EquipmentSelection,DesignEngineering,and

FinancialPlanningServicesfortheBakerCity
UVTreatmentFacilityy
KickOffMeeting&
Technology Workshop TechnologyWorkshop
BakerCity,OR
January 12, 2012 January12,2012
WaterQuality,Treatment,andRegulatoryComplianceProject
Meeting Agenda MeetingAgenda
1. KickOff Meeting (9:3010:30) 1. Kick OffMeeting(9:30 10:30)
Welcome,Introductions
ProjectObjectivesandUpdatesfromCity j j p y
ReviewAgenda
ReviewProjectGuide(Scope&Schedule) j ( p )
DataExchange
OtherItems,Discussion
2. TechnologyWorkshop&Lunch(10:302)
3. SiteVisit(23:30) ( )
Project Scope & Objectives ProjectScope&Objectives
Objective: Costeffective LT2 Compliance Objective:Cost effectiveLT2Compliance
Task1:ProjectManagement&QC
T k 2 UV E i S l i Task2:UVEquipmentSelection
Task3:ProjectDefinitionDevelopment
Task4:FinancialPlanningandRate
Evaluation
Project Org Chart & Communications ProjectOrgChart&Communications
HDR PM:
Anna
Zaklikowski
HDR Principal:
, David Keil
QA/QC Leads:
Ron Brown (Treatment)
Shawn Koorn (Finance)
BC Staff Contacts:
Gary Van Patten (Asst PW Director/Surveyor)
Larry McBroom (PW Construction Supervisor)
Jake Jones (Water Treatment Specialist)
Jeanie Dexter (Finance Director)
~
Anna Zaklikowski (Project/Process Engineer)
Bryan Black (Sr. Technical Advisor)
Rich Stratton (Sr. Technical Advisor)
Joseph Healy (Finance Task Lead)
Don Best (Electrical/I&C)
Mike Zeltner (Civil)
Jerry Spencer (Structural)
Karl Sutton (Building Mechanical)
Donn Hogan (Architect)
Eric Sjoberg (CAD/BIM Lead)
Mike Wallace (Permitting)
Rich Glassen (Cost Estimating)
Paul Wasser (Geotech/Geoengineers)
Schedule: Project Overview Schedule:ProjectOverview
Project Budget Schedule ProjectBudgetSchedule
?
Schedule: Key Milestones Schedule:KeyMilestones
ProjectMilestone Date
NoticetoProceed 11/9/11
UV Equipment Procurement RFP Advertisement (by CITY) 4/13/2012 UVEquipmentProcurementRFPAdvertisement(byCITY) 4/13/2012
UVEquipmentProcurementProposalDeadline 5/11/2012
SubmitrecommendationofUVSystemSuppliertoCity 6/8/2012
NoticeofAwardtoUVEquipmentSupplier* 6/22/2012
*ConditionalNoticeofAwardpendingUVValidationReportapprovalbyOHA
Schedule: Meetings Schedule:Meetings
Task Meeting Date
Project
M t
Concept& CriteriaReviewMtg (InternalQA/QC) 1/6/12
Management
(Task1)
UV System
Procurement
(Task2)
ProjectKickOffMeetingandTechnologyReviewWorkshop 1/12/12
ReviewofUVProcurementDocuments(conferencecall) 3/21/12
( )
LampBreakageResponsePlanWorkshop 8/17/12
Project
Definition
Development
(T k 3)
ProjectDefinitionTaskReviewMeeting(conferencecall) 9/26/12
(Task3)
Financial
Planningand
RateDesign
(Task4)
FinancialPlanningTaskInitiationConference(conferencecall) 1/17/12
FinancialPlanningWorkshop(conferencecall) 2/14/12
FinancialPlanDraftReportReviewMtg (conferencecall) 4/3/12
+Biweeklystanding30minuteprogress/coordinationcalls
( )
RateDesignWorkshop(conferencecall) 5/15/12
Schedule: Deliverables Schedule:Deliverables
Task Deliverables Date
DraftUVSolicitationPackage 2/29/2012
UV
Equipment
Procurement
(Task 2)
g / /
FinalRFPpackage 4/13/2012
DraftLampBreakageResponsePlantoCITY 8/3/2012
DraftLampBreakageResponsePlantoOHA 8/24/2012
l k l d FinalLampBreakageResponsePlantoCITYand
OHA 9/14/2012
Project
Geotech InvestigationWorkplan 7/13/2012
DraftGeotechReport 8/31/2012
j
Definition
(Task 3)
FinalGeotech Report 9/28/2012
DraftDrawingPackagetoCITY 9/5/2012
DraftOPCCtoCITY 9/19/2012
Financial
Planning
and Rate
Design
(Task 4)
DraftFinancialPlanReport 3/13/2012
FinalFinancialPlanReport 4/17/2012
DraftRateDesignAnalysisReport 5/29/2012
Final Rate Design Analysis Report 6/26/2012
(Task 4)
FinalRateDesignAnalysisReport 6/26/2012
Data Exchange DataExchange
1. InfoReceived:
S li D
3. PreviousReportsandDocumentsforSite:
R M Pl U d (if li bl SourcewaterqualityData
4.5MGreservoirasbuilts
ASR/siteCADfile
2000WaterFacilitiesPlan
RecentMasterPlanUpdate(ifapplicable,
HDRhasthe2000MasterPlan)
Geotechnicalreport(s)forsite,ifavailable
4. Historicaloperationsdata(previous3yrs)
O i d f i (fl k
2. SiteRecordDrawingsforthefollowing
facilities:
Storagetanks
Otheronsitefacilities,includingyardpiping
d i / l l hl i b ildi
Operationsdataforsite(flowrate,tank
levels)
Monthlyoperationsreports(e.g.,chlorine
usage/doses,CTreports)
5 Other Information:
andmetering/valvevaults,chlorinebuilding,
generatorbuildingandtelemetrybuildings
Verifyexistingfacilitiesversusplans/reports;
Identifyanymodificationsatthesitethat
have been made at the site since preparation
5. OtherInformation:
Updatesindemand/flowprojections
Powersupplyinformationforsite
Historyofelectricalpoweroutagesatsite
& l k / d l d l
havebeenmadeatthesitesincepreparation
ofrecorddrawings(identifyonrecord
drawingsifpossible)
O&Mmanualsormake/modelandcontrol
strategiesforsitecontrolvalves
ASRLicenseDocumentation
FinancialData(requestedbyJoeHealy)
i i f i UVDisinfection
Technology gy
Workshop
January12,2012
WaterQuality,Treatment,andRegulatoryComplianceProject
Technology Workshop Agenda TechnologyWorkshopAgenda
1. Background(10:3011:15)
Workshop Objectives WorkshopObjectives
Regulatory/TreatmentRequirements(ExistingandUnderLT2)
IntroductionandReview:WhyUV?
UVBasicsandRegulatoryRequirements
2. UVTreatmentSystems(11:1512)
UV Technology Overview UVTechnologyOverview
SystemOperation&Maintenance
GeneralUVSystemDesignCriteria
WaterQualityReview&ImpactstoUV
UVProcessSchematic&PossibleLayouts
P li i C t I f PreliminaryCostInfo
3. Lunch(1212:45)
4. UVSystemProcurement(12:451:15)
5. OtherProjectConsiderations(1:151:30)
ChlorinationMethod
SCADA/CommunicationsUpgrades
ProvisionsforFutureFacilities
Hydraulics
6. Closing(1:302)
Open Discussion OpenDiscussion
ReviewKeyDecisionsandNextSteps
AdjourntoSiteVisit
Key Workshop Objectives & Decisions KeyWorkshopObjectives&Decisions
1. Define Design Criteria for UV System (i.e., flow, 1. DefineDesignCriteriaforUVSystem(i.e.,flow,
UVT,futureexpansion)
2. LimitUVTechnologyOptions? gy p
3. SelectUVEquipmentProcurementMethod:
Capitalcostorlifecyclecost p y
Earlyprocurementw/equipmentstoragevs.assign
contracttoContractor
Treatment Requirements (Existing) TreatmentRequirements(Existing)
1. Notreatmentfor
Cryptosporidium
2. DisinfectionRequirements:
3 l (99 9%) i ti ti f 3log(99.9%)inactivationof
Giardia w/chlorine
4log(99.99%)inactivationof
/
(Giardia)
virusesw/chlorine
3. UnfilteredSystems:
<5 NTU turbidity (monitored <5NTUturbidity(monitored
priortodisinfection);
Excludingeventspermitted
under OAR 333 061 0030(3) underOAR3330610030(3)
(Cryptosporidium)
Treatment Requirements (Under LT2) TreatmentRequirements(UnderLT2)
1. RequirementsforUnfilteredSystems:
Complywithturbidityrequirements
UnfilteredwatersystemsmustuseacombinationofTWOdisinfectantsto
inactivateCryptosporidium,Giardia,andviruses
Cryptosporidium controlunderWatershedControlProgram
MeetRequirementsforsystemsutilizingsurfacewaterorGWUDIsources
withoutfiltration)(OAR3330610032(2)&(3))
2. DisinfectionRequirements:
3loginactivationofCryptosporidium (w/UV)
3log inactivation of Giardia (UV or chlorine) 3 loginactivationofGiardia (UVorchlorine)
4loginactivationofviruses(w/chlorine)
3. ComplianceSchedule:
ComplianceDeadline:October2016(Systems<10,000,2yrextensionfor
i l i ) capitalimprovements)
Nextroundofcryptomonitoringin2019.Thenwhat?
