Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Bridging Multiracial Feminist Theory and Quantitative Sociological Gender Research Author(s): Catherine E. Harnois Reviewed work(s): Source: Gender and Society, Vol. 19, No. 6 (Dec., 2005), pp. 809-828 Published by: Sage Publications, Inc. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27640852 . Accessed: 06/03/2013 06:15
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Sage Publications, Inc. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Gender and Society.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
examines the limitations of the sociological research on feminist identities and ideologies that ignores the intersection the of race and gender. Drawing from multiracial feminist theorizing, as feminist a biased indicator of the salience of feminism author asks, Is self-identification in African American women 's lives? Do women 's racial statuses mediate the relationship between particular life events and experiences and the extent to which they embrace feminism ? and To what extent are racial dif This article to be ? To answer these ques important when considering what women understand feminism ferences to analyze data from tions, the author conducted multiple group analyses of structural equation models are consistent with multiracial feminist the 1996 General Social Survey. Her findings theories and sug are no to feminist research so that women's differences gest a need to rethink traditional approaches longer marginalized.
Keywords:
multiracial
feminism;
feminist
identity;
intersectionality
and Miller
feminist
used quantitative
theorists had been
analyses
of
for
creates patterns
' simply by adding the effects of race to those of gender" (1983,46). While has been much ing widely accepted and corroborated by qualitative
research, quantitative sociological research has failed to incorporate this
ficiently.
Quantitative
sociological
studies of feminist
identities
and ideologies
AUTHOR'S NOTE: An earlier version of this article was presented at the annual meeting of the Ameri can Sociological in San Francisco, in August 2004. The author would like to Association, California, thank Judith Blau, Andrew Perrin, Barbara Risman, Tanya Golash-Boza, and the anonymous at Gender & Society for their extremely helpful comments regarding this article. REPRINT Catherine Harnois, Department REQUESTS: IL 60607-7140; 1007 W. Harrison e-mail: St., Chicago, reviewers
GENDER & SOCIETY, Vol. 19No. 6, December 2005 809-828 DOI: 10.1177/0891243205280026 ? 2005 Sociologists forWomen in Society 809
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
810
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
often
use methods
that
assume Leaving
women's aside
race those
has studies
little
to do with on one
their racial
relationship
to feminism.
solely one
trol variables (e.g., Johnston Conover 1988; Kane and Schippers 1996; Peltola, 1996; Schnittker, Freese, and Powell 2003). Milkie, and Presser 2004; Rhodebeck In so doing, these studies assume that (1) the effect (or lack thereof) of any particu
lar characteristic different be measured racial A groups. close examination of a few recent studies reveals the importance of this meth racial by on women's or ethnic a groups relationship and set of with feminism is the same with do not for women feminism vary of can across (2) a woman's indicators that relationship themselves
particular
odological assumption. Schnittker, Freese, and Powell (2003), Peltola, Milkie, and Presser (2004), and Rhodebeck (1996), for example, investigate how sociodemo
graphic only with ables characteristics as a dummy any other affect variable, feminist and in none identities. of these Each studies of these is race studies allowed among includes race to interact the vari
of different
Schnittker, Freese, and Powell (2003, 617) conclude affect women's likelihood of identifying as feminist.
the on racial feminist cancel dummy variable, the authors or out." What suggest that influ do self-identification each other that various these and in different studies
might
In this case,
income and
that generational
involvement
differences,
labor
in the paid
force might
and
shape women's
feminist
on their race
also make the
approaches
assumption that the meaning of feminist identity and feminism is identical for women of different racial and ethnic groups. Rhodebeck's (1996) study of feminist
identity women movement to assumes that two variables, "how close for example, and opinion, of the women's liberation thermometer and "a feeling rating they feel" are able to measure and or feminists," well Latina, Black, white, equally
Asian American women's feminist identities. Johnston Conover's (1988) study of feminist identity and political beliefs finds that "feminists are distinctive in their
fundamental women might and values" affect but these makes values. no mention of how racial differences among
the American
and name ethnic a few),
feminist
dif it seems
groups
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
811
reasonable (including
to white
suggest
that
racial
differences
may
women's)
enduring
relations
different
ways;... same way
tend to experience
has same the same kind conclusions
the world
of experi that about
article,
I demonstrate
the
importance
of centralizing research
when
quantitative feminism
relationship,
quantitative feminist differences. conjunction employed multiracial intersectional nism in women's with allow
remains Quantitative
in
multiracial women's
differences and
feminist framework
lives
propose of femi
an
feminism.
Although the analysis here speaks most directly to sociological analyses of femi nism, the implications of this research highlight the importance of multiracial
feminism for feminist scholarship and practice more generally.
