Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Status of Report:
Draft Final
Rev 0 2012/06/29
Project Teams:
HPT10-Consequence assessment
Reporting Organisation Name & Address: IACS 36 Broadway London SW1H 0BH Summary:
The effect of applying the January 2012 internal draft plus selected Rule amendments of the Harmonised Common Structural Rules (CSR-H) to current tanker and bulk carrier designs has been assessed. For this assessment, the designs have not been altered or optimized. CSR-H has been applied on CSR compliant designs, and as such the final effect of applying the CSR-H may be different. The final effect of applying the CSR-H will not become apparent until new designs have been created which balance the distribution of actual scantlings provided against the distribution of Rule requirements. Software comparison amongst members on common ships is still ongoing and some differences still exist. This version of the consequence assessment is being released together with the 1 July 2012 version of the CSR-H. The reason that the consequence assessment is based on the earlier January 2012 draft version is due to the time necessary for the Societies to update their application software and to perform the analyses. The consequence assessment results will be updated periodically in order to reflect the newer versions of the rules as they become available and updated reports will be issued. Revision History: Date 1 July 2012 Comment
Assessment for January 2012 Internal Draft + Top Priority Rule changes External Release
July 2012
Page 1
Consequence Assessment
Content
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Rule reference........................................................................................................................3 1.2 Extent of present Consequence Assessment Report..............................................................3 1.3 Double Hull Oil Tankers Consequence Assessment Summary ........................................3 1.4 Bulk Carriers Consequence Assessment Summary............................................................3 2 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 4 3 Consequences summary...................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Bulk Carriers .........................................................................................................................7 3.1.1 Bulk Carriers Capesize..................................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Bulk Carriers BabyCape .................................................................................. 9 3.1.3 Bulk Carriers Panamax .................................................................................. 10 3.1.4 Bulk Carriers Handymax ............................................................................... 11 3.2 Oil Tankers ..........................................................................................................................12 3.2.1 Oil Tankers - VLCC.......................................................................................... 12 3.2.2 Oil Tankers - Suezmax...................................................................................... 12 3.2.3 Oil Tankers - Aframax ...................................................................................... 13 3.2.4 Oil Tankers - Panamax...................................................................................... 14 3.2.5 Oil Tankers - Handymax................................................................................... 14 Appendices
Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix I Appendix J Appendix K Appendix L Appendix M Appendix N Appendix O Appendix P Appendix Q Appendix R Appendix S Appendix T Appendix U Appendix V Appendix X Ship details Glossary BC-1 - Capesize 1 BC-2 - Capesize 2 BC-3 - Capesize 3 BC-4 - Baby Cape 1 BC-5 - Baby Cape 2 BC-6 - Panamax 1 BC-7 - Panamax 2 (Not included in this report version) BC-8 - Handymax 1 BC-9 - Handymax 2 BC-10 - Handymax 3 OT-1 - VLCC 1 OT-2 - VLCC 2 OT-3 - Suezmax 1 OT-4 - Suezmax 2 OT-5 - Aframax 1 OT-6 - Aframax 2 OT-7 - Aframax 3 OT-8 - Panamax 1 OT-9 - Panamax 2 OT-10 - Handymax 1 OT-11 - Product Carrier (Not included in this report version)
July 2012
Page 2
Consequence Assessment
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Rule reference
January 2012 internal draft and important Rule amendments in April 2012
1.4 Double Hull Oil Tankers Consequence Assessment High Level Summary
Prescriptive Assessment In general the prescriptive plating assessment shows relatively little scantling impact on the CSR compliant vessels. Keel plating and sheer strake shows scantling results that are more conservative than CSR. The CSR-H prescriptive stiffener results are more conservative than CSR. However in comparison with the offered modulus the scantling impact is relative local. Finite Element Yield Assessment Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. Finite Element Buckling Assessment The software comparison activity for buckling is in progress and therefore the FE buckling results have not been included in this report version.
July 2012
Page 3
Consequence Assessment
2 Introduction
A consequence assessment was conducted based upon the January 2012 draft of the Harmonised Common Structural Rules (CSR-H). A number of important Rule amendments were identified, and these Rule amendments were incorporated into the software for the present consequence assessment. This report includes the effect of January 2012 Rules plus these April Rule changes. This compares the new requirements with the CSR version dated July 2010. This version of the consequence assessment is being released together with the 1 July 2012 version of the CSR-H. The reason that the consequence assessment is based on the earlier January 2012 draft version is due to the time necessary for the Societies to update their application software and to perform the analyses. The consequence assessment results will be updated periodically in order to reflect the newer rules as they become available and updated reports will be issued. The trends and results of the consequence assessment should be considered preliminary and representative at this point in time based on the referenced rule version. It should be noted that the comparisons will change as the CSR-H are updated based on further project team development or based on Industry feedback we receive. The results will also change as the Societies update their individual software packages. Since this report includes preliminary results based on early drafts of the CSR-H, an overall assessment of whether structural areas are governed by the hull girder longitudinal strength, local prescriptive or FEM requirements has not been made. This work is still ongoing. It is noted that the entire rule set upon which the results in this consequence assessment report are based is subject to revision. Furthermore specific in progress items that are still under development by the IACS rule developers during the Industry review period have been identified in the Foreword of the CSR-H to help industry understand which sections are still being worked on. The following is a list of the in progress items together with the impact on the consequence assessment. In progress items Rule Reference Pt 1, Ch 1, Sec 1, [3.2.2] Subject Rule general principles, additional class notation GRAB [X] Rule general principles, corrosion protection Loads, hull girder permissible shear force corrections Comment Reviewing the requirements associated with the 40 t grab for BC-A and BC-B bulk carriers above 70,000 t deadweight. Reviewing the requirements associated with SOLAS II-1/32 (IMO PSPC-ballast). Reviewing the clarity of the shear force corrections in various prescriptive rule sections, including the corrections in the FE section such as Pt 1, Ch 7, Sec 2, [4.3.3]. Reviewing the direct strength loading conditions for outside the midship region, especially for the foremost and aftmost cargo holds/tanks. Reviewing the shell and deck minimum net thickness requirements in way of the machinery space and aft part. Consequence Assessment Impact Information has been provided for both 40t and 20t in the appendices of the CA Report.
Pt 1, Ch 3, Sec 4
Not applicable. This item does not affect results of current CA Report scope. Not applicable. This item does not affect results of current CA Report scope.
Pt 1, Ch 4, Sec 8
Not applicable. This item does not affect results of current CA Report scope.
Pt 1, Ch 6, Sec 3, Table 1
Not applicable. This item does not affect results of current CA Report scope.
July 2012
Page 4
Consequence Assessment Rule Reference Pt 1, Ch 7, Sec 2 Subject Direct strength analysis, cargo hold structural strength analysis
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Comment Reviewing and updating the analysis procedure for the envelop assessment method (EM) for the midship cargo hold region and the analysis procedure outside the midship cargo hold region. Consequence Assessment Impact The envelop assessment (EM) does not affect results of current CA Report as the individual cargo hold assessment method (IM) has been used by Societies. Buckling results from FE analysis have not been included in this report since rule development and calibration have not been completed at this time. Fine mesh FE results have not been included in this report since rule development and calibration have not been completed at this time. Buckling results for BC side shell should be regarded as preliminary and will be subject to revision. Buckling results for bilge plating should be regarded as preliminary and will be subject to revision. Buckling results for stiffeners should be regarded as preliminary and will be subject to revision. Not applicable. This item does not affect results of current CA Report scope. Not applicable. This item does not affect results of current CA Report scope. Also refer to separate Fatigue CA report. Application of structural arrangement requirements not applied in the CA Report as existing vessel designs used.
Pt 1, Ch 7, Sec 3
Pt 1, Ch 8, Sec 5, Table2
Direct strength analysis, local fine mesh structural strength analysis, screening procedure Buckling, plate capacity, plane plate panels Buckling, plate capacity, curved plate panels Buckling, capacity of stiffeners
Reviewing and updating the analysis procedures and requirements mainly for locations outside midship. Reviewing and updating requirements concerning buckling capacity of side shell of bulk carriers. Reviewing and updating the buckling capacity requirements for curved plate. Reviewing and updating requirements for warping effects. Reviewing and updating the reference stress-based buckling method. Reviewing and updating the analysis procedures and requirements, particularly for the FE fatigue analysis. Reviewing and updating double bottom height and the floor/girder spacing requirements together with Pt 1, Ch 2, Sec 3, [2].
Pt 1, Ch 8, Sec 5, Table 3
Pt 1, Ch 8, Sec 5, [2.3]
Pt 1, Ch 8, App 1, [1.2] Pt 1, Ch 9
Pt 2, Ch 1, Sec 2, [3.1]
Nineteen ships have been used for this consequence assessment in the following size categories: Bulk Carriers Capesize Babycape Panamax Handymax Oil Tankers VLCC Suezmax Aframax Panamax Handymax
July 2012
Page 5
Consequence Assessment
The ships have been chosen to be representative of designs currently offered by the major shipbuilders from Asia. The ships are not identified explicitly for reasons of confidentiality. The principal particulars for each ship are presented in Appendix A. This report covers the Consequence Assessment for the longitudinal structural members in the midship region. The various software applications used by IACS Members have been compared with each other using common Bulk Carrier and Oil Tanker designs to ensure consistent results are being obtained.
July 2012
Page 6
Consequence Assessment
3 Consequences summary
3.1 BulkCarriers
3.1.1 Bulk Carriers Capesize BC1 Capesize 1 (see Appendix C) Empty Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Hopper plating needs to be increased by 0.5 to 1.0mm to meet CSR-H requirements (Design Load Set FD-1 and GRAB). Inner bottom plating needs to be increased by 1.0mm (Design Load Set FD-1). Side shell side frame region is failing in buckling - bucking factor 1.17~1.57 (OST Load Case), and lowest strake of top side is failing in buckling buckling factor 1.19. Prescriptive stiffeners: Hopper side and Top side stiffeners: CSR-H section modulus requirements are more conservative in comparison to CSR. Longitudinals in the hopper, inner bottom and topside does not meet the CSR-H requirements (Design Load Set FD-1). Topside stiffeners do not meet the CSR-H buckling requirements. (Design Load Set WB-1) Inner bottom longitudinals: CSR-H section modulus requirements are more conservative in comparison to CSR. The offered stiffeners are not meeting the CSR-H requirements. Scantling impact is expected. (Design Load Set FD-1) Finite Element - Yielding Deck and topside plating scantlings are not meeting the CSR-H FE requirements. Loaded Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Hopper plating and outermost strake of inner bottom need to be increased by 2.5mm and 0.5mm respectively to meet CSR-H requirements (Design Load Set FD-1). Side shell side frame region and top strake of hopper are failing in buckling (bucking factor 1.13~1.65 and 1.20 respectively). (OST Load Case) Prescriptive stiffeners: In general CSR-H section modulus requirements are more conservative in comparison to CSR. Bottom, hopper and topside stiffeners are not satisfying the CSR-H modulus requirements. Topside stiffeners do not meet the CSR-H buckling requirements. (Design Load Set WB-1 and HSM1 Load Case) Inner bottom longitudinals and side shell longitudinals: CSR-H section modulus requirements are more conservative in comparison to CSR. The offered stiffeners are not meeting the CSR-H requirements. Scantling impact is expected. Finite Element - Yielding Side shell (side frame region), hopper plating, topside plating, double bottom floors, deck scantlings are not meeting the CSR-H FE requirements. Ballast Hold Prescriptive plating: Inner bottom plating needs to be increased by 1.0mm to meet the CSR-H requirements. (Design Load Set FD-1) Side shell side frame region is failing in buckling (bucking factor 1.17~1.57). (OST Load Case) Prescriptive stiffeners: Topside stiffeners do not meet the CSR-H buckling requirements. Inner bottom stiffeners do not meet the CSR-H section modulus requirements (Design Load Set FD-1). Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the ballast hold except for inner bottom plate.
July 2012
Page 7
Consequence Assessment
BC2 Capesize 2 (see Appendix D) Empty Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally most of the offered scantlings meet the CSR-H requirements. Side shell side frame region is failing in buckling (bucking factor 1.16). Topside tank flat bottom part is failing in buckling (buckling factor 1.41). Prescriptive stiffeners: Bottom stiffeners and deck stiffeners are failing in buckling (buckling factor 1.03~1.32) Bottom longitudinals and inner bottom longitudinals are not meeting the CSR-H requirements. CSR-H requirements are also more conservative than CSR. Loaded Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally most of the offered scantlings meet the CSR-H requirements. Side shell side frame region is failing in buckling (bucking factor 1.18). Topside tank flat bottom part is failing in buckling (buckling factor 1.41). Prescriptive stiffeners: Generally the CSR-H stiffener modulus requirements are higher than CSR requirements. Hopper plating longitudinals does not meet the CSR-H requirements. Topside tank flat bottom part/longitudinal stiffeners are not meeting the CSR-H requirements. Ballast hold Prescriptive plating: Generally most of the offered scantlings meet the CSR-H requirements except for inner bottom plate. Side shell side frame region is failing in buckling (bucking factor 1.18). Topside tank flat bottom part is failing in buckling (buckling factor 1.41). Prescriptive stiffeners: Bottom stiffeners are failing in CSR-H buckling (buckling factor 1.02 ~ 1.10), and not sufficient to meet CSR-H Yielding requirements. Hopper stiffeners are also not sufficient to meet CSR-H requirements. Finite Element - Yielding FE Yielding: Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the ballast hold. BC3 Capesize 3 (see Appendix E) Loaded Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally all the offered scantlings meet the CSR-H requirements (Yielding & Buckling). Prescriptive stiffeners: Generally the CSR-H section modulus requirements are higher than CSR. However, in general all the offered scantlings meet the CSR-H requirements (Yielding & Buckling).
July 2012
Page 8
Consequence Assessment
3.1.2
BC4 BabyCape 1 (see Appendix F) Empty Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Thickness increase (0.5 mm) for bottom girder plate due to minimum thickness requirement. Prescriptive stiffeners: Increase to bottom, hopper slope and bilge stiffeners due to yielding. Loaded Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact Prescriptive stiffeners: Slight impact for wing tank stiffeners due to buckling requirement. Finite Element - Yielding FEM Yielding usage factor increase for upper part of web frame and stool connection with the inner bottom (to be confirmed thanks to a local fine mesh analysis), Heavy Ballast Hold Empty in Alternate Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact. Prescriptive stiffeners: Section modulus increase for hopper tank (for yielding) and wing tank stiffeners (for yielding and buckling). Finite Element - Yielding FEM Yielding usage factor increase for upper part of web frame and stool connection with the inner bottom (to be analysed in more detail thanks to a local fine mesh analysis), BC5 BabyCape 2 (see Appendix G) Empty in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact. Some bottom girders needs to be increased by 0.5mm to meet the CSR-H requirements (Governing Criteria: minimum thickness). Upper part of hopper needs to be increased by 4.5 due to grab requirement. Higher minimum requirement on double bottom girder plates with some +0.5 mm impact. None other notable differences in general. Prescriptive stiffeners: Generally CSR-H derives more conservative section modulus requirements than CSR. Inner bottom longitudinals are failing lightly in CSR-H buckling (bucking factor 1.01 ~ 1.03). Longitudinal stiffeners on the topside tank sloped plating are failing in CSR-H buckling (buckling factor 1.02 ~ 1.16). Generalized increase of the SM requirement; small scantling impact due to buckling on inner bottom, bigger on top wing tank stiffeners Loaded in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact. Some bottom girders and a part of hopper need to be increased by 0.5mm to meet the CSR-H requirements (Governing Criteria: minimum thickness and grab requirements respectively). Lower requirement in CSR-H compared with CSR on inner bottom, bottom and side shell, but no scantling impact; higher requirement on double bottom girder plates with some +0.5 mm impact due to minimum. Prescriptive stiffeners: Generally CSR-H derives more conservative section modulus requirements than CSR. Scantling impact is observed in bilge area stiffeners (Failing in buckling and yielding). Some stiffeners on the topside sloped plating failing in yielding and buckling. A part of inner bottom longitudinal are failing in yielding. Generalized increase in CSR-H requirement compared with CSR of the SM requirement but scantling impact only on inner bottom above tunnel, hopper, and wing tank. July 2012 Page 9
Consequence Assessment
Heavy Ballast Hold Empty in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact. It is notable 1 mm increase in CSR-H compared with CSR, due to minimum, on double bottom girder plates. However, due to the offered scantlings, no impact on scantlings. Side shell plating is failing in buckling (buckling factor ~1.07). Prescriptive stiffeners: Section modulus increase for some part of the inner bottom (for yielding) and wing tank stiffeners (for yielding and for buckling at some longitudinals). Section modulus increase on almost all stiffeners. However, due to the offered scantlings, scantling impact of CSR-H is only on wing tank and a part of the inner bottom and very small. Finite Element - Yielding FEM Yielding none impact noted
3.1.3
BC6 Panamax 1 (see Appendix H) Empty Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact from yield assessment. CSR-H buckling is more severe for side shell in single side region compared to CSR CSR-H buckling factor 1.14 ~ 1.69, and CSR buckling factor 0.54 ~ 0.66. CSR-H yielding requirements need to be increased in bilge plate by 0.5mm. Prescriptive stiffeners: Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact. Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR compliant vessels. Loaded Hold in Alternate Loading Condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact from yield assessment. CSR-H buckling is more severe for side shell in single side region compared to CSR CSR-H buckling factor 1.136 ~ 1.665, and CSR buckling factor 0.333 ~ 0.820. In lowest strake of upper strake of upper wing CSR-H buckling factor is 1.113 and CSR factor is 0.740. CSR-H yielding requirements need to be increased in bilge plate by 0.5mm. Prescriptive stiffeners: CSR-H yield assessment is generally more conservative than CSR. However majority of the offered scantlings meet the CSR-H requirements. Some local scantling increase may be necessary. Longitudinal stiffeners in topside sloped plating is failing in CSR-H buckling (buckling factor 1.003 ~ 1.166). Inner bottom longitudinals in way of duct keel are failing in CSR-H (factor 1.106 ~ 1.108). Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR compliant vessels. Heavy Ballast Hold Loaded in Alternate Condition Prescriptive plating: Prescriptive Plating: Generally no impact from yield assessment. CSR-H buckling is more severe for side shell in single side region compared to CSR CSR-H buckling factor 1.12 ~ 1.63, and CSR buckling factor 0.245 ~ 0.777. CSR-H yielding requirement needs increase in bilge plate by 0.5mm. Prescriptive stiffeners: Prescriptive Stiffener: Longitudinal stiffeners in topside sloped plating is failing in CSR-H buckling (buckling factor 1.031 ~ 1.175). Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR compliant vessels.
July 2012
Page 10
Consequence Assessment
3.1.4
BC8 Handymax 1 (Double side skin) (see Appendix J) Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact from yielding assessment. Side shell plating in way of the double side midpart is failing in buckling (buckling factor 1.03 ~ 1.10). Inner hull top strake is also not sufficient for CSR-H Buckling (buckling factor 1.02), and side stringer in way is also failing in buckling (buckling factor 1.09) Some bottom girders needs to be increased by 1.0mm to meet the CSR-H requirements (governing criteria: minimum thickness). Prescriptive stiffeners: Generally CSR-H is more conservative than CSR. Some limited scantling impact in way of bottom shell stiffeners. Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR compliant vessels. BC9 Handymax 2 (see Appendix K) Heavy ballast cargo, loaded in alternate condition Prescriptive plating: Generally no impact from yielding assessment. Prescriptive stiffeners: Bottom longitudinals are failing in buckling (buckling factor 1.035 ~ 1.295) in Design Load Set WB3. BC10 Handymax 3 (see Appendix L) Prescriptive: Mid-part of side shell plating and Top side longitudinals were not satisfied with Harmonised CSR buckling requirement and it has scantling impact. Hull girder stress caused by oblique sea is very severe; the governing load case of this part was OST. Prescriptive stiffeners: Some bottom longitudinals and bottom girder longitudinal need scantling increase due to yielding requirements of CSR-H. Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR compliant vessels.
July 2012
Page 11
Consequence Assessment
3.2 OilTankers
3.2.1 Oil Tankers - VLCC OT1 VLCC 1 (see Appendix M) Prescriptive plating: Harmonised CSR has relatively little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. Some strakes on the longitudinal bulkhead top two strakes do not satisfy CSR-H buckling (buckling factor 1.02 ~ 1.14) due to design load set OT1-FSM1. OT2 VLCC 2 (see Appendix N) Prescriptive plating: Harmonised CSR has relatively little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. Increase on inner bottom plating (0.5mm) is observed in comparison with the offered. Prescriptive stiffeners: Some longitudinal stiffeners at inner hull do not satisfy CSR-H requirements. Most main deck longitudinals do not satisfy CSR-H prescriptive buckling requirements slightly. Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. 3.2.2 Oil Tankers - Suezmax
OT3 Suezmax 1 (see Appendix O) Prescriptive plating: Increases on keel plating (4mm), sheer strake (2mm), inner bottom plating (0.5mm), and inner hull plating (0.5mm) are observed in comparison with the offered. Prescriptive stiffeners: In general all the CSR-H stiffeners section modulus requirements are more conservative than CSR. Hopper and inner hull longitudinal needs to increase to meet CSR-H requirements. Main deck stiffeners are failing CSR-H buckling requirements (buckling factor 1.055 ~ 1.129). CSR buckling factor is in the order 0.85 ~ 0.90. Inner hull and hopper longitudinals do not comply with CSR-H due to yielding (Load Case OST). Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. OT4 Suezmax 2 (see Appendix P) Prescriptive plating: Thickness increase (1 mm) for one strake of stringer due to minimum thickness requirement. Prescriptive stiffeners: Section modulus increase for inner hull and longitudinal bulkheads stiffeners mainly due to additional setting pressure (taking into account in CSR-H and not in CSR-OT). Some stiffeners on longitudinal bulkhead do not satisfy CSR-H prescriptive buckling requirements. Finite Element - Yielding FE Yielding usage factor increase for transverse stringers (to be analysed in more detail thanks to a local fine mesh analysis), and for the upper part of the transverse web frame due to setting pressure.
July 2012
Page 12
Consequence Assessment
3.2.3
OT5 Aframax 1 (see Appendix Q) Prescriptive plating: Increases on keel plating and sheer strake. Inner bottom, hopper plating and inner hull mid-part do not meet CSR-H requirements (0.5mm to 1.0mm increase may be needed). Prescriptive stiffeners: Some longitudinal stiffeners at bottom shell, side shell, inner bottom, hopper, inner hull, and longitudinal bulkhead do not satisfy CSR-H requirements. Main deck longitudinals are failing in buckling (utilisation factor 1~1.23). This is slightly higher than CSR Buckling (0.87~0.91). Finite Element - Yielding Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. OT6 Aframax 2 (see Appendix R) Prescriptive plating: On prescriptive plating, Harmonised CSR has relatively little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. Bilge plating does not meet the CSR-H buckling requirement. Prescriptive stiffeners: Prescriptive stiffener results from CSR-H are generally more conservative than CSR. However all the offered scantlings are sufficient to meet CSR-H. OT7 Aframax 3 (see Appendix S) Prescriptive plating: Keel plating need to be increased by 2.0mm to meet CSR-H requirements. Top strake of inner hull and longitudinal bulkhead is just meeting CSR-H buckling (utilisation factor 1.02). For the main deck 2.5mm to 3.5mm increase is observed from CSR to CSR-H. The CSR-H requirements are good match with the offered. The offered thickness for inner bottom will need to be increased by 0.5mm to meet the CSR-H. Thickness increase of 0.5mm for two strakes on the inner hull will be necessary to meet the CSR-H. Prescriptive stiffeners: Generally the stiffener modulus requirements are higher for CSR-H compared to CSR. In comparison with the offered there are few locations where increase may be necessary: Few stiffeners on side shell, main deck. Majority of the stiffeners on the inner hull and longitudinal bulkhead will need to be increased in comparison to the offered. (mid to upper part). Main deck longitudinals are failing in buckling (utilisation factor 1.04~1.08). This is higher than CSR Buckling (0.76~0.83). OT8 Panamax 1 (see Appendix T) Prescriptive plating: Side shell plating and sheer strake need to be increased by 0.5mm to meet CSR-H requirements. Bilge plate is failing in buckling (buckling utilisation of 1.87). For the remaining locations all the offered thicknesses are sufficient to meet the CSR-H requirements. Prescriptive stiffeners: The offered section modulus of the inner hull longitudinals are not meeting the CSR-H section modulus requirements (the CSR-H pressure is higher than the CSR pressure on the inner hull longitudinals that are failing). Finite Element - Yielding FE Yielding (CSR-H) no impact.
July 2012
Page 13
Consequence Assessment
3.2.4
OT9 Panamax 2 (see Appendix U) Prescriptive plating: Keel plating and sheer strake need to be increased by 1.5mm to meet CSR-H requirements. For the remaining locations all the offered thicknesses are sufficient to meet the CSR-H requirements. Prescriptive stiffeners: Offered modulus of some longitudinals (lower and upper part) does not meet the CSR-H requirements. Finite Element - Yielding FE Yielding (CSR-H) no impact. 3.2.5 Oil Tankers - Handymax
OT10 Handymax 1 (see Appendix V) Prescriptive plating: Keel plating need to be increased by 2.0mm to meet CSR-H requirements. Sheer strake need to be increased by 1.0mm. Inner hull three strakes need to be increased by 0.5mm. Prescriptive stiffeners: All offered modulus of longitudinals meet the CSR-H requirements. Finite Element - Yielding FE Yielding (CSR-H) no impact.
