Basil Chulev The invention of the "Slavic" Fairytale (From the monk Foma to "South-Slavia")

1. Introduction After the fall of the "Berlin wall" and the following relative emancipation of many uropean nations which came out under the !"th century #$ron Curtain# caused %y the #Cold &ar# the imposition of enforced history %y former and current empires over the last few centuries is e'periencing serious recession( &ithout the astern %lock censorship) many uropean nations %egan to work %ack and rediscover their own) and conse*uently + common uropean history( $n recent years scientists from C,ech -epu%lic) Croatia) .acedonia) /oland) -ussia) Slovenia) etc( as well as &estern countries such as $taly) ngland) Canada) the 0etherlands) .e'ico) 1ermany) 2SA and others) spawned considera%le num%er of scientific studies and researches which have contri%uted for faster healing and correction of the politically-distorted uropean history( At last) long-o%structed 3istorical -evision and the painstaking removal of the fictional "Great Migration of Peoples") the fantastic fa%le of "Slavic mythical homeland behind the Carpathians") and the removal of the a%surd linguistic division on "Centum" and "Satem" languages - has %egan( $n order to understand why and how all this is possi%le to happen) here are some of the causes and conse*uences of the uropean counterfeit history( Starting with a fairy tale4

2. The fairytale of the "Third Rome" 5he fairytale of the "Slavs which came from behind the Carpathians " traces its roots deep from another even older fairytale - the fa%le of the "Third Rome" (or "!nd 5sarigrad") + the city of .oskow( $n the decades after the fall of Constantinople under 6ttoman occupation in 789:) and the 5urkish flood over .acedonia and .acedonian peninsula) happened the second mass e'odus of the population) similar to the one following the -oman occupation in the !nd century B(C( (( $t created a second wave of emigration northward) %y a myriad of .acedonian communities and tri%es( $n such new re*uirements) dispersion and lack of religious center like the ;onsantinopol (Constantinople) was) the church clergy rised the idea to promote .oskow as the " Third Rome" (or the "New New Rome")( Conceived in 5ver) during the reign of /rince Boris of 5ver) where the monk Foma wrote the " ulogy pious of /rince Boris Ale'androvich") the idea to promote .oskow as "5hird -ome" was readily accepted %y the church circles across the then newly esta%lished -ussian principalities4 ;iev) .oskow) /#skov and 0ovgorod( Specific steps for the reali,ation of this idea were made during the reign of the /rince $van $$$ of -ussia) who therefore married Sofia /al<ologus) the niece of ;onstantin

(Constantine) =$ /al<ologus) the last christian emperor of ;onsantinopol (Constantinople)( $van $$$ through this marriage o%tained the legal right as a successor to the astern -oman mpire( After this legal intervention) the initial idea of the monk Foma was first pu%licly promoted and raised in /anag>ur (pu%lic) letter composed %y another -ussian monk) Filofe> from /#skov in 797") to his divine son of 1rand /rince of .oskow) $van $$$ ?asilevich( From the letter he (the /rince $van) declared4 "Both Romes have fallen The third one stands !nd there will be no fourth Nobody can replace our christian "ingdom#" &ith this "o%,nana" the false foundations for the rising of the then still none'istent "Slavs" were set( Filofe> and the church in the letter of $van $$$ ?asilevich e'plicitly identified the " third Rome" with .oskow principality( 5hey also added other invented "facts") in order to make the fairytale more %eautiful) such as the fictional genealogy and apparent consanguinity of $van $$$ ?asilevich with the -oman emperors( 3e allegedly came "through $% generations bac" from the genetic line of the Roman &mperor !ugustus)" thus "proving" that he was successor to the astern -oman mpire not only %ecause of his marriage to Sofia /al<ologus %ut also through consanguinity( 5hey mentioned even that "Mos"ow is situated on seven hills' (ust li"e Rome((("

