Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
(2)
The linear state space description (nodal form) is obtained by
determining the Jacobian matrices (A, B) at the equilibrium
point. Simulation and experiments of free vibrations without
control are conducted to verify the dynamic behaviour of the
model. In Table 2 the natural frequencies of the first three
modes of the 8-plate model and of the measured bridge set-up
are listed. The frequencies agree well with the measured
frequencies.
Table 2. Natural frequencies of the 8-plate model and the
Bridge set-up
Mode 8-plate model Bridge set-up
1. vertical symmetric 1.33 Hz 1.35 Hz
2. vertical asymmetric 2.54 Hz 2.76 Hz
3. vertical symmetric 3.85 Hz 4.08 Hz
To design a model based controller for specific modes it is
more convenient to use the modal state space representation,
Gawronski (2004). This representation is obtained from the
already derived nodal state space representation by trans-
formation using the modal matrix
1414
Re . In the modal
description all modes are decoupled.
-1
x R x
m
= (3)
1
m
= A R AR,
1
m
= B R B ,
m
= C CR (4)
Where
14 1
x
m
e is the modal state vector,
14 14
A
m
e is
the modal system matrix,
14 1
B
m
e is the modal input
vector,
14 14
C
m
e is the modal output matrix and the nodal
output matrix
14 14
C
e is the identity matrix.
3. KALMAN FILTER TO ESTIMATE MODAL STATES
To estimate the modal states a Kalman filter is employed,
Lunze (2006). By measuring only the vertical displacement
7
x in midspan the symmetrical modes can be observed.
Therefore, only the symmetrical modes ( ) SM are extracted
from the vectors / matrices of Eq. (4):
( )
7 5 3 1
diag , , ,
SM
m m m m m
= A A A A A (5)
| |
7 5 3 1
T
SM
m m m m m
= B B B B B (6)
Preprints of the 18th IFAC World Congress
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2011
912
| |
7 5 3 1
SM
m m m m m
= C C C C C (7)
Where
2 2
A
mi
e ,
2 1
B
mi
e and
14 2
C
mi
e are the com-
ponents of mode i .
The dynamics of the estimator are given by
SM SM SM SM SM SM
m m m m s s m m
s
u
| |
|
= + +
|
|
\ .
x A x B L y C C x
y
(8)
| | | |
7 8 4 4
T T
s
x x q q = = y (9)
where
SM
m
x are the estimated symmetric modal states. The
measurement is
s
y (
8
x is obtained by numerical differentia-
tion) and
s
y is the estimation of this measurement based on
SM
m
x . The matrix
s
C selects the estimated elements
7
x and
8
x out of the vector
SM SM
m m
C x . The convergence of
SM
m
x
SM
m
x is determined by the observer gain L . This gain is found
by minimizing a quadratic cost function.
4. NONLINEAR MODEL OF THE ACTUATOR SYSTEM
The used PMA is developed and manufactured by the
company Festo, Festo (2010). The pulling-only actuator
consists of a flexible tube. By inflating the tube with com-
pressed air it expands in radial direction and contracts in
longitudinal direction. The force
Mi
F produced by the PMA
{1, 2} i e depends on the pressure
Mi
p inside the muscle and
its contraction length
Mi
s . Detailed information about mod-
elling of pneumatic actuators including mass flow, pressure
dynamics and force characteristics are given in Hildebrandt et
al. (2003) and Hildebrandt (2009). Input of the actuator
system i is the reference position
vi
u of the proportional
directional control valve. Output of the actuator system is the
generated force
Mi
F . In Bleicher (2011), the nonlinear
actuator model is given by
( ) ( )
( )
1 2
2
0 1 2
0
1 0
2
0 1 2
1 0
, ,
2
, , 0
, , 0
Mi Mi Mi Mi Mi vi
Mi Mi Mi
Mi Mi
Mi vi vi
Mi p L
Mi Mi
Mi
Mi vi vi
v
p f p s g p s u
s s p
s s
p
C p b u u
p n RT
s s
p
C p b u u
p
k v v
v v v
v v v
= +
+
=
+ +
| |
<
|
\ .
+
+ +
| |
>
|
\ .
(9)
( )
( ) ( )
2 3
0 1 1 2 3
,
Mi Mi Mi
Mi v p Mi Mi Mi Mi
F h p s
p p A c c p s c s c s
=
= +
(10)
where
Mi
p is the measurable system state,
Mi
s is a time-
variant measurable system variable, and ( ) ,
b
q b is the flow
rate function defined by Eq. (11). Further parameters are
listed in Table 3.
( )
2
1 , (subcritical flow)
,
1
1, (supercritical flow)
b
b
b
b
q b
q b
q b
b
q b
| |
>
|
=
\ .