July 2012
Page 14
Appendix A
Ship details
ID BC-1 BC-2 BC-3 BC-4 BC-5 BC-6 BC-7 BC-8 BC-9 BC-10 OT-1 OT-2 OT-3 OT-4 OT-5 OT-6 OT-7 OT-8 OT-9 OT-10 OT-11
ID Capesize 1 Capesize 2 Capesize 3 Baby Cape 1 Baby Cape 2 Panamax 1 Panamax 2 Handymax 1 Handymax 2 Handymax 3 VLCC 1 VLCC 2 Suezmax 1 Suezmax 2 Aframax 1 Aframax 2 Aframax 3 Panamax 1 Panamax 2 Handymax 1 Product Carrier
Oil Tanker
LBP (m) 285 284 293 240 248 225 223 183 185 185 319 324 264 264 240 240 234 220 219 176
Bmld (m) 46.0 45.0 50.0 43.0 43.0 32.0 32.3 32.3 32.3 32.0 60.0 60.0 48.0 50.0 42.0 44.0 42.0 32.3 32.2 32.2
Tsc (m) 18.1 18.2 18.4 15.0 14.5 14.0 14.5 12.6 12.8 14.0 22.6 21.0 17.0 17.0 15.0 14.8 15.0 14.7 14.5 12.6
Dmld (m) 24.8 24.7 24.9 21.3 20.2 20.0 20.1 17.5 18.0 18.0 30.4 29.0 23.7 23.2 21.5 21.0 21.2 21.2 20.9 18.2
Dwt. (t) 180200 180000 205000 114500 115000 82000 81000 53000 57000 48000 318000 330000 158000 163000 97000 103000 105000 76000 74000 50500
July 2012
Appendix B/Page 1
Appendix B
Glossary
The figures and tables in this document use the nomenclature defined below.
Strakes
The approximate strake positions have been indicated in order to show appropriate detail for representative plate thickness and adjacent stiffener scantlings. Exact stiffener groupings have not been shown to protect design confidentiality.
July 2012
Appendix B/Page 1
Numbering system
In general the strakes and girders are numbered from the centre line outward and from the baseline upward. The stringers are numbered from the upper to the lower.
Stiffener types
The following identification is used: FB Flat Bar BP Bulb Plate IA Inverted Angle T tee section
Materials
The following symbols are used: MS Mild Steel of yield stress = 235 N/mm2 H32 High Tensile Steel of yield stress = 315 N/mm2 H36 High Tensile Steel of yield stress = 355 N/mm2
The plating in mm and the stiffener size in cm3. In the case of required columns, the thickness or section modulus necessary to comply with the Rules is indicated.
Scantling change
The incremental change for plating is shown in mm. For plating the following is indicated in the detailed results in the Appendices: Difference in net CSRH - CSR in mm Difference in net CSRH offered net thickness in mm The difference is calculated for Yield results only. The impact of buckling is not indicated in the difference columns. The change for stiffeners is shown as the percentage change in section modulus. For stiffeners the following is indicated in the detailed results in the Appendices: Percentage difference between CSR and CSRH. Percentage calculated as (CSRH CSR) / CSR. Percentage difference between offered stiffener modulus and CSRH. Percentage calculated as (CSRH offered) / CSR. The percentages are calculated for Yield results only. The impact of buckling is not indicated in the percentage columns. Note: The above two paragraphs with reference to stiffener size, and change for stiffener is tentative only. We will review as we carry out the work to determine whether this is workable.
July 2012
Appendix B/Page 2
July 2012
Appendix B/Page 3
Criterion
The following shorthand is used to identify the criterion driving the scantlings: CSR Tanker Rule reference
Short description HG Bending HG Shear HG Initial Buckling HG US Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Other Sloshing Bottom Slam Bow Impact Buckling slender PSM Buckling pres Quay FEM Yield FEM buckling HG Fatigue Local, fatigue Rule category Hull girder bending requirement Hull girder shear Hull girder initial/prescriptive buckling Hull girder ultimate strength Local scantling, minimum thickness Local scantling, loads based Local scantling, loads based Local scantling, loads based Local Scantling misc. empirical formulae Local scantling, sloshing Local scantling bottom slamming forward Local scantling bow Impact forward Buckling according to stiffness and proportions Prescriptive buckling for PSM Local Scantling quay requirement FEM yielding criteria FEM advanced buckling criteria HG section modulus increase for fatigue Local fatigue for stiffener end connections CSR Tanker Rule reference 8/1.2 8/1.3 8/1.4.2 & 10/3 9/1 8/2.1.5, 8/2.1.6, 8/3.1.4, 8/4.1.5 & 8/5.1.4 8/2 Table 8.2.4 to 8.2.8, 8/3.9, 8/4.8 & 8/5.1.2 8/2.6 for PSM 8/2.5.6 & 2.5.7 for corrugations Other Req. except Rule Ref. for Local, Min T and Local, press 8/6.2 8/6.3 8/6.4 10/2.2 10/2.3 except 10/2.3.3 8/2.2.4 9/2 Table 9.2.1 9/2 Table 9.2.2 8/1.5 9/3 and App C
July 2012
Appendix B/Page 4
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in the tables for CSR-H)
1 2 3 4 5 Blank: Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending). Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling). Governing criteria is Fatigue. Governing criteria is GRAB. Governing criteria is Other. Governing is shown in the table.
July 2012
Appendix B/Page 5
Consequence Assessment
Appendix C
BC 1 Capesize 1
Figure C.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO HOLD - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo hold (hold 4,5&6) after application of the CSR-H for Bulkers.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
BLG1 BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 HP1 HP2 HP3 HP4 UW1 UW2 UW3 UW4 UW5 UW6 UW7 IB1 IB2
16.50 22.00 21.00 21.00 19.00 17.00 16.50 17.00 15.00 14.00 14.50 12.50 22.00 13.50 13.50 14.50 14.50 22.00 17.00 17.00
16.0 16.0 15.5 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 15.0 15.0 14.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 17.0 17.0
Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P GRAB GRAB Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min GRAB GRAB
0.66 0.41 0.41 0.41 0.57 0.63 0.66 0.43 0.42 0.33 0.37 0.91 0.51 0.73 0.84 0.92 0.92 0.67 0.41 0.42
14.0 16.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 17.5 15.5 15.0 15.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 18.0 18.0
Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P GRAB Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Local P Local P
0.98 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.67 0.73 0.81 0.59 0.61 0.57 0.87 1.19 0.76 0.77 0.80 0.89 0.86 0.71 0.53 0.56
-1.8 0 -1.6 -1.6 -1.7 -1.7 -1.8 1.8 0.5 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0
-2.5 -6.0 -7.0 -7.0 -5.0 -3.0 -2.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 -1.0 -10.5 -2.0 -2.0 -3.0 -3.0 -10.5 1.0 1.0
5 2, 5 2, 5 2, 5 5 2, 5 5 2, 5 2, 5 4 5 5 2, 5 5 5 5 5 5 2, 4 4
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
IB3 IB4 IB5 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8
17.0 17.0 17.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 15.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 13.5 15.0 14.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 14.5 16.5 22.5
17.0 17.0 17.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 14.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5
GRAB GRAB GRAB Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min
0.42 0.43 0.43 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.51 0.69 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.79 0.45 0.36 0.46 0.46 0.67 0.91 0.75 0.58
18.0 18.0 18.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 12.0 14.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 12.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
Local P Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min
0.56 0.59 0.60 0.76 0.74 0.75 0.76 0.71 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.01 0.72 0.91 1.17 1.33 1.57 1.19 0.87 0.76
1.1 1.1 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 -0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.5 -0.7 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
1.0 1.0 1.0 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5 -0.5 -2.5 -8.5
4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
BTM1 BTM 2 BTM 4 BTM 5 BTM 6 BTM 8 BTM 9 BTM 10 BTM 12 BTM 13 BTM 14 BTM 16 BTM 17 BTM 18 BTM 20 BTM 21 BTM 22 BTM 23 BTM 24 BTM 25 HPR1 HPR2 July 2012
207 207 854 850 850 850 850 850 850 842 842 842 834 834 985 982 984 982 984 984 734 662
133 134 700 701 702 705 706 707 709 710 712 714 715 716 751 752 799 755 802 803 684 640
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.86 0.86 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.78 0.87 0.85
173 174 806 810 814 821 825 829 836 840 844 851 855 859 919 923 978 931 987 1084 858 810
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.70 0.70 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.77 0.93 0.93
30% 30% 15% 16% 16% 17% 17% 17% 18% 18% 19% 19% 20% 20% 22% 23% 22% 23% 23% 35% 25% 27%
-16% -16% -6% -5% -4% -3% -3% -3% -2% 0% 0% 1% 3% 3% -7% -6% -1% -5% 0% 10% 17% 22%
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
HPR3 HPR4 HPR5 HPR6 HPR7 HPR8 HPR9 HPR10 UW1 UW10 UW11 UW12 UW13 UW14 UW15 UW2 UW3 UW4 UW5 UW6 UW7 UW8 UW9 IB1 July 2012
643 605 549 546 546 546 546 548 772 1191 1191 1191 1191 1184 1184 1026 1026 1026 1115 1200 1191 1191 1191 216
598 567 558 548 539 529 520 510 576 974 998 1021 1076 1149 1157 606 599 643 684 853 887 918 947 91
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.81 0.79 0.79 0.76 0.74 0.72 0.69 0.68 1.19 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.92 1.05 1.02 0.98 0.91 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.66
765 723 682 644 621 610 598 587 878 1356 1409 1461 1512 1562 1523 962 971 980 990 1351 1330 1311 1301 165
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.88 0.83 0.83 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.73 1.13 1.10 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.25 1.22 1.17 1.10 1.18 1.16 1.16 1.14 0.77
28% 27% 22% 17% 15% 15% 15% 15% 53% 39% 41% 43% 41% 36% 32% 59% 62% 52% 45% 59% 50% 43% 37% 81%
19% 19% 24% 18% 14% 12% 10% 7% 14% 14% 18% 23% 27% 32% 29% -6% -5% -4% -11% 13% 12% 10% 9% -23% 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
IB2 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB8 IB9 IB10 IB12 IB13 IB14 IB16 IB17 IB18 IA_1 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 MD8 MD9 MD10 July 2012
216 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 219 1264 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263
86 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 661 124 782 760 750 740 731 721 712 703 694 685
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.65 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.65 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92
156 1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1041 1016 1015 1014 223 898 882 879 898 918 937 957 976 996 1015
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.77 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.77 0.91 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
81% 58% 58% 58% 58% 58% 58% 58% 58% 57% 54% 53% 53% 81% 15% 16% 17% 21% 26% 30% 34% 39% 44% 48%
-28% 28% 28% 28% 28% 28% 28% 28% 28% 28% 24% 24% 24% 2% -29% -30% -30% -29% -27% -26% -24% -23% -21% -20%
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
MD11 MD12 MD13 BG11__1 BG11__2 BG11__3 BG15__1 BG15__2 BG15__3 BG19__1 BG19__2 BG19__3 BG3__1 BG3__2 BG7__1 BG7__2 BG7__3 BG0__1 BG0__2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 July 2012
1263 1263 1262 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 265 265 76 76 76 58 58 728 722 659 601 546
676 668 652 67 73 67 67 73 67 67 73 67 170 153 67 73 67 31 31 707 659 618 581 530
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.92 0.92 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.73 0.69 0.65 0.65
0.89 0.89 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
53% 58% 63% No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. 20% 18% No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. 16% 10% 9% 10% 11%
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
204 181
Local P Local P
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
3% -5% -13% 5% 3% 1% 3% 5% 1%
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
BLG1 BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 HP1 HP2 HP3 HP4 UW1 UW2 UW3 UW4 UW5 UW6 UW7 IB1 IB2
16.50 20.00 20.00 18.00 18.00 16.50 16.50 16.50 15.00 14.00 14.50 12.50 22.00 13.50 13.50 14.50 14.50 22.00 20.50 20.50
16.5 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.5 15.5 15.0 15.0 14.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 20.0 20.0
Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P GRAB GRAB Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Local P Local P
0.64 0.43 0.43 0.54 0.59 0.64 0.64 0.41 0.41 0.32 0.39 0.95 0.51 0.75 0.86 0.93 0.93 0.67 0.24 0.25
14.0 16.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 17.5 16.5 17.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 20.5 20.5
Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Local P Local P
0.97 0.63 0.63 0.68 0.68 0.75 0.80 0.58 0.61 0.57 0.86 1.20 0.76 0.78 0.81 0.89 0.86 0.71 0.48 0.49
-2.2 0.0 -1.8 -1.9 -2.0 -2.1 -2.2 -1.6 2.9 1.8 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2
-2.5 -4.0 -6.0 -4.0 -4.0 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 -1.0 -10.5 -2.0 -2.0 -3.0 -3.0 -10.5 0.0 0.0
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 2, 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
IB3 IB4 IB5 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8
20.50 20.50 20.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 28.00 14.00 19.50 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 15.00 14.50 18.00 18.00 18.00 15.50 16.50 22.50
20.0 20.0 19.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 14.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 15.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5
Local P Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min
0.25 0.27 0.28 0.47 0.48 0.49 0.51 0.73 0.40 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.44 0.37 0.63 0.63 0.74 0.88 0.78 0.60
20.5 20.5 20.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 12.0 12.5 14.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
Local P Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min
0.49 0.52 0.55 0.76 0.74 0.75 0.75 0.01 0.62 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.08 0.71 0.89 1.25 1.41 1.65 1.13 0.88 0.76
0.3 0.3 0.7 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 2.5 -0.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 -1.1 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
0.0 0.0 0.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.5 -16.0 -1.5 -5.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -1.0 -0.5 -4.0 -4.0 -4.0 -1.5 -2.5 -8.5 5 5 2, 5 2, 5 2, 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2, 5 2, 5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
BTM 1 BTM 2 BTM 4 BTM 5 BTM 6 BTM 8 BTM 9 BTM 10 BTM 12 BTM 13 BTM 14 BTM 16 BTM 17 BTM 18 BTM 20 BTM 21 BTM 22 BTM 23 BTM 24 BTM 25 HPR1 HPR2 July 2012
206 206 847 847 847 847 839 839 838 838 838 838 832 832 984 984 984 984 984 984 731 662
177 178 726 728 730 734 736 738 718 720 722 725 727 729 813 815 817 819 821 823 672 629
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.82 0.82 0.83 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.80 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.85 0.84
228 230 764 766 770 778 782 786 794 798 802 810 814 818 991 1024 1060 1097 1137 1180 1124 1062
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.69 0.69 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.89 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.93 0.93 0.97 0.95 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.74 0.93 0.93
29% 29% 5% 5% 6% 6% 6% 7% 11% 11% 11% 12% 12% 12% 22% 26% 30% 34% 39% 43% 67% 69%
11% 12% -10% -10% -9% -8% -7% -6% -5% -5% -4% -3% -2% -2% 1% 4% 8% 12% 16% 20% 54% 60%
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
HPR3 HPR4 HPR5 HPR6 HPR7 HPR8 HPR9 HPR10 UW1 UW10 UW11 UW12 UW13 UW14 UW15 UW2 UW3 UW4 UW5 UW6 UW7 UW8 UW9 IB1 July 2012
643 605 549 546 546 546 546 548 772 1191 1191 1191 1191 1184 1184 1026 1026 1026 1115 1200 1191 1191 1191 341
589 567 558 548 539 529 520 510 620 978 1002 1025 1076 1149 1157 607 600 645 685 855 890 922 951 235
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.80 0.77 0.78 0.76 0.73 0.71 0.69 0.67 1.19 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 1.05 1.02 0.98 0.91 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.64
1003 948 895 845 822 799 777 760 863 1358 1411 1464 1515 1565 1526 864 863 879 913 1248 1268 1286 1303 293
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.86 0.81 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.77 0.73 1.14 1.14 1.00 0.99 1.05 1.02 1.02 1.27 1.27 1.20 1.12 1.22 1.20 1.20 1.16 0.76
70% 67% 60% 54% 53% 51% 50% 49% 39% 39% 41% 43% 41% 36% 32% 42% 44% 36% 33% 46% 43% 40% 37% 24%
56% 57% 63% 55% 50% 46% 42% 39% 12% 14% 19% 23% 27% 32% 29% -16% -16% -14% -18% 4% 7% 8% 9% -14%
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
IB2 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB8 IB9 IB10 IB12 IB13 IB14 IB16 IB17 IB18 IA_1 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 MD8 MD9 MD10 July 2012
341 1117 1117 1117 1117 1117 1117 1117 1117 1117 1117 1115 1115 341 1264 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263 1263
221 1069 1069 1069 1069 1069 1069 1069 1069 1062 1020 999 978 231 781 759 749 740 730 721 711 702 694 685
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.63 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.64 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92
275 1346 1346 1346 1346 1346 1346 1346 1346 1341 1334 1353 1373 288 850 858 878 898 918 937 957 976 996 1015
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.76 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.85 0.85 0.76 0.91 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
24% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 26% 31% 35% 40% 24% 9% 13% 17% 21% 26% 30% 35% 39% 44% 48%
-19% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 20% 19% 21% 23% -16% -33% -32% -30% -29% -27% -26% -24% -23% -21% -20% 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
MD11 MD12 MD13 BG11__1 BG11__2 BG11__3 BG15__1 BG15__2 BG15__3 BG19__1 BG19__2 BG19__3 BG3__1 BG3__2 BG7__1 BG7__2 BG7__3 BG0__1 BG0__2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 July 2012
1263 1263 1262 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 76 280 280 76 76 76 59 59 728 722 659 601 546
676 668 652 78 85 78 78 85 78 78 85 78 228 205 78 85 78 44 44 736 690 628 572 523
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.92 0.92 0.91 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.71 0.66 0.64 0.64
0.89 0.89 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
272 242
Local P Local P
53% 58% 63% No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. 19% 18% No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. 26% 20% 18% 17% 16%
-18% -17% -16% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA -3% -13% NA NA NA NA NA 27% 14% 13% 11% 11%
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
6% -4% -12% 5% 3% 1% 3% 5% 1%
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
BLG1 BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 HP1 HP2 HP3 HP4 UW1 UW2 UW3 UW4 UW5 UW6 UW7 IB1 IB2
16.50 22.00 21.00 21.00 19.00 16.50 16.50 17.00 16.00 15.00 16.00 13.50 22.00 14.00 13.50 14.50 14.50 22.00 17.00 17.00
16.5 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.5 16.5 15.5 15.0 16.0 13.5 11.5 13.5 12.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 17.0 17.0
Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Min Local P Local P Min Min Min GRAB GRAB
0.65 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.57 0.65 0.65 0.42 0.36 0.26 0.30 0.76 0.47 0.63 0.79 0.87 0.87 0.64 0.41 0.41
14.0 16.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 17.5 15.5 15.0 15.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 18.0 18.0
Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P GRAB Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Local P Local P
0.98 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.67 0.73 0.81 0.59 0.61 0.57 0.87 1.19 0.76 0.77 0.80 0.89 0.86 0.71 0.53 0.56
-2.1 0.0 -1.8 -1.8 -1.9 -2.0 -2.1 1.2 -0.2 -0.2 -1.1 -1.5 0.0 -1.5 -0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 1.0
-2.5 -6.0 -7.0 -7.0 -5.0 -2.5 -2.5 0.5 -0.5 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -10.5 -2.5 -2.0 -3.0 -3.0 -10.5 1.0 1.0
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
IB3 IB4 IB5 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8
17.00 17.00 17.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 15.00 12.50 11.50 11.00 11.00 13.50 15.00 14.50 16.00 16.00 16.00 16.50 17.00 22.50
17.0 17.0 17.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 14.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 15.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5
GRAB GRAB GRAB Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min Local P Min Local P Min Local P Min Min Min
0.41 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.45 0.46 0.47 0.68 0.57 0.65 0.70 0.70 0.78 0.44 0.36 0.47 0.47 0.73 0.70 0.65 0.53
18.0 18.0 18.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 12.0 14.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 12.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
Local P Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min
0.56 0.59 0.60 0.76 0.74 0.75 0.76 0.71 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.09 0.01 0.72 0.91 1.17 1.33 1.57 1.19 0.87 0.76
1.1 1.1 0.8 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.6 -0.8 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 2.5 -1.1 -0.3 -0.4 -0.3 -0.5 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
1.0 1.0 1.0 -18.5 -18.5 -18.5 -18.0 -1.0 -1.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.5 -3.0 -8.5
4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Net Offered SM [cm3] 209 209 878 874 874 874 874 874 874 866 866 866 855 855 1013 1013 1013 1013 1013 1013 734 728 666 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3]
[HCSR - CSR] / CSR [%]
Ref.
