Kevin Scheid

From: 1 9/11 Closed by Statute |

Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:13 PM
To:
Cc: Dan. Levin® usdoj.gov;! 9/11 closed by statute |
Subject: [Pwd: Missing Documents]

Missing Documents
(3.04 KB)
Kevin: this is the note I sent you last week on this this is further to my
previous You should be aware that we are working down a list of priority issues while we
are also attempting to fulfill your requirements so we appreciate your patience.

(working down your 'missing documents" paper)

1 sent you a response on DR#1—we are comfortable with our previous responses, should you
have further questions or concerns please let me know & I"11 arrange some time with the
CFO staff.

DR#5--Its not fair to say we've been tasked on this since May on this one as you just
asked us to reinstate our search for these particular items. The DCI Review Group (DRG)
will be working this request.

DRG has (since our meeting) been focusing on the Comm'n's highest priority items, the
SEIBs and the WH request regarding the PDB so that we could get those ready, they've just
completed that tasking. They will have to do the work on DCI DR#5 to the extent that we
can evern resurrect any of these materials. They are currently at work on the Comm'n's
2nd priority issue, the CIRs for Dieter Snell and the PC/DC/CSG materials for Mike Hurley.
I'll talk with DRG on Monday and see if we can get you an estimated production schedule on
this item as well as the other items they are responsible for below.

DR#8:

Item 8: We have produced docs on this

Item 11: We have produced docs on this
Item 17: as per ray previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you here. Item 20: with
the amendment of your request we have production on this & it should be to you shortly.
Item 30: We have additional production on this item & it should be with you shortly. Item
36; as per my previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you here other than what is
currently avaiblable on the reading room. Item 14: CMS is coordinating with the
Administration regarding production of this item. Item 16: The DCIDs you requested have
been supplied and are being processed for production you should have them shortly. You
will also receive the rescinded DCIDs that you clarified were wanted at our last meeting.
Item 19: We appreciate your clarification of this request, that you actually wanted the
underlying documents. This will have to come from DRG. Item 22: We will have nothing
additional for you here. Item 24: We will have nothing additioanl for you here. Item 29:
This will come from DRG. Items 34 & 37: Will be worked by DRG to the extent deemed
necessary. DCI DR#10, item 3: This has been produced.
 Kevin Scheid
| 9/11 Closed by Statute |
From:
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:08 PM
To: Kevin Scheid
Cc: Steve Dunne
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Missing Documents]

I'll talk to DRG & to Mr. Giza on Monday and we'll see what we can do about getting you a
drop dead date on the few remaining items.
Kevin Scheid wrote:
9/11 Closed by Statute
> ^^^^^^^^^j
> Thanks for the update. My screw-up... sorry I didn't catch your
> previous email.
>
> We need to close out these requests as soon as possible, i.e., pick a
> drop dead date. Of the several items that are still in production
> (e.g., #14, #20, #29, #30, #37), when do you expect the Community to
> be completed? Can we pick December 15 as the final delivery date for
> these items?

> KJS
>

> From:I 9/11 Closed by Statute |

> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 2:13 PM
> To: Kevin Scheid
> Cc: Dan.Levin@USdQ-1 .oov: I 9/n Closed by Statute |
> Subject: [Fwd: Missing Documents]
>
> Kevin: this is the note I sent you last week on this this is
> further to my previous You should be aware that we are working down
> a list of priority issues while we are also attempting to fulfill your
> requirements so we appreciate your patience.
>
> (working down your 'missing documents" paper)
> I sent you a response on DR#l--we are comfortable with our previous
> responses, should you have further questions or concerns please let me
> know & I'll arrange some time with the CFO staff.
>
> DR#5--Its not fair to say we've been tasked on this since May on this
> one as you just asked us to reinstate our search for these particular
> items. The DCI Review Group (DRG) will be working this request.
>
> DRG has (since our meeting) been focusing on the Comm'n's highest
> priority items, the SEIBs and the WH request regarding the PDB so that
> we could get those ready, they've just completed that tasking. They
> will have to do the work on DCI DR#5 to the extent that we can evern
> resurrect any of these materials. They are currently at work on the
> Comm'n's 2nd priority issue, the CIRs for Dieter Snell and the
> PC/DC/CSG materials for Mike Hurley. I'll talk with DRG on Monday and
> see if we can get you an estimated production schedule on this item as
> well as the other items they are responsible for below.
>
> DR#8:
>
> Item 8: We have produced docs on this
> Item 11: We have produced docs on this
> Item 17: as per my previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you
> here. Item 20: With the amendment of your request we have production
> on this & it should be to you shortly.
> Item 30: We have additional production on this item & it should be with
> you shortly.
> Item 36; as per my previous, we'll have nothing additionally for you
> here other than what is currently avaiblable on the reading room.
> Item 14: CMS is coordinating with the Administration regarding
> production of this item.
> Item 16: The DCIDs you requested have been supplied and are being
> processed for production you should have them shortly. You will also
> receive the rescinded DCIDs that you clarified were wanted at our last
> meeting.
> Item 19: We appreciate your clarification of this request, that you
> actually wanted the underlying documents. This will have to come from
> DRG.
> Item 22: We will have nothing additional for you here.
> Item 24: We will have nothing additioanl for you here.
> Item 29: This will come from DRG.
> Items 34 & 37: Will be worked by DRG to the extent deemed necessary.
> DCI DR#10, item 3: This has been produced.
Mail:: INBOX: FW: DCI DR#19 Page 1 of 1

136.83MB / 476.84MB (28.70%)

Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:47:08 -0500
From: Kevin Scheid <kscheid@9-11commisston.gov>^
To: "' <team2@9-11corrtmission.gov>4?
Subject: FW: DCI DR#19
9/11 Closed by Statute

Team --

Please re^/ii.ciosed by statute ients on our recent Document request and let me
know what you tninK. I will get back to her with a coordinated answer.
Thanks.

KJS

From:l 9/11 Closed by Statute I

Sent .-Tuesday, November 2 5 , 2003 11:07 AM
To: Kevin Scheid
Subject: DCI DR#19

Kevin:
#2: We believe we have already produced to Susan Ginsburg the MOU you
have requested--if this is not what you are looking for please let us
know.

#3 Our records reflect that we have already produced both DO Strategic

Plans for 2005 & 2010

#6 is a request for an NSA originated document, we will coordinate with

NSA regarding production.

#9 is the very similar to your earlier request in DCI DR#8 --CMS

believes it has already produced everyting they have, but will go back
to their people and ask whether there is anything further

#18 there are no additional documents, you have the only annual
strategic intelligence reviews on CT that were done in that time
period--you have 2 and those are the only reports of that kind.

#19 CMS asks what are you really looking for here? National Sigint
priorities, HUMINT (you should already have), IMINT what exactly is it
that you want?--this seems very broad to them.

http://kinesis.swishmail.com/webmail/imp/message.php?actionID= 148&mailbox=INBO... 11 /25/2003

 ^.v ;9/ll Closed by Statute

Gordon Lederman |
From: Steve Dunne j
Sent: Friday, Decem ber 19, 2003 3:45 PM
To: Team 2; Team 3 I
Cc: Front Office I
Subject: FW: CIA Outstanding Document Requests for Prioritization

Teams 2 and 3: Her< 9 / 11[closed bY st atyte jonse t p tne list of outstanding document requests you
gave us earlier today. Pltiimy lex us know if you have any comments on her report.
Thanks. Steve ;
T-i (final
From: I 9/11 Closed by S t a t u t e
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 3:15 PM i
To: Steve Dunne j
Cc: Front Office i
Subject: Re: CIA Outstanding Document Requests for Prioritization

steve: thanks, right, as I said in my note; to you—the staff's list WILL differ from my
Prioritization list because they don't yet; have all the documents I've located. After
documents are located many require redaction or interagency coordination as well as
adminstrative processing which |"~ "1& the paralegals carry out—this accounts for
the lag time, but for my purposes these do no require prioritization--!'m done with them
at that point—its essentially only a clerical function that has to be carried out from
that point forward.
My interest in seeking prioritization on the items I listed in my note to you is for my
own purposes as to where to focus the search efforts first. The administrative processing
is a wholely separate function and documents will be produced as processing is completed.
DCI DR#5: Items 38, 43, 45 & 46. We have not been able to locate these
documents which were produced to the Joint Inquiry staff. Unfortunately because of the
way these were indexed we don't have sufficient information to search further, if Congress
is able to give you further information on these documents we'll be happy to search again,
but this information has not been sufficient for us to be able to recover these docs.
DCI DR#8: 14c & 19 are in the process of being produced—this is all we have on these
items. 34 & 37 were put on hold at the request of the Comm'n staff at our two meeting with
you on the doc requests and our mfrs from these 2 meetings indicate that the staff wanted
to consider further how to refine their requests for these two items—so we should
continue to hold. If that determination has changed and you have refined request, please
let us know & we'd appreciate prioritization of these request as well.
DR#16: is listed in my note as an item to be prioritized. A substantial amount of
material is in coordination for production, I am working on the sitreps which will also be
produced under this DR--there is one additional place I need to search on this request
which is why I listed it on my note to you as a DR requiring prioritization.
DR#18 almost all of these items have been located, they only require administrative
processing, redactions/bates-stamping/interagency coord etc. which is why I did not list
them on my listing of DRs requiring prioritization. I have a little more searching I need
to do on item 6 and I spoke with Scott Allan about that on the phone yesterday (or the day
before). Additionally, Scott tells me that he won't be ready for the interviews until the
second week in January.
DR#19--the items I listed requiring prioritization are the only items for which I'm still
searching--the other items have already been located and are being processed.
Hope this helps ,r~9/ll Closed by Statute \e Dunne wrote:

/n closed by statutephanks for your memo; we are still considering our response.
> Our teams headed by Mike Hurley and Kevin Scheid have come up with a
> list of requests (see below) for which they believe they have not
> received any documents; to the extent these are not covered in your
> memo, could you let me know where they stand? Thanks. Steve
> Outstanding requests:

> DR#5: items 38, 43, 45, 46

> DR#8: items 14c, 19, 34, 37
> DR#16: item 1
> DR#18: items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
> DR#19: items 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18,
> 19

> Fromj 9/11 Closed by Statute |

> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 3:17 PM
> To: Steve Dunne; Dan Marcus«™.»»»™»_^^^^^^^™,
> Cc: Dan.LevinQusdoj .gov,\n closed by statute I
> Subject: CIA Outstanding Document Requests for Prioritization

> Steve & Dan: Thanks for agreeing to take a look at our outstanding
> document requests in an effort to assist us by prioritizing. The
> listing is attached. Please let me know if vnn havp any questions and
> thanks so much for your help,! 9/11 closed by statute I
 Page 1 of2

Gordon Lederman

From: Dan Marcus

Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 7:28 PM
To: Gordon Lederman
Subject: FW: status of requests

Original Mf>«;<aop
FrOmJ 9/ll Closed by Statute
Sent; Vionoav, i-epruarv yy. MW /;ib PM
9/11 Closed by Statute
Cc:"Steve Dunne; Dan Marcus; Kevin Scheid
Subject; Re: status of requests

Steve, just a few notes to 9 /n closed by statute; comments regarding the items requested by team #2:

1) For items 34 and 37 of DR #8, my notes indicate that the Comm'n has agreed (since at least our 17 Jul
03 meeting) that these items are in a "hold" status, i.e. that CIA need not provide anything further unless
we rec'd specific requests.

2) For item 6 of DR # 19, my 17 Dec 03 forwarding letter to the Comm'n states: "The document > /
responsive to Item No. 6 .. .is a report prepared by a former official o f . . . [NSA] concerning f) I ^
management of the [1C]... We are unable to locate a copy of this document in CIA files and have
advised by NS A's focal point for Commission matters that NSA has been unable to locate the
document..." ,

3) Please note that the document produced to theComm'n on 15 Dec 03, in response to item no. 33 of
DRrff5, is also responsive to item nosT 11 and 16 of DR #19. The document produced as 0500010 on 15
Dec 03 is the'final veTsiorroTme draft requested by item 11 of DR #19.
9/11 Closed by Statute;;

9/11 closed by statutejease chime in if you have something additional/different—from my optic this is
what I have-BELOW IN ALL CAPSJ 9/11 closed bv statute |

Steve Dunne wrote:

9/11 closed by statuteTeam 2 reports that production on the following requests is

incomplete; could you tell us where you stand? We may be asked about this
at the Commission meeting tomorrow. Thanks. Steve
DR 5, Item 43 WE WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM-WE TRIED,
BUT DONT HAVE COPIES OF EVERYTHING GIVEN TO THE JOINT INQUIRY—IF WE
RECEIVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP US LOCATE THE
DOCUMENT WE'LL BE HAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT AT THIS POINT WE DONT
BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.
DR 5, Item 45WE WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM--WE TRIED,
BUT DONT HAVE COPIES OF EVERYTHING GIVEN TO THE JOINT INQUIRY—IF WE
RECEIVE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP US LOCATE THE

2/10/2004
 Page 2 of 2

DOCUMENT WE'LL BE HAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT AT THIS POINT WE DONT

BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.
DR 8, Item 34PUT ON HOLD AT BOTH OF OUR STATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF
AND WE WERE TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.
DR 8, Item 37PUT ON HOLD AT BOTH OF OUR STATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF
AND WE WERE TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.

***DESPITE THE FACT THAT 37 WAS PUT ON HOLD WE'VE

PRODUCED A BUNCH OF FININTEL UNDER THIS ITEM ANYWAY.

DR 19, Item 6WE COULD NOT LOCATE THIS ITEM, NSA DIDNT HAVE ANY LUCK
FINDING IT EITHER
DR 19, Item 11 - this is of particular interest to CommissionersWE PRODUCED A
FINAL ON THIS, WE SPOKE TO DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE CAME
OUT FOR A STATUS MEETING.
DR 19, Item 13WE TALKED WITH DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM DURING A
STATUS MEETING HERE. HE TOLD US HE'D GET BACK TO US IF WE NEEDED TO DO
SOMETHING FURTHER
DR 19, Item 14ACCORDING TO ALL INFORMATION WE HAVE THERE IS NO WRITTEN
REPORT, DCI/COS TALKED WITH MR. KERR & WITH MR. PAVnT-NEITHER
REMEMBER A WRITTEN PRODUCT HAVING BEEN DONE-NO SEARCHES HAVE
YIELDED SUCH A PRODUCT.
DR 19, Item 16OUR UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS ITEM IS THE SAME THING AS
ITEM 11, WE PRODUCED A FINAL OF THIS ALREADY.
DR 19, Item 19WE SPOKE WITH DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE WAS
HERE FOR A STATUS MEETING—CMS NEEDED MORE INFORMATION RE: WHAT
TEAM 2 WAS LOOKING FOR HERE--WHAT TYPES OF PRIORITIES OR IS THIS JUST
ANOTHER WAY OF ASKING AGAIN FOR THE PRIORITIES FRAMEWORK? I SENT
SEVERAL NOTES TO KEVIN ASKING FOR FURTHER INFORMATION DATED: 23
NOVEMBER 2003 AND 17 DECEMBER 2003 AND NEVER HEARD ANYTHING FURTHER.

2/10/2004
 Pagel of 2

Gordon Lederman

From: Steve Dunne

Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 6:00 PM
To: Team 2
Cc: Dan Marcus
Subject: FW: status of requests

FYI.

Original Message
Fro 9/ll Closed by Statute
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 5:37 PM
To; Steve Dunne
Closed by Statutep a n MafCUS
Subject: Re: status of requests

9 / l l C l o s e d b y S t a t u t e j e a s e chjme jn jf yQU
something additional/different—from my optic this is what I
nave-BELOW IN ALL CAP f 9/11 closed by statute

Steve Dunne wrote:

| 9/11 closed by statute |Team 2 reports that production on the following requests is
incomplete; could you tell us where you stand? We may be asked about this at the
Commission meeting tomorrow. Thanks. Steve
DR 5, Item 43 WE WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM-WE TRIED, BUT
DONT HAVE COPIES OF EVERYTHING GIVEN TO THE JOINT INQUIRY— IF WE RECEIVE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP US LOCATE THE DOCUMENT WE'LL BE
HAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT AT THIS POINT WE DONT BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.
DR 5, Item 45WE WERE NOT SUCCESSFUL IN RECOVERING THIS ITEM-WE TRIED, BUT
DONT HAVE COPIES OF EVERYTHING GIVEN TO THE JOINT INQUIRY— IF WE RECEIVE
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT MIGHT HELP US LOCATE THE DOCUMENT WE'LL BE
HAPPY TO TRY AGAIN, BUT AT THIS POINT WE DONT BELIEVE WE'LL RECOVER THIS.
, Item 34PUT ON HOLD AT BOTH OF OUR STATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF AND WE
o - W E R E TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.
L- /*>*5 ~DR 8, Item 37PUT ON HOLD AT BOTH OF OUR STATUS MEETINGS BY THE STAFF AND WE
WERE TOLD NOT TO PRODUCE.

***DESPITE THE FACT THAT 37 WAS PUT ON HOLD WE'VE PRODUCED A

BUNCH OF FININTEL UNDER THIS ITEM ANYWAY.

DR 19, Item 6WE COULD NOT LOCATE THIS ITEM, NSA DIDNT HAVE ANY LUCK FINDING
IJ EITHER . . .
DR 19, Item 1 1 - this is of particular interest to C6mmissionersWE-pRODUCED~A~FINAL ON '
' WE SPOKE TO DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE CAME OUT FOR A STATUS
__ _
bR-19ritemT3WE'TALKED WITH DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS" ITEM DURING A STATUS
MEETING HERE. HE TOLD US HE'D GET BACK TO US IF WE NEEDED TO DO SOMETHING
:THER
L. DR 19, Item 14ACCORDING TO ALL INFORMATION WE HAVE THERE IS NO WRITTEN
C REPORT, DCI/COS TALKED WITH MR. KERR & WITH MR. PA VITT- NEITHER REMEMBER A

2/9/2004
 Page 2 of2

WRITTEN PRODUCT HAVING BEEN DONE-NO SEARCHES HAVE YIELDED SUCH A

PRODUCT.
rr

CDF
DR 19, Item 160UR UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS ITEM IS THE SAME THING AS ITEM
cn
11, WE PRODUCED A FINAL OF THIS ALREADY.

J
R 19, Item 19WE SPOKE WITH DAN MARCUS ABOUT THIS ITEM WHEN HE WAS HERE
OR A STATUS MEETING—CMS NEEDED MORE INFORMATION RE: WHAT TEAM 2 WAS
DOKING FOR HERE--WHAT TYPES OF PRIORITIES OR IS THIS JUST ANOTHER WAY OF
SKING AGAIN FOR THE PRIORITIES FRAMEWORK? I SENT SEVERAL NOTES TO KEVIN
SKING FOR FURTHER INFORMATION DATED: 23 NOVEMBER 2003 AND 17 DECEMBER
003 AND NEVER HEARD ANYTHING FURTHER.

