PPETG Emulsion Task Force Update

Roger Hayner AEMA Annual Meeting Indian Wells Wells, CA February 19, 2009

PPETG ETF Background

PPETG Emulsion Task Force

Conceived and formed last AEMA-

ISSA-ARRA Annual Meeting in F b February 2008 under d guidance id of f Ji Jim Sorenson Identified need for industry expertise and involvement in ongoing research activities pertaining to asphalt emulsions and finished Pavement Preservation systems Are we prepared as an industry to compete and deliver quality and performance?

Original Scope Outline

Review needs for Preservation Materials Research- Emulsion & Aggregate Evaluate existing Pavement Preservation Roadmap R&D/Problem Statements Evaluate consortium work plans and review i ongoing i research h Make recommendations and integrate work k activities ti iti

Original Scope Outline

Coordinate and share activities and results with existing binder, mix, modeling, and preservation ETGs Facilitate adoption of new findings and research results through appropriate ETG/AASHTO/ASTM & Industry Channels such as ISSA/AEMA/ARRA/AI

Original Scope Outline

Advance the effort to develop Performance Based methods & specifications for emulsions & treatments Encourage adoption of Uniform National Standards AEMA/ISSA/ARRA coordination di ti

Task Force Representation

Task Force Co-Chairs

Roger Hayner - Colas Inc., AEMA, AI-TAC Colin Franco - RI DOT, , TSP2, , PPETG, , SCOM,SCOR

Task Force Representation

Barry Baughman - AEMA Chair, Ultrapave Corp. Chris Lubbers - AEMA, BASF, now Kraton Polymers Delmar Salomon -AEMA, Pavement Preservation Systems LLC Ch i Ab Chris Abadie di - Louisiana L i i Transportation T t ti Research Center Arlis Kadrmas - AEMA, AEMA Sem Materials Kevin VanFrank - Utah DOT Gaylon Baumgardner -AEMA, -AEMA ISSA, ISSA Ergon Asphalt Emulsions Alan James - AEMA, ISSA, Akzo Nobel

Task Force Representation

Laurand Lewandowski - PRI Asphalt Technologies Scott Shuler - CSU- Ft. Collins, Schuler Consultants Hussain Bahia/Andrew Hanz - UWisc.UWisc Madison Peter Seebaly - UNev. Reno Amy Epps Martin - Texas A&M- C.S. Yetkin Yildirim - Univ. Texas Austin Mar Stro Mary Stroup-Gardiner p Gardiner - CSU Chico Jim Moulthrop - ISSA, AEMA, TRB, Fugro Consultants Gayle King - AEMA, TRB, GHK Inc. Bob Klutz - Kraton Polymers

Task Force Representation

Mark Buncher Asphalt Institute Mike Anderson Asphalt Institute Hal Panabaker DuPont Larry Galehouse - NCPP, TSP2 Patte Hahn - Administrative Support NCPP,TSP2 John Johnston - Information Technology Support NCPP, TSP2 J k Youtcheff Jack Y t h ff -FHWA FHWA Jim Sorenson - FHWA Joe Gregory FHWA Charles Glover Texas A&M Univ.

On-Going Research Reviews

Microsurfacing Mix Design StudyJim Moulthrop

Improve Performance of Slurry Surfacing Develop Rational Mix Design Procedures Guidelines for Proper Use & Application Specification Guidelines Project j Finalized- Report p
Forthcoming

ARC Update- Hussein Bahia/Andrew Hanz

Cold Asphalt Applications Develop a more scientific system for

characterizing emulsified asphalts i l di id l bi d ti

On-Going Research Reviews

Federal Lands Survey- Gayle King

Project Complete and Report Forthcoming Strawman Specification Draft Recovery Method- BASF/SEM Evaporation DSR Testing Targeted for High and Potentially

Low Performance Properties, MSCR for Modification Identification Identified Need for Standardized Approved Supplier Certification Program for Emulsions Monitoring Ongoing Work using Strawman Spec

On-Going Research Reviews

Alternative Residue Test MethodsArlis Kadrmas

BASF/SEM Evaporation Test Method vs.

