Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
Sharing a proud legacy dedicated to Philippines progress and world understanding. ______________________________________________________
Page 2
CAVEAT!
SAN PEDRO ESTATE VS. TITULO PROPRIEDAD 4136. All must be fair and just, and should be able to distinguish. We are heirs of Don Alejandro P. San Pedrothe lone judicially declared next of kin and true legal heir of Don Mariano San Pedro, i.e. under the Spec. Proc. Case 312-B, RTC, Malolos, Bulacan. Titulo Propriedad 4136 had been the work of false heirs and criminal syndicates. Don Alejandro P. San Pedro and his heirs have not been using Titulo 4136 as it is criminal and invalid. We are always on the side of the government, always legal and are innocent of the crimes of the unlawful. The true and legal Spanish titles of the San Pedro estate that already passe d P.D. 892 with OCT o-5797, Decree 137745 of Dec. 6, 1971 is Titulo Composicion con en el Estado for its concrete latifundio in old Norzagaray, and as well as its Maura Law adjustment title, Titulo Informacion Possessoria for its altruistic encomienda in the segregated metropolitan areas and near provincesthat passed P.D. 892 with OCT 374, Decree 4627 in 1910. IF THE SUPREME COURT REALLY MEANT TO NULLIFY THE VAST SAN PEDRO ESTATE ALTOGETHER, IT WILL INSTEAD ANNUL THE TRUE AND VALID TITULO COMPOSICION CON EN EL ESTADO AND TITULO INFORMACION POSSESSORIA OF THE SAN PEDRO ESTATE, BUT IT DID NOT!
Page 3
[THE HISTORICAL TRUTH & THE LEGAL FACTS OF THE SAN PEDRO ESTATE]
PREFATORY NOTE:
Eventually, all major landholdings and properties held by Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc. shall be turned-over or, more appropriately, donated or assigned as University sites and endowments for ownership-trust and management of The Enlightenment University System. In this regard, it is necessary to inform the public of the perfect legitimacy and/or legality of the said vast landholdings and properties of the Don Mariano E. San Pedro estate, most particularly: 1) the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado, which consists of own 4,700 has. latifundio of Don Mariano E. San Pedro in old Norzagaray, in old Bulacan; 2) the Titulo Informacion Possessoria, which comprises of "Enlightenment project's" 173,000 has. encomienda in central Tagalog region encompassing Metro-Manila cities and towns, and great portions of the suburban provinces of Bulacan, Nueva Ecija, Quezon, Rizal & Laguna (Pls. see GRs 103727 & 106496); and as well as 3) the Land Bank Capital BondsInterim Certificates Nos. 180-1, 180-2, 180-3, and 180-4, all under the Series of 1968, each valued at P400,000,000, totalling P1,600,000,000 with 7% interest per annum, as certified to by the Central Bank of the Philippines (CBP) on December 14, 1989. In effect and point of fact, this article on the "Complete Facts and Legality of the San Pedro Estate" is about the truth & legitimacy of the renown Don Mariano E. San Pedro estate and the all too recognizable and palpable Titulo Informacion Possessoria of the Maura Lawreplacing the nullified Titulo Propriedad 4136.
Page 4
THE HISTORICAL TRUTH AND THE LEGAL FACTS OF THE SAN PEDRO ESTATE (& THE TITULO COMPOSICION CON EN EL ESTADO WITH TITULO INFORMACION POSSESSORIA)
--The Weapon of Rizalist Enlightenment Revolution! THE FOREGROUND
The Philippines condition of corruption stinks! The answer inevitably will be Civil War or Reform? Then impeach the corrupt Supreme Court and justly set-aside and declare all its rulings favoring fake/spurious land titles as null and void, ab initio! (Fake land titles are the greatest sources of Graft & Corruption!)And expand the pending Death-Penalty Bill in Congress against anybody using fake titles to include the magistrates, the bar, and any government employees abetting fake land titles!
"An immoral and corrupt government would be an anomaly among a righteous people!"
-- DR. JOSE RIZAL
WE ARE READY FOR THE CONCLUSIVE PART II OF THE PEACEFUL-INTELLECTUAL-ENLIGHTENMENT-REVOLUTION! Ready to fight! PHILIPPINE ENLIGHTENMENT MOVEMENT: the Vanguardia Rizalista, the Knights of Rizal, the Freemasons, Enlightenment Masters, the Jose Rizal University, The Enlightenment University System, Enlightenment League & Moral Society, Inc., Philippines Enlightenment Network (PEN writers), Sovereignian Rizalists, Intellectuals and Literati, including Freethinkers/Truthseekers, Scientists, the Progressive Students & Out-of-school Youths, Progressive Sr. Citizens, Progressive Workers and Employees, to use the DON MARIANO SAN PEDRO ESTATE and its TITULO COMPOSICION CON EN EL ESTADO and TITULO INFORMACION POSSESSORIA (that have passed the strict requirements of P.D. 892) to clean, beautify, and rebuild the Philippines!
Page 5
THE HISTORICAL TRUTH AND THE LEGAL FACTS OF THE SAN PEDRO ESTATE (and its Titulo Composicion con en el Estado and Titulo Informacion Possessoria that have both passed the strict requirements of PD 892)
[A CRY FOR JUSTICE! GIVE BACK TO THE RIZALISTS* THE HISTORIC LAND THAT THEY OWNED FOR THE NATIONAL ENLIGHTENMENT PROJECT OF DR. JOSE P. RIZAL!] (A Peaceful Enlightenment Revolutionary
Position Paper on the Truth and Legality of the Mysterious San Pedro Estate!) In His Honor of Martyrdom in the Langhaya: SOVEREIGN FELIX M. MELGAR Greatest Spiritual Leader in Oriental World, The Supreme Pontiff of the Rizalist Church --The Church Bearing the Philippines Flag!
ENLIGHTENMENT THEISM* (an invocation....) By: Dr. Jose Rizal, and Voltaire, with adaptations.
[Enlightenment Theism is the natural theology of Truthseekers and Freethinkers in the Enlightenment discipline (Enlightenment is a scientific philosophy without ignorant and superstitious religion). The Theist is conscious of societys need for truth-belief in God eternal as the real anchor of truth, morality, unity, and peace.] *Please see "Enlightenment Theism" as Quoted (with a Rizalian Enlightenment adaptation) in Will Durant, The Story of Philosophy, Simon & Schuster, N.Y., 1961, p.242-243. The Masters of Enlightenment, La Liga Filipina, Vanguardia Rizalista, the PEN writers, the Knights of Rizal, the Freemasons of the Earth, Jose Rizal University, The Enlightenment University System (ThEUS), Enlightenment League & Moral Society (ELMS), Philippines Enlightenment Network (PEN) Writers, Sovereignian Rizalists of Luzon, Visayas, Mindanao, The World Enlightenment Movement (WEM), Universal Involvement in World Enlightenment (UIWE), other progressive organizations, and the scientific institutions, including the San Pedro heirs are Rizalistas, with Philippine Enlightenment patron: The Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc. Help or Become an Enlightenment Rizalist, Join us and Give Justice a Chance! Remember the Langhaya!
By THE PHILIPPINES ENLIGHTENMENT MOVEMENT:
Page 6
CAVEAT!
SAN PEDRO ESTATE VS. TITULO PROPRIEDAD 4136. All must be fair and just, and should be able to distinguish. We are heirs of Don Alejandro P. San Pedrothe judicially declared next of kin and true legal heir of Don Mariano E. San Pedro. Titulo Prop. 4136 had been the work of false heirs and criminal syndicates, particularly the groups of Wilfredo Torres, and Don Engracio San Pedroalias Pedro Ignacio. Don Alejandro P. San Pedro and his heirs have always been on the side of the government, always legal and are innocent of the crimes of the unlawful. Theyve not been using TP 4136 as it is criminal and invalid. The true and legal Spanish titles of the San Pedro estate that already passed P.D. 892 with OCT o 5797, Decree 137745 of Dec. 6, 1971 is Titulo Composicion con en el Estado (TCCE) for its concrete latifundio in Old Norzagaray, and its valid Maura Law adjustment Titulo Informacion Possessoria (TIP) for its altruistic private encomienda (Enlightenment project) of Dr. Jose Rizal, Rizalistas and Masons. We should be very careful. IF THE HON. SUPREME COURT REALLY MEANT TO NULLIFY THE VAST SAN PEDRO ESTATE ALTOGETHER, IT WILL INSTEAD ANNUL THE TRUE AND VALID TITULO COMPOSICION CON EN EL ESTADO AND TITULO INFORMACION POSSESSORIA OF THE SAN PEDRO ESTATE, BUT IT DID NOT!