<
(11)
Table 3. Parameters of the actuator system using a PMA
type DMSP-40-356N and a valve type MYPE-5-1/4-420-B,
Festo (2010)
Virtual piston area
v
A 0.01022 m
2
Valve parameter
1
C 6.25 litre/(sbar)
Specific gas constant R 287 J/kgK
Gas temperature
L
T 293 K
Valve parameter b 0.23
Force constant
1p
c 0.09540 m
Force constant
1
c 22130 kg/s
2
Force constant
2
c -493900 kg/s
2
m
Force constant
3
c 1849000 kg/s
2
m
2
Polytrophic exponent
p
n 1.0
Ambient pressure
0
p 101325 N/m
2
Supply pressure
v
p 6
0
p
Volume constant
0
v 0.43699 litre
Volume constant
1
v 9.4724 litre/m
Volume constant
2
v -44.6014 litre/m
2
Isentropic exponent k 1.4
Air density
0
1.293 kg/m
3
5. FORCE CONTROL USING I/O LINEARISATION
Exact I/O linearization is applied to render the nonlinear
actuator dynamics linear for forces in the range 0 to 3000 N
and for -1 1
vi
u s s . The linearising and stabilising control
law is given by
( )
( ) ( )
0
0
,
,
, ,
f Mi Mi Mi Mi
vi Mi ref
g Mi Mi g Mi Mi
L h p s s a F
a
u F
L h p s L h p s
( + A +
= +
(12)
( ) ( ) ( )
1
, ,
f Mi Mi v p Mi Mi Mi
L h p s A c s f p s = (13)
( ) ( ) ( )
1
, ,
g Mi Mi v p Mi Mi Mi
L h p s A c s g p s = (14)
( ) ( )
2
1 1 2 3
2 3
Mi p Mi Mi Mi Mi
s c c p c s c s s A = + (15)
where
Mi
F is the measured force,
, Mi ref
F is the reference
force,
f
L h and
g
L h are the
i
L - derivatives,
Mi
s A is the
derivative of the time-variant measurable system variable and
0
a is the control parameter to set the time constant of the
resulting linear actuator dynamics which is given by
( )
1
0
0
1
.
1
PT
T
a
G s
s a T s
= =
+ +
(16)
The control parameter is set to
0
3.18 Hz a = respectively
0.05 s
T
T = , Bleicher (2011). The controller behaves experi-
mentally as expected as long as the supply pressure is
constant also under load changes and if the sampling rate of
the digital controller realisation is high enough.
Preprints of the 18th IFAC World Congress
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2011
913
6. VELOCITY FEEDBACK CONTROL TO REDUCE
FIRST MODE VIBRATIONS
The concept to control first mode vibrations is based on a
cascade control structure with a subsidiary force control and a
superior velocity feedback control. The control gain K for
positive feedback (negative plant gain) of the observed modal
velocity was found by applying the root locus method (Dorf
(2008)) assuming a non-saturated control signal (force) and
negligible observer dynamics. Hence, closed-loop poles are
defined as roots of the equation
( ) ( )
1
1 0
PT
G s G s K + = (17)
where G is the transfer function of the first mode and
1
PT
G is
the linear actuator dynamics given by Eq. (16).
The transfer function of the first mode (input: total force
1 2 M M M
F F F = + produced by the two pneumatic muscles,
output: modal velocity
1 M
x ) is derived using the Laplace
transform of the modal state-space model:
( )
1
2 2
1 1 1
2
m
b s
G s
s s , e e
=
+ +
(18)
Parameters of this transfer function are the natural frequency
1
8.36 rad/s e = , the damping factor
1
0.0022 , = and
2
1
0.0003422 rad/(s N)
m
b = .
The optimal damping ratio
1,
0.32
opt
, = of the closed-loop
system is achieved with the gain setting 17, 500 Ns/rad K = .
Fig. 4. Control structure for experiment
Root locus analysis furthermore revealed that high gain
velocity feedback cannot render the closed-loop system
unstable. Due to the special pole-zero constellation (a zero at
the origin and 3 poles) the conjugate complex poles will
converge to 10 j for K (at least theoretically for
this ideal linear system model). Very large gains will lead to
an undesirable increase in the natural frequency and a
decrease of the damping ratio.
Up to now, no constraints in the control signal have been
taken into account. Due to the nature of the chosen actuator,
only limited unidirectional (positive) control forces can
beapplied. These forces push the bridge downwards. Simula-
tions have shown that the practically applied gain should be
doubled to obtain the above given optimal damping ratio. The
Popov Criterion (Khalil (2001)) was successfully used to
prove the stability of the closed-loop system formed by a
static nonlinear gain (saturated velocity feedback law)
1 1 max
, max 1 max
1
2 for 0 2
for 2
0 for 0
m m M
M ref M m M
m
Kx Kx F
F F Kx F
x
s s
= >
<
(19)
and the linear system
( )
1 1 ,
( ) ( ) ( )
M PT M ref
x s G s G s F s = (20)
Having a maximal force of 3,000 N for one PMA it follows
that
max
6, 000 N
M
F = .