Comment
BTM 1 BTM 2 BTM 4 BTM 5 BTM 6 BTM 8 BTM 9 BTM 10 BTM 12 BTM 13 BTM 14 BTM 16 BTM 17 BTM 18 BTM 20 BTM 21 BTM 22 BTM 23 BTM 24 BTM 25 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3
July 2012
180 181 710 712 714 717 719 721 724 726 728 732 734 735 820 822 824 826 828 830 711 612 678
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.85 0.85 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.87 0.82 0.80
173 174 806 810 814 821 825 829 836 840 844 851 855 859 919 923 978 931 987 1084 858 810 765
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.70 0.70 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.93 0.93 0.95 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.88 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.77 0.93 0.93 0.88
-4% -4% 14% 14% 14% 15% 15% 15% 15% 16% 16% 16% 17% 17% 12% 12% 19% 13% 19% 31% 21% 32% 13%
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 664 664 662 662 660 660 551 772 1026 1026 1026 1115 1341 1332 1491 1491 1582 1587 1791 1791 1787 1787 219 219
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
HPR4 HPR5 HPR6 HPR7 HPR8 HPR9 HPR10 UW1 UW2 UW3 UW4 UW5 UW6 UW7 UW8 UW9 UW10 UW11 UW12 UW13 UW14 UW15 IB1 IB2
July 2012
599 592 656 648 572 565 559 861 880 940 1000 1050 1203 1267 1332 1477 1461 1526 1682 1655 1720 1784 151 142
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.75 0.70 0.67 0.65 0.63 0.61 0.67 1.15 1.02 0.98 0.95 0.88 0.93 0.92 0.87 0.86 0.83 0.82 0.77 0.75 0.74 0.73 0.65 0.65
723 682 644 621 610 598 587 878 962 971 980 990 1351 1330 1311 1301 1356 1409 1461 1512 1562 1523 165 156
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.83 0.83 0.78 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.73 1.13 1.25 1.22 1.17 1.10 1.18 1.16 1.16 1.14 1.10 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.77
21% 15% -2% -4% 7% 6% 5% 2% 9% 3% -2% -6% 12% 5% -2% -12% -7% -8% -13% -9% -9% -15% 10% 10%
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 816 219 1278 1277 1277 1277 1277 1277 1277 1277 1277 1277 1277
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
IB4 IB5 IB6 IB8 IB9 IB10 IB12 IB13 IB14 IB16 IB17 IB18 IA_1 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 MD8 MD9 MD10 MD11
July 2012
685 685 685 685 685 685 685 685 685 685 685 685 148 727 676 667 659 645 637 636 658 620 613 634
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.65 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89
1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1045 1041 1016 1015 1014 223 898 882 879 898 918 937 957 976 996 1015 1034
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.97 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.97 0.99 0.97 0.77 0.91 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
53% 53% 53% 53% 53% 53% 53% 53% 52% 48% 48% 48% 51% 24% 31% 32% 36% 42% 47% 51% 48% 61% 66% 63%
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 1277 1276 77 77 77 76 76 76 76 76 76 269 269 78 78 78 59 59 773 766 659 601 546 521
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
MD12 MD13 BG11__1 BG11__2 BG11__3 BG15__1 BG15__2 BG15__3 BG19__1 BG19__2 BG19__3 BG3__1 BG3__2 BG7__1 BG7__2 BG7__3 BG0__1 BG0__2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6
July 2012
599 589 82 89 82 78 85 78 78 85 78 231 208 89 97 89 43 43 741 694 636 580 530 491
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.89 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 0.71 0.68 0.64 0.65 0.64
1053 1060
Local P Local P
204 181
Local P Local P
0.89 0.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.83 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.91 0.87 0.80 0.78 0.78
76% 80% No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. -12% -13% No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. No HCSR Req. 10% 4% 6% 10% 11% 10%
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 519 519 1594 1594 1594 1519 1198 1198
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure C.2 Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (HCSR/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and CSR) Hold 4 (Hold 4 is an empty hold in alternate loading condition)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
h) Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
f) Upper slop wing tank (S) July 2012 Appendix C BC 1/Capesize 1/Page 31
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
l)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
o) Deck (S+D)
p) Deck (S)
July 2012
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
f) Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure C.3 Normalized Yield UF Ratio (CSR-H / CSR-H_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H) Hold 4 (Hold 4 is an empty hold in alternate loading condition)
a)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
b)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
c)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
d)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
f)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
h)
Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g) Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g) Deck (S)
July 2012
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
f) Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Figure D.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSR-H for Bulk Carrier.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 US1 US2 US3 US4 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5
18.5 22 22 20 18.5 17.5 17.5 16.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 20.5 24.5 30 30 22.5 22.5 17.5 17.5 16.5 16.5 14 24 13 14.5 12 12 12
18.0 18.0 18.0 18.5 18.5 18.0 18.0 17.0 17.0 14.5 14.5 15.0 14.5 14.5 10.5 10.5 22.0 22.0 17.5 17.5 13.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 10.5 14.5 10.5 10.5 10.5
Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.62 0.46 0.47 0.57 0.65 0.66 0.66 0.50 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.50 0.48 0.45 0.29 0.31 0.51 0.46 1.02 0.63 0.94 0.43 0.74 0.64 0.81 0.81 0.82
15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.0 16.5 14.0 15.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 10.5 10.5 20.5 20.5 16.5 18.0 12.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.5 14.0 7.5 7.5 7.5
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.66 0.66 0.67 0.71 0.73 0.80 0.66 0.73 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 0.83 0.89 0.76 0.77 0.45 0.55 0.66 0.97 1.41 0.81 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.71
-2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -1.5 -3.0 -1.5 -0.5 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.0 0.5 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.0 -0.5 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0
-3.0 -6.5 -6.5 -4.5 -3.0 -2.5 -1.0 -2.5 -5.0 -6.5 -6.5 -6.5 -6.5 -10.5 -19.5 -19.5 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 0.5 -4.0 -4.5 -2.0 -12.0 -5.5 -0.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Net Offere d SM 3 [cm ] 235 1355 1468 1458 1452 1756 1364 1539 2242 1299 1234 1232 368 1552 1108 1021 1153 1142 1322 1322 317 CSR Net Req. SM 3 [cm ] 170 991 1004 1016 1026 1176 1117 760 1431 977 979 947 284 1215 941 850 993 767 723 781 252 CSR Buckli ng 0.64 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.70 0.62 0.35 0.68 0.63 0.75 0.73 0.52 0.54 0.52 0.34 0.68 0.77 0.68 0.70 0.59 CSRH Net. Req. SM 3 [cm ] 197 1220 1245 1270 1289 1684 1354 1203 1348 1144 988 1026 365 1519 1194 1107 1277 929 807 770 284 CSRH Buckli ng 0.61 0.95 0.95 0.97 0.98 0.96 0.85 0.71 0.71 0.83 0.88 0.88 0.49 0.69 0.75 0.59 0.82 0.83 0.79 0.81 0.62 [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press 16% 23% 24% 25% 26% 43% 21% 58% -6% 17% 1% 8% 28% 25% 27% 30% 29% 21% 12% -1% 13% [CSRHOffered] / Offered [%] -16% -10% -15% -13% -11% -4% -1% -22% -40% -12% -20% -17% -1% -2% 8% 8% 11% -19% -39% -42% -10% 1 1 1 1 Comme nt
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 SS1 SS2 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 US1 US2 US3 US4 BG2
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 US1 US2 US3 US4 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5
18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 17.5 17.5 19 18 18 18 18.0 17 24.5 32 32 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.0 16.5 14 24 13 14.5 12 12 12
18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 17.5 17.5 17.5 18.5 15.5 14.5 15.0 15.0 14.5 10.5 10.5 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 16.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 10.5 14.5 10.5 10.5 10.5
Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local Min T Local press Local press Local press Local press Local Min T Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.69 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.71 0.73 0.73 0.54 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.93 0.48 0.45 0.43 0.52 0.55 0.57 0.55 0.89 0.56 0.90 0.40 0.81 0.70 0.88 0.88 0.89
15.5 15.5 15.5 16.0 16.0 15.5 17.0 14.5 15.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 10.5 10.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 17.5 13.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.5 14.0 7.5 7.5 7.5
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.69 0.69 0.70 0.75 0.76 0.83 0.68 0.75 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 0.83 0.90 0.76 0.77 0.55 0.67 0.69 0.96 1.41 0.80 0.92 0.92 0.74
-2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -0.5 -3.0 -3.0 -1.5 -0.5 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -0.5 -3.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.0 -0.5 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0
-3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -2.5 -2.5 -2.0 -0.5 -4.5 -2.5 -4.0 -4.0 -4.0 -3.0 -10.5 -21.5 -21.5 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.0 -6.0 -4.5 -2.0 -12.0 -5.5 -0.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Net Offere d SM 3 [cm ] 231 1198 1198 1198 1198 1307 1197 1600 2338 1263 1324 1322 319 1085 1086 998 1101 1199 1392 1392 286 CSR Net Req. SM 3 [cm ] 185 1081 1090 1098 1104 1193 1114 776 1220 1076 924 894 193 969 989 850 956 864 694 740 268 CSR Buckli ng 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.68 0.40 0.65 0.61 0.72 0.71 0.62 0.61 0.57 0.39 0.65 0.79 0.65 0.67 0.64 CSRH Net. Req. SM 3 [cm ] 209 1630 1661 1692 1716 1669 1292 1242 1343 1143 988 1026 274 1252 1122 1016 1265 925 807 770 298 CSR-H Buckli ng 1.11 1.32 1.28 1.27 1.27 1.17 1.07 0.93 0.71 0.87 1.03 1.02 0.95 0.99 0.96 0.76 0.84 0.85 0.89 0.91 1.03 [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press 13% 51% 52% 54% 55% 40% 16% 60% 10% 6% 7% 15% 42% 29% 13% 20% 32% 7% 16% 4% 11% [CSRHOffered] / Offered [%] -9% 36% 39% 41% 43% 28% 8% -22% -43% -10% -25% -22% -14% 15% 3% 2% 15% -23% -42% -45% 4% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Comme nt
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 SS1 SS2 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 US1 US2 US3 US4 BG2
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 US1 US2 US3 US4 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5
18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 17.5 17.5 19 18 18 18 18.0 17 24.5 32 32 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 19.0 16.5 14 24 13 14.5 12 12 12
18.0 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.0 18.0 17.0 17.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 16.0 14.5 10.5 10.5 18.0 18.5 18.5 20.0 18.5 13.0 12.5 12.0 10.5 14.5 10.5 10.5 10.5
Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.68 0.68 0.69 0.70 0.70 0.71 0.71 0.49 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.85 0.47 0.45 0.42 0.49 0.52 0.50 0.44 0.88 0.56 0.89 0.40 0.80 0.70 0.87 0.87 0.89
15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.0 16.5 14.0 15.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 10.5 10.5 20.5 20.5 16.5 18.0 12.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 7.5 14.0 7.5 7.5 7.5
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.66 0.66 0.67 0.71 0.73 0.80 0.66 0.73 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 0.83 0.89 0.76 0.77 0.45 0.55 0.66 0.97 1.41 0.81 0.92 0.92 0.00 0.71
-2.5 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -1.5 -3.0 -2.0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -2.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -6.0 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 -3.0 -0.5 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0
-3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -2.5 -1.0 -5.0 -2.5 -4.0 -4.0 -4.0 -3.0 -10.5 -21.5 -21.5 2.0 2.0 -2.0 -0.5 -6.5 -4.5 -2.0 -12.0 -5.5 -0.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.5
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Net Offere d SM 3 [cm ] 231 1198 1198 1198 1198 1307 1197 1849 2751 1263 1324 1322 321 1088 1091 1096 1548 1310 1392 1392 286 CSR Net Req. SM 3 [cm ] 183 1111 1125 1139 1150 1248 1180 774 1219 1074 919 890 230 973 1009 1035 1419 1172 853 801 266 CSR Buckli ng 0.67 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.76 0.67 0.40 0.64 0.61 0.71 0.71 0.61 0.61 0.56 0.41 0.64 0.78 0.65 0.67 0.63 CSRH Net. Req. SM 3 [cm ] 214 1588 1626 1665 1746 1995 1598 1335 1343 1144 990 1028 223 1239 1157 1167 1415 1021 818 774 304 CSRH Buckli ng 0.64 1.10 1.07 1.05 1.05 1.02 0.90 0.75 0.72 0.86 0.93 0.92 0.50 0.82 0.75 0.59 0.76 0.83 0.82 0.84 0.66 [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press 17% 43% 45% 46% 52% 60% 35% 73% 10% 6% 8% 16% -3% 27% 15% 13% 0% -13% -4% -3% 14% [CSRHOffered] / Offered [%] -7% 33% 36% 39% 46% 53% 34% -28% -51% -9% -25% -22% -31% 14% 6% 6% -9% -22% -41% -44% 6% 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Comme nt
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 SS1 SS2 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 US1 US2 US3 US4 BG2
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure D.2 Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Loaded Hold in Alternate Condition Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure D.3 Normalized Yield UF Ratio (CSR-H / CSR-H_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area, Loaded Hold in Alternate Condition Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Figure E.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO HOLD - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL, LOADED HOLD IN ALTERNATE CONDITION Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo hold after application of the CSR-H for Bulk Carrier.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net thickness [mm] 20.5 19.5 19.0 18.0 16.0 17.0 18.0 15.0 20.5 20.5 20.5 16.0 25.5 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.5 25.0 15.0 15.5 14.5 15.5 14.0 15.5 16.0 13.5 11.5 13.0 CSR Net Req. [mm] 19.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 15.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 14.5 12.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 10.0 10.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 CSR Buckling CSR-H Net. Req. [mm] 19.5 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.5 18.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 13.0 12.0 12.0 13.5 16.5 16.5 16.0 16.0 16.0 14.5 14.5 15.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 CSR-H Buckling 0.57 0.594 0.609 0.65 0.698 0.725 0.594 0.693 0.723 0.884 0.884 1.235 0.689 0.719 0.716 0.706 0.699 0.463 0.463 0.471 0.482 0.522 0.564 0.549 0.847 0.71 0.72 0.667 0.595 1.033 N/A 0.607 0.571 0.637 0.711 0.656 Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 3.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -1.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 3.0 -1.5 -1.5 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -3.5 0 3.0 0 0 0 0 0 2.5 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Difference in net CSRHOffered [mm] -1.0 -5.5 -5.0 -4.0 -2.0 -2.5 0 -1.0 -6.5 -6.5 -6.5 -2.0 -11.5 -18.0 -19.0 -19.0 -17.5 -1.5 -1.5 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.5 -1.5 0 -13.0 -3.0 -3.5 -2.5 -3.5 -1.5 -4.0 -4.5 -2.0 0 -1.5
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
Comment
BTM 1 BTM 2 BTM 3 BTM 4 BTM 5 BTM 6 BLG SS 1 SS 2 SS 3 SS 4 SS 5 SS 6 MD 1 MD 2 MD 3 MD 4 IB 1 IB 2 IB 3 IB 4 IB 5 HPR 1 HPR 2 HPR 3 IH 1 IH 2 IH 3 IH 4 IH 5 BG 1 BG 2 BG 3 BG 4 BG 5 BG 6
Local FEM FEM FEM FEM FEM Local Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Grab Grab Grab Grab Grab Grab Grab Local Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength FEM Local FEM FEM FEM FEM
0.60 0.61 0.64 0.69 0.71 0.70 0.53 0.60 0.70 0.70 0.87 0.87 0.64 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.70 0.48 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.53 0.47 0.48 0.69 0.72 0.68 0.62 0.75 0.68 0.63 0.61 0.69 0.79 0.72
Local FEM FEM FEM Local FEM Local Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Grab Grab Grab Grab Grab Grab Grab Local Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Local Local FEM Local Local Local
5 2 2 2 5 2 5 5 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 1 1 1 1 5 5 2 5 5 5
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified July 2012 Appendix E BC 3/Capesize 3/Page 2
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account.
Ref. Net Offered SM 3 [cm ] 397 1450 1446 1440 1427 1765 1419 1283 1725 1357 1412 1777 1777 1777 544 1913 1913 1913 1913 167 408 431 424 419 423 1786 1215 1059 1147 1327 1153 1057 CSR Net Req. SM 3 [cm ] 300 1182 1212 1242 1272 1375 898 457 894 283 964 907 874 843 488 1883 1883 1866 1729 N/A 185 N/A N/A N/A N/A 650 691 703 780 1064 854 678 Criterion CSR Buckli ng 0.68 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.67 0.67 0.5 0.45 0.62 0.6 0.78 0.72 0.71 0.7 0.62 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.69 0.56 0.62 0.74 0.68 0.61 0.73 0.81 0.82 0.76 0.61 0.51 0.42 CSRH Net. Req. SM 3 [cm ] N/A 1328 1358 1389 1419 1570 1206 459 966 333 605 626 691 757 489 1979 1979 1979 1979 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 832 841 840 841 1391 1078 965 Criterion CSRH Buckli ng 0.639 0.695 0.698 0.71 0.741 0.739 0.623 0.515 0.642 0.627 0.773 0.717 0.707 0.697 0.569 0.652 0.652 0.652 0.652 N/A N/A 0.707 0.749 0.793 0.759 0.729 0.941 0.889 0.798 0.64 0.535 0.496 [CSRH CSR] / CSR [%] N/A 12% 12% 12% 12% 14% 34% 1% 8% 18% -37% -31% -21% -10% 0% 5% 5% 6% 15% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 28% 22% 19% 8% 31% 26% 42% [CSRHOffered] / Offered [%] N/A -8% -6% -4% -1% -11% -15% -64% -44% -75% -57% -65% -61% -57% -10% 3% 3% 3% 3% N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A -53% -31% -21% -27% 5% -7% -9% Comment
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 SS1 SS2 SS5 SS6 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3
Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Local Local Local Local Local HG Strength Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Local Local Local Local Local
Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Local Local Local Local Local HG Strength Local HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength HG Strength Local Local Local Local Local
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1
1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix F
BC 4 BabyCape 1
MD2
SS5
US3
US4
SS4
US5
SS3
SS2 HPR3
HPR2
SS1
IB1
IB2
HPR1
BG6
BG1
BG2
BG3
BG4
BG5
BLG2
BTM1 BTM2
BTM3
BTM4
BTM5
BTM6
BTM7
BLG1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net Thickness CSR Net Req. [mm] CSR Buckling CSRH Net Req. [mm] CSRH Buckling 0.529 0.53 0.532 0.537 0.559 0.631 0.628 0.628 0.514 0.56 0.891 0.891 0.877 0.794 0.526 0.466 0.515 0.52 0.525 0.697 0.678 0.698 0.814 0.94 0.871 0.707 0.6 0.72 0.72 0.721 0.723 0.663 Difference in net CSRH CSR Difference in net CSRH Offered -6.5 -8.5 -8.0 -7.0 -6.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.5 -1.5 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -3.5 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T GRAB Req. GRAB Req. Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6
15.0 Local, Min T 0.28 15.0 13.0 Local, Min T 0.281 13.0 14.5 Local, press 0.283 13.0 14.5 Local, press 0.301 13.0 15.0 Local, press 0.354 13.0 15.0 Local, press 0.518 13.0 15.5 Local, press 0.515 13.5 15.5 Local, press 0.515 13.5 15.0 Local, press 0.309 13.0 15.0 Local, press 0.406 13.0 13.5 Local, press 0.998 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 0.998 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 0.927 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 0.825 13.0 18.0 GRAB Req. 0.277 18.0 18.0 GRAB Req. 0.325 18.0 18.5 Local, press 0.356 18.5 18.0 Local, press 0.316 18.0 17.5 Local, press 0.267 17.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.485 11.0 9.5 Local, Min T 0.459 11.0 9.5 Local, Min T 0.515 10.0 11.0 Local, Min T 0.832 11.5 12.0 Local, press 0.968 11.5 13.0 Local, press 0.932 12.0 13.5 Local, press 0.726 12.5 13.5 Local, press 0.535 12.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.747 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.748 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.751 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.761 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.639 11.5 (+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR
21.5 21.5 21 20 19 16 16.5 16.5 16.5 14.5 14 14 14 16.5 19.5 19 19 18 17.5 24 24 20 16 14 13 13.5 13.5 11 11 11 11 12
0.0 0.0 -1.5 -1.5 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0
0.0
0.0 -13.0 -13.0 -10.0 -4.5 -2.5 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. Net Offered SM CSR [cm3] CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 152 153 653 654 667 680 828 420 322 223 1378 1091 186 659 804 757 336 81 865 153 1383 1837 1886 192 [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] 17% 17% 7% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 6% 0 12% 5% 10.% 14% 19% 15% 7% 8% 32% 48% 33% 19% 17% 6% [CSRH Offered] / Offered [%] -14% -13% -18% -17% -15% -12% -15% -56% -46% -62% 3% -8% -20% -2% 10% 4% -53% -92% -24% -75% 33% 13% 6% -6%
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0.59 0.59 0.603 0.596 0.615 0.662 0.619 0.533 0.421 0.501 0.946 0.898 0.692 0.594 0.517 0.6 0.463 0.877 0.692 0.931 1.122 1.032 0.89 0.626
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS4 SS5 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1
176 130 Local, press 0.63 176 131 Local, press 0.631 792 609 Local, press 0.7 788 615 Local, press 0.693 784 621 Local, press 0.687 772 627 Local, press 0.679 972 760 Local, press 0.681 954 383 Local, press 0.674 598 305 Local, press 0.462 591 224 Local, press 0.5 1335 1232 Local, press 0.9 1181 1043 Local, press 0.942 233 169 Local, press 0.566 672 579 Local, press 0.777 732 679 Local, press 0.713 728 661 Local, press 0.659 717 313 Local, press 1.0 1034 75 Local, press 0.921 1143 657 Local, press 0.902 610 103 Local, press 0.954 1036 1042 Local, press 0.924 1624 1547 Local, press 0.851 1775 1617 Local, press 1.0 203 181 Local, press 0.594 (+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure F.2 Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of Heavy Ballast Hold Empty in Alternate Condition Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and in CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Transverse Bulkheads
f) Web Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
h) Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure F.3 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio of Heavy Ballast Hold Empty in Alternate Condition Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Transverse Bulkheads
f) Web Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
h) Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
MD2 SS5
SS4 US5
SS3
SS2 HPR3
BG6
BG1
BG2
BG3
BG4
BG5 BLG1
BLG2
BTM1
BTM2
BTM3
BTM4
BTM5
BTM6
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net Thickness CSR Net Req. [mm] CSR Buckling CSRH Net Req. [mm] CSRH Buckling 0.539 0.544 0.564 0.595 0.651 0.652 0.652 0.55 0.593 0.751 0.751 0.918 0.821 0.397 0.461 0.451 0.517 0.551 0.704 0.689 0.705 0.824 0.953 0.892 0.839 0.606 0.727 0.727 0.727 0.73 0.669 Difference in net CSRH CSR Difference in net CSRH Offered -5.0 -7.0 -6.0 -5.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.5 -1.5 -4.0 -4.0 -1.0 -3.5 -3.5 -2.5 -4.5 -1.0 -0.5 -13.0 -13.0 -10.0 -4.5 -3.0 -2.0 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Grab Req. Local, press Grab Req. Grab Req. Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6
15.0 Local, Min T 0.302 15.0 13.0 Local, press 0.308 13.0 13.0 Local, press 0.359 13.0 13.0 Local, press 0.419 13.0 13.5 Local, press 0.549 13.0 14.0 Local, press 0.551 13.5 14.0 Local, press 0.551 13.5 13.5 Local, Min T 0.359 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 0.46 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 0.846 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 0.846 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 1.013 13.0 13.5 Local, Min T 0.875 13.0 16.0 Grab Req. 0.183 16.0 18.0 Local, press 0.251 16.5 15.0 Local, press 0.291 14.5 14.5 Grab Req. 0.422 14.5 11.5 Local, press 0.487 13.0 9.5 Local, Min T 0.495 11.0 9.5 Local, Min T 0.474 11.0 9.5 Local, Min T 0.526 10.0 11.0 Local, Min T 0.847 11.5 11.0 Local, Min T 0.994 11.0 11.0 Local, Min T 0.979 11.0 11.0 Local, Min T 1.022 11.0 11.5 Local, press 0.542 12.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.756 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.757 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.759 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.769 10.5 9.5 Local, Min T 0.647 11.5 (+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR
20 20 19 18 16 16.5 16.5 16.5 14.5 17 17 14 16.5 19.5 19 19 15.5 13.5 24 24 20 16 14 13 11.5 13.5 11 11 11 11 12
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 -1.5 -0.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. CSRH CSR Net. Net CSR Criterion Ref. Req. Req. Buckling SM SM [cm3] [cm3] 174 131 Local, press 0.673 153 BTM1 788 464 Local, press 0.673 648 BTM2 784 477 Local, press 0.674 648 BTM3 780 486 Local, press 0.675 648 BTM4 772 493 Local, press 0.679 648 BTM5 972 615 Local, press 0.688 775 BTM6 954 313 Local, press 0.68 387 BLG1 598 231 Local, press 0.467 320 BLG2 600 437 Local, press 0.432 598 SS1 1335 1252 Local, press 0.912 1406 SS2 1181 1022 Local, press 0.951 1060 SS3 233 241 Local, press 0.592 215 IB1 984 733 Local, press 0.611 666 IB2 672 543 Local, press 0.642 734 HPR1 662 350 Local, press 0.584 542 HPR2 644 144 Local, press 0.396 234 HPR3 1034 91 Local, press 0.957 82 MD1 1143 792 Local, press 0.938 871 MD2 610 88 Local, press 0.948 72 US1 1036 744 Local, press 0.966 732 US2 1106 812 Local, press 0.907 834 US3 1095 914 Local, press 0.872 939 US4 203 99 Local, press 0.576 177 BG1 (+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR Net Offered SM CSR [cm3] [CSRH CSR] / CSR [%] 17% 40% 36% 33% 31% 26% 24% 39% 37% 12% 4% -11% -9% 35% 55% 63% -10% 10% -18% -2% 3% 3% 78% [CSRH Offered] / Offered [%] -12% -19% -17% -17% -16% -20% -59% -46% 0 5% -10% -8% -32% 9% -18% -64% -92% -24% -88% -29% -25% -14% -13%
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0.592 0.597 0.608 0.617 0.652 0.612 0.52 0.418 0.488 0.944 0.905 0.531 0.514 0.554 0.558 0.425 0.878 0.854 1.066 1.032 1.032 0.904 0.617
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure F.7 Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of No. 5 CARGO HOLD (Loaded in Alternate Condition) Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and in CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Transverse Bulkheads
f) Web Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
h) Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure F.8 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio of No. 5 CARGO HOLD (Loaded in Alternate Condition) Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Transverse Bulkheads
f) Web Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
h) Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
MD2
LB2
SS4
LB1
SS3
US5
SS2
SS1 HPR3
HPR2 HPR1
BLG3
IB1
IB2
BG6
BG1
BG2
BG3
BG4
BG5
BLG2
BTM1
BTM2
BTM3
BTM4
BTM5
BLG1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net Thickness CSR Net Req. [mm] 15.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 18.0 18.0 16.5 16.5 13.0 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.0 12.0 11.0 11.0 11.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 10.0 9.5 CSR Buckling 0.222 0.227 0.244 0.292 0.467 0.531 0.38 0.405 0.727 0.727 0.662 0.555 0.227 0.297 0.342 0.384 0.49 0.314 0.305 0.314 0.708 0.88 0.674 0.731 0.451 0.648 0.649 0.653 0.75 0.548 0 0 0.834 CSRH Net Req. [mm] 15.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 18.0 18.0 17.0 16.5 15.0 11.0 11.0 10.0 14.5 13.5 11.0 11.0 12.0 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 11.5 11.0 12.5 9.5 CSRH Buckling 0.472 0.476 0.481 0.403 0.462 0.489 0.406 0.413 0.718 0.718 0.55 0.615 0.476 0.456 0.542 0.593 0.638 0.561 0.553 0.561 0.679 0.803 0.67 0.655 0.536 0.64 0.64 0.641 0.692 0.592 0 0 0.859 Difference in net CSRH CSR Difference in net CSRH Offered -6.0 -8.0 -7.0 -6.0 -3.0 -2.0 -2.0 -1.5 -3.5 -3.5 -1.5 -4.5 -1.5 -1.0 -2.0 -1.5 -0.5 -14.0 -14.0 -11.0 -2.5 -1.5 -2.5 -1.0 -1.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.5 -0.5 -1.0 -0.5 -2.5
Ref.
Criterion Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Grab Req. Grab Req. Grab Req. Grab Req. Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
Criterion Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Grab Req. Grab Req. Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BLG1 BLG2 BLG3 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 IB1 IB2 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 LB1 LB2 LB3
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 0.5 2.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 1.5 2.5 0.0
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. CSR-H CSR Net. Net CSR Criterion Ref. Req. Req. Buckling SM SM [cm3] [cm3] 175 119 Local, press 0.591 136 BTM1 792 418 Local, press 0.591 604 BTM2 788 429 Local, press 0.592 604 BTM3 784 437 Local, press 0.593 604 BTM4 772 448 Local, press 0.597 604 BTM5 963 551 Local, press 0.609 723 BLG1 491 396 Local, press 0.527 548 BLG2 490 437 Local, press 0.466 587 BLG3 1446 1143 Local, press 0.686 1300 SS3 1251 933 Local, press 0.685 998 SS4 233 124 Local, press 0.496 148 IB1 615 426 Local, press 0.651 629 IB2 672 363 Local, press 0.596 711 HPR1 671 311 Local, press 0.548 539 HPR2 653 144 Local, press 0.385 235 HPR3 1153 386 Local, press 0.767 667 MD1 1150 360 Local, press 0.756 819 MD2 1212 194 Local, press 0.655 405 US2 1184 469 Local, press 0.723 547 US3 1183 539 Local, press 0.801 626 US4 1172 819 Local, press 0.782 983 US5 203 92 Local, press 0.514 169 BG1 1016 672 Local, press 0.743 816 LB1 665 572 Local, press 0.874 550 LB2 625 440 Local, press 0.811 364 LB3 (+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR Net Offered SM CSR [cm3] [CSRH CSR] / CSR [%] 14% 45% 41% 38% 35% 31% 38% 34% 14% 7% 20% 48% 96% 73% 64% 73% 127% 109% 17% 16% 20% 84% 22% -4% -17% [CSRH Offered] / Offered [%] -24% -24% -23% -23% -22% -25% 12% 20% -10% -20% -37% 2% 6% -20% -64% -42% -29% -67% -54% -47% -16% -17% -20% -17% -42%
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0.545 0.547 0.547 0.557 0.599 0.584 0.525 0.547 0.619 0.629 0.493 0.58 0.511 0.462 0.429 0.715 0.709 0.78 0.78 0.873 0.809 0.443 0.822 0.957 0.807
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix G
BC 5 BabyCape 2
MD1 US1
MD2
US3
SS3
HPR3
SS2
HPR2 IB1 BG1 BTM1 IB2 BG2 BTM2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 HPR1
ST1
SS1
IB7 BG5
BG4 BTM5
BLG2
BTM6
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref. BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BLG1 Offered Net Thickness [mm] 23 22.5 22.5 21.5 20 18.5 16.5 14 15 CSR Net Req. [mm] 15 13 13 13.5 13.5 13.5 14 13 14.5 Criterion Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, press CSR Buckling 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.42 0.44 0.58 0.65 0.64 0.60 CSR-H Net Req. [mm] 15 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 Criterion Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, press CSR-H Buckling 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.62 0.66 0.71 0.68 0.96 Difference Difference in net in net CSRH CSRH CSR Offered 0.0 -8 0.0 -9.5 0.0 -9.5 0.0 -8.5 -0.5 -7.0 -0.5 -5.5 -1.0 -3.5 0.0 -1.0 -0.5 -1.0 Comment 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Governing criteria is bilge pl. reqr.t Governing criteria is bilge pl. reqr.t
BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 ST1 ST2
15 14 14.5 14.5 14.5 14 24.5 17.5 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 16 14.5 28 28 28 16 11.5 11.5 11.5 13 13 12.5 11.5 10.5 14.5 9.5 11
14.5 13.5 15 14.5 14.5 13.5 13.5 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 14 14 9.5 9.5 11 11 11 11 11 9.5 11 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5
Local, press Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
0.54 0.37 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.70 0.45 0.35 0.38 0.39 0.40 0.40 0.41 0.42 0.42 0.26 0.33 0.48 0.45 0.48 0.76 0.79 0.73 0.73 0.74 0.75 0.43 0.51 0.60 0.37 0.27 0.66
Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
0.92 0.56 1.07 1.07 1.07 0.70 0.66 0.50 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.52 0.47 0.47 0.50 0.70 0.67 0.70 0.71 0.73 0.80 0.80 0.74 0.73 0.61 0.62 0.66 0.61 0.48 0.71
-0.5 -0.5 -2 -1.5 -1.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 0
-1.0 -1.0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.0 -11.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -2.0 -0.5 -18.5 -18.5 -17.0 -5.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -1.5 -1.0 -2.0 -1.0 0 -4.0 0 -1.5
1 Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2
(+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR (*) With GRAB mass = 40 t the rule plate thickness of IB1 to HPR1 becomes 20.5 mm and the rule plate thickness of HPR2 to HPR3 becomes 17 mm. Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account.