UV Disinfection Basics: Why UV? UVDisinfectionBasics:WhyUV?
1. Costeffectivetreatmentfor
LT2
2. Targetswiderangeof
microbialpathogens
3. ReducesCTrequirements
met by chlorine metbychlorine
4. Chemicalfree
5. Nowastestream
6. Nodisinfectionbyproduct
formation
7. Doesnotaffecttasteof
water
8. Can optimize power usage
CostOpinionforLT2ComplianceOptions(From2009HDRTM)
8. Canoptimizepowerusage
basedonwaterqualityand
flowrate
9. Partofmultibarrier,reliable
treatment strategy treatmentstrategy
UV weaknesses; considerations UVweaknesses;considerations
1. Poorviralinactivation
2. Notaphysicaltreatmentbarrier:
Doesnotremoveparticulatesandorganics;
Doesnotprotectagainstfirethreatorexcursionsinwaterquality
3 Importance of meeting requirements for unfiltered systems (coliform 3. Importanceofmeetingrequirementsforunfilteredsystems(coliform
reqts,WatershedControlProgram,inspections,facilitymaintenance,
etc)
4. Waterqualitymaylimitapplicability
b k l 5. Lampbreakage;mercuryreleaseconcerns
RegulatoryReqts forUVFacilities:
Validation & Dose Validation&Dose
OAR3330610036(5)(c)(D):SystemsmustvalidateandmonitorUV
reactorstodemonstratethattheyareachievingaparticularUV
dosevaluefortreatmentcredit.
(i)UVdosetable.ThetreatmentcreditslistedinthistableareforUVlight
atawavelengthof254nmasproducedbyalowpressuremercuryvapor
lamp To receive treatment credit for other lamp types systems must lamp.Toreceivetreatmentcreditforotherlamptypes,systemsmust
demonstrateanequivalentgermicidaldosethroughreactorvalidation
testing
Doseneededfor3logcryptonearly2Xdosefor2logcrypto
3logcryptodosemeetsallGiardia disinfectionreqts!
ValidationOptions
1. OffSite
Accept bids for pre validated Acceptbidsforprevalidated
equipmentonly(basedon
standardtestprotocol)
Acceptbidscontingenton
f l d l d successful3rdpartyvalidation
beforepurchase
2. OnSite
Accept bids based on successful Acceptbidsbasedonsuccessful
validationafterinstallation
3. ValidationMethods:
CalculatedDose
DoseSetpointMethod
UV Equipment Approved List UVEquipmentApprovedList
Nolargecapacity(>2.5mgd)UVsystemsarelisted.
OHA will need to verify validation report submitted by MFR as part of proposal OHAwillneedtoverifyvalidationreportsubmittedbyMFRaspartofproposal.
RegulatoryReqts forUVFacilities:
Disinfection Disinfection
OAR3330610032(3)Disinfectionreqts forunfiltered
systems:
(b) Systems for chemical disinfection must have either: (b)Systemsforchemicaldisinfectionmusthaveeither:
(A) Redundantcomponents,includingan
auxiliarypowersupplywithautomatic
startup andalarmtoensurethatdisinfectant p
applicationismaintainedcontinuouslywhilewater
isbeingdeliveredtothedistributionsystem;or
(B) Automaticshutoff ofdeliveryofwatertothedistributionsystem
whenever there is less than 0 2 mg/l of residual disinfectant concentration wheneverthereislessthan0.2mg/lofresidualdisinfectantconcentration
inthewater,oriftheultravioletlightsystemfails.IftheDepartment
determinesthanautomaticshutoffwouldcauseunreasonablerisktohealth
orinterferewithfireprotection,thesystemmustcomplywithparagraph
(3)(b)(A) of this rule (3)(b)(A)ofthisrule.
OAR3330610032(18)Inactivationtoolboxcomponentsformeeting
CryptosporidiumtreatmentRequirements.
