Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Aerospace Laboratory II
Supersonic Flow and Shockwaves
http://sps.aerospace.utoronto.ca/labs/raal
Experiment Duration: 150 min
Instructor
M. R. Emami
Aerospace Undergraduate Laboratories
University of Toronto
Winter 2013
1
1. Purpose
Some basic concepts of supersonic flow are demonstrated using a nominal Mach 1.6
wind tunnel. Impact and static pressure probes are employed to monitor velocities in the
tunnel at various points along the flow. A variable valve is used for changing the flow
rate. A Schlieren camera system is used for the examination of shock waves from objects
placed in the test section. A computer-aided data acquisition system is used to collect and
record pressure data from the impact and static pressure probes.
2. Apparatus
- Half section supersonic tunnel (M = 1.6) with fixed static pressure taps.
- Traversing Pitot impact probe and knife-edge model.
- Whispair blower, 12.2 kJ/s at 3520 rpm (P = 70 kPa).
- Axial cooling fan for Whispair blower.
- Intake filter/silencer. Exhaust muffler.
- Motorized intake flow ball valve.
- Probe manipulation system for vertical and longitudinal motion.
- Honeywell absolute pressure transducers model #142PC15A (0-775 mmHg).
- 24v Solenoid valve manifold (SMC Pneumatics SY100)
- Wallace & Tiernan dial pressure gages (0-400 and 400-800 mmHg).
- Schlieren camera system. Test section aperture 25 mm by 30 mm.
- Data acquisition system (PCIM-DAS1602/16 PCI Board).
- Power supplies and power control unit.
- Web cams and audio system.
3. Notation and Constants
a speed of sound (m/s)
A cross-sectional area (m
2
)
A* throat area (m
2
)
specific heat ratio (air = 1.4)
M Mach number (V/a)
n refractive index p pressures (mmHg)
p
1
static pressure (mm Hg)
p02 Pitot tube stagnation pressure (mmHg)
density (kg/m
3
)
viscosity
R ideal gas constant = 287 J/kgK (dry air)
T temperature (K)
U flow velocity (m/s)
V flow velocity (m/s)
2
4. Experiment Setup
The major elements which make up the aerospace undergraduate laboratory supersonic
facility are indicated in Fig. 1. The tunnel operates as open circuit, meaning air is drawn
from the laboratory and exhausted outside the building.
Figure 1: Aerospace Laboratory Supersonic Facility (M = 1.6)
4.1 Wind Tunnel
The power required to run a wind tunnel scales roughly as the third power of the flow
velocity. This factor is reflected in the test section dimensions which for the supersonic
facility are small compared with the other laboratory tunnels. However, the 20 HP (15
kW) motor required for starting and running at supersonic speeds is higher powered than
either of our other tunnels, although the latter have much larger test sections.
The design of a supersonic tunnel can be tricky, mainly due to viscous effects during the
starting process. Compression ratios required to start a high Mach number tunnel are
usually at least twice the normal shock pressure ratio and even at M = 1.5 approximately
30% extra power is required. The transient starting phenomena are difficult to evaluate
theoretically, so a good mix of empiricism, experience, and some luck is needed in the
design and manufacturing of a good tunnel.
The laboratory tunnel incorporates a supersonic nozzle contour which has been designed
using methods of characteristics [1]. The nozzle coordinates that are listed in Table 1
3
include an empirical correction for boundary layer growth, which is an important factor at
high speeds. The contoured tunnel floor is slotted and sealed to permit the insertion of a
traversing Pitot tube. The roof of the test section is plane and corresponds to the
centerline of a hypothetical symmetrical tunnel of twice the height.
