Sunteți pe pagina 1din 8

Original Paper

Neuropsychobiology 2009;60:8086 DOI: 10.1159/000236448


Received: January 27, 2009 Accepted after revision: June 23, 2009 Published online: September 10, 2009

Quantitative Motor Activity Differentiates Schizophrenia Subtypes


Sebastian Walther Helge Horn Nadja Razavi Philipp Koschorke Thomas J. Mller Werner Strik
University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Key Words Actigraphy Catatonia Psychosis Motor retardation Negative syndrome Antipsychotics

quantitative motor activity. The increased duration of immobility appears to be the special feature of catatonic schizophrenia. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Abstract Background: Motor symptoms are frequent in schizophrenia and relevant to the diagnosis of subtypes. However, the assessment has been limited to observations recorded in scales and experimental designs. The aim of this study was to use wrist actigraphy to obtain motor activity data in 3 schizophrenia subtypes. Methods: In total, 60 patients with schizophrenia (35 paranoid, 12 catatonic, 13 disorganized) were investigated using continuous wrist actigraphy over 24 h in an inpatient setting on average 38 days after admission. Data of the wakeful hours of the day were analyzed. Results: The activity level was predicted by schizophrenia subtype and by the type of antipsychotic medication. The movement index and mean duration of uninterrupted immobility were found to be predicted only by the schizophrenia subtype. Age, gender, duration of illness and chlorpromazine equivalents did not contribute to the variance of the activity data. A MANOVA demonstrated the significant differences in the 3 parameters between schizophrenia subtypes (p = 0.001). Patients with catatonic schizophrenia had lower activity levels, a lower movement index and a longer duration of immobility than those with paranoid schizophrenia. Conclusions: Schizophrenia subtypes can be differentiated using objective measures of

Introduction

The quality and frequency of motor symptoms in schizophrenia have been accorded importance in the diagnosis of subtypes and were described in detail in classical psychopathology [1, 2]. Today, their prevalence and thus the diagnosis of catatonia appears to be decreasing, and their clinical distinction from neuroleptic side effects is unreliable [3, 4]. Motor symptoms, however, occur frequently in schizophrenia. In fact, 50% of a schizophrenia group were found to present at least 1 motor symptom during the acute stage [5]. Further, motor symptoms are still part of the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia in DSM-IV and ICD-10. They are necessary for the diagnosis of the catatonic subtype of schizophrenia even if the mere presence of motor symptoms is not sufficient in either classification system. Instead, a predominance of motor symptoms is required to allow the diagnosis of catatonia. Research interest in motor symptoms of schizophrenia has increased within the past 2 decades, and several studies suggest an important role for the motor system in this disorder. The development of motor abilities has been reSebastian Walther, MD University Hospital of Psychiatry Bolligenstrasse 111 CH3060 Bern (Switzerland) Tel. +41 31 930 9111, Fax +41 31 930 9404, E-Mail walther@puk.unibe.ch

2009 S. Karger AG, Basel 0302282X/09/06020080$26.00/0 Fax +41 61 306 12 34 E-Mail karger@karger.ch www.karger.com Accessible online at: www.karger.com/nps

