UNCLASSIFIED

AD 294 949
ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL INFORMATION AGENCY ARLINGTON HALL STATION ARLINGTON 12, VIRGINIA

UNCLASSIFIED

NOTICE: When government or other drawings, specifications or other data are used for any purpose other than in connection with a definitely related government procurement operation, the U. S. Government thereby incurs no responsibility, nor any obligation whatsoever; and the fact that the Government may have formulated, furnished, or in any way supplied the said drawings, specifications, or other data is not to be regarded by implication or otherwise as in any manner licensing the holder or any other person or corporation, or conveying any rights or permission to manufacture, use or sell any patented invention that may in any way be related thereto.

_______________________________

ASD TR-7-871 (IV)

ASD Interim Report 7-871 (IV) December 1962

SHEET METAL FORMING TECHNOLOGY

W. W. Wood R.E. Goforth D. L. Norwood C. H. Cole Jr. W. D. Moore C. R.Clifton J. R. Russell W. A. Beck R. A. Ford

CJ~

Aeronautics and Missiles Division CHANCE VOUGHT CORP.

A Division of Ling- Temco-Vought, Inc.

Dallas 22, Texas

Contract AF 33(657)-7314 ASD Project No. 7-871 Interim Technical Engineering Report 1 October 1962 to 31 December 1962

T.S1A

The purpose of this project is to determine the inherent limitations of sheet metal forming processes, to develop the knowledge to significantly advance these and to recommend the manner in which this can be accomplished. This report represents the results of the fourth period, consisting of three months, and covers the final experimental work on tensile testing and forming under combined conditions of high velocity, high temperature and high pressure. Results have been obtained on a projectile impact test fixture, a lowexplosive closed system, a high-explosive open system, an electro-hydraulic open system, an electromagnetic system and conventional presses.

FABRICATION BRANCH MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY

AFSC Aeronautical Systems Division United States Air Force Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

NOTICES When Government drawings, specifications, or other data are used, for any purpose other than in connection with a definitely related Government procurement operation, the United States Government thereby incurs no responsibility nor any obligation whatsoever; and the fact that the Government may have formulated, furnished, or in any way supplied the said drawings, specifications, or other data, is not to be regarded by implication or otherwise as in any manner licensing the holder or any other person or corporation, or conveying any rights or permission to manufacture, use, or sell any patented invention that may in any way be related thereto.

Qualified requesters may obtain copies of this report from ASTIA, Document Service Center, Arlington Hall Station, Arlington 12, Virginia.

Copies of ASD Technical Reports should not be returned to the AFSC Aeronautical Systems Division unless return is required by security considerations, contractual obligations, or notice on a specific document.

ASD TR-7-871 (IV)

ASD Interim Report 7-871 (IV) December 1962

SHEET METAL FORMING TECHNOLOGY

W. W. Wood R. E. Goforth D. L. Norwood C. H. Cole Jr. W. D. Moore C. R. Clifton J. R. Russll W. A. Beck R. A. Ford

Aeronautics and Missiles Division CHANCE VOUGHT CORP.

A Division of Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc.

Dallas 22, Texas

Contract AF 33(657)-7314 ASD Project No. 7-871 Interim Technical Engineering Report 1 October 1962 to 31 December 1962

The purpose of this project is to determine the inherent limitations of sheet metal forming processes, to develop the knowledge to significantly advance these and to recommend the manner in which this can be accomplished. This report represents the results of the fourth period, consisting of three months, and covers the final experimental work on tensile testing and forming under combined conditions of high velocity, high temperature and high pressure. Results have been obtained on a projectile impact test fixture, a lowexplosive closed system, a high-explosive open system, an electro-hydraulic open system, an electromagnetic system and conventional presses.

FABRICATION BRANCH MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY

AFSC Aeronautical Systems Division United States Air Force Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

ABSTRACT - SUMMY Interim Technical Progress Report

ASD I)TERI REPORT 7-871(IV) December 1962

SHEET METAL FORMING TECHNOLOGM

W. W. Wood et al Aeronautics and Missiles Division Chance Vought Corporation

The purpose of this project is to determine the inherent limitations of sheet metal formin processes, to develop the knowledge to eignifica47y advance these, and to recommend the manner in which this can be accomplished. Principal areas of investigation are concerned with the effect that primary process variables such as velocity, temperature, and pressure have on various

classes of metals and alloys.

This report presents the results of the fourth

period, consisting of three months, which covers the final xperimentl work on tensile testing and forming under combined conditions of high velocity, high temperature, and high pressure. Results have been obtained on a pro-

jectile impact test fixture, low explosive closed system, high explosiveopen system, electro-hydraulic-open system, and electrcagnetic systom and conventional presses.
Results have been obtained for the available ductility for the various

materials under ccubined conditions of velocity, temperature and pressure.

In addition, optimum ranges of velocity have been obtained for each alloy and has been related to the high energy rate forming systems. This includes critical forming speeds beyond which neg!ligble formability exists and

imediately below which optimum formability usually exists. Generally, the ultra high speed systems utilizing shock wave for forming produce superior formability when compared with lower speed systems such as
low explosive and conventional presses. However, the formabl~ty of som materials han been found to be unimproved at these high velocities. Okher materials, such as the titaniume and refractory metalso are not suitble for forming at high speeds except under suitable combined conditions with temperature.

ii

FOREWARD

This Interim Technical Progress Report covers the work performed under contract AF 33(657)-7314 from 1 October 1962 through 31 December 1962. It is published for technical information only and does not necessarily represent the recommendations, conclusions, or approval of the Air Force. This contract is being conducted by the Aeronautics and Missiles Division of the Chance Vought Corporation. It is entitled "Sheet Metal Forming Technology" and is being conducted under William W. Wood, Project Engineer. Others who participated in the research and in the preparation of the reports are: R. E. Goforth, Senior Manufacturing Research Engineer; J. R. Russell, R. A. Ford, D. L. Norwood, C. H. Cole Jr., C. R. Clifton, W. D. Moore, and W. A. Beck, all Manufacturing Research Engineers. This contract was initiated by the Fabrication Branch, Manufacturing Technology Laboratory, AFSC Aeronautical Systems Division, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, and is being administered under the direction of Mr. B. B. Waters (ASRCTF). This is the fourth of a series of four interim reports that will cover the progress of the research through the first fifteen months. A technical report will be written at the end of the fifteenth month and a development plan and handbook will be finished at the end of the nineteenth month.

PUBLICATION REVIEW

Approved by:

William W. Wood Project Engineer

C4 -rn' Y/7/e

TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. ABSTRACT ...... FORWARD ......................

.. . . .

.. .........

................

ii
21.
.
. . . . . .

INTRODUCTION .....

.......................
.
* ..

LONGITUDINAL HIGH VELOCITY TENSILE TESTING

4 4
4

Introduction .

. . .

. . .

. .

. . . . . * ..
..........

0 *

Test Procedure .........

Discussion

. .

. .

. . .

. .

. . . .

4
5

Results and Conclusions

................

ELEVATED-TEMPERATURE LOW EXPLOSIVE

FREE BULGE DOME AND TUBE TESTING. .
..

...

..

..

....

9. 9 9
. i0

Introduction . . . . . . . . . Test Apparatus .... ...............

. . . . . . .....
.

. .......

Results and Conclusions ...

...............

FABRICATION OF PARTS . . . . . . . . . . .i

Introduction ..

..

..

..

..

..

....
.........
.

..
..

i 11 15

Test Apparatus and Equipment ...

Procedures and Preparation of Tests...

Discussion .
.

.......
. .

. . ..

.
.

.
.

. .

17
. . . .

APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B

. .......
. . . . .

. . . . .
. .
. . . . .

. .......
. . .

41
102

. . .
. . .

.
.

APPENDIX C... DISTRIBUTION LIST

.
. . . . .

120

. .

. . . .........

. 132

LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 2 Combined Velocity

-

I~ Temperature Effect on Uniform

....

Strain for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens

6
.
.

Static, Free Form Dome Setup .........

Static, Shallow Recessing Setup ...... Electro-Hydraulic Forming Setup .......... Deep Recessing Die Configurations .
.

...
...

11
12

3 4 5 6
7a
7b

13
. .. .

14
14 21
. 22

Shallow Recessing Die Configuration ... Experimental Die Formed Parts - 17-7 PH
.

.........
.
.

...
. .

Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points -

17-7 PH ...

...........

. .

Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points A-286 . . . . ................

.

23

9
10a

Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points Vascojet 1000 ...... ...............
.

....
. .

24
.
-

Experimental Die Formed Parts - USS 12 MoV

25

10b lla lib

12

Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points USS 12 MoV ... .................. . . Experimental Die Formed Parts - Titanium (6A14V) Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimenta Points
Titanium (6A1-4V)........
. . . . . . . .

26

. -

27
28
-

Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points

Titanium (13V-Cr-3Al) ......... 13

...

29 30
-

Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimenta Points L-605 ............. . . . . . . . . . Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points Rene'41 ....... . . . . . . . . . . . Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points 2024-0 Aluminum .............. . .. Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points
17-7 PH (Elevated Temperature -

14
15

31
-

32
-

16

1000F) .

33

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

FigurePage
17 Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points A-286 (Elevated Temperature - 1000F) . .. . . . . Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points Vascojet 1000 (Elevated Temperature - l00*F) . . .. Elongation Limit Curve Shoving Experimental Points USS 12 MoV (Elevated Temperature - 1000F) . . . . .. Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points Titanium (6Al-4v) (Elevated Temperature - 1200 F).. Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points
-

33

18

34
34

19

20

35
-

21

Titanium (13V-llCr-3A1) (Elevated Temperture-1200F).

22 23 Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimenta Points L-605 (Elevated Temperature - 500F) . . . . . . . .. Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points Rene'l1 (Elevated Temperature - 500 0 F) .... ........ Elongation Limit Curve Showing Experimental Points 2024-0 Aluminum (Elevated Temperature - 200 F) . . . . Comparison Between Draw (T) and No-Draw (U), Static Formed 2024-0 Aluminum Parts . . ....... Comparison Between Static Formed Titanium (6A1-4V) Parts at 1200OF (V) and Room Temperature (W) . . . . . Example of Part Forming in the Shallow Recess Dies #1(X), #2(Y), and #3 () ............

35
36

36 37
38

24

25

26

39
40

27

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Free Bulge Dome - Low Explosive High Temperature Page

Tensile Testing Data .....

2

................. ...............

.. ..
..

103 105
121

Free Bulge Tube - Low Explosive High Temperature

Tensile Testing Data .......

Deep Recessing - Draw-Static Forming (Room Temperature) ...... .................

vi.

LIST OF TABLES (Continued)

Table

Page Deep Recessing - Draw-Low Explosive Air (Room Temperature)....... .... ......... Deep Recessing - Draw-High Explosive Water
(Room Temperature) .
.

1 4
5 6

121
....

. . ..........

122
. ...

Deep Recessing - Draw-Electromagnetic

(Room Temperature) . . . ........
. . . .

123

7
8

Deep Recessing - No Draw - Static Forming (Room Temperature) ....... ... .........
Deep Recessing - No Draw - Static Forming

123 124 124 125

126

(Elevated Temperature) .... 9

...................

Deep Recessing - No Draw - Low Explosive Air (Room Temperature)....... . . . . . . . . . . . Deep Recessing - No Draw - Low Explosive Air (Elevated Temperature) .................... Deep Recessing - No Draw - High Explosive Water
(Room Temperature) .................. Deep Recessing - No Draw - Electro-Hydraulic

10 11
12

(Room Temperature) ............ 13

14 15

............. .

127 128 128

.
. .

Shallow Recessing - No Draw (Room Temperature) .....

Shallow Recessing Shallow Recessing
-

Static Forming .................

Low Explosive Air

No Draw No Draw

(Room Temperature) .....

-

....................
Low Explosive Air .............. . . .

(Elevated Temperature) ... 16

129

Shallow Recessing - No Draw - High Explosive Water (Elevated Temperature) ............ . . Shallow Recessing - No Draw - Electro-Hydraulic (Room Temperature) ..... .................

130

17

131

vii

LIST OF GRAPHS

Grah
1 Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at Various Test Temperatures and Velocities - 17-7 PH 5" Gage Length ..... ............ ........

Page

42

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at Various Test
Temperatures and Velocities - A-286 -5" Gage Length . . ......... ..... ..................... 48

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at Various Test Temperatures and Velocities - Rene'41 5" Gage Length ...... .. . ... . ... ... Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length At Various Test Temperatures and Velocities - Beryllium 5" Gage Length .......... .................... Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at Various Test Temperatures and Velocities - Molybdenum (.5 Ti) 5" Gage Length ......... ................... Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at Various Test Temperatures and Velocities - Columbium (lOMo-lOTi)5" Gage Length ....... ................... Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at Various Test Temperatures and Velocities - Tungsten 5" Gage Length ......... ................... Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at Various Tempera-

-5

59

62

65

68

tures - 17-7 PH - 5" Gage Length ............ 9 Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for

...

69

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at Various Tempera-

tures - A-286 - 5" Gage Length ... 10

...........

73

Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at Various Tempera-

tures - Rene'141 - 5" Gage Length ...........

....

77

viii

LIST OF GRAPHS (Continued) Graph

Ul Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at Various Temperatures - Beryllium - 5" Gage Length ... ........... Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at Various Temperatures - Molybdenum (.5% Ti) - 5" Gage Length ... ...... Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at Various Temperatures - Columbium (10 Mo-lO Ti) - 5" Gage Length . Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at Various Temperatures - Tungsten - 5" Gage Length ... ...........

..

81

12

82

13

83

14

...

85

15

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position

of .2 Inch Gage Length at -320OF and Various Test Velocities -17-7 PH - 5" Gage Length .. ......... ...

86

16

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at -320*F and Various Test Velocities - A-286 - 5" Gage Length ... .......... . Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at -320F and Various Test Velocities - Vascojet 1000 - 5" Gage Length ....... ...

87

17

89

18

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at -320*F and Various Test Velocities - USS 12 MoV - 5" Gage Length ........... Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at -320*F and Various Test
Velocities - L-605 - 5" Gage Length ..........

90

19

91

20

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position

of .2 Inch Gage Length at -320OF and Various Test

Velocities - Rene'41 - 5" Gage Length

21

.. . . . o . . .

92

Longitudinal Tensile Specimens Elongation Vs. Position of .2 Inch Gage Length at -320*F and Various Test

Velocities - 2024-0 Aluminum - 5" Gage Length

22 23

.....

94
.

Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal

Tensile Specimens at -320OF - 17-7 PH - 5" Gage Length 95

Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal

Tensile Specimens at -320*F - A-286
-

5" Gage Length

96

ix

LIST OF GRAPHS (Continued)

Graph
24 Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at -320*F - Vascojet 1000 511 Gage

Pg

length

. .

. .

. . .

. .

. . . . . . . . . .

97

25

Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudinal Tensile Specimens at -320F - USS 12 MoV - 5" Gage

Length
26 27

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

. ..

..

98

Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Lonitudinal Tensile Specimens at -320F - L-605 - 5" Gage Length . . Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Longitudial

99

Tensile Specimens at -320F

28

Rene'41 - 5" Gage Length .

100 101
106

Uniform Elongation Vs. Forming Velocity for Lonitudinal Tensile Specimens at -320*F - 2024-0 Aluminum . . . . .

29 30
31

Explosive Free Bulge Dome -Average Strain Vs. Velocity -2024-0 Aluminum ... . ........... Explosive Free Bulge Dome-Average Strain Vs. Velocity - 17-7 PH ......................
Explosive Free Bulge Dome - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - A-286 . . . . . . . . . . . .

107

108 109

32
33

Explosive Free Bulge Dome

Average Strain Vs.

.

Velocity - Vascoet 1000 ........