Table 1: Static Pressure Tap Locations
Tap
Number
x (mm)
y
(mm)
h
(mm)
A/A
*
A
*
/A
M
(theory)
0.0 3.45 26.55 1.58 0.632 .405
11.6 8.86 21.14 1.26 0.794 .545
1 24.7 12.17 17.83 1.06 0.942 .755
2 36.6 13.21 16.79 1.00 1.000 1.00
3 48.3 12.37 17.63 1.05 0.952 1.26
4 61.0 10.69 19.31 1.15 0.869 1.46
5 73.7 9.40 20.60 1.23 0.815 1.57
6 86.4 8.64 21.36 1.27 0.786 1.63
7 99.1 8.33 21.67 1.29 0.775 1.65
8 118.0 8.18 21.82 1.30 0.769 1.66
9 209.5 8.18 21.82 1.30 0.769 1.66
10 300.1 8.18 21.82 1.30 0.769 1.66
11 diffuser - - - - -
Figure 2: Supersonic Nozzle Geometry
Air is sucked through the Laval nozzle of the tunnel depicted in Figs. 1 and 2, but several
other methods of flow drive may be used. For example, a closed circuit tunnel reduces
the operating power requirement, permitting the pressure of the whole tunnel to be varied
if desired; the necessity of continuously drying air is also eliminated for this design. In a
blow-down tunnel, power requirements are reduced by charging a compressed or reduced
pressure air storage tank which is then used to power the tunnel on an intermittent basis.
These and other variants are discussed in [1].
4.2 Data Acquisition System
The data acquisition system consists of a Pentium
|
.
|
\
|
+
+
=
(
M
M A
A
(2)
Equation (2) is called the Area-Mach number relation and leads to the remarkable
consequences that since M = f(A/A
*
) and A/A
*
1:
a) For subsonic situations: M increases as A/A
*
decreases (i.e. the nozzle converges).
b) For M= 1, A/A
*
= 1, sonic conditions prevail at the throat.
c) For supersonic situations: M increases as A/A
*
increases, (i.e. the nozzle diverges).
The somewhat counter-intuitive conclusion which is enunciated by (c) may be
appreciated more readily by the examination of the Area-Velocity relation:
9
( )
V
dV
M
A
dA
1
2
= (3)
In this expression it is evident that increases in velocity follow automatically from an area
enlargement. Also, if 0 =
A
dA
the nozzle has a minimum area (the throat) and at that
location M = 1.
6.2 Determination of Isentropic Flow Properties in Nozzles
6.2.1 Use of the Table of Isentropic Flow Properties
A MATLAB
file can be generated from the experiment user interface which computes
the predicted values for M listed in Table 1, using the tabulated A/A* data from the same
table.
6.2.2 Tunnel Flow Measurements (Supersonic Regions)
In Fig. 5 the Pitot tube measures the stagnation or total pressure behind the shock. In this
diagram p1 corresponds to the static pressure in a plane which is tangent to the shock.
Figure 5: Pitot Impact Tube in Supersonic Flow
The following expression, known as the Rayleigh Pitot Relation is usually solved
recursively to obtain M once p1 and p02 are known.
( )
2
5
2
2
1
1
2
1
2
1
02
1 7
167
1
1
1
2
2
1
=
(
+
(
+
=
M
M
M
M
p
p
(4)
10
6.2.3 Tunnel Flow Measurements (Subsonic Regions)
Equation (4) cannot be used for the determination of velocities upstream of the throat
since a shock wave cannot exist at these locations. The following expression from Fig. 4
should be used for such cases:
2
7
2
1
2
1
0
5
1
2
1
1
(
+ =
(
+ =
M
M
p
p
(5)
6.2.4 Optical Methods for Gas Dynamic Analysis
In fluids and solids, pressure and density changes propagate at the velocity of sound in
the medium. For an ideal gas the sound velocity is:
RT a = (6)
Shock waves formed about a body in a supersonic flow are created because disturbances
at the body surface cannot propagate upstream since the maximum propagation speed is
limited to the local speed of sound. This principle is illustrated in Fig. 6, where the
crosses represent disturbances traveling at a velocity U in each case.