peatedly shown to be delayed in children who later suffer from schizophrenia [68]. A body of evidence supports impaired motor control and motor sequencing in schizophrenia [911]. Reduced volume in the cerebellum in schizophrenia was reported [8, 12] and thought to relate to disturbances of the motor system. Gait disturbances have been observed in patients with schizophrenia [13] as well as bradykinesia in 818% of the neuroleptic-nave patients [14]. Parkinsonism and dyskinesia were demonstrated to be related to psychopathology in neuroleptic-nave firstepisode patients [15]. In addition, several studies on neurological soft signs have reported motor disturbances in both treated and untreated schizophrenia [1619]. The assessment of motor symptoms, however, is challenging and often limited to clinical observation and specific rating scales. On the other hand, studies relying on quantitative measurements usually depended on laboratory settings [11, 20, 21]. To obtain information about the motor behavior of schizophrenic patients in naturalistic environments, objective quantitative measurements are needed. Actigraphy is a validated tool in sleep medicine and has become important for motion analysis in psychiatric research [22]. However, only few studies on quantitative motor activity during wakefulness have been conducted in schizophrenia using actigraphy [2325]. Farrow et al. [23, 24] reported a negative correlation of the cumulated activity counts with avolition. We have reported higher motor activity levels (AL) in cycloid psychoses as compared to paranoid schizophrenia [26] and poor correlation between objective motor activity and expert ratings [27]. In addition, disturbances of the sleep-wake cycle as measured by actigraphy were reported in schizophrenia [2830]. We were interested whether DSM-IV schizophrenia subtypes would differ with regard to quantitative motor activity as measured by actigraphy. In particular, we hypothesized that specific motor features of catatonic schizophrenia could be identified compared to the other schizophrenic subtypes. Further, based on the fact that the clinical distinction between catatonic and druginduced movement disorders is unreliable, we explored the possibility whether objective movement parameters would be more reliable to discriminate them.
Subjects and Methods
Subjects Study participants were recruited during the first 3 weeks after admission to the inpatient department of the University Hospital of Psychiatry Bern, Switzerland. The inclusion criterion was a

DSM-IV diagnosis of schizophrenia based upon clinical interviews and review of all records available, taking into account the longitudinal course of the disorder. The exclusion criteria were a history of or concomitant neurological or medical disorder, or substance abuse (except for nicotine). Participation was unpaid. Sixty-three patients were included in the study with an overlap with the sample reported earlier [27]. Three of the patients received anticholinergic drugs which may influence motor activity and were excluded from the final analyses. Chlorpromazine equivalents were calculated according to Rey et al. [31] and Woods [32]. In addition, 14 patients were also treated with antidepressants for the negative syndrome in schizophrenia. Seven received a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, 1 a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor , 3 a selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, and 3 patients were on tricyclic antidepressants. No difference in antidepressant prescription was detected between the schizophrenia subgroups (2 = 5.515; d.f. = 8; p = 0.773). The demographic and clinical variables are displayed in table 1. After a complete explanation of the aims and procedures of the study, the patients provided written informed consent. The procedures are in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki and had been approved by the local ethics committee (KEK No. 208/06). Measures The patients were interviewed and assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) [33]. In addition, they wore an actigraph (Actiwatch, Cambridge Neurotechnology Inc., UK) on the wrist of the nondominant arm for 24 consecutive hours for the continuous recording of motor activity. Handedness was determined by asking the patients about the preferred hand when writing, brushing teeth and eating with a spoon. Motor Activity Parameters Movement counts of the actigraph were stored in 2-second intervals, allowing continuous recording for a maximum of 36 h on the 64-kB memory. We chose the smallest possible interval to achieve maximum temporal resolution. The nondominant arm was chosen because it reflects average movement during day- and nighttime, while actigraphy in the dominant arm represents maximum movements that are strongly related to manual work or activities [34]. The start of measurement varied between 10: 00 and 15: 00, but for the analyses we included the whole 24-hour cycle, so each hour of the day was covered. In 3 participants (1 of each subtype), however, we failed to record complete 24-hour datasets as these patients removed their actigraphs during sleep. Motor activity is subject to circadian rhythms. By investigating inpatients of 1 large psychiatric university hospital we had the chance to normalize external and social rhythms. The patients on all wards get up around 7: 00, have breakfast at 07: 30, lunch at 11:30 and dinner at around 18:00. Also, they are engaged in several group activities during the day and have social contact until 22:00, when the lights are usually turned off. Measurements were performed exclusively during weekdays to assure that there was equal impact of group therapies across the participants. At the end of the recording, the patients were asked to provide sleep log information and to fill in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [35]. Data Analysis The data were analyzed using Sleep Analysis 5 (Cambridge Neurotechnology) and EXCEL templates for further analyses.

