Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
A Priestly Theology
H. David Blalock
FOREWORD
H. David Blalock
February 1997
PREFACE
Truth does not change because it is, or is not,
believed by a majority of the people.
--- Guido Bruno (1548-1600)1
1
The Great Thoughts, page 54.
There are definite ideas expressed in The Bible, but are
those ideas expressed in today's Christian ethic? Have we, as
modern Christians, held true to the original intent of
Christianity, or are we more concerned with the dogma and
doctrine generated over the last 2000 years? How does what is
generally assumed about The Bible compare to its letter?
It is commonly asserted that The Bible is perfect. If this is
so, then why does The Bible itself say the Word of God is the
only perfect thing? As a guide to understanding basic Truth,
The Bible is indispensable. As Truth itself, it is a mere
glimmer in the brilliance of God.
It is maintained that The Bible is the Word of God. This is
so in a way, but the true Word of God is Jesus Christ. The
Bible, no matter how sacred it may seem, is still merely a book:
paper, print, and binding. Christ is the Living Word of the
Living God. We must be aware that the needs of all men were
met when Jesus went to the cross. God provides, not The
Bible.
The intent of this book is to help Christians grow
spiritually, not create disruption. But remember this: God is
infinite. We are finite creations of an infinite mind. How can
such creations create or convey perfection?
2
Patrologia Latina
the first generation were "all of one accord and one mind."3
What has changed to generate so many doctrinal differences?
The mind of man.
In his attempt to organize the universe so he might better
understand it, Man made the mistake of setting aside a
cubbyhole for God. As it became evident this cubbyhole was
not large enough, Man made more cubbyholes and placed a bit
of God in each, creating a piecemeal, manageable deity that
performed as required. When this deity showed power beyond
that assigned Him, it was either disbelieved, re-catalogued
under different headings, or ignored. God became finite and
predictable, defined by Man. But, what about the time before
the construction of this elaborate catalogue? If there were
those who saw God as an infinite God, would they not have
expressed it?
Indeed, the best witness for an unbounded and all-
powerful God is The Bible itself as the Holy Spirit opens it to
the Christian sincerely wishing to understand God. The best
way to approach this understanding is to read The Bible
without preconception. A student of The Bible will always
encounter confusion and questions if he begins from other than
the beginning, which is a proper attitude towards the basics in
the study of The Bible.
Extra-Biblical Sources
Is it right to look for evidence of God outside The Bible, or
is that blasphemy? Considering the fact that our God is a God
of the living, not the dead, it is fair to assume that the term
"living" includes more than just those people associated with
The Bible. There are those who insist that God spoke only
through the writers of the Canon, yet The Bible tells us that the
Spirit will lead us into all Truth, and Christ Himself taught that
the Comforter would bring to remembrance everything He had
taught His disciples. The Apostle John in his gospel admits
that, were all the facts and teachings of Jesus to be recorded,
there were not enough books to hold them. 6 Where, then, are
5
The Age of Reason
6
John 21:25
we to find the balance of the information of which Jesus
spoke?
We could be receptive to the Spirit in study, learn His
voice and accept His gentle teaching. This is the best way, the
way Jesus recommended. But some of us have difficulty
dealing with the idea that the Spirit of the Almighty God can
speak directly to us personally, much less discern His voice
from the clamoring around us. For this reason, the Spirit
moved men in times past to write hundreds of books on
spiritual growth. Some are garbled, confused and uncertain
renditions of basic truth, products of innocent ignorance. Some
are deliberate alteration of truth to fit established doctrine.
Some are honest attempts to plumb the depths of the Spirit
while fighting off prejudices ingrained in the author. These
writings eventually defined the concept of orthodoxy and
heresy, drawing an often arbitrary line between the two, then
reinforcing that line until the orthodoxy was not just protected
from discordant ideas, but imprisoned its own attributes. The
security offered by orthodox Christianity is not only necessary
but vital to those who seek nothing more from religion than a
promise of the extension of that security beyond death. This is
not, of itself, wrong. The exercise of this mindset in daily life,
however, is to bring death into life, and is unnatural. In spite of
the contemporary move within the community to relate to
"modern issues" of social import, the attitude and motivation
remains how the problems and issues addressed relate to sin
and death.
7
Annotations to Bacon's "Essays" (1798)
Man's understanding of God has become as a thin, weak,
bad wine. Without bouquet or body, it retains only the faintest
identification with its Source. It is a mere shadow of the
Reality. Some would rather assume Man created God in his
own image, thinking this somehow assures Man's dignity, yet,
as has been so eloquently said,
The image is Man and the Reality is just at the outer limits
of perception.
