Mars Miscellaneous Articles

National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
NASAFacts
NASA launched a multipurpose spacecraft named Mars Re- During the cruise phase of the mission, the flight team put the
connaissance Orbiter on Aug. 12, 2005 to advance our under- spacecraft through a series of checkout tests and science cali-
standing of Mars through detailed observation, to examine po- brations, in addition to conducting two maneuvers to fine-tune
tential landing sites for future surface missions and to provide its trajectory.
a high-data-rate communications relay for those missions.
The spacecraft will reach Mars on March 10, 2006. A multi-en-
Scientists will use the spacecraft to study the surface, moni- gine burn as the spacecraft first nears the planet will slow the
tor the atmosphere, and probe underground, all to gain bet- craft enough for Mars’ gravity to capture it. The first orbit will
ter knowledge of the distribution and history of Mars’ water, take about 35 hours and have an extremely elliptical shape,
whether frozen, liquid or vapor. with its farthest point about 150 times farther from the planet
than its closest point. The mission will use aerobraking for the
Carrying the most powerful telescopic camera ever flown to next 6 months to modify the orbit to a rounder shape optimal
another planet, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will be able to for science operations. Aerobraking, used previously at Mars
show Martian landscape features as small as a kitchen table by NASA’s Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Odyssey orbiters,
from the spacecraft’s low orbital altitude. That camera and five relies on repeated, carefully calculated dips into the upper
other science instruments will produce copious data every day atmosphere, where friction with the atmosphere slows the
for a planned 24-month science phase. To pour the data back spacecraft. This reduces the cost of the mission by reducing
to Earth at more than 10 times the rate of any previous Mars by about 450 kilograms (992 pounds) the amount of onboard
mission, the spacecraft will use a wider antenna dish, a faster fuel that had to be launched from Earth in order for the space-
computer and an amplifier powered by a bigger solar-cell ar- craft to enter the desired orbit around Mars.
ray.
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter’s primary science phase will be-
Mission Overview gin in November 2006 and operate for 2 Earth years, encom-
passing a full Mars year. Every 112 minutes, the spacecraft will
An Atlas V two-stage launch vehicle sent the spacecraft on its make a complete circuit of Mars, flying a nearly circular orbit
way to Mars from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Fla. that will range from about 255 kilometers (160 miles) over the
www.nasa.gov
South Pole to 320 kilometers (200 miles) over the North Pole. biter has 160 gigabits of solid-state memory and a processor
NASAFacts
operating at up to 46 million instructions per second.
In addition to its own science, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter
will serve as a communications relay satellite for missions The orbiter carries six science instruments for examining the
that land on Mars. The first to use this capability, according to planet in various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum from
current plans, will be Phoenix, the first mission in NASA’s com- ultraviolet to radio waves. Two other investigations will use the
petitively selected Mars Scout program. Phoenix is a station- spacecraft itself as a tool.
ary lander for studying Mars’ north polar region in 2008. Data
from Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter will also help in selection q High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment will photo-
of landing sites for future missions. Among the first planned for graph many areas totaling about 1 percent of Mars’ surface in
using this capability is a highly sophisticated rover called Mars unprecedented detail, revealing features as small as 1 meter
Science Laboratory, now in development and slated to begin (3 feet) across. Ball Aerospace, Boulder, Colo., built the cam-
surface operations in 2010. era for the University of Arizona, Tucson.
Science Objectives q Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for

Mars will extend the search for water-related minerals on Mars
The science objectives for the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter by providing spectral information that could identify key miner-
mission make it the critical next step in the NASA Mars Ex- als in patches as small as a swimming pool at a few thousand
ploration Program of “following the water” as a multi-mission carefully chosen sites, while covering the whole planet at a
strategy for learning about Mars’ changing climate, geologic resolution of 200 meters (650 feet). Johns Hopkins University’s
history and potential ability to harbor life. Key objectives for Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Md., provided this instru-
this mission are to: ment.
q Characterize the present climate of Mars and how the cli- q Context Camera will take wider-swath pictures to provide
mate changes from season-to-season and year-to-year. a simultaneous visual context for smaller-area observations
by other instruments. Over the primary science phase, this im-
q Characterize Mars’ global atmosphere and monitor its ager could cover 15 percent or more of the Mars surface. The
weather. supplier is Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, Calif.
q Investigate complex terrain on Mars and identify water-re- q Mars Climate Sounder will look both down and horizon-
lated landforms. tally through the atmosphere in order to quantify the global
atmosphere’s vertical variations of water vapor, dust and
q Search for sites showing stratigraphic or compositional evi- temperature. This instrument, supplied by NASA’s Jet Propul-
dence of water or hydrothermal activity. sion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., utilizes recent technological
advances to achieve the measurement objectives of a heavier,
q Probe beneath the surface for evidence of subsurface layer- less compact instrument originally developed at JPL for the
ing, water and ice, and profile the internal structure of the polar 1992 Mars Observer and 1998 Mars Climate Orbiter missions.
ice caps.
q Mars Color Imager will produce global images daily to
q Identify and characterize sites with the highest potential for track changes in Martian weather. In addition, it will use ultra-
future missions that will land on Mars’ surface, including pos- violet filters to examine variations in ozone. Ozone serves as
sible missions to collect samples for returning to Earth. a reverse indicator about water in Mars’ atmosphere. Where
there’s more water, there’s less ozone, and vice versa. The
q Relay scientific information to Earth from Mars surface mis- camera is essentially a copy of a Mars Climate Orbiter instru-
sions. ment. However, the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter instrument
has a wider fish-eye lens to compensate for the spacecraft
Spacecraft rolls needed to target specific locales on Mars. The new Mars
Color Imager is also supplied by Malin Space Science Sys-
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has a height of 6.5 meters (21 tems.
feet) topped by a 3-meter (10-foot) radio antenna dish. Its
width from the tip of one solar panel to the tip of the other is q Shallow Subsurface Radar will penetrate to roughly half a
about 13.6 meters (45 feet). The solar panels have about 20 kilometer (a third of a mile) below Mars’ surface for information
square meters (220 square feet) of solar cells. The spacecraft about underground layers of ice, rock and, perhaps, melted
weighed about 2,180 kilograms (4,800 pounds) at launch, water that might be accessible from the surface. This radar,
with fuel for 20 onboard thrusters making up about half of that which will also probe the internal structure of the Martian ice
mass. caps, is provided by the Italian Space Agency (ASI) through a
bilateral agreement.
Lockheed Martin Space Systems, Denver, Colo., built the
spacecraft. q The Gravity Investigation will track variations in the
orbiter’s movement in order to map Mars’ gravity by its effect
For handling large amounts of data, Mars Reconnaissance Or- on the spacecraft. Previous orbiters have mapped regional

variations in the planet’s gravity that result from differences the orbiter’s more powerful direct-to- Earth telecommunica-
NASAFacts
in crustal thickness and other factors. This spacecraft’s lower tions system.
altitude will allow higher-resolution data. Researchers will use
gravity measurements to assess how much the mass of Mars’ q The Optical Navigation Camera compares the predicted
polar ice caps changes with the seasons. positions of Mars’ two moons, Phobos and Deimos, with the
camera’s observations as the spacecraft approaches Mars.
q The Atmospheric Structure Investigation will use data col- Once demonstrated by Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, this
lected from the orbiter’s accelerometers during each dip into navigation technique can be used by future Mars landers to
the upper atmosphere throughout the aerobraking phase of enter the atmosphere more precisely and thus land closer to
the mission. The upper atmosphere’s effect on the spacecraft’s the intended site.
velocity will be analyzed for information about changes in the
density of the atmosphere at known altitudes. Quick analysis q Another technology demonstration adds a higher-frequency
will help guide calculations about how deep to plan the next (Ka band) radio transmitter to the standard (X band) pack-
dip. The accumulated data will also improve understanding of age. The Ka band package uses less power than its X band
atmospheric dynamics. counterpart to send the same amount of data. However, the
Ka band signal is more attenuated by water in Earth’s atmo-
Additional Payload sphere. A comparison of Ka band and X band performance
will provide information to support planning future use of the
The payload for the mission also includes a relay telecommu- telecommunications systems.
nications package and two technology demonstrations.
For More Information
q Electra is an ultra-high-frequency (UHF) radio for relaying
commands from Earth to landers on the Mars surface and for The official Web site of the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter proj-
returning science and engineering data back to Earth using ect is at http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Jet Propulsion Laboratory

California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California
3-06

MAPPING THE SURFACE
OF A PLANET
Student Guide
Mars Education Program

Arizona State University
Version 2.00
Mapping the Surface of a Planet
Written and Developed by:
Keith Watt, M.A., M.S.

Assistant Director
ASU Mars Education Program
Edited by:
Paige Valderrama, M.A.

Assistant Director
Sheri Klug, M.S.

Director
(C) 2002 ASU Mars Education Program. All rights re-

served. This document may be freely distrubuted for non-
commercial use only.
1
MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET
Identifying Surface Features

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has been returning
pictures of Mars back to Earth since 1965, when the Mariner 4 spacecraft flew
past Mars and sent back twenty-one images. Science and technology have
progressed greatly since the early mission days. The Mars Global Surveyor
spacecraft has sent back over 100,000 pictures of the Martian surface. These
pictures have helped scientists determine what types of geological activity
have occurred to make the planet appear as it does today. Impact craters,
volcanoes, layering, and river beds look much the same on Mars as they do on
Earth. Scientists can, therefore, use Earth's features as a comparison for
Mars. In these activities you are a mission scientist trying to figure out what
is happening on the surface of Mars. Geological features on Mars are easy to
identify if you know what you are looking for. The following is a description of
some of the most common geological features on Mars. Becoming familiar
with these features will assist you in completing the activities that follow.
Impact Craters
Impact craters on Mars, the Moon, rays. These rays are particularly
or any other planetary body are visible on the Moon. The walls of
formed when meteorites slam into the crater slope down to the floor,
its surface displacing rock and soil, which is often remarkably flat. If
creating a bowl-shaped hole or the impact was violent enough to
crater. Impact craters on Mars vary melt the rock which became the
in size from less than 1 km (0.6 floor of the crater, a central uplift
miles) to 2,100 km (1,300 miles) in or peak will often form. You can see
diameter. An impact crater usually this for yourself by adding drops to a
has five parts, although not all of glass of water. As each drop hits the
these parts are visible in all craters. water's surface, a crater will form
The picture at right is of a crater in a complete with a central uplift. Try it!
region called Arabia Terra on Mars.
It is typical of craters found not only Ejecta
on Mars, but on the Earth and Moon Wall
as well. The raised area around the
edge of the crater is called the rim, Rim
and is material that was thrown
upward by the violence of the impact
that created the crater. Some of the
material that was in the crater was
thrown high into the air and landed
outside the crater in a blanket called Central Uplift Floor
ejecta. One type of ejecta is long,
outward-pointing streaks called Arabia Terra, Mars
Credit: Malin Space Science Systems/NASA
2
Volcanoes
On both Earth and Mars, volcanoes sluggishly. This lava doesn't flow
are hills or mountains made from very far from the vent, but instead
built-up layers of lava (hot, molten gets heaped up into a bulbous
rock) ejected from cracks or vents "plug", giving this type of volcano
in the planet's crust. At the top of the name plug dome. This type of
the volcano is a roughly circular volcano is usually small, rising not
depression. This depression is called more than a few thousand meters
a caldera if it is larger than one mile above the surface. Spatter cones
(0.6 km) in diameter or, confusingly are of a similar size, but are formed
enough, a crater if it is smaller than from gas-charged lava fountains that
one mile (0.6 km) in diameter. spew lava high into the air. Cinder
There are five major types of cones are formed from volcanic ash
volcanoes. Shield volcanoes are and coarse materials exploding from
domes much wider than they are the vent. The most famous cinder
high (shaped like a shield) and have cone appeared in a Mexican farmer's
very low slopes. They are formed cornfield in 1943. The cinder cone
from hot, freely-flowing lava (usually erupted for nine years and reached a
silica-poor basalt). The largest height of over 400 meters (1300
volcano on Earth is a shield volcano feet)!
called Mauna Loa, which rises over
9 km (5.4 miles) from its base on The last type of volcano, and the
the sea floor. The largest volcano in most common on the Earth, is the
the Solar System, Olympus Mons composite volcano. This type of
on Mars, is a shield-like volcano. volcano is actually a blend of the
Olympus Mons is almost 27 km (17 other types, sometimes having quiet
miles) high and its base is almost eruptions and sometimes having
700 km (430 miles) across! violent explosive eruptions. Mount
St. Helens, which last erupted on
If the lava from a volcano is made May 18, 1980, is an example of this
up mostly of silica, it will flow more type of volcano.
A B C A. Plug Dome
(Jabal Abyad, Saudi Arabia)
Photo by Vic Camp
B. Spatter Cone
(Pu'u 'O'o, HI)
Photo by J.D. Griggs
C. Cinder Cone
D E (Pu'u ka Pele, HI)
Photo by J.P. Lockwood - USGS
D. Shield Volcano
(Mauna Loa, HI)
Photo by D. Little
E. Composite Volcano
(Mt. St. Helens, WA)
Photo courtesy of USGS
3
Stratification
The Earth's crust has experienced Canyons also exist on Mars, some
many changes over its four and a possibly cut by a moving fluid such
half billion year history. The crust is as water or lava. The largest canyon
made up of many layers of rock, one on Mars is Valles Marineris, which
laid on top of the other in a process is over 10 km (6 miles) deep and
called layering or stratification. 4,000 km (2,500 miles) long. If
These rock layers, or strata, tell us placed on the Earth, it would stretch
much about the history of the Earth across the entire United States! The
and how it has changed over time. entire Grand Canyon would fit in one
The strata form a geological timeline of its side canyons. Unlike the
that we can use to date significant Grand Canyon, however, Valles
changes in the Earth's crust. Marineris was not cut by a river.
Wherever this timeline is exposed, Instead, it was formed when some
we can easily read off the history of event caused the Martian crust to
that area. One spectacular place bulge so that it pulled apart.
where we can see the strata that Regardless of whether a canyon was
make up the Earth's crust is in the formed by flowing water or by a
Grand Canyon. The canyon was separating crust, the strata revealed
formed over many millions of years tell us the same story of the planet's
as the Colorado River slowly wore history. Using cameras aboard
through the surface rock and carved spacecraft orbiting Mars, scientists
deeper and deeper channels. As the have found evidence of layered
river dug deeper, more and more terrain. Could these layers tell us
layers of rock were exposed, how Mars has changed over time?
revealing more and more about the This is one of the questions
geological history of this region. scientists hope to answer by
studying the strata found on Mars.
Grand Canyon, Arizona Valles Marineris, Mars

Photo by Piotr Azia Credit: NASA
4
River Beds
Rivers on Earth form when running wetter than it is today. So where did
water carves channels into the land all the water go? Water on Mars
as rainwater flows from higher to today can exist only as ice or as
lower elevations. On Mars, no liquid water vapor. Scientists theorize that
water can exist today because of its much of Mars' water is locked up as
cold surface temperatures and low ground ice deep beneath the
atmospheric pressure, so no water surface. This layer of frozen ice and
can flow to carve channels. NASA rock, called permafrost, may be
spacecraft instruments, however, several kilometers thick. Even after
have found many examples of long, much of the water on Mars froze,
snake-like formations that resemble scientists believe that periodically
dry river beds similar to those found large impacts may have melted the
on Earth. At the eastern end of permafrost and temporarily allowed
Valles Marineris is a complex system water to flow on Mars again. Not for
of outflow channels that drain into long though! This water would
the plain called Chryse Planitia. eventually either refreeze or turn to
These channels were thought to vapor and escape into the
have formed when hundreds of cubic atmosphere. The water in the
kilometers of water suddenly flooded Martian atmosphere is visible today
the surface, carving each channel in as wispy ice clouds that float over
just a few weeks. It was as if all of the surface. If Mars was warmer
the water in the Great Lakes were and wetter in the distant past than it
suddenly drained into the Gulf of is today, what happened to cause
Mexico in just two weeks. There are this change? Could the same
many features on Mars, such as change happen to Earth? These are
Nanedi Vallis, shown below, that questions that scientists are
indicate that at one time the planet attempting to answer by using data
may have been much warmer and returned by spacecraft sent to Mars.
Nanedi Vallis, Mars Mississippi River, Earth

Crfedit: Malin Space Science Systems/NASA Credit: MODIS/NASA
5
Determining the Surface History

Think of the most beautiful and interesting place you have ever seen. Are
there mountains, lakes, volcanoes, rivers, or rocks there? Do you have any
idea how these geological features were formed? Determining how these and
other geological features formed and how they influence their surroundings is
the job of geologists. With geological knowledge gathered from the Earth's
surface, geologists can determine what is happening on other planets. Once
you have learned to identify geological features on the Earth or on Mars, the
next question you should ask is: How were these features formed? Which
features were formed first and are therefore older? Which features were
formed later and therefore are younger? The process of answering these
questions is called determining the surface history of the planet. In order to
make this determination, geologists use three basic rules, or principles, when
trying to figure out an area's geological history. You must learn these
principles so that you can determine the history of the areas of Mars you will
study in the activities that follow.
The Principle of Superposition
The first principle which is used in Which are the youngest? On Earth,
determining the surface history of an by examining the different minerals
area is called the Principle of and fossils that appear in the
Superposition. This principle different layers, geologists can
describes the order in which rocks estimate when the rock layers were
are placed above one another. You laid down. In this way we discover a
know from our discussion of timeline of Earth's geological history
stratification that rocks in the Earth's preserved in the exposed layers of
crust are laid down in layers, one on rock. In areas where the layering is
top of the other. The Principle of not exposed, geologists drill into the
Superposition states that strata ground and remove long tubes of
located at the bottom of an rock called core samples. These
undisturbed stack of rocks are older core samples reveal the layering of
than the layers at the top of the rock beds in exactly the same way.
stack. If you think about it, this
makes sense. No natural force
would have peeled back layers of
older rock and then laid down a layer
of younger rock in between. The
only place the younger rock could be
laid down is on top of the older
layers. The picture to the right is of
an area on Mars and shows an
excellent example of strata. Which
layers in this picture are the oldest? Exposed Strata on Mars
Credit: MSSS/NASA
6
The Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships

The second principle geologists use produce the deep canyon feature we
in determining the surface history of see today. Because the rocks were
an area is called the Principle of cut by the river, they must be older
Cross-Cutting Relationships. This than the river. The canyon itself, the
principle states that rocks or "cut" in the rocks, was created by
geological features such as canyons, the river carving its way through the
rivers, or cracks in rocks, may be cut rocks. Therefore, the rocks are the
by other rocks or by other geological oldest feature, followed by the river,
features. The picture of the Grand and then the canyon "cut". These
Canyon (see page 3) shows rocks kinds of relationships help geologists
that have been cut over millions of determine the age of different
years by the Colorado River. The geological features on the surface.
river slowly wore its way down This process will reveal a lot about
through the layers of rock to the surface history of a region!
The Principle of Horizontal Bedding

The final principle used by geologists California lies upon a fault, or a
that we will study here is called the moving fracture between two huge
Principle of Horizontal Bedding. plates of the Earth's crust. These
This principle states that rocks that continental plates are moving
are deposited by water, such as very slowly, and over millions of
limestone, or rocks that are years the rock layers begin to
deposited by wind, such as buckle. Take a telephone directory
sandstone, are deposited in nearly and hold it by its edges. Look at the
horizontal layers. If the layers are end of the book and notice that the
no longer horizontal, they must have pages start out horizontal. Now
been bent or folded after they were watch the pages as you move your
originally laid down. The picture hands together. They bend! This is
below and to the right is of folded the same effect that is happening as
bedding in a rock unit near the continental plates apply force to
California. What forces could have the rock layers, so they bend as
caused these layers to bend? well.
Horizontal Layers Folded Sandstone Layers

Photo by John Crossley Photo by Mark Peletier
7
MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET - ACTIVITY 1
Now is your chance to apply what you've learned to actual images of the
Martian surface. The image included with this activity was taken by the Mars
Orbiter Camera (MOC), one of the three instruments aboard the Mars
Global Surveyor (MGS) spacecraft. MGS was launched November 7, 1996,
and arrived at the Red Planet on September 12, 1997. The spacecraft
completed its primary mission on January 31, 2001, but was still in good
health so controllers decided to extend its mission. The goal of this activity
and the ones that follow is to give you practice analyzing actual data sets
from Mars in order to determine the surface history of the planet. You will
need to be able to recognize the various geological features and apply the
three principles we studied to determine the ages of those features. Once
you have the ages of all the features, you will develop hypotheses of how
those features were formed.
Features Near Olympus Mons (MOC2-102)
1. The image has been overlaid with a grid that has been marked in
kilometers so that you can record the positions of features you identify.
a) What is the width of the area shown on the image? __________ km

b) What is the length of the area shown on the image? __________ km
2. Examine the long, winding feature that extends from the bottom left to the
top right of the image. Is it raised above the surface or is it carved into the
surface? What is your hypothesis?
_________________________________________________________
3. In order to answer question 2, you actually need more information: the

Sun is illuminating the picture from the right. Your teacher will perform a
demonstration which will show you where the shadow appears when features
are illuminated from different sides. Now look at the circular feature just
above and to the right of the center of the image. If the Sun is shining from
the right side of this feature, is it a volcano or an impact crater? __________
For this image, if the shadow is on the right side of a feature, is that feature
raised or lowered? __________ If the shadow is on the left side, is that
feature raised or lowered? __________
4. Olympus Mons, the largest volcano in the Solar System, produced the lava
flows that you see in the upper left corner of the image. Which feature is
older, the lava flows or the long winding feature that extends across the
image?
_________________________________________________________
8
Features Near Olympus Mons (MOC2-102) - Data Log
Grid Age
Feature Notes
Coordinates Rank
5. Complete the Data Log above, identifying as many features (such as

craters, canyons, riverbeds, and volcanoes) in the image as you can
recognize. Record the grid coordinates of each feature on the Log so that you
can find them later. After you have identified these features, use the three
principles you learned previously to rank the features from oldest to
youngest. Be sure to explain your reasoning in the "Notes" column! Finally,
in the space below "tell the story" of what has happened to form the features
shown in this image in your own words.
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
9
The second instrument aboard the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft is the
Thermal Emission Spectrometer (TES). The purpose of TES is to measure
thermal infrared (IR) energy that is emitted from Mars. We often perceive
thermal IR energy as heat. Just like visible light, thermal IR energy exists in
many different "colors" or wavelengths. These "colors" however, are so red
that your eye can't perceive them. TES has a special instrument which can
not only see these wavelengths, but it can also measure how much of each
wavelength is present. The instrument is also capable of measuring the total
amount of energy reflected from the surface of Mars. Material with a high
albedo is shiny and bright because it reflects a great deal of light, while
material with a low albedo does not reflect much light and appears dark. You
will use TES's measurement of the albedo of the Tharsis Province to learn
more about the unique geology of this region.
Albedo of the Tharsis Province

1. Examine the scale printed below the TES image. This scale shows the
percentage of visible and IR light received from the Sun that is being
reflected from the surface of Mars.
a) What is the minimum percentage of visible and IR light that is

reflected in the image? ____________
b) If you were looking at this area through a telescope, would it

appear light or dark? ______________
c) What is the maximum percentage of visible and IR light that is

reflected in the image? ____________
d) If you were looking at this area through a telescope, would it

appear light or dark? ______________
e) Approximately what percentage is represented by a dark green

color? _________________
2. Find the three volcanoes of the Tharsis Montes region. The volcano
located on the lower left is called Arsia Mons, the volcano in the middle is
Pavonis Mons, and the volcano located to the upper right is Ascraeus Mons.
a) Which of these volcanoes has the highest albedo? _____________

b) Which of these volcanoes has the lowest albedo? ______________
10
3. The large volcano northwest of (to the left and above) the Tharsis Montes
is Olympus Mons, the largest volcano in the Solar System. Notice that there
is a region of very bright material on the northwest face of the volcano. This
bright material is actually not on the surface, it is water-ice clouds in the
atmosphere.
a) Which side of Olympus Mons is the material on? _________________
b) Now look at the Tharsis Montes. Which side is the material on here?
__________________________________________________________
c) Why do you think the material is only found on one side of the
volcanoes?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
d) What does this tell you about the winds on Mars?

__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
4. Look at the filmy white feature stretching northeast from Pavonis Mons
and lying southeast of Ascraeus Mons. This feature is Valles Marineris, the
largest canyon in the Solar System. The canyon is marked by material that is
similar in albedo to the material on the northwest side of the Tharsis Montes.
a) What do you think this material might be? _______________________

b) Why do think this material would collect in the canyon?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
5. Look at the red-colored region near the north pole of Mars (the black
circular area here is just the area where Mars Global Surveyor could not
collect data).
a) Is this region bright or dark? ____________________________
b) Why do you think the region appears this way (bright or dark)?
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
11
The third major instrument on board the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft is
the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA). This instrument, controlled
from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, transmits
infrared laser pulses towards Mars. These pulses bounce off the Martian
surface and the instrument measures the time it takes to receive the return
pulse. Because light (and an infrared laser pulse) always travels at the same
speed, the instrument can measure the distance from the spacecraft to the
surface with a great deal of accuracy. The image you will use in this activity
shows the topography or heights, of the region surrounding the three
Tharsis Montes volcanoes. This image is not a photograph! A computer
generated this image by assigning colors to represent different heights above
or below the datum, or "sea level" on Mars. The color scale below the image
will allow you to determine the heights of the features.
Topography of the Tharsis Montes Region

1. The grid on this image is marked in degrees of latitude and longitude. The
Martian equator runs directly through the middle of the image at 0 degrees
latitude. One degree of latitude or longitude in this region is about 59 km.
a) What is the width (in degrees) of the image? __________ deg
b) What is the length (in degrees) of the image? __________ deg
2. Notice the three volcanoes that cross the image from bottom left to top
right.
a) How tall (in meters) are these features above the datum?
______,_______,______ m
b) How wide (in degrees) are the volcano bases? _____,______,_____ deg
c) Multiply each of your three answers in part b by 59 km/degree to find

out the width (in km) of each base. ______,_______,______ km
3. Based on your reading and your results from question 2, what type of
volcano do you think the Tharsis Montes are? Why?
_____________________________________________________
4. Based on what you know about this type of volcano, what type of rock
might the interior of Mars be made of (basalt or silica-rich rocks)? Why?
_____________________________________________________
12
Topography of the Tharsis Montes Region - Data Log
Grid Age
Feature Height
Coordinates Rank
5. Complete the Data Log above, identifying as many features in the image as
you can recognize. Record the grid coordinates of each feature on the Log so
that you can find them later. Using the color key below the image, estimate
the height of each feature. After you have identified these features, use the
three principles you learned previously to rank the features from oldest to
youngest. Finally, in the space below "tell the story" in your own words of
what happened to form the features seen in the image.
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________
MAPPING THE SURFACE
OF A PLANET
Teacher Guide
Mars Education Program

Arizona State University
Version 2.00
Mapping the Surface of a Planet
Written and Developed by:
Keith Watt, M.A., M.S.

Assistant Director
Edited by:
Paige Valderrama, M.A.

Assistant Director
Sheri Klug, M.S.

Director
(C) 2002 ASU Mars Education Program. All rights re-

served. This document may be freely distrubuted for non-
commercial use only.
1
MAPPING THE SURFACE - TEACHER GUIDE
Mapping the Surface of a Planet is intended to fit within your existing Earth
science curriculum, rather than in addition to it. This Teacher Guide presents
tips that you can use to make Mapping the Surface an engaging educational
experience for your students. The background information presented on
pages 1-6 is intended to be given to each student or student team. The
three activities (one using data from each instrument on board Mars Global
Surveyor) are best set up as stations through which student teams can
rotate, but can also be used as a whole class activity. Each team should have
a printed copy of all three activity sheets, but the image itself can be placed
at the appropriate station. Of course, if resources permit, each team can be
given a complete set of images. If students do have their own copies, it is
suggested that you allow the students to circle features they have found in
each image, writing notes about their observations directly on the image.
Vocabulary words are printed in bold text throughout the background
material. Definitions can and should be obtained from the context, rather
than presented as simply a list of words. In this way the students not only
learn the targeted vocabulary, they are also given the opportunity to practice
comprehension skills.
Activity 1: Features Near Olympus Mons (MOC2-102)
1. a) 7 km b) 12 km. It is important that you stress the sense of scale in the
images contained in each activity. Each is taken at very different resolutions
(levels of detail), so actual sizes of the surface features shown will vary.
2. Answer depends upon students. There is no right or wrong answer here.
The important issue is that they make a hypothesis, but then realize they do
not have sufficient information to answer the question. This process is at the
core of the scientific method.
3. It is an impact crater. Shadow on right = lowered, shadow on left =
raised. You will need to demonstrate this using a bucket. Shine a light
(flashlight, sunlight, etc.) at an angle across the top of the bucket. The side
of the bucket nearest the light will be in shadow, while the opposite side will
be lit. Turn the bucket upside down and you'll get the opposite result.
4. The lava flows are older. Because the winding, river-like feature cuts
across the lava flows, the Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships says that
the lava flows must be older.
5. This is an example of what to look for: "Olympus Mons erupted, sending
massive amounts of lava flowing outward. River runoff (or lava from a later
eruption) cut a canyon through the lava flow. Later runoff through the
canyon carved the smaller channel. A meteor impacted in the area, causing
a crater that partially covered the canyon and smaller river bed. Different
students will identify different features, but all should have something
plausible. A quick tip: Some people find the canyon easier to visualize if the
image is turned upside down!
2
Activity 2: Albedo of the Tharsis Province
1. a) 7% b) Dark c) 37% d) Light e) ~18-22%. There are two important

concepts in this question: first, can the students correctly interpret a visual
scale, and second, do they undersand the concept of albedo. Albedo is
nothing more than how bright or dark certain areas on the planet are, just
like looking at a black and white television set. TES is somewhat unique in
that it measures not only the "visual brightness", but also the "infrared
brightness". Depending upon the level of your class, this could be the perfect
time to introduce your students to the electromagnetic spectrum, if you have
not done so already. Once you have explained the colors in the visual part of
the spectrum, it's not too difficult for the students to visualize a color "redder
than red, so red that that your eye can't see it".
2. a) Pavonis Mons b) Arsia Mons. This question is intended to provide an
application of the concept of albedo, but also serves as an introduction to
Martian geography. Remember that a place seems more "real" when you
have a name for it!
3. a) Northwest (This is given in the question.) b) Northwest c) The clouds
are being blocked by the tall volcanoes. d) The winds on Mars in this region
must have been blowing west to east when this image was taken. The
situation on Mars is similar to the "rain shadow" of mountain ranges on Earth.
The winds are blowing the clouds against the mountains, so they all
"congregate" on one side of the volcanoes. Most people don't think of Mars
as having weather, but it does! In fact, Mars provides meteorologists on
Earth with a simpler atmosphere they can study to improve their knowledge
of Earth's atmosphere.
4. a) Ice clouds b) The lower altitude of the canyon floor is cooler and often
protected from the Sun, so clouds are more likely to form there. The
spacecraft Lunar Prospector found deposits of water ice on the surface of the
Moon, hidden in craters that were sheltered from the Sun. Could we possibly
find water ice in Valles Marineris?
5. a) Bright b) The ice at the pole reflects the light very readily, making the
surface appear bright. Your students should be able to draw this conclusion
by making an extension of their knowledge of the brightness of water-ice
clouds, as discussed in the previous questions. Be sure to point out to them
that the black spot directly at the pole is simply a region that Mars Global
Surveyor was unable to map. We don't have any data there, so we don't
have any colors. Mars Global Surveyor was in a nearly-polar orbit which
enabled it to map almost all of the surface of Mars. Had it been in an exactly
polar orbit, it would have been able to fill in the black spot in this image.
3
Activity 3: Topography of the Tharsis Province

1. a) 30 degrees b) 40 degrees. Here we are using latitude and longitude
rather than using kilometers directly. Mars uses the same latitude and
longitude system we use on Earth, so this is a good time reinforce that
concept. Because the image is centered on the equator, the distance
represented by one degree of both latitude and longitude is approximately
the same. For a more advanced class, you can point out that this is not true
everywhere on a globe because the lines of longitude converge at the North
Pole!
2. a) about 12,000 m for all three volcanoes b) ~8 degrees, ~5 degees, and
~6 degrees, respectively. c) ~472 km, ~295 km, and ~354 km, respectively.
This question has the dual purpose of allowing you to reinforce scale and
multiplication tasks and of getting a sense of just how big these volcanoes
are. Putting them in perspective to known distances ("about the same size
as Arizona") will be very helpful. Note: Student answers will vary somewhat.
3. They must be shield-like volcanoes because the bases are so big and the
slopes are so low. Remind your students that the background material states
that hotter lava flows a further distance and shield volcanoes have the
hottest lava of all five volcano types, so the lava flows the furthest and
creates the largest bases and the lowest slopes.
4. Basalt. Basaltic lava is hotter and therefore flows further than silica-rich
lava. Now we have a good idea what the material that makes up the lava
flow is. Point out that geology is a like detective story - from small clues, we
get big answers.
5. An example: "The Tharsis Montes volcanoes formed and then erupted,
sending lava flowing out onto the surrounding plain. Two smaller volcanoes
erupted, adding more lava to the initial flow. Finally, some object impacted
the surface, creating a crater on the lava flow." Again, student responses will
vary depending on which features they chose to rank. Note that the smaller
volcano could have formed after the impact crater, but because we assume
the volcanism all occurred at about the same time, we assume that the
smaller volcano formed not too long after the Tharsis Montes. Again, you are
grading the students' thinking and reasoning skills -- if they can support their
answers, they have achieved the educational objective.
4
Features Near Olympus Mons (MOC2-102) - Data Log
Grid Age
Feature Notes
Coordinates Rank
Main Lava Flow 0 km, 0 km to All features cut

1 across the flow.
5.0 km, 5.0 km
Cuts across lava
0 km, 12.0 km to
Canyon 2 flow, but has other
7.0 km, 0 km features on it.
4.5 km, 6.0 km to Cuts across plain
Long Channel 3 and canyon.
4.5 km, 8.0 km
Short Channel 3.0 km, 7.5 km to Cuts across long

4
4.5 km, 8.0 km channel
Clearly defined edges,
Impact Crater 4.5 km, 4.75 km 5 no erosion, so must
be recent.
6 Extemely eroded, so
Eroded Crater 4.0 km, 4.25 km
must be older.
Topography of the Tharsis Montes Region - Data Log
Grid Age
Feature Height
Coordinates Rank
Volcano -104.5, +11 deg 1 12,000 m
Volcano -113, +0.5 deg 1 12,000 m
Volcano -120.5, -9.5 deg 1 12,000 m
Lava Flow -123, +10 deg to 2 5,000 m

-116.5, +7 deg
Volcano -124.0, +2.5 deg 3 5,000 m
-113, +8.5 deg 3,000 m rim,

Impact Crater 4
0 m floor
5
Appendix 1: National Science Education Standards

Mapping the Surface of a Planet is not just a fun and motivating activity for
your students, it also satisfies many of the standards laid down by the
National Research Council in their publication National Science Education
Standards (1996). In this appendix we identify the specific Standards which
are met by this activity. The relevant section titles are given in parenthesis.
Content Standards:
CONTENT STANDARD A: As a result of their activities, all students should

develop the abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry:
1. Identify questions that can be answered through scientific
investigations. (Activity 1, Activity 2, Activity 3)
2. Conduct a scientific investigation. (Act.1, Act.2, Act.3)
3. Use appropriate tools to analyze and interpret data. (Act.1, Act.2,
Act.3).
4. Develop descriptions and explanations using evidence. (Act.1, Act.2,
Act.3)
5. Think critically and logically to make the relationships between
evidence and explanations. (Act.1, Act.2, Act.3)
6. Recognize and analyze alternative explanations. (Act.1, Act.2, Act.3)
7. Communicate scientific procedures and explanations. (Act.1, Act.2,
Act.3)
8. Use mathematics in all aspects of scientific inquiry. (Act.1, Act.3)
CONTENT STANDARD D: As a result of their activities, all students should

develop an understanding of:
1. Structure of the Earth system (Volcanoes, Stratification, River Beds,
Act.1, Act.2, Act.3),
2. Earth's history (Impact Craters, Stratification, Principle of
Superposition, Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships, Principle of
Horizontal Bedding, Act.1, Act.2, Act.3),
3. Earth in the Solar System (Identifying Surface Features).
CONTENT STANDARD G: As a result of their activities, all students should

develop an understanding of:
1. The nature of science (Principle of Superposition, Principle of Cross-
Cutting Relationships, Principle of Horizontal Bedding, Act.1, Act.2,
Act.3).
6
Appendix 1: National Science Education Standards (cont.)

In addition to content standards, the National Science Education Standards
roadmap also lays out teaching standards to guide educators in the best
practices for the teaching of science. Mapping the Surface of a Planet models
these teaching standards and serves as a vehicle for their implementation.
The specific Standards for which the unit is especially well-suited are outlined
below.
Teaching Standards:
TEACHING STANDARD A: Teachers of science plan an inquiry-based science

program for their students.
1. Develop a framework of year-long and short-term goals for students.
2. Select science content and adapt and design curricula to meet the
interests, knowledge, understanding, abilities, and experiences of
students.
TEACHING STANDARD B: Teachers of science guide and facilitate learning.

1. Focus and support inquiries while interacting with students.
2. Orchestrate discourse among students about scientific ideas.
3. Challenge students to accept and share responsibility for their own
learning.
4. Recognize and respond to student diversity and encourage all students
to participate fully in science learning.
5. Encourage and model the skills of scientific inquiry, as well as the
curiosity, openness to new ideas and data, and skepticism that
characterize science.
TEACHING STANDARD C: Teachers of science engage in ongoing assessment

of their teaching and of student learning.
1. Use multiple methods and systematically gather data about student
understanding and ability.
TEACHING STANDARD D: Teachers of science design and manage learning

environments that provide students with the time, space, and resources
needed for learning science.
1. Structure the time available so that students are able to engage in
extended investigations.
2. Create a setting for student work that is flexible and supportive of
science inquiry.
3. Ensure a safe working environment.
7
Appendix 1: National Science Education Standards (cont.)
4. Make the available science tools, materials, media, and technological

resources accessible to students.
5. Engage students in designing the learning environment.
TEACHING STANDARD E: Teachers of science develop communities of science

learners that reflect the intellectual rigor of scientific inquiry and the attitudes
and social values conducive to science learning.
1. Display and demand respect for the diverse ideas, skills, and
experiences of all students.
2. Enable students to have a significant voice in decisions about the
content and context of their work and require students to take
responsiblity for the learning of all members of the community.
3. Nurture collaboration among students.
4. Structure and facilitate ongoing formal and informal discussion based
on shared understanding of rules of scientific discourse.
5. Model and emphasize the skills, attitudes, and values of scientific
inquiry.
Surface
Impact
Craters
Bedding
Features
Horizonal
Activity 3
Activity 2
Activity 1
Volcanoes
Principle of
Principle of
Principle of
River Beds
Identifying
Stratification
Relationships
Cross-cutting
Superposition
Na
tu r
eo
fS
cie
n ce
Ea
r
Sy th in
ste
m th e S
ola
r
Ea
rth
his
tor
y
Str
u
Sy ctur
ste eo
m fE
art
Ma h
sci them
en
ce atics
in
Co
mm
un
ica
tio
n
Activities
An
Background
aly
ex z
pla e al
na t
tio erna
ns tiv
Re e
lat
ex ee
pla v
na iden
tio
ns ce an
De
vel d
usi op
ng e
ev xpla
ide n
Us nce atio
et ns
an o
aly ols a
ze n
da d
Co ta
n
Inv duct
est a
iga scie
tio nti
n fic
Ide
nti
fy
8
Qu
est
ion
s
sp1240cover 7/7/04 4:17 PM Page 1
SP-1240
SP-1240
MARS EXPRESS The Scientific Payload

M ARS E XPRESS
The Scientific Payload
Contact: ESA Publications Division

c/o ESTEC, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Tel. (31) 71 565 3400 - Fax (31) 71 565 5433
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page 1
SP-1240
August 2004
M ARS E XPRESS
The Scientific Payload
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page ii
SP-1240 ‘Mars Express: A European Mission to the Red Planet’

ISBN 92-9092-556-6 ISSN 0379-6566
Edited by Andrew Wilson

ESA Publications Division
Scientific Agustin Chicarro

Coordination ESA Research and Scientific Support Department, ESTEC
Published by ESA Publications Division

ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Price €50
Copyright © 2004 European Space Agency
ii
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page iii
Contents
Foreword v
Overview
The Mars Express Mission: An Overview 3
A. Chicarro, P. Martin & R. Trautner
Scientific Instruments
HRSC: the High Resolution Stereo Camera of Mars Express 17
G. Neukum, R. Jaumann and the HRSC Co-Investigator
and Experiment Team
OMEGA: Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l’Eau, 37

les Glaces et l’Activité
J-P. Bibring, A. Soufflot, M. Berthé et al.
MARSIS: Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface 51

and Ionosphere Sounding
G. Picardi, D. Biccari, R. Seu et al.
PFS: the Planetary Fourier Spectrometer for Mars Express 71

V. Formisano, D. Grassi, R. Orfei et al.
SPICAM: Studying the Global Structure and 95

Composition of the Martian Atmosphere
J.-L. Bertaux, D. Fonteyn, O. Korablev et al.
ASPERA-3: Analyser of Space Plasmas and Energetic 121

Ions for Mars Express
S. Barabash, R. Lundin, H. Andersson et al.
MaRS: Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science 141

M. Pätzold, F.M. Neubauer, L. Carone et al.
Beagle 2: the Exobiological Lander of Mars Express 165

D. Pullan, M.R. Sims, I.P. Wright et al.
US Participation
US Participation in Mars Express 207
A.D. Morrison, T.W. Thompson, R.L. Horttor et al.
Acronyms & Abbreviations 215
iii
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page v
FOREWORD
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page vii
mars express: foreword
Mars, our most Earth-like planetary neighbour, beckons. Its pristine and diverse
surface, equal in area to Earth’s land surface, displays a long and fascinating history,
punctuated by impact events, volcanism, tectonics, and aeolian, fluvial and glacial
erosion. A century ago, astronomers believed they were witnessing the last attempts
of a dying martian civilisation to cope with the devastating effects of climate change.
The notion of an intelligently inhabited Mars was later dispelled, but the expectation
that simple life forms could have survived persisted. Today, after sending robotic
missions to Mars, our view of the planet retains some striking similarities to those
earlier romantic conjectures.
We know from orbiting spacecraft that Mars has undergone dramatic climatic and
geologic changes. Water coursing over its surface in the distant past left dramatic
evidence in deeply carved channels and fluvial networks. Yet today we find the planet
is cold and dry. There is no evidence so far that life exists there now, but primitive life
during Mars’ warmer, wetter past is a real possibility. So, mysteries remain: how did
our Earth-like neighbour arrive at its present parched, cold and almost airless state?
Did life evolve and then die out? Did it leave a fossil record? Last but not least, can
the changes experienced by Mars teach us something about the dramatic changes
being predicted for our own planet?
These and other questions have spurred scientists and engineers to meet the
enormous challenge of sending missions to Mars. A Mars-bound spacecraft must
survive journeys of more than 6 months, approach the planet from just the right angle
and at the right speed to enter orbit, and then operate successfully to return valuable
observations. Some missions have failed, but the successes have more than repaid the
effort and risk. Our knowledge about Mars has grown dramatically with every
successful visit. Four decades of space-based observations have produced more
information and knowledge than earlier astronomers with Earth-bound telescopes
could have imagined.
Europe joins Mars exploration

Since the Greeks of more than 2000 years ago, many Europeans have made important
observations of Mars with the naked eye and through ground-based telescopes,
including Nicolaus Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler, Galileo Galilei,
Christian Huygens, Giovanni Cassini, William Herschel, Giovanni Schiaparelli and
Eugene Antoniadi. Europeans have also contributed their fair share of speculation and
fantasy about the planet in a fine tradition beginning in 1897 with the publication of
The War of the Worlds by H.G. Wells, in which hostile martians invade Earth.
The Soyuz launcher and its precious cargo are

transported to the launch pad on 29 May 2003.
vii
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page viii
SP-1240
Europe, however, never sent its own spacecraft to Mars – until now. The European
Space Agency (ESA) launched the Mars Express orbiter and its small Beagle 2 lander
in 2003 on Europe’s first mission to any planet. Research institutes throughout Europe
provided the instruments onboard the orbiter, some of them first developed for the ill-
fated Russian Mars-96 spacecraft. Now upgraded, they provide remote sensing of the
atmosphere, surface, subsurface and space environment of Mars to a degree of
accuracy never before achieved. The information being gleaned is helping to answer
many outstanding questions about the planet.
The mission
Mars Express was successfully launched on 2 June 2003 from Baikonur, Kazakhstan,
by a Russian Soyuz rocket. Following a cruise of almost 7 months, the main space-
craft was captured into orbit on 25 December 2003 and soon established a highly
Mars from 5.5 million km, imaged by the High elliptical polar orbit with a closest approach to the surface of about 270 km and a
Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC). The dark period of about 6.75 h. The fate of the Beagle 2 lander, aimed to land in Isidis Planitia,
features at top are part of the northern remains unknown. In addition to global studies of the surface, subsurface and
lowlands, where oceans possibly existed
billions of years ago. atmosphere at unprecedented spatial and spectral resolutions, the unifying theme of
(ESA/DLR/FU Berlin; G. Neukum) the mission is the search for water with all the instruments in its various states
everywhere on the planet.
ESA provided the launcher, orbiter and operations, while the instruments were
provided by scientific institutions through their own funding. The ground segment
includes the ESA station at Perth, Australia, and the mission operations centre at
ESOC in Germany. The Mars Express prime contractor was Astrium in Toulouse,
France, and a large number of European companies were involved as subcontractors.
The ESA engineering and scientific teams are located at ESTEC in The Netherlands.
International collaboration, through participation either in instrument hardware or
data analysis, is important for diversifying the scope of the mission and improving its
scientific return. Collaboration with the NASA Mars Exploration Rovers plays an
important role because of the complementary science goals.
Following spacecraft commissioning in January 2004, most instruments began
their own calibration and testing, in the process acquiring scientific data. This phase
lasted until June 2004, when all the instruments but one began routine operations after
the payload commissioning review. The deployment of the MARSIS radar antennas,
however, was postponed. The late deployment was initially planned to maximise
daylight operations of the other instruments before the pericentre naturally drifts to
southern latitudes, which coincides with the nightime conditions required for
subsurface sounding by MARSIS. The nominal lifetime of the orbiter is a martian
year (687 days), with a potential extension by another martian year to complete global
coverage and observe all seasons twice over.
Early science results

The High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) has provided breathtaking views of the
planet, in particular of karstic regions near the Valles Marineris canyon (pointing to
liquid water as the erosional agent responsible for modifying tectonic and impact
features in the area) and of several large volcanoes (the Olympus Mons caldera and
glaciation features surrounding Hecates Tholus). The OMEGA IR mineralogical
mapping spectrometer has provided unprecedented maps of water-ice and carbon
dioxide-ice occurrence at the south pole, showing where the two ices mix and where
they do not. The Planetary Fourier Spectrometer (PFS) has measured atmospheric
carbon monoxide variations in each hemisphere and confirmed the presence of
methane for the first time, which would indicate current volcanic activity and/or
biological processes. The SPICAM UV/IR atmospheric spectrometer has provided
the first complete vertical profile of carbon dioxide density and temperature, and has
simultaneously measured the distribution of water vapour and ozone. The ASPERA
energetic neutral atoms analyser has identified the solar wind interaction with the
upper atmosphere and has measured the properties of the planetary wind in Mars’
viii
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page ix
magnetic tail. Finally, the MaRS radio science experiment has measured for the first
time surface roughness by pointing the spacecraft high-gain antenna towards the
planet, reflecting the signal to Earth. Also, the martian interior is being probed by
studying the gravity anomalies affecting the orbit owing to mass variations of the
crust.
Water is the unifying theme of the mission, studied by all instruments using
different techniques. Geological evidence, such as dry riverbeds, sediments and
eroded features, indicates that water has played a major role in the early history of the
planet. It is assumed that liquid water was present on the surface up to about
3.8 billion years ago, when the planet had a thicker atmosphere and a warmer climate.
Afterwards, the atmosphere became much thinner and the climate much colder, the
planet losing much of its water in the process; liquid water cannot be sustained on the
surface under present conditions. Mars Express aims to reveal why this drastic change
occurred and where the water went. A precise inventory of existing water on the
planet (in ice or liquid form, mostly below ground) is important given its implications
for the potential evolution of life on Mars; the 3.8 billion-year age is precisely when
life appeared on Earth, which harboured similar conditions to Mars at that time. Thus,
it is not unreasonable to imagine that life may also have emerged on Mars and
possibly survived the intense UV solar radiation by remaining underground. The
discovery of methane in the atmosphere could indicate just that or the presence of
active volcanism. From previous orbital imagery, volcanoes on Mars were assumed
to have been dormant for hundreds of millions of years. This idea needs a fresh look
as the implications of currently active volcanism are profound in terms of thermal
vents providing niches for potential ecosystems, as well as for the thermal history of
the planet with the largest volcanoes in the Solar System. Mars Express is already
hinting at a quantum leap in our understanding of the planet’s geological evolution,
complemented by the ground truth being provided by NASA’s rovers.
Scope of this publication

This ESA Special Publication focuses on the Mars Express scientific instrumentation
and its state about a year after launch in order to include some initial scientific
discoveries. In spite of the Beagle 2 failure, the lander’s payload is also thoroughly
described here because it is of the highest scientific value. Furthermore, the orbiter
instruments are looking specifically for possible evidence of past or present life. No
other mission to Mars since NASA’s Viking missions in the 1970s has made
exobiology so central to its scientific goals. For further details, both in terms of
science results and public outreach, see http://sci.esa.int/marsexpress/
Spectacular views
A few spectacular initial results are shown in the next few pages, selected in view of
their wide public appeal rather than their intrinsic scientific value. All the scientists
involved in Mars Express are now busy submitting papers that include important
scientific results, and even a few breakthroughs at this early phase of the mission. The
purpose here is to give a visual impression of this early science data.
Agustin Chicarro
Project Scientist, Mars Express
ESTEC, June 2004
ix
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:52 PM Page x
SP-1240
This HRSC image was recorded on 14 January 2004. It shows a portion of a 1700 km-long and
65 km-wide swath taken in the south-to-north direction across the huge Valles Marineris canyon. It
is the first Mars image of this size at high resolution (12 m pix–1), in colour and in 3-D.
(ESA/DLR/FU Berlin; G. Neukum)
x
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:53 PM Page xi
This HRSC image was recorded during

revolution 18 on 14 January 2004. It shows a
vertical view of a mesa in the true colours of
Mars. The summit plateau stands about 3 km
above the surrounding terrain. Only isolated
mesas remain intact after the original surface
was dissected by erosion. The large crater has
a diameter of 7.6 km. (ESA/DLR/FU Berlin;
G. Neukum)
This HRSC image was recorded during

revolution 18 on 15 January 2004 from a
height of 273 km, east of the Hellas basin at
41°S/101°E. The area is 100 km across, with a
resolution of 12 m per pixel. It shows the Reull
Vallis, formed by flowing water. North is at
top. (ESA/DLR/FU Berlin; G. Neukum)
xi
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:53 PM Page xii
SP-1240
This HRSC image was recorded during revolution 143 from an altitude of 266 km, providing a perspective view of the western flank of the Olympus
Mons shield volcano in the western hemisphere. The escarpment rises from surface level to more than 7000 m. Resolution is about 25 m per pixel. The
picture is centred at 22°N/222°E; north is to the left. (ESA/DLR/FU Berlin; G. Neukum)
This HRSC vertical view shows the complex

caldera at the summit of Olympus Mons, the
highest volcano in the Solar System. The
average elevation is 22 km; the caldera has a
depth of about 3 km. This is the first high-
resolution colour image of the complete
caldera, taken from a height of 273 km during
revolution 37 on 21 January 2004. Centred at
18.3°N/227°E, the image is 102 km across with
a resolution of 12 m per pixel; south is at the
top. (ESA/DLR/FU Berlin; G. Neukum)
xii
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:53 PM Page xiii
This HRSC image shows the Acheron Fossae

region, an area of intense tectonic activity in
the past. Acheron Fossae marks the northern
edge of the Tharsis plateau; it is part of a
network of extensional fractures that radiates
from the Tharsis ‘bulge’, a huge area of
regional uplift of intensive volcanic activity.
The region is situated at 35-40ºN / 220-230ºE,
about 1000 km north of Olympus Mons.
(ESA/DLR/FU Berlin; G. Neukum)
OMEGA observed the southern polar cap of Mars on 18 January 2004,

in all three bands. At right is the visible image; in the middle is carbon
dioxide ice; at left is water ice. The two types of ice are mixed in some
areas but distinct in others. (ESA/IAS, Orsay; J-P. Bibring)
xiii
AAsec1.qxd 7/8/04 3:53 PM Page xiv
SP-1240
Initial ASPERA results indicate the very different characteristics of two important regions: the impact area of the solar wind with the upper
atmosphere and in the Mars tail (planetary wind), confirming the existence of the planetary wind (O+ and molecular ions).
(ESA/RFI Kiruna; R. Lundin)
SPICAM has provided the first complete vertical profile PFS initial results indicate that the atmospheric distribution of carbon
obtained by an orbiter of the density and temperature of carbon monoxide is different over the northern and southern hemispheres. The
dioxide from 10 km to 110 km above the surface. It has also presence of atmospheric methane has also been confirmed by PFS, which
measured the distribution of water vapour and ozone opens up new possibilities of there being lifeforms on the planet today.
simultaneously for the first time, indicating that where there is Methane is rather short-lived in the martian atmosphere, so the source(s)
more water vapour there is less ozone. that replenish it can have only two origins: volcanic or biologic.
(ESA/CNRS Verrières; J.-L. Bertaux) (ESA/IFSI Frascati; V. Formisano)
xiv
Chicarro.qxd 7/7/04 10:11 AM Page 1
MISSION OVERVIEW
The Mars Express Mission: An Overview
A. Chicarro, P. Martin & R. Trautner
Planetary Missions Division, Research & Scientific Support Department, ESA/ESTEC, PO Box 299,
2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
Email: agustin.chicarro@esa.int
Mars Express is not only the first ESA mission to the red planet but also the first 1. Introduction
European mission to any planet. Mars Express was launched in June 2003 from the
Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan aboard a Russian Soyuz rocket. It included
both an orbiter and a small lander named Beagle 2, in remembrance of Charles
Darwin’s ship. It is the first ‘Flexible’ mission of ESA’s long-term science programme
(now known as Cosmic Vision) and was developed in the record time of about 5 years
from concept to launch, and in the most cost-efficient manner with respect to any
other comparable Mars mission.
Before Mars Express, ESA and the scientific community spent more than 10 years
performing concept and feasibility studies on potential European Mars missions
(Marsnet, Intermarsnet), focusing on a network of surface stations complemented by
an orbiter, a concept that was further developed by CNES in the recently cancelled
Netlander mission. The network concept was considered to be a high scientific
priority in Europe until the demise of the Russian Mars-96 mission, which included
many outstanding European scientific instruments and which may be reconsidered in
the future. Mars Express was conceived to recover the objectives concerning the
global study of the planet by the Mars-96 mission, and added two major new themes:
water and life, following the recommendations of the International Mars Exploration
Working Group (IMEWG) and the endorsement of ESA’s Advisory Bodies that Mars
Express be included in the Science Programme of the Agency.
The scientific investigations of Mars Express closely complement those of recent
US orbital missions such as Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Odyssey, as well as the
spectacular Mars Exploration Rovers. In addition, very close collaboration was
established, in anticipation of future collaboration with Japan, with the Nozomi
mission because the scientific objectives and orbital characteristics were
complementary. Unfortunately, Nozomi did not reach the planet.
On 2 June 2003 at 17:45:26 UT, a Soyuz rocket with a Fregat upper stage was 2. Mission Overview
launched from Baikonur and injected the 1223 kg Mars Express into a Mars transfer
orbit. Launch windows to Mars occur every 26 months but 2003 was particularly
favourable because it offered the maximum launch mass, a situation that does not
repeat for another 16 years. This was important; Beagle 2 could not have been carried
in the less-favourable 2005 window.
Mars Express is a 3-axis stabilised orbiter with a fixed high-gain antenna and
body-mounted instruments, and is dedicated to the orbital and in situ study of the
planet’s interior, subsurface, surface and atmosphere. It was placed in an elliptical
orbit (250 x 10 142 km) around Mars of 86.35° quasi-polar inclination and 6.75 h
period, which was optimised for the scientific objectives and to communicate with
Beagle 2 and the NASA landers or rovers being launched in 2003-2005.
The spacecraft was captured into Mars orbit on 25 December 2003. Following
completion of spacecraft commissioning in mid-January 2004, the orbiter
experiments began their own commissioning processes and started acquiring
3
SP-1240
7
5
4
3
2
Fig. 1. Mars Express with the Beagle 2 capsule scientific data from Mars and its environment. The radar antenna was planned to be
still attached. 1: MARSIS. 2: HRSC. deployed last in order to maximise early daylight operations of the other instruments,
3: OMEGA. 4: PFS. 5: SPICAM. 6: ASPERA. before the natural pericentre drift to the southern latitudes. The optical instruments
7: Beagle 2. (MaRS requires no dedicated
hardware). began their routine operational phase after the Commissioning Review in June 2004.
The deployment of the radar antennas was delayed for safety modelling checks. The
nominal orbiter mission lifetime is a martian year (687 days), following Mars orbit
insertion and about 7 months’ cruise. It is hoped that the nominal mission will be
extended into a second martian year of operations in order to increase the global
coverage of most orbital experiments and, eventually, to allow data-relay
communications with potential landers up to 2008, provided that the spacecraft
resources allow it.
The Beagle 2 descent capsule was ejected 5 days before arrival at Mars, while the
orbiter was on a Mars collision course; Mars Express was then retargeted for orbit
insertion. From its hyperbolic trajectory, Beagle 2 entered and descended through the
atmosphere in about 5 min, intending to land at < 40 m s–1 within an error ellipse of
20 x 100 km. The fate of Beagle 2 remains unknown because no signal was ever
received from the martian surface, neither by the UK’s Jodrell Bank radio telescope
nor by the Mars Express and Mars Odyssey orbiters. All of them made strenuous
efforts to listen for the faintest of signals for many weeks following Beagle 2’s arrival
at Mars. ESA set up a commission to investigate the potential causes of the probable
accident and issued a number of recommendations for future missions. The selected
landing site was in Isidis Planitia (11.6°N, 269.5°W), which is a safe area of high
scientific interest – this impact basin was probably flooded by water during part of its
early history, leaving layers of sedimentary rocks. The area is surrounded by
geological units of a variety of ages and compositions, from densely cratered
highlands to volcanic flows to younger smooth plains. The lander’s highly integrated
instrument suite was expected to perform a detailed geological, mineralogical and
chemical analysis of the site’s rocks and soils, provide site meteorology, and focus on
finding traces of past or present biological activity. Data from this combination of
instruments could have solved the issue of life on Mars. Beagle 2’s operational
lifetime was planned to be up to 180 sols (about 6 months).
ESA provided the launcher, orbiter, operations and part of Beagle 2, the rest of the
lander being funded by a UK-led consortium of space organisations. The orbiter
instruments were all provided by scientific institutions through their own funding.
4
mission overview
Most ESA Member States participated in providing the scientific payload but other Fig. 2. Mars Express in launch configuration at
countries (including USA, Russia, Poland, Japan and China) have joined in various Baikonur.
capacities. The ground segment includes the new ESA station of New Norcia, near
Perth, Australia, and the mission operations centre at ESA’s European Space
Operations Centre (ESOC). A second ESA station at Cebreros, near Madrid, Spain,
will be used later in the mission, while NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) will
increase the scientific data return during the whole mission. The orbiter was built by
Astrium in Toulouse, France, as prime contractor, together with a large number of
European companies as subcontractors in each of ESA’s Member States.
The Mars Express orbiter is the core of the mission, scientifically justified on its own 3. Scientific Objectives
merit by providing unprecedented global coverage of the planet, in particular of the
surface, subsurface and atmosphere. Beagle 2 was selected through its innovative
scientific goals and very challenging payload. The combination of orbiter and lander
(Figs. 1 & 2) was expected to be a powerful tool to focus on two related issues: the
current inventory of ice or liquid water in the martian crust, and possible traces of past
or present biological activity on the planet. The broad scientific objectives of the
orbiter are:
— global colour and stereo high-resolution imaging with about 10 m resolution

and imaging of selected areas at 2 m pix–1;
— global IR mineralogical mapping of the surface;
— radar sounding of the subsurface structure down to the permafrost;
— global atmospheric circulation and mapping of the atmospheric composition;
— interaction of the atmosphere with the surface and the interplanetary medium;
— radio science to infer critical information on the atmosphere, ionosphere,
surface and interior.
The ultimate scientific objective of Beagle 2 was the detection of extinct and/or
5
SP-1240
extant life on Mars, a more attainable goal being the establishment of the conditions
at the landing site that were suitable for the emergence and evolution of life. In order
to achieve this goal, Beagle 2 was designed to perform in situ geological,
mineralogical and geochemical analysis of selected rocks and soils at the landing site.
Furthermore, studies of the martian environment were planned via chemical analysis
of the atmosphere, local geomorphological studies of the landing site and via the
investigation of dynamic environmental processes. Further studies to be performed by
Beagle 2 included the analysis of the subsurface regime using a ground-penetration
tool and the first in situ isotopic dating of rocks on another planet.
The description and detailed science goals of the orbiter and lander experiments
are presented below; see also Table 1.
3.1 Orbiter scientific instruments

The Mars Express orbiter scientific payload totals about 116 kg shared by six
instruments, in addition to a radio-science experiment that requires no additional
hardware. The instruments can be listed in two catagories: those dealing primarily
with the solid planet by observing the surface and subsurface (HRSC super/high-
resolution stereo colour imager; OMEGA IR mineralogical mapping spectrometer;
MARSIS subsurface sounding radar altimeter), and those studying the atmosphere
and environment of Mars (PFS planetary fourier spectrometer; SPICAM UV and IR
atmospheric spectrometer; ASPERA energetic neutral atoms analyser). The MaRS
radio science experiment will provide insights into the internal gravity anomalies, the
surface roughness, the neutral atmosphere and the ionosphere of Mars.
The camera is based on the space-qualified HRSC Flight Model 2 developed for
the Mars-96 mission, with the addition of a super-resolution channel. Its major goal
is global coverage of the planet at high resolution. The scientific interpretation of the
data focuses on the role of water and climate throughout martian history, the timing
and evolution of volcanism and tectonics, the surface/atmosphere interactions, the
establishment of an accurate chronology, and the observation of Phobos and Deimos.
In order to meet these objectives, the imaging capabilities of HRSC allow the
characterisation of surface features and morphology at high spatial resolution (about
10 m pix–1 in stereo, colour and at different phase angles), surface topography at high
spatial and vertical resolution with dedicated stereo imaging, surface features and
morphology using nested images at super resolution (2 m pix–1), terrain classification
by multispectral datasets, scattering properties of the regolith and atmosphere by
multi-phase angle observations, and atmospheric properties and phenomena by limb
sounding and nadir observations. High- and super-resolution are obtained around
pericentre, at and above 250 km.
OMEGA, derived from the Mars-96 spare model, is a visible and near-IR mapping
spectrometer operating in the wavelength range 0.38-5.1 µm. It will provide global
coverage of Mars by the end of the nominal mission at medium resolution (1-5 km)
from orbital altitudes between 1000 km and 4000 km, and higher-resolution (a few
hundred metres) snapshots of selected areas, amounting to at least a few percent of
the surface. OMEGA is characterising the composition of surface materials, studying
the time and space distribution of atmospheric CO2, CO and H2O, identifying the
aerosols and dust particles in the atmosphere, and monitoring the surface dust
transport processes. It is contributing greatly to understanding the evolution of Mars
from geological time scales to seasonal variations and is giving unique clues for
understanding the H2O and CO2 cycles throughout martian evolution.
MARSIS is a low-frequency nadir-looking pulse-limited radar sounder and
altimeter with ground-penetration capabilities operated. It uses synthetic aperture
techniques, two 20 m booms and a secondary receiving monopole antenna to isolate
subsurface reflections. It is the first radar sounder to investigate the martian surface
and subsurface. Its primary objective is to map the distribution of water (both liquid
and solid) in the upper portions of the crust down to 3-5 km varying with geological
composition (nightside). The detection of such water reservoirs addresses key issues
6
mission overview
Table 1. The Mars Express scientific experiments.
Expt. Principal Participating

Code Instrument Investigator Countries
Orbiter
HRSC Super/High-Resolution G. Neukum D, F, RU, USA, FIN,
Stereo Colour Imager DLR/FU, Berlin, D I, UK
OMEGA IR Mineralogical J.P. Bibring F, I, RU
Mapping Spectrometer IAS, Orsay, F
PFS Atmospheric Fourier V. Formisano I, RU, PL, D, F, E,
Spectrometer CNR, Frascati, I USA
MARSIS Subsurface-Sounding G. Picardi I, USA, D, CH, UK,
Radar/Altimeter Univ. Rome, I DK, F, RU
& J. Plaut
NASA/JPL
ASPERA Energetic Neutral Atoms R. Lundin S, D, UK, F, FIN,
Analyzer & S. Barabash I, US, RU
RFI, Kiruna, S
SPICAM UV and IR Atmospheric J.L. Bertaux F, B, RU, US
Spectrometer CNRS, Verrières, F
MaRS Radio Science Experiment M. Paetzold D, F, US, A
Univ. Köln, D
Lander
Beagle 2 Suite of imaging instruments, C. Pillinger UK, D, US, F, CH,
organic and inorganic Open Univ., UK RU, PRC, A, E
chemical analysis, robotic & M. Sims
sampling devices and Leicester Univ., UK
meteo sensors
in the geological, hydrological, climatic and possibly biological evolution of Mars,

including the current and past global inventory of water, the mechanisms of transport
and storage of water, the role of liquid water and ice in shaping the landscape of Mars,
the stability of liquid water and ice at the surface as an indication of climatic
conditions, and the implications of the hydrological history in the evolution of
possible martian ecosystems. Secondary MARSIS objectives include subsurface
geologic probing, surface roughness and topography characterisation at scales from
tens of metres to km (dayside), and ionosphere sounding (dayside) to characterise the
interactions of the solar wind with the ionosphere and the upper atmosphere. At the
time of going to press, the radar booms had not been deployed.
The Planetary Fourier Spectrometer, also derived from a Mars-96 model, is a
double-pendulum IR spectrometer optimised for atmospheric studies. It covers the
wavelength ranges 1.2-5 µm and 5-45 µm with a spectral resolution of 2 cm–1 and a
spatial resolution of 10-20 km. The main scientific objectives are the global long-term
monitoring of the 3-D temperature field in the lower atmosphere, the measurement of
the minor constituent variations (water vapour and carbon monoxide) and D/H ratio,
the determination of the size distribution, chemical composition and optical properties
of the atmospheric aerosols, dust clouds, ice clouds and hazes, and the study of global
circulation and dynamics. PFS will also determine the thermal inertia (from the daily
surface temperature variations), the nature of the surface condensate and seasonal
variations of its composition, the scattering phase function, pressure and height for
selected regions, and is studying the surface-atmosphere exchange processes.
7
SP-1240
SPICAM is a UV and IR spectrometer devoted to studying the atmosphere. It is

focusing on atmospheric photochemistry, the density-temperature structure of the
atmosphere (0-150 km), the upper atmosphere-ionosphere escape processes, and the
interaction with the solar wind. The UV sensor is looking through the atmosphere
either at the Sun or stars to obtain vertical profiles by occultation, or to the nadir to
obtain integrated profiles, or at the limb to obtain vertical profiles of high-atmosphere
emissions. The IR sensor is used only in the nadir-looking mode (column abundances
and H2O, CO2 and O3 cycles). SPICAM measurements are addressing key questions
into the present state of the atmosphere, its climate and evolution. SPICAM and PFS
are highly complementary.
The ASPERA energetic neutral atom analyser is studying plasma domains at
different locations along the spacecraft’s orbit, focusing on the interaction of the
upper atmosphere with the interplanetary medium and the solar wind, and
characterising the near-Mars plasma and neutral gas environment. The scientific
objectives are being met by studying remote measurements of energetic neutral atoms
in order to investigate the interaction between the solar wind and the atmosphere,
characterise quantitatively the impact of plasma processes on atmospheric evolution,
and obtain the global plasma and neutral gas distributions in the near-Mars
environment. In situ measurements of ions and electrons complement the energetic
neutral atom images; they have never been obtained before and provide undisturbed
solar wind parameters. A similar instrument was carried by the Japanese Nozomi
mission.
The MaRS radio science experiment does not require dedicated hardware but it is
performing radio sounding experiments of the neutral martian atmosphere and
ionosphere to derive vertical density, pressure and temperature profiles as a function
of height, and the diurnal and seasonal variations in the ionosphere. It is also
determining the dielectric and scattering properties of the martian surface in specific
target areas with a bistatic radar experiment for the first time, and is determining
gravity anomalies in the crust in order to investigate the structure and evolution of the
interior. Precise determination of the mass of Phobos and radio sounding of the solar
corona during superior conjunction with the Sun are also among the objectives. The
experiment relies on the observation of the phase, amplitude, polarisation and
propagation times of radio signals transmitted by the spacecraft and received at
ground stations on Earth. This experiment has a significant heritage from its
equivalent on the Rosetta mission.
Although not considered as part of the scientific payload, two subsystems on the
spacecraft were planned to benefit particularly from Beagle 2 operations. The Mars
Express Lander Communications (MELACOM) subsystem is the orbiter-to-lander
data relay transponder, with the primary mission of providing data services for the
lander. Mars Express was scheduled to fly over the landing site every 1-4 sols and was
to relay scientific data to the UK-based Lander Operations Centre via ESOC. The
Visual Monitoring Camera (VMC) also remained as part of the orbiter. This
standalone digital camera imaged the successful separation of Beagle 2 before arrival
at Mars.
3.2 Lander scientific instruments

Although Beagle 2 (Fig. 3) did not accomplish its mission because it was most likely
lost during the entry, descent and landing, it is still relevant to review the various
scientific instruments and robotic tools, given the importance of the investigations
and the high standards to which they were built. It is hoped that another opportunity
will allow all or some of these instruments to fly again to Mars to undertake the search
for life.
The lander’s scientific payload totalled less than 10 kg, shared between six
instruments and two dedicated tools to sample the surface and subsurface materials of
Mars, plus a robotic sampling arm with 5 degrees-of-freedom. Two were mounted
directly on the lander platform: the Gas Analysis Package and the Environmental
8
mission overview
THE ISSUE OF WATER
Today, liquid water cannot exist on the surface of Mars

because of the low atmospheric density (6 mbar).
However, there is ample evidence that liquid water
flowed freely in the early history of Mars, as witnessed
by dry riverbeds in the heavily cratered Noachian
southern highlands. The early climate appears to have
been warm and wet (although there are renewed doubts
about this) until about 3.8 billion years ago, much like
the Earth’s at about the same age. This was when life
appeared on our planet, as evidence from Greenland
indicates. So, if the conditions were similar on both
planets, it appears reasonable for biological activity to few microns of soil in both polar caps. However, in light
have flourished on Mars as well. Soon after 3.8 billion of similar results on the Moon from Lunar Prospector,
years ago (in geological terms), surface conditions where we know from rock samples there is no water at
changed dramatically, creating the cold and dry place of all, these data only indicate an existing mechanism
today, as modest erosion rates at the Mars Pathfinder site concentrating H+ from the solar wind towards the poles.
illustrate. There is also growing evidence that the young Therefore, most of the Mars Express orbiter instruments
smooth northern plains were once covered by a liquid- are directed towards settling this issue, in particular
water ocean extending over a third of the planet. The through radar subsurface sounding (MARSIS), surface
question is thus: where has all this water gone? Was it mineralogical mapping (OMEGA), establishment of a
lost into space through natural degassing, including detailed chronology of geological evolution (HRSC),
atmospheric erosion through large impacts, or is it still imaging of atmospheric escape (ASPERA) and the study
somewhere on Mars, probably below the surface in ice of the H2O, CO2 and dust cycles in the atmosphere (PFS
form, as in terrestrial permafrost? Recent Mars Odyssey and SPICAM). Never has a mission to Mars been so
gamma-ray spectroscopy data have revealed a focused on producing the water inventory of the planet,
significant concentration of H+ ions adsorbed to the first and never has it been so well equipped to find out.
THE ISSUE OF LIFE which would have indicated the existence of extinct life,
or even the presence of methane, indicative of extant life
The Mars Express mission planned to address the issue together with other organic compounds. Results from a
of the emergence of life in the cosmos and, in particular, single instrument will most likely not allow the issue of
life signatures on Mars both directly and indirectly. The life on Mars to be settled, but all the measurements taken
majority of orbiter instruments are looking for together will allow us to build a scenario pointing, or
indications of favourable conditions for the existence of not, in the direction of present or past life on Mars.
life, either at present or during the planet’s past, and Either way, the cosmobiological implications would be
particularly for traces of liquid, solid or gaseous water. far-reaching: we would know if life is a common
The HRSC camera is imaging ancient riverbeds, the occurrence in the Universe or not. In this debate,
OMEGA spectrometer is looking for minerals with OH– comparing the geological evolutions of Earth and Mars
radicals formed in the presence of water, the MARSIS is obviously a fruitful exercise because the planets share
radar will look for subsurface ice and liquid water, the seasons, polar caps, a transparent atmosphere and
PFS and SPICAM spectrometers are analysing water aeolian activity, for example. Our other planetary twin
vapour in the atmosphere, and ASPERA and MaRS are neighbour, Venus, must not be forgotten in view of its
studying neutral-atom escape from the atmosphere, in similarities with Earth in terms of internal activity and
particular O2 coming from water and carbonates. The recent resurfacing. Comparative planetology is the key
instruments on Beagle 2 were designed to look for the to our understanding of Solar System evolution,
presence of water in the soil, rocks and atmosphere, and including cosmobiology. Since NASA’s Viking missions
in particular to look for traces of life with direct in 1976, it is the first time that the exhaustive search for
measurements, such as the presence of a larger amount life is so central to a space mission to Mars, even after
of the light C12 isotope compared to the heavier C13, the failure of Beagle 2.
9
SP-1240
Fig. 3. Beagle 2 operating on the surface of

Mars.
Sensor Suite. The others were housed within an innovative structure called the
Payload Adjustable Workbench (PAW) at the end of the robotic sampling arm: the
Stereo Camera System, Microscope, X-ray Spectrometer and Mössbauer
Spectrometer, together with a set of tools that included the Rock Corer Grinder, the
PLanetary Underground TOol and other support equipment such as a sampling spoon,
a torch and a wide-angle mirror. The PAW also carried one of the ESS sensors. The
science-payload-to-landed-structure ratio is about 1/3, the highest so far of any
planetary lander.
The Gas Analysis Package (GAP) is designed for quantitative and qualitative
analysis of sample composition and precise isotopic measurements. It can process
atmospheric samples and soil or rock chippings acquired by the sampling tools. These
are deposited via an inlet system into one of eight miniaturised ovens. Gases are
analysed directly (such as those present in the atmosphere), after their release from
samples by heating, or those resulting from a byproduct of chemical processing (e.g.
CO2). GAP is very flexible and can investigate processes dealing with atmospheric
evolution, circulation and cycling, the nature of gases trapped in rocks and soils, low-
temperature geochemistry, fluid processes, organic chemistry, formation temperatures
and surface exposure ages, and can also assist in isotopic rock dating.
The Environmental Surface Suite (ESS) contributes to the characterisation of a
landing site and to meteorological studies through the measurements from 11
parameter-sensors scattered around the lander platform and PAW. Measurement of the
UV and radiation flux at the surface together with the oxidising capability of the soil
and atmosphere provides insights into exobiological investigations. In addition, the
measurement of atmospheric temperature, pressure, wind speed and direction, dust
saltation and angle of repose complements the in situ environmental experiments.
The Stereo Camera System (SCS) consists of two identical CCD cameras and
integrated filter wheels. A primary engineering objective of the Beagle 2 SCS was the
construction of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the landing site from a series of
overlapping stereo image pairs. The DEM was to be reconstructed on Earth and used
to position the PAW with respect to target rocks and soils. The investigation of the
landing site included 360° panoramic imaging, multi-spectral imaging of rocks and
10
mission overview
soils to determine the mineralogy, and close-up imaging of rocks and soils to infer the
texture. Observations of the day and night sky, Sun, stars and Deimos and Phobos
allow the identification of atmospheric properties such as optical density, aerosol
properties and water vapour content. The SCS also supports the determination of the
landing site location by providing panoramic and celestial navigation images.
Furthermore, the observation of lander surfaces and atmospheric effects allows the
identification of dust and aerosol properties in the atmosphere.
The Microscopic Imager (MIC) investigates the nature of martian rocks, soils and
fines at the particulate scale (few mm). Such studies would have provided important
data to fulfil Beagle 2’s exobiological objectives in the form of direct evidence of
microfossils, microtextures and mineralisations of biogenic origin, if present. In
addition, identifying the physical nature and extent of the weathering rinds/coatings
on rocks and soils contributes to the geological characterisation of a landing site.
Atmospheric and global planetary studies also benefit from detailed knowledge of
dust morphology. The MIC was the first attempt to image and assess directly
individual particles of sizes close to the wavelength of scattered light on another
planet. The acquisition of complete sets of images for each target allows the 3-D
reconstruction of sample surfaces in the visible and UV.
The primary goal of the X-Ray Spectrometer (XRS) is to determine, in situ, the
elemental composition and, by inference, the geochemical composition and
petrological classification, of the surface material at the landing site. Major elements
(Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe) and trace elements up to Nb are detectable. The
instrument employs X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to determine the elemental
constituents of rocks, using a set of four radioisotope sources (two 55Fe and two 109Cd)
to excite the sample. Crude radiometric dating of martian rocks in situ was to be
performed using the 40K/40Ar method. For this, the XRS needs to make a precise
measurement of K on a ‘fresh’ sample of rock. The Ar component is determined by
the GAP as part of a suite of experiments performed on a core sample extracted from
the same specimen.
The Mössbauer Spectrometer (MBS) allows a quantitative analysis of Fe-bearing
materials in rock and soil materials. The Fe-rich nature of martian deposits enables
relative proportions of Fe in olivine and pyroxene to be determined using the
Mössbauer technique, together with magnetite in basalts. Owing to the abundance of
Fe-bearing minerals on Mars and their formation being linked to the history of water
on the planet, MBS measurements are particularly important. Also, these results
provide information about rock weathering in general, and oxidation in particular. The
MBS uses gamma rays from the decay of 57Co to 57Fe. The generated spectra allow the
characterisation of the mineralogical make-up of rocks and soils, and hence their
petrological classification. In conjunction with the X-ray spectrometer, the Mössbauer
spectrometer complements the in situ geochemical and petrological work, and
provides support for the GAP measurements.
The Rock Corer Grinder (RCG) on the PAW is a combined tool that addresses the
scientific prerequisite that all the PAW instruments have access to pristine material on
a suitably prepared rock surface to avoid the effects of weathering rinds and
geometric effects that can seriously compromise instrument performance. The RCG
removes the altered material and produces a flat, fresh surface suitable for both types
of spectrometer measurements. After the in situ analyses have been completed, a
sample from the ground patch is extracted by the coring action of the device, and
delivered to the GAP inlet port for chemical analysis.
The PLUTO (PLanetary Underground TOol) is another PAW tool to retrieve soil
samples from depths down to about 1.5 m and, depending on the terrain, from under
a large boulder. This capability is very important for exobiological investigations
because materials preserving traces of biological activity would be found at depth
within the soil or rocks, where they would be unaffected by solar-UV radiation. In
addition to its main function as a soil sample-acquisition device, PLUTO allows
in situ temperature measurements as a function of time and depth as it travels below
11
SP-1240
the surface. The ground-intrusion behaviour also allows the mechanical properties
and layering of the soil to be estimated.
Coordination between Mars Express orbital observations and Beagle 2
experiments had to be carefully planned, so that the lander could provide ground truth
to the orbiter through its detailed geological and chemical analysis, and the orbiter
could provide the landing site regional context for the Beagle 2 experiments. Detailed
studies of the Beagle 2 landing site have also been carried out.
4. Science Operations The ‘G3-UB’ baseline orbit of Mars Express has a quasi-polar inclination of 86.35°.
In order to fine-tune observation parameters such as illumination, a manoeuvre was
performed to transition from a G3-U to a G3-B orbit a few weeks after Mars orbit
insertion. The total number of orbits during the nominal mission is 2293, which
corresponds to slightly more than 3 orbits per sol. Good illumination conditions for a
systematic coverage of the whole surface is a major requirement for the global
coverage strategy. Priorities are dictated by scientific goals (e.g., polar coverage,
regions of interest, targets of opportunity) and, at the beginning of the mission, by the
need to fly over the lander site in the Isidis Planitia area. Beagle 2 communication
contacts were repeatedly attempted for more than a month, and were expected to vary
between once a week to once a day during nominal Beagle 2 operations. The lander
lifetime, a main driver of the orbiter’s early science operations, was estimated to be
about 6 months as a result of decreasing illumination and dust building up on the
lander panels.
Mars Express is recording science data onboard and dumping it during ground
station passes. The daily data volume varies throughout the year from less than 1 Gbit
to about 6 Gbits, via the single New Norcia ground station with its 35m antenna and
8 h daily coverage. The use of NASA’s Deep Space Network is planned in order to
increase the capacity.
As one of the various actors in Mars Express science operations, the Payload
Operations Service (POS) was established at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory,
(Chilton, UK) to support the Mars Express Project Scientist Team (PST), the Principal
Investigators (PIs), the Mission Operations Centre (MOC) and the Lander Operations
Centre (LOC). The POS carried out the development, implementation, testing and
operations of the system and tools required to support Mars Express science
operations under contract from ESA. The PST and PIs compile the Master Science
Plan (MSP) to schedule the acquisition of science data by the spacecraft in a way that
is consistent with the scientific objectives and the resources available during the
observation time. The MSP represents the basis of all payload operations timeline
planning during the various phases of the mission. The high-level scientific planning
is performed by the Science Operations Working Group (SOWG), which includes
representatives of all the PI teams. PST and POS both interface with the MOC, the PI
institutes and the LOC.
4.1 Data distribution

To further the potential use of the Mars Express scientific data, as well as to benefit
from a new scientific perspective, ESA established a participating programme for
Interdisciplinary Scientists (IDSs) and Recognised Cooperating Laboratories (RCLs).
The six selected IDSs (half being non-European) bring their expertise in various
multidisciplinary fields, such as the space environment, surface-atmosphere
interactions, geological evolution or cosmobiology, in order to support various PI
teams by typically combining data from several instruments into investigations from
a fresh viewpoint. The RCLs have IDS guidance to prepare themselves for
interpreting the data when they become available to the public after the 6-month
proprietary period and distributing them further into the geoscience community
and/or country they represent, as these RCLs have been selected to encourage
scientific groups from areas new to space activities to participate in ESA planetary
12
mission overview
missions. In addition, ESA is building a scientific data archive for all planetary
missions as a repository of European planetary data after the 6-month proprietary
period (see below).
4.2 Data archiving

The Planetary Science Data Archive (PSA) is an online archive that provides data
search and access via the Internet of ESA’s planetary missions, data-formatted to
NASA’s Planetary Data System (PDS) standards. Following the request by Mars
Express PI teams for the archive to offer additional functionality on top of the
delivery of PDS-compliant data sets, the reuse of an existing astronomy scientific data
archive architecture was adopted because it offered significant cost benefits over
developing an entirely new system. This archive will be located at the European
Space Astronomy Centre (ESAC), Villafranca, Spain, while expertise exists in the
PST at ESTEC. Detailed requirements have been defined for the PSA by
representatives from a wide variety of disciplines, who will support the testing and
overall future functionality of the PSA. The PSA will support scientists looking for
data on specific topics, particular instruments or given locations on the planet, as well
as helping the general public and educators, interested in visually appealing or easy-
to-interpret data.
International collaboration beyond the ESA Member States, through participation in 5. International
either instrument hardware or scientific data analysis, is important for diversifying the Collaboration
scope and quality of the mission’s the scientific return. Three major partners are
contributing to the mission: USA, Russia and Japan. NASA provided a major share
of MARSIS and is supporting Co-Investigators in most of the scientific payloads.
NASA is also making its DSN available to increase the science data download
throughout the mission, including critical manoeuvres. Russian scientists are involved
in most of the orbiter experiments as many of these originated on Mars-96 as joint
collaborations between European and Russian institutes. Other non-ESA countries
participating in the mission include Poland and China.
Collaboration with Japan is a special case, although the high expectations were
unfortunately not met. Turning the malfunction of the Nozomi spacecraft soon after
launch in 1998 into a positive event, the Mars Express and Nozomi Science Working
Teams began a close collaboration because both missions were then expected to reach
Mars at the same time. In the end, however, Nozomi could only fly past Mars because
its technical difficulties could not be overcome to enter orbit. This collaboration
included scientific data exchange and analysis, as well as the ongoing exchange of
scientists from all the instrument teams. The missions were highly complementary in
terms of orbits and scientific investigations, with Nozomi focusing on the atmosphere
and in particular its interaction with the solar wind from a highly-elliptic equatorial
orbit, while Mars Express is devoting a large share of its mission to the surface and
subsurface from polar orbit. Never before was a planet expected to be simultaneously
observed from two different geometries by two orbiters of different space agencies.
This tandem exploration was planned to pave the way for even closer cooperation in
the future between Europe and Japan to other targets, such as Mercury.
Further details on the Mars Express mission and its Beagle 2 lander can be found
at http://sci.esa.int/marsexpress/ and http://www.beagle2.com/
13
Neukem.qxd 7/7/04 11:48 AM Page 15
SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
HRSC: the High Resolution Stereo Camera of Mars Express
G. Neukum1,4 , R. Jaumann2 and the HRSC Co-Investigator and Experiment Team3

1
Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Earth Sciences, Institute of Geosciences, Remote Sensing of the
Earth and Planets, Malteserstr. 74-100, Building D, D-12249 Berlin, Germany
Email: gneukum@zedat.fu-berlin.de
2
German Aerospace Center (DLR), Rutherfordstrasse 2, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
Email: ralf.jaumann@dlr.de
3
see Tables 2 & 3
4
until 2002: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Rutherfordstrasse 2, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
The High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC), originally developed for the
Russian-led Mars-96 mission, was selected as part of the Orbiter payload for
ESA’s Mars Express mission. The HRSC is a pushbroom scanning instrument
with nine CCD line detectors mounted in parallel in the focal plane. Its unique
feature is the ability to obtain near-simultaneous imaging data of a specific site
at high resolution, with along-track triple stereo, four colours and five different
phase angles, thus avoiding any time-dependent variations of the observational
conditions. An additional Super-Resolution Channel (SRC) – a framing device –
will yield nested images in the metre-resolution range for detailed photogeologic
studies. The spatial resolution from the nominal periapsis altitude of 250 km will
be 10 m px–1, with an image swath of 53 km, for the HRSC and 2.3 m px–1 for the
SRC. During the mission’s nominal operational lifetime of 1 martian year
(2 Earth years) and assuming an average HRSC data transfer share of 40%, it
will be possible to cover at least 50% of the martian surface at a spatial
resolution of ≤ 15 m px–1. More than 70% of the surface can be observed at a
spatial resolution of ≤ 30 m px–1, while more than 1% will be imaged at better
than 2.5 m px–1. The HRSC will thus close the gap between the medium- to low-
resolution coverage and the very high-resolution images of the Mars Observer
Camera on the Mars Global Surveyor mission and the in situ observations and
measurements by landers. The HRSC will make a major contribution to the
study of martian geosciences, with special emphasis on the evolution of the
surface in general, the evolution of volcanism, and the role of water throughout
martian history. The instrument will obtain images containing morphologic and
topographic information at high spatial and vertical resolution, allowing the
improvement of the cartographic base down to scales of 1:50 000. The
experiment will also address atmospheric phenomena and atmosphere-surface
interactions, and will provide urgently needed support for current and future
lander missions as well as for exobiological studies. The goals of HRSC on Mars
Express will not be met by any other planned mission or instrument.
17
SP-1240
1. The Challenge Europe will make a major contribution to the international programme of Mars
exploration with the launch of Mars Express in 2003. The scientific objectives of the
orbiter include the significant task of completing the high-resolution reconnaissance
of Mars from orbit and the partial recovery of the scientific objectives of the lost
Russian Mars-96 mission.
Imagery is the major source for our current understanding of the geologic and
climatologic evolution of Mars in qualitative and quantitative terms. It has the
potential to enhance our knowledge of Mars drastically and is an essential prerequisite
for detailed surface exploration. Therefore, a prime objective of the Mars Express
orbiter is the photogeologic analysis of the martian surface at high resolution. For this
task, the existing second flight model of the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC)
developed for Mars-96 was selected. This pushbroom camera will provide
simultaneously high-resolution, stereo, colour and multiple phase-angle coverage and
thus will acquire imaging data of unprecedented scientific quality. In response to the
urgent demands for very high-resolution imagery in the metre-range, a
complementary Super-Resolution Channel (SRC) was added. This boresighted
channel serves as the ‘magnifying lens’ by providing image strips nested in the wider
swath of the HRSC stereo and colour scanner.
The reconnaissance task is quite challenging: in only 2 Earth years – the nominal
operational lifetime of Mars Express – at least half of the martian surface shall be
covered at a pixel resolution better than 15 m, three quarters of the surface at 30 m
per pixel and almost the entire surface at least at 100 m px–1. In addition, about 1%
will be observed at about 2 m px–1. The images will allow surface distances, heights
and the colours of different rocks to be measured. During imaging, the camera is
250 km or more above the martian surface. The camera processes internally up to 9
million pixels per second; the output data rate (after on-line compression) to the
spacecraft memory depends on the altitude and can reach up to 25 Mbit s–1, i.e.
200 Mbit of memory are filled with compressed data within several minutes. Each
and every bit acquired by the camera is extremely valuable because most of the
covered regions will be overflown only once at the highest resolution.
Such data will not be acquired by any other current or planned mission. The
HRSC image data have a high potential for unravelling the geologic and climatologic
history of Mars. It will also provide the required database for the preparation and
planning of future sample-return missions, as well as other robotic and human
exploration.
2. The Science The HRSC directly addresses two of the main scientific goals of the Mars Express
mission (high-resolution photogeology and surface-atmosphere interactions) and signifi-
cantly supports another two (atmospheric studies and mineralogical mapping). In
addition, the imagery will make a major contribution to characterising the landing site
geology and its surroundings for the Mars Express and other Mars missions (e.g. NASA’s
Mars Exploration Rovers). The scientific objectives and measurement goals have been
formulated by an international team of 45 Co-Investigators (Co-Is) from 10 countries
under the leadership of the Principal Investigator (PI). The image data will focus on:
— characterisation of the surface structure and morphology at high spatial resolution

of ≥10 m px–1;
— characterisation of the surface topography at high spatial and vertical resolution;
— characterisation of morphological details at super-resolution of up to 2 m px–1;
— terrain classification at high spatial resolution by means of colour imaging;
— refinement of the geodetic control network and the martian cartographic base;
— characterisation of atmospheric phenomena;
— characterisation of physical properties of the surface through multi-phase angle
measurement;
— observation of Phobos and Deimos.
18
scientific instruments
Fig. 1. Nirgal Vallis floor surface ages.

