Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Aims:
Disclaimer: No warranty is made for the accuracy of the contents of this FAQ.
Table of Contents
(Key Word Index is found in Section 7.)
1] Resource Pointers
1.1 What acoustics related news groups and FAQs are there?
1.2 What World Wide Web sites are there?
1.3 What acoustics software is available on the Net?
1.4 What acoustics books and journals are there?
2] Basic Acoustics
3] Vibration
5] Reserved
6] Miscellaneous Questions
8] Weighting Tables
10] Composers
1] Resource Pointers
*** 1.1 What acoustic related news groups and FAQs are there?
news groups
news:alt.sci.physics.acoustics - started by Angelo Campanella - now the principal group for discussion of
acoustics topics. Ang's CV is at URL http://www.CampanellaAcoustics.Com/angelo.htm .
news:sci.physics - general physics but occasionally acoustics related questions are posted.
news:rec.audio.tech - includes discussion on audio equipment, speakers etc. There are other rec.audio
groups which may be of interest.
news:comp.dsp - the group for people interested in computing digital signal processing solutions, FFTs
FIRs IIRs etc.
FAQs
The main archive site for all usenet FAQs is ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/
The Audio FAQ, with everything you ever wanted to know about the subject, from preamplifiers to speakers
and listening room acoustics. It is located in the pub/usenet/rec.audio.* directories
The comp.speech faq has information on speech processing and some software links
http://www.speech.su.oz.au/comp.speech/
http://www.infoseek.com/
http://altavista.digital.com/
http://www.dejanews.com/ (can also be used as Usenet posting gateway)
http://www.excite.com/
http://www.hotbot.com/
http://www.yahoo.com/
http://www.lycos.com/
or use your nearest Archive site to look for files you want.
Spectrogram 4.12 - Accurate real time Win95 spectrum analysis program (freeware) by Richard Horne is at
a few sites including: ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/win95/sound/gram412.zip
The comp.speech faq has several links to speech related software including speech recognition and text to
speech programs.
Odeon is a program for architectural acoustics. A demonstration version is available by ftp. The demo
includes a large database for coefficients of absorption. A web page at URL
http://www.dat.dtu.dk/~odeon/index.html describes the capabilities of the program and gives the ftp
address.
Also some interactive acoustics software (e.g. room acoustics, RT, decibel conversion etc.) is available at a
couple of sites.
CATT Auralization - demo version of CATT-Acoustic (room acoustics prediction / auralization). A free
download version is available on the Web site, but it lacks a small key file which can be transferred via e-mail
in return for name, address and company/organization affiliation. See www.netg.se/~catt . (4-98 per
Bengt-Inge Dalenback * Mariagatan 16A * S-41471 Gothenburg * SWEDEN catt@netg.se * phn/fax: +46
31145154)
Introduction to Sound
Speaks, C
Good foundation for acoustics principles
Fundamentals of Acoustics
Kinsler, L Frey, A et al.
Good overall coverage of acoustics but includes lots of theory
Acoustics ...
Pierce, A
Classic advanced text - lots of theory
Some Journals
| Definitions used:
|
| 10^(-5) indicates 10 raised to the power of minus 5
| 1.0E-12 indicates 1.0 x 10^(-12)
| 1 pW indicates 1 picowatt i.e. 1.0E-12 Watt
| W/m^2 indicates Watts per square metre
| lg indicates logarithm to base 10
| sqrt indicates the square root of
| pi = 3.142
| Lw is sound power level, the w is subscripted
2] Basic Acoustics
How small and rapid are the changes of air pressure which cause sound?
When the rapid variations in pressure occur between about 20 and 20,000 times per second (i.e. at a
frequency between 20Hz and 20kHz) sound is potentially audible even though the pressure variation can
sometimes be as low as only a few tens of millionths of a Pascal. Movements of the ear drum as small as
the diameter of a hydrogen atom can be audible! Louder sounds are caused by greater variation in pressure.
A sound wave of one Pascal amplitude, for example, will sound quite loud, provided that most of the acoustic
energy is in the mid frequencies (1kHz - 4kHz) where the human ear is most sensitive. It is commonly
accepted that the threshold of human hearing for a 1 kHz sound wave is about 20 micro-Pascals.
In all cases the logarithmic measure is used to compare the quantity of interest with a reference value, often
the smallest likely value of the quantity. Sometimes that reference can be an approximate or average value.
Most often in common acoustics, the decibel is used to compare the sound pressure level (SPL) in air with
a reference pressure. The reference level for sound intensity (I), sound power level (PWL) and sound pressure
in water are amongst others that are in common use:
1) Quantities of interest often exhibit such huge ranges of variation that a dB scale is more convenient than a
linear scale. For example, sound pressure radiated by a submarine may vary by eight orders of magnitude
depending on direction; expression in linear units carries with it the confusion of the location of the decimal
point. Decibels values are characteristically between only -999 to +999.
2) The human ear interprets loudness more easily represented with a logarithmic scale than with a linear
scale.
Often, the "maximum" level and sometimes the "peak" level of the sound being measured is quoted. During
any given time interval the peak level will be numerically greater than the maximum level and the maximum
level will be numerically greater than the (rms) sound pressure level;
peak>max>rms.
Unfortunately, human perception of loudness vis-a-vis frequency changes with loudness. When sound is very
loud - 100 dB or more, the perception of loudness is more consistent across the audible frequency band. "B"
and "C" Weightings reflect this trend. "B" Weighting is now little used, but C-Weighting has achieved
prominence in evaluating annoying community noises such as low frequency sound emitted by artillery fire
and outdoor rock concerts. C-Weighting is also tabulated in 8.2.
The first electrical sound meter was reported by George W Pierce in Proceedings of the American Academy
of Arts and Sciences, v 43 (1907-8) A couple of decades later the switch from horse drawn vehicles to
automobiles in cities led to large changes in the background noise climate. The advent of "talkies" - film
sound - was a big stimulus to sound meter patents of the time, but there was still no standard method of
sound measurement. "Noise" (unwanted sound) became a public issue.
The first tentative standard for sound level meters (Z24.3) was published by the American Standards
Association in 1936, sponsored by the Acoustical Society of America. The tentative standard shows two
frequency weighting curves "A" and "B" which were modeled on the response of the human ear to low and
high levels of sound respectively.
With the coming of the Walsh-Healy act in 1969, the A-Weighting of sound was defacto presumed to be the
"appropriate" weighting to represent sound level as a single number (rather than as a spectrum). With the
advent of US FAA and US EPA interests in the '70's, the dBA metric was also adapted by them. (Along with
the dBA metric has come an associated shortfall in precision in accurately presenting the capacity of a given
sound to produce hearing loss and the capacity to create annoyance.)
[Editor's Note: A single number metric such as dBA is more easily understood by legal and administrative
officials, so that promulgation, enforcement and administrative criteria and actions are understandable by
more parties, often at the expense of a more precise comprehension and engineering action capability. For
instance, enforcement may be on a dBA basis, but noise control design demands the octave band or even
third-octave band spectral data metric.]
The most commonly referenced weighting is "A-Weighting" dB(A), which is similar to that originally defined
as Curve "A" in the 1936 standard. "C-Weighting" dB(C), which is used occasionally, has a relatively flat
response. ""U-Weighting"" is a recent weighting which is used for measuring audible sound in the presence
of ultrasound, and can be combined with A-Weighting to give AU-Weighting. The A-Weighting formula is
given in section 8 of this FAQ file.
In addition to frequency weighting, sound pressure level measurement can be time weighted as the "Fast",
"Slow" or "Impulse" response. Measurements of sound pressure level with A-Weighting and fast response
are also known as the "sound level".
