Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
November, 2012
Overview
.......................................................................................... 3
Conclusion
...................................................................................... 12
November, 2012
About CargoNet
Formed in 2009 by Verisk Analytics and the NICB, CargoNet helps prevent cargo theft and increases recovery rates through secure and controlled information sharing among theft victims, their business partners, and law enforcement. Crime analysts and subject-matter experts manage CargoNets database and information-sharing system. CargoNet applies an integrated, layered approach that analyzes cargo crime from multiple perspectives and includes: Integrated databases Cargo recovery network Task force and investigations support Tractor/trailer theft deterrence program Secondary-market monitoring and interdictions Crime trend analysis and loss control services Training and education
November, 2012
Purpose and Uses of the Q3 2012 United States Cargo Theft Report
The Third Quarter 2012 United States Cargo Theft Report presents findings from CargoNets analysis of cargo theft incidents reported during this time period and discusses the potential impact of cargo crime on U.S. businesses. The research found within this report addresses four fundamental topics with regards to Q3 2012 cargo theft incidents: 1. 2. 3. 4. What commodity categories were impacted most by cargo theft? Where did U.S. cargo theft incidents occur? When did U.S. cargo theft incidents occur? What specific locations were most frequently targeted for U.S. cargo theft?
Highlights
There was a 9% increase in reported Q3 cargo theft incidents in 2012 (246) over what was reported in Q3 of 2011 (225). In California, there was a 19% increase in reported Q3 cargo theft incidents in 2012 (75) over what was reported in Q3 of 2011 (63). In Q3 2012, the Top 10 list of states with the highest number of reported cargo theft incidents made up 85% of the total reported cargo theft incidents. On the line graph that charts reported cargo theft by weekday, the typical V shape indicating a weekend trend in cargo theft was less pronounced than during previous periods. Prepared food and beverage products were the most stolen commodity in Q3 2012. Food, base metals, electronics, apparel, and plastic and rubber products represented 69% of all commodity types reported stolen in Q3 2012, versus 63% in Q2 2012.
Cargo theft incidents that occurred from July 1 - September 30, 2012
* Please note: the Q3 2012 figures in the report reflect the number of Q3 thefts reported as of September 30, 2012. Throughout the fourth quarter of 2012, additional incidents that occurred in Q3 2012 will continue to be reported. The final number of Q3 2012 incidents was 246. However, for the purpose of comparison with Q3 2012, you will see unadjusted Q3 2011 numbers used throughout this report.
November, 2012
2011
2012 273
Reported Theft Incidents
302 251
163
205
225
246
120 100 80 60 40 20 0
91 89
79
Q1
Q2
Q3
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
As of September 30, 2012, 246 cargo theft incidents were reported to CargoNet as having occurred in Q3 (July 1, 2012 September 30, 2012) - shown in Figure 1. By comparing the first three quarters of 2011 to the first three quarters of 2012 (Figure 1), you will notice a 28% increase in the number of reported cargo theft incidents. As of September 30, 2012, there was an average of 3.0 reported cargo theft incidents per day in 2012, with an average of 2.7 reported incidents per day in Q3 alone. By analyzing the first nine months of the year (Figure 2), you will notice a slight decrease in reported cargo thefts during the summer months. This can be attributed to the annual decline in shipping during end of Q2 and beginning of Q3. We are expecting to see an increase in reported incidents in Q4 due to the annual holiday shipping increase. Overall, we regard the Q1-Q3 numbers as being only part of the whole 2012 story. What looks like a significant increase in cargo theft this year is most likely to be due to an increase in the number of cargo theft incidents being reported.
November, 2012
Q3 2011 75 63 52
Q3 2012
60 50 40 30 20 10 0 CA TX FL
13 27 27 27 20 24 17 7 14 7 9 22 7 2 7 4 6
GA
NJ
PA
TN
IL
MI
VA
Of the top ten states (Figure 3) where cargo theft incidents were reported this quarter, six showed increases when one compares numbers from Q3 2011 to Q3 2012. California, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Michigan and Virginia showed increases of 19%, 54%, 100%, 29%, 250%, and 50%, respectively. Florida, New Jersey, and Illinois showed decreases in reported cargo theft incidents this quarter when compared with Q3 2011. Florida and Illinois in particular experienced significant decreases -- 48% and 68%, respectively.
November, 2012
Rank Q3 2012 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 7
Verisk Crime Analytics
Cargo Theft Incidents State CA TX FL GA NJ PA TN IL MI VA SC NC OH MS 9 UT MN 10 IN MD MO AL Q3 2012 75 27 27 20 17 14 9 7 7 6 4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 Q3 2011 63 27 52 13 24 7 7 22 2 4 1 1 3 0 6 0 6 1 0 1 % Change 19% 0% - 48% 54% - 29% 100% 29% - 68% 250% 50% 300% 300% 33% N/A - 50% N/A - 67% 100% N/A 0% 1 3 2 6 4 7 8 5
Q3 2011
November, 2012
60 50
Reported Theft Incidents
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
In Figure 4, reported cargo theft incidents no longer show a V pattern as they have in previous reports. The reason why the V pattern is less prevalent is because the quality and timeliness of cargo theft incident reporting continues to improve. Sunday, Friday, and Saturday continue to be the days when the most theft incidents are reported.
