Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
INTRODUCTION
As one of the largest and most established vertically integrated photovoltaic (PV) manufacturers on the planet, SolarWorld is intimately involved with every step of the solar PV value chain from raw silicon to installed systems to end of life recycling. This complete knowledge base combined with our extensive history provide the critical insight required to lead the solar industry on technical topics.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the mechanical design of photovoltaic systems for wind and snow loads in the United States, and provide guidance using The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE 7-05 and ASCE 7-10 as appropriate. With the introduction of the ASCE 7-10, there are two potential design principles used for calculating wind and snow loads for PV systems in the U.S. until all state building codes have transitioned to ASCE 7-10. This paper will show how to calculate for wind and snow loads using both design principles.
SolarWorld modules have been tested according to UL and IEC standards and the maximum design loads for various mounting methods are provided in the Sunmodule User Instruction guide. Once we have gone through the sample calculations and have the applicable wind and snow loads, we will compare them to SolarWorlds higher mechanical load capacities to ensure that the Sunmodule solar modules are in compliance.
The design methodology in this document has been third party reviewed. Please see certified letter at the end of this document for more details.
Figure 1. A typical rooftop solar installation. U.S. model building codes have used ASCE 7-05 as the basis for several years, which largely follows the design principles of Allowable Stress Design. Recently ASCE 7-10 was published and has become the basis for the 2012 series of the International Codes (I-Codes). ASCE 7-10 represents a shift in design principles toward Load Resistance Factor Design. A few states have already adopted the 2012 International Building Code 2012 (IBC) that includes references to ASCE 7-10 and, for the first time, specifically mentions PV systems. There are several key differences between these two versions of ASCE 7 standards. This paper provides sample calculations following both ASCE 7 standards that are reflected in the 2012 IBC and earlier versions.
Below are the portions of the code that will be referenced in the sample calculations:
In this paper, examples explain step-by-step procedures for calculating wind and snow loads on PV systems with the following qualifications in accordance with ASCE. The recommended chapter references for ASCE 7-05 are: Chapter 2 Load Combinations Chapter 6 Wind Load Calculations Chapter 7 Snow Load Calculations In ASCE 7 -10, the chapters have been re-organized and provide more detailed guidance on certain topics. The recommended chapter references are: Chapter 2 Load Combinations Chapter 7 Snow Load Calculations Chapters 26 31 Wind Load Calculations Example calculations: In the following examples, we outline how a designer should calculate the effect of wind and snow loads on a PV module for residential and commercial buildings based on few assumptions and using the Low-Rise Building Simplified Procedure. ASCE 7-05: Section 6.4 ASCE 7-10: Section 30.5 In the Simplified Method the system must have the following qualifications (see ASCE 7.05 section 6.4.1.2 or ASCE 7-10 section 30.5.1 for further explanation): The modules shall be parallel to surface of the roof with no more than 10 inches of space between the roof surface and bottom of the PV module. The building height must be less than 60 feet. The building must be enclosed, not open or partially enclosed structure like carport. The building is regular shaped with no unusual geometrical irregularity in spatial form, for example a geodesic dome.
The building is not in an extreme geographic location such as a narrow canyon a steep cliff. The building has a flat or gable roof with a pitch less than 45 degrees or a hip roof with a pitch less than 27 degrees. In case of designing more complicated projects the following sections are recommended: ASCE 7-05: Section 6.5.13.2 ASCE 7-10: Section 30.8 Example 1 - Residential Structure in Colorado: System Details: Location: Colorado Terrain: Urban, suburban, wooded, closely spaced obstructions Exposure: Class B Building Type: Single-story residential (10- to 15-feet tall) Mean height of roof: ~12.33 feet Building Shape: Gable roof with 30 pitch (7:12) System: Two Rail System; attached module at four points along the long side between 1/8 to 1/4 points as described in the SolarWorld Sunmodule User Instruction guide Module area: 18.05 ft (Reference: Sunmodule datasheet) Module weight: 46.7 lbs (Reference: Sunmodule datasheet) Site ground snow load (Pg): 20 psf
Ct = Thermal factor I = Importance factor Pf = Snow load on flat roof Pg = Ground snow load Ps = Sloped roof snow load Load Combination D* = Dead load E = Earthquake load F = Load due to fluids with well-defined pressures and maximum heights H = Load due to lateral earth pressure, ground water pressure or pressure of bulk materials L = Live load Lr = Roof live load R = Rain load S* = Snow load T = Self-straining load W* = Wind load
Hip Roof
Gable Roof
* In this white paper we only use dead, snow and wind loads.