Many modern sound level meters can measure the average sound energy over a given time. this metric is
called the "equivalent continuous sound level" (Leq). More recently, it has become customary in some circles
to presume that this sound measurement was A-Weighted if no weighting descriptor is listed.
= 73.3 dB
Note: for two different sounds, the combined level cannot be more than 3 dB above the higher of the two
sound levels. However, if the sounds are phase related ("correlated") there can be up to a 6dB increase in
SPL.
The basilar membrane is wider at its apex than at its base near the oval window; the cochlea tapers towards
its apex. Groups of the delicate hair sensors on the membrane, which membrane varies in stiffness along its
length, respond to different frequencies transmitted down the spiral. The hair sensors are one of the few cell
types in the body which do not regenerate. They can therefore be irreparably damaged by large noise doses.
Refer to the Tinnitus FAQ for more information on associated hearing disorders.
http://www.mankato.msus.edu/dept/comdis/kuster2/audiology.html
http://oto.wustl.edu/cochlea
ftp://rtfm.mit.edu/pub/usenet/news.answers/medicine/tinnitus-faq
The safety aspects of ultrasound scans are the subject of ongoing investigation. One metric that has been
expressed is that exposure to ultrasound should not exceed 85dB in the 16kHz octave band.
Health hazards also result from extended exposure to vibration. An example is "white finger" disease, which
is found amongst workers who frequently use hand-held machinery such as chain saws.
*For a plane wave, the sound power that passes through a surface of A square meters is defined as the ratio
of the pressure squared to the air impedance
I = p^2/(rho*c)
When combined with the propagation unit vector, this defines the rate of sound energy transmitted in a
specified direction per unit area normal to the direction. When measured in practical units, we can compute
intensity after the relation that
Numerically, the sound intensity is related to the sound power as follows: In free air space, a source emitting
Lw dB re 1 picowatt produces the sound pressure level Lp at a distance R feet as
Lp=Lw-20logR-0.6
At a one foot radius, that sound power is distributed over a surface of 4*pi = 12.57 square feet or
(*.3048^2=.0920*) 1.17 square meters. 10log1.17=0.7dB. So within 0.1 dB, the coincidence exists that the
sound intensity in picowatts per square meter is numerically equal to the sound pressure level in dB!
NOTE: This identity holds true only when the impedance, rho*c is exactly 400 mks rayls. This occurs for sea
level at 39 degrees C. For 22 C, rho*c = 412; a 0.13 dB difference arises. But at higher elevations, air density
decreases for a given temperature. At an elevation of 840 feet above sea level, rho*c reduces to 400 at 22 C.
(fortunate for much of Midwestern US!). The 0.13 dB difference at sea level is not usually significant for
acoustical measurements.
Sound intensity meters are popular for determining the quantity and location of sound energy emission.
At distances large compared to the size of the source, sound intensity diminishes according to the inverse
square law.
I = Io/D^2
This is relatively simple to reliably calculate, provided the source is small and outdoors where no echoes
occur. (But indoor calculations in a reverberant field are rather more complex. )
If the noise source is outdoors and its dimensions are small compared with the distance to the monitoring
position (ideally a point source), then as the sound energy is radiated it will spread over an area which is
proportional to the square of the distance. This is an 'inverse square law' where the sound level will decline by
6dB for each doubling of distance.
Line noise sources such as a long line of moving traffic will radiate noise in cylindrical pattern, so that the
area covered by the sound energy spread is directly proportional to the distance and the sound will decline
by 3dB per doubling of distance.
Close to a source (the near field) the change in SPL will not follow the above laws because the spread of
energy is less, and smaller changes of sound level with distance should be expected.
If the observation position very close to the source, at a distance that is small compared to the size of the
source, the sound level changes very little with location in that source area. One may be able to determine
the "virtual center" of the whole sound field, whence inverse square law calculations can proceed in reference
to that distance, for locations outside the source area.
The surrounding environment, especially close to the ground, and in the presence of wind & vertical
temperature gradients, has a great effect on the sound received at a distant location. Ground reflection
affects sound levels more than a few feet away (distances greater than the height of the sound source or the
receiver above the ground). Wind and air temperature gradients affect all sound propagation beyond 100
meters over the surface of the earth. Sound propagates well downwind (traveling with the wind), and very
poorly upwind. When the ground surface is cooler than the air just above it ("inversion"), typically late at
night and just before dawn, sound will travel great distances across the landscape even without any wind.
In addition it is always necessary to take into account attenuation due to the absorption of sound by the air,
which may be substantial at higher frequencies. For ultrasound, air absorption may well be the dominant
factor in the reduction.
The sound pressure level (SPL) resulting from sound power (Lw) being radiated into free space, e.g. over a
paved surface, is computed from
If instead the sound is emitted over a reflecting plane such as a hard surface, three (3) decibels are added to
the SPL.
For example, a lawn mower with sound power level 100 dB(A) will produce at a sound pressure level (SPL) of
about 89dB(A) at the operator (you) position over grass and 92 dB(A) when the mower is operated over a hard
surface such as your driveway. At your neighbor's yard 50 feet (15m) away, the SPL will be is 65 dBA.
In the comparison method, the SPL that the item causes in that room is compared the SPL created by a
standard "Reference Sound Source" (see the 'Acculab' portion of this web page) to determine the sound
power emitted by the item. This is the most common and economical method.
In the direct method two processes may apply. For the hemianechoic method, the SPL is measured in every
direction on a surface encompassing the test item. These measurements are then combined to compute the
emitted sound power. For the reverberation room, the SPL is measured at several locations in the that room,
then averaged. The sound power is computed from that average as:
See ISO Technical Committee Web Site for acoustical measurement information.
or
The speed of sound in air at a temperature of 0 degrees C and 50% relative humidity is 331.6 m/s. The speed
is proportional to the square root of absolute temperature and it is therefore about 12 m/s greater at 20
degrees C. The speed is nearly independent of frequency and atmospheric pressure but the resultant sound
velocity relative to the ground may be substantially altered by wind velocity.
A good approximation for the speed of sound in other gases at standard temperature and pressure can be
obtained from
where gamma is the ratio of specific heats, P is 1.013E5 Pa and rho is the density.
See also CRC Handbook of Chemistry & Physics for some other substances and Dushaw & Worcester
JASA (1993) 93, pp255-275 for sea water.
A-Weighting: The A-weighting scale attempts to balance the electronic pass band of a sound level meter
to respond to sound at various frequencies as the human ear actually hears it after passing through the
eardrum, the middle and into the inner ear (cochlea).
Loudness Weighting: The actual weighting curve for the human ear is much more complex than the
simplistic A-weightng curve. The ear canal creates a resonance around 4,000 Hz, and the low frequency
response depends on sound level, being flatter for the highest sound levels, and cutting off rapidly at low
frequencies for low sound levels.
Phons: The loudness level of any sound, in phons, is the decibel level of an equally loud 1kHz tone, heard
binaurally by an otologically normal listener.
(NOTE: Historically, it was with reluctance that a simple frequency weighting "sound level meter" curve
(A-Weighting) was accepted as giving a representative approximation to loudness.
One phon curve is especially selected; that which has a 1,000Hz threshold of 40 decibels (referenced to
20 micropascals). This curve is assigned the special name of "the 40-phone curve" (no surprise).
More on Loudness: The ear senses noise on a different basis than simple energy summation, and this
can lead to discrepancy between the loudness of certain repetitive sounds and their sound level.
A 10dB sound level increase is perceived to be about "twice as loud" in many cases.