[There is mystery in the San Pedro estate and in its refusal to die all too suddenly; and the hope for truth and justice remained unperturbed among the simple, honest, and courageous family of Don Alejandro P. San Pedro in Taguig City. These "next of kin" and "true legal heirs" of Don Mariano San Pedro struggled enough through hardships and poverty to be able to dig-on and discover and secure with honor the sacrosanct & edifying truth of the two Spanish titles that have passed the strict requirements of PD 892 (Titulo Composicion con en el Estado & Titulo Informacion Possessoria)!
Page 7
THE STORY/HISTORY
The Historical Truth & the Legal Facts of the Don Mariano E. San Pedro Estate (& its 2 Spanish titles that have passed the strict requirements of P.D. 892)
CONTENTS
[hide]
Prefatory Note The Foreground Caveat The Story/History 1 Introduction 2 Touch me not! 3 Rizalists' history 4 Role of the Freemasons 5 Enlightenment project 6 Need for vast land 7 Role of the Rizalistas 8 Nota bene! 9 Promulgating Royal Decree 10 Compliance with Maura Law 11 The Maura Law 12 Reforming colonial rule 13 Death of Enlightenment project 14 Demise of personalities 15 The San Pedro heirs 16 Advent of GRs 103727 & 106496 17 Torrens titles for Titulo Composicion 18 Exempt from GRs 103727 & 106496 18.1 First reason 18.2 Second reason 18.3 Third reason 18.4 Fourth reason 18.5 Fifth reason 19 San Pedro estate now with perfect titles 20 Supreme Court suspected
21 Largest Caper of Ortigas 21.1 Expose of Justice Bidin 21.2 Mere 1972 location map 21.3 Latest land-grabbing project 21.4 Hacienda de Mandaluyon is fake 21.5 SOS to Enlightenment movement NOTES 22.1 Titulo Informacion already passed PD 892 22.2 Titulo Informacion constitutes 173,000 has. 22.3 Looking back for clarity 22.4 SC approved plan of Titulo Informacion Possessoria 22.5 Spanish title alone can validate large estates 22.6 E-movement to hold vigil for Titulo Informacion 22.7 Other properties within Titulo Informacion 22.8 Rizalist to Struggle More Determinedly 22.9 Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc. 22.10 PIADECO lost case in ownership of the San Pedro estate
Page 8
TOUCH ME NOT!
[Now, a clarification is immediately needed in order to explain that the December 31, 1996 ''en banc'' Decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in GRs 103727 and 106496 is not applicable to Don Alejandro San Pedro, whose judicial declaration[iv] as "true legal heir" and "next of kin" of Don Mariano San Pedro in Spec. Proc. Case 312-B is the result of the sustained and affirmed order of Judge Oscar Fernandez in the heirship issues in GR 103727; and the (fake) extrapolated TP 4136 that Judge Fernandez nullified is the one pleaded by Petitioner/Appelee ''alias'' Don Engracio San Pedro (''nee'' Pedro Ignacio) to have been issued in April 29, 1894.[v] The original and true Spanish titles of the San Pedro estate consisted of the TITULO COMPOSICION CON EN EL ESTADO for Don Marianos own concrete latifundio in Norzagaray, Bulacan, and as well as the TITULO INFORMACION POSSESSORIA for the Enlightenment project
Page 9
of such 173,000 has. altruistic encomienda in the national capital region of Dr. Jose Rizal. The TITULO COMPOSICION CON EN EL ESTADO, particularly, was found authentic by NBI Doc. Examiner Antonio Rotor; was approved twice by Judge Emmanuel Munoz in 1971 and 1972 in Land Reg. Cases N-1861 & N-1876; was respectively issued with Decrees 137745 and 139093; was issued with Torrens titles or two OCTs O5797 and O-5617; and finally, has passed the strict requirements of the PD 892 for Spanish titles, and has now become imprescriptible, perfect, and valid till the end of time.]
HISTORY OF RIZALISTS CO-OWNERSHIP OF THE VAST LAND OF THE GREATER SAN PEDRO ESTATE
The history of the Rizalists communal co-ownership of the vast land, is the history of the greater San Pedro estate, and of the revolutionary but peaceful 'Enlightenment project of Dr. Jose Rizal.[vi] It all started with the tragic fiasco committed by the Dominican friars in 1887, when against the pleadings of the 200 farmers opposing the increase of rent in the face of poor harvest, the religious order disregarded their must for benevolence and compassion, and instead went wayward ordering Gen. Valeriano Weyler to evict the poor farmers from their homes, including the family of Dr. Jose Rizal, whose home and other buildings on the farm were all torn down.[vii] It was too much to bear; even adding to painful memories of his mother's maltreatment by the Catholic church prelates in 1871--who ordered Dona Teodora to the cold prison without a hearing, and made to walk ten miles (16-km.) from the town of Calamba to Sta. Cruz.[viii] It was a very dramatic and sad event that happened that day, most particularly for Dr. Jose Rizal and his family. Dr. Rizal had just returned from Germany, where he ably finished his course in Opthalmology, and also caused his dramatic novel Noli Me Tangere to be published.[ix] He was a fast rising political figure at that time. And the church authorities seemed envious and threatened. He had earlier joined the Freemasonry in Spain, and it was like he was seeking for powerful allies in this kind of event in his life.[x] Dr. Jose Rizal was actually leading the way of a determined intellectual aiming for change in his own Motherland as he chose to side with the progressive disciplines of liberalism, freemasonry and Enlightenment.[xi] These were also the great social forces that had then taken the upper hand in Spain and in Europe.
Page 10
and a known ally to Gov. Gen. Ramon Blanco. With him was Don Ignacio Conrado, a Castillian Mason, who would become the respected Supremo of the Vanguardia Rizalista. They had come for very meaningful subject: how to prevent the continued occurrence of such land-related incidents, and to forestall the situation to exacerbate into serious agrarian unrest. The brother Masons were seeking to develop a most timely and effective measure that would strike at the heart of the build-up problems of the natives. Thus, together with Dr. Jose Rizal, with seriousness of purpose, the brother Masons had broached and came upon a peaceful social formula;--it was actually an encompassing venture for such visionary national industrialization, that would then very well serve to constitute the missing "Enlightenment project" for the illustrious enlightenment Masonic movement.
Page 11
and industrialize the land. They were willing to sacrifice to secure the vast land that they needed. They wouldnt want to have anything to do with the lands held by the Roman church. There will be a need to establish schools that will instruct for science & technology away from the control of the church. And while the funding is too important, this can be readily procured from out of the vast land to be acquired from the government.
NOTA BENE!
(The only link the people might have known of the cautious Enlightenment project was the mortgage deal of the vast land between Don Mariano and Don Conrado, as had been undertaken pursuant to the Maura law procedure.[xviii] What they never knew was the deeper involvement of Dr. Rizal in the reserved Enlightenment project with his Freemason brothers who were mostly Spanish subjects, known among them were Don Mariano San Pedro and Don Ignacio Conrado. It was so sensitive and guarded, involving as it did the operation of Freemasons to whisk the imperious thunder from out of the powerful friars--since theyre burning incense to the sentiments of the natives against the civil govt.; and the plan involved the acquisition of vast tract of land to make a productive Utopian industrial estate that would draw the energy and talents of the natives. To involvedSpanish-subjects the effort was meant to secure Spanish rule much away from home. But as it turned, the Enlightenment project would have been a peaceful master stroke to solve the problem of its misrule, at a time when the world was caught up with revolts for liberation of colonies.)
Page 12
THE PROMULGATION OF THE ROYAL DECREE OF 1894 (or THE MAURA LAW)
The news went that the awaited Royal Decree that will award the land would allow for adjustment of second grant of larger ''encomienda'' for altruistic enlightenment projects of Spanish subjects in the colonies.[xix] And soon enough, in 1894, (as Dr. Rizal had adjusted his life to banishment in Dapitan, pursuing lucrative practice of his profession, and on top of all had won a big prize in lottery), the awaited Royal Decree of 1894 (Maura law) was finally promulgated, and was issued in the same year with liberal Rules and Regulations for implementation by Masonic Gov. Gen. Ramon Blanco. But the Rules & Regulations required that only natural persons were qualified to apply, and juridical persons, associations, (and sole corporations and churches, including Orders like Dominican, Augustinian, Jesuit, etc.) were disqualified to secure grant from the said Royal Decree of 1894.[xx] The most qualified in the group to own bigger land was Don Mariano San Pedro y Esteban, a Spanish subject, an enlightenment Masonic brother, liberal, and with known achievements in public civil works in support of the Civil Government. The plan was for Don Mariano San Pedro to secure (his own) first grant of a modest ''latifundio'' in the old Norzagaray (Bulacan) from the Civil Government, and then to seek its adjustment in the Maura law procedure for a second grant of an altruistic ''encomienda'', which is much bigger and greatly more extensive, enough for the Utopian Enlightenment project of the (Masonic Enlightenment) group, and this would be perfected through the legal ''hipoteca'' (mortgage) transaction with the Spanish Mortgage Law. The fund to finance the latter transaction would come from the providential lotto prize winning of Dr. Jose Rizal, courtesy of the undisclosed maneuver of the Masonic Utopian group.
Page 13
Page 14
THE MAURA LAW MUST HAVE BEEN SPAIN'S LAST DITCH EFFORT TO INTRODUCE REFORM IN ITS COLONIAL RULE
The Maura law must have been the try of Spain to appease the natives in the colonies. It is known all over the world that the Enlightenment movement in Europe had somewhat transformed the imperial states, and became the hope for reform in the colonies. Only the conservative church, mired in ignorance, superstition and corruption, was persistent in its tyrannical rule, exacting high rents and retributions from the natives. The prohibition in Maura law against the juridical persons (also associations, corporations and sole corporation) seemed aimed against the tyrannical church, and its Orders: Augustinians, Dominican, Jesuits, etc.) Because of Maura law the land was freed from their monopoly, which caused them to hate Dr. Jose Rizal, and caused him to suffer death. With the Maura law, the Masonic (mostly Spanish subjects) became the new ''principalia'' that would have presided the enlightenment and the modernization and industrialization of the colonies. (Much like the concept of the Zaibatzu in Japan, blended with the Protestant work ethic and industry of the pioneer settlers in California that brought about the superior Silicon Valley phenomenon.) The situation in the Philippines would have been set for the modernistic rule of the Enlightenment Masonic forces, with Dr. Jose Rizal in the lead.[xxii] But the Church instigated the killing of Dr. Jose Rizal, and this was sadly responded with violent revolution by the illustrious Katipunan of Gat Andres Bonifacio.
Page 15
Page 16
EXEMPTION FROM GRs 103727 & 106496, AND THEIR MANIFEST ERRORS
(We surmise that the Hon. Supreme Court may have preceded from a wide of the mark premise, and may have been grinding away at varying facts, warped in having a judicious agenda which they needed to indulgently stand all along, or simply having highbrow fit at that time. But how can we plea the seeming ignoring by the Hon. Supreme Court of the existence of the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado of the San Pedro estate for the 4,700 has. concrete latifundio in Norzagaray, Bulacan, in one hand, and on the other hand,the informacion possessoria particularly of the hypoteca contrat0, registered with the Spanish Mortgage Law (and therefore giving rise to the veritable Spanish land titlethe Titulo Informacion Possessoria), for the 173,000 has. encomienda,--except that such was the most classic case of the working of the best feature of the Maura Law..allowing for the adjustment of land grant for purposes of an award of an altruistic encomienda. (But for what purpose was that encomienda for, and whose bidding was it? They never asked!) They ignored, and they didnt care to find out, because the altruistic encomienda was for the Enlightenment project favored and chosen by Dr. Jose Rizal!
Page 17
'''BUT FIRST''', it is not true that the Spanish Titulo of the San Pedro estate was not registered with Act 496, and therefore it is not also true that the said Titulo has not complied with the requirements of Pres. Decree No. 892. Through the very orderly Land Registration Cases Nos. N-1861 and N1876 (being cases ''in rem''), bearing Questioned Documents Report 230163 submitted by Antonio B. Rotor, NBI Documents Examiner (with report of authenticity on the Questioned Document, in possession of Prudential Bank, under Safety Deposit Box 145), the lands under the Spanish title (Titulo Composicion con en el Estado) have been issued with Torrens OCT O-5797 with Decree No. 137745 issued on Dec. 6, 1971, and OCT O-5617 with Decree No. 139093 issued on March 28, 1972. '''SECOND''', what was at issue in the notorious San Pedro cases should be the dual Spanish titles of the San Pedro estate, viz. the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado and the Titulo Informacion Possessoria, not the Titulo Prop. 4136 (allegedly issued in April 29, 1894), because there is no Spanish title of that sort on record. It is informed that that Titulo 4136 was patently extrapolated by the criminals ignorantly seeking to impress with "large numbers" sought to be apparent on its face, (while the original one, the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado, issued in April 25, 1894, held strength in the smaller first grant of ''latifundio'' of 4,700 has. extant on its face without need for alteration, to be only adjusted within a strict time period, to a second grant of an ''encomienda'' thru Maura Law). It was the altered April 29, 1894 Titulo Prop. 4136 described in the Questioned Document Report 448-977 of Sept. 2, 1977 that was presented by shady character named Segundo Tabayoyong based on mere tainted xerox copies. (The original April 25, 1894 Titulo Composicion was very orderly and officially examined in said Questioned Documents Report 230-163 submitted in Jan. 28, 1963 by NBI Doc. Examiner Antonio Rotor, with no report of errors.) '''THIRD''', it is not true that "the original of Titulo Composicion of the San Pedro estate was never presented in Court". The said original Titulo Composicion had been presented many times in fact-finding Regional Trial Courts, exactly to determine its genuineness and authenticity. It was bared before Judge Emmanuel Munoz, which caused him to issue same with decree for release of Torrens title. It was exhibited to Judge Benigno Puno which caused him to adjudicate on 70,000 has. in Quezon province in favor of San Pedro heirs. It was presented to Judge Juan Echeverri to ably decide the San Pedro cases in his impeccable Sala. In fact, the original Titulo Composicion with 4,700 has. on its face, without need for alteration, was originally examined very regularly by NBI with a report of genuineness and authenticity. And before it disappeared, it was stolen by Wilfredo Torres in Prudential Bank in Manila, for which he was prosecuted in Manila CFI (Crim. Case 68810) for Estafa and Theft, was imprisoned and made to pay P100,000,000 representing the value of the document. The world knows, and the undisputable official LRA record shows that the 'original and 'basic Spanish titulo of the San Pedro estate is nothing else but the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado issued on April 25, 1894 for
Page 18
the first ''latifundio'' grant equivalent to 4,700 has. in the old Norzagaray. (Please see the LRA Record in LRC Nos. N-1861 and N-1876). The second Spanish title of the San Pedro estate is the Titulo Informacion Possessoria that came about with the registration with the Spanish Mortgage Law of the informacion possessoria of the hypoteca contrato as proof of the official adjustment award of a second grant of an altruistic ''encomienda'', under the procedure in the 1894 Maura lawnecessarily through the legal ''hipoteca'' transaction in Dec. 03, 1894 between Don Mariano San Pedro and Don Ignacio Conrado under Spanish Mortgage Law, ''i.e.'' over 173,000 has. for altruistic and illustrious Enlightenment project of the Rizalistas and the Masonic Utopian group. All laws were complied for both the first ''latifundio'' grant of 4,700 has. in old Norzagaray, Bulacan, and the second (adjustment) grant of an altruistic ''encomienda'' of 173,000 has. '''FOURTH''', these San Pedro cases in G.R.s 103727 and 106496 are about criminal parties corrupting and prostituting our legal system to satisfy their greed. The claimant-heirs led by Don Engracio San Pedro, are fake claimant-heirs, with Don Engracio San Pedro only used as an ''alias'' by criminal person whose real name was 'Pedro Ignacio. Why he was allowed with unclean hands this far to vent his criminalities is the wonder of privileged Philippine justice system. (The judicially declared 'next of kin and 'true legal heir of Don Mariano by Spl. Proc. Case 312-B was Don Alejandro P. San Pedro, was not made a party in said Supreme Court cases, since the "appealed Order of Judge Fernandez" in G.R. 106496 was instrumental in his final declaration as the next of kin and true legal heir of Don Mariano San Pedro (by Spl. Pr. 312-B), thus making his interest in the said cases allied with government, while being pensively dissuaded to intervene in said San Pedro cases by Hon. Justice Vicente V. Mendoza.) (And the Spl. Pr. Case 312-Bs declaration of Don Alejandro as 'next of kin and 'true legal heir of Don Mariano is given imprimatur by Hon. Supreme Court, themselves, by their ''en banc'' Resolution of Jan. 26, 1989.) And while the Appellants-Petitioners in these cases are criminal, the Respondents Aurelio Ocampo, Dominador Buhain and Teresa dela Cruz had likewise criminally conspired to landgrab. They were able to secure from the Registry of Deeds of Quezon City titles to portions of the San Pedro estate, particularly Transfer Certificate of Titles (TCTs) Nos. 1386, 8982, 951975-951977, 313624, 279067, 1412, 353054, 372592, 149120, 86404, 17874-17875, all emanating from the invalid Original Cert. of Title (OCT) 614 and TCTs 255544 and 264124, both derivatives of the notorius OCT 333; (2) that the aforesaid defendants were able to acquire ownership of portions of the estate through deceit, fraud, bad faith and misrepresentation; (3) that OCT 614 and 333 had been cancelled by and thru final and executory decision dated March 21, 1988 in relation to letter recommendations by Bureau of Land, Bureau of Forest Devt., the Solicitor General, in regard to Central Bank (CB) Circulars dated April 7 & 23, 1971, Sept. 12, 1972 and June 10, 1980. There is a failure of justice, here! The Philippines is crying for justice, here!