Explosive Free Bulge Dome - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - USS 12 MoV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explosive Free Bulge Dome - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - Titanium (6A1-4V) ... ... ........

110
11.1
-

34

35
36

Explosive Free Bulge Do

Rene'41 .#.. .. . . Explosive Free Bulge Dome

Average Strain Vs. Velocity

... . ... e.. .... Velocity

112 -

L-605 .

. ..

...

.Average . . Strain . Vs. .

..

113
11

37

Explosive Free Bulge Dome - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - Titanium (13V-lCr-3A1) .... ...... Explosive Free Bulge Dome - Average Strain Vs. Velocity -Molybdenum (.5% Ti) . . . . . . . . Explosive Free Bulge Dome - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - Columbium (10lMo-10 Ti ... . . .

38

. . .

115 116

39

LIST OF GRAPHS (Concluded) GraphPage 40 41

42 43

Explosive Free Bulge Dome - Average Strain Vs. .................. Velocity - Tungsten .... Explosive Free Bulge Tube - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - Rene'41 .. ..............
Explosive Free Bulge Tube - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - 17-7 PH ..... ................... Explosive Free Bulge Tube - Average Strain Vs. Velocity - A-286 . ........................ Explosive Free Bulge Tube - Average Strain Vs. ................. Velocity - Vascojet 1000 .... Explosive Free Bulge Tube - Average Strain Vs.
Velocity - Titanium (6A-4V). .
. . . . .... . .

116
.
.

117
118 118

44

119
. 119

45

X1

INTRODUCTION Designers of advanced vehicles of the high velocity aeronautic and aerospace types are placing greater demands on the sheet metal forming industry by designing parts from the high strength thermal resistant alloys that were once made from more formable materials. Added to this are those forming problems associated with the new thermal resistant alloys such as springback and buckling, requiring greater controls in order to maintain the necessary tolerances. A third type of current forming problem is the requirement for close tolerances in both thickness and contour for the more common materials. These greater demands placed on the sheet metal forming industry has generally resulted in increased activity in development of new forming systems. This activity has been extremely great, with particular emphasis placed on the high velocity system such as explosive, electro-hydraulic, electromagnetic and gas expansion. Other high energy forming types such as high temperature, high rubber pressure, and vibration forming have received less attention. In addition, the development of the more conventional forming systems by increasing pressures, addition of heat, and other methods of adaptation has received less attention than the more sophisticated systems. It is now necessary to appraise the sheet metal forming systems by a systematic evaluation of the fundamental parameters governing formability of metals and alloys. The primary purpose of this "Sheet Metal Forming Technology" program is to determine the inherent limitations of sheet metal forming processes, to develop the knowledge to significantly advance these, and to recommend the manner in which this can be accomplished. The approach is to first assess the current state-of-the-art for sheet metal forming by surveying literature and the industry. After the systems were determined that indicate considerable deficiencies as to formability knowledge of the process, a comprehensive experimental program was initiated in order to gain systematic data that will aid in overcoming these deficiencies. These data involve fundamental effects of pressure, temperature and velocity, on a broad range of metals and alloys. From this, recommendations can be made as to the forming systems which hold maximum potential for further development. The program covers the broad class of forming types shown below: I. Conventional Forming A. Brake Bending B. Rubber Forming C. Linear Contouring D. Plane Contouring

E. Spinning F. Bulging
G. Mechanical Die Drawing H. Drop Hammer I. Supplemental Forming

II.

Advanced Methods of Forming A. High Pressure Liquid B. High Temperature C. Explosive D. Capacitor Discharge E. Gas Expansion F. Impact Rubber G. Vibration

Analytical procedures are being utilized to determine the limitations of the better known processes while experimental and analytical procedures are being used to establish the limitations of the more advanced processes, about which less is known from a formability standpoint. The effect of heat, velocity, and pressure is being investigated singularly and in combinations in the following ranges; 1. 2. Temperature: Room temperature - 2500*F Velocity: Static - 1000 Ft/sec. Rubber pressure: Zero.- 100,000 psi

3.

.Materials for the experimental part of the program have been selected from a broad class of alloys and metals as shown below: 1. 2. Aluminum Alloy Stainless Steel 2024-0 17-7 PH

A-286
USS 12 MoV 3. Titanium

6A-4V

13V-llCr-3A1
4. Beryllium

5.
6. 7.

Tool Steel Super Alloys Refractories

Pure Beryllium Vascojet 1000 Rene'41

L-605
Molybdenum (j Ti)

Columbium (10 Mo-1O Ti)

Pure Tungsten Previous effort has been in two directions: (1) securing state-of-the-art information from industry and others by personal interviews and a survey of literature and (2) conducting an extensive experimental program that will fill the gp between needed and existing informatim. Longitudinal tensile specimens of three gage lengths, 1, 5, and 10 inch respectively and three gages, .020, .063, and 0.125 were tested at temperatures and velocities noted above. Free forming tests were conducted at various combinations of temperatures and velocities for 2 inch diameter tubes and 2-1/2 inch diameter domes. Parts were formed to various depths utilizing female dies at various combinations of temperature and velocity with 2 inch tubing, 6 inch diameter domes, and 6 inch diameter shallow recessed beaded panels.

Work in this quarter finalized the experimental phase of the program and the results are reported herein. A Technical Report will be submitted as a summary of all previous work. The last period of the contract will be used for finalizing a formability handbook and formulating a future development report. This report will be submitted for a clarification of current sheet metal forming processes and recommendations for future development work needed to significantly advance sheet metal forming technology.

LONGITUDINAL, HIGH VELOCITY TENSILE TESTING

Introduction The test data contained in this report is in the velocity range from static to 620 ft/sec. and the temperature range from cryogenic (-320*F) to 20000F. Using only 5" gage length tensile specimen, these combined velocity-temperature tests were completed for seven materials in the temperature range from ambient to 2000*F for all velocities. These seven materials are those which were not previously reported. Strain distribution curves and uniform elongation vs forming velocity curves are shown in Appendix A, Graphs . through 14. Cryogenic testing in the velocity range from static to 600 ft/sec. has been

completed. Six materials, Titanium (6A1-4V), Titanium (13V-11Cr-3A1), Beryllium, Molybdenum (.5% Ti), Columbium (10 Mo-lO Ti), and Tungsten were not tested because of their brittle nature at cryogenic temperatures. Strain distribution curves and uniform elongation vs forming velocity for the tested materials are shown in Appendix A, Graphs 15 through 28.

Test Procedure Two machines were used for the high velocity tests. The Projectile Impact Tester (CVC XMS 541.013) was used for all ambient and elevated temperature high velocity tests and all cryogenic testing above 150 ft/sec. (See Interim Report II, page 15.) For the cryogenic tests below 150 ft/sec. the Rotary Impact test machine (CvC Xs 541.014) was used with a special chamber around the test specimen for introducing liquid nitrogen as shown in Figure 24 on page 20 of Interim Report No. III. Cryogenic testing with the Projectile Impact Tester was accomplished by inserting the tensile specimens and their coupling tup in a plastic bag which was then filled with liquid nitrogen. The theoretical temperature of liquid nitrogen, -320 0F, was verified by
using a potentiometer.

Discussion The data in this section is derived from the elongation vs. position curves obtained by measuring the grid marks on the tensile specimens. These curves are shown in Appendix A, Graphs 1-7 and 15-21. Because of the large number of specimens tested, it was necessary to show selected curves representative of the strain distribution found for the various velocities and temperatures. Although the interpretation of the data is somewhat arbitrary, the following rules were applied consistently throughout the test series.

i4

(1) The uniform elongation is taken as the average value of elongation outside the necked area. (2) The critical velocity region is established by the following criteria: a) a strain distribution curve that shows a reasonably good reduction in area at fracture, the fracture located at the impacted end of the specimen, a small uniform strain value.

b) c)

The critical velocity of the refractory metals, Columbium (10 Mo-lO Ti) and Molybdenum (.5% Ti), was difficult to determine because of the low value of elongation. For these two materials, particular weight was placed on the position of the fracture rather than the value of the uniform elongation. Due to the increased strength of some materials at cryogenic temperatures, it was necessary to change the specimen size in order to insure a break in the gage section. This was accomplished by machining a specimen with a 2.5 inch gage length and a .125 inch gage width. Tests were preformed which showed a correlation of uniform elongation and maximum elongation between these specimens and the standard specimens.

Results and Conclusions Only those materials shown in Appendix A, Graphs 1 through 7 and 15 through 21
are considered in detail. Graphs 8 through 14, and 22 through 28 show the results of plotting uniform elongation versus forming velocity with a composite graph of the various temperatures given for each material. In Figure 1, the

uniform static strain at various test temperatures is compared to the corresponding dynamic strain values.
Based on Figure 1, (shown on the next two pages), the following conclusions

can be drawn concerning uniaxial deformation. Considering each material

separately, it can be seen that: (1) Rene'41 and Columbium (10 Mo-10 Ti) show the same ductility for static and dynamic loading. Rene'41 shows a ductility decrease of approximately 25% from room temperature to cryogenic and a
steady decrease from room temperature to 1000F. Columbium

(10 Mo-10 Ti) decreases in ductility from room temperature to

2000 F. Room temperature is the best forming temperature for both Rene'41 and Columbium (10 Mo-lO Ti). (2) 17-7 PH shows a ductility increase (dynamic loading compared to static loading) of 100% at cryogenic, 50% at room temperature. Both processes show the same ductility from 500'F to 1000 0 F. There is a ductility decrease of approximately 50% for both processes from room temperature to cryogenic with steady decrease to 1000F. Dynamic loading at room temperature is the best forming condition

for 17-7 PH.

5

Material

Combined Temperature.

Velocity Effect

6o

B/
40

-'-

UY'i.LC

17-7 PH

10

0 -320

500

1000

1500

'"

200(

Temperature (F)

60
50
0
V-4

A-286

30

20

10

01
Molybdenum Max

Temperature ("'F)

-320

J
6

]---

I-

500

1000

15002

Temperature (OF)

FIGURE 1:

C0MB

D VELOCITY T4PERATURE EFFECT ON UNIFOQW

STRAIN FOR LONGITUDINAL TENSILE SPECIMENS

Material

Combined Temperature

Velocity Effect

60

0
Renel'41

30

20

10

-320

500

1000

1500

20

Temperature (OF)
10 Columbium max.

(10 Mo-10 Ti)

0 -320

o500

1000 Temperature (OF)

1500

Beryllium

14sx.

-320
10
Tungsten

500

1000

1500

Temperature (OF)
i

Max.
0

-320

500 iOOO Temperature (OF)

1500

20C

FIGURE 1: 00MBINE) VELOCITY TWPERATURE EFFECT ON UNIFORK (Concluded) STRAIN FOR LONGITUDINAL TENSILE SPECIMENS

(3)

Dynamic and static loading presents the same ductility for A-286 except for a 15% increase of dynamic over static at room temperature. A-286 shows a maximum ductility at cryogenic with a steady decrease thereafter. Dynamic or static loading at cryogenic (-3200F) is the best forming condition for A-286. Tungsten and Beryllium show the same ductility for static and dynamic loading. An increase in temperature does not increase

(4)

the ductility of Tungsten.

The best ductility for Beryllium was

shown at 800OF for static loading. If it is desirable to form Beryllium by a high ener, method, the temperature of the metal should be raised to 1600F. Four materials (Vascojet 1000, USS 12 MoV, 2024-0 Aluminum and L-605) were tested at cryogenic temperature during this period. Elevated temperature testing was completed during the last period and were reported in Interim Report III.

Graphs 24, 25, 26 and 28 in Appendix A show the uniform elongation as a function
of forming velocity. In each case the uniform elongation is room and elevated temperatures as presented in Graphs 1, 2, lower than that at

5 and 6 in Interim

Report III.

ELEVATED-TEMPERATURE LW EXPLOSIVE FREE BULGE DOME AND TUBE TESTING

Introduction The objective of this phase of testing is to extend the temperature range of the previously determined room temperature data. All materials tested are 0.020 in. and include:

Domes (1)
(2)

17-7 PH
A-286

(7)
(8)

L-605
Rene'41

(3)

Vascojet 1000

(4)
(6)

(5)

uss 12 oV
Titanium (641-4v)
Titanium (13V-JlCr-3A1) Tubes

(o) Molybdenum (.5% Ti)

(U) Columbium (lOMo-lOTi)
(12) Tungsten

(9)

2024-0 Aluminum

(1)

17-7 PH

(4)
(5)

Titanium (6Al-4V)
Rene'41

(2) A-286 (3) Vascojet 1000 All tubing is annealed, welded two-inch I.D.

Since high explosive water forming is not readily adaptable to high temperature tests, the elevated temperature work is limited to low explosive testing. Several of the dome materials exhibited a critical velocity in the low explosive range at elevated temperature as shown in Graphs 29-40, Appendix B. Room temperature data, previously determined, are also shown. It should be noted, however, that no critical velocity was reached in the tubing tests at either room or elevated temperature. (See Graphs 41-45, Appendix B.)

Test Apparatus The test specimens for both tubing and dome tests were resistance heated using a 100 KVA low-voltage transformer. All remaining apparatus used in room temperature testing is discussed in detail in previous Interim Reports. (See Interim Report II for tubing apparatus; Interim Report III for dome apparatus.)

Results and Conclusions Domes Eleven of the twelve materials tested showed a definite decrease in elongation at a specific respective critical velocity. Although L-605 exhibited no decrease in elongation, by comparison with'the test specimens of other materials, it is felt that a critical velocity does exist approximtely 100 fps above the highest L-605 test velocity. Additional conclusions can be based upon the results shown in Table 1 and Graphs 29 through 40 in Appendix B. The average elongation of all test materials, except Titanium (13V-lICr-3A1), remains constant or increases with test temperature. Also for the materials exhibiting a critical velocity in the elevated temperature range, there is a definite decrease in critical velocity with increasing temperature. The only exception to this is molybdenum, as shown in Graph 38, Appendix B. It is also evident that a range of increased elongation exists immediately below the critical velocity for all materials except aluminum and refractories. Tubes
Of the five tubing materials tested, Titanium (6A1-4V) showed an increase in elongation with temperature while 17-7 PH and A-286 decreased in elongation. (See Table 2 and Graphs 41 The remaining materials exhibited no change. tests no evidence of a critical tubing the Throughout B.) through 45 in Appendix velocity was observed.

10

FABRICATION OF PARTS

Introduction These series of tests are intended to study and compare the validity of tensile testing and free forming against actual die forming operations. That is, when tensile testing and free forming establishes a given uniform elongation limit the formed part can be expected to fail when this limit is exceeded. Dies that were used in this series were female type tube bulge dies, dome dies, shallow recess dies, and free forming dome dies. Female type tube bulge die tests have been completed and discussed in Interim Report No. III. Dome and shallow recesses have now been completed. Elevated temperature tests, where applicable, are included in this report. Five energy sources are included in these series. (1) Low Explosive - Air They are:

(2) 'High Explosive - Water

(3) Electro-HYdraulic (4) Electromagnetic

(5) Static (Conventional Presses)

Materials tested include all those available for the experimental part of the program with the exceptions of those metals belonging to the Beryllium and Refractory classes of alloys.

Test Apparatus and F4uipment Forming Mediums: Static - The punch and die setup shown below (Figure 2 1,000 ton press was used to form static, free form domes.

