0 evaluări0% au considerat acest document util (0 voturi)
43 vizualizări4 pagini
62337
ng12-0434
judge bruce t beesley
judge dorothy nash holmes
washoe legal services
paul elcano
nvb-10-05104
52639
cadle co v. keller
canon 2, rule 2.15
responding to attorney
Titlu original
3 19 12 0204 Email to Nvbar Bar Grievance Reporting Unauthor AGAINST KERN and SUE of WNM 374 SCHROEDER 05104 NVB ETC
62337
ng12-0434
judge bruce t beesley
judge dorothy nash holmes
washoe legal services
paul elcano
nvb-10-05104
52639
cadle co v. keller
canon 2, rule 2.15
responding to attorney
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
62337
ng12-0434
judge bruce t beesley
judge dorothy nash holmes
washoe legal services
paul elcano
nvb-10-05104
52639
cadle co v. keller
canon 2, rule 2.15
responding to attorney
Drepturi de autor:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formate disponibile
Descărcați ca PDF, TXT sau citiți online pe Scribd
bar grievance reporting unauthorized practice of law
From: Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com)
Sent: Mon 3/19/12 1:07 PM To: glennm@nvbar.org 4 attachments THE 2 11 12 email to WCSO RPD Reno City Attorney Hill NPUC Hill et al b.pdf (137.8 KB) , from nv supreme court website on eviction stay packet instructions.pdf (28.0 KB) , Eviction Procedure - Washoe County Sheriff's Office - 911 Parr Blvd, Reno, Nevada.pdf (80.9 KB) , stay eviction 31 thru 36 zc park terrace HOA package fill out reprinted.pdf (78.3 KB)
Dear Assistant Bar Counsel Machado,
Hello, and I hope you are well. I am writing to file a grievance against Galye A. Kern, Esq. and Sue King, property manager and owner of Western Nevada Management related to the unauthorized practice of law and unlawful interference with my attorney-client relationships and violation of privacy rights and client confidientiality. Ms. Kern simply does not appear or do any legal work in either the unlawful interruption of essential services case in the RJC, nor in the subsequent summary eviction proceeding in RJC 2012-000374. Rather, Sue King is litigating without a law license.
And Gayle A. Kern, Esq. is aware of, and, I believe, ratifying it, at the very least. Additionaly, upon information and belief, one or both of these individuals have attempted to prevent me from having access to my mail and or electricity by communicating with NV Energy and the USPS, despite the fact that King has made the admissions detailed in the "other thoughts" section below. What seems very instructive to me is that no less an attorney than Richard Hill lacks anythign to cite to to provide legal support for the manner of service of Orders for Summary Eviction other than to say they are served or performed "in the usual and customary manner of the Washoe County Sheriff's Office", however, I could find nothing indicating such a thing to be tantamount to black letter law. It is the usual and customary practice of the WCSO to threaten, or to follow through on a threat to arrest anyone who challenges them or who asserts their constitutional rights and charge them with Obstruction or Justice...or "rubstruction" as Deputy Cannizzaro calls it.
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin, Esq., 1422 E. 9th St. #2, RENO, NV 89512, tel: 775 338 8118, fax: 949 667 7402; ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com Nevada Bar No: 9473
From:Zach Coughlin (zachcoughlin@hotmail.com) Sent: Sat 3/17/12 12:21 PM To: gaylekern@kernltd.com; karenayarbe@kernltd.com; kaitlynmiller@kernltd.com Hotmail Active View 1 attachment (803.2 KB) MERS Mort...pdf Download(803.2 KB) Download as zip Hi Gayle, I would appreciate some sort of assurances on your part that my personal property and my client's files will be accored privacy, not copied, not accessed or duplicated, etc. I want to retrieve my personal property immediately, please contact me in writing and let me know when I can do so. Any damage done to my property in the course of any "moving" of it by you, your agents, or anyone connected with Western Nevada Management will result in my seeking redress on my own behalf and on behalf of my clients. Already your negligence in this regard has resulted in damage to my client's interests and will likely result in several lawsuits.
