Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
7. Overhead cost Back offce staff, running costs of the offces and
depreciation of capital investments.
E = Eko; P = Prayas; D = Drishtee.
(+) Plus identifes the most important cost categories for each case.
CTMSNG I!O!MANC AN ICNCY '!S | 'AVNGS O! T IOO!
66
The main cost observations are:
Access to a strong distribution system is critical, as no one can afford to build a dedicated system
from scratch: Prayas and Drishtee are leveraging systems they already developed, while Eko is
building a network of kirana shops in the complementary business of mobile airtime.
The technology-based self-service model (e.g. in mainstream banking, the ATM) is not yet
available. Service personnel are still needed to process transactions in every case. The cost per
transaction remains signifcant.
In the long term, the most relevant (variable) cost for both Eko and Drishtee is pay-out to their retail
agents, typically a share of the commission received from the bank.
Unlike the other models, Prayas delivers services directly through its staff, who also act as tellers in
the NGOs offces. The result is a higher ratio of fxed to variable costs and a longer path to break-
even.
Balance-based models face potentially enormous client education costs to attract substantial
savings.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR BCS: CROSSING THE DOUBLE HURDLE
BCs and their agents must break even twice frst through sign-ups, and second through converting
sign-ups into active users. After agents have signed up everyone they can in their service area, a very
different skill-set, time horizon and marketing strategy are needed to hit the second stage of proftability.
A majority of No Frills accounts opened by BCs have remained non-operational. Retaining customers
after the initial transactions proves to be a big challenge
6
.
Transaction-based BCs can achieve rapid sustainability by targeting clients who demand larger, one-
time transactions like remittances, cheque deposits and time deposits. They must also discourage loss-
making transactions like small deposits and withdrawals, and small recurring deposits. If recurring
deposit limits are kept high, and time deposits actively marketed, losses from the former can be more
than offset through profts in the latter. The willingness and ability of banks to accomplish system
integration between their core banking system and the BC is another critical success factor.
Balance-based BCs require a longer investment horizon. Offering a wide range of useful fnancial
products around the no-frills leader should impel a gradual rise in balances over time. Withdrawals and
frequent small transactions must be discouraged. Moderately large recurring deposits (>Rs.150) have
a major positive impact over time, especially if maturing ones can be retained/rolled over into time
deposits.
In both models BCs can hit break-even faster through adding supplementary business lines with quick,
proftable pay-back. For BCs with microcredit experience this is a natural add-on, since they have
already incurred the cost of setting up and maintaining a viable distribution channel. The agent model
can reduce the overall cost of delivery as agents can usually take on and manage more of the lending
risks, and may require lower salaries than MFI staff. However, agents activities are also subject to less
direct control. The BC will be dependent on the agents initiative for the pace of business growth, and
dependent on their networks and business performance for portfolio quality.
6
Report of the Working Group to Review the Business Correspondent Model. Reserve Bank of India, Mumbai, Aug. 2009, p. 12.
MicroSave Market-led solutions for fnancial services | 67
As volumes increase, banks may increase product complexity and mix transaction and balance-based
incentives in their models. BCs should be careful to master one approach before focusing on the other,
as the two approaches have very different institutional, control and marketing implications, and require
different skill sets from staff and agents.
CONCLUSIONS
This study analyses three of the many experiences in branchless banking in India and attempts to reach
general recommendations for making BC models sustainable.
In the long run, the incentives in balance-based models will greatly promote fnancial inclusion.
However, these models are signifcantly more diffcult and costly to manage than transaction-based
ones. An evolutionary transition from a transaction-based approach to an integrated approach will be
healthy for Indian microfnance.
I
N
S
T
I
T
U
T
I
O
N
A
L
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
B
r
a
n
d
a
n
d
I
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
B
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
M
a
r
k
e
t
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
f
o
r
M
i
c
r
o
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
M
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
f
o
r
M
F
I
s
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
M
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
e
B
r
a
n
d
a
n
d
I
d
e
n
t
i
t
y
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
s
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
C
a
p
i
t
a
l
S
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
i
n
g
&
E
q
u
i
t
y
V
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
r
k
e
t
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
f
o
r
M
i
c
r
o
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
Q
u
a
n
t
i
t
a
t
i
v
e
M
a
r
k
e
t
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
M
e
t
h
o
d
s
C
o
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
P
r
i
c
i
n
g
o
f
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
a
l
a
n
d
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
R
i
s
k
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
L
e
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
s
I
n
d
i
v
i
d
u
a
l
L
e
n
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
C
r
e
d
i
t
O
f
f
c
e
r
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
P
i
l
o
t
T
e
s
t
s
:
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
C
o
n
d
u
c
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
P
i
l
o
t
T
e
s
t
s
:
L
o
a
n
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
s
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
R
o
l
l
-
O
u
t
M
a
r
k
e
t
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
f
o
r
M
i
c
r
o
F
i
n
a
n
c
e
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
f
o
r
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
i
o
n
s
P
r
o
c
e
s
s
M
a
p
p
i
n
g
L
o
a
n
P
o
r
t
f
o
l
i
o
A
u
d
i
t
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
A
u
d
i
t
&
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
a
n
d
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
F
i
n
a
n
c
i
a
l
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
R
a
t
i
o
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
A
d
v
a
n
c
e
d
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
i
n
g
f
o
r
M
F
I
s
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
S
y
s
t
e
m
s
f
o
r
M
F
I
s
D
e
l
i
n
q
u
e
n
c
y
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
G
r
o
u
p
-
b
a
s
e
d
M
F
I
s
H
u
m
a
n
R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
I
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
g
S
t
a
f
f
I
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
S
c
h
e
m
e
s
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
o
f
T
r
a
i
n
e
r
s
B
r
a
n
c
h
M
a
n
a
g
e
r
s
T
r
a
i
n
i
n
g
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
P
r
o
m
o
t
i
o
n
G
o
v
e
r
n
a
n
c
e
P
r
o
d
u
c
t
D
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
a
n
d
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
S
o
c
i
a
l
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
a
n
c
e
M
a
n
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
T
i
e
r
1
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
T
i
e
r
2
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
e
s
e
d
g
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
@
g
m
a
i
l
.
c
o
m
Kenya Offce
Shelter Afrique House, Mamlaka Road,
P.O. Box 76436-00508, Nairobi, Kenya
Tel : +254-20-2724801/6, 2075724,
Fax : +254 (20) 2720133
India -
Head Offce
B-52, Mahanagar Extension,
Kapoorthala Crossing
Lucknow - 226 006 (U.P.) India
Tel. : +91 - 522 - 2335734,
Fax : +91-522-4063773
E-mail : info@MicroSave.net | Website : www.MicroSave.org
MicroSave
Market-led solutions for fnancial services
Uganda Offce
Plot 119, Kira Road,
P. O. Box 7184 Kampala, Uganda
Tel. : +256-312-260225
Southern Offce
23, Sai Enclave,
Road No. 12, Banjara Hills,
Hyderabad - 500 034 (A.P.) India
Tel. : +91-40-23386140
Northern Offce
Flat 187,
Harmony Apartments,
Sector 4, Pocket 1, Dwarka,
New Delhi, India.