) together with a

FIGURE 2:

STATIC FREE FOI4 DOME

SETUP

11

Static shallow recessed parts were formed using femle dies oil a 2,500 ton press equipped with a trapped rubber head . (Figure 3 )

IMai-n Roin

Ruibber Part

B~ase Dolster

FIGURE 3:
-Air

STATIC SHALLW RECESSING SETUP

Low Explosive - Both shallow recessed ad domed parts were formed using the low explosive chamber andl hold-down fixture In conjunction with the explosive press. These tools are discussed in Interim Report No. II. High Explosive - Water - Both shallow recessed and domed parts were formed using the necessary tool and high explosive'forming facility shown in Interim Report No. II. Blectro -foramg - Both electrical forming methods utilized the capacitor discharge equipment shown in Interim Report No.* II. The capacitor bank has a capacity of 18,,4oo joules (n13.6 ufd at 20 kilovolts). Capacitance during experimental forming varied from 85.2 jitd to 113.6 /Lfd 'due to the explosion and subsequent replacement of two capacitors. Blectro-hyidraulic parts were formed utilizing the explosive press in conjunction with the standpipe shown in Figure 4I. Electromgnetic parts were formed utilizing the explosive press and a specially designed magntic coil.

12

Eyp],osive Fre.,s

Water Fill

Electrode

Water Drain Shallow Recess Die Ch .Vacuum Line

Tab~le of Explosivye Press

FIGURE 1 4:

ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC FOR14ING SETUflP

Dies: Domes and low velocity forming of domes was performed in three different femle dome dies with the following approximte elongations. (See Figure. 5 )
-High

Dome Die #1 Dome Die #2 -2% Dome Die #3 - 57$ Die Cavities were evacuated to approximate ly 28 inches of mercury for all Tose est. art ofthedie contacting the material to be formed were faesprayed with alumina prior to high temperature testing. Static forming of domes was accomplished with a six-inch diameter free form dome die and plunger. Elevated temperature testing was accomplished by heating the plunger and the part to the required temperature.

13

"A"

U"Alt

"All

D14~ "All'

"

l"ici-

3.000

2.000

FIGURE 5:

DME

RECESSING DIE CONFIGURATICS

Shallow Recessing - Parts were formed in three different fe=3le shallow recessing dies with the following approximte elonations. (See Figure 6 )

Shallow Recess Die #1 Shallow Recess Die #2 Shallow Recess Die #3

5
15%

-30

DJFd# gyp.$

FIGURE 6:

SHALLUi RECESSING DIE C0NFIGURA3I0NS

14

Die cavities were evacuated to approximately 28 inches of mercury for all tests. Those parts of the die contacting the material to be formed were flame sprayed with alumina prior to high temperature testing.

Procedures and Preparation of Tests Static Velocity Forming

Dome shaped parts were formed at static velocity using a conventional press setup in a Lake Erie 1,000 ton hydraulic press as shown in Figure 2. Room temperature tests determined that depth to which the part could be recessed before fracture under conditions of ideal draw and complete clamping. For both draw and no-draw tests a lubricant (700 Draw Wax) was used on the punch. No lubricant was used on the drawing surfaces consistent with the experimental conditions of the high velocity tests. The recess depth at fracture was obtained by measuring the position of the main ram. For the no-draw tests adequate blank prevent drawing. On tests where the current flange buckling and fracture larger than that required to provide draw. size and/or hold down pressure was used to optimum draw pressure was used for conof the part, a blank diameter was used no material for the anticipated amount of

For the elevated temperature tests, all parts were formed under no-draw conditions, heat was applied to the punch. Although the die and hold down ring were cooler than the punch, which remained at the test temperature, during the forming operation, it was found that a very slow forming rate (approximately 2 inches/minute) was sufficient to allow the part to come up to temperature prior to contacting the punch. The surfaces of the punch, die and pressure ring were chrome plated to prevent changes in the surface condition of the tools during the test series. No lubricant was used. Shallow recessed, static velocity parts were formed under high pressure by a trapped rubber head, mounted in a single action hydraulic press. No lubrication was used on either the rubber to part interface or on the die. Strain rate, as determined by the pressure build up in the rubber was on the order of

5 in/min. in the vertical direction.

Sufficient blank size was used to prevent

drawing.
Low Explosive - Air The afore mentioned series of dome and shallow recessed dies mounted on a special, mechanical explosive press were used to conduct the low explosive
-

air tests. These tests were performed using Bullseye pistol powder contained in a 700 grain capacity firing chamber. The firing chamber was located approximately six-inches above the part. Explosive charges ranging from 100 to 700 grains, depending on material and gage, were compressed by hand into the firing chamber. Electrical detonation was achieved by use of an Atlas, M-100 match assembly. Velocities were approximated to be in the 100 to 300 fps range.

15

High Explosive - Water

Tests were conducted using the afore mentioned series of dome and shallow recessed dies, and facilities. A high explosive powder, RDX, with a 2 wax content, compressed to 18,000 psi was the energy force for all high explosive water dome and shallow recess part forming. An electrical blasting cap fired by a dry cell battery was used to initiate this energy force. A series of tests indicate that 2D/3 (where D = diameter of the formed part) was near the optimum stand-off distance. Therefore, this 2D/3 value for stand-off distance was held constant in all subsequent testing. All testing in this series was conducted with the tool submerged approximately eight-feet under water. Velocities were approximated to be in the 500 to 800 fps range. Electro-Hydraulic Forming was performed using the 3j-inch gap and 2-inch stad-off distance which had been determined by previous testing. The initiating wire was a 0.030

diameter 5356 aluminum welding wire. Water head was 12 inches. Charging voltage varied from the absolute minimum of 6 kilovolts to the absolute maximum of 20 kilovolts. Energy can be calculated from:
2 E = 1/2 CV

where

E C

is the energy in Joules is the capacitance in farads

V is the voltage. Velocities attained are estimated to be in the lower portion of the high explosive
range.

Electromagnet ic All electromagnetic forming was accomplished with a full complement of eight
capacitors. The coil is made up of 22 turns of #I AWG copper wire wound on a three-inch core, to six-inches outside coil diameter. The coil is completely enclosed in glass-filled epoxy, with a 1/16 inch sheet of epoxy-glass over the coil face. Initial attempts to form electromagnetically into a metal die were completely unsuccessful because of the "nagnetic cushion" effect which returns the material to the coil face in a buckled condition. For this reason the free form deep recess die was used, and a #2 shallow recessing die was constructed These dies eliminated the "magnetic cushion" effect. of linen base phonolic. Additional difficulty was encountered with the materials of high electrical

resistivity; it was impossible to obtain sufficient force to deform the material. This problem was solved by the use of a sheet of .063 gage 2024-0
aluminum overlay between the part to be formed and the coil. were exhausted before this portion of the program was reached. Using this

procedure it was possible to fracture the stainless steels and one titanium

alloy and to slightly form the super alloys. The remainder of the materials

16

Voltages used varied from 6 KV for aluminum to 12-18 K for the balance of the materials.

Discussion Deep Recessing: Draw-Room Temperature - Part fabrication under draw conditions was accomplished by static, low explosive, high explosive, and electromagnetic means. Parts were not formed by electro-hydraulic means because it proved impossible to maintain a water head on one side of the part and a vacuum on the other. If the hold down pressure was increased enough to hold the vacuum then the part was not free to draw. The best results were obtained from the static forming process because of slow loading and the ability to control draw. See Tables 3 through 6 Appendix C for the results of the deep recessed, draw testing. High explosive results approached those of static forming except in the Titanium alloys which are sensitive to strain rate. Low explosive - air results are generally lower than either static forming or high explosive results. This is partially due to a powder burning of the part and excessive hold down pressure encountered in the use of the explosive press. Figure 25 illustrates the increase in formability that may be gained by a part formed under a draw condition as opposed to a no-draw condition. Electromagnetic parts were run under draw conditions. because the coil employed in these tests could not withstand those pressures necessary to prevent drawing. Coil design was the first major problem encountered in this part of the program. A useable coil for tube bulging was never devised; however, a coil for recessing, which is marginal, evolved slowly. High flux concentrations in the center of the coil and especially coil durability are still very pressing problems. The inability to form into metallic dies because of the "cushioning effect" and the poor applicability of most materials to this process place severe limitations on electromagnetic forming. Aluminum was best suited to this process due to its good conductivity. However, all those materials that were formed using aluminum overlays yielded results that were as good as the other forming processes. Much work must be done if this process is to become a useful tool of modern industry. No Draw - Room Temperature - Part fabrication under no-draw conditions was accomplished by static, low explosive, high explosive, and electro-hydraulic means.. Figures 7 through 15 illustrate the results of the testing for this portion of the program. The results also appear in Tables 7 through 12 The velocities shown for the different processes are based on those velocities measured in free form, dome testing. These velocities, though not exact, are reasonably accurate and close enough for discussion purposes. The velocities shown for electro-hydraulic forming were estimated since it was impossible to measure velocities electrically by an Eput Timer due to the extremely high voltages used in this process. The percentage of elongation attainable in each die is shown by a dashed line. Those parts,with the exception of static

parts, which fall off one of the die elongation lines do so because of a slight drawing of the part and subsequent correction as to actual elongation.
The curve shown in each figure is that curve obtained in the dome free forming portion of this program.

17

A graph of 17-7 Ph is shown in Figure 7. This graph shows a maximum elongation of 22% in a velocity range from 0 to 600 fps. From 600 fps to critical velocity the maximum elongation rises to 38%. Thus high explosive parts formed in the upper velocity ranges formed in the number two die while the other processes failed in that die. A graph of A-286 is shown in Figure 8. This graph shows a maximum elongation of 25% at static velocity dropping to 17.5% at a velocity range of 60 to 530 fps. From 530 fps to critical velocity the maximum elongation rises to 27%. Once again the high explosive part formed at the upper velocities was good, whereas the other processes at a lower velocity yielded a split part. This graph shows a A graph of Vascojet 1000 is shown in Figure 9. maximum elongation of 17.5% at static velocities, dropping to 15% from 75 to 500 fps. From 500 fps to critical velocity the maximum elongation rises to 20%. A high explosive part is shown .to be a good part at 21.5%. This part falls so near the forming limit that it easily could have failed. Good and split part will both fall on the forming limit curve. A graph of USS 12 MoV is shown in Figure 10. A maximum elongation of 16% is shown for velocities of from static to 600 fps. From 600 fps to critical velocity the maximum elongation rises to 22.5%. Once again a high explosive part formed at the forming limit. Had it not been for a slight amount of draw this part would probably have failed at 26%elongation.

A graph of Titanium (6A1I4V) is shown in Figure

11.

A maximum elonga-

tion of 6%is shown for velocities from 0 to 250 fps. From 250 fps to critical velocity the maximum elongation rises to 10%. The electro-hydraulic and high explosive parts fall beyond the critical impact velocity. Both static forming and low explosive forming yielded split parts on the forming limit curve. A graph of Titanium (13V-llCr-3A1) is shown in Figure 12. A maximum elongation of 10t is shown from a velocity of static to 125 fps. From 125 fps to the critical impact velocity the maximum elongation rises to 13.5%. The electro-hydraulic and high explosive parts fall outside the critical impact velocity and thus failed. The low explosive part fell on the forming limit curve and yielded a split part.

A graph of L-605 is shown in Figure 13.

From static to 625 fps the maximum

elongation is 17.5%. From 625 fps to the critical impact velocity the mxim= elongation rises to 22.5%. A good, high explosive part fell on the forming limit

curve,: thus indicating that good and bad parts will both fall on the curve.

Had not some drawing been present this part would have failed at 26% elongation. A graph of Rene'41 is shown in Figure 14. A maximm elongation of 18% is shown from 50 to 500 fps. From 500 fps to the critical impact velocity the maximum elongation increased to 22%. A good high explosive part falls on
the forming limit curve.

18

A graph of 2024-0 Aluminum is shown In Figure 15. Maximum elongation from static to critical velocity is 18.5%. The static formed part falls on the forming limit curve. Low and high explosive formed parts as well as the electro-hydraulic part all formed without splitting in the number one die. The forming limit curve is based on uniform or average strain. Thus it is possible to obtain a slightly greater strain than that shown. Such is. the case where the electro-hydraulic and high explosive processes yielded good parts in an area where a split part would be expected. No Draw - Elevated Temperature - Both static and low explosive results closely parallel each other. (See Tables 8 through 10 ). The most noteworthy increase in formability due to elevated temperature occurs in the two titanium alloys. At elevated temperature (1200F) the titanium alloys are capable of forming a good part in Die #1 as opposed to a split part at room temperature. This is true for both static and low explosive forming. See Figure 26 for an example of increase in formbility of titanium at elevated temperatures. At elevated temperatures the low explosive process yielded an increase in formability of .063 gage 17-7 Ph and A-286. Also an increase in formability for .020 gage L-605 and Rene '41. See Figures 16. through 24 for a comparison to free forming elevated temperature results. Shallow Recessing: Room Temperature - Part fabrication was accomplished by static forming, low explosive, high explosive, electro-hydraulic and electromagnetic means. High explosive forming yielded the better results. (See Tables 13 through 17 Appendix C). This was due to the better forming limits of some materials at high velocities and due to a slight drawing of the part. On27 one electromagnetic shallow recessed part was formed due to a lack of power. That being 2024-0 Aluminum in the #2 phenolic die. The part failed. See Figure 27 for an example of parts formed in Dies #1, 2, and 3. Elevated Temperature - The only noteworthy increase in shallow recess formability at elevated temperature occurs in the titanium alloys. These alloys at 1200*F formed a good part in die #1, as opposed to a split part at room temperature. (See Table 15 Appendix C).

19

FABRICATION OF PARTS SMBOL CHART FOR FIGURES 7 THRU 2

PROCESS

RESULT

SYKBOL

Static Forming

Good Part
Split Part

Low Explosive Air

Good Part Split Part Good Part

A
0

Electro-Hydraulic

Split Part
Good Part High Explosive
-

Water Split Part

20

~r

-~

j~,i;P4

-.

-4

14,-

0 4I-

4.--

--

--l

-- *

V
.* *;5 I-

TF\~ t
~74[

740

'71

T-1

'

I2

I
iz

~ 14

j~

w.~r~+

14

ITH'A*ji7i~

443

1.

T.

1;1

000

7 1 *2:

5!

PT~~9S~~

231

j IJ
tti.;

I~

17,i'.

ri' l~hv'
r-t

242

U2

U
rag

I
C 0H

rz4

25

7-71

di I

44

00

*I

%-

UTWXW

99WOAy

26

77,

-~

-,,

270

... :: . w .. .: :! ::: :. :::: :::

7.7, 774 '7

... .. ....
.... ... ... ... . .. .. . . .-.

...

.. .. . .. ... . ..

... ... .. . . .. .. .... .. .:

I.::.: : :

..

. .

.. .. ..

.4

........... ...
.. .. .....

. .. .. . .. . .. . . ..
. . .......

70

4:

.. . ... .. .. .. .. ... .... .. . .. .. .. _...

. .. ..

.... ..

.. .. .. ...

. .. .. .. ...

.. . ... .. ~ .. . ..

. .....

. .

-H:728

.T j
~~,~
,

I . . . I I'I
-

HL.

~ ri ~

'i I ~IiI"~;~.

ihi +V~~~br I :i

.4

r'

F,~~444~~~;

Tt

(PtH~~j

F;I-:.
:11fitt
t

S Ti..i
-ITIR~

d t1~I~ ~1~

-fT{
0

HL :yj !-:

jjf. T

29

*1

*1

.~7v

-j

1.

TI*,i

C-I

30

LP 1:L -7

T I-

.............. l .tit iI. ...............

_ 7 A!-ml 7 JtLt 71 i M: J4

11- Ell

i-ig iFi-1.1p, -I-t! t

!:t

t,.. JV 1:1 ..

T H4

ft

M M T. T:

-------

M I

A_

It

;o N1,r 14.
Ht

PRiiRJ 4 i-jlj I tit,-

T H+

7 ------------- -

-- - .. ----------a :14A T7--- ------------T 1: -.-.

ft NO

it

44

fW

Ait
4 R-11 14 71 i

f!l, T LT

fj_,

J, Triq _7

..........

It

-4 +

w,
4L tg

ET

9-

+H +i+ -A+H. +i+

T a 4,

11 T r
'tv! T:: X ErT + 14 4

1 4T
-4 TT +

4___ T-I 7 T ;i',. T474, 1

T PRE V

. ....
. . .

-L-4+

++ + ITT; 4 +1 4+ .21 444 i

iH

-Z

o T T.I

fM TW 41

44

T m T
+

0:
Z.-

IT"+

1HjE_

31

7 7 ..

-4

71. 7,

Ti~ 7

74

n l 777_

-11 iti-.
44

ELI H L"'-f'-"rip

til 4H,1
jt 'h I-f

it

K **vi.
__4

L.-

I~~Fill j.

v~'-T ~'KfF77
__

..-

L.

tZJ

r7:
g

ILL

-H

ai

.ZT.Z9OSZA

32

FIGURE 16 ELONGATION LIMIT CURVE SHOWING EXPERIMENTAL POINTS 17-7 PH (ELEVATED TEMPERATMR 10000F)

GOOD PAM

LIY-

AFIT[a7:f

IMM - 1000IT 0)"1. 500

304g:~

20FT.
. . ... . .. ......

,~

Pt-B. - . 1! -A

201020

30

00

.06070

IIGUB 17 EITIF! IMTCUV

(EEAEI~ET ;4

Efoooi

30

1 ir -

1.

..... ....

100

200

300

1400

500

600

700

Velocity (Ft./Sec) 33EW1

FIGURE 18 EWNATIONI LDUTf CURVE SHOWING EVERIJUTAL POINTS

30

T4SPLIT PA

GOOD PART

-A2L1

Ai~f

it-i7
RII

Lx~

~{
4l

-4r;H
P U
4
.
*

1 7_f_

FIGURFR19 (LLEA1T
2I0
_ _ __

LDPEM
_ _

100 OF,0
_rill__ __ _ _ __ _ _

M
_

SPLIT
=t-m~o
IjT I R

11.1

LID-TLUE11-1. It, . .' . .

.. IV
9M
tf

_400

42

M;

101 ~~~;j

0.

10

20

30

Velocity Ft/Sec.

4o4

FIGURE 20 ELONGATION LIMIT CURVE SHOWING EOXPERIMENTAL POINTS TITAJIIJ4 (6hi-0i) (EMEATED. TEDeMATURE iO&'i)
-

4'4

100

200T Too I'o ,700: 30-'.' :,

50

..

Im.G WZ HTA ANW .(........

4i112

.....

S202,M

XT T10

Veoct

(it/Se4

it35RZ-

FIGURE 22 ELO1GATI ON LIMI CURVE SHOWING PERIMAL POINTS

L-605 (ELEATED TMJ AMURE

4i0

-500

100

OF_-A

10

40

40

50

NO. 0H1C

EXE~14A

POINPS

T1

10

.. .

,4
jl-# T ,~ f: T+i -

I
-.-. .tt

100

200L300
NOFIGURE

400F,00

600

TO

DIE

23

___TE

TEWAUR -

*1*F

40~

I
(PANec 36R

44
0

0~~7 17.0060 Veoct

FIGURE 2)i ILORITICU LIMIT CURVE SHOWING '' RD0ITA P03IM, 2024-0 AIfLUJE

DIETE NO.R

20

30

iloit ~T

00

100T

200

300.io (F/Sc

o0

70

4[4-4it

rz37

19

38

I
mom*

39i

10
P04

40z

APPENDIX A

41

GRAPH 1 LOAGITUDIINAL TENSIM SPECIMENS ELONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAGE LUM AT VARIOUS TEST TEMPERATMM AND VELOCITIES 17 -7 PH - 5" GAGE LIMME HELD END 60 40 20 -7-7,
+ 0 'V" J1 , , 1", , , 17,, - . -, -1 -- - - ' :. .. fH. ";4

ROM

MATM STATIC
11, 4':L r-14;

.020 GAW

IMPACM END

. . . .

E.2

-t : '1
'

LI
!#

r7---=-M

-i 7qi.!

:4 444

IF4 u-

44

80
. ..

no

ift -UH1

444'

60

EN
1-f4-4 +

HUE HA FH

::
.. .
ME

...

E.2

40

-- Ttt

-7

4,4

'T

..........

ILL

80 60 40 .2
44

-260 Ft/Sec ..
41,
344

tFFT -ff-l ir
4

.. ..

r -L'

i 1441 ::'r! i:
jjF "'H.

it h,
',4 i :'

1:lJx; j:,44L---44i

"4

ill+

T;

gg 141i"IT, Of i4l' j
0

so

ILL A, xr;

Frtt

- rll 4mi

60
4, P,

4#5

-rill

.2

40
20 0 "I fj, M
. i,

-R17

4-

'41 1

1
:7. iflif,

4
15 Position (Typical) 20 25

42 7-

0MPH 1 (Contnu.d)

60~~

51~5 Ft/S.c

El. 2
0

<K ::~

f
-

__

~ ~ ILl
ljr
-~

~ 44li3~IflA3~jj

*~

Atrti9~~Th{:~~

44-i

~~jjJ~.iri

~*

flOCK TB3E'ZBATLJEU

.063 GAGE

80

STATIC

i~0 .2

60

.2

I 250 Ft/S.c 80 jjt

.2

f i~:7fj~.:~tJr

4'K1I:~'-~I7

20

Position (Typical) 43

GRAPH 1. (Continued)

80

300 Ft/Sec

60 -------.2 207

T~m
60

v77~4i34tL

80
60

580 Frt/Sec

4
20.

..........
-#

...

F ......
M

60
rr
-1

ST!I

20

80

Ft5a

44J

GRAPH 106mtinued) .123 Ft/Sec

ek + I TH 1 1 4 _11T M TV .. . .....

80

60 40
20
0 ti

+ !i 1;1,

. ;*'Iii
ttf

iT I -" V fi .19111-PT,
+111 Mj77l. .. ..

# T HI
. . ..

ft

tt

80 60
44-1:

240 Ft/Sec
44A 71 44 tl 1 t 4 '# ffE1

E.2

40
P44
?0

OM I fl I

'W:

fl -4,111" "14 "11-1

. .. .

. . . . . .....

P, M Tg

T . -

1 IfW17
4 . +
3f

Eli' ""I" ::i'L1

80
tT t:ll lilt i1j,r 1111, lilt il I i"

450 Ft/Sec
0 i jmgj M i4 -----------........... ..........

.2 20 0

:R

!ttwUL jLIZ U-' 157

,l

..

80 6D

4 11 P11111111,11 4
r-I'l NT F t7!
i V41 J:

t4M -4 4

5 i't r-;
ii"
4T Iff

. . U T. -4A ,4, _4
N N I J _i F

. ..

......... T -111 IT

Llt

40

2 20
1-14 +4 I

R
44. lit r 11:

0 Position (Typical)

4v

45

GROH 1 (Continued)

10M *F - .06-1 GAOE 80

60 270

1-/4

Or-

e7

80if

t/e

-4

160

Position~ (Tpcl

15

20

25

46,fK

:1,

GRAPH 1 (Concluded)

60

480 Ft/Sec

07
1' 17
,,~

AI6L

10

15

20

25

Position (Typical)

47

-.

GRAP 2 IITUINAL TW8U19 "ELCHMAION VS POSITION OF .2 AT VARZOUS TEST TEMPIRAWE A-286 - 5" GAGE
ROOK TE467IMMUE

SPECMIS INCH GAGE. LOON AND VELCITIES IflGTR .020 (~l IMPACTED END

HELD END 60

STAIC

4f

ilV

IijT*4~

tI=

60

250 Ft/Sc

20 OV 'TiV,-TTjrd ;-h

AK

I" 1 1i" 120

3. 4

25

448

GPHP 2 (Cont inued)

80j

360 Ftfj8ec

80
60
_ _ _ _ _ _I 7 r.

20
0
80

~
___

1475 Ft/B.ca

E. 2
20-i

'F

j;:;

