Sunteți pe pagina 1din 73

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Contract No.: T/MONORAIL/WJWC/2008


Project Title: MUMBAI MONORAIL
Document Title:

Design Calculations for Guideway Beams of Frame 17


(Definitive Design Review)
Revision History

A1

01-04-13

Initial Submission

MARK

DATE

DESCRIPTION

APPROVED BY (LTSE)

Project Director
Joint Project Director

SYSTEMS

Atul Jain
CheeChiak Yang

SCOMI ENGINEERING BERHAD


Checked By (Civil)
Zafrin Zakaria

CIVIL

LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED


Checked By (QA/QC Manager)
Name

Checked By (QA/QC Manager)

Checked By (Project Manager)


Name

Prepared By
Vivek Pagnis

Checked By

DATE: 10.04.2013

DATE

CONTRACTORS DOCUMENT
No.:

DOCUMENT No.:

MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

REVISION

A1

10-April-2013

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

PRELIMINARY NOTE
This document is the exclusive property of LTSE.
It is confidential and may not be used, reproduced or communicated either in
whole or in part, in any form or manner without the prior written agreement of
LTSE.
This document shall not be distributed to third parties except under the terms of
the contract.

REVISION STATUS

A1

10-04-13

Initial Submission

AMS

VVP

ZZ

Rev.

Date

Revision Note

Designed by

Checked by

Approval by

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
1.0 SUMMARY
This report contains the detailed superstructure guide-way beam design of Frame No. 17 with a curved
alignment in plan and 27+22+26m span configuration. The results are shown below:

(i) Guideway Beams :


Beam size : section consist of
800(width) x 2200(Depth) box section at mid-span & endblock
Concrete strength : 60 MPa
2.0 DESIGN CRITERIA
Refer to Definitive Design Review Design Criteria for Guideway Structural Design(MM002-D-DR-VSP-LTSE303001)
References: - IRS Concrete Bridge Code 1997
- BS 5400 PART 4

3.0 COMPUTER MODEL


The finite element model of the structure is shown in Figure 3.1. The frame has 27+22+26m span
configuration.
The linear static, dynamic and time-dependent analyses are carried out using the MIDAS software. The
structure has been modeled by means of BEAM element with six degree of freedom per node. Elastic springs
are included in the model to simulate the soil-structure interaction in both longitudinal and transverse direction.

Fig. 3.1 : 3D rendered model in MIDAS software

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 1 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

Fig. 3.2 : Sign convention of internal forces in the element's local coordinate system

3.1 Section Properties


(A) Concrete The specified minimum 28-day compressive strengths of concrete used for the various structural
members are as follows:
Structural Concrete
Element
Grade

Guideway
Piers
RC Portals
Pilecaps
Piles

60
45
45
35
35

Fcu (Mpa)

60
45
45
35
35

Fc' (Mpa) Ec (Mpa)

48
36
36
28
28

36000
32500
32500
29500
29500

B) Post-tensioning tendons: The following mechanical properties of prestressing tendon are adopted in the
design.
Nominal diameter

= 15.24 mm

Nominal tensile strength

= 1860 MPa (GUTS)

Nominal strand area

= 140 mm2

Specified characteristic breaking load = 260KN

LTSE

Stress at anchorage (jacking)

= 75% of GUTS

Class of relaxation

= Normal

Modulus of elasticity, E

= 195000 MPa

Friction coefficients, k

= .17

Wobble coefficient,

= .002

Draw-In at anchorage

= 6 mm

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 2 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

3.2 Construction Sequence


The following construction sequence has been assumed in the time-dependent construction stage analysis:
1. Stressing Span Tendon(Duration = 60 days)
Time lapsed from concreting of first beam to launching of last beam.
*Age of pre-cast beam at stressing = 3 days
*Age of all pier elements at time of loading = 28 days
2. Casting Intermediate Stitching(Duration = 14 days)
Time lapsed from concreting of to achieving sufficient strength before
stressing continuity tendon.
*Age of stitching concrete at stressing = 10 days
3. Stressing Middle Continuity Tendon(Duration =2 days)
Time lapsed from threading strands to stressing last middle strand.
4. Stressing Top Continuity Tendon(Duration =1 day)
Time lapsed from threading strands to stressing last top strand.
5. Casting End Stitching Concrete(Duration =7 days)
Time lapsed from concreting to curing of concrete .
*Age of stitching concrete at stressing = 3 days
6. 1 Month after Completion
Minimum time lapse required before SDL and LL can be applied.
7. 1 Year after Completion
8. 20 Years after Completion
To cater for total losses of pre-stressing force due to time-dependent effects.
The results of construction stage analysis are combined with the effect of loads on the completed structure
due to superimposed dead load, wind load, live load, seismic effects
and temperature effects.

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 3 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

GUIDEWAY BEAMS

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 4 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

4.0 Summary
This section documents the detailed design of the Prestressed Guideway Beams. Generally, the guideway
beam consists of rectangular solid end blocks at both ends (2.2m height), and towards the mid span (2.2m
height) that is made of hollow box sections. There are three types of beams; Beam Type GB276 and GB278
at ends and GB277 at intermediate span. Fig. 4.1 shows the dimensions and locations of post-tensioned
tendons. Table 4.1 summarizes the details for post-tensioned tendons and Table 4.2 shows the summary of
main bars and torsion/shear links. Further details are contained in the construction drawings.

Fig 4.1 End Section and Mid Box Section


Table 4.1 Summary of Post tensioned tendon details
Tendon
No of strands per
Marking
Type
tendon
Span Tendon
10
T1 & T2
Continuity Tendon
12
T3 & T4

Jacking Force per


tendon (KN)
1953
2343

Table 4.2 Summary of reinforcement bars


Section

Mid
Section

Solid
Section

LTSE

Beam
Type

Top Bars

Bottom Bars

Side Bars

Torsion/ Shear Links

GB
269,271

9T16

9T16

2T16 @ 200 c/c


rings+ 2L-T12@200c/c
each face

GB 270

9T16

9T16

2T16 @ 200 c/c


rings+ 2L-T12@200c/c
each face
inner links

GB
269,271

18T16

4T25 + 4T25

2T16 @ 200 c/c 4Legged


100c/c
each face

T16

GB 270

18T16

18T16

2T16 @ 200 c/c 4Legged


100c/c
each face

T16

2L-T16@100c/c outer
inner links

2L-T16@100c/c outer

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 5 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

The design calculations of the precast post-tensioned guideway beams comprise of the
following:
(i) Pre-stressing design at SLS
(ii) Check Bending Capacity of Beam at ULS
(iii) Design for Shear force and Torsional Moment at ULS
(iv) Design of Beam End Block.
The mechanical properties of prestressing tendon adopted in the design are as shown below.
Nominal diameter = 15.24 mm (0.6)
Nominal tensile strength = 1860 MPa (GUTS)
Nominal strand area = 140 mm2
Specified characteristic breaking load = 260 kN
Stress at anchorage (jacking) = 75% of GUTS (1395 MPa)
Class of relaxation = very low relaxation (relaxation at 1000h =2.50 % of GUTS)
Modulus of elasticity, E = 195000 MPa
Friction coefficients, k = 0.17
Wobble coefficient, = 0.002 rad/m
Draw-In at anchorage = 6 mm
The stress limitations of prestressed concrete under serviceability loads are shown below.
a)

Transfer stage

Load Combination
All

b)

Type of stress
Compressive Stress
Tensile stress

Service stage

Load Combination
All

Type of stress

Compressive Stress
Tensile stress
S1
S2a, S2b, S3a, S3b
& S4
Tensile stress

LTSE

Allowable Stress
Lesser of
0.5 x 48 = 24 Mpa
0.4 x 60 = 24 Mpa
1.0 Mpa

Allowable Stress
0.4 x 60 = 24 Mpa
0.0 Mpa
0.36 x 60 = 2.79 Mpa

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 6 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

4.1 SLS COMBINED AXIAL AND BENDING STRESSES CHECK


The prestressed guideway beams are designed to have a maximum tension of 1MPa at transfer, zero tension
at service (due to service load Combination 1) and 0.36(fcu)0.5 tension due to service load Combinations 2 to 4
at top and bottom extreme fibres. The following tables summarize the maximum stresses of the beam (top and
bottom fiber), followed by the envelope of combined stress diagrams along the beam. Maximum and minimum
stresses and corresponding results along the beams are summarized. Negative indicates compressive stress
and vice versa. All stresses are reported in N/mm2.
Case 1: Max Top Fiber Stress + corresponding results
Case 2: Min Top Fiber Stress + corresponding results
Case 3: Max Bottom Fiber Stress + corresponding results
Case 4: Min Bottom Fiber Stress + corresponding results
Note:
Bend (+z) = Bending stress due to moment about local y-axis in +z direction
Bend (-z) = Bending stress due to moment about local y-axis in -z direction

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 7 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
AT TRANSFER STAGE
Envelope Stresses Diagrams for Track 1
Top Fiber
Span 1

Span 2

Span 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 8 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Bottom Fiber
Span 1

Span 2

Span 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 9 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Envelope Stresses Diagrams for Track 2
Top Fiber
Span 1

Span2

Span 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 10 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Bottom Fiber
Span 1

Span 2

Span 3

Conclusion
Stresses
Compressive stress
Top Fiber
Tensile stress
Bottom
Compressive stress
Tensile stress
Fiber

LTSE

Allowable (Mpa)
-24
1
-24
1

Actual (Mpa)
-1.856
1.03
-4.892
0

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

Remark
OK
OK
OK
OK

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 11 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 12 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
AT SERVICE STAGE
Stresses due to service load combinations 1 (zero tension design) for both track 1 & track 2
Envelope Stresses Diagrams for Track 1 as shown as follows:
Top Fiber
SPAN 1

SPAN2

SPAN 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 13 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Bottom Fiber
SPAN1

SPAN2

SPAN 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 14 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Envelope Stresses Diagrams for Track 2 as shown as follows:
Top Fiber
SPAN 1

SPAN 2

SPAN 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 15 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Bottom Fiber
SPAN 1

SPAN 2

SPAN 3

Conclusion
Stresses
Compressive stress
Top Fiber
Tensile stress
Bottom
Compressive stress
Tensile stress
Fiber

LTSE

Allowable (Mpa)
-24
0
-24
0

Actual (Mpa)
-13.48
0
-12.58
0

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

Remark

OK
OK
OK
OK

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 16 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

Stresses due to service load combinations 2 to 4 for both track 1 & track 2
Envelope Stresses Diagrams for Track 1 as shown as follows:
Top Fiber
SPAN 1

SPAN2

SPAN 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 17 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 18 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Bottom Fiber
SPAN1

SPAN2

SPAN 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 19 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

Envelope Stresses Diagrams for Track 2 as shown as follows:


Top Fiber
SPAN 1

SPAN 2

SPAN 3

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 20 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Bottom Fiber
SPAN 1

SPAN 2

SPAN 3

Conclusion

Stresses
Compressive stress
Top Fiber
Tensile stress
Bottom
Compressive stress
Fiber
Tensile stress

LTSE

Allowable (Mpa)
-24
2.78
-24
2.78

Actual (Mpa)
-13.92
0.798
-13.77
0

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

Remark
OK
OK
OK
OK

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 21 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

4.2 ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE DESIGN OF HOLLOW SECTIONS


4.2.1 ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE DESIGN OF MID HOLLOW SECTION
SPAN 1
The ultimate limit state analysis is carried out by the AdSEC software for bending capacity check, whereas
combined shear and torsion design is done by using a spreadsheet. The figure below shows the arrangement
of bars in the box section at the mid span after the completion of the structure.
4.2.1.1 SUMMARY OF BEAM FORCES
The summary of the maximum element forces due to various ultimate load combinations is tabulated below.
The 6 cases summarized below are
Case 1 Max & Min Axial Force + corresponding results
Case 2 - Max & Min My + corresponding results
Case 3 - Max & Min Mz + corresponding results
Negative sign in axial force indicates compression and vice versa.

Table 4.2: Ultimate Load Combinations 1 - 5 (U1-U5) for span1


Elem
51
88
95
84
85
92

LTSE

Load
Axial (kN)
U4(max)
410.35
U3b(min)
447.42
U4(min)
211.43
U4(max)
230.7
U3b(min)
169.2
U3b(max)
97.31

Moment-y Moment-z
(kNm)
(kNm)
3363.71
215.06
2490.73
138.57
4932.76
124.35
7177.02
246.24
5914.15
493.81
6225.24
529.8

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 22 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Specification
General Specification
Code of Practice
Country
Bending Axes

BS5400
India
Biaxial

Section 1 Details
Definition
Name
Type
Material
Perimeter
Section Area
Reinforcement Area
Reinforcement

Mid-section
Concrete
C60
1.407E+6mm2
23710.mm2
1.685%

Section Nodes
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Y
[mm]
375.0
400.0
400.0
375.0
-375.0
-400.0
-400.0
-375.0
110.0
110.0
-110.0
-110.0

Z
[mm]
1100.
1075.
-1075.
-1100.
-1100.
-1075.
1075.
1100.
850.0
-750.0
-750.0
850.0

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 23 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Bars
Bar

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

[mm]
-326.0
-217.3
-108.7
0.0
108.7
217.3
326.0
-326.0
-217.3
-108.7
0.0
108.7
217.3
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-225.0
-225.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
326.0
148.0
-326.0
-148.0
0.0
326.0
148.0
-326.0
-148.0
0.0

Z
[mm]
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
-1010.
-1010.
-804.0
-804.0
872.0
872.0
1010.
1010.
0.0
-925.0
-899.0
-699.0
-499.0
-299.0
-99.00
101.0
301.0
501.0
701.0
-899.0
-699.0
-499.0
-299.0
-99.00
101.0
301.0
501.0
701.0
-691.0
-491.0
-291.0
-91.00
109.0
309.0
509.0
709.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
888.0
888.0
888.0
888.0
888.0

Diameter
[mm]
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Material

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500

Type

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

Pre-stress Pre-stress
Appl. loads
Force
Strain
include/exclude
pre-stress
[kN]

-1860.
-1530.

exclude
exclude

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 24 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72

148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
225.0
225.0
225.0
-225.0

-691.0
-491.0
-291.0
-91.00
109.0
309.0
509.0
709.0
0.0
-925.0
250.0
250.0

16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
42.22
42.22

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

-1860.
-1530.
-1860.
-1860.

exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude

Elastic Properties
Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.
Geometric Centroid

y
z

Area
Second Moments of Area

Iyy
Izz
Iyz

Principal Second Moments of Area Iuu

0.0mm
-12.51mm
1.407E+6mm2
632.2E+9mm4
92.26E+9mm4
33.06E-6mm4
632.2E+9mm4

Torsion Constant
Section Modulus

Zy

92.26E+9mm4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0mm4
568.2E+6mm3

Plastic Modulus

Zz
Zpy

230.6E+6mm3
825.1E+6mm3

Zpz
Ry
Rz

332.2E+6mm3
670.4mm
256.1mm

Izz
Angle
ky
kz

Shear Area Factor

Radius of Gyration

Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.


Geometric Centroid

y
z

EA
EI

EIyy
EIzz
EIyz

Principal EI

Maximum compressive force


Strain at Nmax
Moment at ref. pt. for Nmax

0.01648mm
-6.685mm
55.91E+6kN
23.64E+6kNm2
5.135E+6kNm2
-85.09kNm2

EIuu
EIzz
Angle

23.64E+6kNm2
5.135E+6kNm2

Nu

-17270.kN
0.0[-]
0.1622kNm
407.4E-6kNm

Myy
Mzz

-263.5E-6

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 25 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Note: Nmax is the maximum compressive force which can be carried by the section.
This is calculated by applying a constant strain across the entire section, using
ultimate material properties.

Section Material Properties


Type
Name
Weight
Density
Cube Strength
Tensile Strength
Elastic Modulus (short
term)
Poisson's Ratio
Coeff. Thermal Expansion
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
ULS Compression Curve
ULS Tension Curve
SLS Compression Curve
SLS Tension Curve
Aggregate Size

Concrete
C60
Normal Weight
2.300t/m3
60000.kPa
3718.kPa
37.00E+6kPa

fcu
fct
E

0.2000

12.00E-6/C
mc,ULS 1.500
mc,SLS 1.000
0.003500[-]
Recto-parabolic
No-tension
Linear
No-tension
20.00mm

Reinforcement Properties
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve

Fe 500
500000.kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2
Strands
1.857E+6kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2

Loading
Reference Point
All loading acts through the Reference Point.
All strain planes are defined relative to the Reference Point.
Definition
Reference Point Coordinates

y
z

Geometric
Centroid
0.0mm
-12.51mm

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 26 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Applied loads
Load Case
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load

Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case

N
[kN]
410.3
447.4
211.4
230.7
169.2
97.31

1
2
3
4
5
6

Myy
[kNm]
3364.
2491.
4933.
7177.
5914.
6225.

Mzz
[kNm]
215.1
138.6
124.3
246.2
493.8
529.8

Section 1 Details
1.69% reinforcement in section 1 (Mid-section). Check this against code requirements.

ULS Cases Analysed


Name

Loading

Pre-stress
Factor

Strength Analysis - Loads


Case
1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
410.3
447.4
211.4
230.7
169.2
97.31

Myy
[kNm]
3364.
2491.
4933.
7177.
5914.
6225.

Mzz
[kNm]
215.1
138.6
124.3
246.2
493.8
529.8

M
[kNm]
3371.
2495.
4934.
7181.
5935.
6248.

[]
-3.658
-3.184
-1.444
-1.965
-4.773
-4.864

Strength Analysis - Summary


Governing conditions are defined as:
A - reinforcing steel tension strain limit
B - concrete compression strain limit
Effective centroid is reported relative to the reference point.
Case

Eff.
Centroid
(y)

Eff.
Centroid
(z)

[kN]
Maxima
4
-0.8899
Minima
2
-0.4688

Mu

M/Mu

Governing
Condition

[kNm] [kNm]

Neutral Neutral
Axis
Axis
Angle
Depth
[]
[mm]

7282. 230.7 7181. 16250. 0.4419 B: Node 1


3749. 447.4 2495. 15960. 0.1563 B: Node 1

From above it is observed that the Max. M/Mu ratio = 0.442 which is less than unity. Hence section is
safe.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 27 of 71

MUMBAIMONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
4.2.2 ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE DESIGN OF MID HOLLOW SECTION
SPAN 2
The ultimate limit state analysis is carried out by the AdSEC software for bending capacity check, whereas
combined shear and torsion design is done by using a spreadsheet. The figure below shows the
arrangement of bars in the box section at the mid span after the completion of the structure.
4.2.2.1 SUMMARY OF BEAM FORCES
The summary of the maximum element forces due to various ultimate load combinations is tabulated below.
The 6 cases summarized below are
C
Case
1M
Max & Mi
Min A
Axial
i lF
Force + corresponding
di results
lt
Case 2 - Max & Min My + corresponding results
Case 3 - Max & Min Mz + corresponding results
Negative sign in axial force indicates compression and vice versa.
Table 4.3: Ultimate Load Combinations 1 - 5 (U1-U5) for span2
Moment-y Moment-z
(kNm)
(kNm)
Elem
Load
Axial (kN)
26
U4(min)
322.47
5222.48
726.05
27
U4(max)
484 61
484.61
713 76
713.76
355 32
355.32
26
U4(min)
215.35
6264.1
693.31
29
U4(max)
270.58
1948.86
29.78
34
U3b(min) 270.65
3857.16
840.28
34
U3b(max) 142.96
1550.93
997.87

LTSE

DefinitiveDesignReview
DesignCalculationforFrame17

MM002DDREPWLTSE311050Rev.A1

Page 28 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Specification
General Specification
Code of Practice
Country
Bending Axes

BS5400
India
Biaxial

Section 1 Details
Definition
Name
Type
Material
Perimeter
Section Area
Reinforcement Area
Reinforcement