(c)To receive treatment credit for UV light water systems must treat at least (c)ToreceivetreatmentcreditforUVlight,watersystemsmusttreatatleast
95percentofthewaterdeliveredtothepublicduringeachmonthby
UVreactorsoperatingwithinvalidatedconditionsfortherequiredUVdose
RegulatoryReqts forUVFacilities:
Monitoring Monitoring
OAR3330610036(5)(c)(D):
(ii) R t it i S t t it th i UV t t (ii)Reactormonitoring.SystemsmustmonitortheirUVreactorsto
determineifthereactorsareoperatingwithinvalidatedconditions...This
monitoring mustincludeUVintensityasmeasuredbyaUVsensor,flow
rate,lampstatus,andotherparameterstheDepartmentdesignates
basedonUVreactoroperation.Watersystemsmustverifythe
calibrationofUVsensorsatleastmonthly,andmustrecalibratesensors
inaccordancewiththeEPAUVDisinfectionGuidanceManualas
necessary necessary.
(iii)Watersystemsmustmonitorthepercentageofwaterdeliveredto
thepublicthatwastreatedwithinvalidatedconditionsfortherequired
UVdose.Iflessthan95percentofwaterdeliveredwaswithinvalidated
conditions,aTier2publicnoticemustbeissued
RegulatoryReqts forUVFacilities:Reporting
OAR3330610040(1):
b i lid i l d i i 1. Submitvalidationtestresultsdemonstratingoperating
conditionsthatachieverequiredUVdosenolaterthan
applicablecompliancedeadline.
2. Monthlyreportsummarizingthepercentageofwater
enteringthedistributionsystemthatwasNOT treatedbyUV
reactors operating within validated conditions for the reactorsoperatingwithinvalidatedconditionsforthe
requireddose...
UVDisinfection
B i Basics
UVTechnologyOptions:LPHOandMP gy p
LowPressureHighOutput(LPHO)
MediumPressure
UVTechnologyOptions:
Low Pressure High Output (LPHO) LowPressureHighOutput(LPHO)
1. General:
Availableindifferentsizeranges
Nearly all UV intensity at 254nm NearlyallUVintensityat254nm
MFRs:Wedeco (ITT),Trojan
2. Pros
Smallerpowerreqt (smaller
generator/UPS?)
L ti
Wedeco Kseriesreactors:
Lowerpowerconsumption
Goodcleaningsystem
Longerlamplife
Lessreductionindoseiflampfails
Reducedfoulingpotential potentially
Largeflowsupto40mgd
lowerDesignFoulingFactor
Integralbaffleplateforflowdistribution;
providesaddedprotection?
3. Cons
Generally require more space than MP GenerallyrequiremorespacethanMP
reactors
Highheadloss throughreactor(upto52in)
Morelamps,maintenance
Potentiallylongerstarttimes
Wedeco LBXReactors:
Smallerflowsupto8.5mgd
Generallyonly50%turndowninreactor
UVTechnologyOptions:
Medium Pressure (MP) MediumPressure(MP)
1. General:
A ailable in different si e ranges Availableindifferentsizeranges
UVintensityoverbroaderwavelength
range;lessefficientdosedelivery
MFRs:Trojan,Calgon,Ozonia
2. Pros
TrojanSwift@Kennewick
2. Pros
Compactdesign&systemfootprint
Lowheadloss throughreactors(05in)
LowercapitalcostthanLPHOathigher
designUVTs(>85%)
j f
Fewertotallamps
Betterreactorturndown
3. Cons
Higherpowersupplyreqt
h Higherenergyusage
Greaterpotentialtobeoutofspecinthe
eventlampfails
Subjecttospectraeffect uncertaintyin
doseneeded
Calgon SentinelReactors
RecentDoseConcernsforMPSpectraEffect
InrecentvalidationtestsforMPsystems:
Dependingonthevalidationtesting
approachandimplementationatthewater
treatmentplant,thecontributionoflow
wavelengthUVlightmaysuggestbetter
d ( h Cryptosporidiuminactivation(e.g.,when
MS2phageisusedforvalidationtesting)
thanisactuallyoccurring.
Questions: Q
1. WhatdoesOHAsayaboutthis?
2. HowcanwebalanceriskofallowingMPto
bidwithcompetitiveness?
3 EPA and CA are talking about allowing 15% 3. EPAandCAaretalkingaboutallowing15%
correctionfactor,butnothingconfirmed.
