y
p
u
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 5
A1. SDOF Structures

.

\

+ =
2
L
L L ) c c (
h
h y u y u
where: = yield displacement
c
y
= yield curvature
L
h
= length of plastic hinge
This relation yields to:
which relates the ultimate curvature c
u
with the ultimate
displacement
u
.
3
L c
2
y
y
=

.

\

+ =
2
L
L L
c c
h
h
y u
y u
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 6
A1. SDOF Structures
But c
u
is directly related
to critical strains of the
cross section.
For example, the strain
u
of the edge fiber can
be written as:
h
c
u
u
=
Neutral
axis
Thus, the ultimate displacement,
u
, can be associated with the
critical strains of the cross section of the plastic hinge.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 7
A1. SDOF Structures
Simplification for:
C
y
small compared to C
u
C
y
~ 0
LL
h
/2 ~ L
L
h
~ h/2
L
L
C C
h
p y
u
C
u
C
L
h
Real diagram
of curvatures
Simplified diagram
of curvatures
2
u u
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 8
A1. SDOF Structures
Step 1
Calculate the effective period, T
eff
, using the secant stiffness at
the theoretical yield point.
Step 2
Calculate the ultimate displacement,
u
, assuming that the equal
displacement rule holds, i.e. from the elastic response spectrum
for T=T
eff
and =5%.
Step 3
Calculate the corresponding ultimate curvature, c
u
.
Step 4
Calculate the corresponding critical strains,
u
, and check if they
are acceptable.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 9
A1. SDOF Structures
a) If the critical check concerns the compression of the concrete:
Let max
u
= 4. Also, h = 0.36 m, = 0.36/1.80 = 0.2.
b) If the critical check concerns the tension of the steel:
Let max
u
= 6%. Also, h = 1.35 m, = 1.35/1.8 = 0.75.
(a) (b)
01 . 0
2 2 . 0
004 . 0
L
u
=
=
04 . 0
2 75 . 0
06 . 0
L
u
=
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 10
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Panagiotakos & Fardis (1996)
Predimensioning
Suggested to be based on the serviceability earthquake (can
be taken equal to 4050% of the design earthquake,
depending on the importance) using the ForceBased
design.
Elastic analysis (q=1) with simplified methods (e.g. lateral
force method of EC8). However, the stiffness corresponding
to the cracked sections must be used (can be taken equal to
25% of the uncracked).
The period can be determined from the Rayleigh quotient:
where and
i
= static
displacement of
the i
th
floor due
to loads P
i
.
=
=
=
n
1 i
i i
n
1 i
2
i i
P
m
2 T
=
n
1 j
j j
i i
o i
z m
z m
V P
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 11
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Step 1
Calculate the required reinforcement of the beams (spans and
supports) and of the columns and walls at their base (foundation
level) for the most adverse combination:
1.35 G + 1.5 Q (nonseismic combination); or
G +
2
Q + E
s
(seismic combination,
s
= serviceability earthquake).
Step 2
Calculate the required reinforcement of the columns and the
walls at the rest of their height using the capacity design
procedure.
Step 3
Calculate the required shear reinforcement using capacity design.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 12
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Step 4
Calculate more accurately the effective period, T
eff
, using the
secant stiffness at the yield point of each section, taking under
consideration the actual reinforcement. Approximate formulas
from the literature can be employed.
Step 5
Calculate the displacement
e
of the equivalent SDOF system:
e
= S
de
(T
eff
, =5%).
