qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyui opasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfgh jklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvb nmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwer tyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopas dfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzx cvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmq wertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuio pasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghj klzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn mqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwerty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc vbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmrty uiopasdfghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdf

ghjklzxcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxc
PROGRAMA ANALITICA AN I SEMESTRUL II GRUPURILE DE INTERESE SI SOCIETATEA CIVILA: ACTORI AI PROCESULUI DECIZIONAL

I. Informatii despre curs Titlul disciplinei: Grupurile de interese si societatea civila : actori ai procesul decizional Codul : RI15208 Numarul de credite: 6 Locul de desfasurare: Facultatea de Istorie, Catedra de Istorie Contemporana si Relatii Internationale Programarea in orar a activitatilor: conform orarului II. Informatii despre titularul de curs , seminar, lucrare practica sau laborator Nume, titlu stiintific: Natalia Cuglesan, Dr Informatii de contact : natalia_cuglesan@yahoo.com, natalia.cuglesan@cassoe.ro Ore de audienta: Joi, 1213, sala 305 III Descrierea cursului

Importanta procesului decizional in UE este data, nu numai sub aspectul democratic ci si prin distributia competentelor intre actorii participanti. Teoriile integrarii europene abordeaza procesul decizional prin prisma actorilor importanti care influenteaza adoptrea si implementarea sau monitorizarea modului de indeplinire a cerintelor din acquis-ul comunitar. Democraia este o trstur fundamental a Uniunii Europene. Poate fi apreciat UE drept o democraie pe cale de consolidare? Cum poate fi depasita s ituatia caracterizata prin sintagmadeficit democratic?. Cum se adopt deciziile din perspectiva guvernanei multi-nivel? Cum se implica actorii privati in elaborarea, adoptarea si implementarea deciziei? Aceste chestiuni vor fi abordate pas cu pas n cursul Grupurile de interese si societatea civila, actori in procesul decizional. Prima parte este dedicata abordarii grupurilor de interese si urmareste prezentarea celor mai relevante categorii de grupuri de interese si a canalelor prin care acestea pot influenta decizia la nivel UE.. Partea a doua trateaza asupra participarii societatii civile, functie de natura domeniilor in care activeaza organizatiile celui de-al treilea sector. Ce rol joac, deci, actorii privai? Obiectivele/scopurile cursului Principalul obiectiv al cursului este analiza rolului exercitat de diversele grupuri de interese si de organizatiile societatii civile in procesul decizional, in special, in faza de elaborare, implementare si monitorizare, din perspectiva guvernantei multi-nivel. Sub acest aspect, cursul urmareste sa stimuleze dezbaterile asupra importantei implicarii actorilor privati, prin contributiile aduse sub aspect economic, democratic si al corelarii

actiunilor, programate la nivel comunitar, cu cerintele comunitatilor carora li se adreseaza aceste decizii. Principalele scopuri ale cursului sunt, dup cum urmeaz: Investigarea i analiza, pe baza dezbaterilor, a rolului alocat actorilor privati, functie de abordarea teoretica a UE(interguvernamentalism, neofunctionalism, guvernanta multi-nivel); Identificarea principalelor canale de acces ale grupurilor de interese si ale societatii civile la nivel comunitar in scopul influentarii deciziei; Identificarea diferenelor ntre abordarea guvernanei centrate pe stat i guvernana multi -nivel; Examinarea diverselor grupuri de interese si ONG-uri, functie de domeniul de activitate ale acestora, prin prisma importantei lor in lobbying-ul exercitat la Bruxelles; Examinarea documentelor comunitare ce releva deschiderea institutiilor europene spre cooperarea cu actorii privati; Analiza modului de cooperare decizional; a actorilor subnationali si privati in procesul