' ''FIFTH''', the set-up would have been alright that the dishonest and unlawful San Pedro claimants are well contained in the pool-proof system of the Honorable Supreme Court, without involving and linking the legal and legitimate estate of Don Mariano which the state and the government also owe the duty to protect, ''i.e''. by virtue of ''parens patriae'' and the property rights of helpless citizens. The Hon. Supreme Court will just have to prosecute all criminals now in its jurisdiction, without favoring anyone, as theyre all with unclean hands. After all, the Hon. Supreme Court have already determined the next of kin and true legal heir of Don Mariano--who had founded the Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, for the good of the country, and through his holographic Will probated in 1994 had invested this with virtually the whole of the San Pedro estate to make good that objectivewithout any complaint from his heirs. (The setting up of the Philippines Silicon Valley project in Norzagaray, Bulacan was the principal instruction of Don Alejandro to his three sons--but now only two remain today.) The registration of the April 25, 1894 Titulo Composicion with Act 496 could not have been ignored by Hon. Supreme Court, after all, it is of Judicial Notice to them; and its compliance with PD 892 is all but ''fait accompli''. It is only when the Hon. Supreme Court sought to involve the lawful San Pedro estate and tried to obliterate it, that the facts of its ruling became jumbled and appeared confused.
Page 19
THE SAN PEDRO ESTATE HAS NOW BECOME A PERFECT LAND ESTATE WITH COMPLETE SPANISH TITLES THAT HAVE PASSED THE STRICT REQUIREMENTS OF PRES. DEC. 892
They cant possibly void the San Pedro estate because it is a natural adjunct of the remains of Don Mariano E. San Pedro, particularly as recipient of the two valid Spanish land titles: viz. the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado and the Titulo Informacion Possessoria. ''Titulo Composicion con en el Estado'' of April 25, 1894, because its two land registration cases with the Torrens system in 1972, in the time of Dictator who tried to slay it, are cases ''in rem'' that have notice to the whole world. And as a result, the question of validity of Spanish titulo issued on April 25, 1894, after the same was duly examined and found in order by Land Reg. Court in ''in-rem'' proceedings, has become ''res judicata.'' The Titulo Informacion Possessoria itself had also passed the strict requirements of PD 892 particularly by virtue of Original Cert. of Title 374 of the Register of Deeds of Bulacan, issued in 1910 and with Decree No. 4627 under Plan II-668, Accession 178829, consisting of 18,982,262.4387 sq.mtrs, and as well as also by virtue of Original Cert. of Title 4134[xxiii], with Plan II-987, Accession No. 178829, consisting of 10,982,745 sq.mtrs., under Decree no. 602939, located in Brgys. Mayamot, San Isidro and Cupang, in Antipolo.
Page 20
Therefore, the said ''en banc'' Decision of Hon. Supreme Court, in so far as it prejudiced the San Pedro estate and its two valid Spanish titles (viz.: the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado and the Titulo Informacion Possessoria), is in fact ''ultra vires'' on its part; and, hence, it acquired no jurisdiction on said San Pedro estate and its two Spanish land titles. Forcing the issue would result into grave abuse of discretion that would result into lack of jurisdiction. The Hon. Supreme Court cannot now Order a new trial to correct its mistake because doing so will starkly result to double jeopardy against judicially confirmed next of kin and true legal heir of Don Mariano San Pedro. Neither the Hon. Supreme Court can promulgate today, ''motu propio'', a new judgment to correct the previous one where it erred because of stark absence of fair trial, and therefore would be lacking and be without due process. And, indeed, the validity of April 25, 1894 ''Titulo Composicion'' has become ''res judicata'' after it passed strict examination in L.R. Cases N1861 & N-1876, which are cases ''in rem'' that acquired notice and jurisdiction to the whole world, and as proof thereof have resulted the issuance of the OCTs 0-5617 and 0-5797, together with equally perfect and valid TCTs that have now passed to third parties who are "innocent purchasers for value." By its registration with the Land Reg. Act 496, and particularly by its compliance with the strict requirements of Pres. Decree 892, the San Pedro estate has now become a perfect land estate, with perfect land titles, titles which are imprescriptible, unvoidable, free from laches, and valid till the end of time.
Page 21
Page 22
procedure now adopted by Hon. Supreme Court in arriving at its conclusion that TCTs 77652 and 77653 were derived from OCT 351 contrary to what is stated in the faces of said TCTs, finds no support in law as it amounted to a correction and/or alteration of the TCTs in violation of existing applicable law. Under Sec. 112 of Act 496 (now Sec. 108, PD 1529), no TCT or OCT may be amended or altered except upon order of proper Regl. Trial Court". Please see the Dissenting Opinion of Justice A. Bidin in G.R. 97197. (Justice Bidin exposed such grave prostitution of law, which is so unprecedented!)
Page 23
Page 24
NOTES:
The San Pedro Estate and its Two Spanish Titles Already Passed the Strict Requirements of Pres. Dec. No. 892
WHATEVER the landdeveloper-landgrabbers, the corrupt government agencies, the envying persons that abhor the San Pedros and the Rizalists, those who do not feel convenient the Rizalistas gaining power and the San Pedros nothing but prestige, and the ignoramuses that do not know a bit about land law, say about Spanish titles is now academic, because the Spanish titles of the San Pedro estate (viz.: the Titulo Composicion con en el Estado and the Titulo Informacion Possessoria) are already registered with Land Registration Act 496, and has passed the strict requirements of Presidential Decree 892.
Page 25
Who dares say, no Spanish titulo is allowed by law anymore? What for is the strict requirements for compliance by P.D. 892, IF COMPLIANCE THEREAT WOULD NOT RESULT TO THE NEEDED AUTHORIZATION TO PURSUE OWNERSHIP OF THE REST OF VAST LANDS OF THE LEGAL ESTATE? What is this, PD 892 would promise exemption from its harsh rules upon difficult compliance, only to retake the land, or give it to somebody else? Only the Spanish titles of the San Pedro estate had passed the requirements of PD 892 for its vast lands in Norzagaray, Bulacan and the Central region of the Philippines, nothing else! It is because, only the San Pedro estate and its two Spanish titles has passed the strict requirements of stringent Maura Law (for large estates in the central region), nothing else! The Maura law is the last legal system of Spanish Land Registration. All big lands must have been registered in Maura law. And changes perforce must be recorded with its heralded system of land adjustment. (After Maura law, all previous systems of Spanish title of land ownership, if there be any, are no longer honored.)
Page 26
Page 27
This is the Location Plan of the San Pedro estate (per Titulo Informacion Possessoria) recognized by the Hon. Supreme Court as "notoriously claimed" by San Pedro Heirs, which is "kind" as it is in accord with law on land ownership. This is the only time Hon. Supreme Court exhibited in SCRA a "MAP OF LAND CLAIM AND OWNERSHIP", and emphasized its most legal "public,notorious, adverse to whole world" claim of land ownership.
Page 28
Page 29
Rizalists to Struggle Determinedly for Enlightenment Using the Titulo Informacion Possessoria
The Rizalists will struggle determinedly to bring about greater Enlightenment in the world today. This will need for greater effort of the Enlightenment movement to strengthen their vigilance to Dare to Know! And to Fight the Infamous Things! The infamous things are the perplexing injustices, poverty, ignorance, superstitution, and graft and corruption. The Enlightenment wealth and its basis in the land of Titulo Informacion Possessoria (that has been possessed and placed under cultivatorship by our forbears), shall be usedto continue the peaceful social revolution started in the Enlightenment project of Dr. Jose Rizal.