But) despite all this fa%le scenarios and tales of .oskow as the "Third Rome" (or "New )onstantinopol")) the conspirators needed a story that will also transform the -ussian population into "Romans" of the new "Third Rome(" And %ecause they reali,ed in time that to forge a "Roman origin" of the whole population is impossi%le) they invented the ne't %ig lie of the newly re-esta%lished christian kingdom - the "Slavians"( $n the moment of su%lime inspiration and divine providence the astern church was renamed in "Pravo*slavna" + the -ight-illustriously) and its illustrious pilgrims) the .oskovites) and all the other .acedonic %elievers who glorified it + in " Pravo*Slavni" (-ightillustrious)) or shortly - "Slav(ani" (Slavens)( Actualy) this solution wasn#t chosen %y chance( &ithin the plans and secret agenda of the astern Catholic (i(e( " Pravoverna")1 church) this name should@ve fit with the old &estern name for "+eneti" (i(e( "Slo*veneti")2 + and old -oman geopolitical term
7

5he ad>ective "Catholic" (i(e( "Pravoverna" or "Pravoslavna" in all ast- uropean languages) ) meaning "Right*,aithful" or "-nly-True*Belief (in 1od)") thus ".niversal") "!ll*embracing" faith( Ad>ective over which e'clusive right the &estern " Roman*Catholic" church and astern "Catholic" (i(e( "Pravoverna") church are desperately fighting for the last 7A centuries( ! ?eneti (?enden)?andal) etc() + another &estern- uropean name for the /re--oman inha%itants of the Central urope( From there through "Slovo" - word) to "Slo*+eneti" thus "Sloveni"(

"Sclavinias" (lat( Sclavini< - "area") %y which the ancient -omans denoted different provinces and areas throughout urope(

3. Sclavini

Such "sclavinias" are mentioned east of the -hine and in north 1ermany and 3ungary) as they are also mentioned in Spain) Asia .inor or 0orth Africa( 5his multi-purpose name was regularly used for a particular area or group of areas4 " cclesia Sclavoni<" included Bosnia and Balmatia) "S(c)lavonia" in

today#s Croatia) ".acedonian Sclavini<" 3) "Sklavinska" (today renamed Bu%linska) in /oland) etc( ven the so-called Germania (i(e( "0eigh%oring-land"C in Datin Germanus' from CelticC compare with 6ld $rish "gair" * neigh%or) until) and long after the foundation of the 3oly mpire %y Franks and Charlemagne around AB E""4) on the maps was "Sclavania"(see the map a%ove)5( 6tto von Bismarck himself pointed out that his grandmother FGdidn/t "new a word in German' but spo"e only Sorabian H(6 Also from astern -oman sources in Datin we read4 " de !si0 et &urop0 patribus' Thraci0' Macedoni0' Salonic0 et circumiacentis Sclavinis "7 From here we can clearly denote the e'act meaning of the Datin administrative term #S"lavini0# with significance of #area# or #region#( 5he same Datin word) slightly altered) is still used even today4 " nclaves" + %y definition are certain areas or territories) whose residents %elong to the same ethnic group( 5he Datin-derived term "S"lavini0" was actually used for the settlements (territories) which were initially out of the astern -oman empire control and independent from ;onstantinopol (Constantinople)( 5he term can %e interpreted as "enclaves on the &astern Roman empire periphery"( 5his Datin geopolitical term8 later has %een once again changed %y the "Germans" of the newly-shaped 1oly Roman &mpire) as a new word4 "S"laven") thus receiving a *uite diferent and discriminating significance( $n this way) through the game of words) from " sclavini0") i(e( enclaves) through "S"laven" and "Pravoslaven") and through -ussian-imposed vulgar logic4 "it@s all the same + SlavianISlavic" (thus "Russian") + the astern Church and the new -ussian mpire presented themselves in the role of "Mother homeland" of the orthodo' "Sclavenes I slavic I slavyan" from all over the urope( &estern neoimperialists) however) with their famous pragmatism of hungry /aleolithic hunters and gatherers) didn@t panic infront of this megalomaniac -ussian plan( 6n contrary) even >oyfully) they em%raced the -ussian trickery and readily turned it in their favor4 " 2f Russia claims that she/s the
:

Cam%ridge .edieval ncyclop<dia) ?olume $$( 1ermanic tri%es (1ots)?isigoths) Franks) etc() after their appearance in astern urope in !nd century A(B( have managed to con*uer -ome %y 8JA and western history and civili,ation was reset once again( A 0ew 3oly 1ermanI-oman empire was esta%lished %y AB E"" and the legend of Charlemagne replaced the legends of Ale'ander the 1reat and -oman emperors( 5he Franks %ecame the official successors of the &estern -oman empire) %ut not of -ome@s pagan religion and ancient history( Aristotle) /lato) /tolemy) were forgotten) and the new era of the 3oly 1ermanI-oman mpire) %ased on Christian dogma) has %egun in western urope( 9 0orth-1erman historian Adam from Bremen in the 77th century gave us a precise description of "Germania" from that time4 "Sclavania is 7" times %igger than our Sa'ony) (G) inha%ited %y ?inuli) which are sometimes called ?andals( (G) $f we add the C,echs and /oles) Sklavania really e'ceeds Sa'ony (((() 5hose most-western are ?agrians( 5heir town that lies near the sea is called Stargrad (6ld city)"( A Sor%s + Du,ecian Ser%s (DuKiLki Sr%i)) a Slavic people living in parts of southeastern Branden%urg and eastern Sa'ony( /reviously known as &endsI&endi. J By,antine Chronicles) E:A-E:J E All this generally &estern-coined geopolitical terms are meant for erasing the historical continuity in urope and worldwide) in avail to growing imperialistic thirst for power and dominance( Alike the "!merica" and the "!mericans") two continents and large ma>ority of indigenous and non-indigenous population) named %y + one person that wasn@t " !merican" at all( 5he same unilaterally and more or less vulgar principle applies for Africa) Asia) Australia) etc() and does not reflect the historical or any reality other than the &estern- uropean one(
8

3Mother of all the 3Slavs3' then this means that all the 3Slavs3 on the territory of 4estern' Central and Southeastern &urope are foreigners which came from the east5 " And they even added their contri%ution to the game of words) via &estern languages through the new nglish word "slave" (derived from the DatinI$talian "Schiavo"- slave)9) so the term "SklavenISlavic" ac*uited even more pe>orative connotation of lower race( 5his gave the e'cuse and further re-enacted the earlier animosity %etween the &estern -oman-Catholic and astern Catholic church( 3ostility which was relatively placated after the secret deal stroked %ack in JMA on the shores of Banu%e) when they agreed the generic #demarcation line# which was to %e roughly positioned along the river Brava as astI&est %oundary( But the -ussian empire and church %roke the spell( And so on) after several interruptions due to .ongolian) 0eigh%oring (1ermanic)) Dyach (/olyakI/olish)) and other su%>ects invasions) already in the 7Jth century appeared the "Pan*Slavism") a movement instaured and funded directly %y the -ussian mpire and Church) created for the promotion of the -ussian interests to all the " Slavic" people( $n addition to this incredi%le instalation) -ussia started with the systematic rewriting of the history) which %egan to suffer serious changes and damage from the "scientific" and religious circles in .oskow) changes later accepted and happily customi,ed for their own interests %y &estern church) new western monarchies and empires( For e'ample4 Bertrandon de la Broc*uiere during his trip in Balkans in his "Nourney Beyond the Sea" in 78:: writes4 "Macedonian ,ilipopolis which is here the biggest Macedonian center(" 5oday Filipopolis still e'ists) %ut it is no longer called Filipopolis) nor it is a city in .acedonia + now it is " Plovdiv" in "Bulgaria"( Also Sredets turned into "Sophia") or 1orna (2pper) BKuma>a which %ecame "Blagoevgrad"( Ber in Aegean part of .acedonia %ecame "+eroia" in "Grease")?oden %ecame "&ddessa" and ;ostur - "Castoria"( Belgrad (the "white-city") in pirus %ecame " Berat" in "!lbania"( 6r how a%out the city of 5reva from ?indland in north Sklavania (the land of "?endiI?eneti") which %ecame "1amburg" in "Germania") etc( etc( &hat happened to all these original .acedonic names and placesO -ussian and &estern academies and universities) church) and all the other availa%le institutions and media) in the 7J)7E and 7M th century applied massive "reshuffle" of the .acedonic population in urope into " Slavic"( $n order to remove the previous history new -ussian and other uropean empires %egan with enormous and violent cancellation of entire ethnicities and epochs that didn@t fit for a long time within their plans for division of urope( 5he evidences of this convulsive historical crime are everywhere and they cannot %e hidden4 "2n his published wor" he (Purii ?enelin) initiated and defended the idea that the Bulgars were not of Tur"ic descent but were 3Slavs3 2n $678' under the auspices of the 9 -ussian: !cademy of Sciences' +enelin travelled through Moldavia' Bulgaria' and Romania' collecting and studying manuscripts 1e wrote the (FirstQ) grammar of Bulgar and the (FirstQ) history of Bulgar literature ("6n the formation of new Bulgarian literature) 1rammar of the modern Bulgarian language")(" 1 $n similar fashion the "Great Migration of Peoples" was invented) in order to erase the continuity of any ethnicity or nation in uropean %efore their rule(11 According to this new theory the world for " Slavs" %egins in the 9-Ath
M

$talian "Schiavo" from the Datin ver% "scavare"- diggingC as the slaves were commonly used for hard la%our such as construction works( 7" "Straddling borders; literature and identity in Subcarpathian Rus" %y laine -usinko( p(7"M 77 5his was actually the :rd great shift in uropean history( First one occured when the -oman empire (later split in astern and &estern) replaced the .acedonian empire (78E BC)C than the 3oly 1ermanI-oman

century) when supposedly happened the "Great Migration of Peoples") in which they allegedly came ",rom behind the Carpathians") although there is no mythical ancient "Slavic" homeland anywhere to %e found) for the simple reason that such a "Slavic land of origin" and "Slavs" are nothing else than post factum fictional infuse( For e'ample ?atican even falsified a whole ast -oman-$mperial act in order to create a false origin of the " Croats" and "Serbs" + the famous Constantine ?$$ /orphyrogenitus act "<e !dministrando 2mperio" + a ?atican forgery of the "Slavic" origins( Dike all the other newly out-of-the-hat created nations) " Serbs" and "Croats" were victims of the widespread &estern-falsified history manipulation( 5his fa%ricated mperors Act) "!dministration of the &mpire") supposedly written %y /orphyrogenitus ) is taken as the main source on the origin and the "Slavic" arrival on the Balkans( .ost historians agree that if there wasn@t the /orphyrogenitus Act) then on the arrival of the "Slavs" on Balkan) and the origin of "Serbs" and "Croats" and meaning of their names + we will know nothing( 5his a%solute lack of any other " Slavic" historical %ackground encouraged ?atican to falsify the "<e !dministrando 2mperio"( 5he ?atican awareness ) that %y falsifying the main historical source on the "Serbs" and "Croats" they will %e a%le to change the future of this new "nations") and hold the power to manipulate them + was the main motive to continue with their usual dirty >o% of concealing the reality( 3ow could@ve they miss this easy preyO $n order to put some light on the true origin of the " Croats" and their name) it is necessary to first check e'isting interpretations and theories) which are all %ased on the parts of this Act) supposedly written %y the astern--oman emperor /orphyrogenitus( $ndeed) it is enough to take a look at the official science interpretations on the origin of the "Croats" and the name "Croat") and see that they are %ased solely on this /orphyrogenitus act as the main source( 5hat the said act is really a forgery on the origin of the "Serbs" and "Croats" is showed %y the very e'amples from the te't( 5he first one talks a%out the alleged origin of the name of the "Croats"( 5hus there is written4 "Croat" in "Slavic" languages means "one who possesses a large territory (" 5he supposed /orphyrogenitus act further says that " Croats" were named so %ecause they allegedly kept many countries and large territory in their possession( But) it is o%vious that the word "Croat" not in any .acedonic or "Slavic" language) nor in any language in the world means "the one who holds a large territory (" 0ot to mention the fact that "Croats" never held any "large territory"( 5he official given e'planation %y the church and official science is that /orphyrogenitus allegedly wrote such origin of the name of the "Croats" %ecause that word was similar to the "Gree"" word "hora") which means "land"( 3owever) even in this case it is not clear why the " Croats" name is not interpreted as + "land" or "those*landers" and not as "those who hold a large territory "( All this commotion lies e'poses the following *uestion4 3ow is it that the " Croats") who supposedly moved together with the "Serbs" in the Balkans were named after a " Gree"" word "hora" (which %y the way has to have the same meaning in " Slavic") even if doesn@t) ) %ut the Ser%s got their name from the Datin word "Servus"O Both "Croats" and "Serbs" supposedly migrated together to the Balkans ) %ut the By,antine emperor named the "Serbs" after the Datin word and "Croats" after the supposed "Gree"=Slavic" wordO And why would a By,antine mperor wrote a nonsenses like that) especially if we take into account that he was educated ruler who also knew how to writeO 5he only plausi%le
empire (AB E"") has replaced the &estern -oman empireC and finaly the -ussian empire which succeeded the astern -oman empire (AB 797")(