Sone: And that leads us to the "sone" which happens to be the same metric, but with a different name
and a different number sequence. The sone is another unit of comparative loudness with
1 sone = 40 phons,
2 sones = 50 phons,
The sone "10dB rule" is inappropriate at very low and high sound levels where human subjective perception does not
follow it. This can lead to a discrepancy between the loudness of certain repetitive sounds and their sound level..
Loudness Calculation: Loudness level calculations, typically according to ANSI S3.4, take account of
"masking" - the process by which the audibility of one sound is reduced due to the presence of another at a
close frequency. The redundancy principles of masking are applied in digital audio broadcasting (DAB),
leading to a considerable saving in bandwidth with no perceptible loss in quality.
3] Vibration
It is sometimes more useful to know the vibration velocity or displacement. Often, moving coil transducers
are used to directly measure vibration velocity. A single integration of that signal provides a measure of
displacement.
If only an accelerometer is available, it is necessary to integrate the acceleration signal once for velocity and
twice for displacement. If the vibration is sinusoidal at a known frequency, f, then an integration is calculated
by dividing the original by 2 x pi x f (noting that there is also an associated phase change).
Example: A machine is vibrating with sinusoidal motion at 79.6 Hz with an rms acceleration of 10 m/s^2.
The final result may also be expressed in terms of zero-to-peak, which is found as the square root of two
[sqrt(2)] times the rms value. The peak-to-peak value is twice again that.
Thus, one has three measures (acceleration, velocity, displacement) and three scales (rms, 0-p, p-p) totaling
nine possible explicit measures of one and the same vibration. Couple that with three possible directions
(E-W, N-S, up-down) one faces 27 separate possible values... and then there are inches, mils, microns and
millimeters... Needless to say, one must be eternally vigilant and explicit in their vibration measurement and
reporting nomenclature!
If the vibration is produced by a motor inside a machine, it is necessary that the natural frequency of the
supporting system is well below frequency of motor oscillations (the forcing frequency). This is achieved by
increasing the mass or decreasing the stiffness of the system as appropriate.
The method of vibration isolation is demonstrated with a weight held from a rubber band. If the band is moved
up and down very slowly the suspended weight will move by the same amount. At resonance the weight will
move much more and possibly in the opposite direction. But as the frequency of vertical movement is further
increased, the weight will become almost stationary. Springs are more commonly used in compression than
in tension.
Important:-
Intuitive attempts to reduce vibration from machinery can sometimes instead aggravate the problem. This is
especially true when care was originally taken to minimize vibration at the time of design, manufacture and
installation.
Another method of vibration control is to cancel the forces involved using a Dynamic Vibration Absorber. Here
an additional "tuned" mass-spring combination is added so that it exerts a force equal and opposite to the
unwanted vibration. They are only appropriate when the vibration is of a fixed frequency.
Recently, "Active Vibration Control", using techniques akin to Active Noise Control has evolved. This senses
the unwanted vibration of a structural member to produce a reversed phase signal to drive a transducer
attached to the same member to counter the motion. In that way, for instance, the vibration of rolling wheels
of a vehicle is prevented from being transmitted into the body of that vehicle through the chassis
It can be determined on small material samples with an "impedance tube" or on large samples in a laboratory
"reverberation room". The impedance tube evaluates sound absorption at normal incidence only, and
produces absorption values that are slightly lower than those found in the reverberation room where the
"Sabine coefficient" is measured over a wide range of incidence angles.
For the purposes of architectural design, the Sabine coefficient is preferred, though the normal incidence
absorption may be used in the absence of any other information. Interestingly some absorbent materials are
found to have a Sabine coefficient in excess of unity at higher frequencies. This is due to diffraction effects.
Where this occurs the value can be taken at face value for small material patches and as 1.0 for very large
absorbers (entire walls). The Odeon computer program includes a file of absorption coefficients.
*** 4.3 What is the difference between sound absorption & sound
insulation ?
There is often confusion between sound insulation and sound absorption.
Sound is absorbed when it encounters a material which will convert some or all of it into heat, or which allows
it to pass through not to return. For this reason good sound absorbers do not of themselves make good
sound insulators. Sound insulators rarely absorb sound. Sound absorbers contribute little to sound
insulation. They are treated separately in sound control design.
Sound insulation prevents sound from traveling from one place to another, such as between apartments in a
building, or to reduce unwanted external noise inside a concert hall. Heavy materials like concrete are the
most effective materials for sound insulation - doubling the mass per unit area of a wall will improve its
insulation by about 6dB. It is possible to achieve good insulation over most of the audio frequency range with
less mass by instead using a double leaf partition (two independent walls separated by an air gap filed with a
sound absorber).
Test procedures (e.g. ASTM E-90 in the lab and E336 in the field) generate a loud and consistent broad band
spectrum of steady noise on one side of a partition or specimen of the material under test, then measure the
amount of this sound that passes through that material. The ratio of the incident sound to the transmitted
sound is the "noise reduction", usually expressed as 10 time the logarithm of this ratio. If the noise reduction
is also corrected for the amount of sound absorption to be found in the receiving room, 10 times the logarithm
of the corrected ratio is called the "transmission loss. This is performed for 1/3 octave bands of noise from
100 to 4000 Hz.
A single-number rating of that range of noise reductions or transmission losses van be had by fitting them to
a segmented curve.
In North America, this procedure is ASTM E413. The fitted range is from 125-4000 Hz. The value of that curve
at 500 Hz is called the Noise Isolation Class (NIC) or Sound Transmission Class (STC) respectively.
Internationally, ISO140-3 produces the noise reduction and transmission loss data in the same way. But the
single number rating is according to ISO 717 which uses data in the 100-3150 Hz range. This single number
rating is called "R'" and "R" respectively.
Similar methods are applied to impact ("footfall") noise (a problem in multifamily residential buildings). A
standard tapping machine is used to hammer on the floor, lightly and steadily at the rate of 10 taps per
second. The sound pressure level in the room below are measured. ASTM E492 and ISO 140-4 and 717
apply. (See ASTM e-33 Web Site .)
The method of noise insulation will depend on the exact situation; generalities are extremely difficult to
devise. Situations are more often than not unique, depending on the nature of the building infrastructure that
the architect or his informal successors have devised. More often than not, successful noise isolation
improvement requires the advice of a competent and experiences person and at an early stage of the
renovation. The following ideas may serve as initial guidelines.
When the noise is from an external source such as a main road it may be possible, if planning authorities
permit, to screen with a noise barrier. These can be effective providing that the direct line of sight between
traffic and house is concealed by the barrier.
The weak point for sound transmission to and from a building is most often via the windows. Double glazing
will usually afford noticeably better protection than single glazing, but in areas of high external noise it might
be preferable to have double windows with a large air gap (25 to 100 mm) and acoustic absorbent material on
the perimeter reveal around that gap. For a few people, the resultant lower room background noise level can
make noise transmitted through party walls more apparent. The fitting of new windows may reduce the level
of air ventilation, and it will be vital to compensate for this, if necessary with by improving the noise insulation
of certain party walls.
Noise through party walls can be reduced by the addition of a false wall. This is constructed from a layer of
sound insulating material, commonly plasterboard, separated from the party wall by a large void containing
acoustic quilting. The false wall must not be connected to the party wall because that would allow sound
transmission paths. The quality of construction is an important consideration if optimal levels of attenuation
are desired. It is advisable to contact an independent noise consultant before allowing any building works to
commence.
*** 4.5 How does acoustics affect classrooms and meeting rooms?
This question is less common, but now known to be a significant factor in modern public education.
Basically, the degree that we hear well in a room depends on the background noise level and the
reverberation of sound in that room. An example of a good listening environment is outdoors in a quiet back
yard in the country . Here, the background noise level can be as low as 35 dBA and the reverberation time
will be a tiny fraction of a second, if any. A class or meeting of 20 to 30 persons will proceed quite well, the
group acting in harmony most if not all of the time. Repartee vital to learning can be rapid and 2-way.