Cratering counts on MOC data reveal the
near-recent aeolian activity at the floor of
Nirgal Vallis, while the formation of the valley
more than 3.8 Gy ago can be roughly
constrained based on Viking data. Note the
obvious gap in spatial resolution to be closed
by the HRSC. (counts by D. Reiss, DLR)
These will dramatically increase our knowledge about the planet with special
emphasis on:
— the geologic evolution of the martian surface;

— the evolution of volcanism and its influence on the martian environment;
— information on the past climate, its variability and the role of water through
martian history;
— the structure of the martian crust and the elastic response of the lithosphere;
— surface-atmosphere interactions (variable features, frost) and aeolian processes
and phenomena;
— analysis of atmospheric phenomena (dust devils, cloud topography, aerosol
content);
— characterisation of past, present and future landing sites and support for lander
experiments;
— support for exobiological studies.
Looking at the previous martian imagery and the expected performance of cameras
and altimeters aboard current and planned missions, HRSC’s imaging data will close
the gap between medium- to low-resolution coverage and the very high-resolution
images of the Mars Observer Camera (MOC) on Mars Global Surveyor, as well as the
in situ observations and measurements by landers. It will substantially increase the
very high-resolution image coverage. Such data will not be provided by any other
instrument on any other planned mission. The experiment will also contribute
significantly to the scientific objectives of past, current and future Mars lander
modules (e.g. Mars Pathfinder; the lander missions of 2003 with the Mars Exploration
Rovers; sample-return missions) by providing context information on the geological
setting of the landing sites. Landing site characterisation will address geological and
topographic mapping for scientific interpretation, as well as landing safety and
mobility characteristics of future sites.
Orbital imagery in the 10 m px–1 range, as obtained by the HRSC, is an essential
prerequisite to detailed surface exploration and to solving many of the open questions
such as volcanic evolution or the role of water throughout martian history. The
19
SP-1240
Fig. 2. An example of the expected data return zoom-in capability of the SRC channel for targeted observations in the metre-range
from the HRSC. During standard operations, will follow-up these questions at even greater detail.
the HRSC will provide stereo and colour The ability to study morphologic surface features in more detail by photogeology
information as shown in this example from the
airborne HRSC experiment at the Aeolian is complemented by the possibility of deriving ages even for small features like valley
island of Stromboli. Here, spatial and vertical floors, surfaces of former lakes, and debris aprons from creep or lavaflows. High-
resolutions of 40 cm were obtained (main resolution imagery enables the counting of craters much smaller than the features
image). For Mars, resolutions in the 10 m themselves and is essential for reconstructing the geologic history and sequencing of
range are expected. For comparison, a Digital events. The reconstruction of the martian cratering record requires the ability to
Terrain Map (DTM) of Arsia Mons in the
available DTM resolution of 1 km px–1, derived determine the crater-size frequency distribution at all scales. This is impossible at the
from Viking data with a resolution of moment because 10 m resolution is insufficient and there is little coverage available
170 m px–1, is shown (top left). in the metre-range (see Fig. 1). Closing this gap is a major objective for the HRSC.
The stereo and colour capabilities will both significantly enhance the interpretation
of the imaging data (Figs. 1 and 2). For instance, the accurate determination of
erosion rates, the modelling of various geologic processes such as water flow, ice-
abetted creep, and emplacement of lava flows, is presently limited by the lack of
information on local elevation differences. The colour information will be important
for terrain classification, detecting compositional layering, variations in surface
materials and their composition, and recognising different surface processes.
A key aspect in the evolution of Mars is the role of water in the different epochs.
Valley networks and outflow channels provide ample evidence of the existence of
liquid water or ice on or in the ancient surface of the planet. Small gullies discovered
in MOC images might indicate rather young or even recent erosional activity by
water. The present surface, however, is essentially water-free (with the exception of
the small residual water ice caps on the poles), and the atmosphere contains only
minor amounts of water vapour. Though some water might have escaped into space,
the question of water on the surface and where it is now is one of the great
unanswered questions in the exploration of Mars.
Permafrost and ground water are considered as the most likely candidates for large
water reservoirs in the subsurface. The past or present existence of ground ice is
indicated by various morphologic surface features, e.g. rampart craters, terrain
softening, and features from the interaction of magma and permafrost. The latitudinal
variation of the depth of permafrost has been inferred from the minimum diameter of
20
craters with fluidised ejecta flows (rampart ejecta). Future topographic and
morphologic information must be detailed enough to map the exact distribution of
ejecta and to determine precisely its volume. If a substantial amount of subsurface ice
is present, a terrain can be degraded, or ‘softened’, by gravity-induced viscous creep
of surface material. The degree of such terrain softening can be accurately determined
only if the topographic data have spatial and vertical resolutions high enough to
discriminate between undisturbed and softened ground (e.g. sharp vs. broad slope
inflections; concave vs. convex slope segments). In a similar manner, the volume of
surface features (e.g. thermokarst depressions) caused by the interaction of ground
water or ground ice with magma can be calculated only on the basis of sufficiently
precise stereo information with horizontal and vertical resolutions better than that of
the addressed features (typically of the order of tens or hundreds of metres).
A variety of mechanisms has been invoked to explain the origin of valley networks
and outflow channels, including surface water runoff, glacial processes, groundwater
sapping and mass wasting. Runoff implies a warmer, denser atmosphere, which
places important constraints on the evolution of the atmosphere as a whole. It is a
cornerstone not only for the development of Mars’ aqueous history but also for the
question of life having ever existed on Mars. A critical unknown in the development
of valleys and channels is the amount of water needed to create these features and the
maximum discharge rates. These can be computed only if reliable cross-sectional
profiles through the channels are available; the longitudinal slope of the channel floor
also needs to be known.
The existence of ancient palaeolakes and sedimentary basins in the northern
lowlands of Mars is one of the most debated topics in martian geology. If ocean-
sized bodies of water or mud ever persisted on Mars, they would have had a
substantial impact on the atmosphere and global climatic conditions. Even though a
lot of effort has been spent in trying to identify evidence for such terminal lakes, into
which the outflow channels would have spilled their load of water and sediment, the
work suffers from the lack of extended high-resolution imaging data. Lacustrine
features that would prove the existence of lakes are very subtle and only a few could
be definitely identified in high-resolution Viking Orbiter images. MOC data show
evidence for layered deposits in many impact craters, suggesting that standing
bodies of water occurred in these locations. Such features are abundant and
widespread over the entire planet. If there were lakes, their extent will be determined
only by continuous high-resolution coverage to trace faint wave-generated
shorelines surrounding them. Once a shoreline has been identified, the volume of
water in a lake can be derived from topographic information only. This will help to
decide whether lakes periodically covered as much as a quarter of the planet or were
comparable in size to the volumes discharged by individual floods. This, in turn, will
significantly improve our understanding of the martian water inventory and
palaeoclimate.
Mars has had a long and varied volcanic history. Based on Viking data, the
youngest volcanic deposits were thought to occur at Olympus Mons. Evidence from
crater counts and martian meteorites suggest that Mars could be volcanically active
even today. MOC images then revealed a number of young lava flows (as young as a
few million years) in several volcanic provinces such as Olympus Mons, Tharsis,
Elysium and Amazonis Planitia. Models of the formation of Mars indicate that, at the
end of heavy bombardment, the global heat flow was about five times the present
value and was even higher during heavy bombardment. Such high heat flows imply
high rates of volcanism early in the planet’s history, yet available morphologic
evidence for volcanic activity in this period is rather sparse because the older terrains
are highly modified and much of the earlier history is not visible in available images.
A multitude of volcanic features reflecting a variety of volcanic processes has been
found on the martian surface, which can be divided into central cones and volcanic
plains. More than 60% of the surface is covered by plains units of all types. Some are
certainly volcanic and some are undoubtedly of other origin. In many cases, however,
21
SP-1240
Fig. 3. HRSC orthoimage mosaic of Vulcano their origin is interpreted controversially. Volcanic edifices were classified into three
Island (I) with 50 m contour lines derived from different categories based on their morphologies: with shield volcanoes, domes (tholi)
HRSC stereo data. Obtained during the HRSC and composite cones, and highland paterae. Lava flow deposits are associated with
flight campaign of May 1997 at an altitude of
5000 m with a spatial resolution of 20 cm px–1 most of the volcanoes. Their morphology suggests high fluidity, which corresponds
for the nadir and 40 cm px–1 for the stereo to a mafic to ultramafic composition by terrestrial analogy. This interpretation is
lines. confirmed by the chemical analysis of the SNC meteorites. The results of Mars
Pathfinder indicate the presence of more silicic volcanic materials, which implies a
higher degree of crustal fractionation than previously thought. The different
environmental conditions on Mars, however, with lower gravity and lower
atmospheric pressure, could be responsible for a larger amount of explosive activity
than on Earth, assuming similar mafic composition and similar volatile content. High-
resolution imaging and topographic information is essential for a better understanding
of the formation processes and the evolution of volcanic features. The volcanic
history is intimately tied to the climatic history and the history of internal processes.
Volcanic activity, especially on the Tharsis bulge, could also explain the occurrence
of outflow events and the formation of thermokarst features. From Viking imagery we
know that a spatial resolution of about 10 m px–1 is sufficient to recognise single lava
flows within the complex flows found on the flanks and around the shield volcanoes.
Quantitative models to estimate the diffusion rate, yield strength and composition of
lavas are based on the length, width and volume of a single lava flow as well as on
the local topography. The recognition of explosive deposits requires the detailed
analysis of erosional features, while many small possible volcanic features like the
domes in the lowlands remain enigmatic without higher resolution imagery or have
not yet been discovered with existing data.
Wind has played a major role in shaping the martian surface and is still active. Both
erosional and depositional landforms are widespread features. The most prominent
features are dunes occurring either in large dune fields or as isolated patches. Other
aeolian features are wind streaks, yardangs, pits and grooves. It is not clear if dunes
22
Fig. 4. Example of an HRSC data product.

Vulcano Island in a perspective view based on
a Digital Elevation Model from HRSC-A stereo
and multispectral data. The resolution is 25 cm
from 6 km flight altitude.
are still active despite some hints in MOC data. High-resolution imagery and the
possibility of analysing the population and degradational state of small craters over a
large area are essential for a better understanding of dune formation and evolution.
Atmospheric studies are a prime objective for the cameras aboard the NASA Mars
Surveyor missions, which will have increased our knowledge of atmospheric
circulation and the cycles of volatiles and dust before the launch of Mars Express. A
high-resolution, multicolour and multiphase stereo instrument, however, will make a
significant contribution to our understanding of atmospheric phenomena on Mars,
especially of cloud properties, local wind regimes, dust devils, variations in aerosol
content and the vertical structure of the atmosphere.
Detailed mapping (geology, morphology, topography, composition, etc.) is the pre-
requisite for the proper characterisation and selection of areas of interest for lander
missions, mobile surface activity and sample return. An imaging instrument gathering
high-resolution, stereo and colour imagery (Figs. 3 and 4) of large parts of the martian
surface will provide the required database. One of the surprising results from MOC/
MGS was the discovery that the martian surface appears completely different in
images with different spatial resolution. Surfaces that seem smooth at typical Viking
scales (60-100 m px–1) show a rough morphology at the very high resolution of MOC
(few m px–1) and vice-versa. MOC, however, is observing only a small fraction of the
martian surface and much more image data at similar resolution are needed.
Finally, Mars Express will encounter Phobos several times during the nominal
mission, when the node of its orbit on the equatorial plane is at the Phobos distance
from Mars. There will be periods of about a week when close flybys will occur
naturally, with little impact on mission operations. At these times, the HRSC Co-I
Team is interested in imaging Phobos at high- and very high-resolution, as well as in
colour and stereo. These images will be of higher resolution than the Viking images
and will provide an excellent opportunity for detailed geological, compositional,
regolith and orbital studies.
23
SP-1240
HRSC Stereo Colour Scanner
Digital Unit
HRSC-SRC
Fig. 5. HRSC Flight Model.
3. The Camera The HRSC instrument (Fig. 5; Table 1) consists of the camera unit containing the
HRSC stereo colour scanner and the Super-Resolution Channel (SRC), and of the
digital unit. The unique capability of the HRSC stereo colour scanner is to obtain
quasi-simultaneously high-resolution images in three-line stereo, in four colours and
at five phase angles. The combination with the SRC makes it a five-in-one camera:
— the along-track acquisition of stereo imagery avoids changes in atmospheric and

illumination conditions which so far have caused severe problems in the
photogrammetric evaluation of stereo images acquired at well-separated times;
— the triple stereo images permit robust stereo reconstruction, yielding Digital
Terrain Models (DTMs) at a vertical resolution similar to the high pixel
resolution of the nadir sensor, with 10 m px–1 at 250 km altitude (periapsis);
— the colour images (Fig. 6) enable terrain classification and provide information
on compositional variations and surface weathering as a complement to the more
specific (but with lower spatial resolution) mineralogical information obtained by
the imaging spectrometer of Mars Express;
— the multiphase imagery will address the physical properties of the martian soil
(roughness, grain size, porosity) via photogrammetric data evaluation by
providing a second stereo angle triplet (in essence quintuple stereo);
— the super-resolution imagery, nested in the broader swath of the scanner with a
spatial resolution of 2.3 m px–1 at periapsis, will serve as the magnifying lens to
analyse surface morphology at even greater detail.
The HRSC stereo colour scanner is a multi-sensor pushbroom instrument, with

nine CCD line sensors mounted in parallel delivering nine superimposed image
swaths. Originally, it was developed as the HRSC instrument for the Russian Mars-96
mission. Two fully tested and calibrated Flight Models were prepared, and only minor
modifications to the remaining version were required to satisfy the Mars Express
interface requirements.
The stereo colour scanner comprises a baffle, optics, optical bench, spectral filters,
24
Table 1. HRSC characteristics and performance.
HRSC stereo colour scanner SRC
Mechanical and Electrical Parameters

Camera Unit envelope 515 x 300 x 260 mm (height x width x length)
Digital Unit envelope 222 x 282 x 212 mm (height x width x length)
Mass 19.6 kg
Power consumptiona 45.7 W during imaging 3.0 W during imaging
Radiation shielding 10 krad
Electro-optical Performance
Optics, focal length Apo-Tessar, 175 mm Maksutov-Cassegrain, 975 mm
F number 5.6 9.2
Stereo angles –18.9°, 0°, +18.9° in-track FOV 0.543°
Cross-track field of view 11.9° 0.543°
Number of CCD lines 9: on 3 plates with 3 lines each 1 area array sensor
Detector type THX 7808B KODAK KAI 1001
Sensor pixel size 7 x 7 µm 9 x 9 µm
Pixel size on ground 10 x 10 m at 250 km altitude 2.3 x 2.3 m at 250 km altitude
Field of view per pixel 8.25 arcsec 2 arcsec
Active pixels per sensor 9 sensors at 5184 pixels 1024 x 1032
Image size on groundb 52.2 km x [# of lines] at 250 km 2.3 x 2.35 km at 250 km
Radiometric resolution 8-bit entering compression 14-bit or 8-bit selectable
Sensor full well capacity 420 000 e¯ 48 000 e¯
Gain attenuation range 10.5 dB to 62 dB in 3 dB steps –
Spectral filtersc 5 panchromatic and 4 colour –
Pixel MTF at 50 lp/mm at nadir: 0.40; at 20°off nadir: 0.33
SNR for panchromatic linesd >>100 (without pixel binning) >>70
SNR for colour lines >80, blue >40 for 2x2 macro pixels
Digital Features
On-line compression yes, DCT: table-controlled JPEG
Mean output data rate peak rate 25 Mbit s–1 after compression
Operations
Pixel exposure time 2.24 ms to 54.5 ms 0.5 ms to 8 s
Pixel binning formats 1 x 1, 2 x 2, 4 x 4, 8 x 8 –
Compression rates 2...20, nominal: 6...10, bypass possible
Typical data volume ≈1 Gbit/day (compressed data)
Duty cycle every orbit; several times/orbit
Internal data buffer no 8 x 8 bit or 4 x 14 bit images
Typical operations duration 3 – 40 min
Expected coverage ≥50% at about 15 m px–1 ≥1% at about 2.5 m px–1
Operational lifetime > 4 years
Notes
a: including 12 W maximum heating power. b: image size is defined by the swath width times the number of acquired image lines, and depends on available
downlink capacity. c: nadir, outer stereo (2), photometric (2) 675±90 nm; blue 440±45 nm; green 530±45 nm; red 750±20 nm; near-IR 970±45 nm.
d: worst-case scenario (30° solar elevation angle and dark Mars region)
25
SP-1240
Fig. 6. The HRSC colour filter spectral

characteristics.
CCD sensors lines, sensor electronics and thermal control system. The technical
design is defined by:
— single-optics design;
— CCD line arrays with 5272 pixels each;
— nine detectors for simultaneous stereo and colour imaging, and for multi-phase
angle measurements;
— CCDs and sensor electronics implemented in high-reliability hybrid, low-noise
and low-power technology;
— implementation of the CCD-control unit in ASICs.
The SRC is a framing device and uses an interline CCD detector to cope with the
very short exposure and read-out times. It is based on an instrument development for
the Rosetta Lander and the design is characterised by:
— CCD area array interline detector with 1024 x 1032 pixels;

— highly miniaturised and low-power detector and control electronics;
— compact 3D multi-chip module technology using thin-film multilayer
metallisation, dycostrate, plasma-etching and chip-on-wire technology;
— selectable dynamic range of 8- and 14-bit per pixel;
— internal data buffer to store eight 8-bit (or four 14-bit) images;
— lightweight Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope with a focal length of 975 mm.
The HRSC scanner and the SRC are boresighted and mounted in a common
instrument structure. The common Digital Unit contains a power converter, spacecraft
interface, processor for instrument control, data compression unit and heater control
unit. It is based on the Digital Unit developed for the Mars-96 mission. Modifications
include a lighter housing box, a new camera control processor based on the Mars-96
telemetry controller unit, and new spacecraft interfaces derived from existing parts.
The HRSC is operated in individual imaging sequences. A typical sequence
consists of nine HRSC stereo colour scanner images covering the same area on the
ground. Image data will be taken during every orbit that offers sufficient illumination
conditions for 4-30 min. Data will be compressed on-line by JPEG-based
compression hardware with an average (selectable) compression factor of 6-10 and
with throughput rates of up to 450 lines s–1 in four parallel signal chains (each serving
26
Fig. 7. Above left: SRC optics (Maksutov

Cassegrain, focal length 975 mm, optics length
210 mm). Above right: the SRC electronics and
detector section.
Fig. 8. HRSC scanner and SRC footprints.
Fig. 9. HRSC and SRC pixel resolution for the

nominal Mars Express orbit with 258 km
periapsis altitude.
27
SP-1240
Fig. 10. The Mars Express orbit, with HRSC’s

field of view near periapsis.
a part of the nine CCD lines). Bypassing the compression is possible. Data
compression techniques have been used successfully on previous planetary missions
(e.g. on the US Clementine mission to the Moon based on hardware similar to the
HRSC chip-set) and for current Earth remote-sensing and deep-space missions. Up to
date, a specific implementation of the JPEG algorithm, namely the Discrete Cosine
Transform (DCT) compression, has been applied in most of the cases. Before its
implementation in the HRSC, the DCT algorithm was thoroughly tested. No
appreciable loss of ‘science’ arising from this particular method could be detected
within the expected compression rates.
The SRC (Fig. 7) is used for targeted observations. It will operate mostly in
parallel with the scanner to generate nested super-resolution images in order to avoid
any location problems and to obtain the contextual information and the precise
position (Figs. 8 and 9).
SRC imaging will be carried out in one of two modes. In the ‘internal’ mode, up to
eight 8-bit images or four 14-bit images can be acquired during one session. The
images are stored in an SRC internal buffer and transferred to the spacecraft memory
via the digital unit after compression. There are no restrictions on scanner operations
for this mode. In the ‘connected’ mode, one of the four HRSC signal chains is devoted
to SRC. This means that, in addition to spot and raster images, contiguous image
strips can be formed. However, this requires a reduction in resolution or in the number
of operated lines of the scanner.
The operational profile foresees imaging preferably near periapsis and at solar
elevation angles of 15-90°. With the Mars Express reference orbit, this will be
possible during the first 3 months (January to March 2004) of the mapping phase and
after one year with the periapsis in the dark again starting in March 2005. However,
high-altitude imaging is also envisaged and solar elevation angles down to a few
degrees will be used for specific tasks. The high flexibility in instrument operations
(e.g. pixel summation, compression ratio, windowing, integration time) allows
optimisation of data acquisition with respect to the scientific goals, the available
spacecraft resources and orbital constraints. Multiple imaging sequences during one
orbit revolution are being considered for optimum coverage strategies.
28
Neukem.qxd 7/7/04 12:00 PM Page 29
Fig. 11. The HRSC operating principle and

viewing geometry of the individual CCD
sensors.
The highest image quality is attained by providing accurate spacecraft attitude and
orbital data. Combined with geometrical calibration data, they allow the derivation of
digital terrain models. Radiometric precision is maintained by thorough on-ground
calibration and by periodic in-flight verification over near-uniform targets such as
dust storms.
The achievable surface coverage is not restricted by the HRSC instrument but has
to be traded-off between available telemetry rates, telemetry sharing and orbit
characteristics (Fig. 10). During the nominal mission lifetime of 2 Earth years and
within the given mission constraints, at least 50% of the surface will be covered at a
spatial resolution of ≤ 15 m px–1 and about 1% at a spatial resolution of 2.5 m px–1.
The camera is designed to sustain an operational lifetime of more than 4 Earth years
in orbit, consistent with the envisaged mission extension of another martian year.
The martian surface is ‘scanned’ by the nine CCD lines of the stereo colour scanner
at frequencies of up to 450 Hz (Fig. 11). Single spot observations by the SRC are
gathered at specific times from periapsis while continuous observations are
performed at a constant frequency. After internal signal processing and on-line data
compression, HRSC data are transferred to the spacecraft mass memory at output
rates of up to 25 Mbit s–1.
Instrument operations control (housekeeping and command echo monitoring, data
consistency checks) is performed by the DLR Institute of Planetary Research in
concurrence with the PI and his project group at FU Berlin.
During the cruise phase, the camera will be operated only for internal health checks
(i.e. no imaging will be provided, with the exception of looking back at the Earth-
Moon system for a ‘farewell’ picture). During the approach to Mars, HRSC-SRC
images of Mars will be obtained for the first time.
For nominal imaging, camera operations focus on the configuration of the camera
channels (CCD lines, signal electronics, use of the SRC) and of the on-line data
compression. Various imaging strategies will be realised by setting different
resolutions for each of the nine CCD lines via pixel summation formats. Pixel
summation (or ‘macropixel’) formats of 1x1, 2x2, 4x4, 8x8 (first factor: in-flight
direction pixel summation, realised by exposure time variations; second factor:
across-flight direction pixel summation, digitally realised by pixel summation/
averaging in the Digital Unit) are possible independently for each line. Thus, under
certain restrictions it is possible to read out all nine CCD lines by three signal chains
29
SP-1240
and to devote the remaining one to the read-out of SRC data. The number of possible
configurations has been grouped into 64 basic camera macro formats. The macro
format is selected by commands and remains constant during one imaging sequence.
A number of internal parameters (e.g. sensor integration time for taking into account
imaging altitudes, sensor on/off delays for covering the same area on the ground, as
well as window size and compression parameters for reducing the data rate, timing
for SRC observations) are set depending on the selected imaging strategy. All of them
are constant during one imaging sequence (except the sensor integration time, which
is automatically adopted according to the orbit profile) but may be changed via
commands for subsequent sessions.
4. Relation to Other Mars The HRSC is a standalone instrument – it does not require operational interactions
Express Instruments with other instruments. There are no restrictions regarding simultaneous operations
with other instruments except probably the electric ambient field of MARSIS.
The surface- and atmosphere-oriented instruments of Mars Express are highly
complementary. DTMs and images derived from the HRSC will allow registration
and map projection with the results of the OMEGA IR mapping spectrometer and the
MARSIS subsurface radar to a common reference surface. The combined evaluation
of HRSC images and topographic data with the gravity measurements obtained by the
MaRS radio science experiment will allow an improved investigation of the martian
crust. The HRSC will also produce improved spacecraft orbit and attitude information
from high-precision stereo models, which will be shared with the Mars Express
project and the other instruments for their data reduction.
While OMEGA will provide surface mineralogy at about 100 m resolution,
HRSC’s colour capability will detect compositional variations in the OMEGA
subpixel range, leading to a better understanding of terrain boundaries and spectral
mixing characteristics. The topographic information derived from MARSIS can be
used to verify or calibrate the HRSC terrain models and vice-versa.
5. Relation to Other In order to better understand and validate the achievements and scientific return
Missions expected from the HRSC, the instrument has to be placed in a broader context of former,
current and planned missions. Almost every planetary mission carries an imaging
system for observing planetary surfaces and atmospheres (Fig. 12). In addition, Mars
Global Surveyor is carrying a laser altimeter (MOLA) around Mars for the first time.
What will HRSC achieve in comparison with other Mars missions?
The Viking missions provided near-global (95%) coverage at 200 m px–1 and 28%
coverage at ≤ 100 m px–1, but only 0.3% was observed at ≤ 20 m px–1. The Mars
Observer Camera (MOC, initially developed for the failed Mars Observer mission,
now on Mars Global Surveyor) provides global coverage with its wide-angle camera
at a spatial resolution of 225 m px–1. The MOC narrow-angle camera yields a spatial
resolution of up to 1.4 m px–1, but only for a small amount of the martian surface even
after the extension of the MGS mission. The spatial resolution of the SRC is
comparable to MOC and it will be possible to increase the 2 m-resolution coverage
significantly, which is especially important for future lander missions.
Mars Climate Orbiter (MCO) aimed at covering about 80% of the surface at
40 m px–1, but its loss resulted in a major gap in martian imagery. HRSC can fill that
gap. Mars Odyssey arrived in orbit in October 2001 and provides a spatial resolution
of 20 m px–1. However, the number of images that can be transferred to Earth is
severely limited and no more than about 7% of the surface will be covered. The Mars
Surveyors carry single-line sensors that lack intrinsic geometrical control. Only Mars
Express and HRSC data will close the gap in the high-resolution reconnaissance
imagery and provide the link between MOC’s small images at very high-resolution
and the medium- to low-resolution data of former missions.
Moreover, the HRSC is the only dedicated stereo camera planned for flight. Some
30
Fig. 12. Best spatial resolution and surface

coverage for past, present and planned Mars
missions.
high-resolution stereo imagery has been obtained but only by multiple coverage at
different times and for a very small part of the surface. From Viking data, a global DTM
with 1 km resolution was obtained; better resolution was achieved only locally. MGS
has provided stereoscopic coverage with its wide-angle camera at 225 m px–1. Mars
Odyssey is focusing on colour imagery and has no dedicated plans for stereo coverage.
A second source for topographic information is the MOLA laser altimeter on MGS.
It has produced global topographic coverage with a spatial resolution of about 300 x
1000 m at the equator, and better near the poles. The HRSC with a (nominal) resolution
of 10 m is a significant improvement. Furthermore, the individual laser return points
(though these cannot be seen in images) can be entered as control information in the
HRSC image adjustment procedures to calibrate for absolute heights. The MOLA
altimeter and the HRSC stereo information are thus highly complementary.
The Viking cameras were sensitive only in the visible wavelength range. Near-
global coverage with 2-3 colours was achieved at 900 m px–1 and only a small amount
of the surface at 100 m px–1 (~1%). The MGS/MOC instrument has only a 2-colour
capability for the wide-angle camera, while the narrow-angle camera has no colours
at all. The THEMIS camera of Mars Odyssey has five colours, with a maximum
resolution of 20 m px–1. With the ability to transfer 15 000 images in total, no more
than about 7% of the surface can be covered. The HRSC colour capability will
drastically improve the multispectral coverage of the martian surface. Owing to its
higher spatial resolution (ratio ~1:5), it will support the spectrometer data obtained by
Mars Express and Mars Odyssey.
Furthermore, the HRSC is the only instrument with the ability to obtain near-
simultaneous images with multiple phase angles of the surface. Similar information
by other cameras/missions has and will be obtained only by multiple coverage with
large time differences, producing severe problems in photometric modelling arising
from variations of atmospheric conditions, variable surface features etc. The unique
multi-angle capability of the HRSC will also support its stereo capability by providing
not only a stereo triplet but also a stereo quintuplet.
In conclusion, the orbital reconnaissance of the martian surface is not met by any
other instrument or set of instruments. The HRSC is a unique instrument in the inter-
national Mars exploration effort and will close the existing gaps and provide the
required imaging and cartographic products for future missions.
31
SP-1240
Fig. 13. This test image, looking across Lake Constance in March 1995, illustrates Fig. 14. HRSC test image of Mount Etna lava flows from
HRSC’s resolution. The cable car rope (diameter 10-15 cm) is imaged from a distance of a flight altitude of 10 km. Resolution is 40 cm px–1.
40 km. The pixel resolution at this range is 1.6 m.
6. The Test Campaign The HRSC instrument and its ground data system were extensively tested in March
1995 at Lake Constance (Fig. 13), as well as during airborne experiments near Mount
Etna (Fig. 14), Stromboli and Vulcano, Sicily, in May 1997. The tests included the
HRSC Flight Model and demonstrated the resolving power and the radiometric
quality of the instrument, as well as the reliability of the fully operational software.
The airborne campaign verified the entire system in an end-to-end test, including the
ground data system. The HRSC Qualification Model was mounted on a stabilising
platform and the volcanoes were covered from a flight altitude of 10 km with a spatial
resolution of 40 cm px–1, in triple stereo, in colour and at multiple phase angles. These
targets were selected specifically for their relevance to comparative planetology.
Comparative analysis of volcanic morphologies will shed important light on the
origin and mechanisms of volcanic activity on both planets. Images from Etna
(Fig. 14) were analysed for their potential to recognise and map surface features
typically associated with volcanoes, such as lava flows.
The dataset of the Stromboli airborne test is available in Planetary Data System
(PDS) standard format on CD-ROM along with stereo processing software and
calibration data.
A further result of this test and other multiple airborne flight campaigns with the
Qualification Model was the demonstration of the robustness of the camera system
under severe environmental conditions. During these tests, the camera produced
excellent imagery which allowed the qualitative and quantitative validation of the
camera performance parameters. Since 1997, the HRSC airborne camera has been
widely used for Earth remote-sensing applications.
Additional tests have been conducted in order to identify ageing and degradation
effects; none has been found. For Mars Express, the HRSC instrument underwent
comprehensive and full-scale tests before integration on the spacecraft.
32
Fig. 15. The HRSC project team structure. Fig. 16. The Science Team structure.
Mars Express scientific data will be transmitted to Earth daily. After receipt in Perth, 7. The Data Processing
Australia (or at station of the NASA Deep Space Network) and primary decoding and Tasks
formatting, the image data will be processed at the DLR Institute of Planetary
Research, Berlin (D) to a certain level.
The data reduction will be performed in consecutive steps consisting of systematic
and scientific data processing. For Mars-96, a fully operational software package for
scanning instruments was developed. A modified version of this software that takes
into account framing camera characteristics (SRC) has been applied and tested for
analysis of Viking Orbiter, Clementine and Galileo images. Only minor modifications
to Mars Express-specific needs are necessary.
The results of the systematic data processing step are radiometrically and
geometrically calibrated and map-projected images. These data will be transferred to
the database of the PI at FU Berlin. After validation by the PI, they will be released
electronically to the Science Team at the individual home institutes of the Co-Is. They
will be distributed to the Science Team members and the science community. The
scientific data processing by the Science Team involves chiefly the photogrammetric
and cartographic processing and colour image production, and will result in higher
level products, including DTMs, orthoimages, image mosaics, cartographic products
(e.g. image maps, topographic maps, thematic maps) and a refined geodetic control
network.
After the processing phase, the data will be released as individual images in
electronic version or through hardcopy, as offset-printed maps and CD-ROM archives
in PDS formats for further use by the general planetary science community and the
public. The stereo images are expected to have a great potential for public relations
activities.
The processing software was tested and refined as an additional result of the HRSC
airborne campaigns. Data handling and data management were also exercised. The
amount of data processed for airborne projects since 1999 exceeds the expected Mars
data volume by a factor of 10-100.
The HRSC experiment organisation is divided into three functional teams (Science 8. The Team
Team, Instrument Team, Operations Team) under the direction and responsibility of
the PI, supported by his project team at FU Berlin (Fig. 15; Table 2). The Science
Team (Fig. 16) is subdivided into working groups by discipline to meet the
33
SP-1240
Table 2. HRSC Co-Investigators.
J. Albertz1, G. Bellucci6, J.-P. Bibring32, M. Buchroithner3; E. Dorrer4, H. Ebner5, E. Hauber2, C. Heipke7, H. Hoffmann2, W.-H. Ip8, R. Jaumann2,
H.-U. Keller8, P. Kronberg19, W. Markiewicz8, H. Mayer4; F.M. Neubauer10, J. Oberst2, M. Pätzold10, R. Pischel2, G. Schwarz11, T. Spohn12,
B.H. Foing13, K. Kraus14, K. Lumme15, P. Masson16, J.-P. Muller17, J.B. Murray18, G. Gabriele Ori19, P. Pinet20, J. Raitala21, A.T. Basilevsky22,
B.A. Ivanov23, R. Kuzmin22, M.H. Carr24, T.C. Duxbury25, R. Greeley26, J.W. Head27, R. Kirk28, T.B. McCord29, S.W. Squyres30, A. Inada31
1. TU Berlin, Photogrammetry and Cartography, EB 9, Straße des 17. Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
2. DLR Berlin, Institute of Planetary Research, Rutherfordstrasse 2, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
3. TU Dresden, Institute of Cartography, Helmholtzstr. 10, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
4. Universität der Bundeswehr, Institut für Photogrammetrie und Kartographie, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, D-85577 München, Germany
5. TU München, Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung, Arcisstr. 21, D-80290 München, Germany
6. Istituto di Fisica Spazio Interplanetario (INAF), I-00133 Rome, Italy
7. Universität Hannover, Institut fuer Photogrammetrie und Ingenieurvermessungen (IPI), Nienburger Str. 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
8. Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, Postfach 20, D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
9. TU Clausthal, Leibnizstr. 16, D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany
10. Universität Köln, Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, A.-Magnus-Platz, D-50923 Köln, Germany
11. DLR Oberpfaffenhofen, Institute of Remote Sensing Methods, D-82234 Wessling, Germany
12. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Institut für Planetologie, Wilhelm-Klemm-Str. 10, D-48149 Münster, Germany
13. ESA Research & Scientific Support Department, ESTEC, P.O. Box 299, NL-2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands
14. TU Wien, Institut für Photogrammetrie und Fernerkundung, Gußhausstraße 27-29, A-1040 Wien, Austria
15. University of Helsinki, Observatory and Astrophysics Lab., PO Box 14, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
16. Lab. de Géologie Dynamique de la Terre et des Planétes (ERS CNRS 0388), Univ. Paris-Sud (bât. 509), F-91405 Orsay Cedex, France
17. Department of Geomatic Engineering, University College London, Gower St., London WC1E 6BT, UK
18. Department of Earth Sciences, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire MK7 6AA, UK
19. Dipartimento di Scienze, Universita’ d’Annunzio, Viale Pindaro 42, I-65127 Pescara, Italy
20. GRGS, Observatoire de Midi-Pyrénéés, 14 Avenue Edouard Belin, F-31400 Toulouse, France
21. Astronomy Space Institute, University of Oulu, FIN-90401 Oulu, Finland
22. Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Kosygin Street 19, Moscow 117975, Russia
23. Institute of Dynamics of Geospheres, Russian Academy of Science, Leninskij Prospect 38, Moscow 117979, Russia
24. US Geological Survey, Branch of Astrogeology, 345 Middlefield Rd., Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA
25. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 301-429, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
26. Department of Geology, Arizona State University, Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404, USA
27. Department of Geological Science, Brown University, Box 1846, Providence, RI 02912, USA
28. Astrogeology Team, US Geological Survey, 2255 N. Gemini Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
29. Planetary Science Division/SOEST, University of Hawaii, 2525 Correa Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
30. Center for Radiophysics and Space Research, Space Sciences Building, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-6801, USA
31. Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodai Nada, 657-8501, Kobe, Japan
32. Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, CNRS, F-91405 Orsay, France
Table 3. HRSC Experiment Team.
FU Berlin: T. Denk, O. Fabel, S. van Gasselt, C. Georgi, S. Huber, G. Mygiakis,

G. Neukum (PI), S. Preuschmann, B. Schreiner, S, Werner, W. Zuschneid;
DLR: T.Behnke, U. Carsenty, K. Eichentopf, J. Flohrer, B. Giese, K. Gwinner, E. Hauber,

H. Hirsch, H. Hoffmann, A. Hoffmeister, R. Jaumann, D. Jobs, U. Köhler, K.-D. Matz,
V. Mertens, J. Oberst, S. Pieth, R. Pischel, C. Reck, E. Ress**, D. Reifl, T. Roatsch,
F. Scholten, G. Schwarz, I. Sebastian*, S. Sujew*, W. Tost, M. Tschentscher, M. Wählisch,
I. Walter, M. Weiss, S. Weifle, M. Weiland, K. Wesemann;
Subcontractors: A. Zaglauer, U. Schönfeldt, K. Eckhardt, J. Krieger, D, Tennef, S. Govaers,

A. Kasemann, M. Langfeld (DLR/Anagramm), E. Rickus (Levicki microelectronic),
J. Schöneich (Jena-Optronik)
*left project, **retired
34
experiment objectives (Geosciences, Photogrammetry/Cartography, Spectrophoto-

metry, and Atmosphere). The Instrument and Operations Teams, led by the
Experiment Manager, include engineers and scientists from the DLR Institute of
Planetary Research. The industrial contractor is Astrium (D), who built, assembled,
tested and verified the HRSC for Mars-96.
The DLR Institute of Planetary Research provides a competent Instrument Team
that was especially trained for a similar task in the Mars-96 HRSC experiment,
covering the development of the sensor electronics, compression, electrical and
optical ground support equipment, mission planning, instrument operations, target
acquisition, calibration, data processing and data management. The DLR Institute is
in charge of the assembly, verification and testing, for the system integration
qualification, testing and calibration, and of the camera system integration with the
spacecraft. Astrium (D) was responsible for the development of the Digital Unit and
the integration and testing of the instrument subunits.
The PI and Co-Is are responsible for the scientific outcome of the experiment, and
the Co-Is have individual responsibilities in areas such as calibration support, data
processing, assessment of imaging scenarios, and photogrammetric data processing.
All public relations efforts are a primary responsibility of the PI, who also has the
primary data rights. The PI will actively support ESA in PR matters.
The Instrument Team includes engineers and scientists from the DLR Institute of
Planetary Research and industry (all of whom have built and flown space instruments)
and was recruited from the former HRSC Mars-96 Team. Similarly, the Operations
Team from the DLR Institute of Planetary Research has extensive experience in
running planetary missions and processing, archiving and the delivery of data
products; it originally developed the HRSC ground data system on Mars-96.
35
Bibring.qxd 7/7/04 12:06 PM Page 37
OMEGA: Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l’Eau, les Glaces et

l’Activité
J-P. Bibring1, A. Soufflot1, M. Berthé1, Y. Langevin1, B. Gondet1, P. Drossart2, M. Bouyé2, M. Combes2,

P. Puget2, A. Semery2, G. Bellucci3, V. Formisano3, V. Moroz4, V. Kottsov4 and the OMEGA Co-I team:
G. Bonello1, S. Erard1, O. Forni1, A. Gendrin1, N. Manaud1, F. Poulet1, G. Poulleau1, T. Encrenaz2, T. Fouchet2,
R. Melchiori2, F. Altieri3, N. Ignatiev4, D. Titov4, L. Zasova4, A. Coradini5, F. Capacionni5, P. Cerroni5,
S. Fonti6, N. Mangold7, P. Pinet8, B. Schmitt19, C. Sotin10, E. Hauber11, H. Hoffmann11, R. Jaumann11,
U. Keller12, R. Arvidson13, J. Mustard14 & F. Forget15
1
Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale (IAS), Bâtiment 121, F-91405 Orsay Campus, France
Email: jean-pierre.bibring@ias.u-psud.fr
2
Laboratoire d’Etudes Spatiales et d’Instrumentation en Astrophysique (LESIA), Observatoire de
Paris/Meudon, F-92195 Meudon, France
3
Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario (IFSI-INAF), I-00133 Rome, Italy
4
Institute for Space Research (IKI), 117810 Moscow, Russia
5
Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale (IASF-INAF), I-00133 Rome, Italy
6
Department of Physics, University of Lecce, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
7
Orsay Terre, F-91405 Orsay Campus, France
8
Observatoire de Midi-Pyrénées, F-31000 Toulouse, France
9
Laboratoire de Planétologie de Grenoble, F-38400 Grenoble, France
10
Laboratoire de Planétologie et de Géodynamique, Université, F-44322 Nantes, France
11
DLR Institute of Planetary Research, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
12
Max-Planck-Institute für Aeronomie, D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
13
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Washington Univ., St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
14
Department of Geological Sciences, Box 1846, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
15
Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique (LMD), IPSL, Université Paris 6, F-75252 Paris, France
The OMEGA visible and near-IR mapping spectrometer will reveal the mineral-
ogical and molecular composition of the surface and atmosphere of Mars
through the spectral analysis of the diffused solar light and surface thermal
emission. It will provide global coverage at medium resolution (2-5 km) for
altitudes from 1500 km to 4000 km, and high-resolution (< 350 m) spectral
images of selected areas.
OMEGA (Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l’Eau, les Glaces et l’Activité) is a 1. Introduction

visible and near-IR mapping spectrometer, operating in the spectral range 0.38-
5.1 µm. Combining imaging and spectrometry, it will study the mineralogical and
molecular composition of the surface and atmosphere of Mars through the spectral
analysis of the diffused solar light and surface thermal emission. OMEGA will
provide global coverage at medium-resolution (2-5 km) for altitudes from 1500 km to
4000 km, and high-resolution (< 350 m) spectral images of selected areas, amounting
to a few percent of the surface, when observed from near-periapsis (< 300 km
altitude). OMEGA will:
37
SP-1240
Fig. 1. The Flight Model of OMEGA. — characterise the composition of surface materials, identifying the composition
and the spatial and temporal distributions of the various classes of silicates,
hydrated minerals, oxides and carbonates in soils and rocks, and of ices and
frosts;
— study the spatial and temporal distributions of atmospheric CO2, CO, H2O and
aerosols.
OMEGA will therefore address major questions concerning internal structure,

geological and chemical evolution, past activity and present surface variegation. It
will greatly contribute to understanding the evolution of Mars, ranging from
geological timescales to seasonal variations. In particular, it will provide unique clues
for understanding the H2O and CO2 cycles over martian history. It will play a major
role in identifying areas of interest for future in situ exploration.
OMEGA was developed for the Russian Mars-96 mission. A spare unit was fully
integrated and calibrated for that mission, and served as the basis for the Mars Express
flight unit (Fig. 1). The major change was the complete redesign of the Main
Electronics. OMEGA is managed as it was for Mars-96, between France, Italy and
Russia, involving the following Institutions: IAS (Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale,
Orsay, France), LESIA (Laboratoire d’Etudes Spatiales et d’Instrumentation en
Astrophysique, Observatoire de Paris/Meudon, France), IFSI (Istituto di Fisica dello
Spazio Interplanetario, Rome, Italy) and IKI (Institute for Space Research, Moscow,
Russia). The Principal Investigator and the Experiment Manager are both from IAS.
2. Scientific Objectives The highly inclined (86°) and eccentric (0.6) orbit of Mars Express offers variable
ground-track spatial sampling and latitude drift of the periapsis to produce near-global
coverage. Consequently, OMEGA will achieve global coverage at medium resolution
from medium altitudes, and will acquire high-resolution spectral images, for a
fraction of the surface, with full selection flexibility, when operating close to
periapsis. With its instantaneous field of view (IFOV) of 4.1 arcmin (1.2 mrad),
global coverage should be attained in one martian year, at 2-5 km resolution, from
altitudes of 1500-4000 km, while the highest resolution at periapsis should reach a
few hundred metres.
2.1 Mineralogy
OMEGA will map the surface in order to identify the minerals of the major geological
units. The goal is to study the evolution of Mars caused by internal activity, meteoritic
impacts and interaction with the atmosphere.
38
Viking Orbiter and Mars Global Surveyor images indicate strong albedo variations
down to subkilometre scales. Spectral images from the ISM mapping spectrometer on
the Phobos mission in the near-IR also show large compositional variations at
kilometre scales. Although large amounts of transported soil with uniform properties
cover parts of the surface, all geological units exhibit part of their uncovered bedrock
at these scales. OMEGA should therefore reveal the diversity of the global surface,
inferring compositional variations directly related to planetary evolution.
In addition, OMEGA’s high-resolution observations close to periapsis will:
— increase the sensitivity for detecting constituents with restricted geographical

extension. For example, the continuing failure to detect carbonates might be
directly linked to limited instrumental resolution. High-resolution snapshots of
areas more likely to have accumulated sedimentary carbonates might lead to a
positive detection of fundamental value;
— map mineralogical boundaries between geological units, in particular recent
plains and older regions with a high density of impact craters, thus helping to
understand Mars’ hemispherical asymmetry;
— identify the composition of deposits and reveal possible gradients in the hydration
minerals near features associated with fossil water flows;
— monitor features associated with wind transportation.
As for the spectral range and spectral sampling, OMEGA will operate within 0.38-
5.1 µm using 352 contiguous spectral elements (spectels), 7-20 nm wide. It will
identify, through their diagnostic spectral features, the major classes of silicates and
other important minerals (such as carbonates), oxides and hydrates. Moreover,
OMEGA is capable of measuring the content of OH radicals within the surface soil
and rocks, so as to identify possible genetic relationships of hydrated minerals with
major structural units such as volcanoes or canyons. In addition, fluidised ejecta
around impact craters is likely to indicate that the underlying bedrock contains ice
mixed with rocks. It is then plausible that ejecta experienced hydration. The spectral
features of hydrated minerals (clays) are readily observable in the near-IR.
Alteration processes transformed martian mafic rocks into ferric-bearing minerals.
In order to understand when this process took place (via volcanic activity, interaction
with the atmosphere or flooding water), it is essential to relate these minerals with
geological structures. OMEGA will detect these altered minerals through their
signatures at 0.5-0.8 µm.
It is plausible that the martian CO2 reservoir is dominated by carbonates. The
detection and localisation of these minerals would be of key importance for under-
standing the past activity of the planet. OMEGA should unambiguously detect them,
even at very low concentrations, through their absorption features at 3.4-4.0 µm.
2.2 Polar caps and frosts

OMEGA will determine the spatial evolution of the two polar caps, by observing CO2
and H2O, and the layered deposits. It will enable discrimination between the
permanent (residual) ice, at both poles, and the seasonal frosts. It will thus monitor
the cycle of sublimation/condensation, and identify the relative contributions of the
two major atmospheric constituents as a function of time and location. OMEGA will
also identify dust within the polar ices; its composition indicates its origin and thus
reveals the transportation processes.
At lower latitudes, the condensation of frost will be mapped over time, for both
CO2 and H2O. In addition, OMEGA is capable of detecting minor species containing
carbon or nitrogen; no such molecules have yet been observed, and their discovery
would be of major interest for understanding the overall chemical evolution.
If there are permafrost layers, they may appear at the surface in a few regions.
OMEGA would detect such icy-rich rocky sites. By identifying the borders of these
underlying permafrost layers, the global distribution of ice within the crust can be
evaluated, complementing the subsurface sounding by the MARSIS radar instrument
39
SP-1240
of Mars Express. Identification of the sites and phases where most of the water resides
is a major goal, in particular when searching for the most favorable sites for possible
past organic activity, and assessing water resources for future exploration.
2.3 Atmospheric evolutionary processes

OMEGA is well-suited for monitoring some of the atmospheric parameters with key
roles in martian meteorology: total pressure, column densities of the H2O and CO
minor constituents, content of aerosols, and, in some cases, vertical temperature
distribution. It complements the PFS and SPICAM investigations, with lower spectral
sampling but at much higher spatial resolution. The ISM/Phobos imaging spectro-
meter, which mapped part of the martian surface in February-March 1989,
demonstrated the ability of IR spectroscopy, even at low spatial sampling (21 km), to
retrieve the altimetry of Mars (100 m vertical resolution) accurately. The observations
of CO2 absorption bands with OMEGA will provide, as did ISM/Phobos, a measure-
ment of the ground pressure. As the altimetry of Mars is now of higher quality, thanks
to continuing MOLA/Mars Global Surveyor measurements, OMEGA will study local
pressure variations, as induced by baroclinic wave pattern at mid-latitudes, by passing
over the same regions at different times. The expected variations of a few percent in
atmospheric pressure will be measured easily by OMEGA (the design goal is 1% in
accuracy), in the absence of global dust storms.
OMEGA will monitor the CO and H2O partial pressure for each resolved pixel.
The spatial distribution of these minor constituents is still a field of great interest,
following the ISM/Phobos discoveries of unexpected variations in their mixing ratios
from volcano areas and surrounding plains.
OMEGA has four major advantages over ISM/Phobos for atmospheric studies:
— about double the spectral resolving power. This is important for improved
retrieval of the H2O and CO total column densities;
— extension of the spectral range up to 5.1 µm. The 3.2-5.1 µm range accesses the
thermal emission of the martian disc for most of the dayside regions (surface
temperature higher than about 240K). It will be possible to infer the thermal
profile from the inversion of the strong CO2 ν2 band at 4.3 µm. In addition, new
information, complementing that obtained from the diffuse solar spectrum, will
be obtained on the CO abundance from its absorption bands at 4.7 µm;
— an IFOV 2.9 times higher, leading to a spatial sampling 70 times higher at
periapsis;
— greatly extended planetary coverage, because of the near-polar orbit instead of the
equatorial orbit of the Phobos mission.
Another important atmospheric parameter is the aerosol content. It has a key role
in the general circulation, because the dust modifies the radiative properties of the
atmosphere through its heating and cooling rates. As the atmospheric dust content
shows very strong variations, both on a local scale and over a seasonal cycle,
continuous monitoring is as necessary as knowing the local thermal profile. The
analysis of ISM/Phobos data has shown that the aerosol abundance can be estimated
from the slope of the reflected component of the spectrum. The same information will
be derived by OMEGA over the whole martian disc. Moreover, OMEGA will be able
to identify the aerosols through their composition (silicate and/or icy-rich particles),
and assess their distribution with altitude and time, in addition to their optical
properties. In particular, these measurements can be correlated with surface and
climatic seasonal properties, towards an integrated (surface, atmosphere, aerosols)
database of unique meteorological value.
Observations by the Short Wavelength Spectrometer (SWS) of ESA’s Infrared
Space Observatory (ISO) provided a high-quality IR spectrum of Mars, which is
helping to prepare for OMEGA observations. In particular, it demonstrated the
feasibility of retrieving dust opacity from the strong 2.7 µm CO2 band. The detection
40
of faint fluorescence emission in CO2 at 4.3 µm by ISO provides another objective:

OMEGA will confirm and study the spatial variation of these emissions, which give
information on the highest part of the stratosphere.
The capabilities of OMEGA can be summarised as: 3. OMEGA Performance

— imaging: 128 contiguous IFOVs of 1.2 mrad (4.1 arcmin) each, corresponding to
< 350 m surface sampling at periapsis;
— spectral: 352 (or 400, depending on the summing mode chosen for the visible
channel) contiguous spectels to acquire the spectral range 0.38-5.1 µm for each
resolved pixel, with 96 (or 144) spectels to cover the 0.38-1.05 µm range, with a
spectral sampling of 7 nm (or 4.5 nm), 128 spectels to cover 0.93-2.73 µm, with
13 nm spectral sampling, and 128 spectels to cover 2.55-5.1 µm, with 20 nm
sampling;
— photometric: S/N > 100 over the full spectral range, allowing the identification of
absorptions and thermal variations to the percent-level.
The high sensitivity of OMEGA and its high spectral and spatial sampling
capabilities should allow the unambiguous detection and compositional
identification, on each resolved pixel, of the surface minerals and their OH/H2O
content, the atmospheric major and minor constituents, and the aerosols. For example,
if there are carbonates at concentrations of a few percent, they should be readily
detected. At the same spatial scale of a few hundred metres, the surface temperature
will be mapped with an accuracy of better than 1K.
Such performance will provide an unprecedented harvest of results in a wide variety
of Mars and planetary science fields such as: geology, tectonic and chemical planetary
evolution, climatology and meteorology, atmospheric processes and exobiology.
4.1 Instrument concept 4. Instrument Description

OMEGA is a mapping spectrometer, with coaligned channels working in the 0.38-
1.05 µm visible and near-IR range (VNIR channel) and in the 0.93-5.1 µm short
wavelength IR range (SWIR channel). The data products constitute three-dimensional
(x, y, λ) ‘image-cubes’, with two spatial and one spectral dimensions.
The VNIR channel uses a bi-dimensional CCD detector, operating in a pushbroom
mode. The telescope’s focal plane provides one cross-track line corresponding to the
entire 8.8° FOV, defined by an entrance slit; the second dimension of the image is
provided by the motion of the spacecraft. Each line is spectrally dispersed along the
columns of the array, the slit being imaged through a concave holographic grating.
The SWIR channel operates in the whiskbroom mode. Each imaged pixel is
focused by an IR telescope on a slit, followed by a collimator. The beam is then split
towards two separated spectrometers, to acquire the IR spectrum of each resolved
pixel on to two InSb linear arrays of 128 spectels each, working at 0.93-2.73 µm and
2.55-5.1 µm. A scanning mirror in front of the telescope provides cross-track swaths
16-128 pixels wide, for a maximum FOV of 8.8° (matching the VNIR FOV). The
spacecraft motion provides the second spatial dimension. The images are built as
shown in Fig. 5. Each array is cooled to 70K by a dedicated cryocooler, while the
entire spectrometer is cooled to 190K by a conductive link to a passive radiator.
The typical IR integration time, defined by the spacecraft ground-track velocity and
the spatial sampling chosen, is 2.5 ms or 5 ms. The corresponding VNIR integration
times are 50-200 ms, depending on the swath width (and hence the altitude). With such
integration times, an S/R of > 100 is specified over the entire spectral range.
OMEGA comprises two distinct units, coupled by a 0.7 kg electrical harness:
— a Camera unit (OMEga Camera, or OMEC), carrying the VNIR and SWIR
41
SP-1240
Fig. 2. VNIR optical layout.
Fig. 3. VNIR electronics.
spectrographs, their associated electrical devices, and an electronics assembly for

controlling the camera. All units are integrated on a common baseplate. The mass
and size of OMEC are, respectively, 23.5 kg, and 290x180x150 mm;
— a Main Electronics module (OMEga-Me, or OMEM), for the data processing and
the general management of the instrument. Mass is 4.6 kg.
OMEGA’s power requirement is 27.4 W during the ~2 h cooling of the focal

planes, and 47.6 W peak power during observation.
4.2 VNIR
VNIR comprises two optical subsystems: a focusing telescope with its focal plane on
a slit, and a spectrometer to spread the slit image in the spectral dimension. It provides
image data in the spectral range 0.38-1.05 µm, achieving a maximum spatial
sampling of 0.4 mrad and a maximum spectral sampling of 50 Å.
The optical layout and major components of VNIR are summarised in Fig. 2 and
42
Table 1. OMEGA’s VNIR characteristics. Table 2. VNIR telescope and

spectrometer optical parameters.
Element/Parameter Description/value
Aperture 15.6 mm
Telescope Double Gauss objective Focal length 57.6 mm
Field of view 8.8° Field of view 8.8°
Spectrometer concave holographic grating mirror F number 3.7
Detector CCD Thomson TH 7863 384×288 pixels Scale factor 1°/ mm
Detector size 8.8×6.6 mm Entrance slit width 50 µm
Pixel size 23×23 µm Grating type concave
Spectral range 0.38-1.05 µm holographic
Spectral resolution 70-200 λ/∆λ grating mirror
Dynamics 12-bit Grooves/mm 65

Dispersion 1071Å/mm
Wavelength range 0.38-1.05 µm
Grating size 40 x 10 mm
Material Silica
Table 1. A refractive telescope focuses the image on to a slit placed on the Rowland Manufacturer Jobin Yvon
circle of an aberration-corrected concave holographic grating mirror. This element
reflects and disperses the light on a CCD detector tangent to the Rowland circle. The
detector used is the TH7863 frame-transfer CCD produced by Thomson. The grating
mirror creates a flat image at the focal plane, matching the flat detector matrix to the
grating without other optical components. Each row of the CCD frame contains an
image of the slit at a given wavelength, while each column contains the spectrum of
a point along the slit. The bi-dimensional image of the surface is obtained by the
pushbroom technique, in which the spacecraft’s movement along its orbit scans the
slit across the planetary surface. The electrical signal from the detector is amplified
and then digitised by a fast 12-bit analogue/digital converter (ADC). Following
conversion, all data are processed within the OMEGA Main Electronics module.
In order to decrease the detector noise, the VNIR channel is cooled to 190K by
conduction to the SWIR mechanical unit.
Refractive optics are preferred over reflective because of the large (8.8°) field of
view requirement. The telescope has a 6-element objective similar to that of a modern
commercial photographic camera. The shape of the elements and the types of optical
glass were chosen to obtain the best chromatic aberration corrections over the entire
spectral range. The last element serves as a field lens which matches the entire
objective with the grating to avoid light losses. To avoid stress in the lenses at the
working temperature, the two doublets are not cemented. The two glasses, FK54 and
fused silica, have very different expansion coefficients of 8×10–6 K–1 and 0.55×10–6 K–1
at room temperature. The entrance aperture of 15.6 mm is defined by a diaphragm
between the two doublets.
An aberration-corrected concave holographic grating is placed 142.7 mm from
the entrance slit (which is in the focal plane of the telescope). The grating is tilted
to form the spectrum at an angle of roughly 6° from the optical axis. This angle does
not allow CCD insertion near the entrance without beam obscuration, so a folding
mirror deflects the beam toward the side of the assembly, where the CCD can be
mounted with ample clearance. The zero-order spectrum, at 4.5° from the folded
optical axis (lying in the y-z plane), is directed into a light trap to prevent
degradation of the image. The first-order spectrum ranges in angle from 6° at
0.35 µm to 10° at 1.05 µm. The second- and higher order spectra can, in principle,
also degrade the data. Their contributions depend both on the grating efficiency and
the spectral distribution of the incident radiation. For this reason, a dedicated filter
is mounted in front of the detector. The concave, spherical, holographic grating in
a Rowland mounting – where the entrance slit and the spectrum are on radii of
curvature of the grating – makes the spectrometer compact, light and simple. In
43
SP-1240
fact, no collimator or camera lens is required and the spectrometer has only one
element. Moreover, the focal plane image is flat, matching the planar CCD sensors.
Since the concave holographic grating is obtained by recording a perfect optical
pattern with groove spacing absolutely constant, it has no ghosts. Stray light is also
at a much lower level than the best ruled gratings. Therefore, concave holographic
gratings generally have a much higher signal to noise ratio than classically ruled
gratings.
The optical performances were computed by ray tracing. In the focal plane, the spot
diagram is about the pixel size (23×23 µm). For off-axis propagation (4.4°), the total
spot size is about 2 pixels in the sagittal direction (the z direction, see Fig. 2). More
precisely, on axis and at 0.7 µm, 98.8% of the energy falls within a 23×23 µm pixel;
at 4.4° off-axis and 0.4 µm, 74% of the energy falls within a CCD element. When the
light propagates off-axis, the spot size is smaller for the shorter wavelengths.
The block diagram of the VNIR electronics is shown in Fig. 3. The Pattern
Generator (PG) determines the CCD integration time, and generates the timing
signals necessary to transfer an image from the light-sensitive area to the masked zone
and then to the output shift register of the CCD. The output of the CCD is then
amplified and converted by a fast 12-bit ADC under control of the PG.
The timing of the instrument imposes a relatively high frequency for CCD
operation. In fact, depending on the distance from the planet and hence on the
spacecraft speed, the time TR between consecutive frames can be chosen as: 50, 100,
200, 400 or 800 ms. During the TR period the integration, readout and data
transmission processes must occur. To save time, integration and transmission of the
previous frame are overlapped. Because the maximum data value that can be
transmitted during TR is limited to 12 288 bytes, it is not possible to read the total
frame of 384×288 pixels, corresponding to 110 592 bytes. We are forced to read only
a subframe, or to reduce the number of pixels by summing them on chip. The
combination of different scientific requirements, integration times and hardware
limitations led us to the definition of 40 operation modes, which can be selected
through commands sent to the spacecraft, ranging from the nominal (spatial ×
spectral) mode (128×96 with summation of 3×3 pixels), to the high spectral
resolution mode (64×144), to the high-speed mode (16×96). Summation along
columns and rows decreases the spatial and spectral resolution, but increases signal-
to-noise ratio considerably. The implementation of mode 16×74 is the most critical
owing to the short time available to complete all the operations (TR = 100 ms). For
this reason, the Pattern Generator provides two values for the pixel readout
frequency: fslow = 500 kHz when the pixel voltage has to be digitised and
ffast = 4 MHz when the pixel is simply read from the CCD output register without any
digital conversion.
4.3 SWIR
The SWIR channel consists of a telescope and its fore-optics, a beam splitter and two
spectrometers, each with its detector array actively cooled (Fig. 4).
The telescope is a Cassegrain of 200 mm focal length, an f/4 aperture, leading to a
1.2 mrad (4.1 arcmin) IFOV and a 15 arcmin free FOV (including the positioning
tolerances). The distance between the primary and secondary mirrors is 51 mm;
between the secondary mirror and the image plane is 82 mm.
In front of the telescope, a fore-optics system has the primary goal of providing a
cross-track scanning of the IFOV. It includes two mirrors, moving and fixed. The total
scanning angle is ±4.4° (FOV = 128 IFOV), and is adjusted to the OMEGA viewing
direction. The control of the scanning mechanism is performed by a dedicated FPGA-
based electronic subsystem.
Focused by the telescope on an entrance slit, through a shutter, the beam is first
collimated, then separated, by a dichroic filter with its cut-off wavelength at 2.7 µm
towards two spectrometers, operating at 0.93-2.73 µm and 2.55-5.1 µm. Each
spectrometer includes a blazed grating working at its first order, and an optical
44
Fig. 4. SWIR channel optical layout.
1: Cassegrain telescope of 200 mm focal

length, f/4 aperture, 4 arcmin IFOV
and 15 arcmin free FOV (including the
positioning tolerances).
2: entrance slit 800 µm high (spatial
dimension).
3: collimator (off-axis parabolic mirror
R = 192.85 mm, offset 37.14 mm) to
collimate the beam from the slit to the
dichroic and the gratings.
4: dichroic filter, separates the two
channels (short wavelength is
reflected; long wavelength is
transmitted).
5: folding mirror, reflects the short
wavelength channel to the grating.
6: blazed flat gratings working in the
first order. Short wavelength: groove
density 180/mm, incidence angle –6.5°
and blazed wavelength 1.7 µm; long
wavelength: groove density 120/mm,
incidence angle –10.6° and blazed
wavelength 3.8 µm.
7: spherical collector mirrors
(R = 378.49 mm), re-image the
diffracted image of the slit near the
field mirrors.
8: spherical field mirrors
(R = 378.49 mm), image the grating
inside the objective.
9: objectives, four spherical ZnSe lenses,
re-image the diffracted image of the
slit.
10:
10:sets of filters in front the detector.
11:
11:InSb detector linear arrays (128 pixels
of 90x120 µm photosensitive area and
pitch of 120 µm.)
reflective system, then a field mirror and a refractive refocusing system that gives a
large aperture on the detection block (f/1.6). It images the spectrum on to a 128-
element InSb linear array, cooled to < 80K, and multiplexed by a charge transfer
device. Sets of filters are implemented in front of the detector to reject the
contribution of other orders from the grating.
The InSb photodiodes were manufactured by SAT (F). The dimensions of each
photosensitive element is 90×120 µm, with a pitch of 120 µm. All elements of the
focal planes are hybridised on a ceramic with two electric circuit layers to connect the
elements. The ceramic is glued to a titanium baseplate and covered by a titanium
frame that holds the filters.
An internal calibration source controls potential shifts of the overall spectrometer
transmission and calibrates the relative response of each pixel. The tungsten lamp,
operated as a black body, is heated to different temperatures. The calibration beam is
reflected towards the spectrometer by diffusion on the back side of the entrance slit.
SWIR requires accurate thermal control, at three levels:
— the electronics and the cryocoolers heads are internally linked by heat pipes and
coupled to a 280K radiator.
45
SP-1240
Table 3. Typical OMEGA observing sessions.
Maximum altitude (km) 300 1500 4000

True anomaly 0 60 95
Pixel size < 360 m < 1.8 km < 4.8 km
Track width (px) 16 64 128
Track width (km) 5-7 60-120 300-600
Track length (px) ~ 7500 ~ 2000 ~ 1000
Track length (km) ~ 3000 ~ 3000 ~ 3000
Session duration (min) ~ 12 ~ 12 ~ 24
Data volume (Mbit) ~ 200 ~ 200 ~ 200
Table 4. OMEGA total data budget.
Investigation Global Mapping High-Resolution Seasonal Variation

(100% coverage) (5% coverage) (5% coverage)
Required number of 250 500 500

non-overlapping
contiguous sessions
Total data volume ~ 50 Gbit ~ 100 Gbit ~ 100 Gbit
— the spectrometer must be cooled to ≤ 190K, to minimise the thermal background

and to enable the detectors to reach their operational temperature (< 80K). This is
achieved by copper links to a spacecraft radiator;
— the IR detectors must be cooled to < 80K, controlled with an accuracy of better
than 0.1K. This is done by using copper heat links to two cryocoolers, one for
each array: Inframetrics 13000-series integral Stirling cycle coolers controlled by
dedicated electronics. Their guaranteed lifetimes are > 2500 h;
4.4. OMEGA Main Electronics

The main electronics power and control the instrument, acquire and compress all
scientific data on-line, and interface with the spacecraft telecommand/telemetry
system. The entire system is cold-redundant. Within OMEga-Me, the Command and
Data Processing Unit (CDPU) has the following tasks:
— acquisition of all scientific data from VNIR and SWIR;

— formatting for realtime data compression;
— wavelet-based data compression, followed by formatting of processed data;
— reception and formatting of housekeeping data;
— forwarding of all data to the spacecraft telemetry system.
The CDPU is based on a TSC21020 Temic processor, and integrated, together with
a 6 Mbyte SRAM, into a 3D-packaged highly miniaturised cube, inherited from the
ÇIVA instrument aboard the Rosetta mission.
5. Ground Calibration OMEGA was fully calibrated before its delivery and integration with the spacecraft.
The calibration plan included spectral, geometric, photometric, sample and functional
tests, with the following goals:
46
spacecraft track velocity spacecraft track velocity spacecraft track velocity
a b c
Fig. 5. Whiskbroom building of the IR image, with contiguous swaths (a), undersampling (b) and oversampling (c).
— spectral calibration: determination of the spectral centre position and width of

each spectel, with an accuracy of better than 1/5 of the spectel width, within the
entire FOV;
— photometric calibration: determination of the Data Number (DN) value of each
spectel for a given incident power. Accuracy: better than 1% spectel-to-spectel
(relative) and better than 20% in absolute terms;
— geometric calibration: determination of the IFOV and FOV of each channel, their
spatial response in azimuth and declination, and their relative coalignment;
— sample calibration: determination of the actual response of OMEGA when
imaging targets with minerals and mixtures of known composition;
— functional calibration: determination of the instrumental response for all
programmable parameters and modes.
A dedicated calibration facility was built at IAS, comprising two major

components:
— an ultra-clean vacuum chamber, where OMEGA was installed on a stage

remotely movable in two angular directions around the entrance pupil of the
instrument. The chamber’s thermal screens and regulated platforms cool the
spectrometers to any temperature within the range 300-150K, while maintaining
OMEga-Me at a different and higher temperature. The incident beam, from the
optical bench, passes through a large sapphire window to illuminate OMEGA;
— an optical bench, purged with dry nitrogen, containing a 4 m focal length and
400 mm-diameter collimator, imaging one of the following four sources on to
OMEGA: a monochromator, a black body with temperature stabilised up to
1200°C, a point source (1/3-pixel) illuminated by a high-temperature (2500°C)
ribbon black body, and a cold black body (down to 70K).
During calibration, OMEGA was operated through its Electrical Ground Support
Equipment (EGSE) and spacecraft simulator, while the facility (vacuum chamber and
optical bench) was controlled by a dedicated computer, acquiring all relevant
parameters (monochromator wavelength, angular positions of the moving stage,
temperatures), and acting as the slave in a master/slave configuration with the EGSE,
ensuring synchronous acquisition with OMEGA scientific data.
47
SP-1240
6. Operations Given the global Mars Express orbital and downlink constraints within the nominal
(one martian year) duration of operations, the OMEGA science goal of complete
planetary coverage cannot be achieved at the highest possible resolution, obtained
close to periapsis. Thus, the OMEGA investigation is divided into three global modes:
— global (100% complete) coverage at 2-5 km spatial resolution, acquired from

altitudes of 1500-4000 km;
— high-resolution (< 350 m) coverage of a fraction (> 5%) of the surface, with high
flexibility of site selection (longitude and latitude), acquired close to periapsis;
— seasonal monitoring of surface and atmospheric composition at given locations,
with wide flexibility of site selection (longitude and latitude).
These investigations will be conducted using different operational and instru-

mental modes. With a fixed IFOV, OMEGA has the flexibility to accommodate
operations from a variety of altitudes, through a number of acquisition times, swath
widths and data compression modes. As the IR maps will be built by contiguous
cross-track swaths (Fig. 5) in a wiskbroom mode, the displacement of the spacecraft
track during the acquisition of a swath should be as close as possible to the pixel size
(5a) in order to avoid both undersampling (5b) and oversampling (5c).
At periapsis, where the orbital ground velocity is about 4 km s–1, the nadir track
shifts by one IFOV in less than 100 ms. This duration corresponds to acquiring cross-
track swaths 16 pixels wide, with a nominal integration time of 5 ms. Thus, the
nominal OMEGA high-resolution mode, operated from altitudes of < 350 km, will
build maps 16 pixels wide. For medium-resolution modes, 32-pixel swaths will be
chosen when operating from altitudes of 350-700 km, and 64 pixels from altitudes up
to about 1500 km. From 1500 km to 4000 km, OMEGA will provide global coverage:
it will use the full 128-pixel FOV, for which one swath is acquired, with nominal
integration time, in 640 ms. However, at these altitudes, the ground-track velocity is
less than 2 km s–1, and the spacecraft ground-track shifts by one pixel (one IFOV) in
1-2.5 s. In order to avoid oversampling, OMEGA will sum several (up to 4)
contiguous swaths. This is illustrated in Table 3, indicating three typical session sizes,
with the assumption of a (pessimistic) compression factor of 3, and spatial summing
of two contiguous swaths for the global coverage mode. The non-overlapping
sessions required to achieve the three objectives quoted above are covered in Table 4.
These budgets are based on building maps with non-overlapping sessions and
performing limb observations. These require the availability of dedicated spacecraft
pointing modes:
— nadir pointing, either along the track, or with a constant off-track angle (up to
30°), for all surface mappings;
— 3-axis inertial pointing, for a few atmospheric studies and some specific surface
observations.
The data, as soon as they are received at ESOC on the Data Distribution System
(DDS) are transferred to IAS, on a dedicated server, where they are decompressed,
PDS formatted and archived. Each cube of data is submitted to a quick-look analysis
(for both scientific data and housekeeping) to validate its completeness and the
quality of the downloaded data. In parallel, orbital and spacecraft attitude parameters
are received from ESOC via ESTEC, out of which geometric cubes are built, first as
predicted values and then after proper reconstruction. These cubes are in-house PDS-
formatted in a manner identical to the scientific ones, to enable a reconstruction of the
mapped areas on the martian surface.
The entire OMEGA team has direct, full and protected access to the data server at
IAS, on which a variety of auxiliary files (such as calibration files) are available. In
accordance with ESA policy, the data processing is restricted to the team during the
proprietary period.
48
For the distribution and archiving strategy after this period, OMEGA will comply
with the overall ESA scientific data policy. The goal is to prepare a final level of data
set, constituting: the raw compressed data, the decompression procedures, the
decalibrated data for each pixel at the surface of Mars, referred to a (latitude,
longitude) frame, and the complete spectrum from 0.38 µm to 5.1 µm, in physical
units. This geometric reconstruction will include the instrumental and spacecraft
corrections, thus allowing image-cubes to be generated. These calibrated image-cubes
will be formatted according to the Planetary Data System (PDS) standard for
distribution and archiving, through the ESA Planetary Science Archive. The actual
storage medium will depend on availability at the time of operations; at present,
erasable/rewritable CD-ROMs and DVDs are being considered.
49
Picardi.qxd 7/8/04 1:02 PM Page 51
MARSIS: Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface

and Ionosphere Sounding
G. Picardi1, D. Biccari1, R. Seu1, J. Plaut2, W.T.K. Johnson2, R.L. Jordan2, A. Safaeinili2, D.A. Gurnett3,
R. Huff 3, R. Orosei4, O. Bombaci5, D. Calabrese5 & E. Zampolini5
1
Infocom Department, ‘La Sapienza’ University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
Email: aclr@aerov.jussieu.fr
2
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
3
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IW 52242-1447, USA
4
CNR/IAS, Planetology Department, Via del Fosso di Cavaliere, I-00133 Rome, Italy
5
Alenia Spazio S.p.A., Via Saccomuro 24, I-00131 Rome, Italy
This paper describes the science background, design principles and the expected
performance of the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere
Sounding (MARSIS), developed by a team of Italian and US researchers and
industrial partners to fly on the ESA Mars Express orbiter. The unique
capability of sounding the martian environment with coherent trains of long-
wavelength wide-band pulses, together with extensive onboard processing, will
allow the collection of a large amount of significant data about the subsurface,
surface and ionosphere. Analysis of these data will allow the detection and 3-D
mapping of subsurface structures down to several kilometres below the surface,
the estimation of large-scale topography, roughness and reflectivity of the
surface at wavelengths never used before, and the production of global and high-
resolution profiles of the ionospheric electron density (day and night). Finally,
the MARSIS frequency-agile design allow the sounding parameters to be tuned
in response to changes in solar illumination conditions, the latitude and other
factors, allowing global coverage to be achieved within the Mars Express
baseline orbit and mission duration.
The set of scientific objectives for MARSIS was defined in the context of the 1. Introduction
objectives of the Mars Express mission and within the more general frame of the open
issues in Mars studies. The primary objective is to map the distribution of liquid and
solid water in the upper portions of the crust of Mars (Carr, 1996). Detection of such
water reservoirs will address key issues in the hydrologic, geologic, climatic and
possible biologic evolution of Mars, including the current and past global inventory
of water, mechanisms of transport and storage of water, the role of liquid water and
ice in shaping the landscape of Mars, the stability of liquid water and ice at the surface
as an indication of climatic conditions, and the implications of the hydrologic history
for the evolution of possible martian ecosystems.
Three secondary objectives are also defined for MARSIS: subsurface geologic
probing, surface characterisation and ionosphere sounding. The first is to probe the
subsurface of Mars, to characterise and map geologic units and structures in the third
dimension. The second is to acquire information about the surface: to characterise the
surface roughness at scales of tens of metres to kilometres, to measure the radar
reflection coefficient of the upper surface layer, and to generate a topographic map of
the surface at approximately 10 km lateral resolution. The final secondary objective
is to use MARSIS as an ionosphere sounder to characterise the interactions of the
51
SP-1240
solar wind with the ionosphere and upper atmosphere of Mars. Radar studies of the
ionosphere will allow global measurements of the ionosphere electron density and
investigation of the influence of the Sun and the solar wind on the ionosphere.
2. Composition Models In this section, models of the composition of the upper layers of Mars are described,
of the Upper Layers based on the recent literature and classical Mars studies.
The state and the distribution of H2O in the martian megaregolith are a function of
crustal thermal conductivity, geothermal heat flow, ground-ice melting temperature
and the mean temperature at the surface (this last is the only quantity varying
systematically with latitude). These factors determine the thickness of the cryosphere,
which is the layer where the temperature remains continuously below the freezing
point of H2O. Although the mean annual surface temperatures vary from about 220K
at the equator to about 155K at the poles, the annual and secular surface temperature
variations determine periodic freezing and melting of any H2O present down to a
depth of about 100 m. The cryosphere extends below this ‘active layer’ to the depth
where the heat flux from the interior of the planet raises the temperature above the
melting point of ground-water ice. Below the cryosphere, H2O in the pore space can
only be in liquid form.
Estimates of the depth of the melting isotherm range from 0 km to 11.0 km at the
equator, and from 1.2 km to 24 km at the poles, according to different values of the
parameters found in the literature. Liquid water may persist only below such depths;
moreover, liquid water would diffuse towards the bottom of the regolith layer and
thus could lay further below, although local conditions may still offset the above
considerations. A nominal depth in the range 0-5000 m is assumed.
Estimates of the desiccation of the martian megaregolith, via ice sublimation in the
cryosphere, yield values of the depth at which ice is still present ranging from zero to
several hundred metres. A nominal depth in the range 0-1000 m is assumed.
The interfaces most likely to be detected by MARSIS, being closer to the surface,
are the contact between the desiccated regolith and the permafrost, and the interface
between a subterranean reservoir of liquid water and the cryosphere. These are the
basic scenarios for the detection and identification of water-related interfaces in the
martian subsurface.
The structure of the martian crust is the result of many different processes, given the
complex geological history of the planet. However, it appears that the most significant
on a global scale are impact processes, which have played a major role in the structural
evolution of the crust by producing and dispersing large quantities of ejecta, and by
fracturing the surrounding and underlying basement. It is estimated that, over the course
of martian geologic history, the volume of ejecta produced by impacts was sufficient to
have created a global blanket of debris up to 2 km thick. It is likely that this ejecta layer
is discontinuously interbedded with volcanic flows, weathering products and
sedimentary deposits, all overlying a heavily fractured basement.
A 50% surface porosity of the regolith is consistent with estimates of the bulk
porosity of martian soil as analysed by the Viking Landers. A value this high requires
that the regolith has undergone a significant degree of weathering. A lower bound for
the surface porosity can be taken at 20%, derived from the measured porosity of lunar
breccias. An equation of the decline of porosity with depth owing to the lithostatic
pressure can be obtained by adapting a similar equation devised for the Moon, based
on seismic data unavailable for Mars. The equation is of the form:
z

£1z2 £102 e K (1)
where Φ(z) is the porosity at depth z, and K is a decay constant that, for Mars, can
be computed by scaling the measured lunar decay constant for the ratio between the
lunar and martian surface gravitational acceleration, under the assumption of
comparable crust densities. The resulting value for Mars is K = 2.8 km.
52
Table 1. Dielectric properties of the subsurface material.
Crust Material Pore-Filling Material

Andesite Basalt Water Ice Liquid Water
εr 3.5 7.1 3.15 88

tan δ 0.005 0.014 0.00022 0.0001
Table 2. Value ranges of the surface geometric parameters.
Large-Scale Model Small-Scale Model

rms slope correlation length rms slope rms height
0.01-0.1 rad 200-3000 m 0.1-0.6 rad 0.1-1 m

(0.57-5.7°) (5.7-34.3°)
It appears almost certain from morphologic and chemical evidence, as well as from
SNC meteorites, that the martian surface is primarily basaltic. However, it could have
a thin veneer of younger volcanics overlying a primitive crust. Whether this primitive
crust is basaltic, anorthositic like the Moon, granodioritic like the Earth’s continents
or some other kind of composition, is unknown. The NASA Pathfinder APXS
analyses of rocks and soils confirm the basaltic nature of Mars’ surface. Chemical
classifications of lavas show that the Barnacle Bill and Yogi rocks are distinct from
basaltic martian meteorites. These rocks plot in or near the field of andesites, a type
of lava common at continental margins on Earth. Although a multitude of different
chemical compositions is present at the surface of Mars, it is necessary to select a few
representative materials as most meaningful for electromagnetic studies. Given the
above considerations about the nature of the martian crust, andesite and basalt were
chosen because their dielectric constants are end-members of the range within which
the martian surface materials may vary.
The dielectric properties of the crust end-member materials, together with those of
the water and ice filling the pores, are listed in Table 1.
To summarise, the reference models representing the two most likely detection
scenarios for a Mars orbital sounder at km depths are (Fig. 1):
Ice/water interface detection. According to the model, the porosity of the martian
megaregolith is maximum at the surface and its decay with increasing depth is
given by the exponential law in Eq. (1). The pores are filled with ice from the
surface down to a depth below which liquid water is stable and becomes the pore-
filling material. The change causes a discontinuity of the overall dielectric
constant, which can be detected by the radar sounder. The ice/water interface is
believed to be at a depth of between 0 m and 5000 m.
Dry/ice interface detection. This model is based on the same assumptions as the
ice/water model with respect to the megaregolith properties. However, the pore-
filling material here is considered to be gas or some other vacuum-equivalent
material up to a certain depth below which ice fills the pores. Hence the interface
to be detected is between dry regolith and ice-filled regolith, expected to be at a
depth of between 0 m and 1000 m.
These models will be used to estimate the penetration performance under typical
MARSIS operating conditions.
53
SP-1240
Fig. 1. Martian crust stratification models.

Simple 2-layer structures are proposed. The
discontinuity is created by a change in the
pore-filling material. a: ice/water interface
detection; b: dry/ice interface detection.
3. Surface Characterisation Images of the surface from the Viking Landers and Mars Pathfinder depict a gently
undulating surface strewn with rocks ranging in size from a few centimetres to
metres. Although these images cover only a minute portion of the planet, Mars’
thermal and radar properties have prompted extensive modelling of a rock
population scattered over the entire surface. The surface geometric structure is thus
characterised in terms of a large-scale morphology on which a small-scale geometric
structure, of rocks, is superimposed. It is assumed that the surface can be described
as a random distribution of heights, characterised by a variance σh, a correlation
length L and a local surface rms slope ms. By assuming that the height distribution
is Gaussian, then ms = √2 σh / L, so that the distribution is completely determined
once the values of two of these parameters are known. The terms large-scale and
small-scale refer to different approximations in the modelling of the radar
backscattering coefficient; the divide between large-scale and small-scale is
essentially the radar wavelength.
Topographic data can be used to derive the large-scale geometry of the surface. The
global topographic maps of Mars currently available were compiled from several
types of measurements with different resolutions and sources of uncertainties. These
data do not provide a complete, global picture of Mars’ topography, but allow the
inference that elevation changes, although relevant in magnitude, do not involve
average slopes greater than 5° (0.1 rad), and often much less. Also, the correlation
lengths for the topography appear to be rather large, perhaps of the order of tens of
kilometres.
To characterise the surface geometry at scales smaller than the radar resolutions, it
is necessary to use proper data sets: measured values for Mars are in the range 0.7-
13°, averaging 2°, with a remarkable diversity from place to place over the surface.
Such values refer to scales that, according to model interpretations, range from a few
tens to a few hundred metres.
To summarise, plausible ranges for the parameters describing the surface geometry
are listed in Table 2.
Recent attempts to describe the structure of planetary surfaces by means of fractals
have also been taken into account. Tests on MGS/MOLA data have shown that the
Hurst exponent (H) with very high probability lies in the range 0.7-1 and the rms
slope (s(∆x)) extrapolated with a lag ∆x = 166 m is lower than 0.05.
4. Characterisation The study of the martian ionosphere is important not only as a topic in its own right,
of the Ionosphere but also because the ionosphere has a strong influence on the subsurface and surface
soundings. Electromagnetic radiation cannot propagate through an ionised gas at
frequencies below the electron plasma frequency, given by fp = 8980 √Ne Hz, where
54
Fig. 2. a (above): typical plasma frequency

vertical profile; b (left): plasma frequency
behaviour with solar zenith angle.
Ne is the electron number density in cm–3. A typical profile of the electron plasma
frequency in the dayside martian ionosphere is shown in Fig. 2a, based on plasma
density measurements from the Viking Landers (Hanson, 1977). Usually the electron
plasma frequency on the dayside of Mars has a single, well-defined maximum, at an
altitude of 125-150 km. Radio waves incident vertically on the ionosphere are
reflected at the point where the wave frequency is equal to the electron plasma
frequency. Transmission through the ionosphere is possible only at frequencies above
the maximum electron plasma frequency in the ionosphere, fp (max). Figure 2b shows
a plot of fp (max) versus solar zenith angle. The solid dots give the plasma frequency
obtained from radio occultation measurements (Zhang et al., 1990a; 1990b), and the
solid lines give extrapolations using the Chapman theory of planetary ionospheres.
Subsurface soundings are possible only at frequencies greater than fp (max). Since
they require frequencies as low as possible, the global distribution of the ionospheric
electron density (hence plasma frequency) becomes an important factor in selecting
the operating frequency of the sounder and the optimal orbital strategy for data
collection. The lowest frequency that can penetrate the martian ionosphere varies
from about 4 MHz on the dayside to somewhat below 1 MHz on the nightside.
Clearly, the best region for carrying out subsurface soundings is on the nightside, at
solar zenith angles greater than 90°. Unfortunately, very little is known about the
ionosphere on the nightside. A typical nightside maximum plasma frequency appears
to be about 800 kHz. From our knowledge of the ionosphere of Venus, for which
better nightside electron density measurements are available, it is likely that there are
isolated regions on the nightside of Mars where the plasma frequency extends well
below 800 kHz.
Even when the sounding frequency is above fp (max), the ionosphere still has an
effect on the radar signal. As is well known (Stix, 1964), the index of refraction for
an electromagnetic wave propagating through an unmagnetised plasma is given by
n = [1-(fp /f )2]1/2. Even at frequencies several times the plasma frequency, the index of
refraction has a noticeable deviation from the free-space value of n = 1. This
deviation causes a frequency-dependent time delay, called dispersion, that distorts the
shape of the radar pulse. It is easily demonstrated that the phase shift induced by the
ionosphere over the ∆f = 1 MHz bandwidth of the radar chirp signal is substantial,
approximately 200 rad for a centre frequency at f = 2 fp(max), and 5 rad at
55
SP-1240
f = 10 fp(max). Since the sounder must almost certainly operate at frequencies below
10 fp(max), it follows that we must be prepared to remove the dispersive effects of the
ionosphere, otherwise the signal-to-noise ratio and range resolution of the radar signal
would be severely degraded in the chirp compression process.
5. MARSIS Orbital The baseline orbit for Mars Express has a periapsis distance of 250 km, apoapsis
Requirements distance of 10 142 km, inclination 86.35° and period of 6.75 h. Figure 3 shows the
tangential and radial components of the satellite’s orbital velocity as a function of
altitude above the equatorial radius. MARSIS is designed to perform subsurface
sounding during each orbit when the altitude is lower than about 800 km; for the
baseline orbit that means a period of about 26 min. This allows mapping of about
100° on the surface on each orbit, allowing extensive coverage at all latitudes within
the nominal mission duration. To achieve this global coverage, MARSIS is designed
to support both dayside and nightside operations, although performances are
maximised during the night (solar zenith angle > 80°), when the ionosphere plasma
frequency drops off significantly and the lower frequency bands, which have greater
penetration capability, can be used. Ionospheric soundings will be also carried out by
MARSIS on certain passes when the orbiter is at an altitude up to 1200 km, both
during day and night time.
6. Measurement Concept 6.1 Subsurface and surface sounding

and Experiment The sounder’s principle of operation is explained in Fig. 4. The electromagnetic wave
transmitted by the antenna impinges on the surface, producing a first reflection that
Description propagates back to the radar, generating a strong return signal received at time
t0 = 2H/c, H being the spacecraft height and c the speed of light in vacuum. However,
thanks to the long wavelengths employed, a significant fraction of the energy
impinging on the surface is transmitted into the crust and propagates down with a
decreased velocity v = c/n (n is the refractive index of ice related to the real dielectric
constant εr by n = √εr) and an attenuation proportional to the penetration depth (z), to
the wavelength (λ) and to the material loss tangent (tan δ, defined as the ratio of the
imaginary part to the real part of the complex dielectric constant, tan δ = εi/εr). Should
subsurface dielectric discontinuities be present at depth z0 below the surface, additional
reflections would occur and the echoes would propagate back through the first layer
medium and then to the radar, generating further echo signals, much weaker than the
front surface signal, with time delay t0 + 2z0 /v. As a consequence, time-domain
analysis of the strong surface return, eventually after multi-look non-coherent
integration, allows estimation of surface roughness, reflectivity and mean distance, just
as in classical pulse-limited surface radar altimeters. Moreover, the weaker signals
after the first strong surface return will enable the detection of subsurface interfaces,
while their time delays will allow measurement of the depths of those interfaces.
Detection performance will be limited by two main factors: the strength of the
Fig. 3. Radial and tangential spacecraft velocity. surface clutter echoes and the noise floor entering the receiver. The surface clutter
echoes originate by reflections from those surface areas (marked C in Fig. 4) that have
2-way propagation path delays identical to that of the useful subsurface signal (point
B in Fig. 4). While this is not a problem for perfectly flat surfaces (the angular
backscattering law imposes a very high attenuation on such lateral reflections), most
natural surfaces are not at all flat and surface clutter echoes can be very strong in
practical situations. As a direct consequence, when the competing subsurface echoes
are highly attenuated by the propagation into the crust, the surface clutter echoes may
mask the useful signal and limit the detection. Furthermore, even when the surface
clutter power is lower than the competing subsurface echo, the detection performance
can be limited by the noise floor of the receiver. Such noise can be very high at the
low frequencies commonly used for radar sounding owing to the contribution of the
cosmic noise temperature entering the receiver, which is many order of magnitudes
56
Fig. 4. MARSIS observation geometry and

principle of operation.
higher than receiver internal noise for typical noise figures of 3-4 dB and frequencies
of 1-10 MHz (Picardi et al., 1998a; 1999a).
In the standard subsurface sounding mode, MARSIS can transmit and receive any
of the following bands: 1.3-2.3 MHz (centred at 1.8 MHz), 2.5-3.5 MHz (centred at
3 MHz), 3.5-4.5 MHz (centred at 4 MHz) and 4.5-5.5 MHz (centred at 5 MHz). The
instantaneous bandwidth is 1 MHz for all the bands, and the transmitted waveform is
a pseudo-linear frequency modulated pulse (chirp). Since, on the dayside of Mars, the
ionosphere will not allow the use of frequencies below ~3 MHz, only the two higher
bands (4 MHz and 5 MHz) can be used for surface/subsurface sounding during the
day. However, the best penetration is during nightside observations, when the longest
wavelengths can also be used.
Transmitted pulses are radiated through a 40 m tip-to-tip dipole mounted normally
to the orbiter’s direction of motion, fed by a matching network that flattens the antenna
frequency response over the full 1.3-5.5 MHz range. The reflected echoes are received
both from the primary dipole antenna and from a secondary receiving antenna. This
short monopole is mounted vertically, aligned with the nadir axis, and features a null
in the nadir direction and thus records off-nadir surface echoes alone (Picardi et al.,
1999b). Received echoes on both channels are converted to a small offset frequency
and digitised for onboard processing and later downlink. The receiving window
accommodates echoes from a maximum depth of 5-8 km, depending on the crust
dielectric constant. Since the data rate of the digitised samples is on the order of a few
Mbit/s, substantial data reduction is performed onboard to comply with the orbiter’s
data rate and volume constraints. Data reduction is performed by the onboard
processor, which features adaptive range compression, azimuth compression and
multi-look non-coherent integration, depending on the operating modes. The range
compression allows a range resolution equivalent to 150 m in vacuum and waveform
sidelobes controlled to provide a system dynamic range in excess of 50 dB. Azimuth
compression is performed by coherent unfocused Doppler processing, to reduce along-
track surface clutter and noise power; the along-track resolution after azimuth
compression is sharpened to 5-9 km, depending on the altitude. Cross-track surface
clutter reduction by dipole/monopole signal combination is performed during ground
processing. Non-coherent averaging with multiple Doppler filters (looks) can also be
performed before downlink to reduce statistical fluctuations of the final profiles.
Finally, echo profiles collected at different frequencies can be processed to enhance the
discrimination of subsurface reflections, which are strongly dependent on the
frequency, from the surface reflections, which are mostly frequency-independent.
During ground processing, downlinked data will be analysed for time delay to
subsurface reflector(s), intensity of subsurface reflection(s), and a measure of
‘confidence’ that a subsurface interface was detected. These parameters will be
incorporated into a global map database, to allow interpretation of local and regional
behaviour. Detailed analysis will be conducted for regions of interest. This will include
modelling of the electrical properties of the layers and interfaces. The modelling will
57
SP-1240
result in estimates of thickness of layers, depth to interfaces, dielectric properties of the

materials, and an interpretation of the properties of the materials, including
composition. It is expected that the abrupt dielectric contrasts that should exist at a
martian water table would allow an unambiguous identification of liquid water. If
small (tens of km in lateral extent) aquifers are present, the resolution and processing
scheme of MARSIS should allow their detection, unlike other systems that may require
extensive, uniform layer and interface conditions. Boundaries involving the presence
and absence of ground-ice will be more difficult to distinguish, but regional trends
(with latitude and elevation) should allow discrimination of ground-ice boundaries.
The first surface reflection echoes of MARSIS operating as a sounder will be
processed to give estimates of the average height, roughness and reflection coefficient
of the surface layer, according to the classical altimetric approach. By measuring the
time delay of the echo, it will be possible to estimate the average distance of the radar
from a reference flat surface level, while the duration of the waveform leading edge
will be proportional to the large-scale surface roughness averaged over the pulse-
limited spatial resolution cell. Finally, the peak value of the average echo waveform
will be used to estimate the backscattering coefficient and, in conjunction with the
roughness value, to estimate the Fresnel reflection coefficient of the surface. A further
improvement of the altimeter mode performance, in terms of resolution and accuracy,
can be achieved by processing the return echoes collected over the same region during
different orbits. During ground processing, surface reflection profiles will be analysed
for surface reflectivity at each frequency, echo dispersion at the surface (an indication
of surface roughness) and surface elevation. These parameters will be further
incorporated into the global map database, to allow interpretation of local and
regional behaviour, and for comparisons with other data sets.
6.2 Ionospheric sounding

MARSIS ionospheric measurements employ both passive and active techniques. The
passive technique uses the thermal emission line at the local electron plasma
frequency to make highly accurate measurements of the local electron density. The
active technique uses radar signals (soundings) to measure the vertical range to the
ionospheric reflection point as a function of frequency. For active soundings, a simple
ionospheric mode of operation is used in which sinusoidal pulses with a nominal
duration of 91.4 ms are transmitted in 160 frequency steps from 0.1 MHz to 5.4 MHz.
The time required to step through a complete frequency sweep is 1.23 s. Using these
measurements, the vertical profile of the plasma electron frequency (hence, electron
density) can be determined, as in Fig. 2a. There are two modes of operation:
continuous and interleaved. The continuous mode of operation provides a contiguous
series of ionospheric sounding sweeps, thereby providing the highest possible
horizontal resolution. Since such a contiguous series of sweeps leaves no time for
subsurface soundings, this mode is used relatively infrequently. The more common
mode interleaves the subsurface soundings with the ionospheric soundings in a
regular pattern. These will be particularly useful if ionospheric electron density
information is needed to interpret or optimise the subsurface soundings.
7. Instrument Description A functional block diagram of MARSIS is shown in Fig. 5; the principal character-
istics are given in Table 3. There are three main subsystems:
— the Antenna Subsystem (AS), including the primary dipole antenna for trans-
mission and reception of the sounder pulses, and the secondary monopole
antenna for surface-clutter echo reception only;
— the Radio Frequency Subsystem (RFS), including both the transmit channel and
the two receive channels for the dipole and monopole antennas, respectively;
— the Digital Electronics Subsystem (DES), including the signal generator, timing
and control unit and the processing unit.
58
Table 3. Principal parameters for the