Motor Activity in Schizophrenia Subtypes

Neuropsychobiology 2009;60:8086

81

Table 1. Characteristics of the schizophrenia subtypes

Characteristic

Schizophrenia subtype paranoid (n = 35) n % 51.4 5.3 5.7 68.6 20.0 SD 9.64 8.84 6.21 350.35 5.53 5.43 15.51 catatonic (n = 12) n 6 0 2 5 5 Mean 45.50 6.34 4.25 566.13 14.92 20.00 79.92 % 50.0 0 16.7 41.7 41.7 SD 12.19 5.70 2.96 537.62 4.03 7.66 17.60 disorganized (n = 13) n 9 1 2 5 5 Mean 36.23 14.85 9.38 718.46 15.85 20.77 84.46 % 69.2 7.7 15.4 38.5 38.5 SD 10.26 10.50 3.55 659.00 5.44 5.54 18.68

Comparison 2 d.f. p

Male gender Antipsychotic treatment None Typical Atypical Both

18 2 2 24 7 Mean

1.365 7.151

2 6

0.523 0.236

F 2.602 2.967 3.049 1.143 1.377 2.353 1.439

d.f. 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

p 0.083 0.059 0.055 0.326 0.261 0.104 0.246

Age, years Duration of illness, years Episodes Chlorpromazine equivalents PANSS positive score PANSS negative score PANSS total score

39.60 10.97 7.31 488.45 17.60 17.06 75.51

Using the sleep log information, we removed data collected during sleep. We chose to extract 3 parameters from the data that had previously been described [34] and used in schizophrenia [26, 27]. AL is the mean number of activity counts per hour. The movement index (MI) is the percentage of periods with an activity count 1 0, reflecting the proportion of 2-second periods with activity or immobility. The mean duration of uninterrupted immobility periods (MIP) provides a global measure of the distribution and number of immobility periods. Further analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0. General linear models (GLM) were computed for AL, MI and MIP as dependent variables using Wald 2. The main effects of the following predictors were compared: schizophrenia subtype, age, gender, type of antipsychotic medication, chlorpromazine equivalents, number of episodes and duration of illness. Afterwards, a MANOVA using Wilks with AL, MI and MIP as dependent variables and schizophrenia subtype as between-subject variable was performed. Bonferroni correction was applied for multiple comparisons. Differences between groups in the descriptive statistics were tested using 1-way ANOVAs or 2 tests when appropriate. Correlations of activity parameters were performed using Pearsons correlation. All levels of significance are 2-tailed.

Results

Motor Activity during Wakefulness For each of the motor activity parameters a GLM was computed with the predictors schizophrenia subtype, chlorpromazine equivalents, type of antipsychotic drugs
82
Neuropsychobiology 2009;60:8086

used (none, atypical, typical or both), age, gender, number of episodes and duration of illness. The GLM of AL demonstrated a significant main effect for schizophrenia subtype (2 = 6.055, p = 0.014) and type of antipsychotic treatment (2 = 3.861, p = 0.049). However, an ANOVA for AL with schizophrenia subtype and type of antipsychotic failed to detect an interaction of both factors (F5, 60 = 0.984, p = 0.437). When we performed an independent t test on AL, we found a nonsignificant trend towards higher AL in the patients treated with atypical antipsychotic drugs only (T40 = 1.853, d.f. = 38, p = 0.072). However, the type of antipsychotic drug used was comparable between the schizophrenia subtypes (see table 1). The GLM of MI found a significant main effect only for schizophrenia subtype (2 = 5.968, p = 0.015). Similarly, the GLM of MIP showed a significant main effect only for the predictor schizophrenia subtype (2 = 11.563, p ! 0.001). None of the other predictors had a significant main effect on any of the activity parameters. As the GLMs revealed schizophrenia subtype to have a main effect on motor activity parameters, these 3 parameters were entered as dependent variables into a MANOVA with schizophrenia subtype as between-subject factor. Schizophrenia subtype demonstrated a significant overall effect (Wilks : F6, 60 = 4.320, p = 0.001). Significant differences between schizophrenia subtypes
Walther/Horn/Razavi/Koschorke/ Mller/Strik

p = 0.045 50 p = 0.016 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 n = 35 0 n = 12 n = 13 0


Paranoid Catatonic Disorganized Schizophrenia type

40 30 20 10 n = 35 n = 12 n = 13

Mean duration of uninterrupted immobility (s)

p < 0.001 6 4 2 n = 35 0 n = 12 n = 13

Activity level (counts/h)

Movement index (%)

Paranoid Catatonic Disorganized Schizophrenia type

Paranoid Catatonic Disorganized Schizophrenia type

Fig. 1. Quantitative motor activity in schizophrenia subtypes. Bars display means + 1 SD. Post hoc comparisons

using Bonferroni correction.

