Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
95539
MAGNETIC
_" ..--.q("l i n 0")
SHIELDING
!l/_ _ " , _"
";;_
3_ L _L_m -"I--,' O "_ e_ 4 u'J rO _ r" Z _mm _ _"_ Z
INTERPLANETARY
SPACECRAFT
,O ,O
FINAL
k_
REPORT: Advanced
NASA/USRA
0 f_ 0 N Z ,,O .$,, I r_
t_ m
by
Department
Duke University of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Durham, North Carolina 27708-0300
Science
July,
1993
Professor
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The
provided
by Eric
Smith,
Head Duke
Engineering and
Library the
at Duke
in the Don
enormously is gratefully
Carson,
at Goddard
Center
students Jason
have
to this Goldsmith,
design John
Alex
Adkins,
A1 Johnson, Vibby
Graham
Orriss,
Prasad,
Hans
Alexander
David
Wasik,
and Brian
Yamanouchi.
Table
of Contents
Abstract
4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8 11 13 14 17 17 18 23 OF 23
for Manned
Shielding
Alternative Magnetic
Optimization of Force
and Stress
Emitter
Calculations
Configuration
.........................................................................................
APPENDIX
MAGNETIC, SPACECRAFT
..............................................................
Abstract This project is concerned with the design and engineering of deployed, high temperature superconducting coils (DHTSC) for the production of large volume, low-intensity magneticfields to produce shielding of manned spacecraft against solar flare protons. The concept of using a superconducting coil for magneticshieldingagainstsolarflare radiationduring mannedinterplanetary missionshaslong beencontemplatedand was consideredin detail in the yearsprecedingthe Apollo missions. Only lower temperaturesuperconductors were then known, and the field coils neededto producethe protectivefield werelimited in size to the ship dimensions. Thesecoils wereineffective unlessthey carriedenormoustotal circulatingcurrents,andtheir potentialusein the Apollo program was
abandoned. the field with coils With high temperature the spacecraft mass and energy field superconductors, it has now become requirement realistic to consider lowered deploying together are made beyond system such hull and the current requirements. system coil is dramatically concomitant between capable especially possible
Importantly,
experiments
possible and
a magnetic
generating
the field of the earth of increasing wires through the mean been
produced
superconductor concepts
that have
within small
last year,
the use of a
another
mission. groups shielding of up to seven systems supports and students, the design engineering of specific that not only advantages
then with
of magnetic result
have
systems shielding
dramatic
weight
compared
Inh'oduclion
ultimate function
objective
and
piggyback to test
payload of of
is to produce
magnetic
spacecraft orbits
solar flare protons, orbital of being temperature high Tc decay tested from
sufficient
concept.
using
in diameter
to produce
moments
required
system. missions.
benefits
interplanetary to be emphasized.
of a protective of
usefulness
increasing
of propellant magnetic
would program.
an innovative,
high temperature
superconducting
Historical
Perspective
magnetic While
fields
from
energetic
contemplated
missions
the concept
gained
of protecting 250
device
miles radiation
Johnston
Island
(Project
with a peak
of three
satellites
1, and
produced
This
concern
system manned
seriously field
considered
The
applications missions
renewed
to provide designs.
the required
capabilities
shielding
at significant
savings
Radiation
Issues
for Manned
Spaceflight
space
radiation Allen
is generally radiation
by three of galactic
prime
sources: rays,
Belts, storms,
cosmic
contain
1 Gev),
belt radiation.
The former
two fomas
that dwarf
the latter. Historical most flares same often cited data is commonly in February powerful used to predict potential exposures, of 1960, and the benchmark of 1972. solar flares While these
of 1956,
November
In fact, a flare of the The unshielded and 411 rem even over with a 30
of magnitude
event
1989. 3
blood-forming-organ respectively. a 10 grams day period for any protection to shielding extremely While activity,
(BFO)
equivalents were
were
62 rem,
110 rem,
equivalents shield. 4
39.8 rein, and 50.7 rem respectively rem limit for vital organs concern benefit must from specific been
centimeter
Since
5, significant missions
be raised
long
current
U.S.
afforded
missions
per cycle
successfully Mars
planned which
periods
missions,
forces
mission
designers
of smaller it has
be quite that 7
significant
of solar an annual
predicted mission.
an unprotected
crew
100 rein
on a Mars
Mass
Shielding
is
generally
referred
to as a The major
passive problem
shielding
concept.
Simply,
of
encountered
with mass
is that from
Furthermore, with
the shielding
be considered,
be noted
type of
mission,
implementation.
configuration in order
inherent mass
strategies
be considered
reasonable
levels.
Alternative
Shielding
Strategies
of active Of these,
concepts electric
have and
been
suggested, shielding
electric, suffer
plasma
which creating
render
their
infeasible.
magnetic
shielding, charged
which
a magnetic hope
a spacecraft
particles,
appears
be the greatest
shield.
Magnetic
Shielding
Work
on
the
concept of the
was
initiated was,
before
manned limited
spaceflight to low
was
even
concept
of course,
temperature posed in
The use of such low temperature tile equilibrium would temperatures still state. be
superconductors
attained needed
to liquid in order
temperatures
through
refrigeration magnetic maintaining intensities Third, question savings the shield One might
the superconducting
This
requirement
designs cryogenic
requirements magnetic
Second,
achievable
extremely
to shield required
shielding
found
a weightsupport of
protecting
against
1 bey or higher
component noted
concern
such
high have
magnetic been
fields
have
organisms,
especially travelers
exposures.
Studies
as to the potential
dangers
to space
acceptance
The debateon the generaltopic of magneticfield interactionswith living organismsstill can be seen especiallyseenwith respectto the high voltageelectricallines that areusedto supplypower acrossthe country. However, with proper designthe field presentin the crew quarterscan be reducedto values lower thannormallypresenton earth. With the adventof high temperaturesuperconductors, heightenedinterestin magnetic shieldsis apparent.This interestis further fueled by recentplanningfor a mannedmission to Mars which would directly benefit from the developmentof magneticshielding technologies. A numberof studieshave focusedon the useof the newceramicmaterialswhich can achievesuperconductivityatliquid nitrogen temperatures as well ason possibleconfigurationsfor a magneticshield. Onesuchconfigurationis that of a deployedtorus.12 Thesenew superconducting materialspresenta numberof notableadvantages, including significantly lesscooling needsaswell asdeployedconfigurationsfor superconducting wires. The deployed configuration appearsespecially promising due to enormousreductions in mass and energy requirementsover previous ship-boardcoil designs. In addition, the dangerthat catastrophic failure of the magneticshieldposesto a spaceship's crew is minimized by deploying the shield away from the shipasopposedto producingthe necessary magneticfieldswith a ship-board coil. 12
Mathenmtical Basisfor
The concept has been behind practical of using deployed high temperature investigatorsl2,18,
the Design
magnetic
fields
it is important it is desired
to establish
shield. radius.
of 10 meters
of establishing once
of energetic
magnetic
dimension
shown
region length
in approximately as follows20:
is determined
(1)
where
relativistic
particle
momentum
I A
Now, case
momentum of basic
is calculated particles,
as the product
However, case
in the
relativistic of light,
considerations
of particles
approaching
the speed
the momentum
is calculated
p _
mov _l-(c) 2
(3)
where
mo v c = = =
the particle
rest mass
velocity of light
3 x 108 nVs
The
calculation
of momentum 4:
as achieved
using
equation
3 may
also be achieved
using
the relativistic
relation
in equation 1
1- c
Iv;
the ratio in equation of the actual 5: energy of the particle in question to the rest energy Energy / Rest Energy
(4)
Equation particle,
4 is simply as simplified
of that
7= Actual
(5)
In St6rmer
the
specific
case
of
interest,
if
it is desired 25 meters.
to fully The
protect
a radius moment
of 10 meters,
then
the from
radius
will need
to be approximately
magnetic
may be calculated
equation 1. A cutoff energyof 200 MeV hasbeensuggested 21, andto protect a St6rmerradius of
meters from protons of this energy, the relativistic the kinetic energy through momentum must be found. Knowing that 1 MeV to determine equivalent velocity to 1.6 x 10 -13 joules, of those protons. of 200 MeV solving protons can be used
25 is the
This is achieved
the following:
K. E. = mc 2 - mo c2
(6)
which
Thus,
using
equation
energy,
(approximately
The momentum
equation
moment
for protection
be examined
in greater
detail.
In particular,
moment
increases
as the area
enclosed with
electrical for
activate equation
shield
as a function
of the radius
of the toms,
the total
current
using
1, to give:
I = 4 nC_P qYo A
(7)
Equation function
for example,
protons
to approximate
the current
in amperes
as a
4.5x10 I R2
9 (8)
Here,
it is interesting
and important
to note a relation
which
determines
the energy
required
for magnetic
E = LI z
(9)
where
the coilinductance.
10
the inductance
is assumed
to be a constant,
then an
is obtained:
7rC),P E= L/ q -- oA ) \
t"4
(10)
that we have
here considered
(200 MeV
protons,
Cst of 25 meters),
equation
8 can be
into equation
9 to yield:
E:L
(21019) R4
(11)
While
it should
varies
shown
is the dependence
shows
required size,
requirement
for protecting
from
same
particles,
by a fourth
dependence.
Torus
Mass
Optimization
torus
size
and
mass
with
knowledge
mass
as a function
of the
First,
it should mass
is simply
and toms-tube
(MT):
Mror
= Mw + Mr
(12)
The
wire mass
is determined
as follows:
M w = 2 JrRap
(13)
where
R a
= = =
torus radius total cross sectional area of wire to the total current density
11
superconductor
wire density
The toms-tube
mass
is found
as follows:
M r = 2zcRm
(14)
where
The
optimum
size
in terms
is finally
determined
by differentiating
the total
mass
with
respect With
this to zero. calculated First, upon results, it is possible to now optimize the
procedure
which
protection
of a St6rmer
of 25 meters,
to perform
optimization. these
Further
constraints
of the superconductor
be established wire.
on recent
reported
of high temperature
superconductor
if it is still desired
mass
the above
current
of the current
can be computed
as a function
of radius.
equation
results:
a-'--
45 R2
I
(15)
The
mass
of the wire
by simply
multiplying
the circumference
cross-sectional
of the wire.
