Complaint Against Judges Waltz and Salter MISCONDUCT

1. Misconduct involving evidence

Both prohibited 730 evaluator from doing investigation as per FC 3118 Both prohibited 730 evaluator from having access to forensic tapes, interviews, police reports, CPS, records, etc. Both did not allow mother to cross examine psychologists, therapists, social workers and others Waltz did not allow Ruby to file an ex parte for discovery Waltz ended trial before mothers witnesses could testify, including crucial testimony from a Lieutenant After 730 expert testified the sexual abuse likely occurred, Waltz himself qualified a CPS worker as an expert and although this expert had never spoken with the child, took his recommendation against protecting Lexi over the 730 expert. (Mother has evidence that this social worker perjured himself, and is/was under criminal investigation. He had to resign from a senior position at CPS because of this false testimony which endangered a child). Waltz denied receipt of 29 page police report detailing how the supervised visitation agency he appointed to monitor mothers visits was guilty of not reporting abuse despite verification by police it had been sent to him. Both prohibited the receipt of transcripts for many hearings, all recent ones, even when Ruby needed them to appeal Both disregarded evidence that the abuse occurred, including police investigation and recommendation to D.A. to prosecute, medical, psychiatric, psychological and videotaped testimony by the child Both disregarded evidence that the father was unfit and possibly had a criminal background. He is not being allowed back into the U.S. because of this. Prohibited access to transcripts Waltz inappropriately invoked privilege for childs therapist and used that to prohibit therapist from testifying about the abuse 2. Misconduct involving privacy laws to inhibit public scrutiny

Both closed courtrooms without any explanation Salter had deputies at door and asked for IDs at the courtroom door to intimidate courtwatchers Waltz sealed the record improperly (when mother asked Salter to unseal, he said he was not able to unseal what Waltz had sealed). Salter gagged mother after the media took an interest; mother not able to talk to family, friends or media; later he said it was a clerical error, however there is evidence it was not. Salter threatened mother with incarceration if she spoke with her parents about the abuse

3. Misconduct involving punishment and threats to silence

Waltz punished mother with loss of custody after she reported the sexual abuse, despite no findings against mother. Later it was said that the mother had coached/alienated the child, despite no evidence of this and despite evidence from the 730 that he believed Lexi was NOT coached. The 730 said that he did not know what kind of experiment was being conducted in the court, but the child was in danger (completely ignored by the judges). Mother restricted to supervised visitation by both judges Restraining Order issued by Salter against mother spontaneously at a hearing in which the father was ordered to show up but did not. There was no hearing and no opportunity to refute the order. The order said it was for sending an email to the father which asked the father to consider negotiating custody OUTSIDE the court system. This order provided justification for changing visitation from unsupervised two days a week to no contact. Mother has not seen her child since (approximately one month ago) Mother was threatened she had to stop saying the abuse had occurred or she would not see her child (This threat has been underlying everything with both judges since Lexi was taken away from her mother), hence the above mentioned 3. Retaliation section 4. Misconduct involving collusion Judge Salter colluded with Waltz in sealing the record. When mother asked Salter to unseal the record, he stated that he could not unseal that Waltz had sealed. There is collusion between Judge Waltz and the CPS worker that he appointed to be a 730 to help in the cover up because the REAL 730 stated that he believed LD had been sexually assaulted and should be protected.

BIAS
1. Alienation and other biased findings against protecting child

No finding of unfitness before taking custody away from mother. Isolation of the abused child is a main tactic to silence the child Although father was ordered to come to the court three times, he never showed up and the judge did not punish him in any way. Custody remained with him, despite the fact that he has been outside the country for many months with no plans to return. 2. Appointees

Both minors counsels who were appointed by the judge are known to work closely with the court and cover up abuse, especially Harold LaFlamme

Supervised visitation agency appointed by both? judges colluded with him in covering up evidence of abuse. They are being criminally investigated. CPS worker appointed by judge to give expert opinion colluded in the cover up (perjury even) Therapist appointed by Judge ? was taken off case after testifying to protect child and a new one has been appointed who is known to cover up abuse 3. Biased Remarks

Salter called mother a liar in open court before she even testified indicating he knew what he was going to decide before the trial ended Waltz repeatedly made respectful and supportive remarks to the father like May peace be with you Waltz repeatedly denigrated the mother