Table 2. Correlation of motor activity parameters and PANSS

PANSS positive score r p

PANSS negative score r p

PANSS total score r p

AL, counts/h 0.181 0.167 MI, % 0.286 0.027* MIP, s 0.286 0.027* * p < 0.05.

0.351 0.006* 0.204 0.118 0.025 0.848

0.225 0.084 0.087 0.507 0.111 0.398

toms such as mannerism were most frequent among patients with catatonic schizophrenia (92%; 2 = 28.880, d.f. = 12, p ! 0.001), while other items of the negative syndrome were equally rated between the groups (social avoidance: p = 0.237; lack of spontaneity: p = 0.427; blunted affect: p = 0.499). Likewise, the PANSS items disturbance of volition and depression were not rated differently between the groups (p = 0.147 and p = 0.518). Sleep The actual sleep time differed between the groups (see table 3). No variations were identified in terms of sleep quality and motor activity during sleep.

were detected in each of the dependent variables: AL (F2, 60 = 4.629, p = 0.014), MI (F2, 60 = 3.615, p = 0.033) and MIP (F2, 60 = 10.397, p ! 0.001). The post hoc t-tests revealed differences between patients with catatonic and paranoid schizophrenia (see fig. 1ac). Indeed, in paranoid schizophrenia the highest AL and MI were found, while patients with catatonic schizophrenia displayed the longest duration of immobility. AL correlated negatively with the PANSS negative subscore. On the other hand, the PANSS positive subscore correlated positively with MI and negatively with MIP (see table 2). Therefore, stronger negative syndrome severity was associated with less activity, while stronger positive syndrome scores indicated shorter immobility and a higher proportion of active periods. The PANSS item score for motor retardation was highest among catatonia patients (2 = 19.337, d.f. = 10, p = 0.008). However, motor retardation to some extent was rated frequently in each subtype (paranoid 37%, catatonic 91%, disorganized 47%). As expected, specific sympMotor Activity in Schizophrenia Subtypes

Discussion

The results demonstrate differences in motor activity during wakefulness in schizophrenia subtypes and support our hypothesis. In fact, they diverge in terms of the magnitude of activity (AL), the relative amount of active periods (MI) and the mean duration of immobility (MIP). Patients with catatonic schizophrenia had a lower overall AL, lower MI and longer immobility periods as compared to patients with paranoid schizophrenia. No post hoc differences were found between the disorganized and other subtypes. Even though the type of antipsychotic medication had some unspecific effect on AL, there was no interaction of antipsychotic and subtype associated with AL. All other factors presumably influencing motor activity, such as age, gender, chlorpromazine equivalents and duration of illness, had no effect on the parameters tested.
Neuropsychobiology 2009;60:8086

83

Table 3. Sleep data

Schizophrenia type paranoid mean PSQI Sleep efficiency, % Sleep latency, hh:mm:ss Actual sleep time, hh:mm:ss Immobile time percent, % Sleep AL, counts/h Sleep MI, % Sleep MIP, s 6.50 84.40 00:28:32 07:41:38 91.95 1,814.91 4.65 78.55 SD 3.57 6.71 00:31:06 01:36:42 5.08 1,449.91 3.26 60.05 catatonic mean 8.00 86.22 00:27:11 08:55:05 91.95 1,440.07 4.52 79.33 SD 2.66 7.66 00:17:41 01:28:16 7.28 1,023.58 3.31 54.24 disorganized mean 5.83 79.56 00:41:30 06:09:45 88.21 1,763.93 5.46 53.23 SD 3.10 8.37 00:45:16 03:21:06 8.25 1,671.15 4.34 33.75

d.f.