BACKGROUND
Baca Zinn and Thorton Dill ( 1996) have described multiracial feminist theory as a feminist perspective that first and foremost goes beyond an additive model of oppression by theorizing the intersectionality of different systems of oppression and by refusing the temptation to privilege one dimension of oppression or identity over others. Although far from a unified line of inquiry, multiracial feminist theory is held together by theorists' emphasis on the relational aspect of women's differ
a social Brown and the "treatment of race as a basic division, 1997) (Barkley a focus a and fundamental force in of power, of political hence struggle, and men's lives" and Thorton Dill women's 1996, 324). Taken (Baca Zinn shaping as a whole, much feminist offers three that multiracial theory hypotheses challenge ences structure of the existing quantitative and and the research on women's feminist identities and ideologies.
First, multiracial
cation as feminist racial of different that
feminist
lives differs
self-identifi
for women suggest to differ feminism and ethnic to
that the particular factors for women of different racial theorizes activist groups that what commitments as well. In what women involved follows,
multiracial the
understand
to be differ
in feminism) I discuss
the dominant
approaches
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
812
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
understanding
racial feminist
feminist
theories
Measuring
the Salience
of Feminism
inWomen's
Lives
Quantitative
feminism feminist (e.g.,
scholarship on feminism
lives Milkie, in one and of Peltola, Presser
typically operationalizes
respondents' Schnittker, 2004; Freese,
the salience of
as Powell and
in women's
two ways:
self-identification
2003) and respondents' feminist attitudes or beliefs (e.g., Dugger 1988; Ransford and Miller 1983). From the perspective of multiracial feminist theory, however,
both approaches are potentially problematic.
With regard to the first approach, self-identification, multiracial feminist theo rists (e.g., hooks 1984; Jackson 1998; Walker 1983) have suggested that women's
racial status may affect the relationship between women's self-identification as
feminist and their feminist ideology. The history of Black women's marginalization
from Black sider able about the women's women to be indicator gender movement, to self-identify feminist beliefs. of how issues cause some for example, may as feminist, even if they have what as feminist self-identification Thus, Black women are. Many as "womanist" Black hesitance many would among con
identify
or "humanist"
a part of Black is so much women's that because lives, oppression suggested a distinct moment in which become because seldom have conscious they they a to adopt label to take a stand their oppression, they are less compelled political that oppression. or attitudinal variables to measure the salience of feminism in
against Using
ideological
women's lives is also problematic. As Collins ([1990] 2000), Smith (1983), and hooks (1984) have repeatedly argued, feminism may mean something different to particular racial and ethnic groups of women. Collins ([1990] 2000, 16, 238) has
that in contrast argued sion to the exclusion includes tion a wide range to white of other feminism, which tends to focus of oppression, systems of behavior "actions including education, and public expand see African taken on oppres gender American feminism discrimina
to eliminate
in housing, and
and political rep system. Whereas or upper-class, as sepa issues feminist in addition
women
heterosexual, may
of
multiracial work,
to antisexism work
In sum, approaches spective multiracial
1983).
quantitative From the per between lives women. will We
to measuring of multiracial
for traditional challenges in women's lives. feminism that feminism and ethnic
and
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
813
from
that
be
for the
feminism
in women's
might
women ethnic
might minority
gender something
ideologies, different.
What
Leads
Women
studies
generally education,
characteristics characteristics)
status,
women's
feminism.
argued
earlier,
however,
implicit assumption
inmost empirical
studies of women's
takes however,
paths to feminism
is generally challenged has
is that
the this
race or ethnicity, the path one of one's regardless same. Much feminist of multiracial theorizing,
to feminism
assumption. Multiracial feminist research (e.g., Collins [1990] 2000; hooks 1984; Jones 1984; Porter Gump 1980; Poster 1995; Ridley Maison 1983; Roth 2004; Segura 1994) has found that women of different racial and ethnic groups tend to
have tion that among different qualitatively the three. Given life experiences experiences these with work, family, differences, may affect multiracial women's and religion, theories feminist in different the rela suggest ways
particular
feminism
1981; 1981; hooks 1984; Moraga and Anzaldua (Collins [1990] 2000; Davis Maison 1983). Ridley Smith and Smith (1981, 114) have further argued that one of the differences
between women For Black white tend women's to have and gender politics a specific in which moment of color, and other women savvyness, I don't that they however, know what of Black realize women is that white exists. lifelong that oppression is a "oppression to use,
women
thing":
"There
is a political
word
canniness?