2/9/2004
TTiomas H Kean
CHAIR FAX COVER SHEET
Lee H. Hamilton
VICE CHAIR Tg/n closed by StatuTeSHCral Counsel, CIA
i i • .:.'..:'
Richard Ben-Veniste
Fax No.: 9/11 Closed by Statute
Max Qeland

Fred F. Fielding From: Steven M. Dunne .:'>j

Deputy General Counsel
Jamie S. Gorelkk
(202)331-4067 l ! :'
Slade Gorton fax (202) 296^5545 ; '
John Lehman
Date: December 23,2003
Timothy J. Roemer

James R Thompson
Pages, including cover sheet: 3
9/11 Closed by Statute
|- As discussed at the meeting earlier today, here is
Philip D. Zelikow
KXECUT1VE DIRECTOR a list of outstanding document requests. We look forward to
working with you to get all of these requests fulfilled as soon as
possible. Please call Dan Marcus or. me with any questions. Thanks.
Steve
G*A«*A ' V ''''• - • • ' '

TEL (202) 331-4060

FAX (202) 296-5545
www.9-1 lcommission.gov
 .. t

OUTSTANDING DCI DOCUMENT REQUESTS

December
'• •• ' 23,2003
'

Document Request No'. 8 (issued July 3,-2003) •.' ;;.

€>. a**Item 3 - briefing packages for DCI dndDDCI for NSC meetings
*r ^*Item 4 - presentations on UBL, af Qa'ida given by DCI to POTUS or VPOTUSl
**Item 14c- DCI's intelligence priprities frarnework
**Item 19 - DCI's declaration of war; on terrorism
x Q**Item 33 - CTC briefings for DCI on UBL, al Qa'ida, etc.
/uTli'T ' i,-*0' '•'•' •'• ; •—~~—' "
f-W'VJr ' ' ' ' '-
Document Request No. 11 (issued August; 7, 2003)
Item 17 - FAA requests for intelligence on(aviation security issues

Document Request No. 13 (issued September 3, 2003)

- Item 2 - intelligence reports used to" produce nerfain terrorist financing reports
9/11 Closed by Statute

'ocument Request No. 16 (issued October 8, 2003)

1 - 4pcuments or presentations given to certain NSC officials on UBL, al Q.

Document Request No. 17 (October 22,2i

Item 3 - reports re terrorists as refugees or asylees
Item 21 - reports re entry of terrorists through specified borders
**Item 22 - documents regarding a specific border control project
;.' •<' • 'i ^~
Document Request No. 18 (issued November 6, 2003) /
**Item 1 - MFRs and other documents summarizing NSC meetings
A Items 2-6 - documents on Sudanese issues *
- DCLbriefing materials on theT~

Documentltecjuest lSfo/19 (November 24, 2003)

/^~ Item 1 - submission to Joint Inquiry re studies of 1C reform
N. **Item 4 - analysis of al Qa'ida comsec capability — ^f^
ft >l) Item 5 - reports on National Intelligence Warning System
Item 6 - NSA DDO report on management of 1C
^ Item 7 - report on DCI's collection authorities
- **Item 8 - memo recommending creation of the CTC — ^
j\m 9 - collection or analysis strategies dii UBL, al Qa'ida, etc.
' ' Item 10 - communications from the DCI toD/NSA on UBL and al Qa'ida
**Itenfll~draftNIEon^al Qa'ida;: '"''" " '' * ^
memo on NfO for Terrorism and warni
ontheTTIC ^^^Jy^^J^^
Items Wl^?- reports on CIA's couriterterronsm programs
**Item 16V documentsXpflecting die prioritization of terrorist threats
9/11 Closed by Statute

9/11 Closed by Statute

 Document Request No. 19 (November 24>1003) --continued
/ 2-/\l ft Item 17 - examples of "red cell" products
- \vu--^Jtern 18- Annual Strategic Intelligence Reviews on Counterte.rrqrism
-<& *tem 19 - documents articulating intelligence priorities

Document Request No. 22 (issued December 8, 2003)

**Items 1-6 - documents relating to passports and passport analysis
Items 7-16 - documents relating to passports and passport analyst
£_ **Item 17 - annual planning documents

Document Request No. 23 (issued December 9, 2003)

**Item 13 - intelligence analysis on certain NGOs

Document Request No. 24 (issued December 15, 2003)

**Items 1-3 - documents regarding certain terrorist communications^
-—""i

Document Request No. 25 (issued December 19, 2003

**Item 1 - copy of Mike S. binder of documents

(** indicates highest priority items)