Evaluarea impactului deciziilor, luate prin cooperarea intre actorii publici si privati, asupra eficientei guvernantei la nivel national si local. Competente dobandite : Dupa terminarea acestui curs studenii vor fi capabili:
S neleag i s explice desfasurarea procesului decizional din UE prin participarea actorilor privati, alaturi de actorii publici de la nivel supranational si al guvernelor statelor membre, precum si a autoritatilor subnationale; S elaboreze studii cu un nivel tiinific ridicat privind cooperarea si competitia intre actori in procesul elaborarii si adoptarii deciziei, din perspectiva guvernantei multi-nivel; S opereze cu concepte cheie i s compare diversele teorii din perspectiva adecvanei cu practicile comunitare actuale ; S neleag derularea procesului decizional, din UE, ca rezultat al contribuiei actorilor reprezentativi : supranaionali, naionali, subnaionali i privai(grupuri de interese si societatea civila) ; S identifice contribuia diversilor actori privati din sfera grupurilor de interese la cresterea eficientei guvernantei sau ai societatii civile privind respectarea drepturilor fundamentale ;

 S formuleze propuneri privind diversificarea mijloacelor de cooperare intre actori si armonizarea intereselor specifice ale acestora, in special, din perspectiva cetatenilor UE.

IV Evaluarea didactic a studentilor Asimilarea cunostinelor la disciplina Grupurile de interese si societatea civila, actori in procesul decizional se bazeaz pe activitatea desfurat la cursuri i seminarii. Evaluarea didactic a studenilor va cuprinde examin area n cadrul sesiunii de vara, combinat cu evaluarea progresiv pe parcursul semestrului n cadrul seminariilor. n conformitate cu structura anului academic, examinarea progresiv, prin activitatea studenilor la seminarii, va reprezenta o pondere de 30% n nota final. Pe categorii de elemente, nota final va fi format astfel: Prezena la seminar 5% Activitatea la seminar 15% Elaborarea eseu i recenzie 10% Examinarea final 70%

V. Materiale folosite in cadrul procesului educational specific disciplinei Prezentarea cursurilor se va realiza in sistem powerpoint si, eventual, filme documentare VI. Metode utilizate in cadrul predarii, al seminarului sau al lucrarilor practice
-expunere clasica; -argumentare - prelegere

Structura Cursului Partea I : Grupurile de interese in Uniunea Europeana

Saptamana 1: Teoriile integrarii europene si rolul grupurilor de interese in procesul decizional ( interguvernamentalismul si neofunctionalismul)
Concepte cheie: interguvernamentalismul liberal, grupuri de presiune, spill-over, elite supranationale Definitie grup de interese: 1. Business Dictionary.com: Grupurile de interese sunt organizatii non-profit i, de obicei,organizatii voluntare, ai cror membri au o cauz comun si pentru care
4

urmaresc s influeneze politicile publice fr a urmari si exercitarea unui control politic. Principalele lor activiti sunt lobbyingul pe langa membrii org anelor legislative, prin contribuii la lucrarile partidelor politice pentru a alege politicieni care arata intelegere sau sunt maleabili i desfurarea unor campanii de propagand sub acoperire sau deschise. 2. The Free dictionary: Un grup de persoane care lucreaz n numele sau ori pentru sustinerea
puternica a unui anumit interes, cum ar fi un articol de lege, o industrie, sau un segment special al societii.

3. Political science: Orice asociaie de persoane sau organizaii, de obicei, organizate formal, care incearca sa influenteze, pe baza uneia sau a mai multor preocupri comune, politicile publice n favoarea lor. Toate grupurile de interese mprtesc dorina de a influenta politica guvernului pentru a beneficia ei nii sau interesele acestora. Scopul lor ar putea fi o politic care sa foloseasca exclusiv membrilor grupului sau unui segment al societii (de exemplu, subveniile guvernamentale pentru agricultori) sau o politic care promoveaza obiective publice mai largi (de exemplu, mbuntirea calitii aerului). Acestea ncearc s i ating obiectivele prin lobby - care consta in ncercarea de a exercita presiuni asupra factorilor de decizie pentru a obine rezultatele scontate, n favoarea lor.

4. Enciclopedia britanica: Grupurile de interese (sau grupuri de presiune) sunt rezultatul firesc al comunitilor de interese care exist n toate societile, de la cele mai restranse grupuri, cum ar fi Asociatia Producatorilor de Radiere din Japonia, la grupuri mai largi, cum ar fi AFL-CIO, ori la grupurile foarte vaste de afaceri precum organizaiile militare n rile cu regim autoritar. Grupurile de interese exista la toate nivelele de guvernare - naionale, de stat, provinciale i local iar acestea au ocupata din ce n ce mai mult, un rol important n afacerile internaionale

5. Webster Dictionary: grup de interese sau grup de presiune: orice grup care exercit o presiune asupra oficialilor guvernamentali i de stat, prin lobby -uri, propagand, etc, n scopul de a influena legislaia sau politicile.