1.393 2.724 0.775 5.008 1.603 0.284 0.285 1.034

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

0.257 0.075 0.466 0.010* 0.211 0.754 0.753 0.363

* p = 0.008 (catatonic > disorganized; post hoc t test, Bonferroni correction).

As in an earlier study [27], reduced magnitude of motor activity (AL) was associated with higher PANSS negative syndrome scores. In contrast, with higher PANSS positive syndrome scores we found a shorter duration of immobility (MIP) and a higher proportion of active periods (MI). Both correlations indicated less rest during marked positive syndromes. Some single PANSS items might be more relevant to motor activity than others. As expected, motor retardation and mannerisms were rated most frequently in catatonic schizophrenia. Depression, lack of spontaneity, disturbance of volition and social avoidance displayed no differences between the subtypes. In the GLMs we found no impact of chlorpromazine equivalents on the motor activity parameters, nor could we observe an impact of the type of antipsychotic administered on MIP and MI. In AL, however, there was a difference between the types of antipsychotic administered. On the other hand, we failed to find specific differences in the post hoc tests. In addition, there was no interaction of the factors antipsychotic medication and subtype of schizophrenia. A nonsignificant trend towards higher activity was observed in AL when we compared atypical versus typical antipsychotics. This ambiguous result is in line with the finding that atypical antipsychotic drugs vary substantially in their ability to induce extrapyramidal side effects [36]. However, there were no differences between the groups in terms of the prescription of antipsychotic drugs. The most prominent difference between the subtypes was found in the duration of immobility. Thus, our results suggest that the duration of immobility could reflect specific catatonic symptomatology, the intrinsic motor disturbances in schizophrenia [15] or both.
84
Neuropsychobiology 2009;60:8086

Catatonic patients exhibit an irregular pattern of activity with longer periods of immobility followed by active phases. This could also explain the low average AL because longer immobility would contribute to lower AL. Similarly, longer duration of immobility would decrease the proportion of active periods in favor of inactive periods and thereby lead to a lower MI. Our results suggest that motor activity in catatonic schizophrenia is characterized by intermittent inhibitions preventing the patients from regular, fluent movement patterns. These phenomena, interestingly, are usually not perceived by clinical observation and lack operationalization in standard psychopathological scales and diagnostic systems. In fact, no significant difference in the negative syndrome was detected between the subgroups. Motor retardation as a PANSS item was frequent in all subgroups, even though the scores in catatonia were higher. Therefore, the categorization of single patients as catatonic simply by the observation of reduced motor activity is imprecise. Employing actigraphic measures such as the duration of immobility could increase the quality of diagnosis, adding an objective parameter to the clinical observation of rather complex catatonic movement patterns like mannerisms, stereotypy, echophenomena, perseveration and automatic obedience. Patients with catatonic schizophrenia were shown to have specific deficits in decision making and set shifting, neuropsychological measures associated with ventral prefrontal cortical function [37]. Indeed, the medial prefrontal cortex is critical to the evaluation of the relevance of cognitive goals and motor acts [38]. Findings from neuroimaging studies in catatonic schizophrenia reported a reduced cerebral blood flow in the parietal lobe [39,
Walther/Horn/Razavi/Koschorke/ Mller/Strik

40], structural alterations in frontoparietal areas [41] and functional deficits in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex [42]. Another explanation for reduced motor activity in catatonia stems from the association of negative symptoms and motor activity. In fact, negative symptoms correlate highly with catatonia [43] and some authors attribute this to a higher vulnerability of catatonic schizophrenia to neuroleptic-induced negative symptoms [44]. At the current state of research, it is not possible to attribute quantitative motor activity to a state or trait phenomenon in schizophrenia subtypes. From the historical view of schizophrenia subtypes we would conclude that disturbances of motor activity are stable over time and over different periods of the disorder [1, 2]. Neurological soft signs, however, seem to vary with the course of the disorder to some extent, while some symptoms remain stable after antipsychotic treatment [15, 19]. Slight differences between the groups were also documented for the actual sleep time, with disorganized schizophrenia displaying the shortest duration. However, our data on sleep measures are only of descriptive value. They must be interpreted with caution, since longer recording periods are recommended for actigraphic estimates of sleep [29, 45]. The strength of our study is the objective motor activity assessment during the wake period of a day in a patient group with comparable social and circadian rhythms. In addition, we ruled out the impact of age, gender, chlorpromazine equivalents and duration of illness on our activity data. Also, we excluded patients on anticholinergic medication. Limitations of the study are the small number of subjects with catatonic and disorganized subtypes, due to the lower prevalence. Since we did not control for the intrinsic parkinsonism and dyskinesia reported also in unmedicated schizophrenia [15], patients receiving anticholinergic drugs against extrapyramidal side effects