e'planation is that this "interpretations" were inserted into the /orfirogenitus work much latter) or all the act is pure falsification( Also) the /orphyrogenitus mention of the Ser%ian name as derived from the Datin word "Servus" (meaning "servant") + it is impossi%le for two more o%vious reasons( 6ne is that in the time of Constantine ?$$ /orphyrogenitus Datin wasn@t the official language of the ast -oman mpire) as it was a%andoned five centuries %efore(12 5he second is that the Ser%s (Sor%sISora%i) have %een known %y that name in Central urope( Central uropean Ser%s (Sor%s from Sora%ia)) also mentioned in the Frankish annals) are the Ser%s who have never %een under the rule of the astern -oman mpire) nor close to the Balkans) so it was *uite impossi%le for them to get this name from there( So) if they were to %e named after the Datin " Servus" + this must@ve come from the (&estern) 3oly -oman mpire and not from the /orphyrogenitus act( 5his issue was also addressed %y the famous Croatian historian) Ferdo RiSiT who pointed that the origins of the names " Croat" and "Serb" are unscientific and mismanaged(13 6ther %latant e'ample is the supposed "creation" of the Cyrillic alpha%et on demand of the prince -ostislaw of 1reat .oravia) who asked for sacred %ooks written in their language) i(e( the language of the people from 1reat .oravia (todays BavariaI/olandIC,ech repu%licISlovakia)( And to whom and where he adressed this demandO 5he answer is + .acedoniaQ As one of the greatest " slavicist" of all times ?atroslav NagiT concluded and proved a%out the invented "Slavs" and their languages4 "They did not originate in the central plains of Pannonia as most e>perts claimed' but in Southern (Aegean) Macedonia"(14 5he conse*uences of this huge historical and human disaster were not to %e awaited very long((( From the time when they were gradually created (7A-7M century) " Slavs" %ecame su%>ect to humiliation) discrimination and persecutions %y most of the regimes in urope( &ith the application of %rutal imperialistic-politically-corrective methods) in*uisition) invasions) and theories for "big migrations" they (-ussian and other uropean empires) astern and &estern church() tucked away from history the natural continuity and the origin of the nations( $t was simply concluded that " we all came from somewhere and nobody is from nowhere)" and even if someone goes to search someones origin + it will face the &estern uropean and -ussian "scientific" censorship and oppression( &hen they finally managed to make such a mess) to the point that all went nuts - then they started to devour them in peace) divide the faceless and %eheaded nations and territories) and started the creation of their new colonies4 Al%ania) Bosnia and 3er,egovina) Croatia) (shaped %y the Austro-3ungarian empire and 0apoleon)) Bulgaria and Ser%ia (created %y -ussia) in concordance(Q) with other uropean empires)) C,echo-Slovakia) /oland) and 1ermania - later 3oly -oman mpire (created %y the &estern -omanCatholic church))15 $talia (created in 7E"! %y 0apoleon Bonaparte)) Slovenia (e'-/)ingdom of 2llyria@)
7!

