Annotated Bibliography Alohatula. Cloning of Dolly The Sheep-The Cloning Controversy. Online Video Clip. Youtube. 1 Oct. 2009.

Web. 31 December 2013. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkZV7hl-kXE> This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it showed multiple opinions of the public including many celebrated people(such as the president of the United States). This source was used in our public opinion page and the overview of the huge impact Dollys birth caused. Boyle, Robert. Ethics of using preimplantation genetic diagnosis to select a stem cell donor for an existing person. National Center for Biotechnology Information. 24 November 2001. Web. 17 December 2013. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1121702/> This source gives detailed information on embryo transfer, and how many people have reacted to it. This source was useful because it discussed ethical issues regarding human cloning, and gave multiple public opinions. This source was used in creating our thesis statement, and gave us background information about human cloning.

Cohen, Daniel. Cloning. Brookfield: Millbrook Press Inc., 1998. Book. 11 December 2013 This source was about how Cloning has evolved, and how Dolly the Sheep has caused much controversy over human cloning. It was important to us in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly because it tied Dolly together with many other books and happenings at the time, such as Brave New World and Frankenstein. This source was used in our thesis statement, and helped us get an impression of what the public thought of human cloning at the time. D., Dani. The Human Cloning Controversy. Human Cloning.org. 26 February 1998. Web. 14 January 2014. <http://www.humancloning.org/essays/dani.htm> This source was the report by a student on the human cloning controversy. This source is useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it described how many people reacted to Dollys cloning. This source was used in our page about the public reaction. Dexter, Hollye. The Religious Ethics of Cloning. Demand Media. n.d. Web. 17 December 2013. <http://people.opposingviews.com/religious-ethics-cloning-9383.html> This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it gave information on 3 distinct views of the ethics regarding human cloning-the scientific view, the Catholic view, and general view from other religions. This source was used in our collection of public opinions.

Diep, Francie. Scientists Create First Cloned Human Embryo. 15 May 2013. Web. 15 January 2013. <http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-05/scientists-create-humanclone-embryo-stem-cell-harvesting> This source was a report that the first human embryos have been created. This source is useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows that Dollys cloning did lead to human cloning. This source was used in our tab on human cloning. Dobson, Roger; Gray, Richard. Extinct ibex is resurrected by Cloning. 31 January 2009. Web. 20 January 2013. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/sciencenews/4409958/Extinct-ibex-is-resurrected-by-cloning.html> This source was a report that an extinct animal species had been revived by cloning. This source is useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it showed a future use for cloning technology. This source was used in our page on the future. Dolly and Bonny. Photograph. Roslin Institute, Scotland. n.d. Web. 4 January 2014<http://www.roslin.ed.ac.uk/public-interest/dolly-the-sheep/a-life-of-dolly/> This source was a picture of Dolly in a grass field alongside her firstborn child, a sheep named Bonny. This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows that Dolly was a normal sheep and showed no discrepancies in the process of reproduction compared to other sheep. This source was used in our analysis of similarities and differences between Dolly and the average sheep.

Dolly the Sheep Creator Knighted. BBC-News. n.p. 29 December 2007. Web. 6 January 2014. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7163587.stm> This source was an article saying that Ian Wilmut, the creator of Dolly the Sheep, had been knighted. This source is important in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows that the British Royalty thinks very highly of Sir Ian Wilmut and regard his actions as revolutionary and helpful, not sinful. This source was used in our collection of public opinions from the time-they would not have knighted him if they did not think that his actions had been beneficial. Dolly gives birth. 23 April 1998. Web. 20 January 2013. <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/82816.stm> This source gave the news that Dolly the Sheep gave birth to her first lamb. This source is useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows that Dolly was able to give birth just like a normal sheep. This source was used in our tab on Dolly the Sheep. Dolly the Sheep is put to Sleep, aged only Six. The Guardian. 15 February 2003. Web. 5 November 2013. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2003/feb/15/ genetics.animalrights> This source was not very helpful, but was a primary source of Dollys death-it was written in the months after Dolly died. This article gives plenty of speculation as well-Could Dolly have died early because she was a clone. All of this speculation added to our case of why humans should not have the right to manipulate others lives.

Dyer, Owen. Dollys Arthritis Dents Faith in Cloning. U.S. National Library of Medicine. 12 January 2002. Web. 4 January 2014. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1122035/> This source was a report that Dolly had received arthritis in her left hind leg. This source is important in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it showed a difference between Dolly and other sheep-her life was ended much more quickly than other sheep by roughly 5-6 years. This source was used in our analysis of similarities and differences between Dolly and the average sheep. Frost, Martin. Dolly the Sheep dies Young. n.p. 13 February 2003. Web. 15 November 2013. <http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/roslin_dolly.html> This source gave plenty of information-it had lengthy paragraphs on the science behind Dolly(which is not of as much interest to us) and a column on the Ethics surrounding Dollys cloning. This gave us another opinion of an individual who had a strong belief regarding rights and responsibilities about cloning. This, alongside the other and information about Dolly, helped us come to the conclusion of our thesis statement.

Ghanly, Sarah. Dolly the Sheep and the Ethical, Social, and Legal Issues of Cloning SocyBerty. n.d. Web. 1/10/14 <http://socyberty.com/issues/dolly-the-sheep-andthe-ethical-social-and-legal-issues-of-cloning/> This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it talked about the controversy surrounding cloning in general, and talked a small bit about how Dolly is not the first animal to be cloned, but it was the first clone from an adult cell. This source was used in our controversy page and the page about how Dolly was cloned. Gillis, Justin. Dolly the Sheep, Star of Cloning, Put to Death for Illness. post-gazette. 15 February 2003. Web. 5 January 2014. <http://old.postgazette.com/healthscience/20030215dollyscience3p3.asp/> This source was a report that Dolly had been put down due to arthritis in her left leg. This source is important in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it showed that Dolly was indeed different from a natural sheep-she died much earlier. This source was used in our analysis of similarities and differences between the cloned sheep and the natural one, and an analysis of whether those effects were direct causes of the cloning, or from other, more natural sources.

Harrub, Brad. Cloning-Ethics-Dr. Brad Harrub. Online Video Clip. Youtube. 26 Feb. 2012. Web. 3 January 2014. <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLy-tYq8qV0> This source was a speech by a doctor presenting information on the cloning of Dolly, the science behind it, and how it effected the viability of human/mammal cloning. This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows the opinion of a well-credited professor who has extensive knowledge of cloning. This source was used in our overview of Dolly. Highfield, Roger. Dolly Creator Ian Wilmut Shuns Cloning. The Telegraph. 16 November 2007. Web. 7 December 2013. <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/3314696/Dolly-creator-ProfIan-Wilmut-shuns-cloning.html> This source stated how Ian Wilmut declined his license for human cloning. Wilmuts reasoning for this was because he believed that Japanese scientists had a much better chance of of successfully cloning a human. This source was important to us in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it was interesting to see Ian Wilmuts stance on human cloning.

Highfield, Roger. British Scientists Condemn Plans to Clone Babies. Daily Telegraph. 10 March 2001. Web. 10 December 2013 <http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1325839/British-scientistscondemn-plans-to-clone-babies.html> This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it portrayed both sides of the human cloning argument. The opinion of the priests of the Vatican was shown(those of the Christian religion who tended to portray cloning as evil and unnatural) and the scientists involved. This source was used in our thesis statement and our collection of public opinions from the time. Hirst, Mark. The Biology of Cloning. 26 June 2006. Web. 20 January 2013. <http://www.open.edu/openlearn/nature-environment/natural-history/the-biologycloning> This source gave information on how cloning works. This source is useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it showed how Dolly was created. This source was used in our page on how Dolly was created. Human Cloning Laws. National Conference of State Legislatures. January 2008. Web. 17 December 2013. <http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/human-cloninglaws.aspx> This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows the official government reaction to human cloning speculation created by Dolly the Sheeps existence.