4. Determine wind pressure at h = 30 ft, Pnet30, from Figure 6.3 5. Determine adjustment for building height and exposure, , from Figure 6.3 Adjustment factor for Exposure B is = 1.00 6. Determine adjusted wind pressure, Pnet, from Equation 6-1 Pnet = Kzt Pnet30 Wind effective area is the pressure area on the module that is distributed between four mounting clamps. Each mid-clamp takes one-quarter of the pressure and holds two modules which are equal to one-half area of one module. Area of module is 18.05 square feet. Effective area is ~10 square feet. Pnet for wind speed of 90 mph and the wind effective area of 10 ft2:
1) 1.4D 2) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5 (Lr or S or R) 3) 1.2D + 1.6 (Lr or S or R) + (L or 0.5W) 4) 1.2D + 1.0W + L + 0.5 (LR or S or R) 5) 1.2D + 1.0E + L + 0.2S 6) 0.9D + 1.0W 7) 0.9D + 1.0E
Fmin, max
Fmin, max
When two rails are supporting the module with topdown clamps, the module design capacity is: Downward: +113 psf Upward: -64 psf These values are well above the governing design loads of: Downward: +37.4 psf Upward: -25.7 psf To distribute the combined loads on the module that are transferring to the rails, please refer to the Mounting User Instruction guide and ASCE 7-10 section 30.4.
When two rails are supporting the module with topdown clamps, the module design capacity is: Downward: +55 psf Upward: 33 psf These values are well above the governing design loads of: Downward: +23.5 psf Upward: -15.45 psf To distribute the combined loads on the module that are transferring to the rails, please refer to the Mounting User Instruction guide and ASCE 7-05 section 6.5.12.2.
10
Example calculations In the following example we outline how a designer should calculate the effect of wind and snow on a PV module for commercial buildings based on few assumptions and using Main Wind-force Resisting Systems design. ASCE 7-05: Section 6.5.12.4.1 ASCE 7-10: Section 30.4 Example 2- Commercial Structure in Colorado: Location: Colorado Terrain: Urban, suburban, wooded, closely spaced obstructions
Exposure: Class B Building Type: Two-story Commercial (25 feet tall) Mean height of roof: ~25.33 feet Building Shape: Gable roof with 5 pitch (1:12) System: Two Rail System; attached module at four points along the long side between 1/8 to 1/4 points as described in the SolarWorld Sunmodule User Instruction guide Module area: 18.05 ft. (Reference: Sunmodule Datasheet) Module weight: 46.7 lbs (Reference: Sunmodule Datasheet) Site ground snow load (Pg ): 20 psf
Ct = Thermal factor I = Importance factor Pf = Snow load on flat roof Pg = Ground snow load Ps = Sloped roof snow load Load Combination D* = Dead load E = Earthquake load F = Load due to fluids with well-defined pressures and maximum heights H = Load due to lateral earth pressure, ground water pressure or pressure of bulk materials L = Live load Lr = Roof live load R = Rain load S* = Snow load T = Self-straining load W* = Wind load
* In this white paper we only use dead, snow and wind loads.