/////recompose the following
The weak point for sound transmission to and from a building is most often via the windows. Double glazing
will usually afford noticeably better protection than single glazing, but in areas of high external noise it might
be preferable to have double windows with a large air gap (25 to 100 mm) and acoustic absorbent material on
the perimeter reveal around that gap. For a few people, the resultant lower room background noise level can
make noise transmitted through party walls more apparent. The fitting of new windows may reduce the level
of air ventilation, and it will be vital to compensate for this, if necessary with by improving the noise insulation
of certain party walls.
Noise through party walls can be reduced by the addition of a false wall. This is constructed from a layer of
sound insulating material, commonly plasterboard, separated from the party wall by a large void containing
acoustic quilting. The false wall must not be connected to the party wall because that would allow sound
transmission paths. The quality of construction is an important consideration if optimal levels of attenuation
are desired. It is advisable to contact an independent noise consultant before allowing any building works to
commence.
6] Miscellaneous Questions
*** 6.1 What is active noise control?
ANC is an electronic method of reducing or removing unwanted sound by the production of a pressure wave
of equal amplitude but opposite sign to the unwanted sound. When the electronically produced inverse wave
is added to original unwanted sound the result is nil sound at that location.
This method of noise control is sometimes considered a "cure-all" for noise problems. But this is not the
case. Noise cancellation in 3D spaces such as living areas is difficult to impossible to achieve. However it
can be more successful locally, e.g. for a passenger sitting in an aircraft or car. Many institutions world wide
are developing technology to increase the circumstances where ANC can be effective. The award winning
"Active Noise Control FAQ" is maintained by Chris Ruckman and available at a number of sites worldwide
including:
http://www.erols.com/ruckman/
" .. When the speed of an aircraft is supersonic, the pressure waves cannot get away ahead of the aircraft as
their natural speed is slower than that of the aircraft. Slower, in this context, means just over 1200 km/hr at
sea level and about 10% less at normal cruising altitude. Because they cannot get away, the pressure
disturbances coalesce and lag behind the airplane, which is in effect traveling at the apex of a conical shock
wave. The main shock wave is generated by the extreme nose of the airplane, but ancillary shocks are
generated by all the major fuselage discontinuities. .. "
[snip] .. A body moving through the air pushes the air aside. Small disturbances move away at the speed of
sound. Disturbances from a slowly moving body go out in circles, like ripples from a pebble in a pond. If the
body moves faster, the circles are closer in the direction of travel. If the body is supersonic, then the circles
overlap. The envelope of circles forms a cone. The vertex angle of the cone is determined by its vertex moving
in the travel direction of, and with the speed of the body, while the circles grow at the sound speed. [snip]
The existence of the "Mach cone", "Mach waves" and the corresponding angle, was discovered by Ernst
Mach in the nineteenth century. [snip]
Large parabolic reflectors 1/2 meter or more in diameter can be used to send and receive sound over
significant distances. Your local science museum or exploratorium may have a demonstration of this
method. It is also possible to refract and focus sound with an "acoustical lens. The lens is constructed from
parallel plates which locally decrease the speed of sound. Also, a large thin bubble, say 2 metres across,
filled with carbon dioxide will focus sound. The effect is not very pronounced.
Sound can be directed by assembling several loudspeakers in an organized array. See "Acoustics" by Leo
Beranek, 1954 and 1986, pp 93-115. This principle is used in column speakers, and commercial systems for
reducing noise levels outside the dance floor area of discos.
See "Science" 14 October 1994 page 233, "Scientific American" (International Edition) February 1995 Page
32 or "Physics Today" September 1994 Page 22, all quite readable articles.
http://ne43.ne.uiuc.edu/ans/sonolum.html
http://www.wdv.com/Sono
[snip] .. I have been sufficiently interested to reconstruct the apparatus for producing this effect -- using a pair
of piezoelectric transducers, an old oscilloscope and a signal wave generator -- materials costing only a few
hundred dollars.
I am proud to say that tonight I managed to reproduce this effect -- the tiny bubble has the appearance of a
tiny blue star trapped in the middle of the flask. It is distinctly visible to the unadapted eye in a dark room,
and it is a very startling thing to see. [snip]
c is velocity of sound
S is the surface area of the neck opening
V is bottle volume
L is the effective length of the neck i.e. the actual length plus ends correction. Ends correction ~ 1.5 times
radius of neck opening
Example: A 75 cl (7.5E-4 m^3, approx. a "fifth") sized wine bottle with neck diameter 19 mm, bottle neck
length 8 cm, air temp = 20 degrees C. The calculated resonant frequency is 109Hz, actual resonance was
105Hz.
Helmholtz resonators are sometimes employed as a means of passive noise control in air conditioning ducts.
They may also be hidden in the wall design of auditoria and offices in order to improve the acoustics.
Pitch is also a subjective frequency ordering of sounds. Perceived pitch is dependent on frequency, wave
form and amplitude or changing amplitude. Numbers can be assigned to perceived pitch relative to a pure
frontal tone of 1000Hz at 40dB (1000 mels) thereby establishing a pitch scale.
The ratio of frequency intervals for Just Intonation is demonstrated below in the scale of C major, though the
same ratios apply to all the major keys:
C
(9:8)
D
(10:9)
E
(16:15)
F
(9:8)
G
(10:9)
A
(9:8)
B
(16:15)
C <- Octave
The interval between E & F and between B & C is a semi-tone, whilst the other intervals are tones. The
interval between any two notes above can be found by multiplying the intervening ratios; thus if all the above
ratios are multiplied together the resultant is 2 because an octave is twice the original frequency.
Intervals are also sequentially labeled; the interval. For instance, in the scale of C major: C D E F G A B C,
the note 'E' is the third note of the scale and the interval from C to E is therefore called a third. For the scale
D major: D E F# G A B C# D, the third will be F#. The term 'interval' can also be used to indicate that the
notes are sounded together, in which case there are consonant intervals and dissonant intervals.
The notes of minor scales differ from their major counterparts; one important difference being the flattened
third. E flat is a minor third above the note C.
The use of Just Temperament causes serious problems of intonation when music modulates between keys.
Equal Temperament is nearly always used as a compromise to the problem of tuning (see question 6.6).
A cavity will have certain resonant frequencies. These frequencies depend on the shape and size of the cavity
and on the velocity of sound within the cavity. Human vocal cords vibrate impulsively (pulse rate is the voice
fundamental) in the vocal tract, generating a range of frequencies above that fundamental. The vocal tract and
cavities enhances various frequency components imparting the recognizable voice spectrum.
The velocity of sound in helium is more than twice that in air. The characteristic resonant frequencies of the
vocal tract cavities will be raised in that ratio. The mechanical resonant frequency of any solid or fleshy tract
component will not be altered by helium, but the result of the higher resonance frequency of the several vocal
tract cavities is to alter substantially the relative amplitudes of the voice spectrum components and
harmonics thus leading to a significant voice timbre change and also an apparent pitch change.
The fluid, although non-flowing, undergoes small amplitude vibration relative to some equilibrium position.) For
heavy fluids like water, the coupling is two-way, since the structural response is influenced by the fluid
response, and vice versa. For lighter fluids like air, the coupling may be either one-way (where the structural
vibration affects the fluid response, but not vice versa) or two-way (as occurs, for example, in the violin.
Structural acoustics problems of interest involving water include the vibration of submerged structures,
acoustic radiation from mechanically excited, submerged, elastic structures; acoustic scattering from
submerged, elastic structures (e.g., sonar echoes); acoustic cavity analysis; and dynamics of fluid-filled
elastic piping systems. These problems are of interest for both time-harmonic (sinusoidal) and general
time-dependent (transient) excitations. Water hammer in pipes can be thought of as a transient structural
acoustics problem.
Structural acoustics problems of interest involving the air medium include determining and reducing noise
levels in automobile and airplane cabins.
Reference (for simple geometry problems): "Sound, Structures, and Their Interaction," Second Edition, by
M.C. Junger and D. Feit, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1986).
*** 6.10 What is the doppler effect?
When a sound source is moving, a stationary observer will hear a frequency that differs from that which is
produced by the source. The doppler effect will be noticed as a marked drop in pitch when a vehicle passes
at high speed. An interesting fact is that doppler for any straight line movement always sweeps down in
pitch!
If one approaches a sound source by moving toward it with a velocity, v, the frequency of the sound heard is
F=Fo(c+v)/c, where Fo is the emitted sound frequency, c is the speed of sound in still air and v is the speed
of the observer or the moving source. if one moves away from a sound source, the sign of v is reversed.
But for an approaching sound source, the frequency of the sound heard is F=Fo*c/(c-v). For a receding
source the sign of the velocity, v, term is reversed.
Example 1: A sound source, S, emits 1000 waves per second (1 kHz) and is moving directly towards an
observer, O, at a speed of 100 metres per second (equivalent to approximately 225 miles per hour).
After 1 second the wave front, which is traveling at the speed of sound, will have traveled 340 metres from the
original source position. Also after that second the sound source will have moved 100 metres towards the
observer.
0 m 340 m
S | | | | | | | | | Obs.
100 m 340 m
S | | | | | | | | | Obs.
Therefore the same number of waves will occupy a space of 340-100 = 240 metres and the wavelength will be
240/1000 = 0.24 metres. To the observer the frequency heard will be the speed of sound divided by its
wavelength = 340/0.24 = 1416.7 Hz.
Example 2: An observer moving at 100 metres per second directly approaches a stationary sound source, S,
which is emitting 1000 waves per second (1 kHz). In this example there is no change in wavelength. In one
second, the observer will hear the number of waves emitted per second plus the number of waves which s/he
has passed in the time (1000+100/0.34) = 1294.1 Hz.
Note the interesting result - a stationary observer with moving source will not hear the same frequency as a
would a moving observer with a stationary source.
Interesting corollaries are that if one is confined to movement velocities equal to or less than the speed of
sound, on approaching a sound source, one will observe frequencies up to only twice the radiating frequency,
but if one is stationary and approached by a sound source, there is no upper frequency limit.
Thought teaser: Apply these principles to light, aether, red shift and quasars. What would cause a "blue
shift"?
Pink noise is produced by filtering white noise to have the same power within each octave. Narrow band
analysis will show a fall in level with increasing frequency, but third-octave band or octave band analysis
results will be "flat".
*** 6.12 When should stranded wire be used for audio cables in a
PA system? What is the "electrical skin effect"?
Q:Tim <2207leung@hknet.com> wrote: When should solid core or stranded audio cables be used in the
public addressing system that broadcasts an audio with sound bandwidth 7kHz? Any reasons for the
choice?
For higher audio frequencies, the "skin effect" in practical conductors forces the current to be close to the
surface. This increases the effective resistance of that wire. The "Skin depth" - for planar geometry and wire
diameters much larger than this depth - is where the ac current diminishes to 1/e of the surface value. Round
wire conductors should be less than three times that planar skin depth in diameter for there to be a "small"
effect.
One way to circumvent the problem is to use stranded wire, each stand insulated from the other and woven in
a special pattern that varies the radius and thus the magnetic linkage. This is called "Litz wire".
Audio designers may bundle several smaller gauge insulated wires, stranded or solid, to form a larger
capacity conductor with minimal skin effect. Also, thinner or stranded wire has a nice flexibility and
workability.
The skin depth, delta, is given by: delta = a/sqrt(f) where delta is in meters, f in Hertz. The constant, a, is
.0642 for silver, .0660 for copper, .0826 for aluminum, .127 for brass, and .185 for a representative solder. My
reference is "Fields and Waves in Communications Electronics," Ramo, Whinnery, and Van Duzer, Wiley,
1965, page 289.
It is important to note that for a wire diameter comparable to the skin depth, The current does not fall off
nearly as rapidly as for the planar case. The Bessel function solution must be used to get reasonable
accuracy. >From the same reference, define T=sqrt(2/j)/delta. The current in a cylindrical conductor is
proportional to J0(Tr) where J0 is the Bessel function of order zero, and r is the radius. For a wire 3.2 skin
depths in diameter, the current at the skin depth is 73% that at the surface, and it is not much lower at the
center. (For a planar surface, current at the skin depth is only 37% of that at the surface and drops further
with depth.) The table below indicates the increase of resistance and inductance caused by the skin effect for
a single strand of solid copper wire 20,000 Hz. The values of resistance and inductive reactance are given as
fractions of the DC resistance. The results are a function of the wire radius in skin depths, so the results can
be scaled to other frequencies by scaling the diameter by sqrt(20000/freq)
(Ed. Notes: 1-Lowering the frequency increases the effective diameter at which each ratio cited applies. Viz
the 18 gauge 20 kHz effect would be the same for a wire of diameter 0.0641 (14 gauge) at 8 kHz.)
2-From the coefficient, a, it is apparent that: Silver conductors will perform about the same as copper
conductors. The skin depth is about 25% greater in aluminum (0.0826 vs 0.0660) so that for instance the
relative skin effect in #12 aluminum wire is the same as in #14 copper wire. For brass and solder, the skin
depth is double that of copper or silver.)
Art Ludwig concludes with: "Litz wire - a bundle of woven insulated wires - is designed to reduce the skin
effect. Ordinary stranded wire will not help since the wire strands are in electrical contact and tend to stay at
the same radius from the center.
"My web site contains a Glossary including entries on skin effect and Litz wire, in addition to other sound
data. The address is http://www.silcom.com/~aludwig
"A Matlab program is available (Requires Matlab 5) for computing skin depth effects, current density, effective
resistance, etc., etc. for cylindrical copper wires of any diameter and at any frequency. Easily changed for
other conductors. It is available on request from aludwig@silcom.com .
7] INDEX
A-Weighting 2.4 2.12 8.1 8.2
absorption coefficient 4.1 4.2
absorption coefficients, Table of 8.3
accelerometer 3.1
acoustic energy 2.1 2.8 2.10 4.1 4.3
Acoustical Society of America 2.4 http://asa.aip.org/
active noise control 6.1
active vibration control 3.3
addition of sound 2.5
air absorption 2.9
ANC 6.1
atmospheric attenuation 2.9
atmospheric pressure 2.1 2.11
audibility 2.1 2.12
auralization 1.3
C-Weighting 8.2
column speaker 6.3
concert pitch 6.6
dB(A) 2.4 8.1
decibel (dB) 2.2 2.3 2.4
Doppler effect 6.10
dynamic vibration absorber 3.3
ear 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.7 http://oto.wustl.edu/cochlea/
elastic structures 6.9
equal temperament 6.6 6.7
equivalent continuous sound level 2.4
focusing sound 6.3
frequency 2.1 2.4 2.12 6.6 6.7
hearing conservation 2.7 http://www.globaldialog.com/~nhca/index.html
hearing damage 2.6 2.7
Helmholtz resonator 6.5
historical notes 2.4 2.12
insulation 4.3 4.4 4.5
interference 6.3
interval (music) 6.6 6.7
inverse square law 2.9
just intonation 6.7
Leq 2.4
logarithmic scale 2.2 2.3
loudness 2.1 2.2 2.12
loudspeaker 2.1 6.3
longitudinal wave 2.1
Lw 2.10
major and minor keys 6.7
masking 2.12
mel 6.6
musical scale 6.6 6.7
ocean sound velocity 2.11
octave 6.6 6.10
PA cable 6.12
pascal 2.1 2.2 2.8
passive noise control 6.1 6.5
peak level 2.3
phon 2.12
physical constants http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/contents.html
Pierce, George W 2.4
pink noise 6.11
pitch 6.6 6.8
resonance 6.5 6.8
reverberation time 4.1
Sabine, Wallace C 4.1
semi-tone 6.6 6.7
skin effect 6.12
sone 2.12
sonic boom 6.2
sonoluminescence 6.4
sound 2.1
sound absorption 4.1 4.2 4.3
sound cancellation 6.1
sound decay 2.9
sound insulation 4.3 4.4 4.5
sound intensity 2.2 2.8
sound intensity meter 2.8
sound level 2.4 2.5 2.12
sound level meter 2.3 2.4 2.8 2.12
sound power level 2.10
sound pressure 2.1 2.2
sound pressure level 2.3 2.4 2.5
speech 6.6 6.8
speaker 2.1 6.3
speed of sound 2.1 2.11 6.8 6.11
structural acoustics 6.9
supersonic 6.2
tapping machine 4.4
third-octave band 8.2
tinnitus 2.6 2.7
U-Weighting 8.2
ultrasound 2.9
ultrasound scans 2.7
velocity of sound 2.1 2.11 6.8 6.10
vibration & Seismic (3.4) 2.1 2.7 3.1 3.2
vibration control 3.3
voice 6.6 6.8
wave 2.1
weighting 2.4 2.12 8.1
white finger 2.7
white noise 6.11
8] Weighting Tables
*** 8.1 A-Weighting
A-Weighting can be found from the following formulae
For A-Weighting: A(f) =
12200^2 f^4
------------------------------------------------------------------
A(1000)
It is convenient to list A-Weighting at nominal octave or 1/3-octave ("third-octave") frequencies, for example
1250 Hz or 2500 Hz. Ideally weightings should be calculated for the exact frequencies which may be
determined from the formula 1000 x 10^(n/10), where n is a positive or negative integer. Thus the frequency
shown as 1250 Hz is more precisely 1258.9 Hz etc.
(4)* *
* There is some reason to believe that a very low frequency rollover frequency of 4 Hz may be appropriate for
instruments that are to be used to measure sound affecting humans.
===========================================================
-----------------FIBERGLASS, Generic------------------------------
1" Duct Liner Board 1.5 pcf 0.23 0.54 0.68 0.83 0.92 0.89 0.74
2" Duct Liner Board 1.5 pcf 0.42 0.83 1.02 1.05 1.04 0.48 0.99
R-6 = 2" (4'or 6'x125' rolls) 0.31 0.58 0.86 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.77
R-8 = 2-1/2" (Thinnest common 0.33 0.68 0.96 0.95 0.95 0.99 0.89
R-11 = 3-1/2" est 0.40 0.70 0.96 0.96 0.98 0.99 0.90
R-13 3-5/8" est 0.50 0.80 0.97 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.94
R-19 = 6 " est 0.60 0.85 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.95
R-25 = 8" est 0.70 0.88 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.96
R-30 9" (2'x4' Batts)est 0.75 0.90 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.97
B-38 12" (2'x4' Batts)est 0.80 0.95 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.98
Lay-in (#7 Mount, Typical) 0.75 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.80 0.70 0.80
'3/4" F-glassPanel, Est. 0.09 0.09 0.46 0.78 0.77 0.80 0.53
Fiberglass, 1" 0.23 0.50 0.73 0.88 0.91 0.97 0.76
Fiberglass Batting, 4" 0.80 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.95 0.99
-----------------CURTAINS-----------------------------------------
0.04psf polyester @ 30" 0.28 0.22 0.34 0.45 0.55 0.71 0.39
0.04psf polyester @ 6" 0.02 0.22 0.50 0.50 0.52 0.65 0.44
0.12psf polyester @ 30" 0.42 0.43 0.64 0.75 0.86 0.93 0.67
0.12psf polyester @ 6" 0.17 0.46 0.63 0.80 0.76 0.78 0.66
0.194psf DblLayer Nomex @ 30" 0.53 0.57 0.82 1.05 1.30 1.53 0.94
0.194psf DblLayer Nomex @ 6" 0.23 0.62 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.30 0.93
-----------------WINDOWS------------------------------------------
GlasWindws, Heavy Plate Glass 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.04
" Ordinary Window Galss 0.35 0.25 0.18 0.12 0.07 0.04 0.16
GypDwll,1/2",Nailed/2x4,16"oc 0.29 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.07
Marble or Glazed Tile 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
Openings, Stage,0.25 to 0.75 0.25 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.75 0.50
Opngs,DeepBalc.,UphSeats 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 0.75
Grilles, Vents 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.50 0.36
------------FLOORS------------------------------------------------
Concrete or Terrazo 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.20 0.02
Linl,Asplt,Rubr,CrkTile/Cncr 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Linl,Gyp,Rubr,Crk,3/16"/Solid 0.04 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.04
WOOD Block, Pitch Pine 0.05 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.10 0.22 0.07
WOOD, on Joist or Sleeper 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.09
PARQUET in Asphalt or Concret 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.06
Wood Platform, Space Beneath 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.10 0.21
WOOD, Solid and Polished 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.05
Carpet, Heavy, on Concrete 0.02 0.06 0.14 0.37 0.60 0.65 0.29
Crpt,Hvy/40ozHrflt orFoamRbr 0.08 0.24 0.57 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.55
Crpt/LatxBck/40ozHF orFoamRbr 0.08 0.27 0.39 0.34 0.48 0.63 0.37
Crpt,WoolPile/Undrpd, 5/8"thk 0.20 0.25 0.35 0.40 0.50 0.75 0.38
Crpt,WoolPile,/Cncrt, 3/8"thk 0.09 0.08 0.21 0.26 0.27 0.37 0.21
Water Surface (Pool) 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.01
WoodPnl,3/8-1/2",2-4"Airgap 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.10 0.19
/////////ADDENDUM\\\\\\\\\\\\\//////
From: Matthew_J._stead@ieaust.org.au (Matthew J. stead):
Subject: Acoustic Database (re-sent message)
Date: 02 Nov 1995 23:46:17 GMT
Centre Octave Band Frequency 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000
alphabetic listing (UK)
Acoustic plaster (SBI) 0.15 0.25 0.40 0.55 0.60 0.60 0.45
Acoustic plaster 12mm thick ( 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.23
Acoustic plaster on solid wal 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.23
Acoustic tiles on solid wall 0.15 0.42 0.65 0.72 0.70 0.60 0.62
Acoustic tiles suspended 0.40 0.50 0.70 0.77 0.80 0.75 0.69
Brick-unglazed 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.04
Brickwork (pointed) 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04
Carpet 6mm pile bonded to ope 0.03 0.09 0.20 0.54 0.70 0.72 0.38
Carpet-indoor outdoor-foam ba 0.02 0.02 0.15 0.39 0.74 0.77 0.33
Carpet-loop pile-medium heavy 0.06 0.21 0.67 0.55 0.56 0.60 0.50
Ceramic tiles with smooth sur 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Compressed mineral fibre susp 0.40 0.50 0.65 0.75 0.80 0.75 0.68
Concrete 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.02
Concrete block-course 0.36 0.44 0.31 0.29 0.39 0.25 0.36
Concrete block-painted, seale 0.10 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.08 0.07
Concrete breeze or Cinder blo 0.20 0.30 0.60 0.60 0.50 0.50 0.50
Cork tiles 25mm on solid wall 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.55 0.60 0.55 0.36
Curtains in heavy folds 0.10 0.35 0.55 0.70 0.70 0.65 0.58
Curtains in medium folds 0.05 0.15 0.35 0.55 0.65 0.65 0.43
Face brickwork 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.04
Glass (1 m2) 4 mm 0.20 0.25 0.20 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.15
Glass (1 m2) 6 mm 0.15 0.06 0.04 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.06
Glass fibre acoustic blanket- 0.18 0.65 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.88
Glass pane 4mm (average) 0.35 0.25 0.18 0.12 0.07 0.04 0.16
Glass pane 6mm (large) 0.18 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.04
Hardcord carpet on hard floor 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.10 0.30 0.50 0.12
Hardcord carpet on underfelt 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.45 0.65 0.20
Heavy carpet on concrete 0.02 0.06 0.14 0.37 0.60 0.65 0.29
Heavy curtains in folds again 0.06 0.10 0.38 0.63 0.70 0.73 0.45
Heavy pile carpet on underfel 0.07 0.25 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.70 0.51
Light curtains against solid 0.04 0.07 0.11 0.18 0.30 0.35 0.17
Linoleum or vinyl stuck to co 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.03
Marble or Glazed Tiles 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
Marble slabs (SBI) 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
Medium pile carpet on underfe 0.08 0.15 0.40 0.55 0.60 0.70 0.43
Medium pile carpet on underfe 0.11 0.14 0.37 0.43 0.27 0.25 0.30
Curtain (medium weight) 14oz/ 0.07 0.31 0.49 0.75 0.70 0.60 0.56
Mineral fibre (medium density 0.45 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.81
Mineral fibre (medium density 0.10 0.35 0.60 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.60
Mineral fibre (medium density 0.20 0.45 0.65 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.66
Occupied auditorium seats-ful 0.20 0.40 0.46 0.46 0.51 0.46 0.46
Occupied auditorium seats-woo 0.16 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.40 0.38
Occupied metal or wooden seat 0.15 0.19 0.22 0.39 0.38 0.30 0.30
Orchestra player with instrum 0.37 0.80 1.10 1.30 1.20 1.10 1.10
Painted Brickwork 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.02
People (per person) 0.10 0.20 0.35 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.29
Person in padded office chair 0.15 0.25 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.40 0.38
Plaster acoustic tile suspend 0.25 0.50 0.80 0.80 0.60 0.50 0.68
Plaster on concrete block 0.12 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.05 0.04 0.07
Plaster on solid wall 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.03
Plaster on studs 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.05
Plaster on wall 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.06
Plaster-gypsum or lime-smooth 0.14 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.04 0.03 0.06
Plasterboard as a suspended c 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.09
Plasterboard ceiling 13 mm 0.29 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.07 0.09 0.07
Plasterboard on battens 9mm 0.30 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.05 0.09
Plasterboard Partitioning (mi 0.30 0.20 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.11
Plywood 9 mm 0.28 0.22 0.17 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.15
Plywood on battens 12mm 0.30 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.15
Plywood on battens 5mm 0.40 0.35 0.20 0.15 0.05 0.05 0.19
Plywood with airspace behind 0.32 0.43 0.12 0.07 0.07 0.11 0.17
Polished marble or glazed til 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Rockwool 25mm + 25mm air gap 0.40 0.90 0.80 0.63 0.68
Rockwool 25mm + 25mm air gap 0.53 0.92 0.60 0.30 0.59
Rockwool blanket 100mm 0.45 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.90 0.81
Rockwool blanket 25mm 0.10 0.35 0.60 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.60
Rockwool blanket 25mm with 10 0.15 0.30 0.75 0.85 0.75 0.40 0.66
Rockwool blanket 25mm with 5p 0.10 0.35 0.85 0.85 0.35 0.15 0.60
Rockwool blanket 50mm 0.20 0.45 0.65 0.75 0.80 0.80 0.66
Rockwool blanket 50mm with 10 0.40 0.80 0.90 0.85 0.75 0.40 0.83
Rough concrete (SBI) 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.07 0.03
Rubber floor tiles 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.05 0.05 0.08
Seated high school student 0.22 0.30 0.33 0.40 0.44 0.45 0.37
Seated primary school student 0.18 0.23 0.28 0.32 0.35 0.40 0.30
Single pane of glass-3 mm (SB 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.03
Smooth brickwork with flush p 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.04
Smooth brickwork-10 mm deep p 0.08 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.22 0.24 0.15
Smooth concrete-painted or gl 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Smooth unpainted concrete (SB 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.02
Standing adult 0.12 0.24 0.59 0.98 1.13 1.12 0.74
Thin cork or Vinyl tiles on c 0.02 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.03
Tight loop pile carpet 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.45 0.13
Tile-asphalt-linoleum or conc 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.03
Timber boards on joists 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.11 0.09
Tufted pile carpet 9mm on fel 0.08 0.08 0.30 0.60 0.75 0.80 0.43
Unoccupied auditorium seats-f 0.12 0.19 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.27
Unoccupied auditorium seats-w 0.03 0.05 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.10 0.09
Unpainted Brickwork 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.03
Vinyl or hard composition flo 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Water surface (pool) 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
Water surface in swimming poo 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01
Wood parquetry on solid floor 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.06 0.07 0.06
Wooden floor on joists (SBI) 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.09
Argentina
Argentina Acoustical Association
Asociacion de Acusticos Argentinos
c/o Prof A. Mendez, Laboratorio de Acustica, Camino Centenario Y 506, 1897 - Gonnet, Argentina