Mid-section
Concrete
C60
1.407E+6mm2
23710.mm2
1.685%

Section Nodes
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Y
[mm]
375.0
400.0
400.0
375.0
-375.0
-400.0
-400.0
-375.0
110.0
110.0
-110.0
-110.0

Z
[mm]
1100.
1075.
-1075.
-1100.
-1100.
-1075.
1075.
1100.
850.0
-750.0
-750.0
850.0

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 29 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Bars
Bar

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

[mm]
-326.0
-217.3
-108.7
0.0
108.7
217.3
326.0
-326.0
-217.3
-108.7
0.0
108.7
217.3
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-225.0
-225.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
326.0
148.0
-326.0
-148.0
0.0
326.0
148.0
-326.0
-148.0
0.0

Z
[mm]
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
-1010.
-1010.
-804.0
-804.0
872.0
872.0
1010.
1010.
-200.0
-925.0
-899.0
-699.0
-499.0
-299.0
-99.00
101.0
301.0
501.0
701.0
-899.0
-699.0
-499.0
-299.0
-99.00
101.0
301.0
501.0
701.0
-691.0
-491.0
-291.0
-91.00
109.0
309.0
509.0
709.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
888.0
888.0
888.0
888.0
888.0

Diameter
[mm]
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Material

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500

Type

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

Pre-stress Pre-stress
Appl. loads
Force
Strain
include/exclude
pre-stress
[kN]

-1860.
-1530.

exclude
exclude

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 30 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72

148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
225.0
225.0
225.0
-225.0

-691.0
-491.0
-291.0
-91.00
109.0
309.0
509.0
709.0
-200.0
-925.0
250.0
250.0

16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
42.22
42.22

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

-1860.
-1530.
-1860.
-1860.

exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude

Elastic Properties
Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.
Geometric Centroid

y
z

Area
Second Moments of Area

Iyy
Izz
Iyz

Principal Second Moments of Area Iuu

0.0mm
-12.51mm
1.407E+6mm2
632.2E+9mm4
92.26E+9mm4
33.06E-6mm4
632.2E+9mm4

Torsion Constant
Section Modulus

Zy

92.26E+9mm4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0mm4
568.2E+6mm3

Plastic Modulus

Zz
Zpy

230.6E+6mm3
825.1E+6mm3

Zpz
Ry
Rz

332.2E+6mm3
670.4mm
256.1mm

Izz
Angle
ky
kz

Shear Area Factor

Radius of Gyration

Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.


y
z

Geometric Centroid
EA
EI

EIyy
EIzz
EIyz

Principal EI

EIuu
EIzz
Angle

Maximum compressive force


Strain at Nmax
Moment at ref. pt. for Nmax

Nu
Myy
Mzz

0.01648mm
-8.317mm
55.91E+6kN
23.64E+6kNm2
5.152E+6kNm2
-83.55kNm2
23.64E+6kNm2
5.152E+6kNm2
-259.0E-6
-16360.kN
0.0[-]
-0.03001kNm
-784.9E-6kNm

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 31 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Note: Nmax is the maximum compressive force which can be carried by the section.
This is calculated by applying a constant strain across the entire section, using
ultimate material properties.

Section Material Properties


Type
Name
Weight
Density
Cube Strength
Tensile Strength
Elastic Modulus (short
term)
Poisson's Ratio
Coeff. Thermal Expansion
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
ULS Compression Curve
ULS Tension Curve
SLS Compression Curve
SLS Tension Curve
Aggregate Size

Concrete
C60
Normal Weight
2.300t/m3
60000.kPa
3718.kPa
37.00E+6kPa

fcu
fct
E

0.2000

12.00E-6/C
mc,ULS 1.500
mc,SLS 1.000
0.003500[-]
Recto-parabolic
No-tension
Linear
No-tension
20.00mm

Reinforcement Properties
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve

Fe 500
500000.kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2
Strands
1.857E+6kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2

Loading
Reference Point
All loading acts through the Reference Point.
All strain planes are defined relative to the Reference Point.
Definition
Reference Point Coordinates

y
z

Geometric
Centroid
0.0mm
-12.51mm

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 32 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Applied loads
Load Case
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load

Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case

N
[kN]
322.5
484.6
215.3
270.6
270.6
143.0

1
2
3
4
5
6

Myy
[kNm]
5222.
713.8
6264.
1949.
3857.
1551.

Mzz
[kNm]
726.0
355.3
693.3
29.78
840.3
997.9

Section 1 Details
1.69% reinforcement in section 1 (Mid-section). Check this against code requirements.

ULS Cases Analysed


Name

Loading

Pre-stress
Factor

Strength Analysis - Loads


Case
1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
322.5
484.6
215.3
270.6
270.6
143.0

Myy
[kNm]
5222.
713.8
6264.
1949.
3857.
1551.

Mzz
[kNm]
726.0
355.3
693.3
29.78
840.3
997.9

[kNm]
[]
5273. -7.915
797.3 -26.46
6302. -6.316
1949. -0.8755
3948. -12.29
1844. -32.76

Strength Analysis - Summary


Governing conditions are defined as:
A - reinforcing steel tension strain limit
B - concrete compression strain limit
Effective centroid is reported relative to the reference point.
Case

Eff.
Centroid
(y)

Eff.
Centroid
(z)

[kN]
Maxima
3
-0.9519
Minima
2
-0.4344

Mu

M/Mu

Governing
Condition

[kNm] [kNm]

11230. 215.3 6302. 15670.

Neutral Neutral
Axis
Axis
Angle
Depth
[]
[mm]

0.4023 B: Node 2

4982. 484.6 797.3 10120. 0.07880 B: Node 2

From above it is observed that the Max. M/Mu ratio = 0.402 which is less than unity. Hence section is
safe.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 33 of 71

MUMBAIMONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

4.2.3 ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE DESIGN OF MID HOLLOW SECTION


SPAN 3
The ultimate limit state analysis is carried out by the AdSEC software for bending capacity check, whereas
combined shear and torsion design is done by using a spreadsheet. The figure below shows the
arrangement of bars in the box section at the mid span after the completion of the structure.
4.2.3.1 SUMMARY OF BEAM FORCES
The summary of the maximum element forces due to various ultimate load combinations is tabulated below
below.
The 6 cases summarized below are
Case 1 Max & Min Axial Force + corresponding results
Case 2 - Max & Min My + corresponding results
Case 3 - Max & Min Mz + corresponding results
Negative sign in axial force indicates compression and vice versa.
Table 4.4: Ultimate Load Combinations 1 - 5 (U1-U5) for span3
Moment-y Moment-z
El
Elem
Load
L d
Axial
A i l (kN)
(kN )
(kNm)
(kN )
(kNm)
42
U3b(min) 310.39
1029.97
106.25
43
U4(max)
397.83
703.1
595.6
35
U4(min)
83.11
5693.12
600.63
40
U4(max)
35.43
5697.52
188.7
35
U3b(min)
37.81
19.89
617.77
43
U3b(max) 270.66
1156.38
832.45

LTSE

DefinitiveDesignReview
DesignCalculationforFrame17

MM002DDREPWLTSE311050Rev.A1

Page 34 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Specification
General Specification
Code of Practice
Country
Bending Axes

BS5400
India
Biaxial

Section 1 Details
Definition
Name
Type
Material
Perimeter
Section Area
Reinforcement Area
Reinforcement

Mid-section
Concrete
C60
1.407E+6mm2
23710.mm2
1.685%

Section Nodes
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Y
[mm]
375.0
400.0
400.0
375.0
-375.0
-400.0
-400.0
-375.0
110.0
110.0
-110.0
-110.0

Z
[mm]
1100.
1075.
-1075.
-1100.
-1100.
-1075.
1075.
1100.
850.0
-750.0
-750.0
850.0

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 35 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Bars
Bar

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

[mm]
-326.0
-217.3
-108.7
0.0
108.7
217.3
326.0
-326.0
-217.3
-108.7
0.0
108.7
217.3
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-326.0
326.0
-225.0
-225.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
-324.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
-148.0
326.0
148.0
-326.0
-148.0
0.0
326.0
148.0
-326.0
-148.0
0.0

Z
[mm]
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
-1010.
-1010.
-804.0
-804.0
872.0
872.0
1010.
1010.
-200.0
-925.0
-899.0
-699.0
-499.0
-299.0
-99.00
101.0
301.0
501.0
701.0
-899.0
-699.0
-499.0
-299.0
-99.00
101.0
301.0
501.0
701.0
-691.0
-491.0
-291.0
-91.00
109.0
309.0
509.0
709.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
-788.0
888.0
888.0
888.0
888.0
888.0

Diameter
[mm]
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Material

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500

Type

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

Pre-stress Pre-stress
Appl. loads
Force
Strain
include/exclude
pre-stress
[kN]

-1860.
-1530.

exclude
exclude

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 36 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72

148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
148.0
225.0
225.0
225.0
-225.0

-691.0
-491.0
-291.0
-91.00
109.0
309.0
509.0
709.0
-200.0
-925.0
250.0
250.0

16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
42.22
42.22

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

-1860.
-1530.
-1860.
-1860.

exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude

Elastic Properties
Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.
Geometric Centroid

y
z

Area
Second Moments of Area

Iyy
Izz
Iyz

Principal Second Moments of Area Iuu

0.0mm
-12.51mm
1.407E+6mm2
632.2E+9mm4
92.26E+9mm4
33.06E-6mm4
632.2E+9mm4

Torsion Constant
Section Modulus

Zy

92.26E+9mm4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0mm4
568.2E+6mm3

Plastic Modulus

Zz
Zpy

230.6E+6mm3
825.1E+6mm3

Zpz
Ry
Rz

332.2E+6mm3
670.4mm
256.1mm

Izz
Angle
ky
kz

Shear Area Factor

Radius of Gyration

Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.


Geometric Centroid

y
z

EA
EI

EIyy
EIzz
EIyz

Principal EI

Maximum compressive force


Strain at Nmax
Moment at ref. pt. for Nmax

0.01648mm
-8.317mm
55.91E+6kN
23.64E+6kNm2
5.152E+6kNm2
-83.55kNm2

EIuu
EIzz
Angle

23.64E+6kNm2
5.152E+6kNm2

Nu

-16360.kN
0.0[-]
0.03479kNm
59.75E-6kNm

Myy
Mzz

-259.0E-6

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 37 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Note: Nmax is the maximum compressive force which can be carried by the section.
This is calculated by applying a constant strain across the entire section, using
ultimate material properties.