This results
in the following:
M w = 2zcRag
2.3x106 R
(16)
Next,
the mass
of the
torus=tube
must
be calculated,
and
this is found
similarly
as the product
of the
circumference
(17)
12
*4
Thus
being
is simply:
2.3x10 Mrr R
+0.55R
(18)
size,
equation
18 can be differentiated
with respect
to the radius
to
dMro r dR
2.3 x 10 6 _-0.55 = 0 R2
(19)
Solving equation
yields
an optimum
radius
of 2036
The
optimmn
mass be noted
is then found
using of for
kg for the full size (not prototype) of the tube in the optimum proton energy, or tube mass
can be easily
St0rmer
Calculation
of Force
and Stress
in Coils
forces These
and
stresses
involved may
in
a deployed
characteristics
be calculated
as follows.
be determined
relation23:
PolZ [ln(
8R ]
(20)
where
R r
= =
the coil radius the wire radius the permittivity 4nx10 -7H/m of free space
/1 o = = I =
the current
must ratio
once current
again
by realizing (J).
density
the following
relation:
13
r = _/---_
(21)
current
is 1093
amps
as calculated
above
current
density force to
wire radius
is found.
This allows
which
low.
The
the ratio
of the force
(7--
FMAG /l_r 2
(22)
Using The
equation stress
of 1.66 x 105 N/m 2 is found. of the St6rmer radius and relation: the coil radius can be calculated by combining
equations
the following
(23)
neglecting radius.
All of these
calculations
can be repeated
particle
and St/Jrmer
Selective
Emitter
Calculations
With wire
the
planned
use
of
superconducting deployed
wire,
by the This
is due
temperatures with
by using
coatings an internal
an absorptivity layer
x 10 -2,
achievable attained
reflecting
temperature length
is still 147OK. 12
This assumes
of 1 wire
oriented of
perpendicular
the transition
temperature
high temperature
superconducting
14
(_)
2I_.
'
Fig.
1 Torus
geometry
shown
section
(Note:
not to scale,
the
sunlight
is parallel
to the plane
approach absorber
of cooling coatings
coil is by of
over
of illumination. ratio
a mesh region
or Mylar inside
sheet
to emissivity
the length
the toms,
perpendicular
to the
by examining The
balance by a
the absorption
of solar energy
total power
is governed
by the following
relation:
Pi. = S_zA1
(24)
where
flux (watts/cm
2)
AI=
the illuminated
area
radiated
away
as follows:
15
co., = o-eAsT 4
where the Stefan-Boltzman 5.67 x 10 12
C =
(25)
constant 4
watts/cm2-K
A2=
Te =
If it is now
assumed area
radius area
of the torus
is 2036
meters First,
radius area
of the major
diameter
below:
A 1 = (2R)(2r)
(26)
This
is calculated
to be 4072
we have
been
using.
The emitting
as follows:
A 2 = [(2nR)(2nr)]
+ [2n(R
- r) 2]
(27)
This
accounts Now,
gained equation
from
the inner
sheet
to be
2.61
x 107 m 2 in
this case.
24 equal
to equation
is obtained:
(28)
if the same
absorptivity
ratio
constant
is
watts/m2,12
equation
reveals
temperature
equilibrium that
of approximately to using
a viable
mechanical First,
problems
by this configuration. and the deployment but this would cooling This might need systems. be difficult
present
in light
of the enormous
masses
energies) would
required need
by mechanical
of the torus
to be maintained.
of the magnetic
16
field, but is certainly achievablewith present-dayorientationand stabilizationtechnologiesdeveloped for satellites. Fourth,it shouldbenotedthat a temperature gradientwould exist acrossthe areaof the web or foil, with the coldestpoint beingat or nearthe middle. This might requireincreasingthe rateof thermal conduction in the web or foil. If a hollow web was used,this problem could be solved by allowing a gasto circulatethroughthe matrix by forcedconvection. Only a smallquantityof gaswould be requiredhere. Alternatively, the entire configurationcould be allowed to cool naturally, as long as thenecessary time for suchcoolingis within practicallimits on sucha mission. This entirely self-cooled system,with its stringentrequirementon orientation,may not bepractical with manydesignsthat have already been proposedfor a Mars mission. However, it does indicate the engineeringpossibility of dispensingwith mechanical coolingentirely if the missiondesigncanbeapproached with a freehand.
Shield
and Spaceship
Configuration
previously
published such
design
for
expedition gravity to 2.
took
into
account and
special in a
as the requirement This magnetic eight field geometry shield, configuration to protect those
by rotation,
resulted
temperature a coil of
in figure state.
One thus
criteria
is the
of a magnetic of those
quarters, such
and
a distribution field
of the
coil wires of
areas
in the interior
the living
are substantially
canceled
Using
the Deployed
Coil as a Magnetic
Sail
It
was
first
suggested field
by
24
between
a shipboard Since
magnetic
field force
and the earth's will increase moments calculation scale) been Zubrin case,
could
a small increases,
of propulsion. from
this propulsive
magnetic that
it is evident this
discussed shows
it is possible
to consider moment
in the
present anaps.m
that with
a assumed of thrust
magnetic
20 millionths suggested
of a pound
can be obtained
More
that thrust
in momentum
m/s 2 may
described
it is evident
concepts
using
17
,__
(u+'
(5
_I
_- u_z
..C'_
D A N_
_0
cZ_
__-<
Z
_
;::1 ,,-,
to test shows
radiation
shielding
Furthermore, 200
an analysis miles,
of the amount
of drag drag
to be experienced
in
at approximately Thus,
the atmospheric
of 20 millionths repulsion
of a pound. appears
the concept
of compensating
for atmospheric
magnetic
to be viable. 26
Design
of a Prototype
System
have system
been
focused
design concept.
cycle
on defining
the
criteria
A small, on another
payload
launched
piggyback areas:
geosynchronous
Prototype
the following
torus
deployment
system
sensing
technologies
command,
control,
and communications
teclmologies
energy
control
technologies
thermal
considerations
flexible
superconducting
wire
is scaling, given
coil.
calculations high
on this
above
currently
it should zone
of under
around
50 MEV
protons.