CSR Net Net Req. Ref. Offered SM SM CSR [cm3] [cm3] BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 ST1 ST2 178 767 767 757 751 744 734 614 621 481 487 65 112 1088 1184 182 751 751 751 751 751 751 528 585 514 1344 1344 1269 1130 1297 1297 81 201 103.40 102.23 101.01 105.63 81.36 83.37 135 473 480 389 397 406 411 342 545 398 322 29 38 982 827 159 544 544 544 544 544 544 39 448 46 684 634 743 1028 1207 1252 10 103 29 29 29 29 26 63 CSR-H CSR Net. Req. Buckling SM [cm3] 0.72 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.72 0.74 0.57 0.48 0.14 0.12 0.77 0.84 0.74 0.74 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.54 0.62 0.29 0.90 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.87 0.78 0.89 0.70 0.78 0.77 0.76 0.80 0.58 1.31 171 586 593 479 488 497 503 420 668 473 327 29 37 1097 853 201 694 694 694 694 694 694 48 495 49 844 861 893 1237 1370 1400 0 198 0 0 0 0 0 0 [CSR[CSR-H HCSR-H Offered] Comment CSR] / / Offered Buckling CSR [%] [%] 0.71 26% -4% 0.84 24% -24% 1 0.84 24% -23% 1 0.84 23% -37% 1 0.86 23% -35% 1 0.87 23% -33% 1 0.91 22% -31% 1 0.88 23% -32% 1 1.14 22% 7% 0.97 19% -2% 0.62 2% -33% 1 0.06 0% -56% Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area 0.06 0% -67% Transv. stiff area 0.79 12% 1% 0.79 3% -28% 1 0.79 26% 10% 0.82 28% -8% 0.84 28% -8% 0.84 28% -8% 0.84 28% -8% 0.84 28% -8% 0.84 28% -8% 0.55 21% -91% Transv. stiff area 0.67 11% -15% 0.48 6% -90% Transv. stiff area 0.86 23% -37% 1 0.83 36% -36% 1 0.90 20% -30% 1 1.04 20% 9% 0.99 13% 6% 0.86 12% 8% Transv. stiff area 0.80 92% -1% (Watertight) Governing 0.84 criteria is harbour cond. 0.78 0.77 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.99 -
Criterion
Criterion
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
(+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
2.2 0.9)
Plots of Yielding usage factor CSR-H (Filter-out elements with usage factor <
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
MD1 US1
MD2
US3
SS3
HPR3
SS2
HPR2 IB1 BG1 BTM1 IB2 BG2 BTM2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 HPR1
ST1
SS1
IB7 BG5
BG4 BTM5
BLG2
BTM6
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
CSR-H Bucklin g
Comment
Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, press
Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, press
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Governing criteria is bilge pl. reqr.t Governing criteria is bilge pl. reqr.t
BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3
15 14 17 17 17 14 24.5 19 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 14.5 13.5 28 28 11 16 11.5 11.5 11.5 13.5 14 10
14 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 17 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 17.5 17 14 14 9.5 9.5 11 11 11 11 11 9.5 11 9.5
Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Grab Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T
0.54 0.37 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.45 0.29 0.31 0.32 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.33 0.39 0.49 0.46 0.49 0.77 0.80 0.74 0.74 0.71 0.68 0.65
Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T
0.92 0.55 0.86 0.84 0.84 0.70 0.66 0.47 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.50 0.47 0.48 0.53 0.70 0.67 0.75 0.75 0.78 0.82 0.82 0.72 0.70 0.71
0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 0 -0.5 0 0 0 0 2.0 1.0 1.0
-1.0 -1.0 -4.0 -4.0 -4.0 -1.0 -11.5 -2.0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -0.5 +0.5 -18.5 -18.5 -17.0 -5.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -2.0 -2.0 0.5
1 Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) 1 1 1 1
2 2 2
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
CSR-H Bucklin g
Comment
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
2 2 2
(+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR (*) With GRAB mass = 40 t the rule plate thickness of IB1 to HPR1 becomes 20.5 mm and the rule plate thickness of HPR2 to HPR3 becomes 17 mm. Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. Specific table is given below for buckling assessment on stiffeners
Net Offered SM CSR [cm3] 175 761 761 751 746 742 741 614 621 481 487 67 114 1088 1184 231 1089 1089 1089 1089 1089 1089 392 423 358 1344 1344 1057 1103 900 900 82 204 100 100 100 101.63 81.36 84.24 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 136 476 483 392 400 408 414 344 549 399 322 29 37 985 831 235 802 802 802 802 771 709 32 310 22 697 641 588 697 753 765 10 104 29 29 29 29 22 109 CSR-H CSR Net. Req. Buckling SM [cm3] 0.73 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.74 0.57 0.38 0.14 0.12 0.77 0.84 0.72 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.56 0.70 0.31 0.91 0.88 0.97 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.70 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.77 172 589 597 482 491 500 506 422 672 534 378 29 37 1100 878 273 950 950 950 950 912 838 44 460 14 848 865 840 1065 1033 1021 0.0 198 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 [CSR-H [CSR-H CSR-H - CSR] Offered] Buckling / CSR / [%] Offered [%] 0.71 26% -2% 0.85 24% -23% 0.85 23% -22% 0.85 23% -36% 0.88 23% -34% 0.88 23% -33% 0.93 22% -32% 0.89 23% -31% 1.14 22% 8% 0.97 0.62 0.06 0.06 0.76 0.76 0.74 0.70 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.70 0.71 0.55 0.83 0.51 0.83 0.80 0.91 0.98 1.05 0.95 0.79 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.82 0.82 1.25 34% 17% 0% 0% 12% 6% 16% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 18% 40% 48% -35% 22% 35% 43% 53% 37% 33% 92% 11% -22% -57% -68% 1% -26% 18% -13% -13% -13% -13% -16% -23% -89% 9% -96% -37% -36% -21% -3% 15% 13% -3% Transv. stiff area (Watertight) Governing criteria is harbour cond. Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area 1 1 Governing criteria is HG strength Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area 1 Comment
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 ST1 ST2
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
MD1 MD2 US1 LB1 US2 US3 SS5 US4 US5 SS4 SS6
SS3
HPR3
SS2
HPR2 SS1 IB1 BG1 IB2 BG2 IB3 BG3 IB4 IB5 BG4 IB6 BG5 HPR1 IB7 BLG2 BG6 BLG1 BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref. Offered Net Thickness 22.5 22 22 21 19.5 18 16 14 CSR Net Req. [mm] 15 13 13 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 Criterion CSR Buckling CSRH Net Req. [mm] 15 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13 Comment Criterion CSR-H Buckling Difference in net CSR-H CSR 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 -0.5 Difference in net CSR-H Offered -7.5 -8.5 -8.5 -7.5 -6.0 -4.5 -2.5 -1.0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Governing criteria is bilge pl. reqr.t Governing criteria is bilge pl. reqr.t
Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T
Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T
BLG1
14
13.5
0.55
13
n.a.
-0.5
-1.0
BLG2
14
13.5
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab
0.48
13
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab Local, Grab
n.a.
-0.5
-1.0
13 13 13 13 13 13 17
-1.0 -3.5 -3.5 -3.5 -1.5 -12.5 -0.5 1 Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*) Grab mass = 25 t (*)
IB2
17
17
0.36
17
0.53
IB3
17
17
0.37
17
0.53
IB4
17
17
0.38
17
0.53
IB5
17
17
0.38
17
0.53
IB6
17
17
0.40
17
0.53
IB7
17
17
0.40
17
0.53
HPR1
17
17
0.40
17
0.46
HPR2
16
14
0.25
14
0.44
-2.0
HPR3
13
17.5
0.43
17.5
0.51
+4.5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
CSR Net Req. [mm] 9.5 9.5 11 11 11 11 11 9.5 11 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5
Criterion
CSR Buckling
CSRH Net Req. [mm] 9.5 9.5 11 11 11 11 11 11.5 12.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 9.5
Comment Criterion CSR-H Buckling Difference in net CSR-H CSR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 Difference in net CSR-H Offered -18.5 -19.5 -17 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -1.0 -1.5 -0.5 +0.5 +0.5 +0.5 -0.5 -1.5 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 LB1
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
0.44 0.41 0.44 0.73 0.76 0.68 0.68 0.71 0.71 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.52 -
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
0.70 0.67 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.79 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.69 -
(+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR (*) With GRAB mass = 40 t the rule plate thickness of IB1 to HPR1 becomes 20.5 mm and the rule plate thickness of HPR2 to HPR3 becomes 17 mm. Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. Specific table is given below for stiffeners buckling assessment
Net CSR Offered Net Req. SM CSR SM [cm3] [cm3] 177 765 765 755 748 742 731 475 396 396 399 67 125 1182 1059 170 588 588 588 588 588 588 387 428 355 952 1040 922 994 823 872 81 201 100 100 100 102 770 130 454 460 373 381 389 394 323 247 263 304 28 40 973 815 137 468 468 468 458 438 378 19 209 21 701 610 556 702 749 598 9 99 28 28 28 28 701 CSR-H CSR Net. Req. Buckling SM [cm3] 0.70 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.80 0.65 0.54 0.49 0.14 0.79 0.77 0.83 0.72 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.54 0.68 0.35 0.98 0.91 0.96 0.99 0.99 0.83 0.86 0.67 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.39 162 556 563 455 464 472 478 393 298 257 373 28 49 1096 852 168 580 580 580 580 563 563 35 373 14 829 821 632 936 988 707 0 212 0 0 0 0 572 [CSR[CSR-H HCSR-H Offered] CSR] / Buckling / Offered CSR [%] [%] 0.73 25% -8% 0.90 23% -27% 0.90 22% -26% 0.90 22% -40% 0.93 22% -38% 0.94 21% -36% 0.99 21% -35% n.a. 22% -17% 21% -25% n.a. -2% -35% n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.70 0.75 0.82 0.92 1.01 1.01 1.03 1.03 1.01 1.03 0.55 0.86 0.48 0.96 0.90 1.02 1.11 1.16 0.78 0.83 0.89 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.84 0.06 23% 0% 20% 13% 5% 23% 24% 24% 24% 27% 29% 49% 83% 79% -32% 18% 35% 14% 33% 32% 18% 114% -18% -7% -58% -61% -7% -20% -1% -1% -1% -1% -1% -4% -4% -91% -13% -96% -13% -21% -31% -6% 20% -19% 6% -26% Transv. stiff area (Watertight) Governing criteria is harbour cond. Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area Transv. stiff area 1
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
Comment
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 MD1 MD2 US1 US2 US3 US4 US5 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 BG6 LB1
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
(+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix H
BC-6 PANAMAX1
Figure H.1 - No.5 CARGO HLOD (Ore Hold)- LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the No.5 cargo hold after application of the CSR-H for Bulk Carrier
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net thickness [mm]
16 15.5 15.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 15.5 15.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 13 13 23 23 23 23 17 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 15.5 14 13.5 11.5 11 11 16 16 11 10 10 10
Ref
Difference Difference in net in net CSR-H Comm CSRHCriterion CSRHent Buckling Offered CSR [mm] [mm]
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Grab Req. Grab Req. Grab Req. Grab Req. Grab Req. Local, Min T Grab Req. Grab Req. Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T 0.527 0.564 0.564 0.618 0.635 0.663 0.529 1.085 1.665 1.665 1.665 1.665 1.136 0.786 0.853 0.621 0.591 0.625 0.659 0.368 0.418 0.420 0.481 0.497 0.487 0.519 0.897 1.113 0.676 0.699 0.751 0.633 0.805 0.575 0.575 0.575 0.575 0 0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.067 -0.5 -0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1 -3.5 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 -0.5 -3.5 -3.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 5 -3.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.067 -0.5 -1 0 -13 -13 -13 -13 -2.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -3.5 -1.5 0 -2.5 -1 -0.5 -0.5 -5.5 -5.5 -1 0 0 0
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 TS1 TS2 TS3 TS4 TS5 TS6 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
For Grab Weight = 40t, t_net_req is as follows; IB1: 18.5mm, IB2~IB5: 19.5mm, HPR2~HPR3: 18.5mm.
Typical stiffeners are reported. No grouping. CSR BC: buckling ratio Chapter 6, Sect.3, 3.2.1 result of formula for plating. Chapter 6, Sect.3, 4.2.1, 4.3.1 result of formula for stiffener. CSR-H: Eta/eta_allowable Eta Chapter 8, Section 3, 3 Eta_allowable Chapter 8, Section 1, table 1. Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account.
Net Offered SM [cm] 68.121 68.121 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 505.986 483.704 483.704 483.704 706.125 960.307 762.417 869.245 869.245 869.245 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 1178.658 83.604 83.604 720.21 720.21 720.21 720.21 720.21 720.21 720.21 720.21 720.21 720.21 494.608 494.608 494.608 494.608 639.582 1155.074 1137.886 1137.886 890.801 890.801 890.801 890.801 890.801 890.801 890.801 890.801 135.323 135.323 CSR Net Req. SM [cm] 40.946 41.295 375.258 377.995 380.732 386.205 388.942 391.679 397.153 399.89 402.627 405.364 457.101 459.942 391.679 337.077 305.549 285.502 288.891 24.026 23.527 756.524 736.967 706.305 402.713 399.141 396.828 396.064 394.255 393.924 428.495 431.405 428.954 426.33 77.689 77.689 659.718 659.718 659.718 659.718 659.718 659.718 644.268 627.916 611.563 595.211 409.214 364.71 334.431 33.795 32.25 556.404 547.278 576.165 509.982 503.679 483.848 475.307 467.446 452.77 436.839 428.426 42.6 38.99 CSRH Net Criterion CSR Buckling Req. SM [cm] Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press 0.788 0.787 0.714 0.713 0.712 0.71 0.709 0.707 0.705 0.704 0.703 0.702 0.683 0.682 0.682 0.586 0.535 0.485 0.472 0.423 0.659 0.679 0.702 0.725 0.78 0.777 0.775 0.772 0.769 0.766 0.763 0.76 0.756 0.754 0.577 0.576 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.626 0.585 0.546 0.505 0.281 0.557 0.572 0.586 0.649 0.661 0.671 0.682 0.693 0.704 0.712 0.722 0.597 0.552 43.08 43.41 388.80 388.80 388.80 388.80 388.80 388.80 388.80 388.80 388.80 388.80 432.77 432.77 432.77 415.94 382.12 350.52 334.14 24.60 23.82 737.60 709.15 687.27 500.21 517.12 535.66 554.30 566.36 580.39 647.05 667.20 679.02 689.96 90.23 90.23 662.90 662.90 662.90 662.90 662.90 662.90 662.90 662.90 662.90 662.90 503.72 467.25 433.66 44.74 41.62 704.81 679.80 701.83 609.26 589.99 563.89 549.45 535.25 520.80 507.32 504.36 47.43 43.60 [HCSR[HCSROffered]/O CSR-H Comment CSR]/CSR ffered Buckling [%] [%] 1.07375 5.22% -36.75% 1.0725 5.12% -36.28% 0.73 3.61% -23.16% 0.73 2.86% -23.16% 0.73 2.12% -23.16% 0.73 0.67% -23.16% 0.73125 -0.04% -23.16% 0.745 -0.74% -23.16% 0.7575 -2.10% -23.16% 0.7575 -2.77% -23.16% 0.7575 -3.43% -23.16% 0.7575 -4.09% -23.16% 0.715 -5.32% -14.47% 0.722 -5.91% -14.47% 1.015 10.49% -14.47% 0.707 23.40% -14.01% 0.645 25.06% -21.00% 0.605 22.77% -27.53% 0.591 15.66% -52.68% 0.732 2.38% -97.44% 0.815 1.23% -96.88% 0.871 -2.50% -15.15% 0.912 -3.77% -18.42% 0.954 -2.70% -20.94% 0.73 24.21% -57.56% 0.727 29.56% -56.13% 0.724 34.99% -54.55% 0.721 39.95% -52.97% 0.719 43.65% -51.95% 0.716 47.34% -50.76% 0.713 51.00% -45.10% 0.71 54.66% -43.39% 0.706 58.30% -42.39% 0.701 61.84% -41.46% 1.01625 16.14% 7.92% 1.01875 16.14% 7.92% 0.705 0.48% -7.96% 0.705 0.48% -7.96% 0.705 0.48% -7.96% 0.705 0.48% -7.96% 0.705 0.48% -7.96% 0.705 0.48% -7.96% 0.705 2.89% -7.96% 0.705 5.57% -7.96% 0.705 8.39% -7.96% 0.705 11.37% -7.96% 0.73125 23.10% 1.84% 0.66375 28.12% -5.53% 0.608 29.67% -12.32% 0.597 32.37% -90.96% 0.605 29.06% -93.49% 0.801 26.67% -38.98% 0.81 24.22% -40.26% 0.849 21.81% -38.32% 1.003 19.47% -31.61% 1.042 17.14% -33.77% 1.092 16.54% -36.70% 1.118 15.60% -38.32% 1.142 14.51% -39.91% 1.166 15.03% -41.54% 1.098 16.13% -43.05% 1.019 17.72% -43.38% 0.87125 11.34% -64.95% 0.7975 11.82% -67.78%
Ref BL1 BL2 BL4 BL5 BL6 BL8 BL9 BL10 BL12 BL13 BL14 BL15 BL17 BL18 BL19 SL1 SL2 SL3 SL4 SL5 SL6 SL7 SL8 SL9 DL1 DL2 DL3 DL4 DL5 DL6 DL7 DL8 DL9 DL10 IL1 IL2 IL4 IL5 IL6 IL8 IL9 IL10 IL12 IL13 IL14 IL15 HL1 HL2 HL3 HL4 HL5 TL11 TL10 TL9 TL8 TL7 TL6 TL5 TL4 TL3 TL2 TL1 BG1 BG1
Criterion Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press Local. Press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.2 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and CSR) Hold 5 (Hold 5 is a loaded hold in alternate loading condition)
a) Bottom Shell
b) Side Shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
c) Main Deck
d) Inner Bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Hopper Sloping
f)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
Transverse Web
j)
Lower Stool
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
k) Upper Stool
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.3 Normalized Yielding UF (CSR-H / CSR-H_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H) Hold 5 (Hold 5 is a loaded hold in alternate loading condition)
a) Bottom Shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
c) Main Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Hopper Sloping
f)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g) Bottom Girder
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
Transverse Web
j)
Lower Stool
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.4 - MIDSHIP CARGO HOLD (No.4 Empty Hold) Mid - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo hold after application of the CSR-H for Bulk Carrier
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered CSR Net Net thickness Req. [mm] [mm]
16 15.5 15.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 15.5 15.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 13 23 23 23 23 16 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 14.5 14 13.5 11.5 11 11 16 16 11 10 10 10 15.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12 15.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 9 9 9 9 14.5 15 15 15 15 15.5 14 14 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 9 9 9 9
Ref
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 TS1 TS2 TS3 TS4 TS5 TS6 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
For Grab Weight = 40t, t_net_req is as follows; IB1: 18.5mm, IB2~IB5: 19.5mm, HPR2~HPR3: 18.5mm.
Typical stiffeners are reported. No grouping. CSR BC: buckling ratio Chapter 6, Sect.3, 3.2.1 result of formula for plating. Chapter 6, Sect.3, 4.2.1, 4.3.1 result of formula for stiffener. Eta/eta_allowable Eta Chapter 8, Section 3, 3 Eta_allowable Chapter 8, Section 1, table 1.
CSR-H:
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB July 2012 Appendix H BC 6/Panamax 1/Page 17
Consequence Assessment 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account.
Net Offered SM [cm]
68.05 68.05 443.83 505.99 505.99 505.99 505.99 503.99 502.42 502.42 502.42 502.42 505.33 505.33 510.63 485.94 483.70 483.65 606.38 879.20 901.11 866.17 868.26 869.25 1178.83 1178.66 1178.66 1178.66 1178.66 1178.66 1178.66 1178.66 1177.98 1177.28 75.69 75.69 512.23 512.23 512.23 512.23 512.23 512.23 512.23 512.23 512.23 512.23 491.62 491.62 488.60 486.42 603.10 1155.07 1137.89 1137.89 890.80 889.94 856.11 856.11 856.11 856.11 865.38 885.92 135.32 135.32
Ref
BL1 BL2 BL4 BL5 BL6 BL8 BL9 BL10 BL12 BL13 BL14 BL15 BL17 BL18 BL19 SL1 SL2 SL3 SL4 SL5 SL6 SL7 SL8 SL9 DL1 DL2 DL3 DL4 DL5 DL6 DL7 DL8 DL9 DL10 IL1 IL2 IL4 IL5 IL6 IL8 IL9 IL10 IL12 IL13 IL14 IL15 HL1 HL2 HL3 HL4 HL5 TL11 TL10 TL9 TL8 TL7 TL6 TL5 TL4 TL3 TL2 TL1 BG1 BG1
Criterion
Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press
CSR Buckling
0.81 0.80 0.57 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.79 0.69 0.69 0.60 0.54 0.49 0.32 0.42 0.66 0.68 0.70 0.73 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.60 0.60 0.45 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.45 0.60 0.56 0.52 0.29 0.56 0.57 0.59 0.65 0.66 0.67 0.68 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.72 0.61 0.56
[HCSR[HCSR- Offered]/ CSR-H CSR]/CSR Offered Com Criterion Buckling [%] [%] ment
Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press 0.62 0.62 0.60 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.71 0.70 0.70 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.84 0.69 0.65 0.63 0.60 0.73 0.78 0.80 0.83 0.86 0.73 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.70 0.70 0.54 0.55 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.62 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.64 0.74 0.79 0.81 0.89 0.92 0.96 0.98 1.00 1.02 0.96 0.90 0.66 0.60 4.88% 4.78% 4.54% 0.66% -0.05% -1.45% -2.13% -2.80% -4.12% -4.76% -5.40% -6.03% -7.22% -7.78% -8.34% 15.05% 15.95% 14.31% 7.80% 2.74% 1.26% -1.66% -0.70% 2.97% 94.53% 94.72% 94.88% 94.27% 91.91% 89.58% 87.30% 85.05% 82.84% 80.72% 7.32% 7.32% 8.59% 8.59% 8.59% 8.59% 8.59% 8.59% 6.94% 6.94% 6.94% 6.94% 24.66% 24.61% 24.51% 23.64% -18.37% 45.92% 48.08% 50.46% 52.87% 55.53% 59.17% 62.95% 67.27% 72.25% 78.06% 84.91% 10.04% 10.30% -37.20% -36.72% -93.45% -22.19% -22.19% -22.19% -22.19% -21.88% -21.64% -21.64% -21.64% -21.64% -13.28% -13.28% -14.18% -19.16% -25.91% -32.52% -96.76% -98.12% -12.22% -14.14% -15.71% -16.28% -33.39% -33.91% -34.24% -34.58% -35.67% -36.51% -31.78% -32.14% -33.30% -34.44% -32.23% -32.23% -93.07% -11.96% -11.96% -11.96% -11.96% -11.96% -13.30% -13.30% -13.30% -13.30% -7.72% -13.86% -19.06% -34.06% -96.68% -29.87% -28.93% -23.95% -12.61% -12.08% -10.12% -9.58% -8.68% -8.88% -10.06% -10.48% -65.33% -68.17%
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.5 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and CSR) Hold 4 (Hold 4 is an empty hold in alternate loading condition)
l)
Bottom Shell
m) Side Shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
n) Bilge Shell
o) Main Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
p) Hopper Sloping
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
r)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
t)
Transverse Web
u) Transverse Bulkhead
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.6 Normalized Yielding UF (CSR-H / CSR-H_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H) Hold 4 (Hold 4 is an empty hold in alternate loading condition)
l)
Bottom Shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
o) Main Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
p) Hopper Sloping
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
r)
Bottom Girder
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
t)
Transverse Web
u) Transverse Bulkhead
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.7 - No. 3 CARGO HOLD (Ore/Ballast Hold)- LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of No.3 cargo hold after application of the CSR-H for Bulk Carrier
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net thickness [mm]
16 15.5 15.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 15.5 15.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 13 13 23 23 23 23 17 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 15.5 14 13.5 11.5 11 11 16 16 11 10 10 10
Ref
Difference Difference in net in net CSR-H CSRHCSRH- Comment Criterion Buckling CSR Offered [mm] [mm]
0.54 0.56 0.56 0.61 0.63 0.65 0.53 1.07 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.63 1.12 0.79 0.84 0.65 0.65 0.64 0.65 0.39 0.44 0.44 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.52 0.89 1.10 0.66 0.71 0.77 0.65 0.83 0.60 0.59 0.59 0.59 0 0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 5.091 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.5 1 1 1 1 0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1 -3.5 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 -0.5 -3.5 -3.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 5.091 -3.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -1 0 -13 -13 -13 -13 -2.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -3.5 -1.5 0 -2.5 -1 -0.5 -0.5 -5.5 -5.5 -1 0 0 0
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 TS1 TS2 TS3 TS4 TS5 TS6 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4
15.5 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 20.591 Local, Press 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 12 Local, Min T 13 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T 14.5 Grab Req. 15 Grab Req. 15 Grab Req. 15 Grab Req. 15 Grab Req. 13 Local, Min T 14 Grab Req. 14 Grab Req. 11 Local, Min T 10.5 Local, Min T 10.5 Local, Min T 10.5 Local, Min T 10.5 Local, Min T 10.5 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T 10 Local, Min T
4 4 4 4 4 4 4
For Grab Weight = 40t, t_net_req is as follows; IB1: 18.5mm, IB2~IB5: 19.5mm, HPR2~HPR3: 18.5mm.