MARSIS subsurface sounding mode.
Centre frequencies
Band 1 1.8 MHz
Band 2 3.0 MHz
Band 3 4.0 MHz
Band 4 5.0 MHz
Bandwidth 1.0 MHz
Irradiated power
Band 1 1.5 W
Band 2 5.0 W
Band 3 5.0 W
Band 4 5.0 W
Transmit pulse width 250 µs
(30 µs in mode SS5)
PRF 130/s
Minimum altitude 250 km
Fig. 5. MARSIS functional block diagram. Max. altitude subsurface 800 km
sounding
Max. altitude ionosphere 1200 km
sounding
Receive window size per 350 µs
channel (baseline)
In nominal surface/subsurface sounding operations, MARSIS transmits in rapid Analog to digital conversion rate 2.8 MHz
sequence up to four quasi-simultaneous pulses at one or two different frequencies, Analog to digital conversion 8 Bit
selected from the four available bands, and receives the corresponding echoes on both No. processed channels 4 (max)
the dipole and monopole antennas. The whole transmit/receive cycle is repeated at a Max. no. simultaneous 2
rate fixed by the system Pulse Repetition Frequency (PRF). The selection of the PRF frequencies
is an important issue in the definition of the MARSIS timing scheme, since the Radiation gain 2.1 dB
antenna pattern is practically isotropic in the along-track direction. With this system, Dipole antenna element length 20 m
spectral aliasing of surface clutter echoes could occur if the Doppler bandwidth is Monopole antenna length 7m
under-sampled. Considering that a folding localised into far-range cells can be Data rate output (min/max) 18/75 kbit/s
accepted at the highest frequency bands (because penetration to the corresponding Data volume daily (max) 285 Mbit
Mass 17 kg
depths is unlikely) a fixed PRF of 130 Hz was selected as the baseline for surface/
Power (max. incl. margins) 64.5 W
subsurface sounding. In fact, the risk of folding in useful range cells seems to be very
small, while the implementation burden is significantly reduced. With such a PRF, the
basic transmit/receive repetition interval is 7.69 ms. Within this time frame, the
MARSIS transmitter radiates through the main dipole antenna up to four chirps of
nominal duration 250 µs, waiting for about 100 µs between any two consecutive
chirps. Two different frequency bands can be assigned to the four pulses, selectable
from the four operating bands. After transmission is completed, MARSIS turns to the
receive mode and records the signals received from both dipole and monopole
channels for each transmitted pulse. The duration of the receiving window 350 µs,
accommodating an echo dispersion of about 100 µs, which corresponds to about 5-
8 km of penetration, depending on the propagation velocity in the crust. Upon
reception, echoes are down-converted and digitised to a format suitable for the
onboard processor. Four processing channels allow the processing of two frequency
bands received from the dipole and monopole at each PRF. The digitised echo stream
is processed by the digital electronics subsystem in order to reduce the data rate and
data volume, and allow global mapping of the observed scene within the allocated
amount of orbiter mass memory.
Starting from the desired along-track sampling rate of the surface, the basic
azimuth repetition interval is identified and all the pulses received within such an
interval (frame) are processed to yield a single echo profile referring to one azimuth
location. Range compression is performed on each pulse by classical matched
filtering, although adaptive techniques are used to update the matched filter reference
59
SP-1240
function at each frame in order to correct for the time-variant phase distortions
introduced by the ionosphere propagation (Picardi et al., 1998a; 1999a; Picardi &
Sorge, 1999). The information needed for this adaptive filtering is estimated by a
dedicated processing of the initial pulses of each frame, and is then used for all the
remaining pulses of the same frame, thus assuming the fluctuation rate of the
distortion is slower than the frame duration. Alternative techniques for such adaptive
filtering are based either on using the front surface reflection for direct extraction of
the propagation medium’s impulse response (Safaeinili & Jordan, 2000), on the
estimation of some parametric model of the propagation medium using a contrast
maximisation technique (Picardi & Sorge, 1999; Biccari et al., 2001c).
By correctly sampling the surface and subsurface Doppler spectra, coherent
integration of the range-compressed echoes within each frame is possible, enhancing
the spatial resolution in the along-track direction and linearly reducing the cosmic
noise level (Picardi et al., 1998a: 1999a). For simplicity, unfocused Doppler
processing has been implemented, entailing an azimuth resolution of 5000 m at
altitudes below 300 km, increasing to 9000 m at higher altitudes. Coherent integration
is performed using a fixed number of phase-correction functions, thus synthesising a
bank of parallel Doppler filters around the zero Doppler point (or the Doppler
centroid). However, since the small amount of computational and memory resources
available in the processor limits the number of Doppler filters that can be synthesised
to about five, the position and usage of these filters are optimised taking into account
the behaviour of the observed surface. Specifically, if specular scattering from a flat
surface is dominant, the greatest portion of the echo power falls into the single
Doppler filter that contains the point of specular reflection (the central Doppler filter
for a non-tilted surface), leaving mostly noise to the lateral Doppler filters. Under
such conditions, it is clear that the best choice is to use that single Doppler filter,
eventually located by a Doppler-tracking algorithm, and discard the others. For the
contrary case of a rough layer, non-coherent scattering is dominant and the signal
power is distributed over several Doppler filters, so it is worth averaging echoes from
the same zone processed by different Doppler filters to improve the signal-to-noise
(S/N) ratio and reduce statistical fluctuations (speckle).
A primary indication of MARSIS’ capability for subsurface sounding is given by the
S/N at the processor’s output (Picardi et al., 1999a). Under normal MARSIS operating
conditions, the contribution of the receiver internal noise to the system noise tempera-
ture can be neglected, compared to the contribution of the external cosmic noise. This
assumption is easily verified at low frequencies, where the cosmic noise temperature
is millions of K, which corresponds to receiver noise figures higher than 40 dB.
The maximum dynamic range of the sounder can be computed by evaluating the
S/N in the case of a rough surface, where the surface echo can be evaluated according
to the geometric optics approximation, and in the case of a perfectly specular surface
return, where the geometric optics approximation cannot be applied and we get a
higher echo from the surface.
Evaluating the radar equation in the two cases shows that, during nominal
sounding operations, an S/N always better than 14 dB is available on the front surface
echo. This allows precise positioning of the receiving window using a tracking
algorithm, and allows precise estimation of surface parameters with the surface
altimetry mode, provided that sufficient averaging is performed to reduce statistical
fluctuations of the signal (speckle noise).
8. Model Performance To assess the interface-detection performance of the radar sounder, the backscattering
cross-sections of concurrent echoes from the surface and subsurface layers (Fig. 4) as
operating conditions change need to be evaluated. These can be expressed as
σs = Γs fs (σh,s, Ls, λ) and σss = Γss fss (σh,ss, Lss, λ), with Γs and Γss being the Fresnel
reflectivity terms, which deal with the surface and subsurface dielectric properties,
and fs and fss the geometric scattering terms, which deal with the geometric structure
60
of the surface and subsurface; Ls and Lss are the correlation lengths; λ is the
wavelength. In the following sections, the Fresnel terms and the geometric scattering
terms are evaluated using the simplified reference crust models introduced in
Sections 2 and 3.
8.1 Modelling of Fresnel reflectivity terms

According to electromagnetic theory, the Fresnel reflectivity for nadir incidence on a
surface can be expressed as:
1 2er1 102
2
s ` ` R201 (2)
1 2er1 102
with εr1(0) the real dielectric constant of the crust evaluated at the surface (z = 0).
The Fresnel reflectivity for the subsurface layer at depth z can be expressed as:
ss,z R212,z 11 R201 2 2 10 0.10 a 1z2 dz

Z
(3)
2
with R12,z the reflection coefficient of an interface located at depth z:
2er1 1z2 2er2 1z2

2
` `
2
R (4)
2er1 1z2 2er2 1z2
12,z
and α(ζ) the 2-way unit depth attenuation due to dielectric dissipation in the crust,
expressed in dB/m:
α(ζ) = 1.8 x 10–7 f0 √ε tan δ (5)
The evaluation of the Fresnel reflectivity terms requires knowledge of the complex
dielectric constants of the crust as a function of depth. This can be modelled starting
from the dielectric constants of the basic elements contained in the martian crust
(Table 1) and using the exponential law (Eq. 1) for the porosity decay against the
depth into well-known Host-Inclusion mixing formulae (Picardi et al., 1999a). Since
porosity depends on depth, then so do the effective dielectric constants of the
mixtures. The Maxwell-Garnett model for spherical inclusions was adopted for this
analysis. As a result, the real dielectric constant at the surface (a water-filled regolith
is not considered to be possible at the surface) ranges between 4 and 6 for a basalt-
like regolith, and between 2 and 4 for andesite-like regolith; the lower values
correspond to higher surface porosity and dry regolith. As the depth increases, the first
layer’s dielectric constant increases because of the lower porosity and approaches the
dielectric constant of the pure host material (basalt or andesite in our models). If an
interface among ice-filled and water-filled regolith or dry-regolith and ice-filled
regolith occurs at a certain depth, there will be an abrupt change in the real part of the
dielectric constant. The dielectric contrast will be higher for ice/water interfaces, for
higher surface porosity and, of course, for greater depths. This dielectric contrast is
the origin for the subsurface reflection process, and the subsurface reflection
coefficient will be proportional to its intensity through Eq. 4. Moreover, the
absorption in the crust can be modelled using Eq. 5 and the obtained loss tangent
profiles and the total subsurface reflectivity can be computed by performing
integration over the depth according to Eq. 3. Figure 6 shows the resulting reflectivity
of the surface and subsurface echoes for both ice/water and dry/ice interface
scenarios, assuming the different materials and surface porosity values listed in
Table 1. It is clear from the figures that the surface reflectivity ranges between –7 dB
61
SP-1240
and –15 dB, depending on the surface composition and porosity, and has a typical
value of –10 dB for most scenarios.
8.2 Backscattering model

As mentioned in Section 3, backscattering from the martian surface can be modelled
by considering two main terms: the large-scale scattering contribution results from
gentle geometrical undulations of the surface on a scale of many hundreds to
thousands of metres, whereas the small-scale scattering contribution arises from the
rapid, slight variations of surface height over a horizontal scale of some tenths of
metres. Both surface scales are modelled as Gaussian random processes with a
circular symmetric correlation function, and are described by the rms height σh and
correlation length L. A third non-independent parameter is introduced, called rms
slope, which for a Gaussian correlation function is given by ms = √2σh/L and
represents the average geometric slope of the surface.
Simple approximate methods can be applied for surfaces that present a unique
roughness scale, with either a large correlation length (gently undulating surface) or
a very small rms height (slightly rough surface) compared to the incident wavelength.
Specifically, the Kirchhoff method can be applied for gently undulating surfaces,
which respect the tangent plane conditions, and the Small Perturbation Method can be
applied to slightly rough surfaces. The classical studies on the validity conditions of
these two models have recently been updated, and regions of validity currently
defined show that the Kirchhoff approximation can be used to evaluate the large-scale
backscattering contribution, whereas the Small Perturbation Method can be used for
the small-scale contribution. The approach here for modelling the total surface back-
scattering is to consider the two roughness scales independently and to sum the
respective backscattering cross-sections obtained with the Kirchhoff and Small
Perturbation Method approximations.
For the Kirchhoff term, an analytic model of the backscattering cross-section was
obtained by extending the electric field method followed by Fung & Eom (1983) to
the case of a generic Kirchhoff surface and pulsed radar. The expression found allows
prediction of the backscattering cross-section without restriction to the geometrical
optics approximation (pure diffuse scattering), but properly taking into account both
the coherent (specular) and non-coherent (diffuse) component of the scattering
process. Under the simplifying assumptions of a Gaussian surface correlation
function and Gaussian (compressed) pulse shape, the expression of the Kirchhoff
backscattering cross-section is:
PK (τ) = ΓπH 2 (Pc + Pnc1 – Pnc2) (6)
where H is the altitude, Pc (τ) is the coherent (specular) scattering component,

while Pnc (τ) = Pnc1 (τ) – Pnc2 (τ) is the non-coherent (diffuse) scattering component.
The maximum power is received when full coherent reflection occurs, i.e. when
the surface is perfectly flat. In such a condition, it is easy to verify that Pnc1 = Pnc2 and
the non-coherent term Pnc reduces to zero, while the coherent term Pc approaches the
shape of the transmitted pulse, which is maximum in the origin; the maximum cross-
section of the large-scale contribution of the surface is then σK,max = ΓπH 2, which is
a value consistent with that predicted by the image theorem for the reflection
coefficient of perfectly flat surfaces. As the surface becomes rougher, the coherent
component goes towards zero and non-coherent scattering becomes dominant
(geometrical optics model). By considering the fractal surface model (Section 3), the
geometric optics model (H = 1 in the fractal model) can be considered as the end
model. Moreover, the Hagfors model (H = 1/2 in the fractal model) will be the other
end-model: the geometric optics model is considered as the worst case (Biccari et al.,
2001a).
Turning to the small-scale contribution, the Small Perturbation Method
approximation allows the backscattering coefficient to be expressed as:
62
σ 0pp(θ) = 8k4 σ 2h2 |αpp(θ)|2 cos4q W(KB) (7) Fig. 6. Surface and subsurface Fresnel
reflectivity with medium surface porosity
(35%) and (a) ice/water interface, (b) dry/ice
where k = 2π/λ is the wave number, θ is the incidence angle, app(θ) is the Fresnel
interface.
Reflection Coefficient for the pp polarisation, W(K) is the surface roughness small-
scale spectrum and KB is the Bragg Frequency, given by KB = 2k sinθ.
Summarising, the surface backscattered power, σT(τ), can be obtained by summing
the large-scale and small-scale contributions:
σT(τ) = σK(τ) + σSP(τ) (8)
where σSP(τ) is the Small Perturbation term. Figure 7 shows the surface cross-
section given by Eq. 8, assuming the worst-case small-scale contribution and a large-
scale correlation length of about 2000 m, as a function of the depth of the competing
subsurface return (assuming a reference average εr = 4). The plots are normalised so
that the 0 dB axis indicates the maximum possible cross-section, which is given again
by σK,max = ΓπH 2. As seen in the figure, the scattering cross-section is maximum at
nadir and rapidly falls as the ‘equivalent depth’ increases, up to a level at which it
becomes practically a constant. This behaviour can be easily understood by
considering the superposition of the two scale contributions. In fact, according to
classical random scattering theory, the large-scale Kirchhoff component dominates
the backscattering around the nadir and determines the cross-section fall-off rate
(owing to the small value of ms), while the small-perturbation component dominates
at high off-nadir locations and is responsible for the flat behaviour of the cross-section
when the Kirchhoff contribution has vanished.
8.3 Surface clutter reduction techniques

As apparent from Fig. 7, when sounding over rough areas of the martian crust (rms
slope > 2-3°) the detection depth will be severely limited by the surface clutter, rather
than by the cosmic noise. In order to improve the sounding performance in these
regions, different methods of reducing the surface clutter contributions were included
in MARSIS: Doppler filtering of surface clutter; dual-antenna clutter cancellation;
and dual-frequency clutter cancellation. Detailed descriptions and performance
assessment of the three methods can be found in Picardi et al. (1999a). Below is a
short review of the techniques and their cancellation performances.
Doppler filtering of the surface clutter is a direct consequence of the azimuthal
synthetic aperture processing performed by the MARSIS onboard processor to
63
SP-1240
Fig. 7. Surface scattered power according to sharpen the along-track resolution and enhance noise suppression. In fact, if the
the two-scale model. A Gaussian spectrum at Doppler spectrum at each specific range location is sampled using a proper PRF, the
large-scale and a 1.5-power law spectrum at surface clutter contribution from along-track off-nadir angles is mapped to the high
small-scale are assumed. Large-scale
correlation length is 2000 m, small-scale rms end of the Doppler spectrum, while subsurface echoes from nadir are mapped to the
height is 1 m. H = 250 m (-) and 800 km (-.-.). lowest portion of the Doppler spectrum.
a: 1.8 MHz; b: 2.8 MHz; c: 3.8 MHz; The amount of clutter reduction from this technique can be evaluated by simple
d: 4.8 MHz. geometric considerations, taking into account the reduction of the scattering areas for
the nadir subsurface return and the off-nadir surface return, after Doppler filtering. An
improvement factor (IF) can be defined as the ratio of signal-to-clutter ratios before
and after the cancellation technique. The Doppler filtering IF can be expressed
approximately by:
a1 b
z ¢
IF 1 (9)
B¢ B z
where z is the depth of the subsurface return and ∆ is the radar range resolution,
and the condition z > ∆ is assumed to be verified. As clearly seen in Fig. 8a, an IF of
about 12 dB can be obtained by this technique at large depths.
64
Fig. 8. Improvement Factor (IF) of the surface

clutter cancellation techniques. a: Doppler
filtering; b: dual-antenna cancellation (1° roll
angle and 10% antenna pattern knowledge
accuracy); c: dual-frequency cancellation as a
function of number of averaged looks.
Since surface clutter echoes from off-nadir in the cross-track direction are not
affected by any Doppler modulation and cannot be eliminated by the previous
technique, additional clutter suppression techniques were studied for MARSIS, based
on a dual-antenna or dual-frequency processing concept.
The dual-antenna cancellation technique (Picardi et al., 1998a; 1999a) uses a
primary antenna to transmit and receive the composite subsurface/surface signal, with
a pattern maximum in the nadir direction (for MARSIS, a dipole mounted parallel to
the surface and normal to the motion direction) and a secondary antenna to receive
surface clutter only, with a pattern null in the nadir direction (for MARSIS, a short
monopole oriented vertically under the spacecraft). The cancellation scheme is a
coherent subtraction after correction for the antenna gain imbalance between the two
channels:
G1 1u2
Vtot V1 V2
B G2 1u2
(10)
with V1 and V2 the complex signals at the dipole and monopole channels, and G1(θ)
and G2(θ) the antenna gain patterns for the dipole and monopole, respectively. It is
simple to show (Picardi et al., 1999a) that the surface clutter echoes are completely
removed by the subtraction, leading to infinite IF, if we assume that:
— returns from the two antennas are totally correlated;

— surface and subsurface return contributions to V1 and V2 are totally uncorrelated;
— the antenna patterns G1(θ) and G2(θ) are perfectly known;
— the monopole pattern null points exactly towards the nadir direction in both
along-track and cross-track directions;
— the primary and secondary antenna channels have the same phase/amplitude
transfer function (perfectly amplitude-balanced and phase-matched channels).
65
SP-1240
Fig. 9. Ice/Water interface detection charts. In practice, the dual-antenna cancellation IF is limited by imperfect knowledge of
Subsurface attenuation (including absorption the antenna pattern, unknown antenna pointing errors (roll and pitch angles) and
and scattering loss) appears in black; surface amplitude/phase mismatching between the two channels. In Picardi et al. (1999a),
clutter after coherent cancellation in red; noise
floor in blue. Altitudes are H = 250 km and these effects were considered and it was concluded that the main limitation to the IF
800 km; frequencies are 1.8 MHz and 5 MHz. comes from the antenna pattern knowledge and the cross-track pointing error of the
Surface correlation length is 1000 m. monopole (roll angle).
Typical IF behaviour as a function of the antenna gain variance σg2 and the space-
craft roll angle α is shown in Fig. 8b. Values of 10% accuracy in the knowledge of the
antenna patterns and ±1° roll angle result in a maximum IF of about 20 dB. Note that
this clutter cancellation technique could also be performed on the square-law detected
signals on the two dipole and monopole channels, but with reduced performance.
Another technique for clutter suppression, based on non-coherent processing of
echoes acquired simultaneously at different frequencies, has been proposed (Picardi
et al., 1999a), in order to provide surface clutter cancellation if the dual-antenna
technique proves insufficient (for example, owing to problems in positioning the
monopole null) or cannot be applied because monopole channel data are not available
on the ground. The dual-frequency technique uses the fact that the surface clutter
66
power at two frequencies remains almost constant (or the changes can be easily Fig. 10. Dry/Ice interface detection charts.
predicted by modelling), while the subsurface power is a strong function of frequency. Subsurface attenuation (including absorption
and scattering loss) appears in black; surface
As consequence, if the detected signals at both frequencies are subtracted, the surface
clutter after coherent cancellation in red; noise
contribution is significantly reduced while the subsurface contribution remains floor in blue. Altitudes are H = 250 km and
unchanged. The main limitation of this technique arises from the speckle which 800 km; frequencies are 1.8 MHz and 5 MHz.
decorrelates at the two frequencies, and represents a clutter residual after cancellation. Surface correlation length is 1000 m.
If the mean powers of surface clutter at the two frequencies are assumed to be equal,
IF can be shown to be linearly related to the number of averaged looks before
subtraction of the signal (Picardi et al., 1999a). As clearly seen in Fig. 8c, an IF of
about 5 dB can be obtained using five averaged looks.
8.4 Subsurface return signal-to-noise performance

Figures 9-10 summarise the predicted performance of the radar sounder in detecting
the ice/water and dry/ice subsurface interfaces, according to the simple models
described above and using the nominal MARSIS design parameters discussed in
Section 6.1. Figure 9 refers to ice/water interface detection, and Fig. 10 to dry/ice.
The four graphs in each figure present the detection at the two boundary frequency
67
SP-1240
bands (1.8 MHz and 5 MHz) from two altitudes (250 km and 800 km), which
represent the minimum and maximum heights of Mars Express during the portion of
the orbit when MARSIS is active. Each detection chart contains the following
normalised power levels as a function of the interface depth:
— subsurface return power, including effects of absorption and scattering. Absorption

is taken into account as in Section 8.1, assuming the two end-member host
materials (basalt and andesite) and porosities (20-50%). The backscattering is
computed assuming a subsurface correlation length equal to 2000 m and two
extreme values of the subsurface layer rms slope (1° and 5°);
— surface clutter power after coherent clutter cancellation, including Doppler
filtering and dual-antenna cancellation (dual-frequency cancellation is not
considered because we want to evaluate single-look performance). Two values of
rms slope are used, between 1° and 5°, while the surface correlation length is also
assumed to be 2000 m;
— noise floor level, computed to match the S/N values reported in Section 8.2, plus
a little increment from the receiver internal noise amplification after the dual-
antenna cancellation.
Based on a 0 dB detection threshold criterion, it is easily seen from the figure that,
thanks to the surface clutter cancellation techniques and to the strong noise
suppression, penetration depths to several kilometres can be achieved under the most
likely scenarios for the martian crust.
9. Ionospheric Sounding Since the ionosphere is a very good specular reflector, the S/N for active ionospheric
Performance sounding is expected to be good. The main difficulty is that, at frequencies below the
half-wavelength resonance of the antenna (~3 MHz), the radiated power decreases
rapidly with decreasing frequency (approximately as frequency to the fourth power).
This is compensated for to some extent by the fact that the range to the ionospheric
reflection point decreases with decreasing frequency (Fig. 2a), which tends to
improve the S/N at low frequencies. Also, at frequencies below ~1 MHz, the cosmic
noise background falls with decreasing frequency, which also improves the S/N at
low frequencies. At a spacecraft altitude of 500 km, the resulting S/N for the daytime
ionospheric model shown in Fig. 2a is expected to be 5.4 dB at 0.1 MHz, increasing
to 8.6 dB at 0.3 MHz, 18.4 dB at 1.0 MHz and 21.3 dB at 3.0 MHz. These S/Ns are
adequate to perform ionospheric sounding on the dayside of Mars under almost all
conditions. On the night side, where the electron densities are expected to be much
lower, the S/N is likely to become marginal, since the plasma frequencies are much
lower, which increases the range to the reflection point for any given spacecraft
altitude. It is also possible that the ionosphere may be more disturbed on the nightside
of Mars, which could cause scattering from small-scale irregularities, thereby causing
a further reduction in the S/N. Although the ionospheric sounding performance is
somewhat marginal on the nightside, it is almost certain that useful information will
be obtained, particularly at low altitudes where the range to the reflection point is very
small. Also, a very strong return signal is expected when the sounding frequency
passes through the local plasma frequency, which will give the local electron plasma
density under almost all conditions.
68
Biccari, D., Picardi, G., Seu, R. & Melacci, P.T. (2001a). Mars Surface Models and References
Subsurface Detection Performance in MARSIS. In Proc. IEEE International Symp.
on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IGARSS 2001, Sydney, Australia, 9-13 July
2001.
Biccari, D., Ciabattoni, F., Picardi, G.,Seu, R., Johnson, W.K.T. Jordan, R., Plaut, J.,
Safaeinili, A., Gurnett, D.A., Orosei, R., Bombaci, O., Provvedi, F., Zampolini, E.
& Zelli, C. (2001b). Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere
Sounding (MARSIS). In Proc. 2001 International Conference on Radar, October
2001, Beijing, China.
Biccari, D., Cartacci, M., Lanza, P., Quattrociocchi, M., Picardi, G., Seu, R.,
Spanò, G. & Melacci, P.T. (2001c). Ionosphere Phase Dispersion Compensation,
Infocom Technical Report N.002/005/01-23/12/2001.
Carr, M.H. (1996). Water on Mars, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Fung, A.K. & Eom, H.J. (1983). Coherent Scattering of a Spherical Wave from an
Irregular Surface. IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, AP-31(1), 68-72.
Hanson, W.B., Sanatani, S. & Zuccaro, D.R. (1977). The Martian Ionosphere as
Observed by the Viking Retarding Potential Analyzers. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 4351-
4363.
Picardi, G. & Sorge, S. (1999). Adaptive Compensation of Mars Ionosphere
Dispersion: A Low Computational Cost Solution for MARSIS, Infocom Technical
Report MRS-002/005/99, October 1999.
Picardi, G., Plaut, J., Johnson, W., Borgarelli, L., Jordan, R., Gurnett, D., Sorge, S.,
Seu, R. & Orosei, R. (1998a). The Subsurface Sounding Radar Altimeter in the
Mars Express Mission, Proposal to ESA, Infocom document N188-23/2/1998,
February 1998.
Picardi, G., Sorge, S., Seu, R., Fedele, G., Federico, C. & Orosei, R. (1999a). Mars
Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere Sounding (MARSIS): Models and
System Analysis, Infocom Technical Rep. MRS-001/005/99, March 1999.
Picardi, G., Sorge, S., Seu, R., Fedele, G. & Jordan, R.L. (1999b). Coherent Cancella-
tion of Surface Clutter Returns for Radar Sounding. In Proc. IEEE International
Symp. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IGARSS’99, Hamburg, Germany,
28 June - 2 July 1999, pp2678-2681.
Safaeinili, A. & Jordan, R.L. (2000). Low Frequency Radar Sounding through
Martian Ionosphere. In Proc. IGARSS 2000, 24-28 July 2000, Honolulu, Hawaii,
IEEE, pp987-990.
Stix, T.H. (1964). The Theory of Plasma Waves, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Zhang, M.H.G., Luhmann, J.G., Kliore, A.J. & Kim, J. (1990a). A Post-Pioneer
Venus Reassessment of the Martian Dayside Ionosphere as Observed by Radio
Occultation Methods. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 14,829-14,839.
Zhang, M.H.G., Luhmann, J.G., Kliore, A.J. & Kim, J. (1990b). An Observational
Study of the Nightside Ionospheres of Mars and Venus with Radio Occultation
Methods. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 17,095-17,102.
69
Formisano.qxd 7/9/04 12:23 PM Page 71
PFS: the Planetary Fourier Spectrometer for Mars Express
V. Formisano1, D. Grassi1, R. Orfei1, D. Biondi1, E. Mencarelli1, A. Mattana1, F. Nespoli1, A. Maturilli1,

M. Giuranna1, M. Rossi1, M. Maggi1, P. Baldetti1, G. Chionchio1, B. Saggin2, F. Angrilli2, G. Bianchini2,
G. Piccioni3, A. Di Lellis3, P. Cerroni3, F. Capaccioni3, M.T. Capria3, A. Coradini3, S. Fonti4, V. Orofino4,
A. Blanco4, L. Colangeli5, E. Palomba5, F. Esposito5, D. Patsaev6, V. Moroz6, L. Zasova6, N. Ignatiev6,
I. Khatuntsev6, B. Moshkin6, A. Ekonomov6, A. Grigoriev6, V. Nechaev6, A. Kiselev6, Y. Nikolsky6,
V. Gnedykh6, D. Titov6, P. Orleanski7, M. Rataj7, M. Malgoska7, A. Jurewicz7, M.I. Blecka7, H. Hirsh8,
G. Arnold8, E. Lellouch9, A. Marten9, T. Encrenaz9, J. Lopez Moreno10, S. Atreya11 & P. Gobbi12
1
Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario CNR (IFSI), Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100,
I-00133 Roma, Italy
Email: formisan@nike.ifsi.rm.cnr.it
2
Universita di Padova, Dipartimento Ingegneria Meccanica (DIUNP), Via Venezia 1, I-35131 Padova, Italy
3
Istituto Astrofisica Spaziale CNR (IAS), Reparto di Planetologia, Viale dell’Universita 11,
I-00185 Roma, Italy
4
Universita degli Studi di Lecce, Dipartimento di Fisica Via Arnesano, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
5
Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte (OAC), Via Moiariello 16, I-80131 Napoli, Italy
6
Space Research Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences (IKI), Profsojuznaja 84/32,
117810 Moscow, Russia
7
Space Research Center of Polish Academy of Sciences (SRC PAS), Bartycka 18A, 00716 Warsaw, Poland
8
Deutsche Forschungsansalt fur Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut fur Planetenerforschung,
Rudower Chausse 5, D-12489 Berlin Adlershoft, Germany
9
Observatoire de Paris Meudon, Department de Recherch Spatiale (DESPA), Place J. Janssen 5,
F-922195 Meudon, France
10
Istituto de Astrofisica de Andalusia CSIC, p.o.b. 3004, E-18080 Granada, Spain
11
The University of Michigan, Planetary Science Laboratory, 2455 Hayward Ave.,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, USA
12
Istituto di Fisica dell’Atmosfera CNR (IFA), Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, I-00133 Roma, Italy
The Planetary Fourier Spectrometer (PFS) for the Mars Express mission is
optimised for atmospheric studies, covering the IR range of 1.2-45 µm in two
channels. The apodised spectral resolution is 2 cm–1, while the sampling is 1 cm–1.
The FOV is about 2° for the short wavelength (SW) channel and 4° for the long
wavelength (LW) channel, corresponding to spatial resolutions of 10 km and
20 km, respectively, from an altitude of 300 km. PFS will also provide unique
data on the surface-atmosphere interaction and the mineralogical composition of
the surface. It will be the first Fourier spectrometer covering 1-5 µm to orbit the
Earth or Mars.
The experiment has real-time onboard Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) in order
to select the spectral range of interest for data transmission to ground.
Measurement of the 15-µm CO2 band is very important. Its profile gives, via a
complex temperature-profile retrieval technique, the vertical pressure
temperature relation, which is the basis of the global atmospheric study. The SW
channel uses a PbSe detector cooled to 200-220K, while the LW channel is based
on a pyroelectric (LiTaO3) device working at room temperature. The
interferogram is measured at every 150 nm displacement step of the corner cube
retroreflectors (corresponding to 600 nm optical path difference) via a laser
71
SP-1240
diode monochromatic interferogram (a sine wave), with the zero crossings

controlling the double pendulum motion.
PFS will operate for about 1.5 h around the pericentre of the orbit. With a
measurement every 10 s, 600 measurements per orbit will be acquired,
corresponding to 224 Mbit. Onboard compression will reduce it to 125 Mbit or
less, depending on the allocated data volume per day. An important requirement
is to observe at all local times in order to include night-side vertical temperature
profiles. Total instrument mass is 31.2 kg.
1. Scientific Objectives 1.1 Introduction

In the past 30 years, ground-based observations and space missions have built an
impressive body of information about Mars. Nevertheless, a large number of
questions remain open. One of the most interesting problems is the evolution of the
climate and atmosphere in relation to water. It is widely believed that the younger
Mars possessed a dense atmosphere and liquid water on the surface. However, careful
investigation of the recent atmosphere and surface is required for clarification.
The widespread use of IR spectroscopy in recent years for systematically studying
planetary surfaces and atmospheres has detected molecular species in both major and
minor quantities. Strong vibration-rotation bands in the 1-20 µm wavelength range
are the fingerprints for unambiguous identification of chemical species. Many
spectral bands of CO2, H2O and CO come within the range of sensitivity of PFS. Their
detection will help to solve a wide set of scientific problems concerning atmospheric
composition, solid-phase surface components and atmospheric dust.
In the near-IR range, where the incident solar radiation is either absorbed or
scattered by molecules and dust grains, molecular bands usually appear in absorption.
In the far-IR, molecular bands appear in both emission and absorption because the
observed flux strongly depends on the thermal profile of the atmosphere.
However, even when the absolute intensities of the molecular bands are known
from laboratory studies, it can be far from simple to derive the abundance of
atmospheric constituents from a planetary spectrum. In the near-IR, a rough estimate
of the absorber abundance can be obtained using the ‘reflecting layer model’. This
model assumes no scattering above a purely reflecting layer (cloud or surface). It is
reasonable to apply it to the case of a tenuous atmosphere, such as that on Mars.
Various methods can be used to determine the temperature-pressure T(P) relationship.
In the cases of Mars, Venus and Jupiter, thermal profiles have been derived from
strong absorption bands in the thermal-IR and also from radio occultation
measurements by probes such as Mariner and Pioneer (Kliore et al., 1972; 1976).
In situ measurements have been made on Mars and Venus.
Near-IR spectroscopy has greatly increased our knowledge of the surface
composition and structure of planetary bodies, moons and asteroids. For planets with
atmospheres, the identification of surface spectral signatures is strongly related to the
simultaneous knowledge of the atmospheric structure. Electronic and molecular
transitions occur at definite energies associated with near-IR wavelengths and result
in the absorption of incident solar radiation by surface materials. In the visible and
near-IR range (up to approximately 2.5 µm), transition of d-shell electrons and
electron exchange between ions dominate. Particularly evident are the signatures
from iron ions (e.g. McCord & Cruikshank, 1981). At longer wavelengths, the crystal
structure and the nature of different rocks and minerals can be discriminated on the
basis of the strength and position of absorption bands (e.g. Bartholomew et al., 1990).
A number of mineralogically significant bands of silicates, carbonates, sulphates,
nitrates, phosphates, oxides and hydroxile-bearing materials occur in the thermal-IR.
A great amount of laboratory work has been devoted to the systematic study of the
relative strengths and positions of diagnostic spectral signatures (e.g. Hunt et al.,
1974). Experimental results are supported by theoretical models in which the relations
72
Table 1. PFS scientific objectives.
Atmospheric studies: global long-term monitoring of the 3-D temperature field in the lower
atmosphere (from the surface up to 40-60 km); measuring the variations of minor
constituents (water vapour and carbon monoxide); searching for other minor components of
the atmosphere; a new determination of the D/H ratio; studying the optical properties of
atmospheric aerosols (dust clouds, ice clouds, hazes) and determining their size
distributions and chemical compositions; investigating the radiance balance of the
atmosphere and the influence of aerosols on atmospheric energetics; studying global
circulation, mesoscale dynamics and wave phoenomena.
Surface studies: monitoring the surface temperature; determining the thermal inertia obtained
from the daily surface temperature variations; determining the restrictions on the
mineralogical composition of the surface layer; determining the nature of the surface
condensate and seasonal variations of its composition; measuring the scattering phase
function for selected surface locations; determining local pressure and height (CO2
altimetry) for selected regions; surface-atmosphere exchange processes.
between IR spectral signatures and ion mass band strength and crystal structure were
investigated (e.g. Carr, 1974).
1.2 The atmosphere of Mars

Mars resembles the Earth much more than any other planet in the Solar System, and
studying its atmosphere provides a better understanding of our own. There is evidence
of an earlier denser martian atmosphere, warmer climate and free water on the
surface. However, explaining how warming was supported on the young Mars is not
easy. The history of water on Mars is one of the most interesting problems in Solar
System studies, and it directly connects with the possible presence of life on ancient
Mars.
The investigations of Mars’ atmosphere have determined an average composition
of mainly carbon dioxide (95%), nitrogen (2.7%) and argon (1.6%) (Owen, 1992).
About ten minor constituents have been identified. Of them, water vapour plays an
important role in atmospheric processes and surface/atmosphere interactions. Water
vapour bands will be observed by both PFS channels; monitoring water vapour
variations (time, latitude, location) is an important task for PFS, and simultaneous
observations in the two channels will provide estimates of H2O vertical distribution.
The global annual average surface temperature of Mars is 210K (Arnold et al.,
1993); the atmosphere is colder than Earth’s at all heights. In general, the vertical
structure of both can be divided into three main regions: low, middle (mesosphere)
and upper (thermosphere). The middle atmosphere of Mars is its coldest region. Here
is the sink for the energy flux coming from the surface and troposphere (heated by
solar visible and near-IR) and the thermosphere. There are several important
qualitative differences with the terrestrial atmosphere:
— there is no temperature maximum in the mesosphere;

— the lapse rate in the low atmosphere is less than on Earth;
— there are strong daily variations near the surface because of the much lower
thermal capacity;
— the strong influence of aerosols on atmospheric heating.
The computation of realistic General Circulation Models (GCMs) is a very

difficult task because it has to accommodate so many different effects. Horizontal
differences in temperatures lead to differences in pressure, but they are smoothed by
winds. Winds transfer heat together with air masses, influencing local temperature
profiles. Temperatures are also affected by dust being lifted from the surface.
Condensation is another route to aerosol formation, and it also feeds back to
73
SP-1240
temperatures. Winds vary with topography. However, a few groups of theoreticians

have made significant large progress in GCM modelling. They work mainly with data
from Mariner-9/IRIS for Ls 290-350° and much less for Ls 45-55° (full profiles; Ls
is the angle between the Sun-Mars line and the northern spring equinox) and the much
less informative Viking/IRTM atmospheric temperatures. PFS LW observations of the
15 µm band will help to fill the gaps. Such measurements will strengthen the
empirical base for checking the martian GCMs.
Aerosols play a major role in the formation and variations of 3-D temperature and
wind patterns in the atmosphere. There are two aerosol types: dust lifted from the
surface, and condensates. A Global Dust Storm is the most pronounced manifestation
of the influence of dust on martian meteorology, but aerosols are always present in the
atmosphere and both kinds participate in heating/cooling processes. The chemical
nature (minerals/ices), size distribution and optical depth of the aerosol medium will
be estimated from PFS observations. Simultaneous observations by the two channels
should be very helpful.
Previous data exhibited both seasonal and daily variations, and occasional climatic
events. During northern winter, two different regimes have been observed in different
years. In the first case, one or more dust storms cover nearly all the planet; in the
second, there is no global storm but high winds raise dust in confined regions. By
contrast, summer weather appears to be more repetitive: winds are generally low and
evolve on a diurnal timescale. Storms are very peculiar events and require more
detailed investigation. Pressure profiles, wind patterns and atmospheric dust-
evolution must be carefully analysed to determine the effects on surface morphology.
Surface changes produced by atmospheric activity have been revealed by
observations of albedo patterns, and suggest close coupling of surface morphology
with ambient evolution. In particular, chemical and physical processes at the
lithosphere-atmosphere boundary must be better described and understood.
Temperature changes control the polar cap condensation rate and influence the
formation and the evolution of clouds. Until now, white condensation (mainly water-
ice) clouds have been observed; however, their evolution and detailed composition
are still uncertain.
Atmospheric data can also be helpful, in combination with surface composition
analyses, in determining the:
— distribution, abundance and physical status of water on the planet;

— volatile distribution and abundance in the atmosphere, on the crust, and at depth;
— outgassing processes.
The spectrum of Mars (as for any planet) consist of two elements: short
wavelengths dominated by bireflected solar radiation, and long wavelengths
dominated by the planet’s thermal radiation. For Mars, the boundary between these
two regimes is near 4 µm. The PFS SW and LW ranges almost match these regimes
of the martian spectrum. Bands of atmospheric gases in the SW range appear only as
absorption features; in the LW they can appear as absorption (if atmospheric
temperature falls with height) or emission (if it rises), and occasionally the band may
have a complicate shape.
1.3 Thermal sounding of the martian atmosphere

1.3.1 Physical background
In a strong absorption band, the thermal radiation emitted from the surface and lower
atmospheric levels is absorbed by the higher regions and cannot escape to space.
However, the strength of absorption bands usually varies by several orders of
magnitude within a given spectral interval. If the outgoing radiation is measured
across the entire band then different parts will bear information about the temperature
at different altitudes.
The thermal sounding needs several conditions to be satisfied. First, the gas must
74
have spectral bands in the thermal-IR region. Second, the gas must be abundant
enough to give strong absorption in the centre of the band in order to maximise the
altitude range of sounding. Third, it is desirable that the gas is uniformly mixed within
the bulk of the atmosphere and its abundance must not vary significantly with space,
local time or season. Carbon dioxide meets these requirements rather well for the
terrestrial planets. That is why CO2 fundamental bands are usually chosen for
thermally sounding the atmospheres of Venus, Earth and Mars.
The solution of radiative transfer equation for the outgoing radiation takes the
form:
q
I1n2 e1n2 B1n, TS 2 t 1hS, q 2 B 3n, T1h2 4 K1n, h2 dh (1)

hs
where ν is the wavenumber, η = log (p) (p is pressure) is the vertical coordinate, ε

and Ts are the emissivity and temperature of the surface, respectively, B is the Planck
function describing the blackbody radiation, T(η) is the vertical temperature profile,
and
0t 1h, q 2
K1n, h2 (2)
0h
is the weighting function, where t (η, – ∞) is the transmittance between the

atmospheric level η and space along the line-of-sight. The first term in Eq. (1)
corresponds to the radiation from the surface attenuated by the atmosphere. The
second one describes the emission of the atmosphere. The weighting functions
K (ν, η) define the weight with which the atmospheric layer at pressure η contributes
to the radiation measured at wavenumber ν. Eq. (1) is written under the following
assumptions:
— the atmosphere is plane parallel. This is valid until the emission angle is smaller
than ~80°;
— the scattering is neglected. This assumption is valid for almost all seasons on
Mars because the dust loading is small. Only during dust storms should the
scattering by dust be taken into account and Eq. (1) modified;
— it is assumed that the local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) requirement is met.
This assumption means that the scattering in spectral lines is negligible and the
energy of each absorbed photon is converted to the thermal energy of the gas via
molecular collisions. This provides the necessary coupling between the radiation
and kinetic temperature of the emitting gas. Detailed studies showed that the LTE
conditions are fulfilled in the martian atmosphere at least in the altitude region 0-
60 km, which will be covered by PFS.
1.3.2 PFS temperature sounding capabilities

The positions of the absorption bands of CO2 gas in the PFS spectral region are shown
in Fig. 1. The central wavenumbers and line intensities were taken from the HITRAN
database (Rothman et al., 1992). Two very strong fundamental bands of CO2 are in
the thermal-IR region (200-2500 cm–1) and they can be used for thermal sounding.
The first at 15 µm is in the region of maximum radiation from Mars and is optimal
for thermal sounding. The band at 4.3 µm falls in the spectral interval where the
thermal radiation is already low and the contribution from reflected solar light is not
negligible. However, this band can be used at least at the night side to improve the
quality of thermal sounding provided by the 15 µm band. PFS will be the first
instrument to measure the outgoing radiation in these two bands simultaneously.
The altitude coverage and vertical resolution of the remote sensing are defined by
75
SP-1240
Fig. 1. Transmittance of gases in the atmosphere of Mars.
Fig. 2. Carbon dioxide weighting functions for the 4.3 µm and 15 µm

absorption bands.
Fig. 3. Synthetic spectra in the LW channel of PFS. Fig. 4. Test temperature retrievals from PFS spectra.
the behaviour of weighting functions (Eq. 2). Examples of the weighting functions for
PFS are shown in Fig. 2. The numbers on the curves designate the wavenumber: 550-
668 cm–1 corresponds to 15 µm and 2360-2380 cm–1 to 4.3 µm. PFS weighting
functions cover the pressure range from the surface up to ~10–3 mbar, corresponding
to altitudes 0-70 km. However, the effectiveness of thermal sounding drops as the
weighting functions decrease with altitude. The width of weighting functions is
defined by the scale height of the atmosphere (~10 km) and the band structure. From
Eq. 1 it is clear that broad weighting functions smooth small-scale features of the
temperature profile. Nevertheless, practise shows that the features much smaller than
the width of the weighting function can be retrieved from the emission spectrum
because many spectral channels are used. The vertical resolution is estimated to be 3-
5 km.
Additional use of the measurements in the 4.3 µm CO2 band can improve the
quality of the sounding, especially above 30 km. At these altitudes, the weighting
functions for 15 µm (667 cm–1 and 668 cm–1) are very broad. Those for the 4.3 µm
band (2360 cm–1 and 2370 cm–1) have smaller widths. These channels can provide
better determination of the temperature profile above 30 km. The sounded region can
76
be extended upward by ~10 km in the off-nadir observations allowed by the PFS

scanning capability. Fig. 2 (dashed lines) shows examples of weighting functions for
slant geometry with emission angle of 80° for the 668 cm–1 and 2360 cm–1 channels.
1.3.3 Test temperature retrievals from PFS radiance spectra

The vertical temperature profile T(η) is the solution of the non-linear integral Eq. 1
using the radiance measurements I(ν) in the CO2 band. The solutions of this problem
are unstable with respect to small perturbations of the right hand side of the equation.
The experimental errors in the measured radiance spectrum can result in a non-
physical temperature profile. The procedures that can provide a stable solution of the
ill-posed problems are regularisation algorithms. They use various kinds of a priori
information about the solution in order to select physically meaningful functions
among mathematically possible solutions.
Several methods were developed to solve the thermal-sounding Eq. 1. The Smith
iterative (Smith, 1970) and Tikhonov regularisation (Tikhonov et al., 1990) methods
were used for testing temperature retrievals from PFS radiance spectra. First, using
the MARSGRAM software (Justus et al., 1995), three ‘true’ temperature profiles were
selected, representing the variety of conditions on Mars: 1 equatorial day model;
2 equatorial night model; 3 polar summer model. The synthetic spectra of the
outgoing radiation calculated for each temperature model and dust-free atmosphere
are shown in Fig. 3.
Each retrieval algorithm organises its own process of iterative correction of the
initial profile. It is done in different ways but all the methods tend to reduce the
deviation of the synthetic profile from the ‘measured’ one.
The surface pressure is usually a free parameter in the retrieval procedures.
However, the measurements in the 2.0 µm CO2 band simultaneously carried out in the
PFS short wavelength channel will provide the necessary data on the surface pressure,
at least for daytime observations. So it was assumed that the surface pressure was
known in this set of test retrievals.
Temperature profiles retrieved by the Smith iterative and Tikhonov regularisation
methods are compared in Fig. 4 with the ‘true’ profiles. The retrieval error bars for
dust-free tests are also presented in the right side of the figure. The following
conclusions about the PFS temperature-sounding capabilities can be drawn from the
test retrievals:
— in the dust-free atmosphere, the temperature profile can be retrieved from the
measurements in the 15 µm CO2 band with an accuracy of ~3K in the altitude
region 0-65 km. This value can be considered as the noise of the retrieval
procedures. The accuracy of the retrievals from the actual measurements will
depend on the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) achieved in the PFS measurements;
— the retrieval errors increase above 65 km because the weighting functions
decrease with altitude (Fig. 2) and the radiance measurements are no longer
sensitive to atmospheric temperature;
— the retrieval accuracy at the surface is 2-3K by deriving the surface pressure from
the 2.0 µm CO2 measurements. This was proved by several test retrievals with the
wrong surface pressure;
— test temperature retrievals from the dusty spectrum without taking aerosols into
account resulted in ~10K errors in the lower 10 km of the atmosphere.
1.3.4 The influence of aerosols

Dust is always present in the martian atmosphere. Its abundance varies significantly
with season and from year to year. Its optical depth changes from 0.2 to more than
unit in the visual range. The absorption features of palagonite dust were discovered in
Mariner-9 spectra. In the short wavelength wing of the 15 µm CO2 band, the water ice
features have been found in Mars Global Surveyor/TES spectra. They were observed
at high zenith angle, together with palagonite bands.
77
SP-1240
The influence of aerosols on martian spectra were modelled, assuming the

presence of palagonite aerosols (optical parameters were taken from Roush et al.,
1993) with modified gamma particle size distribution (Pollack & Toon, 1982):
n1r2 r ra exp c d
a
g 1r>rm 2 g
(3)
The modal radius rm = 0.4, effective radius reff = 1.6 µm and constants α = 1 and
γ = 1 were used. In the spectral range favourable for temperature and aerosol retrieval,
the single scattering albedo is less than 0.4; aerosol particles are black and non-
scattering. In order to model the aerosol influence in the spectral range of temperature
retrieval, spectra were calculated for optical depth τ = 0.3, 1, 10, and scale height
Ha = 10 km at zenith angles of observations 0° and 70°. The results are shown in
Fig. 5.
The aerosol influence on the spectra can be summarised as:
— aerosol absorption increases the altitude of the effective emission level. So a
temperature profile retrieved with pure gaseous transmission functions relates to
the shifted levels;
— aerosol absorption can be asymmetrical in the wings of the 15 µm band. The
absorption coefficient is doubled in the long wavelength wing. The measured
brightness temperature in the short wavelength wing agrees with calculations,
although in the long wavelength wing it is systematically lower.
1.4 The 3-D global atmospheric circulation

Direct observations of winds in the martian atmosphere are very rare, available for
only a few landing sites. Wind direction and speed derived from cloud tracking and
aeolian streaks correspond to the boundary layer and are often ambiguous (see Zurek
et al., 1992, and references therein). Remote sounding from orbit remains the most
valuable source of information about the large-scale dynamics of the atmosphere.
Long-term global monitoring by PFS of such atmospheric parameters as vertical
temperature profiles, aerosol optical depth, surface pressure and water vapour column
density will provide an important insight into the following aspects of the atmospheric
dynamics:
Global circulation. The fundamentals of atmospheric dynamics on rapidly rotating

planets like Earth and Mars show that geostrophic winds derived from the remotely
determined 3-D temperature field are a good approximation of the true large-scale
atmospheric motions in a non-equatorial zone (Pedlosky, 1979). So far, thermal winds
have been retrieved only from the Mariner-9/IRIS observations taken during the
northern winter (Zurek et al., 1992). Long-term global temperature sounding of the
martian atmosphere by PFS will have complete latitude, longitude and seasonal
coverage in the altitude range from the surface up to about 60 km. This will allow us
to determine systematically the wind pattern and to follow seasonal changes in global
circulation. Simultaneous monitoring of the atmosphere’s dust content will provide
further insight into the role of dust in the atmospheric dynamics. PFS observations
will also help us to understand the mechanisms of polar warming, which is supposed
to be of a dynamical nature.
Wave phenomena. The experience gained from the analysis of Mariner-9/IRIS and
Viking/IRTM data shows that similar observations of the atmospheric temperature
field by PFS will allow us to study some important wave phenomena: thermal tides
and their interaction with large-scale topography, quasi-stationary waves probably
generated by instabilities in the mid-latitude zonal jet, and large-amplitude waves at
high latitudes during the polar warming.
78
Fig. 5. Synthetic spectra of Mars’ atmosphere, including the 9 µm

palagonite absorption band. Fig. 6. Synthetic spectrum for the PFS SW channel.
Fig. 7. Synthetic transmittance spectrum in the 3.7 µm HDO band. Fig. 8. Synthetic transmittance spectrum in the 2.35 µm CO band.
Transport of atmospheric species. Mars is a unique planet, where the main

atmospheric component (carbon dioxide) is deposited on the polar caps in winter.
This produces seasonal variations of up to 25% in surface pressure. Systematic
measurements of this parameter by PFS will give an estimate of the mean meridional
flow from summer to winter hemisphere. Furthermore, the water vapour that sublimes
from the polar cap in summer and is then transported to the lower latitudes can be
used as a tracer of the large-scale atmospheric motions (Haberle & Jakosky, 1990).
PFS observations of atmospheric water will impose additional constraints on the
transporting winds.
1.5 The minor constituents

Minor constituents identified in the atmosphere of Mars are H2O, CO, O2, O3, He, Ne,
Ar, Kr and Xe. Their mixing ratios are less than 10–3. Four of these gases have bands
in the PFS spectral range: H2O, CO, O3, O2 (Fig. 1). The bands of isotopes such as
HDO,13C 16O2, 12C, 16O and 18O are well separated from the bands corresponding to the
main isotopes and may be used to re-estimate the isotopic ratios.
Synthetic spectra of Mars in the wide spectral range of 1.2-45 µm were computed
79
SP-1240
in order to analyse the PFS capabilities in the investigation of minor constituents.The

general view of the martian spectrum in the near-IR range is shown in Fig. 6.
The spectrum demonstrates sharp absorption features of the atmospheric CO2, H2O
and CO, and a broad spectral signature of surface minerals at ~3 µm. It also shows the
contribution from thermal emission at λ > 4 µm (dashed line). The computations were
performed for the nominal temperature model (mid-latitudes, northern summer)
elaborated on the basis of Viking landing data (Seiff, 1982). PFS measurements will
provide the H2O detection limit of ~1 µm. The transmittance spectrum of HDO is shown
in Fig. 7. Fig. 8 presents the CO transmittance spectrum for the mixing ratio of 6x10–4.
The martian volcanoes are the highest in the Solar System. They cover more than
2 atmospheric scale heights (~27 km in the case of Olympus Mons). Such
topographical features offer the possibility of obtaining vertical profiles for trace
gases and dust. PFS observations along the slopes will sound increasingly high
altitudes as the field of view moves towards the top. However, the analysis of such
observations is not straightforward because the vertical profiles of the species in the
vicinity of the slopes can be affected by the surface-atmospheric interactions and can
differ from those in the free atmosphere.
1.6 Water distribution and cycle in the martian atmosphere

The first detection of H2O on Mars was made by Earth-based spectral observations at
high resolution (about 0.1 Å) using the Doppler shift of weak lines with respect to
much stronger telluric features in the band at 8200 Å (Spinrad & Richardson, 1963;
Kaplan et al., 1964). If a telluric absorption line is not oversaturated, then a much
weaker planetary feature belonging to the same gas can be visible on its wing because
of Doppler shift. Water vapour in the martian atmosphere have been studied
systematically using this method, including average abundance and latitude, daily and
seasonal variations. Average water abundance of about 10 µm ppw (precipitable
microns water equivalent) is a typical value. However, the ground-based observations
had intrinsic limitations in spatial resolution and coverage.
Measurements of water bands in the atmosphere of Mars were also performed by
several experiments onboard the orbiters Mars-3 (Moroz & Nadzhip, 1975),
Mariner-9 (Hanel et al., 1972) and Viking-1 & -2 (Jakosky & Farmer, 1982). These
experiments provided much better spatial resolution (≤ 20 km) and detection
threshold (1-3 µm ppw).
Mariner-9/IRIS detected atmospheric water vapour in the region from the South
Pole to the Equator, using rotational lines in the spectra between 250 cm–1 and
500 cm–1. These features were not observed over the North Pole. The total amount of
water vapour in the atmosphere was estimated from a quantitative comparison of
observed and synthetic spectra in the range 10-20 µm ppw. It has been proposed (e.g.
Pollack et al., 1979) that water vapour abundance in the atmosphere may be greatly
affected by the adsorption of water vapour on dust particles. Suspended dust particles
would supply a large surface, producing rather efficient adsorption. Much of the water
vapour would settle with dust and it would be released again into the atmosphere as
the temperature increases. There is a strong coupling between the temperature and the
water abundance fields, but there is still no clear understanding of all the possible
sources and sinks of atmospheric water.
Sublimation of water from the north polar cap certainly occurs, but the best model
is still uncertain on the quantity. Similarly the regolith is certainly capable of
adsorbing and desorbing water, thereby modulating to some degree the amount of
water within the atmosphere. The efficiency of this process depends, however, on the
composition of the regolith and on the ability of water molecules to diffuse through
the uppermost centimetres of regolith, and both of these are very uncertain (Jakosky
& Haberle, 1992). A set of experiments on future Orbiters and Landers is necessary
for a real understanding of the seasonal cycle. First of all, long-term studies (many
martian years) of water vapour are necessary. Several missions are required and PFS
will make a crucial contribution.
80
Fig. 9. Simultaneous measurements of the

equivalent width of two H2O bands gives
information about the vertical distribution of
water vapour.
The water vapour mixing ratio profile seems to indicate the existence of two
regions in the atmosphere: below 20-25 km there is relatively high water abundance;
above this boundary, it is about 10 times lower (Rodin et al., 1997).
Three different spectral ranges could be used for remote measurements of
atmospheric water from orbit:
— near-IR: bands at 1.38, 1.87, 2.7 µm;

— thermal-IR details of the pure rotational H2O band in the range 20-50 µm;
— microwave lines of the pure rotational bands (1.63 µm, for instance).
The sensitivity curve of PFS is such that the 1.87 µm and 2.7 µm bands are more
favorable. The detection threshold of 1 µm ppw could be achieved in measurements
with an S/N of 100.
The 1.87 µm band appears to be the most convenient for H2O detection, as it is
almost free of overlap with the CO2 bands. However, the 2.7 µm band will be used to
make the H2O abundance determination more accurate.
The disadvantage of the thermal-IR range is the strong dependence of the water
spectral features on the temperature profile in the lowest 1-3 km of the atmosphere,
which cannot be resolved directly by any remote-sounding experiment. In principle,
we can observe H2O features in the thermal-IR range not only in absorption but even
in emission (in the case of the temperature inversion just above the surface). However,
the joint analysis of the H2O spectral details observed simultaneously in the near-IR
and in the pure rotational bands can impose constraints on the vertical distribution of
water vapour. Fig. 9 shows the isolines of equivalent widths of the 1.87 µm band
(solid lines) and 50 µm band (dots). This diagram is based on a set of calculations of
synthetic spectra for various H2O vertical profiles. The abscissa shows the H2O
column density and Z is the effective altitude of water location. Fig. 9 demonstrates
that simultaneous measurements in several water vapour bands will be able to give an
estimate of vertical distribution.
PFS also provides an additional opportunity for detection of the 3.7 µm HDO band.
It was observed in the martian spectrum by Owen et al. (1988) and the D/H ratio was
found to be considerably higher than on Earth (about 6 times). PFS could provide a
new, independent determination of this ratio.
In summary, PFS will perform long-term observations of atmospheric water
vapour on Mars. This will provide further understanding of the behaviour of water on
the planet, its seasonal and diurnal cycles, and distribution of sources and sinks. In
comparison with other experiments that have measured martian H2O, PFS has several
advantages:
81
SP-1240
— the uncertainties in temperature profile, which are usual for near-IR observations
of water vapour bands, will be minimised by simultaneous temperature-sounding
in the 15 µm CO2band;
— high spectral resolution in the near-IR range will result in clear discrimination
between the atmospheric and surface spectral features, making the quantitative
analysis more reliable;
— simultaneous observations of the water vapour bands in thermal-IR and near-IR
will help the vertical distribution of H2O to be estimated.
1.7 The aerosol investigation

1.7.1 Introduction
The scientific objectives of PFS include:
— the determination of the optical properties, size distribution and chemical

composition of the atmospheric aerosols: dust clouds, ice clouds and hazes;
— the investigation of the influence of aerosols on energy exchanges in the
atmosphere.
The surface-atmosphere interaction plays a role in the surface’s morphology and

chemical composition and the atmosphere’s temperature, pressure and composition.
It is well known that the CO2, water and dust cycles are strongly interconnected and
with the seasonal variations. Winds, erosion processes and global dust storms are the
principal mechanisms for material exchange between aerosols and the surface and
between different regions of the planet. Studying the atmosphere’s solid components
is therefore an important task. Furthermore, the composition of the atmospheric dust
provides clues on the chemical composition of the surface, because the identification
of dust materials implies characterisation of the soil properties. Last but not least,
correctly interpreting the atmosphere’s pressure and temperature behaviour must
include the role played by the aerosols.
1.7.2 The dust cycle

Atmospheric dust has a role in determining the martian climate and it is clear that it
is key for surface geology over a long time scale.
Suspended dust affects the thermal structure and atmospheric circulation with a
typical seasonal evolution (Haberle, 1986). The increase of opacity in the northern
hemisphere autumn and winter is consistent with global dust storms. This effect is
linked to the planet’s perihelion, when heating and atmospheric circulation reach
maximum. Atmospheric opacity also depends on the form, dimension and composi-
tion of the dust grains.
During local dust storms, the lifted materials are redistributed over contiguous
areas, while global dust storms transfer dust from the southern hemisphere to the
north and the polar cap. Beside the storm effects, dust can be transferred through the
atmosphere by baroclinic and planetary waves (Kahn et al., 1992). The dust is
probably placed in suspension by strong winds and/or water and CO2 degassing from
the regolith.
The continuous monitoring of the martian atmosphere by PFS in the IR will reveal
the evolution of the aerosol composition and amount. Moreover, the dust cycle is
strongly linked to the water and CO2 atmospheric cycles. In fact, the presence of dust
at the poles can significantly affect the energetic balance and, then, influence the
water vapour and CO2 fluxes. Dust grains in the atmosphere may become
condensation nuclei for CO2 and H2O accretion on their surfaces. In particular, the
CO2 condensed on the grain surface may act as a cold trap for atmospheric water. In
addition, the transfer of dust from the surface to the atmosphere depends on the
pressure and, therefore, on the CO2 abundance. These elements are further evidence
that dust and gas composition of the atmosphere are connected and cannot be treated
separately.
82
1.7.3 Aerosol dust particles

Although spectral signatures of dust particles were clearly evident in Mariner-9/IRIS
spectra, it was difficult to define the bulk composition of solid grains with a high
degree of confidence. The content of SiO2 in the dust has been inferred from the
comparison of observations with laboratory data; it appears to be 60±10%. Phobos-2
observations of the martian atmosphere using solar occultations in the UV and visible
revealed absorption features, probably owing to aerosols (dust particles interpreted as
haematite-type) and ozone. A correlation seems to exist between the amount of
particulate material in the atmosphere and ozone abundance. This evidence suggests
the possibility of heterogeneous chemistry in martian aeronomy (Atreya, 1989) and
confirms that aerosols and dust particles play an important role in atmospheric
evolution. However, the nature of the particles and their size distribution is not well
determined. Atreya (1989) suggests that they could be ices covered by different types
of dust (haematite, magnetite and limonite). The PFS data will be helpful in
identifying the aerosol nature: the spectrum of light scattered by the atmospheric
particles and their thermal emission are sensitive to the chemical composition and size
distribution. Additional restrictions could be imposed by the phase function measured
by PFS. The problem of separating contributions from the surface and atmospheric
radiation should be solved when the aerosol optical depth is not very large. PFS will
provide the opportunity for simultaneous measurements of the spectra of the scattered
light and the thermal emission of clouds and hazes in the wide range 1.25-45 µm.
1.7.4 The composition of dust

The wavelength range of PFS over 5 µm can be diagnostic for the composition of
dust. Much observational evidence indicates the presence of silicate materials, but
attribution to a specific class has not yet been achieved. The Mariner-9 data suggested
that montmorillonite might be a major component (Hunt et al., 1973). While the
observed 10 µm silicate band is easily reproduced by laboratory spectra of crystalline
clays, problems occur in simulating the 20 µm band: it does not exhibit any double
peak, as is typical of many terrestrial silicate materials. Further observations by PFS
at 10 µm and 20 µm could reveal spectroscopic details helpful for identifying the
silicate minerals in martian dust. Thermal emission spectra of Mars in the 5-10 µm
range have been obtained by a grating array spectrometer aboard the Kuiper Airborne
Observatory (Pollack et al., 1989). The observations confirmed that the spectrum of
Mars at > 5 µm has more features than previously believed (Roush et al., 1989).
Features at 6.1, 7.8 and 9.8 µm are attributed to water and silicate minerals on the
surface. Weaker features appear atmospheric in origin: the CO32– anionic group can
contribute with bands at 6.7 µm and 7.05 µm, when included in distorted sites of
complicated crystalline structures; and SO42– and HSO4– in sulphates and bisulphates
produce resonances at 8.7 µm and 9.78 µm. Again, there are doubts about the relative
amount of carbonates and sulphates in the form of dust. PFS observations could
provide details on cation composition in complex crystalline materials.
1.8 The soil of Mars

1.8.1 Introduction
The spectral studies of the martian surface indicate there to be different types of soil
and rocks. They include drift soil, which is similar to the global dust and already
analysed by remote spectral measurements from Mariner-9/IRIS, Viking and
Phobos-2/ISM and directly at the Viking and Pathfinder landing sides by X-ray
fluorescence (Toulmin et al., 1977). There is also sand – attributed to local weathering
processes – and more crystalline soil that could be a mixture of dust and local
material. The Pathfinder landing site is dominated by three rock types. Dark rocks
such as Barnacle Bill and Bambam seem to be fresh basalt or basaltic andesite (Rieder
et al., 1997). Bright rocks like Broken Wall and Wedge are attributed to weathered
basalts or basaltic andesite. Pink rocks are thought to be chemically cemented drift
formations. There is clearly a wide variety of chemical, mineralogical and
83
SP-1240
morphological characteristics in the surface material at the site. Global spectral

studies by PFS will add information on how representative these features are for the
whole surface, by comparing the PFS observations of the Pathfinder site with other
martian targets. Mapping the distribution of hydrated minerals and salts in the soil is
important for understanding the weathering processes and the former role of water on
Mars.
1.8.2 The role of PFS

To study the surface of Mars, PFS observations will address the following objectives:
— thermal measurements and determination of the soil’s thermal inertia;

— evaluate the local atmospheric pressure and the relative altitude of various
regions;
— overview of generic areas of the surface in order to trace the overall distribution
of various materials (iron oxides, clays, palagonites, hydrates, sulphates, nitrates,
igneous minerals, ices);
— study specific areas chosen to search for answers to fundamental questions on the
evolution of the planet and the ancient paleoclimate, e.g. the past existence of
abundant liquid water on the surface (by searching for carbonates and other
evaporites);
— study the surface-atmosphere exchange processes.
IR spectroscopy in the range covered by PFS is a powerful tool for exploring the
surface composition. Different families of resonance fall within the IR spectral range:
— charge transition bands of electrons in the lattices of transition metal ions;

— charge transfer bands due to electron exchange between ions in the material;
— vibrational bands of radicals/molecules present in minerals.
In general, discriminating between atmospheric and surface contributions to the

spectrum is rather difficult, requiring a combined study of surface and aerosol/dust
constituents. Correctly interpretating the gaseous atmospheric composition requires
the subtraction of the solid material’s contribution from the recorded spectra.
Finally, a quantitative identification of materials must be based on a comparative
analysis of the collected spectra with laboratory measurements on analogue
compounds representing martian materials.
1.8.3 Determination of the thermal inertia of the soil

Thermal inertia, which depends on thermal conductivity, mass density and specific
heat, is a measure of the responsiveness of a medium to changes in its temperature.
The dominant reason for variations in thermal inertia is generally grain-size
differences in the superficial material. Thus data on thermal inertia have the potential
for telling us if the superficial material is relatively coarse- or fine-grained.
Using PFS measurements of the thermal spectrum from the martian surface in the
wide spectral range 5-45 µm, it is possible to determine the pre-dawn temperature of
the soil and, from this, its thermal inertia. This can be done by comparing the actual
pre-dawn temperatures with those predicted by an idealised thermal model of the
surface layer (Kieffer et al., 1977).
1.8.4 Evaluation of the local atmospheric pressure and elevation

The depth of the carbon dioxide unsaturated absorption band measured at a specific
site depends on the local atmospheric pressure and, consequently, on the altitude . The
PFS SW channel (1.2-5.0 µm) could be used to acquire pressure and relative elevation
data and, finally, to map the surface relief. Such an approach was applied to the
Mars-3 and -5 and Phobos data.
84
1.8.5 The chemical and mineral composition of the surface

Among the prime unresolved and oft-debated questions of Mars is the structure and
composition of its surface materials. Reflectance and emittance spectroscopy in the
near-IR and mid-IR is diagnostic of mineralogy, and hence provides useful
information on the surface composition. The spectra of minerals in terrestrial
conditions show remarkable dependence on varying experimental situations,
including the form of the material (which may be bulk or particulate with different
granularity and packing), background temperature, uniformity of sample heating,
pressure and insolation angle.
1.8.6 Iron oxides

Crystalline ferric oxides, such as haematite, have long been proposed as one of the
major components of the martian surface, in view of the planet’s colour and the
substantial amount of Fe2O3 measured in the soil by the Viking Landers. The broad
absorption bands around 10 µm and 20 µm, observed in the spectra from
Mariner-9/IRIS, appear inconsistent with crystalline ferric oxides. On the other hand,
there is no evidence for such compounds at the Pathfinder site.
The comparisons performed so far with the spectra of Mars suggest that either only
a few percent of coarsely crystalline haematite or abundant but nanocrystalline
haematite are present in the studied areas (Morris & Lauer, 1990). However, a more
systematic research of spectral features typical of Fe3+ resonances on the martian
surface can be useful to clarify this point. Spectroscopic observations by PFS in both
SW and LW channels (where haematite shows narrow bands at 2.9, 6.1 and 7.8 µm
and broad bands around 18.5 µm and 21.5 µm) can be a great help in determining the
main allotropic form of haematite on Mars. The spectral resolution of PFS in this case
should have a strong diagnostic power, since the spectral bands of samples with a high
degree of crystallinity are, in general, more structured than those of nanocrystalline or
amorphous samples (which tend, instead, to be structureless).
1.8.7 Water in the martian soil

PFS will also trace the distribution of hydrates on the surface, by analysing the H2O
bands around 3 µm (due to O-H stretching) and around 6 µm (H-O-H bending).
Although it is clear that hydration water is widespread on the surface, there is not
much of it. Surface materials should, in fact, be dehydrated in comparison with
terrestrial soils, with a water content of up to a few percent (Soderblom, 1992). PFS
can improve, on a statistical basis, these evaluations by searching for regions with a
higher content of hydration water.
1.8.8 Ices
Mars has a dynamical seasonal cycle of CO2 and H2O exchange between the surface
and atmosphere. The interplay between vaporisation and condensation of both CO2
and H2O produces clouds and mists in the atmosphere and frost and ices on the
surface. We expect – apart from polar summers – that PFS observations of ice and
frost deposits may be hindered by clouds and mists.
As the role of H2O in the polar cycles remains to be clarified, searching for CO2
and H2O ice and frost features in the spectra of the north polar region will be very
useful. Unlike H2O ice, which strongly absorbs throughout the thermal-IR, CO2 ice
absorbs strongly in the bands at 2.7 µm, 4.3 µm in the SW channel of PFS and at
15 µm in the LW channel. This difference could be a basis for distinguishing between
the two substances while observing the surface ice deposits. If, however, there are
abundant particles of solid CO2 more than a few µm in size, as there probably are at
the polar caps, the reflectivity and emissivity of the surface deposits are also strongly
influenced by the weak absorption between the strong bands (Hansen, 1997). In such
conditions, a thorough examination of these spectral regions is important.
85
SP-1240
2. Instrument Description 2.1 Introduction

PFS is a double pendulum interferometer working in two wavelength ranges (1.2-
5 µm and 5-45 µm; Table 2). Martian radiation is divided into two beams by a
dichroic mirror. The two ranges correspond to two planes (one on top of the other)
containing the two interferometers, so that the same motor can simultaneously move
the two pendulums and the two channels are sampled simultaneously and
independently. The pendulum motion is accurately controlled via a laser diode
reference channel using the same optics as the martian radiation. The same laser diode
also generates the sampling signal for the analogue-digital converter (ADC),
measuring the 600 nm displacements of the double pendulum mirror. The
measurements are double-sided interferograms, so that the onboard FFT can be
computed without needing the zero optical path difference location.
2.2 Instrument organisation

PFS is a Fourier spectrometer produced by the combined efforts of several groups
from Italy, Russia, Poland, Germany, France and Spain. The flight hardware was built
in Italy (the Interferometer Block with its controlling electronics, the digital
electronics controlling the experiment, and the Ground Support Equipment with the
spacecraft simulator) and Poland (power supply and pointing system). Special flight
parts and subassemblies were built in Russia and Germany.
2.3 Technical description

The flight hardware, totalling 31.2 kg, is divided into four modules (Fig. 10), with
connecting cables (0.8 kg):
— Module-O (PFS-O): the interferometer, with its optics and proximity electronics,
is the core of PFS. 21.5 kg;
— Module-S (PFS-S): the pointing device, which allows PFS to receive radiation
from Mars or from the inflight calibration sources, 3.7 kg;
— Module-E (PFS-E): the digital electronics, including a 32-Mbit mass memory and
a realtime FFT. 3.0 kg;
— Module-P (PFS-P): the power supply, with the DC/DC converter, redundancies
and the separate power supplies for the 16-bit ADCs. 2.2 kg.
Power requirements are: 5 W thermal control, 10 W in sleep mode, 35 W full

operational mode and 44 W peak.
2.4 Module-O (PFS-O)

PFS-O is divided into the Interferometer Block (IB) and Electronics Block (EB).
They are mechanically separated but electrically connected through six cables. The
highly compact IB is a gas-tight box filled by dry nitrogen in order to preserve the
hygroscopic optical elements.
2.4.1 Optical scheme of PFS-O

The optical scheme of PFS is shown in Fig. 11. The incident IR beam falls onto the
entrance filter that separates the radiation of the SW channel from that of the LW
channel and directs each into the appropriate interferometer channel. The PFS-S in
front of the interferometer allows the FOV to be pointed along and across the
projection of the flight path onto the martian surface. It also directs the FOV at the
internal blackbody sources diffusers and to open space for inflight calibration. Each
PFS channel is equipped with a pair of retroreflectors attached by brackets to an axle
rotated by a torque motor. The axle and drive mechanism are used for both channels,
which are vertically separated. The optical path difference is generated by the rotation
of the retroreflectors (Hirsch & Arnold, 1993). The motor controller uses the outputs
of two reference channels, which are equipped with laser diodes. This interferometer
design is very robust against misalignment in a harsh environment, in comparison
86
Table 2. PFS characteristics.
SW LW
Spectral range, µm 1.2 – 5.0 5 – 50
Spectral range, cm–1 2000 – 8200 250 – 1750
Spectral resolution, cm–1 1.5 1.5
FOV, deg 1.7 2.8
NEB, W cm–2 sr–1 5 x 10–9 4 x 10–8
Detector type photoconductor pyroelectric
Material PbSe LiTaO3
Temperature, K 220 290
Interferometer type double pendulum
Reflecting elements cubic corner reflectors
Beamsplitter CaF2 CsI
Max. optical path difference, mm 5 5
Time for motion, s 5 5
Reference source laser diode
SW/LW separation KRS-5 with a multi-layer coating reflecting SW radiation Fig. 10. PFS Flight Model integrated on Mars
Interferogram two-sided Express at prime contractor Alenia Spazio in
Turin.
Sampling number 16384 4096
Sampling step, nm 600 600 (over-sampled)
Dynamical range 215
Spectra (from onboard FFT), 8192 2048
number of points
Fig. 11. PFS optical scheme.
with the classical Michelson-type interferometer (Hirsch, 1997). The detectors are in
the centre of the parabolic mirrors. The optical path is changed by rotating the shaft
of the double pendulum along its axis. In this way, the optical path is four times that
provided by a single cube-corner displacement because two mirrors move at the same
time. The dichroic mirror acts as a fork that divides the two spectral ranges. Indeed,
it reflects all the wavelengths below 5 µm and remains more or less transparent for
longer wavelengths. The band stop for wavelengths below 1.2 µm is provided by the
silicon window, with its cutoff at 1.24 µm and placed in the optical inlet of the SW
87
SP-1240
channel. This filter is tilted by 1.5° so that the radiation returning to the source is not
partially reflected on the detector.
The double-pendulum axis is rotated by a brushless, frictionless motor (two for
redundancy). The shaft of the double pendulum is held only by two preloaded ball
bearings so additional mechanical friction is required for stabilising the pendulum
speed.
Double-sided interferograms are acquired by placing the zero optical path
difference in the centre of the mirror displacement. A double-sided interferogram has
several advantages, including a relative insensitivity to phase errors. Bilateral
operation is adopted in order to reduce the time-cycle of each measurement, but
separate calibration for each direction is recommended in order to maintain the
radiometric accuracy.
The spectral reference beam is a diode laser (InGaAsP at 1.2 µm); its detector is an
IR photodiode with maximum response at about 1.2 µm. The beam of the reference
channel is processed like the input signal so that its optical path coincides with that of
the signal being studied. Each channel has its own reference beam and the different
lengths of the double-pendulum arms are fully compensated for. Because the LW
beam splitter is not transparent at the wavelength of the corresponding reference
diode laser, a special small window was added in order to keep the attenuation of the
laser beams negligible through the beam splitter itself. The unused output beams of
the two reference channels terminate into optical traps.
2.4.2 Electronics of PFS-O

Most of the electronics inside PFS-O are analogue but the microprocessor-based On-
Board Data Management (OBDM) board controls all the complex procedures during
acquisition of the interferogram, including communication with PFS-E. It includes
32 kword of EPROM for software storage and 96 kword for data. The most important
electronics block is the speed controller. The zero crossing of an interferogram of a
monochromatic source that is very stable in wavelength can be used for sampling the
interferogram of the source under study. Ideally, the interferogram of the
monochromatic source should be a pure sine wave but it is not simply because its
interferogram is limited in time. The shorter the wavelength of the reference source
means better sampling accuracy.
For PFS, 1.2 µm is the reference source because of the limited variety of diode
lasers and it simplifies the optical design. The wavelength of a diode laser depends on
its temperature and power, so great care has to be taken in their control.
The speed of the double pendulum is such that a frequency of 2 kHz is generated
for the SW channel, so a train of 4 kHz pulses is produced from the electronics of the
SW reference channel. Thermal control is also very important for an IR
interferometer; heaters and thermometers are positioned at eight locations.
A ‘locking system’ blocks the double pendulum during launch and manoeuvring
for orbital insertion and correction. The procedure of locking and unlocking takes a
minimum of 3 min but using a paraffin actuator means it can be repeated hundreds of
times. The launch acceleration vector will be along the axis of the double pendulum
for maximum robustness.
The photoconductor SW channel detector can work at temperatures down to 200K.
It is passively cooled through a radiator and its holder is partially insulated from the
rest of the IB. For the LW channel, the pyroelectric detector can operate without
performance degradation even at ambient temperatures.
2.5 Module-E (PFS-E)

PFS-E controls all the PFS modules: the communications to and from the spacecraft,
memorising and executing the command words, and operating PFS and sending back
the data words to the spacecraft. Moreover, it synchronises all the procedures
according to the time schedule and to the clock time from the spacecraft.
88
2.6 Module-P (PFS-P)

PFS combines many kinds of electrical energy consumers: standard digital and
analogue electronics, sensitive preamplifiers and ADCs, light sources and
electromechanical devices (motors and relays). All of them have different supply
requirements and some need to be electrically isolated (to ensure extremely high
stability) and/or individually controlled by Module E’s processor. This is why PFS-P
is more complicated than a simple DC/DC converter: there are three independent
converters, six different power outputs (totalling 13 independent voltages), one
common input interface to satellite and one interface to DAM. All converters have
cold redundancy. Switching between main/reserve +5 V is controlled by the
spacecraft, while the other main/reserve converters are controlled by PFS itself.
2.7 Module-S (PFS-S)

The previous version of the pointing system, for the Mars-96 mission, had two
degrees-of-freedom in pointing (two rotation axes), but was rather heavy (8.5 kg for
the system and 2.3 kg for the controlling electronics). The pointing system is certainly
necessary for generating a complete set of measurements, since we need to measure
not only the martian radiation but also the calibration blackbody and empty space.
Mars Express provides nadir pointing so PFS itself needs only one degree of rotation,
simplifying the PFS-S design and reducing mass considerably (to 3.7 kg).
2.8 Modes of operation, data-acquisition cycle

PFS-S and PFS-O work in parallel during an observation session, while PFS-E
coordinates operations of the other modules by sending commands and receiving
messages. During measurements, PFS-S must be motionless while PFS-O acquires
data. This is the only synchronisation point in the data-acquisition cycle. Upon
completion of acquisition, all the modules work asynchronously while PFS-E
coordinates their operations:
— starts rotation of PFS-S;

— receives LW and SW interferograms from PFS-O;
— if spectra are required, PFS uploads previously acquired LW and SW interfero-
grams into the Fast Fourier Transform processor and downloads computed
spectra;
— prepares the telemetry data pack i.e. splits information into frames and stores
them in the mass memory;
— upon completion of the PFS-S rotation gives a command to PFS-O to start new
acquisition.
After each data-acquisition cycle, PFS checks whether new telecommands have
been received and, if any, executes them. Telemetry can be sent at any time on request
from the spacecraft.
2.9 Inflight calibration

During observation sessions, PFS periodically performs calibrations by sending
commands to PFS-S to point sequentially at the calibration sources: deep space,
internal blackbody and calibration lamp. The housekeeping information obtained
from PFS-O after each calibration measurement contains, in particular, the
temperatures of the sensors and the blackbody. These data are used for the
computation of the absolute spectra for the LW channel.
3.1 What is measured 3. Test and Calibration

The two detectors of the LW and SW channels measure the light intensity of the two
interferograms. The repetition of the measurement while the double pendulum moves
at constant speed gives the interferogram. In order to compute the spectrum from the
89
SP-1240
interferogram, the measurements must be taken at constant optical path difference,

information given by the zero crossings of the sine signal from the interferogram of a
monochromatic light (the laser diode).
3.2 Responsivity and signal-to-noise ratios

Three PFS models passed through the laboratory ‘calibration’ process: PFS-06
(Qualification), PFS-07 (Flight) and PFS-08 (spare FM, the refurbished PFS-06).
‘Calibration’ in this context means laboratory studies of the instrument properties that
are necessary (although perhaps not sufficient) to extract spectra in absolute units
from the observations of Mars by PFS. Ideally, calibrations should result in the
algorithm of transfer from telemetric information to spectra of Mars in absolute units.
However, instrument properties are not constant with time and the problem is
complicated by the differences between laboratory and space conditions. Additional
information, including inflight calibration and even models of martian spectra, is
necessary for processing actual data.
Having a set of n independently found Bν (i) spectra, we can compute the average
0
spectrum Bν and noise equivalent brightness (NEB)

0
Bn0 1i2 BN0

NEB2n a (4)
n1
A more detailed discussion of the processing procedure for IR spectrometer data is

given in Hanel et al. (1992). Two blackbody-imitator sources (cooled by liquid
nitrogen) were used to study the PFS LW channel properties; one blackbody at 1400K
was used to study the SW channel. Sensitivity Dν and noise equivalent brightness
NEBν were then computed from these measurements. The spectral resolution was
measured with a mercury lamp and taking spectra with known features.
Fig. 12 shows the measured spectrum of the lamp used for calibrating both
channels. The S/N is also computed from the measurements. Fig. 13 shows a CH4
feature as measured in the LW and at maximum spectral resolution, to indicate that
2 cm–1 was achieved.
Rough computations show that an S/N at Mars of about 100 or larger will be
achieved in the vicinity of 15 µm bands with the detector at 220K. This is good
enough for retrieving the vertical temperature profiles of the atmosphere. Further
studies of the instrument’s thermal behaviour will be performed.
The responsivity for wavenumbers ν > 5000 cm–1 is rather poor, because the
reflectivity of the semi-transparent mirror separating LW and SW radiation is too low
in this part of spectra. It is also this part of the spectrum where errors in optical
alignment have greater impact. The situation is improved by optimising the transfer
function of the SW channel filter.
3.3 Sample of performed measurements

Laboratory measurements were made on gases such as CO2 by using a gas cell, and
studying the transmission of radiation from a source. Fig. 14 shows the LW spectra
around 15 µm, obtained for different CO2 pressures inside the cell. Measurements
were made at room temperature. Figs. 15 & 16 show the SW CO2 band at 4.3 µm and
2.7 µm. It is evident that the spectral resolution allows the observation of
rotovibrational features of the gas.
4. Data-taking Along the 4.1 Data-transmission modes

Orbit The data-transmission mode (DTM) defines the kind of scientific data that PFS must
select and store in the mass memory to be sent to Earth. PFS has 15 DTMs, numbered
for historical reasons, 0, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 27, 28, 9, 10, 15, 16. DTM 0 is for
PFS operating in the autonomous test mode; the others are obtained in the science
90
Fig. 12. Computed S/N for SW and LW using a single globar lamp Fig 13. CH4 bands in the LW channel at different resolution (PFS
spectrum. measurements: triangles; laboratory spectrometer: squares).
Fig. 14. CO2 15 µm transmission band measured in the laboratory with Fig. 15. CO2 4.3 µm band measured with PFS in the laboratory at
PFS at different gas pressures. different gas pressures.
Fig. 16. CO2 2.7 µm band measured with PFS in the laboratory at
different gas pressures.
91
SP-1240
mode, where PFS acquires both LW and SW interferograms. If spectra are required
(DTM 9, 10, 15, 16), PFS makes Fast Fourier Transforms of the interferograms. Then,
depending on the DTM, PFS selects the required data. Interferograms can be selected
completely or partially.
Of the 15 DTMs, 10 provide interferograms and four spectra:
— MODE 0: autotest of the interferometer (4096 points in the LW channel and 16384 points
in the SW channel provide the sine wave shape and the monitoring of the speed during the
double pendulum motion);
— MODE 2: full LW interferograms;
— MODE 4: half-resolution interferograms, SW and LW;
— MODE 5: half-resolution LW interferograms;
— MODE 6: half-resolution SW interferograms;
— MODE 7: full LW interferogram + one-sided SW interferogram (including the zero optical
path difference and right side);
— MODE 8: one-sided LW and SW interferograms (right side);
— MODE 17: full LW and SW interferograms;
— MODE 18: full SW interferograms;
— MODE 27: full LW interferogram + one-sided SW interferogram (including the zero
optical path difference and left side);
— MODE 28: one-sided LW and SW interferograms (left side);
— MODE 9: modules of LW and SW spectra;
— MODE 10: modules of LW spectra;
— MODE 15: full modules of LW spectra and SW spectra with reduced range (2000 points
in the SW channel between 2000 and 4000 cm–1);
— MODE 16: modules of SW spectra (6144 points).
4.2 Data-taking along the orbit.