Conventional ASTM D6997 Distillation Method testing at 138C or 260C

2 day prep time- Force Draft Oven 24hr@25C + 24hr@60C

Evaporation more relative to actual pavement

exposure curing temperatures & aging Evaluating DSR & MSCR on Residue New ASTM Specification p D-7497 Approved pp

On-Going Research Review

Survey of Current Recovery Methods MethodsLaurand Lewandowski

Majority of States Surveyed Multiple methods of recovery utilized No consistency as to which method used Demonstrated need for standardized
method PRI Evaluation of field samples against protocols from Strawman Specification

On-Going Research Review

NCHRP 14-17 Manual for EmulsionBased Chip Seals for Pavement Preservation Maintenance Personnel Amy y Epps pp Martin/Scott Schuler

Develop manual for Chip Seal construction

procedures Utilizes stirred can vs. other distillation methods of emulsion residue recovery Identified opportunity to compare with BASF/SEM Evaporation method with conventional methods in their research program Significant g findings g on effects of moisture, , type of aggregate/emulsion, surface condition, time to traffic, stone embedment depth

ETF Subcommittee Organization g

Originally g y Five Subcommittees

Emulsion Testing & Residue Recovery

Newest Subcommittee

Methods Residue Testing Aggregates, Mix Design & Performance Testing Approved Supplier Certification Inspection & Acceptance Research Need Formulation & Proposal Submission

Subcommittee Organization
Emulsion Testing g& Residue Recovery Methods
Arlis Kadrmas- Chair Gaylon Baumgardner, Paul Morris, Laurand Lewandowski, Chris Lubbers, Lubbers Roger Hayner

Review & Identify Emulsion tests Identify Recovery methods & resulting effects of tests on Residue

Subcommittee Organization
Residue Tests
Gayle King- Chair Hussain Bahia, Amy Epps Martin, Gaylon Baumgardner, Arlis Kadrmas, Lauren Lewandowski, Chris Lubbers

Identify High and Low Temperature tests for Performance Properties p Polymer Property Identification High Float Testing

DSR

MSCR

Other Testing Needs?

Frequency Sweeps

Subcommittee Organization
Aggregates, Mix Design, and Performance Tests
Jim Moulthrop- Chair Hussein Bahia, Scott Schuler, Gayle y King, g, Mary Stroup-Gardiner, Chris Lubbers, Laurand Lewandowski, Jack Youtcheff

Microsurfacing & Chipseals Initial Focus Are the current design methods sufficient to provide performance? How o do we e relate e ate lab ab vs. s field? Proper construction design approval process? Certification Process

Subcommittee Organization
Approved pp Supplier pp Certification
Roger Hayner- Chair Arlis Kadrmas, Colin Franco, Chris Abadie, Kevin VanFrank (C (Combined bi d St States t G Group) ) Mike Anderson

Develop Approved Supplier

Acceptance Document Draft similar to program used for PG binders under R26 Guidelines Uniform acceptance & implementation across state agencies.

Subcommittee Organization
Inspection & A Acceptance t
Colin Franco- Chair Roger Hayner, Delmar Salomon, Salomon Chris Abadie, Kevin Van Frank

Agency Level A L l Methods for Inspection & Acceptance of E Emulsion l i Products/Systems Matrix developed of y , current systems, tests, critical factors for performance, acceptance criteria

Emulsion Task Force

Priority y on Chipseals p & Microsurfacing/Slurry Type Surface Treatments Currently most exposure Remaining R i i Emulsion E l i P Product d t Processes to be addressed

Rejuvenators In Place Recycling Bond Agents Fog Seals Other Treatments

Emulsion Task Force

Deliverables for Task Force

Define & Recommend any additional

needed research Performance Based Specifications for emulsions and emulsion mixes/processes Protocols for Design-Developmentg p Certification Protocols for Construction & Performance Protocols for Inspection &

Task Force Activity

2 Face To Face Meetings g 3 Conference Calls

April 2008 December 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008

Next Meeting g

May 14-15th New Orleans, LA during the

PPETG Meeting following SEPPP Meeting

Emulsion Task Force Update

1. Are we prepared to deliver as an industry as Pavement Preservation Movement grows?

Questions?

1. Material Evaluation & Selection 1 2. System Design 3. Proper Construction Techniques 4. Education Tools for Training 5. Agency Inspection & Acceptance