PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, appellee, vs. MARIVIC GENOSA, appellant. DECISION PANGANIBAN, J.

: Admitting she killed her husband, appellant anchors her prayer for acquittal on a novel theory -- the battered woman syndrome (B !", which allegedly constitutes self-defense# $nder the proven facts, however, she is not entitled to complete e%oneration because there was no unlawful aggression -- no immediate and une%pected attack on her by her batterer-husband at the time she shot him# Absent unlawful aggression, there can be no self-defense, complete or incomplete# But all is not lost# &he severe beatings repeatedly inflicted on appellant constituted a form of cumulative provocation that broke down her psychological resistance and selfcontrol# &his psychological paralysis she suffered diminished her will power, thereby entitling her to the mitigating factor under paragraphs ' and () of Article (* of the +evised ,enal -ode# .n addition, appellant should also be credited with the e%tenuating circumstance of having acted upon an impulse so powerful as to have naturally produced passion and obfuscation# &he acute battering she suffered that fatal night in the hands of her batterer-spouse, in spite of the fact that she was eight months pregnant with their child, overwhelmed her and put her in the aforesaid emotional and mental state, which overcame her reason and impelled her to vindicate her life and her unborn child/s# -onsidering the presence of these two mitigating circumstances arising from B !, as well as the benefits of the .ndeterminate !entence 0aw, she may now apply for and be released from custody on parole, because she has already served the minimum period of her penalty while under detention during the pendency of this case# The Case 1or automatic review before this -ourt is the !eptember 23, (''4 5ecision6(7 of the +egional &rial -ourt (+&-" of 8rmoc -ity (Branch *3" in -riminal -ase 9o# 3)(:-), finding ;arivic <enosa guilty beyond reasonable doubt of parricide# &he decretal portion of the 5ecision reads= >?+?18+?, after all the foregoing being duly considered, the -ourt finds the accused, ;arivic <enosa y .sidro, <$.0&@ beyond reasonable doubt of the crime of ,arricide as provided under Article 2A: of the +evised ,enal -ode as restored by !ec# 3, +A 9o# B:3', and after finding treachery as a generic aggravating circumstance and none of mitigating circumstance, hereby sentences the accused with the penalty of 5?A&># &he -ourt likewise penaliCes the accused to pay the heirs of the deceased the sum of fifty thousand pesos (,3),)))#))", ,hilippine currency as indemnity and another sum of fifty thousand pesos (,3),)))#))", ,hilippine currency as moral damages#627 &he .nformation6*7 charged appellant with parricide as follows= &hat on or about the (3th day of 9ovember (''3, at Barangay Bilwang, ;unicipality of .sabel, ,rovince of 0eyte, ,hilippines and within the Durisdiction of this >onorable

-ourt, the above-named accused, with intent to kill, with treachery and evident premeditation, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault, hit and wound one B?9 <?98!A, her legitimate husband, with the use of a hard deadly weapon, which the accused had provided herself for the purpose, 6causing7 the following wounds, to wit= E-adaveric spasm# EBody on the 2nd stage of decomposition# E1ace, black, blownup F swollen wG evident post-mortem lividity# ?yes protruding from its sockets and tongue slightly protrudes out of the mouth# E1racture, open, depressed, circular located at the occipital bone of the head, resulting 6in7 laceration of the brain, spontaneous rupture of the blood vessels on the posterior surface of the brain, laceration of the dura and meningeal vessels producing severe intracranial hemorrhage# EBlisters at both e%trem6i7ties, anterior chest, posterior chest, trunk wG shedding of the epidermis# EAbdomen distended wG gas# &runk bloated#/ which caused his death#6A7 ith the assistance of her counsel,637 appellant pleaded not guilty during her arraignment on ;arch *, (''B#6:7 .n due course, she was tried for and convicted of parricide# The Facts Version of the Prosecution &he 8ffice of the !olicitor <eneral (8!<" summariCes the prosecution/s version of the facts in this wise= Appellant and Ben <enosa were united in marriage on 9ovember (', ('4* in 8rmoc -ity# &hereafter, they lived with the parents of Ben in their house at .sabel, 0eyte# 1or a time, Ben/s younger brother, Ale%, and his wife lived with them too# !ometime in (''3, however, appellant and Ben rented from !teban ;atiga a house at Barangay Bilwang, .sabel, 0eyte where they lived with their two children, namely= Hohn ;arben and ?arl ,ierre# 8n 9ovember (3, (''3, Ben and Arturo Basobas went to a cockfight after receiving their salary# &hey each had two (2" bottles of beer before heading home# Arturo would pass Ben/s house before reaching his# hen they arrived at the house of Ben, he found out that appellant had gone to .sabel, 0eyte to look for him# Ben went inside his house, while Arturo went to a store across it, waiting until '=)) in the evening for the masiao runner to place a bet# Arturo did not see appellant arrive but on his way home passing the side of the <enosas/ rented house, he heard her say E. won/t hesitate to kill you/ to which Ben replied E hy kill me when . am innocentI/ &hat was the last time Arturo saw Ben alive# Arturo also noticed that since then, the <enosas/ rented house appeared uninhabited and was always closed#

8n 9ovember (:, (''3, appellant asked ?rlinda ,aderog, her close friend and neighbor living about fifty (3)" meters from her house, to look after her pig because she was going to -ebu for a pregnancy check-up# Appellant likewise asked ?rlinda to sell her motorcycle to their neighbor +onnie 5ayandayan who unfortunately had no money to buy it# &hat same day, about (2=(3 in the afternoon, Hoseph Jalida was waiting for a bus going to 8rmoc when he saw appellant going out of their house with her two kids in tow, each one carrying a bag, locking the gate and taking her children to the waiting area where he was# Hoseph lived about fifty (3)" meters behind the <enosas/ rented house# Hoseph, appellant and her children rode the same bus to 8rmoc# &hey had no conversation as Hoseph noticed that appellant did not want to talk to him# 8n 9ovember (4, (''3, the neighbors of !teban ;atiga told him about the foul odor emanating from his house being rented by Ben and appellant# !teban went there to find out the cause of the stench but the house was locked from the inside# !ince he did not have a duplicate key with him, !teban destroyed the gate padlock with a borrowed steel saw# >e was able to get inside through the kitchen door but only after destroying a window to reach a hook that locked it# Alone, !teban went inside the unlocked bedroom where the offensive smell was coming from# &here, he saw the lifeless body of Ben lying on his side on the bed covered with a blanket# >e was only in his briefs with inDuries at the back of his head# !eeing this, !teban went out of the house and sent word to the mother of Ben about his son/s misfortune# 0ater that day, .luminada <enosa, the mother of Ben, identified the dead body as that of 6her7 son# ;eanwhile, in the morning of the same day, !,8* 0eo Acodesin, then assigned at the police station at .sabel, 0eyte, received a report regarding the foul smell at the <enosas/ rented house# &ogether with !,8( ;illares, !,8( -olon, and 5r# +efelina -erillo, !,8* Acodesin proceeded to the house and went inside the bedroom where they found the dead body of Ben lying on his side wrapped with a bedsheet# &here was blood at the nape of Ben who only had his briefs on# !,8* Acodesin found in one corner at the side of an aparador a metal pipe about two (2" meters from where Ben was, leaning against a wall# &he metal pipe measured three (*" feet and si% (:" inches long with a diameter of one and half (( (G2" inches# .t had an open end without a stop valve with a red stain at one end# &he bedroom was not in disarray# About ()=)) that same morning, the cadaver of Ben, because of its stench, had to be taken outside at the back of the house before the postmortem e%amination was conducted by 5r# -erillo in the presence of the police# A municipal health officer at .sabel, 0eyte responsible for medico-legal cases, 5r# -erillo found that Ben had been dead for two to three days and his body was already decomposing# &he postmortem e%amination of 5r# -erillo yielded the findings quoted in the .nformation for parricide later filed against appellant# !he concluded that the cause of Ben/s death was Ecardiopulmonary arrest secondary to severe intracranial hemorrhage due to a depressed fracture of the occipital 6bone7#/ Appellant a !"tte #"ll"n$ Ben# !he testified that going home after work on 9ovember (3, (''3, she got worried that her husband who was not home yet might have gone gambling since it was a payday# ith her cousin ?cel AraKo, appellant went to look for Ben at the marketplace and taverns at .sabel, 0eyte but did not find him there# &hey found Ben drunk upon their return at the <enosas/ house# ?cel went home despite appellant/s request for her to sleep in their house#

&hen, Ben purportedly nagged appellant for following him, even challenging her to a fight# !he allegedly ignored him and instead attended to their children who were doing their homework# Apparently disappointed with her reaction, Ben switched off the light and, with the use of a chopping knife, cut the television antenna or wire to keep her from watching television# According to appellant, Ben was about to attack her so she ran to the bedroom, but he got hold of her hands and whirled her around# !he fell on the side of the bed and screamed for help# Ben left# At this point, appellant packed his clothes because she wanted him to leave# !eeing his packed clothes upon his return home, Ben allegedly flew into a rage, dragged appellant outside of the bedroom towards a drawer holding her by the neck, and told her E@ou might as well be killed so nobody would nag me#/ Appellant testified that she was aware that there was a gun inside the drawer but since Ben did not have the key to it, he got a three-inch long blade cutter from his wallet# !he however, Esmashed/ the arm of Ben with a pipe, causing him to drop the blade and his wallet# Appellant then Esmashed/ Ben at his nape with the pipe as he was about to pick up the blade and his wallet# !he thereafter ran inside the bedroom# Appellant, however, insisted that she ended the life of her husband by shooting him# !he supposedly Edistorted/ the drawer where the gun was and shot Ben# >e did not die on the spot, though, but in the bedroom#6B7 (-itations omitted" Version of the Defense Appellant relates her version of the facts in this manner= (# ;arivic and Ben <enosa were allegedly married on 9ovember (', ('4*# ,rior to her marriage, ;arivic had graduated from !an -arlos, -ebu -ity, obtaining a degree of Bachelor of !cience in Business Administration, and was working, at the time of her husband/s death, as a !ecretary to the ,ort ;anagers in 8rmoc -ity# &he couple had three (*" children= Hohn ;arben, ?arl ,ierre and ;arie Bianca# 2# ;arivic and Ben had known each other since elementary schoolL they were neighbors in BilwangL they were classmatesL and they were third degree cousins# Both sets of parents were against their relationship, but Ben was persistent and tried to stop other suitors from courting her# &heir closeness developed as he was her constant partner at fiestas# *# After their marriage, they lived first in the home of Ben/s parents, together with Ben/s brother, Ale%, in .sabel, 0eyte# .n the first year of marriage, ;arivic and Ben Elived happily/# But apparently, soon thereafter, the couple would quarrel often and their fights would become violent# A# Ben/s brother, Ale%, testified for the prosecution that he could not remember when Ben and ;arivic married# >e said that when Ben and ;arivic quarreled, generally when Ben would come home drunk, ;arivic would inflict inDuries on him# >e said that in one incident in (''* he saw ;arivic holding a kitchen knife after Ben had shouted for help as his left hand was covered with blood# ;arivic left the house but after a week, she returned apparently having asked for Ben/s forgiveness# .n another incident in ;ay 22, (''A, early morning, Ale% and his father apparently rushed to Ben/s aid again and saw blood from Ben/s forehead and ;arivic holding an empty bottle# Ben and ;arivic reconciled after ;arivic had apparently again asked for Ben/s forgiveness#

;rs# .luminada <enosa, ;arivic/s mother-in-law, testified too, saying that Ben and ;arivic married in E('4: or ('43 more or less here in 1atima, 8rmoc -ity#/ !he said as the marriage went along, ;arivic became Ealready very demanding# ;rs# .luminada <enosa said that after the birth of ;arivic/s two sons, there were Ethree (*" misunderstandings#/ &he first was when ;arivic stabbed Ben with a table knife through his left armL the second incident was on 9ovember (3, (''A, when ;arivic struck Ben on the forehead Eusing a sharp instrument until the eye was also affected# .t was wounded and also the ear/ and her husband went to Ben to helpL and the third incident was in (''3 when the couple had already transferred to the house in Bilwang and she saw that Ben/s hand was plastered as Ethe bone cracked#/ Both mother and son claimed they brought Ben to a ,asar clinic for medical intervention# 3# Arturo Basobas, a co-worker of Ben, testified that on 9ovember (3, (''3 EAfter we collected our salary, we went to the cock-fighting place of .!-8#/ &hey stayed there for three (*" hours, after which they went to E$niloks/ and drank beer M allegedly only two (2" bottles each# After drinking they bought barbeque and went to the <enosa residence# ;arivic was not there# >e stayed a while talking with Ben, after which he went across the road to wait Efor the runner and the usher of the masiao game because during that time, the hearing on masiao numbers was rampant# . was waiting for the ushers and runners so that . can place my bet#/ 8n his way home at about '=)) in the evening, he heard the <enosas arguing# &hey were quarreling loudly# 8utside their house was one E1redo/ who is used by Ben to feed his fighting cocks# Basobas/ testimony on the root of the quarrel, conveniently overheard by him was ;arivic saying E. will never hesitate to kill you/, whilst Ben replied E hy kill me when . am innocent#/ Basobas thought they were Doking# >e did not hear them quarreling while he was across the road from the <enosa residence# Basobas admitted that he and Ben were always at the cockpits every !aturday and !unday# >e claims that he once told Ben Ebefore when he was stricken with a bottle by ;arivic <enosa/ that he should leave her and that Ben would always take her back after she would leave him Eso many times/# Basobas could not remember when ;arivic had hit Ben, but it was a long time that they had been quarreling# >e said Ben Eeven had a wound/ on the right forehead# >e had known the couple for only one ((" year# :# ;arivic testified that after the first year of marriage, Ben became cruel to her and was a habitual drinker# !he said he provoked her, he would slap her, sometimes he would pin her down on the bed, and sometimes beat her# &hese incidents happened several times and she would often run home to her parents, but Ben would follow her and seek her out, promising to change and would ask for her forgiveness# !he said after she would be beaten, she would seek medical help from 5r# 5ino -aing, 5r# 0ucero and 5ra# -erillo# &hese doctors would enter the inDuries inflicted upon her by Ben into their reports# ;arivic said Ben would beat her or quarrel with her every time he was drunk, at least three times a week# B# .n her defense, witnesses who were not so closely related to ;arivic, testified as to the abuse and violence she received at the hands of Ben#

EB#(# ;r# Hoe Barrientos, a fisherman, who was a 6neighbor7 of the <enosas, testified that on 9ovember (3, (''3, he overheard a quarrel between Ben and ;arivic# ;arivic was shouting for help and through the open Dalousies, he saw the spouses Egrappling with each other/# Ben had ;arivic in a choke hold# >e did not do anything, but had come voluntarily to testify# (Please note this was the same night as that testified to by Arturo Busabos#647" EB#2# ;r# Hunnie Barrientos, also a fisherman, and the brother of ;r# Hoe Barrientos, testified that he heard his neighbor ;arivic shouting on the night of 9ovember (3, (''3# >e peeped through the window of his hut which is located beside the <enosa house and saw Ethe spouses grappling with each other then Ben <enosa was holding with his both hands the neck of the accused, ;arivic <enosa/# >e said after a while, ;arivic was able to e%tricate he6r7self and enter the room of the children# After that, he went back to work as he was to go fishing that evening# >e returned at 4=)) the ne%t morning# (Again, please note that this was the same night as that testified to by Arturo Basobas"# EB#*# ;r# &eodoro !arabia was a former neighbor of the <enosas while they were living in .sabel, 0eyte# >is house was located about fifty (3)" meters from theirs# ;arivic is his niece and he knew them to be living together for (* or (A years# >e said the couple was always quarreling# ;arivic confided in him that Ben would pawn items and then would use the money to gamble# 8ne time, he went to their house and they were quarreling# Ben was so angry, but would be pacified Eif somebody would come#/ >e testified that while Ben was alive Ehe used to gamble and when he became drunk, he would go to our house and he will say, E&eody/ because that was what he used to call me, Emokimas ta,/ which means Elet/s go and look for a whore#/ ;r# !arabia further testified that Ben Ewould bo% his wife and . would see bruises and one time she ran to me, . noticed a wound (the witness pointed to his right breast" as according to her a knife was stricken to her#/ ;r# !arabia also said that once he saw Ben had been inDured too# >e said he voluntarily testified only that morning# EB#A# ;iss ?cel Arano, an (4-year old student, who is a cousin of ;arivic, testified that in the afternoon of 9ovember (3, (''3, ;arivic went to her house and asked her help to look for Ben# &hey searched in the market place, several taverns and some other places, but could not find him# !he accompanied ;arivic home# ;arivic wanted her to sleep with her in the <enosa house Ebecause she might be battered by her husband#/ hen they got to the <enosa house at about B=)) in the evening, ;iss Arano said that Eher husband was already there and was drunk#/ ;iss Arano knew he was drunk Ebecause of his staggering walking and . can also detect his face#/ ;arivic entered the house and she heard them quarrel noisily# (Again, please note that this is the same night as that testified to by Arturo Basobas" ;iss Arano testified that this was not the first time ;arivic had asked her to sleep in the house as ;arivic would be afraid every time her husband would come home drunk# At one time when she did sleep over, she was awakened at ()=)) in the evening when Ben arrived because the couple Ewere very noisy in the sala and . had heard something was broken like a vase#/ !he said ;arivic ran into her room and they locked the door# hen Ben couldn/t get in he got a chair and a knife and Eshowed us the knife through the window grill and he scared us#/ !he said that ;arivic shouted for help, but no one came# 8n cross-e%amination, she said that when she left ;arivic/s house on 9ovember (3, (''3, the couple were still quarreling# EB#3# 5r# 5ino -aing, a physician testified that he and ;arivic were co-employees at ,>.0,>8!, .sabel, 0eyte# ;arivic was his patient Emany times/ and had also

received treatment from other doctors# 5r# -aing testified that from Huly :, ('4' until 9ovember ', (''3, there were si% (:" episodes of physical inDuries inflicted upon ;arivic# &hese inDuries were reported in his 8ut-,atient -hart at the ,>.0,>8! >ospital# &he prosecution admitted the qualifications of 5r# -aing and considered him an e%pert witness#/ %%% %%% %%%

'# &he body of Ben <enosa was found on 9ovember (4, (''3 after an investigation was made of the foul odor emitting from the <enosa residence# &his fact was testified to by all the prosecution witnesses and some defense witnesses during the trial# ()# 5ra# +efelina @# -erillo, a physician, was the ;unicipal >ealth 8fficer of .sabel, 0eyte at the time of the incident, and among her responsibilities as such was to take charge of all medico-legal cases, such as the e%amination of cadavers and the autopsy of cadavers# 5ra# -erillo is not a forensic pathologist# !he merely took the medical board e%ams and passed in ('4:# !he was called by the police to go to the <enosa residence and when she got there, she saw Esome police officer and neighbor around#/ !he saw Ben <enosa, covered by a blanket, lying in a semi-prone position with his back to the door# >e was wearing only a brief# %%% %%% %%%

E5r# -aing/s clinical history of the tension headache and hypertention of ;arivic on twenty-three (2*" separate occasions was marked at ?%hibits E2/ and E2-B#/ &he 8,5 -hart of ;arivic at the ,hilphos -linic which reflected all the consultations made by ;arivic and the si% (:" incidents of physical inDuries reported was marked as ?%hibit E*#/ 8n cross-e%amination, 5r# -aing said that he is not a psychiatrist, he could not say whether the inDuries were directly related to the crime committed# >e said it is only a psychiatrist who is qualified to e%amine the psychological make-up of the patient, Ewhether she is capable of committing a crime or not#/ EB#: ;r# ,anfilo &ero, the barangay captain in the place where the <enosas resided, testified that about two (2" months before Ben died, ;arivic went to his office past 4=)) in the evening# !he sought his help to settle or confront the <enosa couple who were e%periencing Efamily troubles/# >e told ;arivic to return in the morning, but he did not hear from her again and assumed Ethat they might have settled with each other or they might have forgiven with each other#/ %%% %%% %%%

5ra# -erillo said that Ethere is only one inDury and that is the inDury involving the skeletal area of the head/ which she described as a Efracture/# And that based on her e%amination, Ben had been dead 2 or * days# 5ra# -erillo did not testify as to what caused his death# 5ra# -erillo was not cross-e%amined by defense counsel# ((# &he .nformation, dated 9ovember (A, ('':, filed against ;arivic <enosa charged her with the crime of ,A++.-.5? committed Ewith intent to kill, with treachery and evidence premeditation, % % % wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault, hit and wound % % % her legitimate husband, with the use of a hard deadly weapon % % % which caused his death#/ (2# &rial took place on B and (A April (''B, (A ;ay (''B, 2( Huly (''B, (B, 22 and 2* !eptember (''B, (2 9ovember (''B, (3 and (: 5ecember (''B, 22 ;ay (''4, and 3 and : August (''4# (*# 8n 2* !eptember (''4, or only fifty (3)" days from the day of the last trial date, the >on# 1ortunito 0# ;adrona, ,residing Hudge, +&--Branch *3, 8rmoc -ity, rendered a H$5<;?9& finding ;arivic guilty Ebeyond reasonable doubt/ of the crime of parricide, and further found treachery as an aggravating circumstance, thus sentencing her to the ultimate penalty of 5?A&># (A# &he case was elevated to this >onorable -ourt upon automatic review and, under date of 2A Hanuary 2))), ;arivic/s trial lawyer, Atty# <il ;arvel ,# &abucanon, filed a ;otion to ithdraw as counsel, attaching thereto, as a precautionary measure, two (2" drafts of Appellant/s Briefs he had prepared for ;arivic which, for reasons of her own, were not conformed to by her# &he >onorable -ourt allowed the withdrawal of Atty# &abucanon and permitted the entry of appearance of undersigned counsel# (3# ithout the knowledge of counsel, ;arivic <enosa wrote a letter dated 2) Hanuary 2))), to the -hief Hustice, coursing the same through Atty# &eresita <# 5imaisip, 5eputy -lerk of -ourt of -hief Hudicial +ecords 8ffice, wherein she submitted her EBrief without counsels/ to the -ourt# &his letter was stamp-received by the >onorable -ourt on A 1ebruary 2)))#

;arivic said she did not provoke her husband when she got home that night it was her husband who began the provocation# ;arivic said she was frightened that her husband would hurt her and she wanted to make sure she would deliver her baby safely# .n fact, ;arivic had to be admitted later at the +iCal ;edical -entre as she was suffering from eclampsia and hypertension, and the baby was born prematurely on 5ecember (, (''3# ;arivic testified that during her marriage she had tried to leave her husband at least five (3" times, but that Ben would always follow her and they would reconcile# ;arivic said that the reason why Ben was violent and abusive towards her that night was because Ehe was craCy about his recent girlfriend, 0ulu % % % +ubillos#/ 8n cross-e%amination, ;arivic insisted she shot Ben with a gunL she said that he died in the bedroomL that their quarrels could be heard by anyone passing their houseL that Basobas lied in his testimonyL that she left for ;anila the ne%t day, 9ovember (:, (''3L that she did not bother anyone in ;anila, rented herself a room, and got herself a Dob as a field researcher under the alias E;arvelous .sidro/L she did not tell anyone that she was leaving 0eyte, she Dust wanted to have a safe delivery of her babyL and that she was arrested in !an ,ablo, 0aguna# EAnswering questions from the -ourt, ;arivic said that she threw the gun awayL that she did not know what happened to the pipe she used to Esmash him once/L that she was wounded by Ben on her wrist with the boloL and that two (2" hours after she was Ewhirled/ by Ben, he kicked her Eass/ and dragged her towards the drawer when he saw that she had packed his things#/

(:# .n the meantime, under date of (B 1ebruary 2))), and stamp-received by the >onorable -ourt on (' 1ebruary 2))), undersigned counsel filed an $+<?9& 8;9.B$! ;8&.89 praying that the >onorable -ourt allow the e%humation of Ben <enosa and the re-e%amination of the cause of his deathL allow the e%amination of ;arivic <enosa by qualified psychologists and psychiatrists to determine her state of mind at the time she killed her husbandL and finally, to allow a partial re-opening of the case a quo to take the testimony of said psychologists and psychiatrists# Attached to the $+<?9& 8;9.B$! ;8&.89 was a letter of 5r# +aquel 1ortun, then the only qualified forensic pathologist in the country, who opined that the description of the death wound (as culled from the post-mortem findings, ?%hibit EA/" is more akin to a gunshot wound than a beating with a lead pipe# (B# .n a +?!80$&.89 dated 2' !eptember 2))), the >onorable -ourt partly granted ;arivic/s $+<?9& 8;9.B$! ;8&.89 and remanded the case Eto the trial court for the reception of e%pert psychological andGor psychiatric opinion on the Ebattered woman syndrome/ plea, within ninety (')" days from notice, and, thereafter to forthwith report to this -ourt the proceedings taken, together with the copies of the &!9 and relevant documentary evidence, if any, submitted#/ (4# 8n (3 Hanuary 2))(, 5ra# 9atividad A# 5ayan appeared and testified before the >on# 1ortunito 0# ;adrona, +&--Branch *3, 8rmoc -ity# .mmediately before 5ra# 5ayan was sworn, the -ourt a quo asked if she had interviewed ;arivic <enosa# 5ra# 5ayan informed the -ourt that interviews were done at the ,enal .nstitution in (''', but that the clinical interviews and psychological assessment were done at her clinic# 5ra# 5ayan testified that she has been a clinical psychologist for twenty (2)" years with her own private clinic and connected presently to the 5e 0a !alle $niversity as a professor# Before this, she was the >ead of the ,sychology 5epartment of the Assumption -ollegeL a member of the faculty of ,sychology at the Ateneo de ;anila $niversity and !t# Hoseph/s -ollegeL and was the counseling psychologist of the 9ational 5efense -ollege# !he has an AB in ,sychology from the $niversity of the ,hilippines, a ;aster of Arts in -linical 6-ounseling7, ,sychology from the Ateneo, and a ,h5 from the $#,# !he was the past president of the ,sychological Association of the ,hilippines and is a member of the American ,sychological Association# !he is the secretary of the .nternational -ouncil of ,sychologists from about :4 countriesL a member of the 1orensic ,sychology AssociationL and a member of the A!?A9 6-ounseling7 Association# !he is actively involved with the ,hilippine Hudicial Academy, recently lecturing on the socio-demographic and psychological profile of families involved in domestic violence and nullity cases# !he was with the 5avide -ommission doing research about ;ilitary ,sychology# !he has written a book entitled E?nergy <lobal ,sychology/ (together with 5rs# Allan &an and Allan Bernardo"# &he <enosa case is the first time she has testified as an e%pert on battered women as this is the first case of that nature# 5ra# 5ayan testified that for the research she conducted, on the socio-demographic and psychological profile of families involved in domestic violence, and nullity cases, she looked at about 3)) cases over a period of ten (()" years and discovered that Ethere are lots of variables that cause all of this marital conflicts, from domestic violence to infidelity, to psychiatric disorder#/

5ra# 5ayan described domestic violence to comprise of Ea lot of incidents of psychological abuse, verbal abuse, and emotional abuse to physical abuse and also se%ual abuse#/ %%% %%% %%%

5ra# 5ayan testified that in her studies, Ethe battered woman usually has a very low opinion of herself# !he has a self-defeating and self-sacrificing characteristics# % % % they usually think very lowly of themselves and so when the violence would happen, they usually think that they provoke it, that they were the one who precipitated the violence, they provoke their spouse to be physically, verbally and even se%ually abusive to them#/ 5ra# 5ayan said that usually a battered % % % comes from a dysfunctional family or from Ebroken homes#/ 5ra# 5ayan said that the batterer, Dust like the battered woman, Ealso has a very low opinion of himself# But then emerges to have superiority comple% and it comes out as being very arrogant, very hostile, very aggressive and very angry# &hey also had (sic" a very low tolerance for frustrations# A lot of times they are involved in vices like gambling, drinking and drugs# And they become violent#/ &he batterer also usually comes from a dysfunctional family which over-pampers them and makes them feel entitled to do anything# Also, they see often how their parents abused each other so Ethere is a lot of modeling of aggression in the family#/ 5ra# 5ayan testified that there are a lot of reasons why a battered woman does not leave her husband= poverty, self-blame and guilt that she provoked the violence, the cycle itself which makes her hope her husband will change, the belief in her obligations to keep the family intact at all costs for the sake of the children# %%% %%% %%%

5ra# 5ayan said that abused wives react differently to the violence= some leave the house, or lock themselves in another room, or sometimes try to fight back triggering Ephysical violence on both of them#/ !he said that in a Enormal marital relationship,/ abuses also happen, but these are Enot consistent, not chronic, are not happening day in 6and7 day out#/ .n an Eabnormal marital relationship,/ the abuse occurs day in and day out, is long lasting and Eeven would cause hospitaliCation on the victim and even death on the victim#/ %%% %%% %%%

5ra# 5ayan said that as a result of the battery of psychological tests she administered, it was her opinion that ;arivic fits the profile of a battered woman because Einspite of her feeling of self-confidence which we can see at times there are really feeling (sic" of loss, such feelings of humiliation which she sees herself as damaged and as a broken person# And at the same time she still has the imprint of all the abuses that she had e%perienced in the past#/ %%% %%% %%%

5ra# 5ayan said ;arivic thought of herself as a loving wife and did not even consider filing for nullity or legal separation inspite of the abuses# .t was at the time of the tragedy that ;arivic then thought of herself as a victim# %%% %%% %%%

('# 8n ' 1ebruary 2))(, 5r# Alfredo ,aDarillo, a physician, who has since passed away, appeared and testified before +&--Branch *3, 8rmoc -ity# 5r# ,aDarillo was a 5iplomate of the ,hilippine Board of ,sychiatryL a 1ellow of the ,hilippine Board of ,sychiatry and a 1ellow of the ,hilippine ,sychiatry Association# >e was in the practice of psychiatry for thirty-eight (*4" years# ,rior to being in private practice, he was connected with the Jeterans ;emorial ;edical -entre where he gained his training on psychiatry and neurology# After that, he was called to active duty in the Armed 1orces of the ,hilippines, assigned to the J# 0una ;edical -enter for twenty si% (2:" years# ,rior to his retirement from government service, he obtained the rank of Brigadier <eneral# >e obtained his medical degree from the $niversity of !anto &omas# >e was also a member of the orld Association of ;ilitary !urgeonsL the NueCon -ity ;edical !ocietyL the -agayan ;edical !ocietyL and the ,hilippine Association of ;ilitary !urgeons# >e authored E&he -omparative Analysis of 9ervous Breakdown in the ,hilippine ;ilitary Academy from the ,eriod ('3A M ('B4/ which was presented twice in international congresses# >e also authored E&he ;ental >ealth of the Armed 1orces of the ,hilippines 2)))/, which was likewise published internationally and locally# >e had a medical te%tbook published on the use of ,rasepam on a ,arke-5avis grantL was the first to use ?nanthate (siquiline", on an ?#+# !quibb grantL and he published the use of the drug Oopiclom in ('43-4:# 5r# ,aDarillo e%plained that psychiatry deals with the functional disorder of the mind and neurology deals with the ailment of the brain and spinal cord enlarged# ,sychology, on the other hand, is a bachelor degree and a doctorate degreeL while one has to finish medicine to become a specialist in psychiatry# ?ven only in his Bth year as a resident in J# 0una ;edical -entre, 5r# ,aDarillo had already encountered a suit involving violent family relations, and testified in a case in (':A# .n the Armed 1orces of the ,hilippines, violent family disputes abound, and he has seen probably ten to twenty thousand cases# .n those days, the primordial intention of therapy was reconciliation# As a result of his e%perience with domestic violence cases, he became a consultant of the Battered oman 8ffice in NueCon -ity under Atty# 9enita 5eproCa# As such consultant, he had seen around forty (A)" cases of severe domestic violence, where there is physical abuse= such as slapping, pushing, verbal abuse, battering and bo%ing a woman even to an unconscious state such that the woman is sometimes confined# &he affliction of ,ost-&raumatic !tress 5isorder Edepends on the vulnerability of the victim#/ 5r# ,aDarillo said that if the victim is not very healthy, perhaps one episode of violence may induce the disorderL if the psychological stamina and physiologic constitutional stamina of the victim is stronger, Eit will take more repetitive trauma to precipitate the post-traumatic stress disorder and this % % % is very dangerous#/ .n psychiatry, the post-traumatic stress disorder is incorporated under the Ean%iety neurosis or neurologic an%cietism#/ .t is produced by Eoverwhelming brutality, trauma#/ %%% %%% %%%

5r# ,aDarillo e%plained that with Eneurotic an%iety/, the victim relives the beating or trauma as if it were real, although she is not actually being beaten at that time# !he thinks Eof nothing but the suffering#/ %%% %%% %%%

A woman who suffers battery has a tendency to become neurotic, her emotional tone is unstable, and she is irritable and restless# !he tends to become hard-headed and persistent# !he has higher sensitivity and her Eself-world/ is damaged# 5r# ,aDarillo said that an abnormal family background relates to an individual/s illness, such as the deprivation of the continuous care and love of the parents# As to the batterer, he normally EinternaliCes what is around him within the environment#/ And it becomes his own personality# >e is very competitiveL he is aiming high all the timeL he is so machoL he shows his strong faPade Ebut in it there are doubts in himself and prone to act without thinking#/ %%% %%% %%%

5r# ,aDarillo emphasiCed that Eeven though without the presence of the precipator (sic" or the one who administered the battering, that re-e%periencing of the trauma occurred (sic" because the individual cannot control it# .t will Dust come up in her mind or in his mind#/ %%% %%% %%%

5r# ,aDarillo said that a woman suffering post traumatic stress disorder try to defend themselves, and Eprimarily with knives# $sually pointed weapons or any weapon that is available in the immediate surrounding or in a hospital % % % because that abound in the household#/ >e said a victim resorts to weapons when she has Ereached the lowest rock bottom of her life and there is no other recourse left on her but to act decisively#/ %%% %%% %%%

5r# ,aDarillo testified that he met ;arivic <enosa in his office in an interview he conducted for two (2" hours and seventeen ((B" minutes# >e used the psychological evaluation and social case studies as a help in forming his diagnosis# >e came out with a ,sychiatric +eport, dated 22 Hanuary 2))(# %%% %%% %%%

8n cross-e%amination by the private prosecutor, 5r# ,aDarillo said that at the time she killed her husband ;arivic/c mental condition was that she was Ere-e%periencing the trauma#/ >e said Ethat we are trying to e%plain scientifically that the re-e%periencing of the trauma is not controlled by ;arivic# .t will Dust come in flashes and probably at that point in time that things happened when the re-e%periencing of the trauma flashed in her mind#/ At the time he interviewed ;arivic Eshe was more subdued, she was not super alert anymore % % % she is mentally stress (sic" because of the predicament she is involved#/ %%% %%% %%%

2)# 9o rebuttal evidence or testimony was presented by either the private or the public prosecutor# &hus, in accord with the +esolution of this >onorable -ourt, the records of the partially re-opened trial a quo were elevated#6'7 R%l"n$ &' the T("al C&%(t 1inding the proffered theory of self-defense untenable, the +&- gave credence to the prosecution evidence that appellant had killed the deceased while he was in bed sleeping# 1urther, the trial court appreciated the generic aggravating circumstance of treachery, because Ben <enosa was supposedly defenseless when he was killed -lying in bed asleep when ;arivic smashed him with a pipe at the back of his head# &he capital penalty having been imposed, the case was elevated to this -ourt for automatic review# Supervening Circumstances 8n 1ebruary (', 2))), appellant filed an $rgent 8mnibus ;otion praying that this -ourt allow ((" the e%humation of Ben <enosa and the ree%amination of the cause of his deathL (2" the e%amination of appellant by qualified psychologists and psychiatrists to determine her state of mind at the time she had killed her spouseL and (*" the inclusion of the said e%perts/ reports in the records of the case for purposes of the automatic review or, in the alternative, a partial reopening of the case for the lower court to admit the e%perts/ testimonies# 8n !eptember 2', 2))), this -ourt issued a +esolution granting in part appellant/s ;otion, remanding the case to the trial court for the reception of e%pert psychological andGor psychiatric opinion on the battered woman syndrome pleaL and requiring the lower court to report thereafter to this -ourt the proceedings taken as well as to submit copies of the &!9 and additional evidence, if any# Acting on the -ourt/s +esolution, the trial Dudge authoriCed the e%amination of ;arivic by two clinical psychologists, 5rs# 9atividad 5ayan 6()7 and Alfredo ,aDarillo, 6((7 supposedly e%perts on domestic violence# &heir testimonies, along with their documentary evidence, were then presented to and admitted by the lower court before finally being submitted to this -ourt to form part of the records of the case#6(27 The Iss%es Appellant assigns the following alleged errors of the trial court for this -ourt/s consideration= (# &he trial court gravely erred in promulgating an obviously hasty decision without reflecting on the evidence adduced as to self-defense# 2# &he trial court gravely erred in finding as a fact that Ben and ;arivic <enosa were legally married and that she was therefore liable for parricide# *# a pipe# &he trial court gravely erred finding the cause of death to be by beating with

3# &he trial court gravely erred in not requiring testimony from the children of ;arivic <enosa# :# &he trial court gravely erred in concluding that ;arivic/s flight to ;anila and her subsequent apologies were indicia of guilt, instead of a clear attempt to save the life of her unborn child# B# &he trial court gravely erred in concluding that there was an aggravating circumstance of treachery# 4# &he trial court gravely erred in refusing to re-evaluate the traditional elements in determining the e%istence of self-defense and defense of foetus in this case, thereby erroneously convicting ;arivic <enosa of the crime of parricide and condemning her to the ultimate penalty of death#6(*7 .n the main, the following are the essential legal issues= ((" whether appellant acted in self-defense and in defense of her fetusL and (2" whether treachery attended the killing of Ben <enosa# The C&%(t)s R%l"n$ &he appeal is partly meritorious# C&llate(al Fact%al Iss%es &he first si% assigned errors raised by appellant are factual in nature, if not collateral to the resolution of the principal issues# As consistently held by this -ourt, the findings of the trial court on the credibility of witnesses and their testimonies are entitled to a high degree of respect and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of any showing that the trial Dudge gravely abused his discretion or overlooked, misunderstood or misapplied material facts or circumstances of weight and substance that could affect the outcome of the case#6(A7 .n appellant/s first si% assigned items, we find no grave abuse of discretion, reversible error or misappreciation of material facts that would reverse or modify the trial court/s disposition of the case# .n any event, we will now briefly dispose of these alleged errors of the trial court# First, we do not agree that the lower court promulgated an obviously hasty decision without reflecting on the evidence adduced as to self-defense# e note that in his (B-page 5ecision, Hudge 1ortunito 0# ;adrona summariCed the testimonies of both the prosecution and the defense witnesses and -- on the basis of those and of the documentary evidence on record -- made his evaluation, findings and conclusions# >e wrote a *-page discourse assessing the testimony and the self-defense theory of the accused# hile she, or even this -ourt, may not agree with the trial Dudge/s conclusions, we cannot peremptorily conclude, absent substantial evidence, that he failed to reflect on the evidence presented# 9either do we find the appealed 5ecision to have been made in an obviously hasty manner# &he .nformation had been filed with the lower court on 9ovember (A, ('':# &hereafter, trial began and at least (* hearings were held for over a year# .t took the trial Dudge about two months from the conclusion of trial to promulgate his Dudgment# &hat he conducted the trial and resolved the case with dispatch should not be taken against him, much less used to condemn him for being unduly hasty# .f at all, the

A# &he trial court gravely erred in ignoring and disregarding evidence adduced from impartial and unbiased witnesses that Ben <enosa was a drunk, a gambler, a womaniCer and wife-beaterL and further gravely erred in concluding that Ben <enosa was a battered husband#

dispatch with which he handled the case should be lauded# .n any case, we find his actions in substantial compliance with his constitutional obligation#6(37 Second, the lower court did not err in finding as a fact that Ben <enosa and appellant had been legally married, despite the non-presentation of their marriage contract# .n People v. Malabago,6(:7 this -ourt held= &he key element in parricide is the relationship of the offender with the victim# .n the case of parricide of a spouse, the best proof of the relationship between the accused and the deceased is the marriage certificate# .n the absence of a marriage certificate, however, oral evidence of the fact of marriage may be considered by the trial court if such proof is not obDected to# &wo of the prosecution witnesses -- namely, the mother and the brother of appellant/s deceased spouse -- attested in court that Ben had been married to ;arivic#6(B7 &he defense raised no obDection to these testimonies# ;oreover, during her direct e%amination, appellant herself made a Dudicial admission of her marriage to Ben# 6(47 A%iomatic is the rule that a Dudicial admission is conclusive upon the party making it, e%cept only when there is a showing that ((" the admission was made through a palpable mistake, or (2" no admission was in fact made#6('7 8ther than merely attacking the non-presentation of the marriage contract, the defense offered no proof that the admission made by appellant in court as to the fact of her marriage to the deceased was made through a palpable mistake# hird, under the circumstances of this case, the specific or direct cause of Ben/s death -- whether by a gunshot or by beating with a pipe -- has no legal consequence# As the -ourt elucidated in its !eptember 2', 2))) +esolution, 6c7onsidering that the appellant has admitted the fact of killing her husband and the acts of hitting his nape with a metal pipe and of shooting him at the back of his head, the -ourt believes that e%humation is unnecessary, if not immaterial, to determine which of said acts actually caused the victim!s death# 5etermining which of these admitted acts caused the death is not dispositive of the guilt or defense of appellant# Fourth, we cannot fault the trial court for not fully appreciating evidence that Ben was a drunk, gambler, womaniCer and wife-beater# $ntil this case came to us for automatic review, appellant had not raised the novel defense of battered woman syndrome, for which such evidence may have been relevant# >er theory of selfdefense was then the crucial issue before the trial court# As will be discussed shortly, the legal requisites of self-defense under prevailing Durisprudence ostensibly appear inconsistent with the surrounding facts that led to the death of the victim# >ence, his personal character, especially his past behavior, did not constitute vital evidence at the time# Fifth, the trial court surely committed no error in not requiring testimony from appellant/s children# As correctly elucidated by the solicitor general, all criminal actions are prosecuted under the direction and control of the public prosecutor, in whom lies the discretion to determine which witnesses and evidence are necessary to present#62)7 As the former further points out, neither the trial court nor the prosecution prevented appellant from presenting her children as witnesses# &hus, she cannot now fault the lower court for not requiring them to testify# Finally, merely collateral or corroborative is the matter of whether the flight of ;arivic to ;anila and her subsequent apologies to her brother-in-law are indicia of her guilt or

are attempts to save the life of her unborn child# Any reversible error as to the trial court/s appreciation of these circumstances has little bearing on the final resolution of the case# F"(st Le$al Iss%e: Self-Defense and Defense of a Fetus Appellant admits killing Ben <enosa but, to avoid criminal liability, invokes selfdefense andGor defense of her unborn child# hen the accused admits killing the victim, it is incumbent upon her to prove any claimed Dustifying circumstance by clear and convincing evidence#62(7 ell-settled is the rule that in criminal cases, selfdefense (and similarly, defense of a stranger or third person" shifts the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defense#6227 The Battered oman S!ndrome

.n claiming self-defense, appellant raises the novel theory of the battered woman syndrome# hile new in ,hilippine Durisprudence, the concept has been recogniCed in foreign Durisdictions as a form of self-defense or, at the least, incomplete selfdefense#62*7 By appreciating evidence that a victim or defendant is afflicted with the syndrome, foreign courts convey their understanding of the Dustifiably fearful state of mind of a person who has been cyclically abused and controlled over a period of time#62A7 A battered woman has been defined as a woman who is repeatedly subDected to any forceful physical or psychological behavior by a man in order to coerce her to do something he wants her to do without concern for her rights# Battered women include wives or women in any form of intimate relationship with men# 1urthermore, in order to be classified as a battered woman, the couple must go through the battering cycle at least twice# Any woman may find herself in an abusive relationship with a man once# .f it occurs a second time, and she remains in the situation, she is defined as a battered woman#6237 Battered women e%hibit common personality traits, such as low self-esteem, traditional beliefs about the home, the family and the female se% roleL emotional dependence upon the dominant maleL the tendency to accept responsibility for the batterer/s actionsL and false hopes that the relationship will improve#62:7 ;ore graphically, the battered woman syndrome is characteriCed by the so-called cycle of violence,62B7 which has three phases= ((" the tension-building phaseL (2" the acute battering incidentL and (*" the tranquil, loving (or, at least, nonviolent" phase#6247 5uring the tens"&n*+%"l "n$ phase, minor battering occurs -- it could be verbal or slight physical abuse or another form of hostile behavior# &he woman usually tries to pacify the batterer through a show of kind, nurturing behaviorL or by simply staying out of his way# hat actually happens is that she allows herself to be abused in ways that, to her, are comparatively minor# All she wants is to prevent the escalation of the violence e%hibited by the batterer# &his wish, however, proves to be double-edged, because her placatory and passive behavior legitimiCes his belief that he has the right to abuse her in the first place# >owever, the techniques adopted by the woman in her effort to placate him are not usually successful, and the verbal andGor physical abuse worsens# ?ach partner

senses the imminent loss of control and the growing tension and despair# ?%hausted from the persistent stress, the battered woman soon withdraws emotionally# But the more she becomes emotionally unavailable, the more the batterer becomes angry, oppressive and abusive# 8ften, at some unpredictable point, the violence spirals out of control and leads to an acute battering incident#62'7 &he ac%te +atte("n$ "nc" ent is said to be characteriCed by brutality, destructiveness and, sometimes, death# &he battered woman deems this incident as unpredictable, yet also inevitable# 5uring this phase, she has no controlL only the batterer may put an end to the violence# .ts nature can be as unpredictable as the time of its e%plosion, and so are his reasons for ending it# &he battered woman usually realiCes that she cannot reason with him, and that resistance would only e%acerbate her condition# At this stage, she has a sense of detachment from the attack and the terrible pain, although she may later clearly remember every detail# >er apparent passivity in the face of acute violence may be rationaliCed thus= the batterer is almost always much stronger physically, and she knows from her past painful e%perience that it is futile to fight back# Acute battering incidents are often very savage and out of control, such that innocent bystanders or intervenors are likely to get hurt#6*)7 &he final phase of the cycle of violence begins when the acute battering incident ends# 5uring this t(an,%"l pe("& , the couple e%perience profound relief# 8n the one hand, the batterer may show a tender and nurturing behavior towards his partner# >e knows that he has been viciously cruel and tries to make up for it, begging for her forgiveness and promising never to beat her again# 8n the other hand, the battered woman also tries to convince herself that the battery will never happen againL that her partner will change for the betterL and that this good, gentle and caring man is the real person whom she loves# A battered woman usually believes that she is the sole anchor of the emotional stability of the batterer# !ensing his isolation and despair, she feels responsible for his well-being# &he truth, though, is that the chances of his reforming, or seeking or receiving professional help, are very slim, especially if she remains with him# <enerally, only after she leaves him does he seek professional help as a way of getting her back# @et, it is in this phase of remorseful reconciliation that she is most thoroughly tormented psychologically# &he illusion of absolute interdependency is well-entrenched in a battered woman/s psyche# .n this phase, she and her batterer are indeed emotionally dependent on each other -- she for his nurturant behavior, he for her forgiveness# $nderneath this miserable cycle of tension, violence and forgiveness, each partner may believe that it is better to die than to be separated# 9either one may really feel independent, capable of functioning without the other#6*(7 "istor! of #$use in the Present Case &o show the history of violence inflicted upon appellant, the defense presented several witnesses# !he herself described her heart-rending e%perience as follows= A&&@# &AB$-A989

>ow did you describe your marriage with Ben <enosaI

A .n the first year, . lived with him happily but in the subsequent year he was cruel to me and a behavior of habitual drinker# N @ou said that in the subsequent year of your marriage, your husband was abusive to you and cruel# .n what way was this abusive and cruelty manifested to youI A >e always provoke me in everything, he always slap me and sometimes he pinned me down on the bed and sometimes beat me# N A N A N A N >ow many times did this happenI !everal times already# hat did you do when these things happen to youI . went away to my mother and . ran to my father and we separate each other# hat was the action of Ben <enosa towards you leaving homeI >e is following me, after that he sought after me# hat will happen when he follow youI

A >e said he changed, he asked for forgiveness and . was convinced and after that . go to him and he said Esorry/# N 5uring those times that you were the recipient of such cruelty and abusive behavior by your husband, were you able to see a doctorI A N A %%% N A N A N A %%% 6-ourt7 Gto the witness N >ow frequent was the alleged cruelty that you saidI @es, sir# ho are these doctorsI &he company physician, 5r# 5ino -aing, 5r# 0ucero and 5ra# -erillo# %%% %%%

@ou said that you saw a doctor in relation to your inDuriesI @es, sir# ho inflicted these inDuriesI 8f course my husband# @ou mean Ben <enosaI @es, sir# %%% %%%

?verytime he got drunk#

N 9o, from the time that you said the cruelty or the infliction of inDury inflicted on your occurred, after your marriage, from that time on, how frequent was the occurrenceI A N A N A ?verytime he got drunk# .s it daily, weekly, monthly or how many times in a month or in a weekI &hree times a week# 5o you mean three times a week he would beat youI 9ot necessarily that he would beat me but sometimes he will Dust quarrel me#
6*27

N 9ow, going to your finding no# * where you were the one who attended the patient# hat do you mean by abrasion furuncle left a%illaI A Abrasion is a skin wound usually when it comes in contact with something rough substance if force is applied# N A N hat is meant by furuncle a%illaI .t is secondary of the light infection over the abrasion# hat is meant by pain mastitis secondary to traumaI

A !o, in this Ath episode of physical inDuries there is an inflammation of left breast# !o, 6pain7 meaning there is tenderness# hen your breast is traumatiCed, there is tenderness pain# N !o, these are obDective physical inDuries# 5octorI %%% ere you able to talk with the patientI @es, sir# hat did she tell youI %%%

+eferring to his 8ut-,atient -hart6**7 on ;arivic <enosa at the ,hilphos >ospital, 5r# 5ino 5# -aing bolstered her foregoing testimony on chronic battery in this manner= N !o, do you have a summary of those si% (:" incidents which are found in the chart of your clinicI A N A @es, sir# ho prepared the list of si% (:" incidents, 5octorI . did# dates for the

%%% N A N

N ill you please read the physical findings together with the record#

A As a doctor-patient relationship, we need to know the cause of these inDuries# And she told me that it was done to her by her husband# N A %%% A&&@# &AB$-A989= N By the way 5octor, were you able to physical e%amine the accused sometime in the month of 9ovember, (''3 when this incident happenedI A N A N A As per record, yes# hat was the dateI .t was on 9ovember :, (''3# !o, did you actually see the accused physicallyI @es, sir# @ou mean, Ben <enosaI @es, sir# %%% %%%

A (# ;ay (2, ('') - physical findings are as follows= >ematoma (+" lower eyelid and redness of eye# Attending physician= 5r# 0uceroL 2# ;arch (), (''2 - -ontusion->ematoma (0" lower arbital area, pain and contusion (+" breast# Attending physician= 5r# -anoraL *# ;arch 2:, (''* - Abrasion, 1uruncle (0" A%illaL

A# August (, (''A - ,ain, mastitis (0" breast, 2o to trauma# Attending physician= 5r# -aingL 3# April (B, (''3 - &rauma, tenderness (+" !houlder# Attending physician= 5r# -anoraL and :# Hune 3, (''3 - !welling Abrasion (0" leg, multiple contusion ,regnancy# Attending physician= 5r# -anora# N Among the findings, there were two (2" incidents wherein you were the attending physician, is that correctI A N A @es, sir# 5id you actually physical e%amine the accusedI @es, sir#

N 8n 9ovember :, (''3, will you please tell this >onorable -ourt, was the patient pregnantI A N @es, sir# Being a doctor, can you more engage at what stage of pregnancy was sheI

A N A

?ight (4" months pregnant# !o in other words, it was an advance stage of pregnancyI @es, sir#

-an family trouble cause elevation of blood pressure, 5octorI

A @es, if it is emotionally related and stressful it can cause increases in hypertension which is unfortunately does not response to the medication# N .n 9ovember :, (''3, the date of the incident, did you take the blood pressure of the accusedI A N A 8n 9ovember :, (''3 consultation, the blood pressure was (4)G(2)# .s this considered hypertensionI @es, sir, severe#

N hat was your 9ovember :, (''3 e%amination, was it an e%amination about her pregnancy or for some other findingsI A 9o, she was admitted for hypertension headache which complicates her pregnancy# N A N A N A %%% hen you said admitted, meaning she was confinedI @es, sir# 1or how many daysI 8ne day# hereI At ,>.0,>8! >ospital# %%% %%%

N -onsidering that she was 4 months pregnant, you mean this is dangerous level of blood pressureI A .t was dangerous to the child or to the fetus# 6*A7

Another defense witness, &eodoro !arabia, a former neighbor of the <enosas in .sabel, 0eyte, testified that he had seen the couple quarreling several timesL and that on some occasions ;arivic would run to him with bruises, confiding that the inDuries were inflicted upon her by Ben#6*37 ?cel Arano also testified6*:7 that for a number of times she had been asked by ;arivic to sleep at the <enosa house, because the latter feared that Ben would come home drunk and hurt her# 8n one occasion that ?cel did sleep over, she was awakened about ten o/clock at night, because the couple were very noisy Q and . heard something was broken like a vase# &hen ;arivic came running into ?cel/s room and locked the door# Ben showed up by the window grill atop a chair, scaring them with a knife# 8n the afternoon of 9ovember (3, (''3, ;arivic again asked her help -- this time to find Ben -- but they were unable to# &hey returned to the <enosa home, where they found him already drunk# Again afraid that he might hurt her, ;arivic asked her to sleep at their house# !eeing his state of drunkenness, ?cel hesitatedL and when she heard the couple start arguing, she decided to leave# 8n that same night that culminated in the death of Ben <enosa, at least three other witnesses saw or heard the couple quarreling#6*B7 ;arivic relates in detail the following backdrop of the fateful night when life was snuffed out of him, showing in the process a vivid picture of his cruelty towards her= A&&@# &AB$-A989= N ,lease tell this -ourt, can you recall the incident in 9ovember (3, (''3 in the eveningI A hole morning and in the afternoon, . was in the office working then after office hours, . boarded the service bus and went to Bilwang# hen . reached Bilwang, . immediately asked my son, where was his father, then my second child said, Ehe was not home yet/# . was worried because that was payday, . was anticipating that he was gambling# !o while waiting for him, my eldest son arrived from school, . prepared dinner for my children#

N 0ets go back to the clinical history of ;arivic <enosa# @ou said that you were able to e%amine her personally on 9ovember :, (''3 and she was 4 months pregnant# hat is this all aboutI A Because she has this problem of tension headache secondary to hypertension and . think . have a record here, also the same period from ('4' to (''3, she had a consultation for twenty-three (2*" times# N A 1or whatI &ension headache#

N -an we say that specially during the latter consultation, that the patient had hypertensionI A &he patient definitely had hypertension# .t was refractory to our treatment# !he does not response when the medication was given to her, because tension headache is more or less stress related and emotional in nature# N hat did you deduce of tension headache when you said is emotional in natureI

A 1rom what . deduced as part of our physical e%amination of the patient is the family history in line of giving the root cause of what is causing this disease# !o, from the moment you ask to the patient all comes from the domestic problem# N A @ou mean problem in her householdI ,robably#

N A N A N A N A N A N A N A N

&his is evening of 9ovember (3, (''3I @es, sir# hat time did Ben <enosa arriveI hen he arrived, . was not there, . was in .sabel looking for him# !o when he arrived you were in .sabel looking for himI @es, sir# 5id you come back to your houseI @es, sir# By the way, where was your conDugal residence situated this timeI Bilwang# .s this your house or you are rentingI +enting# hat time were you able to come back in your residence at BilwangI . went back around almost 4=)) o/clock# hat happened when you arrived in your residenceI

A N A N A N A N A

;arie Bianca# hat time were you able to meet personally your husbandI @es, sir# hat timeI hen . arrived home, he was there already in his usual behavior# ill you tell this -ourt what was his dispositionI >e was drunk again, he was yelling in his usual unruly behavior# hat was he yelling all aboutI >is usual attitude when he got drunk# hat else did

N @ou said that when you arrived, he was drunk and yelling at youI he do if anyI A N

>e is nagging at me for following him and he dared me to quarrel him# hat was the cause of his nagging or quarreling at you if you knowI

A >e was angry at me because . was following % % % him, looking for him# . was Dust worried he might be overly drunk and he would beat me again# N @ou said that he was yelling at you, what else, did he do to you if anyI

A hen . arrived home with my cousin ?cel whom . requested to sleep with me at that time because . had fears that he was again drunk and . was worried that he would again beat me so . requested my cousin to sleep with me, but she resisted because she had fears that the same thing will happen again last year# N A N ho was this cousin of yours who you requested to sleep with youI ?cel AraKo, the one who testified# 5id ?cel sleep with you in your house on that eveningI

A >e was nagging at me at that time and . Dust ignore him because . want to avoid trouble for fear that he will beat me again# ,erhaps he was disappointed because . Dust ignore him of his provocation and he switch off the light and . said to him, Ewhy did you switch off the light when the children were there#/ At that time . was also attending to my children who were doing their assignments# >e was angry with me for not answering his challenge, so he went to the kitchen and 6got7 a bolo and cut the antenna wire to stop me from watching television# N A N hat did he do with the boloI >e cut the antenna wire to keep me from watching &#J# hat else happened after he cut the wireI

A 9o, because she e%pressed fears, she said her father would not allow her because of Ben# N A N A N A N 5uring this period 9ovember (3, (''3, were you pregnantI @es, 4 months# >ow advance was your pregnancyI ?ight (4" months# as the baby subsequently bornI @es, sir# hat/s the name of the baby you were carrying at that timeI

A >e switch off the light and the children were shouting because they were scared and he was already holding the bolo# N A N A >ow do you described this boloI ( (G2 feet# hat was the bolo used for usuallyI 1or chopping meat#

N @ou said the children were scared, what else happened as Ben was carrying that boloI

A N

>e was about to attack me so . run to the room# hat do you mean that he was about to attack youI

(At this Duncture the witness started crying"# A&&@# &AB$-A989= N A N ere you actually brought to the drawerI @es, sir# hat happened when you were brought to that drawerI

A hen . attempt to run he held my hands and he whirled me and . fell to the bedside# N A N A N A N A N A N !o when he whirled you, what happened to youI . screamed for help and then he left# @ou said earlier that he whirled you and you fell on the bedsideI @es, sir# @ou screamed for help and he left, do you know where he was goingI 8utside perhaps to drink more# hen he left what did you do in that particular timeI . packed all his clothes# hat was your reason in packing his clothesI . wanted him to leave us# 5uring this time, where were your children, what were their reactionsI

A >e dragged me towards the drawer and he was about to open the drawer but he could not open it because he did not have the key then he pulled his wallet which contained a blade about * inches long and . was aware that he was going to kill me and . smashed his arm and then the wallet and the blade fell# &he one he used to open the drawer . saw, it was a pipe about that long, and when he was about to pickup the wallet and the blade, . smashed him then . ran to the other room, and on that very moment everything on my mind was to pity on myself, then the feeling . had on that very moment was the same when . was admitted in ,>.0,>8! -linic, . was about to vomit# -8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+= (&he witness at this Duncture is crying intensely"# %%% %%% %%%

A&&@# &AB$-A989= N A N A N A N A &alking of drawer, is this drawer outside your roomI 8utside# .n what part of the houseI 5ining# here were the children during that timeI ;y children were already asleep# @ou mean they were inside the roomI @es, sir#

A After a couple of hours, he went back again and he got angry with me for packing his clothes, then he dragged me again of the bedroom holding my neck# N @ou said that when Ben came back to your house, he dragged youI >ow did he drag youI -8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+= &he witness demonstrated to the -ourt by using her right hand fle%ed forcibly in her front neck" A And he dragged me towards the door backward#

A&&@# &AB$-A989= N here did he bring youI

A 8utside the bedroom and he wanted to get something and then he kept on shouting at me that Eyou might as well be killed so there will be nobody to nag me#/ N A N A !o you said that he dragged you towards the drawerI @es, sir# hat is there in the drawerI . was aware that it was a gun#

N @ou said that he dropped the blade, for the record will you please describe this blade about * inches long, how does it look likeI A N A N A &hree (*" inches long and (G2 inch wide# .s it a fle%ible bladeI .t/s a cutter# >ow do you describe the blade, is it sharp both edgesI @es, because he once used it to me#

-8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+=

N A N A

>ow did he do itI >e wanted to cut my throat# ith the same bladeI @es, sir, that was the obDect used when he intimidate me# 6*47

N 5id you ask for a complete e%ample who are the relatives of her husband that were fond of battering their wivesI A hat . remember that there were brothers of her husband who are also battering their wives# N 5id she not inform you that there was an instance that she stayed in a hotel in 8rmoc where her husband followed her and battered 6her7 several times in that roomI A N A N !he told me about that# 5id she inform you in what hotel in 8rmocI !ir, . could not remember but . was told that she was battered in that room# !everal times in that roomI

.n addition, 5ra# 9atividad 5ayan was called by the +&- to testify as an e%pert witness to assist it in understanding the psyche of a battered person# !he had met with ;arivic <enosa for five sessions totaling about seventeen hours# Based on their talks, the former briefly related the latter/s ordeal to the court a quo as follows= N= hat can you say, that you found ;arivic as a battered wifeI -ould you in layman/s term describe to this -ourt what her life was like as said to youI A= hat . remember happened then was it was more than ten years, that she was suffering emotional anguish# &here were a lot of instances of abuses, to emotional abuse, to verbal abuse and to physical abuse# &he husband had a very meager income, she was the one who was practically the bread earner of the family# &he husband was involved in a lot of vices, going out with barkadas, drinking, even womaniCing being involved in cockfight and going home very angry and which will trigger a lot of physical abuse# !he also had the e%perience a lot of taunting from the husband for the reason that the husband even accused her of infidelity, the husband was saying that the child she was carrying was not his own# !o she was very angry, she was at the same time very depressed because she was also aware, almost like living in purgatory or even hell when it was happening day in and day out# 6*'7 .n cross-e%amining 5ra# 5ayan, the public prosecutor not merely elicited, but wittingly or unwittingly put forward, additional supporting evidence as shown below= N .n your first encounter with the appellant in this case in (''', where you talked to her about three hours, what was the most relevant information did you gatherI A &he most relevant information was the tragedy that happened# &he most important information were escalating abuses that she had e%perienced during her marital life# N Before you met her in (''' for three hours, we presume that you already knew of the facts of the case or at least you have substantial knowledge of the facts of the caseI A . believe . had an idea of the case, but . do not know whether . can consider them as substantial# %%% %%% %%%

A @es, sir# hat . remember was that there is no problem about being battered, it really happened# N Being an e%pert witness, our Durisprudence is not complete on saying this matter# . think that is the first time that we have this in the ,hilippines, what is your opinionI A !ir, my opinion is, she is really a battered wife and in this kind happened, it was really a self-defense# . also believe that there had been provocation and . also believe that she became a disordered person# !he had to suffer an%iety reaction because of all the battering that happened and so she became an abnormal person who had lost she/s not during the time and that is why it happened because of all the physical battering, emotional battering, all the psychological abuses that she had e%perienced from her husband# N A . do believe that she is a battered wife# as she e%tremely batteredI

!ir, it is an e%treme form of battering# @es#6A)7

,arenthetically, the credibility of appellant was demonstrated as follows= N And you also said that you administered 6the7 obDective personality test, what % % % 6is this7 all aboutI A &he obDective personality test is the ;illon -linical ;ultia%ial .nventory# &he purpose of that test is to find out about the lying prone6ne7ss of the person# N hat do you mean by thatI

A ;eaning, am . dealing with a client who is telling me the truth, or is she someone who can e%aggerate or % % % 6will7 tell a lie6I7 N And what did you discover on the basis of this obDective personality testI

N 5id you gather an information from ;arivic that on the side of her husband they were fond of battering their wivesI A N A . also heard that from herI @ou heard that from herI @es, sir#

A !he was a person who passed the honesty test# ;eaning she is a person that . can trust# &hat the data that ./m gathering from her are the truth#6A(7 &he other e%pert witness presented by the defense, 5r# Alfredo ,aDarillo, testified on his ,sychiatric +eport,6A27 which was based on his interview and e%amination of ;arivic <enosa# &he +eport said that during the first three years of her marriage to

Ben, everything looked good -- the atmosphere was fine, normal and happy -- until Ben started to be attracted to other girls and was also enticed in6to7 gambling6,7 especially cockfighting# % % %# At the same time Ben was often Doining his bar"ada in drinking sprees# &he drinking sprees of Ben greatly changed the attitude he showed toward his family, particularly to his wife# &he +eport continued= At first, it was verbal and emotional abuses but as time passed, he became physically abusive# ;arivic claimed that the viciousness of her husband was progressive every time he got drunk# .t was a painful ordeal ;arivic had to anticipate whenever she suspected that her husband went for a drinking 6spree7# &hey had been married for twelve years6L7 and practically more than eight years, she was battered and maltreated relentlessly and mercilessly by her husband whenever he was drunk# ;arivic sought the help of her mother-in-law, but her efforts were in vain# 1urther quoting from the +eport, 6s7he also sought the advice and help of close relatives and well-meaning friends in spite of her feeling ashamed of what was happening to her# But incessant battering became more and more frequent and more severe# % % %#6A*7 1rom the totality of evidence presented, there is indeed no doubt in the -ourt/s mind that Appellant ;arivic <enosa was a severely abused person# %ffect of Batter! on #ppellant Because of the recurring cycles of violence e%perienced by the abused woman, her state of mind metamorphoses# .n determining her state of mind, we cannot rely merely on the Dudgment of an ordinary, reasonable person who is evaluating the events immediately surrounding the incident# A -anadian court has aptly pointed out that e%pert evidence on the psychological effect of battering on wives and common law partners are both relevant and necessary# >ow can the mental state of the appellant be appreciated without itI &he average member of the public may ask= hy would a woman put up with this kind of treatmentI hy should she continue to live with such a manI >ow could she love a partner who beat her to the point of requiring hospitaliCationI e would e%pect the woman to pack her bags and go# here is her self-respectI hy does she not cut loose and make a new life for herselfI !uch is the reaction of the average person confronted with the so-called Ebattered wife syndrome#/6AA7 &o understand the syndrome properly, however, one/s viewpoint should not be drawn from that of an ordinary, reasonable person# hat goes on in the mind of a person who has been subDected to repeated, severe beatings may not be consistent with -nay, comprehensible to -- those who have not been through a similar e%perience# ?%pert opinion is essential to clarify and refute common myths and misconceptions about battered women#6A37 &he theory of B ! formulated by 0enore alker, as well as her research on domestic violence, has had a significant impact in the $nited !tates and the $nited Ringdom on the treatment and prosecution of cases, in which a battered woman is charged with the killing of her violent partner# &he psychologist e%plains that the cyclical nature of the violence inflicted upon the battered woman immobiliCes the latter/s ability to act decisively in her own interests, making her feel trapped in the relationship with no means of escape#6A:7 .n her years of research, 5r# alker found

that the abuse often escalates at the point of separation and battered women are in greater danger of dying then#6AB7 -orroborating these research findings, 5ra# 5ayan said that the battered woman usually has a very low opinion of herself# !he has % % % self-defeating and selfsacrificing characteristics# % % % 6 7hen the violence would happen, they usually think that they provoke6d7 it, that they were the one6s7 who precipitated the violence6L that7 they provoke6d7 their spouse to be physically, verbally and even se%ually abusive to them#6A47 According to 5ra# 5ayan, there are a lot of reasons why a battered woman does not readily leave an abusive partner -- poverty, self-blame and guilt arising from the latter/s belief that she provoked the violence, that she has an obligation to keep the family intact at all cost for the sake of their children, and that she is the only hope for her spouse to change#6A'7 &he testimony of another e%pert witness, 5r# ,aDarillo, is also helpful# >e had previously testified in suits involving violent family relations, having evaluated probably ten to twenty thousand violent family disputes within the Armed 1orces of the ,hilippines, wherein such cases abounded# As a result of his e%perience with domestic violence cases, he became a consultant of the Battered oman 8ffice in NueCon -ity# As such, he got involved in about forty (A)" cases of severe domestic violence, in which the physical abuse on the woman would sometimes even lead to her loss of consciousness#63)7 5r# ,aDarillo e%plained that overwhelming brutality, trauma could result in posttraumatic stress disorder, a form of an%iety neurosis or neurologic an%ietism#63(7 After being repeatedly and severely abused, battered persons may believe that they are essentially helpless, lacking power to change their situation# % % % 6A7cute battering incidents can have the effect of stimulating the development of coping responses to the trauma at the e%pense of the victim/s ability to muster an active response to try to escape further trauma# 1urthermore, % % % the victim ceases to believe that anything she can do will have a predictable positive effect#6327 A study63*7 conducted by ;artin !eligman, a psychologist at the $niversity of ,ennsylvania, found that even if a person has control over a situation, but believes that she does not, she will be more likely to respond to that situation with coping responses rather than trying to escape# >e said that it was the cognitive aspect -- the individual/s thoughts -- that proved all-important# >e referred to this phenomenon as learned helplessness# 6&7he truth or facts of a situation turn out to be less important than the individual/s set of beliefs or perceptions concerning the situation# Battered women don/t attempt to leave the battering situation, even when it may seem to outsiders that escape is possible, because they cannot predict their own safetyL they believe that nothing they or anyone else does will alter their terrible circumstances#63A7 &hus, Dust as the battered woman believes that she is somehow responsible for the violent behavior of her partner, she also believes that he is capable of killing her, and that there is no escape#6337Battered women feel unsafe, suffer from pervasive an%iety, and usually fail to leave the relationship#63:7 $nless a shelter is available, she stays with her husband, not only because she typically lacks a means of self-support, but also because she fears that if she leaves she would be found and hurt even more#63B7

.n the instant case, we meticulously scoured the records for specific evidence establishing that appellant, due to the repeated abuse she had suffered from her spouse over a long period of time, became afflicted with the battered woman syndrome# e, however, failed to find sufficient evidence that would support such a conclusion# ;ore specifically, we failed to find ample evidence that would confirm the presence of the essential characteristics of B !# &he defense fell short of proving all three phases of the cycle of violence supposedly characteriCing the relationship of Ben and ;arivic <enosa# 9o doubt there were acute battering incidents# .n relating to the court a quo how the fatal incident that led to the death of Ben started, ;arivic perfectly described the tensionbuilding phase of the cycle# !he was able to e%plain in adequate detail the typical characteristics of this stage# >owever, that single incident does not prove the e%istence of the syndrome# .n other words, she failed to prove that in at least another battering episode in the past, she had gone through a similar pattern# >ow did the tension between the partners usually arise or build up prior to acute batteringI >ow did ;arivic normally respond to Ben/s relatively minor abusesI hat means did she employ to try to prevent the situation from developing into the ne%t (more violent" stageI 9either did appellant proffer sufficient evidence in regard to the third phase of the cycle# !he simply mentioned that she would usually run away to her mother/s or father/s houseL6347 that Ben would seek her out, ask for her forgiveness and promise to changeL and that believing his words, she would return to their common abode# 5id she ever feel that she provoked the violent incidents between her and her spouseI 5id she believe that she was the only hope for Ben to reformI And that she was the sole support of his emotional stability and well-beingI -onversely, how dependent was she on himI 5id she feel helpless and trapped in their relationshipI 5id both of them regard death as preferable to separationI .n sum, the defense failed to elicit from appellant herself her factual e#periences and thoughts that would clearly and fully demonstrate the essential characteristics of the syndrome. &he -ourt appreciates the ratiocinations given by the e%pert witnesses for the defense# .ndeed, they were able to e%plain fully, albeit merely theoretically and scientifically, how the personality of the battered woman usually evolved or deteriorated as a result of repeated and severe beatings inflicted upon her by her partner or spouse# &hey corroborated each other/s testimonies, which were culled from their numerous studies of hundreds of actual cases# $owever, they failed to present in court the factual e#periences and thoughts that appellant had related to them %% if at all %% based on which they concluded that she had B&S. e emphasiCe that in criminal cases, all the elements of a modifying circumstance must be proven in order to be appreciated# &o repeat, the records lack supporting evidence that would establish all the essentials of the battered woman syndrome as manifested specifically in the case of the <enosas# B S as Self-Defense

.n any event, the e%istence of the syndrome in a relationship does not in itself establish the legal right of the woman to kill her abusive partner# ?vidence must still be considered in the conte%t of self-defense#63'7 1rom the e%pert opinions discussed earlier, the -ourt reckons further that crucial to the B ! defense is the state of mind of the battered woman at the time of the offense6:)7 -- she must have actually feared imminent harm from her batterer and honestly believed in the need to kill him in order to save her life# !ettled in our Durisprudence, however, is the rule that the one who resorts to selfdefense must face a real threat on one/s lifeL and the peril sought to be avoided must be imminent and actual, not merely imaginary#6:(7 &hus, the +evised ,enal -ode provides the following requisites and effect of self-defense=6:27 Art# ((# 'ustifying circumstances# -- &he following do not incur any criminal liability= (# Anyone who acts in defense of his person or rights, provided that the following circumstances concurL First# $nlawful aggressionL Second# +easonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel itL hird# 0ack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself# $nlawful aggression is the most essential element of self-defense#6:*7 .t presupposes actual, sudden and une%pected attack -- or an imminent danger thereof -- on the life or safety of a person#6:A7 .n the present case, however, according to the testimony of ;arivic herself, there was a sufficient time interval between the unlawful aggression of Ben and her fatal attack upon him# !he had already been able to withdraw from his violent behavior and escape to their children/s bedroom# 5uring that time, he apparently ceased his attack and went to bed# &he reality or even the imminence of the danger he posed had ended altogether# >e was no longer in a position that presented an actual threat on her life or safety# >ad Ben still been awaiting ;arivic when she came out of their children/s bedroom -and based on past violent incidents, there was a great probability that he would still have pursued her and inflicted graver harm -- then, the imminence of the real threat upon her life would not have ceased yet# here the brutaliCed person is already suffering from B !, further evidence of actual physical assault at the time of the killing is not required# .ncidents of domestic battery usually have a predictable pattern# &o require the battered person to await an obvious, deadly attack before she can defend her life would amount to sentencing her to Emurder by installment#/6:37 !till, impending danger (based on the conduct of the victim in previous battering episodes" prior to the defendant/s use of deadly force must be shown# &hreatening behavior or communication can satisfy the required imminence of danger#6::7 -onsidering such circumstances and the e%istence of B !, self-defense may be appreciated# e reiterate the principle that aggression, if not continuous, does not warrant selfdefense#6:B7 .n the absence of such aggression, there can be no self-defense -complete or incomplete -- on the part of the victim#6:47 &hus, ;arivic/s killing of Ben was not completely Dustified under the circumstances#

&itigating Circumstances Present .n any event, all is not lost for appellant# hile she did not raise any other modifying circumstances that would alter her penalty, we deem it proper to evaluate and appreciate in her favor circumstances that mitigate her criminal liability# .t is a hornbook doctrine that an appeal in a criminal case opens it wholly for review on any issue, including that which has not been raised by the parties#6:'7 1rom several psychological tests she had administered to ;arivic, 5ra# 5ayan, in her ,sychological ?valuation +eport dated 9ovember 2', 2))), opined as follows= &his is a classic case of a Battered oman !yndrome# &he repeated battering ;arivic e%perienced with her husband constitutes a form of 6cumulative7 provocation which broke down her psychological resistance and natural self-control# .t is very clear that she developed heightened sensitivity to sight of impending danger her husband posed continuously# ;arivic truly e%perienced at the hands of her abuser husband a state of psychological paralysis which can only be ended by an act of violence on her part# 6B)7 5r# ,aDarillo corroborates the findings of 5ra# 5ayan# >e e%plained that the effect of repetitious pain taking, repetitious battering, 6and7 repetitious maltreatment as well as the severity and the prolonged administration of the battering is posttraumatic stress disorder#6B(7 ?%pounding thereon, he said= N hat causes the trauma, ;r# itnessI

and fear and probably in most 6acute7 cases the first thing will be happened to the individual will be thinking of suicide# N And in chronic cases, ;r# itnessI

A &he chronic cases is this repetitious battering, repetitious maltreatment, any prolonged, it is longer than si% (:" months# &he 6acute7 is only the first day to si% (:" months# After this si% (:" months you become chronic# .t is stated in the book specifically that after si% (:" months is chronic# &he 6a7typical one is the repetitious battering but the individual who is abnormal and then become normal# &his is how you get neurosis from neurotic personality of these cases of post6t7raumatic stress disorder# 6B27 Answering the questions propounded by the trial Dudge, the e%pert witness clarified further= N But Dust the same6,7 neurosis especially on battered woman syndrome % % % affects % % % his or her mental capacityI A N A @es, your >onor# As you were saying6,7 it % % % obfuscated her rationalityI 8f course obfuscated#6B*7

A hat causes the trauma is probably the repetitious battering# !econd, the severity of the battering# &hird, the prolonged administration of battering or the prolonged commission of the battering and the psychological and constitutional stamina of the victim and another one is the public and social support available to the victim# .f nobody is interceding, the more she will go to that disorder#### %%% %%% %%%

.n sum, the cyclical nature and the severity of the violence inflicted upon appellant resulted in cumulative provocation which broke down her psychological resistance and natural self-control, psychological paralysis, and difficulty in concentrating or impairment of memory# Based on the e#planations of the e#pert witnesses, such manifestations were analogous to an illness that diminished the e#ercise by appellant of her will power without, however, depriving her of consciousness of her acts. &here was, thus, a resulting diminution of her freedom of action, intelligence or intent# ,ursuant to paragraphs '6BA7 and ()6B37 of Article (* of the +evised ,enal -ode, this circumstance should be taken in her favor and considered as a mitigating factor# 6B:7 .n addition, we also find in favor of appellant the e%tenuating circumstance of having acted upon an impulse so powerful as to have naturally produced passion and obfuscation# .t has been held that this state of mind is present when a crime is committed as a result of an uncontrollable burst of passion provoked by prior unDust or improper acts or by a legitimate stimulus so powerful as to overcome reason#6BB7 &o appreciate this circumstance, the following requisites should concur= ((" there is an act, both unlawful and sufficient to produce such a condition of mindL and (2" this act is not far removed from the commission of the crime by a considerable length of time, during which the accused might recover her normal equanimity#6B47 >ere, an acute battering incident, wherein Ben <enosa was the unlawful aggressor, preceded his being killed by ;arivic# >e had further threatened to kill her while dragging her by the neck towards a cabinet in which he had kept a gun# .t should also be recalled that she was eight months pregnant at the time# &he attempt on her life was likewise on that of her fetus#6B'7 >is abusive and violent acts, an aggression which was directed at the lives of both ;arivic and her unborn child, naturally produced passion and obfuscation overcoming her reason# ?ven though she was

N @ou referred a while ago to severity# hat are the qualifications in terms of severity of the postraumatic stress disorder, 5r# ,aDarilloI A &he severity is the most severe continuously to trig6g7er this post6t7raumatic stress disorder is inDury to the head, banging of the head like that# .t is usually the very very severe stimulus that precipitate this post6t7raumatic stress disorder# 8thers are suffocating the victim like holding a pillow on the face, strangulating the individual, suffocating the individual, and bo%ing the individual# .n this situation therefore, the victim is heightened to painful stimulus, like for e%ample she is pregnant, she is very susceptible because the woman will not only protect herself, she is also to protect the fetus# !o the an%iety is heightened to the end 6sic7 degree# N A N But in terms of the gravity of the disorder, ;r# itness, how do you classifyI

e classify the disorder as 6acute7, or chronic or delayed or 6a7typical# -an you please describe this pre6-7classification you called delayed or 6atypical7I

A &he acute is the one that usually require only one battering and the individual will manifest now a severe emotional instability, higher irritability remorse, restlessness,

able to retreat to a separate room, her emotional and mental state continued# According to her, she felt her blood pressure riseL she was filled with feelings of selfpity and of fear that she and her baby were about to die# .n a fit of indignation, she pried open the cabinet drawer where Ben kept a gun, then she took the weapon and used it to shoot him# &he confluence of these events brings us to the conclusion that there was no considerable period of time within which ;arivic could have recovered her normal equanimity# >elpful is 5r# ,aDarillo/s testimony64)7 that with neurotic an%iety -- a psychological effect on a victim of overwhelming brutality 6or7 trauma -- the victim relives the beating or trauma as if it were real, although she is not actually being beaten at the time# !he cannot control re-e%periencing the whole thing, the most vicious and the trauma that she suffered# !he thinks of nothing but the suffering# !uch reliving which is beyond the control of a person under similar circumstances, must have been what ;arivic e%perienced during the brief time interval and prevented her from recovering her normal equanimity# Accordingly, she should further be credited with the mitigating circumstance of passion and obfuscation# .t should be clarified that these two circumstances -- psychological paralysis as well as passion and obfuscation -- did not arise from the same set of facts# 8n the one hand, the first circumstance arose from the cyclical nature and the severity of the battery inflicted by the batterer-spouse upon appellant# &hat is, the repeated beatings over a period of time resulted in her psychological paralysis, which was analogous to an illness diminishing the e%ercise of her will power without depriving her of consciousness of her acts# &he second circumstance, on the other hand, resulted from the violent aggression he had inflicted on her prior to the killing# &hat the incident occurred when she was eight months pregnant with their child was deemed by her as an attempt not only on her life, but likewise on that of their unborn child# !uch perception naturally produced passion and obfuscation on her part# Sec&n Le$al Iss%e: Treacher! &here is treachery when one commits any of the crimes against persons by employing means, methods or forms in the e%ecution thereof without risk to oneself arising from the defense that the offended party might make#64(7 .n order to qualify an act as treacherous, the circumstances invoked must be proven as indubitably as the killing itselfL they cannot be deduced from mere inferences, or conDectures, which have no place in the appreciation of evidence#6427 Because of the gravity of the resulting offense, treachery must be proved as conclusively as the killing itself#64*7 +uling that treachery was present in the instant case, the trial court imposed the penalty of death upon appellant# .t inferred this qualifying circumstances merely from the fact that the lifeless body of Ben had been found lying in bed with an open, depressed, circular fracture located at the back of his head# As to e%actly how and when he had been fatally attacked, however, the prosecution failed to establish indubitably# 8nly the following testimony of appellant leads us to the events surrounding his death=

N @ou said that when Ben came back to your house, he dragged youI >ow did he drag youI -8$+&= &he witness demonstrated to the -ourt by using her right hand fle%ed forcibly in her front neck" A And he dragged me towards the door backward#

A&&@# &AB$-A989= N here did he bring youI

A 8utside the bedroom and he wanted to get something and then he kept on shouting at me that Eyou might as well be killed so there will be nobody to nag me/ N A N A !o you said that he dragged you towards the drawerI @es, sir# hat is there in the drawerI . was aware that it was a gun#

-8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+ (At this Duncture the witness started crying" A&&@# &AB$-A989= N A N ere you actually brought to the drawerI @es, sir# hat happened when you were brought to that drawerI

A >e dragged me towards the drawer and he was about to open the drawer but he could not open it because he did not have the key then he pulled his wallet which contained a blade about * inches long and . was aware that he was going to kill me and . smashed his arm and then the wallet and the blade fell# &he one he used to open the drawer . saw, it was a pipe about that long, and when he was about to pickup the wallet and the blade, . smashed him then . ran to the other room, and on that very moment everything on my mind was to pity on myself, then the feeling . had on that very moment was the same when . was admitted in ,>.0,>8! -linic, . was about to vomit# -8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+ (&he witness at this Duncture is crying intensely"# %%% %%% %%%

N @ou said that he dropped the blade, for the record will you please describe this blade about * inches long, how does it look likeI A &hree (*" inches long and S inch wide#

N A N A N A N A

.t is a fle%ible bladeI .t/s a cutter# >ow do you describe the blade, is it sharp both edgesI @es, because he once used it to me# >ow did he do itI >e wanted to cut my throat# ith the same bladeI @es, sir, that was the obDect used when he intimidate me# %%% %%%

&he above testimony is insufficient to establish the presence of treachery# &here is no showing of the victim/s position relative to appellant/s at the time of the shooting# Besides, equally a%iomatic is the rule that when a killing is preceded by an argument or a quarrel, treachery cannot be appreciated as a qualifying circumstance, because the deceased may be said to have been forewarned and to have anticipated aggression from the assailant#6437 ;oreover, in order to appreciate alevosia, the method of assault adopted by the aggressor must have been consciously and deliberately chosen for the specific purpose of accomplishing the unlawful act without risk from any defense that might be put up by the party attacked#64:7 &here is no showing, though, that the present appellant intentionally chose a specific means of successfully attacking her husband without any risk to herself from any retaliatory act that he might make# &o the contrary, it appears that the thought of using the gun occurred to her only at about the same moment when she decided to kill her batterer-spouse# .n the absence of any convincing proof that she consciously and deliberately employed the method by which she committed the crime in order to ensure its e%ecution, this -ourt resolves the doubt in her favor#64B7 Proper Penalt! &he penalty for parricide imposed by Article 2A: of the +evised ,enal -ode is reclusion perpetua to death# !ince two mitigating circumstances and no aggravating circumstance have been found to have attended the commission of the offense, the penalty shall be lowered by one ((" degree, pursuant to Article :A of paragraph 36447 of the same -ode#64'7 &he penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium period is imposable, considering that two mitigating circumstances are to be taken into account in reducing the penalty by one degree, and no other modifying circumstances were shown to have attended the commission of the offense#6')7 $nder the .ndeterminate !entence 0aw, the minimum of the penalty shall be within the range of that which is ne%t lower in degree -- prision mayor -- and the ma%imum shall be within the range of the medium period of reclusion temporal# -onsidering all the circumstances of the instant case, we deem it Dust and proper to impose the penalty of prision mayor in its minimum period, or si% (:" years and one ((" day in prison as minimumL toreclusion temporal in its medium period, or (A years 4 months and ( day as ma%imum# 9oting that appellant has already served the minimum period, she may now apply for and be released from detention on parole#6'(7 %pilogue Being a novel concept in our Durisprudence, the battered woman syndrome was neither easy nor simple to analyCe and recogniCe vis-T-vis the given set of facts in the present case# &he -ourt agoniCed on how to apply the theory as a modern-day reality# .t took great effort beyond the normal manner in which decisions are made -on the basis of e%isting law and Durisprudence applicable to the proven facts# &o give a Dust and proper resolution of the case, it endeavored to take a good look at studies conducted here and abroad in order to understand the intricacies of the syndrome and the distinct personality of the chronically abused person# -ertainly, the -ourt has learned much# And definitely, the solicitor general and appellant/s counsel, Atty# Ratrina 0egarda, have helped it in such learning process#

%%%

A&&@# &AB$-A989= N A N @ou said that this blade fell from his grip, is it correctI @es, because . smashed him# hat happenedI

A Ben tried to pick-up the wallet and the blade, . pick-up the pipe and . smashed him and . ran to the other room# N hat else happenedI

A hen . was in the other room, . felt the same thing like what happened before when . was admitted in ,>.0,>8! -linic, . was about to vomit# . know my blood pressure was raised# . was frightened . was about to die because of my blood pressure# -8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+= ($pon the answer of the witness getting the pipe and smashed him, the witness at the same time pointed at the back of her neck or the nape"# A&&@# &AB$-A989= N @ou said you went to the room, what else happenedI

A -onsidering all the physical sufferings that ./ve been through with him, . took pity on myself and . felt . was about to die also because of my blood pressure and the baby, so . got that gun and . shot him# -8$+& Gto Atty# &abucanon N A @ou shot himI @es, . distorted the drawer#64A7

hile our hearts empathiCe with recurrently battered persons, we can only work within the limits of law, Durisprudence and given facts# e cannot make or invent them# 9either can we amend the +evised ,enal -ode# 8nly -ongress, in its wisdom, may do so# &he -ourt, however, is not discounting the possibility of self-defense arising from the battered woman syndrome# e now sum up our main points# First, each of the phases of the cycle of violence must be proven to have characteriCed at least two battering episodes between the appellant and her intimate partner# Second, the final acute battering episode preceding the killing of the batterer must have produced in the battered person/s mind an actual fear of an imminent harm from her batterer and an honest belief that she needed to use force in order to save her life# hird, at the time of the killing, the batterer must have posed probable -- not necessarily immediate and actual -- grave harm to the accused, based on the history of violence perpetrated by the former against the latter# &aken altogether, these circumstances could satisfy the requisites of self-defense# $nder the e%isting facts of the present case, however, not all of these elements were duly established# -HEREFORE, the conviction of Appellant ;arivic <enosa for parricide is hereby AFF()M*+# >owever, there being two (2" mitigating circumstances and no aggravating circumstance attending her commission of the offense, her penalty is )*+,-*+ to si% (:" years and one ((" day of prision mayor as minimumL to (A years, 4 months and ( day of reclusion temporal as ma%imum# .nasmuch as appellant has been detained for more than the minimum penalty hereby imposed upon her, the director of the Bureau of -orrections may immediately )*.*AS* her from custody upon due determination that she is eligible for parole, unless she is being held for some other lawful cause# -osts de oficio# SO ORDERED.

and thus would have no opportunity beforehand to deliberate on her acts and to choose a less fatal means of eliminating her sufferings#6(7 As e%haustively discussed in the ponencia, the UBattered oman !yndromeU has three phases, to wit= ((" the tension-building phase, where minor batterings in the form of verbal or slight physical abuse occurs# >ere, the woman tries to pacify the batterer through a show of kind, nurturing behaviorL or by simply staying out of his wayL (2" the acute battering incident phase which is characteriCed by brutality, destructiveness and sometimes, death# &he battered woman usually realiCes that she cannot reason with him and that resistance would only e%acerbate her conditionL and (*" the tranquil period, where the couple e%perience a compound relief and the batterer may show a tender and nurturing behavior towards his partner# -ontrary to the findings in the ponencia, the defense was able to establish the occurrence on more than one occasion of the Utension-building phaseU of the cycle# &he various testimonies of appellantVs witnesses clearly reveal that she knew e%actly when she would once again be subDected to acute battery# >er cousin, ?cel Arano, testified that she often asked the latter to sleep in her house as she was afraid every time her husband came home drunk# -learly, whenever appellant requested for AranoVs company, she was e%periencing a tension-building phase# &he barangay captain, ,anfilo &ero, also testified that appellant sought his help two months before she killed her husband, again demonstrating that she was in the tension-building phase and was attempting to prevent another incident of acute battery# Appellant presented evidence to prove that the tension-building phase would occur whenever her husband would go out looking for other women, would lose at cockfights or would come home drunk# !he often tried to ignore her husbandVs attitude or, as testified to by some witnesses for the prosecution, even shouted back, fought off or even inDured her husband during the tension-building phase, if only to prevent the onset of acute battery# Appellant was able to perfectly describe the tension-building phase of the cycle immediately prior to the death of her husband, i.e., when she knew or felt that she was going to be killed by the deceased# !he could not possibly have testified with clarity as to prior tension-building phases in the cycle as she had never tried to kill her husband before this time# .t was shown by the testimonies of appellant and even witnesses for the prosecution that appellant would seek shelter in her motherVs or her fatherVs house after an acute battering incident, after which would begin the process of begging for forgiveness, promises of change in behavior and return to the conDugal home, only for the same cycle to begin all over again# &o require appellant to prove the state of mind of the deceased, as seems to be required in the ponencia, would mean that no person would ever be able to prove self-defense in a battered woman case# Appellant could not possibly prove whether the deceased felt provoked into battering by any act or omission of appellant# !he cannot possibly prove that she felt herself to be the sole support of the deceasedVs emotional stability and well-being# 9evertheless, appellant felt trapped and helpless in the relationship as, in the end, she resorted to killing her husband as no one could or did help her, whether out of fear or insensitivity, during the violent marriage she endured#

DISSENTING OPINION .NARES*SANTIAGO, J.: .n convicting ;arivic <enosa of the crime of parricide, our esteemed colleague ;r# Hustice Artemio J# ,anganiban found that there was no factual basis to conclude that ;arivic was suffering from Battered oman !yndrome (B !" at the time she took the life of her husband# ith due respect, . register my dissent# &he novel theory of UBattered oman !yndromeU is recogniCed in foreign Durisprudence as a form of self-defense# .t operates upon the premise that a woman who has been cyclically abused and controlled over a period of time develops a fearful state of mind# 0iving in constant danger of harm or death, she knows that future beatings are almost certain to occur and will escalate over time# >er intimate knowledge of the violent nature of her batterer makes her alert to when a particular attack is forthcoming, and when it will seriously threaten her survival# &rapped in a cycle of violence and constant fear, it is not unlikely that she would succumb to her helplessness and fail to perceive possible solutions to the problem other than to inDure or kill her batterer# !he is seiCed by fear of an e%isting or impending lethal aggression

&he Uacute battering incident stageU was well demonstrated by the severe beatings suffered by ;arivic in the hands of the deceased as well as the threats to kill her using a bolo or a cutter#627 &he physical abuses occurred at least * times a week in the (( miserable years of their marriage,6*7 si% incidents of which were documented by the ('')-(''3 medical records of ;arivic# &hey included, among others, hematoma, contusion, and pain on the breastsL multiple contusions and trauma on the different parts of her body even during her pregnancy in (''3#6A7 &he tranquil period underwent by ;arivic was shown by the repeated kiss and make-up episodes of their relationship# 8n more than 3 occasions, ;arivic ran to her parents/ house after violent fights with the deceased only to forgive the latter every time he would fetch her and promise to change#637 All these recurring phases of cycle of violence, repentance and forgiveness developed a trauma in the mind of ;arivic making her believe that a forthcoming attack from the deceased would cause her death# &his state of mind of ;arivic was revealed in her testimony given way back in (''4, before she was e%amined by e%perts on B !# $naware of the significance of her declarations, she candidly narrated how she felt immediately before she killed the deceased, thus A&&@# &AB$-A989 N A N A %%% N !o you said that he dragged you towards the drawerI @es, sir# hat is there in the drawerI . was aware that it was a gun# %%% %%%

A -onsidering all the physical sufferings that .Vve been through him, . took pity on myself and . felt . was about to die also because of my blood pressure and the baby, so . got the gun and shot him#6B7 .t must be stressed that the defense of UBattered oman !yndromeU was not raised by ;arivic before the lower court but only here on automatic review# &his makes the foregoing testimony more worthy of great weight and credence considering that the same could not have been cunningly given to suit or conform to the profile of a battered woman# ;oreover, there was indeed basis for ;arivic to fear death because of her medical history# 5r# 5ino -aing testified that he treated ;arivic for hypertension due to domestically related emotional stress on 2* separate occasions# &he latest one was on 9ovember :, (''3 when she suffered from severe hypertension and had a blood pressure of (4)G(2) on the 4th month of her pregnancy#647 1urthermore, 5r# 9atividad A# 5ayan, a clinical psychologist and an e%pert on B ! who e%amined ;arivic, assessed the effects of the repeated violence on the latter as follows= A hat . remember ### was it was more than ten years that she was suffering from emotional anguish# &here were a lot of instance of abuses, ### emotional abuse###verbal abuse and### physical abuse# &he husband had very meager income, she was the one who was practically the bread earner of the family# &he husband was involved in a lot of vices, going out with bar"adas, drinking, even womaniCing, being involved in cockfighting and in going home very angry which### triggered a lot of physical abuse# !he also had the e%perience of taunting from the husband for the reason that the husband even accused her of infidelity, the husband was saying that the child she was carrying was not his own# !o she was very angry, she was at the same time very depressed because she ## #6felt7 almost like living in purgatory or even in hell when it was happening day in and day out# W%% N %%% %%%

hat happened when you were brought to the drawerI

A >e dragged me towards the drawer and he was about to open the drawer but he could not open it because he did not have the key# 6&7hen he pulled his wallet which contained a blade about * inches long and . was aware that he was going to kill me and . smashed his arm and then the wallet and the blade fell# &he one he used to open the drawer . saw, it was a pipe about that long, and when he was about to pickup the wallet and the blade, . smashed him then . ran to the room, and on that very moment everything on my mind was pity on myself, then the feeling . had on that very moment was the same when . was admitted in ,>.0,>8! -linic, . was about to vomit# %%% N %%% hat else happenedI %%%6:7

And what was it that triggered ### that tragedy in your opinionI

A . think for several weeks, she was already having all those tensions, all those an%ieties, they were not enough, that the husband was even going to cockfighting %%% A !he was angry with him, he was angry with her and . think he dragged her and even spun her around# !he tried to fight him so there was a lot of fight and when she was able to escape, she went to another room and she locked herself with the children# And when the husband was for a while very angry he calms down then and then (sic"# But . remember before that the husband was looking for the gun and . think he was not able to open the cabinet because she had the key# !o during that time, . remember, that she was very much afraid of him, so when the husband calmed down and he was asleep, all she was concerned was to end up her misery, to save her child which she was carrying and to save her two children# . believe that somehow sheVs not rational#6'7 %%% %%% %%%

A hen . was in the room, . felt the same thing like what happened before . was admitted in ,>.0,>8! -linic, . was about to vomit# . know my blood pressure has raised# . was frightened . was about to die because of my blood pressure# %%% %%% %%%

,+8!# &+$@A

N ;rs# itness, being an e%pert witness, giving more the facts and circumstances on this case that the books you studied in the e%pertise in line and in the BB hour contact with appellant ;rs# <enosa, could you say that this is not ordinary selfdefense but a survival on her partI A N @es, sir# &o what she did to her husband (sic"I

%%%

%%%

%%%

A @es, sir this is not an ordinary self-defense, but this 6is7 a need to survive, a need to survive with her two sons and 6the7 child sheVs bringing# N >ad she not able to kill her husband, would she still be in the very short moment with the victim (sic"I A .f she did not do that she believes that she will be the one who would be killed#6()7

A >e was nagging ### me at that time and . Dust ignore6d7 him because . want to avoid trouble for fear that he will beat me again# ,erhaps he was disappointed because . Dust ignore6d7 hi6s7 provocation and he switch off the light and . said to him, Uwhy did you switch off the light when the children were there#U At that time . was also attending to my children who were doing their assignments# >e was angry with me for not answering his challenge, so he went to the kitchen and g6o7t a bolo and cut the antenna wire to stop me from watching television# %%% %%% %%%

A >e switch6ed7 off the light and the children were shouting because they were scared and he was already holding a bolo# N A %%% >ow do you describe this boloI ( (G2 feet# %%% %%%

&here is no doubt therefore that ;arivic was afflicted with the UBattered oman !yndromeU and that it was an apprehension of death and the instinct to defend her and her unborn childVs life that drove her to kill her husband# &he ponente further refused to sustain the self-defense proffered by ;arivic because there was allegedly no aggression or danger posed on her life by the victim at the time she attacked the latter# Again, . beg to disagree# &raditionally, in order that self-defense may be appreciated, the unlawful aggression or the attack must be imminent and actually in e%istence# &his interpretation must, however, be re-evaluated vis%a%visthe recogniCed inherent characteristic of the psyche of a person afflicted with the UBattered oman !yndrome#U As previously discussed, women afflicted by this syndrome live in constant fear for their life and thus respond in self-defense# 8nce B ! and an impending danger based on the conduct of the deceased in previous battering episodes are established, actual occurrence of an assault is no longer a condition sine qua non before self defense may be upheld# hreatening behavior or communication can satisfy the required imminence of danger. As stated in the ponencia, to require the battered person to await an obvious deadly attack before she can defend her life would amount to sentencing her to murder by installment# .n the case at bar, the cycle of violence perpetrated by the deceased, which culminated in the physical assaults and an attempt to shoot ;arivic when she was 4 months pregnant, took the place of unlawful aggression, thus entitling her to a complete self defense even if there was no actual employment of violence by the deceased at the time of the killing# ;arivic had every reason to believe that the deceased would kill her that night not only because the latter was verbally threatening to kill her while attempting to get a gun from the drawer, but more importantly because the deceased wounded her on the wrist with a bolo, and because of the deceasedVs previous conduct of threatening to cut her throat with a cutter which he kept in his wallet# Nuoted hereunder are the relevant testimonies of ;arivic A %%% A hen . arrived home, he was already in his usual behavior# %%% %%%

N @ou said the children were scared, what else happened as Ben was carrying that boloI A N >e was about to attack me so . ran to the room# hat do you mean that he was about to attack youI

A hen . attempted7 to run he held my hands and he whirled me and . fell 6on7 the bedside#6((7 %%% -8$+& &o the witness %%% %%% %%% %%% %%%

N &he bolo that you said which Ben was holding at that time, 6was7 it a bolo or a knifeI A Bolo#

N ere you wounded or were there inflictions on your body when he was holding and trying to frighten you 6with7 that boloI A 9o, only here#

-8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+ (&he witness pointed to her wrist"# -8$+& &o the witness

>e was drunk again, he was yelling in his usual unruly behavior#

N A N A N %%% N A N A %%% N A N A N A %%%

@ou were demonstrating a motion, whirling, did your husband really whirl youI @es, your >onor# >ow did he whirl youI hirled around# Hust like spinning# %%% %%%

here did he bring youI

A 8utside the bedroom and he wanted to get something and then he kept shouting at me that Uyou might as well be killed so there will be nobody to nag me# N A N A %%% N !o you said that he dragged you towards the drawerI @es, sir# hat is there in the drawerI . was aware that it was a gun# %%% %%%

here did he whirl you, was it inside the bedroom or outsideI .n our bedroom# &hen after the whirling what happenedI >e kicked my ass and then . screamed#6(27 %%% %%%

hat happened when you were brought to the drawerI

@ou screamed for help and he left, do you know where he was goingI 8utside perhaps to drink more# hen he left what did you do###I . packed all his clothes# hat was your reason in packing his clothesI . wanted him to leave us# %%%
6(*7

A >e dragged me towards the drawer and he was about to open the drawer but he could not open it because he did not have the key# 6&7hen he pulled his wallet which contained a blade about * inches long and . was aware that he was going to kill me and . smashed his arm and then the wallet and the blade fell# &he one he used to open the drawer . saw, it was a pipe about that long, and when he was about to pickup the wallet and the blade, . smashed him then . ran to the room, and on that very moment everything on my mind was pity on myself, then the feeling . had on that very moment was the same when . was admitted in ,>.0,>8! -linic, . was about to vomit# %%% N %%% %%%

@ou said that he dropped the blade, for the record will you please

describe this blade about * inches long, how does it look likeI A N A N A N A N A &hree (*" inches long and (G2 inch wide# .s it a fle%ible bladeI .tVs a cutter# >ow do you describe the blade, is it sharp both edgesI @es, because he once used it to me# >ow did he do itI >e wanted to cut my throat# ith the same bladeI @es sir, that was the obDect used when he intimidate me#6(37

%%%

A . was frightened that my husband would hurt me, so . packed all his things then on the following day . will leave, . was afraid and . want to make sure . would deliver my baby safely#6(A7 %%% %%% %%%

A After a couple of hours, he went back again and got angry with me for packing his clothes, then he dragged me again outside of the bedroom holding my neck# A&&@# &AB$-A989 N @ou said that when Ben came back to your house, he dragged youI >ow did he drag### youI -8$+& .9&?+,+?&?+ (&he witness demonstrated to the -ourt by using her right hand fle%ed forcibly in her front neck" A And he dragged me towards the door backwards#

+?-5.+?-& B@ A&&@# &AB$-A989 N .n other words, there were two (2" incidents, the first incident and then he left and then two (2" hours after he came backI A @es, sir#

A&&@# &AB$-A989

N A N

And the whirling happened in the first incidentI @es, sir# And the dragging with arms fle%ed in her neck and on that blade

happened on the second incident (sic"I A %%% -8$+& &o the witness N A N A N A %%% N A hy, what is that blade aboutI A cutter about * inches long# ho used thatI Ben# >e used that on youI >e scared me on that (sic"# %%% %%% @e, sir# %%% %%%

!ince accused-appellant has already admitted to the killing, it is incumbent upon him to prove the claimed mitigating circumstance of illness# .n this case, however, aside from the testimony of the accused that his mind went blank when he killed his wife due to loss of sleep, no medical finding was presented regarding his mental condition at the time of the killing# &his -ourt can hardly rely on the bare allegations of accused-appellant, nor on mere presumptions and conDectures# 9o clear and convincing evidence was shown that accused-appellant was suffering an illness which diminished his e%ercise of will-power at the time of the killing#6(47 .n the case at bar, appellant was allowed and did in fact present clear and convincing evidence that she was a battered woman for (*-(A years and that she suffered from the UBattered oman !yndromeU# ?%pert testimony was presented and admitted to this effect, such that the ponente ably discussed the causes and effects of the syndrome# &o ignore the testimony and the evidence thus presented is to make impossible the proof of mental state# ?vidence as to the mental state need not be also Ubeyond reasonable doubt# Jerily, the requirement of threatening behavioral pattern of the batterer in previous violent episodes was sufficiently satisfied in the present case# &his, Du%taposed to ;arivicVs affliction with B ! Dustified the killing of the deceased# &he danger posed or created in her mind by the latterVs threats using bladed weapons, bred a state of fear, where under the circumstances, the natural response of the battered woman would be to defend herself even at the cost of taking the life of the batterer# &he ponencia/s acknowledgement of UBattered oman !yndromeU as a valid form of self-defense, is a noble recognition of the plight of, and a triumph for battered women who are trapped in a culture of silence, shame, and fear# &his would however be an empty victory if we deliberately close our eyes to the antecedents of this case# &he facts are simple# ;arivic was suffering from the UBattered oman !yndromeU and was defending herself when she killed her husband# >er acquittal of the charge of parricide is therefore in order# IN VIE- -HEREOF, . vote to A-N$.& ;arivic <enosa#

But he did not hit you with thatI @es, because . managed to run every time he scared (sic"#6(:7

&here are many things which cannot be proved by direct evidence# 8ne of this is state of mind# .n the case at bar, there is more than sufficient physical evidence presented by the appellant from which her mental state can be inferred# &he prosecution did not obDect to the presentation of these physical and testimonial pieces of evidence, namely, the medical records of 2* instances of domestic violence-related inDuries and the testimonies of neighbors, cousins and even the barangay captain# .ndeed, no person would endure 2* reported instances of beatings if she were planning to kill her spouse in the first place# &he maDority need not worry that women around the country will mastermind the killings of their husbands and then use this 5ecision to bolster their attempts to employ the B ! defense# ;oreover, as found in the ponencia, appellant should be allowed the mitigating circumstance of passion and obfuscation# &his, at the very least, supports a finding that the acts of violence and battery committed by the deceased were illegal and unlawful and were committed immediately before appellant could recover her natural equanimity# But what is the natural equanimity of a battered womanI Appellant was not a normal married woman# !he can never be in a state of natural equanimity as she was in a constant state of alertness and hypersensitivity to the ne%t phase of acute battery# &he esteemed ponente also correctly found that the appellant acted with diminished will-power# >owever, he failed to go further# .n the case of People v. 'avier,'()* it was held=