In the following, the subscript e denotes the equivalent SDOF
system.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 13
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Step 6
Calculate the rotations at the end sections of the structural
members (beams, columns):
The displacement at the i
th
storey can be written in terms of
the displacement of the equivalent linear system as:
i
=
i
e
where
i
is an unknown coefficient. Similarly,
a
i
=
i
a
e
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 14
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Basic assumptions
1. The total seismic load of the multistorey structure is equal
to the one of the equivalent SDOF structure (i.e. the base
shear V
0
is the same):
Also,
e e e
a m P =
= = = =
= = = =
n
1 i
i i e
n
1 i
e i i
n
1 i
i i
n
1 i
i e
m a a m a m P P
=
=
n
1 i
i i e
m m
=
= = = =
n
1 j
j j
i i
e
e
e
i i e i i i i i
m
m
P
m
P
m a m a m P
e
i
i
=
=
=
n
1 j
j j
i i
e i
m
m
P P
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 15
A2. Multistorey Buildings
2. The total work of the seismic loads is the same in the multi
storey and the equivalent SDOF structure:
or
(from the previous relation between P
i
and P
e
)
=
=
n
1 i
i i e e
P P
e
n
1 i
i i
e
P
P
=
=
=
=
=
n
1 i
i i
n
1 i
2
i i
e
m
m
=
=
=
top
i
i
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 17
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Case 1
In typical building, and due
to the capacity design that
has been performed, plastic
hinges are expected to form
at the base of the columns
and the walls and at the
ends of the beams.
Then, assuming that the
plastic deformation is
significantly larger than the
elastic one:
and
top
i
z i
H
tot
tot
i
i
H
z
=
e
n
1 i
2
i i
n
1 i
i i
tot
top
z m
z m
H
=
=
=
tot
top
H
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 18
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Case 2
In case that it is expected that a
soft storey mechanism will be
developed at the j
th
floor in the
ultimate deformation, it can be
set:
In that case:
top
=
e
and
top
z
j
z
j1
j
j1
=
=
=
n ... j i for 1
) 1 j ( ... 1 i for 0
i
1 j j
top
z z
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 19
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Intermediate case
For less extreme cases, it can be assumed that the relation of
the storey displacements for inelastic response is similar to the
one for elastic response. Then the coefficients
i
can be
assumed equal to the ones that correspond to the elastic
displacements up to yield:
The values of the 1
st
eigenmode can be used in that case as an
approximation.
el
top
el
i
i
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 20
A2. Multistorey Buildings
Inelastic storey displacements
After the values of
i
have been determined with one of the
abovementioned methods, the inelastic storey displacements
can be determined from the top displacement:
and the storey drifts are:
Step 6
Check that the above required rotations
i
at the ends of the
structural elements are within the allowable limits.
=
=
=
n
1 j
2
j j
n
1 j
j j
i e i
m
m
i 1 i
i 1 i
i
z z
=
+
+
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 21
Use Pushover analysis
Can be used for the determination of the maximum
displacements of Method A and the plastic deformation at each
cross section.
The target displacement of the equivalent SDOF system is
needed.
Basic concept:
Demand = Capacity
Sd
Sa
Capacity spectrum
Elastic spectrum for effective damping
or inelastic spectrum
Performance point
Target displacement
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 22
Equivalent SDOF system
Storey distribution of seismic loads
where:
V = base shear
i
= assumed distribution of storey displacements with
top
=1.
Equivalence between forces and displacements
where:
Q = force or displacement of the MDOF system
Q
*
= corresponding force or displacement of the SDOF system
= participation factor
=
j
j j
i i
i
m
m
V F
*
Q Q =
=
2
i i
i i
m
m
F3
0
Sd
Sa
0
V=Fi
F4
F2
F1
tot
a
m
V
S
S
d
=
 
tot
*
tot
i i
2
i i tot
2
i i
m
m
m
m
m m
m
=
=
i i
*
m m
Base shear
Top displacement
Capacity curve
Capacity spectrum
Sa
Sd
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 25
Calculation of max displacements (ATC40)
Step 3
First estimation of the performance point
Sa
Sd
0
Ko=Kcr
a1
1
1
=5%
Capacity spectrum
First estimation of
the performance
point
Elastic
spectrum for
5% damping
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 26
Sa
Sd
0
Ko
a1
1
=5%
A2
A1
y
ay
Calculation of max displacements (ATC40)
Step 4
Bilinear representation of capacity spectrum
Capacity spectrum
Elastic
spectrum for
5% damping
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 27
Calculation of max displacements (ATC40)
Step 5
Calculation of effective damping
0 S
D
hyst
E
E
4
1
=
1 1
1 y 1 y
eff
a
) a a ( 7 . 63
5 ) % (
+ =
Earthquake duration
New structures of
good seismic
performance
Structures of
medium seismic
performance
Structures of poor
seismic
performance
Short
(close to the epicenter)
A B C
Long
(away from the epicenter)
C C
Type of
structure
hyst
(%)
A
s 16.25 1.00
> 16.25
B
< 25 0.67
> 25
C All values 0.33
u u
u y u y
a
) a a ( 51 . 0
13 . 1
u u
u y u y
a
) a a ( 446 . 0
845 . 0
Sa
Sd
u
au
y
ay
Ko Keff
ES0
ED
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 28
Sa
Sd
0
Ko
a1
1
=5%
y
ay
=eff
a2
2
1:BS
1:BL
.