"A Six-Foot
Magnet Engineering.
System
for
Magnetic
in International Conference
Proceedings Plenum
of the Press,
by K. D. Timmerhaus,
18
2 Vittitoes, Charles N., "Magnetic-Filed Shielding of Satellites From High-Energy-Electron Environments," Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, SAND--89-2956, May 1990.
3 Simonsen, Mars, NASA Lisa C. and John E. Nealy, 3079, 1991. Radiation Protection for Human Missions to the Moon and
Technical
Paper
Lawrence SHielding
W.,
John
E. Nealy,
John
W. Wilson, Interplanetary
Atwell, Journal
"Large
Solar
Flare and
for Manned
of Spacecraft
Vol.
26 (1989),
5 Fry,
"Radiation
Protection
Guidelines
for Space
Mission,"
Health
Physics,
6 Nealy, Radiation
John
E.,
Lisa
W. Townsend, (1975-1986)",
and
John
W. Wilson, 901347,
"Deep-Space
Exposure
Analysis
SAE Paper
Daniel
and Alcestis
R. Oberg, Inc.,
"The Medical
Aspects
of a Flight
to Mars",
J. Boston,
Ed., Univelt,
1984, p. 173-180.
8 Kash, September,
Sidney
W.
and
Robert
F. Tooper,
"Active
Shielding
for Manned
Spacecraft,"
Astronautics,
9 Levy, Avco
R.H.,
Radiation Div.,
Shielding
of Space
Vehicles
by Means TN 61-7),
Coils,
Avco
Corp.,
Everett
106 (AFBSN
10 Dow, Manned
Norris Space
F.
"Structural Symposium,
Implications
in Space",
Proceedings
of the
Stations
Los Angeles,
11 Singer, IAF,
S.F.,
"Some August
Consequences
of a Theory
of the Radiation
Belt",
9th Annual
Congress
of the
Amsterdam,
High Shields
Coil Galactic
(DHTSC) Radiation
Interplanet,'u'y
Journal
of the British
Interplanetary
Society,
19
14 Brown,
G.V., Eds.,
"Magnetic
Radiation
Shielding",
in High
Magnetic
Fields. 1962.
H. Kolm,
B. Lax, F. Bitter,
and R. Mills,
Cambridge,
15
Dow,
Norris Space
F.
Structural
Implications General
of the Electtric
TIS in 14).
Report
No.
R60SD376,
Science
Laboratory,
16 Kash, June
S.W.,
"Mininmm
Structural
Mass
for a Magnetic
Radiation
Shield",
AIAA
Journal,
Vol.
1,
1963, p. 1439-1441.
17
Kholodov,
Yu.
A.,
Space
Biology
and Pole,
the Priroda
Magnetic (Moscow),
Field.
Translated
into
English
from
Kosmicheskaya Systems
Biologiya
i Magnitnoye
by Air Force
Command,
Wright-Patterson
AFB,
Ohio,
Foreign
Technology
18
Hilinski,
Erik Magnetic
J. and Shield",
F. Hadley in press.
Cocks,
"A Deployed
High
Temperature
Superconducting
Coil
(DHTSC)
19 St6rmer,
C.,
The Polar
Aurora,
Oxford,
at the Clarendon
Press,
p. 292,
1955.
20 Helgesen, due
John
O. and
Frank with
of a Charged
Particle
Field of 1966,
to a Finite
Solenoid
Radiation
Protection",
and Astronautics,
Sciences
Meeting,
J. E. Nealy, Concept
"Radiation SAE,
Missions",
Systems,
Williamsburg,
22 Amato, 308.
Ivan,
"New
Superconductors:
A Slow
Dawn",
Science,
Vol.
259, January
20
23 Moon,
Francis
C., Magneto-Solid
Mechanics,
John Wiley
& Sons,
New York,
1984.
24 j. Engleberger,
U.S. Patent
No. 3,504,868,
granted
April
7, 1970.
25 Zubrin, British
Robert
M.,
"The Society,
Use
of Magnetic
Sails
to Escape
from
Low
Earth
Orbit",
Journal
of the
Interplanetary
Vol. 46 (1993),
pp. 3-10.
26
Woodcock, p. 50.
Gordon
R.,
Space
Stations
and
Platforms,
Orbit
Book
Company,
Malabar,
Florida
(1986),
21
22
_7, 2: .........
5_
APPENDIX
MAGNETIC,
ELECTROSTATIC, SPACECRAFT
AND
PLASMA
SHIELDING
OF
- A BIBLIOGRAPHY
is given other
of references
to methods Both
of shielding computer
spacecraft
from searching
solar has
and been
shielding. materials
of older
reports,
patents.
facilities
herein,
include:
magnetic
employment using
magnetic With
however,
materials
to use. been
shielding
of literature However, no
concepts
ranging without
shipboard
be complete which
referencing
pioneering
book,
although
concerned radiation
shielding
mathematical
for virtually
all subsequent
1')$8
1. Singer, IAF, S.F., "Some Consequences August of a Theory of the Radiation Belt", 9th Annual Congress of the
Amsterdam,
26, 1958.