Bibliografia obligatorie:

1. Stanley Hoffmann, Obstinate or obsolete: The fate of the nation state and the case of Western Europe, in: Daedalus: Proceedings of the American

Academy of Arts and Sciences, Vol.95, No.3, 1966, pp.862-915. 2. Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from
Messina to Maastricht, Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1998, pp.18-80 - Biblioteca 3. Rainer Eising, Interest groups in EU policy-making, http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-4 4. Andrew Moravcsik, Is there a Democratic Deficit in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis, in: Government and Opposition, Vol.39, No.2, 2004, pp.336-363. 5. Andrew Moravcsik, In Defence of a < democratic deficit> : Reassessing Legitimacy in the European Union, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.40, No.4, 2002, pp.603-624. 6. Andrew Moravcsik, The European Constitutional Compromise and the neofunctionalist legacy, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 12, No.2, 2005, pp.349386.

Bibliografie suplimentara: 7. Andreas Follesdal and Simon Hix, Why There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.44, No.3, 2006, pp.533-562. 8. Kerry E. Howell, Neo-Functionalism Reassessed: Suggesting a Synthesis of European Integration Theory, Working Paper Series, No.14, 1998. 9. Phillipe C. Schmitter, Neo-neofunctionalism, in: Antje Wiener and Thomas Diez(Eds.), European Integration Theory, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003, pp.45-74. 10. Lee McGowan, Theorising European Integration: revisiting neofunctionalism and testing its suitability for explaining the development of EC competition policy, in: European Integration online Papers (EIoP) Vol. 11, No. 3, 2007.

Saptamana 2: Guvernanta multi nivel: Procesul decizional in Uniunea Europeana

Concepte cheie: Proces decizional, actori supranationali, stat national, guvernare locala, Grup de interese, Societate civila Bibliografie obligatorie :

1. Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Lanham, Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc. , 2001, pp.1-33. 2. Gary Marks and Liesbet Hooghe, Contrasting visions of Multi-level Governance, in: Ian Bache and Matthew Flinders(Eds.), Multi-level Governance, Oxford, OUP, 2004, pp.15-30. 3. Gary Marks, Liesbet Hooghe and Kermit Blank, European Integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. Multi-level Governance, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.34, No.3, pp.342-377. 4. David J. Bailey, Governance or the crisis of governmentality? Applying critical state theory at the European level, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 13, No.1, 2006, pp.1633 5. Sabine Saurugger, Les groups dintrts entre dmocratie associative et mcanismes du contrle, dans : Revue de Raisons Politiques, Vol.2, No.10, 2003, pp.151- 169. 6. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union , 1 and 2 edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003/2007, Cap.1(Introduction). Bibliografie suplimentara :

7. Frank R.Baumagartner and Beth L.Leech, Basic Interests. The importance of groups in politics and in political science, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1998, pp.XVXXII and pp.22-43.- Biblioteca 8. Sabine Saurugger, Les groups dintrts entre dmocratie associative et mcanismes de contrle , in : Raisons Politiques, No.10, Mai 2003, pp.151-169. 9. Kees van Kersbergen & Frans van Waarden, Governance as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy, in: European Journal of Political Research Vol. 43, No.2, 2004, pp.143171.

Saptamana 3: Grupurile de interese: Canalele de influentare a procesului decizional la nivel UE

Concepte cheie: lobby, consultare, expertiza, negociere Bibliografia obligatorie :

1. Rainer Eising, Interest groups and the European Union, in: Michelle Cini(Ed.), European Union Politics, Second Edition, Oxford, oxford Unioversity Press, 2007, pp. 202 -221.- Biblioteca 2. Scott R.Furlong and Cornelius M. Kerwin, Interest Group Participation in Rule Making: A Decade of Change, in: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol.15, No.3, 2005, pp.353-370. 3. Sabine Saurugger, LExpertise: un mode de participation des groups dintrt au processus dcisionnel communautaire, in : Revue Franaise de Science Politique, Vol.52, No.4, 2002, pp.375-401. 4. Bernhard Wessels, Contestation potential of interest groups in the EU : emergence, structure and political alliances, in: Gary Marks and Marco R. Steenbergen (Eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp.195-215.- Biblioteca 5. Pieter Bouwen and Margaret McCown, Lobbying versus litigation: political and lega l strategies of interest representation in the European Union, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 14, No.3, 2007, pp.422443.