some difference in attitude I think between Black and white feminists. I think what it is, is like the surprise factor. There is virtually no Black person in this country who
is surprised women white manner." haps exposed lives. (higher feminist While about oppression." are more likely women, many of, She to find sexist Black both feminism status, goes their on to say that in contrast to Black in "an out of for color women, intellectual them," have per been feminist consciousness is often and and may women other "pointed women
For white
whereas conscious
white
be
education, theorists
involvement
their throughout oppression to particular life events related multiracial in the paid labor force), sexist feminism may not develop
of color,
to particular multiracial
on difference the challenges emphasis to understanding identities and ideolo feminist on feminism to for quantitative research the need feminist theories. It begins with the central
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
814
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
problem see
of how
to measure
the salience
of
feminism
in women's
lives?the
extent
to which women
they themselves of what question
see feminism
as factors a part encourage
studies typically associate higher incomes and higher levels of education with fem inist identity and less traditional gender ideology, I investigate how this might
we when change we make fewer racial tionship and ethnic between consider assumptions groups. the a broader about understanding the similarities of women's between feminism women I then of and when different
issues: gender
ideology
It is commonly assumed in feminist women less traditional have gender ideologies and Gender role lesbian issues.2 ideology proxy for feminist beliefs and sexism identification, and understand
that feminist and practice scholarship of gay and are generally supportive as a used is, for example, frequently and numerous as feminist inherently scholars interconnected and
organizations
heterosexism
(e.g., Collins
how
2004; Lorde
among
1984; Rich
these three
1980; Rubin
issues varies
the relationship
groups;
scholarship.
I then discuss
of these findings
for feminist
RESEARCH DESIGN
To examine
which
these hypotheses,
Social Survey,
of noninstitutionalized, is a nationally survey representative on a biennial This in conducted adults the basis. United States, ing to it is the well suited because few this very among ularly project ask whether respondents on focuses specifically they gender self-identify and women's as feminist issues.3 and In
it includes 1996,
the General
Survey was administered to 1,619 women, 270 of whom self-identified as Black and 1,272 of whom identified as white. The gender module was administered to a subset of 821 women, of whom 139 self-identified as Black and 645 identified as white. Women who identified as neither white nor Black were excluded from my
While there analysis. women inism among from other racial is tremendous of other racial need and for quantitative ethnic groups, in the General research the small Social fem concerning of women number made this an
groups
represented
Survey
impossibility
I use lives. four These
respondent believes
affect
as feminist
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
815
(two categories). consistent with more using than one one's set of Rather,
In each feminism.
case, As
indicate
more relatively to capture is designed it deliberately refrains from measure everyday with relationship of how women lives.
a response
as a measure a more
of women's
feminism. relate
to feminism?the
it is designed salience
inclusive in women's
feminism
When
feminism,
investigating
I use several
to embrace
1996 General
Social Survey), including educational attainment (dummy variables for completed high school, some college, and more than college, where no high school diploma is
status for variables marital income, category), family (dummy logged or separated, or widowed and divorced where married is the refer ence and religiosity where variable, (measured by an eight-category category), more at religious I also values indicate attendance services). frequent higher include the respondent has children variables and dichotomous whether indicating the reference never married her current workforce status.
In the third section of the analysis, I investigate the extent to which feminism itself differs for white and Black women. I test how the salience of feminism in
women's lesbian for gay and support a latent variable respondents' gender ideology by creating women are hurt three observed with variables: whether by the traditional family "women take care of running their homes whether should and leave (dichotomous), lives affects respondents' gender ideology and issues. Imeasure running believe the country that women up to men" (dichotomous), likely task to take (four care and the extent due each to which to their of these are more to this represent respondents "bio being variables, gender using a their
of children For
better-suited" logically lower values numerical attitudes. latent believe I measure variable sexual with relations
what
traditional issues by
between
two
adults
of
the same
should be allowed in the public ries), whether books favoring homosexuality should be allowed to library (dichotomous), whether an "admitted homosexual"
make ations, a speech in the community the government should her higher or his sexual (dichotomous), have the right and whether to ask (four a person under "detailed For for important situ questions" each observed and lesbian
orientation represent
categories). support
numerical
values
greater
gay
as many
respondents
in the analysis
as possible,
and
to avoid
the bias
caused by listwise deletion, I impute values for missing data using the multiple imputation procedure in SAS.4 To increase the reliability of my findings, I imputed
eight sets.5 Sch?fer's each separate data sets the NORM and conducted I combined (2000) parameter estimates In the following from this analyses each of on each these data of these sets data using from
model The
parameters
variances
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
816
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
by
combining
variance
(equal
to
the
average variance
of
the
com to the
follows, indicated.
RESULTS
Measuring The sented the Salience measurement in Figure of of Feminism tool 1, where for the the inWomen's salience of Lives feminism in women's lives lives is repre vari
salience
of feminism
in women's
is a latent
as described
of the other
the women's
from
analyses
on each
the model
(RMSEA) is low (0.049), all Because many multiracial 1984; Moraga and Anzaldua among these indicators might
a
suggesting a good overall model fit. feminist theorists (e.g., Collins [1990] 2000; hooks 1981; Smith 1983) have argued that the relationship differ for women of different racial groups, I conduct
to test for these differences. group group pro analysis Multiple analysis multiple a sophisticated to understanding vides differences cross-group by allow approach on individual to progressively free cross-group constraints ing researchers equality more we fit the of and less constrained indices models, parameters. By comparing can determine across to vary which be allowed model should groups parameters and which The Table salience can results 1. Model of remain from 2 equal. this analysis are
shown and
in the variance
second of
and the
third latent
of the but
constrains in women's
feminism
to be equal
for Black
and white
allows the factor loadings of the observed variables to differ. Model 3 builds on model 2 by allowing the factor loadings of the observed variables, as well as the
mean and variance of the latent variable, to differ across rights groups. In all three models, to be 1 and is the factor used for the importance of women's loading to index variables. the other indicator is constrained
The fit indices at the bottom of Table 1 suggest that each measure of the salience of feminism inwomen's lives fits well with the data; those models thatmake fewer
constraints across RMSEA racial across groups. for groups The each fit significantly Comparative are the models better Fit strong, than Index, but those that assume average of Tucker-Lewis each of these Index, indices equality and sug
indices
3 represents
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
817
Women's Improved
has
Figure
1 :
The
Salience
of Feminism
inWomen's
Lives
fact dom By we
that
the
value 3.8
of
the average
chi-square
divided
by
the degrees
of
free
occurs itself,
factor
analysis
already
suggests
some
interesting
differences
in
1with model
to differ
3,
variables
white differences self-identifi women, emerge. groups, Among important as feminist, movement the women's benefited has you feeling personally, are all to women's to the salience attention issues related paying strongly in women's of feminism lives; while these women's variables lives, are they also are significant significantly in Black predictors weaker
of of
pre
dictors for Black women. The factor loading for feminist self-identification
than twice as are large for white women indicators The supports is more ences statistically factor different compared across groups. the with Black women, and
ismore
all three
confirmatory multiracial
feminism's
salience
of
feminism
in women's with
lives
previous 3 lend
to multiracial
theory's
ment concerning
feminist middle-class identify movement. white as feminist
from the
an upper to self
to which
the women's
movement
has benefited
them personally
(Collins
1984). It is
that Black of the
to note, that this marginalization however, important women are less feminist women. than white When salience age, more of feminism salient in women's in Black women's lives in model lives 3, we
aver
compared
What
Leads 2
Table contributing
results of
feminism
with
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
(0.177) (0.275)
(0.124) (0.100) (0.104) (0.200) Model 3 (white) 0.828*** (white) 0.909*** (white) 1.029*** (Black) 0.875*** (Black) 0.430* (Black) 0.707* (white) 0.404 (Black) (Black) 0a (white) 1a 0.534 0.990 1.498 0.291** 0.021 0.988
Model 2
* (white) * (Black) (white) 0.898*** (white) 0.817*** (Black) (Black) 0.532* 0.921* 1.026 1.009 1a 0.418
0.942
(0.120) (0.106) Model 1 0.869*** TABLE Loadings, Factor 1: Salience Confirmatory Feminism, of General 1996 (N= Analysis: Factor Social Survey 1,542) 1a 0.824*** (0.093) (0.061) Each b. data imputed its Fit produced set Comparative Index, Tucker-Lewis and own which squared of root error approximation, then mean were
1.014*** 0.416*** 0a
NOTE: Numbers in parentheses are combined standard errors. Parameter estimates and standard errors were combined using NORM.
.05. .01. **significant .001. at *significant ***significant Root mean squared approximation13 of error Women's helped has movement you Importance of rights women's feminist as Self-identify Variance of "closeness to feminism" Mean of "closeness to feminism" Pays issues to attention women's Fit lndexb Comparative lndexb Tucker-Lewis yfldf Average df
a. averaged. Constrained.
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
819
from the
portion of are
of
this
feminism allowed
analysis, in women's
and
variance
of loadings
the
latent of the
Black of
In addition,
have
analysis on Black
and white
not
the confirmatory factor the average analysis, with Across fit data sets, the average the data. the good imputed Compara Index were and 0.943 and 0.923, and Index and Tucker-Lewis respectively,
to the predictor variables as strong as the fit quite fit indices for this model
is 0.033,
all of which
from
suggest
for white
for Black
higher
of
force,
fam
ily income) are not statistically significant predictors of the salience of feminism in white women's lives, other factors being held equal. The frequency with which the
respondent on white women, nism. attends women's white women religious feminism, who have services and is shown to have with compared never married a significant negative or widowed married effect white
are more to embrace femi likely is positively the salience associated with of women more who white have than spent
in postsecondary the most. education feminism years embracing Having some attended is also associated with increased feminism college significantly test. None white this is true only if we use a one-tailed of women, among although four the predictors included tors of the salience of in the model, feminism that were those including significant predic are shown to predict women's in white the lives,
salience of feminism in the lives of Black women, although this may in part be due to the relatively small number of Black women included in this analysis (270 Black
women, as compared with 1,272 white women).
