0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
157 vizualizări4 pagini
The document discusses the evolutionary origins of multicellular animals (Metazoa) from unicellular organisms. It proposes that Metazoa evolved from colonial flagellated protozoa similar to modern choanoflagellates, which form spherical colonies. Key evidence for this colonial theory includes the presence of flagellated collar cells in many early-diverging animals as well as molecular data linking choanoflagellates and Metazoa. The hypothetical first metazoan (protometazoan) had surface cells in contact, separating its extracellular matrix into external and internal layers and showing anterior-posterior polarization.
The document discusses the evolutionary origins of multicellular animals (Metazoa) from unicellular organisms. It proposes that Metazoa evolved from colonial flagellated protozoa similar to modern choanoflagellates, which form spherical colonies. Key evidence for this colonial theory includes the presence of flagellated collar cells in many early-diverging animals as well as molecular data linking choanoflagellates and Metazoa. The hypothetical first metazoan (protometazoan) had surface cells in contact, separating its extracellular matrix into external and internal layers and showing anterior-posterior polarization.
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
The document discusses the evolutionary origins of multicellular animals (Metazoa) from unicellular organisms. It proposes that Metazoa evolved from colonial flagellated protozoa similar to modern choanoflagellates, which form spherical colonies. Key evidence for this colonial theory includes the presence of flagellated collar cells in many early-diverging animals as well as molecular data linking choanoflagellates and Metazoa. The hypothetical first metazoan (protometazoan) had surface cells in contact, separating its extracellular matrix into external and internal layers and showing anterior-posterior polarization.
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
called peramorphosis (= extended shaping). The narwhal's
enormous tooth is an example of peramorphosis. Pedomorphosis often t'esults in descendants that are smaller and anatomically simpler than their ancestors. Small body size and short generation time (because the develop- mental program has been truncated) typify many species that have colonized unpredictable or changeable environments such as temporary pools, and perhaps the plankton commu- nity. Pedomorphosis is also common among symbiotic species, such as certain parasitic barnacles (Fig. 19-83). In these, the nonpedomorphic female is modified to absorb nutrients from the host and to produce the myriad eggs and offspring necessary to infect new hosts. Compared with the female, the pedomorphic male is a dwarf, little more than a sexually mature larva, parasitic on the female, whose only role is to provide sperm to fertilize the female's eggs. Being tiny, the male does not corn pete substantially with the female for the host's nutritional resources, allowing her to direct more food-energy to egg production. Finally, pedomorphic dscendants of large-bodied ancestors have colonized entirely new habitats. As shown in Figure 4-10, heterochrony in a family of segmented worms (polychaetes) enabled the small-bodied pedomorphic descendant to colonize the minute water-filled spaces between sand grains (an intersti- tial community). Peramorphosis typically results in descendants that are larger and anatomically more complex than their ancestors. Much of the story of metazoan evolution, as we have indi- cated throughout this chapter, is the achievement of large body size. Large body size and long generation times should be favored in constant or predictable environments such as the deep sea, upwelling areas of the sea, and coral reefs. Other advantages of large body size were discussed earlier in this chapter. Throughout this book, we will use the terms pedomorpho- sis and peramorphosis to describe significant and appropriate examples of heterochrony. You should be aware, however, that each of these categories is divided into three subcate- gories based on the exact form of heterochronic change. In the worm example, the morphogenesis of a functional go- stage of the ancestral hfe cycl_e __ that early _ a normal (ancestral) rate of development with an early onset of thus-arrestfigTurffi'cieveTOpmerilof1lie rionrproiutive (somatic) parts of the I!lal ___ <!_<'_velopmental rate of somatic structures, .. meaQiiJ,g. t}}at_diffeien tiation of the body lags per- manently behind reproductive development; or postdisplace- ment, a normal (ancestral) rate and period of development with a delayed onset (postponed start of differenciation) of somatic structures, resulting again in a sexually mature juve- nile body. These three forms of pedomorphosis and the similar categories of peramorphosis are summarized in Figure 4-11. Although they are easy to define in theory, these cate- gories are difficult to distinguish in practice and, for that reason, we use only the general terms pedo- and peramorpho- sis in this book. ORIGIN OF METAZOA Most zoologists agree that metazoans share a common ances- try with sorne unicellular organism. The classical colonial theory, in which Metazoa is derived from a colony of flagel- lated protozoa, is the most widely accepted hypothesis among contemporary zoologists (Fig. 4-12). An alternative hypothe- sis, the syncytial theory, proposes that metazoans evolved from a multinucleate but unicellular plasmodium similar to a slime mold or perhaps a ciliate protozoan. Later, membranes evolved to produce a cell boundary around each of the nuclei. The syncytial theory receives sorne support from the development of organisms such as slime molds or insects (Drosophila), in which an early multinucleated stage is followed by cellularization to form a multicellular body. However, phylogenetic analysis based on morphology and gene sequences as weil as the developmental patterns of most animais contradict the syncytial theory and favor the colonial theory. For these reasons, we consider only the colonial theory here. A modern version of the colonial theory states that the premetazoan (a protozoan) consisted of a small spherical colony bearing a surface layer of flagellated cells that was used for locomotion and feeding (Fig. 4-12C). The colony origi- nated from a cell that divided repeatedly by mitosis, but the daughter cells did not separate after cell division. Those daughter cells were surrounded and held together by a pro- teinaceous ECM in which they were deeply embedded. The gelatinous ECM also occupied much of the interior of the sphere. Similar to extant choanoflagellates, the cells each bore a single collared flagellum. A few nonflagellated cells, capable of giving rise to flagellated cells and gametes, were scattered in the subsurface ECM (Fig. 4-12C). Severa! facts support such a flagellate ancestry. Flagel- lated, or monociliated, collar cells-cells with a single fla- gellum and collar of microvilli-are widespread in meta- zoans, and the ciliated cells of lower metazoans, particularly sponges, jellyfishes, sea anemones, and corals, are exclu- sively monociliated (Fig. 4-13B). Molecular and morphologi- cal data both indicate that choanoflagellates and metazoans are sister taxa. An ECM to which cells are attached and through which they move is nearly universal in metazoans. Cellular specializations, such as eggs and sperm, have evolved in sorne colonial flagellates, such as the spherical, colonial Volvox. Although it is unrelated to metazoans, Volvox is an analog for an ancestral metazoan because it demonstrates how a mul- ticellular organism evolved from a unicellular ancestor, in this case a Chlamydomonas-like cell. Volvox is not the ancestor of Metazoa, but rather is an autotrophic organism with plantlike cells. rRNA sequence data indicate that multicellularity in Volvox evolved 50 to 75 million years ago, far too late for it to have been a progenitor of metazoans, which had their origin at !east 600 million years in the past. Thus, the volvocids evolved multicellularity in parallel with the metazoans (and with at !east four other groups: fungi, brown algae, red algae, and green plants). FROM THE BOOK: INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY: A FUNCTIONAL EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH (RUPPERT, FOX, BARNES) ECM - EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX 8 Ameboid ce li Ameboid cell C Hypothetical premetazoan Evolutionary Origins 71 External ecm D Hypothetical protometazoan Ante ri or pole FIGURE 4-12 Origin of Metazoa: choanoflagellate colonies and metazoan evolution. A and B. different forms of the choanoflagellate colony Proterospongia haeckeli. C, A hypothetical premetazoan based on the choanoflagellates in A and B. 0, A hypothetical protometazoan showing cellular specialization along an anterior-posterior axis. Surface cells are bou nd together and in mutual contact, thus allowing physiological regulation of the interior of the body. The actual sister taxon of Metazoa is most likely Choanoflagellata. Among the. extant choanoflagellates, colonies of Proterospongia haeckeli (Fig. 4-12A,B) closely resemble the hypothetical premetazoan (Fig. 4-12C). The colony consists of flagellated collar cells embedded in the surface of a gelatinous ECM. Cells undergoing division and lacking flagella occur deeper in the ECM (Fig. 4-12B). A surface sheetlike layer of cells and an ECM containing individual free cells foreshadow the two primary metazoan tissues, epiti).elial and connective, described earlier in this chapter. At the cellular leve!, choanoflagellate collar cells are virtually.identical to collar cells (choanocytes) found in the metazoan sponges. A choanoflagellate cell and sponge choanocyte both have a single flagellum surrounded by a collar of microvilli and a flagellar shaft with a bilateral vane (Fig. 4-13). In both, the flagellum is anchored 10 the cell by microtubules, which radiate from the flagellar basal body. .The hypothetical first metazoan, the protometazoan (Fig. 4-12D), may have differed from the premetazoan (Fig. 4 -12C) in severa! ways. First, the surface cells probably adjoined or were in contact with each other, thus faCihtating intercellular communication and providing a barrier between the external environment and e ECM in th!! interior of the body. Second, the close associati f b on o adJacent cells largely excluded the ECM from the cells, thus separating the ECM into external pe ;nternal layers, each of which could then adopt inde- n ent functions (Fig. 4-12D). Third, the body was polar- ized along the anterior-posterior axis. Fourth, the separation of layers and body polarity promoted cell specialization (Fig. 4-12D). ORIGIN OF POLARITY AND CELL SPECIALIZATION Most motile protozoans are polarized cells that have leading (anterior) and trailing (posterior) ends or, if sessile and attached, they have oral free ends and aboral attached ends. Metazoans are similarly polarized, depending on whether they are motile or sessile, but how did the polarity of the multicellu- lar metazoan body evolve from the unicellular polarity of pro- tozoans? A clue to the answer is found in the eggs of severa! groups of metazoans. During oogenesis in these groups, the eggs express a rudimentary flagellum and a collar of microvilli at a site on the cell surface that corresponds to the animal pole ofthe zygote (Fig. 4-13B-D). In certain invertebrate taxa, the animal pole corresponds to the anterior end of the larva (although it is the posterior end in others). Additional research is needed, but the current evidence suggests a line of descent from the polarity of a choanocyte to the primary ante- rior-posterior polarity of the metazoan body (Fig. 4-13). The protometazoan probably was polarized along an anterior-posterior axis, but what environmental conditions might have selected for the evolution of such polarity? For an aquatic metazoan, the environment presents itself in gradients of light, temperature, oxygen, and food availability. If, for 72 Chapter 4 Introduction to Metazoa Tail E Head 8 A Anterior Animal De l Veget Effective stroke ! ::-. .. : ... / c : .. ;::- Va ne Radial microtubule anchor FIGURE 4-13 Origin of metazoan polarity. A. Primitive coll ar ce li with a flagellar va ne, as occurs in protozoan choanoflagellates and metazoan sponges. B, Choanocyte-like monociliated cell from the surface epithelium (epidermis) of an anemone larva (Cnidaria), showing its power stroke in the direction of the accessory centriole. C. Early oocyte of a sea cucumber (Echinodermata) showing a low collar and rudimentary cilium; 0, Sea cucumber zygote in the sa me orientation as the oocyte in C. Note th at the animal and vegetal poles correspond to the apex and base, respectively, of the epithelial cell in B. E, A typical metazoan sperm showing its polarity in relation to an epithelial spermatogonium from which it rose. F, Anterior end of a simple larva (Cnidaria). Note the position of the accessory centrioles, which indicate posteriorly directed.ciliary effective strokes and thus forward movement in an anterior direction. (B, Modifod and redraum from lUeger, R M. 1976. Monociliated epidermal cells in Gastrotricha: Signijicance for concepts of early meto.wan evolution. Z. z.ooL Syst. Evolut.fursch. 14:198-226; C-E, ModifodfromFrick,J E., andRuppert, E. E. 19%. Primordial germ cells of Synaptula hydriformis (Holothuroitka: &hinodermata) are epethelial flagellatedrcollar cells: Their apica/rbasal poimity becOTMS primary egg polarity. Biol Bull. 191:168-177, and Frick, J E., and Ruppert, E. E. 1997. Primordial germ cells and oocytes of Branchiostoma virginiae (Cephaloclumlata, Acrania) are jlagellated epithelial cells: Relationship between epitMlial and primary eggpolarity. Zygote 5:139-151.) example, the availability offood is related to light (through pho- tosynthesis), natural selection would favor any variant inclividual capable of detecting and following a light gradient. This is best accomplished with a clirection-sensitive sensory capability cou- pied with a directional (polarized) locomotory system. Thus, selection may have favored any organism capable of tracking a resource concentration graclient. Altematively, developmentai biologist Lewis Wolpert suggests that body polarity evolved from attachment to a Attachment to a rock in water, for example, places an organism at an interface, a very steep gradi. ent. Once attached, variants would be favored that adhere well at the attached end and perform other tasks, such as feeding, at the opposite end. This again leads to a polarized body. Once polarity was established, movement would create an environmental graclient along the locomotory axis that would favor differentiai expression of traits (Fig. 4-120). For exam- ple, enhanced membrane sensitivity to environmental stimuli might be favored in cells at the anterior end of the body because they are the first to encounter changes in environ- mental conclitions. Similarly, enhanced flagellar growth, density, or activity might be favored in cells at the equator, or widest part of the body, since those locations best contribute to locomotion. Cells with a capacity for division, leading to growth, might be favored at the. posterlor end, because in that position they contribute to and interfere !east with locomo- tion. Thus, motility along a polar axis may itself promote cellular specialization because the cells occupy different fixed positions in an environmental graclient (Fig. 4-120). According