Tel: +54 21 84 2686 Fax: +54 21 71 2721
e-mail: ciclal@gba.gov.ar
Web: http://www.eie.fceia.unr.edu.ar/~acustica/adaa/index.htm
LABORATORIO DE ACÚSTICA Y ELECTROACÚSTICA: http://www.eie.fceia.unr.edu.ar/~acustica/
Australia
Australian Acoustical Society
Private Bag 1, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010
Tel: +61 2 331 6920 Fax: +61 2 331 7296
Austria
Austrian Acoustics Association
c/o Prof Ewald Benes, Technische Universitat Wien, Institut fur
Allgemeine Physik, Wien, Austria
Tel: +43 1 58801-5587 Fax: +43 1 5864203
Belgium
Belgian Acoutics Assosciation (ABAV)
Av. P Holoffe 21, 1342 Limelette, Belgium
Tel: +32 2 653 88 01 Fax: +32 2 653 07 29
e-mail: bbri.lim@pophost.eunet.be
Brazil
Sociedade Brasileira de Acustica
Attn Prof Samir Gerges, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina,
Departamento de Engenharia Mecanica, Campus Univeritario, C.P 476
CEP 88040-900, Florianopolis - SC, Brazil
Tel: +55 48 2344074 Fax: +55 48 2341519
e-mail: gerges@mbox1.ufsc.br
Canada
Canadian Acoustical Association
PO Box 1351, Station F, Toronto, Ontario, M4Y 2V9, Canada
Tel: +1 514 343 7559 or +1 613 993 0102
Chile
Sociedad Chilena de Acustica
San Francisco # 1138, Santiago, Chile
. Tel/Fax: +56 2 555 63 66 or +56 2 551 79 20
e-mail: acusticos@entelchile.net with copy (Cc) to: crooke@cmet.net
China (PRC)
Acoustical Society of China
17 Zhongguancun St., Beijing 100080, China
Czech Republic
Czech Acoustical Society
Technicka 2, 166 27 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Tel: +420 2 24352310 Fax: +420 2 3111786
e-mail: csas@feld.cvut.cz
Denmark
Acoustical Society of Denmark
c/o Department of Acoustic Technology, Bldg. 352 - Technical University
of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark
Tel: +45 4588 1622 Fax: +45 4588 0577
e-mail: atc.das@dat.dtu.dk
Finland
Acoustical Society of Finland
c/o Helsinki University of Technology, Acoustics Laboratory,
Otakaari 5 A, FIN-02150 Espoo, Finland
Tel: +358 9 451 2499 Fax: +358 9 460 224
e-mail: akustinen.seura@hut.fi
France
French Acoustical Society
Societe Francaise d'Acoustique
23 avenue Brunetiere, 75017 Paris, France
Tel +33 1 48 88 90 59 Fax: +33 1 48 88 90 60
e-mail: sfa@cal.enst.fr
Germany
German Acoustical Society
Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Akustik
c/o Department of Physics Acoustics, University of Oldenburg,
D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
Tel: +49 441 798 3572 Fax: +49 441 798 3698
e-mail: dega@aku.physik.uni-oldenburg.de
Greece
Hellenic Acoustical Society
Patision 147, 112 51 Athens, Greece
Tel or Fax: +30 1 8646 065
Hong Kong
Hong Kong Institute of Acoustics
PO Box 7261
Hong Kong
Fax: +852 2886 3777
e-mail: hkioa@hk.super.net
Hungary
Scientific Society for Optics, Acoustics... (OPAKFI)
Fo utca 68, H-1027 Budapest, Hungary
Tel/Fax: +36 1 202 0452
e-mail (c/o Andras Illenyi): illenyi@sparc.core.hu
India
Acoustical Society of India
c/o Dr S Agrawal, CEERI Centre, CSIR Complex, Hillside Road,
New Delhi-110012, India
Tel: +91 11 5784642
e-mail (c/o National Physical Lab): Agrawals%npl@sirnetd.ernet.in
Italy
Associazione Italiana di Acustica
Istituto di Acustica "O.M. Corbino"
Area della ricerca di Roma Tor Vergata
Via del Fosso del Cavaliere
00133 Roma Italy
Tel. +39 6 49934480 (ask Mrs. Cappelli)
Fax: +39 6 20660061
E-mail: aia@idac.rm.cnr.it
Japan
Acoustical Society of Japan
Nippon Onkyo Gakkai
4th Floor, Ikeda Building, 2-7-7 Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Tel: +81 3 3379 1200 Fax: +81 3 3379 1456
Korean Republic
The Acoustical Society of Korea,
c/o 302-B, The Korean Federation of Science and Technology,
635-4, Yeoksam-dong, Kangnam-gu, Seoul-city, 135-080, Rep. of Korea
Tel: +82 2 565 1625 Fax: +82 2 569 9717
Mexico
Mexican Institute of Acoustics
Instituto Mexicano de Acustica
c/o Sergio Beristain, P.O. BOX 75805,
Col. Lindavista 07300 Mexico, D.F.
Tel +52 5 682 28 30 Fax: +52 5 523 47 42
e-mail: SBERISTA@vmredipn.ipn.mx
Netherlands
Netherlands Acoustical Society
Nederlands Akoestisch Genootschap
Postbus 162, NL-2600 AD, Delft, Netherlands
Tel: +31 15 26 92 442 Fax: +31 15 26 92 111
e-mail: nag@tpd.tno.nl
New Zealand
New Zealand Acoustical Society
c/o J. Quedley, CPO Box 1181, Auckland, New Zealand
Tel: +64 9 623 3147 Fax: +64 9 623 3248
e-mail: mms@bitz.co.nz
Norway
Acoustical Society of Norway
Norsk Akustisk Selskap
Sintef Telecom and Informatics, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
Tel: +47 73 59 26 45 Fax: +47 73 59 14 12
e-mail: truls.gjestland@informatics.sintef.no
Peru
Acoustical Society of Peru
Sociedad Peruana de Acustica
Garcilazo de la Vega 163, Salamanca de Monterrico, Lima 3, Peru
Tel: +51 1 4351151 Fax: +51 1 4675625
e-mail: cjim@mail.cosapidata.com.pe
Poland
Polish Acoustical Society
Polskie Towarzystow Akustyki
Instytut Akustyki, Uniwersytet Adama Mikiewicz, ul J.Matejki 48/49,
60-769 Poznan, Poland
Tel or Fax: +48 61666 420
e-mail: ula@phys.amu.edu.pl
Portugal
Portuguese Acoustical Society
SPA - CAPS/Instituto Superior Tecnico, Av. Rovisco Pais
1096 Lisboa CODEX, Portugal
tel: +351 1 841 9393/39 fax: +351 1 352 3014
e-mail: capsist@alfa.ist.utl.pt
Romania
Romanian Acoustical Society
Societatea Romana de Acustica
c/o Nicolae Enescu, Universitatea Politehnica Bucuresti,
Splaiul Independentei nr. 313, 77206 Bucuresti, Romania
Tel: +40 1 4101615 Fax: +40 1 4104488
e-mail: enescu@cat.mec.pub.ro
Russia
East-European Acoustical Association (http://webcenter.ru/~eeaa/)
44, Moskovskoe Shosse, Saint Petersburg, 196158, Russia
Fax: +7 (812) 1279323
e-mail: eeaa@online.ru
Singapore
Society of Acoustics Singapore
c/o W Gan, Acoustical Services Pte Ltd
209-212 Innovation Centre, NTU
Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798
Fax +65 791 3665
e-mail: wsgan@singnet.com.sg
Slovakia
Slovak Acoustical Society
c/o Prof Stefan Markus, Racianska 75, PO Box 95, 830 08 Bratislava 38,
Slovakia
Tel: +421 7 254751 Fax: +421 7 253301
e-mail: markus@umms.savba.sk
South Africa
South African Acoustics Institute
c/o John R. Hassall
Acoustics, Noise and Vibration Consultancy
Email: jhassall@pixie.co.za
Tel: +27 11 403 1163
Spain
Spanish Acoustical Society
Sociedad Espanola de Acustica
Serrano 144, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
Tel: +34 1 5618806 Fax: +34 1 4117651
e-mail: a.perezlopez@mad.servicom.es
Sweden
Swedish Acoustical Society
Svenska Akustiska Sallskapet
c/o Ingemansson AB, Box 47 321
S-100 74 Stockholm, Sweden
Tel: +46 8 744 5780 Fax: +46 8 18 26 78
e-mail: sas@ingemansson.se
Switzerland
Schweizerische Gesellschaft fur Akustique
Societe Suisse d'Acoustique
Postfach 251, 8600 Dubendorf
Tel: +41 1 823 4743 Fax: +41 1 823 4793
e-mail: kurt.heutschi@empa.ch
Turkey
Turkish Acoustical Society - TAS
Y.T.U. Mimarlik Fakultesi
Yildiz, 80750, ISTANBUL/TURKEY
Tel: +90 212 259 70 70 ext: 2772
Fax: +90 212 26105 49
e-mail: takder@ana.cc.yildiz.edu.tr
UK
Institute of Acoustics
5 Holywell Hill, St Albans, Herts, AL1 1EU, UK
Tel: +44 1727 848195 Fax: +44 1727 850553
e-mail: Acoustics@clus1.ulcc.ac.uk
USA
Acoustical Society of America
500 Sunnyside Blvd., Woodbury, NY 11797, USA
Tel: +1 516 576 2360 Fax: +1 516 576 2377
e-mail: asa@aip.org
Home
Last updated 3 May 2007.
Original Web Site by Point & Click Software, Inc.