A few follow-up items have been acquired.

First, regarding Kurdistan, the essay uploaded @ Israpundit has also been uploaded on the homepage of the Kurdistan National Assembly. Second, a few articles that correlate the Kurds and the Jews have been provided, a few of which are derived from a website that appears to aggregate literature related to the Kurds. An introduction to KURDISTAN and a review of ISRAELI-KURDISH RELATIONS illustrate the credibility of claims of a long-term affinity of Kurds towards Jews, and analysis of The Genetic Bonds between Kurds and Jews has included COMPARING DNA PATTERNS OF SEPHARDI, ASHKENAZI & KURDISH JEWS; these have not only led to the generic view that Kurdistan will be the second home for Jews after Israel, but scientific studies have detailed why:

The Y Chromosome Pool of Jews as Part of the Genetic Landscape of the Middle East Jews were found to be more closely related to groups in the north of the Fertile Crescent (Kurds, Turks, and Armenians) than to their Arab neighbors.

http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?p=106398003 [requires registration]: There are between 300,000 and 500,000 Kurdish Jews, which is between 3.5 and 4.0% of the entire Jewish population and around 2.0% of the entire Kurdish population.

Second, regarding Syria, the us had intel on chemical strike before it was launched [yielding the obvious question as to why an alarum wasnt promptly sounded], and a video has allegedly shown how DAVID CAMERON has been EXPOSED ON ISLAM. Again, it will be curious to note during the Sunday Talk Shows whether anyone queries a BHO-defender as to why this dire-emergency [on Friday] devolved into a potential attack that was no longer time-sensitive [on Saturday] and, thus, could yield debate that would conveniently be delayed until after the Labor Day vacation and BHOs return from Europe.

Third, regarding ObamaCare, being contemplated by a group of TEA Party Groups is a message along these rhetorical lines: We have been fervent supporters of Congressman Mike Fitzpatrick for years, having provided time, cognition and money to this honest civil servant. Yet, he has not yet agreed to oppose financing ObamaCare through the Continuing Resolution, for whatever reason[s]. He is threatening to undermine the energies expended by his base, which has provided the door-knocking component that underlies his achievements; indeed, the intensity of the national effort even extends to plans to primary each Republican who attempts to forget that If you fund it, you own it! There is no further information available that will affect any effort to strategize regarding this issue. We therefore hope that Mike will announceimmediatelythat he recognizes the acute dangers of statism that ObamaCare would cement into American life and specifically pledge to oppose funding ObamaCare on each/every vote that he will take throughout the rest of his current term. We would want Mike to embrace the two-pronged innovation detailed previously [splitting the CRs to isolate the two pivotal

oneswhich would be amended to forestall IRS-enforcement and to mandate HHS implementation of the GOP-plan], recognizing that it could initially provide common ground among Republicans and subsequently yield a dont blink [no compromise] posture when dealing with the Democrats.

Fourth, amplifying documented lawlessness permeating the ObamaCare roll-out is the latest revelation that is obviously intended to quell the eruption from Organized Labor [white-house-considers-awardingobamacare-subsidies-intended-for-the-uninsured-to-labor-unions], again illustrating why it is not desirable simply to delay implementation; procrastination [such as Boehners trial-balloon advising prompt adoption of a 60-day temporary foot-drag] would allow for BHO to start getting people to sign-up with the exchanges [as of 10/1/2013]. This must be viewed as totally unacceptable; indeed, some of us would go so far as to suggest that this one vote must not be tethered to any other issue and must not permit BHO to shift-$ to accomplish his nefarious goals unimpeded by mandamus-injunctions and/or threatened-litigation. Mike and his colleagues must be helped to recognize that no other issue promises to trump this one [for immediacy and implications], recalling that ObamaCare has NOTHING to do with healthcare and EVERYTHING to do with government control over everyones private life; Middle of the Road in Healthcare Leads to Socialism, so the reader may wish to take a crash-course that summarizes many of the points we have made: Defunding ObamaCare 101.

Fifth, it is always desirable to be reminded of 12-unspoken-rules-for-being-a-liberal.

Sixth, an article that concluded Ted Cruz enjoys clear edge among tea party activists at Americans for Prosperity summit cements my view that he remains the early GOP frontrunner for POTUS:

Here is a key-excerpt from the piece:

He followed Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.), Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, all of whom addressed the organization Friday. While the others were warmly received absent some activists who heckled Rubio over his immigration stance the reception for Cruz was nothing short of adoring.

Here is a personal reaction which was triggered by this article:

First of all, this is a pivotal article for many reasons, as the GOP girds for battle over ObamaCare; clearly, the support for Cruz "translates" into endorsing his defunding effort.

Second, anyone wishing to follow [via Facebook] the compilation of presidential-aspirations exploding daily regarding Cruz can join either "Ted Heads" or "Ted Cruz for President 2016."

Third, anyone wishing to watch his father's speech this past Thursday in Wilmington, Delaware @ the rally promoted by Heritage Action can either tune-in tomorrow on C-SPAN-I @ 1:31 p.m. e.d.t. or can watch the 80-minute event; he gave the invocation and the coda.

Fourth, what is clear, now, is that the POTUS-nomination will be contested between the "moderates" [with genealogy back through Romney to McCain] presumably led by Christie [although Walker could be recruited in case Chris doesn't lose enough weight] and the triad of Cruz/Paul/Rubio. Most conservatives feel Rubio has become selfmarginalized, and his "Hispanic" appeal is subsumed by Cruz; likewise, the stridency of Paul [particularly regarding foreign policy, c/o his father] is subsumed by the balance struck by Cruz.

Therefore, this article serves to reinforce the capacity for Cruz to emerge as the undisputed leader of the Conservatives in the GOP, and he won't allow a public spat to emerge with anyone [including Christie] as did Paul. His capacity to attract additional support could create a tsunami that would potentially freeze-out many potential opponents ahead-of-time, and no amount of D-inspired bad-mouthing would alter this outcome.

Cruz is a straight-talker, he is honest, he is Presidential, he is a leader, and anyone listening to his father will recognize how very close fell the apple from the family tree.

Seventh, its time to rest [recalling that this is the Sabbath]; a few blast e-mails ago, it was suggested that accumulated hyperlinks regarding ObamaCare would be consolidated and, as desirable as it is to

complete this task [plus to address other categories of hyperlinks, particularly related to reverse-racism and social-issues, which can be distilled sufficiently to allow for key-conclusions to be articulated]its time to catch some shut-eye [and to handle whatever critique this blast may have triggered].