H!I*1

0--I
510 Ft/SeC
80

.2 20

mmO

TDmflRAuR

A03 eAGZ

80

~~~~~STAMIC

___________

2
20
5 15 . Position (Typical)
77

TI

20

25

49

GRIA.PH 2 (Continued)

80

37.5 Ft/Sec
7+T

60

40

. ...

.2

t:V

7 1,7717

20

1
0

I7-

50

GRAPH 2 (Continued)

80
20 ~

62o it/see

LT1 7*~f

60

JSTATIC

-rEl

-2 11
0tl

IT .:1tj:fl
u -J

-T t

I-T,

60

20

10
Positon (Tpica+
-4'

402

GRAPH 2 (Continued)

80

1455 Ft/Sec

40

20
20

414

SecMZ

60
.2

535PtSI

7'I

20

60
0
'I

77

----mA 15

20

25

Position (Typical)

52

GRAPH 2 (Concl1uded)

100

1.25 It/Sec

Tlrl lit, 1,;!.t:TTl

T.

_____

itifl f:litl
'-' 7;:ti 7-r jt !;;

20

IIjj4___

.55

ft/tit

5:

110

7.

53

GMPH 3 WB3GITUDINAL TMI5IL SPECI34KU EWUQATIONf VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAGE- I==ff AT VARtIOUS TEST T EATUMlS AND VELOCITIES RMN'1 - 5" GAS' I==Q MWQ TDERATUB ELD MN
80STATIC
_

- .020 GAGE IMPACTED END

TwTip IIT

4F1~ r4l

~
r

21

14

44

77

54

GRAPE 3 (Continued)

20

1 4
IRA

4A

Th

ft

20

80 80 .39../..

.20 20 139it/ca(p s

80

.. ... ... .... ...

GRIM! 3 (Coztizaued)

tH

.iiui00.i t~~~
I I

300 Ft/Sec
. -:

I!'-

J i32.:

4i~~~~rr~1

-v 1HT ix:tl L qi rA~ 1I 41

---

:~

20T
4 -1

'

80

530

15

20

656

GRAPH 3 (Continued) 500*F

-

.020 GAOE

60
1 T

&
*vh4;1

I 1 ;41! X

E
.2

'

'-

'I2 4!TZ

4--.i4

60

H E
80

--....
Positi-n (Tpial

+57.

...

0PP 3 (Concluded)
10001P 80
-

.020GhOW

sTAT

T'+3T

~~

60 '

lfj

20
2 13. T1

.220
t

+~T'

11o it/se(Tpiae

60

445t

GRAPH 4~ IOWIMMJINAL TENSILE SPEDS ELONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAGE LENGTR AT VARIOUS TEST TEMPERTURES AND VELOCITIES ]BERYLLIUM4 5"1 GAGE LENGTH' GAGE WO02 F O00 HELD ED HELD ED 10 STTIC HFT1 -1

fl4ATU END

IE2'4i
U80;

jj .063 GAG

111 u-,-~:;4V~:

-!1

0 10 F/E
'i t#-

.2

1, i

8o

o063 GAGE

40

STATIC

30+
20o .2 10
i"
-

T...111

10 11#1 t

'
t

td

tr~

10 25

2 0 Psitio

15SZ Typial t

20

25

GRAPH 4~ (Continued)

20 FTSEC

q.X

90o0

-44

HG

.03

7060

GRAPE 4 (Concluded)

20

Tw

61

GRtAPH~ 5
IMNITUDIINAL TENSILE SPECI)UNS ELONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAIGE IMNOGE AT VARIOUS TEST TEPEN!UIRES AND VELOITIES MoLX3Nmm (.5% TO) -PA( IflG BEUD END

30
ul , , J.; tI

SA
l 4

fc.............

AM

S 20 .211 101

'T7 77

IF
0 Pouti (yicl

6....

......

GRAPH 5 (Continued) 1000'01' - .020 GAGE 20

t
,+

STATIC
T
N

E 02

10

ITH 11
Tr 0 L

j1E'FTM[
4

FS:

U5, 1PT/S3C 50
4
IT TF -0.

a
m

40 30 -.411.:: 02
Lv 10
D

71 -

i+

_1114.t

NO

Of L.;; 44

94

4T

4. + M F

_t; F4

T
T.

3 M
x

. I':[ tH 71

ta

_fl i 1 44 MIN RJ44

.j!

1,:..

40
_LL If

290 FT/SEC Z:. .4L t;i, ..... .....

"'T
f-T

30 .2 20
14 If

It
Vifi, ii

M
" . I .. ......

I-H- 4+4 i
Lrf

14 _7
N

10 -P It-, -IN ..

IF144M .....

. . .

.....

ti

2000 *F

.020 GAGE

30 20 .2 1.0
0
41.

STATIC Jil
il;; ii

.!

114'

-4
MT 20

-t

Imf

7E

ZM jl[ 25

Position (Typical)

63

GRMP

5 (Concluded)
55 IT/SEC

30

T;IM

I
10-

+I

Poiho

(Typca1

64t

GUMP 6 LONGITUDINAL TEIWIL spzcims ELONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAGE IZNGT AND VEOCITIs AT VARIOUS TEST TORTl GAGE. LENG COLLD(B11 (3.0 IdO-10 Ti)
-5$

HBO END 30

BOOK

STUATICl

.020 .GGZiAT
i'~ i7.:ij.

r-j

20

lySE

.2 10 L~ITT 0

i4

Jf7~i~~

200 T/SEc
30
-

20
1

ft

TM

- :JF I114 4 ... im-' I

n ...

~~

.l-T7

~ l 10 Poit0

~h ~ .T~ 4

~ (.;7ical

45!1WI

'Ill

v,!

65

MAM 6 (Continued)
ROOK HATURE STATIC
fj
i

.063 WE

40

30
.tjil

I q!

Lj:

71

4;

20 2
10
i,

q; ;s 11!tj !:Tll
jr L .

-P
..

:4P TIT-MIM11M,

0
OD 50 40
2
W

...
20 rf/00 ..... .....
114# H+f f ..

+ . ... ... ... i5

. T+ Taw

. .
-4

. . . ..... .....

. ....
I

:M

30
20
10

444 :,,#:

It" itZT,
It

'4 #

. .
t
NN qj +

44

--

50 40
-lit
4 +

30
20
4
1

-M 091
if
1 V,

f
1 114.

Ii ..... . .. . . . . ....
t P4:

.... ..... . ... ...... .. ..... ----.... ....

10

it

TIT"

4 wl-dr,

It I "I iiij
U: I L

0
Position (Typical)

15

66

GRAE 6 (Continued)
10000,

.020 GAME
1T

20

101

.2

Hff."!

10~L
--.

t. F144.,

4*'

I ITH-

20

7C

T0

-165-

!T

* F/SC

.F

V-1

LL;p;~i~i

20I

.00 AG

10

Kt

.25 ZEEitioTpcl

67r

: 7.

MMA? 7 LONGNITUIA TENL SPECIMEN EW3WTION VS PCOITION OF .2 INKCJIGM.EIZNG' AT VARM Uff MOULMTUMB ASD VWI!IBB TUNGSTEN - 5" GAGE LIT 1000OF - .020 GAGE STATIC 10 .2.....

*L E

10

200P.20

GAGE

30~~Pa

-+i.

it4

IT .

.7 Oi M!,F j,:j:j:0J!. ,I ;11 t:

:.T

Y- x

-ftf If
T

A..

t x
T

F!
lift'illMH
1 VIN[

it +

Mw
ATT x:

ww T H 'M HIM L
it7

T Tt

- ----------

_. 1

.. .

..
.1

IT X_
f 11 . I t.. :

Tt TH: 41 jr4+j:ti, X. 41 It

T,
ITI I

Vill-

4",

1 TH:

:[RA1.1 L 4 ti ]LI.14 _Tj :11", 1-7:

Vj F., 111 1:::: J

U,

4.

IMT I
rPx

ff:

Aw V4

.11.

..... ...

"IMM
ld 4 T U

t:a 4 4
*: IT ... TR 4 1: IVI

..........

-HFT -I. .. . ..1-144

W I Ii 1,q 4# 4 I M t 1_14
1, 41 T T T'l

+ 4 :M - HH M: X -- -------Z
A :2 1. m

Mf
:X:

X.

X T
+ . . . .

4 Go + H 44j M, . ...... xt# -,rulJ4 +

r
J' 7,111.

1,4, A:q i ;

ilL T
-Lrr

T !

4,
400 :14f -Mi'j 4 " V 41, P

44

am, :: IHill T'

14 I. .1i

Hi+iw
ml; I Q __ I M ilill +1-

Ti I,.

j
If I.,

. .

14
fl m

c X . j T al -TT. mmf l : I.. + R4 N 4' st -,A11 t I IlL 0, R T i 1 x 44M: M m: M

.. + t TT Ift: I

Tx

T. +44-- + X

w ---- - ------7

... .... . ....

4F,

- QIrlill Sk"T Ti 4

4 T HrP, H R It.

44

Ltd fttl

, "

M. 0

69

LTST:

12

.2 .

r0 0

It ......

70m

Th~ 44

qa

M.,i 174

j71

LIT

-it
IT2T
14L

-'.1

iii

t72
(WTI.

77"
6T,

4i +

4[

jj.
M
!,T

-Ill II~ M

.,

-+[P,#

i!-

{F-44i FITIr
+ F1

~r~r2f'ji7

:I-

H+~4

IT

IV

X~
4 - 4#

+ 515iT.

.73

171

TT

.1

144 I
-I74

I4
i+

4--

:Iiffk 7775

41

;P+

41D
JI-4 I lf

+ yl
4 4, It, It T., jif,,: P -fl.i.

Ri
TT

T." HITT

T 7

17

Mq: .. . .. . .. .. .. . ..

-44-

4+ HT X . ..... .................... .......... ........

I WM

TR

T I

44

M IT

4rll

I t

:pT

q 1-im- -H T. 1.1 .4. ::: T,:- "'IT 0

I : l4j

.43

x
A It

lat.

.- F .. 14

It

tt

It

T'

T 4

Ml

4-,; J! i, I: u Ili A":-

.14

Tj ,
IT

1.

f,

fl I

IlU + 4 -4 M

X X ..... ... .. .......... X X

M.:

Tx:

im

I -

T .:" -,

TTI X IT lit

I X T T

J76 -

IH

j~-'

.:-I.
-717

MR t * '18mi NY ri

2 4 4

~ ~

KRI 94 ii
7 : Ai:U:
................

*t11*i44

2 1T

7P Up T0

74 1

T. 7i

Lih41 -1

K :4fit-

1v 10 .;P R oo

71
i1

I ;F
1-4,

IT
4q 4

~4I

PI-I

.- 4 .. . .;1 .T.

ib

:11
TPH
:7 .. .. ...8

F1

MD

IIIII . V

h t

Lf

1 11 ;. ur'

!1]

N t X . . T T-x
T:

-:N: I If X
M: -H+ +4+H::' # ....... .

4R fT1-T -11 ::
. ,I .-'

ITT I a mov:T"'To ta .. ........ TTITT:

++..:::::: .... T.
M .:: :T :X :::. . I.: T 44 .. .

TV X

M4 m I w X=MITT: .. .... ........... ..... ................ ..... :T ----1 .. ....... .. .............. ...............

2:

T:

M IME7 =m jxq: xv.: tissm: ...... ......... ..... TT I NTT TRR-Mrl f M l -4 M W.U7 M M UIM
........ .

M... T. XXI ..... .- TTI: w: Imm

i:

IT x T 41 J: MIT X.
4 '74 f iff. ITT I TT + R: AT M 'R 41T T. T,

0.0 .

- +t:

Y4

:nX: 411+ 44 T

I, 1:1 ITT 41

41

I T 4 HE Of XT
ipTT 114.14 4 4

HOW

110
T I R M

WIN

II

'rit T.

MMI .. .77777 U .... Mmi tnt mT fl: 4 1' W& . t: 1: T. F 1-1-111 1 TT .-4 : -p't 1111

IT,

79

] IL 4.l
C., =___

-4.

l~4,

~~ ~~~l't .

1--U

ti+.-fIt

-t

4L
TPP

IT

I___

:T.

IT4

:L71T:t4 11"HIV1 t 1,

'''''41T

41:

I0 T t

...... 80.

GRAPH 1. UNIFORM ELONGATION VS FORMING VELOCITY FOR LONGITUDINAL TENSILE~ SPECIMENS AT VARIOUS TEMPERATEURES BERYLLIU14 - .5" GAGE IZNGTH .063 Gage 10 400 F

20

800OF

10

Ir

0 10

10
+ 11141,

160OF
1+ +1

20

5
155

I~t WN

101

u~lzi

titl

LU

01

Vt-t
Ii t
T

Li -.

I!1V.F

T.~

TTVI , TT;
141

IA

40

It-

0 0

00

00

10,

10AD

82

I
i7

V
m p .'~t

IM

LTT

ff__

T;

T~~1 -.I

4 i4

,&4, 11 T14 M1l4

i ~'~1 ~~ j2~

y :# il h' '4~
H 4-g

i __

A[1
0 -7

T1
4.42A

'.'fl..

41
1.44

834

!7r~

Lt..

14,1
1

~14

1
m ,i
Ei 4
100

84

GRAPH 14 UNIFORM ELONGATION VS FORKING VELOCITY FOR LO0NGITUDINAL TENSILE SPEC IMENIS AT VARIOUS TEMPERATURES TUNGSTEN - .5" GAGE LIMTH ,020 GAGE 1000 OF

2000F

10
0

Cooite

L 4f 44
-

rN-50.1

Velocity (Ft/See)

85

GRAPH 15 LONGITUDINAL TENSILE SPECIMENS ELONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAGE-LENGTH AT -320*F AND VARIOUS TEST VELOCITIES 17-7 PH - 5" GAGE LENGTH HEWLD 60 220 Fl/SEC IMACTED END

20i

20

484FT SEC

25

P 11F

44

11 14 t=; f'Tht fi$j lfI

10

15

20'

25

Position (Typical)

86

GRAPH 16
WGII JDIIAL

TznsUZ spECim

ELONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 fINCH GAGE LENGTH AT-3120*F ANqD VARIOUS TEST VELOCITIES A-286 - 5", GAGE LENGT HELD mN
60I
I

.02 GAEMACTED STATIC

i , *1

END

so
II

-4ii

277-1 =1
0
80~

77~

17-

150 ft/Sec

___________

40

20
. 1

i.

15

F02

887

GUMP

16 (Concluded) 500 Ft/Sec

80

60
.2

'7

20
0

1015 Pos ition (Typical)

20

25

88

GRAPH 17 LORMIUDINAL TENSILE sPECIMe LONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAGE IXEMMI AT-320*F ANID VARIOUS TEST VELOCITIES VASC0JN]T 1000 - 5" GAGE LENGTH! .020 GAGE HELD END 30 207

PWACTED END

~STATIC

I1I

i;w'

7K irIIV
510 Ft/Sec

7Ot/~ 7-,

20-

Rii

289

GRAPH 18 LONGITUDIAL TESUIE spECIms. ElONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAGE-LENGT AT -3200F AND VARIOUS VELOCITIES USS 12 14eV - 5" GAGE LMNTK HEDED.020 GAGE ThPACTE END

E 30STTC
20
-'10

7: 77,

30
7

305 F/E
-7'.: iTU

.2 7717

II

1 jh

______________

IPosition (Tvpical)

__

90

GRAPH 19 LONGITUDINAL TENSILE SPECnam.I FAWNGTION VS POSITION -OF .2 INCH GAGE Ifl0TH AT -320*F AND VARIOUS TEST VUWCITIES L-605 - 5" GA~JZ IflQTj

.063 GAGE

250T

40X

20

20 Poito

15202 (Typical) L

iii91

GRAPH 20 LONITUDINAL TISIIB1 SPECIMENS ELONGATION VS POSITION OF .2 INCH GAC IZNGT AT-320*F AND VARIOUS TEST VELOCITIES R'e1 - 5" GAGO IZNOM HBO END
70

~.020 GAGE-WATDW
STATIC..

60

250
40__

~
20
j
' 1

7-...

i
r

irrH
__1

.2~
_ _

.i;4PI~j~iiiT.i.~PI.!.Lv$I4 ~~iN:L~ ~__ j~iii'4 .~Tjf~ I~i

4'~

F
/ e
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

0_

H0f

E.
20 ---

-~

' 7Vv Vi I:iFt1 :7O I -

4I I' -j
*
O

Li
1:

It
V
I

W7Y

ft...,

j~[
'j. 25.

{ .4,
1j. " 15 20

01 ~1

209
- - -- - - - - - - - - -- - _ .. '

GRAPH 20 (Concluded)

4
30

-.

455 Pt/Sec

___

__

..

~ .~ ... ....

.2

L
10. 0 510 30
..

--.-.

1-

+iL, 4 --

t/sec

L
I~j

.2
20

I
514
10

tr
I
___

4}I

10

15

2.0

25

Position (Typical)

93

GRAPH 21

LONGITUDINAL TEISIIZ SPECIMEN ELONGATION VS POSITION O0F .2 INC OWGE LENGITH AT -32O*F AIM VARIOUS TEST VElOITIES' 202h-O AIAIEINWI 5" GM EN=T

Em 30
30

.D.t:LI

~;i+r

Mi~~1

20

SE

4r

!;

'-i-

20

50

ILI-oo~

ionff (Typica)l

M94 --------------------------rill

sl

L
J4

V:

,f,

1.
;I; 4,

IT
T V1

+1
14 +j-

+ t

'f* 4

rl T 11T
. .. .--.. . . .. . . .... ...

Tm

XT TM 1+ X .t j:4 t qq T: 112 -T

;T. TM
fff RM -

T
o ION

4 I: T! P-TI f:

.14T:

Hl

xlimf

fful t, +
+ i i'.

T 4:P: MOM It +
T It+* . F

X- .
top T 4 I'T

+
"'M! M, ff"

19% IM

J#

4,
.. .....

rill U i U ;m# J1
tt

:d
:t1lt

T74:1-

T-i . t

_ AF1 _l 44

IM
+1

S.M.

!T. tajt4 14

-HIM .
i : i

14 *
IRi N.
- , +

fi

T
4:
Il 4. VIT Pf, +

55NJ

.4

il

1:1M

4-

Tf

R!

llffl'

RJU"

Rh 7:

I H T. T

441R 111.1--l-Hrt i HO

M T. +t
-MITT[

... IS -'Wh Hill

X
Mll TA t

T t: 14-

T
. . ----1:411 T: fill

A:

m m I :. 1.11 l.. .:

M T

T n

T: T "

all
0

95

1d4" T

1lf i;

~.
1[*1W~

,~

I~

~~ir

rn

'7

HIT 11 1r

77[

i J"~

t'f I11it~li
;7 ~
4:

b H'~I' ~~K,

7 _1j

'il14

41I~
Ii ill ;fj t,4E

4I~

~l.

414 ~ 12.11
1.,H ..., -'.I

.I d

f.

I T,,

II'
96p

lr;.fI1 i:1 7::liiii

T

14

7118

T.

Iff

. ... ...

Rif it

97

T . .. i4~ . -.

ij:~

:1 ~ ~

hC l'J:Ti

4~

iI-0

JLV

il1jijll ~t d .
0

6"4

it

U
0

4j-

I Eli,

-TIT
iii

tf

t
t

lil
I H: 1 i

rx
U-'

4W

044;4

Pi8 -11 t 11 i; Il, ufll.

F i

f 7il , il

11 1

[N]

"T
Q R.R4 U,

14
al"ll

-1'V -4IM:X-M I..:: TT.T. :;TTa IVA' fl WIT---

I a I. T TE-
+

MW I,

B-H .. . =XXT

31MM.T.

co CM M

... .. r: I, t

jj
M.: J: '4 1,

V, M
T12"TH'. T

