Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Table Of Contents
Indicators Point To A Steady Slowdown Supply Constraints And Demand Pressures Weigh Monetary And Fiscal Policies Are Tight A Weak Business Climate Will Mute Longer Term Growth Related Research
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Economic Research:
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
July after IPI growth had slowed continuously since 2010 (see chart 1). The manufacturing industry was the main drag, with the annual growth rate sliding to -1.5% year on year, from -1.2% in June. In particular, investment-related industries, such as construction materials, metallurgy, and truck manufacturing, appear to have slowed.
Chart 1
Data from Russia's Purchasing Managers' Index suggest that growth will remain weak in the third quarter of this year. The PMI for August improved only marginally to 49.4, staying well below 50 for two consecutive months for the first time since 2009 (see chart 2; a PMI of more than 50 represents expansion of the manufacturing sector compared with the previous month, while a reading under 50 represents a contraction). These data also suggest that Russia's slowdown reflects not just global conditions, but also specific Russian structural weaknesses, in our view. The economy appears to be underperforming its neighbors. Manufacturing PMIs in countries in the emerging EMEA regions all improved in August on the back of economic improvement in some countries of the eurozone (European Economic and Monetary Union), and all except Russia are above 50 (see chart 2).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 2
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
bank's key priority to lower inflation should help underpin this rate of consumer spending growth.
Chart 3
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Chart 4
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Between 2004 and 2008, Russia benefited from large capital inflows boosted by high returns on investment, owing to a scarcity of capital and room for gains in productivity. The combination of rising oil prices and the central bank's policy of controlled ruble appreciation stimulated carry-trade. Now, however, faltering oil prices, diminished investment opportunities, and the switch toward a more flexible exchange rate have triggered the outflows. Investment contraction also reflects a loss of competitiveness resulting from a rise in wage costs-these have increased by an average of 5.5% in real terms in the first seven months of 2013 on a year earlier.
Chart 5
Russia's private sector outflow is at odds with the other emerging markets, which have experienced sizable private sector inflows since the central banks of developed markets, and especially the U.S. Federal Reserve, have used quantitative easing (QE) in an attempt to stimulate their economies. QE policies have created massive global liquidity and caused an acceleration of capital flows to emerging markets. More recently, however, the Federal Reserve's recent talk of a plan to taper its monetary stimulus prompted investors to shun emerging market economies that had over the past few years appeared attractive to them. The sizable outflow of private sector capital makes Russia less sensitive to the tensions caused by QE. The Russian ruble has only weakened by 4% against the U.S. dollar over the past three months, while the Indian rupee and the Indonesian rupiah have experienced more serious weakness (down by 17% and 15%, respectively, against the dollar).
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Meanwhile, the sustained decline in current account surpluses also reflects demand pressures in Russia. The current account balance shrank to 3.0% of GDP in 2012 from 5.3% in 2011. The rate of decline was even greater than in 2005-2006, when the current account surplus was averaging 11% of GDP. Imports last year rose strongly despite falling investment and slower manufacturing export growth, suggesting that the increase was entirely centred in consumer goods. Households' consumption was underpinned by recycling rising energy export revenues. Hence, the population expects rising living standards.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
inflation reached 7.4% year on year in May this year, compared with 3.6% in May 2012 (see chart 6). This rise was the result of an increase in food inflation triggered by a poor harvest and an increase in administered prices--mostly regulated tariff hikes on electricity and gas prices--in July 2012, September 2012, and January 2013. Inflation ebbed somewhat to 6.5% in July this year as the effects of administrated price rises fade and as a result of a better harvest. Inflation nevertheless remains above the central bank's target range of 5%-6% in 2013. For the same reasons, we expect inflation to average 6.0% in 2013, making a CBR rate cut possible. We also believe that scope for larger cuts is likely to be limited by continued ruble weakness, which will persist amid a diminishing current account surplus and sustained capital outflows.
Chart 6
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Over the longer term, however, we believe Russia's prospects of easing the capacity constraints in its natural resource extraction sector are slim given the extended period of insufficient investment in it. Activity in the non-energy sector is also likely to remain muted until the country's business climate and competitiveness improve markedly.
Related Research
Ratings On Russian Federation Affirmed On Solid Fiscal And External Balance Sheets; Outlook Stable, June 28, 2013
Additional Contact: Jean-Michel Six, EMEA Chief Economist, Paris (33) 1-4420-6705; jean-michel.six@standardandpoors.com
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT
Copyright 2013 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription) and www.spcapitaliq.com (subscription) and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT