Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Systems fail for a number of reasons People - staff involved with the transformation process have the ability to cause failure, either accidentally, through error of judgement, or purposefully, sabotaging the operation deliberately. The way in which customers interact with operations can induce failure, if instructions are not adhered to. Most operations failures, when traced back to their origins, are a result of some form of human error. Humans originally program computers, machinery failure may be as a result of poor design by a human and customers may make mistakes because they have been given poor instructions that again were originally written by a human. Equipment/machinery - as industrialised countries move increasingly towards the use of automation in both manufacturing and service provision, the reliance on machinery and equipment increases. From time to time these facilities can break down, either partially or totally, causing varying degrees of operational chaos. In many industries, the consequences of failure are exacerbated due to the loss of human skill within the operation. For example, in the apparel manufacturing industry most cloth cutting is undertaken automatically, using either a computer controlled blade, laser or high-pressure water jet. This is an activity which, up until relatively recently, was carried out manually. If the automatic cutting equipment fails, the whole manufacturing process can be stopped. Supplier failure - when operations are being supplied with goods or services from an external source, poor quality or unreliable delivery has the potential to cause system failure. Customer failure - results from the misuse of products or services. For example, customers may be incompetent, or may not read operating guidelines. Most organisations accept that they need to educate their customers to use products or services effectively.
There are different measures of failures such as reliability and availability. Reliability is the ability of a operation to perform or be performed in its required function under its stated condition for a certain period of time. for example how many times the bus arrives on time as according to their published schdedule. Each part of the operation will have a
determined reliability, based on the percentage of the time it performs the operation correctly. In this example, in week one the bus has arrived on time at 78 per cent of the time. Therefore the bus has a reliability of 0. 78 In week 2 the bus has a reliability of 0.77 and week 4 the bus has a reliability of 0.975
availability is the
blockbusters failure to innovate their operations, while holding on to a strategy to expand aggressively. Back in 2000, Blockbuster declined several offers to purchase Netflix and merge with them The management of blockbusters lead to its failure in business as sales plummeted year after year
Origins of failure
Fault-tree analysis is a logical procedure for establishing the origins of failure. This type of analysis recognises that failure in most operations is dependant upon a combination of circumstances and, therefore, considers the interaction between various components of the operation. The fault tree demonstrates that it is usually a series of events that cause failure but that there can be more than one root cause of failure. Some failures depend upon two or more incidents taking place and are linked by an AND node. Other failures occur for a variety of independent reasons and are linked by an OR node.
Key elements: Gates represent the outcome Events represent input to the gates FTA is used to: investigate potential faults; its modes and causes; and to quantify their contribution to system unreliability in the course of product desig
Prevention
notwithstanding all the prevention measures taken, failure does occur then the operation has to cope with it in some way. this is called failure recovery. The recovery process has two objectives. First to put right whatever has gone wrong. Second, to deal with the longer term issues of the failure which may include everything from the way in which customer returns are dealt with by a retailer to the way an organisation deals with a mass product recall, reassuring the public that, as it was a one off failure, the chances of it occurring again are minimal.
This is could be cloud storage for information heavy business such as law firms . where in any type of accidents case files where still intact ,
companies can improve threw using fail-safeing, redundancy and maintenance. relobility can be improve threw improvement methods and is known as PokaYoke ( Poka meaning inadvertent errors and Yoke meaning to prevent).
Redundancy
Because of the nature of many operations and the consequences of failure, some form of back up or redundancy is introduced. This is usually because the cost or risk of failure is extremely high. Examples are: a hospital which will have a back-up generator in case of a power failure; maintenance
Even if fail-safeing and redundancy are to be used to increase reliability, maintenance is still a hugely important part of any operation. The fail-safeing devices must be maintained, as should the back-up equipment. Goals of total productive maintenance The goals of total productive maintenance have been identified by Nakajima (1988) as: To improve equipment effectiveness - early diagnosis of potential equipment failure should result in increased availability and improved reliability, thus increasing the organisations overall performance and profit; To achieve autonomous maintenance - maintenance becomes not only an integral part of the operation but also an integral part of operators daily activities. Whilst direct operators deal with minor faults and repairs, maintenance staff can take responsibility for the