Im. . T TMI TT

Hill Tt rjj i

101

APPENDIX B

10

102

TABLE 1 FREE BULGE DOME LOW EXPL0SIVE HIGH TEMPEATURE TENSILE TESTING DATA Material 17-7 PH Part No. 01101811 01101812 01101813 01101814 01101815 01101816 02102031 02102032 02102033 02102034 02102035 02102036 Vascojet 1000 03101126 03101127 03101128 03101129 03101130 03101131 04103009 04103010 o4103o o01o3o12 o4103013 04103014 0510201705102018 05102019 05102020 05102022 05102023 06102019 06102020 o6102021 06102022 o6102023 06102024 07101019 07101020 07101021 Cbarge Orains (Bullseyve Powder) 60 70 80 60 70 80 70 75 65 70 75 75 80 70 70 75 80 75 70 65 65 70 75 65 70 75 65 70 75 65 70 75 65 70 75 60 70 80
*

Velocity fps 245 250 26o 245 250 260 256 209 240 256 209 240

Temp. OF 500 500 500 10 .1000 1000 500 500 500 1000 1000 1000 500 500 500 1000 1000 1000 500 500 1000 500 1000 1000 500 500 500 1200 1200 1"00 500 500 500 1200 1200 1200 500 500 500

Average Strain % 27.5 27.5 21.5 19.0 28.0 26.0 23.0 26.5 25.5 29.0 24.o 30.5 18.5 14.0 17.5 26.o 8.5 16.0 21.0 25.0 20.0 18.5 21.0 21.0 16.0 13.0 15.5 10.0 12.5 19.0 8.5 20.0 14.5 17.5 18.o 4.0 27.5 29.0 24.5

A-286

?59
232 212 212 232 260 283 261 190 190 261 283 95 158 312 95 158 312 93 124 249 93 124 249 192 212 26o

USS 12 MoV

Titanium (6AI-4V)

Titanium (All Beta)

L-605

103

TABLE 1

(Continued)

FREE BULWE DOME LOW EXPLOSIVE HIGH TEMPEPATURE TENSILE TESTING DATA Charge-Grains (Bullseye
*

Material

Part No.

Velocity

Temp.

Average

Powder) L-605 (Continued) 07101022 07101023 07101024

08103050

fps 192 212 260

222

OF 1000 1000 1000

500

Strain-% 32.0 28.0 30.5

21.5

60 70 80
75

Rene'41

08103051 08103052 08103053 08103054 08103055

Molybdenum 10101080

70 80 70 75 80
85

221 261 222 221 261

462

500 500 i000 1000 1000

I .T.

21.5 21.5 19.0 25 .0 23.0

0.25

(.5% Ti)

10101081 10101082 10101083 10101084

10101085

75 50 75 85
85

390 272 390 462

462

R.T. R .T 600 600

300

0.25 0.25 20.5 21.0

21.5

10101086 Columbium 11101080 11101081 11101082 11101083 1110108 11101085

1110186 Tungsten 12105080 12105081

75 75 65 85 85 85 65
65 60 85

390 288 253 342 342 342 253

253 263 407

300 R.T. R.T. R.T. 1400 500 500

1400 B .T. R.T.

23.0 17.0 11.5 16.5 3.0 4.5 17.0

3.0 0 0

12105082 Aluminum 2024-0 X13101809 X13101810 X13101811 X13101812 X13101813

60 40 30 30 40 40

263 315 175 175 29. 325

800 200 200 38o 200 200

0 1.5 21.5 30.5 18.5 0.5

*Velocity measured 0.050" to 0.40" from dome surface.

104

TABLE 2

FREE BULGE TUBE LOW EXPLOSIVE HIGH TEMPERATURE

TENSILE TESTING DATA Charge -Grains (Bullseye Powder) 70
*

Material

Part No.

Velocity fps 227

Temp. OF 500

Average Strain 25.6

17-7 PH

01107004

01107005
01107006

50
45

157
140

500
1000

24.9
27.9

01107008 01107009 01107010

01107011

60 70 40
75

180 227 130

240

1000 1000 500

1000

25.14 21.5 33.3

26.8

01107012
A-286 02102011

60
45

182
110

500
500

35.0
20.0

02102012
02102013 02102014

55
65 75

150
190 225

500
500 500

19.3
22.0 19.8

02102015
02102016

45
65

110
190

1000
1000

21.3
19-5

02102017 02102018
Vascojet 1000 03102011

75 55
50

225 150
100

1000 1000
1000

19.7 24.6
19.5

03102012

57

125

1000

19.4

03102013
03102014 03102015
03102016

62
68 50
57

217
230

100
1000 500
500

21-3
18.0 21.4
18.6

100
125

03102017

62

217

500

23.0

03102018
Titanium (6A1-4v) 05102011 05102012 05102013 05102014 05102015
05102016

68
80 70 87 92 80
87

230
80 38 133 220 80
133

500
500 500 500 500 120
1200

22.9
13.9 8.5 10.3 12.0 17.5
14.3

05102017 051o2018 Rene'41 08102004

92 70 60

220 38 130

1200 1200 500

15.38 18.9 23.56

08102005 O810206
08102007

73 65
60

215 175
130

500 500
1000

21.7 24.3
24.95

08102008 08102009 08102010 08102011

73 65 55 55

215 175 95 95

1000 1000 1000 500

25.4 23.4 17.0 24.3

*Velocity measured 0.050" to 0.20" from outside diameter of tube. 105

IT.

TI IN
"I
' I. ".~

ii

M.:

1:4x:

a. M
ax

106

tt

4 jlt-l
4,; J.

17

-02 J'j' LT
Fril

4-"-l

iff

ML 49

Nr

4i.

HL .. . .. ..

'a . It Lill 'Zff t7

tt 4

44

j'i
17 14 47 1ni .. . . .. 7 Fiflo -4 t J, 4

I ':7 Tu +.. . I

..... . il

H-V
I'S47 '4 'R H ' SM ITT M MM it . .

i14

V, 1 1 it

:P4

41

Z4
t4

ElliLim

-P Ill

UTSZ#49

690"AV

107

F~I4 4 Hr 1+4

iA

am-. . . . . . ... . . . ... .

.I;.. .

R0
(nCY
-j

00
104

CuzAy 8u9

108

T
*1~~~

op____

i1"In .

i'.'l'-*

'

~n

'~~4.

~~ ll..... H..

Van

;~

.....

1,,.
14 IN'*'*~f.
I

. .. .

19
~ h,' ~~....
L i

.....

H: :iq

T Tj ffliq
4

j: T-f jZTT 77:-:. H7. ..T

:L' IT

:7777 TP wr f

I#
1.4 1 'Mm .1041-41

Rif 4'P#

NE r pxj -i4jR 4 r . '_ Nltlr

i
1:

T:

I . !

i4T

ri T E

8
r :71,

Tt r

I 'I T-

4
A. +
't

Ir.

a
-FIRE

RON[ IR + 1*1

P- 4

4r,
-H- +i+

+1 1

1w 1q.
4'4

_ ::P; 44

"N
. I ,It +

-14

tJ.
+

:4

RT f

if

+
I

i.

4+t -i

_r ti-

ERR :t: -jg ',:,;,

TP

4T

ITIT I .14J,

TIE1:141: T", I +
4 r4

91M

-Wr

-i
i 4A

4R

71: Tit
4. 4 NO
46

44

0 4,
l.

"MR 1;1- r,
-,:*': + H 41 , -L 44

14, 4

mill

I(Tr T H4

H4
M; L ; R4 1,
Tl-

TIT

:F_

I, V :p. 7:

41.
Iff 11 ri SMIR: i 0 0

110

.114,1,1

Ii
.44

j
I

P u

-a

~TL
Tt:I

M~~~:

F-1;.>

II<'-

5i'

V4 V
4.-

'.

4-

11

-UT949

.83a.Ay

H
77 4 A.,

7r,-7

-r

tf

'4
H j 4H :r T7, 'lls, H

IT
Tl z F_ I V41 i T] N' LEH .- T

t+
"i 7P 11+ -1 . i, A

E I %Ji
:F

"P

4L
T!

I.q , - t.,l i: .4 R,:1:, 14..... .....

+ .1-1-H -P
fl-

rig,

41 gt
ta; - '. - tNi i I; - .r I H 1! J i

IH

Pill
P. if i-L-ii. 41-f 4

., I +f
.:.

Ft:l
4.

7-7. Xi

:1

T 7 T IT:
T T'll 4 flj i4

f4fl 4:TE,
JTi'll, E it
ry t+

FH

i I'

+
410i 4 ffT ]:f. 71: .4i I 44. A 4, 1ji -1.;4 4;44 ,I: v 1, -. 2 U A U

+
4

441
fl 51 w

Tt

I L1 0

112

E...e".-.I. 4

1
I

HIT:
~
4..~2TLzj

j<-i

-Mtd

Th

4 r... T~~Tt

...

..

rvi

~
HT,

1 4L
I

"1, 1

. 14

QR NTT
L
4 Fltt - ..
F .

It

0
1, 44U 43.O

1134

.~4 riTr' Pt~

~2 IIt :~4~L IT;~t~t 44~ igr 1 zi1

:tJk I

-tit~

~i~ PW441 4.aI itI~tE ~1. R, ~' ~ irt klL ~~~~~~~T~~~~~~ ~r4'~

1"

j.~ ~

R
4

~ ~T
4~~4

-. p-

'1'i

R-1~F~1 ~ 44..

If

4E~t4:,L

IrI

114

1. I

,.J7
.... 4 .

7,~ I,7
71
_1

tl

Qi

7:7

L4 4
OO

jUTX4

1 M .

:V

.+
a

.. .

.17 a

4
Man

-44-:1

174 ITT 4V, H f

4+4

.-

T:

T:

lml: 1HREHM.
-1

4 + iT
41

mar
1# xttt .t

M, x l

... ....

1. :1 a xmml X 41H H4

ml

if R I i4l 144fl, m -1.0 Um #4 m: M

. . ..... wT + P4

V4 ... -al t L I-1-11 LE

ll-a .44;

....... .....

:++

-t 4

t4 4

UITUM 09W*AV

116

GRAPH 421 EXPLOSIVE FREE BULGE TUBE AVERAGE STRAIN VS VELOCITY

EN'.

.r4R

10i 700 VeoittFtSc 800,

t Rontuprtr

hgaexlsv tes te peatr 1gi c....e i....re io lw exloiv oI . o tests.-i:1 -I.-..-

1,1 I~ ~

Po a l

117

EXPWSIVE

AVERAGE STRAIN VS VKlOITY, 17 -7 PH

rm2

BUlGE TLUE

30
40M

00 10

30

40

50

00700

800

Velocity (Ft/See) ORAl! 4f3 EXPLOSIVE flUZ BULGE TUBE AVERAGE STRAIN VS VELOCIT A-286

60

50

0 10

200

300 Veoct

e00 (Ft/Boo

.i .t .~ .Yjt . . .. 4 A b1 ;
00

Y4.+-'--.d-60 7MT80

10118

GRAP EXPWJOIm FUN AVERAGS STRAIN VASCO=E

44 3U11 Tula VS 'YRLOCrITT 1000

I."OMPS

145H ~
*i
~
M

601.>

-r

~~ ~ ~I~ft ~

t~

j~~"

~~*iX

t2f7+

qjp* f

ld r

o0
30

io

20

0 Velocity (Ft/See 119

44-

...
,

APPENDIX C

120

DEEP RECESSING - DRAW STATIC FOI4ING

TABLE 3

(ROOM TEMPERATURE)
Material Part Number Gage Approximate Depth at Fracture (Inches) Do-D Do T Remarks

17-7 PH
A-286

S01203-001
S02101-004

.063
.020

3.00
3.00

.200
.200

37.0
37.0

(A)
(A)

I Vascojet 1000
USS 12 MoV

Ti(6Al-4V) Ti(13V-llCr-3AI)
L-605

SO2201-001 S03201-001 S04201-001 S05202-001 S06202-004

S07101-004 8 07202-001 S08101-004

.063 .063
.063

3.00 3.00
3.00

.150 .175
.175

.063 .063
.020 .063 .020

1.25 1.60
3.00 3.00 3.00

.031 .063
.163 :163 .175

42.0 39.5 39.5 9.67 16.5

40.7 40.7 39.5

(A) (A)
(A)

(B)

()
(A
(A)

'e41

S08203-001 S13201-004

.063

3.00 3.00

.155 .200

41.5 37.0

(A) (K) (A
(AS

2024 Aluminum

.063
TABLE 4

MW RECESSING - UW

__________OOM TEMPRATURE)_
Part

LOW EXPLSIVE Aj

Material 17-7 PH

Number L01101-003

Gage .020

Die Number 2

D-D o(C) 6T

Charge 350

Dosults .040 22.0 Good

A-286

LEoQ3UoX-04 LE01201 -003 LEO1201-w04 102101-003 Lo21ol-04 LEO2201-003 LE02201-04 103101-003 IZO3201-003 LEO101-003 LE04201-003 LO5101-002 I005201-002 L LE06201-002

.020 .063 .063 .020 .020 .063 .020 .063 .020 .063 .02 .063

3 2 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1

350 500 600 350 350 500 700 350 500 250 500 225 225 225

.076 .040 .105" .042 .062 .038 .105 .001 .045 .000 .050 .000 .000 .000

49.4 22.0 46.5 21.8 50.8 22.2 46.5 25.9 21.5 26.o 21.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Split Good (D) Good split Good Split

I
Vascojet 1000

.063

I USS 12 MoV Ti(6A1-4V) Ti(13V-1Cr-3A1)

L06201-003
LE07101-003 LEO7101-004 1E07201-003 I07201-o04

.063 .063
.020 .020 .063 .063
.020

225
250 400 550

.000

26.0
20.9 46.5 21.3

Split Good

Split
Good Split Good
Good

L-605

Rene'41

2 3 2

.051 .105 .047

LED8101-003

3
2

650

L08101-004 Lo8201-003 L082o1-o 4

350

.132
.027

43.8
23.3

(D)

.oo

.063 .063

3 2 3 121

350 500 650

.048

.060

21.2 51.0

Split Good (D)

TABLE 4 (Continued)

DEEP RECESSING - DRAW

LOW EXPLOSIVE AIR (BOOM TD PATURE)

Part
Material Number Gae

f Die Number
1
2 1 2

D-D
Chage' Do

T Results
Good
Split
Good

2024-0 Aluminum

LE13101-003

113101-004
LE13201-003 LE13201-004

].063

.020 .020 .63

225
350
225

.024
.021

3.6
23.9

350

Split

TABLE 5

DEEP RECESSING - DRAW HIGH EXPLOSIVE - WATER

Part
MaterialNumber 17-7 PH ae .020 H01102-001

Die
Number 2

1
Charge ( 7 iO

Do-D
D

eT
Results 20.7 Good

A-286

Vascojet 1000

I I
I
I

H30,1102-002 E01203-002
HD2102-001 HE02102-002 HRD2202-001 1302202-002 1303101-001

.020
.063
.020 .020 .063 .063 ".020

.053
.043

37.
2

.090

48.0
21.7

Split
Good

EOI203-001 o.63

3
2 3 2 3 2

20
5 10 10 25 5

.111
.053 .030 .05 .136 .050

145.9
20.7 54.0 21.5 143.4 21.0

Good
Good Good Good Good Good

HE33101-W2
H103201-OO

.020
.o63

3
2

7j
10

.1ol
.02

46.9
21.8

split
Good

H303201-002
M o4102-001 =E14102-002 04202-O1 H304202-O02 HEO5102-001 135102-002 -05201-O2

Uss 22 MoV

.063
.020 .020

3
2 3

271
5 12

.145

42.5

Good

.063
.O63

.051 .119

10
25 5

20.9 45.1

Good Split

.037
.025 .000 .o24

22.3
54.5 26.o 3.6

Good
Good Split

Ti(6A2AV)

.063 .020 .020

3 2 1

52O0-oOl

2
1

10

21
5

.000
.057

26.o 26.o 3.0 26.0 47.6

21.9 43.9 21.2 45.5 0.3

Ti(13V-llCr-3A1)

1306102-001 ,306102-002 13062O1-OOI

L-6)5

Rene '41

IO62l-

02 E307101-001 HED7101-002 37201- oi 107201-002 n308103-001 =308103-002 1308203-001 o08203-002

.063 .020 .020 .063 .063

.020 .020 .o63 .063 .020 .020 .063

2 1 2

5 2k 10

.000 .030 .000

1
2 3 2 3 2 3 2 3 122

5
5 10 10 30 5 10 10

.023
.050 .094 .041 .131 .048 .115

3.7
21.0

Split
Good

.o63

27f

.125

4.5

Good

TABLE 5 (Continued)
DEEP RECESSING - DRAW HIGH EXPLOSIVE - WATER

(RooM T34ERATURE) Part

Material Number Gage

Die
Number

(c)

Do-D
"r D T Results

2024-0 Aluminum

HE3102-001 HE13201-Ool HE13201-002

SIER13102-002

.020 .020 .063

27

7
20

.044 o2 .103 .042

21.6

46.7

.063

21.8

I6.o 4o

Good Split Good Split

____
Material
Part Number

TABU 6 DEEP RECESSING - DRAW ELECTROMAGNTIC ~(R"O TERA~fURE)_

Gage
Energy KiloMeasured Elong. in

Results

joules

6 Inches

A286 USS 12 MoV Ti(6AI-4V) L-605 2024-0 Aluminum

EM02101-001 EM04101-OO1 EM05101-001 EM07101-001 EMI3201-O01

.020 .020 .020 .020 .063

18.4 18.4 18.4 18.4 12.8

8 7 7 7 8

1/16 3/4 5/16 1/8

34.4

29.2 16.7 21.9 35.4

Crack Crack Crack

Good
Crack

TABLE 7 DEEP RECESSING - NO DRAW STATIC FOFMING (ROOM TDERURE) Gage .020 .020 .020 .020 .020 .063 .020 .020 .063
Part IApproximate Draw

Material 17-7 PH A-286 Vascojet 1000 USS 12 MoV Ti(6Al-4V) Ti(13V-llCr-3A1) L-605 Rene'41 2024-0 Aluminum

Number So11ol-003 S02101-003 S03113-003 S04101-003 S05101-002 S06202-003 S07101-003 S08101-003 S13201-003

Depth at Fracture 1.95 1.95 1.50 1.95 0.90 1.40 1.85 1.95 1.65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6T 23.9 23.9 14.4 23.9 5.2 12-3 22.2 23-9 17.7

123

TABLE 8
DEEP RECESSING - NO DRAW