1960
2. Dow, N.F., Space "Structural Stations Implications of the Ionizing Radiation April in Space", 20-22, Proceedings of the Manned
Symposium,
Los Angeles,
California,
1960.
1')61
PII_CEDIhG PAGE _J[.ANK NOT 23 FILMED
Levy,
R.H.,
"Radiation Everett
Shielding
of Space
Vehicles
by Means
of Superconducting Apr.
Coils",
Avco
Corp.,
Avco
Res. Rep.
106 (AFBSD
TN 61-7),
1961, p. 1568-1570.
4. Brown,
G.V.,
"Magnetic Eds.
Radiation
Shielding",
in High
Magnetic
Fields.
H. Kolm,
B. Lax, F. Bitter,
and R. Mills,
Cambridge,
1962.
5. Dow,
N.F., General
of Space Contract
Vehicle NASr-34,
Shielding. Rept.
Space R62SD31,
Sciences Apr.
Lab., 1962.
Edmonson,
"Shielding Inform.,
of Space
by Magnetic Protection
Fields", Against
In Atomic Radiation
Washington, Tenn.,
at Gatlinburg,
5-7,
1962, p. 808-818.
7.
Kash,
S.W.
"Active
Shielding
for Manned
Spacecraft",
Astronautics,
Vol. 7, Sept.
1962, p. 68-75.
8. Levy,
Richard by Means
It.
"Author's
Reply
to Willinski's Coils'",
Comment
on 'Radiation Vol.
Shielding
of Space
Vehicles
of Superconducting
ARS Journal,
9. Levy,
R.H., Nov.
The Prospects
for Active
Shielding,
Avco-Everett
Research
Lab.,
Everett,
MA, AMP-94,
1962.
10.
J.M.,
"The
Combination Inform.,
and D.C.,
Passive Protection
Shielding", Against
In
Atomic
Energy in
Radiation
Hazards
Proc.
at Gatlinburg,
Nov.
11.
Tooper,
Davies,
"Electromagnetic
Shielding
of Space
Vehicles",
IAS Paper
No. 62-
156, June,
12. Tooper,
R.F.,
Shielding
Feasibility
Study,
Armour 1962.
Research
Foundation
Summary
Technical
AF 33(616)-8489,
September,
13.
Willinski,
Martin
I.
"Comment
on
'Radiation
Shielding
of
Space
Vehicles
by
Means
of
24
Journal,
Mass
for a Magnetic
Radiation
Shield",
AIAA
J., Vol.
1, June
1963, p. 1439-1441.
15.
Kash,
S.W.
and
R.F.
Tooper,
"Correction
on
Active
Shielding
for
Manned
Spacecraft",
Astronautics,
January,
1963, p. 43.
16. Madey,
Richard,
"Shielding
Against
Space
Radiation",
Nucleonics,
Vol.
21, May
1963, p. 56-60.
i7.
Norwood, Dynamics,
J.M.
and F.L.
Gibbons,
Studies
Shielding
and Superconductivity,
General
Fort Worth,
TX, AD-423178,
18.
Shen,
S.P.,
"Nuclear
Problems
in Radiation
Shielding
in Space",
Astronautica
Acta,
4, 1963, p. 211-274.
19.
Stekly, AMP
Z.J.J.,
Magnetic
Energy 1963.
Storage
Using
Superconducting
Coils,
Avco-Everett
Researc
Lab.,
102, January
20.
Tooper,
Robert
F.,
Shielding
Feasibility
Study
[Final Sys.
Report, Planning,
June
1961-Sept.
1962],
Wright-Patterson Technical
Directorate
of Advanced
Armour
Foundation
Documentary
No. ASD-TDR-63-194,
May,
1963.
21.
Vogler,
Frank
H.,
Shielding York,
for Space
Vehicles", 1963,
Institute 63-12,
Annual May
Meeting,
Paper
1964, p. 872-878.
1964
22. Bhattacharjie, Artificial A. and I. Michael, Radiation Belt", AIAA "Mass and Magnetic Dipole Shielding Against Electrons of the
1964, p. 2198-2201.
23.
Bernert,
Stekly,
Magnetic
Radiation
Shielding
Systems
Analysis,
NASA-CR-64915,
AMP-134,
1964.
25
24.
Feasibility Contract
of Magnetic
Orbital
Shielding AD483301,
System, May,
Report 1964.
of Lockheed
Missiles
and
Space
Co.,
No. AF 04(695)-252,
25.
Felten,
James
E.,
"Feasibility
of Electrostatic Sciences,
Systems
for Space
Vehicle
Radiation
Shielding",
Journal
of the Astronautical
1964, p. 16-22.
26.
Good, Space
R.C.,
S.P.
Shen,
and
N.F.
Dow,
Active Aug.
Shielding General
Concepts Electric
for
the Ionizing
Radiation
in
[Final Lab.
Report,
1 Sep. 1962-31
1963].
Co., Philadelphia,
PA, Space
Sciences
NASA-CR-58950,
31 Jan. 1964.
27.
Hoag, July,
Stekly,
Superconducting
Coil
Technology.
NASA-CR-64915,
AMP-134,
28.
