Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
PAPER
McLaughlin
/
WR
13300
/
Fall 2016
Paper Requirements
INVENTING A TOPIC
There are many strategies for finding a viable topic, but one of the best approaches is to ask questions
about communities and texts that are of interest to you and how those interests might relate to some of
the discussions we've had this semester. Here are some examples (not exhaustive!):
Education/Campus
What steps could the University of Notre Dame take to increase the well-being of first-year
students?
To what extent might meditation be valuable as part of the training for student athletes?
In what ways does education promote (or combat) hedonism?
Are home-schooled students "happier" than their public school counterparts? Why or why not?
Identity/Community
In what ways do current conversations about "happiness" reflect problematic assumptions about
race, class, gender, sexuality, or ability?
Under what conditions is a person more likely to practice altruism? To what extent can those
conditions be recreated within a community that needs more unity?
Popular Culture/Entertainment
What might the rise in "anti-hero" television shows reflect about societal happiness and well-being?
What does the organic food industry want us to believe about the connection between food and
happiness? To what extent are those claims sound, problematic, or incomplete?
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
AUDIENCE/PURPOSE (40 points): The paper makes a clear, focused argument to a specific,
persuadable audience. The paper reflects what's at stake for readers and avoids drifting away
from its intended purpose. The paper keeps an argumentative stance, avoiding mere research
"reporting" or summarizing of what's already known. The paper adopts an appropriate tone for
academic readers.
ORGANIZATION (40 points): The paper offers a clear "road map" for readers, signaling what
readers can expect from the essay. Paragraphs are organized around distinct main ideas and
are arranged in a way that reflects a progression of logical thought. Smooth transitions guide
readers seamlessly through the logic of the argument.
DEVELOPMENT (40 points): The paper addresses all necessary pieces of the argument,
providing relevant context and points of debate to frame the thesis. All claims are supported with
relevant evidence and analysis, with an effective balance between source material and the
writer's independent thought.
CLARITY (40 points): The sentence-level prose is generally free of mechanical errors and typos.
Sentences are varied in structure and length, with attention to precise word choice. The language
is easy to follow, with all important terms and concepts clearly defined.
CONVENTIONS (40 points): The paper follows the current MLA 2016 format and citation
guidelines, using appropriate in-text citations and a properly formatted Works Cited page. Source
material is integrated responsibly and seamlessly throughout, taking into account the
expectations of academic audiences.