Profitability of Momentum Strategies in the International Equity Markets

Kalok Chana Allaudeen Hameedb Wilson Tonga

a

Department of Finance Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Clearwater Bay, Hong Kong
b

Department of Finance and Banking Faculty of Business Administration National University of Singapore Singapore 119260

September 1999

* Correspondence to: Kalok Chan, Department of Finance, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, Tel: 852-2358-7680, Fax: 852-2358-1749, Email: kachan@ust.hk. We thank Hank Bessembinder, Jennifer Conrad, Mike Cooper, Grant McQueen, Anthony Richards, Geert Rouwenhorst, an anonymous referee, and seminar participants at City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and 1998 AFA meetings in Chicago for helpful comments. Chan and Hameed acknowledge the financial support from the Fund for Wei Lun Fellowships (HKUST) and Academic Research Grant (NUS).

Abstract This paper examines the profitability of momentum strategies implemented on international stock market indices. Our results indicate statistically significant evidence of momentum profits. The momentum profits arise mainly from time-series predictability in stock market indices, and very little profit comes from predictability in the currency markets. We also find higher profits for momentum portfolios implemented on markets with higher volume in the previous period, indicating that return continuation is stronger following an increase in trading volume. This result confirms the informational role of volume and its applicability in technical analysis.

I.

Introduction
An extensive body of recent finance literature documents that stock returns are

predictable based on past price history.

Numerous studies examine the profitability of

trading strategies that exploit interdependence of time-series returns and show that these strategies could lead to abnormal returns. For example, Jegadeesh and Titman (1993)

document that over a horizon of three to twelve months, past winners on average continue to outperform past losers by about one percent per month, showing that there is momentum in stock prices. There are two possible explanations for the momentum effect. First, stock prices underreact to information. Chan, Jegadeesh and Lakonishok

(1996) show that stock prices respond gradually to earnings news and that a substantial portion of the momentum effect is concentrated around subsequent earnings announcements. Hong, Lim, and Stein (1999) find that underreaction of stock prices depends on analyst coverage, which is pronounced with bad news. Second, investors tend to flock together. The herding behavior is documented by several studies. For example, Grinblatt, Titman, and Wermers (1995) find that the majority of mutual funds purchase stocks based on their past returns, namely by buying past winners, and that funds showing the greatest tendency to buy past winners also tend to invest more intensely with the crowd than other funds do. Also, Lakonishok, Shleifer, and Vishny (1992) find

evidence of pension fund managers either buying or selling in herds, with slightly stronger evidence that they herd around small stocks. Several recent studies evaluate the profitability of the strategy for international equities. Rouwenhorst (1997) finds that momentum strategies are profitable for equities in 12 European markets, and Rouwenhorst (1999) also reports that emerging market stocks exhibit momentum. On the other hand, Bekaert, Erb, and Harvey, and Viskanta (1997) find that momentum strategies are not consistently profitable for emerging markets, although they perform better when the investable indexes are examined. In this paper, we extend the analysis of momentum strategies to the global equity markets, and contribute to the literature as follows. First, we implement the momentum strategies based on individual stock market indices. As a growing number of international

equity funds gain access to foreign equity markets, portfolio managers have to make topdown decisions on international asset allocations. In fact, Keppler (1990) and Macedo (1995) document the potential benefits of style investment strategies applied to country selection. By analyzing momentum strategies based on stock market indices, this paper examines whether these strategies are useful for country selection. Second, we examine how the profitability of international momentum strategies is affected by exchange rate movements. Profits from international momentum investment portfolios depend on the interrelationship between the currency and equity markets. Consider a U.S. investor who implements a momentum strategy that involves buying British stocks when the value of British stocks increases (in terms of U.S. dollars). The value of her portfolio depends on how the equity and currency markets affect each other. If, for example, British pounds tend to appreciate following a rise in the British equity market, the U.S. investor profits when she liquidates the British stock portfolio and converts back to U.S. dollars. Similarly, if the value of British stocks tends to increase following British pound appreciation, the U.S. investor also profits. In both cases, the

momentum profits do not come from return continuation in the equity market, but from the interdependence between the currency and equity markets. In this paper, we analyze whether international momentum profits are attributable to this interdependence. Third, we investigate whether trading volume information affects the profitability of momentum strategies. Volume has long received attention from technical analysts who believe that volume data provides important information about future price movements. There is a common belief that it takes volume to move prices. Without sufficient trading volume, stock prices may underreact to information. Thus, if a country underreacts to information on low trading activity, the momentum strategy applied to this country will be profitable. Several theoretical papers also show that traders can learn valuable information about securities from past volume information (Grundy and McNichols (1990), Blume, Easley, and OHara (1994), and Campbell, Grossman, and Wang (1993)). A few empirical papers also document that trading volume does contain information about future stock prices. Conrad, Hameed, and Niden (1994) find that high-volume securities

experience price reversals, while low-volume securities experience price continuations. Gervais, Kaniel, and Mingelgrin (1998) show that individual stocks whose trading volumes are unusually large (small) tend to experience large (small) subsequent returns. Lee and Swaminathan (1998) illustrate that past trading volume predicts both the magnitude and persistence of future price momentum and, over intermediate horizons, price momentum strategies work better among high volume stocks. Nevertheless, as these studies are on individual stocks, it is unclear if similar results will hold for our momentum strategies that are implemented on stock market indices. The paper is organized as follows. Section II presents the framework of analysis of momentum strategies. Section III presents the empirical results. Section IV presents robustness tests, and Section V concludes the paper.

II.
A.

Analysis of Momentum Strategies

Basic Momentum Strategies The formulation of the trading strategies is similar in spirit to the strategies

formulated by Lehmann (1990), Lo and MacKinlay (1990) and Conrad and Kaul (1994). The portfolio weights for the trading strategies are determined by the past performance of the asset relative to the average performance of all assets being considered. However, in contrast to previous studies that consider buying or selling individual stocks, our strategies are to long or short individual stock market indices. Therefore, we assume that there is no restriction for investors in trading portfolios of stocks in individual markets worldwide. Investors who do not have positions in individual markets might not be able to implement such strategies because, in some markets, short-selling of equities is prohibited or stock index futures are not available. These strategies are, however, useful to international money fund managers who need to reallocate funds across different markets. We consider, from the perspective of a U.S. investor, the trading strategies for N equity markets in period t. Since our strategies are implemented on foreign stock indices, the profit from investing in foreign markets has to be converted into U.S. dollars.

