MBB 4123 - Hybrid Vehicles (Group Project) Semester Sept 2013 General instructions: 1.

This is a group project and overall marks will be based on the project output as well as shared individual contribution in the project. 2. The project report should cover the ollowing: a. !ecuti"e #u$$ary% b. Project &bjecti"es% c. Bac'(rou)d *)+or$atio)% d. ,as's -istributio) (clearly de+i)e roles o+ each tea$ $e$ber)% e. )(i)eeri)( .)alysis% +. -ri"etrai) si$ulatio) a)d (. /o)clusio). 0our report should )ot be $ore tha) 11 pa(es a)d $i)i$u$ o+ 12 pa(es ( !cludi)( /o"er% ,able o+ /o)te)t% .ppe)di!% etc). 3. The project report grading breakdown: a. !"ecutive Summar# $1 ull page% 1&' b. (bjectives and )ackground *n ormation 2&' c. Task +istribution &' d. !ngineering ,nal#sis -&' e. .onclusion 10' +. ,otal 1223 -. /our project is due on the 24th o+ -ece$ber 2212. (e)d o+ lecture 5ee').

Project 6o 1 7 ,ech)ical a)d /o$$ercial 8easibility o+ V /o)"ersio) o+ a Passe)(er /ar Proble$ #tate$e)t9 /our team had been asked to evaluate the technical and commercial easibilit# o an electric vehicle conversion or a used vehicle market. The target donor vehicle is 0roton 1aja2 which has been in production in #ear 2000. The inal weight o the vehicle must not e"ceed 1&00 kg. -eli"erables9 1. 3ehicle power and wheel tor4ue re4uirement calculations based on the ollowing per ormance targets: a. Target top speed o 120 km5h2 b. !nerg# storage capacit# or minimum !3 range o 6& km per charge at constant speed o 70 km5h2 c. ,cceleration rom 0 to 100 km5h in less than 12 seconds2 d. ,ble to climb 10' gradient at 80 km5h2 e. 0ower and wheel tor4ue re4uirement at speeds o 30 km5h2 70 km5h2 80 km5h and 120 km5h. 2. 0lot a graph o power and wheel tor4ue re4uirements o the vehicle as it ollows the 9rban +#namometer +riving Schedule $9++S% drive c#cle and :ighwa# ;uel !conom# Test $:;!T% drive c#cle. 3. .ompare di erent t#pes o easible s#stems $at least 3 s#stems with possibl# di erent drivetrain la# out and components% and create a decision matri" based on the ollowing selection criterias: i. <owest cost $weight = 10%2 ii. )est 0ower5>ass ?atio $weight = @%2 iii. <owest mass $weight = 7%2 iv. <ess S#stem .omple"it# $weight = @%2 v. )est +#namic 0er ormance $weight = 8%. Austi # #ou inal selection. -. Simulate the selected vehicle using a h#brid vehicle drivetrain model and anal#Be the per ormance o each vehicle subs#stems. ?un a simulation with t5o types o+ o)-board (e)erator:electric $otor and anal#Be the results. .ompare the per ormances o the two vehicles and recommend potential modi ications to improve energ# use igures and per ormance.

Project 6o 2 7 ;)i"ersity /a$pus V:#H V ,ra)sportatio) syste$ Proble$ #tate$e)t9 /our team had been asked to propose technical speci ications or a green transportation s#stem or 9niversiti Teknologi 0!T?(C,S. The designed vehicle should be able to carr# at least 2- passengers and a driver and has a top speed o 70 km5h. /ou are e!pected to a)aly<e a)d proposed the best hybrid electric "ehicle dri"etrai) co)+i(uratio)s i) your project. -eli"erables9 1. 3ehicle power and wheel tor4ue re4uirement calculations based on the ollowing per ormance targets: a. Target top speed o 70 km5h2 b. !nerg# storage capacit# or minimum !3 range o 70 km per charge at constant speed o 30 km5h2 c. ,cceleration rom 0 to 70 km5h in less than 10 seconds2 d. ,ble to climb 10' gradient at 30 km5h2 e. 0ower and wheel tor4ue re4uirement at speeds o 1& km5h2 30 km5h2 -0 km5h and 70 km5h. 2. 0lot a graph o power and wheel tor4ue re4uirements o the vehicle as it ollows the >anhattan drive c#cle. 3. .ompare di erent t#pes o easible s#stems $at least 3 s#stems with possibl# di erent drivetrain la# out and components% and create a decision matri" based on the ollowing selection criterias: i. <owest cost $weight = 10%2 ii. )est 0ower5>ass ?atio $weight = @%2 iii. <owest mass $weight = 7%2 iv. <ess S#stem .omple"it# $weight = @%2 v. )est +#namic 0er ormance $weight = 8%. Austi # #ou inal selection. -. Simulate the selected "ehicle using a h#brid vehicle drivetrain model and anal#Be the per ormance o each vehicle subs#stems. ?un a simulation with t5o types o+ o)-board (e)erator:electric $otor and anal#Be the results. .ompare the per ormances o the two vehicles and recommend potential modi ications to improve energ# use igures and per ormance.

Project 6o 3 7 #H == co Maratho) prototype $odel Proble$ #tate$e)t9 /our team had been asked to propose the best drivetrain con iguration or 9T0 Shell !co >arathon vehicle. *n #our anal#sis2 please use the vehicle properties shown in the table P3. /our main tasks are to anal#Be and determine the best s#stem to achieve the lowest uel consumption rate given the limitations and regulations o the competition. ,able P3 Co 1 2 3 & 7 6 -eli"erables9 1. 3ehicle power and wheel tor4ue re4uirement calculations based on the ollowing per ormance targets: a. Target top speed o &0 km5h2 b. ,cceleration rom 0 to &0 km5h in less than 10 seconds2 d. ,ble to climb &' gradient at 30 km5h2 e. 0ower and wheel tor4ue re4uirement at speeds o 10 km5h2 20 km5h2 30 km5h 2 -0 km5h and &0 km5h. 2. 0lot a graph o power and wheel tor4ue re4uirements o the vehicle as it ollows a modi ied :ighwa# ;uel !conom# Test $:;!T% drive c#cle. To modi # this c#cle2 reduce the target vehicle speed in the drive c#cle b# a actor o 2. 3. .ompare di erent t#pes o easible s#stems $at least 3 s#stems with possibl# di erent drivetrain la# out and components% and create a decision matri" based on the ollowing selection criterias: i. <owest cost $weight = 7%2 ii. )est 0ower5>ass ?atio $weight = 8%2 iii. <owest mass $weight = 10%2 iv. <ess S#stem .omple"it# $weight = 6%2 v. )est +#namic 0er ormance $weight = 8%. Austi # #ou inal selection. -. Simulate the selected vehicle using a h#brid vehicle drivetrain model and anal#Be the per ormance o each vehicle subs#stems. ?un a simulation with t5o types o+ o)-board (e)erator:electric $otor and anal#Be the results. .ompare the per ormances o the two vehicles and recommend potential modi ications to improve energ# use igures and per ormance. +escription >ass2 M 1eight distribution2 F:R rontal area2 Af aerod#namic drag coe icient2 CD rolling resistance2 fr e ective wheel radius2 reff i"ed single gear ratio2 Ntf 3alue 1&0 kg &&:-& 0.& m2 0.3 0.01& 0.13 m -