PFS will perform measurement when the spacecraft is below 4000 km. PFS will wake
up from its sleep mode about 1 h before and follow the scheme:
— apocentre: PFS is in sleep mode, telecommands can be received;

— pericentre minus 60 min: wake-up, wait for warm-up, start autonomous test,
calibration LW, calibration SW, calibration deep space. PFS-S in nadir direction.
Give data to the spacecraft;
— pericentre minus 40 min: start martian observations. Give data to the spacecraft;
— pericentre plus 48 min: stop martian observations. Give data to the spacecraft;
— pericentre plus 53 min: calibration LW, calibration SW, calibration deep space,
autonomous test. Give data to the spacecraft. Go into sleep mode;
— up to apocentre in sleep mode.
In total, 600 measurements per orbit are taken, of which 60 are calibrations. This
corresponds to 1200 measurements per day (the third orbit per day being for
downlink) and 823 440 spectra in a martian year. The footprint from 4000 km is of
the order of 109 km for the SW channel and 188 km for the LW channel; at pericentre
(250 km) they become respectively 6.8 km and 11.8 km (perpendicular to the ground
track, but 20 km along it) .
92
Arnold, G., Hirsch, H., Formisano, V. & Moroz, V. (1993). Studies of Martian References
Atmosphere and Surface by the Planetary Fourier Spectrometer on Board of the
Mars-94 Mission. Proc. SPIE 2089, 284.
Atreya, S.K. (1989). The Martian Upper Atmosphere. In Colloque International,
Premiere Resultats de la Mission Phobos et Future Missions d’exploration de
Mars, CNES, Paris, France, p42.
Bartholomew, M.J., Cruikshank, D.P. & Roush, T. (1990). Asteroid and Meteorite
Spectral Analogs for Phobos. Bull. Amer. Astro.Soc. 22, 1115.
Carr, M.H. (1974). The Geology of Mars. In A Primer in Lunar Geology, NASA
Ames Research Center, pp459-460.
Haberle, R.M. (1986). The Climate of Mars. Sci. Am. 254, 54-62.
Haberle, R.M. & Jakowsky, B.M. (1990). Sublimation and Transport of Water from
the North Residual Polar Cap on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 1423.
Hanel, R.A., Conrath, B.J., Jennings, D.E. & Samuelson, R.E. (1992). Exploration of
the Solar System by Infrared Remote Sensing, Cambridge University Press, UK.
Hanel, R., Conrath, B., Howis, W., Kunde, V., Lowman, P., Maguire., W., Pearl, J.,
Pirraglia, J., Prabhakara, C. & Schlachman, B. (1972). Investigation of the Martian
Environment by Infrared Spectroscopy on Mariner-9. Icarus 17, 423-442.
Hansen, G.B. (1997). The Infrared Absorption Spectrum of Carbon Dioxide Ice from
1.8 to 333 µm. J. Geophys. Res. 102, E9, 21569-21588.
Hirsch, H. & Arnold, G. (1993). Fourier Transform Spectroscopy in Remote Sensing
of Solid Planetary Surfaces. Vib. Spectrosc. 5, 119-123.
Hirsch, H. (1997). Optical Design and Performance of the Planetary Fourier
Spectrometer (PFS). Mcrochimica Acta [Suppl.] 14, 571-574.
Hunt, G.R., Logan, L.M. & Salisbury, J.W. (1973). Mars: Components of Infrared
Spectra and Composition of the Dust Clouds. Icarus 18, 459.
Hunt, G.R., Salisbury, J.W. & Lenhoff, C.J. (1974).Visible and Near Infrared Spectra
of Minerals and Rocks: IX. Basic and Ultrabasic Igneous Rocks. Modern Geology
5, 15-22.
Jakosky, B.M. & Haberle, R.M. (1992). The Seasonal Behavior of Water on Mars. In
Mars (Eds. H.H. Kieffer, B.M. Jakosky, C.W. Snyder & M.S. Matthews), The
University of Arizona Press, Tucson, USA, pp969-1016.
Jakosky, B.M. & Farmer, C.B. (1982). The Seasonal and Global Behavior of Water
Vapor in the Mars Atmosphere – Complete Global Results of the Viking Atmo-
spheric Water Detector Experiment. J. Geoph. Res. 87, 2999-3019.
Justus, C.G., James, O. & Johnson, A. (1995). Mars Global Reference Atmospheric
Model (Mars-GRAM 3.34): Programmer’s Guide. Computer Sciences Corp., USA.
Kahn, R.A., Martin, T.Z., Zurek, R.W. & Lee, S.W. (1992). The Martian Dust Cycle.
In Mars (Eds. H.H. Kieffer, B.M. Jakosky, C.W. Snyder & M.S. Matthews), The
Kaplan, L.D., Munch, G. & Spinrad, H. (1964). An Analysis of the Spectrum of Mars.
Astrophys. J. 139, 1.
Kieffer, H.H., Martin, T.Z., Peterfreund, A.R., Jakosky, B.M., Miner, E.D. &
Palluconi, F.D. (1977). Thermal and Albedo Mapping of Mars during the Viking
Primary Mission. J. Geoph. Res. 82, 4249-4291.
Kliore, A.J., Cain, D.L., Fjeldbo, G., Seidel, B.L., Sykes, M.J. & Rasool, S.I. (1972).
The Atmosphere of Mars from Mariner 9 Radio Occultation Measurements. Icarus
17, 484-516.
Kliore, A.J., Woiceshyn, P.M. & Hubbard, W.B. (1977). Pioneer 10 and 11 Radio
Occultations by Jupiter. In Symposium on Minor Constituents and Excited Species,
Philadelphia, Pa., USA, 9-10 June 1976 (A78-18101 05-42), p703-710.
McCord, T.B. & Cruikshank, D.P. (1981). Spectrophotometric Remote Sensing of
Planets and Satellites. In Infrared Astronomy; Proceedings of the Symposium,
Kona, HI, USA, 23-27 June 1980 (A82-33729 16-90), p57-87.
Morris, R.V. & Lauer, H.V. (1990). Matrix Effects for Reflectivity Spectra of
93
SP-1240
Dispersed Nanophase (Usuperparamagnetic) Hematite with Application to Martian

Spectral Data. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 5101.
Moroz, V. & Nadzhip, A.E. (1975). Measurements of Water Vapour Densities on
Mars 5 Orbiter: Preliminary Results. Cosmic Res. 13, 28.
Owen, T. (1992). The Composition and Early History of the Atmosphere of Mars. In
Mars (Eds. H.H. Kieffer, B.M. Jakosky, C.W. Snyder & M.S. Matthews), The
Owen, T., Maillard, J.P., de Bergh, C. & Lutz, B.L. (1988). Deuterium on Mars: The
Abundance of HDO and the Value of D/H. Science 240, 1767.
Pedlosky, J. (1979). Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Germany.
Pollack, J.B. & Toon, O.B. (1982). Quasi Periodic Climate Changes on Mars: A
Review. Icarus 50, 259.
Pollack, J., Roush, T., Witteborn, F., Bregman, J., Wooden, D., Stoker, C., Toon, O.,
Rank, D., Dalton, B. & Freedman, R. (1989). Thermal Emission Spectra of Mars
(5.4-10.5 mm): Evidence for Sulfates, Carbonates and Hydrates. In Colloque
International, Premiere Resultats de la Mission Phobos et Future Missions
d’exploration de Mars, CNES, Paris, France, p93.
Pollack, J.B., Colburn, D.S., Flasar, F.M., Kahn, R., Carlston, C.E. & Pidek, D.G.
(1979). Properties and Effects of Dust Particles Suspended in the Martian
Atmosphere. J. Geoph. Res. 84, 2929-2945.
Rieder, R., Wänke, H., Economou, T. & Turkevich, A. (1997). Determination of the
Chemical Composition of Martian Soil and Rocks: The Alpha Proton X-ray
Spectrometer. J. Geoph. Res. 102, E2, 4027-4044.
Rodin, A.V., Korablev, O.I. & Moroz, V.I. (1997). Vertical Distribution of Water in
the Near-Equatorial Troposphere of Mars: Water Vapor and Clouds. Icarus 125,
N1, 212-229.
Rothman, L.S., Gamache, R.R., Tipping, R.H., Rinsland, C.P., Smith, M.A.H.,
Benner, D.C., Devi, V.M., Flaud, J.-M., Camy-Peyret, C. & Perrin, A. (1992). The
HITRAN Molecular Data Base – Editions of 1991 and 1992. J. Quan. Spect. &
Rad. Transfer 48, N5-6, 469-507.
Roush, T.L., Blaney, D.L. & Singer, R.B. (1993). The Surface Composition of Mars
as Inferred from Spectroscopic Observations. In Remote Geochemical Analysis:
Elemental and Mineralogical Composition, (Eds. C.M. Pieters & P.A.J. Englert),
Cambridge Univ. Press, UK, pp367-393.
Roush, T.L., Pollack, J.B., Stoker, C., Witteborn, F., Bregman, J., Wooden, D. &
Rank, D. (1989). CO32 and SO42–-bearing Anionic Complexes Detected in Martian
Atmospheric Dust. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. XX, p928.
Seiff, A. (1982). Post-Viking Models for the Structure of the Summer Atmosphere of
Mars. Adv. Space Res., 2, N2, 3-17.
Smith, W.L. (1970). Iterative Solution of the Radiative Transfer Equation for the
Temperature and Absorbing Gas Profile. Appl. Optics 9, N9,1993-1999.
Soderblom, L.A. (1992). The Composition and Mineralogy of the Martian Surface
from Spectroscopic Observations: 0.3 mm to 50 mm. In Mars (Eds. H.H. Kieffer,
B.M. Jakosky, C.W. Snyder & M.S. Matthews), The University of Arizona Press,
Tucson, USA, pp557-593.
Spinrad, H. & Richardson, E.H. (1963). High Dispersion Spectra of the Outer Planets.
II. A New Upper Limit for the Water Vapor Content of the Martian Atmosphere.
Icarus 2, 49.
Tikhonov, A.N., Goncharskij, A.V., Stepanov, V.V. & Jagola, A.G. (1990). Numerical
Methods of Solving the Ill-posed Problems. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).
Toulmin, P., Baird, A.K., Clark, B.C., Keil, K., Rose, H.J., Christian, R.P., Evans, P.H.
& Kelliher, W.C. (1977). Geochemical and Mineralogical Interpretation of the
Viking Inorganic Chemical Results. J. Geophys. Res. 82.
Zurek, W.R., Barnes, J.R., Haberle, R.M., Pollack, J.B., Tillman, J.E. & Leovy, C.V.
(1992). Dynamics of the Atmosphere of Mars. In Mars (Eds. H.H. Kieffer,
B.M. Jakosky, C.W. Snyder & M.S. Matthews), The University of Arizona Press,
Tucson, USA, pp799-817.
94
Bertaux.qxd 7/7/04 1:13 PM Page 95
SPICAM: Studying the Global Structure and Composition

of the Martian Atmosphere
J.-L. Bertaux1, D. Fonteyn2, O. Korablev3, E. Chassefière4, E. Dimarellis1, J.P. Dubois1, A. Hauchecorne1,

F. Lefèvre1, M. Cabane1, P. Rannou1, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd1, G. Cernogora1, E. Quemerais1, C. Hermans2,
G. Kockarts2, C. Lippens2, M. De Maziere2, D. Moreau2, C. Muller2, E. Neefs2, P.C. Simon2, F. Forget4,
F. Hourdin4, O. Talagrand4, V.I. Moroz3, A. Rodin3, B. Sandel5 & A. Stern6
1
Service d’Aéronomie du CNRS, F-91371, Verrières-le-Buisson, France
Email: jean-loup.bertaux@aerov.jussieu.fr
2
Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, 3 av. Circulaire, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
3
Space Research Institute (IKI), 84/32 Profsoyuznaya, 117810 Moscow, Russia
4
Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, 4 place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, Paris, France
5
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, 901 Gould Simpson Building, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
6
SouthWest Research Institute, Geophysics, Astrophysics and Planetary Science, 1050 Walnut Ave.,
Suite 400, Boulder, CO 80302-5143, USA
The SPICAM (SPectroscopy for the Investigation of the Characteristics of the

Atmosphere of Mars) instrument consists of two spectrometers. The UV
spectrometer addresses key issues about ozone and its H2O coupling, aerosols,
the atmospheric vertical temperature structure and the ionosphere. The IR
spectrometer is aimed primarily at H2O abundances and vertical profiling of
H2O and aerosols. SPICAM’s density/temperature profiles will aid the
development of meteorological and dynamical atmospheric models from the
surface up to 160 km altitude. UV observations of the upper atmosphere will
study the ionosphere and its direct interaction with the solar wind. They will also
allow a better understanding of escape mechanisms, crucial for insight into the
long-term evolution of the atmosphere.
1.1 SPICAM goals 1. Introduction

SPICAM (Fig. 1), a lightweight (4.7 kg) UV-IR spectrometer on the Mars Express
orbiter, is dedicated to recovering most of the atmospheric science that was lost with
Mars-96 and its set of SPICAM sensors. The new configuration of SPICAM includes
a 2-channel optical sensor (3.8 kg) and an electronics block (0.9 kg). The UV
spectrometer (118-320 nm, resolution 0.8 nm) is dedicated to nadir viewing, limb
viewing and vertical profiling by stellar and solar occultation. It addresses key issues
about ozone and the H2O coupling, aerosols, atmospheric vertical temperature
structure and the ionosphere. The near-IR spectrometer (1.0-1.7 µm, resolution 0.5-
1.2 nm) is aimed primarily at nadir measurements of H2O abundances, and at vertical
profiling of H2O and aerosols by solar occultation. A simple data processing unit
(0.9 kg) provides the interface with the spacecraft.
For nadir observations, SPICAM UV is essentially an ozone detector, measuring
the strongest O3 absorption band at 250 nm in the solar light scattered from the
ground. In its stellar occultation mode, the UV sensor will measure the vertical
profiles of CO2, temperature, O3, clouds and aerosols. The density/temperature
profiles will constrain and aid in developing the meteorological and dynamical
atmospheric models from the surface and up to 160 km in the atmosphere. This is
95
SP-1240
Fig. 1. Flight Model Sensor Unit of SPICAM essential for future missions that rely on aerocapture and aerobraking. UV observa-
viewed from above. The IR AOTF tions of the upper atmosphere will allow studies of the ionosphere through the
spectrometer is at top; the UV spectrometer is emissions of CO, CO+ and CO+2 , and its direct interaction with the solar wind. Also,
at bottom. The common optical axis points to
the left. For the UV spectrometer, the light it will allow a better understanding of escape mechanisms and estimates of their
enters the mechanical baffle (black), is focused magnitude, crucial for insight into the long-term evolution of the atmosphere.
by a parabolic mirror (bottom right) through a SPICAM’s near-IR sensor, employing the pioneering technology of an acousto-
slit, then dispersed by the grating (middle left), optical tunable filter (AOTF), is dedicated to the measurement of water vapour
to be refocused on the intensified CCD
column abundance in the IR simultaneously with ozone measured in the UV. It will
Detector (at centre).
be achieved with a much lower telemetry budget than the mission’s Planetary Fourier
Spectrometer. In solar occultation mode, this channel will study the vertical structures
of H2O, CO2 and aerosols.
1.2 Background
Observations during the 18th century showed that light from the star Spica decreased
abruptly during occultations by the Moon. It was concluded that the Moon has no
atmosphere because, otherwise, refraction would have produced a progressive
dimming of the star. The SPICAM acronym is a tribute to this early use of stellar
occultation.
In the Earth’s atmosphere, the occultation technique has been used to measure O3
since the 1970s. Only one or two wavelengths were observed at a time in the early
attempts, making identification of the absorber species uncertain. With the advent of
multi-pixel detectors, the absorbing species can be safely identified by their spectral
signatures. It also offers the potential to discover new, unexpected species in the
atmosphere. The method of absorptive occultation spectroscopy is reviewed in
Roscoe et al. (1994) and Smith & Hunten (1990). For terrestrial stratospheric
research, it has become the most advanced method for long-term monitoring of ozone.
In the IR, the most remarkable results are those of the ATMOS/Atlas Space Shuttle
experiment, which provided a set of high-resolution IR spectra of the terrestrial
96
atmosphere. In the UV-visible, NASA’s SAGE-3 is using full-wavelength coverage of

the Sun. Onboard Envisat, SCIAMACHY (Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectro-
meter for Atmospheric Chartography) is performing solar occultation and nadir
observations, and the GOMOS (Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultations of Stars)
instrument is dedicated to the monitoring of ozone and other species by stellar
occultations. SPICAM’s methodology is clearly in line with the most advanced
instrumentation for studying Earth’s atmosphere.
The only solar occultation measurements so far of Mars from spacecraft were
performed during the Phobos mission using the Auguste instrument (Blamont et al.,
1989; Krasnopolsky et al., 1989). Though the Phobos mission was not fully
successful, the solar occultation observations lasted more than a month, resulting in
an important improvement of our knowledge of the martian water vapour profile
(Krasnopolsky et al., 1991; Rodin et al., 1997), aerosol vertical distribution
(Chassefière et al., 1992; Korablev et al., 1993) and ozone distribution (Blamont &
Chassefière, 1993).
The promising results from the Phobos mission were not fully developed because
of the failure of the Mars-96 mission, where the SPICAM set of sensors (total 46 kg)
was dedicated to studying the martian atmosphere. The 4.7 kg SPICAM ‘Light’ of
Mars Express will recover most of the science of SPICAM/Mars-96. The
considerable mass saving was achieved by sacrificing all the visible part of the
spectrum and by suppressing all redundancy between the two sensors. Also, using the
spacecraft for pointing removes the need for pointing platforms and devices. The
proposal for this SPICAM included a separate solar occultation IR sensor (SOIR),
inherited from the solar package of SPICAM/Mars-96. This 3.8 kg sensor consisted
of a grating spectrometer (1.2-4.8 µm, resolution 0.4-1 nm) for vertical profiling
during solar occultations of H2O, CO2, CO and aerosols and exploration of carbon
compounds (Bertaux et al., 2001). Owing to the severe mass constraints of Mars
Explorer, this sensor was deleted at the development stage, and replaced by the
extremely lightweight near-IR spectrometer based on AOTF technology. The
consequences for the scientific return are discussed below.
The tenuity of the CO2 martian atmosphere and the partial transparency to solar UV 2. Scientific Objectives
results in intense photochemical activity, possibly including photocatalytic processes
at the surface or on aerosols. Although the global mechanism of atmospheric chemical
stability proposed at the beginning of the 1970s (Parkinson & Hunten, 1972) is
generally accepted, no substantial progress in modelling has been made in the last
20 years. Understanding martian atmospheric chemistry is of fundamental importance
for characterising the history of Mars (escape of species to space, atmosphere/surface
interactions such as oxidation) as well as for comparison with terrestrial processes
(chemistry/dynamics coupling, possible role of heterogeneous chemistry). Besides
chemical processes, addressing the key problems of the martian climate includes
understanding the transport of radiatively active aerosols, microphysics of clouds,
regolith/atmosphere water exchange and wave activity in the atmosphere. So far, most
of the data on the composition and structure of the martian atmosphere relate to the
total content of the species, with very little information on the vertical profiles of
aerosols, ozone, water vapour and other trace gases. SPICAM focuses on the
determination of atmospheric characteristics from the surface up to 160 km altitude.
SPICAM’s main objectives are defined in the following five subsections.
2.1 Three-dimensional studies related to atmospheric chemical stability

An important step in improving our knowledge of martian photochemistry is the
validation of the currently accepted scheme of chemical atmospheric stability,
originally proposed by Parkinson & Hunten (1972). To explain the CO2 stability, this
scheme invokes odd-hydrogen photochemical species that catalyse the recombination
of CO and O. These catalytic reactions are so efficient that O2 and CO appear in the
97
SP-1240
atmosphere only in very small amounts – the observed quantities are around 0.1%.
The photochemistry scheme is complicated by the amount of water, which is highly
variable. The ozone density is directly connected to HOx radicals, which are the
product of water vapour dissociation. Early photochemical theories (McElroy &
Donahue, 1972; Parkinson & Hunten, 1972) are confirmed by more recent photo-
chemistry models (Nair et al., 1994; Krasnopolsky, 1993). SPICAM provides the
opportunity to validate the stability scheme through simultaneous measurements of
water vapour, ozone and temperature with a good vertical resolution, as well as of
their diurnal, seasonal and latitudinal variations.
Since the water vapour cycle is one of the three important atmospheric cycles (the
others being the dust and CO2 cycles), the present distribution and annual variability
of water reflect both current and past climate processes. In the 1970s, the Mars
Atmosphere Water Detector (MAWD) on the Viking orbiters mapped for the first time
the column abundance of water, for 1.5 martian years. Maximum water content is
observed above the North Pole in summer as a consequence of the sublimation of the
polar cap. In addition, the exchange of water between the atmosphere and the regolith
is likely on both diurnal and seasonal bases. The pore volume of the martian regolith
is substantial and implies that a large part of it can act as a water reservoir. Using solar
occultations, the IR channel will accurately measure the vertical structure of water
vapour in the atmosphere, allowing these important water-exchange processes to be
assessed.
The key processes controlling the vertical distribution of water vapour on Mars are
likely to be large-scale transport, turbulent mixing, the microphysics of nucleation,
growth and sedimentation of ice crystals, and photochemical reactions. Moreover, the
water vapour profile is closely connected to the temperature structure (both dynamic
and radiative) through saturation water pressure. However, the available data do not
allow an adequate determination of the detailed spatial and seasonal variations in the
vertical distribution of water.
Observations of other trace species will also be important in understanding the
behaviour of atmospheric water. One of these trace gases is ozone. The ozone vertical
profile is governed mainly by the abundance of water vapour and it is widely
acknowledged that there is a strong anti-correlation between water vapour and
atmospheric ozone (Barth et al., 1973). Even if the atmospheric ozone content is low,
this constituent is important for characterising the physico-chemical structure of the
atmosphere. Only marginal information is available about the vertical distribution of
ozone: a layer has been tentatively detected in the middle atmosphere by solar
occultation (Blamont & Chassefière, 1993). SPICAM will fill this gap by measuring
ozone profiles using stellar occultations in the UV.
Finally, SPICAM’s nadir-viewing capability will allow the mapping of ozone
column density. In conjunction with the column density of water vapour, as measured
by SPICAM’s IR channel or other Mars Express instruments, this will permit detailed
global scale correlation studies. It should be emphasised that, so far, there is no direct
experimental correlation between H2O and ozone distributions, owing to the lack of
simultaneous measurements. Some correspondence of high ozone near the poles with
H2O derived from temperature-dependent water pressure was found from Mariner-9
ozone (Barth et al., 1973) and temperature measurements (Barth et al., 1992).
SPICAM offers the first possibility of firmly establishing this correlation.
2.2 Atmospheric escape

The efficiency of atmospheric escape is strongly mass-dependent, and it is quite
significant for hydrogen and deuterium. The geological evidence for running water on
the martian surface in the distant past is well established, but the total amount of water
and the periods of activity are still controversial (Carr, 1996). Observation of D/H is
thus particularly important for reconstructing the history of water on Mars. For this,
the fundamental 3.7 µm HDO band was to be studied with the SOIR solar occultation
channel.
98
An important goal of atmospheric studies is the characterisation of escape

processes, which are believed to have played an important role in climate evolution.
The main processes of removing mass from the atmosphere are the sputtering of
atmospheric species by oxygen pick-up ions at the exobase level, and photochemical
escape (Kass & Yung, 1995; Jakosky et al., 1994). The close coupling of all the
atmospheric layers makes it interesting to measure the profiles of hydrogen, carbon
and oxygen species in the lower ionosphere, where strong vertical fluxes of these
species are supposed to take place. SPICAM will observe resonant scattering
emissions of H, C and O in the altitude range 100-200 km, as well as some
fluorescence bands of CO and major ions (CO+2 , CO+). This altitude range, an
essential interface region between the low atmosphere and the upper ionosphere
(where escape occurs through direct interaction with the solar wind), cannot be
studied with in situ measurements because of the pericentre altitude of 300 km. UV
glow measurements by SPICAM should provide information about thermospheric
ion-neutral chemistry and related vertical fluxes of chemical species at the top of the
atmosphere, as well as about their diurnal and seasonal variations.
2.3 Surface/atmosphere chemical interaction; mapping of the atmospheric and

surface oxidant
The level of biologically lethal UV arriving at the surface of Mars is controlled by the
vertical column of ozone, which is itself controlled by H2O, according to present
photochemistry models. These models also predict the presence of O, H2O2, HO2, OH
molecules and radicals, which are extremely reactive with the surface. Together with
ozone, they are the main factors destroying any organic molecule that could be
present on the surface (Stoker & Bullock, 1997). This radiative-chemical environment
of exobiological significance will be evaluated at a variety of locations, latitudes and
seasons, thanks to the polar orbit of Mars Express and its martian-year lifetime. A
photochemistry model validated by the consistency of various measurements makes
it possible to extrapolate back in time and to assess more safely the conditions
constraining the development of life on Mars.
More than 25 years ago, the Viking life detection experiments proved that the
martian soil is extraordinarily oxidising. The evolution of CO2 from the labelled
release experiment is consistent with the presence of a thermally labile oxidant.
Detection and characterisation of the chemical and physical nature of this powerful
oxidant is therefore of great interest not only from an exobiological point of view but
also for studying exchanges between the atmosphere and the regolith on Mars. In the
thin and cold atmosphere, photochemical reactions between traces of water and solar
UV probably lead to the production of H2O2 which, in turn, can condense onto soil
grains and airborne dust. Hydrogen peroxide has not yet been detected in the Martian
atmosphere. A tentative detection/upper limit experiment in millimetric waves was
carried out using the Interferomètre Radio Astronomique Millimétrique (IRAM)
telescope (Moreau et al., 1998). Estimating the total abundance of this constituent
might be feasible using SPICAM’s UV channel.
2.4 Wave activity in the middle atmosphere and thermosphere

Theory predicts that the temperature structure of the thermosphere above 120 km is
dominated by the balance between EUV heating, non-LTE cooling and molecular
diffusion. In the middle atmosphere (40-120 km), the vertical structure is determined
primarily by non-LTE solar heating and radiative cooling in the absorption bands of
CO2, and by solar EUV heating at higher levels. The thermal structure is modified by
the circulation driven by this force, and by tides and gravity waves that propagate from
the lower atmosphere, break and deposit their energy in this region. Lower and upper
circulation models (including General Circulation Models) have recently been extended
into the middle atmosphere, and need adequate temperature/density data to be validated.
Until recently, there were few temperature profiles measured in the upper
atmosphere: Viking lander entry profiles (Seif & Kirk, 1977) and an indirect deriva-
99
SP-1240
tion above 120 km from Mariner-9 airglow (Stewart et al., 1972). New profiles were
derived from Mars Pathfinder (MPF) entry accelerometry (Magalhaes et al., 1999)
and Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) aerobraking data (Keating, 1998). The Thermal
Emission Spectrometer (TES) on MGS produces 3-D temperature fields up to 35 km
in its nadir mode and up to 65 km in the limb-viewing mode (Conrath et al., 1998;
1999). Radio occultation studies from Mars probes result in profiles below 20 km (see
Hinson et al., 1999 for recent MPF radio profiles). Ground-based microwave
observations based on CO-line profiling (Clancy et al., 1990) constrain temperature
profiles on large (planetary) scales up to ~50 km. The thermal structure and
circulation of this part of the atmosphere is of primary importance on Mars: unlike on
Earth, where the circulation in the troposphere is somewhat decoupled from that in
the stratosphere, the vertical extension of meteorological phenomena appears to be
considerable. In some cases, this extension probably reaches the top of the neutral
atmosphere around 120 km (e.g. the Hadley cell during northern winter). The
circulation there may even affect the meteorology at much lower altitude (Forget et
al., 1996). For instance, the strong warming of the polar-night atmosphere during dust
storms is thought to result from an enhancement of the meridional wind between
60 km and 100 km (Wilson, 1997). In fact, this behaviour of the martian atmosphere
may limit the performance of the general circulation models and thus our
understanding of martian meteorology. How can we account for these upper
atmospheric processes? Is the lower thermosphere circulation of importance?
Because of their limited vertical coverage (< 65 km), TES and similar instruments
will not solve the problem, leaving SPICAM as the single optical spectrometer
covering this altitude range.
Gravity waves have small vertical wavelengths relative to their horizontal scales,
which makes them well adapted for detection by SPICAM. In addition, SPICAM will
allow us to observe the propagation and the breaking of these waves up to high
altitude for the first time.
2.5 Impact of aerosols on the martian climate

Dusty and volatile aerosols are important components of the martian atmosphere. The
strong involvement of the aerosols in basic climate fields means that the lower
atmosphere may be considered as a ‘dusty climate’ system. A permanent haze exists
with a column optical depth from 0.1 to 1 depending on season, with sporadic
increases up to several units during great dust storms. It is known to control
temperatures in the troposphere and lower stratosphere. Heating and cooling by
aerosols drive dynamical phenomena, varying on scale from general circulation to
local waves that give rise to atmospheric turbulence. The contents and distribution of
aerosols in the atmosphere are, in turn, controlled by atmospheric motion, being
included in the complex feedback that makes the current climate of Mars extremely
variable. Volatile aerosols also affect the thermal field by changing the optical
properties and settling rates of particles, and therefore provide strongly non-linear
thermal feedback determined by the saturation curve. This effect is expected to be
most significant during aphelion (Clancy et al., 1996; Rodin et al., 1999).
Exploring the phenomena described above implies detailed studies of the vertical,
lateral and size distribution of mineral and volatile aerosols, as well as water vapour,
in the lower atmosphere. SPICAM’s large wavelength range (0.12-1.7 µm) provides
a unique opportunity to study micron-sized aerosols at high spatial resolution.
Simultaneous high-resolution measurement of the water vapour profile yields data on
microphysical condition of cloud formation, e.g. the degree of supersaturation in the
stratosphere and water eddy transport rates in both gaseous and condensed phases.
Comprehensive modelling of thermal balance, turbulent transport and microphysics
of water vapour, ice and dust interaction with a self-consistent 1-D model (Rodin et
al., 1999) will support these measurements.
The components of the martian atmosphere to be measured by SPICAM are given
in Table 1.
100
Table 1. Components of the martian atmosphere measurable by SPICAM.
Species Scientific objective Mode Spectral range Accuracy Altitude range
O3 concentration vertical profile stellar/solar occultation 220-300 nm 2-10% 10-50 km, ∆z < 1 km
O3 total abundance nadir 220-300 nm 5% (> 0.15 µatm) ground res 4×4 km
CO2 atmospheric density and solar/stellar occultation 180 nm 2-10% 20-160 km, ∆z < 1 km
temperature vertical profile 5K
CO2 surface pressure, tides nadir 200 nm 0.2 mbar n/a
1.43 µm 0.1 mbar
H2O total abundance nadir 1.38 µm 0.2. pr. µm ground res 5×5 km
(detectable)
H2O concentration/vertical profile solar occultation 1.1, 1.38 µm see text 5-30 km (clear atm.)
20-50 km (dusty atm.)
∆z = 2-3km
D, H isotope ratios limb emission 121 nm 20%
Aerosols vertical profile of characteristics solar/stellar occultation UV-IR 10 (photometry)
–3
5-60 km, ∆z = 2-3 km
mapping of characteristics nadir spectropolarimetry 1.0-1.7 µm polarisation exploratory
rejection 10–4
O2 concentration vertical profile stellar occultation 200 nm 20% 35-90 km
never done before
O2 concentration limb emission 1.27 µm tentative
H2O2 total abundance nadir 210 nm never done before
SO2 total abundance nadir 220 nm tentative
H, C, O, vertical profiling limb emission 118-320 nm 20% 80-400 km, ∆z ~ 2 km
CO+2 ,CO of aeronomic emissions
Soil contribution to surface studies nadir spectropolarimetry 1.0-1.7 µm 10–3 (photometry) ground res 5×5 km
Table 2. SPICAM mass, power and telemetry budgets.
Mass Electronics block (DPU) 0.9 kg

Sensor unit (SU) 3.8 kg
Total 4.7 kg
Power DPU+SUV 13 W
DPU+SUV+SIR 18 W
Data volume
per measurement SUV 3.1 kB
SIR 1.05 kB
per orbit ~ 5 MB
3.1 Overview 3. The Instrumentation

SPICAM (Figs. 2-5) consists of two blocks: a sensor unit (SU) that includes UV
(SUV) and near-IR (SIR) spectrometers, and a simple data processing unit (DPU).
The SOIR solar occultation package (Bertaux et al., 2001) was excluded because of
mission mass constraints, but the UV and IR channels have solar occultation
capability in their limited wavelength ranges. The instrument’s mechanical layout is
shown in Fig. 1. Mass, power and telemetry budgets are summarised in Table 2.
101
SP-1240
Fig. 2. Optical scheme of SPICAM’s UV and

IR channels. 1: aperture blend of the UV
channel; 2: off-axis parabolic mirror; 3: slit
(can be changed from wide to narrow, by a
mechanical actuator, see text); 4: concave UV
grating; 5: intensifier; 6: CCD; 7: IR channel
objective; 8: IR FOV diaphragm; 9/11:
collimating lens; 10: AOTF crystal; 12: light
trap for undiffracted light; 13: detector
proximity lenses; 14: ‘extraordinary’ beam
detector; 15: ‘ordinary’ beam detector; 16:
solar opening (closed by shutter when not
looking at Sun); 17/21: flat mirror; 18: IR
solar entry; 19: optical fibre; 20: fibre
collimator.
Fig. 3. Breadboard instrument (June 2000; SIR

is the prototype), seen from the same vantage
point as in Fig. 1. In the final configuration, the
parabolic mirror is rectangular, and not
circular.
3.2 UV spectrometer (SUV)

The characteristics of the UV spectrometer are summarised in Table 3. For better UV
efficiency, SUV includes only two reflective surfaces (Fig. 2). The light flux is
collected by an off-axis parabolic mirror, which reflects the light towards the entrance
of the spectrometer. At the focal plane, a mechanical slit system provides two
configurations: no slit for stellar occultations, and with a slit for extended sources.
The slit is divided into two parts, with different widths allowing two spectral
resolutions when observing an extended source. The first (50 µm width) gives good
resolution with lower flux; the second (500 µm) gives more sensitivity at the expense
of a coarser spectral resolution. The slit can be completely retracted, creating a hole
corresponding to the total useful field of view of 2×3.16°. This configuration is used
in the stellar occultation mode at dark limb when the spectrum of the star is recorded
on a few lines of the CCD. The required pointing accuracy is 0.2°.
A holographic concave toroidal grating from Jobin-Yvon, ion-etched for higher
102
Fig. 4. SPICAM Qualification Model seen from

the side of the UV spectrometer. The
intensified CCD is placed at the centre. The
mirror is at left, the grating is at right.
Fig. 5. The AOTF IR channel. From right:

entrance lens, AOTF crystal and the two
detectors, with the electronics board on top.
Table 3. Characteristics of the SPICAM UV channel (SUV).
Primary mirror Off-axis parabola 40×40 mm, coated MgF2, f = 120 mm

Slit 50 µm × 4.6 mm; 500 µm × 2.2 mm
FOV of a pixel 0.7×0.7´
2×3.16° no slit (stellar occultation)
0.24×0.95º with double slit
Spectral range 118 - 320 nm
Grating holographic, concave, toroidal coated MgF2, 290 lines/mm,
blazed 170 nm
Spectral resolution per pixel 0.51 nm
Resolving power (occultations) 120-300 stellar; small slit
Resolving power 120-300 small slit,~20 large slit
(extended source)
Pointing accuracy < 0.2º
Detector CCD Thomson TH7863 TE cooled at 270K, useful
288×384 pixels, 23×23 µm
Intensifier Hamamatsu 200M, solar blind CsTe photocathode, input
window MgF2 + sapphire
Vertical resolution < 1 km (occultations), ~10 km (limb)
103
SP-1240
Fig. 6. Longitude from the Sun around

pericentre (spacecraft altitude below 800 km)
during the first martian year of the mission.
(Figure adopted from Hechler & Yanes, 1999).
efficiency, feeds the detection block. The image ratio is ~1, which means that a
monochromatic image in the entrance of the spectrometer is conserved in the plane of
the detector. The spectral resolution for a point source determined by aberrations is
about 1 nm. The CCD detector is a Thomson TH7863 with 288×384 useful pixels and
a masked zone of equivalent size. Pixel size is 23×23 µm. The detector is electrically
cooled to ~0°C, where the dark current equals 800 electrons per pixel per second, or a
few ADU (Analogue to Digital Unit) only. By means of custom-made fibre optics, the
CCD is coupled with the output window of the image intensifier (from Hamamatsu,
type 200M). A solar blind CsTe photocathode has zero quantum efficiency beyond
320 nm. The input window is made of MgF2 in order to reach down to Lyman-α (a
target of SPICAM). An additional sapphire filter is glued above the window and covers
it in part, preventing overlapping of diffraction orders and Lyman-α stray light.
3.2.1 Expected performances

Taking into account the optical characteristics of the UV spectrometer components,
quantum efficiency of the photocathode, star spectrum and its reddening owing to
interstellar dust absorption, the S/N ratio of SUV in stellar occultation mode can be
estimated. Adopting the equation of Henry, it was found that there are nine stars
emitting more than 104 phot. s–1 cm–2 nm–1 at 220 nm, and 86 stars emitting 103-104
phot. s–1 cm–2 nm–1. For these two thresholds, S/N is respectively > 91 and > 29 per
pixel. There are ~100 pixels that may be used to determine the CO2 or ozone
absorption, and this gives an idea of the likely accuracy achieved on the retrieval of
line density of CO2 and O3. Simulation exercises show that the accuracy should be of
the order of 2-10% for CO2 (20-160 km) and ozone (below 50 km).
For an extended source observation, the whole slit is illuminated, and it is possible
to integrate over several lines of the CCD. When looking at nadir (dayside), the
expected number of photoevents that yield S/N ~ 500 for 1 s integration is
2.5×105 nm–1 at 270 nm.
For limb observations, a typical airglow emission of 8 kR nm–1 (as recorded at the
bright limb by Mariner-9) results in ~ 4000 photoevents per pixel at 220 nm, yielding
a S/N of 62. At wavelengths longer than 300 nm, the large slit would be used for
better S/N if necessary. Along the large slit, where the spectral resolution is about
104
Table 4. Characteristics of the SPICAM near-IR channel (SIR).
Spectral range 1.0-1.7 µm

Spectral resolution 0.5 nm at 1.0 µm; 1.2 nm at 1.7 µm or better than 4 cm–1
FOV 1º
Telescope Lens type, Ø 30 mm
AOTF TeO2, efficiency 70% (in polarised light),
aperture 3.6×3.6 mm, ±3.5º
Detector 2 InGaAs PIN diodes (Hamamatsu G5832), Ø 1 mm,
1 stage TE cooled to –15ºC, D ~ 3×1013 W–1 cm Hz
Transmission of optics 20%
S/N ~1000
5 nm, there is 10 times more flux on each pixel than along the narrow slit. It is
possible again to integrate over several lines of the CCD. For 50 lines, it yields ~104
photoevents per nm at 270 nm, or a S/N of 100 for 1 s integration.
For solar occultations, a 0.2 cm2 mirror looking 90º from the main optical axis is
positioned at the entrance pupil, and the detector operates at the lowest gain and
integration time of 10 ms.
3.3 Near-IR spectrometer (SIR)

A single-pixel detector of InGaAs, associated with an AOTF, will allow the
measurement of the H2O column at nadir for an instrument mass of only 0.7 kg. The
new AOTF devices are based on Bragg diffraction of an entrance beam by the
ultrasonic acoustic wave excited within a crystal. They offer the potential of reaching
a resolving power, λ/∆λ, superior to 1000, amply sufficient to measure nadir H2O by
scanning the absorption lines at 1.38 µm in the solar reflected spectrum. There are no
moving parts such as a chopper. This new concept for IR spectroscopy has not flown
before on a civil spacecraft but it is now sufficiently mature for space research
application.
The AOTF near-IR spectrometer (SIR) is included alongside the UV package; the
optical scheme is shown in Fig. 2. The principal characteristics of SIR are
summarised in Table 4. A lens telescope 30 mm in diameter has a focal ratio of 1:1.9.
A circular diaphragm 1 mm in diameter placed in the focal plane of the telescope
forms the FOV. A collimator with two small lenses forms a beam into a custom-made
TeO2 AOTF crystal with an active zone of 23 mm. The divergence of the beams inside
the crystal is limited to ±5.5°. The linear aperture has the minimal pupil of 3.12 mm
in the centre of the crystal and is less than 3.5 mm at the edges. The output system
separates the beams for different polarisations; it consists of two lenses, the first
compensating for the divergence of the output beam, and the second focusing the light
at the detector. There are two detectors and two short-focus proximity lenses, for the
ordinary and extraordinary beams, to allow measurement of the polarisation of the
incoming light.
For simplicity, SIR uses the same solar entrance as SUV. An optical fibre delivers
the light to the SIR objective. The entry optics of this fibre creates the angular FOV
of about 4 arcsec. A collimator lens at the output of the fibre and a 45° flat mirror
mounted at the baffle of the SIR objective complete the design of SIR’s solar
entrance.
4.1 Nadir viewing 4. Measurements

SPICAM will obtain the first simultaneous measurements of water vapour and ozone
for the martian atmosphere. The vertical column of H2O and O3 will be obtained
105
SP-1240
Fig. 7. Line-by-line spectra of nadir

atmospheric transmission. Spectra are
computed for the water vapour abundance of
15 pr. µm and 50 pr. µm (offset in H2O bands)
and for surface pressures of 6 mbar and
7 mbar (offset in CO2 bands).
systematically along track, on the dayside, when the spacecraft is nadir-oriented, with
a ground resolution of ~4 km at pericentre. The latitude-season coverage for the first
year of the mission is presented in Fig. 6. SPICAM will operate up to 15 min before
and after pericentre (attitudes up to 1500 km), and its coverage may be denser than is
shown in Fig. 6.
4.1.1. Mapping of H2O total column abundance in the IR

The method of nadir sounding of water vapour in the near-IR bands continues the
approach of Mars 3 and MAWD on the Viking orbiters (Farmer & LaPorte, 1972). For
Mars Express, the OMEGA instrument will perform spectral mapping in the same
spectral range, but H2O retrievals from these data will be limited because of the much
coarser spectral resolution. The principal contribution to water vapour mapping on
Mars-Express is expected from the Planetary Fourier Spectrometer (PFS). PFS offers
a near-IR range similar to that of MAWD and a thermal-IR range similar to that of
Mariner-9’s Fourier spectrometer (IRIS). The thermal-IR sounding of H2O requires a
precise knowledge of the temperature profile but it provides redundancy and can be
used at night.
SPICAM’s observational principle in its nadir mode is the same as that of PFS.
SIR’s optical axis is parallel to those of all the nadir-looking instruments on Mars
Express. SIR’s spectral range (1000-1700 nm) requires ~1900 points to be measured.
Practically, the amount of data produced by the instrument (polarimetry measure-
ments double the quantity) will be limited by the telemetry budget. The frequency of
the AOTF ultrasonic excitation is selected by software, so only the most interesting
parts of the spectrum will normally be measured with the desired sampling. The H2O
band could be characterised using only 20 well-chosen points per nadir viewing (FOV
1º), instead of the several thousand for a complete PFS spectrum. The normal
exposure time is expected to be within 4 s, allowing the measurement of two spectra
(one for each polarisation) of ~300 points each.
Simulated spectra of the atmospheric transmittance in the nadir configuration are
shown in Fig. 7. They were computed using the HITRAN-96 database, for a
multilayered atmospheric model. The water vapour band at 1.38 µm is apparent. This
band is highly suited to H2O detection because it is strong and almost free from CO2
influence. For those reasons, it was used by MAWD/Viking (Farmer & LaPorte,
1972). The spectral signatures of H2O are well resolved at the expected spectral
resolution of 4 cm–1. Owing to this relatively high spectral resolution, the gaseous
absorption signatures are easy to distinguish from surface spectral features. The
estimated nadir S/N will be better than 500, so the minimal detectable amount of H2O
column abundance is well below 1 pr. µm.
SIR is capable of measuring the column abundance of CO2 in the 1.43 µm band
106
Fig. 8. Modtran computations for nadir

geometry. Solar zenith angle 60º, ozone total
abundance 5 µ-atm. A possible effect of H2O2
is considered: no H2O2 (curve a); H2O2 column
of 2×1016 cm–2 (curve b) and 2×1017 cm–2
(curve c).
and, therefore, the surface pressure. The pressure change from 6 mbar to 7 mbar
results in a very large modification of the spectrum (Fig. 7). Combined with the S/N
of 1000, it produces an accuracy of better than 0.02 mbar (at least on a relative scale)
in the ground pressure. Owing to the AOTF wavelength selection capability, the
surface pressure will be measured simultaneously with H2O, at a very low telemetry
budget.
The ordinary and extraordinary beams at the output of an AOTF crystal can be
analysed simultaneously using two identical detectors, and the polarisation of the
incident light can be measured with high accuracy (Glenar et al., 1994). The second
single-element detector does not significantly complicate the instrument. Polarimetry
measurements enable a characterisation of grain size for the surface of Mars and of
the properties of atmospheric aerosol components (Santer et al., 1985). In particular,
it is possible to detect cirrus-like crystal clouds (Lee et al., 1990). With such
measurements at a very limited number (2-3) of wavelengths of atmospheric
absorption features (e.g. at 1.25 µm and 1.7 µm, see Fig. 7), important additional
information about the reflectivity of the surface and the aerosol extinction will be
obtained. AOTF’s wavelength control means that these measurements will be
performed simultaneously with H2O detection.
Also, the spectral measurements by SIR could be used for cross-validation of
OMEGA and PFS data.
4.1.2 Mapping of ozone in the UV

For nadir measurements of ozone, the most sensitive method will be used: the strong
Hartley band around 255 nm imprinted on the solar light scattered by the ground and
lower atmosphere. This is the technique that discovered ozone on Mars, and it is
extensively used on Earth, showing the Antarctic ozone hole. The reflectance UV
spectrum results from several sources:
— light reflected by the surface, defined by an albedo A, and modified twice by

extinction of dust and CO2 Rayleigh scattering (at λ > 200 nm);
— light produced by Rayleigh scattering of CO2;
— solar light reflected by aerosols, distributed vertically;
— absorption by ozone, distributed vertically.
107
SP-1240
Fig. 9. Variation of the UV nadir transmission

spectrum with surface pressure.
Wehrbein et al. (1979) were able to fit the Mariner-9 data with a simple single
scattering model, defined by four parameters: ozone optical depth (τ0), surface albedo
(A, assumed to be constant in the UV range), optical depth of dust and Rayleigh (τc)
and the scale height H0 of ozone, different from the fixed atmospheric scale height HS.
Indeed, they found a better fit of the bottom of the spectral reflectance trough (Fig. 8)
with a ratio H0 /HS = 0.6 than with a fixed value H0 = HS, showing that ozone was
found mostly near the cold surface where the air is dry in high-latitude regions.
A refined analysis scheme requires a more sophisticated algorithm than the one
used for the early interpretation of Mariner-7 and -9 data (Barth & Hord, 1971; Barth
et al., 1973; Wehrbein et al., 1979) but such algorithms are already working for the
Earth (the solar backscatter UV method, used by the Global Ozone Monitoring
Experiment on ERS-2).
With SPICAM UV, which registers all wavelengths simultaneously, the S/N will
be much greater than for Mariner-9’s UV spectrometer (larger than 100 for each
nanometer of spectrum in 1 s integration time). This allows the aerosol distribution to
be disconnected from the air scale height and Rayleigh scattering. Either a discrete
ordinate method or codes similar to those used for interpreting solar backscatter UV
spectra in the Earth’s atmosphere will be used.
Figure 8, computed for an ozone quantity of 5 µatm (1 µatm = 2.689×1015 mol cm–2
= 0.1 Dobson units), shows the trough of ozone centred at 255 nm. It is estimated that
a trough of ~1% is detectable, corresponding to a vertical optical thickness at 255 nm
of 0.5%, or a column density of N = τ0/σ = 4×1014 mol cm–2, or 0.15 µatm. This allows
measurements of ozone in all seasons and latitudes. Above this threshold (say,
N > 2 µatm), the statistical noise will be a negligible source of error, while systematic
errors give an uncertainty of 5%.
SUV will be regularly calibrated in flight by observing standard stars and the Sun.
The absolute solar spectrum outside the atmosphere is well known. The reflectance
spectrum of Mars will therefore be obtained with a good absolute accuracy and at a
spectral resolution of 1 nm. Then, in addition to the main features of the reflection
spectrum such as Rayleigh and aerosol scattering overlaid with ozone and CO2
absorption, other unknowns can be retrieved:
108
— for surface pressures of 6 mbar and 8 mbar (the total CO2 vertical column is
directly connected to the surface pressure), the absorption edge varies in wave-
length position at 210 nm (Fig. 9). Therefore, there is the promising possibility of
measuring the surface pressure from the position of the absorption edge in the
reflected spectrum. An accuracy of half-a-pixel (easily achievable with such a
high S/N) or 0.25 nm on the wavelength would translate into an accuracy of
~0.2 mbar. These data will be used for cross-validation of more precise nadir SIR
surface pressure measurements and, combined with the known altimetry, will
provide a valuable source for meteorological studies.
— H2O2 presents continuous absorption in the UV around 200-220 nm (Yung &
Demore, 1999). A simulation of the reflectance (Fig. 8) shows that even for case
b, which is not for maximum H2O2 conditions, there is a small difference. Though
it is difficult to disentangle the continuous absorption by H2O2 from dust, it is
hoped that a careful analysis with assimilation of aerosol data obtained at other
wavelengths will allow the first measurement of this important molecule.
4.2 Vertical profiling by stellar occultation in the UV

SPICAM will measure the vertical distribution of CO2, temperature, O3, aerosols, O2
and possibly H2O2 by using stellar occultation, as planned for SPICAM/Mars-96.
The principle is simple. Along the spacecraft’s orbit, stars are occulted one after the
other by the planetary limb opposite the velocity vector. At a predetermined time, the
spacecraft is oriented in such a way that the line of sight of SUV points towards a
given star. The stellar spectrum recorded above the atmosphere (say, at
200 km), unaltered by atmospheric absorption, serves as a reference spectrum. Then,
while the spacecraft is maintained in a 3-axis, inertial attitude, the line of sight
intersects increasingly deeper parts of the atmosphere, down to total occultation.
The stellar occultation technique offers three decisive features:
— an absolute concentration derived from a relative measurement (self-calibration

means there is no need for instrument calibration);
— excellent vertical resolution, whatever the distance to the planet (because the star
is a point source);
— the accuracy of altitude knowledge, in contrast with limb emission methods, is
independent of the spacecraft attitude. The line of sight is determined entirely by
the direction of the star in the sky (known) and the position of the spacecraft on
its orbit.
Stellar occultations will be performed preferably on the night side of the orbit, and
will not affect the operation of dayside mapping instruments. The spacecraft is
commanded to direct the SUV line of sight towards a bright UV star and this fixed
orientation is maintained within 0.5° (nominal spacecraft capability is better than
0.05°, ensuring that the star remains within the 1° FOV of the instrument during the
occultation, which lasts typically 1-4 min). Several (3-5) occultations per orbit are
foreseen, the limiting factor being the spacecraft orientation, which is a resource to be
shared among the various investigations. Hot stars are preferred, because they are
brighter in the UV. Their spectra are flatter than the solar spectrum in the UV. This
occultation method offers other features:
— whatever the orbit, there will be numerous opportunities for stellar occultations;
— when a star is occulted during one orbit, it will be occulted again during the
following orbits at about the same latitude, but at different longitudes;
— the vertical profiling is not restricted to be along the ground track, in comparison
with other instrumental methods;
— de-occultation (star rise) is also possible, since there is no closed-loop tracking
system.
109
SP-1240
Fig. 10. Absorption cross-sections of CO2 and

ozone in SPICAM’s UV spectral range.
Figure 10 shows the absorption cross-sections of CO2 and ozone in the UV as a

function of wavelength. O2 is absorbing (Schumann-Runge bands) between the peaks
of CO2 and O3, offering the possibility of actually measuring O2. Other absorbers are
dust (Mie scattering generalised to non-spherical particles) and possibly H2O2 and
SO2. The atmospheric transmission simulations are presented in Fig. 11 for various
tangential heights. Besides CO2 and ozone, a dust profile was assumed, with a vertical
optical thickness τd = 0.2 at 300 nm. Rayleigh extinction by CO2 was also included in
the simulations.
Because the CO2 cross-section presents an enormous dynamic range in the UV,
CO2 absorption may begin to be detected at an altitude of 150 km. For decreasing
tangential heights, the CO2 manifests itself by a sharp cut-off that increases in
wavelength, up to ~200 nm at z = 10 km. Longward of 200 nm, the transmission
spectrum is dominated by dust and CO2 Rayleigh extinction, with the additional
trough at 255 nm due to ozone. The depth of this trough is a direct measure of ozone
line density. From the given S/N in stellar occultation mode (see above), the O3 line
density Nh accuracy will depend on the UV magnitude of the star. It can be estimated
that the accuracy on the O3 line density will be about 2% for about 20 stars in the sky
and the measuring threshold corresponding to an absorption of ~1% corresponds to
Nh = 1015 mol cm–2 (horizontal) and local density of 3.5×107 cm–3 at all altitudes
z > 15 km (Korablev, Bertaux & Dubois, 2001).
The Rayleigh extinction above 200 nm can be computed from the CO2 line density
determined below 200 nm. The remaining continuous absorption above 200 nm may
be attributed to dust/aerosols for a determination of its vertical distribution and
spectral characteristics in the UV.
4.2.1 CO2 density and temperature profile

Once the line density of CO2 is determined from the transmission spectra, the local
density n(z) is determined from an Abel inversion. Then, the hydrostatic equation
allows temperature to be determined. As for O3, the accuracy on the CO2 line density
will be about 2% for 20 stars. The accuracy of the retrieved temperature is estimated
to be ±5K in the whole range of altitude, starting at 130-160 km at the top level, while
the lowest altitude achieved will depend on the absorption by aerosols or clouds, and
will most likely be 5-20 km.
110
Fig. 11. Simulated stellar occultation

transmission spectra for tangential altitudes
from 150 km to 10 km in steps of 10 km.
There is a known dependence of the CO2 absorption cross-section on the

temperature T. The retrieval process begins by a first iteration with an a priori profile
T(z) and corresponding choice of CO2 cross-section. Then, N and n are retrieved, and
the scale height is derived, independently of a wrong choice of the cross-section,
providing a new guess for T(z). A few iterations allow convergence of the process. A
similar retrieval procedure was developed and tested for the GOMOS/Envisat stellar
occultation experiment.
Though nighttime stellar occultations are preferred, it is important to keep in mind
that some daytime occultations should be performed on particularly bright stars on the
bright limb. They could be combined with UV airglow limb observations to get a
better understanding of thermal structure, and to solve unambiguously the
discrepancy between Viking and Mariner-9 temperature profiles at z > 120 km. In
addition, the day-night amplitude variation of the exospheric temperature (at the top
of the thermosphere) is a crucial test for the validity of sophisticated Thermospheric
General Circulation Models (TGCMs), such as that developed by Bougher et al.
(1990). The model predicts a dayside temperature of 270K at 170 km, and a night side
T = 160K at the same altitude, but it was impossible to validate this model owing to
the lack of measurements. SPICAM offers a wide coverage of density/temperature
profiles (local time, season, latitude, geography and solar activity) with which the
TGCM could be validated (or invalidated, and modified accordingly). Then, such a
model could be used as a predictive tool for managing aerocapture/aerobraking
operations in future.
Finally, SUV has a unique ability to detect condensation clouds during the night.
The Pathfinder camera detected fog, but was not able to determine the layer’s altitude.
SUV will do this accurately.
4.2.2 The case for molecular oxygen

Molecular oxygen is the result of CO2 photodissociation. Its mixing ratio was
measured to be of the order of 10–3, and is assumed to be constant. O2 provides in the
Schumann-Runge bands (170-210 nm) an additional absorption that should be
measurable. Calculations show that the difference of transmission between an
atmosphere with O2 (O2/CO2 = 10–3) and an atmosphere without O2 amounts to 2%
111
SP-1240
Fig. 12. Periods of solar eclipse for Mars

Express orbit G3A. (Figure adopted from
Hechler & Yanes, 1999.)
between 80 km and 50 km, in a bandwidth of about 20 nm centred on 190 nm. The

absorption decreases somewhat below, but is detectable down to 35 km. In principle,
one expects a constant mixing ratio of O2, in altitude and over the planet, inasmuch
as we understand the chemical reactions that control this molecule. There is, however,
the special case of the polar winter, when the CO2 condenses on the martian surface
while the O2 remains, enriching the airmass. The O2 mixing ratio may be used as a
tracer of polar airmass circulation. Its exact value depends on how fast the non-polar
airmasses flow to the pole to replenish the locally condensing CO2 atmosphere. The
UV occultation technique is the only way of accessing to this important molecule.
4.3 Solar occultation measurements

As well as the SUV working in the stellar occultation mode, both SUV and SIR will
benefit from the advanced pointing capabilities of Mars Express for solar
occultations. A solar aperture below the sensor will be pointed towards the Sun by
orienting the spacecraft. The angular diameter of the Sun as seen from Mars is 0.35º,
but the variability in the brightness of the solar disc requires an attitude control
accuracy of 0.1º, well within the spacecraft specifications.
In the case of a polar orbit, there is no precession of the orbital plane. Then, during
one martian year, there are two periods of solar occultations, centred on the two dates
when the Sun is in the orbital plane (the angle between the solar vector and the orbit
plane is zero). Therefore, the possibilities of solar occultation measurements are
independent of the other orbital elements.
For the nominal orbit during the mission lifetime, some 700 sunset-sunrise
occultation sequences are expected. The occultations occur within about 60 min of
pericentre. The two hemispheres are covered twice during spring and autumn
(Fig. 12). The spacecraft-limb distance during these periods varies between 4000 km
and 11 500 km. The duration of each occultation sequence for the altitude range of 0-
150 km is 2-3 min. During the second martian year, there will be fewer occultations
closer to apocentre (spacecraft-limb distance above 8000 km).
Solar occultation spectroscopic sounding of a planetary atmosphere offers several
advantages. The radiation of the Sun is an incomparably powerful source and it
112
traverses the largest possible atmospheric path (the airmass factor reaches 40-45 for Fig. 13. Simulated near-IR spectrum of the
Mars). As for stellar occultations, the measured spectra are compared with the martian atmosphere at the limb (tangential
altitude 10 km).
unattenuated signal above the atmosphere, which is measured in the same sequence
before occultation to provide self-calibration. A disadvantage is that the atmosphere
can be observed only when and where there is a sunset/sunrise.
Vertical resolution of the UV channel is determined by the slit width in one
direction and by the pixel height in the other. Assuming that the spectra will be
integrated over two lines of the CCD, the FOV will be 1.5×1.5 arcmin, leading to a
linear resolution of 1.7-5 km. Using a single CCD line doubles the linear resolution
in one direction. The FOV of the IR channel will be better than 4 arcmin because of
the fibre optics that deliver the solar light to SIR, limiting the vertical resolution at the
limb to 5 km under the best conditions.
The solar-mode SUV will target the same scientific objectives at the terminator as
the stellar occultation mode but with a better S/N. The Sun’s brightness allows deeper
sounding for dusty conditions. The solar mode SIR can measure water vapour vertical
profiles – extremely important measurements that cannot be done by any other
instrument aboard Mars Express or any planned US mission.
4.3.1 Water vapour profiling by SIR

The efficiency of the solar occultation method for studying the vertical distribution of
water vapour was proved during the Phobos mission, when measurements at 1.87 µm
determined H2O vertical profiles in the altitude range 10-50 km (Rodin et al., 1997).
The simulated absorption spectrum of the martian atmosphere at the limb is shown
in Fig. 13. It is similar to the nadir spectra, but the absorptions are much more
profound. The same near-IR absorption band at 1.38 µm will be used for both. The
absorption features of H2O in this band are deeper than 10%. The accuracy of water-
vapour limb sounding depends on atmospheric conditions. Based on available
observations (one of which comes from the solar occultation experiment on Phobos,
Rodin et al., 1997) and modelling results (Rodin et al., 1999), two types of H2O
profiles can be considered: ‘dry and cold’ and ‘warm and wet’. The dry vertical
profile of H2O constrained by a relatively cold temperature profile in a clean atmos-
phere (Clancy et al., 1990; Rodin et al., 1997) can be described as 100 ppm below
113
SP-1240
10 km, ~30 ppm at 15-20 km and 10 ppm above 25 km. In these conditions, the
highest sounding altitude is around 30-35 km, and the lowest, constrained by the
aerosol absorption, is within 5-10 km. For ‘warm and wet’ conditions, the highest
altitude is 45-50 km (though the absorption at these altitudes is ~0.5%) but the lowest
may be 10-15 km because of the larger amount of dust in the atmosphere, which
levitates to higher altitudes.
4.3.2 Profiling and characterisation of atmospheric aerosols

The main component of martian aerosols is micron-sized dust, a product of soil
weathering, and water ice. According to MGS data (Pearl et al., 1999; Smith et al.,
1999), clouds composed of 2 µm particles with visible optical depths of up to 0.1 are
formed at the water vapour condensation level, which, in equatorial regions, varies
from lower than 10 km at aphelion to almost 50 km in the perihelion season.
Occultation spectroscopy is probably the most sensitive remote-sensing technique for
directly sounding the vertical structure of clouds and aerosols. In solar occultation, the
information about the spectral continuum at distant spectral wavelengths is a
byproduct of gaseous absorption retrievals. As soon as the slant atmospheric opacities
at different wavelengths are obtained from occultation data, the aerosol extinction can
be retrieved by Abel inversion. Then, using the Mie theory (possibly adapted for non-
spherical particles), a number of unknown parameters characterising the aerosol
component can be extracted, such as the size distribution, and the real and imaginary
parts of the refractive index. Also, the vertical variation of key parameters such as the
effective size and the number density can be retrieved.
SPICAM measurements are expected to be able to separate the mineral and volatile
aerosol fractions. However, when both fractions are present, it will be difficult to
determine whether mineral dust particles are cloud condensation nuclei or two kinds
of aerosols mixed along the optical path. To help the interpretation, these data will be
compared with or assimilated into the 1-D cloud microphysics model mentioned
above. It is especially interesting that the vertical profiles of icy aerosols will be
obtained in parallel with water vapour profiles. If the observed water vapour is far
from saturation, we expect mostly mineral dust aerosols that can be verified by
spectroscopic analysis. It is a general assumption that the mineral-dust profile is
controlled by the vertical component of large-scale atmospheric circulation and eddy
mixing. Therefore, these phenomena can be constrained by the retrieved dust profiles
(Korablev et al., 1993).
4.3.3 The consequences of deleting the dedicated solar occultation sensor (SOIR)
The classical IR grating spectrometer for solar occultations (Bertaux et al., 2000)
covers a broad spectral range (1.3-4.8 µm) at a relatively high spectral resolution (2-
4 cm–1), almost the same as the spectral resolution and FOV of PFS. The AOTF
spectrometer has the spectral range of 1.0-1.7 µm and the spectral resolution of
~3.5 cm–1. The FOV in occultation mode is larger (4-5 arcmin) because of the
simplified entrance system.
Unfortunately, the mass constraints of Mars Explorer dictated the deletion of
SOIR. Apart from the vertical resolution, there is no significant degradation of
accuracy for H2O profiling in solar occultation. No redundancy is lost; only the
1.38 µm H2O band of the three main short-IR absorption bands (1.38, 1.87, 2.56 µm)
will be measured, but the grating spectrometer could measure only one at a time
anyway. Reduced spectral resolution does not affect the accuracy drastically. The
narrower spectral range makes the aerosol profiling less effective, losing the capacity
to measure some interesting components:
— the HDO band at 3.7 µm, so the IR measurements of D/H in the lower
atmosphere cannot be compared with the UV measurements in the thermosphere;
— exploratory studies of the carbonic compounds at 3.3-3.7 µm;
— CO measurements in the fundamental CO band at 4.7 µm and in the 2.3 µm
114
overtone band. Photochemical models predict that CO with its long lifetime Fig. 14. Mariner-6 and -7 UV spectrum of the
would not show any significant altitude stratification, but geographical variability upper atmosphere of Mars at a resolution of
20 Å. Limb spectrum at altitudes between
of CO in the lower atmosphere is worth monitoring;
140 km and 180 km, including four individual
— strong saturated CO2 bands (at 4.0 µm and 2.7 µm) fall outside of the AOTF observations (figure adapted from Barth et al.,
spectral range. It was planned to use these bands for atmospheric density studies 1971).
at 80-120 km; the same sounding will be done in the UV. This redundancy, and
the possibility of independently measuring the rotational temperature in the CO2
bands, is lost.
Conversely, an important advantage of the AOTF spectrometer over the grating

spectrometer is that all the interesting regions of the spectral range can be acquired
with the desired sampling during the same occultation session using spectral micro-
windows (for gaseous components) and distant points (for aerosol characterisation in
the spectral continuum). Thus full advantage will be taken of each occultation, which
are relatively infrequent events.
4.4 Airglow observations at the limb

4.4.1 Study of the ionosphere in UV
Most of the ionosphere lies below the planned pericentre altitude of Mars Express
(300 km) so in situ measurements will be impossible. However, the natural UV
airglow of the atmosphere allows remote studies of the ionosphere and its temporal
behaviour as a function of solar-wind parameters. Figure 14 shows the dayglow
spectrum recorded by the Mariner-6 and -7 UV spectrometers (Barth et al., 1971).
The main ionisable neutral constituent is CO2. The CO+2 transition (B2Σu+ – X2πg)
at 289 nm is produced by photoionisation of CO2 from solar UV at λ < 69 nm. The
other band CO+2 (A2Σu – X2πg), between 300 nm and 400 nm, is produced by a
combination of photoionisation and fluorescence scattering on CO+2 ions. The
SPICAM UV long-wavelength cut-off is at 320 nm, which is sufficient to measure the
(4,0) and (3,0) transitions of the A-X band.
The intense Cameron band of CO a3π – X1Σ+ observed at 190-270 nm is produced
by a combination of photodissociation of CO2 by solar UV (λ < 108 nm), electron
impact dissociation of CO2 and dissociative recombination of CO+2 . The variation of this
band intensity with altitude was used to determine the vertical profile of CO2 above
120 km, and from the scale height the temperature of the thermosphere was derived
(Stewart et al., 1972). This indirect method of determining CO2 could be validated with
SUV, when a stellar occultation is performed on the dayside. The large slit of the FOV
will be used to ease the pointing requirement; the bright stellar spectrum would show
up, superimposed on the general airglow only on a few lines of the CCD, and the
115
SP-1240
analysis of the spectro-image would provide information on CO2: direct measurement

by absorptive occultation, and indirect CO Cameron band emission. Neutral O and
neutral H vertical density profiles may be derived from the vertical variations of their
resonance lines at 130.4 nm and 121.6 nm (Lyman-α), respectively.
4.4.2 Hot oxygen corona, atmospheric escape and D/H ratio

While CO2 + hν → CO+2 is the main photoionisation source, it is the O+2 ion that is the
most abundant. As a result, a hot atomic oxygen corona around Mars (Ip, 1988),
similar to that detected by Venera-11 (Bertaux et al., 1981) around Venus from the
emission at 130.4 nm, can be easily detected with SPICAM’s better sensitivity. This
may be an important source of O escape from the martian atmosphere, somewhat
equilibrating the escape of H atoms responsible for the measured enrichment of D/H
ratio (a factor of 6) detected in the IR in the lower atmosphere (Owen et al., 1988).
D atoms and H atoms both produce a Lyman-α resonant emission in the upper
atmosphere, excited by the H solar Lyman-α line. Since the wavelength separation
(H, 121.566 nm; D, 121.533 nm) is larger than the thermal width of each line, the
radiative transfer of both types of Lyman-α are totally decoupled. Though SUV has
insufficient spectral resolution, these two emissions could be tentatively separated
from the vertical distribution of the sum intensities. While the H emission should
present a smooth variation around the CO2 absorption limb (around 120 km), because
it is optically thick, the D Lyman-α emission is optically thin, and the intensity
doubles just above the limb. Any spike at the CO2 limb in the vertical distribution of
Lyman-α total intensity limb (estimated to be ~300 R) would be due to D atoms.
Therefore, both D abundance and H abundance could be determined in the upper
atmosphere, and compared with HDO/H2O measurements in the lower atmosphere in
the IR. With Lyman-α measurements from the Hubble Space Telescope,
Krasnopolsky et al. (1998) reported that the D/H ratio in the upper atmosphere was
lower by a factor of 10 than the D/H ratio in the lower atmosphere. One possible
explanation (Cheng et al., 1999) is that HDO is less photo-dissociated than H2O,
because of a smaller cross-section. This effect is probably insufficient to explain the
discrepancy, and another explanation is known to be important (Bertaux &
Montmessin, 2001): fractionation through condensation. HDO is more prone to
condense in ice crystals than is H2O from the vapour phase, decreasing the D/H ratio
with altitude in regions where the photo-dissociation rate is important. This effect is
known to play an important role in the Earth’s upper troposphere-stratosphere, where
HDO is severely depleted just above the tropopause.
4.4.3 O2 limb airglow in the IR

A dayglow 1.27 µm O2 (1∆g) emission was observed from the ground at high
resolution by Noxon et al. (1976). This emission was predicted just after the discovery
of ozone on Mars by Mariner-9 (Barth & Hord, 1971). The martian situation is similar
to Earth’s, where a strong airglow arises from O2 (1∆g) production from ozone
photolysis. Latitude correlation of this emission with Mariner-9 O3 was reported by
Traub et al. (1979). Mapping of this emission was reported by Krasnopolsky &
Bjoracker (2000). Krasnopolsky (1997) argues that the O2 emission provides even
better insight to photochemistry than ozone, since it is more sensitive to the variations
of the water vapour saturation level (10-35 km) than total ozone, which remains
almost constant.
The band intensity observed by different authors from the ground varies from
1.5 MR to 26 MR; the limb intensity should be greater by a factor of 25 if the dayglow
layer is above dust. If, however, the dayglow and dust are uniformly mixed, this factor
is approximately 3. A reasonable compromise of these factors is a mean value of ~10.
Therefore, if pointed to a sunlit limb together with SUV, SIR could observe the
O2 (1∆g) band intensity of 15-260 MR in a 30 km-thick layer at the limb. This height
corresponds roughly to the FOV of the IR spectrometer, and the predicted S/N will be
better than 20 in a single spectral bin, or 200-300 for the entire band.
116
Several measurements provided by SPICAM are unique, including: 5. Conclusion

— ozone measurements are not included on any flying or planned mission. The
vertical distribution of ozone will be measured during stellar occultations. H2O2
will possibly be detected.
— the density/temperature profiles will provide important constraints for building
meteorological and dynamical atmospheric models, from the surface to the
exosphere. TES/MGS overlaps up to 80 km altitude, but SPICAM will be the
only way to access up to 160 km, the region used for aerocapture and aero-
braking. Stellar occultations provide a unique opportunity for detecting clouds on
the night side and for measuring O2.
— the remote sensing of the ionosphere from natural emissions is not included in
any other planned mission. The measurements of D/H from UV limb emissions
will verify if this ratio is constant or if it varies according to condensation/
evaporation processes (as around the terrestrial tropopause).
— after the loss of the Pressure Modulation IR Radiometer on the Mars Climate
Orbiter, the only instrument to provide water-vapour vertical profiling will be
SPICAM (via solar occultations).
It is already clear that, as on Earth, the atmosphere of Mars has a strong interannual
variability. Atmospheric studies must be pursued at every opportunity. It is also
essential that a variety of techniques be employed: SPICAM applies the most
successful methods from terrestrial studies: backscatter UV spectroscopy and
solar/stellar occultation limb sounding.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank M. Richardson, T. Schofield and V. Krasnopolsky for
useful discussions. CNES and the Belgian government are financing SPICAM.
Atreya, S.K. & Z.G. Gu (1994). Stability of the Martian Atmosphere: Is Hetero- References
geneous Catalysis Essential? J. Geophys. Res. 99, E6, 13,133-13,145
Barth, C.A. & C.W. Hord (1971). Mariner Ultraviolet Spectrometer: Topography and
Polar Cap. Science 173, 197-201.
Barth, C.A., C.W. Hord, A.I. Stewart, A.L. Lane, M.L. Duck & G.P. Anderson
(1973). Mariner 9 Ultraviolet Spectrometer Experiment: Seasonal Variation of
Ozone on Mars. Science 179, 795-796.
Barth, C.A., C.W. Hord, J.B. Pearce, K.K. Kelly, G.P. Anderson & A.I. Stewart
(1971). Mariner 6 and 7 Ultraviolet Spectrometer Experiment: Upper Atmosphere
Data. J. Geophys. Res. 76, 2213-2227.
Barth, C.A., A.I.F. Stewart, S.W. Bougher, D.M. Hunten, S.J. Bauer & A.F. Nagy
(1992). Aeronomy of the Current Martian Atmosphere. In Mars (Eds. Kieffer et
al.), Univ. of Arizona Press, Arizona, USA, pp1054-1089.
Bertaux, J.L., J.E. Blamont, V.M. Lépine, V.G. Kurt, N.N. Romanova & A.S. Smir-
nov (1981). Venera 11 and Venera 12 Observations of EUV Emissions from the
Upper Atmosphere of Venus. Planet. Space Sci. 29, 149-166.
Bertaux, J.L., D. Fonteyn, O. Korablev, E. Chassefière, E. Dimarellis, J.P. Dubois,
A. Hauchecorne, M. Cabane, P. Ranou, A.C. Levasseur-Regourd, G. Cernogora,
E. Quemerais, C. Hermans, G. Kockarts, C. Lippens, M. De Maziere, D. Moreau,
C. Muller, E. Neefs, P.C. Simon, F. Forget, F. Hourdin, O. Talagrand, V.I. Moroz,
A. Rodin, B. Sandel & A. Stern (2000). The Study of the Martian Atmosphere
from Top to Bottom with SPICAM Light on Mars Express. Planet. Space Sci. 48,
1303-1320.
Bertaux, J.L. & F. Montmessin (2001). Isotopic Fractionation through Water Vapor
117
SP-1240
Condensation: the Deuteropause, a Cold Trap for Deuterium in the Atmosphere of

Mars. J. Geophys. Res. Planets 106, E 12, 32879-32884.
Blamont, J.E. & E. Chassefière (1993). First Detection of Ozone in the Middle
Atmosphere of Mars from Solar Occultation Measurements. Icarus 104, 324-336.
Blamont, J.E., E. Chassefière, J.P. Goutail, B. Mege, M. Nunes-Pinharanda, G. Sou-
shon, V.A. Krasnopolsky, A.A. Krysko & V.I. Moroz (1989). Vertical Structure of
Dust and Ozone in the Martian Atmosphere Deduced from Solar Occultation
Measurements. Nature 341, 600-603.
Bougher, S.W., C.G. Fesen, E.C. Ridley & R.W. Zurek (1993). Mars Mesosphere and
Thermosphere Coupling – Semidiurnal Tides. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 3281-3295.
Bougher, S.W., R.G. Roble, E.C. Ridley & R.E. Dickinson (1990). The Mars Thermo-
sphere. II. General Circulation with Coupled Dynamics and Composition.
J. Geophys. Res. 95, 14811-14827.
Carr, M. (1996). Water on Mars, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
Chassefière, E., J.E. Blamont, V.A. Krasnopolsky, O.I. Korablev, S.K. Atreya &
R.A. West (1992). Vertical Structure and Size Distributions of Martian Aerosols
from Solar Occultation Measurements. Icarus 97, 46-69.
Cheng, B.M., E.P. Chew, Ching-Ping Liu, M. Bahou, Yuan-Pern Lee, Yuk L. Yung &
M.F. Gerstell (1999). Photo-Induced Fractionation of Water Isotopomers in the
Martian Atmosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 3657-3660.
Clancy, R.T., D.O. Muhleman & G.L. Berge (1990). Global Changes in the 0-70 km
Thermal Structure of the Mars Atmosphere derived from 1975 to 1989 Microwave
CO Spectra. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 14543-14554.
Clancy, R.T., A.W. Grossman, M.J. Wolff, P.B. James, D.J. Rudy, Y.N. Billawala,
B.J. Sandor, S.W. Lee & D.O. Muhleman (1996). Water Vapor Saturation at Low
Altitudes around Mars Aphelion: A Key to Mars Climate? Icarus 122, 36-62.
Conrath, B.J., J.C. Pearl, M.D. Smith & P.R. Christensen (1998). MGS TES Results:
Characterization of the Martian Atmospheric Thermal Structure. DPS meeting #30,
#11.P06
Conrath, B.J., J.C. Pearl, M.D. Smith & P.R. Christensen (1999). Mars Global
Surveyor TES Results: Atmospheric Thermal Structure Retrieved from Limb
Measurements. DPS meeting #31, #49.08.
Farmer, C.B. & D.D. LaPorte (1972). The Detection and Mapping of Water Vapor in
the Martian Atmosphere. Icarus 16, 34-46.
Forget, F., F. Hourdin & O. Talagrand (1996). Simulation of the Martian Atmospheric
Polar Warming with the LMD General Circulation Model. Ann. Geophys. 14,
C797.
Fox, G.K., A.D. Code, C.M. Anderson, B.L. Babler, K.S. Bjorkman (1997). Solar
System Observations by the Wisconsin Ultraviolet Photopolarimeter Experiment.
I. The First Ultraviolet Linear Spectroscopy of Mars. Astron. J. 113, 1152-1157.
Glenar, D.A., J.J. Hillman, B. Saiff & J. Bergstralh (1994). Acouto-optic Imaging
Spectropolarimery for Remote Sensing. Appl. Opt. 33, 31, 7412-7424.
Hapke, B. (1981). Bidirectional Reflectance Spectroscopy. I. Theory. J. Geophys.
Res. 86, 3039-3054.
Hechler, M & A. Yanes (1999). Mars Express Mission Analysis: the Orbits around
G3-A and G3-B. MAS working paper #413. ESOC, Darmstadt.
Hinson, D.P., R.A. Simpson, J.D. Twicken, G.L. Tyler & F.M. Flasar (1999). Initial
Results from Radio Occultation Measurements from Mars Global Surveyor.
J. Geophys. Res. 104, E11, 26997-27012.
Ip, W.H. (1988). On a Hot Oxygen Corona of Mars. Icarus 76, 135-145.
Jakosky, B.M., R.O. Pepin, R.E. Johnson & J.L. Fox (1994). Mars Atmospheric Loss
and Isotopic Fractionation by Solar-wind-induced Sputtering and Photochemical
Escape. Icarus 111, 271-288.
Kass, D.M. & Y.L. Yung (1995). Loss of Atmosphere from Mars due to Solar Wind-
induced Sputtering. Science 268, 697-699.
Keating, G.M., S.W. Bougher, R.W. Zurek, R.H. Tolson, G.J. Cancro, S.N. Noll,
118
J.S. Parker, T.J. Schellenberg, R.W. Shane, B.L. Wilkerson, J.R. Murphy,
J.L. Hollingsworth, R.M. Haberle, M. Joshi, J.C. Pearl, B.J. Conrath, M.D. Smith,
R.T. Clancy, R.C. Blanchard, R.G. Wilmoth, D.F. Rault, T.Z. Martin, D.T. Lyons,
P.B. Esposito, M.D. Johnston, C.W. Whetzel, C.G. Justus & J.M. Babicke (1998).
The Structure of the Upper Atmosphere of Mars: In situ Accelerometer
Measurements from Mars Global Surveyor. Science 279, 1672.
Korablev, O.I., J.L. Bertaux & J.P Dubois (2001). Occultation of Stars in the UV:
Study of the Atmosphere of Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 7597-7610.
Korablev, O.I., V.A. Krasnopolsky, A.V. Rodin & E. Chassefière (1993). Vertical
Structure of Martian Dust Measured by the Solar Occultation from Phobos
Spacecraft. Icarus 102, 76-87.
Krasnopolsky, V.A. (1993). Photochemistry of the Martian Atmosphere (Mean
Conditions). Icarus 101, 313-332.
Krasnopolsky, V.A. (1997). Photochemical Mapping of Mars. J. Geophys. Res.
(Planets) 102,13,313-13,320.
Krasnopolsky, V.A. & G.L. Bjoracker (2000). Mapping of Mars O2(1∆) Emission. AGU
2000 Spring meeting, Washington DC, USA.
Krasnopolsky, V.A., O.I. Korablev, V.I. Moroz, A.A. Krysko, J.E. Blamont &
E. Chassefière (1991). Infrared Solar Occultation Sounding of the Martian
Atmosphere by the Phobos Spacecraft. Icarus 94, 32-44.
Krasnopolsky, V.A., V.I. Moroz, A.A. Krysko, O.I. Korablev, V.S. Zhegulev,
A.V. Grigoriev, A.Yu. Tkachuk, V.A. Parshev, J.E. Blamont & J.-P. Goutail (1989).
Phobos-2: Solar Occultation Spectroscopic Measurements of the Martian
Atmosphere at 1.9 and 3.7 µm. Nature 341, 603-604.
Krasnopolsky, V.A., M.J. Mumma & G.R. Gladstone (1998). Detection of Atomic
Deuterium in the Upper Atmosphere of Mars. Science 280, 1576-1580.
Lee, P., S. Ebisawa & A. Dollfus (1990). Crystal Clouds in the Martian Atmosphere.
Astron. Astroph. 240, 2, 520-532.
Lellouch, E., G. Paubert & T. Encrenaz (1991). Mapping of CO Millimeter Wave Lines
in Mars’ Atmosphere: The Spatial Variability of Carbon Monoxide on Mars. Planet.
Space Sci. 39, 219-224.
Luhmann, J.G., R.E. Johnson & M.H.G. Zhang (1992). Evolutionary Impact of
Sputtering of the Martian Atmosphere by O+ Pickup Ions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19,
2151-2154.
Magalhaes, J.A., J.T. Schofield & A. Seiff (1999). Results of the Mars Pathfinder
Atmospheric Structure Investigation. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 8943-8955.
Maguire, W.C. (1977). Martian Isotopic Ratios and Upper Limits for Possible Minor
Constituents as Derived from Mariner 9 Infrared Spectrometer Data. Icarus 32, 85-97.
McElroy, M.B. (1972). Mars: An Evolving Atmosphere. Science 175, 443-445.
McElroy, M.B. & T.M. Donahue (1972). Stability of the Martian Atmosphere. Science
177, 986.
Moreau, D., A. Marten & Y. Biraud (1998). Meridional and Seasonal Distributions of
Trace Gases in the Lower and Middle Atmosphere of Mars. Lunar and Planetary
Science Conference, 1998, Houston, TX, USA, Abstract #1369.
Nair, H., M. Allen, A.D. Anbar & Y.L. Yung (1994). A Photochemical Model of the
Martian Atmosphere. Icarus 111, 124-150.
Noxon, J.F., W.A. Traub, N.P. Carleton & P. Connes (1976). Detection of O2 Airglow
Emission from Mars and the Martian Ozone Abundance. Astrophys. J. 207, 1025-
1035.
Owen, T., J.P. Maillard, C. de Bergh & B.L. Lutz (1988). Deuterium on Mars: The
Abundance of HDO and the Value of H/D. Science 240, 1767-1170.
Parkinson, T.D. & D.M. Hunten (1972). Spectroscopy and Aeronomy of O2 on Mars.
J. Atm. Sci. 29, 1390.
Pearl, J.C., M.D. Smith, B.J. Conrath, J.L. Bandfield & P.R. Christensen (1999). Mars
Global Surveyor TES Results: Observations of Water Ice Clouds. DPS meeting #31,
#76.08.
119
SP-1240
Rodin, A.V., R.T. Clancy, R.J. Wilson (1999). Dynamical Properties of Mars Water
Ice Clouds and their Interactions with Atmospheric Dust and Radiation. Adv. Space
Res. 23, 1577-1585.
Rodin, A.V., O.I. Korablev & V.I. Moroz (1997). Vertical Distribution of Water in
Near-equatorial Troposphere of Mars: Water Vapor and Clouds. Icarus 125, 21-29.
Roscoe, H.K., R.A. Freshwater, R. Wolfenden, R.L. Jones, D.J. Fish, J.E. Harries &
D.J. Oldham (1994). Using Stars for Remote Sensing of the Earth’s Stratosphere.
Appl. Optics. 33, 7126-7131.
Rosenqvist, J., P. Drossart, M. Combes, T. Encrenaz, E. Lellouch, J.P. Bibring,
S. Erard, Y. Langevin & E. Chassefière (1992). Minor Constituents in the Martian
Atmosphere from the ISM/Phobos Experiment. Icarus 98, 254-270.
Santer, R., M. Deschamps, L.V. Ksanfomaliti & A. Dollfus (1985). Photopolarimetric
Analysis of the Martian Atmosphere by the Soviet MARS-5 Orbiter. I: White
Clouds and Dust Veils. Astron. Astroph. 150, 2, 217-228.
Seif, A. & D.B. Kirk (1977). Structure of the Atmosphere of Mars in Summer at Mid-
latitudes. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 4364-4378.
Smith, G.R. & D.M. Hunten (1990). Study of Planetary Atmospheres by Absorptive
Occultations. Rev. Geophys. 28, 117.
Smith, M.D., J.C. Pearl, B.J. Conrath & P.R. Christensen (1999). Mars Global
Surveyor TES Results: Observations of Atmospheric Dust during Mapping. DPS
meeting #31, #48.06.
Stewart, A.I. (1972). Mariner 6 and 7 Ultraviolet Spectrometer Experiment:
Implication of CO+2 , CO and O Airglow. J. Geophys. Res. 77, 54-68.
Stewart, A.I., C.A. Barth & C.W. Hord (1972). Mariner 9 Ultraviolet Spectrometer
Experiment: Structure of Mars’ Upper Atmosphere. Icarus 17, 469-474.
Stoker, C.R. & M.A. Bullock (1997). Organic Degradation under Simulated Martian
Conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 10881-10888.
Traub, W.A, N.P. Carleton, P. Connes & J.F. Noxon (1979). The Latitude Variation of
O2 Airglow and O3 Abundance on Mars. Astrophys. J. 229, 846-850.
Wehrbein, W.M., C.W. Hord & C.A. Barth (1979). Mariner 9 UV Spectrometer
Experiment: Vertical Distribution of Ozone on Mars. Icarus 38, 288-299.
Wilson, R.J. (1997). A General Circulation Model Simulation of the Mars Polar
Warming. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 123-126.
Yung, Y.L & W.D. DeMore (1999). Photochemistry of Planetary Atmospheres,
Oxford Univ. Press., UK, p.34.
120
Barabash.qxd 7/7/04 1:41 PM Page 121
ASPERA-3: Analyser of Space Plasmas and Energetic Ions for

Mars Express
S. Barabash1, R. Lundin1, H. Andersson1, J. Gimholt1,a, M. Holmström1, O. Norberg1,b, M. Yamauchi1,

K. Asamura2, A.J. Coates3, D.R. Linder3, D.O. Kataria3, C.C. Curtis4, K.C. Hsieh4, B.R. Sandel4,
A. Fedorov5,c, A. Grigoriev5,d, E. Budnik5,c, M. Grande6, M. Carter 6, D.H. Reading6, H. Koskinen7, E. Kallio7,
P. Riihela7, T. Säles7, J. Kozyra8, N. Krupp9, S. Livi9,e, J. Woch9, J. Luhmann10, S. McKenna-Lawlor11,
S. Orsini12, R. Cerulli-Irelli12, M. Maggi12, A. Morbidini12, A. Mura12, A. Milillo12, E. Roelof 13, D. Williams13,
J.-A. Sauvaud14, J.-J. Thocaven14, T. Moreau14, D. Winningham15, R. Frahm15, J. Scherrer15, J. Sharber15,
P. Wurz16 & P. Bochsler16
1
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, S-98 128, Kiruna, Sweden
Email: stas@irf.se
2
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Sagamichara, Japan
3
Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Surrey RH5 6NT, UK
4
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
5
Space Research Institute, 117810 Moscow, Russia
6
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, UK
7
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Box 503 FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland
8
Space Physics Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143, USA
9
Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, D-37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
10
Space Science Laboratory, University of California in Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-7450, USA
11
Space Technology Ltd., National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland
12
Instituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetari, I-00133 Rome, Italy
13
Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 20723-6099, USA
14
Centre d’Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, BP-4346, F-31028 Toulouse, France
15
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 7228-0510, USA
16
University of Bern, Physikalisches Institut, CH-3012 Bern Switzerland
a
now at Scania, Volvo Corporation, Södertälje, Sweden
b
now at ESRANGE, Swedish Space Corporation, Kiruna, Sweden
c
now at Centre d’Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, Toulouse, France
d
now at Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Box 812, S-981 28 Kiruna, Sweden
e
now at Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 20723, USA
121
SP-1240
The ASPERA-3 (Analyser of Space Plasma and Energetic Atoms) instrument of

Mars Express is designed to study the solar wind-Mars atmosphere interaction
and to characterise the plasma and neutral gas environment in near-Mars space
through energetic neutral atom (ENA) imaging and local charged-particle
measurements. The studies address the fundamental question: how strongly do
the interplanetary plasma and electromagnetic fields affect the martian atmos-
phere? This question is directly related to the problem of martian dehydration.
The instrument comprises four sensors; two ENA sensors, and electron and ion
spectrometers. The Neutral Particle Imager (NPI) measures the integral ENA
flux (0.1-60 keV) with no mass and energy resolution but with high angular
resolution. The Neutral Particle Detector (NPD) measures the ENA flux,
resolving energy (0.1-10 keV) and mass (H and O) with a coarse angular
resolution. The electron spectrometer (ELS) is a standard top-hat electrostatic
analyser of a very compact design. These three sensors are mounted on a
scanning platform providing 4π coverage. The instrument includes an ion mass
composition sensor, IMA (Ion Mass Analyser). Mechanically, IMA is a separate
unit connected by a cable to the ASPERA-3 main unit. IMA provides ion
measurements in the energy range 0.01-40 keV/q for the main ion components
H+, He2+, He+, O+, with 20-80 amu/q.
1. The Science 1.1 Scientific task

The scientific objectives of the Mars Express Orbiter mission are to study the
subsurface, surface and atmosphere of Mars, as well as the interaction of the atmos-
phere with the interplanetary medium. ASPERA-3 will fulfil the last objective by:
— remote measurements of energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) in order to (a)

investigate the interaction between the solar wind and the martian atmosphere,
(b) characterise quantitatively the impact of plasma processes on atmospheric
evolution, and (c) obtain the global plasma and neutral gas distributions in the
near-Mars environment;
— in situ measurements of ions and electrons to (a) complement the ENA images
(electrons and multi-charged ions cannot be imaged), (b) study local character-
istics of the plasma (dynamics and fine structure of boundaries), (c) provide the
undisturbed solar wind parameters required for interpreting ENA images.
As established by earlier missions, and confirmed recently by Mars Global

Surveyor, Mars does not possess an intrinsic dipole magnetic field but only local
crustal magnetisations (Acuna et al., 1998). The local field plays a role in the solar
wind interaction only over limited regions. For the overall interaction picture, the
solar wind interacts directly with the martian ionosphere, exosphere and upper
atmosphere. As a result of the low gravity on Mars, the neutral density can reach 104-
106 cm–3 in the interaction region where the main plasma boundaries, bow shock and
magnetopause, are located. The co-existence of these two components, the solar wind
plasma and the planetary neutral gas, produces a strong interaction. One of the
fundamental collisional interactions is the charge-exchange process between the
energetic ion, A+, and the cold atmospheric gas, M:
A+(energetic) + M(cold) → A(energetic) + M+(cold),
which produces energetic neutral atoms, A, and an ionised gas particle. Directional
detection of the ENA thereby yields a global image of the interaction, if the observer
is at a remote location with respect to the plasma population (Wurz, 2000).
ASPERA-3 will concentrate on studying the effects of the plasma-neutral coupling at
Mars via ENA imaging, complemented by the electron and ion observations.
122
Fig. 1. Martian water inventory derived from

different approaches. The present Earth is also
shown for reference (adapted from McKay &
Stoker, 1989).
1.2 The solar wind-atmosphere coupling

Near-Mars space is strikingly different from Earth-space because of the absence of a
substantial intrinsic martian magnetic field. Without the magnetic cavity of a magneto-
sphere to shield the upper atmosphere from the solar wind, Mars is subject to comet-
like atmosphere erosion processes and solar wind-induced current systems that have no
terrestrial counterparts. From previous missions to Mars (especially Phobos-2) and
from Pioneer Venus Orbiter circling the similarly weakly magnetised Venus, ideas on
how the martian upper atmosphere and solar wind interact and the consequences for
the planet have been developed. In particular, the scavenging of planetary ions may
have resulted in the removal of ~1 m of surface water over 4.5 Gyr (Lundin et al.,
1991). More detailed studies (Perez-de-Tejada, 1992), taking into account the variabil-
ity of the ionosphere throughout the planet’s history, give a much higher (~30 m)
equivalent depth of water that has escaped owing to the solar wind interaction process.
The current atmospheric conditions on Mars indicate that water does not exist on
the surface in any significant amount: 15 mm equivalent water layer (Farmer et al.,
1977). On the other hand, independent analyses of several features of the planet
unambiguously indicate that water did exist in the past on the martian surface. Fig. 1
shows the water inventory based on different approaches: geomorphologic features,
analysis of the SNC meteorites, isotopic abundance and volcanic activity. The total
amount of past surface water results in an equivalent water layer of at least 100 m.
This leads to the problem of martian dehydration. Where is the water? Is it lost or
frozen and buried? If the former, what could produce such an effective escape
mechanism? If the latter, where is this tremendous amount of water stored? As
indicated above, the processes associated with the solar-wind interaction could
account for the escape of up to 30% of past surface water.
Another problem of the solar wind-atmosphere coupling that has not been explored
experimentally is the energetic consequences for the atmosphere of the lack of a
significant dipole field. Kinetic and test-particle models of the Mars-solar wind
interaction (Brecht, 1997; Kallio et al., 1997) suggest that solar wind absorption by
the atmosphere may be an important energy source for the upper atmosphere. The
ENAs generated as a product of the solar wind interaction increase the deposition of
solar wind energy (Kallio & Barabash, 2001) and, at the same time, provide a means
of ‘imaging’ the solar wind interaction. The atmosphere, although thin, alters the
incoming energetic solar wind by:
— generation of ionospheric currents that partially deflect the ion flow around the
ionosphere;
— ‘mass loading’ the solar wind with planetary ions produced mainly by
photoionisation, and solar wind electron impact ionisation of the atmospheric
gases;
— undergoing charge-transfer or charge-exchange interactions with the solar wind
ions.
123
SP-1240
Fig. 2. ENA spectra along the Mars Express

orbit. The ENAs originate in the shocked solar
wind. The arrows mark ENA flux produced in
the upstream solar wind. The energy resolution
corresponds to that of ASPERA-3.
According to the models, some of the solar wind ions (mainly protons and alpha
particles) directly impact Mars’ upper atmosphere near its exobase (~180 km
altitude) because their gyroradii are too large to behave as a deflected ‘fluid’ in the
subsolar magnetosheath (Brecht, 1997; Kallio & Janhunen, 2001) or because they are
partially thermalised by the bow shock (Kallio et al., 1997). Others undergo charge-
exchange reactions with ambient exospheric and thermospheric neutrals, particularly
hydrogen, and then impact the exobase as ENAs (Kallio et al., 1997). In both cases,
solar wind energy is ‘directly’ deposited into the upper atmosphere, increasing
ionisation rates and UV emissions. Kallio & Barabash (2000, 2001) have studied the
effects of such ENA precipitation using Monte Carlo simulations and estimated that,
under typical solar wind conditions, the precipitating hydrogen atoms increase the
ionisation rate by about 1% in comparison with ionisation rates owing to extreme UV
radiation. This effect is comparable to, or even stronger than, similar effects caused
by the O+ and H+ precipitation (Luhmann & Kozyra, 1991; Brecht, 1997; Kallio &
Janhunen, 2001). The results also indicate that a substantial part of the incoming
particles is scattered back from the atmosphere, resulting in an ENA hydrogen
albedo. Imaging these particles would visualise the spots or regions of the most
intense ENA precipitation.
While the energy transfer associated with the proton or ENA precipitation exceeds
that from the O+ precipitation, it is the oxygen ions that cause massive sputtering of
the atmosphere (Luhmann & Kozyra, 1991; Luhmann et al., 1992). Luhmann &
Bauer (1992) estimated that the O+ sputtering results in the escape of 0.1-0.5 kg s–1 of
oxygen atoms. This is on the same level as the non-thermal escape of the hot oxygen
atmospheric component. For comparison, the direct solar wind pick-up, excluding the
bulk ionospheric scavenging, removes 0.01 kg s–1 at most.
1.3 Sources of energetic neutral atoms at Mars

Barabash et al. (1995), Kallio et al. (1997), Holmström et al. (2002), Mura et al.
(2002), Lichtenegger et al. (2002) and Barabash et al. (2002) considered the ENA
production at Mars. ENAs are produced by charge-exchange between the exosphere
containing H, H2, He and O, and the different plasma populations such as:
124
Fig. 3. Model ENA images for four locations

along the Mars Express orbit (three marked in
the inset of Fig. 2); position 4 (not shown in
Fig. 2) corresponds to the orbit apocentre. The
polar axis looks towards the Sun. The polar
angle is the azimuth at the vantage point and
the radius is the polar angle to the Sun
direction. The solar wind ENAs are blocked.
— the supersonic solar wind (Holmström et al., 2002);

— the shocked solar wind (Holmström et al., 2002);
— accelerated planetary ions (Barabash et al., 2002; Lichtenegger et al., 2002);
— the tiny Phobos atmosphere can also interact with both the supersonic and the
shocked solar wind, resulting in ENA generation (Mura et al., 2002);
— the energetic O+ ions picked up by the plasma flow incident on the atmosphere
are backscattered and sputter oxygen, CO2 and its fragments (Luhmann &
Kozyra, 1991; Luhmann et al., 1992). The backscattered and sputtered atoms
have energies up to few hundred eV and form an oxygen ENA albedo. The
intensity of these emissions directly determines the efficiency of the atmospheric
erosion;
— the precipitating protons and hydrogen ENAs can also be scattered back, forming
a hydrogen ENA albedo (Kallio & Barabash, 2001; Holmström et al., 2002).
The supersonic solar wind upstream of the bow shock can experience charge-
exchange with the hydrogen exosphere over very long distances, producing a narrow
(≈ 10°) anti-Sunward beam of ENAs with the energy of the bulk flow of the solar
wind (the spectrum marked by arrows in Fig. 2). These ENAs can be detected only at
the beam edges because they are superimposed on the intense flux of the solar
radiation.
The shocked solar wind is the strongest source of ENAs because the protons
flowing around Mars can interact with dense neutral gas. The detailed modelling of
the ENA production from this source was performed by Kallio et al. (1997),
Holmström et al. (2002) and Mura et al. (2002). Using these models, ENA images that
would be observed from the Mars Express orbit were simulated for solar maximum
conditions. The spacecraft will reach Mars during the moderate solar activity
characteristic of the decline of the solar cycle. The ENA emissions are weaker during
solar maximum so the calculations give lower limits for the ENA fluxes. Fig. 2 shows
the ENA spectra integrated over the unit sphere for several locations along the Mars
125
SP-1240
Fig. 4. Model ENA images of the pick-up

oxygen ions for two vantage points in the tail
and at the pole. The vantage points are in the
plane perpendicular to the ecliptic. The polar
axis is towards the planetary centre. The image
projection is similar to that of Fig. 3. The
energy range is 0.1-1.65 keV. The electric and
magnetic field vectors in the solar wind are
shown for reference.
Express orbit. The estimated ENA fluxes are well above 104 cm–2 s–1 keV–1 and,
therefore, easily detectable. The directional fluxes to be measured well exceed
105 cm–2 s–1 sr–1.
Fig. 3 shows the directional ENA flux integrated over energy as a function of two
spherical angles (ENA images) for several positions along the Mars Express orbit
marked in Fig. 2. Position 4 corresponds to the apocentre. In this fish-eye projection,
the polar axis is looking towards the Sun. The polar angle is the azimuth at the
vantage point and the radius is the polar angle to the Sun direction. The images
display the entire interaction region and can be converted into global distributions of
the proton flow and neutral gas using extracting diagnostic methods similar to that
developed for the Earth’s conditions (Roelof & Skinner, 2000). Holmström et al.
(2002) showed that the ENA fluxes generated from the shocked solar wind are most
sensitive to the neutral hydrogen distribution controlled by the exobase temperature
and the position of the boundary separating the solar wind and planetary plasmas.
Some of the ENAs produced by the shocked solar wind and ENAs originating in
the solar wind can precipitate onto the ionosphere. Fig. 2 (position 1 inside the
magnetosphere) gives a typical spectrum of precipitating ENAs at the 45° solar zenith
angle. The spectrum is rather flat at the level 7x105 cm–2 s–1 keV–1. The peak corre-
sponds to the solar wind energy. The planetary protons originating from ionisation of
the hydrogen corona can charge-exchange with the exospheric gas as well, resulting
in planetary hydrogen ENA emissions. These emissions, investigated in detail by
Lichtenegger et al. (2002), differ from the shocked solar wind ENAs in energy
because the pick-up protons can gain an energy up to four times that of the solar wind.
The ASPERA/Phobos observations of the plasma energisation inside the martian
magnetosphere (Lundin et al., 1993) showed the existence of two basic ion
populations: the tail beams of H+ and O+ of energy 1-3 keV, and outflowing
ionospheric ions of energy 10-100 eV near the tail flanks. Barabash et al. (1995)
estimated the related ENA flux to be 103 cm–2 s–1 keV–1 for the energy range 1-10 keV,
and up to 105 cm–2 s–1 keV–1 for 10-100 eV. The ENA signal associated with the
pick-up oxygen was investigated in detail by Barabash et al. (2002). Using the
126
empirical model of the solar wind plasma flow near Mars developed by Kallio &
Koskinen (1999), Barabash et al. (2002) numerically solved the kinetic equation and
obtained the global distribution of oxygen ions. This distribution was then converted
to the corresponding ENA flux. It was found that the fluxes of the oxygen ENAs could
reach 104 cm–2 s–1 keV–1 and fully reflect the morphology of the oxygen population.
This provides a way to determine the instantaneous oxygen escape rate. One of the
simulated images for the energy range 0.1-1.65 keV is reproduced in Fig. 4. The
projection is similar to that used for hydrogen ENA images but the polar axis in the
vantage point points towards the centre of the planet. The image shows a strong ENA
jet from the subsolar point, where the electric and magnetic field configuration
effectively accelerates newborn planetary ions. The tailward flow is also clearly
reproduced. The corresponding vantage points are shown below the images.
Several experiments on the Phobos mission observed brief plasma disturbances
when the spacecraft crossed that moon’s orbit (Barabash, 1995). They could be
related to a hypothetical neutral gas torus resulting from the moon outgassing. The
solar wind plasma can experience charge-exchange with the Phobos ‘atmosphere’ and
the neutral torus, resulting in ENA emissions. Assuming an outgassing rate of 1023 s–1,
Mura et al. (2002) calculated the associated ENA flux to be of the order of 103-
104 cm–2 s–1 keV–1 for the shocked solar wind plasma, and up to 106 cm–2 s–1 keV–1 for
the solar wind beam. Because of solar radiation, the Phobos ENAs and the Phobos
torus ENAs can be observed only when the moon is in the magnetosheath and the
plasma flow deviates strongly from the anti-solar direction.
1.4 ENA imaging of the martian environment