8
The Essays or Counsels, Civill and Morall, "Of Atheists" (1625)
9
Discourses of Epictetus, Book II, Chapter VIII
PART ONE: On God and Christ
And the Lord said unto Moses ... Thou canst not
see my face: for there shall no man see me, and
live ... Behold, there is a place by me, and thou
shalt stand upon a rock: and it shall come to
pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put
thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee
with my hand while I pass by: and I will take
away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back
parts: but my face shall not be seen.
--- Exodus 33:17-23
14
Matthew 18:11
15
After the Resurrection, it is true that "God is Light, and in him is no Darkness at
all." (I John 1:5) Jesus purged the Dark, both physical and spiritual.
And the people stood afar off, and Moses drew
near unto the thick darkness where God was.
--- Exodus 20:21
Man had separated himself from the face of God, but not
from God Himself. God could still speak to him, but only
through outside means, since the inner man of Adam no longer
functioned. Because of this separation, Man saw God as a
vengeful, vicious, petty, jealous God of strict Law and absolute
power. The truth is, it was the observer, not the Observed, who
walked in darkness. Unable to understand the Truth in the
nature of God, Man saw His warmth as wrath, His love as
judgment, and His wisdom as vengeance. God became a target
of fear; the only One who would ever work to aid all men seen
as the fire in the furnace built for the consumption of the dross.
Still, He worked steadily toward the goal of Redemption.
Much as one walks into the wind during a thunderstorm,
resisted on all sides by the very men He sought to recover, He
doggedly pushed against the flow that would have led all into
chaos and disorder. Because of His determination, He was
perceived as unfeeling and inflexible. Because of His nature,
He was seen as judgmental and full of anger. Through all this,
in spite of the slander and misinterpretation, in spite of the fear
and trepidation of men who saw only their own foibles
reflected in His perfect mirror, He worked for their redemption.
God is a God of honor, truth, and justice. Once the
covenant was struck, He would abide by it, no matter how
miserably the Hebrew behaved toward Him. We must break
the chain of thought that God is fixed and immutable. If that
were so, He would be finite. A fixed God, unchanging, is a
finite God. A God of change and abstraction is infinite. God
can, did, and does change His mind. God can, did, and does
change His manner of dealing with Man. It is the very
changeability of God that allowed a New Covenant to come
about. If God is immutable, He would only deal in one way
with Man. If God is immovable, His first word would have
been the last. This is not so, for righteousness for Man
changed through Jesus Christ. Not all doctrine and dogma is
wrong, but the misapplication of the truth can lead to bondage
as surely as a lie.
Jesus was the conduit to bring God's Light into the Dark,
and in Him we see what Adam was supposed to be. Because of
what Jesus did, we are all free to be what we elect to be, but the
important thing is that we can now be what we were created to
be: gardeners.
Jesus Christ was the architect of the Kingdom: the
cornerstone, the keystone, and the foundation of the New
Jerusalem. He set precedents in worship, prayer, praise, living,
witness, and fellowship. Without His influence, these key
points would have crumbled out of the lives of His people
within the first generation. As He spoke in the earth, He
exercised the creative power of God. With each pronunciation
of "the Kingdom of Heaven is on this wise ... ," He laid another
stone in the tomb of the Old World and the foundation of the
New.
... in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the
book, and the eyes of the blind shall see out of
obscurity and out of darkness.
--- Isaiah 29:18
32
II Corinthians 5:17
33
I Corinthians 15:45
34
Romans 8:29
PART TWO: On Man
35
Patrologia Latina, quoted in The Great Thoughts, p. 133
36
Genesis 44
37
Genesis 9:24-25
ridiculed him,38 the Old Man showed his lack of conscience
and pity. We do not fault the Old Man for his lack of
humanitarianism. He lacked far more than that. He also
lacked the life of God in his spirit. That void was the cause of
his hardness and the origin of that emptiness is in the story of
Adam and Eve.
ADAM AND EVE
A great deal of heated debate rages concerning the nature
of Adam and Eve. Most conservatives maintain they were two
human beings who lived in a literal Eden and were the
originators of Sin, the cause of all men's ills through their
rebellion against God's edict. More liberal Christians believe
they were symbols of some form of theological concept
expressing the primitive understanding of the early Hebrews of
the voluntary separation of man from the tenets and morals of
the Law, as the Greeks did in the Pandora legend.