Consequently, exchange rate movements will also be considered explicitly in the determination of portfolio weights. If Rit denotes the U.S. dollar return from investing in stock index i at time t, rit denotes the local currency return at time t, and eit denotes the percentage rate of change of local currency price (relative to U.S. dollars) at time t, then Rit rit + eit. We consider an investor who buys or sells stocks at time t, based on their performance at time t-1. Let wit (k) denote the fraction of the momentum portfolio devoted to stock index i at time t, where k is the number of weeks between time t-1 and t. The momentum portfolio is constructed by evaluating the performance of stock index i with the other stock indices at time t-1: (1) wit(k) = 1 [Rit-1 - Rmt-1] , N

where Rmt-1 (=

1 N Rit-1) is the cross-sectional average of stock index returns across N N i =1 The portfolio weights are consistent with the philosophy of

markets at time t-1.

momentum strategies whereby an investor in period t will long the winner countries and short the loser countries of the period t-1. Since the portfolio weights are proportional to the differences between the individual stock market returns and the cross-sectional averages, countries that deviate more from the average at time t-1 will have greater (absolute) weight in the time t portfolio. By holding the position in period t, the investor will earn a profit equal to t(k) = i =1

wit(k) Rit(k). Since

i =1

wit(k) = 0, this strategy will lead to a zero cost portfolio.

The aggregate investment long and short in the zero-cost strategies at time t, It(k), is given by (2) It(k) = i =1

|wit(k)| .

Since the arbitrage strategies are zero-cost ones, the portfolio weights can be arbitrarily scaled to obtain any level of profits in a frictionless world. Therefore, we need to assess the economic significance of the profits, beyond the statistical significance. We will

calculate a return measure, which is to divide the expected profits by the length of the holding period and by the amount of investment in the long or short position, i.e., E(t(k)) /(0.5*k*It(k)). This return could be interpreted as the per-period profits for every dollar invested in the long or short position for the arbitrage strategy. It could also be interpreted as the difference in per-period returns between the winner and loser portfolios.

B.

Decomposition of Momentum Profits We could decompose the profits from the momentum strategies into the equity

component, the currency component, and some interaction components. 1 1 N Since Rit rit + eit, wit(k) = [(rit-1 +eit-1) - (rmt-1 + emt-1)], where rmt-1 = rit-1 N N i =1 and emt-1 = as: (3) t(k) = i =1 1 N eit-1, the profit from the momentum strategy in period t can be expressed N i =1
N

wit(k) Rit(k)

1 N { [(rit-1 + eit-1) - (rmt-1 + emt-1)] [rit + eit] } N i =1

N N 1 { (rit-1 - rmt-1) rit + (rit-1 - rmt-1) eit + N i =1 i =1

i =1

(eit-1 - emt-1) rit +

i =1

(eit-1 - emt-1) eit } .

Taking expectations of both sides, the expected profit to the momentum strategy E(t(k)) can be decomposed into four components: (4) E(t1(k)) =
2

1 N E{(rit-1 - rmt-1) rit } N i =1

1 N E(t (k)) = E{(rit-1 - rmt-1) eit } N i =1

E(t3(k)) = E(t4(k)) =

1 N E{(eit-1 - emt-1) rit } N i =1 1 N E{(eit-1 - emt-1) eit }. N i =1

The first component, E(t1(k)), reflects profits due to predictability of equity returns based on past equity performance. The component is positive if the equity market, which

performs better than average in period t-1, is expected to rise further in period t. The second component, E(t2(k)), reflects profits due to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past equity performance. The component is positive if a country whose equity

market performs better than average in period t-1 experiences currency appreciation in period t. The third component, E(t3(k)), reflects profits due to predictability of equity

returns based on past exchange rate performance. The component is positive if a country whose currency appreciates (relative to a basket of currencies) in period t-1 experiences a rise in the equity market in period t. The fourth component, E(t4(k)), reflects profits due to predictability of exchange rate returns based on their past performance. The component is positive if a country whose currency appreciates (relative to a basket of currencies) in period t-1 experiences further currency appreciation in period t.

C.

Market Capitalization-Weighted Momentum Strategies In the previous momentum strategies, the amount invested (or shorted) in one

market depends on how much the individual stock market out-performed (or underperformed) the world market. For some small and illiquid markets, the size of the position (long or short) could be unrealistic and not in proportion to the capitalization of the markets. To overcome this problem, we construct another set of momentum strategies that take into account the market capitalization weights. The portfolio weight for country i is computed as: (5) wMit(k) = hit-1 [Rit-1 - Rmt-1] ,

where hit-1 is the market capitalization weight of country i at time t-1, with

i =1

hit-1 = 1.

Since the portfolio weights depend on hit-1, an investor will not take a very large long or short position in the small markets even if they out-perform or under-perform the world market significantly. Since i =1

wMit(k) = 0, these new weights will also lead to a zero cost

momentum investment portfolio.

III. A.

Empirical Results
Data We obtain from PACAP datatape, the equity market indices for Thailand, Taiwan,

Malaysia and Indonesia while the remaining equity indices are taken from Datastream. Table 1 lists the 23 sample countries, along with their equity market indices and the length of the sample period. Of the 23 countries, nine are from the Asia-Pacific (Australia, Hong Kong, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia), eleven are from Europe (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, UK), two are from North America (Canada and U.S.), and one from Africa (South Africa). Except for Austria, South Africa and Indonesia, the sample period is from 80/1/1 to 95/6/30, a span of more than 15 years. The analyses are conducted based on stock indices denominated in U.S. dollars. The index values are converted from foreign currencies to U.S. dollars based on daily exchange rates retrieved from Datastream. In addition, we collect trading volume for these countries. Except for six countries (Belgium, Denmark, Italy, S. Africa, Spain, and Switzerland), we are able to obtain volume measures in terms of either turnover or dollar volume. Given that these stock markets operate in different time zones with different trading hours, their rates of return on a given calendar day may, in fact, represent the returns realized over different time periods. However, since we conduct the analysis using weekly data or data sampled less frequently, this reduces the potential estimation biases arising from non-synchronous data. To reduce further the non-synchronous data bias, the weekly

interval is defined differently for the evaluation period and holding period. holding period, a week is taken to begin on Thursday and end on Thursday.1

For the

evaluation period, a week is taken to begin on Wednesday and end on Wednesday. For the Since the

evaluation period ends before the holding period starts, this guarantees that the trading strategies do not use price information of any countries from the holding period.

B. Profits to Momentum Strategies We first implement the basic momentum strategies. In period t, we long the winner countries and short the loser countries, and the portfolio weights are constructed based on equation (1). We use five different holding periods k, where k equals 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 12 weeks and 26 weeks. 2 We calculate the aggregate momentum profits across all countries at time t as i(k) = i =1

wit(k) Rit(k), where N is the number of countries. In addition to calculating the total

profits to the momentum strategies, we decompose them into the four profit components as discussed in Section II.