ASPERA-3 will image all of the above ENA sources. The images provide two-fold
information. Firstly, they reveal morphological features of the ENA sources, such as
the location of boundaries and their relative sizes. ENA images are useful, in
particular, for investigating different types of asymmetries expected for the plasma
flow near Mars (Dubinin et al., 1996). The ENA images of the escaping plasma
display globally and instantaneously the size and geometry of the outflowing plasma
region. These characteristics are particularly important for calculations of the total
non-thermal plasma outflow. For instance, the local ion measurements made using the
ASPERA and TAUS instruments during the Phobos mission gave comparable ion
fluxes. However, different assumptions made regarding the outflow region geometry
(mass-loading boundary, plasma sheet) resulted in significant differences in the total
outflow rate estimations, 0.5-1.0 kg s–1 (Lundin et al., 1989) and 0.15 kg s–1 (Verigin
et al., 1991). One of the reasons for this was ambiguity in separating spatial and
temporal variations, which is typical for local plasma measurements. Global and
instantaneous observations of the outflowing plasma region morphology to be made
via ENA imaging would help to resolve this issue, which is important for
understanding the planetary atmosphere evolution.
Secondly, ENA images carry ample quantitative information about both the
planetary plasma and neutral environments. By applying extraction techniques to the
images of the shocked solar wind, quantitative models will be obtained giving the
neutral gas profiles (exobase densities and temperatures) and global proton plasma
distributions (flow geometry, bulk velocity, density and temperature).
Aerobraking measurements from Mars Global Surveyor (Dornheim, 1997)
indicate that the atmospheric density at 150 km altitude varies by 30% in one out of
three passes. Estimated scale heights of ~8 km implies that the densities in the
interaction region higher up will also be much more variable with time than had been
expected. Global ENA imaging of the interaction offers the greatest promise of
separating the spatial and temporal variations of the atmosphere-solar wind
interaction. Apart from imaging, the measurements of ENA flux from certain
directions provide a diagnostic tool for plasma-atmosphere coupling studies.
Precipitating ENAs and ENA albedo (backscattered oxygen) are direct manifestations
of such an interaction.
127
SP-1240
Table 1. ASPERA-3 scientific objectives.
Scientific objective Associated Measurements Measurement Requirements
Determine the instantaneous global ENAs originating from Measure the ENA flux in the energy range tens eV - few keV
distributions of plasma and neutral the shocked solar wind with 4π coverage. ENA flux >104 cm–2 s–1 keV–1. Measure the
gas near the planet upstream solar wind parameters
Study plasma-induced atmospheric ENAs originating from inside Mass-resolving (H/O) ENA measurements in the energy range up
escape the magnetosphere to tens keV. ENA flux >103 cm–2 s–1 keV–1
Investigate the modification of the ENA albedo Mass-resolving (H/O) ENA measurements in the energy range
atmosphere through ion bombardment down to tens eV from the nadir direction.
ENA flux >106 cm–2 s–1 keV–1 (100 eV)
Investigate the energy deposition from Precipitating ENAs ENA measurements in the energy range tens eV - few keV.
the solar wind to the ionosphere ENA flux >104 cm–2 s–1 keV–1
Search for the solar wind- ENA originating from Phobos ENA measurements in the energy range tens eV - few keV
Phobos interactions with 4π coverage. ENA flux 104 cm–2 s–1 keV–1
Define the local characteristics of the Ion and electron measurements Ion and electron measurements in the energy range
main plasma regions of hot plasma few eV - tens keV with 4π coverage
Fig. 5. The ASPERA-3 configuration: the Main Unit (left) and IMA (right). Fig. 6. The ASPERA-3 mechanical model
during vibration testing.
1.5 Scientific objectives and measurements requirements

The studies of martian ENAs resulting from the solar wind-atmosphere interaction
address the fundamental question: how strongly do the interplanetary plasma and
electromagnetic fields affect the atmosphere? This question is directly related to the
problem of martian dehydration as described in Section 1.2. What happened to the
martian water that once flowed in numerous channels? As we know from terrestrial
experience, together with an inventory of organic compounds and external energy
sources, liquid water is a fundamental requirement for life as we know it. Therefore,
a clear understanding of the fate of the martian water is crucial for resolving whether
life has ever existed on Mars.
The general scientific task of studying the solar wind-atmosphere interaction
through ENA imaging can be subdivided into specific scientific objectives. These are
listed in Table 1, together with the corresponding instrument requirements.
1.6 Relation to other missions

ASPERA-3 will perform the first ENA imaging of another planet in the low energy
128
range. No instruments with similar scientific objectives and capabilities are foreseen
to fly to other planets. The only similar experiment, ASPERA-C, was carried by the
failed Mars-96 mission. However, it did not have the ENA energy-analysing Neutral
Particle Detector.
2.1 Overview 2. The Instrument

ASPERA-3 is designed for the analysis of ENAs, electrons and ions, with complete
spherical coverage. Mechanically, ASPERA-3 (Figs. 5 and 6) consists of two units,
the Main Unit (MU) and the Ion Mass Analyser (IMA). The MU comprises three
sensors: NPI, NPD and ELS, with a digital processing unit, all located on a scan
platform. All mechanical and electrical interfaces are made through the scan platform.
The instrument’s total mass is 8.2 kg and its power consumption 13.5 W. The MU
envelope is 359x393x234 mm, and for IMA 255x150x150 mm.
2.2 Measurement principles and capabilities

To fulfil its scientific objectives, ASPERA-3 comprises four sensors; two ENA
sensors (NPI, NPD), an electron spectrometer (ELS) and an ion mass analyser (IMA).
The two ENA sensors are optimised for some of the scientific objectives, while being
complementary. This approach offers the necessary redundancy as well as the
independent cross-checking necessary for such ground-breaking measurements at
another planet. The charged particle sensors not only characterise the local plasma
environment but also support ENA measurements in terms of charged particles
background and inter-calibrations.
The Neutral Particle Imager measures the integral ENA flux with no mass and
energy resolution but with 5x11° angular resolution. The intrinsic field of view is
9x344°. The sensor uses a graphite surface to suppress the UV background. ENAs
incident on the surface at a grazing angle of 20° are reflected and/or cause ion
sputtering. A micro-channel plate (MCP) stack detects the reflected particles and
sputtered fragments with a discrete anode. The NPI head is a replica of the NPI-MCP
sensor developed for ASPERA-C on Mars-96 (launch failure) and successfully flown
on the Swedish Astrid microsatellite, launched in 1995 (C:son Brandt et al., 2000).
The Neutral Particle Detector measures the ENA differential flux over the energy
range 100 eV to 10 keV, resolving H and O with a coarse 5x30° angular resolution.
The sensor consists of two identical detectors, each with a 9x90° intrinsic field of
view. The measurement technique is based on a principle similar to that of NPI. ENAs
incident on a surface at a grazing angle of 15° are reflected and generate secondary
electron emission. The secondary electrons are transported to an MCP assembly,
which gives the START signal. The reflected ENAs hit the second surface and again
produce the secondary electrons used to generate the STOP signal. The time-of-flight
(TOF) electronics give the ENA velocity. The pulse-height distribution analysis of the
STOP signals provides a rough determination of the ENA mass.
The Electron Spectrometer measures electrons in the energy range 0.01-20 keV.
The intrinsic field of view is 10x360°. The 360° aperture is divided into 16 sectors.
The sensor is a standard top-hat electrostatic analyser in a very compact design. ELS
is a reduced version of the MEDUSA experiment for the Astrid-2 and Munin missions
launched in 1998 and 2000 (Norberg et al., 2001).
The Ion Mass Analyser is an improved version of the ion mass spectrographs
TICS/Freja, IMIS/Mars-96 and IMI/Nozomi (Norberg et al., 1998) and a copy of
Rosetta’s ICA instrument. The IMA sensor is a separate unit connected by a cable to
ASPERA-3. It measures ions in the energy range 0.01-30 keV/q for the main ion
components H+, H2+, He+, O+ and for the group of molecular ions 20 < M/q < ~80.
Mechanically, IMA is a separate unit with a 4.6x360° field of view. Electrostatic
sweeping performs elevation (±45°) coverage. The IMA sensor is a spherical
electrostatic analyser followed by a circular magnetic separating section. A large-
diameter MCP with a discrete anode images the matrix azimuth x mass.
NPI, NPD and ELS are mounted on a scanning platform. The combination of the
129
SP-1240
Table 2. Baseline performances of the NPI, NPD, ELS and IMA sensors.
Parameter NPI NPD ELS IMA
Particles to be measured ENA ENA electrons ions

Energy range, keV per charge ≈ 0.1 - 60 0.1 - 10 0.01 - 20 0.01 - 30
Energy resolution, ∆E/E No 0.8 0.08 0.07
Mass resolution No H, O – m/q = 1, 2,
4, 8, 16, >20
Intrinsic field of view 9 x 344° 9 x 180° 10 x 360° 90 x 360°
Angular resolution (FWHM) 4.6 x 11.5° 5 x 30° 10 x 22.5° 4.5 x 22.5°
G-factor*/ pixel, cm2 sr 2.5 x 10–3 6.2 x 10–3 5 x 10–4 3.5 x 10–4
(ε not incl.) (ε not incl.)
Efficiency, ε, % ~1 0.1-20 inc. in G inc. in G
Time resolution (full 3D), s 32 32 32 32
Mass, kg 0.7 1.3 0.3 2.2
Power, W 0.8 1.5 0.6 3.5
*G-factor is the instrument geometrical factor
360° field of view and the scans from 0° to 180° give the required 4π maximum
coverage. The actual coverage depends on the instrument location on the spacecraft.
Table 2 summarises the instrument performance.
2.3 Neutral Particle Imager (NPI)

The NPI head is a replica of the NPI-MCP sensor developed for ASPERA-C/Mars-96
and flown successfully on Astrid (Barabash, 1995). In NPI, the charged particles,
electrons and ions are removed by the electrostatic deflection system, which consists
of two discs separated by a 3 mm gap (Fig. 7). The 5 kV potential between the
grounded and biased discs produces a strong electric field, which sweeps away all
charged particles with energies up to 60 keV. Since the integral ENA flux
substantially exceeds the charged particle flux for energies greater than 60 keV, this
rejection energy provides satisfactory performance. The discs also collimate the
incoming beam in the elevation angle. Apart from being ‘on’ or ‘off’, the deflection
system can be operated in two other modes: ‘alternative’ and ‘sweeping’. In the
alternative mode, the deflection system is turned on and off for one sampling time.
This mode will be used for more accurate separation between charged and neutral
particles entering the system. The deflection system is connected to the high-voltage
supply via an optocoupler. Regulating the optocoupler reference voltage changes the
deflection voltage performing the sweeping and alternating. In order to reduce the
time for discharging the deflection system discs to 1 ms, a second parallel optocoupler
is used.
The space between the deflection system discs is divided into 32 sectors by plastic
spokes forming 32 azimuthal collimators with an aperture of 9x18° each. Neutrals
passing through the deflection system hit a 32-sided conical target at a grazing angle
of 20°. The interaction with the target generates secondary particles, both electrons
and ions, and/or reflection of the primary neutrals. An MCP stack in a chevron
configuration, followed by a 32-sector anode, detects the particles leaving the target.
The signal from the MCP gives the direction of the primary incoming neutral. The
MCP operates in ion mode with a negative bias of –2.6 kV applied to the front side
and thus detects (a) sputtered positive ions of the target material, (b) positive ions
resulting from ionisation of the primary neutrals, and (c) neutrals reflected from the
target surface. In order to improve the angular resolution and collimate the particles
leaving the interaction surface, 32 separating walls are attached to the target, forming
130
Fig. 7. Cutaway of the NPI sensor.
Fig. 8. ENA images expected from NPI for the

locations along the Mars Express orbit
specified in Fig. 2 (position 4 corresponds to
the orbit apocentre). The images were
generated assuming the instrument
characteristics given in Table 2. The Sun is in
the centre of the image. The solar wind ENAs
coming from the Sun direction are not shown.
The projection is similar to that in Fig. 3.
a star-like structure. This configuration allows the entering particles to experience

multiple reflections and reach the MCP. NPI covers 4π in one instrument scan and
produces an image of the ENA distribution in the form of an azimuth x elevation
matrix. The direction vector of 32 elements can be read out once every 31.25 µs. Two
sectors centred around the spin axis and looking toward the spacecraft body are
blocked to monitor the MCP assembly dark counts. This space is also used for the
ELS sensor harness.
An important issue in designing the NPI was the target coating for suppressing UV
photon fluxes, which produce the UV background in the measurements. NPI uses the
same coating as in the PIPPI/Astrid and ASPERA-C experiments: DAG 213, a resin-
based graphite dispersion. This is similar to Aquadag, which is a graphite dispersion
in water. The coating demonstrated satisfactory performance in the PIPPI experiment
131
SP-1240
Fig. 9. NPD’s principal components.

collecting grid
ENA
START MCPs
STOP surfaces
deflector
START surfaces
STOP MCPs
flown in the Earth’s magnetosphere (C:son Brandt et al., 2000). Fig. 8 shows ENA
images expected from NPI for the locations along the Mars Express orbit specified in
Fig. 2.
2.4 Neutral Particle Detector (NPD)

The NPD contains two identical sensors, each a pinhole camera. Fig. 9 provides a
conceptual view of one sensor. In each sensor, the charged particles, electrons and
ions are removed by the deflection system, which consists of two 90° sectors
separated by a 4.5 mm gap. In the normal operational mode, the 10 kV potential
(±5 kV) applied to the sectors results in a strong electric field that sweeps away all
charged particles with energies up to 70 keV. The deflector also collimates the
incoming beam in the elevation angle. The collimated ENA beam emerging from the
3.0x4.5 mm pinhole hits the START surface under the 15° grazing angle and causes
secondary electron emission. By a system of collecting grids, the secondary electrons
are transported to one of two MCP assemblies, giving the START signal for the TOF
electronics. Depending on the azimuth angle, the collection efficiency varies from
80% to 95%. The incident ENAs are reflected from the START surface near-
specularly. Since charge-state equilibrium is established during the interaction with
the surface, the emerging beam contains both the neutral and ionised (positive and
negative) components. To increase the total efficiency, no further separation by the
charge is made. As proved by the ion tracing, there is very little disturbance to the
reflected atomic ions leaving the START surface with energies above 80 eV,
introduced by the START electron optics. Fig. 10 shows the results of electron ray-
tracing in the START assembly electron optic.
Therefore, particles of all charge-states (negative, neutral and positive) will impact
the second surface, the STOP surface, and again produce secondary electrons, which
are detected by one of the three MCP assemblies giving the STOP signal. The TOF
over a fixed distance of 8 cm defines the particle speed. The STOP MCPs also give
the azimuthal direction. Since the secondary electron yield depends on mass for a
given velocity, the pulse height distribution analysis of the STOP signals provides the
estimation of ENA mass. Each event is stored in the array STOP MCP charge x TOF
x direction. The content of the array is accumulated over the sampling time of
31.25 µs. Fig. 11 shows one of the NPD Flight Model sensors.
The selection of the START and STOP surfaces was the most difficult part of
NPD’s development. Extensive studies were performed at the University of Bern
132
Fig. 10. The ray-tracing of the electron

trajectories in the START assembly optics.
Fig. 11. Flight Model of the NPD sensor.
(Jans, 2000) and Brigham Young University (USA) to optimise the performance of
the surfaces, which must satisfy a number of requirements: high secondary-electron
yield, high UV absorption even at grazing angles, high particle reflection coefficient
(START surface), low angular scattering of ions, and low photoelectron yield. For the
START surface, a multi-layer coating composed of a thin layer of Cr2O3 covered by
a thicker layer of MgF and topped with a thin layer of WO2 was chosen. The coating
is optimised for the absorption of the 121.4 nm line at the 15° incident angle. The
reflection coefficient reached was about 30%, a factor of 2 lower than the uncoated
surface. The coating is applied on a titanium substrate polished down to 100Å
roughness.
The STOP surface is graphite (roughness around 100 nm) covered by a MgO layer
about 500 nm thick. This combination has a very high secondary electron yield, low
133
SP-1240
Fig. 12. The UV (Lyman-alpha) background and valid ENA count rates Fig. 13. NPD TOF spectra for 2 keV beams of different masses.
expected for different energies and species for a 1 keV energy window.
Fig. 14. The time-of-flight measurements for different masses Fig. 15. Pulse-height distribution of the valid (START-STOP) signals obtained
as a function of energy. The dashed lines give the theoretical from the STOP MCP under a beam of 15 keV H2O+ ions.
dependence corresponding to the 34% energy loss.
photoelectron yield and high UV absorption. Considerable effort was made to

increase the stability of the MgO coating against moisture. It was established that
polishing the graphite substantially improves the stability, and that possible increases
in air humidity during storage and pre-launch operations do not present any problems
for the surface performance. Both surfaces are stable and do not require special
maintenance. Fig. 12 presents the expected count rates for different ENA and UV
fluxes (Lyman-α) and a TOF window of 1.56 ms defined by the slowest (300 eV)
oxygen atoms travelling the TOF distance. The valid count rates are given for
different species and energies because of the secondary electron yield and reflection
coefficient variations. An energy window of 1 keV is taken and the coefficients
134
Fig. 16. The ELS sensor.
describing the interaction with the surface are assumed to be constant. In reality, of
course, the instrument measures over the entire energy range 0.1-10 keV. Therefore,
Fig. 12 gives count rates for a narrow (in energy terms) beam of oxygen and
hydrogen atoms. The expected UV flux is about 4 kR close to the martian limb
(Anderson, 1974); that gives fluxes, corresponding to a signal-to-noise ratio of 1, of
2x105 cm–2 s–1 sr–1 keV–1 (H, 140 eV), 3x104 cm–2 s–1 sr–1 keV–1 (H, O, few keV) and
4x103 cm–2 s–1 sr–1 keV–1 (O, 10 keV).
The initial tests with the NPD technology model gave results fully corresponding
to the specified performance. Fig. 13 shows TOF spectra for 2 keV beams of different
masses. Fig. 14 summarises TOF measurements. The dashed lines show the
theoretical dependence corresponding to the 34% energy loss in the START surface.
The water molecules produced in the ion source break up during the impact but the
residual components carry the same initial velocity corrected for the energy loss in the
target. Fig. 14 shows that, within 1-10 keV, the TOF measurements give reliable mass
identification. The other independent way of mass identification is based on the mass
dependence of the number of electrons produced from the STOP surface. Fig. 15
shows a pulse-height distribution of the valid (START-STOP) signals obtained from
the STOP MCP when a beam of 15 keV H2O+ ions was used. The different peaks
correspond to different numbers of secondary electrons released from the STOP
surface.
2.5 Electron Spectrometer (ELS)

ELS represents a new generation of ultra-light, low-power, electron sensors (Fig. 16).
It is formed by a spherical top-hat electrostatic analyser and a collimator system.
Particles enter the aperture at any angle in the plane of incidence. Electrons are then
deflected into the spectrometer by applying a positive voltage to the inner spherical
electron deflection plate. The electrons hit an MCP after being filtered in energy by
the analyser plates. The plates are stepped in voltage to achieve an energy spectrum.
Electrons with energies up to 20 keV/q will be measured, with a maximum time
resolution of one energy sweep per 4 s. There are 16 anodes behind the MCP, each
anode defining a 22.5º sector and connected to a pre-amplifier. ELS is mounted on the
ASPERA-3 scan platform, on top of the NPI sensor, so that the full 4π angular
distribution of electrons is measured during each platform scan.
2.6 Ion Mass Analyser (IMA)

IMA (Fig. 17) is an improved version of the ion mass spectrographs TICS (Freja,
1992), IMIS (part of ASPERA-C/Mars-96, 1996) and IMI (Planet-B, 1998) (Norberg
135
SP-1240
Fig. 17. Cross-section view of the IMA sensor.
et al., 1998). It is a copy of the ICA instrument to be launched on Rosetta to Comet

Wirtanen in 2003. Particles enter the analyser through an outer grid. Behind the grid
is a deflection system to divert particles coming from between 45° and 135° with
respect to the symmetry axis into the electrostatic analyser (ESA). Ions within a swept
energy pass band pass the ESA. They are then deflected in a cylindrical magnetic field
set up by permanent magnets. The field deflects lighter ions more than heavy ions
away from the centre of the analyser. The ions finally hit an MCP and are detected by
an anode system. Ions are simultaneously analysed for direction and mass per charge.
The magnet assembly can be biased with respect to the ESA to post accelerate ions,
enabling a selection of both mass range and mass resolution.
The electrons from the MCP are detected by an ‘imaging’ anode system. A system
of 32 concentric rings behind the MCP measures the radial impact position
(representing ion mass) and 16 sector anodes measure the azimuthal impact position
(representing ion entrance angle). The read-out system is based on discrete pre-
amplifiers. Six MOCAD (Monolithic Octal Charge Amplifier/Pulse Discriminator)
chips provide 48 independent channels, 32 rings and 16 sectors. Each chip contains
eight channels including a charge-sensitive pre-amplifier, shaper and discriminator.
The transistor-transistor logic (TTL) outputs are fed to a field-programmable gate
array FPGA device for decoding, addressing and coincidence analysis. Fig. 18
demonstrates the achieved mass resolution at 6 keV ion energy.
3. The Team The ASPERA-3 experiment team is a large consortium that includes 15 groups from
10 countries in Europe, the USA and Japan. Table 3 shows the primary hardware
responsibilities of the different groups.
References Acuna, M.H., Connerney, J.E.P., Wasilewski, P., Lin, R.P., Anderson, K.A.,
Carlson, C.W., McFadden, J., Curtis, D.W., Mitchell, D., Reme, H., Mazelle, C.,
Sauvaud, J.A., d’Uston, C., Cros, A., Medale, J.L., Bauer, S.J., Cloutier, P.,
Mayhew, M., Winterhalter, D. & Ness, N.F. (1998). Magnetic Field and Plasma
Observations at Mars: Initial Results of the Mars Global Surveyor Mission.
Science 279, 1676.
Anderson, D.E. (1974). Mariner 6, 7, and 9 Ultraviolet Spectrometer: Analysis of
Hydrogen Lyman alpha Data. J. Geophys. Res. 79, 1513-1518.
136
Fig. 18. IMA mass resolution at 6 keV.
Table 3. ASPERA-3 groups and primary hardware responsibilities.
Species Scientific objective
Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Kiruna, S PI-institute, NPI, NPD, IMA, scanner
Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, Collaboration with Nozomi, NPI
Sagamichara, JPN calibrations
University of Bern, Physikalisches Institut, CH NPD surfaces, NPD mechanics
Instituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetari, EGSE, NPI mechanics,
Rome, I NPD electronics
Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UCL, UK ELS calibrations
University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona, USA START surface, NPD UV calibrations
Space Research Institute, Moscow, Russia NPD design
Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, USA ELS, IMA imaging detector
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK NPD MCPs
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, FIN DPU, theory
Space Physics Research Lab/University of Theory
Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, NPD electronics
Katlenburg-Lindau, D
Space Science Lab/University of California Theory
in Berkeley, Berkeley, California USA
Space Technology Ltd., National University Hardware support
of Ireland, IRL
Applied Physics Lab/Johns Hopkins University, Theory
Laurel, Maryland, USA
Centre d’Etude Spatiale des Rayonnements, NPI MCPs, IMA calibrations,
Toulouse, F DC/DC board, scanner drivers
137
SP-1240
Barabash, S., Lundin, R., Zarnowiecki, T. & Grzedzielski, S. (1995). Diagnostic of

Energetic Neutral Particles at Mars by the ASPERA-C Instrument for the Mars-96
Mission. Adv. Space Res. 16, (4)81.
Barabash, S. (1995). Satellite Observations of the Plasma-Neutral Coupling near
Mars and the Earth. IRF Scientific Report 228.
Barabash, S., Holmström, M., Lukyanov, A. & Kallio, E. (2002). Energetic Neutral
Atoms at Mars IV: Imaging of Planetary Oxygen. J. Geophys. Res. 107(A10), doi:
10.1029/2001JA000326.
Brecht, S.H. (1997). Solar Wind Proton Deposition into the Martian Atmosphere.
J. Geophys. Res. 102, 11,287.
C:son Brandt, P., Barabash, S., Wilson, G.R., Roelof, E.C. & Chase, C.J. (2000).
Energetic Neutral Atom Imaging at Low (< 10 keV) Energies from Astrid:
Observations and Simulations. J. Atmos. & Solar Terrestrial Phys 62, 901-910.
Dornheim, M.A. (1997). Mars Atmosphere Thicker than Expected. Av. Week & Space
Tech. (29 September), 36.
Dubinin, E., Sauer, K., Lundin, R., Norberg, O., Trotignon, J.-G., Schwingen-
schuh, K., Delva, M. & Riedler, W. (1996). Plasma Characteristics of the
Boundary Layer in the Martian Magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 27,061.
Holmström, M., Barabash, S. & Kallio, E. (2002). Energetic Neutral Atoms at Mars
I: Imaging of Solar Wind Protons. J. Geophys. Res. 107(A10), doi:
10.1029/2001JA000325.
Jans, S. (2000). Ionization of Energetic Neutral Atoms for Application in Space
Instrumentation, Diplomarbeit der Philosophisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät
der Universität Bern, CH.
Farmer, C.B., Davies, D.W., Holland, A.L., LaPorte, D.D. & Downs, P.E. (1977). Mars:
Water Vapour Observations from the Viking Orbiters. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 4225.
Kallio, E. & Barabash, S. (2000). On the Elastic and Inelastic Collisions between the
Precipitating Energetic Hydrogen Atoms and the Martian Atmospheric Neutrals.
J. Geophys. Res. 105, 24973-24996.
Kallio, E. & Barabash, S. (2001). Atmospheric Effects of Precipitating Energetic
Hydrogen Atoms to the Martian Atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 165-177.
Kallio, E. & Janhunen, P. (2001). Atmospheric Effects of Proton Precipitation in the
Martian Atmosphere and its Connection to the Mars-Solar Wind Interaction.
J. Geophys. Res. 106, 5617.
Kallio, E. & Koskinen, H. (1999). A Test Particle Simulation of the Motion of Oxygen
Ions and Solar Wind Protons near Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 557-579.
Kallio, E., Luhmann, J.G. & Barabash, S. (1997). Charge Exchange near Mars: The
Solar Wind Absorption and Energetic Neutral Atom Production. J. Geophys. Res.
102, 22,183.
Lichtenegger, H., Lammer, H. & Stumptner, W. (2002). Energetic Neutral Atoms at
Mars III: Flux and Energy Distribution of Planetary Energetic H Atoms.
J. Geophys. Res. 107(A10), doi: 10.1029/2001JA000326.
Luhmann, J.G. & Bauer, S.J. (1992). Solar Wind Effects on Atmospheric Evolution at
Venus and Mars. In Venus and Mars: Atmospheres, Ionospheres, and Solar Wind
Interactions, AGU Monograph, 66, 417-430
Luhmann, J.G. & Kozyra, J.U. (1991). Dayside Pickup Oxygen Ion Precipitation at
Venus and Mars: Spatial Distributions, Energy Deposition and Consequences.
Luhmann, J.G., Johnson, R.E. & Zhang, M.H.G. (1992). Evolutionary Impact of
Sputtering of the Martian Atmosphere by O+ Pickup Ions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19,
2151.
Lundin, R., Zakharov, A., Pellinen, R., Borg, H., Hultqvist, B., Pissarenko, N.,
Dubinin, E.M., Barabash, S.W., Liede, I. & Koskinen, H. (1989). First Measure-
ments of the Ionospheric Plasma Escape from Mars. Nature 341, 609.
Lundin, R., Dubinin, E., Koskinen, H., Norberg, O., Pissarenko, N. & Barabash, S.
138
(1991). On the Momentum Transfer of the Solar Wind to the Martian Topside
Ionosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 1059.
Lundin, R., Dubinin, E., Barabash, S. & Norberg, O. (1993). ASPERA Observations
of Martian Magnetospheric Boundaries. In Plasma Environments of Non-magnetic
Planets (Ed. T.I. Gombosi), Pergamon Press, UK, p311.
McKay, C.P. & Stoker, C.R. (1989). The Early Environment and its Evolution on
Mars: Implications for Life. Rev. of Geophys. 27, 189.
Mura, A., Milillo, A., Orsini, S., Kallio, E. & Barabash, S. (2002). Energetic Neutral
Atoms at Mars II: Energetic Neutral Atom Production near Phobos. J. Geophys.
Res. 107(A10), doi: 10.1029/2001JA000328.
Norberg, O., Winningham, J.D., Lauche, H., Keith, W., Puccio, W., Olsen, J., Lundin, K.
& Scherrer, J. (2001). The MEDUSA Electron and Ion Spectrometer and the PIA
Ultraviolet Photometers on Astrid-2. Ann. Geophys. 19, 593.
Norberg, O., Yamauchi, M., Lundin, R., Olsen, S., Borg, H., Barabash, S., Hirahara, M.,
Mukai, T. & Hayakawa, H. (1998). The Ion Mass Imager on the Planet-B
Spacecraft. Earth, Planets and Space 50, 199-205.
Perez-de-Tejada, H. (1992). Solar Wind Erosion of the Mars Early Atmosphere.
Roelof, E.C. & Skinner, A.J. (2000). Extraction of Ion Distributions from Magneto-
spheric and EUV Images. Space Sci. Rev. 91, 437-459.
Verigin, M., Gringauz, K.I., Kotova, G.A., Shutte, N.M., Rosenbauer, H., Livi, S.,
Richter, A.K., Riedler, W., Schwingenschuh, K. & Szegö, K. (1991). On the
Problem of the Martian Atmosphere Dissipation: PHOBOS 2 TAUS Spectrometer
Results. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 19,315-19,320.
Wurz, P. (2000). Detection of Energetic Neutral Particles. In The Outer Heliosphere:
Beyond the Planets (Eds. K. Scherer, H. Fichtner & E. Marsch), Copernicus
Gesellschaft, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany, pp251-288.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to A. Balogh and C. Carr (both Imperial College, London,
UK) for providing the IEEE-1355 link chip developed for the Rosetta mission.
139
Patzold.qxd 7/7/04 3:48 PM Page 141
MaRS: Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science
M. Pätzold1, F.M. Neubauer1, L. Carone1, A. Hagermann1, C. Stanzel1, B. Häusler2, S. Remus2, J. Selle2,

D. Hagl2, D.P. Hinson3, R.A. Simpson3, G.L. Tyler3, S.W. Asmar4, W.I. Axford5, T. Hagfors5, J.-P. Barriot6,
J.-C. Cerisier7, T. Imamura8, K.-I. Oyama8, P. Janle9, G. Kirchengast10 & V. Dehant11
1
Institut für Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität zu Köln, D-50923 Köln, Germany
Email: paetzold@geo.uni-koeln.de
2
Institut für Raumfahrttechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, D-85577 Neubiberg, Germany
3
Space, Telecommunication and Radio Science Laboratory, Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA 95305, USA
4
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91009, USA
5
Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie, D-37189 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany
6
Observatoire Midi Pyrenees, F-31401 Toulouse, France
7
Centre d’etude des Environnements Terrestre et Planetaires (CETP), F-94107 Saint-Maur, France
8
Institute of Space & Astronautical Science (ISAS), Sagamihara, Japan
9
Institut für Geowissenschaften, Abteilung Geophysik, Universität zu Kiel, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
10
Institut für Meteorologie und Geophysik, Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, A-8010 Graz, Austria
11
Observatoire Royal de Belgique, B-1180 Bruxelles, Belgium
The Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science (MaRS) experiment will employ radio
occultation to (i) sound the neutral martian atmosphere to derive vertical
density, pressure and temperature profiles as functions of height to resolutions
better than 100 m, (ii) sound the ionosphere to derive vertical ionospheric
electron density profiles and a description of the ionosphere through its diurnal
and seasonal variations with solar wind conditions; MaRS will also (iii) determine
the dielectric and scattering properties of the martian surface in target areas by
a bistatic radar experiment, (iv) determine gravity anomalies for the
investigation of the structure and evolution of the martian crust and lithosphere
in conjunction with observations of the High Resolution Stereo Camera as a base
for 3D topography, and (v) sound the solar corona during the superior conjunction
of Mars with the Sun.
The radio carrier links of the spacecraft Telemetry, Tracking and Command
subsystem between the Orbiter and Earth will be used for these investigations.
Simultaneous and coherent dual-frequency downlinks at X-band (8.4 GHz) and
S-band (2.3 GHz) via the High Gain Antenna will permit separation of
contributions from the classical Doppler shift and the dispersive media effects
caused by the motion of the spacecraft with respect to the Earth and the
propagation of the signals through the dispersive media, respectively.
The investigation relies on the observation of the phase, amplitude,
polarisation and propagation times of radio signals transmitted from the
spacecraft and received with antennas on Earth. The radio signals are affected
by the medium through which they propagate (atmospheres, ionospheres,
interplanetary medium, solar corona), by the gravitational influence of the
planet on the spacecraft and, finally, by the performances of the various systems
aboard the spacecraft and on Earth.
141
SP-1240
1. Introduction Initially conceived as an exploratory tool, radio-science techniques have provided

considerable knowledge of the atmospheres and gravity of the planets – much of it
unexpected. Previous experiments at Mars have demonstrated accuracies in
measurements of martian atmospheric surface pressure and temperature that
surpassed those of in situ measurements made with the Viking Landers (Hinson et al.,
2001). This performance can be matched or possibly improved for occultation
immersion measurements with Mars Express.
Radio-science techniques are applied to the study of planetary and cometary
atmospheres, planetary rings and surfaces, gravity and the solar corona. Much of our
current knowledge of these subjects is based on radio-science observations. Early
investigations include the Mariner, Pioneer and Viking missions, as well as Soviet
projects. Recent and current experiments involve Voyager (Eshleman et al., 1977;
Tyler, 1987), Ulysses (Bird et al., 1994; Pätzold et al., 1995), Giotto (Pätzold et al.,
1991a; 1991b; 1993), Galileo (Howard et al., 1992), Magellan (Tyler et al., 1991) and
Mars Global Surveyor (Tyler et al., 2001). Planned experiments include Cassini
(Kliore et al., 2002), Cassini-Huygens (Bird et al., 1995), Rosetta (Pätzold et al.,
2000) and Mars Express.
Radio-science investigations fall into three broad categories: propagation, bistatic
radar and gravity. First, when the trajectory of the spacecraft takes it behind the planet
as seen from Earth, there is occultation by the planet’s atmosphere. A radio signal
propgating from the spacecraft to a ground station travels through the ionosphere and
neutral atmosphere before being blocked by the planetary surface. This sequency is
reversed upon emergence of the spacecraft. During an occultation event, the refractive
index of the gases in the ionosphere and atmosphere alter the characteristics of the
propagating radio wave. The method can be extended to any one of several separable
‘atmospheres’, including planetary rings and magnetospheres, as well as the
relativistic gravitational effects of stars (Eshleman, 1973). In conducting such
observations, the geometry and other experimental conditions must be controlled so
that the only significant unknown factors are the properties of the medium along the
radio path.
Second, oblique incidence scattering investigations using propagation paths
between spacecraft, planetary surface and Earth station can be used to explore the
surface properties through the microwave scattering function. The technique was first
described by Fjeldbo (1964). It is referred to as ‘bistatic radar’ because the transmitter
and receiver are separated by significant angular distances or ranges. The first such
experiment in space was conducted with Luna-11 in August 1966 to study the Moon’s
surface (Yakaovlev & Efimov, 1966). The oblique scattering geometry afforded by
Lunar Orbiter-1, in October 1966, provided the signal source for the first US
experiment (Tyler et al., 1967). Signals from Explorer-35 also contained echos from
the lunar surface (Tyler, 1968a). Fortuitously, the plane of the spacecraft spin axis and
the antenna polarisation made it possible to measure the Brewster angle of the lunar
crust, leading to an unambiguous value for the relative dielectric constant of lunar soil
of between 2.9 and 3.1, confirming that landers would be on firm ground.
Third, when the radio path is well clear of occulting material, the spacecraft can be
treated as a classical ‘test particle’ falling in the gravity field of the planetary system.
This type of experiment is optimised when the component of its velocity is along the
line-of-sight to the tracking station, thus allowing a measurement of the Doppler
effect. The spacecraft motion causing the Doppler shift is in response to the variations
in mass distribution within a planet or its satellites. This is a classical physics
laboratory experiment carried out at planetary-scale. Our global knowledge of Earth’s
gravity field comes from such studies. The only information on the gravity field of
Mercury is based on the two flybys of Mariner-10 (Anderson et al., 1987). Similarly,
recent observational inferences on the internal structures of the Galilean satellites (for
example, that there is an ocean on Europa) are based on the perturbations of Galileo’s
trajectory during close flybys (Anderson et al., 1992; 1997). A precise determination
of the total mass of Uranus and Neptune from the Voyager-2 flybys (Tyler et al., 1986)
142
Fig. 1. Refractivity profiles at S-band obtained from the Mariner-4 occultation.

Profiles 1-5 were taken prior to the occultation and represent the zero level after biases
and trends owing to effects not connected with the martian atmosphere were removed.
Profile 6 shows the refractivity of the martian atmosphere at S-band probed during
occultation entry. Negative refractivity represents the ionosphere, positive the neutral
atmosphere (from Fjeldbo & Eshleman, 1968).
Fig. 2 (right). Operational sequence for the use of the two-way link for sounding the atmosphere/ionosphere as seen from the Earth. The sequence is
seen projected on to the plane of the sky. The two-way radio ray slices through the atmosphere from the top to the surface during occultation entry and
is then shadowed by the planet. After leaving occultation, the now one-way ray slices through the atmosphere from the surface to the upper levels of
the ionosphere, where the two-way radio link may be reestablished.
has led to the conclusion that there is no need for a ‘Planet X’ to explain the orbits of
these bodies (Standish, 1993). The method has been extended to small bodies, such
as the mass determination of asteroid Mathilde (Yeomans et al., 1997) and the gravity
field of asteroid Eros (Yeomans et al., 2000), and is planned for the Rosetta flyby at
asteroid Siwa in 2008 (Pätzold et al., 2001). For Mars Express, these asteroid
techniques can be applied to precise determinations of the masses of Phobos and
Deimos during close encounters.
2.1 Radio sounding of the neutral atmosphere and ionosphere 2. Science Objectives
The modern value for the surface pressure of Mars was first determined in 1965 by
using the radio occultation method with Mariner-4 (Kliore et al., 1965). Prior to that,
the literature indicated a consensus that the surface pressure was of the order
100 mbar (about 10% of Earth’s), based on spectroscopic observations from the
ground, with many believing that oxygen was a likely major constituent.
A more accurate value was needed in support of martian landers being studied by
NASA teams lead by Wehrner von Braun. At the time of the Mariner-4 launch and
cruise, new ground-based observations of the atmosphere had begun to cast doubt on
the 100 mbar value, suggesting that the true value could be substantially lower. As a
result, Mariner-4 was directed to fly behind Mars to perform radio occultation
measurements. Initial results showed the surface pressure at the occultation point was
approximately 4 mbar (Fig. 1). Further, since spectrographic studies indicated that the
partial pressure of CO2 on Mars was in this range, the atmosphere was almost entirely
carbon dioxide with little, if any, oxygen. Radio occultation measurements have been
included on almost all planetary missions flown since.
143
SP-1240
Fig. 3. X-band refractivity profile obtained

with Mars Global Surveyor on 11 March 1999.
Note that the positive refractivity is
comparable to that shown in Fig. 1 at S-band.
The inset shows on a larger scale the negative
refractivity of the ionosphere. The peak
refractivity translates into a peak electron
density of 8.7x1010 electrons m–3. Ionospheric
refractivity at X-band scales by a factor of
(3/11)2 relative to that at S-band in Fig. 1.
Sounding by radio occultation of Mars Express (Fig. 2) will contribute to the

understanding of the structure of the martian atmosphere, its circulation and dynamics
through the day and seasons. Vertical profiles of density, pressure and temperature
with height resolutions better than 100 m can be derived. Observations of the vertical
structure below 30 km altitude have been made by several spacecraft during
occultations. In situ measurements of three atmospheric profiles during the descents
of the two Viking landers and Pathfinder are available below 200 km altitude. Dust
and haze in the atmosphere do not hinder the propagation of the radio carrier waves,
but the local heating by entrained dust is observed in several occultation temperature
profiles. The Mars Global Surveyor (MGS) radio occultation experiment (Tyler et al.,
1992) retrieved vertical profiles of pressure and temperature extending from the
surface to the 10 Pa level, with surface uncertainties of 2 Pa and 1K (Hinson et al.,
1999).
Radio occultation also provides a measure of the ionosphere’s vertical structure
and an averaged large-scale electron density profile as a function of height and
planetary latitude at each occultation point. One of the goals is to understand the
global behaviour of the martian ionosphere with the effects of the magnetic field,
solar activity and solar wind interaction through the day and seasons.
Photochemical processes control the behaviour of the main ionospheric layer in a
manner similar to the terrestrial F layer (Barth et al., 1992). The electron density
distribution of a weakly magnetised body like Mars is controlled by solar radiation
and the solar wind interaction with the planet. A typical value of the daytime
ionospheric peak density is of the order of 1011 electrons m–3 at altitudes of 110-
135 km (Fig. 3).
Observations by MGS have revealed highly variable and localised magnetic fields
(Acuna et al., 1998). Strong fields at the spacecraft orbit below the ionosphere were
144
observed locally. At other locations, much weaker magnetic fields were found.
Therefore, the possibility of a sufficiently strong global magnetic field involved in the
solar wind interaction might no longer be supported. However, only a narrow latitude
range was covered by MGS observations owing to the low pericentre altitude during
aerobraking.
On the other hand, the radio occultation data from Mariner-9 and Viking (Kliore,
1992) suggest the presence of a global magnetic field in the formation of the
ionosphere. With its better resolution (about 100 electrons cm–3), Mars Express may
address the question of whether the Mariner/Viking profiles reflect only their low
resolution or if a global magnetic field is indeed involved. The height of the ionopause
is not well defined at Mars. At Venus, the ionopause has been defined as that altitude
where the electron density falls below 500 electrons cm–3 (Kliore & Luhmann, 1991),
while the density in the martian profiles never drops below that limit. Mars Express
needs to solve the question of which physical processes define the ionopause altitude.
Either the entry or the exit of the Mars Express occultations will be at nighttime,
providing the opportunity to investigate the nightside ionosphere. Viking resolved a
nighttime ionosphere in only 40% of the measurements, which also showed a high
variability in shape, peak density and height. The anticipated accuracy of Mars
Express will help to solve the question of whether the nighttime ionosphere is
maintained by horizontal transport from the dayside or by impact ionisation owing to
electron precipitation from the tail, which should provide insights into the direction
of the magnetic field on the nightside.
During occultation ingress, the Telemetry, Tracking and Command (TT&C)
subsystem will operate in the two-way mode. The spacecraft downlink frequencies
are derived from the uplink, stabilised by a hydrogen maser in the ground station.
Changes in the received radio frequency (RF) to a fractional frequency stability of
10–14 over 3-100 s integration times correspond to a change in the angle of refraction
of radio rays in occultation experiments of the order 10–8 rad (Tyler, 1987).
The signal-to-noise limitations of previous experiments limited the detectability of
the atmosphere to below 30 km. Mars Express should improve this altitude to 50 km
because of the high signal-to-noise ratio at X-band (transmitted RF power 65 W). The
effective vertical resolution through use of the Abel transform is determined by the
first Fresnel zone radius (λ D)1/2, which is about 300 m for X-band and 600 m for
S-band, respectively, (D is the distance of the spacecraft to the closest approach of the
ray path to the planet). This resolution is far superior to what can be achieved by other
passive sounding instruments, which are limited to typically one atmospheric scale
height (order of km).
Marouf et al. (1986) developed a procedure to improve the resolution beyond the
natural diffraction limit, applying it to the Voyager occultation by Saturn’s rings.
Gresh et al. (1989) applied the procedure to occultation data from the rings of Uranus.
This resulted in a resolution of 100 m, about an order of magnitude improvement on
the Fresnel diffraction limit, for flyby conditions at the outer planets. The technique
was also applied in the first direct determination of Triton’s surface pressure (Tyler et
al., 1989). Karayel & Hinson (1997) applied a similar approach to atmospheres denser
than Triton’s and produced a resolution of about 40 m for simulated martian
conditions. These results justify the expectation that it is feasible to derive vertical
profiles in the martian atmosphere with a height resolution better than 100 m.
Separating the effects from the ionosphere and neutral atmosphere on the radio link
is feasible by using (a) a dual-frequency downlink, (b) the opposite sign of the
refractive index if the radio signal propagates in ionised or neutral media, and (c) the
fact that the peak heights of the ionosphere and the detectable neutral atmosphere are
well separated. This is demonstrated in Figs. 1 and 3 which show the refractivity
profile derived from Mariner-4 occultation data (profile 6) at S-band and a refractivity
profile from MGS at X-band, respectively, as a function of height. Negative
refractivity results from the ionised plasma in the ionosphere and is proportional to
the electron number density; positive refractivity is a property of the neutral
145
SP-1240
Fig. 4a. Duration of Mars Express occultations

(in minutes) over the mission. There will be six
occultation seasons (OCP1 to OCP6), with an
Earth occultation in each orbit over the
expected mission duration of two Martian
years.
Fig. 4b. Duration of occultations by the planet

body during the first season OCP1 (blue dots)
and the duration of occultation by the
atmosphere between 500 km altitude to the
surface (red triangles). The end of the first
occultation season is affected by the start of
the superior solar conjunction of the planet at
year day 238, 2004.
atmosphere which is linearly related to the mass density of the atmospheric

constituents (Fjeldbo & Eshleman, 1968). The refractivity µ of free electrons is given
by
Ne
m 40.31 106
f2
which allows conversion of refractivity into electron number densities (Ne in

electrons m–3 is the electron density, f in Hz is the radio carrier frequency).
It is feasible to retrieve two refractivity profiles with Mars Express for each radio
146
Fig. 5. Spacecraft position along the orbit at

occultation entry (red) and occultation exit
(blue) for OCP1 expressed as true anomaly.
True anomaly of 0 deg is the pericentre
position. The red area marks ±60 deg true
anomaly when the spacecraft is nominally in
nadir pointing. Occultation can be observed
only when ground coverage is available,
typically every third occultation.
Fig. 6. Planetary latitude of occultation ingress

and egress locations during OCP1. Effectively,
all planetary latitudes are covered during all
six occultation seasons.
carrier frequency at S-band and X-band. S-band is expected to be more sensitive to

the negative refractivity (ionosphere) by a factor (11/3)2 compared with X-band, while
the positive refractivity (neutral atmosphere) is essentially independent of the
frequency. Under favourable geometric conditions it will be possible to investigate
the solar wind-magnetic anomalies-ionospheric interaction region.
Computing the differential Doppler from the received S-band and X-band residual
Doppler shifts yields the dispersive media effects associated with free electrons in all
ionised media (martian ionosphere, interplanetary medium, Earth ionosphere) along
the downlink and can be used for calibration, inversion and correction of the classical
Doppler shift. The spacecraft-Earth radio ray path will cross through the sensible
147
SP-1240
ionosphere quickly (in minutes) before entering occultation. The variation in the
Earth ionosphere and the interplanetary medium is assumed to be slow for time scales
shorter than a minute, so the observed changes in radio carrier properties are assumed
to be dominated by the martian ionosphere.
Earth occultations will occur in six ‘seasons’ in the expected 4 years (two martian
years) of operation, with one occultation in each orbit or three to four occultations per
day. The mission baseline calls for one ground station tracking pass per day, which
would cover typically one occultation (two under favourable operational conditions).
The duration of the occultation and the entry and exit position of the spacecraft in its
orbit expressed in true anomaly are shown in Figs. 4a/4b and Fig. 5, respectively. The
occultation entry and exits will cover all planetary latitudes of the northern and
southern hemispheres (Fig. 6).
2.2 Determination of the dielectric properties of the surface (bistatic radar)

The bistatic radar configuration (Fig. 7) is distinguished from the monostatic by
spatial separation of the transmitter (on the spacecraft) and the receiver (in the ground
station on Earth). It may be used to derive information about surface roughness and
slope at scales of the incident wavelength (a few cm). Bistatic radar may also be used
to determine properties of the surface material, such as dielectric constant, through
differential reflection of orthogonal polarisations. The bistatic radar geometry of an
orbiting spacecraft is well suited to probing the surface of planets at a variety of
latitude, longitude and incidence angles. Bistatic radar experiments have been
conducted at the Moon (e.g. Tyler & Howard, 1973; Nozette et al., 1996), Mars
(Simpson & Tyler, 1981; Simpson et al., 1984) and Venus (Pettengill et al., 1997;
Kolosov et al., 1979).
The objectives at Mars focus on the polar regions and caps, the volcanic regions
and the famous ‘Stealth’ area south-west of Tharsis (Muhleman et al., 1991; Edgett et
al., 1997). The bistatic geometry is well-suited to probing icy surfaces, which are
poorly understood on Mars. The fact that the residual south polar cap on Mars has
anomalously high backscatter when viewed from Earth, while the northern cap
(presumably much more massive) does not stand out, is a continuing mystery. The
Stealth region is anomalous in the sense that it yields very weak backscatter when
probed from Earth. In both cases, the unique geometry of a bistatic experiment
promises a better understanding of both the scattering processes and the underlying
surface geology. Selected targets in other areas, such as volcanic plains, will also be
studied. Despite similar appearances in orbital images, some plains do not necessarily
have the same radar behaviour, again suggesting differences in the underlying surface
geology.
For a typical bistatic radar experiment, the radio signal is transmitted from the
spacecraft High Gain Antenna (HGA) towards the surface of Mars and is scattered
from the surface. Optimising the performance of these bistatic radar experiments
requires accurate prediction of the orbiter trajectory in order to formulate antenna
pointing strategies as well as to predict signal parameters such as Doppler shift and
signal amplitude. In a quasi-specular experiment, the antenna is programmed to
follow the locus of points for which surface reflection would be specular if Mars were
smooth. From the data recorded along these specular point paths, surface roughness
can be inferred from Doppler dispersion of the echo signal; the dielectric constant ε
of the surface material can be inferred from echo amplitude and/or polarisation
properties. Dielectric properties of a lunar basin were obtained by measuring the
Brewster angle tan2 φB = ε (Tyler, 1968b). Similarily, a more general Stokes parameter
analysis led to detection of a tellurium-like material in the Venus highlands (Pettengill
et al., 1996).
In a spotlight experiment, the antenna is programmed to track a fixed point on the
surface, viewing it from a variety of angles. When the configuration passes through
the backscatter geometry, coherent backscatter enhancements can be sought in the
echo amplitude and polarisation (Hapke, 1990). Clementine spotlight data have been
148
Fig. 7. Bistatic radar configuration is

distinguished from the monostatic by the
spatial separation of the transmitter
(spacecraft) and the receiver (ground station
on Earth).
Fig. 8. Typical bistatic radar spectrum showing

separation of the echo signal from the direct
signal leaking out from the HGA side lobes
toward the receiver. The broadening of the
echo signal is caused by motion of the specular
point over the surface and is related to surface
roughness (from Simpson, 1993).
interpreted as suggesting the presence of water ice near the lunar south pole (Nozette
et al., 1996; 2001), although that conclusion is not universally accepted (Simpson &
Tyler, 1999). Strong backscatter enhancements are the salient features of backscatter
from the icy Galilean moons of Jupiter (Eshleman, 1987) and have also been observed
in the terrestrial environment of Greenland. Both the mechanism and its expected
signature from real targets remain the subjects of active debate (Hagfors et al., 1985;
Eshleman, 1987; Peters, 1992). Careful measurement of any observed enhancement
magnitude and its angular variation are not available but would be useful.
The radio echo signal is received in the open-loop mode (see below) in two
orthogonal polarisations (e.g. Left Circular Polarisation, LCP, and Right Circular
Polarisation, RCP)), down-converted, sampled and stored for further processing at the
investigator’s home institution. Fig. 8 shows a typical frequency spectrum of the
received radio signal. The direct signal, leaking out from the side lobes of the HGA
and reduced accordingly in power, is on the right. The echo signal is on the left and
it is Doppler shifted relative to the direct signal according to the change in spacecraft-
to-surface-to-Earth distance as a function of time. It is broadened according to the
roughness of the surface and the motion of the specular point over the surface
(Simpson, 1993).
It is required that the HGA points towards the martian surface. To ensure maximum
signal-to-noise ratio in the echo signal received at Earth, the transmission of an
unmodulated carrier at the highest feasible power level is also required. Transmission
of linear (or elliptical) polarisation offers advantages in detecting differential quasi-
149
SP-1240
specular polarisation reflections from volcanic plains, while circular (or elliptical)
polarisation is preferred for spotlight observations of ice deposits.
2.3 Geophysics: gravity anomalies

The gravity field of a planet is the result of its its internal mass distribution and
rotational state. Rapidly rotating planets bulge at the equator as a result of centrifugal
forces. Consequently, the associated redistribution of mass to the equatorial plane
results in a stronger gravitational acceleration of a spacecraft when it is near the pole
than when it is at the same altitude located over the equator. Similarly, anomalies in
the internal distribution of mass are expressed as departures of the external
gravitational field from that of a uniform sphere or a stratified spherical distribution.
Space probes in the vicinity of planetary bodies follow trajectories that deviate from
the ideal orbits described by Kepler’s two-body laws in response to these gravity
anomalies.
Precision two-way radio tracking provides an accurate measurement of spacecraft
velocity along the line-of-sight to the tracking station, with variations attributed to
gravitational acceleration owing to mass distribution in the planetary body. The utility
of data for studying mass variations depends on the sensitivity of the radio system, the
details of the geometry, and the characteristics of the overall spacecraft trajectory. The
method is capable of detecting accelerations of the order of 10–3 Gal
(1 Gal = 10–2 m s–2; Earth surface gravity is 982 Gal). Such data, through the
connection between mass and gravitational force, are used to study planetary
interiors. From low altitudes, even relatively minor variations in the mass density of
surface and near-surface features are detectable. For example, a reduction in density
of about 300 kg m–3 (or about a 10% change in the average martian crustal density) of
a 50-km cube of rock near the surface is readily measurable.
Combining data from a large number of orbits from the Mariner, Viking and MGS
missions has allowed construction of a complete gravity map, with resolution
elements of about 2° on the martian surface. Large-scale variations in the strength of
gravity correspond to the overall distribution of mass, mostly in the deep interior of
Mars, and are relevant to the interpretation of the early history and evolution of the
planet. Smaller scale variations, on lateral distances of a few thousand km or less,
correspond to mass variations relatively close to the surface. Both large- and small-
scale variations must be interpreted in light of the known overall shape of the planet
and the variations in the surface elevation since, as in the examples above,
topographic and mass density variations can play a similar role in the raw gravity
data. Mars Express, as a result of its low periapsis altitude, can improve the present
maps by a factor of about two in linear resolution in areas scanned by the evolution
of the orbit.
Two gravity field models of degree and order 50 have been derived from radio
tracking data of the Viking and Mariner-9 missions (Smith et al., 1993; Konopliv &
Sjogren, 1995). The same teams collaborated on a derivation of a gravity field model
of degree and order 60 and higher using the Mars Global Surveyor tracking data
(Smith et al., 1999; Yuan et al., 2001).
The highly eccentric orbit of Mars Express is not best-suited for a global
investigation of the gravity field. The investigation proposed here focuses on specific
target areas for the determination of local gravity anomalies. Observations with the
HRSC stereo camera will yield the high-resolution 3D topography of the target area.
Three data sets (radio science, camera, radar) will be combined to study the state and
evolution of the martian crust and lithosphere, with implications for studying the
tectonic evolution of Mars.
The targets of investigations are the hot spot areas of Tharsis and Elysium, large
single volcanoes, large impact craters and basins, and the highland-lowland boundary.
The investigation of impact basins must be seen in the context of similar studies on
other planetary bodies, including the Earth, in the sense of comparative planetology
and studies of the impact mechanism, which is not fully understood (particularly for
150
large basins). Studies of the highland-lowland boundary will contribute to the open Fig. 9. Superior solar conjunction geometry of
question of this dichotomy. Mars in the plane-of-sky. Each tick mark
represents one day. Mars is within 40 solar
Topographic data provide digital terrain models (DTMs) which, in combination
radii (circles) from 14 August 2004 to
with the gravity data, are the basis for crustal density models. The measured line-of- 18 September 2004 (left panel), and from
sight free-air gravity anomaly at spacecraft altitudes amounts up to 70 mGal (Janle & 21 September 2006 to 25 November 2006 (right
Erkul, 1991). A complete density model consists of a topographic model (DTM) and panel). Within 12 solar radii, telemetry
a density model of the subsurface structures (e.g. undulations of the crust/mantle reception will be degraded. No telemetry can
be expected within 4 solar radii. An adequate
boundary, mantle plume). Variations in gravity of up to about 500 mGal are associated
signal-to-noise radio carrier can be received at
with topography and drive the need for precise and high-resolution topographic data. any time, however.
DTMs are also necessary for bending-stress models of the lithosphere, as
demonstrated by Janle & Jannsen (1986) for Olympus Mons.
Precise DTMs are required for the lithospheric load of bending-stress models, in
particular for the correlation of the lineament distribution with the topography and
calculated stresses. The combination of radar altimeter data and stereo images from
HRSC will provide DTMs with vertical resolutions of 12-18 m and linear ground
resolutions of 20-30 m, which are perfectly suited for bending stress models and
geologic interpretations of the lineament distribution.
The expected accuracy of the Mars Express X/X-band two-way radio link is of the
order «100 mm s–1 at 10 s integration time. This translates into an accuracy of gravity
accelerations of the order of several mGal, depending on the size and extension of the
local topographic features (Tyler et al., 1992).
2.4 Radio sounding of the solar corona

Mars will move into superior conjunction with the Sun in the autumns of 2004 and
2006. Within about 10° elongation with respect to the solar disc in the plane of the
sky (Fig. 9), the dispersive effects on the radio signals (propagation time, Doppler
shift and Doppler noise) are dominated by the solar corona. It is therefore proposed
that this valuable time be used for a thorough investigation of the solar corona to
derive electron density profiles in the structured corona, solar wind speed, turbulence
spectra in the source regions of fast and slow solar wind streams from coronal holes
and streamers, respectively, and to detect, identify and describe the spatial and
151
SP-1240
Fig. 10. The Mars Express radio subsystem.

The transponder is redundant and each unit
contains an S-band and X-band receiver and
transmitter. X-band is amplified by TWTAs to
an RF power output of 65 W. The RF
distribution unit (RFDU) connects the
receivers and transmitters with the antennas.
It also contains the S-band amplifiers (5 W RF
power output). The HGA receives uplink at
either X-band or S-band and radiates
simultaneously X-band and S-band downlink.
The LGAs receive and transmit at S-band only.
Fig. 11. Mars Express at the time of the release

of the Beagle 2 lander descent capsule, showing
the fixed HGA, a parabolic dish of 1.60 m
diameter. (ESA)
temporal evolution of the shockfronts of coronal mass ejections (Bird et al., 1994;
Pätzold et al., 1995; 1996; 1997; Karl et al., 1997). It is highly desirable to carry out
these observations simultaneously with SOHO or other solar space observatories to
enhance and compare the observations.
The technique of coronal sounding is well established and has been performed by
members of the Mars Express team during the superior solar conjunctions of Ulysses
(1991, 1995), Magellan (1992), Voyager and Viking (Bird et al., 1992; 1994; 1996;
Pätzold et al., 1995; 1996; 1997; Tyler et al., 1977). For Mars Express, a two-way
radio link and dual-frequency downlink at S-band and X-band allow separation of the
coronal dispersive effects from the classical Doppler shifts. The two-way link is a
powerful tool for the derivation of electron density models from observed electron
content when propagation time delay, ranging data and dispersive Doppler shifts are
compared (Pätzold et al., 1997). Furthermore, it provides the basis for the
determination of solar wind speed by correlating uplink and downlink signals
(Wohlmuth et al., 1997) and detection of fast outward-propagating density enhance-
ment originating from solar events.
152
Fig. 12. Radio links between the Orbiter and

the Earth station. Upper panel: one-way
X-band and S-band downlink for bistatic
radar. Lower panel: two-way radio link where
the uplink is transponded phase-coherently
with dual-frequency downlinks at X-band and
S-band. Frequency stability is governed by a
hydrogen maser at the ground station.
3.1 Mars Express radio subsystem 3. Technical Description

Mars Express can receive and transmit radio signals via either of two dedicated
antenna systems:
— High Gain Antenna (HGA), a fixed parabolic dish of 1.60 m diameter, antenna
gains 40 dBi and 28 dBi at X-band and S-band, respectively;
— two Low Gain Antennas (LGAs).
A block diagram of the characteristic features of the radio subsystem is shown in

Fig. 10. Each of the two redundant transponders consist of an S-band and X-band
receiver. The X-band transmitter output is amplified by a redundant 65 W Travelling
Wave Tube Amplifier (TWTA) and the S-band downlink by a Solid State Amplifier
of 5 W RF output. The spacecraft can receive and transmit at S-band (2.1 GHz) via
the LGAs, or receive non-simultaneously at either X-band (7.1 GHz) or S-band via
the HGA. The right-hand circular polarised downlink signals at S-band (2.3 GHz) and
X-band (8.4 GHz) are transmitted via the HGA simultaneously (see an overview of
frequencies in Table 1). The HGA (Fig. 11) is the primary antenna for receiving
telecommands from and transmitting high rate telemetry in the operational phase. The
LGAs are used during the commissioning phase and emergency operations.
MaRS uses two radio link modes (Fig. 12). The coherent two-way radio link is
established by transmitting an uplink radio signal either at S-band or X-band to the
spacecraft. A received S-band uplink carrier frequency is transponded to downlinks at
S-band and X-band upon multiplication by the constant transponder ratios 240/221
and 880/221, respectively, in order to guarantee a ratio of the two downlinks of
880/240 = 11/3. A received X-band uplink is multiplied by 880/749 and 240/749 to
arrive at X-band and S-band downlink frequencies, respectively. Here again, the ratio
of both frequencies is 880/240 = 11/3. The two-way radio mode takes advantage of
the superior frequency stability inherent to the hydrogen maser oscillator at the
ground station on Earth. This mode is used for sounding the atmosphere and
ionosphere, the gravity science applications and the sounding of the solar corona.
The one-way link mode is established by transmitting the X-band and S-band
downlink simultaneously and phase coherently. It is used for the bistatic radar
experiment. Table 1. Carrier frequencies.
3.2 Ground segment Uplink Downlink

Ground stations (Fig. 13) include antennas, associated equipment and operating
S-band 2.1 2.3 GHz
systems in the tracking complexes of Perth, Australia (ESA, 35 m) and NASA’s Deep
X-band 7.1 8.4 GHz
Space Network (DSN, 34 m and 70 m) in California, Spain and Australia. A tracking
153
SP-1240
Fig. 13. ESA and NASA ground station

networks. The 15 m ESA antenna at Kourou
will be used for the commissiong phase, while
the new 35 m antenna near Perth will be the
ESOC
primary antenna. NASA will support specific DSN Madrid OCC
mission phases and the radio science 34 m / 70 m
experiment with its Deep Space Network
antennas at Goldstone (California), Canberra
(Australia) and Madrid (Spain). DSN Goldstone Kourou
34 m / 70 m 15 m
Perth
35 m
DSN Canberra
Fig. 14. ESA’s new 35 m antenna at New 34 m / 70 m
Norcia, Australia.
pass consists of typically 8-10 h of spacecraft visibility and communication at the

respective ground station site. Measurements of the spacecraft range and carrier
Doppler shift can be obtained whenever the spacecraft is visible and its HGA is
pointed towards Earth. The baseline calls for one communication pass at the ESA
ground station per day, summarising approximately 1700 tracking passes for radio
science (630 gravity passes, 750 occultations, 120 corona soundings, 200 bistatic
radar observations). The use of the DSN antennas in California and Spain are under
discussion and would usefully increase the number of tracking passes and experiment
performance.
In the two-way mode, the ground station transmits an uplink radio signal at either
S-band or at X-band and receives the dual-frequency ownlink at X-band and S-band.
Information about signal amplitude, received frequency and polarisation is extracted
and stored as a function of ground receive time.
ESA’s new 35 m ground station at New Norcia, Australia, about 200 km north of
the older tracking complex in Perth, became operational in summer 2002 (Fig. 14). Its
first deep space test with Ulysses was planned for September 2002. The station
equipment consist of three identical new receiving systems designated as the
Intermediate Frequency and Modem System (IFMS; Fig. 15). One is dedicated for
radio science open-loop data recording of the Mars Express radio science
154
Fig. 15. Intermediate Frequency Modem System (IFMS) open-loop digital processor for radio science. This slightly modified third IFMS was
installed in 2002 along with two ESA standard IFMS at the New Norcia antenna in support for the radio science experiments on Mars Express
and Rosetta. This IFMS will allow the recording of received radio carrier parameters at specific radio science settings. AGC: automatic gain
control. FFT: Fast Fourier Transform. IF: intermediate frequency. LO: local oscillator.
investigations and the Rosetta Radio Science Investigations experiment (Pätzold et

al., 2000). This open-loop system will be used specifically for the radio sounding of
the atmosphere/ionosphere, bistatic radar and solar corona investigations where
closed-loop tracking receivers would typically lose lock. The IFMS operates on a
Fig. 16. NASA’s 70 m (foreground) and 34 m
17.5 Msps 24-bit complex baseband stream (containing 12-bit words each for the I (background) deep space antennas at the
and Q channels) and resulting from filtering and decimating the 280 Msps 8-bit Goldstone complex in the Mojave desert.
stream output data from the Common Front End Analogue-to-Digital Converter. (NASA)
These channels are provided for both RCP and LCP polarisations. The radio science
raw data can be directly transferred to a mass storage device and/or processed by a
Fast Fourier routine.
The DSN stations (Fig. 16) also provide uplinks at S-band or X-band. Dedicated
radio science equipment functionally similar to the IFMS is available at all DSN
stations (Asmar & Renzetti, 1993).
Radio science measurements in the ground stations can be done simultaneously on
a non-interference basis with the transmission and/or reception of telecommands.
However, since the signal-to-noise ratio of the carrier signal is considerably reduced
when transmitting telemetry, a non-modulated downlink radio carrier is required in
that case.
3.3 Observed quantities

The two data types (closed- and open-loop) can be generated simultaneously
155
SP-1240
regardless of the radio link configuration (one- or two-way). The received carrier
frequencies, the signal strengths (received total power) and the polarisation of the radio
signals are monitored at the ground station. Ground-based radiometric data are
recorded using closed-loop receivers:
— amplitude and phase (Doppler) measurements (two- and one-way modes);

— ranging measurements (two-way mode only);
— full polarisation measurements (primarily one-way mode).
3.3.1 Doppler shift

The transmission of dual-frequency phase-coherent downlinks at S-band and X-band
with the constant ratio of 11/3 makes it feasible to separate the dispersive from the non-
dispersive Doppler effects on the radio link.
The frequency of the radio carrier is shifted according to the relative radial velocity
between the transmitter and the receiver (classical Doppler shift). Furthermore, a
relative phase shift is experienced when the radio wave propagates through an ionised
medium (ionosphere, interplanetary medium, solar corona). Excluding oscillator drifts
and instabilities, the frequency shift for a one-way (spacecraft-to-Earth) radio link due
to plasma is:
Earth
f0 ds
N ds
40.31 1 d
¢f f f0 e (1)
c dt c f0 dt
s>c
where ds/dt is the rate of change of the distance between transmitter and receiver
(relative velocity), c is the speed of light and f0 is the carrier frequency. The integral of
the electron density Ne(s) along the propagation path ds of the radio wave from the
spacecraft (s/c) to Earth is also called the columnar electron content, or column density.
The first term on the right hand side of (1) is the classical Doppler shift (linear in f0)
and the second term is the dispersive propagation effect of radio waves in ionised
media, which is inversely proportional to f0. A larger classical Doppler shift is
measured on the X-band, but the lower S-band frequency is more sensitive to
dispersive frequency shifts. A change in relative velocity of 2 cm s–1 yields a classical
Doppler frequency shift of 0.6 Hz at X-band. A dispersive frequency shift of 0.6 Hz at
S-band is produced by a change in electron content by one hexem (1016 electrons m–2)
within 1 s.
It is not possible to separate classical and dispersive frequency shifts from the
observed total change in frequency ∆f at either fs or fx, the S-band or X-band carrier
frequency, respectively, alone. However, using Eq. 1 for the two phase-coherent
downlinks at X-band and S-band with a constant transponder ratio of 880/240 = 11/3
and calculating the differential Doppler
¢fs 113 ¢fx , (2)
where ∆fs and ∆fx are the observed Doppler shifts at S-band and X-band,
respectively. According to Eq. 1, it is possible to isolate the dispersive frequency shift:
Earth Earth
d d
dt s
N ds N ds
40.31 1 d 3 dt
s 40.31 1 d
¢fs 113 ¢fx fs 11 fx 113
c c fs dt c c fx dt
s>c s>c
Earth
fs a b N ds
40.31 1 1 d
(3)
c fs2 fx2 dt
s>c
156
Fig. 17. Radio ray bending in a planetary

atmosphere. Refractivity is represented as a
function of radius. The bending can be
described by the total bending angle α, and the
distance of the ray asymptotes, a. In a
spherically symmetric atmosphere, the radio
path remains in a plane and bends about the
centre of the system. The closest approach
distance of the bended ray is r01. The plane is
defined by the geometry of the constellation
(distance to Earth vector, velocity vector of
Earth, distance vector to spacecraft, velocity
vector of spacecraft with respect to Mars).
The ‘differential Doppler effect’ (Eq. 3), calculated from the observed frequency
shifts, is used to determine the changes in electron content. All oscillator drifts and
relative velocities are eliminated in this process. This result can further be used to
correct each single classical frequency shift for the dispersive propagation effects .
The example above was derived for a one-way link. It can be shown that the
calculation of the differential Doppler of a two-way radio link, when the spacecraft
transmitted carrier frequencies are derived coherently from the received (and
Doppler-shifted) uplink frequency, leads to exactly the same relation. In either case,
Eq. 3 can be used to determine the electron content along the downlink path.
Integration of Eq. 3 with respect to time yields the differential phase, which is
proportional to changes in electron content along the downlink from the beginning of
the tracking pass.
3.3.2 Ranging (propagation delay)

The absolute value of total electron content can be determined from the differential
propagation delay by two-way ranging at S-band and X-band:
Earth
a b N ds
40.31 1 1
ts tx (4)
c fs2 fx2
s>c
Typically, the Doppler or phase measurements are more sensitive than the ranging
measurements by about two orders of magnitude (Bird, 1982).
3.3.3 Ray bending in atmospheres

Radio occultation studies of atmospheres can be understood in terms of ‘geometric’
or ‘ray’ optics refraction of signals travelling between spacecraft and ground stations.
In a spatially varying medium where the wavelength is very short compared with the
scale of variation in refractive index, the direction of propagation of an
electromagnetic wave always curves in the direction of increasing refractivity.
Consequently, in a spherically symmetric atmosphere with gas refractivity
proportional to number density constantly decreasing with height, the radio path
remains in a plane and bends about the centre of the system. The degree of bending
depends on the strength of the refractivity gradient. This simple model approximates
a real atmosphere and is useful for understanding the basic phenomena of radio
occultation (Fjeldbo, 1964).
The geometry is illustrated in Fig. 17, where the atmosphere is represented by the
157
SP-1240
Table 2. Doppler velocity error σv (mm s–1) for 1 s integration time.
0.8 AU 2.5 AU
S-band X-band S-band X-band
Thermal noise (ground station) 0.9 0.01 2.00 0.03

Transponder phase noise 0.42 0.26 0.42 0.26
Total error (two-way coherent mode) 0.99 0.26 2.04 0.26
refractivity as a function of radius from the centre, µ(r0), and the bending can be
described in terms of a total bending angle, α, and a ray asymptote, a. The variation
of the bending angle, ray asymptote and refractivity are linked through an Abel
transform (Fjeldbo & Eshleman, 1964),
q
m 0r 21mr2
1 0m 0r
a1a2 2a (5)
2
a2
rr0
a
where r0
m1r0 2
is the ray periapse and,
a q

2
m1r01 2 exp • ln • a b 1 ¶ da ¶
1 a a da
(6)
p a1 B a1 da
aa1
a
with r0
m1r01 2
.
In this last expression, a1 represents the asymptotic miss distance for a ray whose
radius of closest approach is r01. Thus, for spherical atmospheres, if α(a) is known,
then the corresponding refractivity profile can be found exactly. For non-spherical
geometry, alternative numerical solutions are available. The bending angle and the ray
asymptote can be determined accurately by radio occultation to create an
experimentally derived table of α versus a, or α(a).
In order to interpret the refractivity in terms of gas parameters, the pressure and
temperature are calculated assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, for example, from
q
p1h2 6 m 7 g1h2 N1h2 df (7)

h
and
p1h2
T1h2 (8)
kB N1h2
where p(h) and T(h) are the pressure and temperature as a function of height h,
respectively, g is the acceleration of gravity, kB is Boltzmann’s constant, <m> is the
mean molecular mass, and N(h) is the molecular number density. Formal use of these
equations requires a priori knowledge of the atmospheric composition.
158
3.4 Error budget

The major noise sources contributing to the Doppler velocity error are the thermal
noise of the radio receiver on the ground for one-way observations, and both on the
ground and aboard the spacecraft for two-way observations. The velocity error σv
contributed by the ground station is given by
c 2BN0
sv (9)
4pf ¢t B C
and the transponder phase noise σφ by
c 22
sv sf (10)
4pft
where B is the receiver bandwidth, C and N0 are the received carrier power and the
noise power density, respectively. The transponder phase noise σφ was experimentally
determined by Remus et al. (2001) with a transponder electrical qualification model
on ground. The total velocity error σv is calculated in Table 2 for an integration time
∆t of 1 s at S-band and X-band.
Typical integration times for practical observations are in the range 1-10 s, thus
yielding 0.26-0.03 mm s–1 Doppler error, respectively, at X-band for 0.8 AU, large
solar elongation angles and quiet solar wind conditions. The sensitivity in the electron
content from differential Doppler measurements (Eq. 2) at 1 s integration time is
computed to be in the order of 0.02 hexem s–1.
Acuna, M.H., Connerney, J.E.P., Wasilewski, P., Lin, R.P., Anderson, K.A., References
Carlson, C.W., McFadden, J., Curtis, D.W., Mitchell, D., Reme, H., Mazelle, C.,
Sauvaud, J.A., D’Uston, C., Cros, A., Medale, J.L., Bauer, S.J., Cloutier, P.,
Mayhew, M., Winterhalter, D. & Ness, N.F. (1998). Magnetic Field and Plasma
Observations at Mars: Initial Results of the Mars Global Surveyor Mission.
Science 279, 1676-1680.
Anderson, J.D., Colombo, G., Esposito, P.B., Lau, E.L. & Trager, G.B. (1987). The
Mass, Gravity Field, and Ephemeris of Mercury. Icarus 71, 337-349.
Anderson, J.D., Armstrong, J.W., Campbell, J.K., Eastabrook, F.B., Krisher, T.P. &
Lau, E.L. (1992). Gravitation and Celestial Mechanics Investigations with Galileo.
Space Sci. Rev. 60, 591-610.
Anderson, J.D., Lau, E.L., Sjogren, W.L., Schubert, G. & Moore, W.B. (1997).
Europa’s Differentiated Internal Structure: Inferences from Two Galileo
Encounters. Science 176, 1236-1239.
Asmar, S.W. & Renzetti, N.A. (1993). The Deep Space Network as an Instrument for
Radio Science Research. JPL Publication 80-93, Rev. 1.
Barth, C.A., Stewart, A.I.F., Bougher, S.W., Hunten, D.M., Bauer, S.J. & Nagy, A.F
(1992). Aeronomy of the Current Martian Atmosphere. In Mars (Eds. H.H. Kieffer,
B.M. Jakosky, C.W. Snyder, M.S. Matthews), University of Arizona Press, Tucson,
USA, pp1054-1089.
Bird, M.K. (1982). Coronal Investigations with Occulted Spacecraft Signals. Space
Sci. Rev. 33, 99-126.
Bird, M., Asmar, S.W., Brenkle, J.P., Edenhofer, P., Paetzold, M. & Volland, H. (1992).
The Coronal Sounding Experiment. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 92, 425-430.
Bird, M.K., Volland, H., Pätzold, M., Edenhofer, P., Asmar, S.W. & Brenkle, J.P.
159
SP-1240
(1994). The Coronal Electron Density Distribution Determined from Dual-

Frequency Ranging Measurements during the 1991 Solar Conjunction of the
Ulysses Spacecraft. Astrophys. J. 426, 373-381.
Bird, M.K., Allison, M., Asmar, S.W., Atkinson, D.H., Edenhofer, P., Heyl, M.,
Iess, L., Plettemeier, D., Tyler, G.L. & Wohlmuth, R. (1995). The Huygens
Doppler Wind Experiment. In Huygens: Science, Payload and Mission (Ed.
A. Wilson), ESA SP-1177, European Space Agency, pp139-162.
Bird, M.K., Paetzold, M., Edenhofer, P., Asmar, S.W. & McElrath, T.P. (1996).
Coronal Radio Sounding with Ulysses: Solar Wind Electron Density near 0.1 AU
during the 1995 Conjunction. Astron. Astrophys. 316, 437-448.
Edgett, K.S., Butler, B.J., Zimbelman, J.R. & Hamilton, V.E. (1997). Geologic
Context of the Mars Radar ‘Stealth’ Region in Southwestern Tharsis. J. Geophys.
Res. 102, 21545-21567.
Eshleman, V.R., Tyler, G.L., Anderson, J.D., Fjeldbo, G., Levy, G.S., Wood, G.E. &
Croft, T.A. (1977). Radio Science Investigations with Voyager. Space Sci. Rev.
21(2), 207-232.
Eshleman, V.R. (1973). The Radio Occultation Method for the Study of Planetary
Atmospheres. Planet. Space Sci. 21, 1521-1531.
Eshleman, V.R. (1987). The Radar-Glory Theory for Icy Moons with Implications for
Radar Mapping. Adv. Space Res. 7, 133-136.
Fjeldbo, G. (1964). Bistatic Radar Methods for Studying Planetary Ionospheres and
Surfaces. Stanford Electronics Laboratory, Stanford University, SU-SEL-64-025.
Fjeldbo, G. & Eshleman, V.R. (1968). The Atmosphere of Mars Analyzed by Integral
Inversion of the Mariner IV Occultation Data. Planet. Space Sci. 16, 1035-1059.
Gresh, D.L., Marouf, E.A., Tyler, G.L., Rosen, P.A. & Simpson, R.A. (1989).
Voyager Radio Occultation by Uranus’ Rings. Icarus 78, 131-168.
Hagfors, T., Gold, T. & Ierkic, H.M. (1985). Refraction Scattering as Origin of the
Anomalous Radar Returns of Jupiter’s Satellites. Nature 315, 637-640.
Hapke, B. (1990). Coherent Backscattering and the Radar Characteristics of the Outer
Planet Satellites. Icarus 88, 407-417.
Hinson, D.P., Simpson, R.A., Twicken, J.D., Tyler, G.L. & Flasar, F.M. (1999). Initial
Results from Radio Occultation Measurements with Mars Global Surveyor.
J. Geophys. Res. 104 (E11), 29997-27012.
Hinson, D.P., Tyler, G.L., Hollingworth, J.L. & Wilson, R.J. (2001). Radio Occulta-
tion Measurements of Forced Atmospheric Waves on Mars. J. Geophys. Res. 106
(E1), 1463-1480.
Howard, H.T., Eshleman, V.R., Hinson, D.P., Kliore, A.J., Lindal, G.F., Woo, R.,
Bird, M.K., Volland, H., Edenhofer, P., Pätzold, M. & Porsche, H. (1992). Galileo
Radio Science Investigations. Space Sci. Rev. 60, 565-590.
Janle, P. & Erkul, E. (1991). Gravity Studies of the Tharsis Area on Mars. Earth,
Moon & Plan. 53, 217-232.
Janle, P. & Jannsen, D. (1986). Isostatic Gravity and Elastic Bending Models of
Olympus Mons, Mars. Ann. Geophysicae 4, B, 537-546.
Karayel, E.T. & Hinson, D.P. (1997). Sub-Fresnel-scale Vertical Resolution in
Atmospheric Profiles from Radio Occultation. Radio Sci. 32, 411-423.
Karl, J., Pätzold, M. & Bird, M.K. (1997). Coronal Radio Sounding: Non-Gaussian
Turbulence in the Source Regions of the Solar Wind. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 2881-
2884.
Kliore, A.J. (1992). Radio Occultation Observations of the Ionospheres of Mars and
Venus. In Venus and Mars: Atmospheres, Ionospheres, and Solar Wind Interaction
(Eds. J.G. Luhmann, M. Tatrallyay & R.O. Pepin), Geophys. Monograph 66, 265-
276.
Kliore, A.J. & Luhmann, J.G. (1991). Solar Cycle Effects on the Structure of the
Electron Density Profiles in the Dayside Ionosphere of Venus. J. Geophys. Res.
96, 21281-21289.
Kliore, A.K., Cain, D.L., Levy, G.S., Eshleman, V.R., Fjeldbo, G. & Drake, F.D.
160
(1965). Occultation Experiment: Results of the First Direct Measurement of Mars’

Atmosphere and Ionosphere. Science 149, 1243-1248.
Kliore, A.J., Anderson, J.D., Armstrong, J.W., Asmar, S.W., Hamilton, C.L., Rappa-
port, N.J., Walquist, H.D., Ambrosini, R., Bertotti, B., Flasar, F.M., French, R.G.,
Iess, L., Marouf, E.A. & Nagy, A.F. (2002). Cassini Radio Science. Space Sci.
Rev., in Press.
Kolosov, M.A., Yakovlev, O.I., Efimov, A.I., Pavelyev, A.G. & Matyugov, S.S. (1979).
Radio Occultation of the Venusian Atmosphere and Bistatic Radar Location of the
Surface of Venus using the Venera-9 and Venera-10 Satellites. Radio Sci. 14, 163-
173.
Konopliv, A.S. & Sjogren, W.L. (1995). The JPL Mars Gravity Field, Mars50c, Based
upon Viking and Mariner 9 Doppler Tracking Data. JPL Publication 95-5.
Marouf, E.A., Tyler, G.L. & Rosen, P.A. (1986). Profiling Saturn’s Rings by Radio
Occultation. Icarus 68, 120-166.
Muhleman, D.O., Butler, B.J., Grossman, A.W. & Slade, M.A. (1991). Radar Images
of Mars. Science 253, 1508-1513.
Nozette, S., Lichtenberg, C.L., Spudis, P., Bonner, R., Ort, W., Malaret, E., Robin-
son, M. & Shoemaker, E. (1996). The Clementine Bistatic Radar Experiment.
Science 274, 1495-1498.
Nozette, S. (2001). Spudis, P.D., Robinson, M.S., Bussey, D.B.J., Lichtenberg, C. &
Bonner, R. Integration of Lunar Polar Remote-Sensing Data Sets: Evidence for Ice
at the Lunar South Pole. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (E10), 23253-23266.
Pätzold, M., Bird, M.K., Volland, H., Edenhofer, P. & Buschert, H. (1991a).
Dynamics of the Giotto Spacecraft in the Inner Dust Coma of Comet P/Halley;
Part 1: Observations. Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforsch 15, 89-96.
Pätzold, M., Bird, M.K., Volland, H., Edenhofer, P. & Buschert, H. (1991b).
Dynamics of the Giotto Spacecraft in the Inner Dust Coma of Comet P/Halley;
Part 2: Interpretations. Z. Flugwiss. Weltraumforsch 15, 159-164.
Pätzold, M., Bird, M.K. & Edenhofer, P. (1993). The Change of Giotto’s Dynamical
State during the P/Grigg-Skjellerup Flyby Caused by Dust Particle Impacts.
J. Geophys. Res. 98, A12, 20911-20920.
Pätzold, M., Bird, M.K., Edenhofer, P., Asmar, S.W. & McElrath, T.P. (1995). Dual-
frequency Radio Sounding of the Solar Corona during the 1995 Conjunction of the
Ulysses Spacecraft. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 3313-3316.
Pätzold, M., Karl, J. & Bird, M.K. (1996). Coronal Sounding with Ulysses: Phase Scin-
tillation Spectra in Coronal Holes and Streamers. Astron. Astrophys. 316, 449-456.
Pätzold, M., Tsurutani, B.T. & Bird, M.K., (1997). An Estimate of Large-scale Solar
Wind Density and Velocity Profiles in a Coronal Hole and the Coronal Streamer
Belt. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 24151-24160.
Pätzold, M., Neubauer, F.M., Wennmacher, A., Aksnes, K., Anderson, J.D.,
Asmar, S.W., Tinto, M., Tsurutani, B.T., Yeomans, D.K., Barriot, J.-P., Bird, M.K.,
Boehnhardt, H., Gill, E., Montenbruck, O., Grun, E., Hausler, B., Ip, W.H.,
Thomas, N., Marouf, E.A., Rickman, H., Wallis, M.K. & Wickramasinghe, N.C.
(2000). Rosetta Radio Science Investigations (RSI). Research Notes #4, Institut für
Geophysik und Meteorologie, Universität zu Köln.
Pätzold, M., Wennmacher, A., Häusler, B., Eidel, W., Morley, T., Thomas, N. &
Anderson, J.D. (2001). Mass and Density Determinations of 140 Siwa and 4979
Otawara during the Rosetta Flybys. Astron. Astrophys. 370, 1122-1127.
Peters, K.J. (1992). The Coherent Backscatter Effect: a Vector Formulation
Accounting for Polarization and Absorption Effects and Small or Large Scatterers.
Physical Review B 46, 801-812.
Pettengill, G.H., Ford, P.G. & Simpson, R.A. (1996). Electrical Properties of the
Venus Surface from Bistatic Radar Observations. Science 272, 1628-1631.
Pettengill, G.H., Campbell, B.A., Campbell, D.B. & Simpson, R.A. (1997). Surface
Scattering and Dielectric Properties. In Venus II (Eds. S.W. Bougher, D.M. Hunten
& R.J. Phillips), Tucson, University of Arizona Press, USA, p527.
161
SP-1240
Remus, S., Häusler, B., Pätzold, M. & Wennmacher, A. (2001). Ergebnisse der Radio
Science Testmessungen an den ESA Satelliten Rosetta und Mars Express.
Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, 17-20 September 2001, DGLR-2001-022.
Simpson, R.A. & Tyler, G.L. (1981). Viking Bistatic Radar Experiment: Summary of
First-order Results Emphasizing North Polar Data. Icarus 46, 361-389.
Simpson, R.A., Tyler, G.L. & Schaber, G.G. (1984). Viking Bistatic Radar Experi-
ment: Summary of Results in Near-equatorial Regions. J. Geophys. Res. 89,
10385-10404.
Simpson, R.A. (1993). Spacecraft Studies of Planetary Surfaces using Bistatic Radar.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 31, 465-482.
Simpson, R.A. & Tyler, G.L. (1999). Reanalysis of Clementine Bistatic Radar from
the Lunar South Pole. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 3845-3862.
Smith, D.E., Lerch, F.J., Nerem, R.S., Zuber, M.T., Patel, G.B., Fricke, S.K. &
Lemoine, F.G. (1993). An Improved Gravity Model for Mars: Goddard Mars
Model 1. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 20871-20889.
Smith, D.E., Sjogren, W.L., Tyler, G.L., Balmino, G., Lemoine, F.G. & Kono-
pliv, A.S. (1999). The Gravity Field of Mars: Results from Mars Global Surveyor.
Science 286, 94-97.
Standish, E.M. (1993). Planet X – No Dynamical Evidence in the Optical Observa-
tions. Astron. J. 105(5), 2000-2006.
Tyler, G.L. (1968a). Oblique-scattering Radar Reflectivity of the Lunar Surface:
Preliminary Results from Explorer 35. J. Geophys. Res. 73, 7609-7620.
Tyler, G.L. (1968b). Brewster Angle of the Lunar Crust. Nature 219, 1243-1244.
Tyler, G.L. (1987). Radio Propagation Experiments in the Outer Solar System with
Voyager. Proc. IEEE 75, No.10, 1404-1431.
Tyler, G.L. & Howard, H.T. (1973). Dual-frequency Bistatic Radar Investigations of
the Moon with Apollos 14 and 15. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 4852-4874.
Tyler, G.L., Balmino, G., Hinson, D.P., Sjogren, W.L., Smith, D.E., Simpson, R.A.,
Asmar, S.W., Priest, P. & Twicken, J.D. (2001). Radio Science Observations with
Mars Global Surveyor: Orbit Insertion through one Mars year in Mapping Orbit. J.
Geophys. Res. 106, E10, 23327-23348.
Tyler, G.L., Balmino, G., Hinson, D.P., Sjogren, W.L., Smith, D.E., Woo, R.,
Asmar, S.W., Conally, M.J., Hamilton, C.L. & Simpson, R.A. (1992). Radio
Science Investigations with Mars Observer. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 7759-7779.
Tyler, G.L., Brenkle, J.P., Komarek, T.A. & Zygielbaum, A.I. (1977). The Viking
Solar Corona Experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 82, 4335-4340.
Tyler, G.L., Eshleman, V.R., Fjeldbo, G., Howard, H.T. & Peterson, A.M. (1967).
Bistatic-radar Detection of Lunar Scattering Centers with Lunar Orbiter I. Science
157, No. 3785, 193-195.
Tyler, G.L., Eshleman, V.R., Hinson, D.P., Marouf, E.A., Simpson, R.A., Sweetnam,
D.N., Anderson, J.D., Campbell, J.K., Levy, G.S. & Lindal, G.F. (1989). Voyager
Radio Science Observations of Neptune and Triton. Science 246, 1466-1473.
Tyler, G.L., Ford, P.G., Campbell, D.B., Elachi, C., Pettengill, G.H. & Simpson, R.A.
(1991). Magellan – Electrical and Physical Properties of Venus’ Surface. Science
252, 265-270.
Wohlmuth, R., Plettemeier, D., Edenhofer, P., Bird, M.K., Pätzold, M. & Asmar, S.W.
(1997). Measurement of the Propagation Speed of Plasma Inhomogeneities in the
Solar Corona using an Uplink/Downlink Cross-correlation Method. Radio Sci. 32,
617-628.
Yakovlev, O.I. & Efimov, A.I. (1966). Studies of Reflection of Meter-length Radio
Waves. Dokladi Akademii Nauk SSSR 174, 583-584.
Yeomans, D.K., Antreasian, P.G., Barriot, J.-P., Chesley, S.R., Dunham, D.W.,
Farquhar, R.W., Giorgini, J.D., Helfrich, C.E., Konopliv, A.S., McAdams, J.V.,
Miller, J.K., Owen, W.M., Scheeres, D.J., Thomas, P.C., Veverka, J. &
Williams, B.G. (2000). Radio Science Results during the NEAR-Shoemaker
Spacecraft Rendezvous with Eros. Science 289, 2085-2088.
162
Yeomans, D.K., Barriot, J.-P., Dunham, D.W., Farquhar, R.W., Giorgini, J.D.,
Helfrich, C.E., Konopliv, A.S., McAdams, J.V., Miller, J.K., Owen, W., Jr.,
Scheeres, D.J., Synnott, S.P. & Williams, B.G. (1997). Estimating the Mass of
Asteroid 253 Mathilde from Tracking Data during the NEAR Flyby. Science 278,
2106-2109.
Yuan, D.-N., Sjogren, W.L., Konopliv, A.S. & Kucinskas, A.B. (2001). Gravity Field
of Mars: A 75th Degree and Order Model. J. Geophys. Res. 106, E10, 23377-
23402.
Acknowledgements
The Mars Express Orbiter Radio Science (MaRS) experiment is funded by the
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Bonn, Germany, and the
National Aeronautics and Space Adminstration (NASA), Washington DC, USA.
163
Beagle.qxd 7/7/04 3:07 PM Page 165
Beagle 2: the Exobiological Lander of Mars Express
D. Pullan1,4, M.R. Sims1,4, I.P. Wright2,4, C.T. Pillinger2,4 & R. Trautner3,4

