Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
0 INTRODUCTION
A beam having more than two supports is called as continuous beam. The supports at the ends are called as the end supports, while all the other supports are called as intermediate support. It may or may not have overhang. It is statically indeterminate beam. A continuous beam is a structural component that provides resistance to bending when a load or force is applied. These beams are commonly used in bridges. A beam of this type has more than two points of support along its length. These are usually in the same horizontal plane, and the spans between the supports are in one straight line. In contrast to a simply supported beam, which has supports at each end and a load that is distributed in some way along its length, a continuous beam is much stiffer and stronger. A bridge that is made up of beams that span between only two supports is called a simply supported beam bridge. If two or more beams are joined together rigidly over multiple supports, the bridge becomes continuous. The two main factors for consideration in the design of a continuous beam are the type of load and the strength characteristics of the material used to construct the beam. The reactions that occur at the supports of a simply supported beam can be determined by analyzing only the forces applied to the beam.
2.0 OBJECTIVE
The objective of the experiment is to determine the magnitude of fixing moment in a continuous beam by experiment and to compare this value with the value obtained theoretically.
3.0 THEORY
Consider the beam shown below ,
EQUATION 2
4.0 APPARATUS
The following are required : i. ii. iii. Two knife edge support Test beam Three stirrup
iv.
v.
vi.
Spring balance
vii.
viii.
5.0 PROCEDURE
i.
ii.
First of all , we must adjust the dial gauge to zero by turning the hazel .
iii.
iv. v.
The spring balance has been adjusted by using the spring balance adjuster until the dial gauge reads zero . Reading of spring balance has been recorded.
vi.
Then, we increased w1 by 10N and W2 by 5N and the process has been repeated until W1 = 50N
6.0 RESULTS
W1
10
20
30
40
50
W2 Ro
0 0
5 3
10 3
15 3
20 3
25 3
Rf
13
16
18
R actual = Rf- Ro
10
13
15
7.0 CALCULATION
10
8.0 DISCUSSION
1. The comparison between the theoretical and actual results slightly differs due to certain factors :
Observation error @ Parallax errors due to reading taken The dial gauge may not calibrated Small vibration and movement interferences which effects the reading on dynamometers Slightly inclined workbench which may cause vectored load into 2 axis components
2. What we can see based on the graph that we plotted; we can see that the more magnitude applied on the beam, the actual reading becomes higher. This is happened because the load hanger has differences load.
11
9.0 CONCLUSION
It can be conclusively said that the reaction away from the cantilever displays much reaction force compared to the one that is closer to it. Based on the observation the experiment has shown that there will be more deflection at the other end of the beam as the beam gets longer away from cantilever point. Even though there some errors or indifferences in the results compared to theoretical, however the principal idea shows that both theoretical and experimental shows the same concept of cantilever deflection which causes higher reaction force as it moves away from the cantilever point.
12
10.0
REFERENCES
www.atapaje.blogspot.com http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-continuous-beam.htm
13