PIADECO and other groups lost their cases in attempting to own San Pedro estate
THE FABIAN CASTILLO GROUP and PIADECO lost their San Pedro heirship case in the jurisdictional and fact-finding Spl. Proc. Case 312-B (Br. 15,
Page 30
RTC, Mal., Bul.), and it is not the only group that now traces their San Pedro claim thru Don Conrado Ignacio "mortgage". They are preceded in this claim by Maria Socorro Tandag. Sadly, they also all lost their cases in the RTC up to the Hon. Supreme Court. (Pls. ref., ''inter alia'', to Dir. of Forstry. vs. Munoz, SCRA 1968, and the Oct. 11, 1977 fact-finding ruling/ Order in jurisdictional SPC 312-B, Br. IV, Fifth Judicial District, CFI, Baliuag, Bul., ''viz'': "Assuming the estate of Don Mariano failed to redeem the mortgage in favor of Don Conrado within the redemption period of ten years, it is the latter or his heir who had lost the right to collect the indebtedness of Don Mariano after the lapse of the prescriptive period of 10 years and, therefore, the mortgage action against the Estate in ques-tion had expired and the full ownership thereof had remained in the Estate as the encumbrance thereon had been eliminated after the lapse of the prescriptive period for Conrado to institute the mortgage action; Conrados claim in Intervention is manifestly sham and frivolous because there is no law which makes the mortgagee ''ipso facto'' the owner of the property mortgaged upon the mortgagors failure to pay the debt or mortgaged upon the mortgagors failure to pay the debt or redeem the mortgaged property; on the contrary, it is the right of the Conrados to collect or enforce the mortgage that prescribed after the lapse of ten years (Art. 1142 NCC)". XXX.ACCORDING TO EVIDENCE which remains uncontradicted, the Conrados were able to appropriate and benefit from the Estate some income thereof, the total value of which far exceeds the total indebtedness of Don Mariano; considering this uncontradicted evidence and in the light of the character of the "Contrato", it would seem quite clear that the contract between Don Mariano and Ignacio Conrado is one of "antichresis"; it becomes, therefore, the obligation of the Conrados to apply the harvests and income they derived from the Estate in payment of the indebtedness of Mariano San Pedro (Art. 2132 to Art. 2139, NCC); hence, it would seem from the evidence, that the obligation of Don Mariano E. San Pedro, if there was any, involving the Estate in question had already been fully paid or extinguished; moreover, there likewise remained unrebutted and uncontroverted (Tsn, pp. 3, 4 & 5, hearing of Feb. 4, 1977) to the effect that Don Conrado had already accepted more than P100,000.00 for the redemption of the property which was mortgaged to him by Don Mariano.) WITH THEIR TITULO INFORMACION POSSESSORIA MORTGAGE CLAIM AS THEIR BASIS, the groups identified with Don Conrado Ignacio, particularly PIADECO, continue to hold on to the San Pedro estate, and to which they further add-up thedouble II plans and as well as certainSwo plans acquired by Don Ignacio Conrado in the course of his possession and management of the mortgaged Titulo Informacion Possessoria. The Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation has now legally requisitioned the so called estate of Don Ignacio Conrado inclusive of the mortgaged Titulo Informacion Possessoria of Don Mariano E. San Pedro, and as well as its expansion with double II plans, and others. These are such an immense volume of wealth & property, and when totally controlled by the San Pedro Foundation and the Enlightenment movement, can change our course in history, regain for us our honor, and change our destiny as a nation.
Page 30
Page 31
The Philippines Enlightenment Movement is hereby established in the same office with the Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc., and The Enlightenment University System, under the following address: No. 35 Guerrero Street, Taguig City 1638, Tel.: 839-7014, Mobile: 09308765751, E-mail: theenlightenmentmovement @gmail.com.
By: The PHILIPPINES ENLIGHTENMENT MOVEMENT Prof. Arturo D. San Pedro, Administrator of the Estate DON MARIANO E. SAN PEDRO FOUNDATION, INC. No.35 Gurrero Street, Taguig City, Metro-Manila 1638 arturosanpedro@ymail.com 839-7014 09207355333--this mobile was lost in October, 2012. 09308765342my new temporary mobile--Arturo SP, but was lost in Manila snatching incident in Aug., 2013. 09308765751--my very new mobile no.--Arturo SP.
ENDNOTES
_____________ *Those Rizalists with Chivalric Code of Honor attached to La Liga Filipina and the Philippines Enlightenment Movement. [i] Intes, Erlinda B. The Spiritual Bread, yesterday, today & tomorrow: The Rizalist Sovereign and Supreme Pontiffhis youthhood, prophesies, visions, miracle works, and messages, SRLVM, Manila, 2012, p. 163. [ii] Craig, Austin. Lineage, Life and Labors of Jose Rizal: Philippine Patriot, Philippine Educ. Co., Manila, 1913; The Project Gutenberg EBook #6867, Release: Jan. 8, 2005, p. 163-164. Here, Craig said: The justice of the peace of Kalamba, before whom the case first came, was threatened by the provincial governor for taking time to hear the testimony, and the case was turned over to the auxiliary justice, who promptly decided in the manner desired by the authorities. Mercado at once took an appeal, but the venal Weyler moved a force of artillery to Kalamba and quartered it upon the town as if rebellion openly existed there. Then the court representatives evicted the people from their homes and directed them to remove all their buildings from the estate lands within twenty-four hours. In answer to the plea that they had appealed to the Supreme Court the tenants were told their houses could be brought back again if they won their appeal. Of course this was impossible and some 150,000 pesos worth of property was consequently destroyed by the court agents, who were worthy estate employees. Uninvolved tenants were forbidden to shelter them under pain of their own eviction. [iii] Intes, p. 113-114. [iv] With Supreme Court imprimatur through its ''en banc'' Resolution dated Jan. 26, 1989.
Page 32
[v] This fake April 29, 1894 TP 4136 is patently fabricated as examined in 1983 by NBI Document Examiner, Segundo Tabayoyong as it obviously sought to expand the area. Please see the NBI Questioned Document Report No. 448-977 dated September 2, 1977. (Compare with the original Titulo Composicion con en el Estado issued in April 25, 1894, which held strength in smaller first grant of ''latifundio'' of 4,700 has. extant on its face without need for alteration, to be only "adjusted" within a strict time period to a second grant of an encomienda through Maura law (i.e., to give way to Titulo Informacion Possessoria). This unaltered document was examined in 1965 and found authentic by NBI Document Examiner Antonio Rotor. This was approved by Judge Munoz in 1971 in L.R. Cases N-1861 & N-1876, and was issued with 2 Decrees, and with 2 OCTs. This original Titulo Composicion of April 25, 1894 passed strict requirements of PD 892, and become imprescriptible, perfect and valid till the end of time.) [vi] San Pedro, Arturo D. The Philippines Enlightenment project, Pamphlet, DMESPFI, Manila, 2012. [vii] Puno, Chief Justice Renato. Rizal and the Justice System, The Cable Tow, Vol 73. No.5, (from a Speech delivered in November 16, 1996 Plaridel Masonic Temple in a symposium on Rizal jointly sponsored by the Scottish Rite Masons of the Philippines and the Knights of Rizal). If secular injustice was bad, sectarian injustice was worse. The Rizals were Catholics but they were not of the see-noevil, speak-no-evil variety. While in Spain, Rizal realized that the friars were the problem and not the solution to the problem in the Philippines. He wrote the Noli Me Tangere exposing the abuses of the friars. The shaft of Noli shattered the once sacred halo of the friars. Noli provided the powerful friars the casus belli against Rizal. Their rage escalated to an inferno when Rizal again denounced the corruption of the Dominicans in the Calamba estate affair. The Calamba estate originally belonged to the Jesuits. Initially, it covered only a small part of the town. Its ownership passed to the Dominicans. Soon, the Dominicans expanded its area and the estate covered almost the whole of Calamba. But while the estate was growing more and more in size, the Dominicans were paying less and less in taxes. The stink was picked up by the nose of the authorities and the Civil Governor of Laguna was instructed by Governor-General Terrero to start an inquiry. The tenants of the estate, which included the Rizal clan, sought the assistance of Dr. Jose Rizal. Rizal painstakingly investigated the facts about the hacienda and revealed the misdeeds of the Dominicans in a public meeting. Some 60 families were emboldened by the courage of Rizal and they petitioned the Governor-General to draw up more equitable lease agreement between them and the Dominicans. Historian O.D. Corpuz observed that this was the ...first agrarian reform proposal in Filipinas. But Austen Coates observed that it was the beginning of the end for Rizal for he was attacking the friars on their most sensitive point --- money. Predictably, the Dominicans struck back hard. They castigated the alcalde for not placing the town under martial law. In response, the alcalde sought permission to arm the militia. He used the dreaded guardia civil to monitor the movements of the people. The people were also warned by the Dominicans that if they were not obedient, the dire chastisement of God would fall upon them within not many days. The show and use of force did not break the will of the tenants. The wily Dorninicans then shifted their strategy. They decided to use the courts of law to eject the tenants. They filed ejectment cases in the court of Laguna. They won as