November, 2012
Q3 2012
88
40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 19 52 50 39 24 29 16 21 9 17 6 13 18 6 7 6 6 2 2 1 1 0 1 0 38
op
ad
er
d il Y ar Un re
Lo
Lo
Ya r
ut
Lo
or
Ya r
/D
St
Ro
Ro
rp
op
al
in
ck
re
se
in
Dr
of
Tr u
ou
cu
de
Pa
/T er
eh
Se
Si
W ar
The cargo theft trend by location type in Q3 2012 significantly differs from what was reported at the same time last year. The increase in location types such as warehouse/distribution centers, parking lots and truck stops is not necessarily because more cargo theft incidents are occurring in these locations, but because the quality of the information being submitted into incident reports has improved. CargoNet collected 85% or 208 of the total of 246 possible theft location types in Q3 2012 versus 61% of possible location types for what was reported in Q3 2011. The top three cargo theft location types in Q3 2012 (warehouse/dc, parking lot, truck stop) represent 57% of all cargo theft locations reported in this quarter.
Ca
rri
Un
er
se
cu
Ra
En
rk
re
po
Ai
rte
th
November, 2012
Other 15%
Plastics / Rubber - 8%
Apparel / Accessories 8%
Electronics 15%
Table 2 shows the statistics surrounding reported cargo theft incidents in Q3 2012 by top 10 commodities. Food/beverage ranked first with 56 reported theft incidents or 23%, while base metals and electronics tied for second with 36 reported theft incidents or 15% each. The only commodity out of the top 10 to significantly decrease between Q3 2011 and Q3 2012 was electronics, which decreased by 23%. Apparel and accessories, plastics and rubber products, base metals, and furniture showed significant increases between Q3 2011 and Q3 2012. These commodities had increases of 31%, 54%, 80%, and 175% respectively.
Table 2
Cargo Theft by Top 10 Commodities Commodity Food/Beverage Base Metals Electronics Apparel/Accessories Plastics/Rubber Furniture Life Sciences Pharmaceuticals Machinery Personal Care/Beauty Other Unknown Theft Q3 2012 56 36 36 21 20 11 7 7 6 5 36 5 Theft Q3 2011 51 20 47 16 13 4 6 9 9 8 36 15
Verisk Crime Analytics
10
November, 2012
Q3 2011
$1M+
$100K - $1M
$50K - $100K
$10K - $50K
$0 - $10K
Unknown
Figure 7 represents a breakdown of cargo theft incidents in Q3 2011 and Q3 2012 by specific loss value ranges. By looking at this figure, you will notice that reported cargo theft incidents by loss value between Q3 2011 and Q3 2012 has stayed consistent. Twenty four percent of the 246 reported theft incidents in Q3 2012 had a loss value range between $100,000 and $1,000,000, versus 21% in Q3 2011. About 15% of reported cargo theft incidents were in the loss value range of $50,000 to $100,000 in Q3 2012, up from 13% in Q3 2011. Loss values in the range of $10,000 to $50,000 increased to 19%. In Q3 2012, reported theft incidents with smaller values, such as the $0 to $10,000 range, accounted for 3% of total reported Q3 loss. Cargo theft by loss value range as reported in Q3 2011 stayed consistent through Q3 2012.
11
November, 2012
Summary
The following are characteristics of cargo theft occurring from July 1, 2012 to September 30, 2012: 1. As of September 30, 2012, reported cargo theft incidents increased by 28% as compared with the first nine months of 2011. 2. There was a significant decrease in the number of theft incidents reported in Florida, New Jersey, and Illinois in Q3 2012 than what were reported in Q3 2011. 3. There was a less evident weekend trend in Q3 2012; however, Friday had the most incidents reported in both Q3 2011 and Q3 2012. 4. Food and beverages, base metals, electronics, apparel and accessories, and plastics and rubber products made up the top five stolen commodity types in Q3 2012.
Closing Statement
CargoNet encourages transportation, manufacturing, and retail professionals to continue to provide information about cargo theft incidents as quickly as possible to law enforcement and CargoNet. Information sharing needs to be front and center within all industries in order to accurately define, measure, and analyze cargo theft incidents. Better reporting and subsequent analysis enables the delivery and implementation of viable solutions that can help prevent cargo theft and related supply-chain disruptions and improve the opportunity for recovery.
To Report a Theft,
12