Adam was created in the image of God after God
expressed His Preference for the Light, so Adam was the image
of the God of Light, the same image we are exhorted to
manifest today.
... to be conformed to the image of his Son, that
he might be firstborn among many brethren.
--- Romans 8:29
38
II Kings 2:23-25
39
The Great Thoughts, p. 255
cool of the day."40 Eve, the helpmate, was a bit more removed
from this relationship because she was created from a
creation.41 She saw the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of
Good and Evil "that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be
desired to make one wise."42 The Dark, identifiable as God to
the spiritual eye of Eve and Adam, reassured them of their
position with Him when offering the fruit of the Tree.43
Unsuspecting, they partook of the fruit, only to immediately
realize what had happened. Through the fruit, they partook of
that which God the Preferred had omitted from their original
being.
Original Sin was not murder or rebellion. It was
ignorance.
NOAH
The origins of civilizations are as important to some as the
origins of life are to others. According to The Bible, all
civilization as we know it was spawned from the family of one
individual: Noah.47 Of all people living before the Great Flood,
Noah was the only man to find grace in God's eyes. Man had
40
Genesis 3:8
41
Genesis 2:21-23
42
Genesis 3:6
43
Genesis 3:4
44
Quoted by Diogenes Laertius' Lives and Opinions of Eminent Philosophers
45
Proverbs from Plymouth Pulpit (1867)
46
The Inn Album (1875)
47
The name "Noah" means safety, security, rest.
degenerated to the point that even the direct descendants of
Adam were included in that destruction. Methuselah had just
passed on as the waters of the Flood gathered. Noah had lived
concurrently with Lamech, Methuselah, Jared, Mahalaleel,
Cainan, Enos, and their children. He was born only months
after Seth's passing, bare decades after Adam's death. His life
must have been filled with the wisdom of the centuries passed
to him so that, when his grandfather died, he was the final
representative of the Garden.
Some have argued that the Flood never happened, that the
story in Genesis is just that: a story. Others maintain that
archeological findings in the Middle East support the reality of
a worldwide deluge.48 Babylonian and Sumerian literature and
tradition are so similar to the narrative of The Bible that they
have been proposed as the originals from which the biblical
account is copied.
From Noah we learn the importance of a single origin to
all its descendants. Noah was, in a way, the firstborn of the
post-Diluvial world, the first among many. He, through the
direction of God, constructed the method of salvation for his
family, a remnant that, by association with him, received the
blessing of life from God.49 Here we see an obvious type for
Christ. On a massive scale, the life and times of Noah are
descriptive of the life and times of Jesus.
48
For example, The Bible as History, pp. 25-34
49
Genesis 6-8
We he a real person? Or was he a symbol? It doesn't
matter. What does matter is the lesson taught: that the loving
and forgiving Father of Lights delivered Man from death
through the gift of a single Living Spirit, chosen by Him and
committed to His will.
ABRAHAM
Greatest among the patriarchs in The Bible is Abraham.
Looked on as the father of the Hebrews and Moslems, he is
venerated by Jew, Moslem, and Christian alike, the ancestor of
men of faith. Aside from Moses, Abraham is probably the
single most important figure in the history of the Hebrew
people, and therefore in the understanding of the makeup of the
Old Man.
As much as any man at the time could be, he was just, fair,
and sensible; the forerunner of a Law-abiding Hebrew.
Without the benefit of the Law and the Prophets, he showed the
success possible through their exercise. In spite of his common
sense approach to the situations of life, Abraham was still Old
Man, and as such never truly understood the power and
determination of God to redeem Man. When God struck a
covenant with him and promised a son from which a great
nation would arise, he scoffed, swayed by his sight of the
physical, unable to fully trust God for the completion of the
promise.50 He was convinced by Sarai's argument of a need to
act on his own to assure that completion,51 something that to
this day the Hebrews have had reason to deeply regret. Were it
not for their impatience, Ishmael, the ancestor of the Islamites
of Arabia, would never have been born. The controversy over
the homeland of the Hews might never had occurred; the
terrible wars in the Middle East might never have been; the
Crusades would have been unnecessary; the Spanish would
have had no Moorish invaders; Libya would have no Kaddafi,
Iran no Ayatollah, Iraq no Hussein.
