Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
org
The same is true here. Britain has the fourth highest military budget in the world, and the spending on its wars and interventions are on top of this as they are financed from special reserves 14bn so far on war and occupation in Iraq and Afghanistan. Britains spending on the military is more than double that of Germany even before taking account of these additional funds for war, or other hidden costs of the military budget. Yet no-one argues that Germany is a vulnerable or defenceless country. Cutting the regular military budget to the level of Germany would save about 18bn per year. Refusing further military adventures with the US, like that in Libya, and cancelling the 100bn set to be wasted on Trident replacement would yield much more. These sums would be enough to restore all the cuts to welfare, education and health this government has made so far. Britain has a long history as an imperial power. Long ago its ruling class realised it could make greater profits by plundering the rest of the world rather than developing the domestic economy through investment. This is the reason for Britains relative economic decline in the world. The capitalist solution to the crisis is to increase the rate of exploitation at home (through wage cuts and slashed services) and to increase the level of plundering overseas (with wars of conquest, seizure of assets, control of natural resources). Racism will be whipped up to justify wars and distract from the real enemy the capitalist class. [continued overleaf]
[continued from front] But there is an alternative. There are huge resources available if only the correct choices are made. Abandoning wars of intervention, slashing the military budget
and diverting funds to areas which will boost economic activity and jobs is what is needed. Increasing government investment would create growth in the economy and allow an improvement in the living standards of ordinary people. It would also stop the delivery of death and destruction to the peoples of other countries.
like Saddam is just a small time crook compared to the operations of this imperialist mafia. Like Iraq, the longer intervention persists the more Libya will be thrown backwards and chaos inflicted on its people. Irrespective of the insurgents original intentions, this is now a Western-organised war in which they are subordinate. The past months have seen a heroic struggle for democracy across the Middle East. Imperialism has unleashed its violence against it. All those committed to progress in the Arab world should call on the British government to stop its war on Libya. Join the protests against the war. Check www.cnduk.org and www.stopwar.org.uk for details
Those who argue that the war represents the majority of the world can do so only by falsely claiming that UN Security Council reflects world opinion. Yet the combined population of the 10 members who voted FOR the UN Security Council resolution is only 700m people just 10% of the worlds population. In contrast, there has been opposition to the current bombing of Libya and/ or calls for an immediate ceasefire by China, Russia, India, the African Union, Brazil, Argentina and many other Latin American countries. Together these countries make up the majority of the worlds population. Below is a selection of those opposing the bombing: Fidel Castro 21 February 2011 What is absolutely clear is that the government of the United States is not in the least worried about peace in Libya and it will not hesitate in giving NATO the order to invade Hugo Chvez 22 March Venezuela demands the cessation of the imperialist aggressions, bombs and deaths against innocent people... and that the Libyan people be able to decide freely their own destiny Lowkey (@LowkeyMusic1) 19 March 2011 In terms of geopolitics, having a presence in Libya is the perfect way for the imperial powers to co-opt revolutions in Egypt + Tunis European left (www.european-left.org) 20 March 2011 Military interventions including bombing campaigns on Tripoli and other Libyan towns will not bring peace to Libya. The Party of the European Left is convinced that the aim of the intervention is not to help the popular uprising and protect civilians but to regain control of the region and the resources of the country. Jeremy Corbyn MP 20 March 2011 This war is about oil, control and a message to the rest of the world and region that we can do it if we want to. I fear we will soon be involved in a ground war, the partition of Libya and the theft of that countrys oil and resources. George Galloway 20 March 2011 This bombing will not succeed. This will be a long war, casualties will occur far from the scenes of battle and the radicalisation of Arab and Islamic world will proceed apace. This is not peacekeeping. This is imperialist war-making. Caroline Lucas MP 17 March 2011 We have lost all moral authority when it comes to this kind of intervention because of what happened in Iraq. Tony Benn 17 March 2011 The truth is, youre going into a war without clear objectives, although everybody knows what the British objective is, what the America objectives are. And I think this is going to damage the popular movements in the Middle East...