Salvation & Law

Wed Sep 11, 2013 5:56 pm A few excerpts from a piece written by David Shayler 177 pages so here is the link http://www.scribd.com/doc/52405961/The-Third-and-Final-Testament-Part1 Q. What is the difference between unlawful and illegal? A. The salvation of man Common Law:the term is of English origin and is used to describe the juridical principles and general rules regulating the possession, use and inheritance of property and the conduct of individuals,the origin of which is not definitely known*, which have been observed since a remote period of antiquity, and which are based upon immemorial usages and the decisions of the law courts as distinct from the lex scripta; the latter consisting of imperial or kingly edicts or express acts of legislation. Consent and Contracts Maxims (red) with notes The essence of a contract being assent,there is no contract where assent is wanting. Proof of contract requires assent. Bemused ignorance is not silent agreement or consent. Any maxim containing the word consent must beinterpreted in the light of this. There is a world of difference between agreement and non-disagreement. How can you prove silent agreement? And agreement to what? Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can acquire force only by consent. Consent makes the law: the terms of a contract, lawful in its purpose, constitutethe law as between the parties. To him consenting no injury is done. He who consents cannot receive an injury.

No action at law arises on an immoral contract Consent removes or obviates a mistake "When representing people as a Common Law lawyer, I have drafted letters to official bodies like the Crown Prosecution Service asking them to provide the authority behind legislation. So far none of them has come up with a single reference let alone an authority which states that constitutions or statutestake precedence over the Law. Nor have they provided an argument to justify the idea that Acts of Parliament create a binding duty. These communications have though established beyond any reasonable doubt that the CPS and its parent company, UK plc is an unlawful corporation repugnant to God and reason". - David Shayler Must, may, shall Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which canacquire force only by consent Maxims of Law Anyone who doubts this might like to consider the legal definition of must, which under its normal ornatural definition means to have a duty to; to have to; to be compelled or obliged to. Although the shyster editors of Blacks Law have removed must from the 9th edition, previous editions held it to be synonymous with may. However, the 9th and latest edition still defines may to be permitted to and to be a possibility as synonymous with must: Loosely, is required to; shall; must []. In dozens of cases,courts have held may to be synonymous with shall or must, usually inan effort to effectuate legislative intent. Blacks Law, 9th edition So in the language of legislation, legislators use the word must or shall but they do not create a dutybecause they actually mean 'to be permitted to or to be a possibility. This means legislation is an offer we can lawfully refuse. Next time, you get a parking or speeding ticket, study it closely. It usually says you must pay a fine of x. In legalese, this means that you are permitted to pay a fine or it is a possibility that you pay a fine. You have no duty to pay that fine. So dont. Because it all goes to servicing the unlawful national debt, which in turn creates a form of slavery.In order to prove this, next time you get what looks like a bill, ignore it. Instead, write to the CEO of the corporation concerned asking for a lawful bill of settlement. This must (in its true sense) include: The amount owed and the lawful reason for liability (like a contract etc). The name of the man claiming on the liability

His signature