The results of this control strategy are shown and discussed
in Section 7.
Preprints of the 18th IFAC World Congress
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2011
914
7. RESULTS OF EXPERIMENT
For experiment the control structure was implemented in a
real-time environment with a sampling frequency of 100 Hz.
Therefore, a PC running a Linux operation system with the
real-time extension RTAI (https://www.rtai.org/) was used.
The software code was generated and compiled from Scilab /
Scicos block diagrams. Communication to devices was pro-
vided by the HART Toolbox (http://hart.sourceforge.net).
The excitation signal for this experiment was a sinusoidal
force signal in the first mode so that the pneumatic muscle
actuators work first as exciter. Afterwards the vibrations are
actively damped by the actuator. In Fig. 5 the reference force
1/ 2, M ref
F and the measured force
1, M act
F after excitation are
plotted. It can be observed that the measured force follows
the expected linear actuator dynamics
1/ 2, , 1 M est PT
F in good
agreement. In Fig. 6 time histories of estimated modal
velocity with velocity feedback control and without control
are plotted. The control strategy efficiently reduces the first
mode response. The uncontrolled response decays very slow-
ly with logarithmic decrement
1,A
0.034. The controlled
response decays about 26 times faster with
1,A,AVC
0.740.
Fig. 5. Reference force, actual force and estimated force by
first order system (PT1)
The control performance under pedestrian excitation is shown
in Fig. 7. One person is walking from on side to the other
side with a step frequency of 1.35 Hz that corresponds to
the bridges first natural frequency. Without control a maxi-
mum acceleration amplitude of 6 m/s
2
occurs. With control
the acceleration amplitude can be reduced by 89 % to less
than 0.6 m/s
2
. No significant spillover effects in higher un-
symmetrical modes could be observed.
Fig. 6. Modal velocity of the first mode w/o and with AVC
Fig. 7. Pedestrian induced accelerations w/o and with AVC
8. CONCLUSIONS
Active vibration control for a stress ribbon bridge with an
extremely light pneumatic actuator was investigated. For this
purpose, an analytical nonlinear bridge model was developed.
By experiments it was confirmed that the linearized model
represents the nonlinear behavior of the stress ribbon in good
agreement for multi-modal motions. By using exact linear-
ization methods the nonlinear dynamics of the pneumatic
actuator were transformed into fast linear dynamic behavior.
This step greatly simplifies the design for the higher level
velocity feedback controller. The proposed cascaded control
structure for active damping of the bridge mitigates first
mode responses efficiently. To verify the model-based con-
trol designs full-scale experiments were conducted.
The used control strategy can be easily extended to multi-
variable control, thus in further studies a multi-variable
control system will be implemented to control asymmetric
and higher symmetric modes. In addition, the efficiency of
the controller reducing forced and random vibrations induced
by a number of pedestrians will be investigated. Future
analysis will also deal with the robustness of the controller
under strongly varying masses by pedestrians.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors would like to thank Festo AG & Co. KG.,
Esslingen, Germany for the generous material support.
Preprints of the 18th IFAC World Congress
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2011
915
REFERENCES
Baus, U., Schlaich, M. (2008). Footbridges. Birkhuser,
Basel.
Bleicher, A. (2011). Multimodal Active Vibration Control of
a Stress Ribbon Bridge using Pneumatic Muscle
Actuators. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut fr Bauingenieurwesen,
TU Berlin (in German).
Dorf, R., Bishop, R. (2008). Modern Control Systems (11e).
Prentice Hall.
Festo AG & Co. KG (2010). Product Catalogues. Esslingen,
Germany.
Gawronski, W.K. (2004). Advanced Structural Dynamics and
Active Control of Structures. Springer, New York.
Hildebrandt, A., Sawodny, O., Neumann, R., Hartmann, A.
(2003). A Cascaded Tracking Control Concept for Pneu-
matic Muscle Actuators. European Control Conference
(ECC), Cambridge.
Hildebrandt, A. (2009). Control and Design of Servopneu-
matic Drives. Ph.D. Thesis, Institut fr Systemdynamik,
Universitt Stuttgart (in German).
Khalil, H. (2001). Nonlinear Systems (3e). Prentice Hall
Lunze, J. (2006). Regelungstechnik 2. Springer, Berlin (in
German).
Schlaich, M., Bleicher, A. (2007). Spannbandbrcke aus
Kohlenstofffaser-Lamellen. Bautechnik, Vol. 84, Issue 5,
pp. 311-319. Ernst & Sohn (in German).
Strasky, J. (2005). Stress Ribbon and Cable Supported
Pedestrian Bridges. Thomas Telford, London.
Preprints of the 18th IFAC World Congress
Milano (Italy) August 28 - September 2, 2011
916