Kelm,
S. and P. Odelga,
"Employment
of Superconductors Wissenschaftliche
in Spaceflight Gesellschaft
Jahrestagung,
fiir Flugwissenschaften,
1966, p. 242-247.
29.
Levy,
Richard
H. and G. Sargent
Janes,
"Plasma
Radiation
Shielding",
AIAA
J.,
Vol.
2, Oct. 1964,
p. 1835-1838.
30.
Levy,
R.H.
Plasma Sep.
Radiation 1964.
Shielding.
Avco-Everett
Research
Lab.,
Everett,
MA, RR-192,
31.
Petrov,
A.,
"The
'Magnetic
Walls'
of
a Cosmic
Nauchn.-Tekhn. Command,
Obshchestva Wright-Patterson
SSSR AFB,
(Moscow), Ohio,
Foreign
1')65
32. Bernert, NASA, R.E. and Z.J.J. Stekly, "Magnetic Radiation against Shielding Using in Space, Superconducting 1965, p. 199-209. Coils", In
Washington
2d Syrup. on Protec.
Radiations
33.
Hawkins,
S.R.,
"A Six-Foot
Laboratory
Superconducting
Magnet
System
for Magnetic
Orbital
26
Advances
in Cryogenic
Volume
10, Sections
1964,
Discussion,
C.H.
Rosner,
Minnich,
C. Laverick,
34.
Kash,
S.W.,
"Magnetic
Space
Shields", Biennial
Institute
and 25-27,
University, 65-629
Evanston, Institute
Astronautics, ILL.,
Evanston, Northwestern
August
Proceedings,
Springer,
University
1967, p. 135-166.
35.
Levy,
R.H.,
"Comment Belt'",
on 'Mass
and Magnetic
Dipole
Shielding
Against
Electrons
of the Artificial
Radiation
AIAA
36.
Levy,
Plasma
Shielding.
AVCO-Everett
Research
Lab.,
Everett,
MA.
NASA-CR-71254,
AMP-179,
37.
Levy,
Plasma
Radiation
Shielding,
In NASA,
Washington
2d Symp.
on Protec.
against
in Space,
1965, p. 211-215.
38.
McDonald, Fields
Perry and
F.,
An
of Charged Brown
Particles Engineering
Huntsville,
NASA-CR-68657,
1965.
39.
and
R. D. Shelton, In NASA,
"The
Application
Theorem Radiations
to in
Washington
2d Syrup. on Protec.
1965, p. 189-198.
1')66
40. Englesson, Aeronautics Meeting, York, George A., "Superconducting Coils for Shielding Astronautical A Volume in Space", Society, of Technical In American Stepping Papers. Institute of
Stones
to Mars New
AIAA,
1966, A66-25262,
p. 282-287.
27
41. Helgesen, JohnO. andFrank A. Spagnolo,"The Motion of a ChargedParticlein a MagneticField dueto a Finite Solenoidwith Application to Solar Radiation Protection", American Institute of
Aeronautics 1966, Paper and Astronautics, 66-512. Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 4th, Los Angeles, CA, June 27-29,
42.
Levine, AIAA
S.H.,
A. Bhattacharjie,
and R. Lepper,
"Forbidden
Regions
Produced
by Parallel
Dipoles",
43.
Samuel
H. and
Richard
Lepper,
"Analogue Aerospace
Studies Sciences
of Magnetic Meeting,
Shields", 4th,
American CA,
Los Angeles,
27-29,
1968, p. 695-701.
44.
Levy,
R.H.
and
G.S.
Janes,
"Plasma
Radiation
Shielding
for
Deep
Space 120.
Vehicles",
SpaceAeronautics,
45.
[Plasma
Radiation
Shielding]
FinalReport.
AVCO-Everett
Research
Lab.,
Everett,
MA.
NASA-
CR-70802,
Jan. 1966.
1967
46.
Haffner, New
J.W., York,
Radiation Academic
in Space.
Nuclear
Science
and Technology,
Volume
4,
47.
Kash,
S. W.
"Magnetic
Space
Shields",
in Advances Press,
in Plasma Evanston,
Dynamics,
Ed. by T. P. Anderson
and R. W. Springer,
Northwestern
University
48.
Kholodov, Pole].
Yu A., Priroda
Space
Biology
Field
i Magnitnoye Command,
114-115, Div.,
Wright-Patterson
Technology
31 Jan. 1967.
49.
Levy,
Richard
W. French,
Shield."
Concept,
to Space Res.
Avco-Everett 1967.
Research
NASA-CR-84420,
Rept.-258,
50.
Levy,
Richard
H. and Francis
W. French,
The Plasma
Radiation
Shield."
Concept,
and Applications
28
to Space
Vehicles.
Avco-Everett
Research
Lab., Everett,
MA, NASA-CR-61176,
9 Oct. 1967.
51.
V.G.,
"Optimum
Magnetic
Radiation
Shields", Physics
Zhurnal
Fiziki,
Vol.
37
1967, p. 1230-1232,
- Technical
12 (7), Jan.
1968,
p. 892-894.
52.
[Study
of Plasma Research
Radiation Lab.,
Quarterly
Progress
24 Mar.-23
Jun.
1967.
Avco-
Everett
NASA-CR-86614,
53.
Swart,
H.,
"Some
Problems
of Protection
from
Radiation Fltigen.
During III]",
Space
Flights.
III [0ber
Einige No.