Bibliografie suplimentara:
6. Jan Beyers, Rainer Eising and William Maloney, Researching Interest Group Politics in Europe and Elsewhere: Much We Study, Little We Know?, in: West European Politics, Vol.31, No.6, 2008, pp.1103 1128. 7. David Coen, Empirical and theoretical studies in EU lobbying, in : Journal of

European Public Policy, Vol.14, No.3, 2007, pp.333345.

Saptamana 4: Reglementarea accesului grupurilor de interese la nivel european

Concepte cheie : lobby, procedurile legislative, Consiliul Economic si Social European, Consultare, Bibliografie obligatorie : 1. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp.23-48. 2. Pieter Bouwen, The Logic of Access to the European Parliament: Business Lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs , in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.42, No.3, 2004, pp. 473495.
8

3. Wilhelm Lehmann, Soft law or no law? The European Parliament's new role in the management of organized interests , paper presented at the 10th EUSA Meeting, 2009. 4. European Parliament, Directorate General for Research, Lobbying in the European Union: current rules and practices, Working paper, AFCO 104 EN 04-2003, pp.31-42. 5. David Coen, Lobbying in the European Union, in: Constitutional Affairs, Nov.2007. Bibliografie suplimentara 6. Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper. European Transparency Initiative, COM (2006) 194 final, Brussels, 3.5.2006. 7. Arthur Benz, Compounded Representation in EU Multi -level Governance, in Beate Kohler-Koch(Ed.), Linking EU and National Governance, Oxford, oxford University Press, 2003, pp.82-106. 8. Beate Kohler-Koch, Organized interests in the EC and the European Parliament, in: European Integration online Papers(EIoP), Vol.1, No.9, 1997

Saptamana 5: Tipuri de grupuri de interese: interesele mediului de afaceri

Concepte cheie: birocratie, piata, proprietate, liberalism Bibliografia obligatorie: 1. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp.49-72. 2. Stefanie John and Daniela Schweitzer, Industrial lobbying within the European Union: actors, strategies and trends in the multi-level system, 24th Report of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies(AICGS), 2008. 3. Pieter Bouwen, Corporate lobbying in the European Union: the logic of access, in: Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 9, No.3, 2002, pp.365390. 4. Pieter Bouwen, The Logic of Access to the European Parliament: Business Lobbying in the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, in: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol.42, No.3, 2004, pp. 473495. Bibliografie suplimentara

5. Ruth Webster, What drives interest group collaboration at the EU level? Evidence from the European environmental interest group s, in: European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol.4, No.17, 2000. 6. Chris Boyd, Lafarge and Global Warming, in: Robin Pedler(Ed.), European Union Lobbying. Changes in the Arena, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp.57-86.Biblioteca 7. Justin Greenwood,Electricity liberalization, in: Robin Pedler(Ed.), European Union Lobbying. Changes in the Arena, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp.269294.- Biblioteca

Saptamana 6: Tipuri de grupuri de interese: grupurile profesionale

Concepte cheie: libertate civila, reprezentare, personal de conducere Bibliografie obligatorie: 1. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 73-93. 2. EUROCADRES , Professional and Managerial Staff in Europe and their Trade Unions in the 21st Century, 2nd e d i t i o n, 2009. 3. Wim Mijs and Asuncin Caparrs Puebla, Making the Single Market in Financial Services a Reality, in: Robin Pedler(Ed.), European Union Lobbying. Changes in the Arena, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2002, pp.257-268 Biblioteca 4. Commission, Proposal for Directive on the application of patients' rights in crossborder healthcare 5. Commission, Small Business Act for Europe, COM(2008) 394 final, Brussels 25.6.2008. 6. Commission, Green Paper On the European Workforce for Health , COM(2008)725 final, Brussels, 10.12.2008 Bibliografie suplimentara 7. EUROCADRES opinion More And Better Globalisation EUROCADRES View of the EUs Global Policy. 8. Uniunea Profesiilor Liberale din Romnia, Ra p o r t d e Ac t i v i t a t e al Biroului Executiv al Uniunii Profesiilor Liberale din Romnia, pe perioada 1 ianuarie 31 decembrie 2007. 9. Pozitia CEPLIS asupra Directive on the application of patients' rights in crossborder healthcare
10