Bound by His covenant, God honored not only Abraham's
firstborn of belief, but the firstborn of unbelief as well. He
made a great nation of Ishmael, and his seed are as the stars of
the sky.52 Mirroring the action He first accomplished in the
Garden with Adam, God accepted the blame for the lack of
50
Genesis 17:17
51
Genesis 16
52
Genesis 16:7-16
faith in Abraham and took the brunt of the curse to Himself.
The result is that Ishmael's children, though true to God as the
One and Only Living God, lack the vision to accept His Son
for their own salvation.53 Still, God sees them and the rest of
mankind as saved through the sacrifice of the very One they
refuse to acknowledge.
THE OLD COVENANT MANKIND
Armed with the promise given Abraham and the
confirmations of that promise with the generations that
followed, the Old Covenant Man waged war with the Dark
through exercise of trust and belief in that promise. After the
Exodus from Egypt, the Law became the manifestation of that
promise to the Children of Israel; something they could see,
touch, hear, and feel. With the witness of the daily sacrifice,
they were given special honor. They were spectators to the
workings of the plan of redemption in a way no other people
could be. The wondrous Presence of God Himself, the Shekina
glory, traveled in their midst and taught them, when they
listened, of the world to come. Human priests did what was
required, some without understanding, for the purpose of their
own eventual redemption. Israelite kings alternately worked
for and against His plan, becoming directly responsible for the
prosperity or poverty of the nation in a macrocosm of the
seedtime and harvest principle so familiar to the Christian
today.
But no man could prevail against the continuous sinking of
spiritual power to which he was subject. The Dark threatened
to win out, coming closer to success with each generation.
Man had become civilized in name, but not in spirit. As the
time of Christ approached, Man's civilization, instead of
accomplishing its promise of betterment of the human
condition, began to gear to man's destruction. The seeds of the
Dark Ages were being sown long before Rome was sacked,
even before the Empire was established.
Man had been endowed with reason and, unchecked by
moral limitation, this capacity had spawned illogical seed.
Though Israel had the Law to prevent this from occurring to
them, they often fell prey to the lure of the illusion of power
and wealth the Gentile pursued. The net effect of the presence
of the Law was not only compromised, it was nearly negated.
53
Genesis 16:12. See also The Koran, 4:171-172
Still, a bit of the consciousness of man responded to something
greater than himself. The ancient Greeks, for instance,
esteemed Sophia, goddess of wisdom, and worked to better
understand themselves and their environment. Even the
warlike Romans admired this and sought to imitate it. Neither
of these civilizations succeeded in raising this attitude of god-
consciousness to more than gut superstition. The Oriental
cultures developed in much the same manner. Although the
sheer numbers involved in the populations tended to encourage
vision of God in the plural, there was a very deeply ingrained
portion of Oriental philosophy whose crux was a single,
omnipotent (though impersonal) deity. Nevertheless, these
cultures again seemed unable to affect a definitive change in
the political and economic structure. Religion was still little
more than philosophy and superstition. In the Middle East and
Africa, it was different. Religion there had always been an
integral part of their civilization. From the priest-kings of
Sumeria to the Pharaohs of Egypt, government and church held
joint sway over the populace. But the religion was of the mind
and hand, not of the heart. Ritual observance was rife, but
intimate knowledge of God was not only avoided, it was
actually considered blasphemous.
So it was that true religion, consisting of a love for God
expressed through love for fellow man, was all but absent. As
a consequence, man became hard and uncaring. Values such as
good, virtues such as temperance, were a matter for argument
in the Western schools of rhetoric, qualities seldom exercised
in the East (where a code of honor supplanted moral values),
and seldom if ever addressed in the Middle East.
54
See Amos 9:4
would be strong and swift; sure to kill, maim, and torture their
enemies.
And God, who is Light and Life and Love, ignored their
hatefulness.
The time came and went. No warrior-messiah appeared on
the horizon. No massive army fell from heaven onto the
Romans. Wickedness and iniquity seemed untroubled,
unhindered. Some deduced they must have miscalculated the
intent of the prophecies. Others, disenchanted, sold out to the
Gentile. Still others, driven by fanatical nationalistic pride,
styled themselves the Messiah and lifted their hands against
Caesar, but never for long.