Typical stiffeners are reported. No grouping. CSR BC: buckling ratio Chapter 6, Sect.3, 3.2.1 result of formula for plating. Chapter 6, Sect.3, 4.2.1, 4.3.1 result of formula for stiffener. CSR-H: Eta/eta_allowable Eta Chapter 8, Section 3, 3 Eta_allowable Chapter 8, Section 1, table 1. Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account.
Net Offered SM [cm] CSR Net Req. SM [cm] CSR Bucklin g
0.788 0.787 0.714 0.713 0.712 0.710 0.709 0.707 0.705 0.704 0.703 0.702 0.683 0.682 0.682 0.586 0.535 0.485 0.472 0.423 0.659 0.679 0.702 0.725 0.780 0.777 0.775 0.772 0.769 0.766 0.763 0.760 0.756 0.754 0.577 0.576 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.587 0.626 0.585 0.546 0.505 0.281 0.557 0.572 0.586 0.649 0.661 0.671 0.682 0.693 0.704 0.712 0.722 0.597 0.552
Ref
Criterion
Criterion
[HCSR- [HCSRCSR-H CSR]/ Offered] Comm Bucklin CSR /Offered ent g [%] [%]
0.602 0.603 0.875 0.875 0.875 0.875 0.876 0.893 0.909 0.909 0.909 0.909 0.844 0.843 0.864 0.683 0.623 0.585 0.572 0.718 0.870 0.894 0.925 0.953 0.722 0.719 0.716 0.713 0.711 0.708 0.705 0.703 0.698 0.693 0.649 0.651 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.680 0.694 0.630 0.605 0.617 0.590 0.789 0.823 0.865 1.031 1.067 1.114 1.135 1.156 1.175 1.101 1.018 0.703 0.644 6.97% 6.87% 17.76% 16.90% 16.06% 14.42% 13.61% 12.82% 11.27% 10.50% 9.75% 9.01% 17.89% 17.01% 16.15% 1.05% 5.08% 6.51% 0.31% -1.78% -2.48% -1.70% -3.20% -4.79% -48.25% -45.93% -43.58% -41.19% -38.75% -36.28% -33.76% -31.20% -28.60% -26.03% -3.68% -3.68% -2.24% -2.24% -2.24% -2.24% -2.24% -2.24% -2.24% 0.11% 2.72% 8.36% 2.08% -3.20% -3.96% -4.23% -4.50% -10.92% -10.59% -10.27% -10.02% -9.89% -9.41% -9.13% -10.22% -14.91% -22.00% -28.93% 8.23% 8.76% -37.31% -36.84% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -12.67% -2.79% -2.79% -2.79% -29.58% -33.62% -37.13% -94.74% -97.44% 3.56% -0.26% -0.29% -0.33% -57.72% -56.29% -54.72% -53.14% -52.12% -50.93% -45.30% -43.59% -42.59% -41.67% -10.49% -10.49% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -10.45% -0.79% -4.08% -5.92% -19.46% -92.14% -19.04% -21.00% -18.77% -10.40% -13.84% -19.15% -22.61% -25.89% -30.13% -34.41% -37.42% -65.93% -68.66%
BL1 BL2 BL4 BL5 BL6 BL8 BL9 BL10 BL12 BL13 BL14 BL15 BL17 BL18 BL19 SL1 SL2 SL3 SL4 SL5 SL6 SL7 SL8 SL9 DL1 DL2 DL3 DL4 DL5 DL6 DL7 DL8 DL9 DL10 IL1 IL2 IL4 IL5 IL6 IL8 IL9 IL10 IL12 IL13 IL14 IL15 HL1 HL2 HL3 HL4 HL5 TL11 TL10 TL9 TL8 TL7 TL6 TL5 TL4 TL3 TL2 TL1 BG1 BG1
68.121 39.921 Local, Press 68.121 40.261 Local, Press 505.986 375.258 Local, Press 505.986 377.995 Local, Press 505.986 380.732 Local, Press 505.986 386.205 Local, Press 505.986 388.942 Local, Press 505.986 391.679 Local, Press 505.986 397.153 Local, Press 505.986 399.89 Local, Press 505.986 402.627 Local, Press 505.986 405.364 Local, Press 505.986 417.218 Local, Press 505.986 420.359 Local, Press 505.986 423.501 Local, Press 483.704 337.077 Local, Press 483.704 305.549 Local, Press 483.704 285.502 Local, Press 706.125 37.036 Local, Press 960.307 24.994 Local, Press 762.417 809.641 Local, Press 737.595 748.406 Local, Press 709.147 730.422 Local, Press 687.265 719.505 Local, Press 1178.658 962.933 Local, Press 1178.658 952.937 Local, Press 1178.658 945.965 Local, Press 1178.658 939.072 Local, Press 1178.658 921.385 Local, Press 1178.658 907.563 Local, Press 1178.658 973.37 Local, Press 1178.658 966.387 Local, Press 1178.658 947.707 Local, Press 1178.658 929.433 Local, Press 83.604 77.689 Local, Press 83.604 77.689 Local, Press 720.21 659.718 Local, Press 720.21 659.718 Local, Press 720.21 659.718 Local, Press 720.21 659.718 Local, Press 720.21 659.718 Local, Press 720.21 659.718 Local, Press 720.21 659.718 Local, Press 720.21 644.268 Local, Press 720.21 627.916 Local, Press 720.21 595.211 Local, Press 494.608 480.694 Local, Press 494.608 490.074 Local, Press 494.608 484.55 Local, Press 494.608 415.931 Local, Press 639.582 52.611 Local, Press 1155.074 1049.687 Local, Press 1137.886 1005.419 Local, Press 1137.886 1030.194 Local, Press 890.801 887.003 Local, Press 890.801 851.713 Local, Press 890.801 795.06 Local, Press 890.801 758.607 Local, Press 890.801 735.339 Local, Press 890.801 731.526 Local, Press 890.801 749.083 Local, Press 890.801 784.406 Local, Press 135.323 42.6 Local, Press 135.323 38.99 Local, Press
Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local, Local,
Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press Press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.8 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and CSR) Hold 3 (Hold 3 is a heavy ballast hold)
v) Bottom Shell
w) Side Shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
x) Bilge Shell
y) Main Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
z) Inner Bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
bb) Topside Tank Sloping Normalized Yielding Utilization Factor(CSR-H/CSR), Relevant NUF>0.7
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure H.9 Normalized Yielding UF (CSR-H / CSR-H_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H) Hold 3 (Hold 3 is a heavy ballast hold)
v) Bottom Shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
y) Main Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
bb) Topside Tank Slopping CSR-H Normalized Yielding Utilization Factor (CSR-H)>0.9
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure 1 No. 3 Cargo Hold - LONGITUDINAL Members Summary of consequence study result for longitudinally continuous members.
MD2 MD1
IH4 SS5
SS3
SS2
BG1
BG2
BG3
BG4
BG5
BLG1
BTM1
BTM2
BTM3
BTM4
BTM5
BTM6
BTM7
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref. BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 IB1 HPR1 HPR2 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 TW1 TW2 TW3 BG1 BG2 BG3 BG4 BG5 ST1 July 2012 Offered Net thickness [mm] 19 19 19 19 14 14 14 15 15 14 13.5 13.5 13.5 11.5 13.5 22 22 19.5 19.5 15.5 16 15 15 14 11.5 12 13 11 10.5 8 8 12 9 CSR Net Req. [mm] 13.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.50 13.00 11.50 15.00 14.00 13.50 12.50 12.50 12.50 11.50 11.50 8.00 8.00 15.50 14.50 14.00 13.50 13.00 13.00 11.00 9.50 9.50 9.50 8.00 8.50 8.00 8.00 11.00 8.00 Criterion Min Min Local Local Local Local Min Min Local Local Local Local Local Min Min Min Min GRAB GRAB GRAB Local Local Local Local Min Local Min Min Local Min Min Local Min CSR Buckling 0.26 0.26 0.27 0.33 0.56 0.57 0.57 0.54 0.29 0.38 0.80 0.80 0.94 0.90 0.96 0.62 0.54 0.17 0.22 0.33 0.40 0.72 0.72 0.92 0.95 0.98 0.93 0.44 0.48 0.70 0.71 0.39 0.20 CSRH Net. Req. [mm] 19.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.50 15.00 12.00 12.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.00 11.50 11.50 10.00 15.50 14.00 14.00 13.50 13.00 13.00 10.50 10.00 11.50 10.00 10.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 9.50 8.00 Criterion Min Local Local Local Local Local Local Min Local Local Local Min Min Min Min Min Min GRAB GRAB GRAB Local Local Local Local Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Local Min CSRH Buckling 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.59 0.63 0.63 0.62 0.52 0.62 0.62 0.78 1.03 1.10 0.93 0.93 0.71 0.72 0.47 0.74 0.74 0.89 0.94 0.94 1.02 0.90 0.94 0.89 0.55 0.57 0.70 0.70 0.53 0.51 Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -2.0 0.0 0.0 -2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 3.5 2.0 0.0 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 0.5 2.0 0.5 2.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 -1.5 0.0 Difference in net CSRH-Offered [mm] 0.0 -8.0 -8.0 -8.0 -3.0 -3.0 -2.5 0.0 -3.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 -0.5 -2.0 -10.5 -12.0 -4.0 -5.5 -1.5 -2.5 -2.0 -2.0 -3.5 -1.5 -0.5 -3.0 -1.0 -1.5 1.0 1.0 -2.5 -1.0 Comment
Consequence Assessment Offered Net thickness [mm] 8 9 9 13 CSR Net Req. [mm] 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 CSR Buckling 0.31 0.75 0.63 0.93
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Req. [mm] 8.00 8.00 8.00 10.00 Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 Difference in net CSRH-Offered [mm] 0.0 -1.0 -1.0 -3.0
Comment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Ref. BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BTM9 BTM10 BTM11 BTM12 BTM13 BTM14 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 SS9 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 July 2012 Net Offered SM [cm3] 80.0 80.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 400.0 388.0 388.0 388.0 388.0 586.0 586.0 590.0 590.0 469.0 469.0 65.0 63.0 432.0 657.0 657.0 722.0 722.0 722.0 780.0 223.0 223.0 720.0 720.0 720.0 720.0 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 73.0 73.0 299.0 302.0 304.0 310.0 312.0 315.0 320.0 323.0 326.0 329.0 435.0 436.0 495.2 448.6 399.1 377.0 39.9 19.6 174.4 171.8 168.9 170.1 159.2 161.1 106.0 198.0 198.0 543.0 543.0 543.0 543.0 Criterion Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local CSR Buckling 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.90 0.70 0.70 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.70 0.70 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 87.8 88.5 400.9 400.9 400.9 400.9 400.9 400.9 400.9 400.9 400.9 400.9 444.6 447.2 553.1 468.3 426.8 378.6 37.4 20.9 184.7 180.8 176.4 176.7 159.8 156.2 148.9 223.1 223.1 571.1 571.1 571.1 571.1 Criterion Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local CSR-H Buckling 0.52 0.52 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.73 0.73 0.75 0.75 0.73 0.65 0.32 0.30 0.53 0.47 0.40 0.32 1.44 0.87 0.84 0.83 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.71 0.71 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] 20.3% 21.3% 34.1% 32.8% 31.9% 29.3% 28.5% 27.3% 25.3% 24.1% 23.0% 21.9% 2.2% 2.6% 11.7% 4.4% 6.9% 0.4% -6.2% 6.7% 5.9% 5.2% 4.4% 3.9% 0.4% -3.0% 40.5% 12.7% 12.7% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% [CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] 9.8% 10.7% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% -24.1% -23.7% -6.3% -20.6% -9.0% -19.3% -42.4% -66.8% -57.2% -72.5% -73.2% -75.5% -77.9% -78.4% -80.9% 0.1% 0.1% -20.7% -20.7% -20.7% -20.7% Comment
Consequence Assessment Net Offered SM [cm3] 720.0 720.0 720.0 720.0 720.0 720.0 610.0 610.0 596.0 596.0 310.0 310.0 335.0 698.0 698.0 291.0 291.0 291.0 172.0 172.0 462.0 462.0 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 543.0 533.0 500.0 484.0 468.0 452.0 417.0 401.0 385.0 369.0 203.0 198.0 220.0 169.0 159.0 123.3 134.7 129.8 49.5 43.5 360.1 325.8
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 571.1 548.2 548.2 548.2 548.2 548.2 510.5 482.7 456.5 434.9 245.6 234.9 248.3 183.4 172.1 133.8 133.2 111.2 85.5 78.1 355.4 322.7 [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] 5.2% 2.8% 9.6% 13.3% 17.1% 21.3% 22.4% 20.4% 18.6% 17.9% 21.0% 18.6% 12.9% 8.5% 8.3% 8.5% -1.1% -14.4% 72.7% 79.6% -1.3% -0.9% [CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] -20.7% -23.9% -23.9% -23.9% -23.9% -23.9% -16.3% -20.9% -23.4% -27.0% -20.8% -24.2% -25.9% -73.7% -75.3% -54.0% -54.2% -61.8% -50.3% -54.6% -23.1% -30.1%
Ref. IB7 IB8 IB9 IB10 IB11 IB12 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 HPR4 TW1 TW2 TW3 TW4 TW5 LBHD1 LBHD2 LBHD3 BG2-1 BG2-2 BG5-1 BG5-2
Criterion Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local
CSR Buckling 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.40 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.90 0.60 0.50 0.60 0.60
Criterion Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local
CSR-H Buckling 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.46 0.43 0.39 0.32 0.92 0.96 1.10 0.80 0.85 0.82 0.92 0.93 0.59 0.52 0.61 0.54
Comment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure J.1 Usage Factor Ratio (CSRH/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area, Loaded Hold in Alternate Condition Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.7 below for both CSR and CSR-H)
Bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner Bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Outer shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner side
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Hopper plate
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stringers
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Bottom girders
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure J.2 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H)
Bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Outer shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner side
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Hopper
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Bottom girders
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stringers
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix K
Handymax 2
DL1
DL2
DL3
CO_GID
4 WG
Sheer
3 WG
2 WG
S5
1 WG
S4
S3
S2
P3 H
S1
P2 H P1 H
IB5
LG_15
B e ilg
pl1
LG_11
LG_08
LG_05
LG_02
July 2012
keel
B5
B4
B3
B2
B1
IB1
IB4
IB3
IB2
Consequence Assessment
Table 1.1 Plating at frame 127 Offered Net thickness [mm] 15 17 17 15 13 12 12 11,5 13 13 13 13 16,5 20 20 20 19 19 19 19 18,5 18,5 CSR Net Req. [mm] 13 11,3 11,5 11,6 11,3 11,3 11,7 11,6 11,5 11,5 11,5 11,5 11,5 8,2 8,2 8,2 23,5 23,5 23,5 23,5 23,5 14,7 CSR Buckling 0,275 0,398 0,403 0,521 0,62 0,694 0,621 0,643 0,79 0,99 0,414 0,304 0,401 0,485 0,485 0,253 0,258 0,267 0,276 0,297 0,334 CSRH Net. Req. [mm] 11,00 11,75 11,75 11,75 11,75 11,18 11,20 11,50 11,00 11,00 11,00 11,00 11,00 8,15 8,15 8,15 21,80 21,80 21,80 21,80 21,80 14,70 Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] -2,00 0,45 0,25 0,15 0,45 -0,12 -0,50 -0,10 -0,50 -0,50 -0,50 -0,50 -0,50 -0,05 -0,05 -0,05 -1,70 -1,70 -1,70 -1,70 -1,70 0,00 Difference in net CSRH-Offered [mm] -4,00 -5,25 -5,25 -3,25 -1,25 -0,82 -0,80 0,00 -2,00 -2,00 -2,00 -2,00 -5,50 -11,85 -11,85 -11,85 2,80 2,80 2,80 2,80 3,30 -3,80
Ref. Keel B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 Bilge S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 Sheer DL1 DL2 DL3 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 HP1
Criterion t_min Ext F2 FL Ext F2 FL Ext F2 FL Ext F2 FL Ext F2 FL Ext P1 FL Ext P1 FL t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min Coil Coil Coil Coil Coil Grab
Criterion t_min Ti11 stat WB3 Ti11 stat WB3 Ti11 stat WB3 Ti11 stat WB3 Ti11 stat WB3 Ti11 stat WB3 Ti11 stat WB3 t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min Coil Coil Coil Coil Coil Grab
CSRH Buckling 0,506 0,554 0,556 0,609 0,677 0,732 1,601 0,676 0,837 0,879 0,956 0,656 0,531 0,819 0,868 0,866 0,573 0,574 0,582 0,596 0,621 0,671
Comment 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] -1,20 -0,83 -1,04 -1,04 -0,04 -0,04 -0,04 0,50 na na na na Difference in net CSRH-Offered [mm] -1,30 -3,53 -3,04 -2,04 -2,54 -9,54 -9,54 0,70 na na na na
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0,722 0,712 0,842 1,008 1,095 0,764 0,899 0,742 na na na na
Comment
Ti23 R1 Ti23 BSP0,362 13,20 HB 1P WB4 Ti23 R1 Ti23 BSRHP3 14,5 11,8 0,338 10,97 1P WB4 HB BWT R1 0,589 9,46 t_min WG1 12,5 10,5 HB BWT R1 WG2 11,5 10,5 0,695 9,46 t_min HB WG3 12 9,5 t_min 0,785 9,46 t_min WG4 19 9,5 t_min 0,376 9,46 t_min CO_GID 19 9,5 t_min 0,593 9,46 t_min BWT H1 LG_02 8,5 8,7 0,648 9,20 t_min FL LG_05 8,5 na na na na na LG_08 8,5 na na na na na LG_11 8,5 na na na na na LG_15 9,5 na na na na na Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified HP2
1 1 1 1 5 5 5 1 -
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
CL2
DL3
DL4
DL5
DL6
DL7
DL8
SL1
1 WL
SL2
3 WL
2 WL
SL3
5 WL
4 WL
SL4
7 WL
6 WL
SL41
9 WL
H L7 H L6 H L5 H L4 H L3 H L2 H L1
IL14
IL13
IL12
IL10
IL9
IL7
IL6
IL4
IL3
BL17
BL14
BL12
BL10
BL16
BL13
BL9
BL7
BL3
BL6
BL4
July 2012
BL18
BL0
IL0
8 WL
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 442 69 331 331 331 331 326 326 321 321 321 371 371 371 284 350 259
CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 62 62 293 293 301 303 309 312 317 320 322 312 314 316 222 261 21
Criterion S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1
CSR Buckling 0,522 0,651 0,851 0,782 0,653 0,657 0,646 0,63 0,651 0,851 0,782 0,653 0,657 0,646 0,63 0,651 0,851
CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 74 76 393 393 393 393 393 393 393 393 393 373 373 374 288 328 26
Criterion FSM-2 SEA1 FSM-2 SEA1 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 FSM-2 SEA1 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11
CSR-H Buckling 0,519 0,605 1,148 1,148 1,148 1,148 1,217 1,217 1,295 1,295 1,295 1,109 1,109 1,109 1,229 1,035 0,489
[CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] 19,35 22,58 34,13 34,13 30,56 29,70 27,18 25,96 23,97 22,81 22,05 19,55 18,79 18,35 29,73 25,67 23,81
[CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] -0,83 0,10 0,19 0,19 0,19 0,19 0,21 0,21 0,22 0,22 0,22 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 -0,06 -90
Comment
BL0 BL1 BL3 BL4 BL6 BL7 BL9 BL10 BL12 BL13 BL14 BL16 BL17 BL18 SL8 SL7 SL6 July 2012
Consequence Assessment Net Offered SM [cm3] CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 20 11 6 536 562 68 67 584 677 706 663 581 570 111
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 22 12 6 566 587 43 44 464 476 514 502 453 457 114 [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] [CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%]
Ref.
Criterion FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL
CSR Buckling
Criterion stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 BSP-1P SEA1 Ti-W13 stat WB3 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
SL5 SL4 SL3 SL2 SL1 DL1 DL2 DL3 DL4 DL5 DL6 DL7 DL8 IL0
129 290 360 658 658 702 702 779 779 782 779 770 557 111
0,782 0,653 0,657 0,646 0,63 0,651 0,851 0,782 0,653 0,657 0,646 0,63 0,626 0,851
0,405 0,56 0,545 0,808 0,838 0,62 0,617 0,78 0,776 0,8 0,769 0,743 0,738 0,662
10,00 9,09 0,00 5,60 4,45 -36,76 -34,33 -20,55 -29,69 -27,20 -24,28 -22,03 -19,82 2,70
-83 -96 -98 -14 -11 -94 -94 -40 -39 -34 -36 -41 -18 3
IL1 IL3
111 560
111 111
0,782 0,425
114 530
0,662 0,786
2,70 377,48
3 -5
July 2012
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 C-W36 HSM-1 BC5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB4 To-W23
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
IL4
560
511
C-W-20 H1 FL C-W-20 H1 FL C-W-20 H1 FL C-W-20 H1 FL C-W-20 H1 FL C-W-20 H1 FL C-W-20 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL To-W23 R1 HB To-W23 R1 HB To-W23 R1 HB
0,474
530
0,786
3.58
-5
IL6
560
511
0,552
530
0,786
3.58
-5
IL7
560
511
0,529
530
0,786
3.58
-5
IL9
560
511
0,496
530
0,786
3.58
-5
IL10
560
511
0,851
530
0,786
3.58
-5
IL12
491
461
0,782
529
0,848
12.85
IL13
491
461
0,425
529
0,848
12.85
IL14
491
449
0,474
329
0,848
-36.47
-33
HL7
25
41
0,552
23
0,962
-43,90
-8
HL6
131
28
0,529
23
0,471
-17,86
-82
HL5 HL4
378 378
340
0,496 0,851
281 292
0,508 0,544
-17,35 -17,75
-26 -23
355 To-W23
July 2012
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] [CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%]
Ref.