What
Does In addition
It Mean
ent paths
feminism
this
to and
the salience of feminism relationship two issues that are frequently included in discussions of a 2 issues. shows of the Figure representation pictorial salience lesbian of feminism as in women's lives, assumed is frequently embrace feminism and are often gender ideology, in much feminist
multiple between
issues, who
Women der
ideologies
assumed
and practice. thought to have less traditional gen of gay and lesbian
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
820
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
TABLE
2:
Combined Selected
Estimates Independent
inWomen's Survey
Lives (N=
on 1,542)
Black
Women
(0.086)
(0.253)
0.139
to < high school)
(0.086) (0.085)
(0.077) (0.139) (0.050) -0.049*** (0.012) (0.094) (0.090) (0.082)
0.008 0.051
-0.308 0.133 -0.031 -0.038 0.194 -0.034 0.172 0.261
(0.242) (0.213)
(0.204) (0.400) (0.118) (0.034) (0.172) (0.222) (0.219) (0.194)
High school
0.060
0.1491" 0.381* -0.096 -0.060 -0.093 to married/widowed) 0.100 0.1711"
(compared
(0.095)
of women's 1a 1a rights as feminist 0.941*** Self-identify Women's movement has helped you to women's issues Pays attention Residual variance Fit of closeness to feminism
Fit indices'3 Comparative Tucker-Lewis Root mean Index = 0.943 Index = 0.923 error of approximation = 0.031
squared
in parentheses are standard NOTE: Numbers errors. Parameter estimates and standard errors were combined using NORM. a. Constrained. b. Each its own fit indices, which were then averaged. imputed data set produced at .05 (two-tailed). at .001 (two-tailed). Significant at .05 (one-tailed). *significant ***significant
issues.
While
these feminist
three
issues
may
indeed
for a number of women, together the assumption that these three con is one potentially in white rooted groups fit that women, gender embracing ideologies feminism and may mean sexual
than
rejecting of
supporting
3 presents
and support ideology of the factor loadings and variances of the for loadings dents believe women should
and three
on gender the multiple of feminism group analysis In this model, lesbian I have allowed issues. each latent variables, along with the means, women.11 to which sex intercepts, Factor
latent
variables,
to differ
for Black
of the women's importance sexual relations between take care of running their
leave
the country
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
821
Wrong
Allow Homosexual to Speak Publicly? Government Ask re. Sexual Orientation? Allow Homosexual Book in Library?
Are Women Hurt by the Traditional Family? Should Women Be in the Public Sphere? Are Women Biologically Suited forChild-Rearing?
Figure
2:
Structural Lesbian
of
Gender Feminism
Ideology
and
Support
for Gay
and
men,
however,
are
all constrained
to be
1 to scale
the other
observed
variables
and
in this model
in women's
predicting
lives, the indices suggest that themodel fits the data reasonably well. While ideally less than 0.05, Browne and Cudeck (1993) have suggested that RMSEA values less
than 0.08 (0.055) indicate "a reasonable meets Index this and error standard. Tucker-Lewis certainly Fit Comparative that the model now of approximation"; the other On hand, Index are the RMSEA the average than 0.90, in this model values of the
greater
suggesting of
has
a good overall fit. to the parameter estimates presented see that there is a strong 3, we positive
the
left
of fem
gender
gender lesbian
feminism
attitudes
more of positive
lives, issues
support
traditional gender
previous intuitive "Of roles studies of
ideology
the
This finding
as well feminism. likely what
is consistent with
as many Some people's might say,
that
women, no
different significant
Black
there of
appears
relationship
between
salience
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
822
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
TABLE
3:
and Support for Model of Gender Equation Ideology on Women's 1996 General Embrace of Feminism:
Social Survey
(N = 1,542)
White Women Black Women 1.260 0.606 1.184 0.778*** 0.761 0.414 0.699* 0.822*** 0.112 0.180 0.244** 0.526** 0.206 0.220 0a 0.271** 0.267 0a 0.347***
homosexual to speak publicly ask about sexual orientation? government in library allow homosexual book allow are biologically better suited to child
(0.095) (0.072) (0.090) (0.072) (0.124) (0.137) (0.104) (0.154) (0.117) (0.085) (0.045) (0.064) (0.048) (0.152) 0a
(0.682) (0.436) (0.740) (0.189) (1.502) (0.199) (0.252) (0.210) (0.124) (0.164) (0.089) (0.817) (0.170) (0.120) (0.085) (0.178) (0.100)
family
0.370** 0.852*** 0.946*** 1.161*** 0.529*** Issues for 0.350*** 0.358*** 0.454***
has helped you to women's issues Pays attention -> Gender Feminism Ideology -> Support for Gay and Lesbian Feminism Correlation of gender ideology and support issues of support of gender for gay and ideology lesbian
gay and lesbian feminism Variance Residual issues Residual Mean variance of feminism of support variance
Intercept
of gay and
Intercept of gender ideology Fit indices'3 Fit Index = 0.914 Comparative Index = 0.913 Tucker-Lewis Root mean squared error of approximation = 0.055
are standard in parentheses errors. Parameter and standard NOTE: Numbers estimates were combined using NORM. a. Constrained. b. Each its own fit indices, which were then averaged. imputed data set produced at .05. **significant at .01. ***significant at .001. *significant
errors
in women's
lives
and Black
their women
support who,
for gay by
and
lesbian
issues embrace
tra
gender ideology. beliefs gay and concerning from those different significantly there and lesbian
lesbian of Black
issues women
are not
is a significant between correlation Black positive and nontraditional issues gender ideologies. of these findings, homophobic for are more
on to discuss the implications moving women the data do not indicate that Black
Iwant
or more
of
lesbian In fact,
and white
some of the particular average support women. issues more than do white What
quite indicators
these
findings
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
823
the
salience
of
feminism and
for gay
for Black
women
or their
ideologies
DISCUSSION
I began this study by expressing my concern for what lack of attention paid to multiracial feminist theorizing sociology. More specifically, I asked whether the implicit I perceive to be a general in much of quantitative white solipsism inmuch
that regardless dif of racial of quantitative feminist research the assumption (i.e., women the same from the same direction and that feminism ferences, approach can be measured was of each in the same way) The feminism results problematic. a resounding of this study suggest "yes." portion The in women's factor of the salience of feminism lives confirmatory analysis revealed ship with measure women feminism, their issues lives the importance of for allowing on a single women ethnic a complex indicator measure of women's of women's feminism?even relation if
feminism.
