Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Jinarajadasa
TO TH+ C"PT"&/ O* O0R 1"L2"T&O/ &/ *0L*&L$+/T O* " PRO$&1+ *ull moon o3 Chaitra! ,-,)
, ) 5 6
HOW W+ R+$+$4+R O0R P"1T L&2+1 TH+ 2&1&O/ O* TH+ 1P&R&T TH+ L"W O* R+/0/C&"T&O/ TH+ H&77+/ WOR8 O* /"T0R+
Pa e , Pa e 5, Pa e .) Pa e '(
Pa e ,
How We Remember Our Past Lives by C. Jinarajadasa HOW WE REMEMBER O R P!"# L$%E"
"mon the many ideas which have li htened the burden o3 men! one o3 the most serviceable has been that o3 Reincarnation. &t not only e9plains why one man is born in the lap o3 lu9ury and another in poverty! why one is a enius and another an idiot! but it also holds out the hope that! as men now reap what they have sown in the past! so in 3uture lives the poor and wretched o3 today shall have what they lac:! i3 so they wor: 3or it! and that the idiot may! li3e a3ter li3e! build up mentality which in 3ar;o33 days may 3lower as enius. When the idea o3 reincarnation is heard o3 3or the 3irst time! the student naturally supposes that it is a Hindu doctrine! 3or it is :nown to be a 3undamental part o3 both Hinduism and 4uddhism. 4ut the stran e 3act is that reincarnation is 3ound everywhere as a belie3! and its ori in cannot be traced to &ndian sources. We hear o3 it in 3ar;o33 "ustralia & 1ee The Northern Tribes of Central Australia, by 4aldwin 1pencer < *.=. =illen! ,-(6! pa e ,>.! et seq.' and there is a story on record o3 an "ustralian abori ine who went cheer3ully to the allows! and replied on bein ?uestioned as to his levity @ATumble down blac:; 3ellow! jump up white 3ellow! and have lots o3 si9pences to spendBA &t was tau ht by the 7ruids o3 ancient =aul! and Julius Caesar tells us how youn =auls were tau ht reincarnation! and that as a conse?uence they had no 3ear o3 death. =ree: philosophers :new o3 itC we have Pytha oras tellin his pupils that in his past lives he had been a warrior at the sie e o3 Troy! and later was the philosopher Hermotimus o3 =alDomenae. &t is not utterly un:nown to Christian teachin ! i3 we ta:e the simple statement o3 Christ! when ?uestioned whether John the 4aptist was +lijah or +lias reborn@ E&3 ye will receive it! this is +lias which was 3or to come!A and He 3ollows up the statement with the si ni3icant words@ EHe that hath ears to hear! let him hear.A &n later Jewish tradition! the idea is :nown! and the Talmud mentions several cases o3 reincarnation. There are many to whom reincarnation appeals 3orcibly! and 1chopenhauer does but little e9a erate when he says@ E& have also remar:ed that it is at once obvious to everyone who hears o3 it 3or the 3irst timeA. 1ome believe in the idea immediatelyC it comes to them li:e a 3lash o3 li ht in thic: dar:ness! and the problem o3 li3e is clearly seen with reincarnation as the solution. Others there are who row into belie3! as each doubt is solved and each ?uestion answered There is one! and only one! objection which can lo ically be brou ht a ainst reincarnation! i3 correctly understood as Theosophy teaches it. &t lies in the ?uestion@ E&3! as you say! & have lived on earth in other bodies! why donFt & remember the pastGA /ow i3 reincarnation is a 3act in /ature! there surely will be enou h other 3acts which will point to its e9istence. /o one 3act in /ature stands isolated! and it is possible in divers ways to discover that 3act. 1imilarly it is with reincarnationC there are indeed enou h 3acts o3 a psycholo ical :ind to prove to a thin:er that reincarnation must be a 3act o3 /ature and not a theory. &n answerin the ?uestion why we do not remember our past lives! surely the 3irst necessary point is to as: ourselves what we mean by EmemoryA. &3 we have some clear ideas as to the mechanism o3 memory! perhaps we may be able to understand why we do not #or do% ErememberA our past days or lives. /ow! brie3ly spea:in ! what we usually mean by memory is a summin up. &3 & remember today the incidents o3 Pa e )
Pa e '
Pa e >
Pa e L
Pa e ,,
Pa e ,6
How We Remember Our Past Lives by C. Jinarajadasa #HE %$"$O( O) #HE "P$R$#
The history o3 humanity is the history o3 ideas! and the sta es throu h which men have risen 3rom sava e to civiliDed are distin uishable one 3rom the other by the in3luence o3 certain reat doctrines. "mon these teachin s which have moulded civiliDations! the idea o3 +volution stands out as heraldin a new era in the world o3 thou ht. Considered at 3irst as o3 mere academic interest! soon it was reco niDed as o3 practical value! today it is :nown as necessary in the understandin o3 every problem in every department o3 bein . /evertheless it is a 3act that the doctrine o3 evolution is a theory a3ter all. /o one has lived lon enou h to see su33icient lin:s in the evolutionary chain to attest that the char es postulated as havin ta:en place did so actually occur! and that the chain is not a 3ancy but a 3act. Iet evolution is accepted by all as a dynamic idea! 3or li:e a ma ic wand it per3orms wonders in the world o3 thou ht. &t marshals the hetero eneous or anisms o3 nature into orderly roups! and 3rom inanimate atom to protoplasm! 3rom unicellular or anism to multi;cellular! 3rom invertebrate to vertebrate! 3rom ape to man! one ascendin scale o3 li3e is seenC H "nd strivin to be man! the worm $ounts throu h all the spires o3 3orm Iet none can say that evolution is an a reeable 3act to contemplate! 3or there is a ruthlessness in /atureFs methods which is appallin . 0tterly cruel and waste3ul she seems! creatin and per3ectin her creatures only to prey on each other! eneratin more than can live in the 3ierce stru le 3or e9istence. ERed in tooth and claw with ravinA! she builds and un;builds and builds a ain! one;pointed only in this! that a type shall survive! rec:less o3 the pleasure or pain to a sin le li3e. $en themselves! proud thou h they be in a 3ancied 3reedom o3 thou ht and action! are nothin but pawns in a ame she plays. The more 3ully evolution is understood 3rom such 3acts as scientists have so 3ar athered! the more justi3iably can men say! with Omar! o3 their birth! li3e and death@ &nto this 0niverse! and #hy not :nowin ! /or #hence! li:e Water ; willy;nilly 3lowin ! "nd out o3 it! li:e Wind alon the Waste & :now not #hither! willy;nilly blowin . O3 course this attitude does not represent that o3 the majority o3 men. $illions o3 men believe in a Creator! and that E=odFs in his heaven! "llFs ri ht with the worldBA 4ut it is no e9a eration to say that their optimism continually receives rude shoc:s. /o man or woman o3 sensibility can loo: about him and not a ree with TennysonJs comparison o3 li3e to a play @H "ct 3irst! this +arth! a sta e to loomFd with woe Iou all but sic:en at the shi3tin scenes "nd yet be patient. Our Playwri ht may show &n some 3i3th "ct what this wild drama means. Pa e ,.
Pa e ,>
Pa e )5
Pa e )6
How We Remember Our Past Lives by C. Jinarajadasa #HE L!W O) RE( (C$!#$O(
The joy o3 li3eB &s it not everywhereG &n plant and animal and man! do we not see an instinct 3or happiness which impels all creation to rise 3rom ood to better! 3rom better to bestG 1ince =od said! ELet there be li htBA are not all men see:in to step out o3 dar:ness into li ht H blindly! dimly 3eelin that happiness must be their oalG Iet how 3ew 3ind happiness in li3eB &t is easy to sin @K =odFs in his heaven! "llFs ri ht with the worldB 4ut to sin so 3or lon ! one must be blind to the 3acts. Li3e is a tra edy to many! and 3ar more truly is it described by Tennyson@K "ct 3irst! this +arth! a sta e so loomFd with woe Iou all but sic:en at the shi3tin scenes! "nd yet be patient. Our Playwri ht may show &n some 3i3th "ct what this wild 7rama means. /evertheless all 3eel that happiness must be the oal o3 li3e! and humanity never errs in its deepest 3eelin s. 4ut then why should not the attainment o3 happiness be easier than it is G M!( !( E%OL%$(+ "O L There is a philosophy o3 li3e which holds that man is an immortal soul! livin not one li3e on earth but many! rowin throu h the e9periences which he ains in them mani3old capacities and virtues. This philosophy 3urther postulates that all men are the children o3 One 3ather! who has created a universe! in order that working therein His children may :now somethin o3 Him! and come to Him in joy. "ccordin to this theory! the purpose o3 li3e is not to achieve a stable condition o3 happiness 3or any individual! but rather to train him to wor: in a Plan o3 an &deal *uture! and 3ind in that wor: an ever;chan in and ever; rowin contentment. *rom the standpoint o3 the Theosophist! all men are indeed wor:in 3or a 3oreordained ideal 3uture C but they wor: at di33erent sta es! accordin to their di33erin capacities. " reco nition o3 these sta es! and the laws o3 li3e appropriate to each! ma:es li3e less the riddle that it is. There are three broad sta es on the Path o3 4liss which leads to the Hi hest =ood! and they are happiness! renunciation! and trans3i uration. #HE "#!+E O) H!PP$(E"" =od calls upon all His children at this sta e to co;operate with Him! by o33erin them happiness as the aim o3 li3e. He has implanted in them a cravin 3or happiness! and He provides wor: 3or them which shall ma:e them happy. Love o3 wi3e and child and 3riend! 3ame and the ratitude o3 men! success and ease K Pa e ).
