Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
March 5, 2004
Minutes
Members: Staff:
Members Absent:
Michael Hawthorne
Wade stated MNOSHA had a thorough agenda prepared but, due to weather and
minimal attendance by members, they would address the agenda items in an abbreviated
fashion rather than repeating things at the next meeting.
III. Approval of the minutes from the Nov. 14, 2003 meeting
The minutes were held over until the June meeting for approval, because there
were not enough members present. Wade asked the OSHA Advisory Council (OAC)
members to review them and be prepared to approve them at the June meeting. Wade
apologized that the minutes were not out until today. Budget reductions and reductions in
staff have spread her assistant thinner and they were not able to publish these minutes
earlier.
Everyone, including the new members, introduced himself or herself to the OAC.
This was the first meeting for Melanie Allen, Scott Metcalf and Daryl Tindle. Metcalf
OSHA Advisory Council -2- March 5, 2004
Minutes
works for the state prison in Faribault and is a labor representative. Allen works at Ecolab
and will serve as a safety representative. Tindle is with IBEW, Local 160, and is a labor
representative.
Wade gave a brief Department of Labor and Industry (DLI) update. She noted the
department has a relatively lean legislative agenda this year. That will not speak to DLI’s
involvement in overall issues. The bills that impact DLI were not introduced by this
agency.
Wade reported that the legislative issues that will affect MNOSHA are minimal.
DLI has one department catchall bill that will address a provision that would allow DLI
to include NAICS codes as well as SIC codes.
Wade announced there is a bill that has been introduced by the Department of
Natural Resources (DNR) in which DNR is asking to be exempted from a MNOSHA
provision that requires vehicles used to transport prisoners to have a barrier between the
driver and any passengers in the back. A variance was approved on a limited basis earlier
this year. DNR staff members believe they are in control of the situation and want to be
relieved of this responsibility in cases where they do not feel endangered. This is House
File 2456 and will be introduced by DNR.
Gene Harmer asked if DNR’s HF 2456 would impact workplace violence. Wade
stated the variance was issued to address a concern DNR had about finding intoxicated
people in public parks. They did not want to leave a person who is obviously not at their
full capacity, exposed to the elements. Wade noted this is not DLI’s bill and she was not
made aware of all the specifics.
Patricia Todd, the director of the MNOSHA Compliance unit, stated there is
currently an exemption within the system that allows for the State Patrol to have the
optional requirement for a barrier. DNR is asking for the same optional requirement.
MNOSHA looked at DNR’s procedures and it is clearly the DNR officer’s right to say
they feel uncomfortable with that person traveling in their vehicle and can call a police
officer or another DNR representative to transfer the individual.
Wade announced the governor issued his supplemental budget yesterday. The
stated deficit from the February forecast indicated there is about $116 million that needs
to be addressed. The governor’s proposal is still somewhat fresh and the state agencies
have not been notified, so Wade did not know how it would impact DLI. MNOSHA does
not receive any general funding, so Wade does not expect that any cuts that would be
proposed would have an impact on the compliance or consultation programs. With no
details, Wade could not speak to other cuts that might occur throughout DLI, but the
agency should be able to do it in a way that would not impact staffing.
Harmer noted that in the past few years, legislation was introduced and did not
pass, that tied more serious fines to certain penalties. He asked if there has been any
legislation this year to expand the fines for violations that result in a death. Wade noted
OSHA Advisory Council -3- March 5, 2004
Minutes
this issue was pretty well vetted last year and there were changes made. Several years
back, there was a minimum penalty required if the employer caused or contributed to the
death of a worker. The minimum penalty was $25,000. After that, the penalty was
enforced for two fiscal-years. The Legislature revisited that issue last year and amended
the statutes to allow the $25,000 penalty for certain employers to be divided into five
years, with a $5,000 initial penalty and $5,000 in the next four consecutive years. The
commissioner has the responsibility to annually revisit that employer to see if sufficient
changes have been made to promote a safe workplace. If the employer demonstrates they
made the appropriate changes within the workplace, then the commissioner may waive
the annual $5,000 penalty. Discussion has occurred in the past tying penalties to
outcomes. MNOSHA and overall OSHA programs across the nation have believed that if
there are hazards, any penalty should be associated with the actual hazard, not just the
outcome. Wade said there have been no discussions for a bill like that this year and noted
that bills introduced in the past can be put on an existing bill or revisited this year.