to a hypothesis by developmental biologist Leo Buss, the origin of rnetazoan cell specialization may be related to a conflict between the demands for growth and locomotion. Volvox, Proterospongia, and planktonic blastula stages of metazoans require flagellated surface cells for loco- motion, but most flagellated cells cannat divide by mitosis be- cause the centrioles needed to form the mitotic spindles are already in use as the flagellar basal bodies. A metazoan flagel- lated cell can divide only after the flagellum regresses and its basal bodies are freed to form the mitotic apparatus. Th us, the options for growth in a premetazoan composed solely of fla- gellated cells (for example, the species of Proterospongia in Fig. 4-12A) are: (1) enlargement of existing cells; (2) disassembly of flagella, cell clivision, and then flagellar reassembly; (3) clivi- sion of a few cells scattered throughout the embryo while ath- ers retain flagella; or ( 4) division of a few localized cells set aside for growth (Fig. 4-12B-O). Option 1, because of the restricted number of cells, limits ultimate body size, although Volvox daughter colonies and a few postembryonic micrometa- zoans grow by cell enlargement only. Option 2, by requiring the regression of flagella, compromises locomotion. Options 3 and 4 both permit growth and locomotion, but most inverte- brate metazoans have adopted option 4. The setting aside of mitotically active cells enables metazoan growth without compromising locomotion (Fig. 4-12B-O). (A related evolu- tionary event was the setting aside of germ cells capable of meiosis.) Surface flagella are a functional necessity for locomotion in the protometazoan, but what is the optimal position for the set-aside growth cells? Buss suggests that placement at the surface might have resulted in overgrowth of locomotory cells or growth of a tumorlike appendage, either of which would negatively affect motility. Intemalizing the growth cells, however, would neither distort the body surface nor inteffere with the locomotory cells. Perhaps for these reasons the protometazoan did intemalize its growth cells and the process was preserved, as gastrulation, in its descendants (Fig. 4-14; .ii
___ ........;._ GROWTH FIGURE 4-14 Origin of cel! and tissue specialization: segregation patterns of growth cells in hypothetical protometazoans. A. Blastula-like developmental stage of a hypothetical organism; 8, Hypothetical blastula-like organism that does not grow because its cells retain locomotory cilia and thus cannot divide by mitosis. C-E, Growth by internalizing nonflagellated mitotically active cells in three simple hypothetical metazoans. The patterns in C-E a Iso represent three basic forms of gastrulation in actual animais. c. multipolar ingression; D. unipolar ingression; E, invagination (or emboly). Note how the embryonic blastocoel (ECM) is equivalent to adult connective tissue. (Based on ideas in Buss, L. W 1987. The Evolution of lndividuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 201 pp.) also see Reproduction and Development in chapter). An intemalization of cells capable of mitosis also evolved in Volvox and Proterospongia haeckeli (Fig. 4-12B). A colony of P. haeckeli grows by the addition of new surface choanocytes that origi- nate by mitosis of cells in the subsurface gel. Similarly, colonies of Volvox consist of a thousand or more flagellated surface cells and invaginated subsurface pockets of nonflagel- dividing cells (gonidia). The gonidia can give rise to either new colonies or germ cells. . The simultaneous requirement for locomotion and growth 10 early metazoans favored a body with two layers of differenti- ated cells (Fig. 4-12D). The layering of cells established tissues (as described earlier in Cells, Tissues, and Skeletons) and an exterior-interior gradient. The surface cells bad direct access to and other raw materials, but were constfained by the reqUirements for locomotion and for interfacing with the environment. The in teri or cells, liberated from direct :teraction with the environment, became specialized for a production, nutrient storage, and, with the evolution of gut, the digestion offood. ORIGIN OF COMPLEXITY Evidence supports the hypothesis that metazoans evolved from protozoan colonies in which initially similar cells became specialized for different functions. If so, the evolu- tion of Metazoa can be described as a replication of similar units (cells) followed by unit specialization and integration into an organism at a new, higher level of complexity. This replication-specialization-integration of units. sequence is a general pattern in the evolution of large body size and complexity. An example, as we have seen already, is the replication, specialization, and integration of cilia on the body of many ciliates, which are among the largest, most diverse, most active, and most complex protozoan cells. Among metazoans, one example is a body corriposed of a series of similar segments, as in earthworms or crustaceans. Later, these segments become specialized and integrated into regions, such as the head, thorax, and abdomen. Exam- ples at ali levels of biological complexity are illustrated nd described in Figure 4-15.