Section Material Properties


Type
Name
Weight
Density
Cube Strength
Tensile Strength
Elastic Modulus (short
term)
Poisson's Ratio
Coeff. Thermal Expansion
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
ULS Compression Curve
ULS Tension Curve
SLS Compression Curve
SLS Tension Curve
Aggregate Size

Concrete
C60
Normal Weight
2.300t/m3
60000.kPa
3718.kPa
37.00E+6kPa

fcu
fct
E

0.2000

12.00E-6/C
mc,ULS 1.500
mc,SLS 1.000
0.003500[-]
Recto-parabolic
No-tension
Linear
No-tension
20.00mm

Reinforcement Properties
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve

Fe 500
500000.kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2
Strands
1.857E+6kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2

Loading
Reference Point
All loading acts through the Reference Point.
All strain planes are defined relative to the Reference Point.
Definition
Reference Point Coordinates

y
z

Geometric
Centroid
0.0mm
-12.51mm

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 38 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Applied loads
Load Case
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load

Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case

N
[kN]
310.4
397.8
83.11
35.43
37.81
270.7

1
2
3
4
5
6

Myy
[kNm]
1030.
703.1
5693.
5698.
19.89
1156.

Mzz
[kNm]
106.2
595.6
600.6
188.7
617.8
832.4

Section 1 Details
1.69% reinforcement in section 1 (Mid-section). Check this against code requirements.

ULS Cases Analysed


Name

Loading

Pre-stress
Factor

Strength Analysis - Loads


Case
1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
310.4
397.8
83.11
35.43
37.81
270.7

Myy
[kNm]
1030.
703.1
5693.
5698.
19.89
1156.

Mzz
[kNm]
106.2
595.6
600.6
188.7
617.8
832.4

M
[kNm]
1035.
921.5
5725.
5701.
618.1
1425.

[]
-5.890
-40.27
-6.022
-1.897
-88.16
-35.75

Strength Analysis - Summary


Governing conditions are defined as:
A - reinforcing steel tension strain limit
B - concrete compression strain limit
Effective centroid is reported relative to the reference point.
Case

Eff.
Centroid
(y)

Eff.
Centroid
(z)

[kN]
Maxima
3
-2.437
Minima
1
-0.6666

Mu

M/Mu

Governing
Condition

[kNm] [kNm]

29150. 83.11 5725. 15760.

Neutral Neutral
Axis
Axis
Angle
Depth
[]
[mm]

0.3632 B: Node 2

7786. 310.4 1035. 15840. 0.06537 B: Node 2

From above it is observed that the Max. M/Mu ratio = 0.3632 which is less than unity. Hence section is
safe.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 39 of 71

MUMBAIMONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
4.3 ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE DESIGN OF SOLID SECTIONS
4.3.1 ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE DESIGN OF SOLID SECTION
At Pier 1
The ultimate limit state analysis is carried out by the AdSEC software for bending capacity check, whereas
combined shear and torsion design is done by using a spreadsheet. The figure below shows the
arrangement of bars in the box section at the mid span after the completion of the structure.

4.3.1.1 SUMMARY OF BEAM FORCES


The summary of the maximum element forces due to various ultimate load combinations is tabulated below.
The 6 cases summarized below are
Case 1 Max & Min Axial Force + corresponding results
Case 2 - Max & Min My + corresponding results
Case 3 - Max & Min Mz + corresponding results
Negative sign in axial force indicates compression and vice versa.

Table 4.5: Ultimate Load Combinations 1 - 5 (U1-U5)

Elem
57
54
61
54
57
61

LTSE

Load
Axial (kN)
U3b(min) 466.14
U4(max)
428.47
220.69
U4(min)
U4(max)
298.11
U3b(min)
319.4
U3b(max) 312.71

Moment-y Moment-z
(kNm)
(kNm)
-5816.81 371.84
2251.52
399.05
-8517.12
8517.12
316.6
4147.75
72.21
-5779.38 582.54
-6508.94
610.9

DefinitiveDesignReview
DesignCalculationforFrame17

MM002DDREPWLTSE311050Rev.A1

Page 40 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Specification
General Specification
Code of Practice
Country
Bending Axes

BS5400
United Kingdom
Biaxial

Section 1 Details
Definition
Name
Type
Material
Perimeter
Section Area
Reinforcement Area
Reinforcement

1C4end
Concrete
C60
1.759E+6mm2
23980.mm2
1.364%

Section Nodes
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Y
[mm]
375.0
400.0
400.0
375.0
-375.0
-400.0
-400.0
-375.0

Z
[mm]
1100.
1075.
-1075.
-1100.
-1100.
-1075.
1075.
1100.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 41 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Bars
Bar

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

[mm]
-326.0
-108.7
108.7
326.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0

Z
[mm]
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
-907.0
-891.0
-707.2
-691.2
-507.4
-491.4
-307.7
-291.7
-107.9
-91.89
91.89
107.9
291.7
307.7
491.4
507.4
691.2
707.2
891.0
907.0
-907.0
-891.0
-707.2
-691.2
-507.4
-491.4
-307.7
-291.7
-107.9
-91.89
91.89
107.9
291.7
307.7
491.4
507.4
691.2
707.2

Diameter
[mm]
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Material

Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe

500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500

Type

Pre-stress Pre-stress
Appl. loads
Force
Strain
include/exclude
pre-stress
[kN]

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 42 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72

326.0
326.0
-165.0
165.0
-225.0
225.0
-225.0
225.0
-326.0
-108.7
108.7
326.0

891.0
907.0
-500.0
-500.0
125.0
125.0
650.0
650.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0

16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
42.20
42.20
42.20
42.20
25.00
25.00
25.00
25.00

Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

-1530.
-1530.
-1860.
-1860.
-1860.
-1860.

exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude

Elastic Properties
Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.
Geometric Centroid

y
z

Area
Second Moments of Area

Iyy
Izz
Iyz

Principal Second Moments of Area Iuu

0.0mm
0.0mm
1.759E+6mm2
708.4E+9mm4
93.67E+9mm4
37.64E-6mm4
708.4E+9mm4

Torsion Constant
Section Modulus

Zy

93.67E+9mm4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0mm4
644.0E+6mm3

Plastic Modulus

Zz
Zpy

234.2E+6mm3
966.6E+6mm3

Zpz
Ry
Rz

351.5E+6mm3
634.6mm
230.8mm

Izz
Angle
ky
kz

Shear Area Factor

Radius of Gyration

Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.


Geometric Centroid

y
z

EA
EI

EIyy
EIzz
EIyz

Principal EI

Maximum compressive force


Strain at Nmax
Moment at ref. pt. for Nmax

-189.2E-9mm
1.264mm
68.98E+6kN
26.47E+6kNm2
5.460E+6kNm2

EIuu

136.8E-6kNm2
26.47E+6kNm2

EIzz
Angle

5.460E+6kNm2
373.0E-12

Nu

44510.kN
0.0[-]
-0.04209kNm
-0.04327kNm

Myy
Mzz

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 43 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Note: Nmax is the maximum compressive force which can be carried by the section.
This is calculated by applying a constant strain across the entire section, using
ultimate material properties.

Section Material Properties


Type
Name
Weight
Density
Cube Strength
Tensile Strength
Elastic Modulus (short
term)
Poisson's Ratio
Coeff. Thermal Expansion
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
ULS Compression Curve
ULS Tension Curve
SLS Compression Curve
SLS Tension Curve
Aggregate Size

Concrete
C60
Normal Weight
2.300t/m3
60000.kPa
3718.kPa
37.00E+6kPa

fcu
fct
E

0.2000

12.00E-6/C
mc,ULS 1.500
mc,SLS 1.000
0.003500[-]
Recto-parabolic
No-tension
Linear
No-tension
20.00mm

Reinforcement Properties
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve

Fe 500
500000.kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2
Strands
1.857E+6kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2

Loading
Reference Point
All loading acts through the Reference Point.
All strain planes are defined relative to the Reference Point.
Definition
Reference Point Coordinates

y
z

Geometric
Centroid
0.0mm
0.0mm

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 44 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Applied loads
Load Case
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load

Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case

1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
466.1
428.5
220.7
298.1
319.4
312.7

Myy
[kNm]
-5817.
2252.
-8517.
4148.
-5779.
-6509.

Mzz
[kNm]
371.8
399.0
316.6
72.21
582.5
610.9

Section 1 Details
1.36% reinforcement in section 1 (1C4end). Check this against code requirements.

ULS Cases Analysed


Name

Loading

Pre-stress
Factor

Strength Analysis - Loads


Case
1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
466.1
428.5
220.7
298.1
319.4
312.7

Myy
[kNm]
-5817.
2252.
-8517.
4148.
-5779.
-6509.

Mzz
[kNm]
371.8
399.0
316.6
72.21
582.5
610.9

[kNm]
[]
5829. -176.3
2287. -10.05
8523. -177.9
4148. -0.9974
5809. -174.2
6538. -174.6

Strength Analysis - Summary


Governing conditions are defined as:
A - reinforcing steel tension strain limit
B - concrete compression strain limit
Effective centroid is reported relative to the reference point.
Case

Eff.
Centroid
(y)

Eff.
Centroid
(z)

[kN]
Maxima
3 1.129E-6
Minima
2 593.7E-9

Mu

M/Mu

Governing
Condition

[kNm] [kNm]

Neutral Neutral
Axis
Axis
Angle
Depth
[]
[mm]

-6250. 220.7 8523. 16470. 0.5176 B: Node 4


-3220. 428.5 2287. 12230. 0.1870 B: Node 2

From above it is observed that the Max. M/Mu ratio = 0.5176 which is less than unity. Hence section is
safe.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 45 of 71

MUMBAIMONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

At Pier 2
The ultimate limit state analysis is carried out by the AdSEC software for bending capacity check, whereas
combined shear and torsion design is done by using a spreadsheet. The figure below shows the
arrangement of bars in the box section at the mid span after the completion of the structure.