Probleme
des Strahlenschutzes
bei Kosmischen
Astronomie
und Raumfahrt,
2, 1967, p. 57-64.
1')68
54. Lepper, R. and S.H. Levine, Shield Vehicle)", Eds. Proc. "The Quasi-hollow Study Conductor of Quasi-hollow Against Space Magnet as a Space Shield Against for Small Jr., and
(Magnetic Toroidal
Simulator
O'Brien, Meeting
on Protect. Calif.,
Space 1967.
Radiation NASA,
of the Am.
11-15
55.
Levine, Fields.
A Study Report.
Particle
Motion
in Magnetic Calif.,
Radiation
Shielding Labs.
Corp.,
Hawthorne,
Northrop
Corporate
NASA-CR-98074,
NCL-68-28R,
56.
Levy,
Richard
H. and Francis
W. French,
"Plasma
Shield
- Concept
and Applications
to
Space
Vehicles",
J. of Spacecraft
and Rockets,
1968, p. 570-577.
57.
Levy,
Richard
H.
and
W.
French,
"The
Plasma Space
Shield: Reetz,
Concept, Arthur,
to Space Eds.
in Protection Sessions
Against
on Protect. Calif.,
Space 1967.
Radiation NASA,
San Diego,
11-15
SP-169,
p. 93-187.
58.
Modisette,
Jerry
L., Joseph
W. Snyder,
and Richard
D. Juday,
"Space
Radiation
Environment",
in
29
Against
Space
Radiation. against
Reetz, Space
Arthur,
Keran
O'Brien, Meeting
Eds.
Proc.
of the Nucl.
on Protect. Calif.,
Radiation
13th Ann.
of the Am,
11-15
1968, p. 1-17.
59.
Reetz,
Arthur,
O'Brien, Space
Eds.,
Protection at the
Against
Space
Radiation.
Proc.
Radiation
Meeting
of the Am.
1967. NASA-SP-169,
60.
Study
of Plasma
Radiation May
Shielding. 1968.
Final
Report.
Avco-Everett
Research
Lab.,
Everett,
MA,
NASA-CR-61640,
19__6.2
61. French, Francis W., "Solar Institute Jan. 20-22, Flare Radiation Protection Requirements Aerospace for Passive and Meeting, Vol. Active 7th, 7,
American N.Y.,
Sciences
and Rockets,
1970, p. 794-800.
62.
Ryabova,
T.Y.
"Possibility
of Utilizing from
Fields Particles
Protection Electric
Electrons
(Protection
Fields)",
Winter
on Space
Part I, 1969,
p. 277-278.
63.
Urban,
W.,
"Superconducting Rev.,
Magnets v. 3, 1969,
Shielding", Space
Phys.
Res.
at
MSFC: Ala.,
Achievements
Marshall
Huntsville,
64.
Von
Braun,
Wernher,
"Will
Mighty 198.
Magnets
Protect
Voyagers
to Planets",
Popular
Science,
January,
1970
65. Cambel, Ali Bulent, "MHD for spacecraft", Science Journal, January, 1970, p. 69-73.
66.
"Space April
Propulsion 7, 1970.
System",
U. S. Patent
Number
3,504,868,
Filed
November
20,
3O
Zhurnal
- Technical
68.
Trukhanov, (Aktivnaia
K.A.,
and
D. Kh. korablei)",
Morozov, Moscow,
"Active Atomizdat,
Protection 1970.
of Space
Vehicles
zashchita
69.
Trukhanov,
K.A.,
Active AFB,
Shielding Foreign
of Spacecraft, Technology
Ohio,
10 Mar.
197!
70. Levine, S.H. and R. Lepper, and Rockets, "An Active Vol. 8, July Radiation Shield for Cylindrically Shaped Vehicles", J. of
Spacecraft
1971, p. 773-777.
71.
Malton,
P.M.,
"The Protection
of Astronauts
Against
Solar
Flares",
Spaceflight,
Vol.
13, June
1971,
p. 220-224.
72.
K.A. Trukhanov,
G.Z. Sedin,
and V.V.
Tsetlin, Congress
"Some
Aspects
of
26-30,
Europienne
Nucl6aire,
Discussion,
1')73
73. Kovalev, Shielding Federation, 1973. E.E., E.D. Molchanov, Cosmic R.U. Radiation Astronautical Nazirov, and T.Y. Its Earth Riabova, and Y.G. Shneider, "Electrostatic Astronautical SSR, Oct. 7-13,
Against
International Azerbaidzhan
Internatinal
Congress,
74.
Kovalev,
E.E.
"Study
of Basic
Electrostatic
Radiation
Shield
Characteristics
on
31
Sciences
XIV;
Proceedings
of the
on Space Bulgaria,
7, 1975, Berlin,
Akademie-Verlag
1976, p. 251-253.
75.
Kovalev,
E.E.,
E.D.
Molchanov,
T. Ya.
Ryabova,
B.I.
Tikhomirov,
and
Khovanskaya, Cosmic
Characteristics Kosmos
Shielding Procedure
Radiations
Satellite
of Scientific
Apparatus", Research,
Kosmicheskie Vol.
Issledovaniya,
13, Sept.-Oct.
1975, p.
1976, p. 687-692.