1. Whole Sample Period Table 2 reports the results for the whole sample period. The average of total momentum profits (t) is 0.0024 cents for 1-week interval, 0.012 cents for 2-week interval, 0.020 cents for 4-week interval, 0.035 cents for 12-week interval, and 0.195 cents for 26week interval. The table also contains the z-statistics that are asymptotically distributed as N(0,1), under the null hypothesis that the true profits are zero, and are corrected for
1

For the evaluation period, if the beginning (ending) Wednesday is a holiday, then the weekly interval begins (ends) on Thursday (Tuesday). For the holding period, if the beginning (ending) Thursday is a holiday, then the weekly interval begins (ends) on Friday (Wednesday). The length of the evaluation period is the same as the holding period. For example, for a 4-week holding period strategy, we form momentum portfolios based on the past 4-week performance of the countries. We have also done sensitivity tests by varying the holding period, while keeping the length of the evaluation period constant. In general, we find that the momentum profits decrease with the length of the holding period.

heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation based on Newey-West adjustment (1987). In general, the first profit component (t1) is much higher than the other profit components - it contributes more than 90% of total profits for the 1-week holding period, and more than 80% for the 2-week and 26-week holding periods. This indicates that predictability within the equity markets is the most significant source of momentum profits. In contrast, the contribution of the second component (t2 ) and the fourth component (t4) to the momentum profits is relatively small. Finally, the third profit component (t3) has a negative contribution to the momentum profits for the 12-week and 26-week holding periods, indicating a negative relationship between lagged exchange rate returns and equity returns. Therefore, the evidence indicates that even taking into account exchange rate fluctuation does not add much to momentum profits. To assess the economic significance of profits, we calculate the weekly returns by dividing total profits by the length of the holding period and by the total investment long or short, i.e., t(k) /(0.5*k*It(k)). One way to interpret the weekly returns is that they

represent the difference between the weekly returns of the winner portfolios and loser portfolios. Table 2 shows that the weekly returns are statistically significant (with z-

statistics of bigger than two) except for the 12-week holding period, and the magnitudes are quite high for short holding periods. For example, the average of weekly returns is 0.48% for the 2-week holding period, and 0.25% for the 4-week holding period. In other words, the difference between the returns of winner and loser portfolios is at least 0.25% per week. Therefore, an active global asset allocation strategy that reallocates an equity

investment from loser countries to winner countries in accordance with our momentum strategies for every 2 to 4 weeks will outperform a passive buy-and-hold strategy by at least 1% per month. To gauge whether the significance tests are sensitive to the assumption of N(0,1) for the test statistics, we also conduct bootstrap simulations in which the returns of stock market indices are scrambled simultaneously, in an attempt to eliminate any time-series relations, while maintaining cross-market correlations. We implement momentum

strategies on 2000 boostrap samples, and calculate the p-values which measure the

proportion of times the simulated profits are greater than the actual profits. The bootstrap results are even stronger. For example, the p-values are 0.1%, 0%, 0%, 7.3% and 1.3% for the weekly returns of the 1-week, 2-week, 4-week, 12-week, and 26-week holding periods. The momentum returns remain statistically significant (at 5% level) for all

except the 12-week holding period.

2. Post-1985 Period If the success of momentum strategies is due to market segmentation, we would expect the momentum strategies to be less profitable in a more recent sample period when many countries allowed more foreign investors to access their stock markets. For instance, Japan abolished some capital market restrictions in the 1980s (see Bosner-Neal, Brauer, Neal and Wheatley (1990) and Gultekin, Gultekin, and Pentai (1989)), and a number of emerging markets removed or relaxed restrictions on foreign equity ownership in the 1990s (see Bekaert (1995)). To check the sensitivity of our results, we implement momentum strategies using the data after January 1, 1985. The choice of the post-1985 period is adhoc, and simply reflects our intention to keep a reasonably long sample period in order to maintain the power of the test. As there may be concern that the emerging markets were still segmented in late 1980s, we will perform additional robustness tests by excluding emerging markets from the analysis [see Section IV below]. The post-1985 results are reported in Table 3. They are generally comparable to those for the whole sample period. The first profit component (t1) remains the most important in the contribution to the overall profits. There is no evidence that the momentum strategies are less profitable for a more recent sample period. On the contrary, the overall profits and weekly returns in the post-1985 period are slightly higher for holding periods from 2 weeks to 26 weeks than in the full-sample period.

3. Risk Adjustment for Individual Countries Profits In this section, we examine whether all countries earn significant momentum profits after adjusting for world beta risk. First, we compute the momentum profit for country i at

10

time t as it(k) = wit(k) Rit(k). We then normalize the momentum profit by dividing it by the aggregate investment long or short in the zero-cost strategies (It(k)). The normalized
' momentum profits ( * it ) are then regressed on the excess world market return (R mt ) :

(6)

' * it = i + i R mt + it .

The estimate of i from the regression measures abnormal profits of country i. By stacking the above regression equation for all countries, we have a multivariate regression model system where we assume the disturbances (it ) to be independent and identically distributed within each equation, but allow them to be heteroskedastic and contemporaneously correlated across equations. The system of regressions is estimated

with generalized least squares. To allow comparability across countries, we use the post1985 period when all 23 countries have data observations. Results are reported in Table 4. To save space, only abnormal profits (alphas) are reported. For the 1-week holding period, the alphas are small and close to zero for most of the countries. The joint test that alphas are zero for all countries cannot be rejected at the 5% significance level. The alphas become higher for the 2-week and 4-week holding periods - 19 and 17 countries have positive alphas - and the joint test that alphas are zero can be rejected at the 1% significance level. For the 12-week and 26-week holding periods, the abnormal profits disappear, and quite a number of countries have negative alphas. Therefore, our evidence indicates that simple beta risk adjustment could explain most of the profits at long horizons, but not at short horizons (2 and 4 weeks).

C. Profits to Market Capitalization-Weighed Momentum Strategies To implement market capitalization-weighted strategies, we obtain the year-end market capitalization for the 23 countries during the 1980-1994 period from a factbook published by the International Finance Corporation. Ideally, we would like to construct momentum portfolio weights in accordance with equation (5) and based on market capitalization weights in the previous year. However, since we do not have market capitalization data for 1979, we will use the market weights at the end of 1980 to construct

11

the portfolio weights during 1980. Since the market capitalization weights do not change dramatically within a year, we think that using the ex-post market capitalization data for only one year (1980) will not bias the results substantially. We do not report the market capitalization weights here. However, it should be noted that several countries dominate the world stock market capitalization. Throughout the whole sample period, the five largest stock markets (U.S., Japan, United Kingdom, France, and Germany) account for about 75% of the world market capitalization. The market capitalization weights of the remaining countries are therefore quite small. For example, in 1994, the ten smallest stock markets (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Indonesia, Italy, Norway, Spain, Singapore, South Korea and Thailand) accounted for only 10% of the world market capitalization. If momentum profits arise mainly from the small and illiquid markets, then the momentum strategies that take into account market capitalization weights could become unprofitable. Table 5 reports profits to market capitalization-weighted momentum strategies. The overall profits are generally smaller than the profits of previous momentum strategies that are not based on market capitalization weights. Nevertheless, the returns from the market capitalization-weighted strategies remain statistically significant for the short holding periods. We also analyze the profits from buying winners and selling losers separately. We find that buying winner portfolios yields significant profits consistently, but selling loser portfolios creates either insignificant profits or losses.