The Eau Claire office was closed due to the weather, so Tim Kobernat could not
be at the OAC meeting and was unable to fax the information he was going to present at
the OAC. Todd spoke to Kobernat by phone and got his general update.
Todd gave a staff report for the MNOSHA Compliance unit. She referred
members to the Federal Annual Monitoring and Evaluation (FAME) report in the meeting
packets for a summary of how federal OSHA stated they performed in FFY 2003.
The Annual Performance Plan for FFY 2004 was included in the packets. The
annual report for FFY 2003 is also included. The key points in this report indicate
MNOSHA’s conclusions about how it did with its first five-year strategic plan.
OSHA Advisory Council -4- March 5, 2004
Minutes
Significant things that have happened since the last meeting include participation
in the Chase partnership with the AGC. They now have five companies that have reached
the white level.
Todd reported MNOSHA had a few significant cases and one fatality so far this
calendar-year. A summary of the fatalities and serious injuries that occurred in calendar-
year 2003 is in the members’ meeting packets.
Harmer asked whether there is any impact on the obligation of MNOSHA when
federal OSHA enters into a partnership with a group or an industry. Todd said there is
not, because federal OSHA is independent and will operate differently than MNOSHA.
However, MNOSHA is aware of federal partnerships and tries to evaluate the programs
and work with those industries at a state and local level. Within Region 5, they are
participating in two such partnerships. One is with the National Association of Power
Erectors and they are working on one with the Ford Motor Company.
Allen asked how to find more information about the 75/25 program. Todd
suggested she go to the department’s Web site and view an article in Safety Lines
available on that site. The Web site is www.doli.state.mn.us/pdf/4204sl.pdf.
Consultation report
Jim Collins, the director of the MNOSHA Workplace Safety Consultation (WSC)
unit, gave an update about his unit. He reported the feds provide 90 percent of the
funding for WSC and that funding has decreased by a half of a percent. They have two
vacancies and those positions are being filled.
OSHA Advisory Council -5- March 5, 2004
Minutes
This federal fiscal-year, they met with the feds regarding the progress WSC made
for the first quarter. They met their productivity requirements for that quarter, so they are
on track in meeting the strategic goals for this FFY.
The RACER Report, which is the WSC annual report, was in the meeting packets.
They had very good results for their productivity. They completed the year with close to
double the requirements put forth to the feds, so it was a very good year.
Collins reported ergonomics outreach assistance accomplished a lot for the two
positions that were allocated last year. They have done 22 half-day sessions and
conducted 11 onsite assessments, including workstation evaluation and adjustments, and
the review and evaluation of ergonomics programs for effectiveness. The two ergonomics
staff members collaborated with MNOSHA Compliance to complete their State-plan
State Ergonomics Directive. This directive is used by enforcement personnel to do their
inspections. Consultation uses the same document to advise employers to come into
voluntary compliance.
Collins announced the ergonomics unit has 40 workshops planned across the state
to provide ergonomics training and assistance. Presenters at the workshops include IBM
representatives, Dr. Bill Lohman from DLI and Phil Jacobs, who was the chairperson of
the Ergonomics Task-force at DLI. Their primary focus is on safety directors, risk
managers, human resource directors and vice presidents who are the policy-type
individuals.
The outreach and education unit has conducted several luncheons for general
industry. They have had five sessions and trained 99 participants. They had eight
Construction Breakfast seminars and trained 113 participants. In this FFY, WSC has
conducted 297 training sessions and trained 6,226 participants.
Collins announced that WSC’s Safety Grant Program has been trying to bring the
rules in-line with the statute. These rules are being amended so WSC can now begin to
cover training and education. That is important, because it gives the commissioner the
authority to offer grants for training and education, that would include training tied to the
OSHA Advisory Council -6- March 5, 2004
Minutes
purchase of ergonomic equipment. The next step is to publish the rules in the State
Register for 30 days, for information purposes, and then WSC can offer those expanded
services. The rule language is on the way to the assistant commissioner for approval.
Harmer asked whether there is a provision in the grant application that requires a
business to disclose its financial status to qualify for a grant. Collins noted that part of the
rule did not change. They require a financial statement for the employer, to make sure the
employer has the matching funds to make the purchase. Harmer commented that some
employers might not apply for a grant, because they are not willing to make their
financial status public and asked if this becomes public information. Collins did not know
and said he would seek legal counsel’s advice and get back to the OAC. He noted they
have had no problems and, at this point, do not disclose this information, even with
MNOSHA Compliance.