10. Pozzitia CEPLIS privind Green Paper On the European Workforce for Health 11. Pozitia CEPLIS asupra Small Business Act for Europe

Saptamana 7: Tipuri de grupuri de interese: Partidele politice si sindicatele

Concepte cheie: competitie politica, democratie, interese de guvernare, interese ocupationale, electorat Bibliografie obligatorie: 1. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp.94-115. 2. Jan Beyers, Political Cleavages and Interest Group Politics A Comparative Analysis, Paper prepared for the 10th Biennial EUSA International Conference Montreal, Canada, May 17-19, 2007. 3. Michael T. Heaney, Linking political parties and interest groups, i n: L. Sandy Maisel and Jeffrey M. Berry (Eds.), American Political Parties and Interest Groups, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009, pp.568-587. 4. John Monks, Global Europe A European Trade Union view, in: Tony Pilch(ed.), Trade unions and globalization, The Smith Institute, 2007, pp.5059. 5. Susanne Pernicka, UK and Austria Trade union representation of contingent workers in further education, in: Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, Vol.15, No. 3-4, 2009, pp. 461-480. 6. Kristine Mitchell, Trade Unions and EU Politics: Explaining Variation in European Strategies, Paper prepared for EUSA Conference, Montral, Canada May 17 19, 2007. Bibliografie suplimentara 7. Ted Perlmutter, Political Parties and Interest Groups in Italy, 1990-1994, Paper for the international conference Explaining Changes in Migration Policy: Debates from Different Perspectives, University of Geneva, 27 -28 October 2000. 8. Franoise Le Deist and Jonathan Winterton, Trade union strategies for developing competence at work: Experience from eight European countries , http://www.crimt.org/pdf/crimt_2007_le_deist_and_winterton.pdf 9. Jane Hardy and Ian Fitzgerald, Cross Border Trade Union Collaboration in the Context of Competition and Arbitraging Labour in an Enlarged Europe , Paper be presented at ESRC Research Seminar Series Changing Cultures of Competitiveness, University of Manchester, 9 July 2008 .
11
th

10. Strategia ETUC si Planul de Actiune 2007-2011 11. Ulrich Bamberg, The role of German trade unions in the national and European standardization process, TUTB Newsletter, No.24-25, June 2004, pp.12-15. 12. Bianca Cobrzan, The influence of the some interest groups upon the activity of Government and Parliament, in: Revista Transilvan de tiine Administrative, No.1(13), 2005, pp.33-46. 13. Nicolas Bacon and Paul Blyton, Meeting the Challenge of Globalisation - Steel Industry Restructuring and Trade Union Strategy, http://www.imfmetal.org/files/REP_2000

Saptamana 8: Tipuri de grupuri de interese: interesele teritoriale

Concepte cheie: interese regionale, interese locale, Comitetul Regiunilor, oficii regionale de lobbying Bibliografie obligatorie: 1. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp.156-176. 2. Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, < Europe with regions > Channels for representation in the European Union, in: Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol.26, No.1, 1996, pp.73 - 91. 3. Michel Huysseune & M. Theo Jans, Brussels as the capital of a Europe of the regions? Regional offices as European policy actors, in : The e-Journal for Academic Research on Brussels, No.16, 25 February 2008. 4. Josef Esser, Municipalities and Lnder in the Wake of European Multilevel Governance, in: German Journal of Urban Studies, Vol.44, No.2, 2005. 5. The Committee of the Regions, White Paper on Multi-level governance, June 2009. Bibliografie suplimentara 6. Katja Wolff, The Basque Countrys Relation to the European Union Chaos of Interests or Symbolic Diversity?, Paper for the Euroculture Intensive Program 2006 at the Universidad de Deusto in San Sebastian, Spain, February 13 February 23, 2006. 7. Saulius Spurga, Lithuanian interest intermediation and communication of interest groups at the European Union level, in: Informacijos Mokslai, Vol.35, 2005, pp.136149. 8. Anna Olsson, Euroscepticism Revisited - Regional Interest Representation in Brussels and the Link to Citizen Attitudes towards European Integration, Paper prepared for delivery at the 11th Biennial International Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Los Angeles, California, April 23-25, 2009.
12

9. Thomas Christiansen and Pamela Lintner, The Committee of the Regions after 10 Years: Lessons from the Past andChallenges for the Future , in: EIPASCOPE , No.1 2005, pp. 7-13. 10. Danuta Hbner, Regions in a system of multi-level governance, in: Scottish Jean Monnet Centre Occasional Paper Series, Vol. 1, No. 1, January 2009, pp.1-10.

Saptamana 9: Tipuri de grupuri de interese: interesele cetatenilor

Concepte cheie: interese publice, societate civila, protectia mediului, drepturile fundamentale ale omului Bibliografie obligatorie: 1. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 116-155. 2. Lori M. Poloni-Staudinger, The Domestic Opportunity Structure and Supranational Activity, in: European Union Politics,Vol.9, No. 4, 2008, pp. 531 558. 3. Fiona Williams, Claims and Frames in the Making of Care Policies in Europe: Recognition, Rights and Redistribution, Paper submitted to RC19 meeting Social Policies: Local Experiments, Travelling Ideas, Universit de Montral, Canada, August 20-22nd, 2009. 4. Eric W. Welch, Charles C. Hinnant and M. Jae Moon, Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 15, No.3, 2005, pp. 371391. 5. Jrg Flecker, Christoph Hermann et al, Privatisation of Public Services and the Impact on Quality, Employment and Productivity (PIQUE), Vienna, 2009 6. European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication, Your rights as a consumer How the European Union protects your interests , B-1049, February, 2007. Bibliografie suplimentara 7. C.V. Fiorio, M. Florio, S. Salini and P. Ferrari, Consumers Attitudes on Services of General Interest in the EU: Accessibility, Price and Quality 2000-2004,Working Paper, No.2, 2007. 8. Liz Richardson and Peter John, Is lobbying really effective? A field experiment of local interest group strategies to influence elected representatives in the UK , Paper prepared for presentation to Panel 30-10: Alternative Forms Of Political Participation In Cities at 2009 Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the American Political Science Association, Toronto, ON, Canada, 3-6 September, 2009 .
13

9. PE si Consiliul UE, DIRECTIVA 2002/73/CE din 23 septembrie 2002 privind modificarea Directivei 76/207/CEE a Consiliului privind punerea n aplicare a principiului egalitii brbai i femei n ceea ce privete accesul la ncadrarea n munc, la formarea i promovarea profesional, precum i condiiile de munc.

Partea II-a : Societatea civila, actor in procesul decizional

Saptamana 10: Societatea civila si institutiile europene(Comisia si PE)
Concepte cheie : autoritate, egalitate, guvernanta, parteneriat

Bibliografie obligatorie : 1. Justin Greenwood, Interest Representation in the European Union, 2nd edition, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp.177-211. 2. Stijn Smismans, European Civil Society: Shaped by Discourses and Institutional Interests, in: European Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 4, September 2003, pp. 482504. 3. Jonas Tallberg & Anders Uhlin, Civil Society and Global Democracy: An Assessment, in: Daniele Archibugi, Mathias Koenig-Archibugi and Raffaele Marchetti(Eds.), Global Democracy: Normative and Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2011(in curs de aparitie) 4. Giuseppe Allegri, New Social Movements and the Deconstruction of New Governance: Fragments of Post-Modern Constitutional Theories in Europuzzle, in: European Journal of Legal Studies, Vol.1, No.3, 2008, pp.117. 5. Peter Bouwen, Competing for consultation: civil society and conflict between the European Commission and the European Parliament, n: West European Politics, Vol.30, No.2, 2007, pp.265-284. Bibliografie suplimentara

6. Alex Warleigh-Lack, On the path of legitimacy? A critical deliberativist perspective on the right to the citizens initiative, in: Carlo Ruzza and Vincent Della Salla(Eds.), Governance and civil society in the European
14

Union. Volume 1: Normative perspective, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp.55-72 . 7. Sabine Saurugger, La professionnalisation de la representation des interets : quelle legitimation de la societe civile au niveau communautaire ?, Papier prsent au colloque Les groupes dintrt au 21e sicle Paris, 24 et 25 septembre 2004. 8. Gudrun Eisele, European Civil Society- A glance at recent literature, http://nez.uni-muenster.de/download/eisele_-_european_civil _ society.pdf

Saptamana 11: Carta Alba a Guvernantei europene si societatea civila

Concepte cheie : democratie, drepturile omului, mass-media, regim parlamentar, responsibilitate guvernamentala Bibliografie obligatorie: 1. Commission of European Communities, European Governance. A White Paper, COM(2001) 428 final, Brussels, 25.7.2001. 2. Justin Greenwood, Governance and organized civil society at the European Union level: the search for input legitimacy trough elite groups, in: Vincent Della Salla and Carlo Ruzza(Eds.), Governance and civil society in the European Union. Volume 2: Exploring policy issues, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp.31- 46. 3. Carlo Ruzza, Advocacy coalitions and the participation of organized civil society in the European Union, in: Vincent Della Salla and Carlo Ruzza(Eds.), Governance and civil society in the European Union. Volume 2: Exploring policy issues, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp.47-71. 4. Emanuela Bozzini, The role of civil society organizations in written consultation processes: from the European Monitoring Centre to the European Fundamental Rights Agency, in: Vincent Della Sala and Carlo Ruzza(Eds.), Governance and civil society in the European Union, vol.2: Exploring policy issues, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp.93-109. 5. Deirdre Curtin, Private Interest representation or Civil Society Deliberation? A Contemporary Dilemma for European Union, in: Social & Legal Studies, Vol.12, No.1, 2003, pp.55-75. 6. Elizabeth Monaghan, Communicating Europe: The Role of Organized Civil Society, in: Journal of Contemporary European Research , Vol. 4, No. 1, 2008, pp.18-31.

15

7. Sabine Saurugger, Democratic Misfit? Conceptions of CivilSociety Participation in France and the European Union, in: Political Studies, Vol.55, No.2, 2007, pp.384-404. Bibliografie Suplimentara 8. Richard Brosio, Civil Society: Concepts and Critique, From a Radical Democratic Perspective, in: Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies , Vol.2, No.2, 2004, 19p. 9. Sandra Krger, Nothing but consultation : the place of organised civil society in the EU policy making across policies, European Governance Papers, No.C-0803. 10. Daan Brummer, The reality of NGO involvement in EU migration policy. Do NGOs live up to their promise as saviours of EU democratic legitimacy?, Paper prepared for the Fourth Conference on EU Politics of the ECPR Standing Group on the European Union, Riga, 25-27 September 2008.

Saptamana 12: Tipuri de ONG-uri de interes public: ONG-uri specializate pe protectia mediului
Concepte cheie: ecologie, tehnologii curate, calitatea aerului si apei, dezvoltare durabila, energie verde Bibliografie obligatorie: 1. Anthony R. Zito, Meeting the European Unions environmental challenge, in: Vincent Della Salla and Carlo Ruzza(Eds.), Governance and civil society in the European Union. Volume 2: Exploring policy issues , Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp.72-92. 2. Christian Hey, EU Environmental Policies: A short history of the policy strategies, in: Stefan Scheuer(Ed.), EU Environmental Policy Handbook. A Critical Analysis of EU Environmental Legislation, Brussels, European Environmental Bureau, 2005, pp.1730.

3. Jon Barnett and W. Neil Adger, Climate change, human security and violent conflict, in: Political Geography, Vol. 26, No.6, 2007, pp.639- 655. 4. * * *, Convention on Access to Information, Public participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Aarhus, Denmark, 25 June, 1998. 5. Ruth Webster, What drives interest group collaboration at the EU level? Evidence from the European environmental interest groups, in: European Integration online Papers (EIoP), Vol. 4, No.17, 2000, pp. 1-23.

16

Bibliografie suplimentara 6. Documente ale Green 10: 6.1 Cine este Green 10 6.2 Green 10: Environment at the heart of Europe: the role of European Parliament 6.3 Greenpeace Copenhagen Outcome Assessment 6.4 ALTER EU_A captive Commission: the role of the financial industry in shaping EU Regulation 6.5 ALTER-EU: The Commissions Lobby Register One Year on: Success or failure? 6.6 How Africa is feeding Europe 6.7 Why the EU should strengthen 2020 climate action

Saptamana 13: Tipuri de ONG-uri: organizatiile pentru apararea drepturilor fundamentale ale omului
Concept cheie: democratie, pluralism, drepturi politice si civile, egalitate de sanse, dialog intercultural Bibliografie obligatorie: 1. Emanuela Bozzini, The role of civil society organizations in written consultation process: from the European Monitoring Centre to the European Fundamental Rights Agency, in: Vincent Della Salla and Carlo Ruzza(Eds.), Governance and civil society in the European Union. Volume 2: Exploring policy issues , Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp.93-109. 2. Tawhida Ahmed and Israel de Jess Butler, The European Union and Human Rights: An International Law Perspective, in: The European Journal of International Law, Vol.17, No.4, 2006, pp. 771801. 3. Justin Greenwood, Governance and organized civil society at the European Union level: the search for <input legitimacy> through elite groups, in: Vincent Della Salla and Carlo Ruzza(Eds.), Governance and civil society in the European Union. Volume 2: Exploring policy issues, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2007, pp.31-46. 4. Elizabeth Meehan, From Government to Governance, Civic Participation and New Politics; the Context of Potential Opportunities for the Better Representation of Women, Ocasional Paper, No.5, October 2003. Bibliografie suplimentara

5. United Nations Alliance of Civilizations, Alliance of Civilizations Regional Strategy on Intercultural Dialogue and Cooperation in South Eastern Europe , Presented in Sarajevo, 14 December 2009.
17

6. Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper on European Union Consumer Protection, COM(2001) 531 final, Brussels, 2.10.2001 7. Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper on consumer collective redress, COM(2008) 794 final, Brussels, 27.11.2008. 8. Commission of the European Communities, Green paper on a European Citizens' Initiative, COM(2009) 622 final, Brussels, 11.11.2009

Saptamana 14: Tipuri de ONG-uri: organizatii ale societatii civile pentru sanatate si ingrijirea sanatatii
Concepte cheie: guvernanta sanatatii, politica de sanatate a UE, strategia de sanatate, participare publica, societatea civila. Bibliografia obligatorie: 1. Martin McKee, Roza Adany and Laura MacLehose, Health status and trends in candidates countries, in: Martin McKee, Laura MacLehose and Ellen Nolte(Eds.), Health policy and European Union Enlargement, Maidenhead, England, Open University Press, 2004, pp.24-42. 2. Carl-Andy Dubois and Martin McKee, Health and health care in the candidate countries to the European Union: common challenges, different circumstances, diverse policies, in: Martin McKee, Laura MacLehose and Ellen Nolte(Eds.), Health policy and European Union Enlargement, Maidenhead, England, Open University Press, 2004, pp. 43-63. 3. European Commission. Health & Consumer Protection General Directorate, Health in Europe: A Strategic Approach Discussion Document for a Health Strategy , 2007. 4. Commission of the European Communities, Follow-up to the high level reflection process on patient mobility and healthcare developments in the European Union , COM(2004) 301 final, Brussels 20.04.2004. 5. David Byrne, Enabling Good Health For All A reflection process for a new EU health strategy, European Commission Services, 2004. 6. European Commission(Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General), Health in Europe: A Strategic Approach Discussion Document for a Health Strategy , http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_overview/strategy/reflection_process_en.htm

Bibliografie suplimentara 7. Commission of the European Communities, Green Paper on the role of Civil Society in Drugs Policy in the European Union, COM(2006)316 final, Brussels, 26.6.2006.

18

8. Shyama Kuruvilla, CSO Participation in Health, Research and Policy: A review of models, mechanisms and measures, Working Paper 251, London, Overseas Development Institute, 2005. 9. Kelley Lee, Civil Society Organizations and the Functions of Global Health Governance: What Role within Intergovernmental Organizations?, in: Global Health Governance, Vol. 3, No.2, 2010, pp.1-20.

19