Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Outline
EU and German wastewater legislation Relevant phosphorous compounds Physico-chemical removal methods Surface water treatment plant Tegel (Berlin) Enhanced biological P removal process Conclusion
<2 <1
0.2
1: 2: 3: 4: 5:
[Vollenweider, 1982]
Forms of Phosphorus
Total P (TP) consists of Total organic P (TOP) (e.g., phospholipids), Total inorganic P (TIP) (ortho- and poly-phosphates);
Raw wastewater: TP, TOP, TIP 10, 3, 7 mg/L;
Forms of Phosphorus
Total P (TP) consists of Total organic P (TOP) (e.g., phospholipids), Total inorganic P (TIP) (ortho- and poly-phosphates);
Raw WW: TP, TOP, TIP 10, 3, 7 mg/L;
Single media (sand or anthracite) vs. Multi Media (sand and anthracite); (sand and granular active carbon)
Particle size < 0.5 mm up to > 2 mm
9
10
Chemicals Added:
Metal coagulants (Al(III), Fe(III)), organic polymers, lime
Metal Coagulants:
Al3+ (or Fe3+) + 3 OHAl(OH)3 (or Fe(OH)3 ) In AWT, generally operate in sweep flock Also Al3+ (or Fe3+) + PO43AlPO4 (or FePO4 ); Al:P (molar): 1.4, 1.7, 2.3 75 %, 85 %, 95 % P removal
Figure 6-13
12
Chemicals Added:
Metal coagulants (Al(III), Fe(III)), organic polymers, lime
Metal Coagulants:
Al3+ (or Fe3+) + 3 OHAl(OH)3 (or Fe(OH)3 ) In AWT, generally operate in sweep flock Al3+ (or Fe3+) + PO43AlPO4 (or FePO4 ); Al:P (molar): 1.4, 1.7, 2.3 75 %, 85 %, 95 % P removal
Organic Polymers:
Primary coagulants (cationic, anionic, non-charged polymers)
14
Polymer flocculation
Highmolecular compounds adsorb on two particles Highmolecular polymers (0, +, -) as flocculation aid
Chemicals Added:
Metal coagulants (Al(III), Fe(III)), organic polymers, lime
Metal Coagulants:
Al3+ (or Fe3+) + 3 OHAl(OH)3 (or Fe(OH)3 ) In AWT, generally operate in sweep flock Al3+ (or Fe3+) + PO43AlPO4 (or FePO4 ); Al:P (molar): 1.4, 1.7, 2.3 75 %, 85 %, 95 % P removal
Organic Polymers:
Primary coagulants (cationic, anionic, non-charged polymers)
Lime (Ca(OH)2
Ca2+ + 2 OH-):
(hydroxyapatite)
16
III-Filtration relatively low doses; In-Line, Static Mixer, Rapid Mixer or Flocculator
Before I-Sedimentation (High Doses); Before Biological Process (interaction with biology); Before II-Sedimentation (Higher Doses)
17
Badegewsserrichtlinie
Tegel Lake
Tegel Lake
Area: Average depth: 4 km 8m
Max depth:
16 m
wells and water work to produce dw from bank filtrate Nordgraben (with Panke), Tegeler Flie, Oberhavel 2.88 mg/L PO43- in Tegel Lake p-elimination plant put into operation, capacity 6 m3/s 0.05 mg/L PO43- in Tegel Lake
two pipes: DN 1000 each flocculant: Fe2(SO4)3 Fe3+ + PO43- FePO4 pH=5-5.5
PO4
cFe cPO4
Addition of flocculation aid: weak anionic polyacrylamide macroflocs: agglomeration faster, bigger sink faster
Feed concentration 0.2 0.5 mg/L TP (mixture of three feed waters) Effluent: 18-22 g TP/L (required: 25 g TP/L) P-removal of 96% - 99% Present costs of treatment: 7 cent/m (incl. depreciation)
Tegel Lake
Water quality class II
Other waters in Berlin: Class II-III or Class III
Second P removal plant in Berlin: Chain of the Grunewald lakes (drinking water assurance)
Clarification / Sedimentation before filtration if high doses Performance: Up to 95 % P removal; turbidity 1 NTU Other benefits of chemical clarification: 1) High-Ph disinfection by lime; 2) Physical removal of pathogens by III Filtration; Enhanced microbial removals: >2-log protozoa and bacteria; >1-log viruses 3) Chemical precipitation of metals (e.g., Zn(OH)2 , or adsorption onto Al(OH)3 flock) (flock sweep effect)
26
QR
QW
Autotroph B. (aerobic) Heterotroph B. BOD5 Removal (aerobic) org C (BOD) ~> org C (Biomass) Denitirfication (anoxic) org C (BOD) ~> org C (Biomass) Denitrification (anoxic)
C-Source Energy-Source inorg C (CO2) ~> org C (Biomass) NH4 + O2 ~> NO3 org C + O2 ~> CO2 org C + NO3 ~> CO2 + N2
27
Autotroph B. (aerobic) Heterotroph B. BOD5 Removal (aerobic) org C (BOD) ~> org C (Biomass) Denitrification (anoxic) Denitirfication (anoxic) org C (BOD) ~> org C (Biomass)
28
QI 100 l/s
QW
29
PO4 Rel.
QW
Autotroph B. (aerobic) Heterotroph B. BOD5 Removal (aerobic) Denitrification (anoxic) Denitirfication (anoxic) PAOs Step 1 (mainly anaerobic) Step 2 (mainly aerobic, anoxic) C-Source Energy-Source inorg C (CO2) ~> org C (Biomass) NH4 + O2 ~> NO3 org C (BOD) ~> org C (Biomass) org C (BOD) ~> org C (Biomass) Storage Consumption org C ~> Intrac. C growth on In. C org C + O2 ~> CO2 org C + NO3 ~> CO2 + N2 Storage Consumption Poly-P ~> PO4 PO4 ~> Poly-P Cons. of In. C 30
PO4 Rel.
QE
QI
Anae
QE
PO4 rel.
QW
Advantages of EBPR
Only slight increase of waste sludge production as P is stored intracellular Less chemical precipitation necessary Reduced chemical demand Reduced waste sludge production in comparison with chemical removal only Only small anaerobic volumes necessary (option for retrofitting possible)
33
Conclusions
P removal of municipal wastewaters is necessary to avoid eutrophication in receiving surface waters Required P removal rates are high (up to 99%) as concentrations > 50g/L TP already cause eutrophication in freshwater Physico-chemical P removal requires effective coagulants (Fe, Al, lime, polymers), subsequent tertiary filtration and pH control P/C methods produce considerable amounts of sludge waste EBPR shall be applied where ever appropriate (lower sludge production, higher cost effectiveness, combination with C and N removal)
34
Mathias.ernst@tu-berlin.de