So sure of the coming of the Messiah were the Jews of
Palestine that there were pretenders to God's Anointing from
every walk of life. Nearly all, however, were militarily
minded, and rebellion was rife. Roman authorities looked on
an assignment to Palestine as an expression of their disfavor in
the eyes of Caesar. Pontius Pilate, attempting to prove his
efficiency in government, enraged the Jews through bringing
the image of Caesar into Jerusalem, taking temple moneys to
build an aqueduct, and general heavy-handedness in dealings
with the Sanhedrin.55 He often expressed concern over the lack
of loyal Roman guard to his fellow officials in Syria, but
received no pity from that quarter. With only a few Roman
guard and what mercenary troops he could buy, Pilate
governed a rebellious and dangerous people, usually through
the grace of an equally difficult Sanhedrin. As long as they
were disposed to cooperate, Pilate could be fairly certain of the
support of the powerful Jews, those who held sway over the
majority. Without their support, help would be a very long
time coming from Rome.
The common people drew a meager existence from a
dying land. Invaders in the past had robbed them of what
they'd had, Rome and their own elders robbed them of what
they might have. Crime was high, in spite of the terrible
penalties. Existence as a Jew, except for a very few, was a
shame. Subjugated by Rome, conquered and ridiculed on
every front, only the most faithful clung to their heritage.
Israel was dying. The Zealots took their most idealistic
members, the Pharisees their most practical, the Sadducees
their most stoic, the tax-gatherers their most ambitious. The
55
Josephus, Jewish Wars, Book II, "Judaea under Roman Rule"
merchants in Tyre and Caesarea cried out for their assimilation.
The nationalists in the hills of Judaea cried out for separatism.
And the people merely cried for peace.
When a man of wild and shocking appearance began
baptizing in the Jordan, prophesying the coming of the
Messiah, he was sure to gain a following. This man was
different from the others. He denied his own claim to
Messiahship, insisting on the kingship of Another yet to come.
When that Other came, he urged his followers to go after Him.
This, in itself, was enough to show the merit of his office. 56
Nor was the significance of the action lost on the Sanhedrin,
for from that moment Jesus was closely watched.
Following Jesus was often frightening. Supernatural
occurrences seemed drawn to Him as moths to flame. His
word was stunning in its impact, but puzzling in meaning.
Jesus' followers often fell to squabbling amongst themselves
over things He's said or done. This was not surprising, for the
Twelve were from backgrounds so diverse there could have
been no common ground but Jesus' teachings. Though lacking
the Life and Light of God in their spirits and hearts, they
recognized the Word of God, just as the unclean spirit knew
Him. However, whereas the unclean spirit knew Him at
sight,57 men needed to be near Him for a time to come to
appreciate His Light. His physical presence was not
impressive, but His Spoken Word was not to be denied in its
truth and wisdom.
This last generation before the Resurrection was the end
product of millennia of degenerating principle, scruple, and
moral. We have already seen the physical consequences of this
corruption in the shrinking life span, but what is less evident to
us today, because we have no point of reference, is the
callousness of the Old Covenant mind. The Truth to which
Jesus witnessed was of this ilk: a callous disregard for the
sanctity of human life, absence of pity or compassion, disdain
for love and gentleness, love of lucre, pursuance of war and
hatred and discord. In short, Jesus bore witness unto the God
of the Dark when He carried the offering to the Altar for
sacrifice. And that Dark had become totally and unreservedly
Man. The flesh of Man carried its physical manifestation, the
soul its abstract conceptions. This is why Jesus had to come as
56
Matthew 3; Mark 1:2-11; Luke 3:2-22; John 1:15-36
57
They lived and existed in the spiritual realm, and to them He was a great beacon in
the Dark.
a man, to partake of the Darkness that God might suffer what
His creation did, that He might understand the true depth of His
own choice.
At the Crucifixion, the Sin of Man was purged, not merely
covered, for it was the very Blood of God Himself that washed
it clean. That which hung on the Cross was more demigod
than Jesus could ever be, for on the Cross He was God in
totality and Man in totality. Every single act, even to the
driving of the nails, was taken into Him for the ultimate
Enlightening. The very skies of creation were darkened by the
influx of sin from all over the world. The Dark glowed from
the Cross, so much of it in its grisly glory that the centurion
standing at the foot of the Cross was overwhelmed by the sight.
He responded not to the Light that had been Jesus, but to the
immensity of Dark that hung there before him. Taught to
equate the Dark with righteousness, he could react in no other
way.
The world huddled in fear after the Crucifixion. The
disciples of Jesus in the upper room, fearing arrest; the
Sanhedrin in the Temple, fearing exposure of the truth of the
trial; Pilate in his chambers, fearing reprisal for the death of a
popular leader, or of the Sanhedrin for his hesitation; the
Temple guard by the tomb, fearing the death that awaited them
if they varied from their assignments; the people of Jerusalem
in their homes, stunned and confused at the events of the day.