7:

Nustinian $ the 1reat (9!J-9A9) was the last astern -oman emperor to speak Datin as his native tongue( "3istory of the Croats - a ?atican forgery" %y Br( Stevan 5omoviT( 78 http4IIen(wikipedia(orgIwikiI?atroslavUNagiTU$nterests 79 Charlemagne (Charles the 1reat)) king of the Franks) had %een crowned emperor of the -omans on Christmas Bay AB E"" %y /ope Deo $$$( $n MA!) 6tto was crowned mperor %y the /ope Nohn =$$( 5his second date marks the historical %eginning of the 3oly -oman mpire as a territory( From then on) all the affairs of the 1erman kingdom were intertwined with those of $taly and the /apacy( Actual use of the term "3oly mpire" (in the sense of "consecrated") in reference to the medieval -oman mpire entered in use only from 779J) under Frederick $( 5he form "3oly -oman mpire" (in 1erman4 1eiliges R?misches

created %y 0apoleon and occupied %y Austro-3ungary in 7E7A)) 1reece (created in 7E:: >ointly %y ngland) France) -ussia and 1ermany)) -omania (e'-@&alachia@) collateral from 7EJE St(Stefano peace treaty)) etc( 5he emergence and reappointment of all these phantasmagoric new "nations" was staged %y the great powers that convulsively fought and are still fighting against each other for supremacy in urope( 5hus) during the 7Mth century) on .acedonian peninsula emerged a whole new category of a fictional-shaped nations4 Slavs) Bulgars) Al%anians) Bosnians) 1ree') Ser%s) Croats) .ontenegrins) etc() that didn@t e'isted in the past( And the names were nothing more then accidental4 Al%ania - from the Datin " !lba" + Vdawn@ (as it was east of $taly) where the dawn i(e( "!lba" in $talian) is rising)) Slovenia again from "Sclavinia" + areaIenclave) Ser%ia from Datin "Servi0" + servantIvasal) Bulgaria from "vulgar") etc( For e'ample4 the so-called "Serbian" 5sar BuSan originally in the official documents from his time) and in the famous "Code of Tsar <u@an" (after he was crowned in .acedonia@s capital Skop>e)) is noted as ".acedonian ;ing"(16 5he criminal "Slavian" %rainchild of the -ussian imperialists and church was utterly reali,ed with the St(Stefan peace agreement in 7EJE) when the .acedonia and .acedonian people were politically erased from the maps( Since then they openly propagate the lie imposed %y the -ussian- uropean propaganda apparatus that "Macedonians are Slavs") and they came to the Balkans during the 9-Ath century as "Slavs from behind the Carpathians' 5 after crossing the <anube with straws in their mouths" (QO)(

Reich) is attested from 7!98 onward( Dike all the ;ings in the past) he too had to inherit the -oyal lineage from somewhere + the most natural and immediate ancestor-kin was from the last .acedonian kingdom of Samoil( And >ust like the -ussian prince $van $$$ ?asilevich + BuSan) through parental links) settled this matter down( But) as "Servia" (e'--aSka) entered the %igger spheres of interest of ma>or -ussian and other empires) the -oyal ".acedonian" had to disappear and %ecame "Slav") "Serv") "+ulgar") and so on(
7A

Above: Petro Bogdano, Macedonian; Residence Archbishop in Skop e, !piscope of Sc"tari and ad#inistrator of the e$%Macedonian provinces or " Servant kingdoms& ' in (atin) Regni Servi* +not to conf"se ,ith Serbia-./ Today, even if his ethnic origin is ,ritten ,ith big black "ncial letters and can be seen very clear ' he is no, forcibly celebrated in " Albania" as "Albanian" % P et0r Bogdanit/12

5he -ussian "Pravoslaven" plan instead to unify and protect its newly created "Slaven" su%>ects + e'posed them to centennial hell and violent pogroms( &ith false hope for salvation from " the great
7J