were excluded. We did not, however, control for the smoking status, which might also influence motor behavior. At entry, diagnoses were established according to DSM-IV after thorough clinical interview and review of the available records. However, no structured diagnostic interview was performed. Further, it cannot be excluded that ambidextrous patients, who use their nondominant arm more frequently than right-handed subjects, might have been included. Another problem is the correct interpretation of immobility. In sleep research, strongly reduced activity or immobility during the day as measured by actigraphy is defined as daytime napping (i.e. sleep) [46, 47]. Higher activity scores in short-term actigraphy are associated with signs of arousal in EEG of healthy controls [48]. In psychiatric conditions, however, it is possible to be awake and akinetic. The participants were asked to report daytime napping in their sleep logs. Data during sleep periods were removed from the analysis of the main results on activity during wakefulness (see methods). However, we cannot rule out that some of the information provided by the patients was inaccurate. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report differences in schizophrenia subtypes regarding the quantitative motor activity by objective means. The major finding is the increased duration of immobility periods as a specific feature of catatonic schizophrenia. Still, further research should address the specific activity pattern in disorganized schizophrenia as well as the underlying pathophysiology of motor activity in schizophrenia subtypes. In addition, the duration of immobility and the MI were found to be independent of the type and dosage of antipsychotic drugs and therefore may reflect intrinsic motor features of schizophrenia. Actigraphy does not distress patients and may help better understand schizophrenia-specific movement disorders and evaluate the treatment outcome, as has been previously shown in dementia [49].

References
1 Bleuler E: Dementia Praecox or the Group of Schizophrenias. New York, International Universities Press, 1950. 2 Kraepelin E: Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch fr Studierende und rzte. Leipzig, Barth, 1909. 3 Bush G, Petrides G, Francis A: Catatonia and other motor syndromes in a chronically hospitalized psychiatric population. Schizophr Res 1997;27:8392. 4 Stompe T, Ortwein-Swoboda G, Ritter K, Schanda H, Friedmann A: Are we witnessing the disappearance of catatonic schizophrenia? Compr Psychiatry 2002;43:167174. 5 Peralta V, Cuesta MJ: Motor features in psychotic disorders. I. Factor structure and clinical correlates. Schizophr Res 2001; 47: 107 116. 6 Cannon M, Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Harrington H, Taylor A, Murray RM, Poulton R: Evidence for early-childhood, pan-developmental impairment specific to schizophreniform disorder: results from a longitudinal birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002; 59: 449456. 7 Murray GK, Jones PB, Moilanen K, Veijola J, Miettunen J, Cannon TD, Isohanni M: Infant motor development and adult cognitive functions in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2006;81:6574. 8 Ridler K, Veijola JM, Tanskanen P, Miettunen J, Chitnis X, Suckling J, Murray GK, Haapea M, Jones PB, Isohanni MK, Bullmore ET: Fronto-cerebellar systems are associated with infant motor and adult executive functions in healthy adults but not in schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:1565115656.