D. Effects of Trading Volume on Momentum Profits In this section, we examine the role of trading volume in momentum strategies. Several theoretical papers conjecture that there is a relation between trading volume and predictable patterns in short-horizon security returns. Blume, Easley and OHara (1994) show that volume provides information that cannot be deduced from the price statistic and demonstrate that traders who use information contained in the volume statistic will do better than traders who do not. Campbell, Grossman and Wang (1993) argue that because the variations in the aggregate demand of the liquidity traders also generate large

12

levels of trade, volume information can help distinguish between price movements that are due to fluctuating demands of liquidity traders and those that reflect changes in expected returns. An implication of the model is that price changes accompanied by large trading volumes tend to be reversed. Wang (1994) examines the link between the nature of heterogeneity among investors and the behavior of trading volume and its relation to price dynamics. In the model, uninformed investors trade against informed investors and will revise their positions when they realize their mistakes. When the return is high in the previous period, it could be due to private information of informed investors or simply buying pressure for non-informational reasons. If it is due to private information, the high realized return accompanied by high volume in the past will be followed by high future returns. If it is due to non-informational reasons, the high realized return will be followed by low future returns. Conrad, Hameed and Niden (1994) provide empirical evidence on these relations. They find that high-transaction securities experience price reversals, while the returns of low-transactions securities are positively autocorrelated, a result that seems to be consistent with Campbell, Grossman, and Wang (1993). Since the predictability of short-term returns might be affected by trading volume, we examine whether the volume information could affect the momentum profits. For period t, we construct momentum portfolios, and for each equity market, we compare the market trading volume in period t-1 and t-2. The momentum portfolios are divided into portfolios of countries with high and low lagged trading volume. Following Conrad, Hammed, and Niden (1994), the trading volume of a country is defined as high (low) if the volume in period t-1 is higher (lower) than the volume in period t-2. While such a definition seems to be ad-hoc, but since the length of the time interval varies from 1 week to 26 weeks, we already consider the information contents of trading volume over different holding periods. The momentum profits to the high and low lagged volume groups are reported in Table 6. It must be noted that our analysis covers only 17 countries, as we do not have trading volume data for six countries (Belgium, Denmark, Italy, S. Africa, Spain, and Switzerland). Except for the 26-week holding period, the profits and weekly returns are

13

higher for the portfolios of countries with high lagged trading volume than for the portfolios of countries with low lagged trading volume. This indicates that price continuation is stronger following an increase in trading volume. This result is not consistent with the conjecture that momentum profits arise from underreaction to information due to insufficient trading. It also contradicts the prediction of Campbell, Grossman and Wang (1993) and the empirical evidence in Conrad, Hameed, and Niden (1994). Finally, the evidence also suggests that price continuation could not be explained by nonsynchronous trading. According to the nonysnchronous trading hypothesis, when trading volume is high at time t-1, most of the information should already be incorporated into the prices at t-1, so that there will be less return continuation at time t. examine the effects of nonsynchronous trading in the next section. We further

IV. Robustness Tests

A. Nonsynrchronous Trading One possible explanation for momentum profits is the presence of nonsynchronous trading. When there is nonsynchronous trading, index returns are likely to be autocorrelated, so that the momentum strategies that exploit return continuation might seem to be profitable. To mitigate the effect of nonsynchronous trading, we implement momentum strategies with a lag of one week, that is, buying winner countries and selling loser countries one week after we evaluate the past performance. If all component stocks underlying stock indices trade at least once a week, this procedure will be adequate in eliminating any spurious momentum profits due to nonsynchronous trading. Certainly, if the stocks trade much more frequently and momentum builds up within a week, this correction procedure will over-adjust for the nonsynchronous trading bias and then the momentum profits will be understated. Table 7 reports the results. Except for the 1-week holding period, the profits are smaller than those generated without the implementation lag. Nevertheless, all profits remain statistically significant. Therefore, not all of the momentum profits can be

14

explained by nonsynchronous trading.

B. Exclusion of Emerging Markets Our previous results show that a significant portion of momentum profits comes from emerging markets. This is also consistent with the evidence in Harvey (1995) and Bekaert, Erb, Harvey, and Viskanta (1997) who document that emerging market returns have higher autocorrelation and are more predictable. Given the low liquidity of these emerging markets, there are questions about the momentum profits being spurious. To examine this possibility, we implement the strategies on a subset of markets, discarding six emerging markets from our sample (S. Korea, S. Africa, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Indonesia). Table 8 reports the results of implementing the strategies on only the non-emerging markets. The evidence indicates that the momentum profits become smaller than those obtained when all 23 countries are included. For example, the average weekly returns decrease to 0.14% for the 1-week horizon and to 0.28% for the 2-week horizon. Nevertheless, the profits remain statistically significant.

C. Different Betas in the Up and Down Markets Another explanation for the momentum profits is that the simple beta adjustment in Section III.B is not adequate in reflecting compensation for risks. As reported by Rouwenhorst (1998), the winners and losers could have different betas in up and down markets. To evaluate this possibility, we regress excess U.S. dollar returns (in excess of

the U.S. risk-free rate) of the momentum portfolios on the excess U.S. dollar returns of the Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) world index, but allow for different betas in the up and down markets as follows: R pt rft = + + D t (R mt rft ) + (1 D t )(R mt rft ) + pt ,

(7)

where Rpt is the return of the momentum portfolio at time t, rft is the U.S. risk-free rate at

15

time t, 3 Rmt is the return of the MSCI market index at time t, and Dt is a dummy variable that is one if the MSCI return is positive at time t and zero otherwise. We estimate the above regression for returns for winner portfolios, loser portfolios, and the winner minus loser portfolios for different holding periods. To save space, only results for the winner minus loser portfolios are reported. For the momentum effect to be consistent with market dependent betas, winners will have higher betas in an up market and lower betas than losers in a down market. The evidence in Panel A of Table 9 is partially consistent with this explanation. Except for the 1-week holding period, the coefficient + is positive, suggesting that the winner countries have higher betas than the loser countries during the up market. On the other hand, the coefficient - is negative for the 1-week, 2-week, and 4-week holding periods, indicating that winner countries have lower betas than the loser countries during the down market. After adjustment for the changing betas in the up- and down-market, the risk-adjusted returns (alphas) become smaller and are statistically significant only for the 2-week holding period. We also perform similar risk adjustment for returns of momentum portfolios partitioned by high and low past trading volume. Results are reported in Panel B of Table 9. For the momentum portfolios with low past trading volume, the risk-adjusted returns are generally insignificant. However, for the momentum portfolios with high past trading volume, the risk-adjusted returns remain high and statistically significant for short horizons. Therefore, even though the beta risks could account for the returns to momentum strategies under low trading volume, they do not fully explain the observed returns to momentum strategies when trading volume is high.4

Although the risk-free rate is realized for time t, the investors already observe the interest rate at time t-1.