Lehrman, Sally. No More Cloning Around. Scientific American. 22 July 2008. Web. 17 December 2013. <http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=no-morecloning-around> This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows how Ian Wilmut has moved away from human cloning and is trying new methods and experiments. This source was used in our biographies of Wilmut and Dolly. Rantala, M.L.; Milgram, Arthur. Cloning For and Against. Peru-Carus Publishing Company 1999. Book. 13 January 2013. This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it was a huge collection of public opinions on human and mammal cloning from the time period. This source was used in our page of the Public Opinion. Rettner, Rachel. Human Cloning Likely Possible, though Unethical, Experts Say. 17 May 2013. Web. 15 January 2014. < http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/17/humancloning-possible-unethical_n_3293308.html> This source was a report that human cloning is most likely possible. This source is useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows that human cloning could be done off of Dollys cloning. This source was used in our page on human cloning.

Sensenbrunner. HUMAN CLONING RESEARCH PROHIBITION ACT. U.S. Government Printing Office. 1 August 1997. Web. 6 December 2013. <http://beta.congress.gov/congressional-report/105th-congress/housereport/239/1> This source was a bill passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on August 1st, 1997. This bill was a law that prohibited the expenditure of federal fund to conduct or support the cloning of humans. In other words, no government money is to be spent on experiments regarding human cloning. This law was put into effect because Dolly the sheeps cloning was brought into the light. According to the source, this theoretical ability to clone humans has raised strong objections and profound moral, ethical, religious, and psychological concerns throughout the world.. This source was useful to us because it gave us some idea of the impact Dollys creation led to. Smith, Wesley. Ian Wilmut: Human Cloner. The Weekly Standard. 16 February 2005. Web. 12 December 2013. <http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ian-wilmut-human-cloner/> This source is about Ian Wilmuts shifting stances on human cloning. This source was useful in studying our topic because it showed how many peoples stances on human cloning changed over time. This source was used in our page on public reaction.

Shukman, David. China cloning on an Industrial Scale. 13 January 2014. Web. 19 January 2013. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25576718> This source was a report that Chinese Scientists have cloned pigs with a higher success rate than other countries. This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows how cloning has evolved since Dollys cloning. This source was used in our conclusion. Texas A&M Scientists Clone Worlds First Deer. Innovations Report. 23 December, 2003. Web. 7 December 2013.<http://www.innovationsreport.de/html/berichtebiowissenschaften_chemie/bericht-24409.html> This source was a report of scientists having cloned the worlds first cloned deer. This report also stated that Texas A&M was the first academic institution to have cloned five different species of animals. This report is important to us studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the sheep because these clonings are a direct effect of Dollys cloning. Studying advances in cloning that happened because of Dolly helped us come to our thesis statement. Tian, Cindy; Kubota, Chikara; Enright, Brian; Yang, Xhianzhong. Cloning Animals by Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer-Biological Factors. 13 November 2003. Web. 14 January 2014. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC521203/> This source describes how Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer works, and how it can be affected by natural causes. This source is useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it shows how Dolly was created. This source was used in our description of how Dolly was created.

Vos, Shauntilles. Dolly and the Clone Wars. Nova Online. April 2004. Web. 17 December 2013. <http://novaonline.nvcc.edu/eli/evans/his135/events/dolly96/Dolly_Module.html> This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it gave a timeline with notable events regarding Dolly and cloning on it. This source was used in our timeline of Ian Wilmut and Dolly. Wilmut, Ian. After Dolly: The Uses and Misuses of Human Cloning. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., 2006. Book. 10 December 2013 Written by Ian Wilmut himself, this is a firsthand account of Dollys story and his opinions of human cloning. This source was useful in studying Rights and Responsibilities regarding Dolly the Sheep because it is another opinion of how human cloning is right wrong, and misused. This source was used in creating Dollys background and our thesis statement. Wilmut, Ian; Campbell, Keith; Tudge, Colin. The Second Creation: Dolly and the Age of Biological Control. New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2000. Book. 8 January 2014. This source was helpful because it gave information about Ian Wilmut, about other cloned animals when Dolly was cloned, about Keith Campbell, background on Dolly, information regarding why they created Dolly, and the background behind how Dolly was cloned.