Figure 6: Evolution of a Shock Wave
Shock waves are thin (about 0.0001 cm) but special diagnostic techniques are available
for visualizing the variations in fluid density which accompanies shock formation. The
local change of refractive indexdue to gas compressioninterferes with the
transmission of an illuminating beam, and this provides a visual manifestation of the
shock.
Interferometers, Schlieren systems, and shadowgraphs are complementary methods to
monitor the gas density , the first derivative of gas density, and the second derivative,
respectively. A preliminary description of the Schlieren method will be given but a
discussion of other methods is beyond the scope of this manual. Their operating
principles are interesting and are well covered in [4].
11
6.2.5 The Schlieren Method
Whenever there is a change in the local fluid density a concomitant change in the optical
refractive index (n) is observed (remember n = 1.0 only for a vacuum). In Fig. 7(a) a
uniform fluid density is assumed to be present throughout the disturbance region, and the
resulting deflection of a light beam is shown by the solid line OP.
Figure 7: Light Refraction at a Disturbance
A Schlieren system responds to the first derivative of the density as implied in Fig. 7(b)
where the wedge density increases linearly with distance y.
The Schlieren apparatus for this experiment, shown schematically in Fig. 8, uses lenses.
However, for larger systems with long focal lengths mirrors are customarily employed,
since these are less expensive than lenses for comparable size and optical performance.
Figure 8: Schlieren Optical System
In Fig. 8 a light source S is imaged by the lens L
1
onto aperture A, which serves to define
the source and eliminate any spurious light due to reflections from the source envelope.
Lens L
2
collimates the light which then passes through the test section and is focused by
L
3
in the plane of a knife edge KE.
The knife edge is adjusted so that in the absence of any disturbance in the test section it
just occludes all the radiation that would normally pass to the viewing screen. A shock
wave or similar perturbation of the fluid density in the test section may then cause light to
pass around KE as explained in Fig. 7. If the location of the screen is chosen such that it
12
displays a sharp image of the test section via L
3
and the previous conditions have been
met, then shock waves are readily observable.
An example where the Schlieren technique has been used to examine the flow conditions
around a double wedge is shown in Fig. 9. Intuitively one would suspect the shock angle
depicted in Fig. 9 to be proportionally related to the flow velocity, and indeed this is the
case. The , , M relation, given in the figure, can be used to determine the flow Mach
number, where , , M are defined as indicated.
Figure 9: Shock Waves with a Wedge
13
7. Experiment Design
Some preparation and research will be required to design your experiments prior to
actually performing the tests in the wind tunnel. Each experiment should not be viewed
as an independent activity. The results of one experiment may prove useful in defining
the parameters of another test.
A MATLAB
file are:
1. Static Pressure Measurement: To save the static pressure (p
1
) along the tunnel
centreline (roof) use the Static Pressure Measurement box under the
Experiment tab. Enter the number of samples to read from the pressure
transducer at each tap in the Samples box.
2. Horizontal Stagnation Pressure Measurement: To record the stagnation
pressure (p
02
) at each tap location along the tunnel at a fixed height use the
Impact Tube Horizontal Pressure Measurement box under the Experiment
tab, and enter the Pitot tube height (30 mm corresponds to the tunnel centreline).
Enter the number of samples to read from the Pitot tube pressure transducer at
each tap location in the Samples box.
3. Vertical Stagnation Pressure Measurement: To record the stagnation pressure
(p
02
) at a tap location along the tunnel at different heights use the Impact Tube
Vertical Pressure Measurement box under the Experiment tab, and enter the
tap (port) location and the number of transverse points at which the stagnation
pressure is measured. Enter the number of samples to read from the impact tube
pressure transducer at each vertical point in the Samples box.
Flow Variation Pressure Measurement: To record the pressure from the impact and
static pressure probes, while opening or closing the flow intake valve, use the Flow
Variation Pressure Measurement box under the Experiment tab. Enter the starting
position of the valve and the ending position of the valve over which the pressures will be
recorded. This recording mode may take up to several minutes to complete if the valve is
moved through its full range.