STATIC FO1IRG (ELEVATED TEMPERATURE)

Material Part Number Gage Approx.Depth at Fracture Draw
(

TO. T

OF
1000 400

17-7 PH A-286 Vascojet 1000

S01101-004 S01101-005

.020 .020

1.40 1.30

12.3 10.8

SO1201005
S02101-005

.063
.020

1.40
1.50

12.3
14.4

so2l

-06,

.o2o
.020 .063

1.4o
1.50 1.50

12.3
14.4 14.4

650 1000 600

1000 1100

S03101-004 S03201-002

803201-003
USS 12 oV

S03201-004

S0101-004 W41.01-005 oo1-0m2 304201-003 S04201-004

S05101-003-

.063 .063
.020 .020 .o63

0.90

5.2

0.95
0.90 1.35 1.20

547
5.2 31.2 8.9

650 0
4oo 1m 400

.063
.063
.020

1.25
1.95
1.75

9.7
23.9
19.8

600
1100
1200

Ti(6A1-4V)

Ti(13V-llCr-3AI) L-605 Rene'41 2024-0 Aluminum

$
I
I

S05201-002 S05201-003 so6101-001 so6201-005 S07201-002

.o63 .o63 .020 .063 .063

1.80 0.90 1.75 1.30 1.90

21.0 5.2 19.8 10.8 23.5

1200 400 1200 400 1000

S07201-003
S08101-005 S s08101-006 S13201-05 S13201o-06

.063
.020 .020 .063 .063

1.95
1.95 1.75 1.40 1.75

23.9
23.9 19.8 12.3 19.8

750
500 1000 200 400

S13201-007
s13201-0o8

.063
.063

1.75
1.20

19.8
8.9

500
300

S13201-OO9

.063
TABLE 9

1.20

8.9

200

DEEP RECESSING - NO DRAW

W EXPLOSIVE AIR

Part
Material Number Ge

Die
No. Charge c)
(

Draw
% T Results

17-7

A-286

LEo11o1-001 Lo011o1-002 Lw12o1o01 1 0201-002 LEO21O1-001

LEO2101-002

.020 .020 .063 .063 .020

.020

1 2 1 2 1
2

225
300 300 400 225
300

6.0 26.o 6.0 26.o 6.0

26.o

Good Split Good Split Good

Split

Vascojet 1000

L22o 01-ool O I00-0oO LE03101-01

LE03101-002

.063 .063 .020

.O3 124

1 2 1
2

300 400 225

250

6.0 26.0 6.0

26.o

Good Split Good

Split

TABLE 9 (Continued) DEEP RECESSING - NO DRAW LOW EPLOSIVE AIR

(ROoW TWERATURE)
Material Part Number Gage Die INo. h (C) Charge Draw % T Results

Vascojet 1000 I USS 12 oV

LE03201-001 LE03201-002 LE04101-001 LEOIO-002

LE04201-O01

.063 .063 .020 .020

.063

1 2 1 2
1

250 250 225 225

250

6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0

6.0

Good Split Good split

Good

Ti(6Al-4V)
Ti(13V-llCr-3AI) L-15

=LEO4201-OO2 L O510Ol-001 LE05201-OOI

LE06101-001

.o63 .020 .063

.020

2 1 1
1

250 225 225

225

26.0 6.0 6.0

6.0

Split split Split

Split

L62ol-01
LE071O1-001

.o63
.020

1
1

225
225

6.0
6.0

Split
Good

IO71O1-002
Rene'41 LE072Ol-OO1 LE07201-O02 LEO8101-001

.020
.063 .063 .020

2
1 2 1

250
300 400 225

26.0
6.0 26.0 6.0

Split
Good Split Good

LE08l1o-002
2024 -0 Aluminum LE082oI-ooi LM08201-002 LE131O1-001

.020
.063 .063 .020

2
1 2 1

250
300 400 100

26.0
6.0 26.o 6.0

Split
Good Split Good

LE13101-002 LEI32O-O0l
__13201-002

.020 .063
.063

2 1
2

225 200
250

26.0 6.0
26.0

Split Good
Split

TABLE 10

DEEP RECESSING - NO DRAW

LOW EXPOISIVE AIR

(ELEVATED T4)ERATUR)

Material
17-7 Ph

Part
No.
L01OI-005
il01201-006

Gage

Gag IDi
.020 .063
063

No.
2 2 3 2 2 20 o400
500

C)

%Results
0

ra

Temp
split Good
Split

S10o120l-0O5
A-286 Vascojet, 1000
USS 12 MoV t

26.0 o00 26.0

57.0

L0D210-005 L021-005 LEm220l-oO6 LU03101-04 L032o1-04

Lz04101-004 L=04201-004

.020 .063

063
.020 .o63
.020 .063

3
2 2
2 2

200 400 500 200 400

200 40

26.0 26.0 57.0 26.o 26.0

26.0 26.0 1000

split Good Split Split Split

split Split

Ti(6Al-4V)

__

1l05101-003 L805101-0 IZ05201-003 LE052Ol-OO

.02D .020 .063

.063

1 2 1 2

200 200 400 400

6.0 1200 26 .o 6.o 26.0.Split

Good Split Good

125

TABLE 10 (cntinued)
DEEP RECESSING - NO DRAW

(LCw EPLOSIVE AI)

ELEVATED T RATURE
Charge(C)

Part
Material No. Gage

Die
No.

Draw6 T %
0 6.0

Temp.
oI

Results

Ti(13V-llCr-3A1)

LEo62ol-o4 LE06201-005

L-605
Rene'41 2024-0 Aluminum
_ __

IZ07101-005
iao7101-006

LE07201-005 L08101-005 L 081l0oo6 LE13l01-005 IZ13201-i05

.063 .063 .020 .020 .063 .020 .020

1 2 2

200

300
200

26.0
26.0

1200 1200

Good split Good

3
2

300
1400 200

6.0
26.0 26.0 57.0 26.o

Split
split Good Split split Split
split

300 00 122
100 200

50

2 .020 o63 2

26.0
26.o

200
200

TAML

31

DE RECESSIN - ND DW HIGH PLOSIVE - WATER PatDie

Material No. Gp No. Charg

( .020 .020 .063 2 2 4 15

o3)
Do T Results Remarks

17-7 Ph

H110o2-003 HE01102-0l
HU1203-003

3 3
2

.025

15
20

HE01203-004
A-286 ascojet 1000
U~

.063
.020 .020 .063 .020 .020

Ti(6A13-4v)

IE03201-003 I
12 MoV

HE02102-003 HE02102-004 HE 222I-003 HE03101-003 HP03101-04 11504102-003 HE012-001O 150420-003 HE05102-003 HE05102-004 HE05201-003 0E05201-04 11506102-003 m6102 -004 1156201-003 1156201-004 1E07101-003 110lO10o 4 H7201-003

71
15 15 10

.001 .025 .113

.014 .113 .023 .o46 090

23.5 56.9

Good
Split Good 1 Good Split Good Good Split

23.5 45.7
45 .7
23.7 21.4 48.0

214.6

(F)

3
2 2

71

.063

.020 .020 .063 .020 .020 .063

3 2

Ti(13V-11Cr-3A1)

.063
.020 .020 .063 .063 .020 .020

I I
t

L-605

.063

2 3 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2

15
15

.010
.1 053 .128 .0141

22.0

15 5
21

o00

15 5

5
5 5
.00

15

20.7 41.2 21.9 26.0 6.0 26.o 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0

'Good

71 15

15

.031 .054 .028

6.0
22.9 51.6 23.2

Good Split Good Split Split Split Split split4 split split split Good split Good

126

TABLE 11 (Continued) DEEP RECESSING - NO DRAW HIGH EXPLOSIVE - WATER

04Mce TEMERATURE)
Material Rene'41 Part No. HE08103-003 GageDie Gage No. .020 2
(E)

Charge 5

W-D Do6T .036 22.4

I
Results Good

I
Rearks

|
2024-0 Aluminum

HE08103-004 HE08203-003 HE13101-003

HE13101-o04

.020
.063 .020
.020

3
2 1
2

15 15 2j
5

.077
.041 .000
006

49.3 21.9 6.0

25.4

Split Good Good

Split

HE13201-003

.063

10

.027

54.3

Split

TABLE 12 DEEP REMSING - NO DRAW ELECTMO-HIDRAUFLIC (RO T4PERATtR)

Material Part No. Gage Die No. Energy KiloJoules Draw

%
0

6T

Results

Remarks

17-7 PH
A-286

EH01101-01 E31101-002
EHO12O-001 EH02101-001

.020 .020 .063

.020

1 2 2
1

7.2 1.2 16.1

16.1

6.0 26.0
26.0 6.0

Good Split
(D) Good

G
(G) (G)

VascoJet 1000 USA 12 MoV

E0m21l-002 EBO31OI-001
EHO I4I-00l

SEO31ox-002

.02D .020 .020

.020

2 1 2
1

19.9 11.2 14.2

7.2

26.o 6.0 26.o

6.0

Split Good Split

Good

(0) (G) ()
(G

Ti6llY) t
Ti(13V-llCr-3Al) L-605 Rene'41

EHXA101-002 E5-01 01 105101-002

EHK)6201-001 EBD7101-001

.020 .020 .020

.063 .020

2 1 2
1 1

19.9 5.0 12.4

14.4 11.2

26.0 6.0 26.o

6.0 6.0

split split split

Split Good

(a) Gi
(D) (G) (0

E3)7101-002 E
2094-0 Aluminum I.

.020
.020 .020 .063
.020 .020

2
1 2

19.9
11.2 39.8

26.0
6.o 26.0

Split
Good Split

EBHO81O-001 1308101-002

(0) 0)
G) (J)

E O13101-001 ME31Ol--002

IEpo3-OOI

1 2 2

1.8 7.2 11.2

6.0 26.0 26.0

Good Split Good

i) (G (G

127

TABLE 13
SHAILOW RECESSING - NO DRAW

(Room
Part
Material No.

STATIC FOI4ING

TWMETR)

Die
Gage No.

Draw
%
j

[tesults

17-7 Ph

S03101-O01 S01101-002

.020 .020

3
1
2 1 2 1 2 1

15.0

Good

A-286
Vascojet 1000
1

S02101-001
802101-002

.020
.020 .020 .020 .020 .020 .020

30.0 5.0
15 . 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0

Split Good
Split Good Split Good Split Split

S03113-001

USS 12 NoV

Ti(6A1-4V)

Ti(13V-UlCr-3A1)
L-605 Rene'41 I 2024-0 Aluminum

S03113-002 S04101-001 S04101-002 S05101-001

S06201-001 806201-002
S07101-001

.063 .063
.020

1 2
2 1 2 1 2

5.0 15.0
15.0

Good Split
Good

S07101-002
S08101-001 S08101-002 S13101-001 S13101-002

.020
.020 .020 .020 .020

3
0

30.0
5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0

Split
Good Split Good Split

TAB E 14
SHALLOW RECESSInG - NO DRAW

LOW EXPWSIVE AIR

Part No.

Material

jGage
.020 .020

Die No.

(c) Charge

Draw T Results

17-7 Ph A-286 Vacojet 1000

L01101-006 IZo11l1-7

1 2

225 225

5.0 15.0

Good Split Good

Split

L301201-007
L02101-007

Lz01O1-06

.063
.020
.020

2
1
2

400
225
300

15.0
5.0
15.0

(D)

LE02201-007
LBO3101-005 L0310l-006 L803201-005 LE03201-006

.063

ISS

2 MoV

.020 .020 .063 .063

2
1 2 1 2

300 300 250 250

500

15.0

5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0

Good Split Good Split

(D)

12"01-005
i oAzo.lo6 LUO21-005 LEOkOI-O06 LE05101-O05
LE05201-005 LE06101-o0

.020
.020 .o63 .063 .020
.063 .02o0

1
2 1 2 1
1 1

300
225 350 225 225
250 200

5.0
15.0 5.0 15.0

Good
Split Spli split

Ti(6Al-4V)
t Ti(13V-llCr-3A1)

5.0
5-0 5.0

Split
Split Split

t L-605

L062O1-O06 1Z07101-007 L07101-008

LE07201-06

.063

.063 .020 .020

1 1 2

225 225 300

5.0 5.0 15.0

Split Good Split

2
128

500

15.0

(D)

TABLE 14 (Continued)
SHALLOW RECESSING - NO DRAW

LOW EXPLOSIVE AIR (ROOM TEPERATtRE)

Material Rene'41 2024-0 Aluminum

Part
No. LE08101-007 LE08101-008 LEo82ol- 06 LE13101-06 LE13101-007 LE13201-007

Gage .020 .020 .063 .020 .020

INo. 1 2 2 1 2 2

Die

Charge) 225 300 500 225 225

(C)Draw
0

Results Good Split (D) Good Split

LE132o1-006

.063 .063

225
225

5.0 15.0 15.0 5.0 15.0

5.o

.15.0

God

Split

TABLE 15
SHALLOW RECESSING - NO DRAW LOW EXPLOSIVE AIR

(ELEVATED TEMPERURE)

PMrt
Material 17-7 Ph A-286
f

No. LE01101-008 LEO2Ol1m-8 LEo2lo1-0Q8

LE0220-008

Gage Die No. .020 .063 .020

.063

Draw Charge(C)1 5 200 400 200

400

Temp.
TF TResults

2 2 2
2

15.0

1000

Split Split Split

Split

Vascojet 1000 t USS 12 bv t Ti(6AI-4v)

Ti(13V-llCr-3Al)
L-605

LE03101-007 LE03201-007 LE4iOl-oo7 LE0201-07 LE05101-oo6 LE05101-007 LE05201-006 LE05201-007

.020 .063 .020 .063

.020

tL62oioo8
t

IzO62-oo7

.020 .o63 .063

.063
.63 .020 .063 .020 .63
.020 .063

LO71O1-009

2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
2

200 400 200 400 200 200 400 400 400 400
200

15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0

1000 1200

1200

500

Split Split Split Split Good Split ood Split Good Split
Split

f Rene'41 J, 2024-0 Aluminum

LE07201-007 L8101-009 LE08201-007 LE131O1-006 LE132ol-006

2 2 2 2 2

500 200 500 200 300

15.0

, 500 200 200

(D) Split (D) Split Split

129

TABLE 16 SHALLOW RECESSING - NO DRAW HIGH EXPLOSIVE - WATER

Part
Material No.

(ROOM4 TEMAUE) DN Charge

Gage No. (E)

Do
Do-

T
T

Results
-

17-7 Ph

=11o2 -005 HE02202-006 BE01203-005

020 :020 .063

3
2

10 10 10

.000 .019 .012

15.0 28.0 11.3

Good Split Good

HE01203-006
A-286

x63
.020 .020 .63 .063 .020

3
2

20
10 10 10 20 5 10 10 2 5

.012
.000 .000

28 7
15.5 29.9 15.0

Split
Good Split Good Split Good Split Good Split Good

Vascojet 1000

HE02102-005 HE02102-006 E2o2-0o4 HE02202-005 HE031O1-005

3
2 3 1 2 1 2 1

.005

.012

.000 .000 .000 .007 .000

28.7

5.3

USs 12 Mov Ti0(2OE1O14

Ti(6A-4V) TiC13V-11Cr-6l0)

HE03101-OO6 .020 KE03201-004 .063 HE03201-005 663 Ho4102-005 - :020

15.5 5.3 14 .8 5.3

EO4020-OO6
WHE0201-005 BE05102-005

.063
o60
063

2
1
1 1

0
10
5

.006
.003
.006 .020 .003

15.4
5.3
14.9 5.0

Split
Goo
Split Split

HE02O1-005

.63
.020 .020

1
2

5
21

.002
.008 .002

5.0

Split

t L-605

HE06102 0O5 HEOlOI-OO6

o62ol-oo5 HEO7101-005
HEo72ol-oo4 HE07201-005 HW08103-005 HE08103-0o6 HE08203-004

-o3 15
063 063 .020 .020 3 2 3 2 3 2

i00 0
10

=08
.024

-14-7
27.5

5.3 51

Good

Split Split Split

Rene '41

20 20 10 10 20

.007 .034 .004 .004 .010

14.8 26.5 15.1 29-5 14.5

Good Split Good Split Good

2024-0 Aluminum

.063
.063 020 .020 .63

HE08203-005
BE13101-005 aE13101-o06 HE13201-005 HE132l O6

3
1 2 1 2

20
2 10

.023
.000 .000

27.6
5.3 15.5

Split
Good Split Good Split

5.3
15.5

.o63

130

TABLE 17

SHALL4W RECESSING - NO DRAW

ELECTRO -HYDRAULIC (ROO TDPATURE) Material

Part No.

Gage

Die No.

Energy Kilojoules

Draw

Results

Remarks

17-7 Ph A-286

Vascojet 1000 t

USS 12 MoV
t

EHO01-003 EHOo1-004 EH2l0l-003E02101-004 EX03101-003 1 4 EH03ll-0 EHO410-0 1 4

EH04101-003 o51ol-003
EHO51Ol-004

.020 .020 .020 .020 .020 .020

.020

2 3 1 2 1 2

1
2 2 1

32.2 13.8 10.9 16.1 6.1 11.2 16.1

.020

4. 3 2.7

15.0 30.0 5.0 15.0 5.0 15.0 15.0 15.0 5.0

5.0 Good

Good Split Good Split Good Split Split Split Good

(G) (J) (H) (H (G H (

H
0

TE6HV)
L65EHO7101-003 Rene'41 2024-0 Aluminum

.020
.020 .020

1
2
2

5.0 Split
15.0
15.0 5.0

H
(G H

EH711o-004
ENO8101-003

11.2 6.1

.020

16.1
13.8

Split
Good Good

.020

EHD8101-04
EH13101-003

.020
.020

3
1

13.8
1.5

30.0 Split 0 15.0 Split

H

EH13101-004

.020

4.3

(H

NOTES FOR TABLES