Page 33
expected. Rizal's brother, Paciano, and his brother-in-law, Manuel Hidalgo, did not easily give up the fight. They led the tenants appeal to the Real Audiencia in Manila. Again, they lost their appeal but they continued knocking at the door of justice. Paciano prepared the final appeal to the Tribunal Supremo in Madrid. He requested Rizal to fly to Madrid to assist in the appeal. They expected the highest court of Spain to be less biased against the Filipino tenants. The Dominicans shattered their last remaining hope. They jumped the gun on the high tribunal. They forced the eviction of the tenants before their appeal could be decided. Governor-General Weyler sent a detachment of artillery to Calamba. The tenants were given 24 hours to leave or their houses would be either destroyed or burned. The Dominicans themselves chose which house to destroy and which house to burn. The quick wrecking operation rendered some 300 families landless and homeless. Among the victims, the family of Rizal was hardest hit. Rizal's parents had to take refuge in the house of their daughter Narcisa. Paciano was forcibly deported to Mindoro. Manuel Hidalgo was arrested as a filibustero and then deported to Bohol. Other brothers-in-law were hunted and driven to live the lives of outlaws. Rizal's mother bore the ire of the friars. She was arrested and for the second time was slapped a false charge. The charge was for improperly using the surname Alonzo. She was ordered to be imprisoned at Santa Cruz, which could be reached more convenienfly by boat via Laguna de Bay. She offered to pay her boat fare and that of her escort. She was refused. They compelled her to walk the long distance. She did though she was then 64 years old and almost blind. It took her four days to complete her journey to jail. Upon seeing her pitiable state, the civil governor of Sta. Cruz immediately ordered her release. She then fled to Hongkong where her husband Francisco and son Paciano had earlier escaped. The experience shattered the faith of Rizal's mother. In a letter to Bluementritt, Rizal wrote: It is a lamentable consequence of Dominican hatred that my aged mother, who was so pious and religious, now herself says that she can believe no more. She says everything is a fraud." [viii] Craig, p. 88-90. Now comes a disgruntled judge, who had not received the attention at the Mercado home which he thought his dignity demanded. Out of revenge he ordered Mrs. Rizal to be conducted at once to the provincial prison, not in the usual way by boat, but, to cause her greater annoyance, afoot around the lake. It was a long journey from Kalamba to Santa Cruz, and the first evening the guard and his prisoner came to a village where there was a festival in progress. Mrs. Rizal was well known and was welcomed in the home of one of the prominent families. The festivities were at their height when the judge, who had been on horseback and so had reached the town Page 88earlier, heard that the prisoner, instead of being in the village calaboose, was a guest of honor and apparently not suffering the annoyance to which he had intended to subject her. He strode to the house, and, not content to knock, broke in the door, splintered his cane on the poor constables head, and then exhausted himsel f beating the owner of the house. Anyone who cares to know just how ridiculous and inconsistent the judicial system of the Philippines then was would do well to try to unravel the mixed details of the half dozen charges, ranging from cruelty through theft to murder, which were made against Mrs. Rizal without a shadow of evidence. One case was
Page 34
trumped up as soon as another was finished, and possibly the affair would have dragged on till the end of the Spanish administration had not her little daughter danced before the Governor-General once when he was traveling through the country, won his approval, and when he asked what favor he could do for her, presented a petition for her mothers release." [ix] Ibid., p. 131. The printer of Noli Me Tangere lived in a neighboring street, and, like most printers in Germany, worked for a very moderate compensation, so that the volume of over four hundred pages cost less than a fourth of what it would have done in England, or one half of what it would cost in economical Spain. Yet even at so modest a price, Rizal was delayed in the publication until one fortunate morning he received a visit from a countryman, Doctor Maximo Viola, who invited him to take a pedestrian trip. Rizal responded that his interests kept him in Berlin at that time as he was awaiting funds from home with which to publish a book he had just completed, and showed him the manuscript. Doctor Viola was much interested and offered to use the money he had put aside for the trip to help pay the publisher. So the work went ahead, and when the delayed remittance from his family arrived, Rizal repaid the obligation. Then the two sallied forth on their trip. [x] Ibid., p. 123. Thru Spaniards who still remembered Joss uncle, he joined a lodge of Masons called the Acacia. At this time few Filipinos in Spain had joined the institution, and those were mostly men much more mature than himself. Thus he met leaders of Spanish national life who were men of state affairs and much more sedate, men with broader views and more settled opinions than the irresponsible class with whom his school companions were accustomed to associate. A distinction must be made between the Masonry of this time and the much more popular institution in which Filipinos later figured so largely when Prof. Miguel Morayta became head of the Grand Lodge which for a time was a rival of that to which the Acacia owed allegiance, and finally triumphed over it. [xi] Puno, op. cit. Dr. Jose Rizal joined Freemasonry by affiliating with Acasia Lodge No. 9 of the Gran Orientede Espaa.[Cable Tow, Vol. 73, No. 2, July-Aug 1996, Rey Fajardo,] His affiliation with Freemasons was not without significance. As accurately observed by Coates, "...in the light of the bitter opposition of the Span. Church to Freemasonry, this move on his part cant but suggest the adoption of more extreme position in respect of the church; and remembering that the political problem of the Phils. was predominantly an ecclesiastical one, the move may in part reflect his diminished faith in the policy of assimilation." [Coates, Rizal, Filipino Nationalists and Patriot, 1992 ed., Coates, p. 175] Rizal's alliance with freemasons and freemasonry which was then growing by leaps and bounds in the Phils. influenced his future course of action. (Cable Tow, V. 73, No. 2,JulyAug. 1996 issue featuring Masonry and the Phil. Revolution by R. Fajardo, p.13.) [xii] Op. cit., Craig, 137. Then, Governor-General Terrero (personally) summoned Rizal by telegraph to Malacaan from Kalamba. The interview proved to be due to the interest in the author of Noli Me Tangere and a curiosity to read the novel, arising from the copious extracts with which the Manila censors had submitted an unfavorable opinion when asking for the prohibition of the book. The recommendation of the censor was disregarded, and General Terrero, fearful that Rizal might be molested by some of the many persons who would feel themselves aggrieved by his plain picturing of undesirable classes in the Phils., gave him for a bodyguard a young Spanish lieutenant, Jos Taviel de Andrade (who would later become Military Advocate of Dr. Rizal in his rebellion trial).
Page 35
[xiii] Ibid., p. 150-152. [xiv] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Industrial_Revolution [xv] Rizal, Dr. Jose, El Filibusterismo/The Reign of Greed, translated to English by Charles Derbyshire, Manila, 1912, p. 6 of Chapter 39. [xvi] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Rizal#Rizal.27s_Alma_Mater [xvii] Possession and/or cultivation of the land are required by law from applicants for land registration and title. Please see the Maura law [ infra]. [xviii] Ibid. The Maura law required the encomienda land secured through adjustment of title to be registeredd in the Spanish Mortgage law which may then form part of the Informacion possessoria called for in the law. [xix] The news was received with mixed emotions. The natives themselves were mostly oblivious of whatever the new law may bring. But the church people and the friars were visibly furious of the intent of the law. [xx] This is the result of the prohibition in the Maura law against juridical persons and corporations (even the church) from securing grant from the new law. The privilege of owning a latifundio with the right of adjustment for a second grant of land, even of an encomienda, is virtually reserved to trusted Spanish subjects (some say controlled by the Masonic group to assure enlightenment reign or loyalty to newly reformed Spain), which had been hoped to constitute the new enlightened principalia in the colonies. [xxi] Please see December 31, 1996 en banc Decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in GRs 103727 and 106496. [xxii] Had the Philippines been spared from the fashion of reckless revolution at the time, and had the Enlightenment project pushed, the Philippines by now would have been among the developed countries of the world. (It was about the same period that Californias Silicon Valley started to develop its foundational industrial institutions.)