Eric Ajax commented he is pleased to hear about the budget increase for the
Workplace Safety Consultation unit. It had a positive impact on the employees at his
company and he strongly supports it. He also commented that WSC’s efforts on behalf of
alliances are noteworthy in working with the associations, labor, industry and educational
institutions, and bringing all of those organizations together. He asked how we are going
to get the message out about WSC and the impact it has on manufacturing in Minnesota,
helping us save the local marketplace and be competitive in the global marketplace.
Wade noted she has previously talked about taking the OAC on the road. Paul
Grundy is willing to help organize a meeting in Greater Minnesota and they are working
on taking the Sept. 10, 2004 meeting to Rochester. Details will be available at the
June 25, 2004 meeting. She would like to plan at least one meeting a year in Greater
Minnesota and partner with member alliances or other MNOSHA partners to host those
meetings. In coming years, the Greater Minnesota meetings will probably be the June or
September meeting dates, because of the weather. Wade asked members to mark their
calendars and noted it will be good for all of us to get out there.
Wade noted that, in the past, three members of the OAC served on the Public
Relations Subcommittee. Those who served on the subcommittee are no longer with the
OSHA Advisory Council -7- March 5, 2004
Minutes
OAC. Due to low attendance at this meeting, this item was held over to give all the OAC
members an opportunity to consider whether they could participate on this subcommittee.
Wade said this subcommittee reviews the Art McCauley Award nominations and
has other public relations discussions. She noted Collins is the DLI staffer for this
committee. Wade asked for one labor representative, one industry representative and one
safety representative. She would like volunteers, but if there are not enough volunteers,
she will ask OAC members to participate.
Wade clarified that the meetings are just prior to the regular OAC meeting, for 30
minutes, and will not result in an additional meeting date. The subcommittee will give a
verbal report of the discussions at the meeting.
For those not familiar with the Art McGauley Award, Wade noted this award was
developed by the OAC. McCauley was one of those individuals at the forefront of
OSHA. He participated in the national discussion and was always active in safety and
health in Minnesota. This reward is designed to recognize individuals with a long-
standing commitment to promoting safety and health in the workplace and who continue
to make significant contributions.
Wade suggested the OAC hold a place on each agenda to discuss some of the
recommendations that came out of the OAC’s Sept. 12, 2003 meeting, about ways to
improve the current MNOSHA program. She did not have a discussion planned for this
meeting. DLI is making significant progress in ergonomics and believes feedback from
the OAC is absolutely critical. Therefore, she wants to have a broad discussion about
ergonomics at the June meeting. By then, MNOSHA will have a very well-defined
process in place and be better able to share more details with the OAC about the
scheduled training sessions they plan to take on the road.
Harmer asked if Phil Jacobs would be at the June meeting to give an overview of
the recommendations put forth by the Ergonomics Task-force. Wade said she is planning
on having Jacobs at the meeting. She will provide OAC members with a report that was
generated at the conclusion of the task force to serve as a primer they can review prior to
the June meeting. Wade stated, “in a nutshell,” everyone agreed ergonomics is an
extremely important issue but, absent a specific standard, stakeholders prefer we address
this issue through DLI’s Workplace Safety Consultation program. DLI has followed that
guidance through today, including securing two ergonomics positions for WSC. Other
OSHA Advisory Council -8- March 5, 2004
Minutes
information, including training that is scheduled as DLI identifies the sites and resources,
will be made available to OAC members prior to the June meeting. Wade thinks they are
going to create some win-win situations for everyone involved. The Minnesota Safety
Council is “on board” to help and DLI is identifying its partners. She reported resources
have been offered from IBM. DLI is looking for anyone who wants to be a part of this
discussion and is willing to share his or her expertise. Wade asked anyone who is aware
of any resources DLI might tap to move this discussion forward bring it to her or Collins’
attention.
Melanie requested MNOSHA identify three ergonomics areas it wants input about
at the June meeting, so she can prepare in advance and be able to contribute as much as
possible in the discussions. Wade agreed that was an excellent suggestion and she would
get that out before the meeting.
Wade asked OAC members to review the reports in their folders and bring any
questions to the next meeting for discussion.
Metcalf asked if the minutes could be e-mailed to OAC members. Wade noted the
minutes are on the Web site. The minutes are usually timelier and she recognized the
need to get them to the OAC in advance, but DLI is working with very limited resources
right now and will do its best to get them to members prior to the meeting. DLI can
forward them to members electronically. That is something they will continue to work
on.
Respectfully submitted,
Debbie Caswell
Executive Secretary
dc/s