4.3.2.1 SUMMARY OF BEAM FORCES


The summary of the maximum element forces due to various ultimate load combinations is tabulated below.
The 6 cases summarized below are
Case 1 Max & Min Axial Force + corresponding results
Case 2 - Max & Min My + corresponding results
Case 3 - Max & Min Mz + corresponding results
Negative sign in axial force indicates compression and vice versa.

Table 4.6: Ultimate Load Combinations 1 - 5 (U1-U5)

Elem
65
64
65
60
65
68

LTSE

Load
Axial (kN)
U4(min)
335.08
U4(max)
504.41
U4(min)
228.05
U4(max)
329.31
U3b(max)
7 83
7.83
U3b(max) 105.36

Moment-y
(kNm)
-7561.83
-1568.26
-9045.02
146.61
-2485.19
2485 19
-2523.84

Moment-z
(kNm)
1071.44
470.84
1000.35
123.99
1197 97
1197.97
1350.99

DefinitiveDesignReview
DesignCalculationforFrame17

MM002DDREPWLTSE311050Rev.A1

Page 46 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Specification
General Specification
Code of Practice
Country
Bending Axes

BS5400
United Kingdom
Biaxial

Section 1 Details
Definition
Name
Type
Material
Perimeter
Section Area
Reinforcement Area
Reinforcement

1C4end
Concrete
C60
1.759E+6mm2
23680.mm2
1.346%

Section Nodes
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Y
[mm]
375.0
400.0
400.0
375.0
-375.0
-400.0
-400.0
-375.0

Z
[mm]
1100.
1075.
-1075.
-1100.
-1100.
-1075.
1075.
1100.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 47 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Bars
Bar

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60

[mm]
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0

Z
[mm]
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
-907.0
-891.0
-707.2
-691.2
-507.4
-491.4
-307.7
-291.7
-107.9
-91.89
91.89
107.9
291.7
307.7
491.4
507.4
691.2
707.2
891.0
907.0
-907.0
-891.0
-707.2
-691.2
-507.4
-491.4
-307.7
-291.7
-107.9
-91.89
91.89
107.9
291.7

Diameter
[mm]
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Material

Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe

500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500

Type

Pre-stress Pre-stress
Appl. loads
Force
Strain
include/exclude
pre-stress
[kN]

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 48 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82

326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
-165.0
165.0
-225.0
225.0
-225.0
225.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0

307.7
491.4
507.4
691.2
707.2
891.0
907.0
-500.0
-500.0
250.0
250.0
650.0
650.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0

16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
42.20
42.20
42.20
42.20
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

-1530.
-1530.
-1860.
-1860.
-1860.
-1860.

exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude

Elastic Properties
Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.
Geometric Centroid
Area
Second Moments of Area

y
z
Iyy

0.0mm
0.0mm
1.759E+6mm2
708.4E+9mm4

Izz
Iyz

93.67E+9mm4
37.64E-6mm4

Principal Second Moments of Area Iuu


Izz
Angle
Shear Area Factor
ky
kz
Torsion Constant
Section Modulus
Zy
Plastic Modulus
Radius of Gyration

708.4E+9mm4
93.67E+9mm4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0mm4
644.0E+6mm3

Zz
Zpy

234.2E+6mm3
966.6E+6mm3

Zpz
Ry
Rz

351.5E+6mm3
634.6mm
230.8mm

Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.


Geometric Centroid
EA
EI

y
z
EIyy

-175.9E-9mm
2.818mm
68.93E+6kN
26.46E+6kNm2

EIzz
EIyz

5.431E+6kNm2
-0.001529kNm2

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 49 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


Principal EI

EIuu
EIzz
Angle

Maximum compressive force


Strain at Nmax
Moment at ref. pt. for Nmax

Nu
Myy
Mzz

26.46E+6kNm2
5.431E+6kNm2
-4.167E-9
44210.kN
0.0[-]
0.08260kNm
0.09794kNm

Note: Nmax is the maximum compressive force which can be carried by the section.
This is calculated by applying a constant strain across the entire section, using
ultimate material properties.

Section Material Properties


Type
Name
Weight
Density
Cube Strength
Tensile Strength
Elastic Modulus (short
term)
Poisson's Ratio
Coeff. Thermal Expansion
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
ULS Compression Curve
ULS Tension Curve
SLS Compression Curve
SLS Tension Curve
Aggregate Size

fcu
fct
E

Concrete
C60
Normal Weight
2.300t/m3
60000.kPa
3718.kPa
37.00E+6kPa

0.2000

12.00E-6/C
mc,ULS 1.500
mc,SLS 1.000
0.003500[-]
Recto-parabolic
No-tension
Linear
No-tension
20.00mm

Reinforcement Properties
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve

Fe 500
500000.kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2
Strands
1.857E+6kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 50 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Loading
Applied loads
Load Case
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load

Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case

1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
335.1
504.4
228.0
329.3
7.830
105.4

Myy
[kNm]
-7562.
-1568.
-9045.
146.6
-2485.
-2524.

Mzz
[kNm]
1071.
470.8
1000.
124.0
1198.
1351.

Section 1 Details
1.35% reinforcement in section 1 (1C4end). Check this against code requirements.

ULS Cases Analysed


Name

Loading

Pre-stress
Factor

Strength Analysis - Loads


Case
1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
335.1
504.4
228.0
329.3
7.830
105.4

Myy
[kNm]
-7562.
-1568.
-9045.
146.6
-2485.
-2524.

Mzz
[kNm]
1071.
470.8
1000.
124.0
1198.
1351.

M
[kNm]
7637.
1637.
9100.
192.0
2759.
2863.

[]
-171.9
-163.3
-173.7
-40.22
-154.3
-151.8

Strength Analysis - Summary


Governing conditions are defined as:
A - reinforcing steel tension strain limit
B - concrete compression strain limit
Effective centroid is reported relative to the reference point.
Case

Eff.
Centroid
(y)

Eff.
Centroid
(z)

[kN]
Maxima
3 -1.519E-6
Minima
4 -1.062E-6

Mu

M/Mu

Governing
Condition

[kNm] [kNm]

-8034. 228.0 9100. 15740.


-5564. 329.3 192.0

Neutral Neutral
Axis
Axis
Angle
Depth
[]
[mm]

0.5780 B: Node 3

6917. 0.02776 B: Node 2

From above it is observed that the Max. M/Mu ratio = 0.578 which is less than unity. Hence section is
safe.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 51 of 71

MUMBAIMONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
At Pier 3
The ultimate limit state analysis is carried out by the AdSEC software for bending capacity check, whereas
combined shear and torsion design is done by using a spreadsheet. The figure below shows the
arrangement of bars in the box section at the mid span after the completion of the structure.
4.3.2.1 SUMMARY OF BEAM FORCES
The summary of the maximum element forces due to various ultimate load combinations is tabulated below.
The 6 cases summarized below are
Case 1 Max & Min Axial Force + corresponding results
Case 2 - Max & Min My + corresponding results
Case 3 - Max & Min Mz + corresponding results
Negative sign in axial force indicates compression and vice versa.
Table 4.6: Ultimate Load Combinations 1 - 5 (U1-U5)

Elem
71
70
67
71
67
67

LTSE

Load
Axial (kN)
U3b(min)
U3b( i )
330.6
330 6
U4(max)
419.91
U4(min)
104.75
U4(max)
35.26
U3b(min)
50.46
U3b(max)
60.32

Moment-y Moment-z
(kNm)
(kNm)
-1023.3
1023 3
229.79
229 79
-2239.07
713.1
-9219.54
831.8
2871.36
174.29
-1420.91 941.66
-8310.88 1202.5

DefinitiveDesignReview
DesignCalculationforFrame17

MM002DDREPWLTSE311050Rev.A1

Page 52 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Specification
General Specification
Code of Practice
Country
Bending Axes

BS5400
United Kingdom
Biaxial

Section 1 Details
Definition
Name
Type
Material
Perimeter
Section Area
Reinforcement Area
Reinforcement

1C4end
Concrete
C60
1.759E+6mm2
23680.mm2
1.346%

Section Nodes
Node
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Y
[mm]
375.0
400.0
400.0
375.0
-375.0
-400.0
-400.0
-375.0

Z
[mm]
1100.
1075.
-1075.
-1100.
-1100.
-1075.
1075.
1100.

Bars
Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17
MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 53 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


Bar

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62

[mm]
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
-326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0

Z
[mm]
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
-1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1026.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
1010.
-907.0
-891.0
-707.2
-691.2
-507.4
-491.4
-307.7
-291.7
-107.9
-91.89
91.89
107.9
291.7
307.7
491.4
507.4
691.2
707.2
891.0
907.0
-907.0
-891.0
-707.2
-691.2
-507.4
-491.4
-307.7
-291.7
-107.9
-91.89
91.89
107.9
291.7
307.7
491.4

Diameter
[mm]
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Material

Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe
Fe

500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500

Type

Pre-stress Pre-stress
Appl. loads
Force
Strain
include/exclude
pre-stress
[kN]

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 54 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT


63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82

326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
326.0
-165.0
165.0
-225.0
225.0
-225.0
225.0
-326.0
-244.5
-163.0
-81.50
0.0
81.50
163.0
244.5
326.0

507.4
691.2
707.2
891.0
907.0
-500.0
-500.0
550.0
550.0
850.0
850.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0
-969.0

16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
42.22
42.22
42.20
42.20
42.20
42.20
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00
16.00

Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Strands
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500
Fe 500

Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel

-1530.
-1530.
-1860.
-1860.
-1860.
-1860.

exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude
exclude

Elastic Properties
Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.
Geometric Centroid
Area
Second Moments of Area

y
z
Iyy
Izz
Iyz

Principal Second Moments of Area Iuu

Shear Area Factor

Izz
Angle
ky
kz

Torsion Constant
Section Modulus

Zy

Plastic Modulus

Zz
Zpy

Radius of Gyration

Zpz
Ry
Rz

0.0mm
0.0mm
1.759E+6mm2
708.4E+9mm4
93.67E+9mm4
37.64E-6mm4
708.4E+9mm4
93.67E+9mm4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0mm4
644.0E+6mm3
234.2E+6mm3
966.6E+6mm3
351.5E+6mm3
634.6mm
230.8mm

Properties of the untransformed section, ignoring reinforcement.


Geometric Centroid
EA
EI

y
z
EIyy
EIzz
EIyz

Principal EI

EIuu

-175.9E-9mm
6.125mm
68.93E+6kN
26.46E+6kNm2
5.675E+6kNm2
-0.003643kNm2
26.46E+6kNm2

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 55 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Maximum compressive force


Strain at Nmax
Moment at ref. pt. for Nmax

EIzz
Angle

5.675E+6kNm2
-10.04E-9

Nu

43310.kN
0.0[-]
0.02029kNm
-0.01669kNm

Myy
Mzz

Note: Nmax is the maximum compressive force which can be carried by the section.
This is calculated by applying a constant strain across the entire section, using
ultimate material properties.

Section Material Properties


Type
Name
Weight
Density
Cube Strength
Tensile Strength
Elastic Modulus (short
term)
Poisson's Ratio
Coeff. Thermal Expansion
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
ULS Compression Curve
ULS Tension Curve
SLS Compression Curve
SLS Tension Curve
Aggregate Size

fcu
fct
E

Concrete
C60
Normal Weight
2.300t/m3
60000.kPa
3718.kPa
37.00E+6kPa

0.2000

12.00E-6/C
mc,ULS 1.500
mc,SLS 1.000
0.003500[-]
Recto-parabolic
No-tension
Linear
No-tension
20.00mm

Reinforcement Properties
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve
Name
fy
Modulus
Partial Safety Factor
Maximum Strain
Stress/Strain Curve

Fe 500
500000.kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2
Strands
1.857E+6kPa
200.0E+6kPa
ms,ULS 1.150
ms,SLS 1.000
0.05000[-]
Fig 2

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 56 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL PROJECT

Loading
Applied loads
Load Case
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load
Load

Case
Case
Case
Case
Case
Case

1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
330.6
419.9
104.7
35.26
50.46
60.32

Myy
[kNm]
-1023.
-2239.
-9220.
2871.
-1421.
-8311.

Mzz
[kNm]
229.8
713.1
831.8
174.3
941.7
1202.

Section 1 Details
1.35% reinforcement in section 1 (1C4end). Check this against code requirements.

ULS Cases Analysed


Name

Loading

Pre-stress
Factor

Strength Analysis - Loads


Case
1
2
3
4
5
6

N
[kN]
330.6
419.9
104.7
35.26
50.46
60.32

Myy
[kNm]
-1023.
-2239.
-9220.
2871.
-1421.
-8311.

Mzz
[kNm]
229.8
713.1
831.8
174.3
941.7
1202.

M
[kNm]
1049.
2350.
9257.
2877.
1705.
8397.

[]
-167.3
-162.3
-174.8
-3.474
-146.5
-171.8

Strength Analysis - Summary


Governing conditions are defined as:
A - reinforcing steel tension strain limit
B - concrete compression strain limit
Effective centroid is reported relative to the reference point.
Case

Eff.
Centroid
(y)

Eff.
Centroid
(z)

[kN]
Maxima
3 -3.266E-6
Minima
1 -1.058E-6

Mu

M/Mu

Governing
Condition

[kNm] [kNm]

-35120. 104.7 9257. 18200.

Neutral Neutral
Axis
Axis
Angle
Depth
[]
[mm]

0.5085 B: Node 3

-11130. 330.6 1049. 15080. 0.06953 B: Node 3

From above it is observed that the Max. M/Mu ratio = 0.5085 which is less than unity. Hence section is
safe.

Definitive Design Review Design Calculations of Frame 17


MM001-D-DR-VSP-LTSE-311050 Rev A1

10-April-2013

Page 57 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
4.4 Check for Shear at Hollow section (As per IRC concrete bridge code)
The Guideway beam hollow section is checked for shear capacity at a location of max. shear & corresponding moment &
torsion and then at a location of max. torsion & corresponding shear & moment. The locations are based on sorted results
obtained from MIDAS analysis, as tabulated below:
Location
1st span
2nd span
3rd span

LTSE

Elem

88
95
83
26
34
26
35
43
40

Load
U4(max)
U3b(max)
U4(max)
U4(max)
U3b(min)
U4(min)
U4(min)
U3b(min)
U4(max)

Part
J[23]
J[24]
J[72]
J[27]
J[28]
J[27]
I[29]
I[30]
I[55]

Shear-y
Component Axial (kN) (kN)
Shear-z
129.78
-63.55
Torsion
-234.66 -115.42
Moment-y
230.73
16.45
Shear-z
-208.75
-128.5
Torsion
-268.4
142.45
Moment-y
-215.35 -125.62
Shear-z
83.01
104.35
Torsion
142.71
143.12
Moment-y
35.43
20.87

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

Shear-z Torsion
(kN)
(kNm)
1638.82
234.42
1013.07
419.09
-110.72
113.33
1181.73
576.27
1067.51 -854.75
1165.87
441.82
-1547.42 -789.06
-1302.33 -1102.55
-208.44 -116.89

Moment- Momenty (kNm) z (kNm)


-4270.29
47.96
-2966.69
255.94
7177.02 -246.22
-4871.91
722.95
-3838.51 -839.93
-6264.1
693.31
-5603.39
593.68
-2280.86
828.22
5697.52
-188.7

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 58 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Element No.(refer above table & MIDAS model)
Node end
fck =
fy =
Duct diameter=
B
D
Depth of hollow box inside beam
Width of hollow box inside beam
Eff. Depth of beam
d (m)
Eff. Width of beam
b(m)
dist of T1, T2 from top(m)
dist of T3, T4(m)
dist of T5,T6(m)
Area of T1,T2(mm2)
Area of T3,T4(mm2)
Area of T5,T6(mm2)
Factored PS T1,T2(KN)
Factored PS T3,T4(KN)
Factored PS T5,T6(KN)
Area of beam in section
A (m2)
Dist. of c.g of beam from comp. fibre
y (m)
Moment of inertia of beam
I(m4)
Ecc. of tendon T1,T2
e1(T1,T2) (m)
Ecc. of tendon T3,T4
e2(T3,T4) (m)
Ecc. of tendon T5,T6
e3(T5,T6) (m)
Prestress on beam
P/A (Mpa)
Pe1*y/I (Mpa)
Pe2*y/II (Mpa)
Pe3*y/II (Mpa)
fp-comp (Mpa)
fp-tension(Mpa)
CG of Tendons (m)
Cracking Moment of beam
Mcr(KN-m)
ft(Mpa)
Vco(KN)
From above tables,
M at Max V (kNm)
Max V (kN)
Shear at Max Mn(kN)
Max M (kNm)
Governing Shear (Max V)
Shear stress (Mpa)
Vcr 1 (KN)
Vcr 2 (KN)
Min Vcr (IRC 16.4.4.3) (KN)
V limiting (KN)
Dia of stirrups
Number of stirrups
Dia of links
Number of links
Area of links provided
Asv
Dia of Longi bars
Cover (mm)
Eff.depth of beam
dt
Spacing of stirrups reqd.
Sv req(mm)

LTSE

MPa
MPa
m
m
m
m
m

88
J[23]
60
415
0.085
0.8
2.2
1.6
0.22
2.20
0.4667
1.7
0.9
0.5
1400
1680
1680
1538
1935
1910
0.280
1.1
0.63
-0.5710
0.2064
0.5728
38.5
-3.0
1.4
3.8
40.6
36.3
1.2
22611.6
1.9
5954.55
4270.00
1639.00
1471.00
4545.00
1639.00
1.6
8840.7
7479.7
795.3
5954.5
16
2
12
2
628.3
16
50
2126
450

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

83
J[72]
60
415
0.085
0.8
2.2
1.6
0.22
2.20
0.4667
1.7
0.9
0.5
1400
1680
1260
1538
1935
1910
0.280
1.1
0.63
-0.5710 (-ve indicates below c.g of beam)
0.2064 (+ve indicates above c.g of beam)
0.5728 (+ve indicates above c.g of beam)
38.5
-3.0
1.4
3.8
40.6
36.3
1.2
22611.6
1.9
5954.55
5852.00
563.00
111.00
7177.00
563.00
0.5
2330.8
505.1
795.3
795.3
16
2
12
2
628.3
16
50
2126
450

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 59 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________

4.4.1 Check for Max. Torsion at Hollow section


Element
Max Torsion (KN-m)
Corresponding shear (kN)
B (mm)
D (mm)
Thickness of web (mm)
Thickness of top flange (mm)
Thickness of bottom flange (mm)
Ao (mm2)
Torsional stress v (Mpa)
V min (Mpa)
Ast required
V+Vt (Mpa)
Max allowable stress (Mpa)
Status
dia of stirrups (mm)
spacing of stirrups (mm)
Number of outer legs
Ast (mm2)
T/(2*Ao*.87*fyv)
Ast/Sv
Status
Dia of longi bars
Number of bars in bundle
AsL
(Ast/Sv)*(fyv/fyL)
Minimum spacing req.(mm)
Spacing provided(mm)
Status

LTSE

43
1102.60
1302.30
800
2200
290
250
250
994500
1.9
0.42
Reqd.
2.7
5.80
OK
16.0
100.0
2
201.06
1.54
2.01
OK
16.0
2
402.12
1.27
315.5
200.0
OK

kNm
kN
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
N/mm2
mm
mm
no.
mm2

mm
no.
mm2
mm
mm

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 60 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
4.5 Check for Shear at Solid section (As per IRC concrete bridge code)
The Guideway beam hollow section is checked for shear capacity at a location of max. shear & corresponding moment & torsion and
then at a location of max. torsion & corresponding shear & moment. The locations are based on sorted results obtained from MIDAS
analysis, as tabulated below:

Location
1st span

2nd span

3rd span

LTSE

Elem

61
57
61
65
68
65
67
70
67

Load
U4(max)
U3b(max)
U4(min)
U4(max)
U3b(min)
U4(min)
U4(min)
U4(min)
U4(min)

Part
J[18]
J[17]
J[18]
J[13]
J[14]
J[13]
I[15]
I[16]
I[15]

Shear-y
Component Axial (kN) (kN)
Shear-z
-214.78
-88.93
Torsion
17.89
-133.1
Moment-y
-220.69
-87.89
Shear-z
-222.21 -150.63
Axial
-295.85
155.33
Moment-y
-228.05 -148.11
Shear-z
108.44
112.55
Torsion
94.9
123.37
Moment-y
104.75
114.88

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

Shear-z
(kN)
1840.59
1347.27
1722.21
1503.23
1184.66
1436.11
-1797.62
-1362.57
-1683.88

Torsion Moment-y Moment-z


(kNm)
(kNm)
(kNm)
157.81
-8437.13
331.99
417.45
-5386.02
462.94
132.84
-8517.12
316.6
382.71
-7640.89 1032.63
-1012.87
-6270.28 -1163.06
197.64
-9045.0 1000.35
-571.81
-9011.4
805.45
-1071.78
-4073.85
943.47
-584.86
-9219.54
831.8

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 61 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
Element No.(refer above table & MIDAS model)
Node end
fck =
fy =
Duct diameter=
B
D
Depth of hollow box inside beam
Width of hollow box inside beam
Eff. Depth of beam
d (m)
Eff. Width of beam
b(m)
dist of T1, T2 from top(m)
dist of T3, T4(m)
dist of T5,T6(m)
Area of T1,T2(mm2)
Area of T3,T4(mm2)
Area of T5,T6(mm2)
Factored PS T1,T2(KN)
Factored PS T3,T4(KN)
Factored PS T5,T6(KN)
Area of beam in section
A (m2)
Dist. of c.g of beam from comp. fibre
y (m)
Moment of inertia of beam
I(m4)
Ecc. of tendon T1,T2
e1(T1,T2) (m)
Ecc. of tendon T3,T4
e2(T3,T4) (m)
Ecc. of tendon T5,T6
e3(T5,T6) (m)
Prestress on beam
P/A (Mpa)
Pe1*y/I (Mpa)
Pe2*y/II (Mpa)
Pe3*y/II (Mpa)
fp-comp (Mpa)
fp-tension(Mpa)
CG of Tendons (m)
Cracking Moment of beam
Mcr(KN-m)
ft(Mpa)
Vco(KN)
From above tables,
M at Max V (kNm)
Max V (kN)
Shear at Max Mn(kN)
Max M (kNm)
Governing Shear (Max V)
Shear stress (Mpa)
Vcr 1 (KN)
Vcr 2 (KN)
Min Vcr (IRC 16.4.4.3) (KN)
V limiting (KN)
Dia of stirrups
Number of stirrups
Dia of links
Number of links
Area of links provided
Asv
Dia of Longi bars
Cover (mm)
Eff.depth of beam
dt
Spacing of stirrups reqd.
Sv req(mm)

LTSE

MPa
MPa
m
m
m
m
m

61
J[18]
60
415
0.085
0.8
2.2
0
0
2.20
0.6867
1.6
0.8
0.4
1400
1680
1680
1519
1920
1884
1.511
1.1
0.71
-0.5000
0.2506
0.6511
7.0
-2.4
1.5
3.8
10.0
4.1
1.3
4500.69
1.9
4118.46
8437.00
1841.00
1722.00
8517.00
1841.00
1.2
1232.2
1160.1
1170.2
1170.2
16
2
16
2
804.2
16
50
2126
450

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

67
I[15]
60
415
0.085
0.8
2.2
0
0
2.20
0.6867
1.6
0.6
0.3
1400
1680
1260
1491
1832
1848
1.511
1.1
0.71
-0.5000 (-ve indicates below c.g of beam)
0.5472 (+ve indicates above c.g of beam)
0.8478 (+ve indicates above c.g of beam)
6.8
-2.3
3.1
4.9
12.5
1.2
1.4
2620.06
1.9
4071.66
9011.00
1798.00
1684.00
9220.00
1798.00
1.2
797.7
753.4
1170.2
1170.2
16
2
16
2
804.2
16
50
2126
450

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 62 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
______________________________________________________________________________
4.5.1 Check for Max. Torsion at Hollow section
Element
Max Torsion (KN-m)
Corresponding shear (kN)
B (mm)
D (mm)
Thickness of web (mm)
Thickness of top flange (mm)
Thickness of bottom flange (mm)
Ao (mm2)
Torsional stress v (Mpa)
V min (Mpa)
Ast required
V+Vt (Mpa)
Max allowable stress (Mpa)
Status
dia of stirrups (mm)
spacing of stirrups (mm)
Number of outer legs
Ast (mm2)
T/(2*Ao*.87*fyv)
Ast/Sv
Status
Dia of longi bars
Number of bars in bundle
AsL
(Ast/Sv)*(fyv/fyL)
Minimum spacing req.(mm)
Spacing provided(mm)
Status

LTSE

70
1072.000
1363.000
800
2200
290
250
250
994500.0
1.9
0.42
Reqd.
2.6
5.80
OK
16.0
100.0
2
201.06
1.49
2.0
OK
16.0
2
402.12
1.24
324.6
200.0
OK

kNm
kN
mm
mm
mm
mm
mm
2
mm
2
N/mm
2
N/mm
2

N/mm
2
N/mm
mm
mm
no.
2
mm

mm
no.
mm2
mm
mm

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1

Page 63 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4.6 END BLOCK DESIGN
4.6.1 GEOMETRY AND PRESTRESS LOADS
The cross-sectional geometry at the expansion joint end of the PC Guideway beam is as
shown in the following figure. The six tendons are stressed to the following forces and the
anchorages are 265mm square

Anchorage Data
Location
Anchor

X(mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6

Anchor Size

Y(mm)
-165
-165
-165
-165
-165
-165

X Dim (mm)
550
550
975
975
1600
1600

Jacking Force(KN)

Y Dim
(mm)

275
275
275
275
275
275

Jacking
Jacking
Force per Force of
Strand
Anchor

Nos of
strands
275
275
275
275
275
275

10
10
12
12
12
12

195
195
195
195
195
195

1950
1950
2340
2340
2340
2340

4.6.2 PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT


Provide reinforcement around each anchorage to resist the bursting forces. The magnitude of
these forces depends on the size of the anchorage and dimensions of the theoretical prism
surrounding the anchorage as tabulated below

Prism Dimensions

Cable
1
2
3
4
5
6

Fbst / Pk

Area of Steel required

Vertically Laterally
Vertically Laterally Vertically Laterally Vertically Laterally
425
330
0.65
0.83
0.126
0.11
1227
1073
425
330
0.65
0.83
0.126
0.11
1227
1073
675
330
0.41
0.83
0.198
0.11
2314
1287
675
330
0.41
0.83
0.198
0.11
2314
1287
675
330
0.41
0.83
0.198
0.11
2314
1287
675
330
0.41
0.83
0.198
0.11
2314
1287
Maximum reinforcement =
Provide
12 dia
nos of rounds =

LTSE

Ypo / Yo

2314 mm2
helical
upto

330 mm from face

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 64 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________
4.6.3 SECONDARY OR EQUILIBRIUM REINFORCEMENT
As well as providing primary reinforcement in the immediate vicinity of the anchorages, it is
necessary to consider the overall equilibrium of the anchor block and to determine any outofbalance forces and moments that may be set up by the anchorages acting individually or
together. Check for the following stressing sequence.
Case

Stressed cables/ Tendons


1
2
3
4
5
6

1
1
1
1
1
1

2
2
2
2
2

3
3
3
3

4
4
4

5
5

Transverse Out-Of-balance Moments In Vertical Plane


Transverse out-of-balance moments in vertical plane are as tabulated below
Case-1

Case-2

Net
Net Vertical Due to
Vertical
Dimension
Due to
Due to
Moment
distributio Due to
Moment
from
n
anchorages (KNm)
Bottom distribution anchorages (KNm)
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
110
13.14
0.00
13.14
26.28
0.00
26.28
220
51.48
0.00
51.48
102.96
0.00
102.96
330
113.42
0.00
113.42
226.85
0.00
226.85
440
197.36
-2.68
194.68
394.71
-5.36
389.35
550
301.67
-67.03
234.64
603.35
-134.06
469.29
660
424.77 -217.18
207.59
849.54
-434.36
415.17
770
565.03 -429.00
136.03 1130.06
-858.00
272.06
880
720.86 -643.50
77.36 1441.71
-1287.00
154.71
990
890.64 -858.00
32.64 1781.28
-1716.00
65.28
1100
1072.77 -1072.50
0.27 2145.54
-2145.00
0.54
1210
1265.64 -1287.00
-21.36 2531.28
-2574.00
-42.72
1320
1467.64 -1501.50
-33.86 2935.29
-3003.00
-67.71
1430
1677.17 -1716.00
-38.83 3354.35
-3432.00
-77.65
1540
1892.63 -1930.50
-37.87 3785.25
-3861.00
-75.75
1650
2112.39 -2145.00
-32.61 4224.78
-4290.00
-65.22
1760
2334.86 -2359.50
-24.64 4669.72
-4719.00
-49.28
1870
2558.43 -2574.00
-15.57 5116.85
-5148.00
-31.15
1980
2781.48 -2788.50
-7.02 5562.97
-5577.00
-14.03
2090
3002.43 -3003.00
-0.57 6004.85
-6006.00
-1.15
2200
3219.65 -3217.50
2.15 6439.29
-6435.00
4.29
MAX
234.64
MAX
469.29
MIN
-38.83
MIN
-77.65

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 65 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Case-4