1
Space Research Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
Email: dpu@star.le.ac.uk
2
Planetary and Space Sciences Research Institute, Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, UK
3
Research & Scientific Support Department, European Space Agency, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands
4
on behalf of the Beagle 2 project
In late 2003, the Beagle 2 lander component of the Mars Express mission is
planned to touch down in the Isidis Planitia region of Mars (265.0°W, 11.6°N).
Once safely deployed on the surface, Beagle 2 will conduct an intensive and
exhaustive programme of surface operations for about 180 sols (equivalent to
about 6 months on Earth). The principal objective is the detection of extinct
and/or extant life, or at least to establish if the conditions at the landing site were
ever suitable for life to have evolved in the planet’s history. To achieve this goal,
a systematic set of experiments using a complementary suite of instruments will
perform in situ geochemical, mineralogical and petrological analysis of selected
rocks and soils. Studies of the martian environment will also be conducted via
chemical analysis of the atmosphere, local geomorphological assessment of the
landing site and measurement/monitoring of dynamic environmental processes,
including transient events such as ‘dust devils’. Further studies, unique to
Beagle 2, include analysis of the subsurface regime using a ground penetration
tool and the first attempt at in situ isotopic dating of rocks on another planet.
The complete experiment package weighs less than 9 kg and requires less than
40 W of power. With a probe mass limit of 69 kg, imposed by mission constraints,
and a landed mass of 33 kg, Beagle 2 thus aims to fly the highest mass ratio of
payload-to-support systems of any mission to Mars. This is achievable only by
adopting an integrated design approach and employing minimal or zero
redundancy.
Beagle 2 is named to honour the ship used in the epic voyage of Charles Darwin and 1. Introduction
Robert FitzRoy during 1831-1836, which led to publication of Darwin’s On the
Origin of Species. Nearly a century and a half after the publication of the first edition
of this volume, Beagle 2 aims to discover whether the theory of evolution extends to
a second planet in the Solar System. Darwin’s more famous biological works means
that the contributions made by him to geology (and those of FitzRoy to meteorology)
are often forgotten. Beagle 2, like its predecessor, addresses a wide range of subjects:
the life question, of course, but also the geochemical and mineralogical
characterisation of the immediate landing site and the chemistry of the atmosphere.
To fulfil these goals, Beagle 2 has the following remit:
— geological investigation of the local terrain and rocks, especially their light-
element chemistry, composition, mineralogy, petrology and age;
— investigation of the oxidation state of the martian surface within rocks, soils and
at protected locations beneath boulders;
— full characterisation of the atmospheric composition to establish the history of the
165
SP-1240
planet and the processes involved in seasonal climatic changes and diurnal
cycling;
— search for key criteria deemed to demonstrate that life processes could have
operated in the past;
— determination of trace atmospheric gases, indicative of extant life at some
location.
The above list, in many respects, exceeds what has been achieved by previous
missions. It goes far beyond the goals stated for other Mars landers under
consideration and transcends the Science Definition Team’s ambitions for Mars
Express itself. Rock dating, atmospheric characterisation, climatic change monitoring
and the search for possible biologically-derived trace constituents are all among the
most important aspects of the study of Mars, and are envisaged as firsts that could be
achieved by Beagle 2. Presumably none of these was thought to be possible or within
the scope of small landers, as envisaged at the conception of the Mars Express
project.
In its original form, Beagle 2 was conceived as a ‘large’ (108 kg) lander that
carried additional instruments to enable it to act as the third node in a geophysical
network. Following the imposition of more stringent mass constraints (60 kg only
available for a landing craft), a network of several stations was no longer feasible. As
a result, the additional elements of the Beagle 2 payload became redundant and were
therefore deleted. Likewise, the earlier version of Beagle 2 had provision for a small
rover to transport sampling devices some distance from the lander, but the discovery
that the subsurface sampler (the ‘Mole’) had inherent lateral mobility also allowed
that element to be discarded. It is encouraging to note that, throughout the challenging
period from proposal to delivery, the scientific goals (reflected in the payload)
remained intact. This has been achievable only through the skill and dedication of the
Beagle 2 team of engineers and scientists.
1.1 Background
In 1976, two Viking spacecraft landed on Mars with the prime objective of searching
for evidence of life on a second planet in the Solar System. Results from a package
of biological activity experiments and a pyrolysis gas chromatograph-mass
spectrometer (GC-MS) were interpreted, by majority verdict rather than unanimous
consent, as negative. The one positive result that suggested operation of a martian
metabolism was subsequently interpreted as a chemical artefact. The intervention of
an oxidative surface chemistry on the planet rather conveniently explained the
inability of the GC-MS to observe any organic matter above the detection levels, in
spite of some theories that predict the presence of meteorite debris, and hence carbon
compounds, even in a sterile environment.
Although the findings were disappointing, Viking provided the first close-up
images of the martian surface, major element chemical analyses of soil samples and
meteorological information, a feat duplicated at considerably less cost and with
simpler technology 20 years later by Pathfinder. An unexpected bonus of Viking was
that an exploratory compositional and isotopic study of the atmosphere enabled a link
to be made with a previously poorly understood group of meteorites: the Shergotty,
Nakhla and Chassigny association or SNCs (Bogard & Johnson, 1983; Becker &
Pepin, 1984; Carr et al., 1985). The number of SNC-class finds has now grown to
more than 20 specimens; their genetic relationship has been confirmed by
exceedingly precise oxygen isotopic measurements: δ17O, δ18O, where δ17O =
[(17O/16Osample /17O/16Ostandard) – 1] x 1000, per mil, or ‰; and so on for other δ values.
In detail on a plot of δ17O versus δ18O, the so-called ‘cap-’, ‘cap-delta-’, or ‘big-delta-’
17
O value (∆17O = δ17O – 0.52 x δ18O) for martian meteorites is 0.321±0.013‰
(Franchi et al., 1999). The presence in some of the meteorites of six atmospheric
species having the same abundance ratios and isotopic systematics (e.g. high δ15N) as
values measured in the martian atmosphere, points indubitably to Mars as a
166
provenance (Pepin, 1985). The young geological age (1.3 Ga to 180 Ma) of all but
one (4.5 Ga) of the SNC meteorites (Wood & Ashwal, 1981; McSween, 1985; 1994)
provides circumstantial evidence of their being from a body sufficiently large
(planetary-sized) to show recent volcanic activity. Although some scepticism remains,
there is almost universal belief that SNCs are martian. Data from SNC research, in
conjunction with Viking and Pathfinder results, guided the scientific goals of
Beagle 2, which are harmonised rather than being a series of uncoordinated efforts
from a group of disparate investigators.
Although all the SNC samples are igneous in origin, Nakhla, EET A79001 and
ALH 84001 show good evidence of low-temperature hydrothermal alteration,
producing carbonate and other mineral deposits (Carr et al., 1985; Gooding et al.,
1988; Wright et al., 1988; Mittlefehldt, 1994). These discoveries have proved highly
beneficial to the study of the martian environment and to understanding the
chronological sequence of events. For 75 years, however, petrologists failed to
recognise the presence of carbonate in these igneous meteorites. In 1985 geochemical
analyses (Carr et al., 1985) uncovered the existence of carbonates, a vital facet of
martian meteorite research. Eventually, Gooding et al. (1991) demonstrated
unequivocally the presence of inclusions microscopically. For a while it was argued
that carbonate in martian meteorites must be a terrestrial artefact, but δ13C
measurements strongly suggest otherwise (Carr et al., 1985; Wright et al., 1988).
Interpretations based on the 14C content of carbonates in EET A79001, that such
minerals were terrestrial (Jull et al., 1992), may be erroneous owing to experimental
problems (Wright et al., 1997a).
Notwithstanding the above, carbonates in ALH 84001 are isotopically distinct
from all similar species on Earth, and have δ13C values consistent with those expected
for the martian atmosphere. Debates concerning their origin have now switched to the
interpretation of models used for calculating carbonate formation conditions (Wright
et al., 1992). Techniques that rely on major-element abundance, measured by electron
microprobe in selected areas, invoke a high-temperature (600°C) formation event
(Harvey & McSween, 1996). Bulk oxygen isotope and, to some extent, carbon studies
of carbonates by chemical dissolution require a scenario involving liquid water and
temperatures in the range 0-80°C (Romanek et al., 1994). Other studies, at high
spatial resolution, indicate a mixture of origins at a variety of temperatures, for
different generations of carbonate, none of which exceeds 250°C (Valley et al., 1997;
Leshin et al., 1998; Saxton et al., 1998).
The origin of the carbonates in SNC meteorites is of vital importance because they
are accompanied by organic matter (Wright et al., 1989). Also identified within the
mineral, at least in some samples, are features that are interpreted to be nm-sized
fossils (McKay et al., 1996). Thus it has been suggested that biological processes have
been acting on Mars. A view that all the organics are a result of contaminants derived
from percolating Antarctic melt waters (McDonald & Bada, 1995; Bada et al., 1998)
can be refuted on a number of grounds. For example, oxygen isotope and D/H results
(Wright et al., 1997b) would have been disturbed by inundation; as these remain
recognisably different from Earth values, they must be very little affected by
terrestrial water exchange. Although each of the martian meteorites contains some
Earth-generated contamination, specimens where the organic matter is in excess of
1000 ppm, e.g. EET A79001 (Wright et al., 1989), are considered to host some pre-
terrestrial martian carbonaceous material.
Whether the existence of nanofossils or indigenous organic matter in martian
meteorites is genuine or not, the inescapable fact remains that conditions conducive
to life prevailed on Mars in the past. Furthermore, in the years since Viking,
investigations into the viability of terrestrial organisms have demonstrated their
adaptability and tenacity. It has been shown that they can thrive and multiply in acid,
alkaline and highly saline conditions, apparently unaffected by pressure, capable of
living at temperatures ranging from –12°C to 113°C, with the simplest and most
ancient forms being the most tolerant (ESA Exobiology Team, 1999). How long
167
SP-1240
organisms may lie dormant and survive at even greater extremes, particularly at the
low-temperature end of the scale, is unknown. Microorganisms have been shown to
inhabit Antarctic dry valleys, the nearest equivalent on Earth to martian conditions. It
follows that the decision to conclude that Mars is totally hostile to life, on the basis
of the very preliminary results from Viking, was premature.
According to theories proposed after Viking, a problem that must be considered
with respect to carbonaceous matter is its survival on the surface. The planet’s regolith
is highly oxidised, a property believed to arise from hydrogen peroxide in the
atmosphere. Models exist relating to this question (Bullock et al., 1994; Stoker &
Bullock, 1997; Zent & McKay, 1994). One suggests penetration of the oxidant to less
than a few metres in soil, the other assumes a vast turnover so that all material down
to 150 m is oxidised. The martian rocks examined by the Alpha Proton X-ray
Spectrometer (APXS) on Pathfinder’s Sojourner rover showed evidence for a
weathering rind (Rieder et al., 1997) but the depth of this layer was not ascertained,
and the oxidation state was not recorded. One way to address this issue would be
through an in situ investigation that determines the concentrations of certain
components (especially oxidation-sensitive organic compounds) with depth in the
regolith.
Unfortunately, SNC meteorites, being of deep-seated mafic origin, are not able to
elucidate directly the problem of oxidation within the regolith. However, we note here
that martian soils are sulphur-rich, possibly due to volcanic exhalations, and that SNC
meteorites contain sulphides and sulphates (Burgess et al., 1989) and even nitrates
(Grady et al., 1995). Furthermore, from geochemical data it appears that SNCs and
the Viking and Pathfinder soils are related, possibly two-component mixing, with one
end-member being SNC-like and the other being andesitic.
It should be borne in mind that all the rocks investigated by Pathfinder were
igneous and of the same petrological type, with the exception of one ‘rock’ that was
possibly a soil clod. This was disappointing because it was thought that the Pathfinder
landing site (a washout area) would be a good place to find rocks of sedimentary
origin. Perhaps Pathfinder was unlucky; future missions should continue to search for
rock types from sedimentary formations. Note that the Pathfinder APXS attempted to
measure carbon abundance, and hence recognise carbonates (widely thought to be
present at, or near, the martian surface) but none was found. The problem with this
approach is that atmospheric CO2 intervenes between the uneven rock surfaces and
the detector, resulting in a major background signal. Furthermore, although some
close-up images of rocks were taken by the camera on Sojourner (Smith et al., 1997),
these were obscured by dust, which also affected the APXS data. As yet, no
microscopic imaging studies have ever been made on Mars.
Although regions on the martian surface have been assigned relative ages derived
from crater counts, the only absolute dates available for martian rocks come from
SNC meteorites, and, of course, their exact provenance on Mars is unknown. In this
respect, it should be noted that the APXS made measurements that revealed the
average potassium content of the ‘soil-free rock’ to be 0.7±0.1%; the age of such a
rock could have been estimated from a knowledge of the 40Ar content had the noble
gas abundance been measured.
While the abundance and isotopic compositions of martian atmospheric
constituents have been used to such good effect in identifying martian meteorites,
these values, particularly the isotopic ratios, are not well constrained. The data quoted
for 14N/15N (165, δ15N = +650‰) and 12C/13C (88, δ13C = +11‰) were for a limited
number of measurements, which were made using an instrument that was never
envisaged as a dedicated isotope mass spectrometer or, indeed, calibrated in this
respect. In consequence, there is a ±50‰ to ±100‰ (i.e. ±5% to ±10%) error attached
to the figures. Neither the ill-fated Mars Polar Lander (including the Deep Space 2
microprobes) nor the Mars Surveyor mission carried a mass spectrometer that could
have provided more precise data. A totally independent assessment of the full isotopic
composition of carbon dioxide on Mars, both its carbon and oxygen, is still required
168
employing instrumentation designed for that purpose. The same applies to the crucial
measurements of δ15N and δ∆.
The noble gas isotope ratios of martian atmospheric constituents are even less well
defined than those for carbon and nitrogen. A key value for argon, the third most
abundant constituent in the atmosphere of Mars, is 4 ≤ 36Ar/38Ar ≤ 7, described by
some authors as matching the terrestrial value, which happens to be 5.3, conveniently
around the mean of the Viking measurements. Quite unaccountably, SNC meteorites
have a 36Ar/38Ar of 4.1±0.2 (Wiens et al., 1986), a value distinct from all other
meteorites and hence a possible diagnostic indicator of a martian provenance. Other
intriguing noble gas results from Viking and the meteorite clan concern 40Ar/36Ar
(3000±500, c.f. Earth 296) and 129Xe/132Xe (2.5±2, c.f. Earth 0.97). Both ratios imply
a much greater abundance of radiogenic elements (40K and 129I, respectively) in the
martian surface than Earth, or that an early martian atmosphere was lost and
replenished from crustal outgassing.
Water is another intriguing trace constituent (volume mixing ratio 3.0 x 10–4 mol.)
in the martian atmosphere. No D/H ratios were measured by Viking, but some have
been afforded by astronomical observations at infrared wavelengths from ground and
airborne telescopes, and the ratio is believed to be about 5.0±0.2 times the terrestrial
value of 1.6 x 10–4. The quoted error, if applied to the Earth, would suggest all
terrestrial D/H ratios were the same, which is not true; D/H on Earth varies in a
predictable way and reveals much about the hydrological cycle. Measurement of the
equivalent parameter on Mars has the potential to provide information on equivalent
planet-wide phenomena, including seasonal climatic effects, and addresses the issue
of Mars’ warmer and wetter past.
Looking in greater detail at the effects of fluids on Mars, the oxygen isotopic
composition of water released from the hydrated silicates of martian meteorites
(Karlsson et al., 1992; Baker et al., 1998) do not fall on the Mars line defined by high-
temperature minerals. The results predict that water in the martian atmosphere is not
in equilibrium with the surface of the planet and has been, or is being, isotopically
affected by photolytic or exospheric loss processes. Clearly this needs to be studied
further by future space missions.
Quite apart from the major and minor constituents of the martian atmosphere (CO2,
N2, Ar, O2, CO, H2O, Ne, Kr and Xe in abundance order) there are also likely to be
important trace constituents. So far, only upper limits can be placed on these (Owen,
1992; Owen et al., 1997). It is vital that the minor and trace species on Mars are
measured. The abundance and, where possible, isotopic information for trace
atmosphere gases could be the best possible indicators of contemporary biological
activity on the planet. The equilibrium composition of Earth’s atmosphere, for
example, is dictated by the delicate balance of biological production on the ground
and chemical destruction above it. Sampling Earth’s atmosphere anywhere on the
planet will lead to the detection of species that could not be there but for biology. The
same would probably be true for Mars if life exists; even a remote subterranean
lifeform might be recognised from the identification of a gaseous by-product of its
metabolism, i.e. a species out of chemical equilibrium. The best chance in this respect
would appear to be methane: it is produced on Earth by a great variety of primitive
organisms, is chemically short-lived, being destroyed by photolytic oxidation but
stable to gas-solid degradation reactions, and detectable at high sensitivities. Since
biological processes tend to impart large isotopic fractionations during methane
production from its precursors, this parameter may be useful in the preliminary hunt
for extant life on Mars.
1.2 The Beagle 2 investigation

The main focus of the Beagle 2 scientific payload is to establish whether there is
convincing evidence for past life on Mars or to assess if the conditions were ever
suitable. Beagle 2 also plans a globally responsive test to see if there is any present-
day biological activity on Mars.
169
SP-1240
Fig. 1. A fully deployed model of the Beagle 2

lander showing the arrangement of solar
arrays (four petals plus the lid). The base unit
(diameter ~66 cm) accommodates GAP and the
lander systems, including batteries and
transceiver. The PAW is shown deployed and
making contact with a sample under
investigation. All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
In 1996/97, ESA’s Directorate of Manned Spaceflight and Microgravity

commissioned a study into the search for life in the Solar System. The final report
(ESA Exobiology Team, 1999) concluded that, despite Viking results, Mars
represented the best immediate opportunity for searching for life beyond the Earth.
The presence, or recognition, of any, or all, of the following were considered to be
important indicators of biology:
— water;
— appropriate inorganic minerals (e.g. carbonates);
— carbonaceous debris;
— organic matter of complex structure;
— chirality;
— isotopic fractionation between reservoirs (e.g. organics and carbonate).
170
No other Mars mission yet plans such a comprehensive and complete Table 1. Beagle 2 mass budget (kg).
investigation. Furthermore, martian sample-return missions, once the preserve of
Scientific Payload
NASA, but increasingly seen as likely to be driven by a European-led effort, are
GAP and local electronics 5.74
unlikely to yield results before 2015. However, none of the above tests provides an PAW 2.75
unambiguous answer alone. It is therefore the key objective of Beagle 2 to perform a BEEST 0.250
programme of experiments using compatible and synergistic instrumentation capable ESS 0.156
of addressing five of the above six indicators. Subtotal 8.896
At the centre of the Beagle 2 scientific payload is a miniaturised chemical laboratory,
the Gas Analysis Package (GAP), designed to make quantitative and stable isotopic Lander Engineering
Structure (base and lid) 11.972
measurements of gases such as H2, N2, O2 and CO2. GAP includes a 6 cm-radius
including main hinge, etc
magnetic sector mass spectrometer, which can be operated in either static or dynamic Solar panels including hinges 3.21
modes, and the supporting equipment to analyse atmospheric, rock and soil samples ARM 2.11
from the surface of Mars. The system can process and determine some of the noble Transceiver 0.65
gases (Ne, Ar and Xe; including some isotopic measurements) as well as anticipated Battery 2.63
trace constituents such as CH4. The search for chirality was omitted from the Beagle 2 Electronics and memory 3.02
programme on the grounds that the most interesting molecules require the complex step Miscellaneous (cabling, 0.692
bracketry, MLI etc)
of derivatisation; it would seem prudent to confirm their existence before including the
Subtotal 24.284
necessary processing steps that would complicate the instrumentation.
To assist in the primary mission objective and provide essential context, the Lander total (landed mass) 33.18
Beagle 2 payload incorporates a set of deployable in situ instrumentation. The
payload therefore incorporates an arrangement of imaging devices, field Probe Engineering
spectrometers, sampling tools and environmental sensors in order to characterise fully Structure (heatshield 17.81
the landing site in terms of geology and environment. By definition, this array of and back cover)
Parachutes 3.26
diverse yet complementary instrumentation provides a degree of scientific
Airbags and gas generator 14.59
redundancy to a mission with minimal or zero engineering redundancy. Furthermore, Subtotal 35.66
even if the main exobiological objective of the mission proves inconclusive or the
negative results of Viking are confirmed, a wealth of novel science will be conducted Probe total 68.84
with the Beagle 2 payload.
The individual experiments on Beagle 2 are described in detail in later sections;
here, the payload is considered in a general sense. The lander configuration is shown
in Fig. 1; its mass breakdown is given in Table 1. Together, the GAP and the lander
service systems (electronics, batteries, transceiver etc) occupy two-thirds of the
lander base. The in situ instruments and sampling tools are located on the Position
Adjustable Workbench (PAW), effectively the ‘hand’ at the end of a robotic
manipulator that unstows when the lander is unfolded on the surface. During transit
to Mars, these items occupy the remaining recessed third of the lander base. Finally,
the majority of environmental sensors are strategically located about the lander.
Other novel elements of the in situ payload include a ‘torch’: a cluster of LEDs for
white-light illumination of surface materials to determine the true colour of the
martian surface; and a ‘spoon’: a simple soil acquisition-device to act as a backup for
the Mole.
As with any lander-based mission, the camera system on Beagle 2 plays a crucial
role in both the engineering and the science. Shortly after the lander is deployed on
the surface, a panoramic view of the site will be provided by one of the cameras with
the aid of the Wide Angle Mirror (WAM), a device attached to the PAW. This will
allow the mission planners to unstow the PAW safely subsequently and avoid any
obstacles that may be present. The complete scientific investigation of the landing site
with the stereo cameras using the spectral filters will be accumulated systematically
over the primary mission period because of the data volumes involved,
communications constraints and other experiment requirements. However, an early
priority for the cameras is to image the area within reach of the PAW and allow a
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) of the surface to be constructed. Such a model is vital
for planning the in situ analysis and sampling activities of candidate rocks and soils.
In addition to assessing their morphologies and spatial distribution, rocks within reach
of the PAW and the sampling Mole will be imaged through various filters to
determine their composition remotely. A set of candidate sites for detailed
171
SP-1240
investigation will be selected based on the remote-sensing data and engineering

parameters. The cameras also play an important role in understanding the absorption
properties of the atmosphere, in particular with respect to dust and water vapour.
Close-up imaging of rocks and soils will be done initially using one of the stereo
cameras, configured to emulate a hand-lens by selecting the appropriate ‘secondary
optic’ filter. Observations at higher magnification are achieved by the self-
illuminating microscope, which requires contact to be made with the surface to
establish a fixed stand-off distance. Both activities will provide important data on the
texture of the rock/soil and nature of the particulates on the surface of the sample
under investigation. Any remnant microstructures, if present (and visible) and not
destroyed by erosion or the sample preparation process, should be resolvable. The
microscope will also provide spectral information on individual grains and identify
any fluorescing minerals or materials.
The in situ spectrometers will analyse specified areas of each candidate rock or soil
patch, previously imaged with the cameras, to determine elemental chemistry and
iron mineralogy. A range of major and trace element abundances will be determined
by the X-ray spectrometer (XRS) and the iron-bearing minerals in the sample will be
identified by the Mössbauer spectrometer. Because the penetration depths of the
analysing fluxes for both these techniques are low, the true chemical and
mineralogical nature of the fresh material can be determined only by removing any
weathering/alteration rind and adhering soil/dust veneers. Mechanical sample
preparation is therefore necessary by the PAW Rock Corer Grinder tool. The other
function of this tool is to acquire solid samples from rocks in the form of chippings
for analysis by GAP.
There is much synergy between experiments in the payload. For example, GAP in
conjunction with XRS will be the first to attempt to date rocks on the surface of
another planet by radiometric means. To perform a crude radiometric age estimate
requires a precise measurement of potassium content in a sample made by XRS and
a precise measurement of argon made by GAP from the same sample. GAP will also
attempt to derive an exposure age of the surface material by analysing neon isotopic
compositions (20Ne, 21Ne, 22Ne).
In the search for organics, the philosophy adopted by Beagle 2 is that unoxidised
soil material is most likely to be either at depth, below the superoxidised horizon, or
alternatively located under relatively large (~1 m) boulders, which may have lain
undisturbed for aeons. The strategy for retrieving such specimens uses the Mole, the
primary soil sampling tool deployed from the PAW. The device has the ability to
propagate itself directly into the soil to depths up to 1.5 m or crawl across the surface
and be deverted under boulders to acquire material from these protected regimes.
Elemental chemical analysis performed by GAP (light elements) and XRS (major and
trace elements), together with Mössbauer analysis, of such material will provide a
route to testing the oxidation hypothesis and developing meaningful models of
martian surface environmental conditions.
The quantity of organic matter in acquired samples, if present at all, could be small
or highly cross-linked, approximating to elemental carbon (as in some of Earth’s most
ancient rocks) because of chemical processing. The search for organics will,
therefore, be conducted by stepped combustion, a technique that distinguishes carbon
species by the temperature at which they burn or degrade in oxygen. Similar
experiments have been performed on Earth using many hundreds of meteorite
samples and terrestrial rocks, all of which show some trace of organic matter either
indigenous to the specimen or from terrestrial biogenic sources. This sort of
contamination, which causes difficulties for some research on Earth, could be
invaluable on Mars. The stepped combustion method when applied to martian soils
and rocks will confirm whether there are any indigenous forms of carbon with the
appropriate combustion temperatures for them to be organic. Combustion, of course,
converts all carbon entities into CO2, each with 100% efficiency, unlike pyrolysis
which represents only a partial conversion of some components.
172
The stepped combustion technique that converts organic carbon to CO2 also allows
the measurement of the isotopic composition. Indigenous organic matter on Mars
might have a diagnostic δ13C; indeed, the δ13C values of organic matter in martian
meteorites hint that it might be slightly different from that on Earth, but all
experiments are confused by terrestrial contamination. If bulk organic matter and
carbonates are found adjacent in rocks on Mars, then measurement of the isotopic
difference between them will be essential. On Earth, at least, a 30‰ fractionation
between inorganic and organic carbon is the most general signature of biosynthesis
and has been observed in 10 000 examples all the way back in history, from present
day until 3.8 Ga (Schidlowski, 1997); only biology is able to impose such an effect.
Such is the ubiquity of terrestrial biology that there is no such thing on Earth as a rock
without organic material. Even rocks carefully collected on the Moon, protected and
preserved on Earth, show that Earth’s biological activity is impossible to exclude.
Rocks collected and returned to Earth from Mars would almost certainly be
susceptible to such effects. Therefore it is imperative that stepped combustion, with
attendant isotopic measurements, be performed in situ on Mars to establish a true
positive or negative for the presence of organic matter. Fig. 2. Location of key elements of the Beagle 2
Unlike organic matter, carbonates should be totally immune from degradation by lander. Thermal insulating foam is removed for
clarity. The GAP (yellow) and lander support
oxidants. Given that soils are the weathering products of rocks, thoroughly mixed by
systems (pink) occupy complete 120° sectors of
aeolian processes, then fine particles represent the best route to locating martian the base. The PAW (dark blue) houses all the
carbonates and measuring their geochemical parameters, e.g. isotopic compositions. in situ instrumentation and is manoeuvred by
GAP is able to measure the abundance of carbonate in soil and rocks at levels well the ARM (green). Some instruments on the
beyond the capability of spectrometric methods. PAW have associated electronics housed in the
lander base (light blue). A few environmental
Since the separation schemes needed for studying the constituents of rocks are the
sensors are also visible (purple).
same as those needed for the characterisation of the martian atmosphere, the gas All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
analysis package on Beagle 2 is admirably suited for direct analysis of the major
martian atmosphere component CO2 and for minor constituents, particularly CO,
H2O, N2, the noble gases and minute amounts of hydrocarbons. Beagle 2 could thus
be expected to provide a detailed and comprehensive study of the constitution of the
atmosphere with precise isotopic data for major, minor and trace components. It
would follow some constituents during diurnal cycling and as a function of the
mission duration to investigate daily and longer-term climatic processes on Mars.
In respect of methods for separating trace components, procedures to extract and
purify methane, originally developed to provide isotopic information about the
sources of this harmful greenhouse component in Earth’s atmosphere, are included as
part of GAP. A confident detection of methane on Mars, a species that would be out
of chemical equilibrium, would have enormous repercussions for deciding if there is
still an active biology on the planet.
The payload (Fig. 2) on Beagle 2 can be divided into three categories: 2. The Beagle 2 Scientific
Payload
— the Gas Analysis Package occupies about 33% of the lander base section and
requires samples, including atmospheric gases, to be delivered via an inlet
system. GAP is the primary science experiment on Beagle 2; its lead institute is
the Open University;
— a collection of in situ investigation instruments and tools located on the PAW, an
integrated structure attached to the end of the Anthropomorphic Robotic
Manipulator (ARM). The tools are used to prepare the surfaces of samples for
study by the in situ instruments and to extract cores from these samples for
analysis by GAP. The Mole ground penetration tool is deployed from the PAW.
The lead institute for the PAW is the University of Leicester; individual
instruments are supplied by various institutions (see later);
— a suite of sensors for dynamically monitoring the martian environment. These are
located both on the PAW and about the lander. The lead institute for the
environmental sensors is the Open University.
173
SP-1240
2.1 Gas Analysis Package

GAP (Fig. 3) has three modes of operation: quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis
and precise isotopic measurement. Instrument modes will be decided according to the
type of investigation required. There will be three main types of study:
— search for organic matter;

— stepped combustion for total light element content and speciation;
— atmospheric analysis.
In all cases of isotope ratio measurements, the principles of GAP are derived from
MODULUS (Methods of Determining and Understanding Light elements from
Unequivocal Stable isotopic compositions), a concept developed for the Rosetta
mission (Wright & Pillinger, 1998a) and expanded to include Mars (Wright &
Pillinger, 1998b). Specific chemical reactions appropriate to martian species, e.g.
CO2, CO, H2O have been worked out to afford full C, O and H isotopic
characterisation without the necessity of having to resolve isobaric interferences. This
philosophy incorporates real-time calibration of the instrument using a variety of
reference gases, e.g. a reference CO2 used during 13C/12C measurements, etc. In
consequence, stable isotope ratio measurements will be quoted to high precision
relative to internationally accepted standards.
GAP is fed either by direct atmospheric sampling, or via one of 12 ovens mounted
on a carousel. Material acquired by the sampling tools, in the form of soil or rock
chippings, is deposited via an inlet system into one of the ovens, which is then rotated
to a tapping station to connect the oven to GAP. The ovens withstand temperatures up
to 1000°C, although in practice 700°C will be adequate for most analyses. Only the
sample container will be heated. This consists of a platinum liner heated by a Pt-Rh
filament directly wound on to the container. Electrical insulation between the liner
and the filament is secured by a thin layer of aluminium oxide deposited on the outer
surface. Thermal losses in the oven are reduced by means of an internal radiation
shield, and conductive heat losses are cut down by using ceramic support structures
with low heat conductivity.
GAP is designed to make quantitative and stable isotopic measurements of gases
such as H2, N2, O2 and CO2. The system can also process and determine some of the
noble gases (Ne, Ar and Xe) as well as anticipated trace constituents such as CH4. It
operates in one of two ways, either analysing gases directly (such as those present in
the atmosphere, or which can be liberated from samples by heating), or producing
appropriate analyte gases (e.g. CO2) by chemical processing (e.g. conversion of
organic compounds to CO2 by oxidation). In this way, GAP is tremendously flexible,
being able to investigate processes of atmospheric evolution, circulation and cycling,
the nature of gases trapped in rocks and soils, low-temperature geochemistry, fluid
processes, organic chemistry, formation temperatures, surface exposure ages, assist in
isotopic rock dating, etc.
At the heart of the GAP system is a 6 cm-radius magnetic sector mass
spectrometer, which operates in both dynamic and static modes, i.e. continuously
pumped and isolated, respectively. The mass spectrometer includes six ion beam
detectors. The main unit is a triple-collector array for the determination of N2 (m/z 28,
29, 30), O2 (m/z 32, 33, 34), and CO2 (m/z 44, 45, 46). A spur in the flight tube of the
instrument includes a double-collector for measurement of D/H ratios (H2+ and HD+ at
m/z 2 and 3, respectively). A further detector mounted on the high-mass side of the
triple-collector comprises a pulse-counting electron multiplier for measurements of
trace gases. When operated dynamically, the mass spectrometer should be able to
measure stable isotope ratios to high degrees of precision and accuracy (±0.1‰ when
expressed as a δ-value). In contrast, static operation will allow high levels of
sensitivity albeit with some reduction in precision of the isotopic measurements.
As an illustration of instrument performance, note that when Viking test equipment
analysed two different Antarctic soils, each containing 300 ppm carbon, they were
174
Fig. 3. The Gas Analysis Package, the primary

experiment that occupies a complete 120°
sector of the lander base. All the key
components are annotated. Below left: the
Flight Model GAP in transportation case
before final sterilisation. Below right: the
Sample Handing and Distribution System
(SHADS), showing the carousel of ovens (lower
part of assembly) and tapping station (to rear).
All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
determined to have about 5 ppm and 0.01 ppm C as organic carbon. This probably
reflects the low yield of pyrolytic reactions from highly cross-linked carbonaceous
materials. Had materials of equivalent character been analysed on Mars by Viking, the
latter of these would not have yielded any carbon above background, even though a
significant fraction of the 300 ppm total carbon may have been non-pyrolytically
degradable organic matter. Laboratory analyses of carbon in SNC meteorites by a
system similar to GAP is regularly used to measure carbon contents of 250 ppm, or
less, from a few milligrams of sample. Thus GAP should provide meaningful data
from samples where Viking would have detected nothing. The mass spectrometer on
GAP has been designed to measure, quantitatively and isotopically, nanogram
quantities of carbon in any form. For a 50-100 mg sample (the target for Beagle 2
operations on Mars), this translates to a detection limit for carbon of 0.02-0.01 ppm.
175
SP-1240
Fig. 4. The PAW FM, fully assembled and This represents a very significant advance on previous in situ investigations of Mars,
ready for sterilisation, November 2002. Two of and opens up the possibility of a serious reappraisal of the presence of organic
the three Frangibolt actuators are visible materials on the planet.
under the mounting feet.
2.2 PAW subsystem
The PAW (Figs. 4 & 5) is a highly optimised and compact integrated suite of scientific
instruments, sample acquisition and preparation tools, deployed by the ARM for
in situ investigation of the surface. All the lander imaging systems and field
spectrometers are housed on the PAW and rely on the versatility of the ARM for
essential categorisation of the landing site. In addition, GAP, as Beagle 2’s primary
scientific experiment, relies on the PAW-ARM to deliver solid samples for isotopic
analysis.
The majority of instruments and tools on the PAW are serviced by the PAW
electronics. Complex ARM harnessing between the PAW instruments and the lander
support systems is kept to a minimum by the inclusion of an FPGA within the PAW
electronics. The fully equipped PAW is 38 cm at its widest point and has a mass of
only 2.75 kg.
During cruise and coast to Mars, the PAW-ARM is stowed within a recess in the
lander base. The PAW is attached to the ARM via a right-angle bracket and is held
down to the lander base by three feet that secure the system during launch and other
extreme environmental conditions. The baseline release mechanism is to have one
Frangibolt actuator per foot; these are operated prior to initial deployment of the PAW
and the beginning of surface operations. Once deployed, the PAW does not return to
the stowed configuration.
176
Fig. 5: The PAW Qualification Model (QM) and Back End Electronics Stack (BEEST) mounted on the
combined assembly plate. Note that the Rock Corer Grinder QM is equipped with a translation table, an
assembly subsequently deleted from the Flight Model (see Section 2.2.6). All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
177
SP-1240
The principal objectives of the PAW-ARM subsystem are:
— multispectral stereo imaging of the immediate area around the lander;

— Digital Elevation Model (DEM) construction of the landing site (especially the
1 m2 PAW-ARM working zone);
— multi-instrument in situ rock/soil analysis;
— wind measurements at various heights about the martian surface;
— acquisition of core samples from rocks;
— acquisition of soil samples (Mole or spoon) from the subsurface;
— delivery of solid (core or soil) samples to GAP via the inlet port;
— dust-removal from lander surfaces, if possible;
— pre-PAW-ARM deployment hazard mitigation via the WAM
In addition, the following are worthy of inclusion in extended operations:
— analysis of soil samples with in situ instruments, being considered for the primary
mission because it provides for complete assessment of samples acquried from
the subsurface. This applies to samples acquired by the Mole and spoon and
deposited on a suitable surface on the lander. Possible determination of super-
oxidation depth if this is present within the top 2 m of the regolith;
— analysis of uncovered soil surfaces with spectrometers. This requires the top layer
of soil to be scraped off by the PAW; this may also apply to semi-consolidated
blocks if there are any at the landing site. Measurements made in contact with the
soil surface (contamination issues);
— imaging of the Mole-hole. Examination of the hole left by the Mole after
penetration will provide information on various geotechnical properties of the
surface and near-surface materials. The hole, if it remains intact, will also be
useful for imaging diurnal frost deposition and particle-settling processes.
Several lead institutes were involved in supplying hardware to the PAW:
— X-ray Spectrometer (XRS): University of Leicester, UK;

— Mössbauer Spectrometer (MBS): University of Mainz, D;
— Stereo Camera System (SCS): Mullard Space Science Laboratory, UK;
— Microscope (MIC): Space Research and Planetary Sciences Div., Physikalisches
Institut, Bern, CH (PI formally at Max Planck Institute for Aeronomy, Lindau, D);
— camera heads for SCS/MIC and primary optics and close-up lens for SCS:
Space-X (formerly a division of CSEM), CH;
— Planetary Underground Tool (PLUTO) and the Sampling Mole: DLR, Cologne, D;
— Rock Corer Grinder (RCG): Hong Kong Polytechnic University, China;
— Wind Sensor: Oxford University, UK;
— Wide Angle Mirror (WAM), torch, spoon: University of Leicester, UK.
All the other elements of the PAW, including the control electronics, mechanical
structure and harnessing, were designed and supplied by the University of Leicester
as part of the PAW lead activity.
2.2.1 X-ray Spectrometer

The X-ray Spectrometer (XRS; Fig. 6, Table 2) is loosely based on the successful
APXS experiment flown on Pathfinder Sojourner but favouring the excitation method
used by the Viking spectrometers. Like the APXS, the primary goal of XRS is to
determine, in situ, the elemental composition, and, by inference, the geochemical
composition and petrological classification, of the surface material at the landing site.
Major elements (Mg, Al, Si, S, Ca, Ti, Cr, Mn, Fe) and trace elements up to Nb are
detectable with XRS. The exclusion of a proton mode offered by APXS is offset by
the greater sensitivity of GAP in determining light-element abundance. However, a
178
Table 2. XRS engineering parameters.
Mass* 154 g (DHA 56 g; BEE 98 g)

Dimensions DHA 47 mm diam. x 47 mm;
BEE 120 x 81 x 15 mm
Power PPS +6 V (BEE); TCS (BEE heaters). Nominal
current 450 mA; current limit after switch-on for
5 s followed by 660-625 mA for ~12 s. BEE
provides all power directly to DHA
Data volume 32 kb (MCA mode (default); histogram fixed size);
<<1Mb (diagnostic mode; count rate and
integration time dependent)
*excluding DHA housing, which is part of the PAW structure
PPS: Payload Power Supply. TCS: Thermal Control System.
Fig. 6. QM of the X-ray spectrometer. Above left: the Detector Head

Assembly is carried on the PAW. The conical carbon-fibre reinforced
plastic stand-off cone is gold-flashed and contains the excitation sources
and the detector element. Left: the Back End Electronics is located at the
base of the ARM in the relatively warmer environment of the lander
base.
more ambitious and unique application of XRS is to use the precise measurement of
elemental abundance in conjunction with measurements made by GAP to attempt a
crude radiometric age determination.
XRS employs X-ray fluorescence spectrometry to determine the elemental
constituents of rocks (Rieder et al., 1997). The principal components of the instrument
are a set of four radioisotope sources, two 55Fe and two 109Cd, to excite the sample via
primary X-rays at 5.90, 6.49, 22.16 and 24.94 keV, arranged around a Si PIN diode
X-ray detector. A 7.5 mm-thick Be window over the diode permits detection of
fluorescent X-rays down to 1 keV. The energy resolution of the detector (~300 eV) is
sufficient to resolve all lines of interest. The lower energy cut-off of the Be window
transmission is well matched to the X-ray opacity of a 6 mbar CO2 martian atmosphere.
The instrumental resolution requirement is ~25 eV across a 24 keV range (1-25 keV
detector bandpass). Data are digitised using a 16-bit analogue-to-digital converter for
good differential non-linearity performance and binned to 12 bits for onboard storage.
Further binning to 10 bits on the ground will provide ~23 eV resolution.
Crude radiometric dating of martian rocks in situ will be by the 40K→40Ar method.
For this, XRS needs to make a precise measurement of K on a fresh sample of rock.
Preparation of the surface for XRS is performed by the Rock Corer Grinder housed on
the PAW. It is essential that the surface for XRS is both flat and free from weathered
rind because both factors will compromise the performance and results. The Ar
component is determined by GAP as part of a suite of experiments performed on a core
sample extracted later from the same specimen. The target performance of XRS is to
provide a determination of K with a relative precision of better than ~5% in silicate
rocks with K2O levels of 0.2% by weight or greater.
2.2.2 Mössbauer Spectrometer

Mössbauer spectroscopy is an extremely useful tool for quantitative analysis of Fe-
bearing materials and is therefore particularly suited for in situ studies on the surface
179
SP-1240
Fig. 7. The Mössbauer spectrometer. Left: the of Mars. The Fe-rich nature of martian deposits enables relative proportions of Fe in
Detector Head Assembly (DHA) is located on olivine and pyroxene to be determined using the Mössbauer technique, together with
the PAW and contains the radioactive sources magnetite in basalts. In conjunction with the X-ray Spectrometer, the Mössbauer
and detectors. A mechanical shutter blocks the
primary beam when the instrument is not in complements the in situ geochemical and petrological work, and provides support
use. Right: the Back End Electronics (BEE; for the measurements made by GAP. For example, a pure carbonate (other than
the larger circuit board to the left) is located at siderite) gives almost no Mössbauer signal because the technique is specific to Fe
the base of the ARM in the relatively warmer mineralogy; such a signal may favour a candidate rock over another worthy of
environment of the lander base. The image also isotopic analysis.
shows the XRS BEE (top right) and Wind BEE
(foreground). All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2 The Mössbauer effect provides information about the iron content of mineral
samples by measurement of the Doppler shift in the velocity (or energy spectrum) of
gamma-rays emitted by a stationary target bombarded by an isotopically equivalent
gamma-ray source (Klingelhöfer et al., 1996; Klingelhöfer, 1998). Thus the instru-
ment uses gamma rays from the decay of 57Co to 57Fe. The electronic environment of
atoms in a sample dictates the absorption characteristics and thus they give spectra
dependent on their valence state and bonding. The strength of the signals is
quantifiable, so the instrument can characterise the mineralogical makeup of the rocks
and soils, and hence help to identify the petrological classification. Its ability to
measure valence states provides important information about oxidation, and therefore
relative changes in the rocks and soils can provide a detailed understanding of the
weathering environment.
The principal scientific objectives of the Mössbauer Spectrometer (MBS; Fig. 7,
Table 3) are:
— identification of Fe-bearing phases with low detection limits;

— determination of the oxidation state of iron-bearing minerals;
— identification of Fe carbonates, sulphates, nitrates etc. that may provide
information on early martian environmental conditions;
— determination of Fe oxides and the magnetic phase in martian soil;
— detection of nanophase and amorphous hydrothermal Fe minerals that could
Table 3. MBS engineering parameters. preserve biological materials.
Mass DHA 438 g; BEE 102 g
The footprint of the instrument is circular, with a diameter of about 1.5 cm. The
Dimensions DHA: 45 x 50 x 90 mm; average information depth is of the order 100-200 mm. The extent of dust layering
BEE: 100 x 160 x 30 mm found on rocks during the Viking and Pathfinder missions may exceed these values,
Power PPS +6 V; 3 W and the thickness of weathering rinds may be even greater.
Data volume 130 kbit The Mössbauer parameters are temperature-dependent and under certain
circumstances the Mössbauer spectra may change drastically with temperature. This
180
is particularly relevant for small particles exhibiting superparamagnetic behaviour Fig. 8: Left: FM stereo camera, showing the
(e.g. nanophase Fe oxides). The observation of such changes will help in determining camera head and Filter Wheel Assembly
(FWA). The filter wheel itself is driven via a
the nature of the iron-bearing phases. Therefore, Mössbauer measurements will be
stepper motor shown protruding from the
performed at different temperatures. Ideally, these should span both the highest back of the FWA. Right: laboratory image
temperatures (during the day) and lowest temperatures (during the night). acquired with the Development Model camera
and filter R1 (close-up lens; see text and
2.2.3 Stereo Camera System Table 4). The sample is a quartzose sandstone
previously prepared with the QM Rock Corer
The Beagle 2 Stereo Camera System (SCS) is designed to perform a similar function
Grinder (see Fig. 12).
to the Imager for Mars Pathfinder (IMP). Indeed, IMP was the baseline for many of All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2.
the SCS design features, including the spectral coverage, and operating procedures.
The major design difference is that, while IMP created stereo images by using mirrors
to fold the light from two windows onto different halves of a single detector chip, SCS
consists of two identical CCD cameras and integrated filter wheels (Table 4). Another
important difference is that IMP was mounted on a deployable mast 1.75 m above the
surface, while SCS is mounted on the PAW on the end of the ARM. The stereo
baseline is 195 mm and each camera is mounted to provide a toe-in angle of 4.65° for
the required stereo coverage.
A primary engineering objective of SCS is the construction of a DEM of the
landing site, in particular the area within reach of the ARM, from a series of
overlapping monochromatic (670 nm) stereo pair images. The DEM is reconstructed
on Earth and used to position the PAW against target rocks and soils. In addition, a
wide range of other imaging studies of the landing site and atmospheric/astronomical
observations is possible. The following studies are baselined:
— 360° panoramic imaging to characterise the landing site and, depending on the
topography, allow the location of the landing site to be determined with respect
to orbital images;
— multi-spectral imaging of rocks and soils to determine mineralogy (if not
completely obscured by aeolian dust);
— close-up imaging of rocks and soils using the right-hand camera (equipped with
appropriate secondary optics as part of the filter set). This feature emulates the
field geologist’s hand-lens (Table 4);
— observations of the Sun to measure absorption of specific solar wavelengths by
water vapour;
— observations of the Sun and general sky brightness at several times during the day
181
SP-1240
Table 4. The Stereo Camera System filter set.*
λ (nm)** Shape Application
R1 CLOSE-UP LENS; x6.4 magnification Wide curved Geology

R2 Ferric oxyhydroxide (local maximum) 600 flat Geology
R3 Maghemite (local maximum) 800 flat Geology
R4 Goethite, enstatite & hypersthene 900 flat Geology
R5 Ferrous silicates 965 flat Geology
R6 Diopside & fosterite 1000 flat Geology
R7 NEAR STEREO; Ferric oxides/oxyhydrides & Fe Silicates 670 flat DEM/Geology
R8 FAR STEREO; Ferric oxides/oxyhydrides & Fe Silicates 670 curved Stereo/Geology
R9 BLUE; Ferric oxides/oxyhydrides 440 curved Colour/Geology
R 10 GREEN; haematite, d-FeOOH, goethite & lepidocrocite 530 curved Colour/Geology
R 11 Dust Opacity 450 flat Dust
R 12 HOME; Dust Opacity 670 flat Dust
L1 Discriminate crystalline hematite, crystaline goethite 480 flat Geology

& nanophase ferric oxide
L2 BLUE; Ferric oxides/oxyhydrides 440 flat Colour/Geology
L3 GREEN; haematite, d-FeOOH, goethite & lepidocrocite 530 flat Colour/Geology
L4 Ferric oxides (local maximum) oxyhydroxide minerals 750 flat Geology
L5 Haematite, Pyroxenes & Olivines 860 flat Geology
L6 Low-Ca clinopyroxenes 930 flat Geology
L7 NEAR STEREO; Ferric oxides/oxyhydrides & Fe Silicates 670 flat DEM/Geology
L8 FAR STEREO; Ferric oxides/oxyhydrides & Fe Silicates 670 curved Stereo/Geology
L9 Continuum Band 925 flat Water
L 10 Water Absorption 935 flat Water
L 11 Continuum Band; Dust Opacity 990 flat Water/Dust
L 12 HOME; Continuum Band; Dust Opacity 880 flat Water/Dust
*the majority of filters used on Pathfinder appear here, albeit shared between two cameras. A secondary optic for close-up work (R1) is included. The
long-wavelength solar filters are selected during periods of non-use to minimise exposure of the CCDs to UV during the day.
**centre wavelength. Passbands vary per filter ranging from 17 nm to 42 nm for geology, 4nm to 6 nm for dust/water, and 560 nm for the close-up lens.
to allow the determination of atmospheric optical density and aerosol (dust and
water ice) properties;
— astronomical observations of Phobos and Deimos (spectral characteristics) and
bright stars to allow night-time optical density to be determined. There are also
‘public awareness’ opportunities to image the Earth-Moon pair (maximum 3-
pixel separation, at beginning of mission) from the martian surface;
— observations of lander surfaces and, if possible, air bags and landing scuff marks
in soil to determine dust properties;
— if sufficient bandwidth is available, to return full-frame solar images (IMP solar
images were 31 x 31-pixel sub-frames), unique ‘Sun dogs’ and other halo effects
arising from CO2 ice crystals may be observable.
Additional possible observations include looking for transitory or seasonal changes

(dune migration, surface frosts) at the landing site or in the sky (clouds, haloes, dust
devils?).
182
Table 5. SCS engineering parameters.
Mass 174.5 g (SCS-L); 175.5 g (SCS-R)

Dimensions (per camera) 79 x 63 x 75 mm
Power (per camera) PPS +15 V (CCH); PPS +5 V (CCH); PPS +15 V (FWA).
Nominal currents: 70mA (CCH); 40mA (FW moving)
Data volume 10 Mb (uncompressed) or 1 Mb (compressed) per image
The camera system must focus over a wide range of distances to achieve the
scientific objectives. To keep the design simple, a fixed objective lens is used. This
was designed to produce an optimum focus between 0.6 m and 1.2 m to support stereo
pair imaging/DEM generation for the surface within reach of the ARM. To focus out
to greater distances, curved filters provide optimum focus at distances between 1.2 m
and infinity. Each camera is equipped with 48° optics allowing for 100% overlap at
1.2 m distance. The inclusion of a secondary optic in the filter set for the right-hand
camera allows for inspection of materials at approximately 100 mm distance with this
camera. The CCDs allow for an exposure range of 1 ms to 65 000 ms.
The imager on Pathfinder had a sufficiently large depth-of-focus to perform all the
landing site imaging at a single fixed focus The fact that the SCS has two working
distances complicates filter selection for Beagle 2 somewhat. Potentially the size of
the filter set would need to be doubled if it were required to do all science at each
working distance. Given these constraints, two assumptions are made:
— imaging of the area within reach of the PAW is critical for DEM generation but
stereo imaging of the rest of landing site is less important;
— best-resolution images are required of potential targets of interest for the in situ
instruments. However, spectral properties of rocks and soils more than 1.2 m
from the cameras can be retrieved from slightly out-of-focus images, albeit at
reduced resolution.
All of the imaging systems used on the PAW (both stereo cameras and the micro-
scope) use common camera head (CCH) technology consisting of a micro-integrated
electronics cube and a CCD detector (1k x 1k frame transfer device). These camera
heads were produced by Micro-cameras and Space Exploration SA (Space-X), formerly
a division of Centre Suisse d’Electronique et de Microtechnique SA (CSEM) under a
Technology Research Programme (TRP) contract to ESA (11233/94/NL/FM(SC). For
the SCS, this company also provided the primary optics and the close-up lens.
2.2.4 Microscope
The microscopic imager (Fig. 9, Table 6) on Beagle 2 will investigate the nature of
martian rocks, soils and fines at the particulate scale. Such studies will provide
important data in support of the exobiological objective in the form of direct evidence
of fossils, microtextures and mineralisation of biogenic origin if these are present. In
addition, the physical nature and extent of weathering rinds/coatings on rocks and
soils will benefit the in situ geological investigations. Atmospheric and global
planetary studies will also benefit from detailed knowledge of dust morphology.
Given that the discovery of martian biota will be of major scientific, if not
philosophical, importance, minimisation of ambiguity is vital. Thus, several methods
of investigation of a sample are needed to corroborate that a martian deposit is indeed
biogenic. Therefore, in support of the exobiological objective, the microscope will
seek evidential data in the form of preserved fossils in whatever form. Sedimentary
pyrite and, in particular, framboidal textures are frequently observed in recent and
ancient sediments on Earth. Although examples exist for a purely inorganic origin, the
183
SP-1240
Fig. 9. The FM microscope, showing the Table 6. MIC engineering parameters.

camera head (detector and electronics), optical
tube and LED illumination system. The Mass 151 g excluding focusing mechanism (53.7 g), which is
standoff ‘thumb’, part of the PAW structure, is part of the PAW assembly
at the right of the image; it provides a fixed
Dimensions 111.58 mm x 45.24 mm (max. dia. of optical head)
stand-off distance of 12 mm. The point of
contact of the thumb and the PAW orientation Power PPS +15 V (CCH); PPS +5 V (CCH); PPS +15 V (LEDs);
are optimised after SCS imaging. Upper right: PPS +15 V (Focusing mechanism)
a colour composite image acquired with the Data volume 10 Mb (uncompressed) or 1 Mb (compressed) per image. Default
microscope. The sample is a layered limestone
mode is single best focused image plus depth map derived via
from Piz Alv, Switzerland. A 3D reconstruction
onboard algorithm in LSW.
of the sample’s surface is shown below.
Entropy analysis determined the depth of the
scene from 60 images at different focus
positions. The layering is clearly evident in this
isometric view. All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
presence of framboidal pyrite in sedimentary systems is overall considered as

evidence for a biological origin. In that respect, microscopic examination of the
martian surface and, in particular subsurface material, for pyrite as a potential
biogenic mineral might provide important evidence in the search for extinct life.
One of the major drawbacks of the Pathfinder mission was the uncertainty
concerning the extent to which the APXS experiment was affected by a possible
silicate-bearing weathering rind on the surface of sampled rocks. There is now no
evidence that the APXS ever sampled unweathered material. The surfaces of many
rocks facing north-east at the Pathfinder landing site appeared less red in the initial
panorama. However, it has been recently shown that the remarkable brightness of the
sky produced by airborne dust affects the illumination of the surface in such a way
that rocks appear redder when in shadow or oblique sunlight. The initial interpretation
of the less red faces of rocks as dust-scoured (and hence unweathered) surfaces must
therefore be questioned and cannot be justified without a more sophisticated treat-
184
ment of the illumination. Argument about contamination of sampled materials will

always occur unless the sampling strategy provides a method of exposing fresh
(unaltered and unweathered) material. Detailed microscopic study of rock and soil
surfaces will be an important factor in the in situ investigations.
Apart from being a potential barrier for in situ geological study, martian dust plays
a key role in the atmospheric energy budget. Material in suspension in turn controls
the global circulation and the present climate. It is also suspected that the martian dust
has had a major influence on the evolution of the surface and the long-term evolution
of the planet’s climate. To date, properties of the dust particles have been inferred
from remote sensing from Earth, Mars orbit and landed craft. A major contributor to
the overall dynamic, thermal and radiative properties of the martian atmospheric dust
is particle morphology. A thorough understanding of the physical nature of this
material has wide-reaching consequences for planetary scientists. The Beagle 2
microscope will be the first attempt to image and assess individual particles directly
of sizes close to the wavelength of scattered light.
The microscope consists of a camera head identical to that used by the stereo
cameras and a 10-fold magnifying lens system of 20 mm focal length. The depth of
field is 40 mm and the image size is 4.1 x 4.1 mm; thus the scale is 4 µm/pixel (at
12 mm distance. Focusing is achieved by moving the whole assembly in and out (total
travel 6 mm) with a stepper motor-driven translation table secured to the PAW
structure. Spectral information can be gathered by using an illumination system
consisting of a concentric set of super-bright LEDs around the lens system, uniformly
illuminating the field of view. Four wavebands, each with a bandwidth of 30 nm, are
accommodated (642, 523, 466, 373 nm).
Materials exposed on the surface of Mars, including rocks, soils and drifts, are
known to be highly irregular at all scales. The microscope has a small depth of field
so the acquisition of focused images of irregular surfaces ideally requires many
individual images to be taken at various delta stand-off distances from the target.
Single ‘snapshot’ images obtained with the microscope are likely to have little
scientific value. Arrays of images at coarse stand-off distances are undesirable
because subtle morphological and textural features, which may be significant, would
not be resolvable. A complete set of individual images obtained at each stand-off
position is achieved via the focusing mechanism on the PAW.
Generally, individual images compress well because they are usually dominated by
out-of-focus areas (although scene-dependent, estimated compression on Beagle 2 is
about 10:1). Unfortunately, the number of these ‘image layers’ can be as large as 60-
100 per illumination configuration. By applying a focusing algorithm to a set, a single
in-focus image derived from all stepper motor positions plus a depth map for 3D
reconstruction map can be compiled. This process can either be done in situ or back
on Earth. However, a single in-focus image plus map (i.e. two images) is much more
efficient in terms of data volume. For this reason, the onboard software includes a
focusing algorithm.
2.2.5 PLUTO and the Sampling Mole

It is of prime importance to supply GAP with material from rocks and soils to realise
the mission’s primary objective. The Planetary Underground Tool (PLUTO; Fig 10,
Table 7) subsurface soil sampling device provides samples of soil from depths down
to 1.5 m and, depending on the terrain, from under a large boulder. Both activities
have never been attempted on Mars. The Viking missions had access to depths of only
20 cm in the surface soil, which proved to be still within a layer of presumably highly
oxidised material with no measured concentrations of organic matter. It is expected
that the top metre of bulk soil on Mars has in the past been exposed by aeolian mixing
processes to the atmosphere and UV flux, and thus subjected to oxidation and
irradiation processes that destroyed any organic matter over a scale of decades. If
biological activity ever existed on Mars, then decomposition products in the form of
biomarkers would best be preserved at depth in the bulk soil or within rocks.
185
SP-1240
Fig. 10. The PLUTO FM mounted on the PAW Table 7. PLUTO engineering parameters.
FM. The Mole is just visible at the right,
protruding from the launch tube (minus the Mass 340 g (Mole); 550 g (deployment unit); total 890 g
sampling head, which is fitted as late as Dimensions approx. envelope ~380 x ~90 x ~80 mm (Mole = 280 mm long)
possible to avoid biological contamination).
The winch housing is the cylindrical object on Power 3 W (17 W for pin-puller release after landing)
the left. All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2 Data volume ~ kb (HK only)
PLUTO employs a self-penetrating sampling Mole tethered to a support

mechanism attached to the PAW. The Mole is the primary soil-sampling device. It is
based on a Russian self-burying penetrometer; a scaled-down version of the original
device was developed within an ESA TRP activity specifically for space applications
(Re et al., 1997). It requires no reaction force from the lander once a small initial
penetration is achieved: the Mole proceeds into the subsurface, connected by a tether
for power (for the inertial hammering mechanism) and can reach depths several times
the length of its casing.
At the tip of the Mole is a sampling mechanism that can be commanded to open at
the appropriate sampling depth to acquire some 0.20 cm3 of soil. Once secured by
closing the mechanism, the sample is delivered to GAP by retrieving the Mole,
retracting the tool into the ‘launch tube’ and moving the ARM back to the GAP inlet
port on the lander. Samples are released by opening the mechanism again once in
position, docked to the inlet. With one shock occurring every 5 s, it may take 30 min
to 1 h to reach a vertical depth of 1 m under Mars gravity and the estimated soil
resistance.
In addition to serving as a soil sample-acquisition device, the Mole provides a
platform for in situ temperature measurements as a function of time and depth while
embedded in the subsurface. Moreover, soil mechanical properties and layering will
be estimated from the ground intrusion behaviour.
For retrieval from the subsurface, the cable reel operates in reverse, pulling the
device back into the launch tube on the PAW, the latter remaining in position
throughout the entire operation. The Mole retraction manoeuvre has been extensively
tested on a variety of analogous materials. Retraction can also be aided by operating
the hammering mechanism while rewinding the cable, an activity more likely to be
considered for deep sampling. Once back inside its tube housing, the Mole is ready to
discharge its cargo into the GAP sampling inlet.
The Mole can also be deployed laterally across the surface, away from the lander
and towards a suitably sized boulder beyond the reach of the PAW, using the shocks
186
Fig 11. Upper left: the Rock Corer Grinder FM. Note the dual
functionality and shape of the sampling tip. Right: results of coring into
a field sample of quartzose sandstone with a case-hardened thin (~1 mm)
weathering rind (Planetary Science Sample Library 146/274). Lower left:
the RCG QM equipped with the Translation Table (TT) for transcribing
the tool-head during grinding. The TT was not fitted to the FM following
an engineering and scientific assessment on the effectiveness of the
device. All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
Table 8. RCG engineering parameters.
Mass 348 g (FM without Translation Table)

Dimensions approx. envelope ~30 x ~60 x ~100 mm
Power 6W
Data volume ~ kb (HK only)
from its hammering mechanism for forward motion, at a rate of about 10 mm travel
for each percussive stroke. Such hammering perpendicular to the local gravity vector
had already been verified during an early ESA TRP activity. Once the Mole
encounters a large rock with an overhang, it will be diverted downward to initiate soil
penetration under the rock, thereby allowing access to protected samples.
2.2.6 Rock Corer Grinder

It is a scientific requisite that all the PAW instruments have access to fresh,
unweathered/unaltered material in order to avoid the effects of surface weathering
rinds thought to be prevalent on all exposed material on Mars. In addition, the
spectrometers require a prepared flat area of optimum size to counter geometric
effects that can seriously compromise instrument performance. To address these
requirements, the PAW is equipped with a combined Rock Corer Grinder (Fig. 11,
Table 8) tool.
The grinding action of the RCG removes as much weathering rind material as
possible, up to 6 mm, by producing individual or an array of flat, 10 mm-diameter
187
SP-1240
A B C
D E
Fig. 12. The Environmental Sensor Suite (ESS)

flight spares. A: oxidant sensor (note the
spheres for angle-of-repose experiments).
B: UV sensors (six photodiodes). C: pressure
sensor. D: dust impact sensor. E: air
temperature sensor (one of two). The FM wind
sensor is shown in Fig. 13.
fresh surfaces suitable for the spectrometer instruments. A translation table

mechanism was developed for the RCG QM to transcribe the tool-head over the
surface of a sample to produce a flat area of ~30 mm diameter. However, for mass and
other reasons, this facility was not adopted for flight. After all in situ analyses have
been completed, a sample from the ground patch is extracted by using the coring
action of the device and delivered to GAP via an inlet port on the upper part of the
lander. Coring is achieved by a hammering/rotating action of the main drive where
material is retained within the Micro End Effector (MEE) jaw-type device. Cores, or
more precisely a collection of rock chippings, obtained by this tool are of
reproducible volume suitable for the GAP ovens.
2.3 Environmental Sensor Suite

Beagle 2 is equipped with a complementary set of environmental sensors (Fig. 12) to
assist in both the prime objective, characterisation of the landing site and
meteorological studies. Measurement of the UV and radiation flux (a RadFET within
the lander electronics measures total dosage) at the surface together with the oxidising
capability of the soil and air provides direct input into the astrobiological investiga-
tions. In addition, measurement of atmospheric temperature, pressure, wind speed/
direction, dust saltation and angle-of-repose will complement the in situ experiments.
Dynamic studies such as dust devil profiling will also benefit assessments of aeolian
188
erosion rates, as will an understanding of the boundary layer wind regime using the
wind sensor on the PAW.
The mass of the complete suite of sensors is 156 g. Each sensor is powered via the
lander Auxiliary Power Supply (APS) and typically has a 0-5 V analogue output.
Depending on the sampling rate adopted during operations, the environmental sensors
can generate between kilobytes of data (low rate typically one reading from each
sensor every 10 min) through to megabytes (high rate typically 4 Hz).
2.3.1 Oxidant sensor

One controversial issue arising from the Viking results is the postulated presence of
hydrogen peroxide or other oxidising compounds in the soil, used in several cases to
explain the results of the experiments designed to detect martian life. The Beagle 2
oxidant sensor is a one-shot measurement, in which a sensitive titanium film is
exposed to the atmosphere and its resistance is monitored as it oxidises. It is not,
however, H2O2-specific but will also detect other oxidising species, such as O3. By
simultaneously monitoring the UV and dust sensor, it is hoped to shed some light on
the processes generating any oxidants. At the end of the mission, the PAW will be
used to deposit quantities of soil onto the film, and to monitor the response. The
sensor is located near the rim of the lander base.
2.3.2 Ultraviolet sensor

Short-wavelength UV, such as UVB and UVC, are harmful to life and can directly
damage DNA. The UV environment on Mars is known to be harsh, and it is unlikely
that life can survive on the surface, but subsurface life may still be possible. This
sensor will produce a 5-point spectrum in the range of 200-400 nm, covering UVA
(320-400 nm) and UVB (280-320 nm) over seasonal and daily time-scales. At wave-
lengths below 204 nm, the CO2 atmosphere is strongly absorbing, partially blocking
the UVC band (100-280 nm). The sensor is located near the rim of the lander base.
The unit uses six photodiode sensors, each with a particular bandpass filter:.
— 210 nm: main TiO2 dust absorption band;

— 230 nm: biologically damaging and rapidly time-varying regime;
— 250 nm: secondary TiO2 band;
— 300 nm: mid-UVB;
— 350 nm: mid-UVA;
— 200-400 nm (no filter): calibration channel.
2.3.3 Wind sensor

A hot-film wind sensor (Fig. 13) was supplied by Oxford University (UK). It is
mounted with an associated air-temperature sensor on the PAW. The difference in heat
transfer coefficients between the three films can be used to calculate a 2D wind vector
perpendicular to the axis of the wind sensor. In its normal orientation, the sensor
measures a horizontal wind vector. The sensor is calibrated for the range 0.3-30 m s–1
though wind speeds above this range can also be measured. There are several sensor-
specific goals and activities:
— obtain a long-term meteorological record of wind speed and direction, and air
temperature at the landing site;
— obtain higher frequency data (~1 Hz) at various times of the day to enable
characterisation of boundary-layer turbulence and fluxes;
— detect and observe dust devils;
— characterise the vertical profile of air temperature and wind speed at different
times of the day, by taking measurements with the sensor head at different heights
above the surface.
At times, the top surface of the lander can be up to 80°C hotter than the surround-
189
SP-1240
Fig. 13. Wind Sensor FM integrated with the

Wide Angle Mirror during final assembly of
the PAW FM. For an alternative view, see
Fig. 4. All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
ing surface, giving rise to a convective plume. This plume, which affects meteor-
ological measurements made directly above it, will be studied by moving the
temperature and wind sensors into different positions above the lander. Such a plume
was seen by the Viking landers (Ryan & Lucich, 1983), and the effect should be
stronger on Beagle 2 because of its geometry.
2.3.4 Air pressure

The Barobit pressure sensor was supplied to Beagle 2 by the Finnish Meteorological
Institute. It uses the same Barocap sensing element as in the Meteorology Instrument
System aboard the Mars-96 small stations and penetrators (Harri et al., 1998) and
within the MVACS package on the Mars Polar Lander. Barocap is a capacitive
absolute pressure sensor based on a thin silicon diaphragm. The Barobit design is
based on the EGA-P experiment flown aboard Mars Polar Lander. Barobit
electronics and Beagle 2 data-handling capability limit the measurement accuracy
down to about 0.006 hPa and resolution to 0.003 hPa. The sensor is located in the
lander base.
2.3.5 Air temperature

Air temperature will be monitored at two locations using commercial 0.3 mm-
diameter bead platinum resistors. The sensor is optimised to give the highest
sensitivity and accuracy of better than 0.01K over the range –10°C to –60°C. At the
extremes of the operating temperatures (less than –100°C and greater than 10°C), the
accuracy is reduced to about 0.1K. One sensor is mounted at a fixed height of around
0.05 m above the ground, on the edge of one of the solar panel sheets, in an attempt
to isolate it thermally from the effects of the hot lander body. An identical sensor is
mounted as part of the wind sensor assembly on the PAW, allowing air temperature
measurements at heights of up to 0.6 m.
2.3.6 Dust impact monitor

A dust impact monitor, located near the rim of the lander base, will measure the
190
Fig. 14: The ARM Development Model.

impact rate and magnitude of wind-blown dust, providing information about the
regolith transport and mixing mechanisms on the surface. The sensor is mounted
horizontally, near the rim of the probe, and will listen continuously for dust impacts.
It consists of a simple aluminium sheet, 0.25 mm thick, with a polyvinylidene fluoride
(PVDF) piezoelectric film on the rear face. PVDF films such as this have been used
on several missions, most recently on the high-rate detector within the CDA
instrument aboard Cassini (Tuzzolino, 1995). Maximum sensitivity of the device is
1 x 10–10 kg m s–1 (equivalent to a 0.2 mm glass bead dropped from 10 mm height on
Earth); the sensor records the magnitude and time of an impact.
3.1 Anthropomorphic Robotic Manipulator (ARM) 3. Surface Operations

The Beagle 2 ARM (Fig. 14) is a 5-degree-of-freedom manipulator, with the PAW
permanently attached to the wrist. The fully extended ARM is 109 cm long, measured
from the centre of the body joint to the centre of the PAW wrist joint. Each joint
comprises a DC brushed motor driving through a 100:1 harmonic gearbox. Joint
position is detected by a potentiometer mounted directly onto the output shaft. A
typical joint speed is 0.6° s–1 (axes 1-3 only).
The ARM’s primary purpose is to position and orientate the PAW so that the
instruments and tools can perform their tasks. Requirements imposed on the ARM by
the PAW include:
— working zone DEM (0.6 m to 1.2 m near-stereo) requires PAW/ARM to view the
scene from as many perspectives as possible – at least two or three – while
maintaining targets of interest in focus;
— 360º multi-spectral panorama (including > 1.2 m far-stereo) requires PAW/ARM
pointing straight up for maximum height advantage and rotation about this axis.
The relative position of the Sun with respect to the viewing scene needs to be
considered for optimal illumination and direct solar avoidance during geological
imaging;
— close-up lens for imaging rocks, coarse detritus and large clasts at a working
distance of ~80 mm requires optimum PAW orientation to avoid navigational
hazards, including contamination from the surface.
It is proposed that a number of positions be selected within the sphere of PAW/
191
SP-1240
Fig. 15. The ARM FM equipped with a one-

third mass PAW during calibration work. The
configuration shows the sampling Mole docked
to a representative (in terms of mechanical
interface and location) GAP inlet.
ARM operations that are deemed to be ‘safe points’. These are configurations that can
be returned to at any time without risk of collision and from which a series of pre-set
manoeuvres can be initiated.
Those operations requiring actual contact to be made with a sampling surface or
activities with the Mole need special attention and are discussed in the following
sections. Most imaging tasks do not require contact with the sample under
investigation but some scenarios involving close-up work will require careful
navigation to avoid local collisions with objects on the surface. A complete and
accurate DEM of the area reachable by the PAW/ARM and PLUTO sampling Mole,
and an initial characterisation of potential sampling targets contained within the zone,
is an early priority. Only when this has been done can the majority of PAW/ARM
operations commence.
3.2 Positioning
During initial positioning, the location of the spot where the PAW comes into contact
with the candidate sample is not expected to be very precise. A suitable goal is to
achieve initial contact within ±5 mm of a nominated position, based on the working
zone DEM and the capabilities of the ARM. Angular contact should be within 5° of
the average normal to the chosen spot. Once initial contact has been made, then this
point becomes the reference datum and subsequent positioning will be relative, and
therefore more accurate, albeit subject to surface roughness constraints.
The requirement for lateral positioning of the RCG for coring and the instruments
is ±2 mm from the centre of ground patch. This is primarily to ensure that the
instruments view the same spot within the prepared area. Along with this tighter
positional alignment, it is required that the ARM can position a tool or instrument
within 1º of a nominal perpendicular to a face. This is required in particular for
spectrometer positioning, because any angular misalignment alters the distance
between the detectors and surface. It is expected that if this angle is achieved then the
action of applying a longitudinal force coupled with the compliance of the ARM
would remove any angular error anyway.
192
Fig. 16. Sampling operations at the Lander

Operations Control Centre, Univ. Leicester
(UK) during early December 2003. The lander
Ground Test Model, equipped with the DM
ARM, is deploying the QM PAW and
performing a sampling operation with the
Rock Corer Grinder. The sample itself, in this
case a fissile shale, is seated in a bed of coarse
sand and within the working zone of the
PAW/ARM defined by the raised area.
The only instrument that requires more precise positioning is the microscope, which
needs to be positioned longitudinally to an accuracy of 40 µm for focusing. This means
that some device is required to move the microscope over a range of ±3 mm to within
an accuracy of 40 µm. A separate actuator on the PAW provides this.
There is no precise positioning requirement for the PLUTO sampling Mole. It is
expected that positioning within ±3 mm in any axis and within 5° of a nominal
‘launch’ angle will be acceptable.
For the wind sensor to be maintained horizontally with respect to the martian
surface requires the PAW/ARM subsystem to account for relative lander orientation.
The latter will be determined via the onboard accelerometers if they survive the
landing shock. Alternatively, some estimate may be achieved via the stereo cameras.
3.3 Approach technique

Once a sampling spot has been identified on the candidate rock, the ARM will
orientate the PAW to align the RCG as orthogonal to the sampling surface as possible
and advance the PAW along the RCG axis towards the surface (Fig. 16). The RCG is
proposed for all initial contacts with candidate samples, because it is more robust than
other instruments, to establish a reference point from which all subsequent
positioning can be performed with more accuracy. Furthermore, the first operation in
the analysis cycle involves imaging the weathered surface with the close-up lens. This
requires a PAW reorientation anyway, so nothing is gained by placing one of the
longitudinal instruments against the sample first. Advancement in this way proceeds
until contact has been detected or a predetermined timeout has expired. In the latter
case, some sort of corrective action will have to be applied that may involve aborting
the sequence and moving to a safe/default position, branching to another activity.
The final approach prior to making contact may be achievable by operating a
single joint other than the wrist. For example, if the elbow joint is considered, and the
forearm/PAW length is 400 mm, then the PAW needs to sweep forward up to 5 mm in
the worst case, to prepare the surface with the RCG. This equates to an angle of about
0.7° swept by the RCG during operation, compatible with the accuracy of surface
preparation achievable by the RCG.
On the approach to the rock, if not during the whole of the movement, the ARM
movement will be stopped as soon as a sufficient contact force has been reached. This
193
SP-1240
is sensed by a piezoelectric force load washer (sensitivity 3 pC N–1) that generates an

electrical signal upon contact with a resistive surface: a rock, instrument calibration
target on the Calibration Target, GAP inlet or sample dish. Forces required by the
various instruments and tools are determined from this point as a function of ARM
velocity, direction and time. Suitable choice of sampling site can utilise the weight of
the PAW or vertical component thereof. A different contact strategy will be required
for investigations of rocks and unconsolidated materials.
The piezoelectric sensor will not normally give any charge output while the PAW
is being moved around gently during normal ARM movements. The primary mode of
operation is to use the sensor to detect the moment when the PAW comes into contact
with the rock. The ARM is then allowed to continue to drive for a given time after
contact has been detected, determined by the stiffness of the arm joints. The ARM will
stop advancing shortly (~102 ms) after contact has been detected. The exact length of
time depends on the instrument or tool being positioned and the anticipated
orientation of the PAW with respect to the contact surface.
The ARM must operate with a degree of autonomy owing to the limited
communication periods available with Earth. However, it is not intelligent but follows
predetermined manoeuvres or strategies, which then allow it and the associated PAW
to survey the martian surface and analyse the rocks.
3.4 Nominal rock analysis cycle

Given the constraints of the surface operations timeline and scientific requirements,
only a small number of rocks (~3) are expected to be fully investigated in situ.
Assuming that a number of appropriately sized rocks lie within reach of the
PAW/ARM, each potential candidate for detailed analysis will have to be assessed
based on bulk spectral properties, morphology and PAW/ARM accessibility. Once a
candidate has been chosen, the full suite of analysis will be performed in situ by the
PAW instruments and by GAP on the same material. Of course, this modus operandi
may change on arrival at Mars, especially if the landing site yields unexpected or
scientifically interesting diversity.
The list below describes a typical analytical sequence after a candidate rock has
been selected for detailed study:
Assessment
Image the candidate rock from various angles using geology and stereo filters.
Select an area of rock for investigation (constrained by ARM, PAW access,
surface morphology and spectra).
Analysis (weathered surface)

Obtain close-up images of the selected surface using hand-lens and microscope.
Perform detailed measurements with the spectrometers.
Surface preparation
Grind away the surface weathering rind and create a flat working surface.
Analysis (fresh surface)

Obtain close-up images of the prepared surface using hand-lens and microscope.
Perform detailed measurements with the spectrometers.
Sample acquisition and disposition

Extract a core from the centre of the sampling area.
Obtain close-up images of sampling area using hand-lens and microscope.
Deliver core (chippings) to GAP via the inlet port.
This sequence is based on fundamental field practice but may have to be modified
as a result of surface operations and constraints.
194
3.5 PLUTO (Mole) and spoon operations Fig. 17: PLUTO sampling operations at the
The Mole (Fig. 17) is deployed in one of two ways. In the vertical mode, the sampling Lander Operations Control Centre, Univ.
Leicester (UK) during early December 2003.
Mole penetrates the regolith to a specified depth (maximum 1.5 m baselined), from
The lander Ground Test Model, equipped with
where a sample is retrieved. Temperature measurements are obtained at various the DM ARM is being used to deploy the QM
depths (maximum 1.25 m). In the horizontal mode, the Mole crawls across the surface PAW and perform shallow soil sampling
towards a candidate rock and is potentially deverted to retrieve a sample from a operations with the Mole. Left: the sample
sheltered zone under a boulder. The number of samples acquired by the Mole during being acquired from unconsolidated coarse
sand (JSCMars1). Right: the sample being
the primary mission will be restricted to about three.
deposited into the GAP inlet port; note the
The uppermost zone of the martian regolith is probably heterogeneous and chaotic. inlet cover and funnel in the representative
Suspended rocks and pebbles may deviate (or impede) the Mole, thereby contributing section of the lander deck.
to an error in the depth measurement. Mole operations will be progressively more All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
ambitious during the course of surface activities in order to minimise the risk to the
scientific objectives of all instrumentation dependent on the device.
The PAW is also equipped with a ‘spoon’ as a backup method of sampling
unconsolidated soil. The design ensures that no more than 20 mm3 of material is
collected, thereby avoiding the risk of overfilling the sample ovens.
3.6 In situ calibration and validation

Once Beagle 2 has finally come to rest on the surface of Mars and fully deployed
itself, the PAW is ready to obtain the first image of the landing site. This is achieved
via the Wide Angle Mirror, which moves into the FOV of the right-hand stereo camera
when the pre-tensioned spring holding it down is released by the opening of the lid
and solar panels. The figure of the WAM is designed to provide a 360º view of the
landing site that includes the horizon. Fig. 18 shows simulated and actual views using
the WAM.
Immediately after PAW/ARM release and deployment, a programme of calibration
and verification will be initiated. Each instrument will undergo a predefined checkout
and in situ calibration sequence as soon as possible. This will avoid possible
erroneous effects caused by degradation of the data from the targets owing to dust
accumulation etc. Recalibration will also occur throughout the surface mission to
monitor any changes and, if necessary, for instrument diagnostic reasons.
The lander is equipped with a Calibration Target (CT) consisting of individual
targets specific to or shared by the deployable instruments. Each instrument’s CT will
195
SP-1240
Fig. 18. Imaging with the Wide Angle Mirror.

Right: early simulated view of a rock-strewn
landing site prior to PAW/ARM deployment
via the WAM and right-hand stereo camera.
The scene is made up of sky (grey), lander
structure (blue/green) and a martian surface
(brown). Far right: image taken with the DM
Stereo Camera and a spherically figured
WAM. Camera is visible in centre of image
together with the structural & thermal model
PAW and lander model. The WAM mast is
clearly visible in the lower half of the image.
Above: processed version of the far-right
image courtesy of Joanneum Research,
Austria.
be ‘known’ by the onboard software and flagged as a designated point. The position
of the CT has been chosen to allow PAW optimal viewing of the imaging targets and
provide access for physical contact to be made by the spectrometers and the
microscope. The latter case requires some structural support beneath the CT to
accommodate the weight of the PAW.
4. Spacecraft Engineering The 69 kg Beagle 2 is a highly sophisticated spacecraft (Figs. 19 & 20), which uses
advanced technologies and very limited redundancy in order to meet the tight mass
restrictions dictated by the Mars Express spacecraft requirements. Beagle 2 will be
ejected from the orbiter before the Mars orbit insertion, and enter the planet’s
atmosphere on 25 December 2003 after a coast phase of about 6 days. The entry,
descent and landing system will deliver it to the martian surface, where the nominal
science operations phase will begin after an initial commissioning phase. The nominal
lifetime of Beagle 2 is 6 months. The following sections provide an overview of the
technical aspects of the Beagle 2 lander.
In addition to the Beagle 2 Flight Model, a number of system and subsystem
models were built to support the lander test activities. The Beagle 2 programme
delivered the following models to Mars Express:
— the protoflight model (PFM) to be integrated to the orbiter on the launch site;
— the electrical test model (ETM) for software and interface tests;
— two mass/stiffness models (MSM#1 and #2) for mechanical testing, one equipped
with a QM Spin-Up and Eject Mechanism (SUEM).
196
Fig. 19. The Beagle 2 Flight Model during final assembly in the aseptic
clean room at the Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. Note that the
Wide Angle Mirror on the PAW is held down under spring tension when
the lander lid is closed. Above is the the closed lander, ready for
integration into the descent capsule. All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
Fig. 20. Below: the fully assembled and encapsulated Beagle 2 probe,
ready for delivery. Left: enshrouded in thermal insulation and integrated
on Mars Express. All Rights Reserved, Beagle 2
197
SP-1240
— the volume interface model for mechanical integration tests;

— two pyro and frangibolt units (1 FM and 1 EQM).
A number of additional models (aeroshell assembly model, Development Model,

SUEM QM #2, common electronics development model) were built for test purposes
but not delivered to Mars Express.
The Beagle 2 lander comprises a number of subsystems on the landing module,
and some support systems that remain on the Mars Express orbiter. The Beagle 2
system components are described briefly below.
The Entry, Descent and Landing System (EDLS) will decelerate Beagle 2 during
atmospheric entry and deliver the lander to the surface of Mars. The entry sequence is
controlled by onboard accelerometers and fixed time offsets and delays derived from
modelling of the entry phase. The aeroshell, comprising a thermal protection system,
an ablative front shield and a back cover, will decelerate the lander and protect it during
the initial atmospheric entry. It will reduce the probe’s speed from Mach 31.5 to Mach
1.5. Before entering the transonic region, the pilot parachute is deployed. After
reaching subsonic speed, pyrotechnic bolts release the back cover and the front shield.
The parachute system consists of a pilot ’chute and a main ’chute. The pilot ’chute
decelerates the lander to subsonic speed. After the release of the back cover and front
shield, the main ’chute is deployed, which is released on impact on the ground. The
main parachute’s deceleration of the lander also automatically releases the front
aeroshell, which is held in place by aerodynamic pressure following release of the
bolts. Once the probe is 200 m above the surface, detected by a radar altimeter, the
airbag system is activated. It absorbs the remaining speed of ~17 m s–1 in a series of 10-
20 bounces. When the probe finally comes to rest, the lacing that holds the airbags
together is released, forcing the segments apart via their internal gas pressure and
allowing the 33 kg lander to drop to the ground, where it finally deploys itself (Fig. 1).
At the end of the cruise phase, the capsule is released from Mars Express using the
spring-powered spin-up and eject mechanism. This provides the probe with the
correct axial velocity and spin rate for stability during the coast phase until entry. The
capsule aeroshell is made of carbon fibre with a surface layer of powdered cork
(Norcoat) tiles impregnated with phenolic resin for thermal protection during entry.
The back cover is made of carbon fibre with titanium stringers again covered with
Norcoat tiles. These structures act as a bioshield, enveloping and protecting the
lander, airbag system and parachute from all the environments the probe encounters
en route to Mars and pre-launch following sealing of the probe.
The lander structure consists of an upper (lid) and lower (base) shell, which are
held closed by a clamp band until after landing. The shells are made of Kevlar,
providing both energy absorption during impact with the ground and thermal
protection during surface activities. The inner structure of the lander comprises
carbon fibre skins on an aluminium honeycomb core. The lander outer structure
contains a crushable honeycomb designed to deform around small rocks while still
protecting the integrity of the payload and systems.
A main hinge mechanism allows the shells to open and provides self-righting by
shifting the centre of gravity (dominated by the base) if the lander lands the wrong
way up. The lander lid houses the solar panels, which are deployed via electrically-
powered hinges. The base shell accommodates the robotic arm, which allows the
PAW instruments to be deployed.
Beagle 2 is powered via a 42-cell lithium ion battery that is kept warm by the
thermal insulation and by heater power during the martian night. When Beagle 2 is
deployed on the surface, power to charge the battery and/or supply daytime
experiments is provided by four deployable solar panels of total effective area of
about 1 m2. The panels employ high-performance triple-junction gallium arsenide
cells mounted on germanium substrates. The electronics module of the lander
provides power distribution, conditioning and management.
The lander common electronics consists of a number of circuit boards, forming the
198
electronics module (ELM). A local common electronics module (LCE) that supports
GAP is accommodated separately. The lander electronics provide the following
functions:
— onboard processor (ERC32) and data handling;

— power conditioning, distribution and management;
— interfaces to instruments and equipment.
An interface to the lander electronics is provided via the probe umbilical. The
ERC32 processor is controlled by the onboard software, which consists of four basic
modules:
— the Bootstrap Loader (BL), which resides in a PROM. It contains the programs
run initially after power-on (mission phase detection, execution of application
software image);
— the Common Software (CSW), which provides low-level hardware drivers and
utilities;
— the Probe Software (PSW), which provides the functionality required for entry,
descent and landing, as well as for handover to Lander Software functionality;
— the Lander Software (LSW), which provides the lander subsystem control and
instrument and experiment functionality for the surface operations.
The CSW, PSW and LSW are stored in EEPROM and loaded into and executed
from RAM memory.
The Beagle 2 communication system provides the means for bi-directional UHF
radio communication with the Mars Express orbiter and NASA’s Mars Odyssey. It
consists of the following:
— transceiver (transponder and interface digital baseband circuits);

— diplexer, power divider and radio-frequency cables;
— receive and transmit antenna integrated into the lander lid structure.
The data rates provided on the forward link (Mars Express to Beagle 2) are
2 kbit s–1 and 8 kbit s–1. The return link data rates are 2-128 kbit s–1.
Under the UN COSPAR regulations for planetary protection, planetary landers
carrying life-detection instrumentation (designated as category 4B) are subject to
sterilisation procedures, which have a major impact on probe design and assembly,
integration and verification. In order to meet these requirements, the Beagle 2
Planetary Protection Plan was implemented, ensuring that both the protection of the
martian environment and the life-detection capabilities of Beagle 2 were not
compromised. The FM lander/capsule was assembled in an Aseptic Assembly Facility
(Fig. 19). All components were sterilised and cleaned before integration. After lander
integration was completed, measures were taken to prevent any contamination during
tests and on the way to the launch pad.
The Beagle 2 mission can be divided into five phases: 5. Flight Operations
— cruise and coast following deployment from Mars Express;
— descent;
— initial lander operations (status and integrity checkout);
— primary (baseline) mission (landing to +180 sols);
— extended mission, subject to additional funding becoming available (+180 to
+669 sols, i.e. martian year).
An operations team with varying levels of involvement will support all phases of
199
SP-1240
the mission. Most operations will be conducted remotely from the UK via data links,
with only a small team at ESOC for critical operations. Data will be released at
intervals to the public via project-controlled web sites and the media centre,
consistent with the ESA mission publicity and information plan.
Surface operations will be dictated by the ability to communicate with either Mars
Express or Mars Odyssey. The telecommunications system is designed to relay at
least 10 Mbits per day. Communication sessions are dictated by the landing site, Mars
Express orbit, availability of relays via the NASA Mars Odyssey mission, etc.
Beagle 2 remained passive for long periods of the cruise phase. At two intervals
during cruise, the probe was checked out and the battery charged. The data and
command interface with Mars Express allowed reprogramming of the onboard
common electronics in Beagle 2, which will control the descent sequence, had it
proved necessary to redefine the landing sequence time delays. Temperature and
heater power for the Beagle 2 probe were monitored throughout the cruise phase.
The descent will be fully controlled by the processor within the common
electronics. This will be powered up via a hardware timer ~60 min before atmosphere
entry in order to avoid depleting the battery. The onboard processor will continue to
control Beagle 2 until the first communication session is held via either Mars Express
or a relay via Mars Odyssey.
The following operations, which will be initiated following release of the gas-filled
landing bags and impact with the surface, will be performed automatically:
— deploy solar panels;

— start battery charging (for the remainder of the day);
— obtain monochromatic image with right-hand stereo camera and WAM. WAM
will automatically be positioned in the field of view;
— initiate overnight low-power mode if no contact occurs on sol 1;
— continue low-power mode and daytime battery charging until communication
possible.
Following first contact and evaluation of the lander status, including analysis of the
first image, the following operations will be commanded:
— deploy the PAW-ARM subsystem to a safe/default configuration;

— begin the initial imaging phase. An early priority is to provide sufficient stereo
coverage of the PAW-ARM working zone for DEM construction.
Once the area within reach of the PAW-ARM has been modelled, the following
activities dominate the rest of the primary phase of the mission:
— communication sessions;
— accumulation of multispectral images of the landing site and atmosphere;
— PAW-ARM activities, including target assessment, selection, in situ analysis,
surface preparation and sample acquisition;
— extended sampling activities with the Mole;
— gas analysis of samples acquired by the PAW or directly from the atmosphere;
— battery charging.
To conserve power, ARM positioning and GAP processes will be performed during
the day, whereas low-resource activities such as spectrometry and microscopy will be
done at night. Obviously there is some logical and/or priority order to some of the
activities listed above. Furthermore, much is dependent on what Beagle 2 is presented
with at the landing site. It is estimated that an ideal (complete) sampling cycle will
take tens of sols. Assuming a baseline of 5-6 samples is available for analysis, the
primary mission will last ~80-100 sols plus additional time for early operations.
Given these factors, a target primary mission lifetime of up to 180 sols is assumed.
200
The majority of an extended mission, if funded, will be devoted to atmospheric

science because it is expected that available solar power will be reduced by dust
settling on the solar panels and hence a low-power mode will be implemented. The
following operations are expected during the extended mission:
— communication sessions;
— occasional imaging of the landing site and lander targets to monitor for seasonal
and other changes;
— repetition of atmospheric analyses, i.e. daily, seasonal and other changes;
— in situ analysis of other rocks and soils;
— additional sample analysis by GAP, if resources permit and ovens are available.
Three locations on Mars had been visited by landers before 2003. The Viking and 6. Landing Site Selection
Pathfinder sites had in common their rock-strewn landscapes; at the Pathfinder site,
coverage by fragments of ~3 cm was ~16% (Golombek et al., 1997). Size-frequency
data suggest that there should be three specimens larger than 10 cm m–2 of surface,
one of which would be ~20 cm. Boulders like Pathfinder’s Yogi (> 1 m) occur at a
rate of one per 100 m2, so an individual rock of such proportions might be found 5-
6 m from Beagle 2 at any landing locality similar to that of Viking or Pathfinder. The
soil consistency on Mars is sandy and the presence of rounded pebbles in the Ares
Vallis confirmed that water and wind had probably once modified the terrain (Smith
et al., 1997). The Pathfinder location was specifically chosen because it was likely to
have been a flood region; the success of this prediction means that similar sites can
readily be selected for Beagle 2, especially given the availability of Mars Global
Surveyor images to guide decisions.
The Beagle 2 team identified a number of sites that were considered to fit the
mission objectives and constraints (within ±35° of the martian equator and below the
datum). Candidate sites fell into three categories:
— craters in highland terrain with evidence of runoff channels around their margins,
e.g. Gusev (15°S, 185°W), Becquerel (22°N, 8°W);
— regions near the highland/lowland boundary, e.g. Elysium basin (0-20°N, 170-
210°W) and the margin of Amazonis (4°N, 150-151°W);
— previous landing sites: Viking-1 in Chryse Planitia (22.4°N, 48°W) and
Pathfinder in Ares Vallis (19.5°N, 32.8°W).
While all candidate sites, with the possible exception of the Viking-1 site, show
evidence of flooding in the past and hence possible sedimentary deposits, the
highland region was discounted because of the incompatibility with the expected size
of the landing ellipse (~250 x 30-50 km). Further work on site selection followed
analysis of data from Mars Global Surveyor, resulting in the identification of three
suitable regions: the Maja Vallis channel area in Chryse, Tritonis Lacus on the margin
of the Elysium Plains, and Isidis Planitia.
6.1 Isidis Planitia

The landing site for Beagle 2 was eventually chosen as the area around 265.0°W and
11.6°N within Isidis Planitia (Bridges et al., 2002). The site satisfies the safety
requirements for landing (average slope of 0.57° and a low elevation, being more than
3.6 km below the martian datum) and provides an environment with good
exobiological potential. The rock abundance is estimated at about 2-17% (mean 11%)
and, in addition, Isidis shows evidence for the concentration and remobilisation of
volatiles.
In a regional sense, the pattern observed in thermal inertia data suggests that
sedimentary materials have been added to the landing site area from the Noachian
units around the southern half of the basin. At the same time, a variation in the degree
201
SP-1240
to which tuff cones have been eroded suggests that they formed intermittently over a
long period of time (within the Amazonian period, and possibly Hesperian as well).
The whole area has also been resurfaced in relatively recent times by aeolian
deposition and/or erosion, which is highlighted by a deficit in impact craters larger
than 120 m diameter.
In conclusion, Isidis Planitia represents an opportunity for sampling a set of
martian materials not previously encountered by other missions. These include
Noachian rocks from Libya Montes, rocks from below tuff cones (which might show
evidence of geological activity involving CO2-H2O fluids) and rocks from some of
the local impact craters (Bridges et al., 2002).
7. Scientific Analysis In addition to the instrument experimenters, the Beagle 2 project has set up a group
of adjunct scientists under the Chairmanship of the Associate Science Leader,
Dr. A. Brack (Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire, Orleans, F). These investigators,
who have no hardware role, work in a great variety of disciplines; their theoretical
input and background laboratory experience will greatly enhance the interpretation of
the returned data and contribute to the overall success of the mission.
References Bada, J.L., Glavin, D.P., McDonald, G.D. & Becker, L. (1998). A Search for
Endogenous Amino Acids in Martian Meteorite ALH 84001. Science 279, 362-
365.
Baker, L., Franchi, I., Wright, I.P. & Pillinger, C.T. (1998). Oxygen Isotopes in Water
from Martian Meteorites. Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 33, A11-A12.
Becker, R.H. & Pepin, R.O (1984). The Case for a Martian Origin of the Shergottites:
Nitrogen and Noble Gases in EET A79001. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 69, 225-242.
Bogard, D.D. & Johnson, P. (1983). Martian Gases in an Antarctic Meteorite. Science
221, 631-634.
Bridges, J.C., Seabrook, A.M., Rothery, D.A., Kim, J.-R., Pillinger, C.T., Sims, M.R.,
Golombek, M.P., Duxbury, T., Head, J.W., Muller, J-P., Moncrieff, C., Wright, I.P.,
Mitchell, K.L., Grady, M.M. & Morley, J.G. (2002). Selection of the Landing Site
in Isidis planitia of Mars Probe Beagle 2. J. Geophys. Res. (in press).
Bullock, M.A., Stoker, C.R., McKay, C.P. & Zent, A.P. (1994). A Coupled Soil-
Atmosphere Model H2O2 on Mars. Icarus 107, 142-154.
Burgess, R., Wright, I.P. & Pillinger, C.T. (1989). Distribution of Sulphides and
Oxidised Sulphur Components in SNC Meteorites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 93, 314-
320.
Carr, R.H., Grady, M.M, Wright, I.P. & Pillinger, C.T. (1985). Martian Atmospheric
Carbon Dioxide and Weathering Products in SNC Meteorites. Nature 314, 248-
250.
The ESA Exobiology Team (1999). Exobiology in the Solar System and The Search
for Life on Mars. (Ed. A. Wilson). ESA SP-1231, ESA Publications Division,
Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
Franchi, I.A., Wright, I.P., Sexton, A.S. & Pillinger, C.T. (1999). The Oxygen-Isotopic
Composition of Earth and Mars. Meteoritics Planet. Sci. 34, 657-661.
Golombek, M.P., Cook, R.A., Economou, T., Folkner, W.M., Haldemann, A.F.C.,
Kallemeyn, P.H., Knudsen, J.M., Manning, R.M., Moore, H.J., Parker, T.J.,
Rieder, R., Schofield, J.T., Smith, P.H. & Vaughan, R.M. (1997). Overview of the
Mars Pathfinder Mission and Assessment of Landing Site Predictions. Science 278,
1734-1748.
Gooding, J.L., Wentworth, S.J. & Zolensky, M.E. (1988). Calcium Carbonate and
Sulphate of Possible Extraterrestrial Origin in the EET A79001 Meteorite.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52, 909-915.
Gooding, J.L., Wentworth, S.J. & Zolensky, M.E. (1991). Aqueous Alteration of the
Nakhla Meteorite. Meteoritics 26, 135-143.
202
Grady, M.M., Wright, I.P. & Pillinger, C.T. (1995). A Search for Nitrates in Martian
Meteorites. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 5449-5455.
Harri, A.-M., Linkin, V., Pollko, J., Marov, M., Pommereau, J-P., Lipatov, A., Siili, T.,
Manuilov, K., Lebedev, V., Lehto, A., Pellinen, R., Pirjola, R., Carpentier, T.,
Malique, C., Makarov, V., Khloustova, L., Esposito, L., Maki, J., Lawrence, G. &
Lystev, V. (1998). Meteorological Observations on Martian Surface: Met-Packages
of Mars-96 Small Stations and Penetrators. Planet. Space Sci. 46, 6/7, 779-793.
Harvey, R.P. & McSween, H.Y. (1996). A Possible High-Temperature Origin for the
Carbonates in Martian Meteorite ALH 84001. Nature 382, 49-51.
Jull, A.J.T., Donahue, D.J., Swindle, T.D., Burkland, M.K., Herzog, G.F., Albrecht, A.,
Klein, J. & Middleton, R. (1992). Isotopic Studies Relevant to the Origin of the
‘White Druse’ Carbonates on EET A79001. Lunar Planet. Sci. XXIII, 641-642.
Karlsson, H.R., Clayton, R.N., Gibson, E.K. & Mayeda, T.K. (1992). Water in SNC
Meteorites: Evidence for a Martian Hydrosphere. Science 255, 1409-1411.
Klingelhöfer, G. (1998). In-situ Analysis of Planetary Surfaces by Mossbauer
Spectroscopy. Hyperfine Interact. 113, 369-374.
Klingelhöfer, G., Fegley, B., Morris, R.V., Kankeleit, E., Held, P., Evlanov, E. & Prilout-
skii, O. (1996). Mineralogical Analysis of Martian Soil and Rock by a Miniaturized
Backscattering Mossbauer Spectrometer. Planet. Space Sci. 44, 1277-1288.
Leshin, L.A., McKeegan, K.S., Carpenter, P.K. & Harvey, R.P. (1998). Oxygen
Isotopic Constraints on the Genesis of Carbonates from Martian Meteorite ALH
84001. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 62, 3-13.
McDonald, G.D. & Bada, J.L. (1995). A Search for Endogenous Amino Acids in the
Martian Meteorite EET A79001. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 59, 1179-1184.
McKay, D.S., Gibson, E.K., Thomas-Keprta, K.L., Vali, H., Romanek, C.S., Clemett, S.J.,
Chillier, X.D.F., Maechling, C.R. & Zare, R.N. (1996). Search for Life on Mars:
Possible Relic Biogenic Activity in Martian Meteorite ALH 84001. Science 273, 924-
930.
McSween, H.Y. (1985). SNC Meteorites: Clues to Martian Petrologic Evolution? Rev.
Geophysics 23, 391-416.
McSween, H.Y. (1994). What We Have Learned about Mars from SNC Meteorites.
Meteoritics 29, 757-779.
Mittlefehldt, D.W. (1994). ALH 84001, a Cumulate Orthopyroxinite Member of the
Martian Meteorite Clan. Meteoritics 29, 214-221.
Owen, T. (1992). The Composition and Early History for the Atmosphere of Mars. In
Mars (Eds. H.H. Kieffer, B.M. Jakosky, C.W. Sryder & M.S.Mathews), University
of Arizona Press, Tuscon, 818-834.
Owen, T., Biemann, K., Rushneck, D.R., Buller, J.E., Howarth, D.W. & LaFleur, A.L
(1997). The Compositon of the Atmosphere at the Surface of Mars. J. Geophys.
Res. 82, 4635-4639.
Pepin, R.O. (1985). Evidence of Martian Origins. Nature 317, 473-475.
Re, E., Kochan, H., Magnani, P.G. & Ylikorpi, T. (1997). Small Sample Acquisition/
Distribution Tool (SSA/DT). Final Report ESTEC Co. No. 11485/95 NL PP(SC),
Milano.
Rieder, R., Economou, T., Wänke, H., Turkevich, A., Crisp, J., Brückner, J., Dreibus, G.
& McSween, H.Y. (1997). The Chemical Composition of Martian Soil and Rocks
Returned by the Mobile Alpha Proton X-ray Spectrometer: Preliminary Results
from the X-ray Mode. Science 278, 1771-1774.
Romanek, C.S., Grady, M.M., Wright, I.P., Mittlefehldt, D.W., Socki, R.A., Pillin-
ger, C.T. & Gibson, E.K. (1994). Record of Fluid-Rock Interactions on Mars from
the Meteorite ALH 84001. Nature 372, 655-657.
Ryan, J. A. & Lucich, R. D. (1983). Possible Dust Devil Vortices on Mars. J. Geo-
phys. Res. 88, 11005-11011.
Saxton, J.M., Lyon, I.C. & Turner, E. (1998). Correlated Chemical and Isotopic
Zoning in Carbonates in the Martian Meteorite ALH84001. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett.
160, 811-822.
203
SP-1240
Schidlowski, M. (1997). Application of Stable Carbon Isotopes to Early Biochemical

Evolution on Earth. Ann. Rev. Earth and Planet. Sci. 15, 47-72.
Smith, P.H., Bell, J.F., Bridges, N.T., Britt, D.T., Gaddis, L., Greeley, R., Keller, H.U.,
Herkenhoff, K.E., Jaumann, R., Johnson, J.R., Kirk, R.L., Lemmon, M., Maki, J.N.,
Malin, M.C., Murchie, S.L., Oberst, J., Parker, T.J., Reid, R.J., Sablotny, R.,
Soderblom, L.A., Stoker, C., Sullivan, R., Thomas, N., Tomasko, M.G., Ward, W. &
Wegryn, E. (1997). Results from the Mars Pathfinder Camera. Science 278, 1758-
1765.
Stoker, C.R. & Bullock, M.A. (1997). Organic Degradation under Simulated Martian
Conditions. J. Geophysical Res. 102, 10881-10888.
Tuzzolino, A.J. (1995). Applications of PVDF Dust Sensor Systems in Space in-situ
Impact Detection Techniques, Interplanetary Dust, and Future Mars Exploration.
Adv. Space Res. 17 (12): 123-132.
Valley, J., Eiler, J.M., Graham, C.M., Gibson, E.K., Romanek, C.S. & Stolper, E.M.
(1997). Low-Temperature Carbonate Concentrations in the Martian Meteorite
ALH 84001: Evidence from Stable Isotopes and Mineralogy. Science 275, 1633-
1638.
Wiens, R.C., Becker, R.H. & Pepin, R.O. (1986). The Case for a Martian Origin of
the Shergottites. II Trapped and Indigenous Gas Gomponents in EET A79001
Glass. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 77, 149-158.
Wood, C.A. & Ashwal, C.D. (1981). SNC Meteorites: Igneous Rocks from Mars? In
Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf., 12th, 1359-1375.
Wright, I.P., Grady, M.M. & Pillinger, C.T. (1988). Carbon, Oxygen and Nitrogen
Isotopic Compositions of Possible Martian Weathering Products in EET A79001.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 52, 917-924.
Wright, I.P., Grady, M.M. & Pillinger, C.T. (1989). Organic Materials in a Martian
Meteorite. Nature 340, 220-222.
Wright, I.P., Grady, M.M. & Pillinger, C.T. (1992). Chassigny and the Nakhlites:
Carbon-bearing Components and their Relationship to Martian Environmental
Conditions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 817-826.
Wright, I.P., Grady, M.M. & Pillinger, C.T. (1997a). Evidence Relevant to the Life on
Mars Debate. (1) 14C Results. Lunar Planet. Sci. XXVIII, 1585-1586.
Wright, I.P., Grady, M.M. & Pillinger, C.T. (1997b). Evidence Relevant to the Life on
Mars Debate (2) Amino Acid Results. Lunar Planet. Sci. XXVII, 1587-1588.
Wright, I.P. & Pillinger, C.T. (1998a). Modulus – An Experiment to Measure Precise
Stable Isotope Ratios on Cometary Materials. Adv. Space Res. 21, 1537-1545.
Wright, I.P. & Pillinger, C.T. (1998b). Mars, Modulus and MAGIC. The Measurement
of Stable Isotopic Compositions at a Planetary Surface. Planet. Space Sci. 46, 813-
823.
Zent, A.P. & McKay, C.P. (1994). The Chemical Reactivity of the Martian Soil and
Implications for Future Missions. Icarus 108, 146-157.
Acknowledgements
The Beagle 2 consortium has a large industrial component concerned with the
engineering aspects of the programme; we gratefully acknowledge the involvement of
everyone in the team. In addition, the authors would like to express their gratitude to
the European Space Agency (ESA), the UK Particle Physics and Astronomy Research
Council (PPARC), EADS Astrium, the Wellcome Trust and the British National Space
Centre (BNSC).
204
Morrison.qxd 7/7/04 3:04 PM Page 205
US PARTICIPATION
US Participation in Mars Express
A.D. Morrison1, T.W. Thompson1, R.L. Horttor1, C.H. Acton1, Jr., S. Butman1, J.K. Campbell1, P.L. Jepsen1,
W.T.K. Johnson1, J.D. Winningham2, J.J. Plaut1 & A. Vaisnys1
1
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
Email: Andrew.D.Morrison@jpl.nasa.gov
2
Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, TX 78228, USA
This paper describes US participation in the Mars Express mission, in which

NASA is a supporting partner.
In December 1997, ESA issued an Announcement of Opportunity for experiments to 1. Introduction

be included in the Mars Express mission. Mars Express is flying refurbished
European instruments developed for the Russian-led Mars-96 mission, plus an
advanced radar sounder capable of characterising the martian subsurface to a depth of
several kilometres. US scientists who had been appointed Mars-96 Participating
Scientists by NASA were invited to propose as instrument Co-Investigators (Co-Is).
NASA and the Italian Space Agency (ASI) submitted a joint experiment proposal for
the subsurface sounder: the Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and Ionosphere
Sounding (MARSIS).
NASA Headquarters was represented in the ESA selection process. Eleven US
proposers were selected by ESA as instrument Co-Is. The selected investigators
subsequently submitted proposals and proposed budgets to NASA and were
appointed by NASA. The NASA/ASI MARSIS sounder was selected over a
competing proposal prepared by a German-led consortium. J. Plaut, of the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), is the MARSIS Co-Principal Investigator (Co-PI) and
W.T.K. Johnson was named as Instrument Manager. NASA is also funding hardware
development, data reduction and archiving tasks for the Analyser of Space Plasma
and Energetic Atoms (ASPERA-3) instrument via the agency’s Discovery Mission of
Opportunity. Two of ASPERA-3’s four data-gathering sensors, the Electron
Spectrometer and the Ion Mass Analyser, were built by the Southwest Research
Institute (SwRI).
Table 1 lists the Mars Express experiments and their US Investigators. Table 2 lists
the key US personnel.
US participation primarily consists of the Mars Express/NASA Project, managed by 2. US Participation

JPL. The contribution to ASPERA-3 is supported by the Discovery Program,
managed by the NASA Management Office, also located in Pasadena.
2.1 Mars Express/NASA Project

The structure of the Mars Express/NASA Project is shown in Fig. 1. It includes the
US role in MARSIS, support for the US investigators and a Telecommunications and
Interoperability Task to study communications between elements of Mars Express
and US assets at Mars. In addition, the Deep Space Network (DSN) will provide
tracking support.
207
SP-1240
Table 1. US participation in Mars Express instruments.
Country Instrument PI US Hardware US Co-Is
I/US MARSIS G. Picardi, Univ. of Rome W.T.K. Johnson, JPL/ J. Plaut, JPL
Co-PI, J.J. Plaut D. Gurnett, Univ. of Iowa D. Gurnett, Univ. of Iowa
RF subsystems and E. Stofan, Proxemy Research Inc
Sounder antenna
I PFS V. Formisano, Instituto Fisica S. Atreya, Univ of Michigan
Spazio Interplanetario
D HRSC C.G. Neukum, M. Carr, USGS
DLR Institut für R. Kirk, US Geological Survey
Planetenerjundung T. Duxbury, JPL
R. Greeley, Univ. of Arizona
J. Head, Brown Univ.
T. McCord, Univ. of Hawaii
S. Squyres, Cornell Univ.
D MaRS M. Paetzold, Univ. of Cologne L. Tyler, Stanford Univ.
F SPICAM J.L. Bertaux, Service d’Aéronomie, W. Sandel, Univ. of Arizona
Verrières-le-Buisson A. Stern, SwRI
F OMEGA J.P. Bibring, Institut d’Astrophysique
Spatiale
S ASPERA-3 R. Lundin, Swedish Institute D. Winningham, SwRI C. Curtis, Univ. of Arizona
of Space Physics Electron Spectrometer K.C. Hsieh, Univ. of Arizona
and portions of J. Kozyra, Univ. of Michigan
the Ion Mass Analyser J. Luhmann, Univ. of California
E. Roelof, Johns Hopkins Univ.
B. Sandel, Univ. of Arizona
J. Sharber, SwRI
R. Frahm, SwRI
D. Williams, Johns Hopkins Univ.
UK Beagle 2 C. Pillinger, Open Univ. M. Sinha, JPL
Table 2. Key US Mars Express personnel.
Mars Express/NASA Project Manager: Richard L. Horttor (richard.l.horttor@jpl.nasa.gov)

Mars Express/NASA Project Science Manager: Thomas W. Thompson (thomas.thompson@jpl.nasa.gov)
MARSIS Instrument Manager: William T.K. Johnson (wtk.johnson@jpl.nasa.gov)
Mars Express/NASA Project Telecommunications and Interoperability Task Manager: Stanley A. Butman (stanley.butman@jpl.nasa.gov)
MARSIS Co-PI: Jeffrey J. Plaut (plaut@jpl.nasa.gov)
ASPERA-3 ELS PI: J. David Winningham (david@cluster.space.swri.edu)
Discovery Program Manager: John B. McNamee (john.b.mcnamee@jpl.nasa.gov)
NASA Headquarters Program Executive: David Lavery (dave.lavery@hq.nasa.gov)
NASA Headquarters Program Scientist: Catherine Weitz (cweitz@hq.nasa.gov)
208
us participation
Fig. 1. The structure of the Mars

Express/NASA Project.
Specific goals of the Mars Express/NASA Project are:
— to support the science objectives of HRSC (High Resolution Stereo Camera),

OMEGA (IR mapping spectrometer), MaRS (Mars Radio Science), PFS
(Planetary Fourier Spectrometer), SPICAM (UV atmospheric spectrometer),
ASPERA-3 and MARSIS instruments by providing US Co-I support;
— to provide information and advice on navigation and mission operations that
could be used by Mars Express;
— to provide the Radio Frequency (RF) subsystem for MARSIS, including the
integrated transmitter, antenna and receiver;
— to plan for relaying communications to and from Beagle-2 and any potential
European 2005 landers using NASA and ESA orbital assets;
— to coordinate US planning inputs to Mars Express orbiter observations and secure
support from JPL’s Telecommunications and Mission Operations Directorate for
tracking and navigation support for Mars orbit insertion;
— to archive a copy of the science investigation data in a Planetary Data System
(PDS)-compatible format, as specified in the international agreements;
— to support the HRSC investigation with adaptation of NASA/JPL image
processing software;
— to deploy the Spacecraft, Planet, Instrument, C-matrix, Events (SPICE) ancillary
information system.
The Mars Express/NASA Project completed the transition from Phase-B (Planning)
into Phase-C/D (Implementation) in September 2000. Launch initiated mission
operations.
2.2 MARSIS
The MARSIS Program is funded by both NASA and ASI. ASI maintains the science
leadership through the Principal Investigator (PI), Giovanni Picardi of the INFOCOM
Department of the University of Rome, while NASA maintains the instrument
leadership through JPL. The US MARSIS Team provided the antennas and the
receiver and transmitter subsystems; Alenia Spazio, Rome had responsibility for the
digital subsystem and instrument integration and test, under direction of the JPL
Instrument Manager. The Co-PI serves as the lead scientist for the NASA side of the
joint experiment.
The University of Iowa, under contract to JPL, constructed the antenna subsystem,
209
SP-1240
working with their subcontractor, TRW-Astro, Inc., of Carpenteria, CA. The

University of Iowa, under contract to JPL, built the transmitter subsystem; JPL built
the receiver subsystem. JPL integrated the antenna, transmitter and receiver
subsystems into a single RF subsystem that was delivered to Alenia Spazio, who
integrated it with their digital electronic system and delivered an integrated MARSIS
instrument to ESA (Astrium) for mating to the spacecraft.
2.3 Science Support Task

The Science Support Task (SST) comprises three Sub-Tasks: the Co-I Sub-Task, the
HRSC-Multimission Image Processing Laboratory (MIPL) Sub-Task, the Navigation
and Ancillary Information Facility (NAIF)-SPICE Sub-Task and several ancillary
activities, including possible US navigation contributions to the mission.
The Co-I support activity funds and manages the Co-PI and Co-Is. With the
exception of OMEGA, all Orbiter instruments have one or more US Co-Is. The SST
will support OMEGA Co-Is, once selected. The MARSIS Co-PI is also supported by
the SST.
US Co-Investigators will provide instrument calibration, data validation and data
archiving support to their respective Instrument PIs and Teams to help ensure that the
data products meet the objectives of the mission. Co-Investigators are expected to
publish the results of their scientific analysis and provide their data products to the
PDS. Interdisciplinary and Participating Scientists, when selected, will also be
supported by the Co-I support activity.
The Co-I activity also supports obtaining DSN tracking and data communication
through Mars Express Project Service Level Agreements (PSLAs), approved Letters
of Agreement (LOAs) and Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs), allowing technical
exchange between the US Co-Is and their European colleagues and JPL navigation
support to the mission.
The HRSC/MIPL telemetry software development activity is similar to that for
Mars-96. The basic HRSC instrument is the same except that the wide-angle camera
was deleted and a Super-Resolution Channel (SRC) added. With those exceptions, the
instrument formats are the same, including the data compression. The spacecraft is
completely different, as are the telemetry systems.
MIPL developed the HRSC telemetry processing software. This will convert the
HRSC data as they are received in Berlin (D) from ESA into a format compatible with
existing image processing software for further processing. The telemetry processing
includes a telemetry processor and data-merge and decompression programs.
After using the telemetry processor on its data, DLR will distribute this processed
imagery daily to its Co-Is, so that the US HRSC Co-Is can support Mars Express
mission operations, as well as meet their individual commitments as described in their
proposals. As part of this distribution activity, MIPL will receive these processed data
electronically on behalf of the HRSC Co-Is and then distribute them directly to the
US Co-Is.
MIPL will maintain approximately 60 days of the most current HRSC Mars
Express data online, with the remainder held in an offline store. The data will be
provided to the US HRSC Co-Is automatically through a subscription service or on a
request basis. They will have access to the data in level 1 or 2 format, such as the
decompressed version of the level 0 image product, or the radiometrically corrected
version of level 1. The radiometric correction software and calibration files will be
provided to MIPL by DLR.
MIPL will also develop PDS generation and validation software to convert the
HRSC processed imagery into a PDS-compatible format. DLR will then use this
software to place its HRSC data on archive volumes for delivery to the PDS imaging
node at JPL. There will also be sustaining support for the JPL-developed software for
the first 6 months after orbital insertion.
NASA’s SPICE system was conceived to provide planetary scientists with a
standard, flexible and proven method of obtaining and properly using the suite of
210
us participation
Fig. 2. Mars telecommunications

interoperability.
ancillary and engineering data needed for conceptualising and evaluating mission
designs, planning scientific observations, analysing scientific data and comparing
results obtained from multiple instruments and multiple spacecraft. To this end,
SPICE is used – or being adapted for use – on all NASA planetary missions, including
the full suite of JPL’s Mars Exploration Program missions. NASA’s SPICE system
will be deployed to support the US Co-Is, the HRSC team operations, and the other
instrument teams as interested. SPICE was developed and is maintained by JPL’s
NAIF.
In particular, JPL provided the SPICE Tool Kit software and documentation to
ESTEC and Mars Express PI and Co-I teams and team members who will be involved
in producing and using SPICE data components. The latest versions were delivered in
November 2000, June 2001 and June 2002. In conducting its work, the SPICE Sub-
Task is striving to achieve as much commonality as possible with the use of SPICE
by NASA Mars missions.
2.4 Relay communications and tracking interoperability

Another ESA-NASA area of cooperation involves tracking and telecommunication
interoperability. NASA is supporting efforts to establish and demonstrate communica-
tions and tracking interoperability between the various orbiting and landing elements
of NASA and ESA. Starting with the Mars 2001 Orbiter and the 2003 Landers, NASA
plans to launch a series of orbiting and landing/roving elements, with the eventual
goal of returning rock and soil samples to Earth. With all these assets, including Mars
Express, in Mars orbit and on the surface, it is desirable to provide communication
and navigation cross-support between the NASA and ESA elements. This support
may be highly desirable during certain critical mission events such as orbit insertion
or landing. Fig. 2 shows the potential combinations of cross-support at Mars for Mars
Express and other elements in the 2001-2005 time frame.
Achieving interoperability requires several steps:
— determine the interface characteristics of each pair of elements;

— if compatible, proceed to write the Interface Control Documents (ICDs);
— if not compatible, propose design changes to one or both elements;
— write ICD to define interface to be tested;
211
SP-1240
— write test plan and schedule test;

— perform interface test and document results.
2.5 Navigation and orbit insertion

When the Mars Express spacecraft arrives at Mars, it will deliver the Beagle-2 lander
and brake into an elliptical orbit about the planet. Achieving the operational orbit
might involve aerobraking. Coordination between the ESA/ESOC Flight Dynamics
Division and the NASA/JPL Navigation Section will improve understanding of the
mission constraints and risks. This follows the path pioneered by previous joint ESA-
NASA missions such as Giotto, Ulysses and Mars Pathfinder. Comparison of
navigation results from techniques and procedures developed by each agency is the
primary objective of a series of workshops starting in September 2000 on navigation
collaboration for Mars Express.
2.6 The Discovery Program and ASPERA-3

NASA’s Discovery Program is supporting ASPERA-3 as a Discovery Mission of
Opportunity, which is not a complete Discovery Mission but rather a portion of a
larger mission. In this case, it gives the US scientific community the chance to
participate in a mission of a non-US government agency. For ASPERA-3, the
Discovery Program is funding both hardware development and data reduction, and
the PDS archiving tasks being performed by the SwRI.
The Swedish Institute of Space Physics headed the development of ASPERA-3.
The instrument has four sensors, along with the data processing unit and the scanning
platform. Two of the sensors, the Electron Spectrometer (ELS) and the Ion Mass
Analyser (IMA), are funded by NASA as a Discovery Mission of Opportunity. ELS
and IMA were built by SwRI, led by D. Winningham as PI and J. Scherrer as Project
Manager. The instrument was built by an international team of 15 groups from 10
countries.
ASPERA-3’s scientific objectives are to study the interaction between the solar
wind and the atmosphere of Mars and to characterise the plasma and neutral gas
environment in near-Mars space. It uses Energetic Neutral Atom (ENA) imaging to
visualise the charged and neutral gas environments around Mars. ASPERA-3 will
make the first ever ENA measurements at another planet. These studies will address
the fundamental question of how strongly interplanetary plasma and electromagnetic
fields affect the martian atmosphere, which is directly related to the many questions
about water on Mars.
Acknowledgement
The work described in this paper was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and
Space Administration.
212
acronyms.qxd 7/7/04 3:03 PM Page 213
ACRONYMS &
ABBREVIATIONS
AAF Aseptic Assembly Facility (Beagle 2) EQM Electrical Qualification Model

ADU analogue to digital conversion unit ESA European Space Agency; electrostatic analyser
AIV assembly, integration and verification ESAC European Space Astronomy Centre, Villafranca
AO Announcement of Opportunity (Spain)
AOTF acousto-optical tunable filter ESOC European Space Operations Centre, Darmstadt
APS Auxiliary Power Supply (Germany)
APXS Alpha Proton X-ray Spectrometer (NASA Mars ESS Environmental Sensor Suite
Pathfinder) ESTEC European Space Research and Technology Centre,
ARM Anthropomorphic Robot Manipulator (Beagle 2) Noordwijk (The Netherlands)
ASI Italian space agency ETM Electrical Test Model
ASIC Application Specific Integrated Circuit EUV extreme ultraviolet
ASPERA Analyser of Space Plasma and Energetic Atoms EW equivalent width
(Mars Express)
AU Astronomical Unit
FFT Fast Fourier Transform
FIR far-infrared
BEE Back End Electronics FM flight model
BEEST Back End Electronics Stack (Beagle 2) FOV field of view
BL bootstrap loader FPGA field programmable gate array
FUV far-ultraviolet
FW(A) filter wheel (assembly)
CCD Charge Coupled Device FWHM full width at half maximum
CCH Common Camera Head
CDPU Command & Data Processing Unit
CNES Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales GaAs gallium arsenide
CNR Consiglio Nazionale della Ricercha (Italy) GAP Gas Analysis Package (Beagle 2)
CNRS Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique GCM general circulation model
(France) GC-MS gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer
CMOS Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor GDS global dust storm
Co-I Co-Investigator GTM Ground Test Model
COSPAR UN Committee on Space Research
CSW common software
CT Calibration Target (the Damien Hirst ‘spot’ painting HK housekeeping
on Beagle 2) HRSC High Resolution Stereo Camera (Mars Express)
CUL close-up lens
IAS Institut d’Astrophysique Spatiale, Orsay (France)

DCT Discrete Cosine Transform ICA Ion Composition Analyser (Rosetta)
DEM Digital Elevation Model ICD Interface Control Document
DES Digital Electronic Subsystem IDS Interdisciplinary Scientist
DESPA Observatoire de Paris, Département de Recherches IF Improvement Factor
Spatiales (France) IFMS Intermediate Frequency and Modem System
DHA Detector Head Assembly IFSI Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario (Italy)
DLR Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt IKI Institute for Space Research (Russia)
DM Development Model IFOV instantaneous field of view
DN Data Number (pixel intensity on scale of 0-255) IMA Ion Mass Analyser (ASPERA)
DSN Deep Space Network (DSN) IMEWG International Mars Exploration Working Group
DTM Digital Terrain Model; data-transmission mode IMI Ion Mass Imager (Nozomi)
DVD digital versatile disk IMIS Ion-Mass Imaging Spectrometer (Mars-96)
IMP Imager for Pathfinder
IR infrared
EDLS Entry, Descent and Landing System ISM imaging spectrometer (Phobos mission)
EEPROM electrically erasable programmable read-only ISO Infrared Space Observatory (ESA)
memory
EGSE electrical ground support equipment
ELS Electron Spectrometer (ASPERA) JPL Jet Propulsion Laboratory (NASA)
ELM Electronics Module
ENA Energetic Neutral Atom (ASPERA)
EPROM erasable programmable read-only memory LEC local common electronics
215
LCP left-hand circular polarisation PSA Planetary Science Data Archive

LOA Letter of Agreement PSLA Project Service Level Agreements
LOC Lander Operations Centre PSSL Planetary Science Sample Library
LOS line of sight PST Project Scientist Team
LSW Lander Software (Beagle 2) PSW Probe Software (Beagle 2)
LTE local thermodynamic equilibrium px pixel
LUT look-up table
LW long wavelength
QM Qualification Model
MaRS Mars Radio Science (Mars Express)

MARSIS Mars Advanced Radar for Subsurface and RCL Recognised Cooperating Laboratory
Ionosphere Sounding (Mars Express) RCG Rock Corer Grinder (Beagle 2)
MBS Mössbauer Spectrometer (Beagle 2) RCP right-hand circular polarisation
MCA Multi-Channel Analyser (Beagle 2) RFS Radio Frequency Subsystem
MCO Mars Climate Orbiter (NASA) rms root mean square
MCP micro-channel plate
MEDUSA Miniaturized Electrostatic DUal-top-hat Spherical
Analyzer SCS Stereo Camera System (Beagle 2)
MEE Micro-End Effector (Beagle 2) SHADS Sample Handling and Distribution System
MELACOM Mars Express Lander Communications subsystems (Beagle 2)
MEP Mars Exploration Program (NASA) S/N signal-to-noise ratio
MGS Mars Global Surveyor (NASA) SNC Shergottite-Nakhilite-Chassignite meteorite
MGSE mechanical ground support equipment SOWG Science Operations Working Group
MIC microscope SPICAM Spectroscopy for the Investigation of the
MIPL Multimission Image Processing Laboratory (JPL) Characteristics of the Atmosphere of Mars (Mars
MLI multi-layer insulation Express)
MOC Mission Operations Centre; Mars Observer Camera SPICE Spacecraft, Planet, Instrument, C-matrix, Events
MOCAD Monolithic Octal Charge Amplifier/Pulse system
Discriminator SRC Super-Resolution Channel (HRSC)
MOLA Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MGS) SST Science Support Task
MOU Memorandum of Understanding SUEM Spin-Up and Eject Mechanism (Beagle 2)
MPF Mars Pathfinder (NASA) SW short wavelength
MSM Mass Stiffness Model SWIR short wavelength infrared
MSP Master Science Plan SWS Short Wavelength Spectrometer (ISO)
Msps Megasamples per second
TCS Thermal Control System

NAIF Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility (JPL) TES Thermal Emission Spectrometer (Mars Global
NEB noise equivalent brightness Surveyor)
NPD Neutral Particle Detector (ASPERA) TGCM thermospheric general circulation model
NPI Neutral Particle Imager (ASPERA) TICS Three-dimensional Ion Composition Spectrometer
(Freja)
TMOD Telecommunications and Mission Operations
OBDM onboard data management Directorate (JPL)
OMEGA Observatoire pour la Minéralogie, l’Eau, les Glaces TOF time-of-flight
et l’Activitié (Mars Express) TT Translation Table (Beagle 2)
TTL transistor-transistor logic
TWTA travelling wave tube amplifier
PAW Position Adjustable Workbench (Beagle 2)
PDS Planetary Data System
PFM Proto Flight Model VMC Visual Monitoring Camera
PFS Planetary Fourier Spectrometer (Mars Express) VNIR visible & near-infrared
PG Pattern Generator
PLUTO Planetary Underground Tool (Beagle 2)
POS Payload Operations Service WAM Wide Angle Mirror (Beagle 2)
PPS Payload Power Supply (Beagle 2)
PRF Pulse Repetition Frequency
PROM programmable read-only memory XRS X-Ray Spectrometer (Beagle 2)
216
Mars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Mars (planet))

Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about the planet. For other uses, see Mars (disambiguation).
Mars
Mars as seen by the Hubble Space Telescope
Designations
Adjective Martian
Orbital characteristics[1]
Epoch J2000
249 209 300 km

Aphelion
1.665 861 AU
206 669 000 km
Perihelion
1.381 497 AU
227 939 100 km
Semi-major axis
1.523 679 AU
Eccentricity 0.093 315
686.971 day
Orbital period 1.8808 Julian years
668.5991 sols
779.96 day
Synodic period
2.135 Julian years
Average orbital speed 24.077 km/s
1.850°
Inclination
5.65° to Sun's Equator
Longitude of
49.562°
ascending node
Argument of perihelion 286.537°
Satellites 2
Physical characteristics
3 396.2 ± 0.1 km[a][2]
Equatorial radius
0.533 Earths
3 376.2 ± 0.1 km[a][2]
Polar radius
0.531 Earths
Flattening 0.005 89 ± 0.000 15
144 798 500 km²
Surface area
0.284 Earths
1.6318×1011 km³
Volume
0.151 Earths
6.4185×1023 kg
Mass
0.107 Earths
Mean density 3.934 g/cm³
Equatorial 3.69 m/s²
surface gravity 0.376 g
Escape velocity 5.027 km/s
Sidereal rotation 1.025 957 day
period 24.622 96 h[3]
Equatorial
868.22 km/h
rotation velocity
Axial tilt 25.19°
North pole right 21 h 10 min 44 s
ascension 317.681 43°
North pole declination 52.886 50°
Albedo 0.15[4]
Surface temp. min mean max
Kelvin 186 K 227 K 268 K[3]
Celsius −87 °C −46 °C −5 °C
Apparent magnitude +1.8 to −2.91[4]
Angular diameter 3.5—25.1"[4]
Atmosphere
Surface pressure 0.7–0.9 kPa
Composition 95.72% Carbon dioxide
2.7% Nitrogen
1.6% Argon
0.2% Oxygen
0.07% Carbon monoxide
0.03% Water vapor
0.01% Nitric oxide
2.5 ppm Neon
300 ppb Krypton
130 ppb Formaldehyde
80 ppb Xenon
30 ppb Ozone
10 ppb Methane
Mars (pronounced /ˈmɑrz/) is the fourth planet from the Sun in the Solar System. The
planet is named after Mars, the Roman god of war. It is also referred to as the "Red
Planet" because of its reddish appearance. This reddish appearance is due to iron oxide.
Mars is a terrestrial planet with a thin atmosphere, having surface features reminiscent
both of the impact craters of the Moon and the volcanoes, valleys, deserts and polar ice
caps of Earth. It is the site of Olympus Mons, the highest known mountain in the Solar
System, and of Valles Marineris, the largest canyon. Furthermore, in June 2008 three
articles published in Nature presented evidence of an enormous impact crater in Mars'
northern hemisphere, 10 600 km long by 8 500 km wide, or roughly four times larger
than the largest impact crater yet discovered, the South Pole-Aitken basin.[5][6] In addition
to its geographical features, Mars’ rotational period and seasonal cycles are likewise
similar to those of Earth.
Until the first flyby of Mars by Mariner 4 in 1965, many speculated that there might be
liquid water on the planet's surface. This was based on observations of periodic variations
in light and dark patches, particularly in the polar latitudes, which looked like seas and
continents, while long, dark striations were interpreted by some observers as irrigation
channels for liquid water. These straight line features were later proven not to exist and
were instead explained as optical illusions. Still, of all the planets in the Solar System
other than Earth, Mars is the most likely to harbor liquid water, and perhaps life.[7] Water,
in the state of ice, was found by the Phoenix Mars Lander on July 31, 2008.[8]
Mars is currently host to three functional orbiting spacecraft: Mars Odyssey, Mars
Express, and the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. With the exception of Earth, this is more
than any planet in the Solar System. The surface is also home to the two Mars
Exploration Rovers (Spirit and Opportunity) and several inert landers and rovers, both
successful and unsuccessful. The Phoenix lander recently completed its mission on the
surface. Geological evidence gathered by these and preceding missions suggests that
Mars previously had large-scale water coverage, while observations also indicate that
small geyser-like water flows have occurred during the past decade.[9] Observations by
NASA's Mars Global Surveyor show evidence that parts of the southern polar ice cap
have been receding.[10]
Mars has two moons, Phobos and Deimos, which are small and irregularly shaped. These
may be captured asteroids, similar to 5261 Eureka, a Martian Trojan asteroid. Mars can
be seen from Earth with the naked eye. Its apparent magnitude reaches −2.9,[4] a
brightness surpassed only by Venus, the Moon, and the Sun, though most of the time
Jupiter will appear brighter to the naked eye than Mars.
Physical characteristics
Size comparison of terrestrial planets (left to right): Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars.
Mars has approximately half the radius of Earth. It is less dense than Earth, having about
15% of Earth's volume and 11% of the mass. Its surface area is only slightly less than the
total area of Earth's dry land.[4] While Mars is larger and more massive than Mercury,
Mercury has a higher density. This results in a slightly stronger gravitational force at
Mercury's surface. Mars is also roughly intermediate in size, mass, and surface gravity
between Earth and Earth's Moon (the Moon is about half the diameter of Mars, whereas
Earth is twice; the Earth is about ten times more massive than Mars, and the Moon ten
times less massive). The red-orange appearance of the Martian surface is caused by
iron(III) oxide, more commonly known as hematite, or rust.[11]
Geology
Volcanic plateaus (red) and impact basins (blue) dominate this topographic map of Mars.
Rock strewn surface imaged by Mars Pathfinder
Main article: Geology of Mars
Based on orbital observations and the examination of the Martian meteorite collection,
the surface of Mars appears to be composed primarily of basalt. Some evidence suggests
that a portion of the Martian surface is more silica-rich than typical basalt, and may be
similar to andesitic rocks on Earth; however, these observations may also be explained by
silica glass. Much of the surface is deeply covered by a fine iron(III) oxide dust that has
the consistency of talcum powder.[citation needed]
Although Mars has no intrinsic magnetic field, observations show that parts of the
planet's crust have been magnetized and that alternating polarity reversals of its dipole
field have occurred. This paleomagnetism of magnetically susceptible minerals has
properties that are very similar to the alternating bands found on the ocean floors of
Earth. One theory, published in 1999 and re-examined in October 2005 (with the help of
the Mars Global Surveyor), is that these bands demonstrate plate tectonics on Mars 4
billion years ago, before the planetary dynamo ceased to function and caused the planet's
magnetic field to fade away.[12]
Current models of the planet's interior imply a core region about 1,480 kilometres in
radius, consisting primarily of iron with about 14–17% sulfur. This iron sulfide core is
partially fluid, and has twice the concentration of the lighter elements than exist at Earth's
core. The core is surrounded by a silicate mantle that formed many of the tectonic and
volcanic features on the planet, but now appears to be inactive. The average thickness of
the planet's crust is about 50 km, with a maximum thickness of 125 km.[13] Earth's crust,
averaging 40 km, is only a third as thick as Mars’ crust relative to the sizes of the two
planets.
The geological history of Mars can be split into many epochs, but the following are the
three main ones:
 Noachian epoch (named after Noachis Terra): Formation of the oldest extant
surfaces of Mars, 3.8 billion years ago to 3.5 billion years ago. Noachian age
surfaces are scarred by many large impact craters. The Tharsis bulge volcanic
upland is thought to have formed during this period, with extensive flooding by
liquid water late in the epoch.
 Hesperian epoch (named after Hesperia Planum): 3.5 billion years ago to 1.8
billion years ago. The Hesperian epoch is marked by the formation of extensive
lava plains.
 Amazonian epoch (named after Amazonis Planitia): 1.8 billion years ago to
present. Amazonian regions have few meteorite impact craters but are otherwise
quite varied. Olympus Mons formed during this period along with lava flows
elsewhere on Mars.
A major geological event occurred on Mars on February 19, 2008, and was caught on
camera by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Images capturing a spectacular avalanche
of materials thought to be fine grained ice, dust, and large blocks are shown to have
detached from a 700-meter high cliff. Evidence of the avalanche is present in the dust
clouds left above the cliff afterwards.[14]
Recent studies support a theory, first proposed in the 1980s, that Mars was struck by a
Pluto-sized meteor about four billion years ago. The event, thought to be the cause of the
Martian hemispheric dichotomy, created the smooth Borealis basin that covers 40% of
the planet.[15][16]
Soil
In June, 2008, the Phoenix Lander returned data showing Martian soil to be slightly
alkaline and containing vital nutrients such as magnesium, sodium, potassium and
chloride, all of which are necessary for living things to grow. Scientists compared the soil
near Mars' north pole to that of backyard gardens on Earth, saying it could be suitable for
plants such as asparagus.[17] However, in August, 2008, the Phoenix Lander conducted
simple chemistry experiments, mixing water from Earth with Martian soil in an attempt
to test its pH, and discovered traces of the salt perchlorate. Its presence, if confirmed,
would appear to make the soil more exotic than previously believed.[18] Further testing is
necessary to eliminate any possibility of the perchlorate readings being influenced by
terrestrial sources which may have migrated from the spacecraft, either into samples or
into the instrumentation.[19]
Hydrology
Photo of microscopic rock forms indicating past signs of water, taken by Opportunity
Liquid water cannot exist on the surface of Mars with its present low atmospheric
pressure, except at the lowest elevations for short periods[20][21] but water ice is in no short
supply, with two polar ice caps made largely of ice.[22] In March 2007, NASA announced
that the volume of water ice in the south polar ice cap, if melted, would be sufficient to
cover the entire planetary surface to a depth of 11 metres.[23] Additionally, an ice
permafrost mantle stretches down from the pole to latitudes of about 60°.[22]
Large quantities of water are thought to be trapped underneath Mars's thick cryosphere. A
large release of liquid water is thought to have occurred when the Valles Marineris
formed early in Mars's history, forming massive outflow channels. A smaller but more
recent outflow may have occurred when the Cerberus Fossae chasm opened about 5
million years ago, leaving a supposed sea of frozen ice still visible today on the Elysium
Planitia centered at Cerberus Palus.[24] However, the morphology of this region may
correspond to the ponding of lava flows, causing a superficial morphology similar to ice
flows,[25] which probably draped the terrain established by earlier massive floods of
Athabasca Valles.[26] Rough surface texture at decimeter (dm) scales, thermal inertia
comparable to that of the Gusev plains, and hydrovolcanic cones are consistent with the
lava flow hypothesis.[26] Furthermore, the stoichiometric mass fraction of water in this
area to tens of centimeter depths is only ~4%,[27] easily attributable to hydrated
minerals[28] and inconsistent with the presence of near-surface ice.
More recently the high resolution Mars Orbiter Camera on the Mars Global Surveyor has
taken pictures which give much more detail about the history of liquid water on the
surface of Mars. Despite the many giant flood channels and associated tree-like network
of tributaries found on Mars there are no smaller scale structures that would indicate the
origin of the flood waters. It has been suggested that weathering processes have denuded
these, indicating the river valleys are old features. Higher resolution observations from
spacecraft like Mars Global Surveyor also revealed at least a few hundred features along
crater and canyon walls that appear similar to terrestrial seepage gullies. The gullies tend
to be in the highlands of the southern hemisphere and to face the Equator; all are
poleward of 30° latitude.[29] The researchers found no partially degraded (i.e. weathered)
gullies and no superimposed impact craters, indicating that these are very young features.
In a particularly striking example (see image) two photographs, taken six years apart,
show a gully on Mars with what appears to be new deposits of sediment. Michael Meyer,
the lead scientist for NASA's Mars Exploration Program, argues that only the flow of
material with a high liquid water content could produce such a debris pattern and
colouring. Whether the water results from precipitation, underground or another source
remains an open question.[30] However, alternative scenarios have been suggested,
including the possibility of the deposits being caused by carbon dioxide frost or by the
movement of dust on the Martian surface.[31][32]
Further evidence that liquid water once existed on the surface of Mars comes from the
detection of specific minerals such as hematite and goethite, both of which sometimes
form in the presence of water.[33]
Nevertheless, some of the evidence believed to indicate ancient water basins and flows
has been negated by higher resolution studies taken at resolution about 30 cm by the
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.[34]
Geography
Main articles: Geography of Mars, List of mountains on Mars, and List of craters
on Mars
See also: Category:Surface features of Mars
This approximate true-color image, taken by the Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity, shows the view of
Victoria Crater from Cape Verde. It was captured over a three-week period, from October 16 – November
6, 2006.
Although better remembered for mapping the Moon, Johann Heinrich Mädler and
Wilhelm Beer were the first "areographers". They began by establishing once and for all
that most of Mars’ surface features were permanent, and determining the planet's rotation
period. In 1840, Mädler combined ten years of observations and drew the first map of
Mars. Rather than giving names to the various markings, Beer and Mädler simply
designated them with letters; Meridian Bay (Sinus Meridiani) was thus feature "a."[35]
Today, features on Mars are named from a number of sources. Large albedo features
retain many of the older names, but are often updated to reflect new knowledge of the
nature of the features. For example, Nix Olympica (the snows of Olympus) has become
Olympus Mons (Mount Olympus).[36]
Mars’ equator is defined by its rotation, but the location of its Prime Meridian was
specified, as was Earth's (at Greenwich), by choice of an arbitrary point; Mädler and Beer
selected a line in 1830 for their first maps of Mars. After the spacecraft Mariner 9
provided extensive imagery of Mars in 1972, a small crater (later called Airy-0), located
in the Sinus Meridiani ("Middle Bay" or "Meridian Bay"), was chosen for the definition
of 0.0° longitude to coincide with the original selection.
Olympus Mons, the highest mountain in the solar system, at 27km.
Since Mars has no oceans and hence no 'sea level', a zero-elevation surface or mean
gravity surface also had to be selected. Zero altitude is defined by the height at which
there is 610.5 Pa (6.105 mbar) of atmospheric pressure. This pressure corresponds to the
triple point of water, and is about 0.6% of the sea level surface pressure on Earth (.006
atm).[37]
The dichotomy of Martian topography is striking: northern plains flattened by lava flows
contrast with the southern highlands, pitted and cratered by ancient impacts. Research in
2008 has presented evidence regarding a theory proposed in 1980 postulating that, four
billion years ago, the northern hemisphere of Mars was struck by an object one-tenth to
two-thirds the size of the Moon. If validated, this would make Mars' northern hemisphere
the site of an impact crater 10 600 km long by 8 500 km wide, or roughly the area of
Europe, Asia, and Australia combined, surpassing the South Pole-Aitken basin as the
largest impact crater in the Solar System.[5][6] The surface of Mars as seen from Earth is
divided into two kinds of areas, with differing albedo. The paler plains covered with dust
and sand rich in reddish iron oxides were once thought of as Martian 'continents' and
given names like Arabia Terra (land of Arabia) or Amazonis Planitia (Amazonian plain).
The dark features were thought to be seas, hence their names Mare Erythraeum, Mare
Sirenum and Aurorae Sinus. The largest dark feature seen from Earth is Syrtis Major.[38]
The shield volcano, Olympus Mons (Mount Olympus), at 26 km is the highest known
mountain in the Solar System. It is an extinct volcano in the vast upland region Tharsis,
which contains several other large volcanoes. It is over three times the height of Mount
Everest which in comparison stands at just over 8.8 km.
Mars is also scarred by a number of impact craters: a total of 43 000 craters with a
diameter of 5 km or greater have been found.[39] The largest confirmed of these is the
Hellas impact basin, a light albedo feature clearly visible from Earth.[40] Due to the
smaller mass of Mars, the probability of an object colliding with the planet is about half
that of the Earth. However, Mars is located closer to the asteroid belt, so it has an
increased chance of being struck by materials from that source. Mars is also more likely
to be struck by short-period comets, i.e., those that lie within the orbit of Jupiter.[41] In
spite of this, there are far fewer craters on Mars compared with the Moon because Mars's
atmosphere provides protection against small meteors. Some craters have a morphology
that suggests the ground was wet when the meteor impacted.
The large canyon, Valles Marineris (Latin for Mariner Valleys, also known as
Agathadaemon in the old canal maps), has a length of 4000 km and a depth of up to
7 km. The length of Valles Marineris is equivalent to the length of Europe and extends
across one-fifth the circumference of Mars. By comparison, the Grand Canyon on Earth
is only 446 km long and nearly 2 km deep. Valles Marineris was formed due to the
swelling of the Tharsis area which caused the crust in the area of Valles Marineris to
collapse. Another large canyon is Ma'adim Vallis (Ma'adim is Hebrew for Mars). It is
700 km long and again much bigger than the Grand Canyon with a width of 20 km and a
depth of 2 km in some places. It is possible that Ma'adim Vallis was flooded with liquid
water in the past.[42]
THEMIS image of cave entrances on Mars
Images from the Thermal Emission Imaging System (THEMIS) aboard NASA's Mars
Odyssey orbiter have revealed seven possible cave entrances on the flanks of the Arsia
Mons volcano.[43] The caves, named Dena, Chloe, Wendy, Annie, Abbey, Nikki and
Jeanne after loved ones of their discoverers, are collectively known as the "seven
sisters."[44] Cave entrances measure from 100 m to 252 m wide and they are believed to
be at least 73 m to 96 m deep. Because light does not reach the floor of most of the caves,
it is likely that they extend much deeper than these lower estimates and widen below the
surface. Dena is the only exception; its floor is visible and was measured to be 130 m
deep. The interiors of these caverns may be protected from micrometeoroids, UV
radiation, solar flares and high energy particles that bombard the planet's surface.[45]
Some researchers have suggested that this protection makes the caves good candidates for
future efforts to find liquid water and signs of life.
Mars has two permanent polar ice caps: the northern one at Planum Boreum and the
southern one at Planum Australe.
Atmosphere
Main article: Atmosphere of Mars
Mars's thin atmosphere, visible on the horizon in this low-orbit photo.
Mars lost its magnetosphere 4 billion years ago, so the solar wind interacts directly with
the Martian ionosphere, keeping the atmosphere thinner than it would otherwise be by
stripping away atoms from the outer layer. Both Mars Global Surveyor and Mars Express
have detected these ionised atmospheric particles trailing off into space behind
Mars.[46][47] The atmosphere of Mars is now relatively thin. Atmospheric pressure on the
surface varies from around 30 Pa (0.03 kPa) on Olympus Mons to over
1155 Pa (1.155 kPa) in the depths of Hellas Planitia, with a mean surface level pressure
of 600 Pa (0.6 kPa). This is less than 1% of the surface pressure on Earth (101.3 kPa).
Mars's mean surface pressure equals the pressure found 35 km above the Earth's surface.
The scale height of the atmosphere, about 11 km, is higher than Earth's (6 km) due to the
lower gravity. Mars' gravity is only about 38% of the surface gravity on Earth.
The atmosphere on Mars consists of 95% carbon dioxide, 3% nitrogen, 1.6% argon, and
contains traces of oxygen and water.[4] The atmosphere is quite dusty, containing
particulates about 1.5 µm in diameter which give the Martian sky a tawny color when
seen from the surface.[48]
Several researchers claim to have detected methane in the Martian atmosphere with a
concentration of about 10 ppb by volume.[49][50] Since methane is an unstable gas that is
broken down by ultraviolet radiation, typically lasting about 340 years in the Martian
atmosphere,[51] its presence would indicate a current or recent source of the gas on the
planet. Volcanic activity, cometary impacts, and the presence of methanogenic microbial
life forms are among possible sources. It was recently pointed out that methane could
also be produced by a non-biological process called serpentinization[b] involving water,
carbon dioxide, and the mineral olivine, which is known to be common on Mars.[52]
During a pole's winter, it lies in continuous darkness, chilling the surface and causing 25–
30% of the atmosphere to condense out into thick slabs of CO2 ice (dry ice).[53] When the
poles are again exposed to sunlight, the frozen CO2 sublimes, creating enormous winds
that sweep off the poles as fast as 400 km/h. These seasonal actions transport large
amounts of dust and water vapor, giving rise to Earth-like frost and large cirrus clouds.
Clouds of water-ice were photographed by the Opportunity rover in 2004.[54]
Climate
Main article: Climate of Mars
Mars from Hubble Space Telescope October 28, 2005 with dust storm visible.
Of all the planets, Mars's seasons are the most Earth-like, due to the similar tilts of the
two planets' rotational axes. However, the lengths of the Martian seasons are about twice
those of Earth's, as Mars’ greater distance from the Sun leads to the Martian year being
about two Earth years in length. Martian surface temperatures vary from lows of about
−140 °C (−220 °F) during the polar winters to highs of up to 20 °C (68 °F) in
summers.[20] The wide range in temperatures is due to the thin atmosphere which cannot
store much solar heat, the low atmospheric pressure, and the low thermal inertia of
Martian soil.[55]
If Mars had an Earth-like orbit, its seasons would be similar to Earth's because its axial
tilt is similar to Earth's. However, the comparatively large eccentricity of the Martian
orbit has a significant effect. Mars is near perihelion when it is summer in the southern
hemisphere and winter in the north, and near aphelion when it is winter in the southern
hemisphere and summer in the north. As a result, the seasons in the southern hemisphere
are more extreme and the seasons in the northern are milder than would otherwise be the
case. The summer temperatures in the south can be up to 30 °C (54 °F) warmer than the
equivalent summer temperatures in the north.[56]
Mars's northern ice cap.
Mars also has the largest dust storms in our Solar System. These can vary from a storm
over a small area, to gigantic storms that cover the entire planet. They tend to occur when
Mars is closest to the Sun, and have been shown to increase the global temperature.[57]
The polar caps at both poles consist primarily of water ice. However, there is dry ice
present on their surfaces. Frozen carbon dioxide (dry ice) accumulates as a thin layer
about one metre thick on the north cap in the northern winter only, while the south cap
has a permanent dry ice cover about eight metres thick.[58] The northern polar cap has a
diameter of about 1000 kilometres during the northern Mars summer,[59] and contains
about 1.6 million cubic kilometres of ice, which if spread evenly on the cap would be 2
kilometres thick.[60] (This compares to a volume of 2.85 million cubic kilometres for the
Greenland ice sheet.) The southern polar cap has a diameter of 350 km and a thickness of
3 km.[61] The total volume of ice in the south polar cap plus the adjacent layered deposits
has also been estimated at 1.6 million cubic kilometres.[62] Both polar caps show spiral
troughs, which are believed to form as a result of differential solar heating, coupled with
the sublimation of ice and condensation of water vapor.[63][64] Both polar caps shrink and
regrow following the temperature fluctuation of the Martian seasons.
Orbit and rotation
Mars’ average distance from the Sun is roughly 230 million km (1.5 AU) and its orbital
period is 687 (Earth) days. The solar day (or sol) on Mars is only slightly longer than an
Earth day: 24 hours, 39 minutes, and 35.244 seconds. A Martian year is equal to 1.8809
Earth years, or 1 year, 320 days, and 18.2 hours.
Mars's axial tilt is 25.19 degrees, which is similar to the axial tilt of the Earth. As a result,
Mars has seasons like the Earth, though on Mars they are nearly twice as long given its
longer year. Mars passed its perihelion in June 2007 and its aphelion in May 2008.
Mars has a relatively pronounced orbital eccentricity of about 0.09; of the seven other
planets in the Solar System, only Mercury shows greater eccentricity. However, it is
known that in the past Mars has had a much more circular orbit than it does currently. At
one point 1.35 million Earth years ago, Mars had an eccentricity of roughly 0.002, much
less than that of Earth today.[65] The Mars cycle of eccentricity is 96 000 Earth years
compared to the Earth's cycle of 100 000 years.[66] However, Mars also has a much longer
cycle of eccentricity with a period of 2.2 million Earth years, and this overshadows the
96 000-year cycle in the eccentricity graphs. For the last 35 000 years Mars' orbit has
been getting slightly more eccentric because of the gravitational effects of the other
planets. The closest distance between the Earth and Mars will continue to mildly decrease
for the next 25 000 years.[67]
The image to the left shows a comparison between Mars and Ceres, a dwarf planet in the Asteroid Belt, as
seen from the ecliptic pole, while the image to the right is as seen from the ascending node. The segments
of orbits below the ecliptic are plotted in darker colors. The perihelia (q) and aphelia (Q) are labelled with
the date of the nearest passage.
Moons
Main article: Moons of Mars
Phobos (left) and Deimos (right)
Mars has two tiny natural moons, Phobos and Deimos, which orbit very close to the
planet and are thought to be captured asteroids.[68]
Both satellites were discovered in 1877 by Asaph Hall, and are named after the characters
Phobos (panic/fear) and Deimos (terror/dread) who, in Greek mythology, accompanied
their father Ares, god of war, into battle. Ares was known as Mars to the Romans.[69]
From the surface of Mars, the motions of Phobos and Deimos appear very different from
that of our own moon. Phobos rises in the west, sets in the east, and rises again in just 11
hours. Deimos, being only just outside synchronous orbit—where the orbital period
would match the planet's period of rotation — rises as expected in the east but very
slowly. Despite the 30 hour orbit of Deimos, it takes 2.7 days to set in the west as it
slowly falls behind the rotation of Mars, then just as long again to rise.[70]
Because Phobos' orbit is below synchronous altitude, the tidal forces from the planet
Mars are gradually lowering its orbit. In about 50 million years it will either crash into
Mars’ surface or break up into a ring structure around the planet.[70]
It is not well understood how or when Mars came to capture its two moons. Both have
circular orbits, very near the equator, which is very unusual in itself for captured objects.
Phobos's unstable orbit would seem to point towards a relatively recent capture. There is
no known mechanism for an airless Mars to capture a lone asteroid, so it is likely that a
third body was involved — however, asteroids as large as Phobos and Deimos are rare,
and binaries rarer still, outside the asteroid belt.[71]
Life
Main article: Life on Mars
The current understanding of planetary habitability—the ability of a world to develop and

sustain life — favors planets that have liquid water on their surface. This requires that the
orbit of a planet lie within a habitable zone, which for the Sun is currently occupied by
Earth. Mars orbits half an astronomical unit beyond this zone and this, along with the
planet's thin atmosphere, causes water to freeze on its surface. The past flow of liquid
water, however, demonstrates the planet's potential for habitability. Recent evidence has
suggested that any water on the Martian surface would have been too salty and acidic to
support life.[72]
The lack of a magnetosphere and extremely thin atmosphere of Mars are a greater
challenge: the planet has little heat transfer across its surface, poor insulation against
bombardment and the solar wind, and insufficient atmospheric pressure to retain water in
a liquid form (water instead sublimates to a gaseous state). Mars is also nearly, or perhaps
totally, geologically dead; the end of volcanic activity has stopped the recycling of
chemicals and minerals between the surface and interior of the planet.[73]
Evidence suggests that the planet was once significantly more habitable than it is today,
but whether living organisms ever existed there is still unclear. The Viking probes of the
mid-1970s carried experiments designed to detect microorganisms in Martian soil at their
respective landing sites, and had some apparently positive results, including a temporary
increase of CO2 production on exposure to water and nutrients. However this sign of life
was later disputed by many scientists, resulting in a continuing debate, with NASA
scientist Gilbert Levin asserting that Viking may have found life. A re-analysis of the
now 30-year-old Viking data, in light of modern knowledge of extremophile forms of
life, has suggested that the Viking tests were also not sophisticated enough to detect these
forms of life. The tests may even have killed a (hypothetical) life form.[74] Tests
conducted by the Phoenix Mars Lander have shown that the soil has a very alkaline pH
and it contains magnesium, sodium, potassium and chloride.[75] The soil nutrients may be
able to support life, but life would still have to be shielded from the intense ultraviolet
light.
At the Johnson space center lab organic compounds have been found in the meteorite
ALH84001, which is supposed to have come from Mars. They concluded that these were
deposited by primitive life forms extant on Mars before the meteorite was blasted into
space by a meteor strike and sent on a 15 million-year voyage to Earth. Also, small
quantities of methane and formaldehyde recently detected by Mars orbiters are both
claimed to be hints for life, as these chemical compounds would quickly break down in
the Martian atmosphere.[76][77] It is possible that these compounds may be replenished by
volcanic or geological means such as serpentinization.[52]
Exploration
Main article: Exploration of Mars
Mars 3 Lander (stamp, 1972)
Viking Lander 1 site
Dozens of spacecraft, including orbiters, landers, and rovers, have been sent to Mars by
the Soviet Union, the United States, Europe, and Japan to study the planet's surface,
climate, and geology.
Roughly two-thirds of all spacecraft destined for Mars have failed in one manner or
another before completing or even beginning their missions. While this high failure rate
can be ascribed to technical problems, enough have either failed or lost communications
for causes unknown for some to search for other explanations. Examples include an
Earth-Mars "Bermuda Triangle", a Mars Curse, or even the long-standing NASA in-joke,
the "Great Galactic Ghoul" that feeds on Martian spacecraft.[78]
Past missions
The first successful fly-by mission to Mars was NASA's Mariner 4, launched in 1964.
The first successful objects to land on the surface were two Soviet probes, Mars 2 and
Mars 3 from the Mars probe program, launched in 1971, but both lost contact within
seconds of landing. Then came the 1975 NASA launches of the Viking program, which
consisted of two orbiters, each having a lander; both landers successfully touched down
in 1976. Viking 1 remained operational for six years, Viking 2 for three. The Viking
landers relayed the first color pictures of Mars[79] and also mapped the surface of Mars so
well that the images are still sometimes used to this day.
The Soviet probes Phobos 1 and 2 were sent to Mars in 1988 to study Mars and its two
moons. Phobos 1 lost contact on the way to Mars. Phobos 2, while successfully
photographing Mars and Phobos, failed just before it was set to release two landers on
Phobos's surface.
Following the 1992 failure of the Mars Observer orbiter, NASA launched the Mars
Global Surveyor in 1996. This mission was a complete success, having finished its
primary mapping mission in early 2001. Contact was lost with the probe in November
2006 during its third extended program, spending exactly 10 operational years in space.
Only a month after the launch of the Surveyor, NASA launched the Mars Pathfinder,
carrying a robotic exploration vehicle Sojourner, which landed in the Ares Vallis on
Mars. This mission was also successful, and received much publicity, partially due to the
many images that were sent back to Earth.[80]
The most recent mission to Mars was the NASA Phoenix Mars lander, which launched
August 4, 2007 and arrived on the north polar region of Mars on May 25, 2008.[81] The
lander has a robotic arm with a 2.5 m reach and capable of digging a meter into the
Martian soil. The lander has a microscopic camera capable of resolving to one-
thousandth the width of a human hair, and discovered a substance at its landing site on
June 15, 2008, which was confirmed to be water ice on June 20.[82][83] The mission was
declared concluded on November 10, 2008, after engineers were unable to contact the
craft.[84]
Current missions
Spirit's lander on Mars

In 2001 NASA launched the successful Mars Odyssey orbiter, which is still in orbit as of
November 2008, and the ending date has been extended to September 2010.[85] Odyssey's
Gamma Ray Spectrometer detected significant amounts of hydrogen in the upper metre
or so of Mars's regolith. This hydrogen is thought to be contained in large deposits of
water ice.[86]
In 2003, the ESA launched the Mars Express craft, consisting of the Mars Express
Orbiter and the lander Beagle 2. Beagle 2 failed during descent and was declared lost in
early February 2004.[87] In early 2004 the Planetary Fourier Spectrometer team
announced it had detected methane in the Martian atmosphere. ESA announced in June
2006 the discovery of aurorae on Mars.[88]
Also in 2003, NASA launched the twin Mars Exploration Rovers named Spirit (MER-A)
and Opportunity (MER-B). Both missions landed successfully in January 2004 and have
met or exceeded all their targets. Among the most significant scientific returns has been
conclusive evidence that liquid water existed at some time in the past at both landing
sites. Martian dust devils and windstorms have occasionally cleaned both rovers' solar
panels, and thus increased their lifespan.[89]
On August 12, 2005 the NASA Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter probe was launched toward
the planet, arriving in orbit on March 10, 2006 to conduct a two-year science survey. The
orbiter will map the Martian terrain and weather to find suitable landing sites for
upcoming lander missions. It also contains an improved telecommunications link to
Earth, with more bandwidth than all previous missions combined.
The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter snapped the first image of a series of active avalanches
near the planet's north pole, scientists said March 3, 2008.[90]
A prototype of the Phoenix lander practices robotic arm control at a test site in Death
Valley.
The Dawn spacecraft will fly by Mars in February 2009 for a gravity assist on its way to
investigate Vesta and then Ceres.
Future missions
Phoenix will be followed by the Mars Science Laboratory in 2011, a bigger, faster
(90 m/h), and smarter version of the Mars Exploration Rovers. Experiments include a
laser chemical sampler that can deduce the make-up of rocks at a distance of 13 m.[91]
The joint Russian and Chinese Phobos-Grunt sample-return mission, to return samples of
Mars's moon Phobos, is scheduled for a 2009 launch. In 2013 the ESA plans to launch its
first Rover to Mars; the ExoMars rover will be capable of drilling 2 m into the soil in
search of organic molecules.[92][93]
The Finnish-Russian MetNet mission will consist of sending tens of small landers on the
Martian surface in order to establish a wide-spread surface observation network to
investigate the planet's atmospheric structure, physics and meteorology.[94] A precursor
mission using 1–2 landers is scheduled for launch in 2009 or 2011.[95] One possibility is a
piggyback launch on the Russian Phobos Grunt mission.[95] Other launches will take
place in the launch windows extending to 2019.
Manned Mars exploration by the United States has been explicitly identified as a long-
term goal in the Vision for Space Exploration announced in 2004 by US President
George W. Bush.[96] NASA and Lockheed Martin have begun work on the Orion
spacecraft, formerly the Crew Exploration Vehicle, which is currently scheduled to send
a human expedition to Earth's moon by 2020 as a stepping stone to an expedition to Mars
thereafter.
The European Space Agency hopes to land humans on Mars between 2030 and 2035.[97]
This will be preceded by successively larger probes, starting with the launch of the
ExoMars probe and a Mars Sample Return Mission.
On September 28, 2007, NASA administrator Michael D. Griffin stated that NASA aims
to put a man on Mars by 2037: in 2057, we should be celebrating 20 years of man on
Mars.[98]
On September 15, 2008, NASA announced MAVEN, a robotic mission to provide

information about Mars' atmosphere[99].
Astronomy on Mars
Main article: Astronomy on Mars
Photograph of a Martian sunset taken by Spirit at Gusev crater, May 19, 2005.
With the existence of various orbiters, landers, and rovers, it is now possible to study
astronomy from the Martian skies. The Earth and the Moon are easily visible[citation needed]
while Mars’ moon Phobos appears about one third the angular diameter of the full Moon
as it appears from Earth. On the other hand Deimos appears more or less star-like, and
appears only slightly brighter than Venus does from Earth.[100]
There are also various phenomena well-known on Earth that have now been observed on
Mars, such as meteors and auroras.[88] A transit of the Earth as seen from Mars will occur
on November 10, 2084. There are also transits of Mercury and transits of Venus, and the
moon Deimos is of sufficiently small angular diameter that its partial "eclipses" of the
Sun are best considered transits (see Transit of Deimos from Mars).
Viewing
Apparent retrograde motion of Mars in 2003 as seen from Earth
To the naked eye, Mars usually appears a distinct yellow, orange, or reddish color, and
varies in brightness more than any other planet as seen from Earth over the course of its
orbit. The apparent magnitude of Mars varies from +1.8 at conjunction to as high as −2.9
at perihelic opposition.[4] When farthest away from the Earth, it is more than seven times
as far from the latter as when it is closest. When least favourably positioned, it can be lost
in the Sun's glare for months at a time. At its most favourable times — which occur twice
every 32 years, alternately at 15 and 17-year intervals, and always between late July and
late September — Mars shows a wealth of surface detail to a telescope. Especially
noticeable, even at low magnification, are the polar ice caps.[101]
The point of Mars’ closest approach to the Earth is known as opposition. The length of
time between successive oppositions, or the synodic period, is 780 days. Because of the
eccentricities of the orbits, the times of opposition and minimum distance can differ by
up to 8.5 days. The minimum distance varies between about 55 and 100 million km due
to the planets' elliptical orbits.[4] The next Mars opposition will occur on January 29,
2010.
As Mars approaches opposition it begins a period of retrograde motion, which means it

will appear to move backwards in a looping motion with respect to the background stars.
2003 closest approach
The rotation of Mars as seen in a small telescope in 2003.
Mars oppositions from 2003–2018, viewed from above the ecliptic with the Earth
centered.
On August 27, 2003, at 9:51:13 UT, Mars made its closest approach to Earth in nearly
60 000 years: 55 758 006 km (0.372719 AU). This occurred when Mars was one day
from opposition and about three days from its perihelion, making Mars particularly easy
to see from Earth. The last time it came so close is estimated to have been on September
12, 57 617 BC, the next time being in 2287. However, this record approach was only very
slightly closer than other recent close approaches. For instance, the minimum distance on
August 22, 1924 was 0.372846 AU, and the minimum distance on August 24, 2208 will
be 0.372253 AU.[102] The orbital changes of Earth and Mars are making the approaches
nearer: the 2003 record will be bettered 22 times by the year 4000[citation needed].
Historical observations
The history of observations of Mars is marked by the oppositions of Mars, when the
planet is closest to Earth and hence is most easily visible, which occur every couple of
years. Even more notable are the perihelic oppositions of Mars which occur about every
15–17 years, and are distinguished because Mars is close to perihelion, making it even
closer to Earth. Aristotle was among the first known writers to describe observations of
Mars, noting that, as it passed behind the Moon, it was farther away than was originally
believed.
The only occultation of Mars by Venus observed was that of October 3, 1590, seen by M.
Möstlin at Heidelberg.[103]
In 1609, Mars was viewed by Galileo, who was first to see it via telescope.
Map of Mars by Giovanni Schiaparelli.
By the 19th century, the resolution of telescopes reached a level sufficient for surface
features to be identified. In September 1877, a perihelic opposition of Mars occurred on
September 5. In that year, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli, then in Milan, used a
22 cm telescope to help produce the first detailed map of Mars. These maps notably
contained features he called canali, which were later shown to be an optical illusion.
These canali were supposedly long straight lines on the surface of Mars to which he gave
names of famous rivers on Earth. His term, which means 'channels' or 'grooves', was
popularly mistranslated in English as canals.[104][105]
Mars sketched as observed by Lowell sometime before 1914. (South top)
Influenced by the observations, the orientalist Percival Lowell founded an observatory

which had a 300 and 450 mm telescope. The observatory was used for the exploration of
Mars during the last good opportunity in 1894 and the following less favorable
oppositions. He published several books on Mars and life on the planet, which had a great
influence on the public. The canali were also found by other astronomers, like Henri
Joseph Perrotin and Louis Thollon in Nice, using one of the largest telescopes of that
time.
The seasonal changes (consisting of the diminishing of the polar caps and the dark areas
formed during Martian summer) in combination with the canals lead to speculation about
life on Mars, and it was a long held belief that Mars contained vast seas and vegetation.
The telescope never reached the resolution required to give proof to any speculations.
However, as bigger telescopes were used, fewer long, straight canali were observed.
During an observation in 1909 by Flammarion with a 840 mm telescope, irregular
patterns were observed, but no canali were seen.[106]
Map of Mars from Hubble Space Telescope as seen near the 1999 opposition. (North top)
Even in the 1960s articles were published on Martian biology, putting aside explanations
other than life for the seasonal changes on Mars. Detailed scenarios for the metabolism
and chemical cycles for a functional ecosystem have been published.[107]
It was not until spacecraft visited the planet during NASA's Mariner missions in the
1960s that these myths were dispelled. The results of the Viking life-detection
experiments started an intermission in which the hypothesis of a hostile, dead planet was
generally accepted.
Some maps of Mars were made using the data from these missions, but it was not until
the Mars Global Surveyor mission, launched in 1996 and operated until late 2006, that
complete, extremely detailed maps were obtained. These maps are now available
online.[108] [109]
On July 31, 2008, NASA announced that they have discovered water on the planet.[110]
Mars in culture
Historical connections
Mars is named after the Roman god of war. In Babylonian astronomy, the planet was
named after Nergal, their deity of fire, war, and destruction, most likely due to the
planet's reddish appearance.[111] When the Greeks equated Nergal with their god of war,
Ares, they named the planet Ἄρεως ἀστἡρ (Areos aster), or "star of Ares". Then,
following the identification of Ares and Mars, it was translated into Latin as stella Martis,
or "star of Mars", or simply Mars. The Greeks also called the planet Πυρόεις Pyroeis
meaning "fiery". In Hindu mythology, Mars is known as Mangala (मंगल). The planet is
also called Angaraka in Sanskrit, after the celibate god of war, who possesses the signs of
Aries and Scorpio, and teaches the occult sciences. The planet was known by the
Egyptians as "Ḥr Dšr";;;; or "Horus the Red". The Hebrews named it Ma'adim (‫— )מאדים‬
"the one who blushes"; this is where one of the largest canyons on Mars, the Ma'adim
Vallis, gets its name. It is known as al-Mirrikh in Arabic, and Merih in Turkish. In Urdu
and Persian it is written as ‫ خیﻣﺮ‬and known as "Merikh". The etymology of al-Mirrikh is
unknown. Ancient Persians named it Bahram, the Zoroastrian god of faith and it is
written as ‫ ﺮام‬. Ancient
‫ﺑﮭ‬ Turks called it Sakit. The Chinese, Japanese, Korean and
Vietnamese cultures refer to the planet as 火星, or the fire star, a name based on the
ancient Chinese mythological cycle of Five elements.
Its symbol, derived from the astrological symbol of Mars, is a circle with a small arrow
pointing out from behind. It is a stylized representation of a shield and spear used by the
Roman God Mars. Mars in Roman mythology was the God of War and patron of
warriors. This symbol is also used in biology to describe the male sex, and in alchemy to
symbolise the element iron which was considered to be dominated by Mars whose
characteristic red colour is coincidentally due to iron oxide.[112] ♂ occupies Unicode
position U+2642.
Intelligent "Martians"
An 1893 soap ad playing on the popular idea that Mars was populated.
The popular idea that Mars was populated by intelligent Martians exploded in the late
19th century. Schiaparelli's "canali" observations combined with Percival Lowell's books
on the subject put forward the standard notion of a planet that was a drying, cooling,
dying world with ancient civilizations constructing irrigation works.[113]
Many other observations and proclamations by notable personalities added to what has
been termed "Mars Fever".[114] In 1899 while investigating atmospheric radio noise using
his receivers in his Colorado Springs lab, inventor Nikola Tesla observed repetitive
signals that he later surmised might have been radio communications coming from
another planet, possibly Mars. In a 1901 interview Tesla said:
It was some time afterward when the thought flashed upon my mind that the disturbances I had
observed might be due to an intelligent control. Although I could not decipher their meaning, it
was impossible for me to think of them as having been entirely accidental. The feeling is
constantly growing on me that I had been the first to hear the greeting of one planet to
another.[115]
Tesla's theories gained support from Lord Kelvin who, while visiting the United States in
1902, was reported to have said that he thought Tesla had picked up Martian signals
being sent to the United States.[116] However, Kelvin "emphatically" denied this report
shortly before departing America: "What I really said was that the inhabitants of Mars, if
there are any, were doubtless able to see New York, particularly the glare of the
electricity."[117]
In a New York Times article in 1901, Edward Charles Pickering, director of the Harvard
College Observatory, said that they had received a telegram from Lowell Observatory in
Arizona that seemed to confirm that Mars was trying to communicate with the Earth.[118]
Early in December 1900, we received from Lowell Observatory in Arizona a telegram that a shaft
of light had been seen to project from Mars (the Lowell observatory makes a specialty of Mars)
lasting seventy minutes. I wired these facts to Europe and sent out neostyle copies through this
country. The observer there is a careful, reliable man and there is no reason to doubt that the light
existed. It was given as from a well-known geographical point on Mars. That was all. Now the
story has gone the world over. In Europe it is stated that I have been in communication with
Mars, and all sorts of exaggerations have spring up. Whatever the light was, we have no means of
knowing. Whether it had intelligence or not, no one can say. It is absolutely inexplicable.[118]
Pickering later proposed creating a set of mirrors in Texas with the intention of signaling
Martians.
In recent decades, the high resolution mapping of the surface of Mars, culminating in
Mars Global Surveyor, revealed no artifacts of habitation by 'intelligent' life, but
pseudoscientific speculation about intelligent life on Mars continues from commentators
such as Richard C. Hoagland. Reminiscent of the canali controversy, some speculations
are based on small scale features perceived in the spacecraft images, such as 'pyramids'
and the 'Face on Mars'. Planetary astronomer Carl Sagan wrote:
“ Mars has become a kind of mythic arena onto which we have projected our
Earthly hopes and fears. ”
—Carl Sagan, Cosmos[119]
In fiction
Main article: Mars in fiction
The depiction of Mars in fiction has been stimulated by its dramatic red color and by
early scientific speculations that its surface conditions not only might support life, but
intelligent life.
Alien tripod illustration from the 1906 French edition of H.G. Wells' The War of the
Worlds.
Thus originated a large number of science fiction scenarios, the best known of which is
H. G. Wells' The War of the Worlds, published in 1898, in which Martians seek to escape
their dying planet by invading Earth. A subsequent radio version of The War of the
Worlds on October 30, 1938 was presented as a live news broadcast, and many listeners
mistook it for the truth.[120]
Also influential were Ray Bradbury's The Martian Chronicles, in which human explorers
accidentally destroy a Martian civilization, Edgar Rice Burroughs' Barsoom series and a
number of Robert A. Heinlein stories before the mid-sixties.
A comic figure of an intelligent Martian, Marvin the Martian, appeared on television in

1948 as a character in the Looney Tunes animated cartoons of Warner Brothers, and has
continued as part of popular culture to the present.
Author Jonathan Swift made reference to the moons of Mars, about 150 years before their
actual discovery by Asaph Hall, detailing reasonably accurate descriptions of their orbits,
in the 19th chapter of his novel Gulliver's Travels.[121]
After the Mariner and Viking spacecraft had returned pictures of Mars as it really is, an
apparently lifeless and canal-less world, these ideas about Mars had to be abandoned and
a vogue for accurate, realist depictions of human colonies on Mars developed, the best
known of which may be Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars trilogy. However, pseudo-
scientific speculations about the Face on Mars and other enigmatic landmarks spotted by
space probes have meant that ancient civilizations continue to be a popular theme in
science fiction, especially in film.[122]
Another popular theme, particularly among American writers, is the Martian colony that
fights for independence from Earth. This is a major plot element in the novels of Greg
Bear and Kim Stanley Robinson, as well as the movie Total Recall (based on a short
story by Philip K. Dick) and the television series Babylon 5. Many video games also use
this element, including Red Faction and the Zone of the Enders series. Mars (and its
moons) were also the setting for the popular Doom video game franchise and the later
Martian Gothic.
In music
In Gustav Holst's The Planets, Mars is depicted as the "Bringer of War".
See also
Mars portal
Solar System portal
 2007 WD5 – asteroid that had a possible impact with Mars on January 30, 2008
 Colonization of Mars
 Darian calendar – system of time-keeping
 Extraterrestrial life
 List of artificial objects on Mars
 List of chasmata on Mars
 List of craters on Mars
 List of valles on Mars
 Terraforming of Mars
Notes
^
a. Best fit ellipsoid
^
b. There are many serpentinization reactions. Olivine is a solid solution between forsterite
and fayalite whose general formula is (Fe,Mg)2SiO4. The reaction producing methane from
olivine can be written (in balanced form) as: Forsterite + Fayalite + Water + Carbonic
acid → Serpentine + Magnetite + Methane , or: 18Mg2SiO4 + 6Fe2SiO4 + 26H2O + CO2 →
12Mg3Si2O5(OH)4 + 4Fe3O4 + CH4
References
1. ^ Yeomans, Donald K. (2006-07-13). "HORIZONS System". NASA JPL.

Retrieved on 2007-08-08. — At the site, go to the "web interface" then select
"Ephemeris Type: ELEMENTS", "Target Body: Mars" and "Center: Sun".
2. ^ a b Seidelmann, P. Kenneth; Archinal, B. A.; A’hearn, M. F.; et.al. (2007).
"Report of the IAU/IAGWorking Group on cartographic coordinates and
rotational elements: 2006". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 90:
155–180. doi:10.1007/s10569-007-9072-y,
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/doi/10.1007/s10569-007-9072-y. Retrieved on 28
August 2007.
3. ^ a b "Mars: Facts & Figures". NASA. Retrieved on 2007-03-06.
4. ^ a b c d e f g h David R. Williams (September 1, 2004). "Mars Fact Sheet".
National Space Science Data Center. NASA. Retrieved on 2006-06-24.
5. ^ a b Ashley Yeager (July 19, 2008). "Impact May Have Transformed Mars".
ScienceNews.org. Retrieved on 2008-08-12.
6. ^ a b Ian Sample (June 26, 2008). "Cataclysmic impact created north-south divide
on Mars". Science @ guardian.co.uk. Retrieved on 2008-08-12.
7. ^ Trudy E. Bell and Tony Phillips (March 12, 2002). "Once Upon a Water
Planet". Science @ NASA. Retrieved on 2008-06-21.
8. ^ NASA (July 31, 2008). "NASA Spacecraft Confirms Martian Water, Mission
Extended". Science @ NASA. Retrieved on 2008-08-01.
9. ^ "NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows in Brief Spurts on Mars". NASA/JPL
(December 6, 2006). Retrieved on 2007-01-04.
10. ^ Webster, G.; Beasley, D. (September 20, 2005). "Orbiter's Long Life Helps
Scientists Track Changes on Mars". NASA. Retrieved on 2007-02-26.
11. ^ Peplow, Mark. "How Mars got its rust". Retrieved on 2007-03-10.
12. ^ Goddard Space Flight Center. "New Map Provides More Evidence Mars Once
Like Earth". Retrieved on 2006-03-17.
13. ^ Dave Jacqué (2003-09-26). "APS X-rays reveal secrets of Mars' core" (in
English), Argonne National Laboratory. Retrieved on 1 July 2006.
14. ^ McMahon, Peter (2008-03-04). "Mars avalanche caught on camera". Discovery
Channel. CTVglobemedia. Retrieved on 2008-05-31.
15. ^ "Giant Asteroid Flattened Half of Mars, Studies Suggest". Scientific American.
Retrieved on 2008-06-27.
16. ^ "Huge Meteor Strike Explains Mars’s Shape, Reports Say". New York Times.
17. ^ "Martian soil 'could support life'". BBC News (June 27, 2008). Retrieved on
2008-08-07.
18. ^ Chang, Alicia. "Scientists: Salt in Mars soil not bad for life". AP. Retrieved on
2008-08-07.
19. ^ "NASA Spacecraft Analyzing Martian Soil Data". JPL. Retrieved on 2008-08-
05.
20. ^ a b Haberle, R. M.; et al. (2001). "On the possibility of liquid water on present-
day Mars". J. Geophys. Res.. Retrieved on 2006-10-06. 106(E10), 23,317–23,326.
(abstract, full paper requires purchase or AGU subscription)
21. ^ Heldmann, Jennifer L.; et al. (2005-05-07), "Formation of Martian gullies by
the action of liquid water flowing under current Martian environmental
conditions" (PDF), Journal of Geophysical Research 110: Eo5004,
doi:10.1029/2004JE002261,
http://daleandersen.seti.org/Dale_Andersen/Science_articles_files/Heldmann%20
et%20al.2005.pdf, retrieved on 17 September 2008 'conditions such as now occur
on Mars, outside of the temperature-pressure stability regime of liquid water' …
'Liquid water is typically stable at the lowest elevations and at low latitudes on the
planet because the atmospheric pressure is greater than the vapor pressure of
water and surface temperatures in equatorial regions can reach 273 K for parts of
the day [Haberle et al., 2001]'
22. ^ a b Kostama, V.-P.; Kreslavsky, M. A.; Head, J. W. (June 3, 2006), "Recent
high-latitude icy mantle in the northern plains of Mars: Characteristics and ages of
emplacement", Geophysical Research Letters 33: L11201,
doi:10.1029/2006GL025946,
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2006/2006GL025946.shtml, retrieved on 12
August 2007 'Martian high-latitude zones are covered with a smooth, layered ice-
rich mantle'
23. ^ "Mars' South Pole Ice Deep and Wide". NASA (March 15, 2007). Retrieved on
2007-03-16.
24. ^ Murray, John B.; et al. (March 17, 2005), "Evidence for a frozen sea close to
Mars' equator", Nature 434: 352–355, doi:10.1038/nature03379,
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=36832, retrieved on
11 March 2007
25. ^ Kerr, Richard A. (March 4, 2005), "Ice or Lava Sea on Mars? A Transatlantic
Debate Erupts", Science 307: 1390–1391, doi:10.1126/science.307.5714.1390a,
PMID 15746395
26. ^ a b Jaeger, W. L.; et al. (September 21, 2007), "Athabasca Valles, Mars: A Lava-
Draped Channel System", Science 317: 1709–1711, doi:10.1126/science.1143315,
PMID 17885126
27. ^ Boynton, W. V.; et al. (in press), "Concentration of H, Si, Cl, K, Fe, and Th in
the low and mid latitude regions of Mars", Journal of Geophysical Research,
Planets 112: E12S99, doi:10.1029/2007JE002887
28. ^ Feldman, W. C.; et al. (November 30, 2005), "Topgraphic control of hydrogen
deposits at low latitudes to midlatitudes of Mars", Journal of Geophysical
Research 110: E11009, doi:10.1029/2005JE002452
29. ^ Malin, Michael C. (June 30, 2000). "Evidence for Recent Groundwater Seepage
and Surface Runoff on Mars". Science 288: 2330–2335.
doi:10.1126/science.288.5475.2330. PMID 10875910.
30. ^ "NASA Images Suggest Water Still Flows in Brief Spurts on Mars". NASA
(December 6, 2006). Retrieved on 2006-12-06.
31. ^ "Water flowed recently on Mars". BBC (December 6, 2006). Retrieved on
2006-12-06.
32. ^ "Water May Still Flow on Mars, NASA Photo Suggests", NASA (December 6,
2006). Retrieved on 30 April 2006.
33. ^ NASA (March 3, 2004). "Mineral in Mars 'Berries' Adds to Water Story". Press
release. Retrieved on 13 June 2006.
34. ^ McEwen, A. S.; et al. (September 21, 2007). "A Closer Look at Water-Related
Geologic Activity on Mars". Science 317: 1706–1709.
doi:10.1126/science.1143987. PMID 17885125.
35. ^ Sheehan, William. "Areographers". The Planet Mars: A History of Observation
and Discovery. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
36. ^ "Viking and the Resources of Mars" (PDF). Humans to Mars: Fifty Years of
Mission Planning, 1950–2000. Retrieved on 2007-03-10.
37. ^ "Topography". Think Quest. Retrieved on 2007-03-13.
38. ^ Frommert, H.; Kronberg, C.. "Christiaan Huygens". Retrieved on 2007-03-10.
39. ^ Wright, Shawn (April 4, 2003). "Infrared Analyses of Small Impact Craters on
Earth and Mars". University of Pittsburgh. Retrieved on 2007-02-26.
40. ^ "Mars Global Geography". Windows to the Universe. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
41. ^ Wetherill, G. W. (1999). "Problems Associated with Estimating the Relative
Impact Rates on Mars and the Moon". Earth, Moon, and Planets 9: 227.
doi:10.1007/BF00565406, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974Moon....9..227W.
Retrieved on 26 February 2007.
42. ^ Lucchitta, B. K.; Rosanova, C. E. (August 26, 2003). "Valles Marineris; The
Grand Canyon of Mars". USGS. Retrieved on 2007-03-11.
43. ^ G. E. Cushing, T. N. Titus, J. J. Wynne, P. R. Christensen. (2007). "Themis
Observes Possible Cave Skylights on Mars" (PDF). Lunar and Planetary Science
XXXVIII. Retrieved on 2007-08-02.
44. ^ "'Cave entrances' spotted on Mars". NAU. Retrieved on 2007-05-28.
45. ^ "Researchers find possible caves on Mars". Paul Rincon of BBC News.
46. ^ Philips, Tony (2001). "The Solar Wind at Mars". Science@NASA. Retrieved
on 2006-10-08.
47. ^ R. Lundin, S. Barabash, H. Andersson, M. Holmström, A. Grigoriev, M.
Yamauchi, J.-A. Sauvaud, A. Fedorov, E. Budnik, J.-J. Thocaven,2 D.
Winningham, R. Frahm, J. Scherrer, J. Sharber, K. Asamura, H. Hayakawa, A.
Coates, D. R. Linder, C. Curtis, K. C. Hsieh, B. R. Sandel, M. Grande, M. Carter,
D. H. Reading, H. Koskinen, E. Kallio, P. Riihela, W. Schmidt, T. Säles, J.
Kozyra, N. Krupp, J. Woch, J. Luhmann, S. McKenna-Lawler, R. Cerulli-Irelli, S.
Orsini, M. Maggi, A. Mura, A. Milillo, E. Roelof, D. Williams, S. Livi, P. Brandt,
P. Wurz, P. Bochsler (2004). "Solar Wind-Induced Atmospheric Erosion at Mars:
First Results from ASPERA-3 on Mars Express". Science 305: 1933–1936.
doi:10.1126/science.1101860. PMID 15448263.
48. ^ Lemmon; et al. (2004). "Atmospheric Imaging Results from Mars Rovers".
Science 306: 1753–1756. doi:10.1126/science.1104474. PMID 15576613.
49. ^ V. Formisano, S. Atreya, T. Encrenaz, N. Ignatiev, M. Giuranna (2004).
"Detection of Methane in the Atmosphere of Mars". Science 306: 1758–1761.
doi:10.1126/science.1101732. PMID 15514118.
50. ^ "Mars Express confirms methane in the Martian atmosphere", ESA (March 30,
2004). Retrieved on 17 March 2006.
51. ^ Martin Baucom (2006). "Life on Mars?". American Scientist 94 (2),
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/49613. Retrieved
on 26 February 2007.
52. ^ a b C. Oze, M. Sharma (2005). "Have olivine, will gas: Serpentinization and the
abiogenic production of methane on Mars". Geophys. Res. Lett. 32: L10203.
doi:10.1029/2005GL022691.
53. ^ J. T. Mellon, W. C. Feldman, T. H. Prettyman (2003). "The presence and
stability of ground ice in the southern hemisphere of Mars". Icarus 169 (2): 324–
340. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2003.10.022,
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004Icar..169..324M. Retrieved on 26 February
2007.
54. ^ "Mars Rovers Spot Water-Clue Mineral, Frost, Clouds", NASA (December 13,
2004). Retrieved on 17 March 2006.
55. ^ "Mars' desert surface...". MGCM Press release. NASA. Retrieved on 2007-02-
25.
56. ^ Goodman, Jason C (September 22, 1997). "The Past, Present, and Possible
Future of Martian Climate". MIT. Retrieved on 2007-02-26.
57. ^ Philips, Tony (July 16, 2001). "Planet Gobbling Dust Storms". Science @
NASA. Retrieved on 2006-06-07.
58. ^ Darling, David. "Mars, polar caps, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF ASTROBIOLOGY,
ASTRONOMY, AND SPACEFLIGHT". Retrieved on 2007-02-26.
59. ^ "MIRA's Field Trips to the Stars Internet Education Program". Mira.org.
60. ^ Carr, Michael H. (2003). "Oceans on Mars: An assessment of the observational
evidence and possible fate". Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (5042): 24.
doi:10.1029/2002JE001963, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998RPPh...61...77K.
61. ^ Phillips, Tony. "Mars is Melting, Science at NASA". Retrieved on 2007-02-26.
62. ^ J. J. Plaut, G. Picardi, A. Safaeinili, A. B. Ivanov, S. M. Milkovich, A.
Cicchetti, W. Kofman, J. Mouginot, W. M. Farrell, R. J. Phillips, S. M. Clifford,
A. Frigeri, R. Orosei, C. Federico, I. P. Williams, D. A. Gurnett, E. Nielsen, T.
Hagfors, E. Heggy, E. R. Stofan, D. Plettemeier, T. R. Watters, C. J. Leuschen, P.
Edenhofer (2007). "Subsurface Radar Sounding of the South Polar Layered
Deposits of Mars". Science 315: 92. doi:10.1126/science.1139672. PMID
17363628.
63. ^ Pelletier J. D. (2004). "How do spiral troughs form on Mars?". Geology 32:
365–367. doi:10.1130/G20228.2,
http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-
abstract&doi=10.1130%2FG20228.2. Retrieved on 27 February 2007.
64. ^ "MarsToday.Com". Mars Polar Cap Mysery Solved. Retrieved on 2007-01-23.
65. ^ "Mars' Orbital eccentricity over time". Solex. Universita' degli Studi di Napoli
Federico II (2003). Retrieved on 2007-07-20.
66. ^ Jean Meeus (March 2003). "When Was Mars Last This Close?". International
Planetarium Society. Retrieved on 2008-01-18.
67. ^ Ron Baalke (August 22, 2003). "Mars Makes Closest Approach In Nearly
60,000 Years". meteorite-list. Retrieved on 2008-01-18.
68. ^ "Close Inspection for Phobos". ESA website. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
69. ^ "ARES ATTENDANTS: DEIMOS & PHOBOS". Greek Mythology. Retrieved
on 2006-06-13.
70. ^ a b Arnett, Bill (November 20, 2004). "Phobos". nineplanets. Retrieved on 2006-
06-13.
71. ^ Ellis, Scott. "Geological History: Moons of Mars". CalSpace. Retrieved on
2007-08-02.
72. ^ Helen Briggs (BBC science reporter, Boston) (February 15, 2008). "Early Mars
'too salty' for life". BBC News. Retrieved on 2008-02-16.
73. ^ Hannsson, Anders (1997). Mars and the Development of Life., Wiley. ISBN 0-
471-96606-1.
74. ^ "New Analysis of Viking Mission Results Indicates Presence of Life on Mars",
Physorg.com (January 7, 2007). Retrieved on 2 March 2007.
75. ^ "Phoenix Returns Treasure Trove for Science". NASA/JPL (2008-06-26).
76. ^ Vladimir A. Krasnopolsky, Jean-Pierre Maillard, Tobias C. Owen (2004).
"Detection of methane in the Martian atmosphere: evidence for life?". Icarus 172:
537–547. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2004.07.004.
77. ^ "Formaldehyde claim inflames Martian debate", Nature (February 25, 2005).
Retrieved on 19 March 2006.
78. ^ Dinerman, Taylor (September 27, 2004). "Is the Great Galactic Ghoul losing his
appetite?". The space review. Retrieved on 2007-03-27.
79. ^ "Other Mars Missions". Journey through the galaxy. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
80. ^ "Mars Global Surveyor". CNN- Destination Mars. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
81. ^ "Mars Pulls Phoenix In". University of Arizona Phoenix mission Website.
82. ^ "Phoenix: The Search for Water". NASA website. Retrieved on 2007-03-03.
83. ^ "Frozen Water Confirmed on Mars". UANews.org. Retrieved on 2008-08-24.
84. ^ "NASA Mars Mission declared dead". BBC (November 10, 2008). Retrieved on
2008-11-10.
85. ^ "NASA's Mars Odyssey Shifting Orbit for Extended Mission". nasa.com
(October 9, 2008). Retrieved on 2008-11-15.
86. ^ Britt, Robert (March 14, 2003). "Odyssey Spacecraft Generates New Mars
Mysteries". Space.com. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
87. ^ Wardell, Jane (January 26, 2004). "Europe's Beagle 2 Mars Probe Stays
Ominously Silent". Space.com. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
88. ^ a b Bertaux, Jean-Loup; et al. (June 9, 2005). "Discovery of an aurora on Mars".
Nature Magazine. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
89. ^ "Mars Exploration Rovers- Science". NASA MER website. Retrieved on 2006-
06-13.
90. ^ "Photo shows avalanche on Mars". CNN. Retrieved on 2008-03-04.
91. ^ "Mars Science Laboratory". NASA's MSL website. Retrieved on 2007-03-03.
92. ^ "ExoMars". ESA website. Retrieved on 2007-03-03.
93. ^ Rincon, Paul (November 10, 2006). "European Mars launch pushed back".
94. ^ >"Introduction to the MetNet Mars Mission". Finnish Meteorological Institute.
95. ^ a b "Introduction to the MetNet Mars Mission". Finnish Meteorological Institute.
96. ^ Britt, Robert. "When do we get to Mars?". Space.com FAQ: Bush's New Space
Vision. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
97. ^ "Liftoff for Aurora: Europe’s first steps to Mars, the Moon and beyond"
(October 11, 2002). Retrieved on 2007-03-03.
98. ^ "NASA aims to put man on Mars by 2037". Yahoo.com.
99. ^ NASA Selects 'MAVEN' Mission to Study Mars Atmosphere
100. ^ "Deimos". Planetary Societies's Explore the Cosmos. Retrieved on
2006-06-13.
101. ^ "Mars Observing FAQ". Shallow Sky. Retrieved on 2006-06-15.
102. ^ Rao, Joe (August 22, 2003). "NightSky Friday – Mars and Earth: The
Top 10 Close Passes Since 3000 B.C.". Space.com. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
103. ^ Breyer, Stephen (March 1979). "Mutual Occultation of Planets". Sky
and Telescope 57 #3: 220.
104. ^ Snyder, Dave (May 2001). "An Observational History of Mars".
105. ^ Sagan, Carl (1980). Cosmos. New York, USA: Random House.
pp. p.107. ISBN 0394502949.
106. ^ Zahnle K. (2001). "Decline and fall of the Martian empire". Nature 412:
209–213. doi:10.1038/35084148.
107. ^ Salisbury F. B. (1962). "Martian Biology". Science (journal) 136
(3510): 17–26, http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0036-
8075%2819620406%293%3A136%3A3510%3C17%3AMB%3E2.0.CO%3B2-R.
108. ^ NASA probe confirms water on Mars AFP July 31, 2008
109. ^ "Google Mars". Retrieved on 2007-02-26.
110. ^ NASA probe confirms water on Mars AFP, July 31, 2008
111. ^ Sheeham, William (February 2, 1997). "Motions of Mars". The Planet
Mars:: A History of Observation and Discovery. Retrieved on 2006-06-13.
112. ^ "Planet Symbols". NASA solar system exploration. Retrieved on 2006-
06-13.
113. ^ "Percivel Lowell's Canals". Retrieved on 2007-03-01.
114. ^ Fergus, Charles (May 2004). "Mars Fever". Research/Penn State 24 (2),
http://www.rps.psu.edu/0305/mars.html. Retrieved on 2 August 2007.
115. ^ Tesla, Nikola (February 19, 1901). "Talking with the Planets". Collier's
Weekly. Retrieved on 2007-05-04.
116. ^ Cheney, Margaret (1981). Tesla, man out of time. Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. pp. 162. ISBN 978-0-13-906859-1. OCLC 7672251.
117. ^ "Departure of Lord Kelvin", The New York Times, May 11, 1902, p.29.
118. ^ a b Professor Pickering (January 16, 1901). "The Light Flash From Mars"
(PDF). The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2007-05-20.
119. ^ Sagan, Carl (1980). Cosmos. New York, USA: Random House.
pp. p.106. ISBN 0394502949.
120. ^ "Radio's War of the Worlds Broadcast (1938)". Retrieved on 2007-03-
01.
121. ^ "Swift, Jonathan and the moons of Mars". David Darling. Retrieved on
2007-03-01.
122. ^ Kathy Miles and Charles F Peters II. "Unmasking the Face". Retrieved
on 2007-03-01.
External links
 3D maps of Mars in NASA World Wind
 Google Mars – Interactive image of Mars
 Flight Into Mariner Valley – NASA/JPL/Arizona State University 3D flythrough
of Valles Marineris
 Guide to Mars – information about Mars and how to observe it.
 Nine Planets Mars page
 On Mars: Exploration of the Red Planet 1958–1978 from the NASA History
Office.
 Martian Law – a CATO white paper
 Computer Simulation of a flyby through Mariner Valley
 Mars Unearthed – Comparisons of terrains between Earth and Mars
 Ralph Aeschliman's Online Atlas of Mars
 Geody Mars – World's search engine that supports NASA World Wind, Celestia,
and other applications.
 Be on Mars – Anaglyphs from the Mars Rovers (3D)
 NASA/JPL OnMars WMS Server for Mars Data – Work as Google Earth client
overlays
 Exploring Mars: Image Center
 Mars Astronomy Cast episode #52, includes full transcript.
 BBC News update on Mars Express' findings of polar water ice and water-eroded
features on the surface
 BBC News Mars pictures reveal frozen sea
 04/02/07: ESA Prepares for a Human Mission to Mars
 Mars' apparent relative size at opposition as seen by HST
 Mars articles in Planetary Science Research Discoveries
Cartographic resources
 Mars Nomenclature
 PDS Map-a-planet
 Viking Photomap
 MOLA (topographic) map
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
Mars Global
Surveyor Arrival
Press Kit
September 1997
Contacts
Douglas Isbell Policy/Program Management 202/358-1753

Headquarters,
Washington, DC
Franklin O’Donnell Mars Global Surveyor 818/354-5011

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Mission
Pasadena, CA
Contents
General Release ............................................................................................................................ 3
Media Services Information .......................................................................................................... 7
Quick Facts ................................................................................................................................... 8
Mars at a Glance ........................................................................................................................... 9
Historical Mars Missions ............................................................................................................ 10
Why Mars? .................................................................................................................................. 11
The Multi-Year Mars Program .................................................................................................... 14
Mission Overview ........................................................................................................................ 17
Spacecraft .................................................................................................................................... 27
Science Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 31
Program/Project Management .................................................................................................... 34
1
2
RELEASE:
MARS GLOBAL SURVEYOR ON TARGET FOR ARRIVAL
NASA's Mars Global Surveyor, the first in a new series of spacecraft destined to explore
the red planet, is preparing to intercept the orbit of Mars and begin a two-year mapping mission
after a 10-month, 700-million-kilometer (435-million-mile) interplanetary journey.
The orbiter will fire its main engine beginning at 01:17 Universal Time on September
12 (6:17 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time September 11) for 22 minutes to slow its speed enough to
be captured in orbit around the planet.
Mars Global Surveyor is a global mapping mission, carrying a suite of science instru-
ments designed to study the entire Martian surface, atmosphere and interior. Measurements will
be collected beginning in March 1998 from a low-altitude, nearly polar orbit 378 kilometers
(234 miles) above the Martian surface over the course of one complete Martian year, the equiv-
alent of nearly two Earth years.
"Throughout its primary, two-year mission, Mars Global Surveyor will gather informa-
tion on the geology, geophysics and climate of Mars," said Glenn E. Cunningham, Global
Surveyor project manager at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
"The mission will provide a global portrait of Mars as it exists today," he said. "This
new view will help planetary scientists to better understand the history of Mars' evolution, and
will provide clues about the planet's interior and surface evolution. With this information, we
will have a better understanding of the history of all of the inner planets of the solar system,
including our home planet, Earth."
Mars Global Surveyor continues NASA's long exploration of the red planet, which
began more than 30 years ago with the Mariner 4 spacecraft that produced the first pictures of
the planet's cratered surface. Following the successful landing of the Mars Pathfinder lander and
rover on July 4, 1997, Mars Global Surveyor is the first in a multi-year series of missions called
the Mars Surveyor program that will lead to eventual human expeditions to the red planet.
Mars Global Surveyor was launched at 12:00:49 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on
November 7, 1996, atop a three-stage Delta II launch vehicle from launch pad 17A at Cape
Canaveral Air Station, FL. The third-stage Star 48B solid rocket later propelled the spacecraft
out of Earth orbit and on its way to Mars.
Once on course for the cruise to Mars, the spacecraft deployed its two solar panels to
begin generating solar power. One of the solar panels did not fully deploy and is tilted about 20
degrees from its intended position; this is not, however, expected to pose a significant risk to
the mission. The low-gain antenna was used for initial spacecraft communications, until the
3
spacecraft was far enough away from Earth in early January 1997 to begin using its 1.5-meter-
diameter (5-foot) high-gain antenna.
Mars Global Surveyor's six science instruments — the thermal emission spectrometer,
laser altimeter, magnetometer/electron reflectometer, ultra-stable oscillator, camera and radio
relay system — were calibrated during the cruise to Mars. Three trajectory correction maneu-
vers were performed to fine-tune the spacecraft's flight path. All spacecraft systems and the
instrument payload performed well as Mars Global Surveyor headed for its destination, accord-
ing to Joe Beerer, Global Surveyor flight operations manager.
When Surveyor reaches Mars, its 660-newton main engine will fire to slow the space-
craft's speed by more than 973 meters per second (2,176 miles per hour) with respect to Mars
and allow the craft to be captured by Mars' gravity.
"Mars Global Surveyor will be flying over the north pole when it enters orbit around
Mars," said Wayne Lee, Mars Global Surveyor mission planner. "The spacecraft will spend the
first six days in this highly elliptical orbit around the planet, completing one orbit around Mars
in about 45 hours, or just less than two days."
Instrument calibrations and some science measurements will take place during the ellip-
tical orbit phase, said Dr. Arden Albee, Mars Global Surveyor project scientist.
“The spacecraft will be passing in and out of the planet’s magnetic field, if indeed Mars
has one, during the early and larger elliptical orbits around the planet,” he said. “Global
Surveyor will be able to make unique observations of interactions of magnetic field lines with
the solar wind. In addition, it will make calibrations of the magnetometer and electron spec-
trometer that would not be possible from the lower-altitude mapping orbit.
“The thermal emission spectrometer and the camera will obtain initial observations on
the surface and atmosphere of Mars,” Albee continued. “These will provide valuable insight
into changes in the atmosphere that might affect the safety of the spacecraft during aerobraking
operations.”
Six days after Mars arrival, the spacecraft will begin an innovative braking process,
called aerobraking, to lower itself into a low-altitude mapping orbit. Aerobraking allows a
spacecraft to use the drag of a planet's atmosphere to lower its orbit without relying on propel-
lant. The technique was first tested in the summer of 1993, using the Magellan spacecraft orbit-
ing Venus.
During each of its orbits shortly after Mars arrival, Mars Global Surveyor will pass
through the upper fringes of the Martian atmosphere each time it reaches periapsis, the point in
its orbit closest to the planet. Friction from the atmosphere will cause the spacecraft to be
slowed slightly and lose some of its momentum during each orbit. Each time the spacecraft dips
into the atmosphere, its one tilted solar panel will be rotated 180 degrees to protect it from fold-
ing up. As the spacecraft loses momentum, the apoapsis, or the point in its orbit farthest from
4
Mars, will also be lowered.
Trimming its orbit from the highly elliptical, 45-hour orbit to a nearly circular, two-hour
orbit will take about four months. Five engine burns will accomplish the first orbital adjust-
ments, lowering the periapsis (or closest point to Mars) from about 250 kilometers (156 miles)
to about 112 kilometers (69 miles) above the surface.
Next, Mars Global Surveyor will spend about three months adjusting the farthest part of
its orbit from 54,000 kilometeres (33,480 miles) to about 2,000 kilometers (1,240 miles). As the
spacecraft's orbit is trimmed, the time it takes to make one complete revolution around Mars
will diminish to less than three hours.
In the final three weeks of aerobraking, Global Surveyor will raise the closest part of its
orbit once again, until it is circling Mars in a 350- by 410-kilometer (217- by 254-mile) orbit,
very close to the final mapping orbit. With this adjustment, the spacecraft will be orbiting Mars
about once every 118 minutes, and crossing Mars' equator at about 2 p.m. local solar time each
orbit.
As the spacecraft continues to circularize its orbit, the 34-meter-diameter (112-foot)

antennas of NASA’s Deep Space Network will be used to begin a navigation and radio science
experiment, measuring small shifts in the spacecraft's velocity that will tell scientists more
about the planet's gravity field.
All of the spacecraft's instruments will be turned on around March 10, 1998, and the
mapping mission will begin on March 15. Data from this final checkout phase will allow the
spacecraft to obtain one complete global map of the surface — a process that will take seven
days — before the dust storm season begins in the spring.
"In 1998 the Martian dust storms occur roughly between February and August, so the
atmosphere may be disturbed when mapping begins," Albee said. "But we may have an excel-
lent opportunity to obtain data on the spread of a global Martian dust storm, should one occur
next year."
In its final mapping orbit, Mars Global Surveyor will circle Mars at a speed of about 3.4
kilometers per second (7,600 miles per hour) in an orbit that will take it close to both poles. On
the day side of the planet, Global Surveyor will be traveling from north to south. On each orbit,
it will cross the equator at about 2 p.m. local mean solar time. The spacecraft will always see
the surface of Mars on the daylit side as it appears at mid-afternoon. This “sun-synchronous”
orbit puts the Sun at a standard angle above the horizon in each image.
Experiment teams will control their spaceborne instruments from their home institutions.
Each 24 hours worth of data will be transmitted to Earth during daily, 10-hour tracking passes
performed by NASA's Deep Space Network.
The Mars Global Surveyor mission is expected to yield more than 700 billion bits of
5
scientific data, more than the amount of data returned by all previous Mars missions, and
exceeded only by the Magellan Venus mission.
Mars Global Surveyor will examine the entire planet — from the ionosphere, an enve-
lope of charged particles surrounding Mars, down through the atmosphere to the surface and
deep into Mars' interior. Scientists will glean valuable new information on daily and seasonal
weather patterns, geological features and the migration of water vapor from hemisphere to
hemisphere over a complete Martian year.
As the primary mission winds down in late 1999, Global Surveyor will be used to relay
data from microprobes penetrators beneath the surface of Mars that will have been deployed
before arrival by the 1998 Mars Surveyor, and will be used as a backup relay platform for data
from the Mars Surveyor '98 lander itself. Depending on its lifetime, Global Surveyor may also
serve as a communications relay station for other spacecraft arriving at Mars.
Mars Global Surveyor is the first mission in a sustained program of robotic exploration
of Mars, managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, for NASA's Office of Space
Science, Washington, DC. JPL is a division of the California Institute of Technology.
[End of General Release]
6
Media Services Information
NASA Television Transmission
NASA Television is broadcast on the satellite GE-2, transponder 9C, C Band, 85

degrees west longitude, frequency 3880.0 MHz, vertical polarization, audio monaural at 6.8
MHz. Television coverage of the Mars Global Surveyor orbit insertion begins at 5 p.m. Pacific
Daylight Time on Sept. 11 and concludes at approximately 8:30 p.m. PDT, following a live
news briefing. The schedule for NASA TV programming is available from the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, Pasadena, CA; Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX; Kennedy Space Center, FL;
and NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC.
Status Reports
Status reports on Mars Global Surveyor will be issued by the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory's Public Information Office. They may be accessed online as noted below. Daily
audio status reports are available by calling (800) 391-6654.
Briefings
A pre-arrival mission and science overview briefing, originating from the Jet Propulsion
Laboratory, will be carried live on NASA TV at 10 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time on Tuesday,
September 9. Status briefings will be held at 10 a.m. PDT Wednesday and Thursday, September
10-11. A post-arrival briefing will be held at 7:40 p.m. PDT Thursday, September 11. A brief-
ing presenting initial science findings is tentatively scheduled the week of September 22-26.
Image Releases
Images returned by Mars Global Surveyor will be released to the news media in elec-
tronic format only during the mission. The images will be available in a variety of file formats
from the JPL home page at http://www.jpl.nasa.gov . Images will also be distributed from the
Mars Orbiter Camera principal investigator's web site at http://www.msss.com .
Internet Information
Extensive information on Mars Global Surveyor — including an electronic copy of this

press kit, as well as news releases, fact sheets, status reports, spacecraft and science data and
images — is available from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's World Wide Web home page at
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov . The Mars Global Surveyor Project also maintains a home page at
http://marsweb.jpl.nasa.gov . Data from all of the mission's science instruments will be avail-
able on the home pages of each instrument's principal investigator; these addresses are linked to
the Mars Global Surveyor project's home page.
7
Quick Facts
Spacecraft
Dimensions: Main structure 1.2 by 1.2 by 1.8 meters (4 by 4 by 6 feet); 12 meters (40 feet)
across with fully deployed solar panels
Spacecraft mass at Mars arrival: 767 kg (1,691 lbs)
Science instruments: thermal emission spectrometer; laser altimeter; magnetometer/electron
reflectometer; ultra-stable oscillator; camera; radio relay system
Solar arrays: 2 panels, each 3.5 meters (11 feet) long; power 980 watts maximum;
cells composed of gallium arsenide and silicon
Radio: 25-watt transmitter, X-band (8 GHz)
High-gain antenna diameter: 1.5 meters (4.9 feet)
Launch/Cruise
Launch: 12:00:49 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (17:00:49 Universal Time) November 7, 1996,
from Cape Canaveral Air Station, FL
Cruise: 10 months
Mars Orbit Insertion

Orbit insertion burn: Begins 01:17:16 and ends at 01:39:33 Universal Time on Sept 12, 1997
(6:17 p.m. to 6:39 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time Sept 11, 1997); duration 22 min, 17 sec
One-way speed of light time on arrival day: 14 minutes, 6 seconds
Time burn observed on Earth: Begins 6:31 p.m. and ends 6:53 p.m. PDT Sept 11, 1997
Mars-Earth distance on arrival day: 254.6 million km (158 million mi)
Change in velocity: 973 m/sec (2,176 mph)
Velocity before burn (with respect to Mars): 5.09 km/sec (11,386 mph)
Velocity after burn (with respect to Mars): 4.40 km/sec (9,842 mph)
Average deceleration due to burn: 7/100ths of 1 Earth G
Martian seasons at arrival: Fall in northern hemisphere, spring in south
Aerobraking and Mapping Mission

Period of aerobraking: Begins September 17, 1997; continues for 4 months
Period of initial elliptical orbit: 45 hours, plus or minus 3 hours
Final mapping orbit: period 117 min, mean altitude 378 km (234 mi), polar, sun-synchronous
Primary mapping mission: March 15, 1998 to January 31, 2000; covers 1 Martian year (687
Earth days)
Martian seasons when mapping begins: Winter in northern hemisphere, summer in south
Program
Development time: 26 months
Costs: $148 million pre-launch development; $52.6 million launch; $46.4 million mission ops
Spacecraft industrial partner: Lockheed Martin Astronautics, Denver, CO
8
Mars at a Glance
General
q One of 5 planets known to ancients; Mars was Roman god of war, agriculture and the state
q Reddish color; at times the 3rd brightest object in night sky after the Moon and Venus
Physical Characteristics
q Average diameter 6,794 kilometers (4,219 miles); about half the size of Earth, but twice the
size of Earth’s Moon
q Mass 1/10th of Earth’s; gravity only 38 percent as strong as Earth’s
q Density 3.9 times greater than water (compared to Earth’s 5.5 times greater than water)
q No magnetic field detected to date
Orbit
q Fourth planet from the Sun, the next beyond Earth
q About 1.5 times farther from the Sun than Earth is
q Orbit elliptical; distance from Sun varies from a minimum of 206.7 million kilometers
(128.4 million miles) to a maximum of 249.2 million kilometers (154.8 million miles); average
distance from Sun, 227.7 million kilometers (141.5 million miles)
q Revolves around Sun once every 687 Earth days
q Rotation period (length of day in Earth days) 24 hours, 37 min, 23 sec (1.026 Earth days)
q Poles tilted 25 degrees, creating seasons similar to Earth’s
Environment
q Atmosphere composed chiefly of carbon dioxide (95.3%), nitrogen (2.7%) and argon (1.6%)
q Surface atmospheric pressure 8 millibars (less than 1/100th that of Earth’s average)
q Surface temperature averages -53 C (-64 F); varies from -128 C (-199 F) during polar night
to 27 C (80 F) at equator during midday at closest point in orbit to Sun
Features
q Highest point is Olympus Mons, a huge shield volcano more than 15,900 meters (52,000
feet) high and 600 kilometers (370 miles) across; has about the same area as Arizona
q Canyon system of Valles Marineris is largest and deepest known in solar system; extends
more than 4,000 kilometers (2,500 miles) and has 5 to 10 kilometers (3 to 6 miles) relief from
floors to tops of surrounding plateaus
q “Canals” observed by Giovanni Schiaparelli and Percival Lowell about 100 years ago were a
visual illusion in which dark areas appeared connected by lines. The Viking missions of the
1970s, however, established that Mars has channels probably cut by ancient rivers
Moons
q Two irregularly shaped moons, each only a few kilometers wide
q Larger moon named Phobos (“fear”); smaller is Deimos (“terror”), named for attributes
personified in Greek mythology as sons of the god of war
9
Historical Mars Missions
Mission, Country, Launch Date, Purpose, Results
Mars 1, USSR, 11/1/62, Mars flyby, lost at 106 million kilometers (65.9 million miles)
Mariner 3, U.S., 11/5/64, Mars flyby, shroud failed
Mariner 4, U.S. 11/28/64, first successful Mars flyby 7/14/65, returned 21 photos
Zond 2, USSR, 11/30/64, Mars flyby, failed to return planetary data
Mariner 6, U.S., 2/24/69, Mars flyby 7/31/69, returned 75 photos
Mariner 7, U.S., 3/27/69, Mars flyby 8/5/69, returned 126 photos
Mariner 8, U.S., 5/8/71, Mars flyby, failed during launch
Mars 2, USSR, 5/19/71, Mars orbiter/lander arrived 11/27/71, no useful data returned
Mars 3, USSR, 5/28/71, Mars orbiter/lander, arrived 12/3/71, some data and few photos
Mariner 9, U.S., 5/30/71, Mars orbiter, in orbit 11/13/71 to 10/27/72, returned 7,329 photos
Mars 4, USSR, 7/21/73, failed Mars orbiter, flew past Mars 2/10/74
Mars 5, USSR, 7/25/73, Mars orbiter, arrived 2/12/74, some data
Mars 6, USSR, 8/5/73, Mars orbiter/lander, arrived 3/12/74, little data return
Mars 7, USSR, 8/9/73, Mars orbiter/lander, arrived 3/9/74, little data return
Viking 1, U.S., 8/20/75, Mars orbiter/lander, orbit 6/19/76-1980, lander 7/20/76-1982
Viking 2, U.S., 9/9/75, Mars orbiter/lander, orbit 8/7/76-1987, lander 9/3/76-1980; combined,
the Viking orbiters and landers returned 50,000+ photos
Phobos 1, USSR, 7/7/88, Mars/Phobos orbiter/lander, lost 8/88 en route to Mars
Phobos 2, USSR, 7/12/88, Mars/Phobos orbiter/lander, lost 3/89 near Phobos
Mars Observer, U.S., 9/25/92, orbiter, lost just before Mars arrival 8/22/93 (8/21/93 EDT)
Mars Global Surveyor, 11/7/96, orbiter, en route to orbit insertion 9/12/97 (9/11/97 EDT)
Mars 96, Russia, 11/16/96, orbiter and landers, failed during launch
Mars Pathfinder, U.S., 12/4/96, landed 7/4/97, lander and rover, fulfilled all science objectives
10
Why Mars?
Of all the planets in the solar system, Mars is the most like Earth and the planet most
likely to support eventual human expeditions. Earth's Moon and Mercury are dry, airless bodies.
Venus has suffered a runaway greenhouse effect, developing a very dense carbon dioxide
atmosphere that has resulted in the escape of all of its water and the rise of torrid, inhospitable
surface temperatures of nearly 500 C (about 900 F). Mars, on the other hand, has all of the
ingredients necessary for life, including an atmosphere, polar caps and large amounts of water
locked beneath its surface. Mars, in fact, is the only other terrestrial planet thought to have
abundant water that could be mined and converted into its liquid form to support human life.
Compared to Earth, Mars is about 6,800 kilometers (4,200 miles) in diameter, about half
the diameter and about one-eighth the volume of Earth. Mars turns on its axis once every 24
hours, 37 minutes, making a Martian day — called a "sol" — only slightly longer than an Earth
day. The planet's poles are tilted to the plane of its orbit at an angle of 25 degrees — about the
same amount as Earth, whose poles are titled at 23.3 degrees to the ecliptic plane. Because of
its tilted axis, Mars has Earth-like seasonal changes and a wide variety of weather phenomena.
Although its atmosphere is tenuous, winds and clouds as high as about 25 kilometers (15 miles)
above the surface can blow across stark Martian deserts. Low-level fogs and surface frost have
been observed by spacecraft. Spacecraft and ground-based observations have revealed huge
dust storms that often start in the southern regions and can spread across the entire planet.
Early Mars may have been like early Earth. Current theories suggest that, early in its
history, Mars may have once been much warmer, wetter and enveloped in a much thicker
atmosphere. On Earth, evidence for life can be found in some of the oldest rocks, dating from
the end of Earth's heavy bombardment by comets and meteors around 4 billion years ago.
Surfaces on Mars that are about the same age show remains of ancient lakes, which suggests
that liquid water flowed on the surface at one time and the climate was both wetter and substan-
tially warmer. If this proves to be true, then further exploration may reveal whether life did
develop on Mars at some point early in its history. If it did not, scientists will want to know
why it didn't. Or perhaps they will be able to determine whether life that began early on in
Mars' evolution could still survive in some specialized niches such as hydrothermal systems
near volcanoes.
Mars is the most accessible planet on which to begin answering fundamental questions
about the origin of life. Scientists want to know if we are alone in the universe. Is life a cosmic
accident, or does it develop anywhere given the proper environmental conditions? What hap-
pened to liquid water on Mars? Could life have begun on Mars and been transported to Earth?
Exploring Mars also will provide us with a better understanding of significant events
that humankind may face in the future as Earth continues to evolve. What are the factors
involved in natural changes in a planet's climate, for instance? On Earth, one of the most impor-
tant questions now being studied is whether or not human activities are contributing to possible
global warming. Could these climate changes bring about negative environmental changes such
11
as sea level rise due to the melting of the ice caps? Mars provides a natural laboratory for
studying climate changes on a variety of time scales. If Mars in the past was warmer and wet-
ter, and had a thicker atmosphere, why did it change?
Layered deposits near the Martian polar caps suggest climatic fluctuations on a shorter
time scale. If scientists can learn about the important factors controlling climatic changes on
another planet, they may be able to understand the consequences of natural and human-induced
changes on Earth.
Mars is an excellent laboratory to engage in such a study. Earth and Venus are active
environments, constantly erasing all traces of their evolution with dynamic geological process-
es. On Mercury and on Earth's Moon, only relatively undisturbed ancient rocks are present.
Mars, by contrast, has experienced an intermediate level of geological activity, which has pro-
duced rocks on the surface that preserve the entire history of the solar system. Sedimentary
rocks preserved on the surface contain a record of the environmental conditions in which they
formed and, consequently, any climate changes that have occurred through time.
The Search for Life
After years of exhaustive study of the data returned by the Viking spacecraft from their
biology experiments, most scientists concluded that it is unlikely that any life currently exists
on the surface of Mars. Centuries of fascination about the possibility of intelligent life on the
red planet seemed to fade.
Since that time more than 20 years ago, however, much has been learned about the ori-
gins of life on Earth. Biologists learned that the most primitive single-celled microscopic organ-
isms had sprung from hot volcanic vents at the very bottom of Earth's oceans. They found that
the most fundamental carbonaceous organic material appear to demonstrate cell division and
differentiated cell types, very similar to other fossils and living species. Geologists learned that
these organisms could exist in regions along the floors of oceans in environments akin to pres-
sure-cookers, at extremely hot temperatures devoid of light and prone to extreme pressures that
no human being could survive. With new technologies and sophisticated instruments, they
began to measure the skeletons of bacteria-like organisms lodged deep within old rocks.
Then, in August 1996, a NASA-funded team of scientists announced its findings of the
first fossil evidence thought to be from Mars. The findings re-ignited the age-old question: Are
we alone in the universe?
The two-year investigation by a team led by scientists from NASA's Johnson Space
Center, Houston, TX, revealed evidence that strongly suggested primitive life may have existed
on Mars more than 3.6 billion years ago. Researchers discovered an igneous meteorite in
Earth's Antarctica that had been blasted away from the surface of Mars in an impact event; the
rock was dated to about 4.5 billion years old, the period when Mars and its terrestrial neighbors
were forming. According to scientists on the team, the rock contains fossil evidence of what
they believe may have been ancient microorganisms.
12
The team studied carbonate minerals deposited in the fractures of the approximately 2-
kilogram (4-pound), potato-shaped Martian meteorite. They suggested living organisms deposit-
ed the carbonate — and some remains of the microscopic organisms may have become fos-
silized — in a fashion similar to the formation of fossils in limestone on Earth. Then, 16 mil-
lion years ago, a huge comet or asteroid struck Mars, ejecting a piece of the rock from its sub-
surface location with enough force to escape the planet. For millions of years, the chunk of rock
floated through space. It encountered Earth's atmosphere 13,000 years ago and fell in Antarctica
as a meteorite.
In the tiny globs of carbonate, researchers found a number of features that could be
interpreted as having been formed by possible past life. Team members from Stanford
University detected organic molecules called polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) concen-
trated in the vicinity of the carbonate. Researchers from NASA Johnson found iron mineral
compounds commonly associated with microscopic organisms and the possible microscopic
fossil structures.
Most of the team's findings were made possible only because of very recent technologi-
cal advances in high-resolution scanning electron microscopy and laser mass spectrometry. Just
a few years ago, many of the features that they reported were undetectable. Although past stud-
ies of the meteorite in question — designated ALH84001 — and others of Martian origin failed
to detect evidence of past life, they were generally performed using lower levels of magnifica-
tion, without the benefit of the technology used in this research. In addition, the recent sugges-
tion of extremely small bacteria on Earth, called nanobacteria, prompted the team to perform
this work at a much finer scale than had been done in the past.
The findings, presented in the August 16, 1996, issue of the journal Science, have been
put forth to the scientific community at large for further study. The team was co-led by Johnson
Space Center planetary scientists Dr. David McKay, Dr. Everett Gibson and Kathie Thomas-
Keprta of Lockheed Martin, with the major collaboration of a Stanford University team headed
by chemistry professor Dr. Richard Zare, as well as six other NASA and university partners. A
variety of papers have been published in the months since that announcement that have argued
for and against the claims that the evidence is suggestive of ancient life.
Whether or not the evidence stands up to scientific scrutiny, the suggestion alone has
renewed interest in exploring the planets, stars and galaxies outside of the Milky Way galaxy.
The questions resound: Does life exist elsewhere in the universe? And why does it exist at all?
Did life as we know it originate on Earth or did it spring from other planets, only to be trans-
ported to Earth, where it found the most advantageous niche for continuing evolution?
In the year 2005, NASA plans to send to Mars a sample return mission, a robotic space-
craft that will be able to return soil and rock samples to Earth for direct study much as the
Apollo astronauts returned hundreds of pounds of lunar rocks to Earth. Additional debate and
scientific experimentation with Martian meteorites in the next several years may bring about an
answer that could become a turning point in the history of civilization.
13
The Multi-Year Mars Program
Launch of the two 1996 missions to Mars — Mars Pathfinder and Mars Global
Surveyor — ushered in a continuing U.S. campaign of Mars exploration. The program is
designed to send low-cost spacecraft to Mars every 26 months well into the next decade.
Although they were launched within a month of each other in late 1996, Mars Global
Surveyor and Mars Pathfinder have their roots in two separate NASA programs. Mars
Pathfinder was approved as a stand-alone project under NASA's Discovery program, which was
created in 1992 to fund low-cost solar system missions. Mars Global Surveyor, on the other
hand, is the first in a multi-year series of missions under the Mars Surveyor program.
After 1996, current plans call for two Mars Surveyor spacecraft to be sent to Mars dur-
ing each launch opportunity in 1998, 2001 and 2003, and a single sample-return spacecraft in
2005. The program is expected to continue beyond 2005 on a direction set by results obtained
from earlier flights. In addition to fulfilling specific science goals, these missions are expected
to pave the way for human exploration some time early in the next century.
By 2005, NASA will have launched a series of small spacecraft with highly focused sci-
ence goals probing and watching the planet, setting in place a new way of exploring the solar
system. Based on the space agency's philosophy of bringing faster, better and cheaper missions
to fruition, combinations of orbiters and landers will take advantage of novel microtechnologies
— lasers, microprocessors and electronic circuits, computers and cameras the size of a gaming
die — to deliver an ingenious armada of miniaturized robotic payloads to Earth's planetary
neighbor.
The current plan for U.S. missions to Mars is listed below. Projected costs are for space-
craft development only and do not include launch vehicles, mission operations after the first 30
days or spacecraft tracking.
1996:
q Mars Pathfinder (Discovery mission). Demonstrate low cost-entry and landing system, and
rover mobility; initiates mineralogy studies; continue study of surface characteristics and
Martian weather. Cost: $171 million (capped at $150 million in fiscal year 1992 dollars), plus
$25 million for rover.
q Mars Global Surveyor. Perform global reconnaissance of physical and mineralogical sur-
face characteristics, including evidence of water; determine global topography and geologic
structure of Mars; assess atmosphere and magnetic field during seasonal cycles; provide com-
munication relay for the Mars Surveyor '98 microprobes and backup communication relay for
the Mars Surveyor '98 lander. Cost: $148 million.
14
1998:
q Mars Surveyor '98 Orbiter. Launch scheduled December 10, 1998. Characterize the
Martian atmosphere, including definition of atmospheric water content during seasonal cycles.
Provide primary communication relay for the Mars Surveyor '98 lander.
q Mars Surveyor '98 Lander. Launch scheduled January 3, 1999. Access past and present-
day water reservoirs on Mars; study surface chemistry, topology and mineralogy; continue
weather studies. The spacecraft also will deliver two innovative soil microprobes developed
under NASA's New Millennium program. Combined cost of both 1998 missions: $187 million,
plus $26 million for the microprobes.
2001:
q Mars Surveyor '01 Orbiter. Characterize mineralogy and chemistry of surface, including
identification of near surface water reservoirs.
q Mars Surveyor '01 Lander and Rover. Characterize terrain over tens of kilometers (or
miles) at site selected from MGS and Mars Surveyor '98 orbital observations. Select and gather
samples for possible later return. Characterize dust, soil and radiation conditions as they pertain
to eventual human exploration. Test components of in-situ propellant production plant.
Combined development cost of both 2001 missions: approximately $250 million.
2003:
q Mars Surveyor '03 Lander and Rover. Characterize terrain over tens of kilometers (or
miles) at a site chosen using earlier orbital observations; select and gather samples for possible
later return. Other objectives, related to eventual human exploration, are expected to be added
to both 2003 missions.
q Mars Surveyor '03 Orbiter: Provide communications and navigation facilities for 2003 and
later missions on the Martian surface. Combined development cost of both 2003 missions:
approximately $220 million.
2005:
q Sample Return Mission. Return a sample from one of the two rovers launched in 2001 and
2003. Development cost: approximately $400 million.
Beyond 2005:
q To be determined. Plans will depend on results of earlier missions.
15
International Cooperation
International collaboration on all Mars missions will be an important aspect of explo-

ration in the next decade. Many space agencies around the world are considering participation
in the planning stages of future missions, including those of Russia, Japan and many European
countries. Scientists from the United States are consulting with international partners on the
best ways to combine their efforts in Mars exploration. This may result in new proposals for
cooperative missions in the first decade of the 21st century.
Among the ongoing programs taking shape is one called "Mars Together," a concept for
the joint exploration of Mars by Russia and the United States. The program was initiated in the
spring of 1994 and bore its first fruit in the summer of 1995. A Russian co-principal investiga-
tor and Russian hardware were incorporated into one experiment, the pressure modulator
infrared radiometer, to be flown on NASA's Mars Surveyor 1998 orbiter. Dr. Vassili Moroz of
the Russian Academy of Sciences Space Research Institute (IKI) in Moscow will co-lead the
experiment with Dr. Daniel McCleese of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The Russian insti-
tute also will provide the optical bench for the radiometer. In addition, IKI will furnish a com-
plete science instrument, the LIDAR (light detection and ranging) atmospheric sounder, for the
1998 Mars Surveyor lander.
Under Mars Together, NASA is discussing possible collaboration with Russia on a mis-
sion in 2001. This possible arrangement involves an additional rover launched and operated by
Russia that also would select and gather samples for possible later return. The Mars Surveyor
'01 orbiter would provide the communications relay for this rover.
Japan also is building an orbiter, called Planet B, to study the Martian upper atmosphere
and its interaction with the solar wind. The spacecraft, to be launched in August 1998, will
carry a U.S. neutral mass spectrometer instrument to investigate the upper atmosphere, in addi-
tion to a variety of Japanese instruments.
The nations of Europe are considering a mission in 2003 called Mars Express. The ten-
tative plan includes an orbiter carrying one or more small landers and remote-sensing instru-
ments that would study topography and surface minerals. A final decision on this mission is
expected before the end of 1998.
16
Mission Overview
Mars Global Surveyor is a global mapping mission, designed to gather data on the
atmosphere, surface and interior of Mars. Global data sets will enable scientists to determine
Mars' current state and characterize its evolution. Among a myriad of science objectives, Mars
Global Surveyor will study Mars' climate, surface topography and subsurface resources, and
map the entire globe. Information from the mission will serve as a foundation for planning
future robotic and human missions to Mars.
Launch
Mars Global Surveyor was launched at 12:00:49 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on
November 7, 1996, atop a Delta II 7925A launch vehicle from launch pad 17A at Cape
Canaveral Air Station, FL. The launch was delayed one day due to clouds and upper level
winds on the first day of the launch period.
After liftoff, the first stage of the three-stage Delta rocket and the nine solid-fuel strap-
on boosters lifted the spacecraft to an altitude of about 115 kilometers (70 miles) above Earth,
and the Delta's second stage then boosted the payload into a circular parking orbit 185 kilo-
metes (115 miles) above Earth. After achieving the parking orbit, the booster and spacecraft
coasted for about 35 minutes, then fired to raise the apogee, or high point, of the parking orbit.
Small rockets were used to spin up the Delta's third stage and spacecraft to 60 rpm. The
second stage was jettisoned and the third stage, a Star 48B solid rocket, was ignited to complete
the trans-Mars injection burn and send Global Surveyor on its way to the red planet.
Solar panel deployment. About an hour after launch, the spacecraft's two 3.5-meter
(11-foot) solar arrays were unfolded and a piece of metal called the "damper arm" on one of the
panels was broken off during the deployment. (The damper arm is the part of the solar array
deployment mechanism at the joint where the entire panel is attached to the spacecraft.) The
metal fragment became trapped in the 50-millimeter (2-inch) space between the panel's shoul-
der joint and the edge of the solar panel, leaving the array about 19 degrees from its fully
deployed position.
The damper arm connects the panel to a device called the "rate damper," which func-
tions in much the same way as the hydraulic closer on a screen door acts to slow the speed at
which the door closes. In Global Surveyor's case, the rate damper was used to slow the motion
of the solar panel as it unfolded from its stowed position.
The operations team studied the problem with engineering data and computer-simulated
models over the next two weeks. Two strategies for correcting the problem emerged. The first
involved performing several slight maneuvers using the spacecraft's electrically driven solar
array positioning actuators to try to gently shake the array and free the trapped debris. These
maneuvers were carried out in January and February 1997, to no avail.
17
The second strategy was to reconfigure the solar panel during aerobraking so that the
unlatched side of the panel would not be facing into the direction of the air flow and at risk of
folding up on itself. The solar arrays are essential to the aerobraking technique and will be used
to provide the drag surface that will slow the spacecraft's orbital speed, transforming its initial
elliptical orbit into the final, circular mapping orbit. The technique allows Global Surveyor to
carry considerably less fuel to Mars and take advantage of the planet's atmospheric drag to
lower itself into the correct orbit.
After testing and analysis, the flight team determined that aerobraking could be safely
accomplished by rotating the panel 180 degrees, turning the panel's solar-cell side into the flow
of wind each time the spacecraft dips into the Martian atmosphere. By turning the panel's
solar-cell side into the direction of the air flow, force will be exerted on the debris that is lodged
in the hinge. The force of the air flow on the opposite side of the panel will insure the panel
does not close up, and may possibly exert enough force to snap the panel into the latched posi-
tion.
Cruise
The spacecraft spent 309 days en route to Mars, following what navigators call a Type 2
trajectory. This type of flight path took the spacecraft more than 180 degrees around the Sun
and, compared with other types of trajectories, is a slower way to reach Mars. Because the
spacecraft has been traveling at a slower velocity, however, it will require less propellant to
slow down once it is ready to be captured in orbit around the destination planet.
On the first part of its flight, all spacecraft communications with Earth occurred through
Global Surveyor's broad-beam, low-gain antenna. The dish-shaped, narrow-beam high-gain
antenna sat on the spacecraft in a stowed, body-fixed orientation during cruise, making commu-
nications with Earth through the high-gain antenna impossible unless the spacecraft was turned
to point the high-gain antenna directly at Earth.
Outer cruise began on January 9, 1997, when the spacecraft switched from the low-gain
to the high-gain antenna for communications with Earth. The switch-over became feasible when
the angle between the Sun and Earth as seen from the spacecraft fell to a level low enough to
allow the solar panels to collect adequate power while pointing the antenna at Earth.
Three trajectory correction maneuvers were performed along the trip to Mars to fine-
tune the spacecraft's flight path. These thruster firings were performed on November 21, 1996,
March 20, 1997, and August 25, 1997. Another maneuver had been scheduled for April 21,
1997, but was not necessary and, hence, not performed.
During the last 30 days of approach to Mars, the flight team focused on final targeting
of the spacecraft to the proper aim point, and preparations for orbit insertion. On August 19 and
20, the spacecraft's camera took a series of eight images of Mars, at a distance of 5.5 million
kilometers (3.4 million miles). With a resolution of about 20 kilometers (12.5 miles) per picture
18
element, these images were processed to create a movie of the planet as it rotated.
Mars Orbit Insertion
Mars Global Surveyor will perform an attitude reorientation maneuver once it reaches
the orbit of Mars to turn the spacecraft's main engine toward the direction of its motion, or
toward Mars. Then the spacecraft will fire its 660-newton main engine for approximately 22
minutes, 17 seconds, to slow down. The burn will begin at 01:17:16 and conclude at 01:39:33
Universal Time (UT) September 12, 1997 (6:17 to 6:39 p.m. September 11, 1997 Pacific
Daylight Time (PDT)). Because it takes 14 minutes, 6 seconds for radio signals to travel from
Mars to Earth on arrival day, the beginning and end of the burn will be detected on Earth at
6:31 and 6:53 p.m. PDT, respectively.
Telecommunications with the spacecraft will cease 9 minutes into the burn as Mars
Global Surveyor passes behind Mars as seen from Earth. This occultation will last 14 minutes.
NASA's Deep Space Network tracking facilities in California and Australia will regain commu-
nications with Global Surveyor at 01:57:00 UT (6:57 p.m. PDT), when the spacecraft
reemerges from behind Mars.
By completion of the burn, the spacecraft will have slowed down by about 973 meters
per second (2,176 miles per hour) with respect to Mars. Global Surveyor will be in a highly
elliptical orbit, completing one revolution around Mars every 45 hours, plus or minus 3 hours.
Aerobraking
Selection of the less expensive Delta II booster in order to stay within program costs
placed mass limitations on Mars Global Surveyor and prevented it from carrying enough pro-
pellant to Mars to directly achieve a low-altitude mapping orbit. An innovative, mission-
enabling braking technique known as aerobraking was chosen instead to trim the spacecraft's
initial, highly elliptical capture orbit and lower it to a nearly circular mapping orbit.
The Magellan spacecraft at Venus was the first planetary spacecraft to try aerobraking,
as a demonstration, in the summer of 1993. The success of this demonstration cleared the way
for its implementation in the Mars Global Surveyor mission design.
Global Surveyor's use of aerobraking will differ from that performed with the Magellan
spacecraft in two important ways. First, Global Surveyor must aerobrake before it can start its
primary mapping mission, whereas Magellan tested aerobraking as an engineering demonstra-
tion at the conclusion of its mission. Consequently, Global Surveyor's mission objectives are
dependent on successfully aerobraking through the Martian atmosphere until the proper map-
ping orbit is achieved. Not only must aerobraking be successful, but it must be accomplished so
that the spacecraft crosses the equator within a few minutes of 2 p.m. local solar time each
orbit. This is called a “sun-synchronous” orbit. These two elements of the aerobraking phase
make the Mars Global Surveyor's navigation by far the most challenging of the planetary mis-
sions to date.
19
Mars Global Surveyor
Orbit Insertion Timeline
Thursday, September 11, 1997
All times are Earth-received, Pacific Daylight Time
12:40 p.m. Deep Space Station 14 at Goldstone, CA, begins tracking

12:40 Deep Space Station 15 at Goldstone, CA, begins tracking
4:31 Gyro #2 turned on
4:35 Deep Space Station 43 in Australia begins tracking
4:35 Deep Space Station 45 in Australia begins tracking
5:01 Spacecraft begins loading maneuver control parameters
5:17 Deep Space Station 15 transmitter off
5:31 Spacecraft begins maneuver command block
5:55 Spacecraft transmitter switches from high-gain antenna to low-gain antenna #1
5:55 Spacecraft's telemetry turned off; transmits only carrier signal
~5:59 Deep Space Stations re-acquire signal
6:01 Thrusters enabled for steering and attitude control during orbit insertion
6:14 Spacecraft starts turn to align rocket engine in burn direction
6:15 Solar arrays begin turning to orbit insertion orientation
6:29 Inertia measurement unit set to supply accelerometer data
6:30 Fuel and oxidizer valves enabled and armed
6:31 Main engine burn begins
6:40 Deep Space Station 45 transmitter on
6:43 Spacecraft passes behind Mars; radio signal lost
6:44 Closest approach to Mars (periapsis #1)
6:53 Main engine burn ends
6:55 Attitude control returned to reaction wheels
6:55 Spacecraft turns to Earth point and resumes array-normal-spin attitude
6:56 Solar arrays moved to array-normal-spin position
6:57 Spacecraft emerges from behind Mars
~6:57 - 7:03 Deep Space Stations acquire spacecraft carrier signal
7:10 Spacecraft transmitter switches from low-gain antenna to high-gain antenna
7:10 Spacecraft resumes transmitting telemetry (data)
20
During each of its orbits shortly after Mars arrival, the spacecraft will pass through the
upper fringes of the Martian atmosphere each time it reaches periapsis, the point in its orbit
closest to the planet. Friction from the atmosphere will cause the spacecraft to slow slightly and
lose some of its momentum during each orbit. Loss of momentum will lower the spacecraft's
apoapsis, or the point in its orbit farthest from Mars.
Aerobraking will take place over four months, beginning with an initial "walk-in" phase.
After the spacecraft is captured in a 45-hour (plus or minus 3 hours) elliptical orbit around
Mars, its apoapsis and periapsis will be gradually adjusted as scientists and engineers learn
more about the density of Mars' upper atmosphere. The flight team will be able to gauge atmos-
pheric density and variations from one orbit to another, while the spacecraft is tracked continu-
ously by the 34-meter-diameter (112-foot) antennas of NASA’s Deep Space Network, which are
designed to both transmit and receive X-band signals.
In the initial walk-in phase, the spacecraft's closest pass over Mars will be lowered from
the capture orbit of 250 kilometers (156 miles) above the surface to about 112 kilometers (69
miles) above the surface. This will be done with a series of five propulsive maneuvers, using
the spacecraft's thrusters. The first of these propulsive burns, scheduled to take place on
September 16, will be the largest and drop the spacecraft's periapsis altitude to 150 kilometers
(93 miles). The next four burns, occurring on September 18, 20, 22 and 24, will lower the
spacecraft gradually to the 112-kilometer (69-mile) aerobraking altitude.
After completion of the walk-in phase, the spacecraft will spend about three months in
the main phase of aerobraking. During this time, Global Surveyor's apoapsis altitude of 54,000
kilometers (33,480 miles) will be dropped to about 2,000 kilometers (1,240 miles). As the
spacecraft's orbit is trimmed, the time it takes to make one complete revolution around Mars
will drop to less than three hours.
The final three weeks of aerobraking constitute the "walk-out" phase and will reduce the
spacecraft's apoapsis to 450 kilometers (279 miles) above the surface of Mars. As Global
Surveyor lowers its apoapsis, it will also use its thrusters to gradually raise its periapsis from
112 kilometers (69 miles) to 143 kilometers (89 miles) above the surface. By doing so, the
spacecraft will be slowly "walking out" of the atmosphere during each closest approach to
Mars. Adjustments in both the farthest and closest points in Mars Global Surveyor's orbit
around the planet will be reshaping its flight path from highly elliptical to a nearly circular
orbit.
Aerobraking will end with a termination burn performed on about January 18, 1998.
This burn will raise Global Surveyor's periapsis one final time, from 143 kilometers (89 miles)
to approximately 450 kilometers (279 miles) above the surface of Mars. The spacecraft will
then be circling Mars in a 400- by 450-kilometer (248- by 279-mile) orbit, just slightly off from
its final mapping orbit. By then Global Surveyor will be orbiting Mars about once every 118
minutes, and crossing Mars' equator at just about 2 p.m. local solar time each orbit.
21
Aerobraking From Capture Orbit
to Mapping Orbit Altitude Takes
About 130 Earth Days
MOI+ MOI+
Middle Main Phase 80 Days 100 Days
(period = 12 hours)
MOI+
Early Main Phase 60 Days
(period = 24 hours)
MOI+
Early Main Phase 40 Days
22
Mapping Orbit
(period = 34 hours) (period = 2 hours)
Initial Capture Orbit

Late Main Phase
Walk-In Phase
(period = 6 hours)
(period = 48 hours)
5700 Miles MOI = Mars Orbit Insertion

(9170 km)
Mars Global Surveyor aerobraking orbits

Mars Global Surveyor will begin aerobraking in the southern spring, and the historical
record of global dust storms suggests that this is the most likely season for such storms to
occur. During these storms, the dust itself is not of concern, since there is no evidence that it
reaches anywhere near the altitudes at which aerobraking will occur. Scientists are more con-
cerned with the possible increase in atmospheric density at the aerobraking altitude that could
be caused by increased heating due to a dustier atmosphere in general.
Data from the highly successful Mars Pathfinder mission provided valuable new infor-
mation about the density of the Martian atmosphere all the way up to about 120 kilometers (75
miles), which will be used to update the atmospheric models before the start of the Mars Global
Surveyor aerobraking phase. Pathfinder also recorded dust activity and pressure and tempera-
ture fluctuations during its primary mission in July 1997. If Pathfinder’s lander and rover are
still operating by the time Mars Global Surveyor arrives at Mars, surface temperature, pressure
and opacity measurements will be monitored to help the Global Surveyor navigation team
adjust the spacecraft's orbit.
Several measurements will also be made from the Hubble Space Telescope and from
Earth. Hubble will take multiple images of Mars near the start of the aerobraking phase, before
Mars gets too close to the Sun as viewed from Earth. Hubble images taken during the week
before Pathfinder landed showed local dust activity near the landing site in Ares Vallis. When
combined with Earth-based observations made at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, CO,
using the National Radio Astronomy Observatory microwave antenna, these measurements will
yield a global average atmospheric temperature profile from the ground to about 60 kilometers
(35 miles) above the surface.
Scientists have been able to infer that moisture in the atmosphere usually confines
Martian dust to lower altitudes, where it has a minimal impact on the densities at higher alti-
tudes. As Mars gets closer to the Sun, atmospheric temperatures rise, along with water vapor
content, and allow dust to circulate at higher altitudes. The Hubble and radio astronomy
microwave observations will be used to keep a close eye on the Martian atmosphere during aer-
obraking, not only because the spacecraft's periapsis will have to be raised to survive the effects
of a global dust storm, but also because the aerobraking phase coincides with the first half of
the dust storm season.
Mars Global Surveyor will also be dipping repeatedly into the Martian atmosphere in a
different configuration than was originally planned. Because one of the spacecraft's two solar
panels did not fully deploy and latch into place after launch, it is tilted at about 20 degrees from
its fully deployed position. After careful analysis, engineers determined that the only risk posed
by the tilted panel was the possibility that the panel might fold up on itself if enough wind flow
was exerted.
To minimize that risk, the operations team will rotate the unlatched panel 180 degrees
each time the spacecraft encounters the strongest air flow, which will be at periapsis. By rotat-
ing the panel and turning its solar-cell side into the direction of the air flow, the latch will not
be in danger of folding up. The air flow, when exerted on the opposite side of the latch, may, in
23
fact, push the array into the fully locked position. Whether or not that is accomplished, Global
Surveyor's new aerobraking configuration does not pose significant risk to the science objec-
tives of the mission.
Science During Aerobraking
Early science measurements conducted during aerobraking will provide the navigation
team with enough information to perform alternative aerobraking strategies should the situation
arise. Scientists will benefit from new observations of Mars achieved with unique lighting
geometry from Global Surveyor's aerobraking orbit. The spacecraft's low-altitude passes will
allow scientists to record information from much closer to the planet than will be possible dur-
ing the mapping period. This 4-1/2-month transition will also give experiment teams time to
calibrate their instruments and prepare for continuous mapping operations.
The Mars orbital camera will image the surface of Mars at low Sun elevations between
15 degrees north latitude and 45 degrees south latitude, as the spacecraft slowly unwinds from
the aerobraking attitude. Image swaths taken over 100 orbital revolutions will yield more than
5,000 pictures at five times the surface resolution of Viking orbiter imaging.
Data from the thermal emission spectrometer will include 100 atmospheric profiles of
temperature and dust content at an unprecedented altitude of about 100 kilometers (60 miles).
This will be followed each orbit by mid-latitude infrared measurements with a resolution of 30
to 40 kilometers (19 to 25 miles). In addition, daily global coverage of thermal and composi-
tional properties will be recorded at a resolution of about 300 to 400 kilometers (185 to 250
miles) resolution, in association with unique local times of day and seasons.
As the elliptical orbit shrinks, the magnetometer will complete its primary science
objective of determining the existence of a global magnetic field and measuring solar wind
interaction with Mars' magnetopause, the boundary beyond which Mars no longer influences
space. The electron reflectometer portion of this experiment will observe electron density varia-
tions in the ionosphere at the lowest altitude during its two months of operation.
Pointing down at the planet, the laser altimeter will have a unique opportunity during
the spacecraft's closest approach to the planet on its third orbit after arrival to obtain a 600-kilo-
meter (373-mile) swath, centered at 30 degrees north latitude, with 200 meters (655 feet) of
spatial resolution and 2 meters (6.5 feet) of altitude precision. This orbit also permits the only
forward/aft viewing by the thermal emission spectrometer prior to mapping the planet at 5:30
p.m. local solar time.
Finally, as the spacecraft’s orbit is adjusted to achieve a periapsis of 200 kilometers (124
miles) from the surface, the radio science team will see a fourfold improvement in the sensitivi-
ty of their measurements when Global Surveyor flies over features known to produce gravity
variations, such as the south polar cap.
24
The Mapping Mission
The final mapping orbit will be nearly circular, at 350 by 410 kilometers (217 by 254
miles), or an average of 378 kilometers (234 miles) above the planet's surface.
After the mapping orbit is achieved, spacecraft systems will be deployed and instru-
ments will be checked out over the next 10 days.
The primary mission begins once the spacecraft has reached its mapping orbit and is
completing one orbit around Mars about every two hours. Each new orbit will bring the space-
craft over a different part of Mars. As the weeks pass, the spacecraft will create a global portrait
of Mars — capturing the planet's ancient cratered plains, huge canyon system, massive volca-
noes, channels and frozen polar caps. During its mission, Mars Global Surveyor will pass over
the terrain where the two U.S. Viking landers — separated by more than 6,400 kilometers
(4,000 miles) — have rested for 21 years, and over Ares Vallis, home of the Mars Pathfinder
lander (or Carl Sagan Memorial Station) and the Sojourner rover.
The primary mapping mission will begin on March 15, 1998, and last until January 31,
2000 — a period of one Martian year or 687 Earth days (almost two Earth years). The space-
craft will transmit its recorded data back to Earth once a day during a single 10-hour tracking
pass by antennas of the Deep Space Network. During mapping operations, the spacecraft will
return more than 700 billion bits of scientific data to Earth — more than that returned by all
previous missions to Mars and, in fact, roughly equal to the total amount of data returned by all
planetary missions since the beginning of planetary exploration with the exception of the
Magellan mission to Venus.
As Mars rotates beneath the spacecraft, a suite of onboard instruments will record a
variety of detailed information. Detectors will measure radiation — visible and infrared — from
the surface to deduce the presence of minerals that make up Mars. These same instruments will
record infrared radiation from the thin Martian atmosphere, gathering data about its changing
pressure, composition, water content and dust clouds. By firing short pulses of laser light at the
surface and measuring the time the reflections take to return, a laser altimeter will map out the
heights of Mars' mountains and the depths of its valleys.
The camera system will use wide- and narrow-angle lenses to record land forms and
atmospheric cloud patterns. Another sensor will look for a Martian magnetic field. As the
telecommunications subsystem transmits information back to Earth, engineers will use the sig-
nal of the orbiting spacecraft to derive data about the planet's atmosphere and gravitational
field.
By the time global mapping operations are over, Mars Global Surveyor will have
obtained an extensive record of the nature and behavior of the Martian surface, atmosphere and
interior. Such a record will aid in planning more specialized explorations that might involve
robots, scientific stations deployed to the Martian surface, sample return missions and perhaps
25
even human landings. Just as importantly, this record will help scientists understand planet
Earth and what the future might have in store for humanity.
Mission Operations
Throughout the two years of Mars Global Surveyor's mapping mission, principal inves-
tigators, team leaders and interdisciplinary scientists will have science operations planning com-
puters at their home institutions. All will be electronically connected to the project database at
the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, CA, giving them direct involvement in mission
operations.
Their computers will be equipped with software that allows the science teams to remote-
ly initiate most of the commands required by their instruments to conduct desired experiments.
The teams will be able to access raw science data within hours of their receipt on Earth. This
automated operation will provide "quick-look" science data and let investigators easily monitor
the health and performance of their instruments.
Many images and other data will be immediately available to the public on the Internet.
After a short period of data validation, science data, both raw and processed, along with supple-
mentary processing information and documentation, will be transferred to NASA's Planetary
Data System archive for access and use by the broader planetary science community and the
general public.
Control and operation of Mars Global Surveyor will be performed by a team of engi-
neers located at JPL and at Lockheed Martin Astronautics Inc. in Denver, CO. Engineers in
Denver will be electronically linked to JPL, providing monitoring and analysis of Mars Global
Surveyor based on telemetry received from the spacecraft through NASA's Deep Space
Network. The team will also develop the sequence of commands that will be sent to the space-
craft via the Deep Space Network. The electronic networking eliminates the costs of relocating
mission operations team members during the mission.
26
The Spacecraft
The main component of the Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft is a rectangular body, or
bus, that houses computers, the radio system, solid-state data recorders, fuel tanks and other
equipment. Attached to the outside of the bus are several rocket thrusters, which are fired to
adjust the spacecraft's path during the cruise to Mars and to modify the spacecraft's orbit around
the planet.
At launch, the spacecraft weighed 1,060 kilograms (2,337 pounds), including the sci-
ence payload and fuel, and stands about 3 meters (10 feet) tall. The bus or main body of the
spacecraft measures 1.2 by 1.2 meters (4 by 4 feet) and is 12 meters (40 feet) across from tip to
tip when the solar panels are fully unfolded. The high-gain antenna, deployed in the cruise
phase, measures 1.5 meters (4.9 feet) in diameter. The high-gain antenna will be deployed on a
2-meter-long (6-1/2-foot) boom.
To minimize costs, spare units left over from the Mars Observer mission were used in
portions of the spacecraft's electronics and for some of the science instruments. The spacecraft
design also incorporates new hardware — the radio transmitters, solid state recorders, propul-
sion system and composite material bus structure.
Mars Global Surveyor will orbit the planet so that one side of the bus, called the nadir
deck, always faces the Martian surface. Of the six science instruments, four — the Mars orbiter
camera, the Mars orbiter laser altimeter, the electron reflectometer and the thermal emission
spectrometer — are attached to the nadir deck, along with the Mars relay radio system. The
magnetometer sensors are mounted on the ends of the solar arrays.
The bus has two solar-array wings and a boom-mounted high-gain communications
antenna. The solar arrays, which always point toward the Sun, provide 980 watts of electricity
for operating the spacecraft's electronic equipment and for charging nickel hydrogen batteries.
The batteries will provide electricity when the spacecraft is mapping the dark side of Mars. To
maintain appropriate operating temperatures, most of the outer exposed parts of the spacecraft,
including the science instruments, are wrapped in thermal blankets.
In its mapping configuration, the dish-shaped high-gain antenna is deployed on the end
of a 2-meter (6-1/2-foot) boom so that its view of Earth will not be blocked by the solar arrays
as the spacecraft orbits Mars. Measuring 1.5 meters (4.9 feet) in diameter, this steerable antenna
will be pointed toward Earth even though the spacecraft's position will be continuously adjusted
during mapping to keep the nadir deck pointed toward Mars. The spacecraft's radio system,
including the high-gain antenna, also will function as a science instrument. Researchers will use
it in conjunction with NASA's Deep Space Network ground stations for the radio science inves-
tigations.
Spacecraft communications with Earth will always utilize X-band frequencies for radio
tracking, return of science and engineering telemetry, commanding and the radio science experi-
27
High-Gain High-Gain
Antenna Antenna Gimbals
Magnetometer
Propellant Drag
Tank Flap
Attitude Control Thruster Solar Panel

(1 set on each corner of spacecraft)
Solar Panel
28
Magnetometer
Mars Horizon Sensor
Solar Panel Electron Reflectometer
Mars Relay
Solar Panel
Celestial Sensor
Drag Mars Orbiter Assembly
Flap Laser Altimeter
Mars Orbiter Thermal Emission

Camera Spectrometer
Mars Global Surveyor spacecraft

Launch
Configuration
Cruise
Configuration
29
Aerobrake Mapping
Configuration Configuration
Mars Global Surveyor configurations

ments. However, the spacecraft's telecommunications equipment also accommodates Ka-band
downlink, which was furnished as an experiment to demonstrate its feasibility for future mis-
sions. Primary communications to and from the spacecraft occur through the 1.5-meter-diame-
ter (4.9-foot) high-gain antenna.
From launch through the aerobraking operations, the high-gain antenna remains fixed to
one side of the spacecraft, and the spacecraft must be slewed to point the antenna directly
toward Earth for communications. Just before the start of mapping, the high-gain antenna will
be deployed on the end of a 2-meter (6.5-foot) boom mounted to the same side of the space-
craft. This configuration will allow the antenna to automatically track Earth by using two gim-
bals that hold the antenna to the boom.
In addition to the high-gain antenna, the spacecraft also carries four low-gain antennas
that could be used in the event ground-controllers lose the signal from the high-gain antenna.
Two of these low-gain antennas function as transmit antennas, while the other two can receive
signals from Earth. Placement of these four low-gain antennas insures that the spacecraft can
receive commands and transmit downlink telemetry in a wide range of orientations in space.
The spacecraft's 25-watt radio frequency amplifiers allow Global Surveyor to transmit
science and engineering telemetry at data rates between 21,333 symbols per second to 85,333
symbols per second. A symbol is specially encoded bit. It takes approximately 1.147 bits of
storage space to encode one bit of raw data with this particular encoding scheme.
Data rates for sending commands to the spacecraft will vary from as low as 7.8 bits per
second using the low-gain antennas to as high as 500 bits per second using the high-gain anten-
na. The standard date rate is 125 bits per second. Global Surveyor can receive instructions from
Earth at a maximum rate of 12.5 commands per second.
30
Science Objectives
Mars Global Surveyor is designed to provide a detailed, global map of Mars that will
allow scientists to study its geology, climate and interior. Key science objectives are to:
q Characterize the surface features and geological processes on Mars.
q Determine the composition, distribution and physical properties of surface minerals,

rocks and ice.
q Determine the global topography, planet shape and gravitational field.
q Establish the nature of the magnetic field and map the crustal remnant field. (A
crustal remnant field is evidence of magnetism that is detected within the planet's crust or rocks,
produced by the planet's own magnetic field at the time of formation.)
q Monitor global weather and the thermal structure of the atmosphere.
q Study interactions between Mars' surface and the atmosphere by monitoring surface
features, polar caps that expand and recede, the polar energy balance, and dust and clouds as
they migrate over a seasonal cycle.
Among the questions scientists wish to answer are those relating to Mars' early atmos-
phere and the dramatic climate changes which sent the planet into a deep freeze. All the ingre-
dients necessary for life exist on Mars, including water, yet the surface of Mars is totally dry
and probably devoid of life today.
Water is fundamental to the understanding of geological processes and climate change.

But water cannot exist in liquid form at the low atmospheric pressures that currently prevail on
the surface of Mars; it turns into water vapor or ice. Spacecraft have photographed numerous
large and fine channels across the surface of Mars, with shapes and structures that indicate,
almost beyond a doubt, that they were carved by running water. Where has the water gone?
Only a tiny fraction is known to exist in the northern polar cap and in the atmosphere.
Some of it may have escaped into space, but scientists believe that most of it should
have remained on Mars. They want to know if water could be hidden in permafrost — thick
layers of ice-rock — beneath the surface, just as it is trapped in the polar regions on Earth. The
origin and evolution of Mars are still a mystery. Thought to have formed 4.6 billion years ago,
in much the same way as the other rocky planets of the inner solar system, Mars has two dis-
tinct hemispheres, roughly divided by the equator. The southern hemisphere is badly battered,
perhaps the result of an intense bombardment by debris as the planet was forming. This part of
Mars may be closest in history and age to the heavily cratered faces of the Moon and Mercury.
Other regions of Mars may be widespread plains of volcanic lava, which erupted from within
the planet over a long period of time. Similar eruptions spread across Earth's Moon to form the
31
dark areas known as lunar maria, or "seas."
During the last 2 billion or 3 billion years, Mars also developed features that resemble
those of Earth rather than the Moon. Geologic activity in the younger, northern hemisphere cre-
ated huge, isolated volcanoes — most notably Olympus Mons and the other volcanoes along
the Tharsis uplift — as the interior of Mars melted and lava rose to the surface. A huge canyon
just below the Martian equator, called Vallis Marineris, would dwarf Earth's Grand Canyon,
stretching 5,000 kilometers (3,100 miles) across the planet's surface. Many sinuous channels,
apparently cut by running water that may have flooded regions of Mars hundreds of millions of
years ago, also appear in the northern hemisphere.
Science Experiments
Mars Global Surveyor carries a complement of six scientific instruments which have
been furnished by NASA centers as well as universities and industry. They are:
q Thermal Emission Spectrometer. This instrument will analyze infrared radiation

from the surface. From these measurements, scientists can determine several important proper-
ties of the rocks and soils that make up the Martian surface: how hot and cold they get during
the cycles of night and day; how well they transmit heat; the distribution of rock and grain
sizes; and the amount of the surface covered by large rocks and boulders. Scientists will also be
able to identify minerals in solid rocks and sand dunes, which will be key to understanding how
Martian bedrock has weathered over millions of years and how it might be weathering today.
The instrument can also provide information about the Martian atmosphere, especially the loca-
tions and nature of short-lived clouds and dust. Principal investigator is Dr. Philip Christensen,
Arizona State University.
q Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter. This experiment will measure the height of Martian
surface features. A laser will fire pulses of infrared light 10 times each second, striking a 160-
meter (525-foot) area on the surface. By measuring the length of time it takes for the light to
return to the spacecraft, scientists can determine the distance to the planet's surface. Data from
this instrument will give scientists elevation maps precise to within about 30 meters (100 feet)
from which they will be able to construct a detailed topographic map of the Martian landscape.
Principal investigator is Dr. David Smith, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
q Magnetometer/Electron Reflectometer. The magnetometer/electron reflectometer

will search for evidence of a planetary magnetic field and measure its strength, if it exists.
These measurements will provide critical tests for current speculations about the early history
and evolution of the planet. The instrument will also scan the surface to detect remnants of an
ancient magnetic field, providing clues to the Martian past when the magnetic field may have
been stronger due to the planet's higher internal temperature. Principal investigator is Dr. Mario
Acuna, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
q Radio Science. The radio science investigation will use data provided by the space-
craft's telecommunications system, high-gain antenna and an onboard ultra-stable oscillator,
32
which is like an ultra precise clock, to map variations in the gravity field by noting where the
spacecraft speeds up and slows down in its passage around Mars. From these observations, a
precise map of the gravity field can be constructed and related to the structure of the planet. In
addition, scientists will study how radio waves are distorted as they pass through Mars' atmos-
phere in order to measure the atmosphere's temperature and pressure. Dr. G. Leonard Tyler, of
Stanford University, is the radio science team leader.
q Mars Orbiter Camera. Unlike cameras on spacecraft such as Galileo or Voyager, which
take conventional, snapshot-type exposures, the Mars orbiter camera uses a "push-broom" tech-
nique that builds up a long, ribbon-like image as the spacecraft passes over the planet. The cam-
era will provide low-resolution global coverage of the planet every day, collecting images
through red and blue filters. It will also obtain medium- and high-resolution images of selected
areas. The wide-angle lens is ideal for accumulating a weather map of Mars each day, showing
surface features and clouds at a resolution of about 7.5 kilometers (4.6 miles). These global
views will be similar to the types of views obtained by weather satellites orbiting the Earth. The
narrow-angle lens will image small areas of the surface at a resolution of 2 to 3 meters (6.5 to
9.5 feet). These pictures will be sharp enough to show small geologic features such as boulders
and sand dunes — perhaps even the Mars Pathfinder lander and the now-silent Viking landers
— and may also be used to select landing sites for future missions. Principal investigator is Dr.
Michael Malin, Malin Space Science Systems Inc., San Diego, CA.
q Mars Relay System. Mars Global Surveyor carries a radio receiver/transmitter supplied by
the French space agency, Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales, which was originally designed to
support the Russian Mars '96 mission, lost during launch. Now it will be used to relay data
from the microprobes carried on the 1998 Mars Global Surveyor Lander mission, as well as to
serve as a backup to relay data from the lander itself. Data relayed from the surface to Mars
Global Surveyor will be stored in the large solid-state memory of the orbiter's camera, where it
will be processed for return to Earth. This collaborative effort will maximize data collection.
Following support of the Mars '98 mission, the Mars relay system is expected to provide multi-
ple years of in-orbit communications relay capability for future international Mars missions.
33
Program/Project Management
Mars Global Surveyor is the first mission in a sustained program of Mars exploration —
called the Mars Surveyor program — which will send low-cost pairs of orbiters and landers to
Mars every 25 months well into the next century.
The Mars Global Surveyor mission is managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for
NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington, DC. At NASA Headquarters, Dr. Wesley T.
Huntress is associate administrator for space science. Kenneth Ledbetter is director for mission
and payload development. Dr. William Piotrowski is Mars Global Surveyor program executive.
Dr. Patricia Rogers is Mars Global Surveyor program scientist.
At the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Norman Haynes is director of the Mars Exploration
Directorate. Donna Shirley is manager of the Mars Exploration Program. Glenn E. Cunningham
is Mars Global Surveyor project manager. Dr. Arden Albee of the California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, CA, is Mars Global Surveyor project scientist.
JPL's industrial partner is Lockheed Martin Astronautics, Denver, CO, which developed
and operates the spacecraft. Navigation and ground data support are provided by JPL. Science
operations will be carried out by NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD;
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ; Malin Space Science Systems, San Diego, CA; Stanford
University, Palo Alto, CA; and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.
9-9-97
34
Copyright © The New York Times
Originally published January 16, 1901
p •a •t •h •f •i •n •d •e •r
R ov ing on the R e d P l a n e t
Na t i o n a l A e ro n a u t i c s a n d
S p a c e A d mi n i st ra t i o n
Return to Mars!
As explorers, pioneers, and innovators, we boldly expand frontiers in air and history. Life may have arisen in ancient Martian lakes or springs. If so, fossil
space to inspire and serve America and to benefit the quality of life on Earth. evidence of life might be found.
NASA Vision Statement
NASA Strategic Plan Mars was not always the dry wasteland that it is now. Billions of years ago, early
Mars may have been very similar to early Earth, with flowing water and possibly
From the beginning of time, humans have looked up at the heavens and wondered even seas. Understanding why the two planets evolved from that point to the very
what lay beyond the world that we know. Over time, we have learned much about different states we see today can tell us much about what makes Earth such a unique
the universe and our place within it, but much remains to be explored. The questions and special place. Exploring Mars will provide us with a better understanding of
are among the most profound that we face: How did the universe form? Are there significant events humanity may face in the future as Earth continues to evolve. What
planets like Earth around other stars? How did life arise on Earth? Has it ever are the factors involved in natural changes in a planet‘s climate and weather, for
existed elsewhere in our solar system or elsewhere in the universe? What can we instance? Such exploration will also tell us if Mars is a place where humans may
learn about other planets that will help us to understand our own? What else can someday be able—and want—to live and work.
we learn about our own planet? Will humans ever leave Earth for another planet—
and why? and when? Mars has experienced a complicated geologic history. On its surface are vast
expanses of sand dunes, gorges, polar ice caps, huge volcanoes, and gigantic
These are the questions that occupy the people of NASA and shape our work. Our canyons. The giant Olympus Mons volcano is three times as tall as Mt. Everest and
unique contribution to this undertaking is the perspective that we offer from the air larger than Montana; it’s the largest volcano in the solar system. Valles Marineris
and from space. By sending airplanes, spacecraft, rockets, and people into the is three times as deep and ten times as long as the Grand Canyon. With a land
heavens, we not only open new frontiers, we tap into fundamental streams of area equal to Earth’s, Mars offers a potential wealth of natural resources. The
knowledge and discovery. This produces information not only to enrich the soul and essentials for life support, including air and water, can be found or manufactured
the mind, but also to guide our decisions and make us wiser stewards of our home. there. These resources will be essential for humans to live and work on Mars as
We explore space because it is exciting, because it challenges us to be our best, we continue to explore the Red Planet.
and because it makes practical sense. Exploration and discovery are, as they always
have been for humanity, the pathways to our future. There are many questions to be answered and many challenges to be met. Our
explorers will first be robotic—unmanned spacecraft, landers, and rovers. These
Most recently, we have focused attention on one of the most intriguing places we mechanical descendants of Magellan and Lewis and Clark—designed to scout ahead
know of: Mars. Of all the planets in the solar system, Mars is the most like Earth. —will probe the soil, measure the atmosphere, map the surface, and gradually
Although Mars has a thinner atmosphere than Earth, it also has weather seasons understand the lay of the land. Using this information, we will decide together if the next
and an Earth-like day (called a sol) lasting 24 hours, 37 minutes. Mars also has step is to sends humans and how best to do so. Like solving a riddle, exploring another
a diverse and complex surface, including ice and winding channels made by planet is an ongoing series of steps, not a one-shot deal.
flowing water in the distant past. Although the present cold, dry conditions on
Mars are considered hostile for life forms, scientists have evidence that Mars was This is an exciting time to be alive, and to be explorers. As we send missions to Mars—
once warmer and wetter and had a much denser atmosphere early in its and elsewhere in the universe—all are welcome and encouraged to go along for the ride.
Mars Pathfinder Mission Operation and Science
Mars Pathfinder is the first of these trailblazers. The first spacecraft to set down on Mars Pathfinder is investigating the surface of Mars with three primary science
Mars since the two Viking Landers in 1976, Mars Pathfinder is a mission to test instruments. On the lander are a stereoscopic imager with spectral filters on an
key technologies for future science missions. It is the first ever to send out a robotic extendable mast known as the Imager for Mars Pathfinder (IMP) and the
rover to independently explore the surface of Mars. Launched on December 4, Atmospheric Structure Instrument/Meteorology package (ASI/MET), which acts as
1996, Mars Pathfinder took seven months to reach Mars, and then successfully a Martian weather station, gathering pressure, temperature, and wind
landed in a region known as Ares Vallis (Mars Valley) on July 4, 1997. The measurements. On the rover is the Alpha Proton X-ray Spectrometer (APXS), which
lander unfolded and a small rover, named Sojourner (after the American measures the elements present in rocks and soil. Sojourner also has one color and
abolitionist, Sojourner Truth), rolled onto the Martian soil. two black-and-white cameras. These instruments allow investigations of the
geology and surface characteristics at scales of a few millimeters up to hundreds
Mars Pathfinder also delivered science instruments to the surface of Mars to of meters, the geochemistry and evolutionary history of soils and rocks, the
investigate the structure of the Martian atmosphere, weather, surface geology, and magnetic and mechanical properties of the soil as well as the magnetic properties
elemental composition of Martian rocks and soil. The Mars Pathfinder project is one of the dust, the atmosphere, and the rotational and orbital dynamics of Mars.
of the first of the NASA Discovery program, which offers a class of frequent, low-
cost space missions and is part of a long-term program of Mars exploration being Downstream from the mouth of a giant catastrophic outflow channel, this landing site
conducted by NASA’s Office of Space Science. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, an offers the potential for the identification and analysis of a wide variety of crustal
operating division of the California Institute of Technology, manages the Mars materials, from the ancient, heavily cratered terrains, to intermediate-aged ridged
Exploration Program for NASA. plains, to reworked channel deposits. Sojourner‘s mobility provides the capability of
“ground truthing” a landing area over hundreds of square meters on Mars.
Mars Pathfinder Mission Objectives Examinations of the different surface materials are allowing first-order scientific
• Prove that it is possible to successfully deploy ”faster, better, and cheaper“ spacecraft investigations of the early differentiation and evolution of the crust, the development of
(three years for development and cost under $150 million) weathering products, and the early environments and conditions that have existed on Mars.
• Demonstrate a simple, low-cost system, at fixed price, for placing a science payload
on the surface of Mars at one-fifteenth the Viking price tag Mars Pathfinder Science Objectives
• Exhibit NASA‘s commitment to low-cost planetary exploration by completing the • Surface morphology and geology at meter scale
mission for a total of $280 million dollars, including the launch vehicle and • Petrology and geochemistry of surface materials
mission operations • Magnetic properties and soil mechanics of the surface
• Demonstrate the mobility and usefulness of a microrover on the surface of Mars • Atmospheric structure, as well as diurnal and seasonal meteorological variations
• Rotational and orbital dynamics of Mars
Entry, Descent, and Landing
Mars Pathfinder‘s dramatic entry, descent, and landing worked exactly as

engineers had designed, placing the lander and rover safely onto the surface.
The sequence of events included the use of a heat shield and a large parachute,
the lowering of the lander on a bridle, the use of a radar altimeter to tell the
lander how far it was from the surface, rockets to stop the lander in mid-air, and
giant airbags to cushion its fall after the parachute and backshell detached.
Amazingly, this entire process—from entry into the atmosphere to landing—took
just a little over four minutes.
Mars Pathfinder Lander
Once Mars Pathfinder came to rest, the airbags deflated with the lander resting
on its base, and the three lander petals unfolded. It was early morning when the
lander arrived on Mars (about 3:00 a.m. local time), so the lander waited for the
Sun to rise to begin sending data to Earth. During its first day on Mars (known as
Sol 1), the lander took pictures and made weather measurements. It also lifted up
one of its petals and pulled in more of a deflated airbag so that the airbag would
not block the deployment of the rover’s ramps.
The Next Day
On Sol 2, Sojourner rolled down its ramp and onto Martian soil. Over the next
several sols, Sojourner visited rocks named Barnacle Bill, Yogi, and Scooby Doo
by the scientists. The rover also made measurements of the elements found in
these rocks and in the Martian soil. The lander photographed Sojourner and the
Mars Pathfinder‘s Sojourner Rover
surrounding “marscape” and made weather observations. The Mars Pathfinder
mission exceeded all of its mission objectives and has sent back important data
and beautiful views of Ares Vallis.
Sojourner Truth
The name Sojourner was chosen for the Mars Pathfinder rover after
a year-long, worldwide competition in which students up to 18
years old were invited to select a heroine and submit an essay
about her historical accomplishments. The students were asked to
address in their essays how a planetary rover named for their
heroine would translate these accomplishments to the Martian
environment.
Valerie Ambroise, of Bridgeport, Connecticut, submitted the

winning essay about Sojourner Truth, an African-American
reformist who lived during the Civil War era. An abolitionist and
champion of women‘s rights, Sojourner Truth, whose legal name
was Isabella Van Wagenen, made it her mission to ”travel up and
down the land,“ advocating the rights of all people to be free and
the rights of women to participate fully in society. The name
Sojourner also means ”traveler.“
A New Era of Mars Exploration
Mars Pathfinder is the first in a series of spacecraft that will visit the Red Planet over 2005: Mars Sample Return Mission. This exciting and ambitious mission
the next decade. This exciting program of exploration is designed to send low-cost will descend to the surface, collect the samples acquired by either the ’01 or
spacecraft to Mars every 26 months from 1996 to 2005. Each mission will build on ’03 mission rover, and then blast off and return the sample back to the Earth for
the work done by its predecessors and will use the latest technology to revolutionize study by 2008.
our understanding of the planet and its evolution. We are working closely with other
nations on joint efforts that will expand the range of science data we can obtain. Beyond 2005: These missions will be determined by what we learn and what
Ultimately, all this information will help us answer exciting questions about life on we still need to know. The journey will continue. . . .
Mars and whether to send human explorers to the Red Planet. Upcoming U.S.
missions include:
September 1997: Mars Global Surveyor (launched in November 1996)

will orbit Mars and maps the planet’s surface and atmosphere. It will look for
evidence of surface water, study surface geology and structure, and examine
changes in Martian weather for at least one Martian year (a little less than two Earth years).
1998–99: Mars Surveyor ’98 Lander and Orbiter. The lander will set
down near the edge of Mars’ south polar cap and focus on studies of geology,
weather, and past and present water resources. Before touchdown, it will
release two microprobes that will drop into the soil to search for the presence of
subsurface water. The orbiter will examine the atmosphere and changes in
water vapor during the Martian seasons.
2001: Mars Surveyor ’01 Lander and Orbiter. The lander will carry a
rover capable of traveling dozens of kilometers to gather surface dust and soil
samples. There will also be tests of our ability to produce rocket propellant using
Martian rocks and soil as raw materials. The orbiter will study the mineralogy and
chemistry of the surface, including the identification of water resources just below
the Martian surface.
2003: Mars Surveyor ’03 Lander and Orbiter. This lander will also
carry a wide-ranging rover to collect samples from a different part of the planet.
The orbiter will provide the complex links needed for communications and
navigation for this and future surface missions.
Mars Facts
Fourth Planet From the Sun
Distance From the Sun: Minimum: 206,000,000 kilometers Atmosphere: Thin, unbreathable
Average: 228,000,000 kilometers Surface pressure: ~6 millibars, or about 1/200th
(1.52 times as far as Earth) of Earth’s
Maximum: 249,000,000 kilometers Contains 95% carbon dioxide, 3% nitrogen,
1.5% argon, ~0.03% water (varies with season),
Eccentricity of Orbit: 0.093 vs. 0.017 for Earth (0.00 is a perfectly no oxygen. (Earth has 78% nitrogen, 21%
circular orbit) oxygen, 1% argon, 0.03% carbon dioxide.)
Dusty, which makes the sky pinkish. Planet-
Distance From Earth: Minimum: 56,000,000 kilometers wide dust storms black out the sky.
Maximum: 399,000,000 kilometers
Surface: Color: Rust red
Year: 1.88 Earth years = 669.3 Mars days (sols) = Ancient landscapes dominated by impact craters
686.7 Earth days Largest volcano in the solar system (Olympus Mons)
Largest canyon in the solar system (Valles Marineris)
Day: 24.6 Earth hours Ancient river channels
Some rocks are basalt (dark lava rocks); most
Tilt of Rotation Axis: 25.2° vs. 23.5° for Earth others unknown
Dust is reddish, rusty, like soil formed from volcanic
Size: Diameter = 6,794 kilometers vs. rock
12,756 kilometers for Earth Moons: Phobos (“Fear”), 21 kilometers diameter
Surface Gravity: 0.38 (or ~1/3) Earth’s gravity Deimos (“Panic”), 12 kilometers diameter
26 26
Mass: 6.4 x 10 grams vs. 59.8 x 10 grams
for Earth
Density: 3.9 grams/cc vs. 5.5 grams/cc for Earth
Surface Temperature: Cold

Global extremes: –125°C (–190°F) to 25°C (75°F)
Average at Viking 1 site: high –10°C (15°F);
low –90°C (–135°F)
Activity 1: “Old, Relatively”
For exploring Mars, it is important to know which events happened in which order To discover the history of this region, start by listing all the landscape features you
and which areas are older than others. A simple way of figuring out the sequence can see, and the events that caused them (do not bother listing every small crater
of events is “superposition”—most of the time, younger things are on top of older by itself). Now list the events in order from oldest to youngest. [Hints: How many
things, and younger (more recent) events affect older things. separate landslides are there? Is the large crater (“C”) younger than the landslides?
Are the landslides younger than the rock layers at the top of the canyon wall? Are
the small craters older or younger than the landslides?] Sometimes, you cannot tell
which of two events was younger. What additional information would help you tell?
—(From A.H. Treiman, Lunar and Planetary Institute, 1997)
Activity 2: “Geography and Mission Planning”
These locations on Mars were considered by mission planners as possible landing

sites for the two Viking landing craft.
Latitude Longitude
To learn more about this image, visit the World Wide Web site at:
22°N 48°W (Viking Site)
http://cass.jsc.nasa.gov/education/K12/gangis/mars1.html 20°N 108°E
44°N 10°W
Superposition in Your Life 7°S 43°W
46°N 150°W (Viking Site)
Is there a pile of stuff on your desk? On your teacher’s? On a table or floor at home? 44°N 110°W
Where in the pile is the thing you used most recently? The thing next most recently? 5°S 5°W
Where in the pile would you look for something you put down 10 minutes ago? When
If Martians sent spacecraft to these same latitudes and longitudes on Earth, what
was the last time you or your teacher or parent used the things at the bottom of the pile? would they find? Would they find life or evidence of an advanced civilization? Use
a globe or world map to identify these spots on Earth. Use geography reference
Superposition on Mars books to describe what the Martians would see at each site.
Using superposition, we can sort out many of the complicated events in the history
of Mars. For example, you can sort out all the events that affected the area in the If you were a Martian, why would you explore Earth? Does Earth have resources you might
image above. It is a small part (60 kilometers across) of the wall of the great need? What would you want to know about Earth? Where would you land first and why?
canyon system of Valles Marineris. Toward the top is a high plateau (labeled “P”), —(From B.M. French, The Viking Discoveries, NASA EP-146, October 1977)
with a large circular impact crater (“C”). It formed when a huge meteorite hit Mars’
surface. Below the plateau is the wall of Valles Marineris. Here, the wall has been For Reference: Mars Map
cut away by huge landslides (“L”), which leave bumpy rough land at the base of U.S. Geological Survey (1991) Topographic Maps of Polar, Western, and Eastern
the wall and a thin, broad fan of dirt spreading out onto the canyon floor. In the Regions of Mars, U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Map I-2160.
canyon wall, almost at its top, alternating layers of light and dark rock are exposed. USGS Information Services,1-800-USA-MAPS
Image Caption Web Sites
This image is a portion of a full-color, 360-degree panorama of Ares Vallis Mars

(Mars Valley), where Mars Pathfinder landed on July 4, 1997. Visible next to a
rock named Yogi is the rover Sojourner. She has backed up to Yogi and has Ames Center for Mars Exploration http://cmex-www.arc.nasa.gov/
placed the Alpha Proton X-ray Spectrometer instrument against the rock to Lunar and Planetary Institute http://cass.jsc.nasa.gov/expmars/expmars.html
determine its elemental composition. Yogi is approximately 6.5 meters (20 feet) Mars Multi-Scale Map http://www.c3.lanl.gov/~cjhamil/Browse/mars.html
from the Mars Pathfinder lander and stands about 1 meter (3 feet) high. Mars Landing Sites http://www.mars-sites.arc.nasa.gov/
Sojourner is 30 centimeters (1 foot) tall. Marls Global Surveyor Project http://mgs-www.jpl.nasa.gov/
Mars Pathfinder Project http://mpfwww.jpl.nasa.gov/
In the lower left corner of the image is the ramp that Sojourner used to roll off Mars K–12 Curriculum Guide http://esther.la.asu.edu/asu_tes/TES_Editor/
the lander petal and onto the Martian soil. To the right is a portion of the (Arizona State University) CURRIC_GUIDES/curric_guideMENU.html
deflated airbag from the adjacent petal. Sojourner’s tracks across the soil are Mars Surveyor Orbiter http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/databse/
plainly visible and are darker than the undisturbed soil. www-nmc?MARS98S
Mars Surveyor Lander http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/
A dusting of very fine-grained material is also seen on a number of the rocks in database/www-nmc?MARS98L
the view. Dust finer than talcum powder has gathered to the left of Barnacle Bill, Viking Orbiter Image Archive http://barsoom.mss.com/http/vikingdb.html
the pitted football-shaped and -sized rock just above the end of the ramp. Dust Viking Lander Image Data http://www-pdsimage.jpl.nasa.gov/PDS/
particles suspended in the thin Martian atmosphere give the sky its color. public/viking/vl_images.html
At one time in Mars’ past, a large amount of water rushed across this area. The
Tours of the Solar System
direction of flow was to the north, which is toward the upper right corner of this
picture. The flood waters cut a series of gullies in the plain. A trek across this
Views of the Solar System http://bang.lanl.gov/solarsys/
“marscape" toward the horizon would carry you up and down a series of hills and valleys.
(Calvin Hamilton/Los Alamos)
The Nine Planets http://seds.lpl.arizona.edu/nineplanets/
On the horizon can be seen two hills nicknamed the Twin Peaks. They are about
(Bill Arnett/SEDS) nineplanets.html
1 kilometer (0.6 mile) away. To their right is the rock known as the Couch, more
Welcome to the Planets (JPL) http://pds.jpl.nasa.gov/planets/
than 150 meters (500 feet) away.
NASA Spacelink http://spacelink.nasa.gov
Planetary Photo Journal http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov
Images and other data from Mars Pathfinder are relayed via the antennas of NASA’s
Deep Space Network. With stations in Spain, Australia, and California, contact with Education
the lander is possible whenever it is on the near side of Mars. Each day, controllers
send commands and receive scientific and engineering data when Earth is above the NASA On-line Resources for http://www.hq.nasa.gov/education
Educators
Martian horizon at the Ares Vallis landing site.
Lunar and Planetary Institute http://cass.jsc.nasa.gov/lpi.html
More About Mars
Books Viking Lander Imaging Team (1978) The Martian Landscape, NASA SP-425. A
compilation of photographs obtained by the Viking Landers.
Beatty, J.K., and A. Chaikin, eds. (1990) The New Solar System, Third Edition,
Sky Publishing Corp., Cambridge. Viking Orbiter Imaging Team (1980) Viking Orbiter Views of Mars, NASA SP-441.
A compilation of photographs obtained by the Viking Orbiters.
Carr, M.H. (1981) The Surface of Mars, Yale University Press, New Haven. A
highly readable account of our knowledge of Mars at the end of the Viking program. Wilford, J.N. (1990) Mars Beckons, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Christiansen, E.H., and W.K. Hamblin (1995) Exploring the Planets, Second Science Fiction
Edition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Since telescopes first revealed seasonal color changes on Mars, Earthlings have
Cooper, H.S.F. (1980) The Search for Life On Mars: Evolution of an Idea, Holt, been fascinated with the possibility of life on the Red Planet. These classics
Rinehart, and Winston, New York. (among hundreds of others) trace human notions of Martian “society” through
the 20th century and hold up a mirror to the concerns and crises of our own.
Lowell, P. (1895) Mars, Houghton, Mifflin, Boston, New York. Percival
Lowell’s fascinating, passionate, and highly erroneous interpretations of his Bradbury, Ray (1950) The Martian Chronicles, various publishers.
longtime observations of Mars. Especially interesting when read with
Sheehan’s Planets & Perception. Heinlein, Robert (1986) Red Planet, Del Ray Books, Ballantine.
Murray, B. (1989) Journey Into Space: The First Thirty Years of Space Exploration, Wells, H.G. (1898) The War of the Worlds, various editions, various publishers.
W.W. Norton, New York. Describes humankind’s robotic exploration of Mars
and the rest of the solar system, as witnessed by this former director of the Jet
Propulsion Laboratory.
Sheehan, W. (1988) Planets & Perception: Telescopic Views and Interpretations,

1609–1909, University of Arizona Press, Tucson. An introduction to the physical,
social, and psychological pitfalls of observing distant worlds, especially Mars.
This makes an excellent companion to Lowell’s Mars.
Sheehan, W. (1996) The Planet Mars: A History of Observation and Discovery,

University of Arizona Press, Tucson. A popular history of discoveries and ideas about
Mars, emphasizing the era of visual and telescopic observations. EW-1997-08-128-HQ

Mars Miscellaneous Articles

Încărcat de

Informații document

Drepturi de autor

Formate disponibile

Partajați acest document

Partajați sau inserați document

Opțiuni de partajare

Vi se pare util acest document?

Este necorespunzător acest conținut?

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

Mars Miscellaneous Articles

Încărcat de

Drepturi de autor:

Formate disponibile

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

Science Objectives q Compact Reconnaissance Imaging Spectrometer for

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Mars Education Program

Written and Developed by:

Keith Watt, M.A., M.S.

Paige Valderrama, M.A.

Sheri Klug, M.S.

(C) 2002 ASU Mars Education Program. All rights re-

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET

Identifying Surface Features

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET

Grand Canyon, Arizona Valles Marineris, Mars

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET

Nanedi Vallis, Mars Mississippi River, Earth

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET

Determining the Surface History

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET

The Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships

The Principle of Horizontal Bedding

Horizontal Layers Folded Sandstone Layers

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET - ACTIVITY 1

a) What is the width of the area shown on the image? __________ km

3. In order to answer question 2, you actually need more information: the

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET - ACTIVITY 1

Features Near Olympus Mons (MOC2-102) - Data Log

5. Complete the Data Log above, identifying as many features (such as

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET - ACTIVITY 2

Albedo of the Tharsis Province

a) What is the minimum percentage of visible and IR light that is

b) If you were looking at this area through a telescope, would it

c) What is the maximum percentage of visible and IR light that is

d) If you were looking at this area through a telescope, would it

e) Approximately what percentage is represented by a dark green

a) Which of these volcanoes has the highest albedo? _____________

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET - ACTIVITY 2

d) What does this tell you about the winds on Mars?

a) What do you think this material might be? _______________________

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET - ACTIVITY 3

Topography of the Tharsis Montes Region

a) What is the width (in degrees) of the image? __________ deg

b) What is the length (in degrees) of the image? __________ deg

c) Multiply each of your three answers in part b by 59 km/degree to find

MAPPING THE SURFACE OF A PLANET - ACTIVITY 3

Topography of the Tharsis Montes Region - Data Log

Mars Education Program

Written and Developed by:

Keith Watt, M.A., M.S.

Paige Valderrama, M.A.

Sheri Klug, M.S.

(C) 2002 ASU Mars Education Program. All rights re-

MAPPING THE SURFACE - TEACHER GUIDE

MAPPING THE SURFACE - TEACHER GUIDE

Activity 2: Albedo of the Tharsis Province

1. a) 7% b) Dark c) 37% d) Light e) ~18-22%. There are two important

MAPPING THE SURFACE - TEACHER GUIDE

Activity 3: Topography of the Tharsis Province

MAPPING THE SURFACE - TEACHER GUIDE

Features Near Olympus Mons (MOC2-102) - Data Log

Main Lava Flow 0 km, 0 km to All features cut

Short Channel 3.0 km, 7.5 km to Cuts across long