4. OHAhasverballyindicatedtheywouldbe
comfortablewitha15%correctionfactor
UV Technology Comparison Summary UVTechnologyComparisonSummary
LPHO MP
Footprint 2x 1x
Number of Lamps 10x 1x
Power Consumption 1x 2x Power Consumption 1x 2x
Lamp Replacement Cost 3x 1x
Ballast Replacement Cost 1x 2x
UVSystemOperation&Maintenance
1. UVSensorCalibration
2. CleaningSystems:
Optionalautomaticor
manualsleevewiping
TrojanSwiftSC LPHOLampReplacement
systems(mech orcombined
mech/chemical)
Offlinechemicalcleaning
3 C l 3. Componentreplacement:
Lamps
Sleeves
Ballasts
UVSensors
Cleaningcomponents
TrojanSleeveWipingSystem
forSwiftMPsystem
UVSystemOperation&Maintenance:
Component Replacement ComponentReplacement
FromEPAUVDGM:
UVSystemDesignCriteria
UVSystemDesignCriteria: y g
Lamptechnology
CleaningSystem
Fl t Flowrates
UVT
CombinedDerating FactorforEndofLampLife o b ed e a g ac o o d o a p e
(EOLL)andfouledcondition
No.DutyandStandbyTrains
Pressure Requirements PressureRequirements
Headloss
WaterQualityCharacteristics
WaterQualityParametersImpactingUVDesignand
O ti Operation
WQ P t D i I t O&M I t WQParameter DesignImpact O&MImpact
UVT ReactorSizing;DoseBasis UVDose/energy
efficiency
/ Iron&
Manganese
Treatmentreqd >0.3 mg/L
Fe,<0.05mg/LMn
Lamp fouling;energy
efficiency;cleaning
Hardness Treatmentwhen>200mg/L Lamp fouling;energy
efficiency; cleaning efficiency;cleaning
Organics DesignFoulingFactor Lamp fouling;energy
efficiency;cleaning
P ti l E ffi i Particles Energyefficiency
WaterQuality:UVTData Q y
120% 4.5
Turbidity UVT
80%
100%
3 0
3.5
4.0
(
%
)
)
Count 76
Min 65%
Average 97%
60%
80%
2.0
2.5
3.0
n
s
m
i
t
t
a
n
c
e

b
i
d
i
t
y

(
N
T
U
g
Max 100%
90% 100%
95% 100%
10% 95%
5% 90%
20%
40%
1.0
1.5
U
V

T
r
a
T
u
r
b
5% 90%
1% 68%
0% 0.0
0.5
J09 O09 J10 M10 A10 N10 F11 J11 S11 D11
RareLowUVTeventscouldimpactdesignrequirements,increasingcost
Averageenergyusagewillbesignificantlylowerthanduring
UVT/turbidityevents
DistributionofSampleUVT p
65
96% 100%
2
6
86%90%
91% 95%
g
e
1
0
2
76% 80%
81% 85%
(
%
)

R
a
n
g
1
0
1
66% 70%
71% 75%
76% 80%
U
V
T

(
1
1
<65%
66% 70%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
No.SamplesInUVTRange(9/09 9/11)
Manganese,Iron,andHardness g , ,
WQ P t SMCL A R N WQParameter SMCL Average Range No.
Samples
Hardness(mg/LCaCO3) none 38 120 73 21
0 3 0 0 0 0 8 8 Iron 0.3 <0.1 <0.05 0.18 8
Manganese 0.05 <0.05 <0.01 <0.05 8
DesignCriteriaIdentification:UVSystem
Criterion Value
UVLampTechnology MediumPressure orLowPressureHigh
Output
Cleaning System Automatic CleaningSystem Automatic
DesignFlowrate
MaximumDesignFlow 12mgd?
MinimumDesign Flow 2mgd?
UltimateDesignFlow 12mgd?
AverageDesignFlow ?
DesignUVT
MinimumValidatedUVT 70%
DesignUVT@12mgd 85%?
