Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Global Strategy
20 May 2009
Mind Matters
Vanishing value has the market rallied too far, too fast?
James Montier Perhaps I am odd, but I have come to the conclusion that I prefer falling markets to rising
(44) 20 7762 5872
james.montier@sgcib.com ones. Not for any sadistic or even masochistic reason, but rather I like finding stocks that I can
buy. Unfortunately the swift rebound in the markets is leading to rapidly vanishing deep value
opportunities. In early March 179 stocks passed my deep value screen, whereas today only 63
names appear. The good news is that I think one can still build a diversified high quality
basket from the names on the list. Names like BP, Merck, Novartis still appear. However, if
this erosion of value continues, I’ll soon be worrying about a value drought.
Q Two months feels like a lifetime in these markets. But I am astounded by the speed of the
value bounce. In early March my deep value screens were showing an unusual degree both
in length and depth. High quality names like Microsoft and Sony were appearing on my lists.
Q However, deep value has enjoyed a remarkable couple of months. The list of stocks I put
together is up 48% since early March (against a global market return of 33% - all measured
in dollar terms).
Q Similarly our net-net screen was throwing up nearly 600 stocks globally in early March
the highest number of such stocks I have ever seen. Today I can find 369 (although 62% of
those are Japanese small caps reaffirming my belief that this is amongst the cheapest
asset classes in the world).
Q Whilst not yet entirely absent, the erosion of value at such a swift pace alarms me a little.
At this rate, Ben Grahams wise words When such [bargain] opportunities have virtually
disappeared, past experience indicates that investors should have taken themselves out of
the stock market and plunged up to their necks in US Treasury bills will become all too
relevant in a short time.
Q At this rate all we will have left is relative value. I dislike relative value as Ive never been
IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ comfortable simply buying a stock because it was cheap relative to another stock. As Seth
DISCLOSURES AND DISCLAIMERS Klarman notes Absolute-performance-oriented investors
will buy only when investments
BEGINNING ON PAGE 6 meet absolute standards of value.
www.sgresearch.socgen.com
Mind Matters
Vanishing value
Perhaps I am odd, but I prefer falling markets to rising ones. Not because I am a sadist, or for
that matter a masochist, or even because I am bearish by nature rather because falling
markets generally throw up far more opportunities for me to invest in.
For instance, if you can cast your mind back two and a bit months (it seems like a lifetime in
these markets) I put out a note (Mind Matters, 4 March 2009) which provided a list of deep
value opportunities. These were stocks that passed four criteria (an earnings yield at least
double the AAA bond yield, a dividend yield at least two-thirds the AAA bond yield, total debt
less than two-thirds tangible book, and a Graham and Dodd PE of less than 16x).
One of the features of that list was the unusually high quality of the names it generated.
Stocks such as Microsoft, BP, Novartis and Sony all appeared. The other feature was the
length of the list, with 179 names appearing. The selection has performed remarkably well.
Since publication, the deep value stocks identified have risen some 48% in dollar terms (the
MSCI All World has risen 32% over the same period).
However, this leaves me in a quandary. The number of opportunities has shrunk rapidly in
some places. For instance, in Japan only 11 stocks now pass our four criteria. This compares
with 57 Japanese stocks that passed in March, and is lower than the 19 Japanese stocks that
passed in July 2008! Similarly, in Asia only 17 stocks pass the screen compared with 67 in
March. Worldwide, the number of deep value opportunities stands at a little over one-
third of the number I found in March.
The good news is that, I think, one can still build a relatively high quality diversified portfolio
from the 63 names that appear on our deep value screen. For instance, BP, Novartis, Merck
and Cannon still appear (a full list can be found on page 5). However, I suspect that one will
need to be careful if the deep value opportunities continue to disappear at this rate. The
relative paucity of bottom-up opportunities can itself be a signal. As Ben Graham opined
2 20 May 2009
Mind Matters
True bargain issues have repeatedly become scarce in bull markets
Perhaps
one could even have determined whether the market level was getting too high
or too low by counting the number of issues selling below working capital value.
When such opportunities have virtually disappeared, past experience indicates
that investors should have taken themselves out of the stock market and
plunged up to their necks in US Treasury bills.
Regular readers will know that I am also a fan of Grahams net-nets. Of course, in todays
market place the vast majority of net-nets will tend to be small caps. In my note from 4 March
I wrote Currently I am finding the highest number of net-nets I have ever come across. In
fact, I found almost 600 net-nets in March. Thanks to a 50% gain in that basket, today I can
find 369. Over 62% of these are Japanese, reaffirming my view that Japanese small caps
remain among the cheapest assets in the world.
2.3
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.7
0.5
Mar-94
Mar-95
Mar-96
Mar-97
Mar-98
Mar-99
Mar-00
Mar-01
Mar-02
Mar-03
Mar-04
Mar-05
Mar-06
Mar-07
Mar-08
Mar-09
Source: SG Global Strategy
While they have not yet vanished entirely, deep value opportunities are certainly thinner on the
ground. It may appear tempting to pursue an alternative approach by either easing the
parameters or even looking for relative value in order to increase the size of the potential
universe. I can understand why one might be tempted to remove the dividend constraint in the
current market environment. As an experiment I ran the screen without the dividend
constraint, but it only added 20 names to the list.