Fear reigned supreme, for the god of the world was dead.
God and Man had come full circle. Man now stood where
Adam had stood, before God in righteousness, but with one
major and blessed difference: Christ had affirmed that, no
matter the choice made, Man would never again suffer for it.
Christ had removed the capability of anything of God's
creation, including Man, to do evil. Real, active Evil had been
defined in man's understanding of the Dark. Jesus Christ
enlightened the actuality of the Dark by reconciling it to the
Light. Only the memory of the Dark, remaining in the mind of
Man, continued. Man has to struggle with this memory of the
Dark, but Jesus Christ had imputed on Man right-standing with
God.
64
The intent of Jesus' teachings was to take men's eyes from other men and turn
them to God. Instead, Paul has gained almost divine stature today, his words given
nearly equal weight to those of Our Lord. In many churches, Paul's dissertations
seem preferred to the explanations given by Christ, perhaps out of lack of patience
to examine the teachings of the Lord for their meaning.
Christ came to purge the Dark from Man and God,
something He accomplished through the Cross and
Resurrection. But the mind of Man, quickened by the
indwelling Spirit of God, found its most fervent expression in
teaching the doctrine of the Law. Although Man knew the Law
could not impute righteousness, that there could be no life
through the Law, that the Law only increased sorrow, still he
preferred its clarity of definition and decisiveness of nature.
Through adherence to the Law, Man could ignore the newborn
responsibility given him to manifest the Son in the world.
Adhering to the Law required no thought or initiative.
Obedience of the Law was clear-cut and understandable
without contemplation.
Attractive doctrines gain followers quickly, however, and
the first generation of Christians was accosted on all sides by
the Law. The interim generation sought to find a leader who
might define the teachings of God in a manner they could find
easy to understand and spread. This attitude was probably a
carryover from the attitude that spurred the writing of The
Talmud. Rather than make the effort to trace the Spirit of the
Law, the Jew was content to allow the priest to dictate what he
was to believe and how he was to behave toward God. To
combat this mentality, the early evangelists used ever available
tool. Some tried to show the purpose of Christ's ministry
through re-examination of the tenets of the Law (e.g. Epistle of
Barnabas), some through appeal to gentile prophecy and
poetry (as Paul did at Mars Hill), and others through a
combination (Clement, Ignatius, Polycarp). Every effort was
made to encourage intelligent and informed faith instead of
blind, ignorant faith. Legalists, Jewish Christians, and
reactionaries wanted the Law to become an integral part of the
new religion. It held an aura of familiarity, status, and
sociability. One could become a Christian and still retain
Jewish status if the Law was kept. Proselytes to Judaism from
the pagan religions in Alexandria had been doing this for
centuries. Men such as Paul fought a bitter and arduous war
with this mentality. Preaching freedom from bondage was a
fine method of evangelism, but the Jew never totally
understood how the Law, with which they had lived all their
lives, given by God, could be bondage. It didn't seem
reasonable to assume that God would place His Chosen People
in bondage. The bondage was obviously to Rome, not to the
Law. The very ones that should have been teaching freedom
from the Law were teaching bondage to it. Afraid that release
from the Law would mean immediate chaos, they clung to it
with a ferocious tenacity, defending it fiercely against all
comers. Though realizing deep within themselves the
lifelessness of the Law, they refused to admit this publicly,
persecuting those who expressed interest in freedom. How do
we know of their understanding of the ineffectiveness of the
Law? Witness the words of Gamaliel in Acts 5:34-39. Would
any member of the Sanhedrin have allowed even the hint of
something such as Christianity as being from God before the
Resurrection? Was it not for this very thing that Christ was
crucified?
The interim generation would give way to a generation of
the New Covenant, a people who would not remember with
such clarity the teachings of the first generation. In turn, that
New Covenant generation would be succeeded by another,
more separated from the original teaching of the pre-
Resurrection Man. In time, only the strongest of concepts from
before the Resurrection would survive: the hardest to dislodge
from men's minds, those concepts most a part of the former
nature of man.
69
Heretics, a treatise
PART THREE: On Satan
70
Discourses..., "Enchiridion" 27 (p. 282)
71
I Samuel 29:4; I Kings 11:23,25
72
Numbers 22:22,32
a separate and distinct personality whose sole purpose was
Opposition was unformed.