11
4. Determine velocity pressure exposure coefficient, Kz of Kh, see Table 6-3 For exposure B and height of 25 ft, Kz = 0.7 5. Determine velocity pressure, qh, Eq. 6-15 qh = 0.00256 x Kz x Kzt x Kd x V2 x 1 6. Determine net pressure coefficient, GCp See Fig. 6-11B Downward: GCp = 0.3 Upward: GCp = -1.0 (zone 1) -1.8 (zone 2) -2.8 (zone 3)
12
13
1) 1.4D 2) 1.2D + 1.6L + 0.5 (Lr or S or R) 3) 1.2D + 1.6 (Lr or S or R) + (L or 0.5W) 4) 1.2D + 1.0W + L + 0.5 (Lr or S or R) 5) 1.2D + 1.0E + L + 0.2S 6) 0.9D + 1.0W 7) 0.9D + 1.0E
The highest values for upward and downward pressures will govern the design.
The highest values for upward and downward pressures will govern the design.
14
Fmin, max
Fmin, max
For the case of two rails simply supporting the module with top-down clamps, the module design capacity is: Downward: +113 psf Upward: -64 psf These values are above the governing design loads of: Downward: +38 psf Upward: -53.7 psf To distribute the combined loads which are transferring to the rails please refer to the Mounting User Instruction and ASCE 7-10 section 30.4.
For the case of two rails simply supporting the module with top-down clamps, the module design capacity is: Downward: +55 psf Upward: -33 psf These values are above the governing design loads of: Downward: +20.3 psf Upward: -33 psf To distribute the combined loads which are transferring to the rails please refer to the Mounting User Instruction and ASCE 7.05 section 6.5.12.2.
SW-02-5156US-MEC 04-2013 |
15
As this white paper illustrates, SolarWorld Sunmodules easily meet many high wind and snow load requirements within the United States and therefore are ideal for installation in most climates. The ability to meet these requirements is essential when designing solar systems that are expected to perform in various weather conditions for at least 25 years. As Americas solar leader for over 35 years, SolarWorlds quality standards are unmatched in the industry. Unlike most other solar manufacturers in the market today, our systems have proven performance in real world conditions for over 25 years. References 1. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers/ Structural Engineering Institute, 2006. Print. 2. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Reston, Va.: American Society of Civil Engineers :, 2010. Print. 3. International building code 2009. Country Club Hills, Ill.: International Code Council, 2009. Print. 4. International building code 2006. New Jersey ed. Country Club Hills, IL: The Council, 2007. Print.
879 SYCAMORE CANYON RD. PASO ROBLES, CA 93446 (805) 423 423-1326 1326 STRUCTURAL LETTER OF APPROVAL Date: Project Project: EPS Job Number: To: December ecember 30, 30 2012 Solar Module odule Design Loads Methodology Review 12-SWD003 SWD003 Amir Sheikh SolarWorld Americas (SolarWorld) 4650 Adohr Lane Camarillo, CA 93012 Matthew Gilliss Engineered Power Solutions (EPS)
12/31/14
From:
A At t the request of SolarWorld, Engineered Power Solutions (EPS) has reviewed the design meth methodology odology presented in SolarWorld SolarWorlds s White White Paper Paper titled: title Determining Wind and Snow S Loads for Solar Panels (Version 7) 7). The paper presents the recommended recommended design methodology for determining the code prescribed wind and snow loads for solar modules mounted on and flush to a roof surface in accordance with either the 2009 009 (and 2006) International International Building Code (IBC) - which reference references the 2005 Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE 7 7-05), or the 2012 IBC which whi references ASCE 77-10. EPS has found that the design methodology methodology and examples presented in this paper are consistent ent with the design inten intentions ions of each said building code. This letter is in approval of the general design methodology for flush roof mounted solar modules only as discussed in the referenced paper. paper. It is the responsibility of the project engineer of record to addres address the site specific loading conditions for each project. Please lease note that the industry recommended recommended design methodology for roof mounted solar systems has continually changed over recent years as new studies are published. Because of this, EPS recommends periodically reviewing the stated methodology to ensure it matches with the most current rrent code requirements and industry recommendations. P Please lease feel free to contact me with any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, Matthew B. Gilliss, P.E., LEED AP Engineered Power Solutions Letter of Approval SolarWorld Design Loads Methodology Review Page 1