.
Calculation of max displacements (ATC40)
Step 5 (cont.)
Design spectrum for =
eff
Capacity spectrum
Elastic
spectrum for
5% damping
Elastic
spectrum for
=
eff
New
performance
point
min , A
eff
S
A
SR
12 . 2
ln 68 . 0 21 . 3
B
1
SR >
= =
min , V
eff
L
V
SR
65 . 1
ln 41 . 0 31 . 2
B
1
SR >
= =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 29
Calculation of max displacements (ATC40)
Step 5 (cont.)
Minimum values of SR
A,min
, SR
V,min
Step 6
Check convergence
If 0.95
1
<
2
< 1.05
1
O.K.
If not, repeat from step 5
Type of
structure
SR
A,min
SR
V,min
A 0.33 0.50
B 0.44 0.56
C 0.56 0.67
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 30
Calculation of max displacements (ATC40)
Step 7
Deformation of MDOF system and checks
Calculate top displacement: = S
d
Perform pushover analysis up to top displacement equal to
and calculate the ultimate rotations at the joints.
Check rotations of sections according to DBD.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 31
Method B: DDB design
The design is based on the target displacement,
u
.
The target displacement is defined by
Serviceability criteria; or
Ultimate capacity criteria.
The substitute structure is used:
Effective stiffness at the maximum displacement
Effective damping considering the hysteretic energy
dissipation.
The design is not based on the displacement ductility.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 32
B1. SDOF Structures
Developed for bridge piers (Kowalsky, Priestley & Macrae, 1995)
The method is based on the substitute structure
Effective stiffness, K
eff
Effective damping,
eff
Effective period, T
eff
P
P
P
u
y
y u
eff
eo
cr
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 33
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 1
Definition of the design parameters:
m= mass
L = height of pier
f
c
= concrete grade
f
y
= yield stress of reinforcement
= Youngs modulus of elasticity
u
= target displacement.
An elastic displacement response spectrum must be available
for various values of damping
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 34
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 2
Determination of the substitute structure:
Guess an initial value for the yield displacement,
y
.
This value is arbitrary and will be used as the first
approximation. Suggestion:
y
= 0.005L.
Calculate the corresponding ductility =
u
/
y
.
Calculate the corresponding effective damping,
eff
.
Effective damping consists of two terms:
the viscous damping, which is assumed equal to the one for
elastic behaviour (5% for RC structures); and
the hysteretic damping, which can be estimated from the
ductility using relations from the literature. Such a relation,
based on the Takeda model, is suggested by the authors:
05 . 0
95 . 0
1
05 . 0
eff
+ =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 35
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 2 (contd)
Calculate the effective period of the substitute structure from
the value of displacement spectrum that corresponds to S
d
=
u
and =
eff
.
Calculate the effective stiffness of the substitute structure:
T
S
=0%
2%
5%
10%
20%
50%
d
eff
u
eff
T
2
eff
2
eff
m 4
K =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 36
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 3
Calculate the design actions for the dimensioning of the pier.
Seismic force at maximum displacement: P
u
= K
eff
u
.
Seismic force to be used for the design of the pier: P
d
=P
y
:
P
u
= P
d
+ rK
cr
(
u
y
)
where r=K
eo
/K
cr
P
u
= P
d
+ rP
d
( 1)
+ + + =
3
cr
cr
L
EI 3
K =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 38
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 5 (optional)
Check whether the selected section leads to reasonable results.
Elastic period:
Plastic period: where K
eo
= rK
cr
In general:
cr
<
eff
<
eo
If T
eff
is not close to the limits, the design is correct and we
proceed to the following step.
If
eff
is close to
cr
, the response is close to the elastic. In this
case, the design will lead to large amount of reinforcement and
small required ductility.
If
eff
is close to
eo
, the design will lead to small amount of
reinforcement and large required ductility.
cr
cr
K
m
2 T =
eo
eo
K
m
2 T =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 39
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 5 (contd)
P
P
P
u
y
y
u
eff
eo
cr
P
P
P
u
y
y u
eff
eo
cr
T
eff
close to T
cr
Suggested action:
Increase dimensions of
cross section (decrease
y
)
T
eff
close to T
eo
Suggested action:
Decrease dimensions of
cross section (increase
y
)
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 40
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 6
Check convergence.
Calculate new yield displacement:
If , where = required accuracy (e.g. =5%),
stop iterations. Otherwise, repeat procedure from step 2 using
y
as the yield displacement.
Step 7
After convergence is achieved, calculate the horizontal
reinforcement (stirrups) to guarantee capacity of the section to
develop the required curvature ductility:
where L
h
= length of plastic hinge.
cr
d
y
K
P
= '
y y y
' s '
) L / L 5 . 0 1 ( ) L / L ( 3
1
1
h h
C
+ =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 41
B1. SDOF Structures
Example
Step 1
m= 500 Mgr
L = 5.0 m
f
c
= 40 MPa
f
y
= 400 MPa
E = 31.62 GPa
u
/L = 3%
u
= 0.03 5.0 = 0.15 m.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 42
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 2
y
= 0.005 L = 0.025 m
=
u
/
y
= 0.150 / 0.025 = 6.0
Let T
eff
= 1.627 sec, as derived from response spectrum for:
S
e
=
u
= 0.15 m and =
eff
= 0.206
206 . 0
0 . 6 05 . 0
0 . 6
95 . 0
1
05 . 0
eff
=
+ =
m / 7457
627 . 1
500 4
m 4
K
2
2
2
eff
2
eff
=
= =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 43
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 3
P
u
= K
eff
u
= 1118 KN
M
u
= 1118 5.0 = 5589 KNm
(for r = 5%)
M
d
= 894.4 5.0 = 4472 KNm
Step 4
Circular section with diameter D = 1.1 m. Let N = mg = 5000 KN
Let =1.76% for N = 5000 KN and M = 4472 KNm
g
= D
4
/64 I
cr
= 0.033 m
4
I
cr
= 0.033 m
4
KN 4 . 894
1 05 . 0 0 . 6 05 . 0
1118
1 r r
P
P
u
d
=
+
=
+
=
  463 . 0
4
1 . 1
10 40
10 500
) 0176 . 0 05 . 0 ( 205 1 . 0 0176 . 0 12 21 . 0
I
I
2
3
2
g
cr
=
+ + + =
m / KN 25233
0 . 5
033 . 0 10 62 . 31 3
L
I E 3
K
3
6
3
cr
cr
=
=
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 44
B1. SDOF Structures
Step 5
eo
= 0.05 25233 = 1262 KN/m
Initial guess:
y
= 0.025 m. No convergence achieved
repeat procedure.
sec 884 . 0
25233
500
2 T
cr
= =
sec 954 . 3
1262
500
2 T
eo
= =
m 035 . 0
25233
4 . 894
K
P
cr
d
y
= = = '
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 45
B2. MDOF structures
Kalvi & Kingsley (1995) for bridges with many piers
The method starts with an initial guess for the displacements,
which is improved through iterations.