Same rearranging of the personal and geographic names and nationalities was made in all newly-shaped countries across the .acedonian peninsula after the 7 st &orld &ar4 5ur(4 ;ara-vulgar (Black-%ulgar) from Divadia %ecame ";aravoulgaris" + a "Gree"" in "New 1ellas"C 5ur(4 ;ara-1eorge (Black-1eorge) from -aSka %ecame ")arag(orgeviA") a "Serv"(Ser%) from "Servi0"C ?ladimir from &allachia %ecame "+lad" in "Romania"C etc(

mother Russia") all across urope %egan a general persecution and open discrimination of " Slavs" from all sides - the -ussians have forci%ly tried to convert all these .acedonic peoples and collect them under the um%rella of their new 6rthodo' mpire) and the &estern neoimperialists to take away from them "their" new real estates and "Roman*Catholic" territories( Dike the News which were marked and persecuted throughout urope) also the .acedonic people thanks to ".other -ussia" and &estern >akals) were marked with offending and humiliating la%el " Slavs" (slaves)( Buring their centennial struggle for imperial supremacy in urope) the ma>or powers changed territories and imposed new governments) drooping alliances) conspiracy and fraud) created and destroyed entire countries and peoples) without any historical) cultural) or ethical >ustification( Det#s not forget4 only in the !" th century on .acedonian peninsula were fought4 ! &orld) : Balkan) a num%er of supposedly " civil" wars and even one "1umanitarian"(O) war( A "peacetime" persecutions) pogroms) conflicts) genocide and other crimes against oppressed and ravaged .acedonian population are not even worth mentioning( $n their spasms for power) a special place has the plot of the uropean monarchies against the 5urks and 0apoleon#s France in the late 7Eth century( For two o%>ective reasons4 first were .uslims) and the French were -epu%lic + the first modern "democratic" country in urope) thus representing a direct mortal threat to all uropean monarchies( And on top of all - the 5urks and 0apoleon were alliesQ

4. The "!ree" #ro$ect" $n 7JEJ) secret agreement %etween -ussia and Austro-3ungary was signed( Commonly known as the "1reek /ro>ect" it was nothing less than a draft scheme for the partition of 5urkey %etween the two superpowers( 5he plot) as suggested %y -ussia) was to create an independent state under the name "<acia" that will gra% .oldavia) &allachia and Bessara%ia) with orthodo' prince in power( -ussia was supposed to get also 6chakov coast %etween Bug and Bn>epar) as well as some islands in the archipelago) and Austro-3ungary were to anne' neigh%oring 5urkish province( But if the 5urks were to %e e'pelled from urope) then the old astern 3oly -oman mpire had to %e renewed) and on the throne of Constantinople was to %e placed Constantine) the grandson of Catherine $$ ) who had to give up all his rights in -ussia + so %oth empires could not %e united under the same crown( Austria agreed on condition to get a part of the ?enetian possessions in .oldova) and ?enice had to %e compensated with part of the new ast 3oly -oman mpire( But) as it often goes wrong when doing calculation without the salesman + the plans of -ussian mpress Catherine $$ (real name4 Sofia Augusta Frederica) %orn 1erman from Anhalt) and the Austro3ungarian crown were spoiled %y the disastrous outcome of 0apoleonic wars %etween France and other uropean monarchies( 5he "Gree" Pro(ect" was delayed for nearly half a century) at last to %e reali,ed %y their competitors) who were a%le to insert their interests instead( $t was partly reali,ed on the side of the contractors ngland) France) -ussia and 1ermany) %ut without recovering the astern (" -rthodo>") 3oly -oman mpire( So) with time -ussia dropped out of the game) the 5urks are still with one foot in urope) and the newly created colony "Grease" entirely %ecame property of ngland and later &estern empires(

5. The "South%Slavic #ro$ect" &ith the creation of the newly invented nations on the .acedonian peninsula + new pro%lems were created( 5he new "nations") although fictional) e'pressed their own national consciousness and aspirationsQ 5o re-%oot and crush these newly composed attempts for independence of these new nations) ma>or powers enclosed some of them into the sand castle - "The )ingdom of Serbs' Croats and Slovenes(" 2na%le again to fully throttle them and other newly-composed ethnical groups as Bosnians) 3er,egovians) .ontenegrins) and the eternal .acedonians) they tried once again and later renamed them all in + "Bugoslavia" ("Cugoslavia")((( At the end) still remains unanswered the *uestion4 &here are the " Severoslavia") "2sto"oslavia" and "Dapadoslavia"O18

7E

$n .acedonic languages4 Sever W 0orthC $stok W astC Xapad W &estC Pug W South(