Case-5

Net
Net Vertical Due to
Vertical
Dimension
Due to
Due to
Moment
distributio Due to
Moment
from
n
anchorages (KNm)
Bottom distribution anchorages (KNm)
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
110
21.69
0.00
21.69
43.39
0.00
43.39
220
85.41
0.00
85.41
170.83
0.00
170.83
330
189.11
0.00
189.11
378.22
0.00
378.22
440
330.74
-2.68
328.06
661.48
-5.36
656.12
550
508.26
-67.03
441.23 1016.52
-134.06
882.46
660
719.62
-217.18
502.44 1439.25
-434.36 1004.88
770
962.78
-429.00
533.78 1925.57
-858.00 1067.57
880
1235.69
-651.18
584.51 2471.39
-1302.37 1169.02
990
1536.31
-956.94
579.37 3072.63
-1913.89 1158.74
1100
1862.59
-1365.66
496.93 3725.18
-2731.33
993.85
1210
2212.49
-1836.90
375.59 4424.97
-3673.80
751.17
1320
2583.95
-2308.80
275.15 5167.90
-4617.60
550.30
1430
2974.94
-2780.70
194.24 5949.88
-5561.40
388.48
1540
3383.41
-3252.60
130.81 6766.81
-6505.20
261.61
1650
3807.31
-3724.50
82.81 7614.62
-7449.00
165.62
1760
4244.60
-4196.40
48.20 8489.20
-8392.80
96.40
1870
4693.23
-4668.30
24.93 9386.46
-9336.60
49.86
1980
5151.16
-5140.20
10.96 10302.32 -10280.40
21.92
2090
5616.34
-5612.10
4.24 11232.68 -11224.20
8.48
2200
6086.73
-6084.00
2.73 12173.46 -12168.00
5.46
MAX
584.51
MAX
1169.02
MIN
0.00
MIN
0.00

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 66 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Case-5

Case-6

Net
Net Vertical Due to
Vertical
Dimension
Due to
Due to
Moment
distributio Due to
Moment
from
anchorages (KNm)
n
Bottom distribution anchorages (KNm)
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
110
19.65
0.00
19.65
39.29
0.00
39.29
220
78.39
0.00
78.39
156.78
0.00
156.78
330
175.94
0.00
175.94
351.88
0.00
351.88
440
312.00
-2.68
309.32
624.01
-5.36
618.64
550
486.29
-67.03
419.26
972.57
-134.06
838.51
660
698.50
-217.18
481.32 1397.00
-434.36
962.64
770
948.35
-429.00
519.35 1896.70
-858.00 1038.70
880
1235.54
-651.18
584.36 2471.09
-1302.37 1168.72
990
1559.79
-956.94
602.85 3119.58
-1913.89 1205.69
1100
1920.80
-1365.66
555.13 3841.60
-2731.33 1110.27
1210
2318.27
-1836.90
481.37 4636.55
-3673.80
962.75
1320
2751.92
-2308.80
443.12 5503.85
-4617.60
886.25
1430
3221.46
-2780.70
440.76 6442.92
-5561.40
881.52
1540
3726.58
-3278.15
448.43 7453.17
-6556.31
896.86
1650
4267.01
-3874.07
392.93 8534.02
-7748.15
785.87
1760
4842.44
-4570.80
271.64 9684.88
-9141.60
543.28
1870
5452.59
-5300.10
152.49 10905.17 -10600.20
304.97
1980
6097.15
-6029.40
67.75 12194.31 -12058.80
135.51
2090
6775.85
-6758.70
17.15 13551.71 -13517.40
34.31
2200
7488.39
-7488.00
0.39 14976.78 -14976.00
0.78
MAX
602.85
MAX
1205.69
MIN
0.00
MIN
0.00

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 67 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Net Transverese Moment in Vertical Plane
1400.00
1200.00
1000.00

Case1
Case2

800.00

Case3

600.00

Case4
Series5

400.00

Case5
Case6

200.00
0.00

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

-200.00

Maximum moment =
lever arm =
Fy
=
Area of steel required =

1205.69
1.1
240
4567.02285

KNm
m
Mpa
mm2

Provide
2 nos
Area provided =

LTSE

2T
8846.72 mm2

16 @

100 mm c/c for

1.1 m from
face

OK

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 68 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Transverse Out-Of-balance Moments In Horizontal Plane
Transverse out-of-balance moments in vertical plane are as tabulated below
Case-1

Case-2

Net
Vertical
Net Vertical Due to
Dimension
Moment
Due to
Due to
Moment
distributio Due to
from
n
anchorages (KNm)
Bottom distribution anchorages (KNm)
0
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
110
11.19
0.00
11.19
22.38
0.00
22.38
220
43.88
0.00
43.88
87.75
0.00
87.75
330
96.75
0.00
96.75
193.50
0.00
193.50
440
168.49
0.00
168.49
336.99
0.00
336.99
550
257.79
-22.54
235.26
515.59
-45.08
470.51
660
363.33 -122.71
240.63
726.66
-245.41
481.25
770
483.80 -298.35
185.45
967.59
-596.70
370.89
880
617.87 -491.40
126.47 1235.74
-982.80
252.94
990
764.24 -684.45
79.79 1528.49
-1368.90
159.59
1100
921.59 -877.50
44.09 1843.19
-1755.00
88.19
1210
1088.61 -1070.55
18.06 2177.22
-2141.10
36.12
1320
1263.98 -1263.60
0.38 2527.96
-2527.20
0.76
1430
1446.38 -1456.65
-10.27 2892.77
-2913.30
-20.53
1540
1634.51 -1649.70
-15.19 3269.01
-3299.40
-30.39
1650
1827.04 -1842.75
-15.71 3654.07
-3685.50
-31.43
1760
2022.66 -2035.80
-13.14 4045.32
-4071.60
-26.28
1870
2220.06 -2228.85
-8.79 4440.11
-4457.70
-17.59
1980
2417.91 -2421.90
-3.99 4835.83
-4843.80
-7.97
2090
2614.92 -2614.95
-0.03 5229.84
-5229.90
-0.06
2200
2809.76 -2808.00
1.76 5619.51
-5616.00
3.51
MAX
240.63
MAX
481.25
MIN
-15.71
MIN
-31.43

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 69 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Case-4

Case-5

Net
Net Vertical Due to
Vertical
Dimension
Due to
Due to
Moment
distributio Due to
Moment
from
n
anchorages (KNm)
Bottom distribution anchorages (KNm)
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
110
15.50
0.00
15.50
31.01
0.00
31.01
220
61.43
0.00
61.43
122.85
0.00
122.85
330
136.89
0.00
136.89
273.79
0.00
273.79
440
241.03
0.00
241.03
482.06
0.00
482.06
550
372.96
-22.54
350.42
745.91
-45.08
700.84
660
531.80
-122.71
409.09 1063.59
-245.41
818.18
770
716.68
-298.35
418.33 1433.35
-596.70
836.65
880
926.71
-491.40
435.31 1853.43
-982.80
870.63
990
1161.04
-684.45
476.59 2322.08
-1368.90
953.18
1100
1418.77
-877.75
541.02 2837.54
-1755.50 1082.05
1210
1699.03
-1131.51
567.53 3398.07
-2263.01 1135.06
1320
2000.95
-1492.11
508.84 4001.91
-2984.22 1017.69
1430
2323.65
-1936.35
387.30 4647.30
-3872.70
774.60
1540
2666.25
-2386.80
279.45 5332.49
-4773.60
558.89
1650
3027.87
-2837.25
190.62 6055.74
-5674.50
381.24
1760
3407.64
-3287.70
119.94 6815.28
-6575.40
239.88
1870
3804.68
-3738.15
66.53 7609.36
-7476.30
133.06
1980
4218.12
-4188.60
29.52 8436.24
-8377.20
59.04
2090
4647.07
-4639.05
8.02 9294.15
-9278.10
16.05
2200
5090.67
-5089.50
1.17 10181.34 -10179.00
2.34
MAX
567.53
MAX
1135.06
MIN
0.00
MIN
0.00

Case-5

Case-6

Net
Net Vertical Due to
Vertical
Dimension
Due to
Due to
Moment
distributio Due to
Moment
from
anchorages (KNm)
n
Bottom distribution anchorages (KNm)
0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
110
10.49
0.00
10.49
20.97
0.00
20.97
220
42.94
0.00
42.94
85.87
0.00
85.87
330
98.84
0.00
98.84
197.69
0.00
197.69
440
179.70
0.00
179.70
359.39
0.00
359.39
550
286.98
-22.54
264.45
573.97
-45.08
528.89
660
422.20
-122.71
299.49
844.40
-245.41
598.99
770
586.83
-298.35
288.48 1173.66
-596.70
576.96
880
782.37
-491.40
290.97 1564.74
-982.80
581.94
990
1010.30
-684.45
325.85 2020.61
-1368.90
651.71
1100
1272.13
-877.75
394.38 2544.25
-1755.50
788.76
1210
1569.33
-1131.51
437.82 3138.65
-2263.01
875.64
1320
1903.39
-1492.11
411.29 3806.79
-2984.22
822.57
1430
2275.82
-1936.35
339.47 4551.64
-3872.70
678.94
1540
2688.09
-2386.80
301.29 5376.19
-4773.60
602.59
1650
3141.71
-2837.50
304.21 6283.42
-5675.00
608.42
1760
3638.15
-3348.66
289.49 7276.30
-6697.31
578.99
1870
4178.91
-3966.66
212.25 8357.82
-7933.32
424.50
1980
4765.48
-4668.30
97.18 9530.96
-9336.60
194.36
2090
5399.35
-5376.15
23.20 10798.70 -10752.30
46.40
2200
6082.01
-6084.00
-1.99 12164.02 -12168.00
-3.98
MAX
437.82
MAX
875.64
MIN
-1.99
MIN
-3.98

LTSE

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 70 of 71

MUMBAI MONORAIL
_____________________________________________________________________________________

Maximum moment =
lever arm =
Fy
=
Area of steel required =

1135.06
1.1
200
5159.35239

KNm
m
Mpa
mm2

Provide
2 nos
Area provided =

LTSE

2T
8846.72491 mm2

16 @

100 mm c/c for

1.1 m from face

OK

Definitive Design Review


Design Calculation for Frame 17

MM002-D-DR-EPW-LTSE-311050 Rev. A1
Page 71 of 71

S-ar putea să vă placă și