Reliance
self-identification?is
to which and embrace
women minority does not reflect women. While that Black indicator with
as well
to the extent is significantly related it is a stronger and more feminism, significant women. to Black Future research concerned
women's
relationship
Building on the differences revealed in the first section of this article, I then asked if Black and white women followed different paths to feminism. Again, the
answer predicted acteristics was education, "yes." While to which the extent white significantly to significantly feminist to the extent lines, with particular feminism labor force predicted marital women Black status, embraced women's and religiosity with all none feminism, relationship significantly of these char feminism. In
typically
offer family
associated with
of feminism explanations have differed may white or shape women some forms
feminist
in Black as to why
identity or beliefs
women's this might across lives. be the
the salience
family
racial
women's
postponement Black who have women, historically independence, or significant as less significant, view these experiences force out of necessity, may on white events. of The different and Black but nonliberating impact religiosity
refusal
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
824
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
women's
relationship
with
feminism
also
multiracial
feminist
theories.
Drawing
American authority, women, defined.
on Dodson
churches to explore
that African
leadership and among broadly with more
of oppression, and all of which women's foster help For white in contrast, women, religiosity
relationships feminism,
to be associated
traditional gender roles (Brinkerhoff and MacKie 1985; Oppenheim Mason and Kuhlthau 1989). The lack of significant predictors of the salience of feminism inBlack women's
lives may women, was lower statistical be, in part, due to relatively as the number women of Black in this study of white women. On in Black the other women's hand, of the model for Black power was than smaller significantly the lack of significant predic can also be read as support
tors of
of feminism
lives
ingmultiracial
gest, women's it could be lives,
feminist theories. As Smith and Smith (1981) and hooks ( 1984) sug
that because their concern oppression for women's is a more or feminist salient aspect is not of Black issues and girls' associ generally
ated with particular life events. This thesis is supported by the fact that the mean value of the salience of feminism in Black women's lives is significantly higher
women. value been married and While for white corresponding having are to it associated white women's closeness with feminism, religiosity negatively Black and in that women's the institutions appears religious marriage experiences are to discourage less likely their embracing feminism. comparatively than the Multiracial might might Black feminist been white cerned gest status be also provide into why feminist theories for example, income, insight as feminist but with women's associated self-identification traditionally not have a significant in white the salience of feminism with and relationship as women's lives. As hooks has argued, self-identification (1984) although and limited women with that in the mainstream participation to upper-middle-class white with women's feminist women, movement many racial may have largely
women, minority are deeply con incomes less education, with lower and women and gender The results this issues from sug analysis equality. to socioeconomic in women's of feminism lives is less related studies would have us believe.
than
In the third section of this article, I posed the question of whether feminism might mean something different for Black and white women, and again the results
of this salience analysis provide of feminism an affirmative in white women's answer. lives It is clear is strongly and of from and this analysis that associated the positively for gay in their and
with their support for gay and lesbian issues and with nontraditional
ogy. issues results may In contrast, is shown suggest constitute Black to be women's unrelated gender to the ideology salience and support feminism for gay feminism,
gender ideol
and lives. lesbian lesbian These issues
that while
support
women's
Black
women's
feminism likely has a different focus. As Collins ([1990] 2000), hooks (1984), and Smith (1983) have suggested, African American feminism may focus more
broadly on social and economic justice issues, including commitments to racial and
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
825
economic
equality,
educational
opportunities,
and
health
care.