P
i
m
i
i
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 46
B2. MDOF Structures
Equivalent DSOF system
K
e
= stiffness of equivalent SDOF
e
= damping of equivalent SDOF
e
= displacement of equivalent SDOF
e
= seismic force of equivalent SDOF
Assume that the displacements,
i
, of the MDOF system can be
determined from the displacement of the equivalent SDOF,
e
,
through appropriate coefficients
i
:
i
=
i
e
Assume that the accelerations follow the same distribution:
a
i
=
i
a
e
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 47
B2. MDOF Structures
Equivalent DSOF system (contd)
Equal seismic force in the two systems:
But, P
e
= m
e
a
e
, thus
Also,
and
therefore
= = = =
= = = =
n
1 i
i i e
n
1 i
e i i
n
1 i
i i
n
1 i
i e
m a a m a m P P
=
=
n
1 i
i i e
m m
=
= = = =
n
1 j
j j
i i
e
e
e
i i e i i i i i
m
m
P
m
P
m a m a m P
e
i
i
=
=
n
1 j
j j
i i
e i
m
m
P P
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 48
B2. MDOF Structures
Equivalent DSOF system (contd)
Equal work of the seismic forces in the two systems:
Properties of equivalent SDOF system
Stiffness of equivalent SDOF system:
The damping of the equivalent SDOF system,
e
, is calculated
from the damping of each pier,
i
, which depends on the
ductility
i
that is developed at the pier and can be derived
using relations from the literature.
=
=
n
1 i
i i e e
P P
= =
=
= =
n
1 i
i i e
n
1 i
2
i i e
e
n
1 i
i i
e
m P
m P
P
P
=
=
=
n
1 i
i i
n
1 i
2
i i
e
m
m
e
e
e
P
K =
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 49
B2. MDOF Structures
Step 1
Define the target displacement
i,u
of each pier.
In order to have similar damage in all piers, we can assume
same drifts:
i
/
i
. Thus:
i,u
= drift
i
Make an initial estimation of the yield displacements of the
piers,
i,y
and calculate the ductility for each pier:
Calculate the equivalent damping,
e
, for each pier from the
corresponding ductility (similarly to the SDOF systems).
y , i
u , i
i
=
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 50
B2. MDOF Structures
Step 2
Derive the parameters of the equivalent SDOF structure:
Calculate the total effective damping,
e
, combining the
damping,
i
, of the piers.
Calculate the displacement of the equivalent SDOF system,
e
, from the displacements
i,u
of the piers:
Calculate the period of the equivalent SDOF system,
e
.
Calculate the coefficients
i
=
i,u
/
e
Calculate the mass of the equivalent SDOF system:
=
=
=
n
1 i
u , i i
n
1 i
2
u , i i
e
m
m
=
=
n
1 i
i i e
m m
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 51
B2. MDOF Structures
Step 2
Then:
P
e
= K
e
e
and the forces P
i
at the top of each pier can be derived:
2
e
e
2
e
T
m 4
K
=
=
=
n
1 j
j j
i i
e i
m
m
P P
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 52
B2. MDOF Structures
Step 3
Static analysis of the system for the forces P
i
and calculation of
the displacements and the forces that are developed. The
inelastic response must be considered, e.g. nonlinear static
(pushover) analysis or elastic analysis with reduced stiffness
for the piers.
Calculate the accuracy
i
of the obtained displacements
i
of
the piers, similarly to the SDOF systems.
Step 4: checks
If satisfactory accuracy is not achieved, change dimensions of
cross sections or reinforcement of piers and repeat procedure.
If satisfactory accuracy is achieved, verify that the piers can
bear the loads.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 53
Comparison of the two methods
Method A (DBD)
Check the capacity of a predesigned structure to deform with
the required plastic rotations at critical sections.
Increase dimensions of cross sections that are insufficient.
The analysis is based on the linear system that corresponds to
the yield stiffness and 5% damping.
Method B (DDBD)
Directly design the structure for the target displacement.
The analysis is based on the substitute linear system that
corresponds to the effective stiffness at the max displacement
and the equivalent effective damping.
I. N. Psycharis DisplacementBased Seismic Design 54
Problems in the application
Accurate calculation of the real displacements is needed.
The use of displacement design spectra is problematic, due to
many uncertainties.
The distribution of the deformation at the maximum
displacement of MDOF systems is needed.
The plastic rotation capacity of a section is not easy to be
calculated (empirical formulas exist for simple cross sections
only).
Method B (DDBD) might not converge in some cases.
Mult mai mult decât documente.
Descoperiți tot ce are Scribd de oferit, inclusiv cărți și cărți audio de la editori majori.
Anulați oricând.