Motor Activity in Schizophrenia Subtypes

Neuropsychobiology 2009;60:8086

85

9 Delevoye-Turrell Y, Giersch A, Danion JM: Abnormal sequencing of motor actions in patients with schizophrenia: evidence from grip force adjustments during object manipulation. Am J Psychiatry 2003;160:134141. 10 Exner C, Weniger G, Schmidt-Samoa C, Irle E: Reduced size of the pre-supplementary motor cortex and impaired motor sequence learning in first-episode schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2006;84:386396. 11 Putzhammer A, Perfahl M, Pfeiff L, Ibach B, Johann M, Zitzelsberger U, Hajak G: Performance of diadochokinetic movements in schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Res 2005; 79:271280. 12 Habets P, Krabbendam L, Hofman P, Suckling J, Oderwald F, Bullmore E, Woodruff P, Van Os J, Marcelis M: Cognitive performance and grey matter density in psychosis: functional relevance of a structural endophenotype. Neuropsychobiology 2008; 58: 128137. 13 Putzhammer A, Heindl B, Broll K, Pfeiff L, Perfahl M, Hajak G: Spatial and temporal parameters of gait disturbances in schizophrenic patients. Schizophr Res 2004; 69: 159166. 14 Wolff AL, ODriscoll GA: Motor deficits and schizophrenia: the evidence from neuroleptic-naive patients and populations at risk. J Psychiatry Neurosci 1999;24:304314. 15 Cortese L, Caligiuri MP , Malla AK, Manchanda R, Takhar J, Haricharan R: Relationship of neuromotor disturbances to psychosis symptoms in first-episode neurolepticnaive schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Res 2005;75:6575. 16 Flyckt L, Sydow O, Bjerkenstedt L, Edman G, Rydin E, Wiesel FA: Neurological signs and psychomotor performance in patients with schizophrenia, their relatives and healthy controls. Psychiatry Res 1999; 86:113129. 17 Ismail B, Cantor-Graae E, McNeil TF: Neurological abnormalities in schizophrenic patients and their siblings. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:8489. 18 McCreadie RG, Srinivasan TN, Padmavati R, Thara R: Extrapyramidal symptoms in unmedicated schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 2005;39:261266. 19 Whitty P, Clarke M, Browne S, McTigue O, Kamali M, Feeney L, Lane A, Kinsella A, Waddington JL, Larkin C, OCallaghan E: Prospective evaluation of neurological soft signs in first-episode schizophrenia in relation to psychopathology: state versus trait phenomena. Psychol Med 2003; 33: 1479 1484. 20 Caligiuri MP, Lohr JB, Jeste DV: Parkinsonism in neuroleptic-naive schizophrenic patients. Am J Psychiatry 1993;150:13431348. 21 Caligiuri MP, Lohr JB: A disturbance in the control of muscle force in neuroleptic-naive schizophrenic patients. Biol Psychiatry 1994; 35:104111. 22 Teicher MH: Actigraphy and motion analysis: new tools for psychiatry. Harv Rev Psychiatry 1995;3:1835.

23 Farrow TF, Hunter MD, Wilkinson ID, Green RD, Spence SA: Structural brain correlates of unconstrained motor activity in people with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:481482. 24 Farrow TF, Hunter MD, Haque R, Spence SA: Modafinil and unconstrained motor activity in schizophrenia: double-blind crossover placebo-controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2006;189:461462. 25 Poyurovsky M, Nave R, Epstein R, Tzischinsky O, Schneidman M, Barnes TRE, Weizman A, Lavie P: Actigraphic monitoring (actigraphy) of circadian locomotor activity in schizophrenic patients with acute neuroleptic-induced akathisia. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2000;10:171176. 26 Walther S, Horn H, Koschorke P, Mller T, Strik W: Increased motor activity in cycloid psychoses compared to schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry, in press. 27 Walther S, Koschorke P, Horn H, Strik W: Objectively measured motor activity in schizophrenia challenges the validity of expert ratings. Psychiatry Res, accepted for publication. 28 Martin JL, Jeste DV, Ancoli-Israel S: Older schizophrenia patients have more disrupted sleep and circadian rhythms than agematched comparison subjects. J Psychiatr Res 2005;39:251259. 29 Wirz-Justice A, Haug HJ, Cajochen C: Disturbed circadian rest-activity cycles in schizophrenia patients: an effect of drugs? Schizophr Bull 2001;27:497502. 30 Wulff K, Joyce E, Middleton B, Dijk DJ, Foster RG: The suitability of actigraphy diary data, and urinary melatonin profiles for quantitative assessment of sleep disturbances in schizophrenia: a case report. Chronobiol Int 2006;23:485495. 31 Rey MJ, Schulz P, Costa C, Dick P, Tissot R: Guidelines for the dosage of neuroleptics. I. Chlorpromazine equivalents of orally administered neuroleptics. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1989;4:95104. 32 Woods SW: Chlorpromazine equivalent doses for the newer atypical antipsychotics. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64:663667. 33 Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987; 13: 261 276. 34 Middelkoop HA, van Dam EM, Smilde-van den Doel DA, Van Dijk G: 45-hour continuous quintuple-site actimetry: relations between trunk and limb movements and effects of circadian sleep-wake rhythmicity. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:199203. 35 Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH III, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ: The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193213. 36 Leucht S, Corves C, Arbter D, Engel RR, Li C, Davis JM: Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373:3141.

