What is OR

Defendants, US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, as Trustee for CSMC Mortgage-Backed PassThrough Certificates, Series 2006-3, within a Petition for Review by counsel submitted to the Arizona Supreme Court in consolidated cause number(s), 1 CA-CV 12-0073 or 1 CA-CV 120132 an Appeal to an opinion rendered by Maricopa County Superior Court in Cause No. CV 2011-005567 we find the following verbiage: Listing synonymous terms as the Legislature did with lien, encumbrance, and interest in A.R.S. 33420(A) doesnt mean the Legislature meant three different things. Legislatures often use synonyms for emphasis, to make a statutes application unmistakable. See McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350, 359 (1987). Phrases connected by or are not necessarily disjunctive. [Emphasis Added by writer] Blacks Law 8th Edition does not define or so attention is turned to lay people dictionaries. Merriam Websters 1definition of or: 1 used as a function word to indicate an alternative <coffee or tea> <sink or swim>, the equivalent or substitutive character of two words or phrases <lessen or abate>, or approximation or uncertainty <in five or six days> 2 archaic : either 3 archaic : whether 4 used in logic as a sentential connective that forms a complex sentence which is true when at least one of its constituent sentences is true compare disjunction
1

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/or

One would need to inquire if counsel presenting the Petition for Review referenced wikipedia2 for definition of or:
Or may be:

a grammatical conjunction

Looking up the word or upon wikipedia sends the reader to subsequent wording to apply meaning3: Coordinating conjunctions, also called coordinators, are conjunctions that join, or coordinate, two or more items (such as words, main clauses, or sentences) of equal syntactic importance. In English, the mnemonic acronym FANBOYS can be used to remember the coordinators for, and, nor, but, or, yet, and so.[3][4] These are not the only coordinating conjunctions; various others are used, including "and nor" (British), "but nor" (British), "or nor" (British), "neither" ("They don't gamble; neither do they smoke"), "no more" ("They don't gamble; no more do they smoke"), and "only" ("I would go, only I don't have time"). or presents an alternative item or idea ("Every day they gamble or they smoke.") Clearly, several questions arise, were a contract that a layperson has legal understanding differently than the legalese meaning, is there an enforceable contract based on the meeting of the minds or is it there is an attempt to further deceive beyond Fraud in Factum by reading of the
2 3

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grammatical_conjunction

following verbiage from the same Arizona Supreme Court Petition for Review. Consistently, canons of statutory construction dictate that terms connected by or should not be construed separately when the context dictates otherwise. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp., 442 U.S. 330, 339 (1979). This writer has to inquire of the people of the world, would it be advisable for many Amicus Briefs to be filed? The concern to this writer is not only civil implications but criminal implications, would, if the Arizona Supreme Court reversed a lower court would the court also raise issues in the criminal world, how many criminals or crooks would be eligible to have the convictions brought before the court? How many criminals would have a get out of jail free card?