Jesus died, rose, and ascended. The miracles, teachings,
and wisdom He left continued to spread, but there was
resistance. At first, Christianity was tolerated as just another
religion. Then it became clear it was more than mere
ceremony. The authenticity of the miracles associated with
Peter and Paul was soon undeniable. Too many intelligent,
reliable witnesses held to the stories of their healings and
deliverances. Roman citizens in Palestine had been intimately
affected by His ministry,73 and traditions even tell of the
eventual conversion of Pontius Pilate and his wife Procla.74
Something deep within men was responding to this religion,
and to men in worldly authority that meant trouble.
Persecution, first in the form of legislation and a semblance of
decorum, gave way to outright genocidal mania as the power
that was the world, centered in Rome, tried to obliterate
Christianity. But the attempt to stifle it seemed only to fuel its
fires in the hearts of men. While Rome declined, Christ
expanded, eventually touching even the Emperor himself while
still technically an heretical doctrine. It was blamed for the
burning of Rome, the fall of the Temple, even the collapse of
the Roman Empire; and there might have been some truth to
that. Christianity encouraged all that was best in man:
compassion, gentleness, tolerance, virtue, love. Rome
demanded and exercised the worst: hatred, strife, war,
oppression, promiscuity. Christianity preached responsible
freedom from doctrine and dogma. The Temple was so
inflexible that even the voice of reason from Josephus could
not shake it.75
So it was that Israel fell, Rome faded, and men's hearts
were assaulted with a great emptiness. To fill that void, some
appealed to the mind as its own end, establishing religions of
mental discipline, memorization of volumes of written material
seen as manifestation of righteousness.76 Some turned to more
unsavory practices, for this was a time of anarchy and fear: a
grim, leaderless period in history. Kings were commonplace
and cheap, not men of real power. Clawing its way out of that
dark time, that time of fear and uncertainty, plague and war,
73
Matthew 27:54; Mark 15:39; Luke 7:1-10; 23:47; Acts 9:32-35; 10:1-48; 12:6-12
74
Lost Books of The Bible, p. 279; The Other Bible, p. 379
75
Wars of the Jews, Book III, Josephus
76
Islam, for instance, equates knowledge of The Koran with righteousness.
was something new, something that, until then, had held little
fascination for mankind. It had been a background figure,
seldom discussed, not out of fear, but out of its insignificance.
We tend to assume, since the word Satan is used as a
proper name in the King James Version of The Bible, that
Jesus and His disciples knew and understood Satan to be a
separate and distinct personality. However, Jesus and His
disciples were Jews, and as such were not familiar with our
understanding of Christianity (I refer to the human
understanding, of course). They were, however, familiar with
Hebrew tradition.
At about the time of Christ a book called The Book of
Jubilees was written. In it is described an angel named
Mastema (from the Hebrew word for hatred). Mastema is
spoken of as having been involved in the making of idols at Ur,
a practice Abraham as a boy opposed. Abraham also dispelled
a plague of raven sent by Mastema. In rebuttal to this
interference, Mastema is said to have suggested the testing of
Abraham through the sacrifice of Isaac. Later, he resisted the
re-entrance of Moses into Egypt, sought Moses' death, and was
the agent of the plague of the first-born. At no time, however,
did Mastema ever accomplish anything without the direct and
full awareness and permission of God. Much as the Satan in
the Book of Job, he was at all times under the direct command
of God, in total servitude.
This picture of Satan was the picture of the Opponent at
the time of Christ. Subordinate and without independent
volition, Mastema was little more than an errand boy, a far cry
from the Evil One of today's churches: the Devil nearly equal
to God in strength and power. We must remember that when
we read Peter, Paul, James, or John writing about satan, they
were not twentieth century men with over 1900 years of
doctrine on which to base their writings. They were Jews,
converted through their faith in Jesus and their own witness of
what had happened. They saw everything from the Jewish
standpoint, not the "Christian." There was no Christian
doctrine on which to elaborate.
A work of the first few centuries, named The Shepherd of
Hermas, given nearly scriptural authority by many early church
fathers, illustrates the lowly estate of the devil.
... fear not the devil, because he has no power
over you ... The devil doth indeed affright men;
but his terror is vain ...
--- Command 12:22b-23
80
Universalist publications, c. 1819, quoted in The Great Thoughts, p. 34
itself, and there must be someone to salvage the Spirit of the
Canon from this situation.