Future
research
would
do well
to further explore
CONCLUSION
The feminisms tice. significant have racial differences in women's for future the need can be more relationship feminist with and paths and to
feminist differences.
important implications these findings underscore so that we and practice, that seek to examine
prac scholarship our to rethink to approaches encompassing between of women's life experiences,
the relationship
identities, and gender ideology (and no doubt other types of ideology as well) are limited to the extent that they assume that women of different racial and ethnic
will the world?and groups experience same way. While for "controlling ables, allows ferences When when erally nism and for in some some in how racial cases interactions even racial between particular differences" race this and events in that world?in of dummy the vari by means
and other
independent masks
differences people
approach groups
ultimately
ethnic
differences of white
lives. experience and variables only by dummy of color of women (as is gen it is the white model have of femi
feminist women of
theories different
repeatedly
experiences
ethnic groups differently, and this study strongly supports this hypothesis. The results of this study further suggest that studies of feminist identity and ide
ology tities The are also and analyses limited to the extent are identical here ideologies presented that they for women assume the meaning racial feminist of particular and ethnic theory's The feminisms, iden groups. claim of different multiracial
strongly
support
between
for women the
feminist
importance
in
as
of different
underscore
the meaning
remains ment care lives. role
of feminism
enterprise identities the lines
it
a useful of feminist
not
to blur
between
do not by especially
women's lives
capture
The
movement ing both one of
implications
equally to broaden are
participants
the feminist of racism
in the feminist
is seek classism, and
movement
a history behoove
then understanding
the movement's
the possible
main
should be
to
priorities.
organizers
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
826
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
that acknowledge there that tant, may mean this might recruit feminist Taken new members,
paths
to feminism
varieties
of feminism.
which through of addressed issues range from research among the which the idea of
organizations, as a whole,
away other
makes women
and by feminists a singular feminism. clear is that in contempo and of that the ignoring As Lorde but our reluc
differences do exist society, these undermines differences said, "it is not our differences
promise separate
feminism. women,
tance to recognize those differences and to deal effectively with the distortions which have resulted from the ignoring and misnaming of those differences." This
study work among advances to be Black done. understanding In particular, women is different our of women's while from this differences, has but there is much that more study that of white demonstrated women, additional feminism research is
feminist the
studies of Black
generalizability that investigates in this of
feminism
these the meaning
and identities
Furthermore, and paths
should be conducted
there to, feminisms remains a
to investigate
themselves
revealed
to be neither white
analysis suggests
nor Black
that the
and ethnic
feminisms
groups
will vary
that individuals
from
these groups
take to
NOTES
1. See, for example, Moraga and Anzald?a (1981) and Combahee River Collective ([1977] 1983). 2. This is true to the extent that gender role ideology is used tomeasure feminist identity/ideologies and that feminist research, organizations, and educational practices emphasize these issues to the exclu sion of other potential women's/feminist issues. are the 1992 National Election 3. Two other recent data sets that include feminist self-identification to these, the 1996 General Social Survey is Study and the 1999 Century of theWoman Poll. Compared better suited to this analysis because it asks a wider variety of questions concerning feminism, gender ideology, and support for gay and lesbian issues. 4. For every variable with missing data, multiple imputation estimates a linear regression of that variable on each of the other variables in the data set, and these estimated regression equations are then used to generate predicted values for the cases with missing data. To each predicted value is then added a random draw from the residual 5. Sch?fer and Olsen normal distribution and Allison for that particular have suggested the formula variable that five (Allison (1998) (2002) 2002, 33). imputed data sets are
enough to provide reliable parameter estimates. 6. The within-imputation variance is calculated U =? where U equals the variance variance is calculated using of the parameter the formula
using
m fu(t), fr[
m. The between-imputation
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
Harnois
/ DIFFERENT
PATHS
TO DIFFERENT
FEMINISMS?
827
1 m -1 rt
* (f)
is defined as T = ? + (1 + mTl) B (Sch?fer 1997, 109). Fit Index and Tucker-Lewis Index were 0.964 C, the lowest values for the Comparative and 0.946, respectively, and the highest root mean squared error of approximation was 0.043. 8. I am using % Idfto compare the nested models rather than the traditional % difference test because each model produces eight % statistics. and the total variance 7. Inmodel 9.1 performed multiple group analyses that progressively freed cross-group equality constraints on individual parameters and found that the least restrictive model had the best fit. The results from this model are presented in Table 2. 10.When controlling for other factors in the model, age was significant neither when included as a categorical nor when included as a continuous variable. 11.1 performed multiple group analyses that progressively freed cross-group equality constraints on individual parameters and found that the least restrictive model had the best fit. The results from this in Table 3. model are presented
REFERENCES
data. Thousand Allison, Paul D. 2002. Missing Baca Zinn, Maxine, and Bonnie Thorton Dill. Feminist Studies 22:321-33. Oaks, CA: Sage. 1996. Theorizing difference
from multiracial
feminism.
in women's Barkley Brown, Elsa. 1997. "What has happened here": The politics of difference history In The second wave, edited by Linda Nicholson. and feminist politics. New York: Routledge. 1985. Religion and gender: A comparison of Canadian Brinkerhoff, Merlin B., and Marlene MacKie. student attitudes. Journal of Marriage and the Family 47:415-29. R. A., and M. W. Cudeck. 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing equation models, edited by K. Bollen and J. S. Long. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Collins, Patricia Hill. [1990] 2000. Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge. 2004. Black sexual politics. New York: Routledge. Browne, Combahee and American structural
-.
