Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
c
P
n
(kips) 506.1 506.1 0.00 %
COMPUTER FILE: AISC-360-05 EX002
CONCLUSION
The results show an exact comparison with the independent results.
Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS 2013
REVISION NO.: 0
AISC-360-05 Example 002 - 3
HAND CALCULATION
Properties:
Material: ASTM A572 Grade 50
E =29,000 ksi, F
y
= 50 ksi
Section: Built-Up Wide Flange
d =17.0 in, b
f
=8.00 in, t
f
=1.00 in, h =15.0 in, t
w
=0.250 in.
Ignoring fillet welds:
A = 2(8.00)(1.00) +(15.0)(0.250) =19.75 in
2
3 3
3
2(1.0)(8.0) (15.0)(0.25)
85.35in
12 12
= + =
y
I
85.4
2.08in.
19.8
= = =
y
y
I
r
A
+ =
x x
I Ad I
2
3 3
2 4
(0.250)(15.0) 2(8.0)(1.0)
2(8.0)(8.0) 1095.65in
12 12
= + + =
x
I
1 2
1 1
' 17 16in
2 2
+ +
= = =
t t
d d
2 2
4
' (85.35)(16.0)
5462.583in
4 4
= = =
y
w
I d
C
3 3 3
4
2(8.0)(1.0) (15.0)(0.250)
5.41in
3 3
+
= = =
bt
J
Member:
K = 1.0 for a pinned-pinned condition
L = 15 ft
Loadings:
P
u
=1.2(70.0) +1.6(210) =420 kips
Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS 2013
REVISION NO.: 0
AISC-360-05 Example 002 - 4
Section Compactness:
Check for slender elements using Specification Section E7
Localized Buckling for Flange:
4.0
4.0
1.0
b
t
= = =
29000
0.38 0.38 9.152
50
p
y
E
F
= = =
p
< , No localized flange buckling
Flange is Compact.
Localized Buckling for Web:
15.0
60.0
0.250
h
t
= = = ,
29000
1.49 1.49 35.9
50
r
y
E
F
= = =
r
> , Localized web buckling
Web is Slender.
Section is Slender
Member Compression Capacity:
Elastic Flexural Buckling Stress
Since the unbraced length is the same for both axes, they-y axis will govern by
inspection.
( )
6 . 86
08 . 2
12 15 0 . 1
=
=
y
y
r
KL
( )
2
2
2
2
6 . 86
29000
=
|
.
|
\
|
=
r
KL
E
F
e
=38.18 ksi
Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS 2013
REVISION NO.: 0
AISC-360-05 Example 002 - 5
Elastic Critical Torsional Buckling Stress
Note: Torsional buckling will not govern if KL
y
>KL
z
, however, the check is included
here to illustrate the calculation.
( )
y x
z
w
e
I I
GJ
L K
EC
F
+
(
+ =
1
2
2
( )
2
2
29000 5462.4 1
11200 5.41
1100 85.4
180
e
F
(
= + (
+
(
=91.8 ksi >38.18 ksi
Therefore, the flexural buckling limit state controls.
F
e
=38.18 ksi
Section Reduction Factors
Since the flange is not slender,
Q
s
=1.0
Since the web is slender,
For equation E7-17, take f as F
cr
with Q =1.0
( )
29000
4.71 4.71 113 86.6
1.0 50
y
y y
KL
E
QF r
= = > =
So
( ) 1.0 50
38.2
0.658 1.0 0.658 50 28.9ksi
(
(
( = = = =
(
( (
y
e
QF
F
cr y
f F Q F
( )
0.34
1.92 1 , where
(
= =
(
e
E E
b t b b h
f b t f
( )
( )
29000 0.34 29000
1.92 0.250 1 15.0in
28.9 15.0 0.250 28.9
(
=
(
e
b
12.5in 15.0in =
e
b
Software Verification
PROGRAM NAME: ETABS 2013
REVISION NO.: 0
AISC-360-05 Example 002 - 6
therefore compute A
eff
with reduced effective web width.
( )( ) ( )( )
2
2 12.5 0.250 2 8.0 1.0 19.1in = + = + =
eff e w f f
A b t b t
where A
eff
is effective area based on the reduced effective width of the web, b
e
.
19.1
0.968
19.75
eff
a
A
Q
A
= = =
( )( ) 1.00 0.968 0.968
s a
Q Q Q = = =
Critical Buckling Stress
Determine whether Specification Equation E7-2 or E7-3 applies
( )
29000
4.71 4.71 115.4 86.6
0.966 50
y
y y
KL
E
QF r
= = > =
Therefore, Specification Equation E7-2 applies.
When 4.71
y
E KL
QF r
( ) 1.0 50
38.18
0.658 0.966 0.658 50 28.47ksi
(
(
( = = =
(
( (
y
e
QF
F
cr y
F Q F
Nominal Compressive Strength
28.5 19.75 562.3kips = = =
n cr g
P F A
0.90 =
c
( ) 0.90 562.3 506.1kips = = =
c n cr g
P F A >420 kips
506.1kips =
c n
P