THRU 17-

(A) - Forming was stopped at a depth of 3 inches. (B) - Part bad puckers on one side.

(C) - Grains of bullseye gnpowder. (D) - Part not formed down completely to die contour.

(E) - Grams of RDX.

(F) - Unable to prevent drawing.

(G) - Seven capacitors.

(H) - Six capacitors. (J) - Two shots. (K) - Pulled off to one side.

131

DISTRIBUTION GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Armed Services Technical Information Agency Arlington Hall Station Arlington 12, Virginia George C. Marshall Space Flight Center-NASA Attn: William A. Wilson, Chief Methods Research and Development Branch Fabrication & Assembly Engineering Division Huntsville, Alabama Department of the Navy Bureau of Naval Weapons

No.Copies
10

Attn: PID-2 (E. G. Gleason) Washington 25, D. C.

Department of the Navy Bureau of Naval Weapons Attn: RBI (Mr. N. E. Promisel) Washington 25, D. C. 1

Commander Watervliet Arsenal

Attn: Production Methods Mr. George Hohenstein Watervliet, New York Commanding Officer Watertown Arsenal

Attn: ORO Watertown 72, Massachusetts

Materials Advisory Board Attn: Mr. Les Gould 2101 Constitution Avenue Washington 25, D. C. U. S. Naval Ordinance Test Station Attn: John Pearson China Lake, California

C6rmander Aeronautical Systems Division Attn: ASRCT (Col. Arden B. Hughes) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio
Cormmander Aeronautical Systems DiVision Attn: ASRCOO (Mr. C. W. Douglass) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio Commander Aeronautical Systems Division Attn: ASRCTF (Lt. Col. E. M. Morse) Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio 132

DISTRIBUTI10 INDUSTRY Advanced Metals Research Corporation 625 McGrath Highway Somerville, Massachusetts Aerocal Division Attn: D. Z. Chapman, Chief Engineer 24751 So. Crenshaw Blvd. Torrance, California Aero Jet -General Corporation Attn: L. Zernow, Director of Research Ordnance Division

(Continued) No . Copies

11711 S. Woodruff Avenue

Downey, California Aerojet-General Corporation Attn: K. F. Mundt Vice-President, Manufacturing

6352 N. Irwindale Avenue

Azusa, California Allison Division General Motors Corporation Attn: L. E. Batchelor Master Mechanic 1

P. o. Box 894
Inldianapolis 6, Indiana Aeronca Manufacturing Corporation Longren California Division 24751 S. Grenshaw Blvd. Torrance, California Bell Aircraft Corporation Niagara Falls Airport Attn: Mr. Ralph W. Varrial, Manager Production Engineering Buffalo 5, New York Bendix Products Aerospace Division Attn: Library 717 Bendix Drive South Bend, Indiana E. W. Bliss Company Hastings, Michigan Boeing Airplane Company
Aero-Space Division

Attn: Mr. B. K Bucey, Assistant .to Vice-President, Manufa~turing

P. 0. Box 3707
Seattle 24, Washington 133

DISTRIBUTION (Continued)
No. Copies Boeing Airplane Company Attn: Mr. W. W. Rutledge Manufacturing Manager Wichita 1, Kansas Boeing Airplane Company Attn: F. P. Laudan, Vice-President Manufacturing Hq. Office P. 0. Box 3707 Seattle 24, Washington The Budd Company Attn: Gen. C. 0. Bierman Product Development Dept. 2450 Hunting Park Avenue Philadelphia 32, Pennsylvania Cessna Aircraft Company 1

Box 1977
Wichita 1, Kansas The Cincinnati Milling Machine Company Attn: Serope Kalpakcioglu Marburg Avenue Cincinnati 9, Ohio The Cyril Bath Company Attn: J. J. Frank

32400 Aurora Road Cleveland 39, Ohio

Denly Machine Specialties, Inc Attn: James C. Danly 2100 S. Laramie Chicago 50, Illinois Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc. 1

Santa Monica Division Attn: Mr. N. H. Shappell,

Works Manager Santa Monica, California Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc. Attn: 0. L. Rumble, Tooling Manager 3855 Lakewood Boulevard Long Beach 8, California Douglas Aircraft Company, Inc* Attn: Mir. Jess L. Jones, General Manager 2000 N. Memorial Drive Tulsa,..Qklahoma 1

134

DISTRIBUTION (Continued) No. Copies E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Company Central Research Department Experimental Station Wilmington 98, Delaware Federal Presses 511 Divisions Street Elkhart, Indiana Ford Motor Company Scientific Lab., Engineering Staff' Attn: Supervisor, Tech. Info. Section 20000 Rotunda Drive Dearborn, Michigan The Garrett Corporation AiResearch Manufacturing Division Attn: H. W. Young, Factory Manager

9851 Sepulveda Blvd.

Los Angeles 45, California Mr. D. A. Stewart Supervisor, Machinability Unit General Electric Company FPLD Manufacturing

Building 700
Cincinnati 15, Ohio General Dynamics/San Diego Advanced Products Department Attn: Robert A. Kaser P. 0. Box 6231 San Diego 6, California General Dynamics Corporation Advanced Products Division Attn: J. A. Kline, Manager Research and Development San Diego, California General Dynamics Corporation Attn: E. W. Fedderson, Director Manufacturing Engineering of

General Dynamics

San Diego, California General Dynamics Attn: Mr. A. T. Seeman, Chief of Engineering Manufacturing P. 0. Box 1011 Pomona, California

135.

DISTRIBUTION (Continued) No. Copies General Dynamics Corporation Astronautics Division Attn: V. G. Mellquist, Manager Applied Manufacturing Research San Diego, California General Dynamics Corporation Convair Division Attn: C. A. Ives, Supervisor Applied Manufacturing Research San Diego, California General Dynamics Corporation/Ft. Worth Attn: Mr. R. K. May, Chief of 1

Manufacturing R & D
Grants Lane Fort Worth, Texas Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation Attn: Mr. William J. Hoffman Vice-President, Manufacturing Engineering Bethpage, Long Island, New York Hayes Aircraft Corporation

P. 0. Box 2287 Birmingham, Alabem

Hercules Powder Company Wilmington 99, Delaware HPM Division - Koehring Company Attn: D. G. Barkhurst Mount Gilead, Ohio Hughes Aircraft Company Attn: Mr.. J. W. Moffett, Chief, Equipment Engineer El Segundo, California Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. Industrial Division I

P. o. Box 6327
Attn: Mr. P. F. Young, Manager Operations Dallas 22, Texas Lockheed Aircraft Corporation Attn: Mr. C. S. Wagner, Exec. Assistant to the Exec. Vice-President P. 0. Box 511 Burbank, California

136,

DISTRIBUTION (Continued)
No. Copies

Lockheed Aircraft Corporation Georgia Division Attn: Mr. R. A. Mackenzie

Manufacturing Manager Marietta, Georgia Lockheed Aircraft Corporation Attn: Mr. Tony HoffImn, Chief Manufacturing Research Burbank, California Lycoming Division AVCO Manufacturing Corporation Attn: Mr. W. H. Panke Stratford, Connecticut The Marquardt Corporation Attn: K. Sato 1000 W. 33rd Street Ogden, Utah 1

The Marquardt Corporation Ogden Division

Attn: Mr. W. R. Catey

P. 0. Box 670
Ogden, Utah

The Marquardt Corporation

Attn: Mr. J. S. Liefeld Director of Manufacturing 16555 Saticoy Street Van Nuys, California Martin-Marietta Aerospace Division Attn: A. A. Ezra, Chief Technical Development Structures & Aerophysics 1

Mail No. A-92

Denver 1, Coloado

The. Martin Company

Attn: Chief Libr-an

Engineering Library
Baltimore 3, Maryland

McDonnell Aircraft Corporation Attn: Mr. A. F. Hartwig

Chief, Ind. Engineer

P. o. Box 516
St. Louis 66, Missouri

135

DISTRIBUTION (Continued) Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company Attn: Frank C. Graham

No- Copies

2301 Hudson Road St. Pisu 19, Minnesota

Northrop Corporation Norair Division Attn: Mr. R. R. Nolan 1001 East Broadway Hawthorne, California. North American Aviation, Attn: Mr. M. E. Fisher 4300 East Fifth Avenue Columbus 16, Ohio Inc.

North American Aviation, Inc. Attn: Mr. Latham Pollock International Airport Los Angeles 45, California North American Aviation, Inc. Rocketdyne Division Attn: Mr. C. W. Buckel 6633 Canoga Avenue Canoga Park, California Reactive Metals Products Bridgeport Brass Company Attn: Mr. L. G. McCoy Niles, Ohio Republic Aviation .Corporation Attn: A. Kastelowitz Director of Manufacturing Research Conklin Street Farmingdale, New York

Repnolds Metals Company

Attn: Carson L. Brooks 4th and Canal Streets Metallurgical Research Division Richmond 19, Virginia

Rohr Aircraft Corporation

Attn: H. J. Sieradzky

P. 0. Box 878 Chula Vista, California

138

--

r-----------

-777~

DISTRIBUTION (Continued) Ryan Aeronautical Company Attn: Mr. Robert L. Clark P. O. Box 311
Lindbergh Field San Diego 12, California Sheridan-Gray, Incorporated 24701 Crenshaw Boulevard Torrance, California Sikorsky Aircraft Division United Aircraft Corporation Attn: Mr. Alex Sperber, Factory Manager N. Main Street Stratford, Connecticut Sperry Gyroscope Company Division Sperry-Rand Corporation

No. Copies

Attn: Mr. G. A. Richroath

Great Neck, New York Solar Aircraft Company Attn: Mr. J. A. Logan

Manager Facilities Division

2200 Pacific Highway San Diego 12, California Thompson Ramo Wooldridge, Inc. Attn: Mr. Carl W. Goldbeck

23555 Euclid Avenue

Cleveland 17, Ohio U.S.I. Clearing Division of U. S. Industries, Inc.

6499 West 65th Street

Chicago 38, Illinois United States Steel Corporation Research & Technology Division Attn: Mr. M. W. Lightner 525 William Penn Place

Pittsburgh 30, Pennsylvania Verson Allsteel Press Company 9313 S. Kenwood Avenue Chicago 19, Illinois

139

DISTRIBUTION (Continued)

UNIVERSITIES & RESEARCH ORGAN.

American Society of Tool & Manufacturing Engineers

No. Copies
1

Attn: Phillip D. Harvey

Asst. Technical Director 10700 Puritan Avenue Detroit 38, Michigan Armour Research Foundation Illinois Institute of Technology 10 West 35th Street Chicago 16, Illinois California Institute of Technology Attn: Aeronautics Library 1201 E. California Street Pasadena 4, California California Institute of Technology Guggenheim Aeronautical Lab. 1201 E. California Street Pasadena 4, California California Institute of Technology 1

Attn: D. S. Wood
Pasadena 4, California

Carnegie Institute of Technoloa Attn: Professor M. C. Shaw

Schenley Park Pittsburgh 13, Pennsylvania Colorado School of Mines Attn: John S. Rinehart, Director Mining Research Laboratory Golden, Colorado Cornell University - Metallurgical Engineering Attn: Professor G. V. Smith Olin Hall Ithaca, New York Defense Metals Information Center Battelle Memorial Institute 505 King Avenue Columbus 1, Ohio Defense Metals Information Center Battelle Memorial Institute Attn: Webster Hodge 505 King Avenue Columbus 1, Ohio

140

DISTRIBUTION (Continued)
Information Technology Laboratories Attn: Mr. Paul L. Kerrigan

No. Copies 1

Lexington 73, Massachusetts Illinois Institute of Technology

Metallurgical Engineering Technology Center Chicago 16, Illinois

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Department of Metallurgy

Attn: Professor Backofen Cambridge, Massachusetts Northwestern University Attn: J. R. Cotner and J. Weertman Materials Science Department

Evanston, Illinois Stanford Research Institute

Department of Metallurgy Menlo Park, California Syracuse University Research Institute Metallurgical Research Lab. 1

Bldg. D6, Collendale Campus

Syracuse 10, New York The University of California Attn: Dr. J. E. Dorn Berkeley, California University of California 1

Dr. R. Cole and Dr. M. Asimov

Los Angeles, California Battelle Memorial Institute Metalworking Research Division 1

Attn: Daniel Strohecker

505 King Avenue Columbus 1, Ohio

141

4-)

(n

,.

~4-)
4 0
0

()*

4-1 '1 04.3+~ I.a 8 p arN

c~~4

0 40

o
P4 W
4

:2
0

to.4) 0 4
+

0 040

0
4

0. c?. C)~ DH 0
P

14

0 4)

.14

50 .~ 0 4-1
-~

00 4)H ow

r4 U-~-

-P

0 . 01 0

42'

0)

P#t

0H -P

7H
a0 t*

Cr4 )
(a.
4-~.o

H 4)H

*Hi 00 0-

014g .0094

0z~4c0

Q-20.

H4
4) v) A 01Ai'0 n
co. tv

HIw

10 :n0

CLI~

4-~~

**

a(

H-

9P
0
'-

P.

40,

45 >b: (D

4)
0 -4I ~~~~4 to~0

04) 43O

0H4 I

*0 H

P. 0

~
4)

400 4

(Dw
0 0 -84 09 c~ 4) r4-0 00 Id 0 4-3 P0

14roo -4C 0 0 4 -HrL *tI 1-0 0

C-U

0)

j 404) t
1-4

or 000A

H4

UG

~~0

UGD

C',

.4 4414
4 -1.

4..U 43

4 1"0 010S0

4 44I~ +)I+

4)4
A 0 r-4

-H

to

4J-

H~~41rr4
*~4- 4

441~

to C)
o) $-M cns~~uto 4rfr, 4

9 ' 0

C O 10441 41

toW

E $4

714.