CSR Buckling
Criterion BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB4 Ti-W13 stat WB3 Ti-W13 stat WB3 Ti-W13 stat WB3 Ti-W13 stat WB3 To-W23 BSR-1P WB4 To-W23 BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB5 To-W23 BSR-1P WB4 To-W23
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
HL3
378
355
0,782
306
0,641
-13,80
-19
HL2
397
359
0,425
316
0,697
-11,98
-20
79 635
To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 671 P1 HB To-W23 710 P1 HB To-W23 750 P1 HB 789 To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB
WL6
977
829
0,425
613
0,862
-26,06
-37
WL7
971
869
0,402
641
0,864
-26,24
-34
WL8
844
18
0,389
14
0,686
-22,22
-98
109 109
78 CO 78 CO
0 0
25 28
0,768 0,734
-67,95 -64,10
-77 -74
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] [CSRH - CSR] / CSR [%] [CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%]
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
st1 st2
56 56
Ti-W11 H1 NB Ti-W11 45 H1 NB 50
0,851 0,782
1,639 1,639
80,00 84,44
61 48
0 BSP-1P Ti-W23 0 6685 FrWft2 6685 2935 SEA1 H1 HB Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified Transverse structure
1,639
127,77
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
CSR Net Net Offered Req. SM SM [cm3] [cm3] 442 69 388 335 388 388 329 329 321 321 321 371 371 371 284 284 259 129 290 360 642 642 671 671 741 741 62 62 293 293 301 303 309 312 317 320 322 312 314 316 222 261 21 20 11 6 536 562 68 67 584 677
Criterion
CSRH Net. CSR Req. Buckling SM [cm3] 69 71 376 376 376 376 376 376 376 376 376 357 373 357 280 321 25 22 12 6 117 132 22 22 104 107
Criterion
[CSRH[CSRH Offered] Commen CSR-H - CSR] / t Buckling / CSR Offered [%] [%] 10,14 12,68 22,07 22,07 19,95 19,41 17,82 17,02 15,69 14,89 14,36 12,61 15,82 11,48 20,71 18,69 16,00 9,09 8,33 0,00 -
BL0 BL1 BL3 BL4 BL6 BL7 BL9 BL10 BL12 BL13 BL14 BL16 BL17 BL18 SL8 SL7 SL6 SL5 SL4 SL3 SL2 SL1 DL1 DL2 DL3 DL4
S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W F2 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL S-W P1 FL Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB
FSM-2 SEA1 FSM-2 SEA1 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 Ti-W11 stat WB3 BSP-1P SEA1 Ti-W13 stat WB3 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment CSR Net Net Offered Req. SM SM [cm3] [cm3] 741 741 741 539 110 110 386 386 386 386 386 386 386 386 386 24 125 240 232 232 232 308 651 651 622 622 622 706 663 581 570 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 41 28 340 355 355 359 79 635 635 710 710 789 CSRH Net. CSR Req. Buckling SM [cm3] 115 113 102 103 72 81 371 371 371 371 371 371 371 371 371 42 19 240 254 272 287 302 109 114 118 122 126
Harmonised Common Structural Rules [CSRH[CSRH Offered] Commen CSR-H - CSR] / t Buckling / CSR Offered [%] [%] 70,08 70,08 70,08 70,08 70,08 70,08 70,08 70,08 70,08 2,38 -
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
DL5 DL6 DL7 DL8 IL0 IL1 IL3 IL4 IL6 IL7 IL9 IL10 IL12 IL13 IL14 HL7 HL6 HL5 HL4 HL3 HL2 HL1 WL1 WL2 WL3 WL4 WL5
Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB Ti-W13 H2 NB C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL C-W36 H1 FL To-W23 R1 HB To-W23 R1 HB To-W23 R1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB To-W23 P1 HB
BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 FC-W:Ti25 A:S FD2 FC-W:Ti25 OSA-2S FD1 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W15 stat WB3 Ti-W17 stat WB3 Ti-W17 stat WB3 Ti-W17 stat WB3 Ti-W17 stat WB3 Ti-W17 stat WB3
July 2012
Consequence Assessment CSR Net Net Offered Req. SM SM [cm3] [cm3] 622 656 578 109 109 56 56 829 869 18 78 78 50 45 CSRH Net. CSR Req. Buckling SM [cm3] 130 133 12 89 80
Harmonised Common Structural Rules [CSRH[CSRH Offered] Commen CSR-H - CSR] / t Buckling / CSR Offered [%] [%] 43,82 43,75 -
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
Ti-W17 stat WB3 Ti-W17 stat WB3 Ti-W17 stat WB3 FC-W:Ti25 FSM-2 Ti-W15 stat WB3 BSP-1P SEA1
1596
2935
8961
67,25
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure 2.1 Entire 3-Hold model for evaluation of the mid hold
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Figure 2.5 Inner Bottom and Hopper Plating
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Figure 2.8 Side Framing (port side)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Figure 2.9 Side Framing (starboard side)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Figure 2.13 Coaming and supporting Structure
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Executive summary a) It is noted that this assessment report is described for mid-part of the ship and not included Steel coil and fatigue assessment. b) For hull girder buckling, mid-part of side shell plating and Top side longitudinals were not satisfied with Harmonised CSR requirement and it has scantling impact. c) For FE- Yielding, Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. e) The impact was caused by hull girder buckling considering the hull girder stress from oblique seas; the governing load case of this part was OST.
July 2012
Figure L.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO HOLD - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo hold (hold 3) after application of the CSR-H for Bulkers.
MD2 TS1
MD1
SS3
HPR1 IB1 BG1 BTM1 IB2 BG2 BTM2 BTM3 IB3 BG3 BTM4 IB4 BG4
BLG BTM5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Criterion
Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Local Local Min.T Local Local Local Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T COIL COIL COIL COIL Local COIL Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Min.T
CSR Buckling
0.27 0.27 0.30 0.50 0.59 0.37 0.26 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.85 0.37 0.38 0.23 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.10 0.77 0.60 0.83 0.16 0.21 0.50 0.19
Criterion
Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Local Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Min.T
CSRH Buckling
0.45 0.47 0.56 0.59 0.63 1.91 0.51 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.01 0.62 0.62 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.31 0.43 0.68 0.56 0.84 0.40 0.40 0.52 0.40
Comment
2 2 2 1 1 1 5 2 2 2 2 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 1 1
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue and Steel Coil are not taken into account. Net CSR Offered Net Req. CSR Ref. Criterion Buckling SM SM [cm3] [cm3]
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BTM9 BTM11 BTM12 BTM13 BTM14 BTM16 BTM17 BTM18 SS19 SS20 SS21 SS22 SS25 SS26 SS27 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB6 IB7 IB8 IB9 IB11 417 417 417 417 417 417 397 397 354 354 354 354 411 409 412 490 554 559 738 1074 978 1002 1065 1065 1065 1065 1065 1065 1065 639 639 639 639 639 639 640 640 593 277 280 282 285 290 293 296 298 303 305 308 311 333 275 278 234 231 300 270 810 727 784 749 865 753 869 876 883 889 591 591 591 591 591 591 591 591 577 Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.51 0.42 0.37 0.32 0.22 0.77 0.83 0.86 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.54
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR-H Buckling
0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.67 0.69 0.71 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.93 0.84 0.82 0.82 0.63 0.51 0.43 0.35 0.78 0.88 0.91 0.79 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.66
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Ref.
IB12 IB13 IB14 HPR16 HPR17 HPR18 HPR19 HPR20 TS25 TS26 TS27 TS28 TS29 TS30 TS31 TS32 BG5
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press COIL COIL COIL Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR-H Buckling
0.66 0.66 0.66 0.44 0.42 0.38 0.40 0.37 0.83 0.86 0.91 0.94 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.08 0.80
Comment
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Criterion
Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Min.T
CSR Buckling
0.44 0.44 0.48 0.56 0.64 1.77 0.49 0.28 0.52 0.52 0.56 0.60 0.60 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.28 0.27 0.60 0.54 0.50 0.40 0.41 0.47 0.44
Criterion
Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB GRAB Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Min.T
CSRH Buckling
0.44 0.44 0.48 0.56 0.64 1.77 0.49 0.28 0.52 0.52 0.56 0.60 0.60 0.29 0.31 0.31 0.33 0.34 0.27 0.60 0.54 0.50 0.40 0.41 0.47 0.44
Comment
2 2 2 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 5 5 5 5
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Ref.
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BTM9 BTM11 BTM12 BTM13 BTM14 BTM16 BTM17 BTM18 SS19 SS20 SS21 SS22 SS25 SS26 SS27 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB6 IB7 IB8 IB9 IB11 IB12
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.51 0.51 0.50 0.42 0.36 0.32 0.22 0.77 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.63 0.63
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR-H Buckling
0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.66 0.67 0.75 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.73 0.58 0.47 0.41 0.34 0.77 0.85 0.88 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.75 0.76 0.75 0.81 0.81
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Ref.
IB13 IB14 HPR16 HPR17 HPR18 HPR19 HPR20 TS25 TS26 TS27 TS28 TS29 TS30 TS31 TS32 BG5
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR-H Buckling
0.81 0.81 0.42 0.37 0.34 0.45 0.36 0.88 0.91 0.95 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.05 0.77
Comment
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 5
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
z Principal
Ship Type Rule Length Breadth Depth Scantling Draught Speed Bulk Carrier (Handy Max) 182.748m 32..26m 18.1m 12.7m 15.48knots
z Contents
Plot for Yielding Evaluation
1 Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of Cargo Hold Strength Analysis in Mid-Ship Area 2 Normalized Yield Usage Factor(CSR-H/CSR-H_Allowable) of Cargo Hold Strength Analysis in MidShip Area
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g) Hold Frame
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i) Bulkhead Plate
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
2 Normalized Yield Usage Factor(CSR-H/CSR-H_Allowable) of Cargo Hold Strength Analysis in MidShip Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H). Refer to the colour of value range (<0.9), white colour can be applied.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g) Hold Frame
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i) Bulkhead Plate
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix M VLCC 1
Figure M.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSR-H for Tankers.
MD1
MD2
MD3
MD4
LL8
LL5
IH4 LL4 IH3 LL3 IH2 ST3 IH1 LL2 HPR2 LL1 HPR1 IB1 BG1 IB2 IB3 IB4 BG2 IB5 IB6 BG3 BLG1 BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 SS1 SS2 SS3 ST2 SS4
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net thickness [mm]
22.0 20.0 17.5 17.0 18.0 18.0 17.0 21.5 18.5 18.0 20.0 20.0 19.5 17.0 15.0 22.0 22.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 20.0 21.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 17.5 19.0 21.0 19.5 19.5 17.5 16.0 16.0 15.0 14.5 14.5
Ref.
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 HPR1 HPR2 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 IH6 IH7
Criterion
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Quay Quay Quay Quay Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Min. thk
CSR Buckling
0.55 0.59 0.65 0.67 0.64 0.64 0.65 0.58 0.54 0.54 0.50 0.53 0.89 0.88 0.91 0.90 0.92 0.91 0.90 0.95 0.99 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.47 0.55 0.52 0.52 0.57 0.57 0.54 0.64 1.01 0.92
Criterion
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Quay Quay Quay Quay Min.Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Min. Thk Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Min. Thk
CSRH Buckling
0.55 0.59 0.65 0.65 0.63 0.64 0.67 0.57 0.56 0.53 0.57 0.66 0.86 0.88 0.89 0.89 0.92 0.90 0.89 0.96 0.99 0.50 0.50 0.51 0.49 0.50 0.50 0.63 0.57 0.54 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.78 0.95 0.96
Comment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
LL1 LL2 LL3 LL4 LL5 LL6 LL7 LL8
Criterion
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Min. thk
CSR Buckling
0.49 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.83 0.96 0.98
Criterion
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press
CSRH Buckling
0.56 0.51 0.53 0.58 0.80 0.90 1.02 1.14
Comment
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Net Offered SM [cm3]
4677 4642 4590 4579 4601 5091 5079 6026 4112 2816 2816 2478 2785 1439 1816 1816 1809 1858 1858 1853 1585 4330 4330 4330 4330 4330 4358 4262 3358 3350 2505 2487 2044 1755 1512 3776 4285
Ref.
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 HPR1 HPR2 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 IH6 IH7 LL1
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Sloshing Sloshing Sloshing Sloshing Sloshing Sloshing Sloshing Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press sloshing Local Press
CSR Buckling
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
LL2 LL3 LL4 LL5 LL6 LL7 LL8
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR-H Buckling
Comment
July 2012
Executive summary a) It is noted that this assessment report is described for mid-part of the ship and not included Fatigue assessment. b) On prescriptive results, Harmonised CSR has relatively little scantling impact on the CSR vessels. Some longitudinal stiffeners at Inner hull are not satisfied with CSR-H requirements. c) For FE- Yielding, Harmonised CSR has little scantling impact on the CSR vessels.
July 2012
Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSR-H for Tankers.
MD1
MD2
MD3 LL9
MD4
MD5
MD6
LL8 IH5 LL7 IH4 LL6 IH3 LL5 IH2 LL4 IH1 ST HPR3 LL2 HPR2 HPR1 IB4 BG2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 IB5 IB6 BG3 ST
SS5
SS4
LL3
SS3
SS2
IB1 BG1
IB2
IB3
LL1
SS1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net thickness [mm]
19.5 19.5 18.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 18.0 18.0 17.5 17.0 17.0 16.5 16.5 19.0 20.0 20.0 18.5 16.5
Ref.
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BTM9 BTM10 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7
Criterion
Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
CSR Buckling
0.68 0.70 0.80 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.80 0.80 0.82 0.82 0.70 0.72 0.53 0.34 0.33 0.33 0.34 0.52
Criterion
Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T
CSRH Buckling
0.57 0.60 0.71 0.74 0.70 0.74 0.71 0.72 0.70 0.72 0.72 0.73 0.59 0.40 0.37 0.40 0.49 0.63
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 2
July 2012
Ref.
SS8 SS9 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 MD8 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 HPR1 HPR2 HPR3 IH1
Criterion
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press
CSR Buckling
0.77 0.86 0.85 0.87 0.87 0.88 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.81 0.66 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.56 0.59 0.33 0.41
Criterion
Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local
CSRH Buckling
0.83 0.87 0.83 0.86 0.86 0.82 0.84 0.83 0.84 0.78 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.61 0.60 0.60 0.52 0.60 0.46 0.49
Comment
2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5
2 2 2 5
July 2012
Ref.
IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 IH6 IH7 LL1 LL2 LL3 LL4 LL5 LL6 LL7 LL8 LL9 BG1
Criterion
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
CSR Buckling
0.47 0.50 0.52 0.62 0.85 0.62 0.63 0.54 0.59 0.64 0.72 0.59 0.56 0.73 0.85 0.77
Criterion
Local Local Local Local Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Min.T Local Min.T Local Min.T
CSRH Buckling
0.42 0.49 0.63 0.71 0.88 0.65 0.60 0.56 0.52 0.55 0.63 0.60 0.59 0.74 0.87 0.64
Comment
5 5 5 5 2 2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 2 2 5
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 2 3 4 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) Governing criteria is Fatigue Governing criteria is GRAB Appendix N OT 2/VLCC 2/Page 5
July 2012
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. Net Offered SM [cm3]
2819 3660 3667 3852 3828 3826 3826 3815 3807 3807 3807 3096 3096 3096 3096 3096 3105
Ref.
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BTM9 BTM10 BTM11 BTM13 BTM14 BTM15 BTM16 BTM17 BTM18
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.74 0.78 0.78 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.73
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
0.73 0.71 0.72 0.71 0.71 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.78 0.78
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
July 2012
Ref.
BTM19 BTM20 BTM21 BTM22 BTM23 BTM25 BTM26 BTM27 BTM28 BTM29 BTM30 BTM31 BTM32 SS29 SS28 SS27 SS26 SS24 SS23 SS21
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.66 0.61 0.58 0.51 0.38 0.34 0.24
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.76 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.78 0.79 0.80 0.81 0.75 0.72 0.66 0.63 0.53 0.49 0.43
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Ref.
SS20 SS19 SS18 SS17 SS15 SS14 SS13 SS11 SS10 SS9 SS7 SS6 SS5 SS4 SS2 SS1 MD0 MD1 MD2 MD3
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.18 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.20 0.27 0.39 0.43 0.49 0.61 0.68 0.74 0.80 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
0.38 0.34 0.30 0.27 0.33 0.36 0.40 0.48 0.54 0.60 0.73 0.84 0.89 0.94 1.02 1.08 1.03 1.03 1.04 1.06
Comment
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1
July 2012
Ref.
MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 MD8 MD9 MD10 MD11 MD13 MD14 MD15 MD16 MD17 MD18 MD19 MD20 MD21 MD22 MD23 MD24
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.91 0.91 0.91
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04 1.04
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
July 2012
Ref.
MD25 MD26 MD27 MD28 MD29 MD31 MD32 MD33 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 IB8 IB9 IB10 IB11 IB13
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.91 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.88 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
1.05 1.05 1.05 1.04 1.03 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.74 0.76 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Ref.
IB14 IB15 IB16 IB17 IB18 IB19 IB20 IB21 IB22 IB23 HPR29 HPR28 HPR27 HPR26 HPR25 HPR24 HPR23 IH21 IH20 IH19
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.53 0.49 0.47 0.43 0.44 0.39 0.34 0.23 0.18 0.18
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.73 0.65 0.64 0.62 0.59 0.56 0.52 0.48 0.43 0.42 0.38
Comment
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Ref.
IH18 IH17 IH15 IH14 IH13 IH12 IH11 IH10 IH9 IH7 IH6 IH5 IH4 IH3 IH2 IH1 IH0 LL27 LL26 LL25
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.18 0.16 0.16 0.19 0.24 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.43 0.53 0.60 0.66 0.70 0.70 0.75 0.79 0.83 0.57 0.52 0.46
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
0.34 0.31 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.56 0.61 0.66 0.70 0.80 0.92 0.94 0.98 1.00 0.88 0.86 0.94 0.70 0.66 0.55
Comment
5 5 5
5 5 5
July 2012
Ref.
LL24 LL23 LL22 LL21 LL19 LL18 LL17 LL16 LL15 LL14 LL13 LL11 LL10 LL9 LL8 LL7 LL5 LL4 LL3 LL2
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.42 0.36 0.29 0.22 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.19 0.24 0.35 0.40 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.64 0.69 0.85 0.74
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
0.56 0.48 0.39 0.37 0.28 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.28 0.33 0.45 0.59 0.63 0.68 0.79 0.85 1.02 1.05 1.09 1.07
Comment
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Ref.
LLa2 LLa1 BG2-3 BG2-2 BG2-1
Criterion
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
CSR Buckling
0.84 0.88 0.60 0.57 0.53
Criterion
Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press. Local Press.
CSRH Buckling
0.99 1.14 0.83 0.77 0.72
Comment
5
5 5 5
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 2 3 4 5 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) Governing criteria is Fatigue Governing criteria is GRAB Governing criteria is Other
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
z Principal
Ship Type Rule Length Breadth Depth Scantling Draught Speed Oil Tanker (VLCC) 319.615m 60m 28.8m 20.9m 16.75
z Contents
Plot for Yielding Evaluation
1 Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/CSR) of Cargo Hold Strength Analysis in Mid-Ship Area 2 Normalized Yield Usage Factor( CSR-H/ CSR-H_Allowable) of Cargo Hold Strength Analysis in Mid-Ship Area
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Consequence Assessment
Consequence Assessment
f) 2nd Stringer
Consequence Assessment
h) Watertight Bulkheads
Consequence Assessment
k) Aft Web Frames (Btw. Watertight and Swash BHD) July 2012 Appendix N OT 2/VLCC 2/Page 22
Consequence Assessment
l) Deck Plate
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
2 Normalized Yield Usage Factor( CSR-H/ CSR-H_Allowable) of Cargo Hold Strength Analysis in Mid-Ship Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H). Refer to the colour of value range (<0.9), white colour can be applied.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Consequence Assessment
Consequence Assessment
f) 2nd Stringer
Consequence Assessment
h) Watertight Bulkheads
Consequence Assessment
k) Aft Web Frames (Btw. Watertight and Swash BHD) July 2012 Appendix N OT 2/VLCC 2/Page 29
Consequence Assessment
l) Deck Plate
July 2012
Figure O.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSR-H for Tankers.
MD1 LL 7 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 IH 5 MD8
SS7
LL 6 LL 5
IH 4 ST 1 IH 3
SS6
IH1 LL 2 HPR 2 LL 1 IB1 BG 1 BTM 1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 BG2 BTM6 BTM7 HPR 1 ST 3
SS2
SS1
BLG 1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating Offered Net thickness [mm] 14.5 18.5 20.3 20.2 15.5 15.0 16.0 17.0 17.0 15.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 12.5 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 19.0 20.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 20.0 18.5 15.5 14.0 12.5 CSR Net Req. [mm] 14.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 16.0 16.0 15.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 12.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 14.5 14.5 14.0 14.5 14.5 17.0 14.0 15.0 14.0 12.5 CSR CSRH Net. Bucklin Req. g [mm] 0.84 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.80 0.82 0.78 1.00 0.68 0.69 0.74 0.75 0.64 0.67 0.89 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.89 0.90 0.91 0.81 0.79 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.62 0.44 0.75 0.79 0.80 18.5 17.0 17.0 17.5 14.0 14.5 14.5 16.0 13.5 15.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 15.0 15.0 18.0 14.0 16.0 14.5 13.0 Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 -2.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 Difference in net CSRH-Offered [mm] 4.0 -1.5 -3.3 -2.7 -1.5 -0.5 -1.5 -1.0 -3.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 -5.5 -5.5 -5.5 -5.5 -5.5 -5.5 -8.5 -9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 -2.0 -4.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Ref. BTM 1 BTM 2 BTM 3 BTM 4 BTM 5 BTM 6 BTM 7 BLG SS 1 SS 2 SS 3 SS 4 SS 5 SS 6 SS 7 MD 8 MD 7 MD 6 MD 5 MD 4 MD 3 MD 2 MD 1 IB 1 IB 2 IB 3 IB 4 IB 5 HPR 1 HPR 2 IH 1 IH 2 IH 3 July 2012
Criterion Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Other Local, press Local, press Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
Criterion Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local,Min T Local, press Local, press Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local,Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
CSRH Buckling 0.74 0.75 0.75 0.76 0.71 0.72 0.71 0.59 0.70 0.50 0.61 0.67 0.77 0.88 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.81 0.80 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.56 0.57 0.62 0.46 0.69 0.72 0.86
Comment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 2
Consequence Assessment Offered Net thickness [mm] 13.0 14.0 14.5 15.5 14.5 14.5 13.5 13.5 14.0 15.0 CSR Net Req. [mm] 11.0 9.5 14.0 13.5 12.5 11.5 10.0 9.5 9.5 15.0
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSR CSRH Net. Bucklin Req. g [mm] 0.71 0.77 0.61 0.76 0.76 0.67 0.67 0.59 0.83 0.74 13.5 14.5 15.0 14.0 12.5 12.0 10.5 10.5 10.5 14.5 Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] 2.5 5.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 -0.5 Difference in net CSRH-Offered [mm] 0.5 0.5 0.5 -1.5 -2.0 -2.5 -3.0 -3.0 -3.5 -0.5
Ref. IH 4 IH 5 LL 1 LL 2 LL 3 LL 4 LL 5 LL 6 LL 7 BG 1
Criterion Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local,Min T Local,Min T Local, press
Criterion HG Init Buc HG Init Buc Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local,Min T Local,Min T Local, press
CSRH Buckling 0.98 0.98 0.70 0.68 0.69 0.72 0.77 0.89 0.98 0.60
Comment
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Net Offered SM 3 [cm ] 1170 2511 830 3485 806 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 1110 1320 752 544 701
Ref. LL 4 LL 5 LL 6 LL 7 BG 1
Criterion Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
Criterion Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
Comment
CSR OT:
CSR BC:
CSR-H:
Eta/eta_allowable Eta Section 10, 3.2.1.1 for plating Section 10, 3.3.2.2, and 3.3.3.1 for stiffeners eta_allowable Section 8, 1.4 buckling ratio Chapter 6, Sect.3, 3.2.1 result of formula for plating. Chapter 6, Sect.3, 4.2.1, 4.3.1 result of formula for stiffener. Eta/eta_allowable Eta Chapter 8, Section 3, 3 Eta_allowable Chapter 8, Section 1, table 1.
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for CSR-H) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: Governing has been identified and is shown in the table
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure L.2 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (CSR-H/ CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSR-H and CSR)
V: Default XY View G: Bottom & Shell 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 0.7
V: Default XY View G: Inner Hull 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 0.7
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
V: Default XY View G: Section CTR 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 Y X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: HCSR/CSR >0.7 0.7
Longitudinal Bulkhead
V: Default XY View G: Section BGR 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 Y X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: HCSR/CSR >0.7 0.7
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
V: Default XY View G: Section NBG 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 Y X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: HCSR/CSR >0.7 0.7
Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
V: Default XY View G: bulkheads 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 0.7
Transverse Bulkheads
V: Default XY View G: Forward Webs 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 0.7
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
V: Default XY View G: Aft Webs 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 0.7
V: Default XY View G: Typ Webs 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 0.7
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
V: Default XY View G: STR1 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 Y Z X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: HCSR/CSR >0.7 0.7
1st Stringer
V: Default XY View G: STR2 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 Y Z X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: HCSR/CSR >0.7 0.7
2nd Stringer
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
V: Default XY View G: STR3 10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 0.8 Y Z X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: HCSR/CSR >0.7 0.7
3rd Stringer
July 2012
Consequence Assessment Harmonised Common Structural Rules Figure L.3 Normalized Yielding UF (CSR-H / CSR-H_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSR-H)
V: Default XY View G: Bottom & Shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 Y X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: Max of All LC
Longitudinal Bulkhead
10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 Y X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: Max of All LC
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 Y X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: Max of All LC
10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 Y X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: Max of All LC
Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Transverse Bulkheads
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 Y Z X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: Max of All LC
1st Stringer
10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 Y Z X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: Max of All LC
2nd Stringer
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
10. 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.1 1. 0.9 Y Z X Output Set: Yield Check FCT. Criteria: Max of All LC
3rd Stringer
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix P 1. Midship
OT 4 SuezMax 2
Figure P.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSRH for Tankers.
MD1
MD2
MD3
MD4
MD5
MD6
MD7
MD8
CL5
IH3
SS5
CL4
IH2
ST2
SS4
CL3
IH1
SS3
HPR1
SS1
CLG1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered CSR CSRH Net Net CSR Net Criterion Ref. Buckling Thickne Req. Req. ss [mm] [mm] BTM1 16.5 14.5 Local, Min T 0.711 15.5 BTM2 20 13.5 Local, press 0.619 14.0 BTM3 21.5 13.5 Local, press 0.59 14.0 BTM4 21.5 13.5 Local, press 0.59 14.0 BTM5 20.5 13.5 Local, press 0.609 14.0 BTM6 17.5 13.5 Local, press 0.68 14.0 BTM7 17 13.5 Local, press 0.681 14.0 BLG1 15 14.0 Local, press 0.566 13.5 SS1 16 15.0 Local, press 0.652 15.5 SS2 14.5 14.5 Local, press 0.864 14.5 SS3 16 14.5 Local, Min T 0.864 14.5 SS4 16 14.5 Local, Min T 0.826 14.5 SS5 16 14.5 Local, Min T 0.807 14.5 SS6 16 14.5 Local, Min T 0.757 14.5 SS7 14.5 12.5 Local, Min T 0.844 13.5 IB1 15 14.5 Local, press 0.544 14.5 IB2 15 14.0 Local, press 0.544 14.5 IB3 15 14.0 Local, press 0.544 14.5 IB4 15 14.0 Local, press 0.544 14.5 IB5 15 14.5 Local, press 0.544 15.0 IB6 15 14.5 Local, press 0.544 15.0 HPR1 19 15.5 Local, press 0.774 16.0 HPR2 19 14.5 Local, press 0.856 15.0 IH1 15 14.5 Local, press 0.922 15.0 IH2 14 13.5 Local, press 0.922 14.0 IH3 13.5 12.0 Local, press 0.889 13.0 IH4 12.5 10.5 Local, press 0.889 11.5 IH5 14.5 11.5 Local, Min T 0.955 11.5 MD1 17 10.5 Local, Min T 0.868 10.5 MD2 17 10.5 Local, Min T 0.86 10.5 MD3 17 10.5 Local, Min T 0.849 10.5 MD4 17 10.5 Local, Min T 0.84 10.5 MD5 17 10.5 Local, Min T 0.829 10.5 MD6 17 10.5 Local, Min T 0.818 10.5 MD7 17 10.0 Local, Min T 0.747 10.0 MD8 15.5 10.0 Local, Min T 0.833 10.0 CLG1 18 13.0 Local, press 0.582 12.5 SG1 15.5 11.0 Local, Min T 0.659 11.0 ST1 11.5 9.0 Local, Min T 0.677 10.0 ST2 9 9.0 Local, Min T 0.235 10.0 ST3 16 9.0 Local, Min T 0.256 10.0 CL1 16.5 13.5 Local, press 0.832 14.0 CL2 16.5 13.0 Local, press 0.865 13.5 CL3 16.5 12.5 Local, press 0.899 12.5 CL4 16 11.5 Local, press 0.957 11.5 CL5 14.5 10.0 Local, press 0.957 10.5 CL6 13.5 10.0 Local, Min T 0.952 10.0 CL7 15 11.5 Local, Min T 0.912 11.5 CL8 15 11.5 Local, Min T 0.995 11.5 (+) increased requirement from CSR to harmonised CSR CSRH Buckling 0.707 0.617 0.59 0.6 0.643 0.718 0.697 0.632 0.753 0.833 0.833 0.826 0.823 0.84 0.808 0.535 0.532 0.531 0.539 0.552 0.556 0.804 0.811 0.71 0.912 0.942 1.014 0.935 0.858 0.846 0.839 0.836 0.85 0.86 0.821 0.86 0.647 0.685 0.7 0.455 0.393 0.853 0.862 0.703 0.92 0.969 0.999 0.93 1.023 Difference in net CSRH CSR 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 -0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Difference in net CSRH Offered -1.0 -6.0 -7.5 -7.5 -6.5 -3.5 -3.0 -1.5 -0.5 0.0 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.0 -3.0 -4.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -1.0 -3.0 -6.5 -6.5 -6.5 -6.5 -6.5 -6.5 -7.0 -5.5 -5.5 -4.5 -1.5 1.0 -6.0 -2.5 -3.0 -4.0 -4.5 -4.0 -3.5 -3.5 -3.5
Criterion Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. Net CSR Offered Net CSR Ref. SM Req. Criterion Buckling CSR SM [cm3] [cm3]
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 HPR1 HPR2 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 MD8 CLG1 SG1 ST1 ST2 ST3 CL1 CL2 CL3 CL4 CL5 CL6 CL7 CL8 2645 2685 2700 2700 2690 2932 2770 2718 3322 2563 1852 1391 1391 1391 877 2363 2363 2363 2363 2363 2363 3228 2575 2025 1332 1285 1279 2481 1797 1829 1829 1829 1829 1829 1820 880 775 82 169 164 208 3112 3113 1828 1594 9077 1393 2823 2515 2202 2178 2162 2151 2135 2285 1167 947 2964 2116 1708 1288 1314 1256 737 1915 1915 1915 1915 1915 1915 2413 2090 1876 1211 1092 1085 514 758 473 471 470 505 547 640 601 569 21 139 112 112 2658 2063 1567 1262 1122 1148 1433 623 local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press 0.767 0.761 0.759 0.759 0.76 0.765 0.762 0.603 0.698 0.415 0.197 0.292 0.493 0.76 0.752 0.551 0.551 0.551 0.551 0.551 0.551 0.59 0.383 0.2 0.292 0.491 0.761 0.873 0.861 0.865 0.856 0.848 0.836 0.825 0.816 0.807 0.601 1.068 0.694 0.201 0.31 0.602 0.446 0.204 0.304 0.575 0.728 0.928 0.883
Criterion
CSRH buckling
0.831 0.782 0.757 0.748 0.762 0.788 0.779 0.579 0.701 0.581 0.391 0.48 0.65 0.862 0.875 0.708 0.712 0.711 0.717 0.712 0.714 0.89 0.483 0.387 0.529 0.726 0.965 0.927 0.927 0.933 0.931 0.918 0.906 0.909 0.831 0.894 0.72
local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press
local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press local, press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure P.2 Yielding Usage Factor Ratio (CSRH/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.7 both below in CSRH and in CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
c) Longitudinal Bulkhead
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Upper Stringer
f) Mid Stringer
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g) Lower Stringer
h) Transverse Bulkheads
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
Web Frames
j)
Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure P.3 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSRH)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
c) Longitudinal Bulkhead
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
e) Upper Stringer
f) Mid Stringer
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
g) Lower Stringer
h) Transverse Bulkheads
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
Web Frames
j) Deck
July 2012 Appendix P OT 4/SuezMax 2/Page 13
Consequence Assessment
Figure Q.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL PLATE Summary of consequence study result for longitudinally continuous members.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref. BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 MD7 MD6 MD5 MD4 MD3 MD2 MD1 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 HPR1 HPR2 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 BG1 BG2 ST1 ST2 ST3 LL1 LL2 LL3 LL4 LL5 LL6 Offered Net thickness 16.5 19.0 20.0 19.5 14.5 14.0 13.5 13.0 12.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 13.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 18.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 13.5 12.0 11.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 9.0 9.0 12.0 13.5 15.0 14.5 14.0 14.0 14.5 CSR Net Req. [mm] 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.0 12.0 13.5 13.5 13.5 11.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 13.5 12.0 11.0 10.0 13.5 10.0 8.5 8.5 9.0 13.5 14.5 13.0 11.5 10.5 10.5 Criterion Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Minimum Local Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Local Local Local Local Local Minimum CSR Buckling 0.78 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.74 0.74 0.41 0.48 0.52 0.51 0.80 0.86 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.95 0.95 0.80 0.88 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.49 0.51 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.96 0.95 0.68 0.85 0.50 0.07 0.46 0.60 0.73 0.77 0.78 0.90 0.95 CSRH Net. Req. [mm] 19.0 16.0 16.5 16.5 13.5 13.5 12.5 13.0 12.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 15.0 14.0 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 17.0 17.0 16.5 16.0 13.5 14.0 13.0 11.5 10.5 13.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 14.0 15.0 13.5 12.0 11.5 10.5 Criterion Minimum Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Minimum Local Minimum Minimum Minimum Minimum Local Local Local Local Local Minimum CSRH Buckling 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.8 NA 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.9 Difference in net CSRHCSR 3.0 0.5 0.5 Difference in net CSRH-Offered 2.5 -3.0 -3.5 -3.0 -1.0 -0.5 -1.0 Comment
-1.0 0.5
3.5 3.5
-1.0 -1.0 -1.0 2.0 -3.5 -3.5 -3.5 -3.5 -7.5 -5.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 -1.5 0.5 1.0 -2.5 -0.5 -4.0 Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling
0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 -1.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 -0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0
Buckling Buckling
FE buckling
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Ref. BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BTM9 BTM10 BTM11 BTM12 BTM13 BTM14 BTM15 BTM16 BTM18 BTM19 BTM20 BTM21 SS24 SS25 SS26 SS28 SS29 SS31 SS32 SS33 SS34 SS35 SS36 SS38 SS39 SS40 SS41 SS42 SS43 SS44 SS45 MD23 MD22 MD20 Offered section modulus 1723 1723 1723 1723 1740 1740 1740 1740 1746 1746 1746 1746 1743 1743 1743 1743 1817 1817 1817 1817 1255 1255 1157 1576 1468 1361 1264 1070 977 977 977 1070 980 980 794 794 723 723 721 565 565 956 CSR Section Modulus [cm] 455 1686 1682 1678 1678 1674 1670 1666 1662 1658 1654 1650 1646 1642 1638 1634 1742 1738 1734 1729 1322 1223 1134 1450 1368 1236 1170 1028 997 966 966 1043 961 940 621 596 568 577 512 354 348 438 Criteria Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local CSR Buckling 0.75 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.52 0.45 0.38 0.32 0.24 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.22 0.29 0.44 0.51 0.58 0.52 0.58 0.65 0.71 0.76 0.78 0.78 0.87 CSRH Section Modulus [cm] 436 1634 1643 1652 1661 1671 1680 1689 1698 1707 1716 1726 1735 1744 1753 1762 1908 1917 1927 1937 1427 1297 1180 1675 1532 1309 1221 1119 1100 1080 1060 1155 1078 1071 700 679 657 126 123 536 527 584 Comment Criteria Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local CSRH Buckling 0.82 0.84 0.84 0.90 0.86 0.78 0.78 0.80 0.80 0.78 0.78 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.84 0.81 0.82 0.82 0.46 0.36 0.64 0.58 0.46 0.41 0.34 0.37 0.36 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.59 0.70 0.76 0.71 0.79 0.85 1.06 1.08 0.89 0.89 0.99 (HCSRCSR)/CSR [%] -4% -3% -2% -2% -1% 0% 1% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 5% 6% 7% 8% 10% 10% 11% 12% 8% 6% 4% 16% 12% 6% 4% 9% 10% 12% 10% 11% 12% 14% 13% 14% 16% -78% -76% 51% 51% 33% (HCSROffered)/Offered [%] -75% -5% -5% -4% -5% -4% -3% -3% -3% -2% -2% -1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 5% 6% 6% 7% 14% 3% 2% 6% 4% -4% -3% 5% 13% 11% 8% 8% 10% 9% -12% -14% -9% -83% -83% -5% -7% -39%
Buckling Buckling
Buckling
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
CSR Section Modulus [cm] 438 439 441 442 345 337 329 312 320 303 295 294 294 295 451 452 452 453 453 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1522 1529 1450 1377 1300 1153 1100 995 942 827 783
Ref. MD19 MD18 MD17 MD16 MD15 MD14 MD13 MD11 MD12 MD10 MD9 MD8 MD7 MD6 MD5 MD4 MD3 MD2 MD1 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 IB8 IB9 IB10 IB11 IB12 IB13 IB14 IB15 IB16 HPR23 HPR24 HPR25 HPR26 IH28 IH29 IH31 IH32 IH33 IH34
Offered section modulus 956 956 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 727 741 741 741 966 966 1214 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1562 1536 1426 1425 1425 1258 1160 1027 1031 908 789
Criteria Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local
CSR Buckling 0.87 0.87 0.84 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.86 0.87 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.50 0.45 0.41 0.37 0.26 0.19 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.15
Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling Buckling
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
CSR Section Modulus [cm] 738 693 663 583 548 516 481 443 448 384 441 120 1449 1308 1201 1108 1057 1349 956 905 855 804 754 708 991 660 633 603 570 534 493 461 443 455
Ref. IH35 IH36 IH38 IH39 IH40 IH41 IH42 IH43 IH44 IH45 BG1 BG2 LL25 LL26 LL27 LL28 LL29 LL30 LL31 LL32 LL33 LL34 LL35 LL36 LL37 LL38 LL39 LL40 LL41 LL42 LL43 LL44 LL45 LL46
Offered section modulus 789 782 782 607 607 542 542 2906 1956 566 526 422 1350 1350 1350 1361 1361 6679 951 949 823 823 823 820 4895 638 638 638 638 572 572 2815 2250 569
Criteria Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local Local
CSR Buckling 0.18 0.24 0.36 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.59 0.87 0.86 0.74 0.55 0.49 0.43 0.37 0.30 0.24 0.18 0.16 0.06 0.01 0.06 0.12 0.18 0.23 0.42 0.33 0.39 0.44 0.50 0.57 0.62 0.93 0.90 0.79
Buckling
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure Q.1 Usage Factor Ratio (CSRH/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.7 below for both CSR and CSRH)
Bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Outer shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Deck
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner side
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
T.Bulkhead
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Bottom girders
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stringers
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure Q.2 Normalized Yielding Usage Factor Ratio of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area. Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check and filtered by 0.9 below in CSRH) Bottom plate
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Deck plate
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Outer shell
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner bottom
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Inner side
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
T.BHD
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
C.LBHD
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Frames
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stringers
Girders
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix R
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref. Offered Net thickne ss (mm)
16 16.5 19 19 19 18.5 13.5 13.5 17.5 17.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 14 14 14.5 14.5 14.5 14 14 14 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 14 14 14 14 14 14 16 17.5 17.5 17.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 15.5 13 13 14.5 14.5 15 15 16.5 15 15 14.5 15.5 15.5 21.5 13 9.5 9 10.5
Criterion
CSR Buckling
0,63 0,61 0,56 0,56 0,56 0,57 0,71 0,69 1,79 1,62 0,56 0,45 0,56 0,57 0,59 0,59 0,62 0,69 0,89 0,88 0,87 0,89 0,88 0,87 0,89 0,88 0,85 0,84 0,52 0,52 0,52 0,52 0,52 0,52 0,47 0,41 0,41 0,39 0,59 0,60 0,61 0,61 0,66 0,65 0,74 0,89 0,63 0,66 0,62 0,69 0,68 0,67 0,78 0,85 0,49 0,66 0,70 0,19 0,35
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
0,62 0,60 0,55 0,55 0,56 0,57 0,70 0,68 1,36 1,28 0,66 0,58 0,57 0,54 0,55 0,58 0,70 0,71 0,82 0,81 0,80 0,81 0,81 0,81 0,84 0,83 0,83 0,83 0,51 0,50 0,50 0,51 0,51 0,52 0,48 0,47 0,44 0,38 0,58 0,57 0,53 0,52 0,64 0,69 0,69 0,86 0,69 0,68 0,62 0,67 0,64 0,68 0,83 0,80 0,52 0,66 0,74 0,38 0,50
keel B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 bilge8 bilge9 S10 S11 S12 S13 S14 S15 S16 sheer D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 D8 D9 D10 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 HP1 HP2 HP2hoppe r IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 IH6 IH7 IH8 LB1 LB2 LB3 LB4 LB5 LB6 LB7 LB8 CG1 HG1 STR1 STR2 STR3
t_min DLS8 stat DLS8 stat DLS8 stat DLS8 stat DLS8 stat DLS8 stat DLS8 stat DLS1 DLC7bmax DLS1 DLC7bmax DLS8 stat DLS8 stat DLS8 stat t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min DLS5 DLC6amax DLS5 DLC6amax DLS5 DLC6amax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax sloshing t_min DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax t_min t_min t_min t_min DLS5 DLC6amax LG: (tmin) LS: (tmin) LS: (tmin) LS: (tmin)
t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min BSP-1P SEA1 BSP-1P SEA1 stat WB3 t_min stat WB3 t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min t_min BSP-1S OT2 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1P OT1 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 BSR-1P OT2 t_min BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSP-1S OT1 BSR-1P OT2 t_min BSR-1P OT2 t_min stat WB3 t_min t_min t_min t_min
July 2012
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Ref. Net Offered SM [cm] 1923 2035 2035 2040 2040 2040 2040 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2066 2061 2061 2061 2061 1997 1997 1997 1913 1652 1711 1711 1711 1502 1514 1307 1307 1307 CSR Net Reg. SM [cm] 331 1468 1465 1462 1459 1455 1452 1449 1443 1443 1440 1434 1434 1430 1427 1424 1421 1418 1415 1358 1352 1352 842 659 1019 988 926 866 890 1135 1087 1026 Criterion CSR Buckling 0,66 0,703 0,703 0,701 0,701 0,701 0,701 0,693 0,693 0,693 0,693 0,693 0,693 0,693 0,693 0,694 0,694 0,694 0,694 0,716 0,716 0,716 0,703 0,514 0,465 0,412 0,36 0,306 0,194 0,177 0,161 0,161 CSRH Net. Reg. SM [cm] 321 1436 1444 1451 1459 1467 1475 1483 1490 1498 1506 1514 1522 1529 1537 1545 1553 1561 1568 1527 1534 1543 968 739 1065 988 926 866 890 1201 1111 1053 Criterion CSRH Buckling 0,62 0,62 0,62 0,60 0,60 0,60 0,60 0,55 0,55 0,55 0,55 0,55 0,55 0,56 0,56 0,57 0,57 0,58 0,58 0,67 0,67 0,68 0,56 0,66 0,64 0,61 0,57 0,54 0,53 0,50 0,46 0,43 [CSRHCSR] / CSR [%] -3% -2% -1% -1% 0% 1% 2% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 6% 7% 8% 9% 9% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14% 15% 12% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 6% 2% 3% [CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] -83% -29% -29% -29% -28% -28% -28% -28% -28% -27% -27% -27% -26% -26% -26% -25% -25% -24% -24% -24% -23% -23% -49% -55% -38% -42% -46% -42% -41% -8% -15% -19%
BL_1 BL_2 BL_3 BL_4 BL_5 BL_6 BL_7 BL_8 BL_9 BL_10 BL_11 BL_12 BL_13 BL_14 BL_15 BL_16 BL_17 BL_18 BL_19 BL_21 BL_22 BL_23 BL_24 SL_25 SL_26 SL_27 SL_28 SL_29 SL_31 SL_32 SL_33 SL_34 July 2012
W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS7 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-Ti5: DLS8 stat W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax
Ti-W7 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB2 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W5 stat WB3 Ti-W5 stat WB3 Ti-W5 stat WB3 Ti-t5 stat WB3 S-W OSA-1P SEA1 S-W OSA-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1
Consequence Assessment Net Offered SM [cm] 1307 1147 1147 1147 1266 1266 1260 1260 1168 1059 1060 1766 1766 1766 1766 1766 1766 1766 1766 1759 1759 1759 1759 1759 1759 1759 1759 1751 1751 1751 1749 1746 1746 CSR Net Reg. SM [cm] 998 942 949 959 969 969 911 897 571 549 531 481 480 479 478 477 319 318 318 317 316 319 327 335 342 350 358 366 466 465 455 446 445
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Reg. SM [cm] 1025 986 1005 1025 1047 1059 1023 1024 637 620 609 481 480 479 478 477 448 449 451 452 453 465 476 487 498 509 520 531 542 553 554 553 563 [CSRHCSR] / CSR [%] 3% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 12% 14% 12% 13% 15% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 40% 41% 42% 43% 43% 46% 46% 45% 46% 45% 45% 45% 16% 19% 22% 24% 27%
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling 0,161 0,215 0,291 0,367 0,456 0,535 0,69 0,766 0,719 0,748 0,81 0,851 0,848 0,846 0,843 0,84 0,838 0,835 0,832 0,834 0,831 0,828 0,826 0,823 0,82 0,818 0,815 0,817 0,814 0,811 0,808 0,805 0,802
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0,43 0,51 0,54 0,51 0,55 0,60 0,70 0,75 0,67 0,73 0,79 0,79 0,80 0,79 0,79 0,78 0,78 0,77 0,77 0,79 0,79 0,79 0,79 0,79 0,79 0,79 0,79 0,81 0,81 0,82 0,81 0,80 0,81
[CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] -22% -14% -12% -11% -17% -16% -19% -19% -45% -41% -43% -73% -73% -73% -73% -73% -75% -75% -74% -74% -74% -74% -73% -72% -72% -71% -70% -70% -69% -68% -68% -68% -68%
SL_35 SL_37 SL_38 SL_39 SL_40 SL_41 SL_43 SL_44 SL_45 SL_46 SL_47 DL_1 DL_2 DL_3 DL_4 DL_5 DL_6 DL_7 DL_8 DL_9 DL_10 DL_11 DL_12 DL_13 DL_14 DL_15 DL_16 DL_17 DL_18 DL_19 DL_20 DL_21 DL_22
W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7amax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-S: DLS1 DLC7bmax SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax W-WD: DLS1 DLC7bmax SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing
S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-t BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 S-W BSP-1P SEA1 sloshing sloshing sloshing sloshing sloshing Ti-W6 HSM-2 OT1 Ti-W6 HSM-2 OT1 Ti-W6 HSM-2 OT1 Ti-W6 HSM-2 OT1 Ti-W6 HSM-2 OT1 WD-W BSP-1P SEA1 WD-W BSP-1P SEA1 WD-W BSP-1P SEA1 WD-W BSP-1P SEA1 WD-W BSP-1P SEA1 WD-W BSP-1P SEA1 WD-W BSP-1P SEA1 WD-t BSP-1P SEA1 WD-t BSP-1P SEA1 WD-t BSP-1P SEA1 WD-t BSP-1P SEA1 WD-t BSP-1P SEA1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment Net Offered SM [cm] 1746 1730 1731 1839 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1948 1970 1439 1439 1439 1439 1439 1355 1355 1355 1355 1355 1153 CSR Net Reg. SM [cm] 445 684 688 312 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1385 1314 1245 1177 1113 1061 1289 1227 1165 1103 1046 934
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Reg. SM [cm] 573 684 688 324 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1440 1408 1355 1305 1258 1216 1483 1377 1305 1247 1189 1100 [CSRHCSR] / CSR [%] 29% 0% 0% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 7% 9% 11% 13% 15% 15% 12% 12% 13% 14% 18%
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling 0,799 0,791 0,789 0,455 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,539 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,538 0,531 0,447 0,407 0,367 0,327 0,287 0,259 0,178 0,161 0,161 0,161 0,214
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0,81 0,71 0,71 0,50 0,51 0,50 0,51 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,50 0,51 0,51 0,51 0,51 0,51 0,52 0,48 0,47 0,45 0,43 0,41 0,39 0,44 0,49 0,46 0,43 0,43 0,47
[CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] -67% -60% -60% -82% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -26% -27% -2% -6% -9% -13% -16% 9% 2% -4% -8% -12% -5%
DL_23 DL_25 DL_26 IL_1 IL_2 IL_3 IL_4 IL_5 IL_6 IL_7 IL_8 IL_9 IL_10 IL_11 IL_12 IL_13 IL_14 IL_15 IL_16 IL_17 IL_18 IL_19 HL_25 HL_26 HL_27 HL_28 HL_29 IHL_31 IHL_32 IHL_33 IHL_34 IHL_35 IHL_37
SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing SLtr W-Ti6: sloshing W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-Ti5: DLS5 DLC2amax W-To6: DLS4 stat DLS4 stat DLS6 stat DLS6 stat DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax
WD-t BSP-1P SEA1 SLtr W-Ti5: sloshing SLtr W-Ti5: sloshing To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W8 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 FSM-2 OT1 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2
July 2012
Consequence Assessment Net Offered SM [cm] 1138 1138 1138 1138 1145 1145 1064 2734 1065 1724 1724 1724 0 1495 1495 1484 1372 1372 0 1034 1034 1034 1031 1031 0 1037 1037 1045 896 2763 962 910 910 CSR Net Reg. SM [cm] 898 869 838 805 864 908 620 602 717 1462 1302 1187 1386 1303 1238 1173 1107 977 947 916 899 875 828 816 799 445 457 476 447 397
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Reg. SM [cm] 1074 1046 1016 985 998 1036 620 676 717 1528 1433 1304 1522 1403 1336 1269 1202 1087 1068 1047 1063 1152 1152 1198 1263 587 543 511 437 388 [CSRHCSR] / CSR [%] 20% 20% 21% 22% 16% 14% 0% 12% 0% 5% 10% 10% #VALUE! 10% 8% 8% 8% 9% #VALUE! 11% 13% 14% 18% 32% #VALUE! 39% 47% 58% 32% 19% 7% -2% -2%
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling 0,294 0,371 0,448 0,524 0,669 0,743 0,682 0,82 0,808 0,447 0,385 0,322 0,236 0,162 0,149 0,151 0,151 0,211 0,278 0,347 0,419 0,491 0,634 0,706 0,776 0,689 0,899 0,842 0,559 0,506
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0,58 0,56 0,61 0,66 0,71 0,77 0,66 0,70 0,81 0,62 0,58 0,55 0,43 0,33 0,27 0,24 0,26 0,48 0,57 0,65 0,74 0,82 0,89 0,97 1,05 0,87 0,79 0,93 0,60 0,83
[CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] -6% -8% -11% -13% -13% -10% -42% -75% -33% -11% -17% -24% #VALUE! 2% -6% -10% -8% -12% #VALUE! 5% 3% 1% 3% 12% #VALUE! 11% 16% 21% -34% -80% -47% -52% -57%
IHL_38 IHL_39 IHL_40 IHL_41 IHL_43 IHL_44 IHL_45 IHL_46 IHL_47 LBL_27 LBL_28 LBL_29 LBL_30 LBL_31 LBL_32 LBL_33 LBL_34 LBL_35 LBL_36 LBL_37 LBL_38 LBL_39 LBL_40 LBL_41 LBL_42 LBL_43 LBL_44 LBL_45 LBL_46 LBL_47 LBL_48 CGL_1 CGL_2
DLS3 DLC5bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax DLS3 DLC5bmax sloshing sloshing sloshing sloshing sloshing DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC2amax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7bmax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax DLS3 DLC7amax W-Ti8: DLS4 stat W-Ti8: DLS4 stat DLS3 DLC2amax DLS3 DLC2amax DLS3 DLC2amax sloshing sloshing sloshing DLS5 DLC2amax DLS5 DLC2amax
To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 BSR-1P OT2 To-W6 OSA-2S OT1 To-W6 HSM-1 OT1 To-W6 HSM-1 OT1 SLtr W-Ti5: sloshing SLtr W-To5: sloshing SLtr W-Ti5: sloshing Ti-W8 HSM-1 OT2 Ti-W8 HSM-1 OT1 Ti-W8 BSP-1P OT1 Ti-W8 BSP-1P OT2 Ti-W8 BSP-1P OT1 Ti-W8 BSP-1P OT1 Ti-W8 BSP-1P OT1 Ti-W8 BSP-1P OT1 To-W6 BSP-1S OT1 To-W6 BSP-1S OT1 To-W6 BSP-1S OT1 To-W6 BSP-1S OT1 To-W6 HSM-1 OT1 To-W6 HSM-1 OT1 To-W6 HSM-1 OT1 To-W6 HSM-1 OT1 To-W6 HSM-1 OT1 To-W8 HSM-1 OT1 Ti-W8 HSM-2 OT2 Ti-W7 HSM-1 WB1 Ti-W7 HSM-1 WB2
July 2012
Consequence Assessment Net Offered SM [cm] 404 404 155 155 142 142 145 145 CSR Net Reg. SM [cm] 127 122 144 145 128 129 132 133
Harmonised Common Structural Rules CSRH Net. Reg. SM [cm] 127 122 144 145 128 129 132 132 [CSRHCSR] / CSR [%] 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% -1%
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling 0,594 0,536 0,622 0,619 0,161 0,161 0,337 0,337
Criterion
CSRH Buckling 0,70 0,64 0,95 0,97 0,50 0,51 0,72 0,73
[CSRH-Offered] / Offered [%] -69% -70% -7% -6% -10% -9% -9% -9%
SLtr W-Tw5: SLtr W-Tw5: SLtr W-Tw5: SLtr W-Tw5: SLtr W-Tw5: SLtr W-Tw5: SLtr W-Tw5: SLtr W-Tw5:
SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing SLtr W-Tw5: sloshing
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Figure 2.5 Inner Bottom and Hopper Plating
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Harmonised Common Structural Rules Figure 2.7 CL BHD framing and deck framing
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Figure S.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSRH for Tankers.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net thicknes s [mm] CSR Net Req. [mm] CSR Buckl ing CSRH Net. Req. [mm] CSRH Buckl ing Difference in net CSRH-CSR [mm] Difference in net CSRHOffered [mm] Comme nt
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BLG1 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 HPR1 HPR2 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 LL1 LL2 LL3 LL4 LL5 LL6 BG1 BG2 ST1 ST2 ST3
18 20 20 18.5 18 16 13.5 13 14.5 14 13.5 13 13 12.5 12.5 12.5 13 13 13.5 13 13 14.5 17 16 16 14.5 12.5 11.5 12.5 14 14 12.5 12 11.5 13 13.5 14 12.5 10 10
15 15 15 15 14.5 15 12.5 13 13 13.5 13.5 11.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 13 13 13 13 13 12.5 13.5 13.5 12 10.5 9.5 13 11.5 10.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 12.5 10.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.72 0.54 0.62 0.62 0.60 0.91 0.89 0.97 0.99 0.98 0.96 0.97 0.96 0.52 0.54 0.54 0.49 0.56 0.59 0.58 0.70 0.70 0.99 1.00 0.57 0.58 0.67 0.69 0.99 0.99 0.63 0.62 0.32 0.20 0.70
20 15 15 15 15 15.5 13 13 13 13.5 13.5 13.5 13 12.5 12 12 13 12.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 13 14 14 13 11.5 13 13 12 11 10 11.5 13 12.5 10 8.5 8.5 8.5
Local Min T Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Press Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T Local Min T
0.69 0.68 0.68 0.70 0.73 0.73 0.65 0.55 0.53 0.67 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.95 0.91 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.51 0.59 0.54 0.53 0.59 0.69 0.99 1.02 0.53 0.49 0.53 0.70 0.96 1.00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0 2.0 3.5 3 2.5 2.5 3.5 3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 1 3.5 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 2 3.5 0 -0.5 0 0 0
2.0 -5 -5 -3.5 -3 -0.5 -0.5 0 -1.5 -0.5 0 0.5 0 0 -0.5 -0.5 0 -0.5 0 0.5 0.5 -1 -3.5 -3 -2 -0.5 0.5 0 0.5 -1 -2 -1.5 -2 0 0 -1 -4 -4 -1.5 -1.5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account.
Net Offere d SM [cm3] 1750 1763 1763 1753 1750 1967 1696 1175 1076 1073 903 696 693 693 693 697 389 1526 1522 1522 1535 1804 1546 1210 943 812 520 1313 910 786 614 611 1081 426 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 1344 1332 1315 1301 1258 1710 1175 1112 956 886 819 279 277 290 319 375 373 1293 1293 1293 1293 1598 1459 1034 826 776 374 1118 904 728 606 526 330 387 CSR Buckli ng 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.63 0.43 0.16 0.16 0.34 0.79 0.83 0.82 0.81 0.80 0.78 0.76 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.55 0.40 0.15 0.39 0.75 0.70 0.28 0.15 0.15 0.34 0.54 0.90 0.52 CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 1295 1323 1365 1400 1394 1746 1365 1170 995 964 989 520 522 527 531 573 560 1356 1356 1356 1356 1822 1450 1163 1008 1119 593 1214 663 794 680 665 519 377 CSRH Buckli ng 0.75 0.76 0.75 0.76 0.76 0.67 0.56 0.42 0.30 0.47 0.96 1.06 1.06 1.05 1.05 1.08 1.04 0.64 0.65 0.65 0.64 0.65 0.50 0.30 0.61 1.00 0.99 0.34 0.20 0.32 0.55 0.69 0.86 0.53 [HCSR - CSR] / CSR [%] -4% -1% 4% 8% 11% 2% 16% 5% 4% 9% 21% 86% 89% 81% 66% 53% 50% 5% 5% 5% 5% 14% -1% 12% 22% 44% 58% 9% -27% 9% 12% 27% 57% -3% [HCSROffered] / Offered [%] -26% -25% -23% -20% -20% -11% -20% 0% -8% -10% 9% -25% -25% -24% -23% -18% 44% -11% -11% -11% -12% 1% -6% -4% 7% 38% 14% -8% -27% 1% 11% 9% -52% -11%
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
Comme nt
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 HPR1 HPR2 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 LL1 LL2 LL3 LL4 LL5 LL6 BG1
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press Local Press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure S.2 Usage Factor Ratio (CSRH/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.7 both below in H-CSR and CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
l)
Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure S.3 Normalized Yield UF Ratio (CSRH / CSRH_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.9 below in H-CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
l)
Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix T
OT 8 Panamax 1
Figure T.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSRH for Tankers.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
BLG1 BLG2 USS USB LSS1 LSS2 LST BP1 BP2 BP3 BP4 BP5 HP1 HP2 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IS1 IS2 IS3
July 2012
12.0 12.0 12.0 18.0 16.0 16.5 18.5 12.0 13.5 14.5 13.5 12.0 14.0 13.0 12.0 12.5 12.5 13.0 13.0 14.0 13.0 12.5
12.0 11.0 9.0 9.0 12.5 12.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 11.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 11.5 9.0 12.0 12.0 12.5 12.5 13.5 12.5 11.5
Local P Min Min Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.00 0.00 0.76 0.49 0.47 0.36 0.30 0.76 0.69 0.66 0.69 0.76 0.50 0.53 0.60 0.58 0.58 0.56 0.56 0.64 0.67 0.63
12.0 12.0 9.0 9.0 12.5 12.0 9.0 13.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.5 11.5 12.0 12.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 13.5 12.5 11.5
Min Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Min Local P Local P Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
1.87 1.84 0.71 0.53 0.43 0.37 0.34 0.66 0.58 0.56 0.61 0.70 0.58 0.59 0.03 0.47 0.47 0.54 0.54 0.67 0.72 0.69
0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 3.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 -3.0 -9.0 -3.5 -4.5 -9.5 1.5 -1.5 -2.5 -1.5 0.0 -1.5 -1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -1.0
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
IS4 IS5 IS6 DP1 DP2 DP3 DP4 DP5 DP6 DP7 DB1 DB2 DB3 DS1 DS2 DS3 DS4 SP1 SP2 SP3 SP4 SP5 SP6 SP7
July 2012
12.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 12.0 14.0 12.5 12.5 11.0 10.5 9.0 9.0 9.5 11.5 14.0 15.0 15.5 15.0 13.0 11.5
10.5 9.0 9.0 9.5 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.5 9.0 11.5 11.5 10.0 10.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 11.0 12.5 12.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.0
Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Local P Local P Min Local P Min Min Min Min Local P Local P Min Min Min Min
0.61 0.96 0.90 0.98 0.94 0.92 0.93 0.94 0.94 0.83 0.62 0.62 0.68 0.35 0.21 0.50 0.91 0.58 0.63 0.60 0.60 0.58 0.77 0.88
10.5 9.5 9.0 9.5 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.5 9.0 11.5 11.5 10.0 10.5 9.0 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 13.0
Local P Local P Local P Min Min Min Min Min Min Min Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Min Local P Min Min Min Min Min
0.71 0.96 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.87 0.86 0.87 0.87 0.75 0.52 0.51 0.19 0.33 0.08 0.03 0.12 0.64 0.76 0.67 0.65 0.72 0.87 0.84
0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 2.0
-2.0 -0.5 -1.5 -1.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -2.5 -5.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -0.5 0.5 -1.5 -3.0 -3.5 -3.0 -1.0 1.5
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
LB1 LB2
22.5 18.0
18.5 12.5
Local P Local P
0.00 0.00
19.0 12.5
Local P Local P
0.00 0.00
0.5 0.0
-3.5 -5.5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Net Offered SM [cm3] 1013 570 236 233 233 233 211 211 212 236 236 1023 1023 1023 1013 1013 1013 1023 1023 1023 1028 1028 1028 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 958 414 77 62 48 43 188 174 161 203 204 877 882 887 893 903 908 785 789 793 797 801 805 [HCSROffered] / Offered [%]
-5% -27% -67% -73% -79% -82% -11% -18% -24% -14% -14% -14% -14% -13% -12% -11% -10% -23% -23% -22% -22% -22% -22% Appendix T OT 8/Panamax 1/Page 5
Ref.
Comment
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 SS9 SS10 SS11 SS12 SS13 SS14 SS15 SS16 SS17 SS18 SS19 SS20 July 2012
999 835 65 42 37 31 229 210 193 224 269 1038 1036 1033 1031 1026 1023 924 921 919 917 915 913
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.66 0.50 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.74 0.45 0.40 0.34 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65 0.65
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.74 0.67 0.99 0.76 0.79 0.81 0.59 0.52 0.44 0.81 0.88 0.69 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.72 0.72 0.63 0.67 0.63 0.62 0.62 0.62
-4% -50% 19% 50% 31% 40% -18% -17% -16% -9% -24% -16% -15% -14% -13% -12% -11% -15% -14% -14% -13% -12% -12%
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 1028 988 988 787 722 263 263 983 983 983 983 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 988 897 897 892 892 723
Criterion
CSR Buckling
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 MD6 MD7 MD8 MD9 MD10 MD11 MD12 MD13 MD14 MD15 MD16 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IB5 IB6 IB7 IB8 July 2012
1034 1034 1034 1034 898 898 898 898 898 898 898 915 877 839 801 764 688
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.65 0.47 0.43 0.42 0.36 0.49 0.49 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.31 0.24 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17
836 836 837 853 834 834 834 834 834 834 834 940 861 810 761 714 681
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.62 0.59 0.55 0.52 0.52 0.54 0.54 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.62 0.52 0.52 0.50 0.51 0.50 0.50
-11% -14% -12% -10% -6% NA NA -19% -19% -19% -18% -7% -7% -7% -7% -7% -7% -7% 3% -2% -3% -5% -6% -1%
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 721 721 606 606 606 606 593 593 593 370 300 299 384 384 384 384 384 384 295 294 293 385 293
Criterion
CSR Buckling
CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 672 662 651 640 672 600 597 612 637 483 418 420 231 233 235 236 238 240 491 436 419 216 419
Criterion
CSRH Buckling
Comment
IB9 IB10 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 IH6 IH7 IH8 IH9 IH10 IH11 IH12 IH13 IH14 IH15 IH16 IH17 IH18 IH19 BG1 BG2
650 613 575 539 526 518 527 539 555 270 254 235 120 122 124 125 127 129 223 199 193 108 194
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.16 0.22 0.27 0.33 0.46 0.52 0.59 0.65 0.71 0.69 0.72 0.76 0.83 0.83 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.81 0.80 0.80 0.79 0.85 0.79
Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P Local P
0.50 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.67 0.72 0.83 0.96 1.02 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.83 0.83 0.86 0.87 0.88 0.88 1.05 0.96 0.93 0.93 0.93
3% 8% 13% 19% 28% 16% 13% 14% 15% 79% 64% 79% 92% 91% 90% 89% 88% 87% 120% 118% 117% 100% 116%
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure T.2 Usage Factor Ratio (CSRH/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.7 both below in H-CSR and CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
k) Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
d) Deck (S)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure T.3 Normalized Yield UF Ratio (CSRH / CSRH_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.9 below in H-CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
Deck (S)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix U
OT 9 Panamax 2
Figure U.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSRH for Tankers.
MD1 LL 7 MD2 MD3 MD4 MD5 IH5 MD6
SS7
LL 6 LL 5
IH4 ST 1 IH3
SS6
IH1 LL 2 HPR 2 LL 1 IB1 BG1 BTM1 BTM2 IB2 BG2 BTM3 BTM4 IB3 IB4 BG3 BTM5 HPR 1 SS3 ST 3 SS2
SS1
BLG 1
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Offered Net CSR thicknes Net Req. s [mm] [mm] 18.0 19.5 19.5 18.5 18.5 17.5 16.0 16.0 17.5 18.0 18.0 15.5 14.5 15.0 15.0 15.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 15.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 17.0 16.5 16.5 15.5 14.0 13.0 14.0 14.0 14.5 14.5 14.5 13.0 12.5 12.5 11.5 11.0 11.0 11.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 11.5 11.5 11.5 12.0 12.5 12.0 12.5 11.5 10.5 CSR Buckling CSRH Net. Req. [mm] 19.5 14.0 14.0 14.5 14.5 12.0 13.0 12.5 12.5 12.0 12.0 12.0 15.5 9.00 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.5 13.0 12.5 13.5 12.5 11.0 Difference in net CSRH Buckling CSRH-CSR [mm] 0.69 0.69 0.70 0.75 0.81 0.76 0.78 0.71 0.60 0.53 0.66 0.80 0.93 0.85 0.84 0.84 0.86 0.88 0.88 0.53 0.54 0.58 0.61 0.65 0.61 0.58 0.55 0.88 0.5 1.0 1.0 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0 -2.5 0 6.5 Difference in net CSRHOffered [mm] 1.5 -5.5 -5.5 -4.0 -4.0 -5.5 -2.9 -3.5 -5.0 -6.0 -6.0 -3.5 1.5 -6.0 -6.0 -6.0 -5.5 -5.5 -5.5 -3.5 -4.5 -4.5 -4.0 -4.0 -4.0 -3.0 -3.0 -3.0 Comme nt
Ref.
Criterion
Criterion
HG Initial Buc. Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Other
Local, Press 0.601/0.406 Local, Press 0.285/0.423 Local, Press 0.263/0.423 Local, Press 0.203/0.409 Quay Quay 0.425/0.395 0.787/0.398
Local, Min T 0.737/0.337 HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press 0.918 0.913 0.902 0.925 0.921 0.921 0.548 0.548 0.548 0.548
Local, Other Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press
2 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 5 5 2 2 2 2 2
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Offered Net CSR thicknes Net Req. s [mm] [mm] 14.0 15.5 16.5 16.0 15.5 14.5 14.0 14.0 16.0 14.5 16.5 15.5 12.0 12.0 13.0 10.0 10.0 13.0 12.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 11.0 14.0 10.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
Criterion
CSR Buckling
CSRH Net. Req. [mm] 10.0 10.0 13.5 13.0 10.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 11.0 13.0 10.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Criterion
Difference in net CSRH Buckling CSRH-CSR [mm] 0.90 0.93 0.56 0.46 0.49 0.56 0.76 0.82 0.90 0.0 0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Difference in net CSRHOffered [mm] -4.0 -5.5 -3.0 -3.0 -5.0 -5.0 -4.5 -4.5 -6.5 -3.5
Comme nt
IH 4 IH 5 LL 1 LL 2 LL 3 LL 4 LL 5 LL 6 LL 7 BG 1 BG 2 BG 3 ST 1 ST 2 ST 3
0.864/0.394 0.937/0.306
Local, Press 0.164/0.517 HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. HG Initial Buc. Local, Press HG Initial Buc. Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T 0.408/0.544 0.676/0.535 0.898/0.524 0.894/0.366 0.85/0.393 0.71 0.85/0.256 0.578 0.186 0.332
Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T Local, Min T
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account. Net Offered SM [cm3] 1077 1220 1220 1215 1218 1843 1381 1096 1099 996 754 385 539 539 539 537 537 381 1237 1239 1255 1255 1566 1317 1094 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 803 1062 1060 1049 1092 1442 1167 980 806 721 666 407 160 167 175 183 187 221 1124 1124 1124 1124 1439 1146 1006 CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 804 1080 1088 1120 1268 1939 1469 1079 808 757 746 525 251 249 255 262 286 343 1155 1155 1156 1156 1893 1454 1199 [HCSR CSR] / CSR [%] Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press 0.72 0.79 0.79 0.82 0.92 0.81 0.71 0.56 0.40 0.52 0.77 0.95 0.89 0.89 0.88 0.89 0.88 0.98 0.57 0.57 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.61 0.54 0% 2% 3% 7% 16% 35% 26% 10% 0% 5% 12% 29% 57% 50% 46% 44% 54% 55% 3% 3% 3% 3% 32% 27% 19% [HCSROffered] / Offered [%] -25% -12% -11% -8% 4% 5% 6% -2% -26% -24% -1% 37% -54% -54% -53% -51% -47% -10% -7% -7% -8% -8% 21% 10% 10%
Ref.
Criterion
CSR Buckli ng 0.61 0.63 0.63 0.64 0.64 0.56 0.44 0.22 0.15 0.23 0.51 0.51 0.65 0.64 0.64 0.63 0.63 0.65 0.48 0.48 0.49 0.49 0.57 0.41 0.22
Criterion
CSRH Buckli ng
Com ment
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press HG Initial Buc HG Initial Buc HG Initial Buc HG Initial Buc HG Initial Buc HG Initial Buc Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 5 5 5 5
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Ref.
Net Offered SM [cm3] 1089 935 692 517 1710 8871 1023 1015 780 756 985 290 1501 263 116 116 130
CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 826 712 650 250 1838 1253 914 774 713 398 275
Criterion
CSR Buckli ng 0.15 0.29 0.57 0.58 0.53 0.29 0.15 0.23 0.51 0.54 0.74 0.74
CSRH Net. Req. SM [cm3] 980 905 773 319 1987 1314 1013 813 828 467 428
Criterion
CSRH Buckli ng 0.40 0.60 0.98 0.87 0.90 0.32 0.16 0.44 0.92 0.84 0.89
[HCSROffered] / Offered [%] -10% -3% 12% -38% 16% -85% -1% -20% 6% -38% -57%
Com ment
IH 2 IH 3 IH 4 IH 5 LL 1 LL 2 LL 3 LL 4 LL 5 LL 6 LL 7 BG 1 BG 2 BG 3 ST 1 ST 2 ST 3
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press
1269 59 75 63 65
0.60 0.56
898
75 63 65
Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Press Local, Min T Local, Press HG Initial Buc Sloshing Sloshing Sloshing
5 5 1 1
5 5 5
1 1 1
-30% -100% 0% 0% 0%
-40%
5 1
2 2 2
Comment Codes (anticipated governing criteria not included in this table for HCSR) 1 Governing criteria is Hull Girder Strength (Shear or Bending) 2 Governing criteria is FEM (Yielding or Buckling) 3 Governing criteria is Fatigue 4 Governing criteria is GRAB 5 Governing criteria is Other Blank: governing has been identified
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure U.2 Usage Factor Ratio (CSRH/CSR) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.7 both below in H-CSR and CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
l)
Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
l)
Deck (S)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Figure U.3 Normalized Yield UF Ratio (CSRH / CSRH_Allowable) of CARGO HOLD Strength Analysis in MIDSHIP Area Summary of DSA Part (Yielding Check only and filtered by 0.9 below in H-CSR)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
l)
Deck (S+D)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
i)
j)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
l)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Appendix V
OT 10 Handymax 1
1. Midship C.T. 4
Figure V.1 - MIDSHIP CARGO TANK - LONGITUDINAL MATERIAL Summary of scantling increases to longitudinally continuous plating and stiffeners at the mid-length of the midship cargo tank after application of the CSRH for Oil Tanker.
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Plating
Ref. Offered Net Thickn ess [mm] CSR Net Req. [mm] Criterion CSR Buck. CSRH Net Req. [mm] Criterion CSRH Buck. Differen ce in net CSRH CSR Differen ce in net CSRH Offered Comme nt
BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 IH6 IH7 IH8 IH9 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 LS1 BG1 BG2 ST1 ST2 ST3
10.5 11.5 11.5 12.5 12.5 12.5 11.5 11.5 13 13 11.5 11.5 12.5 13 13 11.5 10 9.5 12 12 12 12 14 13.5 11 10.5 10 10 10 9 11.5 10.5 9 9 8.5 14.5 12 10 8 8 8.5
11.5 11.5 11.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 11.5 11.5 10 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 9.5 9.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 11.5 13.5 13.5 11 10.5 9.5 8.5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 7.5 7.5 7.5
Local, min T Local, press Local, press Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T
0.80 0.80 0.80 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.80 0.80 0.76 0.80 0.51 0.33 0.16 0.26 0.41 0.55 0.72 0.81 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.53 0.48 0.34 0.18 0.31 0.43 0.62 0.81 0.71 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.91 0.35 0.62 0.92 0.46 0.22 0.65
12.5 11.5 11.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 11.5 11.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 12 12 12 12 14 14 11.5 11 10 9.5 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 8 8 8
Local, min T Local, press Local, press Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, press Local, press Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T Local, min T
0.70 0.68 0.68 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.69 0.74 0.70 0.79 0.59 0.42 0.28 0.39 0.48 0.56 0.69 0.73 0.50 0.48 0.51 0.52 0.54 0.50 0.38 0.29 0.43 0.50 0.59 0.71 0.66 0.82 0.80 0.80 0.84 0.30 0.55 0.83 0.55 0.41 0.70
1.0 0 0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5
2.0 0 0 -2.0 -2.0 -2.0 0 0 -2.5 -2.5 -1.0 -1.0 -2.0 -2.5 -2.5 -1.0 0.5 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0 -0.5 -1.0 -1.0 -3.5 -2.5 -1.0 -1.0 -0.5 -6.5 -3.0 -1.0 0 0 -0.5
Governing criteria is FE
(+) increased requirement from CSR to CSRH Note: CSR-OT minimum thickness according to rule version July 2010
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
Stiffeners
Fatigue strength is not taken into account.
Net Offered Ref. SM CSR [cm3] BTM1 BTM2 BTM3 BTM4 BTM5 BTM6 BTM7 BTM8 BLG1 BLG2 SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 IB1 IB2 IB3 IB4 IH1 IH2 IH3 IH4 IH5 IH6 IH7 IH8 IH9 MD1 MD2 MD3 MD4 LS1 BG1 BG2 ST1 ST2 ST3 235 720 725 703 702 702 697 670 697 698 472 472 476 373 303 300 299 186 206 594 594 594 714 714 472 469 365 296 296 185 190 279 272 272 184 207 187 77 204 53 53 CSR Net Req. SM [cm3] 23 545 598 292 292 292 608 13 13 10 389 372 339 276 265 251 234 129 20 550 550 550 21 610 416 378 286 265 252 139 103 74 73 82 100 34 0 0 0 0 0 CSRH Net. CSR Criterion Req. Buckling SM [cm3] Local, press 0.73 25 Local, press 0.77 578 Local, press 0.77 645 Local, press 0.56 302 Local, press 0.56 307 Local, press 0.56 312 Local, press 0.78 694 Local, press 0.71 15 Local, press 0.70 16 Local, press 0.51 12 Local, press 0.26 389 Local, press 0.19 372 Local, press 0.17 339 Local, press 0.24 281 Local, press 0.39 279 Local, press 0.45 273 Local, press 0.56 260 Local, press 0.60 145 Local, press 0.53 21 620 Local, press 0.55 621 Local, press 0.55 631 Local, press 0.55 24 Local, press 0.44 Local, press 0.41 695 Local, press 0.26 454 Local, press 0.17 420 Local, press 0.24 335 Local, press 0.34 311 Local, press 0.45 290 Local, press 0.56 162 Local, press 0.59 126 Local, press 0.60 135 Local, press 0.60 116 Local, press 0.59 113 Local, press 0.65 142 Local, press 0.48 36 Local, press 0.70 0 Local, press 0.82 0 Local, press 0.33 0 Local, press 0.19 0 Local, press 0.65 0 Criterion [CSRH - [CSRH CSRH CSR] / Offered] / Buckling CSR Offered [%] [%] 0.71 0.74 0.78 0.54 0.54 0.53 0.77 0.69 0.67 0.57 0.42 0.37 0.28 0.39 0.55 0.62 0.78 0.81 0.50 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.50 0.53 0.42 0.30 0.43 0.55 0.66 0.80 0.78 0.82 0.77 0.76 0.85 0.42 0.76 0.78 0.53 0.53 0.94 5% 6% 8% 3% 5% 6% 14% 15% 16% 18% 0 0 0 2% 5% 9% 11% 13% 3% 13% 13% 15% 16% 14% 9% 11% 17% 17% 15% 17% 22% 84% 59% 37% 42% 6% -90% -20% -11% -57% -56% -56% 0 -98% -98% -98% -18% -21% -29% -25% -8% -9% -13% -22% -90% 5% 5% 6% -97% -3% -4% -11% -8% 5% -2% -13% -33% -51% -57% -59% -23% -83% Comment
Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press Local, press
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
FEA Midship
2.1 Plots of Yielding usage factor ratio CSRH/CSR (Filter out elements with usage factor < 0.7 in both rules)
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
July 2012
Consequence Assessment
2.2 0.9)
Plots of Yielding usage factor CSRH (Filter-out elements with usage factor <
July 2012