Besides the betas, we also calculate the variance of high volume and low volume momentum portfolios. We find the variance of high volume portfolios is lower than the variance of low volume portfolios and therefore refute the conjecture that the profits to high volume portfolios are due to higher total risks.

16

V. Concluding Remarks This paper examines the profitability of momentum strategies formed based on past returns of country indices in the global equity markets. Our results indicate evidence of momentum profits that are statistically and economically significant, especially for short holding periods (less than 4 weeks). Although the momentum profits could be increased by exploiting exchange rate information, the major source of momentum profits arises from price continuations in individual stock indices. Evidence also indicates that the momentum profits cannot be completely explained by nonsynchronous trading and are not confined to emerging markets, although it seems that they diminish significantly after adjusting for beta risk. An interesting result is that when we implement the momentum strategies on markets that experience increases in volume in the previous period, the momentum profits are higher. This indicates that return continuation is stronger following an increase in trading volume. This result seems to contradict the hypothesis of underreaction and price reversals of liquidity-related trades as predicted by Campbell, Grossman, and Wang (1993), but is consistent with the herding behavior theory, in which investors tend to follow the crowd in buying and selling securities. We must point out that our evidence is different from Conrad, Hameed, and Niden (1994), who document that the price changes accompanied by higher trading volume tend to be reversed in the following period. One difference between our study and Conrad, Hameed, and Niden is that we study individual stock indices in the international equity markets while they study individual securities in the U.S. market. This seems to suggest that the relation between trading volume and price continuation (or price reversal) is different between individual stocks and the market. This could be an interesting topic for future work.

17

References Asness, C., J. Liew and R. Stevens, 1996, Parallel between the cross-sectional predictability of stock returns and country returns, Working Paper, Goldman Sachs Asset Management. Ball, R and S. Kothari, 1989, Nonstationary expected returns: Implications for tests of market efficiency and serial correlation in returns, Journal of Financial Economics 25, 51-74. Bekaert. G., and R.J. Hodrick, 1992, Characterizing predictable components in equity and foreign exchange rates of returns, Journal of Finance, 47, 467-509. Bekaert, G., 1995, Market integration and investment barriers in emerging equity markets, World Bank Economic Review, 9, 75-107. Bekaert, G., C. Erb, C. Harvey, and T. Viskanta, 1997, What matters for emerging equity market investments, Emerging markets quarterly, summer, 17-46. Blume, L., D. Easley, and M. OHara, 1994, Market statistics and technical analysis: The role of volume, Journal of Finance, 49, 163-181. Bonser-Neal, C., G. Brauer, R. Neal, and S. Wheatley, 1990, International investment restrictions and closed-end country fund prices, Journal of Finance, 45, 523-548. Campbell, J., S. Grossman, and J. Wang, 1993, Trading volume and serial correlation in stock returns, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 905-940. Chan, K.C., 1988, On contrarian investment strategy, Journal of Business, 61, 147-163. Chan, Louis K.C, N. Jegadeesh and J. Lakonishok, 1996, Momentum strategies, Journal of Finance, 51, 1681-1713. Conrad, J. and G. Kaul, 1998, An anatomy of trading strategies, Review of Financial Studies, 11, 489-519. Conrad, J., A. Hameed, and C. Niden, 1994, Volume and autocovariances in short-horizon individual security returns, Journal of Finance, 49, 1305-1329. DeBondt, W. and R. Thaler, 1985, Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance, 40, 793805. DeBondt, W. and R. Thaler, 1987, Further evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality, Journal of Finance, 42, 557-581. Eun, C. and S. Shim, 1989, International transmission of stock market movements, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 24, 241-255.

18

Gagnon, L. and A. Karolyi, 1996, Information, trading volume and international stock market comovements, Working Paper, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. Gervais, S., R. Kaniel, and D. Mingelgrin, 1998, The high volume return premium, Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania. Grinblatt, M., S. Titman, and R. Wermers, 1995, Momentum strategies, portfolio performance, and herding: A study of mutual fund behavior, American Economic Review, 85, 1088-1105. Grundy, B. and M. McNichols, 1989, Trade and the revelation of information through prices and direct disclosure, Review of Financial Studies. 2, 495-526. Gultekin, B., M. Gultekin, and A. Penati, 1989, Capital controls and international capital market segmentation: The evidence from the Japanese and American stock markets, Journal of Finance, 44, 849-860. Harvey, C., 1995, Predictable risk and returns in emerging markets, Review of Financial Studies, 8, 773-816. Hong, H., T. Lim, and J. Stein, 1999, Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage, and the profitability of momentum strategies, Journal of Finance, forthcoming. Jegadeesh, N. and S. Titman, 1993, Returns to buying winners and selling losers: Implications for stock market efficiency, Journal of Finance, 48, 65-91. Jegadeesh, N. and S. Titman, 1995, Short horizon return reversals and the bid-ask spread, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 4, 116-132. Jorion, P., 1991, The pricing of exchange rate risk in the stock market, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26, 363-376. Keppler, M., 1990, The importance of dividend yields in country selection, Journal of Portfolio Management, Winter 1990. Kho, B., 1996, Time-varying risk premia, volatility, and technical trading rule profits: Evidence from foreign currency futures markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 41, 249-290. Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny, 1992, The impact of institutional trading on stock prices, Journal of Financial Economics, August, 23-43. LeBaron, B., 1991, Technical trading rules and regime shifts in foreign exchange, Working paper, University of Wisconsin, Madison. Lee, C. And B. Swaminathan, 1998, Price momentum and trading volume, Working paper, Cornell University. Lehmann, B., 1990, Fads, martingales and market efficiency, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 1-28.

19

Lo, A. and C. MacKinlay, 1990, When are contrarian profits due to stock market overreaction? Review of Financial Studies, 3, 175-206. Macdeo, R., 1995, Country-selection style, in Equity Style Management, Irwin Professional Publishing, 1995, 333-335. Newey, W., and K. West, 1987, A simple positive definite, heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix, Econometrica, 55, 703-705. Rouwenhorst, K. Geert, 1997, International momentum strategies, Journal of Finance, 53, 267284. Rouwenhorst, K. Geert, 1999, Local return factors and turnover in emerging stock markets, Journal of Finance, 1439-1464. Wang, J., 1994, A model of competitive stock trading volume, Journal of Political Economy 102, 127-168.