http://www.scribd.com/SherylMoulton/d/60896742-MOULTON-v-GAYLE-A-KERN-Perjury-False-Statements-in-Federal-Court-2-11-11-First- Amended-Complaint Karen M. Ayarbe Company: Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. Address: 5421 Kietzke Lane Search Here Suite 200 Reno , NV 89511 Phone Number: 775-324-5930 Fax number: 775-324-6173 Email: karenayarbe@kernltd.com Website: No information provided Admit Date: 09/29/88 Law School: U. Of Colorado Specialization: None Professional Liability Insurance: Yes
Gayle Agnes Kern Company: Gayle A. Kern. Ltd. Address: 5421 Kietzke Lane Suite 200 Reno , NV 89511 Phone Number: 775-324-5930 Fax number: 775-324-6173 Email: gaylekern@kernltd.com Website: No information provided Admit Date: 12/31/84 Law School: U. of Oregon Specialization: None Professional Liability Insurance: Yes
Kaitlyn A. Miller Company: Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. Address: 5421 Kietzke Lane Suite 200 Reno , NV 89511 Phone Number: 775-324-5930 Fax number: --- Email: kaitlynmiller@kernltd.com Website: No information provided Admit Date: 04/29/09 Law School: Golden Gate University Specialization: None Professional Liability Insurance: Yes
Sincerely, Zach Coughlin, Esq., 1422 E. 9th St. #2, RENO, NV 89512, tel: 775 338 8118, fax: 949 667 7402; ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com Nevada Bar No: 9473
Other thoughts:
Well, Sue, since you and Jared Scalise were there video taping the whole thing, all of us should not need to rely on your word, now should we? Produce the video tape, Sue. Shouldn't be too hard if it was so clear they announced they were law enforcement prior to unzipping the locks and drawing their guns and entering my location, then pointing them at me and my dog. Just produce the video, Sue. Did their happen to be any disinterested witnesses, Sue? You know, like people not on the Sheriff's payroll and people not employed by you or Gayle A. Kern, Esq., LTD, Western Nevada Management or the Park Terrace HOA? And what ever did happen to that Manager of yours that was fired or quit or something like that right about the time you decided to serve the eviction notice, Robyn Badolato? Didn't you say she approved the agreement for carpentry services and the occupation of the unit, etc. etc.? But then you said your business knew nothing about it, right? And what was that about respondeat superior?
You know what would be really funny? What if someone had a video that proved that they didn't announce they were police prior to entering? Wouldn't that be a hoot, Sue? But would that person just come right out and show it, or would they let Sue, Jared, the locksmith and Deputy Durbin and Deputy Cannizzarro put something on the record that could later be used to impeach them first? We'll see....Also, wouldn't it be a hoot if the training practices and policies of the WCSO actually instructs Deputies not to announce that they are law enforcement prior to entering? Kind of like how there are penalties for not getting the eviction and lockout done in time (ie, somebody's interpretation of NRS 40.253 views it as within "24 hours of" the Sheriff's "receipt" of the Order, rather than the tenant's "receipt". Regardless, Deputy Machem still seems to think "personally served" means lots of things other than what the law has traditionally viewed as "personally served". Why indicate he "personally served" the Order in his Affidavit of 11/7/11 when he merely, allegedly, according to Liz Stuchell, posted it on the door at 121 River Rock when nobody was home? Why not just say that in the affidavit, rather than leveraging the import of the phrase "personally served" to connote some sort of fidelity to traditional notions of due process and fair play when, clearly, the WCSO, or at least some individuals therein, could care less about such. Kind of like all that Robo-signing going on in the foreclosure defense world. RPD Sargent Sifre doesn't mind taking advantage of all those civil law arguments in his defense in that context though. But, he sure doesn't mind subjecting me to a custodial arrest for jaywalking, which just happens to benefit Richard G. Hill, Esq. in that it prevents me from collecting evidence and discovery incident to the wrongful eviction lawsuit he is facing:
Basically, Richard G. Hill, Esq. and Casey Baker, Esq. constantly seeks to leverage courts, police, the Washoe County Sheriff's Office and others to further his nefarious approach to litigation, rather than roll up his sleeves and find some law in favor of his positions and apply actual facts to them, rather than make up things or quote to third parties and other hearsay (I never made contact with or touched Mr. Hill, I never climbed on anyone's truck, Mr. Hill is not a licensed mental health professional, yet he sounds like a walking DSM-IV when he writes of me, as does arm-chair psychologist cum property manager Sue King. Funny how all these diagnosis are of a bent that would just so happen to also be in line with the views these parties would need endorsed to help them continue making money). Minutes before my hearing in Judge Beesley's Bankrupcty courtroom at 2:30 pm on March 15th, 2012 (which involved the dischargeability of a $1.6 million debt The Cadle Company (of Jan Schlictmann, "A Civil Action" movie/book fame) seeks to enforce: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Schlichtmann ), Washoe County Sheriff's Deputies Durbin and Cannizzaro unlawfully stormed into my location at 1422 E. 9th St, #2, with guns drawn and pointed at me, without previously identifying themselves as law enforcement in any way, and demanding I grab a few things in a couple minutes and leave.
Then, they also threatened to have me arrested for "obstructing justice" if I recorded any of their activities or threats, numerous times telling me they were going to arrest me. Additionally, when my property was outside the location at 1422 E. 9th St. #2, these Deputies threatened to convert it back to the landlord by dragging it back inside the structure and locking the door, in retaliation for my pointing out the abuse of power they were engaging in under color of law vis a vis 42 USC Sec 1983 and other laws. The recent arrest of local athlete Courtney Gardner for "obstructing justice" is all the more dubious in light of these Deputies behavior and statements, especially considering how Gardner is quoted as saying just about exactly what you would imagine law enforcement wish he would say for a juicy quote to feed the sports section to make their arrest seem all the more palatable. This is standard practice in my experience with local law enforcement, in many instances, not all, but many. http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_20163343/arrest-ex-reno-prep-football- star-signed-at
This unlawful eviction was pursuant to an eviction hearing held that morning by Reno Justice Court Judge Jack Shroeder, the same Judge who screamed at me "do you want to go to jail!" when I attempted to address in any way whatsoever Richard Hill's abuse of process in getting a Order of Protection from Judge Schroeder in a scant 40 minutes, and having me arrested on 1/12/12 (two days before Hill's grievance was sent to you), at the extension hearing on January 31, 2012, where Hill admitted he didn't have a good reason for seeking an extension and withdrew his application. I wanted to address Hill's abuse of process for the record, Judge Schroeder decided to scream at me instead. It was reminscent of Judge Nash Holmes telling me, on the record, in Reno Municipal Court case 11 TR 26800 that she would have me arrested and placed in jail if I said Richard G. Hill's name one more time. I cross examined RPD Sargent Tarter about whether he had a retaliatory motive in ticketing me outside Hill's office on 11/15/11 after Hill refused to give me my driver's license, and I reported to Sargent Tarter that RPD Officer Chris Carter had admitted to taking bribes from Richard G. Hill, Esq.
Actually, there is some footage of the "terror" Richard G. Hill was exposed to that necessitated him seeking a Protection Order (the "RPD made him" do it, honest): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBu9zflGALE
I don't know why Sargent Sifre (whom makes more money than a District Court Judge) should be so upset with lawyers like me, who work in the foresclosure defense field. After all, Sargent Sifre has benefitted from foresclosure defense work: http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2011/01/29/nevada-dist-court-quiet-title-viable- sifre-v-wells-fargo-bank/
Sincerely,
Zach Coughlin, Esq. From:Sue King (sue@westernnv.com) Sent: Fri 3/16/12 2:56 PM To: zachcoughlin@hotmail.com There were three witnesses that heard them say POLICE before they went in to the properly. (Me, Jared and the Locksmith) What a loon.
Sue King President/Broker/Supervising CM Western Nevada Management, Inc 804 Mill Street, Reno, NV 89502 Ph: 775-284-4434 Fax: 775-284-4465 sue@westernnv.com www.westernnv.com From: Zach Coughlin [mailto:zachcoughlin@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 2:26 PM To: sheriffweb@washoecounty.us; Sue King; gaylekern@kernltd.com; lstuchell@washoecounty.us; mhaley@washoecounty.us; tvinger@washoecounty.us; rsilva@washoecounty.us; kstancil@washoecounty.us; jboles@callatg.com; jmd@randazza.com; geofgiles@hotmail.com; stermitz@sbcglobal.net; tjhlaw@eschelon.com; mkandaras@da.washoecounty.us; rjcweb@washoecourts.us Subject: illegal eviction procedures by WCSO retaliation etc
Dear Sheriff Haley, Reno Justice Court, et al,
Please find attached my emergency motion for stay of the eviction, which WCSO Deputies Canazaro and Durbin performed yesterday at gunpoint after breaking into my location prior to announcing who they were or identifying themselves as law enforcement.
Sincerely, Zach Coughlin, Esq., 1422 E. 9th St. #2, RENO, NV 89512, tel: 775 338 8118, fax: 949 667 7402; ZachCoughlin@hotmail.com Nevada Bar No: 9473
10 31 13 72675 65630 63341 71437 607 599 Filing and Voxox Fax Proof With 4 4 13 Fax Header's Motion To Strike Remand and Sentencing Memor and Extension of Time Sought Appt of Counsel Etc. Vacate Epo
10 24 13 72675 Printed Notice of WCDA's Attempt To Remand Coughlin and Revoke Two Probations and Addendum To Post-Trial Motions Stamped With Ex 1 Opt A9 Printed