DesignUVT&6 mgd 70%
UVT(95
th
Percentile) 90%
C bi d D i F f EOLL d f l d di i 0 72 CombinedDerating FactorforEOLLandfouledcondition 0.72
Minimum No.DutyTrains 2
MaximumNo.DutyTrains 3
No.StandbyTrains 1
SystemOperatingPressure(PSIG)
SystemDesignPressure(PSIG) 100
MaximumHeadloss through UVReactor 54inches
DesignCriteriaIdentification:WaterQuality g Q y
Criterion Value
Water QualityCharacteristics
WaterTemperature
UVTRange 70% 99%
pH 69
Iron <0.2mg/L
Manganese <0.05mg/L g g/
Hardness 38 120mg/L
Turbidity 05NTU
BakerCitywaterqualitydataisappropriateforuseinUVtreatment
basedondataavailableforMn,Fe,andhardness
UVDisinfectionSystemSchematic
UV#1
From4.5
MG
R i
To3MG
M
FM
Reservoir
Reservoir/
Distribution
UV
T
UV#2
( db ) UV#3(Standby)
UVFacilityandGenerator
PossibleLocations
ro CITY
- OISrRlOOT"ION
SYSTEM
14" OVERFLOW
IE. 3647.68
nr-t"""'r-n\/r'\Ir""'l Mlntt. tr"
CITY OF
BAKER CITY, OREGON
WATER FACILITIES PLAN
I
ll!
fl

\
\
\
ll!
fl
'"
T
\
\
-12"OR- -
3.0 MG RES.
WS = 3647.68
FF = 3620.68

.92 MG RES.
WS = 3647.68
FF = 3634.78
ORAIN AND
RISER VAULr
'i'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
G""

()-J
<::l>-
<::l-J
\!lit
:::l
\f) (FIX HEIGHT)
: 14" 0.1. DRAIN LINE "
I W/EMERGeNCY MANUAL //
: OPERATED ORAIN VALVE ,r:/
I X
I ( I
! 4.5 MG CHLORINE : " ......-1I@1--i- (5" DRAIN
I CONTACT CHAMBER I IA"()l2 Ie :36:32.28
: WS=3672.28-3677.18 ----"
! FF = 3652.28 I,' ",,16; OUTLer
I 24"0.1. J JETER' ,7'----__--
: OUTLer ANO
12" 0.1. TURBIDITY : :: "'",.
BYPASS LINE =1: ....: : L
I Pi t JL8YPASS' _- "-
: g 18"0 I /; IS" TURBIO/TY
I oVERFLOW / ) _-.---- BYPASS 16" INDIANA ST. LINE: " \
OOlLOIN6 IE 3678.28 L.--)- '6- __ _ ORAIN
r--- " _---;/ I
TUFmIOITY I -;--- / j
BYPASS VAULT I ,
fr-----IOO 1_../'..... _../ --_ _-4 v
'I' '1 . " __-r-'c-;;
I dr/6"C.!. '-'_----- 8
1 6ENERATOf< !
t
W ---- OO/l.(JIN6 !
S! ,Jr-/6"STL r:::'
I t
------0 ,.,' /
ltEU,' J
,
I
OLD I OLD MOUNTAIN

LINE
'..[!: I" (50'
UV Equipment Preliminary Costs UVEquipmentPreliminaryCosts
2011ProjectEstimate:$2.5M,assuming:
$432k for equipment (Basis: Wedeco LPHO) $432kforequipment(Basis:Wedeco LPHO)
2,000sf building
2+1pipingconfiguration
2 log treatment 12 mgd @ 70% UVT 2logtreatment,12mgd @70%UVT
Other Design Considerations OtherDesignConsiderations
Identifytaskstobeincludedin
FY2012Predesign/FinalDesignTO: g g
ChlorinationMethod:
Improvementstoexistingchlorinegas
system?
Conversiontoliquidhypochlorite(on
sitegeneratorordeliveredbulkhypo)
Provisionsforfutureinstallationof
chlorine system in new UV building
On site hypo generator
chlorinesysteminnewUVbuilding
SCADA/Communications
Improvements
Improvements in hydraulic control;
Onsitehypogenerator
Improvementsinhydrauliccontrol;
integrationwithUVMCCs
Communicationsofsystemalarms
Localandoffsitecontrolpreferences
ProvisionsforFutureFiltration
Facility
UVSystemMCCs
Review Workshop Decisions ReviewWorkshopDecisions
1 UV System Design Criteria 1. UVSystemDesignCriteria
2. UVTechnologyPreferences
3 S l i 3. SelectUVEquipmentProcurement
Method
4. Othertasks/evaluationsneededduring
design
Next Steps NextSteps
DataRequest
EquipmentProcurement:
ContinuediscussionswithOHA
PrepareDesignCriteriaTMforOHA
Investigatehydraulics
Beginpreparationofprocurementspecs
(frontendsandtechnical)
FinancialPlanning
Schedule Geotech Investigation & Survey ScheduleGeotech Investigation&Survey
Thank You! ThankYou!