20

Table 1 Sample countries, stock market indices, trading volume, and sample periods Country Australia Austria Belgium Canada Denmark France Germany Hong Kong S. Korea Italy Japan Netherlands Norway S. Africa Spain Singapore Switzerland U.K. U.S. Thailand Taiwan Malaysia Indonesia Index Name AUSTRALIA ALL ORDINARY INDEX AUSTRIA GZ ALLSHARE INDEX BRUSSELS SE GENERAL INDEX TORONTO SE (300) COMPOSITE INDEX COPENHAGEN SE GENERAL INDEX FRANCE-DS MARKET INDEX FAZ GENERAL INDEX HANG SENG INDEX KOREA SE COMPOSITE (KOSPI) INDEX MILAN BANCA COMM.ITAL. INDEX NIKKEI STOCK AVERAGE (225) INDEX CBS ALL SHARE GENERAL INDEX OSLO STOCK EXCHANGE INDUSTRY INDEX JOHANNESBURG SE INDUSTRIALS INDEX MADRID S.E. INDEX SINGAPORE-STRAITS T. INDUSTRIAL INDEX CREDIT SUISSE GENERAL INDEX FT ORDINARY SHARE INDEX DOW JONES INDUSTRIALS INDEX BANGKOK S.E.T. INDEX TAIWAN WEIGHTED INDEX KUALA LUMPUR COMPOSITE INDEX JAKARTA COMPOSITE INDEX Market Trading Volume Available Yes Yes No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Currency Australian Dollar Austrian Schilling Belgium Franc Canadian Dollar Danish Kroner French Franc Deutsche Mark Hong Kong Dollar Korean Won Italian Lire Japanese Yen Dutch Guilder Norwegian Kroner S. African Rand Spanish Peseta Singapore Dollar Swiss Franc Sterling Pound U.S. Dollar Thailand Baht Taiwan Dollar Malaysian Ringgit Indonesian Rupiah Sample Period 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 81/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 84/2/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 80/1/1 - 95/6/30 85/1/1 - 95/6/30

21

Table 2 Profits to Momentum Strategies Implemented on Stock Market Indices of 23 Countries in the Full-Sample Period The table contains the decomposition of profits to international momentum strategies that long winner stock indices and short loser stock indices. All indices are denominated in U.S. dollars. The sample period is from 80/01/01 to 95/06/30. We form momentum portfolios (buy winners and sell losers) based on past performance of stock market indices. The weight of each index is based on the deviation of its return in the previous period from the crosssectional average return. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. All profit estimates and aggregate investment weights are multiplied by 1,000. t are average profits overall; t1 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past equity returns; t2 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past equity returns; t3 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past exchange rate returns; t4 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past exchange rate returns. Aggregate investment weight is defined as It(k) =

index i at time t, and Rt (k), the weekly return, is equal to t(k) /(0.5*k*It(k)). The numbers in parentheses are zstatistics that are asymptotically N(0,1) under the null hypothesis that the relevant parameter is zero, and are corrected for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation based on Newey-West adjustment (1987).

i=1

|wit(k)|, where wit is the weight of

1-week

2- week 0.104034 (4.77357) 0.015619 (2.70056) 0.005815 (1.14298) 0.004503 (0.95182) 0.12997 (5.46304) 27.1927

4-week 0.154635 (2.37499) 0.033848 (2.12104) -0.01281 (-0.76844) 0.028817 (2.32403) 0.204487 (2.72098) 40.4157

12-week 0.151245 (0.53314) 0.173832 (2.25263) -0.09791 (-1.14518) 0.132817 (2.12386) 0.359984 (0.97656) 74.3342

26-week 1.6481 (2.42505) 0.469455 (2.07631) -0.6057 (-3.266) 0.439519 (2.6466) 1.9513 (2.38621) 114.0949

t1 t2 t3 t4 t
Aggregate Investment Weekly Return (in %)

0.023286 (2.07272) 0.002997 (1.18537) 0.001082 (0.48264) -0.00258 (-1.03485) 0.024785 (1.91507) 18.7814

0.27743 (2.87784)

0.48303 (6.30818)

0.25371 (3.34746)

0.0940992 (1.31099)

0.1159 (2.34978)

22

Table 3 Profits to Basic Momentum Strategies Implemented on Stock Market Indices of 23 Countries in the Post-1985 Period The table contains the decomposition of profits to international momentum strategies that long winner stock indices and short loser stock indices. All indices are denominated in U.S. dollars. The sample period is from 85/01/01 to 95/06/30. We form momentum portfolios (buy winners and sell losers) based on past performance of stock market indices. The weight of each index is based on the deviation of its return in the previous period from the crosssectional average return. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. All profit estimates and aggregate investment weights are multiplied by 1,000. t are average profits overall; t1 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past equity returns; t2 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past equity returns; t3 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past exchange rate returns; t4 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past exchange rate returns. Aggregate investment weight is defined as It(k) =

index i at time t, and Rt (k), the weekly return, is equal to t(k) /(0.5*k*It(k)). The numbers in parentheses are zstatistics that are asymptotically N(0,1) under the null hypothesis that the relevant parameter is zero, and are corrected for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation based on Newey-West adjustment (1987).

i=1

|wit(k)|, where wit is the weight of

1-week

2-week 0.10836 (3.8576) 0.0167 (2.2398) 0.00356 (0.5693) 0.00542 (0.8491) 0.13403 (4.3839) 27.389

4-week 0.16566 (1.8713) 0.0364 (1.9196) -0.0126 (-0.6024) 0.03862 (2.3522) 0.22806 (2.2415) 40.9606

12-week 0.19465 (0.5426) 0.24708 (2.3926) -0.0955 (-0.9140) 0.10727 (1.3191) 0.45354 (0.9883) 76.0427

26-week 1.8878 (2.2241) 0.75487 (2.4918) -0.336 (-1.4237) 0.40442 (1.7966) 2.7112 (2.6959) 117.2

t1 t2 t3 t4 t
Aggregate Investment Weekly Returns (in %)

0.02615 (1.6964) 0.00156 (0.4582) -0.0011 (-0.3921) -0.0046 (-1.3749) 0.02206 (1.2336) 18.9972

0.2615 (2.0526)

0.5018 (5.0853)

0.2708 (2.6950)

0.0968 (1.0895)

0.1545 (2.5665)

23

Table 4 Risk-Adjusted Momentum Profits on Individual Countries This table reports risk-adjusted profits (alphas) from a multivariate regression of normalized profits of individual countries on excess returns of MSCI world market. We buy winner countries and sell loser countries based on past performance of stock market indices. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. Profits of individual countries are normalized by dividing them by aggregate investment long or short in the momentum strategies. The numbers in parentheses are the t-statistics, which are adjusted for heteroskedastic disturbances of individual countries. The last row contains the p-values for the joint tests that alphas for all countries are equal to zero. 1-week 2- week 4- week 12- week 26- week Australia -0.0959 0.61 0.03447 -2.101 -4.853 (-0.5760) (2.3640) (0.4030) (-3.7180) (-6.1890) Austria 0.473 0.674 0.166 3.324 6.358 (1.9180) (2.1360) (1.1520) (3.6120) (4.6840) Belgium -0.0718 0.318 0.154 -0.31 -1.164 (-0.7390) (2.7530) (3.2380) (-1.0890) (-2.4110) Canada 0.03599 -0.0642 -0.101 -0.55 0.267 (0.4130) (-0.5800) (-2.5080) (-2.4070) (0.8360) Denmark 0.01949 0.282 0.03792 -0.99 -0.883 (0.1630) (2.1160) (0.6720) (-2.9880) (-1.9200) France 0.265 0.313 0.08939 0.568 0.266 (2.2630) (1.6820) (1.1780) (1.1230) (0.4940) Germany 0.196 0.211 0.09649 1.214 0.423 (1.5740) (1.3020) (1.6090) (2.9520) (0.6030) Hong Kong -0.0766 -0.0154 -0.189 1.916 7.495 (-0.2410) (-0.0440) (-1.8490) (2.9270) (7.3360) S. Korea 0.07859 0.705 0.07612 1.83 9.006 (0.2790) (2.3480) (0.7230) (2.5160) (7.7210) Italy -0.261 0.433 0.06313 2.27 4.191 (-1.0710) (1.2560) (0.5120) (2.7680) (2.9000) Japan 0.594 0.755 0.216 -0.799 0.835 (2.1740) (2.4340) (1.9910) (-1.2490) (1.0590) Netherlands 0.02127 0.06132 0.02516 -0.0882 -0.417 (0.3510) (0.7180) (0.8570) (-0.4670) (-1.6070) Norway 0.01877 0.169 -0.0887 -3.258 -3.452 (0.1060) (0.8550) (-1.2780) (-5.7990) (-4.9800) S. Africa 0.09949 0.07277 0.169 -2.598 -1.931 (0.4040) (0.2540) (1.7020) (-3.4590) (-2.0110) Spain 0.08056 -0.0184 -0.0132 -0.687 1.928 (0.3180) (-0.0670) (-0.1440) (-1.0130) (2.2690) Singapore -0.0916 0.315 0.226 0.393 -0.525 (-0.4660) (1.2860) (3.1140) (0.7570) (-0.5730) Switzerland 0.06727 0.151 0.05792 -0.414 1.304 (0.6810) (1.2370) (1.2150) (-1.0010) (2.5070) U.K. -0.0082 0.254 -0.0319 -1.529 -2.66 (-0.0660) (1.8190) (-0.6150) (-4.3750) (-4.8150) U.S. -0.15 -0.113 -0.0296 -0.276 -0.667 (-1.7250) (-1.0780) (-0.8930) (-1.4920) (-2.5070) Thailand 0.466 0.512 0.346 -0.765 -5.636 (1.3880) (1.2400) (2.3120) (-0.6910) (-3.3500) Taiwan 1.793 3.981 0.954 5.238 5.399 (1.8300) (3.2580) (1.9820) (1.4280) (1.4710) Malaysia -0.133 0.321 0.05158 0.978 -1.211 (-0.5580) (1.0940) (0.5210) (1.3770) (-0.9510) Indonesia 1.767 2.649 0.661 2.904 18.215 (2.0330) (3.9280) (2.9160) (2.0470) (5.6340) Testing alphas are equal 0.0651 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 to zero (p-values)

24

Table 5 Profits to Market Capitalization-Weighted Momentum Strategies Implemented on Stock Market Indices of 23 Countries in the Full-Sample Period The table contains the decomposition of profits to international momentum strategies that long winner stock indices and short loser stock indices. All indices are denominated in U.S. dollars. The sample period is from 80/01/01 to 95/06/30. We form momentum portfolios (buy past winners and sell past losers) based on past performance of stock market indices and the market capitalization weights of the previous year. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. All profit estimates and aggregate investment weights are multiplied by 1,000. Aggregate investment weight is defined as It(k) =

(k), the weekly return, is equal to t(k) /(0.5*k*It(k)). The numbers in parentheses are z-statistics that are asymptotically N(0,1) under the null hypothesis that the relevant parameter is zero, and are corrected for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation based on Newey-West adjustment (1987).

i=1

|wMit(k)|, where wMit is the weight of index i at time t, and Rt

1-week Loser Portfolios 0.00699 (0.3423) 0.02007 (2.2010) 0.02706 (1.6492) 16.6701

2-week 0.01582 (0.5001) 0.07736 (3.2829) 0.09317 (3.6987) 24.3707

4-week -0.0915 (-1.3810) 0.193 (2.9938) 0.10147 (1.7879) 36.2423

12-week -0.6021 (-2.0186) 1.0673 (2.8942) 0.46517 (1.3303) 66.1335

26-week -1.9847 (-2.1343) 4.4134 (4.1731) 2.4287 (2.2720) 103.568

Winner Portfolios

Loser + Winner Portfolios Aggregate Investment Weekly Return (in %)

0.1401 (1.6065)

0.3045 (4.2294)

0.1052 (1.6629)

0.0802 (1.0755)

0.1732 (2.8167)

25

Table 6 Profits to Momentum Portfolios With High and Low Lagged Trading Volume This table contains the profits to momentum strategies that long winner stock indices and short loser stock indices, and divides the portfolios into groups of highvolume and low-volume countries. We form momentum portfolios (buy winners and sell losers) based on past performance of stock market indices. The weight of each index is based on the deviation of its return in the previous period from the cross-sectional average return. The trading volume of a country is defined as high (low) if the volume in period t-1 is higher (lower) than volume in period t-2. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. The sample period is from 80/01/01 to 95/06/30. All profit estimates and aggregate investment weights are multiplied by 1000. Aggregate investment weight is defined as It(k) =

i =1

|wit(k)|, where wit is the weight of index i at time t, and Rt (k) = t(k) (0.5*k*/It(k)). The numbers in parentheses are z-statistics that are

asymptotically N(0,1) under the null hypothesis that the relevant parameter is zero, and are corrected for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation based on NeweyWest adjustment (1987). High Volume 1-week Loser Portfolios
0.01701 (0.9299) 0.01475 (0.6220) 0.03176 (1.1218) 17.6008

Low Volume 12-week

-0.426763 (-1.1194) 0.566228 (1.2771) 0.139465 (0.3690) 67.7373

2-week
0.032666 (0.8886) 0.113748 (2.6713) 0.146415 (3.3599) 25.5806

4-week
-0.028375 (-0.3284) 0.285103 (2.8442) 0.256728 (2.2030) 38.2106

26-week
-3.4878 (-3.9095) 3.7609 (3.3008) 0.273096 (0.3154) 104.5007

1-week
-0.012392 (-0.8896) 0.033398 (1.6624) 0.021007 (0.8521) 15.4193

2-week
0.024025 (0.6340) 0.064229 (2.0271) 0.088253 (2.7072) 22.4052

4-week
-0.098492 (-0.9471) 0.11853 (1.6582) 0.020038 (0.2623) 32.4668

12-week
-0.69795 (-1.3400) 0.86121 (2.6431) 0.16326 (0.3709) 60.1726

26-week
-2.6183 (-2.6935) 3.0761 (3.8468) 0.45784 (0.5527) 86.296

Winner Portfolios

Loser +Winner Portfolios Aggregate Investment Weekly Returns (in %)

0.41255 (3.6905)

0.51676 (5.3162)

0.28171 (3.0940)

0.07080 (0.9134)

0.01791 (0.3076)