Schlieren Camera Measurements: To record images or video from the Schlieren
camera use the Schlieren Camera box on the experiment interface. The Image button
saves a snapshot from the camera in JPEG format, whereas the Record Video button
records a short video from the camera in AVI format.
7.1 Verify the Theoretical Mach Number Formulation
Design an experiment to collect static and stagnation pressure data to compute the Mach
number. Compare the results with the Area-Mach number relation (Equation 2) and
address the questions in Section 8.1. Static pressures are measured at taps 1-11 along the
tunnel centerline (roof) that are connected to the pressure transducers. Stagnation
pressure is measured using the Pitot impact tube that can be positioned at different
14
coordinates in the tunnel and can also traverse the tunnel horizontally at a constant
height.
The MATLAB
file to compute the Mach numbers for this experiment using the
MATLAB
performs
calculations using matrix algebra. You can calculate the Mach number for all data points
simultaneously by entering the data as a vector and computing the Mach number for the
entire vector.
7.4 Flow Variation and Shockwaves
Design an experiment to measure the Mach number and to confirm when the flow
becomes supersonic using visual techniques (Schlieren camera) and address the questions
in Section 8.4. You may not observe any visual changes in the flow over a large range of
valve positions. First determine the regime over which the flow changes by opening and
closing the valve all the way. Then use the fine adjustments (the + and buttons) to
incrementally change the flow over that regime. Be aware that the valve has a significant
hysteresis between opening and closing.
15
8. Discussion of Results
8.1 Verify the Theoretical Mach Number Formulation
1. How and why do the static and stagnation pressure measurements vary with the
height of the Pitot impact tube?
2. How does the number of samples per measurement affect the overall results?
What is a suitable number of samples to have a statistically relevant
measurement?
3. Is the Mach number computed from your measurements at sections far from the
tunnel throat smaller or greater than the theoretical value? Why?
4. At which tap (port) location is the deviation from the theoretical Mach number
maximal? Why?
5. Explain various sources that cause deviation from the theoretical value.
8.2 Determine the Vertical Mach Number Profile
1. How and why does the Mach number vary with the location of the Pitot impact
tube along the tunnel (i.e. different tap locations)?
2. Discuss the variations in the vertical Mach number profile at tap (port) 7.
3. From the vertical Mach number profile characterize the boundary layer along the
top and bottom walls of the tunnel.
4. Use dimensional analysis to show the tunnel power requirements scale as V
3
.
You may assume that the power required is directly proportional to the throat area
A*, and power/area is a function of density , viscosity , and velocity V.
8.3 Determine the Effects of Flow Restriction
1. Characterize how the Mach number at the throat and two other locations along the
tunnel is affected by restricting the intake flow.
2. At what valve position and pressures does the flow become supersonic? Does this
agree with theory?
3. Identify and explain each regime in a plot of Mach number vs. time at tap (port) 7,
for opening and closing the valve. Is there a hysteresis?
4. What is the Mach number at the throat when the tunnel goes supersonic? Explain
any discrepancies.
16
8.4 Flow Variation and Shockwaves
1. Compare the Mach number that you measured in this experiment to the results of
the previous experiments. Explain any variations between experiments.
2. What effects does varying the flow have on the shockwaves?
3. What effect does the vertical and horizontal location of the pitot impact tube in
the test section have on the shockwaves?
9. References
[1] A. Pope and K. Goin, High-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing. New York, NY, USA: John
Wiley and Sons, 1965.
[2] J. D. Anderson, Introduction to Flight. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Book
Company, 1978.
[3] J. D. Anderson, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill
Book Company, 1984.
[4] H. W. Liepmann and A. Roshko, Elements of Gas Dynamics. New York, NY, USA: John
Wiley and Sons, 1965.