient and timely decision there need
several diversified brains to think and
act. To less numerous may not tackle
all aspects and too many number may
create conflicts and costly. so, SEC
specified a range of number of board
size i.e. 5 to 20.
1.3 Chairman of Chairman give the conclusive or final They are differed
the Board and decision and CEO is responsible to individuals but
chief Executive execute it. So they should be different whether roles and
individuals. If they are same person, responsibilities of
power can be misused by him/her and chairman and CEO in
accountability can be lost. Aftab is not clearly
defined or is not
found in their annual
report.
2.2 Requirement CFO is appointed to run the finance Aftab gave the tick
to Attend Board activities. In the board meeting he has mark as complied
Meetings: to get direction, approval as well as he with this requirement
has to inform his activities. Secretary but it is not clear that
has to attend in the board meeting to whether CFO and
assist the board as well as to play the company secretary
spoken person role of the board. attended all the board
meetings, because it
is not mentioned in
the meetings and
attendance report.
3.1 (i) Constitution The objective of this requirement is Aftab automobile has
of Audit that at least three members are required complied this
Committee to perform the duties of audit requirement.
committee efficiently and effectively.
3.3.1 (i) Reporting The importance or necessity of audit Aftab declares that it
to the Board of committee is mentioned in section 3 has complied with all
Directors what 3.3.1 requires are just the audit the requirement of
committees duties and responsibilities 3.3.1. But we cannot
for which the committee is established. know what was the
So they should report to the board. conflicts of interest,
suspected fraud or
irregularity or
infringement of law
that the audit
committee has
reported to the board.
3.3.2 Reporting to If audit committee reports to the board Aftab disclosed that,
the Authorities: that has material impact and board audit committee has
ignores it, it means that, board has not not faced such
understood the significance or it situation.
intentionally ignores it. But material
impact must be considered or rectified.
So audit committee should report it to
the SEC so that the board is bound to
take the necessary corrective action.
3.4 Reporting to SEC requires that audit committee’s Aftab declares that,
Shareholders and activities and reports to board should this requirement is
General Investors be disclosed in the annual report with complied. But
signature of the chairman of the audit actually audit
committee. The objective is to disclose committee’s report is
to the shareholders and general not disclosed in the
investors whether and what the audit annual report.
committee has done actually, to know
the transparency and effectiveness of
the audit committees work.
Sec-90: Number of director minimum 3 in public Ltd. Co. 2 in private Ltd. company
no upper limit. Independent director is not required by co. Act 1994.
IAS-1:
Directors report is not required by IAS-1 as part by annual report but if the firm depart
from any standard management shall disclose it in the annual report as specified by
IAS-1, Pec-18.
Conclusion:
SEC deems to ensure corporate governance and create a congenial and disciplined
environment in the investment and corporate sector. So SEC issue the notification that
is required to comply or give explanation if not complied by the stock listed
companies. Now SEC should observe assess and evaluate the present situation
whether companies are complying merely the forms of the notification or there are
significant and substantial positive changes to ensure the SEC objective. SEC should
rethink how real independence and effectiveness of independent director, audit
committee and internal auditors are ensured.