The first attempts at reformation led to the deaths of
literally hundreds in England and Germany, thousands in the
Middle East. The Church itself, already sundered through
internal discord, writhed in anguish over the rising power of
the philosophies and sciences. When the Reformation actually
began to assert real influence over the world, the Church could
do no more than bow to its power, stiffly and slowly accepting
the changes. As a result, pieces of God's Spirit are disbursed
through multiple philosophies of religion and thinking, the
Truth retained through disruption of Man's vanity.
Beneath the turmoil to understanding the Opponent lies a
basic truth: a principle of opposition. Although the principle
might never have been personified individually, it most
certainly was exercised in the world in the days of the Old
Covenant. Its limits were defined by the Law, and, as the Law
defined all things that could prove beneficial to mankind, those
who chose to remain outside the Law soon discovered the
depths of the Dark in all its despair and lack of mercy.
God knew of the misunderstanding of the extent of the
power of the Son of Lawlessness, and provided for the
protection of those who might be falsely accused. For instance,
in His mercy He provided refuge from His own wrath in the
form of the Levite cities (another type for Christ).81
After the Lord's coming, His ministry, death, and
Resurrection, we should have received a better understanding
of the nature of the Opponent. Yet, the very thing that began
the popularity of the notion of a separate being opponent to
God seemed rather to gain more support. Men did not want to
acknowledge that the Opponent in the Old Covenant had been
Man. Though the righteousness of God has been imputed to
Man through Christ Jesus, Man refuses to recognize that fact,
preferring to concentrate his attention on the memory of past
unrighteousness.
Great and wondrous power is allowed by Man to this
Opponent. Yet, the reality at the time of the Coming of Christ
was little more than an errand boy at its most awesome. How
might he become more?
By Man becoming less.
81
Numbers 35:6,9-15
Paul spoke of "the man of sin ... the son of perdition that
opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God" or is
worshipped as God.82 This being is allowed this office because
of the desire of each person to find someone to make the
decisions who, if the decision proves wrong, can be blamed.
Responsibility is the bottom line.
God took men's eyes from other men and turned them to
God. He will continue to call men for this until the full intent
of the Spirit is realized in each person's life. The full power of
the Evil One depends entirely on the irresponsibility of
Christians. Unable to exercise its own power, it will use the
abdicated and neglected power of Christians to accomplish its
ends.
Who is Satan? That which works in opposition to the
manifestation of the image of the Son of God in the world, be
that a person, organization, or nation; that is Satan. Just as
the manifestation of the Opponent has always been through
Man, so it continues. There is, though, one major difference
today: choice. Before the Resurrection, Man could only
manifest abstinence or opposition to God. Being unrighteous,
he could not work righteousness. Today, we can exercise
choice to manifest righteousness or abstinence. Being the
righteousness of God through Christ Jesus, we cannot manifest
evil, although abstinence from righteousness might be called
evil.
86
The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621)
Starting now, we should begin demoting the Devil in our
lives. The resulting promotion of our own spirit will spell
success in spiritual growth and well-being.
We now understand that the Devil is not Lucifer, Man,
God, Jesus, a fallen angel, or god of this world. Satan is the
personification of everything that works against the
manifestation of the Son in the world, a combination of the
corrupt mores, values, and standards of the world system and
the neglect of righteousness that allows its continuance. In
short, Satan is the memory of the Dark that Christ came to
dispel, a memory that receives its power and life from the
support and encouragement of indolent and irresponsible men.
In not wishing to face the needs of his own spiritual growth,
Man prefers to think of himself as a helpless pawn in a game
between God and Satan. Such a philosophy is called dualism
and was the basis for numerous pagan religions.
87
Discourses..., "Enchiridion" 42, 43 (pp. 288-289)
CONCLUSION
We are the "god of this world," and we blind our own eyes
if we neglect the exercise of the righteousness imputed to us
for manifestation in this world. There is no Satan outside of
ourselves. God is the only Power in the world. In an effort to
bring about the peace understood as God's plan for Man,
attention has been turned to unifying men into a common
purpose, but there is no need for a one-world religion, a one-
world government, or a one-world economy. World peace
does not hinge on the agreement of men about men. World
peace and ultimate spiritual success is dependent on agreement
on the Love of God and the manifestation of that Love.
Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy
heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy
strength, and with all thy mind; and thy neighbor
as thyself.
--- Luke 10:27
90
The Fall (1957)
BIBLIOGRAPHY