Stage 2 Assessment Evidence Performance Task/s G. R. A. S. P.

. S G oal To produce a scientific explanation on the anti-microbial potency of Makabuhay Leaf Extract for the people in the farflung community rarely visited by any medical practitioner as first aid for treating mild bacterial infection. You are a science oriented student living in a barangay where folkloric influence in very strong and you have to convince the people to use the bitter decocted extract of makabuhay leaf for the treatment of E. coli contamination. The people in the community It is a known fact that not all people in the community have the capacity to store medicine for common illness. Some finds it even difficult to buy one antibacterial table for a simple stomach ache due to E. coli infection. Today, people in the far flung community will resort to rubbing the aching stomach area with warm leaves of some known herbal plant to alleviate the pain. In the absence of antibacterial tablet or medicine, as an informed student, you already know that Makabuhay leaf extract contain flavonoids and alkaloids that could inhibit and reduce the E. coli infestation to the normal floral level in the intestine. You need to inform the people in the community the list of active ingredients of a diatabs or loperamide the commercially available antibacterial tablet for stomach trouble cause by E. coli. Then show them the design or scientific research method of determining the secondary metabolites of plant extract. The Phytochemical Evaluation and the Antibacterial Screening of Plant Extract. Show them the result of your laboratory investigation. The analysis of the laboratory result and the positive analysis of the scientific research. S tandards and Criteria for success The Scientific Research supporting the claim of the Antibacterial Property of Makabuhay Leaf Extract should contain the necessary element of a good scientific evaluation. The procedure, materials needed, manner of data collection, the result presented and data analysis should be made clear and comprehensible for an ordinary person for convincing effort. Budgetary and efficacy comparison of the antibacterial effect of the Makabuhay Leaf Extract with that of the commercial

R ole A udience

S ituation

Product/Performa nce and Purpose

tablet should be emphasized for economic advantage.

Criteria

5
Demonstrating originality with your topic choice. Demonstrating originality in each phase of project development. Conducting experiments. Collecting, documenting and presenting the data. Possessing knowledge about the project equipment. Being knowledgeable about the scientific literature about your topic. Presenting data, analysis, interpretations, explanations and conclusions in an orderly and understandable manner. Keeping all project materials clean and orderly. Being well groomed for your oral presentation.
Acknowledging sources of information- never plagiarize.

Points 3
Topic of choice is not original. Demonstrating originality in each phase of project development. Experimentation is done in the laboratory with lesser supervision. Processing knowledge about the project with lesser supervision. Limited knowledge about the scientific literature about your topic. Presenting data, analysis, interpretations, explanations and conclusions is not properly done but can be understood.
Keeping project materials clean but not orderly.

1
Topic of choice is not original. Project development protocol is not even original Experimentation is done by adult supervising the research work.

Creativity 20%

Skills 20%

Thoroughness 20%

Lack knowledge about the scientific literature about your topic. Presenting data, analysis, interpretations, explanations and conclusions is not properly done and difficult to understand.
Project materials dirty and disorder.

Clarity 10%

Neatness 10%

Integrity 10%

Does not acknowledge some sources of information there is a sense of plagiarism.

Plagiarized sources of information regarding the research work.

Results 10%

Concluding your project with relevant, valid, scientific, mathematical and/or engineering information.

Concluding your project with relevant, valid, scientific, imperfect mathematics information

Concluding your project with mathematical errors and irrelevant information.