Pa e )>
Pa e )L
How We Remember Our Past Lives by C. Jinarajadasa #HE H$**E( WOR, O) (!# RE
/ever! in the history o3 man:ind! has there been a time as to;day when it could be so truly said that! The old order chan eth! yieldin place to new! "nd =od 3ul3ils Himsel3 in many ways! Lest one ood custom should corrupt the world. &t is true that Ethe man in the streetA :nows o3 no such reat chan e C li3e 3or him moves as o3 old in its 3i9ed rooves! and i3 the worldFs pro ress has multiplied 3or him li3eFs conveniences! it has also multiplied 3or him li3eFs needs. Chan e to him is lar ely a matter o3 a surplus o3 com3orts over pains! and in this re ard the old order has chan ed but little 3or him. 4ut the man in the library! the laboratory! the studio! the pulpit! is aware o3 the reat chan e! and he :nows that it be an with the wor: o3 7arwin and his school. The importance o3 the wor: o3 modern scientists lies in the 3act that they have marshaled 3or us the events o3 nature into an orderly pa eant o3 evolution. What e9oteric reli ion has not been able to do! science has achieved! and that is to show Li3e as one. Technolo ical trinities o3 Creator! Creation! and Creature! or dualities o3 =od and $an! have not uni3ied li3e 3or us in the way science has done. $ysticism alone! with its truth o3 the &mmanence! has revealed to men somethin o3 that uni3ied e9istence o3 all that is! which is the lo ical deduction 3rom modern evolutionary theories. When we contemplate the pa eant o3 nature! we see her at a wor: o3 buildin and un;buildin . *rom mineral to bacterium and plant! 3rom microbe to animal and man! nature is busy at a visible wor:! step by step evolvin hi her and more comple9 structures. Thou h she may seem at 3irst si ht to wor: blindly and mechanically! she has in reality a coherent plan o3 action. Her plan is to evolve structures sta e by sta e! so that the amount o3 time needed by a iven creature 3or its sel3;protection and sustenance may be less and less with each successive eneration. The hi her the structure is in its or aniDation and adaptability! the more time! and hence more ener y! there is 3ree 3or other purposes o3 li3e than sustenance and procreation. Two elements in li3e arise 3rom the per3ection o3 the structural mechanism which the hi her order o3 creatures reveals. *irst! they have time 3or play! 3or it is in play that such ener y mani3ests as is not re?uired 3or ainin 3ood and shelter. The second element mani3ests itsel3 only when human bein s appear in evolution! and men be in to show a desire 3or adaptability. "daptability to environment e9ists in the plant and in the animal! but it is in them purely instinctive or mechanicalC with man on the other hand there is an attempt at conscious adaptability. When this desire 3or adaptability increases! nature reveals a new principle o3 evolution. To the principle o3 the survival o3 the 3ittest by a stru le 3or e9istence! she adds the new one o3 evolution by interdependence. There3ore we 3ind human units a re atin themselves into roups! and primitive men or aniDin themselves into 3amilies and tribes.
Pa e )-