1976
76. Kovalev, E.E., I_.D. Molchanov, of the Basic Earth Vol. Yu.G. Pekhterev, T.Ya. Ryabova, Shielding and from B.I. Tikhomirov, Radiations Kosmicheskie Research, Vol 14, "An on
Cosmic
Issledovaniya,
p. 126-132,
1977
77. Hannah, Society, E.C., "Radiation Protection for Space Colonies", Journal of the British Interplanetary
1977, p. 310-314.
78.
Hannah,
E.C.,
Ray
Protection",
in Space
Manufacturing on Space
Facilities
(Space J.
Colonies), Grey,
Princeton/AIAA/NASA
Conference
Colonization,
Ed., AIAA,
79.
Johnson,
Richard
D. and SP-413,
Charles
Holbrow,
Eds.,
Space
Settlements.
A Design
Study.
NASA,
Washington,
1977.
1')78
80. Grishin, S.D., V.A. shields", Zavadskii, Zhurnal S.N. Ogorodnikov, Tekhnicheskoi Physics, and R.V. Fiziki, Vol. Orlov, "Experimental 1978, investigation of
magnetic Soviet
48, March
p. 617-621,
see also
Physics-
Technica
1978, p. 364-366.
32
81.
Paluszek, M.A.,
Industrialization Calif., American
The
Francisco,
82.
Program:
An Assessment Colorado,
of Present 1978.
Capabilities
and
of Standards,
Boulder,
198Z
83. Birch, P., "Radiation Shields for Ships and Settlements", Journal of the British Interplanetary
Society,
1982, p. 515-519.
1983
84. Ryabova, Space T.Y., Biol. "Electrostatic and Aerospace Shielding Med. Against Cosmic Biol. Radiation (Current Med.) Status and Prospects)", v. 17, no. 2, 1983.
(Kosmich.
i Aviakosmich. Research
(Moscow),
Mar.-Apr.
Service,
Arlington,
VA, May
85.
Townsend,
L.W.,
"HZE Vol.
Particle
Shielding
Using
Confined
Magnetic
Fields",
Journal
of Spacecraft
and Rockets,
20, Nov.-Dec.
1983, p. 629-630.
1985
86.
Frisina,
W.,
"Optimizing Vol.
Electrostatic
Radiation
Shielding
for Manned
Space
Vehicles",
Acta
Astronautica,
12, Dec.
1985, p. 995-1003.
1988
87. Kroger, H., and P. Labelle, ESA Journal, "Computer Vol. Simulation of a Magnetic Shield in a Realistic Space
Environment",
'1282
88. Townsend, L.W., J.E. Nealy, for Manned J.W. Wilson, and W. Atwell, Missions", "Large Solar Flare Radiation Shielding
Requirements
Interplanetary
J. of Spacecraft
and Rockets,
33
on Contract
90.
Simonsen, Shielding
Lisa C., John E. Nealy, for a Martian VA, July Habitat", 9-12,
Lawrence SAE,
W. Townsend, Intersociety
"Space
Radiation 20th,
Conference
Systems,
Williamsburg,
901346.
91.
Townsend,
L.W.,
J.W.
Wilson,
J. L. Shinn, Magnetic
and L.C.
Simonsen,
"Radiation Mars
Concept 20th,
Missions", 9-12,
on Environmental
Systems,
VA, July
1_9_2!
92. Cocks, F. Hadley, for "A Deployable Magnetic High Temperature Against Journal Superconducting Both Solar Fiare Coil and (DHTSC) Galactic Society, - A Novel Radiation Vol. 44,
Producing
Shields
Manned
Interplanetary
Missions",
of the British
Interplanetary
1991, p. 99-102.
93.
Dorn,
Ronald
A. Dorn, Vol.
"Protecting
Humans
from
Ionizing
Radiation
in Space",
Analog
Science
111, Mid.-Dec.
1991, p. 34-50.
94.
Herring,
Brad
J. Merrill, Beach,
Shielding 23-26,
Spacecraft", Cape
in Space FL,
Congress, Canaveral
Cocoa
1991,
Canaveral,
Council
of Technical
Societies,
95.
Landis, Space
Geoffrey
A.,
"Magnetic
Radiation and
Whose
Time
has
in lOth
Manufacturing
8 - Energy Conference,
Space," 1991.
Proceedings Washington,
Princeton,
American
and Astronautics,
1991, p. 383-386.
96.
Simonsen,
Lisa
Radiation
Protection
for Human
Missions
to the Moon
and
34
Mars,
NASA
Technical
Paper
3079,
February,
1991.
97.
Herring, Space
J. Stephen, Exploration,
"Magnetic American
Shielding Nuclear
in NTSE-92:
Nuclear
Technologies
for
1992, p. 738-746.
98.
Hilinski, Magnetic
Erik
J.,
Thin
Fihns
of a Deployable
Space
University,
99.
Mauldin,
John
H., Society,'
Prospects Science
for
Interstellar
Travel. Series,
San
Diego,
Univelt,
Inc.,
American
Astronautical
and Technology
1993
100.
Hilinski, (DHTSC)
Erik
J. and
F. Hadley Shield",
Cocks,
"A Deployed
High
Temperature in press.
Superconducting
Coil
Magnetic
J. of Spacecraft
and Rockets,
35
One highlight of the semester classwork underthe NASAAJSRAAdvancedDesign Programwas a teleconferencewith our NASA mentor, Don Carson,at Goddard SpaceFlight Center. The classis showninteractingduring this meeting.
36