Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Author: Yang Fang / Communication Laboratory Supervisor: Instructor: Professor Sven-Gustav Hggman PH.D Michael Hall
Table of Content
Handover Introduction NETSIM Introduction
NETSIM Structure and modules Introduction Channel Simulator Network Simulator
Simulation result and Performance study Drop call trace tool Future work
Handover Introduction
Handover Introduction
Interfrequency Handover
Intrafrequency Handover
Intersystem Handover
Soft Handover
Softer Handover
NETSIM Introduction
10
NETSIM Introduction
NETSIM - simulation tool for study of planning methods and control
algorithm for WCDMA cellular Radio Network
Platform: Unix Language: C NETSIM can simulate: Voice and data service, packet switched traffic,
circuit switched traffic, different user behavior, Radio network control functions (HO, Admission, Power Control)
Simulation result:
11
WCDMA Simulation
Network Simulator
1. Uplink algorithm; 2. Downlink algorithm; 3. Access Control 4. Admission control; 5. Soft handover 6. Power control
Channel Simulator
NETSIM
12
Advantage: Model considered as accurate Disadvantages: Computing intensive (large Memory and long simulation time required)
Map of simulation environment
13
WCDMA Simulation
Network Simulator
1. Uplink algorithm; 2. Downlink algorithm; 3. Access Control 4. Admission control; 5. Soft handover 6. Power control
14
Mobile Station
15
16
Soft Handover
17
As_Th + As_Th_Hyst
AS_Th AS_Th_Hyst
As_Rep_Hyst
CPICH 2
CPICH 3
Time Event 1A Add Cell 2 Event 1C Replace Cell 1 with Cell 3 Event 1B Remove Cell 3
Cell 1 Connected
M e a s _ S ig n > B e st _ S s A s_ T h a s_ T h _ H y st fo r a p e r io d o f T Y es
No (E ve n t 1B )
R e m o v e W o r s t_ B s in th e A c tiv e S e t
M e a s_ S ig n > B e st _ S s A s _ T h + a s_ T h _H y st fo r a p e r io d o f T No
Y es (E v e n t 1 A )
A c tiv e S e t F u ll Y es No
B e st _ C a n d _ S s > W o r st _ O ld _ S s + A s_ R e p _ H y s t f o r a p e r io d o f T No Y es (E ve n t 1 C )
A d d B e s t B S in A c tiv e S et a n d R em ove W orst B s fr o m th A c tiv e S e t
A d d B e s t_ B s in t h e A c tiv e Set
20
Always connect to the cells with better or best signal quality Swap the cells in the active set frequently
Response quickly to the change of the communication channel No window to evaluate the receiving signal Soft handover gain is fixed (equal to the Marco-diversity gain)
21
22
23
1.58(equal to 2 dB)
3.98(equal to 6 dB)
0.5(second)
0.5(second)
24
Successful call vs. drop call (W indow size = 0.5 s, A S_Th = 6 dB, A S_Rep_Th = 6dB)
100.00% 90.00% 80.00%
Percentage (%)
Percentage of acting different radio links in the SHO procedure (W indowsize = 0.5 s, A S_TH = 6 dB, A s_Rep_Th = 6 dB)
100.00% 98.23% 99.17%
79.50%
79.19%
90.00% 80.00%
Percentage(%)
70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% AS=3 AS=2 Maximum active set size 20.50% 20.81%
70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 1.75% 0.03% AS=3 0.83% AS=2
25
1.58(equal to 2 dB)
2.512(equal to 4 dB)
0.5(second)
0.5(second)
26
Successful call vs. Drop call (W indow size = 0.5 s, A S_Th = 4 dB, A S_Rep_Th = 4 dB )
100.00% 90.00% 80.00% Percentage (%) 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% AS=3 AS=2 Maximum Active set size 20.78% 18.35%
Calls ended normally
Nr. quality failures ul
Percentage of acting different radio links case in SHO procedure (Window size = 0.5 s, AS_Th = 4 dB,A S_Rep_Th = 4 dB)
100.00% 99.31% 98.97%
79.22%
81.65%
90.00% 80.00%
Percentage (%)
70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% 0.69% 0.01% AS=3 1.03% AS=2
27
1.58(equal to 2 dB)
2.512(equal to 4 dB)
0.1(second)
0.1(second)
28
Percentage of acting different radio links case (W indow size = 0.1 s A S_Th = 4dB, A S_Rep_Th= 4 dB)
120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.00% 1.96% 0.07% AS=3 3.18% AS=2 97.97% 96.82%
Acting 3 radio link case in this simulation loop
Acting 2 radio link case in this simulation loop
Acting 1 radio link case in this simulation loop
80.95% 72.83%
60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% AS=3 AS=2 M axim umactive s et s ize 27.17% 19.05%
C alls ended norm ally
N r. quality failures ul
29
Percentage of acting different radio links case w ith different param eters sets (Maxim umactive set size is 3)
120.00%
79.50%
79.22% 72.83%
98.23%
99.31%
97.97%
Acting 3 radio link case in this sim ulation loop
Acting 2 radio link case in this sim ulation loop
Acting 1 radio link case in this sim ulation loop
60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% WS = 0.5; As_T h= 6db WS = 0.5; As_T h= 4db WS = 0.1; As_T h= 4db 27.17% 20.50% 20.78%
Calls ended normally
Nr. of quality failures
30
Percentage of actingdifferent radio links case w ithdifferent param eters sets (Maxim umactive set size is 2)
120.00% 100.00% 80.00% 60.00% 40.00% 20.00% 0.83% 0.00% 1.03% W S = 0.5; As_T h= 4db 3.18% W S = 0.1; As_T h= 4db 99.17% 98.97% 96.82%
79.19%
81.65%
80.95%
60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% WS = 0.5; As_T h= 6db WS = 0.5; As_T h= 4db WS = 0.1; As_T h= 4db 20.81% 18.35% 19.05%
N r. of quality failures
31
Conclusion: The performance is a little better when the active set size is 2 In most time of the call procedure, the communication between the MS and BS only using one radio link Its difficult for find the optimal parameters set for the Window-average algorithm, we have to try a lot of parameters sets to get one better solution for the Window-average algorithm
32
Percentage of acting radio links in the sim ulation loop (Real-tim e algorithm )
100.00% 90.00% 80.00% 70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 8.62% 4.09% AS=3 11.76% 87.29% 88.24%
99.11%
100.00%
70.00% 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% AS=3 Maximum Active s et s ize 0.89% 0.00% AS=2
10.00% 0.00%
AS=2
33
Conclusion: The Real-time algorithm is better than Window-average algorithm The Real-time algorithm always adopt the better channel for the conversation. But the window-average algorithm need some average window to adopt the optimal link
34
35
1 00
2 000 00
1 000 000
36
00 0
00
0 00
00
000
00 0
-6.78302
-6.90614 -11.7081
The drop call in SHO with 3AS The drop call in SHO with 2AS The drop call in SHO with 1AS The Base station's average SIR
-29.3006 The 0 Base station The 1 Base station The 2 Base station The 3 Base station Base station The 4 Base station The 5 Base station The 6 Base station
37
Future Work
38
Future work
More simulations with different parameters set are needed The Packet data service performance with different SHO algorithms is need to be investigated More drop call trace analysis tool need to be integrated in NETSIM
39
Thank you!
Questions?
40