37 Bark R, Dieckmann S, Bogerts B, Northoff G: Deficit in decision making in catatonic schizophrenia: an exploratory study. Psychiatry Res 2005;134:131141. 38 Koechlin E, Danek A, Burnod Y, Grafman J: Medial prefrontal and subcortical mechanisms underlying the acquisition of motor and cognitive action sequences in humans. Neuron 2002;35:371381. 39 Northoff G, Steinke R, Nagel DC, Grosser O, Danos P, Genz A, Krause R, Boker H, Otto HJ, Bogerts B: Right lower prefronto-parietal cortical dysfunction in akinetic catatonia: a combined study of neuropsychology and regional cerebral blood flow. Psychol Med 2000;30:583596. 40 Satoh K, Suzuki T, Narita M, Ishikura S, Shibasaki M, Kato T, Takahashi S, Fukuyama H, Ohnishi H, Morita R: Regional cerebral blood flow in catatonic schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 1993;50:203216. 41 Northoff G, Waters H, Mooren I, Schluter U, Diekmann S, Falkai P, Bogerts B: Cortical sulcal enlargement in catatonic schizophrenia: a planimetric CT study. Psychiatry Res 1999;91:4554. 42 Northoff G, Kotter R, Baumgart F, Danos P, Boeker H, Kaulisch T, Schlagenhauf F, Walter H, Heinzel A, Witzel T, Bogerts B: Orbitofrontal cortical dysfunction in akinetic catatonia: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study during negative emotional stimulation. Schizophr Bull 2004;30:405427. 43 Peralta V, Cuesta MJ: Negative parkinsonian, depressive and catatonic symptoms in schizophrenia: a conflict of paradigms revisited. Schizophr Res 1999;40:245253. 44 Salokangas RK, Honkonen T, Stengard E, Koivisto AM, Hietala J: Negative symptoms and neuroleptics in catatonic schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2003;59:7376. 45 Ancoli-Israel S, Cole R, Alessi C, Chambers M, Moorcroft W, Pollak CP: The role of actigraphy in the study of sleep and circadian rhythms. Sleep 2003;26:342392. 46 Pilcher JJ, Michalowski KR, Carrigan RD: The prevalence of daytime napping and its relationship to nighttime sleep. Behav Med 2001;27:7176. 47 Teixeira LR, Lowden A, Turte SL, Nagai R, Moreno CR, Latorre MR, Fischer FM: Sleep and sleepiness among working and nonworking high school evening students. Chronobiol Int 2007;24:99113. 48 Winkler D, Pjrek E, Pezawas L, Presslich O, Tauscher J, Kasper S: Relationship between power spectra of the awake EEG and psychomotor activity patterns measured by shortterm actigraphy. Neuropsychobiology 2003; 48:176181. 49 Mahlberg R, Walther S: Actigraphy in agitated patients with dementia: monitoring treatment outcomes. Z Gerontol Geriatr 2007;40:178184.

86

Neuropsychobiology 2009;60:8086

Walther/Horn/Razavi/Koschorke/ Mller/Strik

S-ar putea să vă placă și