I always shy away from relative valuation. I have never been comfortable with the idea of
buying a stock simply because it was cheap relative to another stock. As is often the case,
Seth Klarman puts it best, arguing that focusing upon relative valuation is largely caused by
relative benchmarking as it is in essence a way of reducing your tracking error.
20 May 2009 3
Mind Matters
4 20 May 2009
Mind Matters
20 May 2009 5
Mind Matters
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES
Deutsche Lufthansa SG acted as joint bookrunner in the Lufthansa's senior bond issue (6.75% 24/03/2014 EUR).
ENI SG makes a market in Eni warrants
MAN AG SG is acting as joint bookrunner in the MAN AG's senior bond issue.
MAN AG SG is acting as Mandated Lead Arranger of the acquisition facilities set up by MAN for the acquisition of Brazil-based Volkswagen Truck & Bus
OMV SG is acting as joint bookrunner in the OMV AG's senior bond issue.
OMV SG acted as joint bookrunner in the OMV's senior bond issue (6.250% 07/04/14).
StatoilHydro SG acted as joint bookrunner in the StathoilHydro's senior bond issue (4.375% 11/03/2015 EUR & 5.625% 11/03/2021 EUR).
Vallourec SG is acting as financial advisor to Vallourec for the acquisition of three tubular businesses from Grant Predico
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: The information herein is not intended to be an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any
securities and including any expression of opinion, has been obtained from or is based upon sources believed to be reliable but is not
guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness although Société Générale (SG) believe it to be clear, fair and not misleading. SG, and their
affiliated companies in the SG Group, may from time to time deal in, profit from the trading of, hold or act as market-makers or act as advisers,
brokers or bankers in relation to the securities, or derivatives thereof, of persons, firms or entities mentioned in this document or be
represented on the board of such persons, firms or entities. Employees of SG, and their affiliated companies in the SG Group, or individuals
connected to then, other than the authors of this report, may from time to time have a position in or be holding any of the investments or
related investments mentioned in this document. Each author of this report is not permitted to trade in or hold any of the investments or
related investments which are the subject of this document. SG and their affiliated companies in the SG Group are under no obligation to
disclose or take account of this document when advising or dealing with or for their customers. The views of SG reflected in this document
may change without notice. To the maximum extent possible at law, SG does not accept any liability whatsoever arising from the use of the
material or information contained herein. This research document is not intended for use by or targeted at retail customers. Should a retail
customer obtain a copy of this report they should not base their investment decisions solely on the basis of this document but must seek
independent financial advice.
Important notice: The circumstances in which materials provided by SG Fixed & Forex Research, SG Commodity Research, SG Convertible
Research, SG Technical Research and SG Equity Derivatives Research have been produced are such (for example because of reporting or
remuneration structures or the physical location of the author of the material) that it is not appropriate to characterise it as independent
investment research as referred to in European MIF directive and that it should be treated as a marketing material even if it contains a research
recommendation (« recommandation dinvestissement à caractère promotionnel »). However, it must be made clear that all publications
issued by SG will be clear, fair, and not misleading.
Analyst Certification: Each author of this research report hereby certifies that (i) the views expressed in the research report accurately reflect
his or her personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers and (ii) no part of his or her compensation was, is, or will be
related, directly or indirectly, to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.
Notice to French Investors: This publication is issued in France by or through Société Générale ("SG") which is authorised by the CECEI and
regulated by the AMF (Autorité des Marchés Financiers).
Notice to UK investors: This publication is issued in the United Kingdom by or through Société Générale ("SG") London Branch which is
regulated by the Financial Services Authority ("FSA") for the conduct of its UK business.
Notice To US Investors: This report is intended only for major US institutional investors pursuant to SEC Rule 15a-6. Any US person wishing
to discuss this report or effect transactions in any security discussed herein should do so with or through SG Americas Securities, LLC
(SGAS) 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. (212)-278-6000. THIS RESEARCH REPORT IS PRODUCED BY SOCIETE
GENERALE AND NOT SGAS.
Notice to Japanese Investors: This report is distributed in Japan by Société Générale Securities (North Pacific) Ltd., Tokyo Branch, which is
regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan. The products mentioned in this report may not be eligible for sale in Japan and they may
not be suitable for all types of investors.
Notice to Australian Investors: Société Générale Australia Branch (ABN 71 092 516 286) (SG) takes responsibility for publishing this
document. SG holds an AFSL no. 236651 issued under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ("Act"). The information contained in this newsletter
is only directed to recipients who are wholesale clients as defined under the Act.
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES: Please refer to our website: http:\\www.sgresearch.socgen.com
http://www.sgcib.com. Copyright: The Société Générale Group 2009. All rights reserved.
6 20 May 2009