River Collective. [1977] 1983. A Black feminist statement. In This bridge called my back, edited by Cherrie Moraga and Gloria Anzaldua. New York: Kitchen Table-Women of Color Press. Davis, Angela Y 1981. Women, race, and class. New York: Random House. 1987. Something within: Social change and collective Dodson, Jualyne E., and Cheryl Townsend Gilkes. endurance in the sacred world of Black Christian women. InWomen and religion inAmerica. Vol. 3, edited by Rosemary Reuther and R. Keller. New York: Harper and Row. 1900-1968, 1988. Social location and gender-role attitudes: A comparison of Black Dugger, Karen. women. Gender & Society 2:425-48. hooks, bell. 1984. Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston: South End. and white
1998. Feminist attitudes among African American women Hunter, Andrea G., and Sherrill L. Sellers. and men. Gender & Society 12:81-99. InNo Jackson, Shirley A. 1998. "Something about the word": African American women and feminism. middle ground: Women and radical protest, edited by Kathleen M. Blee. New York: New York Uni versity Press. Johnston Conover, Jones, Beverly W. Pamela. 1988. Feminists and the gender gap. Journal of Politics 50:985-1010. 1984. Race, sex, and class: Black female tobacco workers inDurham, North Carolina, and the development of the female consciousness. Feminist Studies 10:441-51. and ethnic variations 1996. Men's in gender-related and women's attitudes. Annual Review beliefs about gender of Sociol
Kane, Emily W., and Mimi Schippers. Gender & Society 10:650-65.
and sexuality.
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
828
GENDER
& SOCIETY
/ December
2005
1984. Sister outsider. Trumansburg, NY: The Crossing Press. Lorde, Audre. eds. 1981. This bridge called my back: Writings Moraga, Cherr?e, and Gloria Anzald?a, by radical women of color. Watertown, MA: Persephone Press. Moya, Paula M. L. 2001. Chicana feminism and postmodernist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Cul ture and Society 26:441-83. of child care ideals among mothers 1989. Determinants Oppenheim Mason, Karen, and Karen Kuhlthau. of preschool-aged children. Journal of Marriage and the Family 51:593-603. Peltola, Pia, Melissa 18:122-44. Milkie, and Stanley Presser. 2004. The "feminist" mystique. Gender & Society
In Porter Gump, Janice. 1980. Reality and myth: Employment and sex-role ideology in Black women. in research, edited by Julia Sherman and Florence L. Den The psychology of women: Directions mark. New York: Psychological Dimensions. Poster, Winifred R. 1995. The challenge and promises of class and racial diversity in the women's move ment: A study of two women's Gender & Society 9:659-79. organizations. 1983. Race, sex, and feminist outlooks. Ransford, H. Edward, and Jon Miller. Review 48:46-59. Laurie A. 1996. The structure of men's and women's feminist Rhodebeck, 10:386-403. tity and feminist opinion. Gender & Society 1980. Compulsory and lesbian existence. Rich, Adrienne. heterosexuality and Society 5:631-60. sex roles: The 1983. Black women's Ridley Maison, Michelene. nal of Social Issues 39:101-13. Roth, Benita. 2004. Separate roads tofeminism: Black, Chicana, ica 's second wave. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University sex: Notes for a radical theory of 1993. Thinking Rubin, Gayle. and gay studies reader, edited by Henry Abelove, York: Routledge. Sch?fer, -. Mich?le Culture American Sociological Feminist iden in
orientations:
Signs: Journal
of Women
social context
the politics of sexuality. In The lesbian Aina Barale, and David M. Halperin. New
Sch?fer, data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Research 33:545-71. Behavioral Schnittker, Jason, Jeremy Freese, and Brian Powell. 2003. Who are feminists The role of generations. American Sociological Review 68:607-22. Segura, Denise A. 1994. Working at motherhood: Chicana and Mexican employment. Smith, Barbara. London: Routledge. 1983. Home girls. New York: Kitchen
J. L. 1997. Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall. 2000. NORM forWindows 2.03. Available from http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html. J. L., and M. K. Olsen. 1998. Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems:
and what do they believe? immigrant Press. In This dialogue. MA: Persephone Jovanovich. mothers and
Table-Women
of Color
the kitchen table: A sister-to-sister Smith, Barbara, and Beverly Smith. 1981. Across bridge called my back, edited by Cherr?e Moraga and Gloria Anzald?a. Watertown, Press. Walker, Alice. 1983. In search of our mothers' gardens. New York: Harcourt Brace
Catherine
is a visiting assistant professor at the University of Illinois-Chicago. E. Harnois She recently completed her Ph.D. in sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and her graduate certificate in women's studies at Duke University. This article is adapted from her Toward an Undisciplined dissertation, Study of Feminism, Identity and Difference.
This content downloaded on Wed, 6 Mar 2013 06:15:27 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions