Page 1 of 24

Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

Calculation Report

VERIFICATION OF SUITABILITY OF
SCAFOLDS FOR HEAT EXCHANGER
LNG PAMPA MELCHORITA
Version 01
March 2009

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 2 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
1. PREAMBLE:

The structure to be analyzed is a scaffold with working platforms that surround the heat
exchanger vessel with ledgers of 0.70mt, 1.02mt, 1.50mt and 2.00mt in length and 21
levels typically @2mt vertically. However on the first 9 levels, we include additional
ledgers @1mt vertically, due to load increment in these levels. In plant view, the
minimum width of scaffolding is 1.5m. To increase the lateral resistance, we added
horizontal and vertical bracing through pipes and clamps. To improve the stability and
resist the lateral loading like wind o earthquake, we include guy wires at two specific
levels.

The scaffolding will be done with Brio Multidirectional System, which is form by jacks with
base plates, posts, ledgers, diagonals, cantilever-saver frames and steel planks.

The scope of this report is to demonstrate the suitability of each element of BRIO
System, show that the actual loads does not exceed the admissible loads of each
element, as well as the system stability in both main directions

The fig. 01 & 02 show typical plant views of scaffolding elements arrangement. The fig 03
shows the elevation of the edge Gridline and the inner gridline, in the first, you can see
the positions of the guy wires.

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 3 of 24
Document:

R
22
73

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

79
15
R

R
22
73

Figure 01: Typical plant view of working platform levels 2000-26000mm

79
15
R

Figure 02: Typical plant view of working platform levels 28000-40000mm.

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 4 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

Figure 03: Elevation of edge gridline and inner Gridline respectively (See the guy wires positions)
Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 5 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

2. DESCRIPCION OF MAIN STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF BRIO SCAFOLDING

SYSTEM

Short descriptions of the main elements are as follows:

2.1.

JACK WITH BASE PLATE

They are structural elements that support the bottom of a scaffolding system. Generally
they bear compression loads, due to scaffolding self weight and live load. It is advisable
to fix/support them on a suitable manner on the surface where the scaffolding is been
erected. The load capacity in compression is 5 ton
2.2.

VERTICAL POST

They are structural elements that bear the axial loads of traction and mainly
compression. The figure 4 shows the admissible load in compression as a function of
lateral bracing.

Figure 04: Load capacity of BRIO post as function of kind of bracing

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 6 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
2.3.

LEDGER

They are structural elements that support the working platforms and bear mainly the
moments and shear loads. The loads capacity depends on the length of each Ledger.
In the Table 01 is shown the load capacity for ledgers.
Table 01, Admissible Capacity of Ledgers

Ledger(m)

2.4.

Punctual Load

Distributed Load

(ton)

(ton/m)

0.70

0.55

1.00

1.02

0.40

0.75

1.50

0.325

0.50

2.00

0.20

0.40

STEEL PLANKS

Table 02, Admissible Load for steel planks

2.5.

Steel Planks span

Distributed load

(m)

(ton/m2)

1.50

0.60

2.00

0.60

CANTILEVER-SAVER FRAME

They are structural elements that resist the compression loads. They have the function to
add a scaffold body in cantilever with ledgers of 0.70 or 1.02mt. The table 03 shows the
load capacity of cantilever-saver frame to resist compression load in the outer edge
node.
Table 03, Load capacity for Cantilever-saver frame

Cantilever-saver

Loads

frame

(ton)

(m)
0.70

1.30

1.02

1.20

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 7 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

3. ANALYSIS:
3.1.

COMPUTER MODEL

To make the structural analysis, we used the software SAP2000, which calculate forces
and stresses produced in different elements of scaffolding system, due to combination of
actual loads and self weight of this structure.
The Model has frame elements, which are lineal elements that resist axial loads,
moment and shear loads. The frame element represents the BRIO ones. Each one has
a determine section and properties equivalent to the BRIO system parts (like Ledger,
diagonal, post, Jack with base plate). The frame elements will be connected with partial
rigid joints. The value of joint stiffness is based on studies over our BRIO system. For
more details about the value of the joint stiffness see section 3.3. The scaffold has the
condition of simple supported at the bottom, which shows a better approximation of the
behavior of Jack with base plate elements.
The following figure 05, shows the isometric view of 3D model of this scaffolding made
with software SAP2000.

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 8 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

Figure 05: Isometric view, Scaffolding model generated in SAP2000

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 9 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
3.2.

ACTUAL LOADS

The following kind of static and dynamic loads were considered for analysis.

DEAD. - This kind takes in consideration the self weight of the scaffolding
system. It is calculated automatically by the software based on the
geometry shape of section and material of the frame element.