0.1554 (1.0934)

0.32295 (3.3397)

0.06466 (0.7945)

0.01285 (0.1502)

0.08122 (1.3437)

26

Table 7 Profits to Momentum Strategies Implemented on Stock Market Indices with One-Week Lag The table contains the decomposition of profits to international momentum strategies, which are implemented on stock market indices one week after the evaluation period. All indices are denominated in U.S. dollars. The sample period is from 80/01/01 to 95/06/30. We form momentum portfolios (buy winners and sell losers) based on past performance of stock market indices. The weight of each index is the deviation of its return in the previous period from the cross-sectional average return. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. All profit estimates and aggregate investment weights are multiplied by 1,000. t are average profits overall; t1 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past equity returns; t2 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past equity returns; t3 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past exchange rate returns; t4 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past exchange rate returns. Aggregate investment weight is defined as It(k) =

weight of index i at time t, and Rt (k), the weekly return, is equal to t(k) /(0.5*k*It(k)). The numbers in parentheses are z-statistics that are asymptotically N(0,1) under the null hypothesis that the relevant parameter is zero, and are corrected for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation based on Newey-West adjustment (1987).

i=1

|wit(k)|, where wit is the

1-week t1 0.03867 (4.76231) 0.0045 (1.71294) 0.00161 (0.86546) 0.0037 (1.87681) 0.04849 (5.518) 18.777

2-week 0.05649 (2.61193) 0.01289 (2.20673) -0.00044 (-0.08291) 0.0082 (1.54072) 0.07714 (3.1634) 27.1901

4-week 0.07258 (1.22021) 0.02831 (1.65729) -0.01725 (-0.99876) 0.02874 (2.28944) 0.11238 (1.5744) 40.4214

12-week 0.07685 (0.2663) 0.1617 (2.09664) -0.08829 (-1.04866) 0.12406 (1.97415) 0.27431 (0.73679) 74.3496

26-week 1.7102 (2.49368) 0.46662 (2.0462) -0.61468 (-3.28058) 0.45832 (2.70514) 2.0205 (2.46977) 114.174

t2

t3

t4

Aggregate Investment Weekly Returns (in %)

0.47211 (6.11125)

0.28295 (3.71398)

0.13059 (1.75742)

0.073668 (1.01479)

0.12046 (2.44747)

27

Table 8 Profits to Momentum Strategies Implemented on Stock Market Indices Excluding Emerging Markets The table contains the decomposition of profits to international momentum strategies that long winner stock indices and short loser stock indices. The countries excluded are South Korea, Taiwan, Malaysia, South Africa, Indonesia, and Thailand. All indices are denominated in U.S. dollars. The sample period is from 80/01/01 to 95/06/30. We form momentum portfolios (buy past winners and sell past losers) based on past performance of stock market. The weight of each index is the deviation of its return in the previous period from the cross-sectional average return. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. All profit estimates and aggregate investment weights are multiplied by 1,000. t are average profits overall; t1 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past equity returns; t2 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past equity returns; t3 are profits attributed to predictability of equity returns based on past exchange rate returns; t4 are profits attributed to predictability of exchange rate returns based on past exchange rate returns. Aggregate investment weight is defined as It(k) =

weekly return, is equal to t(k) /(0.5*k*It(k)). The numbers in parentheses are z-statistics that are asymptotically N(0,1) under the null hypothesis that the relevant parameter is zero, and are corrected for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation based on Newey-West adjustment (1987).

i=1

|wit(k)|, where wit is the weight of index i at time t, and Rt (k), the

1-week

2- week 0.00116 (1.918) 0.00089 (1.646) 0.00058 (2.035) -0.00006 (-0.223) 0.00774 (4.327) 2.376

4-week -0.00040 (-0.413) 0.00155 (0.723) 0.00189 (2.181) -0.00015 (-0.178) 0.00758 (1.440) 3.482

12-week -0.00715 (-1.123) 0.01058 (1.441) 0.00387 (1.088) 0.00386 (1.103) 0.00925 (0.337) 6.231

26-week -0.0430 (-2.673) 0.03269 (1.658) 0.01765 (1.328) 0.00432 (0.390) 0.06707 (1.092) 9.436

t1 t2 t3 t4 t
Aggregate Investment Weekly Return (in %)

0.00036 (0.738) 0.000349 (2.079) 0.000011 (0.126) 0.000092 (0.965) 0.00173 (1.859) 1.654

0.1432 (1.938)

0.282 (4.530)

0.104 (1.629)

0.0430 (0.688)

0.0563 (1.326)

28

Table 9 Risk-Adjusted Returns of Winner minus Loser Portfolios This table reports risk-adjusted returns of momentum strategies implemented on the stock market indices. The sample period is from 80/01/01 to 95/06/30. We form momentum portfolios (buy past winners and sell past losers) based on past performance of stock market indices. We use five different holding periods, ranging from 1 week to 26 weeks. Excess returns (in excess of the U.S. risk-free rate) of winner portfolios, loser portfolios, and winner minus loser portfolios are regressed on excess returns of the MSCI world index. Only the results of winner minus loser portfolios are reported to save space. Panel A: Whole sample
1 Week Alpha 0.002178 (1.3814) -0.032772 (-0.2797) -0.130358 (-1.3111) 2 Weeks 0.005838 (2.6076) 0.139853 (1.1696) -0.241278 (-2.7355) 4 Weeks 0.00544 (1.3775) 0.190473 (1.6011) -0.115813 (-1.3472) 12 Weeks 0.011553 (1.0862) 0.315918 (2.0901) 0.431002 (2.5067) 26 Weeks 0.022874 (1.5170) 0.367446 (2.6382) 0.365632 (1.8569)

Beta in the up market Beta in the down market

Panel B: Partitioned By High and Low Past Trading Volume

High Past Trading Volume 2 Weeks 4 Weeks 12 Weeks 0.011138 0.00315 0.006956 (4.0235) (0.7445) (0.5628) -0.020057 (-0.1455) 0.062501 (0.6618) 0.306412 (1.8975) -0.228743 (-2.0906) 0.282142 (1.6461) 0.308428 (2.0220) Low Past Trading Volume 2 Weeks 4 Weeks 12 Weeks 0.005081 -0.000552 -0.00897 (1.7249) (-0.1249) (-0.6714) -0.046667 (-0.3532) -0.196788 (-1.7590) 0.06148 (0.4391) -0.157092 (-1.3595) 0.07061 (0.3493) -0.344756 (-1.0934)

Alpha

1 Week 0.004738 (2.5604) -0.095956 (-0.6533) -0.009088 (-0.0498)

26 Weeks 0.008554 (0.3703) 0.194791 (1.1850) 0.411637 (1.7536)

1 Week 0.002256 (0.9693) -0.056475 (-0.3931) 0.039377 (0.2818)

26 Weeks 0.005773 (0.2680) 0.091532 (0.4744) -0.28054 (-1.3578)

Beta in the up market Beta in the down market

29