Sta. Barbara Subdivision of Mrs. Ming Ramos and Pres. Fidel Ramos in Cupang, Antipolo that the Ramoses had used this title (OCT 4134), with conveyance from certain heir of Don Mariano San Pedro, to implement the said subdivision. [xxiv] Please anticipate the release shortly of: Planning the Enlightenment Project in the PhilippinesWith a Three-Volume General Project Feasibility Study Report (PFSR) to establish the Four-Thousand and Seven-Hundred (4,700) has. area, between San Jose Del Monte City and Norzagaray, Bulacan, as the (Vol. I) Silicon Valley 1 (Special Economic Zone of PEZA), and to develop the said 4,700 has. area into sustainable international scientific community (Cybercity), which is wholly declared first as a general zone of Eco-tourism, centered in 445 has. (Vol. II) Utopia (Paradise City of the Future) as the model international-integrated-scientific community, and which together, in turn, are focused on the domineering (Vol. III) ThEUS (The Enlightenment University System), as the University of Highest Philosophy and Most Advanced Science & Technology, that will own and manage the whole Silicon Valley 1 Special Economic Zone of PEZA, including the Utopia Paradise City of the Future. [xxv] G.R. No. 91797 August 7, 1992, Widows & Orphans Assoc., Inc. vs- Court of Appeals and Ortigas & Co. Ltd. Partnership. _____________
I.REPOSSESSED FROM THE PRESUMPTUOUS AND USURPING ESTATES (INCLUDING THE APPREHENDED ESTATE OF DON IGNACIO CONRADO, PLS. SEE MUNOZ VS. DIRECTOR OF FORESTRY)--THIS SUMMARY OF THE RESTORED LEGAL LAND HOLDINGS, EMANATING ORIGINALLY FROM THE TITULO INFORMACION POSSESSORIA OF THE ESTATE OF DON MARIANO E. SAN PEDRO, HELD PRIOR REPOSSESSION: FROM 1894 - 2014, WITH S.C. DECISION IN MUNOZ VS. DIR. OF FORESTRY 1. Land title O.C.T. No. 374, with land Plan II-191, and Decree No. 4627, located in the Province of Bulacan;
2. Land title O.C.T. No. 4134, with land Plan II-987, Accession No. 178829, consisting of 10,982,745 sq.mtrs., under Decree no. 602939, located in Bo. Mayamot and San Isidro, Antipolo; Survey conducted on August 1-27, 1909, which was Approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 3. Land title O.C.T. No. 8815, with Land Plan No. II-PSU3236, consisting of 652,563, in Las Pinas, Rizal; 4. Land title T.C.T. No. 57, from O.C.T. No. 374, with Plan II-668, Accession No. 178829, under Decree No. 4974, consisting of 18,982,262.4387, located in the Provinces of Rizal, Tayabas (Quezon), with Survey conducted on Aug. 220, 1909, and approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 5. 6. 7. Land title T.C.T. No. 7957, with a parcel of land located in Malolos, Bulacan; Land title T.C.T. No. 7958, with a parcel of land located in Polo, Bulacan; Land title T.C.T. No. 59504, with a parcel of land located in Bo. Pugad Lawin, Las Pinas, Rizal; Land title T.C.T. No. 17168/T162, with a parcel of land located in Bo. Pugad Lawin, Las Pinas, Rizal; A parcel of land under land title T.C.T. No. 7937;
8.
9.
10. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-96, consisting of 12,000,000 sq.mtrs., located in Kalookan, Balara, Quezon City 11. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-31006; 12. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-156896, located in Marikina; 13. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-193142, located in Norzagaray, Bulacan;
14. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-86649, located in Nueva Ecija; 15. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-86650, located in Nueva Ecija; 16. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-86651, located in Nueva Ecija; 17. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-86652; 18. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-86653; 19. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13517; 20. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-796170; 21. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-15347; 22. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13445; 23. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13527; 24. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-14917; 25. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-15241; 26. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-15193; 27. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-10538; 28. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-15133; 29. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13533; 30. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13502; 31. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-1141; 32. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13208; 33. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13518; 34. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-13352; 35. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-9758; 36. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-135, Accession No. 369932, consisting of 180,875,113, located in San Fernando, Romblon;
37. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-129, Accession No. 369131, consisting of 57,000,500, located in Panabo and Kapalong, Davao; 38. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-136, Accession No. 370022, consisting of 22,000,000, located in Bo. Sto. Tomas, Davao del Norte; 39. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-629, Accession No. 178820, consisting of 149,350,000, located in Gamu, Isabela; 40. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-629; 41. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-629; 42. A parcel of land under Plan II-650, Accession 178993, area of 22,440,451 sq.mtrs., located in Cagayan, Tuguegarao; Survey approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 43. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-650; 44. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-650-A; 45. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-650-A, Accession No. 369982, with area of 10,285,525 sq.mtrs., located in Caralucod, Nabbotoan, Solana, Cagayan Luz; Survey conducted on Aug. 2-31, 1909, approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 46. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-560-A; 47. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-695; 48. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-695, and with a land area consisting of 14,989,867 sq.mtrs., located in Kalookan, Rizal; Survey conducted on Aug. 231, 1909, approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 49. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-695, consisting of 5,758,675, located in Mandaluyong, Rizal; Survey conducted in 1909, approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 50. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-195; 51. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-196; 52. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-667; 53. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-669; 54. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-779;
55. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-1501; 56. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-977, Accession No. 179038, with land area consisting of 3,109,667 sq.mtrs., located in San Rafael, Montalban, Rizal; Survey conducted on June 2-8, 1909, and approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 57. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-977, Accession No. 178848, with land area consisting of 11,233,436 sq.mtrs., located in Payatas, San Mateo, Rizal; Survey conducted on June 2-8, 1909, approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 58. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-977, Accession No. 179049, with land area consisting of 10,146,187 sq.mtrs., located in Kulliat, Kalookan, Rizal; Survey conducted on June 2-8, 1909, approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 59. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-977, Accession No. 370017, with land area consisting of 4,305,492 sq.mtrs., located in Tullahan, Novaliches, Kalookan, Rizal; Survey conducted in 1909; 60. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-977, Accession No. 370002, with land area consisting of 3,701,771 sq.mtrs., located in Novaliches, Kalookan, Rizal; Survey conducted on June 2-8, 1909, approved on Oct. 5, 1909; 61. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-977, Swo-13205, and Decree No. 76548, with land area consisting of 825,548 sq.mtrs., located in PSD, Pasong Putik, Novaliches, Q.C.; Survey conducted on Aug. 15-30, 1965; 62. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-977, and Swo-13247, with land area consisting of 906,726 sq.mtrs., located in Novaliches, Kalookan, Rizal; Survey conducted on Sept. 28, 1925, approved on Oct. 17, 1928; 63. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-987, Accession No. 369788, with land area consisting of 27,108,872 sq.mtrs., located in Bosoboso, Antipolo, Rizal; Survey conducted on Oct. 1-19, 1909; 64. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-987, Accession No. 369462, with land area consisting of 27,894,672 sq.mtrs., located in Bosoboso, Antipolo, Rizal; Survey approved on Dec. 21, 1909; 65. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-1877, Accession No. 118846, with land area consisting of 19,127,820 sq.mtrs., located in Novaliches, Kalookan, Rizal; Survey conducted on June 1-30, 1909, approved on Sept. 28, 1909; 66. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-1877; 67. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-1877, Accession No. 367646, with land area consisting of 33,002,256 sq.mtrs., located in Pasong Tamo, Novaliches, Rizal; Survey approved on Sept. 20, 1909;
68. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-9271, Accession No. 371250, with land area consisting of 106,620,055 sq.mtrs., located in Poblacion, Davao (Minbanao); Survey conducted on Feb. 17, 1909, approved on Nov. 18, 1909; 69. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4747, Accession No. 368925, with land area consisting of 2,969,870 sq.mtrs., located in San Roque & Mayamot of Marikina and Antipolo; Survey conducted on June 7-12, 1909, and approved on Oct. 12, 1909; 70. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4747, Accession No. 571221, with land area consisting of 23,494,644 sq.mtrs., located in Marikina and Antipolo, Rizal; Survey conducted on June 7-12, 1909, approved on Oct. 12, 1909; 71. A parcel of land under Plan II-4747, Accession 369924, area of 153,220 sq.mtrs., located in Tondo, Manila; Survey approved on Oct. 12, 1909; 72. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4747, Accession No. 369923, with area of 2,929,870 sq.mtrs., located in San Roque & Mayamot of Marikina and Antipolo; Survey conducted on June 7-12, 1909, approved on Oct. 12, 1909; 73. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4747; 74. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4747, Accession No. 178819, with land area consisting of 85,681,027 sq.mtrs., located in Lucban, Tayabas; Survey approved on Aug. 31, 1909; 75. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-989; 76. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4667, with Accession No. 369734, with a land area consisting of 15,516,840 sq.mtrs., located in Pasig, Rizal; Survey conducted on Dec. 1-6, 1909, approved on Dec. 7, 1909; 77. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-434, with Accession No. 369736, with a land area consisting of 67,280,856 sq.mtrs., located in Subic and Olongapo, Zambales; Survey conducted on Sept. 1-4, 1909, approved on Oct. 19, 1909; 78. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4347, with Accession No. 369465, with an area of 54,609,306 sq.mtrs., located in Sta. Rita, Cabalan, Olongapo, Zambales; Survey conducted on Sept. 1-4, 1909, approved on Oct. 19, 1909; 79. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4347, with Accession No. 369954, with a land area consisting of 9,103,291 sq.mtrs., located in Sta. Rita, Olongapo, Zambales; Survey conducted on Sept. 1-4, 1909;
80. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4810, Accession No. 178337, with land area of 10,533,789 sq.mtrs., located in Baguio, Benguet, Mountain Province; Survey conducted on May 1-24, 1909, approved on Sept. 21, 1909; 81. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4810, with Accession No. 37360, with a land area consisting of 3,720,523 sq.mtrs., located in Baguio, Mountain Province; Survey conducted on May 1-24, 1909, approved on Sept. 21, 1909; 82. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4810 83. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4509, with Accession No. 31015, with a land area consisting of 1,569,109 sq.mtrs., located in Pangasinan; Survey conducted on Aug. 1-13, 1909, approved on Oct., 1909; 84. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4738, with Accession No. 332774, with a land area consisting of 71,773 sq.mtrs., located in Marikina, Rizal; 85. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-47386, with an area of 129,294 sq.mtrs., located in Payatas, San Mateo, Rizal; Survey approved on Sept. 28, 1909; 86. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-5017, with Accession No. 178824, with a land area consisting of 154,331,875 sq.mtrs., located in San Pablo (Laguna); Survey conducted on April 5-16, 1909, approved on Aug. 13, 1909; 87. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-2003, with a land area consisting of 9,973,575 sq.mtrs., located in Sambogan, Calatagan, Batangas; Survey conducted on Aug. 1-12, 1909, approved on Oct. 19, 1909; 88. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-Psu-3236, with a land area consisting of 652,563 sq.mtrs., located in Pamplona, Las Pinas, Rizal; 89. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-Psu-12450, with Accession No. 227983, with a land area consisting of 950,000 sq.mtrs.; 90. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4736; 91. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4757; 92. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4739; 93. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-3727; 94. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-4616; 95. A parcel of land under Plan No. II-3003; 96. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-8845;
97. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-43517; 98. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-15352; 99. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-1288; 100. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-1873; 101. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-1861; 102. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-6563; 103. A parcel of land under Plan No. Swo-50589; 104. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-258946; 105. A parcel of land under Plan No. Psu-203358, with a land area consisting of 775,776 sq.mtrs., located in Sampaloc, Tanay, Rizal, Surveyed on May 1-23, 1953, approved on May 23, 1953. 4. THAT this adjudication includes other segregated properties that proceed from, or held apart from the Titulo Informacion Possessoria of December 3, 1894, as they have been owned or held and possessed actually and constructively by apothecaries or trustees, in such a manner that is open, public, continuous, and notorious, in the concept of owner, which may hereinafter found and located as part of the Estate of Don Mariano E. San Pedro; 5. THAT also included herein are lands and properties of San Pedro estate, particularly those in Norzagaray, Bulacan, and the old expansive territories of Bulacan, which have later been incorporated to recent provinces of Rizal, Quezon, and Metropolitan Manila, which are likewise considered segregated and of high repute as part of San Pedro estate, that can stand side by side, either independently or together with Titulo Informacion Possessoria and Titulo Composicion con en el Estado, and also constantly bearing ultimate qualifications to meet the requirements of acquisitive prescription, by virtue of inheritance or succession, or by standard description in land registration process under Act 492, "that the lands have been obtained in good faith and have been possessed in the concept of owner, in a manner that is continuous, public, open, notorious, against the whole world, since time immemorial" first by Don Mariano E. San Pedro, and subsequently by his heirs in actuality or constructively through apothecaries and trustees until the present time; 6. That the decedent Don Alejandro P. San Pedro, Sr. left no debts, while the herein true legal heirs of Don Mariano E. San Pedro and as well as the legal devisee (i.e, Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc.), to the best of their undivided interests, through the herein Administrator and Executor, are hereto
adjudicating the foregoing entire estate jointly unto themselves, including other segregated and bona-fide properties therein that may heretofore be discovered and determined; 7. That, except for personal properties (Land Bank Capital Bonds which have been recognized by the Honorable Supreme Court in their Resolution en banc of Jan. 29, 1989 and in GRs 103727 and 106496), the foregoing described lands, will have been declared for taxation purposes on the basis of said Land Bank Capital Bonds that amount in totality to P1,600,000,000.00, even as the almost whole said San Pedro estate by the University-Foundation Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc. shall be assigned and allocated to The Enlightenment University System (ThEUS), which is exempt from paying taxes, as the whole said San Pedro estate will be sought development, and shall be totally utilized by the said Enlightenment University System to revive the stupendous Enlightenment project of Dr. Jose Rizal for the benefit of the country and the Filipino people. NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Sect. 1, Rule 74 of the Rules of Court, I, the Administrator/Executor of testate estate of Don Alejandro P. San Pedro, Sr., jointly with the judicially arbitrated estate of Don Mariano E. San Pedro, hereby adjudicate and by virtue of this instrument, have ADJUDICATED unto the herein true legal heirs of Don Mariano E. San Pedro and as well as in behalf of the legal devisee (i.e, Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc.a university-foundation, in behalf of the foundation-university The Enlightenment University System), UNTO themselves, hereby causes and TAKE RESPONSIBILITY OF THIS ADJUDICATION OF ALL THE FOREGOING PROPERTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS THEREON. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto signed my hand in the City of Manila this ___th day of January, 2014, in the presence of two (2) witnesses.
SGD. ARTURO SP. D. SAN PEDRO, Affiant Chairman/President, Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc. Attorney-in-fact, with GPA of Heirs of Don Mariano E. San Pedro Executor/Rep.of Last Will&Testament of Don Alejandro SanPedro Administrator of Joint Estates of Don M.E. & Don A.P. San Pedro
__ SGD._____________________________
(Witness)
___________ *i.e., referring, inter alia, to Director of Forestry vs. Munoz, 23 SCRA 1968, and the Oct. 11, 1977 fact-finding ruling/Order in jurisdictional Spec. Proc. Case 312-B, Br. IV, Fifth Judicial District, CFI, Baliuag, Bul., viz: Assuming that the estate of Mariano San Pedro failed to redeem the mortgage in favor of Ignacio Conrado within the redemption period of ten years, it is the latter or his heir who had lost the right to collect the indebtedness of Mariano San Pedro after the lapse of the prescriptive period of ten years and, therefore, the mortgage action against the Estate in question had expired and the full ownership thereof had remained in the Estate as the encumbrance thereon had been eliminated after the lapse of the prescriptive period for Ignacio Conrado to institute the mortgage action; Conrados claim in Intervention is manifestly sham and frivolous because there is no law which makes the mortgagee ipso facto the owner of the property mortgaged upon the mortgagors failure to pay the debt or redeem the mortgaged property; on the contrary, it is the right of the Conrados to collect or enforce the mortgage that prescribed after the lapse of ten years (Art. 1142 NCC). xxxaccording to evidence which remains uncontradicted, the Conrados were able to appropriate and benefit from the Estate some income thereof, the total value of which far exceeds the total indebtedness of Mariano San Pedro y Esteban; considering this uncontradicted evidence and in the light of the character of the Contrato, it would seem quite clear that the contract between Mariano San Pedro y Esteban and Ignacio Conrado is one of antichresis; it becomes, therefore, the obligation of the Conrados to apply the harvests and income they derived from the Estate in payment of the indebtedness of Mariano San Pedro y Esteban (Art. 2132 to Art. 2139, NCC); hence, it would seem from the evidence, that the obligation of Don Mariano, if there was any, involving the Estate in question had already been fully paid or extinguished; moreover, there likewise remained unrebutted and uncontroverted (Tsn, pp. 3, 4 & 5, hearing of Feb. 4, 1977) to the effect that Ignacio Conrado had already accepted more than P100,000.00 for the redemption of the property which was mortgaged to him by Don Mariano San Pedro y Esteban; this amount was paid by persons who claim to be the heirs of said descendant. ___________________
**Final justice is poetic justice. And lastly, since the syndicates and the unscrupulous malefactors of the San Pedro estate have greatly abused and exploited the name of our beloved Don Mariano E. San Pedro, i.e. in amassing hundred thousand hectares, and in adversely occupying vast tracts of land (as inventoried in the 1976 Order of Judge Fernandez), and in the collection of double II plans in the name of Don Ignacio Conrado: it is the stand of this representation and of the Don Mariano E. San Pedro Foundation, Inc., in regard to ownership of those lands, that: The law on agency holds! And we declare, that, howsoever much they have acquired and no matter how far they have gone to abuse and exploit the name of Don Mariano San Pedro, there will we come over to prosecute the interest of the San Pedro estatewhich is now owned, administered and
held in trust by the Don Mariano San Pedro Foundation, Inc. - Sharing a legacy dedicated to Phils. progress and world understanding; and much more by the peaceful revolutionary tradition (but dont you misinterpret) of LA LIGA FILIPINA, Rizalista Vanguardia del Patria Adorada! __________ (SUCH IS THE NATURE OF THE ESTATE OF THE DECEASED. Before its final execution in a will or the termination of its administration, it partakes of a dynamic character, enabling it to grow by virtue of sound management by a succession of its administrators or tenants or their voluntary counterparts, or a windfall may come from nowhere to enrich it more. Or that due to bad management, the estate is dissipated; but if there is a showing of fraud or bad faith, the administrator, trustee or tenant, voluntary or not, he alone becomes responsible; and like in agency and as implied trustee, his gains in using the name and body of the estate redound not to him but always to the estate, while he alone suffers, and shall be prosecuted for the loss and damage he incurred and voluntarily committed.--Adapted from varied legal definitions given to estate of the deceased by Blacks Law Dictionary.)
_____________