OVERLOAD. - This load corresponds to the materials and tools weight on

the working platforms. We were instructed to consider 300Kg per level
in 4 levels at any time as maximum on the platforms. For the present
analysis, we considered to place the load on the more critical area.

LIVE. - This load corresponds to the workers self weight. For this analysis
we were instructed to consider a maximum of 4 people working
simultaneously at any level in 4 different levels. We consider an
average weight of 100Kg per person. For the present analysis, we
considered to place the load on the more critical area.

PLATFORM. - These load corresponds to the steel planks self weight,

which will be present in every level all the time. We consider 30kg/m2

WIND. - These load corresponds to those generate by wind pressure

against our structure. According to Peruvian Standard E020, the lateral
pressure of wind is given by the following expression:
Ph= 0.005xCxVh2
Where:
Ph : is the pressure due to Wind in kg/m2
C: is an adimentional factor that varies according to shape of structure
and kind of surface around.
Vh: is the wind speed design rated at height h, in Kph
The wind speed Vh varies according to:
Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 10 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
Vh= Vx(h/10)0.22

V: the design wind speed up to 10m height in Kph and is link to the place
where structure will be develop. For our case, we assume V=110Km/h,
which generate a maximum design Wind speed at the top of scaffolding of
V42= 150km/h
Finally as per European standard, the force that generates the wind is
given by the following formula
F=CsxCfxAxPh
Where:
F: is the force due to wind action.
Cs: is a place coefficient.
Cf: is an aerodynamic force coefficient
A: is the area exposed to the Wind action, in our case we assumed a strip
of 30cm height per each level
EARTHQUAKE. - It corresponds to inertial forces generated by an
earthquake; they are in function of mass concentration that acts in each
node and the spectral acceleration that generates the design earthquake.
These kinds of loads are dynamic and we used an analysis modalspectral. For the current analysis, we used the spectral acceleration OBE
(NFPA 59A 2001) which is shown on the figure 6:

Figure 06: Spectral accelerations considered for analysis modal spectral

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 11 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
3.3.

STIFFNESS ON THE BRIO NODE

To consider the stiffness given by Brio node, in either edge of each ledger element, we
considered a parcial stiffness to moment, which value is given in standard cataloges and
is 4677.20 kgm/rad.
For joint between post, we consider a continuity in our model, due to the action of the
double socket which is fixed with bolts on either edge of the posts
For other elements, we consider no continuity in terms of stiffness connections
The figure 07 shows a standard BRIO ledger connection:

Figure 07: Connection between BRIO ledgers & post

The figure 08 shows the assignment of partial stiffness in Ledgers elements

Figure 08: Consideration of partial stiffness on ledger at BRIO System in T-m/rad

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 12 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

3.4.

BEARING CONDITIONS

The scafolding has a bearing condition as simple supported at the base, which means
that movements in 3 directions are restrain.
The guy wires has a bearing condition as simple supported at their origin points. To
satisfy this condition we supposed that the structures around the Heat Exchanger are
rigid enough.

LOAD COMBINATION
With the load kinds mentioned before, we define critical load combinations as follows:

COMB1: (DEAD+OVERLOAD+PLATFORM+LIVE)
COMB2: (DEAD+OVERLOAD+PLATFORM+LIVE)+WINDX
COMB3: (DEAD+OVERLOAD+PLATFORM+LIVE)+WINDY
COMB4: (DEAD+OVERLOAD+PLATFORM+LIVE)+EARTHQUAKEX
COMB5: (DEAD+OVERLOAD+PLATFORM+LIVE)+EARTHQUAKEY

4. RESULTS:

As per the results from the analysis, we will verify each element that conform the
scaffolding structure
4.1)

BRIO JACK & BASE PLATE`S RESISTANCE

From the application of the different load combination to the BRIO scaffold, we got that
the maximum axial load in the jack & base plate is 4.95 ton (compression). In the table
03 is shown the results for the different load combinations, the negative sign means that
the current loads are in compression.
The admissible capacity in compression from the Jack & base plate BRIO is 5Ton, which
means that the Jack & Base plate performs the load requirement of these scaffolding.

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 13 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

Table 03, Axial forces on Jack & base plate from SAP2000

TABLE: Axial forces on Jack & base plate

Joint
Text
3825
3804
3825
3825
3825

4.2)

OutputCase
Text
COMB1
COMB2
COMB3
COMB4
COMB5

CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination

F3
Ton

-3.0557
-4.9511
-3.9268
-3.7453

-3.6075

BRIO POST`S RESISTANCE

From the analysis, we obtained -4.23ton as the maximum load in the post (compression).
In the table 04, we show the loads on the posts for the different load combinations
The admissible load for posts with lateral bracing @2.00mt (ledgers) is 2.3ton and for
post with lateral bracing @1.00mt is 4.50ton.
Due that current load is over the value with bracings @2.00mt, it is required to place an
additional lateral bracing (ledgers) @1.00 (or 1.00 whichever fits better on contractor
requirements) in the first 9th levels. For this condition the BRIO post performs the load
requirement.

Table 04, Axial forces on BRIO post from SAP2000

TABLE: Axial forces on Brio Post
Frame
Text
7469
7848
7468
7848
7093

OutputCase
Text
COMB1
COMB2
COMB3
COMB4
COMB5

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

CaseType
Text
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination
Combination

F3
Ton

-2.8613
-4.2302
-3.5763
-3.2534

-3.5215

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 14 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
4.3)

BRIO LEDGER`S RESISTANCE

All ledgers have the same section, and we use the followings Ledgers 0.70, 1.02, 1.50
and 2.00 but only the first 3 support the platforms so we will only verify the longest one
which is the more loaded. From the analysis on the BRIO scaffolding, we obtain the
following loads shown on table 05

Tabla 05, Comparison between maximum current loads and admissible ones
Element

Maximum Current load

Admissible Load

(ton/m)

(ton/m)

0.23

0.33

Ledger 1.50m

Remark

OK

From the table, we observe that the ledger 1.50m is loaded below its admissible
capacity, so we conclude that the ledger performs the requirements of actual loads.
4.4)

BRIO STEEL PLANKSS RESISTANCE

All steel planks have the same section, and we use the followings planks 0.70, 1.02, 1.50
and 2.00, so we will only verify the longest one which is the more loaded. From the load
application on Brio Steel planks, we obtained the following loads shown on table 06.
Tabla 06, Comparison between maximum current loads and admissible ones
Element

Maximum Current load

Admissible Load

(ton/m2)

(ton/m2)

0.23

0.60

Steel plank

Remark

OK

L=2.00mt

From the table, we observe that the steel platform is loaded below its admissible
capacity, so we conclude that the steel plank performs the requirements of actual loads.
4.5)

CANTILEVER-SAVER FRAME`S RESISTANCE

From the load application on Brio cantilever-saver frame, we obtained the following loads
shown on table 07.

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 15 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

Tabla 07, Comparison between maximum current loads and admissible ones

Element

Maximun Current

Admissible Load

load (ton)

(ton)

0.61

1.30

Cantilever-saver

Remark

OK!!!

frame L=0.70m

From the table, we observe that Brio cantilever-saver frame is loaded below its
admissible capacity, so we conclude that the Brio cantilever-saver frame performs the
requirements of actual loads.
4.6)

BRIO SCAFOLDING STABILITY VERIFICATION

The Brio system scaffolding is restricted to be slender, due that his behavior would be
unstable and could fail by dump. To verify the stability, we use the OSHA 3150-2002 A
guide to Scaffold use in the construction industry, which requirements are as follows

For supported scaffolds:

H/b<4

where
H: total height of scaffold or height between ties or horizontal supports
b: shorter width of scaffold
In our case, we have a total height of 42mt but the 1st lateral support is at 18mt, the 2nd
@34mt. Then the distances between horizontal supports is 18, 16 and 8mts respectively.
So H=18mt
We assume our Width as the total width of the structure b=8.44m
Then:

H/b=18.00/8.44=2.132<4
From this verification, it is shown that the scaffold performs the stability requirements if
the supporting structure is suitable (Heat Exchanger Vessel)
Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 16 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

If we consider that the total height of the structure and the total width of the structure, our
stability ratio is 4.97 but this figure is not real due that our structure is supported on the
Structures around the vessel by guy wires and they are takes most of the horizontal
loads considered (Wind & Earthquake).
4.7)

GUY WIRES POSITIONS AND RESISTANCE

Guy wires will be use to improve the stability of the scaffolding and take horizontal loads;
they are located in two specific levels and they have different directions according the
position of the structures around the Vessel. The following chart shows the position and
the maximum tension force per each guy wire.

Guy
Wire

Structures Position

E(mm)

N(mm)

Scaffolding Position

U(mm)

E(mm)

U(mm)

Maximum
Tensin

(mm)

Angle ()

Force (ton)

3051000 2152500 151000 3066280 2155220 154223

15851

11.73

1.294

3051000 2152500 151000 3066280 2155220 170223

24706

51.08

1.327

3096000 2180375 156300 3074720 2156720 154223

31886

-3.73

0.813

3096000 2180375 156300 3074720 2156720 170223

34731

23.63

0.780

3093000 2125500 153960 3074720 2148280 154223

29209

0.52

0.723

3093000 2125500 153960 3074720 2148280 170223

33430

29.11

1.088

3051000 2125500 153960 3066280 2148280 154223

27431

0.55

0.807

3051000 2125500 153960 3066280 2148280 170223

31889

30.66

1.213

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

N(mm)

Length Horizontal

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 17 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
5. CONCLUSION & RECOMENDATIONS:

It has been demonstrated the suitability of BRIO Scaffolding System to

resist the different loads. In our analysis, it is assumed the right assembly of
the different BRIO system elements, so the erection in field will be done using
the best erection practices.

We recommend don`t exceed the design load, the maximum number of

workers per level is 4, the maximum number of working levels at any time
(levels with workers and tools/materials) is 4. Besides we considered an
overload for materials and tools of 300Kg per working level. The contractor is
responsible to enforce this conditions on site
The maximum load produced at the base of the BRIO Jack & Base plate
on the floor is 4.95ton, this load was generated by Load Combination
COMB3, which consider dead live and wind load at North direction. The
contractor shall ensure that the floor is able to resist these loads without
sinking or collapse.

The diagonals arrangement on plant view and elevation is adequate to

restrain lateral movements. The movements generated by torsion in plant
view (in case of lateral loads) are reduced by the horizontal bracing which are
placed on specific levels (see DRW SW-LNGPP-04). The maximum lateral
movement on the top platform is produced by Load Combination COMB4,
which consider dead load, Live load and earthquake at East direction and its
value is 111.10mm ( We assumed a reduction factor R=3.5)

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 18 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

The guy wires at the vessel shown different kind of behavior according to the
current load. The maximum tension load is produced by the load
combination COMB2 (Wind) and its value is 1.33ton. The contractor shall
verify the supporting point at the structures around the vessel can
support the load without affecting the stability of system.

The maximum horizontal load at the BRIO Jack & base plate is estimated
in 120Kg in each direction or 169Kg. The contractor shall ensure an anchor
system (screws, nails, bolts, etc) on the floor to resist this load

For the load combinations with lateral forces (Wind and Earthquake), they
have generated traction forces in some elements at the top levels. The
maximum traction load calculated is 900Kg. The contractor shall ensure
the post connection through the splice double beam (connector) which shall
be fixed with 2 bolts (M10x60mm Grade 8.8, 1 in either side).

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 19 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

6. ATTACHMENT:
6.1)

TABLE: REACTIONS ON THE SUPPORT BASE FLOOR (BRIO JACK & BASE
PLATE)

Joint
Text
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3822
3823
3824
3825
3826

COMB1
F1
F2
Ton Ton
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
-0.01 0.00
-0.01 0.00
-0.01 0.00
-0.01 0.01
0.00 0.01
0.00 -0.01
0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.01 0.00
0.01 -0.01
0.01 0.01
0.00 0.01
0.00 -0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 -0.01
0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00

F3
Ton
2.54
1.11
1.51
1.49
2.45
1.57
1.22
2.53
1.06
2.55
1.68
2.84
1.71
1.66
2.44
1.20
1.53
1.60
1.72
1.70
1.65
1.63
2.44
1.72
1.85
2.74
1.47
2.82
3.06
1.63

TABLE:
COMB2
F1
F2
F3
Ton Ton Ton
-0.09 0.07 1.31
-0.10 0.03 2.69
-0.11 0.01 1.78
-0.10 0.00 -0.30
-0.11 0.01 4.40
-0.11 0.01 1.47
-0.11 0.00 0.26
-0.11 -0.01 4.95
-0.06 0.07 -0.85
-0.08 0.03 3.15
-0.08 0.01 1.68
-0.07 0.00 1.05
-0.07 0.00 3.33
-0.07 0.01 1.63
-0.08 0.00 0.85
-0.06 -0.02 2.63
-0.02 0.07 0.90
-0.03 0.03 1.48
-0.02 0.01 1.58
-0.02 0.01 1.90
-0.03 0.00 1.68
-0.02 -0.02 2.12
-0.01 0.07 3.21
-0.01 0.03 2.38
-0.01 0.00 1.95
-0.01 -0.02 2.75
-0.01 0.06 0.15
-0.01 0.03 1.47
-0.01 0.00 3.27
-0.01 -0.02 2.00

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Joint Reactions
COMB3
F1
F2
F3
Ton Ton Ton
-0.01 -0.03 1.29
-0.01 -0.04 0.57
-0.01 -0.02 1.26
-0.01 0.00 1.23
-0.01 0.00 2.28
-0.01 -0.02 1.26
-0.01 -0.04 0.46
-0.01 -0.04 1.30
0.00 -0.03 1.35
0.00 -0.05 3.37
0.00 -0.02 1.61
0.00 -0.01 2.49
0.00 -0.01 1.62
0.00 -0.02 1.58
0.00 -0.06 3.23
0.00 -0.05 1.70
0.00 -0.03 1.55
0.00 -0.05 1.58
0.00 -0.02 1.55
0.00 -0.02 1.54
0.01 -0.05 1.62
0.00 -0.05 1.68
0.00 -0.03 1.62
0.00 -0.04 0.92
0.00 -0.05 0.92
0.00 -0.04 1.73
0.00 -0.04 2.12
0.00 -0.05 3.55
0.00 -0.05 3.93
0.00 -0.05 2.46

COMB4
F1 F2 F3
Ton Ton Ton
0.06 0.05 3.02
0.06 0.02 1.95
0.06 0.01 1.65
0.06 0.00 2.26
0.05 0.00 3.39
0.06 0.01 1.64
0.06 0.01 1.79
0.05 0.04 3.75
0.04 0.05 1.95
0.05 0.02 3.10
0.05 0.01 1.65
0.05 0.00 3.51
0.05 0.00 2.49
0.05 0.01 1.63
0.06 0.02 3.16
0.04 0.04 1.93
0.02 0.05 1.73
0.02 0.02 1.58
0.02 0.01 1.69
0.02 0.01 1.78
0.02 0.02 1.64
0.02 0.04 1.83
0.01 0.05 2.95
0.00 0.02 2.17
0.00 0.02 2.20
0.00 0.04 3.16
0.01 0.04 2.19
0.00 0.02 3.47
0.00 0.02 3.37
0.00 0.03 2.01

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

COMB5
F1 F2 F3
Ton Ton Ton
0.02 0.05 3.11
0.02 0.03 1.61
0.02 0.01 1.60
0.02 0.01 1.74
0.02 0.01 2.75
0.02 0.01 1.62
0.02 0.03 1.63
0.01 0.05 3.12
0.01 0.05 1.56
0.01 0.04 3.16
0.01 0.02 1.63
0.02 0.00 2.96
0.01 0.00 1.91
0.02 0.02 1.61
0.02 0.04 3.09
0.01 0.05 1.62
0.00 0.05 1.60
0.01 0.04 1.57
0.00 0.01 1.72
0.01 0.01 1.70
0.01 0.04 1.61
0.01 0.05 1.64
0.00 0.05 3.03
0.00 0.04 2.24
0.00 0.04 2.30
0.00 0.05 3.25
0.00 0.05 2.14
0.00 0.03 3.45
0.00 0.04 3.61
0.00 0.05 2.20

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 20 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger
3827
3828
3829
3830
3831
3832
3833
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.01
-0.01
-0.01
0.00
-0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

1.50
1.64
1.72
1.86
1.70
1.58
1.09
2.60
1.65
1.70
2.88
1.71
2.77
1.00
2.49
1.05
1.54
2.42
1.50
1.51
0.97
2.64

-0.02 0.07
-0.03 0.04
-0.02 0.02
-0.02 0.00
-0.02 0.00
-0.02 -0.02
-0.04 0.07
-0.05 0.04
-0.05 0.02
-0.04 0.00
-0.04 0.00
-0.04 0.00
-0.05 0.00
-0.04 -0.02
-0.01 0.06
-0.01 0.03
-0.01 0.01
-0.01 0.00
-0.01 0.00
-0.02 0.00
-0.02 0.00
-0.02 -0.03

1.25
1.58
1.44
1.91
1.72
1.85
1.14
4.23
1.62
0.87
3.49
1.64
1.99
1.40
0.12
0.62
1.36
1.72
1.89
1.39
0.76
3.73

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00

-0.04
-0.05
-0.02
-0.02
-0.05
-0.05
-0.04
-0.05
-0.02
0.00
0.00
-0.02
-0.05
-0.05
-0.04
-0.04
-0.02
-0.01
-0.01
-0.02
-0.04
-0.05

1.43
1.58
1.76
1.90
1.64
1.48
0.75
1.75
1.64
1.79
2.90
1.70
1.90
0.48
3.63
1.56
1.74
2.63
1.50
1.74
1.66
3.81

0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03

0.04
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.03

1.50
1.60
1.77
1.87
1.69
1.70
1.36
3.40
1.63
2.02
3.24
1.68
3.25
1.40
3.55
1.57
1.69
2.73
1.87
1.59
1.33
3.29

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

0.05
0.04
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.03
0.04

1.57
1.61
1.75
1.88
1.68
1.64
1.60
3.10
1.63
1.98
3.19
1.69
3.26
1.48
3.32
1.67
1.72
2.81
1.91
1.64
1.51
3.38

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 21 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

Maximum load
in this support =
4.95Ton by
COMB2

Figure 09: Diagram of arrangement of support BRIO Jack & base plates on SAP2000

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 22 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

6.2)

TABLE: MOVEMENT ON TOP LEVEL

TABLE: Joint Displacements
COMB1

COMB2

COMB3

COMB5

Joint

U1

U2

U3

U1

U2

U3

U1

U2

U3

U1

U2

U3

U1

U2

U3

Text

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

mm

3497 -1.00

0.43 -4.20 65.08

-9.37 -4.21

3.50 31.16 -3.55 31.74 15.57

3498 -1.00

0.17 -4.51 65.07

-6.77 -4.39

3.49 31.53 -3.68 31.73 15.26 -3.72 9.435 21.38 -3.57

3499 -0.99

0.81 -4.93 65.08 -13.16 -6.32

3.50 30.61 -4.48 31.74 16.46 -3.91

3500 -0.99

1.54 -4.88 65.09 -20.59 -3.34

3.51 29.51 -4.30 31.74 19.41 -3.83 9.441 23.16 -4.37

3501 -0.99

1.91 -4.10 65.09 -24.38 -4.58

3.51 28.94 -3.56 31.74 21.37 -3.55 9.438 24.25

-3.5

3502 -0.99

2.18 -4.40 65.09 -27.00 -5.44

3.51 28.54 -3.75 31.74 22.86 -3.51 9.437 25.11

-3.5

3503 -0.99

2.72 -4.41 65.09 -32.55 -3.30

3.51 27.70 -3.68 31.74 26.26 -3.47 9.437 27.23 -3.52

-3.7 9.437 21.42 -3.59

9.44 21.73

-4.4

3504 -1.00 -0.39 -4.54 65.07

-1.24 -6.58

3.49 32.33 -3.80 31.73 15.41 -3.22 9.434 28.88 -3.56

3505 -0.45

0.43 -4.20 59.52

-9.37 -4.26

2.68 31.15 -4.05 28.73 15.57 -3.97 7.487 21.42 -4.04

3506 -0.44

0.17 -4.58 59.53

-6.78 -4.13

2.69 31.53 -4.94 28.73 15.26 -4.14 7.489 21.38 -3.94

3507 -0.45

0.81 -6.01 59.52 -13.16 -7.64

2.68 30.61 -5.55 28.72 16.46 -4.91 7.484 21.73 -5.45

3508 -0.44

1.54 -6.04 59.52 -20.59 -4.87

2.68 29.50 -5.47 28.72 19.41 -5.13 7.487 23.16 -5.54

3509 -0.44

1.91 -4.20 59.53 -24.38 -4.15

2.68 28.93 -4.06 28.72 21.37 -4.04 7.489 24.25 -4.05

3510 -0.44

2.17 -4.52 59.54 -27.00 -4.66

2.68 28.53 -4.93 28.73 22.85 -3.99

3511 -0.44

2.72 -4.48 59.55 -32.55 -2.46

2.68 27.70 -4.80 28.74 26.26 -3.09 7.493 27.23 -3.69

7.49

25.1 -3.84

3512 -0.45 -0.39 -4.55 59.54

-1.24 -6.27

2.69 32.33 -5.01 28.74 15.41 -3.51 7.492 21.77 -3.98

3513 -0.18

0.43 -4.32 56.92

-9.37 -4.71

2.30 31.15 -4.01 27.42 15.57 -3.94 7.068 21.42 -4.04

3514 -0.18

0.17 -4.28 56.92

-6.78 -4.42

2.30 31.52 -4.20 27.42 15.26 -4.04 7.067 21.38 -4.11

3515 -0.18

2.17 -4.13 56.93 -26.99 -3.87

2.30 28.53 -4.05 27.42 22.85 -3.92

3516 -0.18

1.91 -4.25 56.93 -24.38 -3.98

2.30 28.93 -3.93 27.42 21.37 -4.01 7.069 24.25 -3.98

3517 -0.18

2.72 -4.18 56.94 -32.55 -2.77

2.30 27.69 -4.20 27.42 26.27

3518 -0.18 -0.39 -4.44 56.92

-1.23 -5.61

-3.3

7.07

25.1 -3.95

7.07 27.24 -3.75

2.30 32.33 -4.57 27.42 15.41 -3.75 7.066 21.77 -4.17

3519

0.19

2.17 -5.97 53.15 -26.99 -5.87

1.73 28.52 -5.01 25.65 22.84 -5.25 7.179

3520

0.19

2.72 -4.85 53.16 -32.56 -4.61

1.73 27.69 -4.11 25.65 26.27 -4.24 7.181 27.24 -3.94

3521

0.20

0.17 -7.13 53.15

-6.79 -7.83

1.75 31.52 -6.09 25.67 15.26 -6.29 7.195 21.38 -6.04

3522

0.20 -0.39 -6.11 53.14

-1.23 -6.84

1.75 32.32 -5.28 25.67 15.41 -5.34 7.195 21.77 -5.13

3523

0.93

2.17 -6.14 45.71 -26.99 -4.89

0.64 28.52 -6.59 22.87 22.84 -5.18 9.562 25.09 -5.19

3524

0.93

2.72 -4.94 45.72 -32.56 -3.43

0.63 27.69 -5.57 22.87 26.27 -3.79

3525

0.95

0.17 -7.26 45.71

-6.80 -7.46

0.66 31.51 -7.79 22.89 15.26 -6.68 9.581 21.37 -6.36

3526

0.95 -0.39 -6.06 45.72

-1.23 -6.44

0.66 32.32 -6.83 22.89 15.41 -5.41

3527

1.31

0.42 -4.52 41.92

-9.38 -4.61

0.09 31.14 -4.58 21.93 15.56 -4.28 11.41 21.41 -4.24

3528

1.31

0.16 -4.36 41.92

-6.79 -4.42

0.08 31.51 -4.27 21.93 15.25 -4.16 11.41 21.37 -4.19

3529

1.31

2.17 -4.14 41.93 -26.99 -4.01

0.09 28.51 -4.07 21.93 22.84 -3.94 11.41

3530

1.31

1.91 -4.28 41.93 -24.38 -3.74

0.09 28.92 -4.33 21.93 21.37 -3.89 11.41 24.25

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

COMB4

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

9.56 27.23 -3.87

9.58 21.77 -5.12

25.1 -3.99
-4

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

25.1 -4.91

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 23 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

3531

1.31

2.72 -4.06 41.94 -32.56 -3.39

3532

1.31 -0.39 -4.43 41.92

-1.23 -5.21

3533

1.57

0.42 -4.29 39.31

-9.38 -4.16 -0.30 31.14 -4.29 21.49 15.56

3534

1.57

0.16 -4.54 39.31

-6.79 -4.22 -0.30 31.51 -4.24 21.49 15.25 -4.12 12.78 21.37 -4.12

3535

1.57

0.79 -6.19 39.32 -13.17 -6.81 -0.30 30.58 -6.31 21.49 16.44 -5.46 12.78 21.72

3536

1.57

1.53 -6.04 39.32 -20.61 -4.49 -0.30 29.47 -6.23 21.49

3537

1.57

1.91 -4.17 39.32 -24.38 -4.09 -0.30 28.92 -4.18 21.49 21.37 -3.94 12.78 24.25 -3.98

3538

1.57

2.17 -4.43 39.32 -26.99 -5.31 -0.30 28.51 -4.19 21.49 22.84 -3.76 12.78

3539

1.57

2.72 -4.32 39.32 -32.55 -3.63 -0.30 27.69 -4.14 21.49 26.27 -3.62 12.79 27.23 -3.75

3540

1.57 -0.39 -4.58 39.30

-1.23 -5.84 -0.30 32.32 -4.23 21.49 15.41 -3.69 12.79 21.77 -3.85

3541

2.12

0.42 -4.18 33.75

-9.38 -3.86 -1.12 31.14 -4.74 21.27 15.56 -3.67 15.92 21.41 -3.55

3542

2.12

0.16 -4.53 33.75

-6.78 -3.89 -1.12 31.51 -5.43 21.27 15.25

3543

2.12

0.79 -4.97 33.74 -13.17 -5.70 -1.12 30.57 -5.16 21.27 16.44 -4.19 15.92 21.72 -4.25

3544

2.12

1.53 -4.91 33.75 -20.60 -3.64 -1.13 29.47 -5.20 21.27

3545

2.12

1.91 -4.20 33.75 -24.38 -3.87 -1.13 28.92 -4.69 21.27 21.37 -3.56 15.92 24.25 -3.49

3546

2.12

2.17 -4.49 33.76 -27.00 -4.47 -1.13 28.51 -5.30 21.27 22.85 -3.52 15.92

3547

2.12

2.72 -4.43 33.76 -32.55 -2.84 -1.13 27.69 -5.31 21.27 26.26 -3.09 15.92 27.23 -3.39

3548

2.12 -0.39 -4.63 33.75

-1.23 -5.57 -1.12 32.32 -5.47 21.27 15.41 -3.75 15.92 21.77 -3.56

3549

0.20

0.43 -6.36 53.15

-9.38 -6.70

1.75 31.15 -5.65 25.67 15.57 -5.81 7.196 21.41 -5.79

3550

0.95

0.42 -6.63 45.71

-9.38 -6.66

0.66 31.14 -6.83 22.89 15.56 -6.23 9.581 21.41 -6.16

3551 -0.18

0.81 -5.79 56.93 -13.16 -6.72

2.30 30.60 -5.49 27.42 16.46 -5.13 7.069 21.73 -5.38

3552 -0.18

1.54 -5.85 56.93 -20.59 -5.06

2.30 29.50 -5.45 27.42 19.41 -5.33 7.069 23.16 -5.47

3553

0.19

1.91 -5.90 53.15 -24.38 -5.92

1.73 28.93 -5.25 25.65 21.37 -5.41 7.179 24.25 -5.31

3554

0.93

1.91 -6.09 45.71 -24.38 -5.27

0.64 28.92 -6.23 22.87 21.37 -5.45 9.562 24.25 -5.56

3555

1.31

0.79 -6.10 41.92 -13.17 -6.36

0.09 30.58 -6.06 21.93 16.44 -5.68 11.41 21.72 -5.66

3556

1.31

1.53 -5.78 41.93 -20.60 -4.81

0.09 29.47 -5.79 21.93

3617

0.19

0.80 -8.71 53.14 -13.16 -8.27

1.74 30.59 -8.03 25.66 16.45 -8.16 7.186 21.73 -8.17

3618

0.20

1.54 -8.43 53.15 -20.60 -9.03

1.74 29.49 -7.80 25.66 19.41 -7.71 7.188 23.15 -7.85

3619

0.94

0.80 -8.97 45.71 -13.16 -8.23

0.65 30.58 -9.03 22.88 16.45 -8.34 9.571 21.72 -8.45

3620

0.94

1.53 -8.59 45.71 -20.60 -8.47

0.65 29.48 -8.62 22.88

19.4 -8.08 9.571 23.15 -8.06

-4.00 -5.61

3.09 31.93 -4.70

30.2

15.2 -4.26 8.322 21.49 -4.55

5454 -0.72

1.17 -6.12 62.30 -16.87 -6.17

3.09 30.06 -5.59

30.2 17.76

5455 -0.72

2.45 -4.77 62.32 -29.78 -4.29

3.09 28.12 -4.62

30.2 24.52 -4.38 8.323 26.13 -4.46

5453 -0.72 -0.11 -4.86 62.30

0.08 32.32 -4.28 21.93 15.41 -3.86 11.41 21.77 -3.99

-4.1 12.78 21.41 -4.08
-5.6

19.4 -4.95 12.78 23.15 -5.45

25.1 -4.06

-3.7 15.92 21.37 -3.51

19.4 -3.95 15.92 23.15 -4.33

25.1 -3.41

19.4 -5.16 11.41 23.15 -5.36

-5.7 8.321 22.32 -5.65

5456

1.85 -0.11 -4.88 36.53

5457

1.85

1.16 -6.18 36.53 -16.89 -5.78 -0.71 30.03 -6.33 21.26 17.75 -5.74 14.32 22.31 -5.71

5458

1.85

2.44 -4.72 36.54 -29.78 -4.42 -0.71 28.10 -5.02 21.26 24.52 -4.16 14.33 26.12 -4.31

5459

0.58 -0.11 -7.83 49.43

5460

0.56

-4.00 -5.16 -0.71 31.91 -5.12 21.26 15.19 -4.49 14.33 21.49 -4.41

-4.01 -8.28

1.21 31.92 -7.65 24.15 15.19 -7.36 8.114 21.49 -7.53

2.45 -6.15 49.44 -29.77 -5.37

1.18 28.10 -5.96 24.13 24.52 -5.64 8.092 26.12 -5.85

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

0.09 27.69 -4.01 21.93 26.27 -3.55 11.41 27.23 -3.71

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Page 24 of 24
Document:

Verification of Suitability of
Scaffolds for Heat Exchanger

Maximum lateral
movement
28.88*3.5=101.10mm

Figure 11: Diagram of joints arrangement on top level on SAP2000

Elaborado por
Nombre / Funcin:

D.Cosacani
Firma:

Revisado por
D: 25

Dpto. Tcnico M:

02

A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

G. Cochachi
Firma:

Aprobado por
D: 27

J. D. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09

Nombre / Funcin:

F.Valdivia
Firma:

D: 27

G. Tcnico

M: 02
A: 09