Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
NE Illinois Workforce:
A comprehensive analysis of occupational competencies
September 2009
Contents
Executive Summary 1
Glossary of Terms 2 Acknowledgements
Introduction 3 The following are the primary researchers
and authors of this report:
Background 5 Hamilton Galloway, Economist and Consulting
Contents 5 Manager, Economic Modeling Specialists Inc.
Methodology Overview 6
Selecting the Right Industries and Occupations 6 Ed Morrison, Director, Institute for Open Economic
Media Coverage and Current Occupation Demand 9 Networks
Using O*NET to Determine Competencies 10
Linda Fowler, Principal/Owner, Regionerate
Understanding KSAs 10
Assessing Competencies 11 Other contributing authors include the following
Making the KSA Analysis Usable 11 individuals:
2
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
The purpose of this study is threefold. First, it seeks to further develop a methodology pioneered by the Regional Work-
force Alliance (RWA) to identify “core” competencies within the Milwaukee 7 and Northeast Illinois region. Competen-
cies are composed of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs). By “core” competencies, we mean specific knowledge, skills,
and abilities that are shared across key industries and occupations within the region. Second, this study identifies and
executes a process for determining key focus industries and occupations and using them to identify core competencies.
Third, the study explores how a focus on “core” competencies can help us develop clearer career pathways and guides to
career transitions.
To identify core competencies, we selected 44 six-digit industries from the North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) that serve as good target industries. These results were grouped into the following nine focus industry
groups: Pharmaceutical, Plastics, Industrial Machinery, Electronic Systems, Finance, Business Services, Consumer Ser-
vices (Green Potential), Other Consumer Services, and K-12 Education. Collectively, the groups represent over one tenth
of regional employment and almost one third of projected regional job growth over the next ten years.
Within these industry groups, we next identified 67 target occupations. For simplicity, the main body of this report
shows 26 occupations that contained significant overlap between the industry groups. Industry group breakouts can be
viewed in Appendices E-M. We divided the 26 occupations into production occupations and service occupations because
the competency structure is fundamentally different between production and service occupations; specifically, production
occupations are more technically oriented, while service occupations are more socially oriented.
• Knowledge: Mechanical, Production and Processing, Mathematics, Education and Training, English Language
• Skills: Learning Strategies, Active Listening, Active Learning, Quality Control and Analysis, Equipment Selection
• Abilities: Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Visualization, Problem Sensitivity, Information Ordering
The top 15 “core” competencies for service occupations are:
• Knowledge: Customer and Personal Service, Clerical, English Language, Mathematics, Computers and Electronics
• Skills: Active Listening, Monitoring, Reading Comprehension, Service Orientation, Active Learning
• Abilities: Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Written Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, Written Expression
A handful of competencies were identified as critical for both production and service occupations. The competencies that
appear on both lists are Mathematics, English Language, Active Listening, Active Learning, Oral Comprehension and
Oral Expression. These competencies compose the bedrock of KSAs for workers entering either the production or service
sectors. These competencies should be considered fundamental to the success of workers in all of the industries targeted
in this report.
By connecting core competencies to both industry groups and occupations, we can begin to develop a more sophisticated
understanding of career pathways and career transitions. In the Industrial Age, career guidance was a simple matter; high
school students followed either a college track or a technical track. In today’s world, we need to rethink our approach to
career pathways and mid-career transitions. Career pathways are no longer simple and linear; rather, they resemble com-
1
Executive Summary
plex wiring diagrams in which individuals face many different choices at different times in their careers. Career planning
and career guidance are no longer a single event. They are a continuous process of evaluation and choice.
The study is one of the first to examine a region’s workforce beyond the traditional metrics of educational attainment,
years of experience, and so on. The results will be used to “streamline” future competency analyses as the region continues
to grow, develop, and position itself as a global player.
Glossary of Terms
NAICS: North American Industry Classification System. The standard industry taxonomy used by all federal and state
statistical agencies.
SOC: Standard Occupational Classification. The customary occupational classification system used by all federal and state
statistical agencies.
O*NET SOC: An extension of the SOC system that further specifies particular occupational categories by considering the
specific knowledge, skills, and abilities that are required for a worker to successful execute his or her job duties.
Competency(ies): Specific categories of knowledge, attributes, and capacities that influence performance of individuals
across all industries and occupations. There are 120 competencies that are broken into a handful of sub-divisions, includ-
ing knowledge, skills, and abilities, or KSAs. Each occupation receives a score that represents the general aptitude of
workers in each of these competency categories.
• Knowledge: A sub-division of the O*NET system that classifies 33 different organized sets of principles and facts.
• Skills: A sub-division of the O*NET system that classifies 35 different developed capacities that facilitate learning.
• Abilities: A sub-division of the O*NET system that classifies 52 different enduring attributes that influence
performance.
Note: There are many KSA titles used in this report that are not immediately understandable. For a detailed description of
the principles associated with each KSA attribute see Appendix B.
2
Introduction
Introduction
In an increasingly competitive global economy, workforce development has become vital for sound regional development.
Recognizing this fact is particularly important for regions that have mature, integrated industry clusters. These regions
often face difficult transitions of moving skilled individuals from mature to emerging businesses.
The concept of fostering a technology-based economy by developing a highly skilled workforce is not new, but often edu-
cation and workforce development professionals struggle to determine what skills and attributes are most needed within
their region. This problem is complicated by a lack of concrete definitions. Certain terms, which are supposed to define
the most important skills for workers, have been used so often and in so many contexts that they are now nearly impos-
sible to measure empirically.
These terms, including “the knowledge economy,” “the information age” and “the creative class,” have been shrouded in
abstract definitions that make them hard to grasp and even harder to assess. As a result, policymakers risk making unin-
formed decisions based on nebulous data. These risks include promoting curricula and degree programs that do not fit
the needs of regional businesses and failing to communicate effectively with companies to find optimal candidates for job
openings.
In this study, EMSI and project partners I-Open and Regionerate (hereinafter “the team”) undertook a new approach to
address this challenge. Not only did we focus on the industries and occupations within the region in order to determine
the most critical demands of the workforce, but we also examined the attributes of workers within the existing workforce.
The team’s efforts expand on the previous work of the Regional Workforce Alliance (RWA), which pioneered this research
by exploring the attributes that are shared within a group of the most critical occupations within the region. The goal
of this project is to enable the Milwaukee 7 region to generate tighter ties among professionals in education, economic
development, workforce development, and the business community.
This new and innovative approach begins by examining the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) required for key occu-
pations within the regional workforce. Then the KSAs for individually selected occupations are grouped into industry
clusters in order to assess the correlation of KSAs across different occupations within the same clusters. The section on the
final research results gives us a much more detailed account of the attributes of the regional workforce than any previous
analysis.
Traditionally, most people view an occupation as a job type that performs a specific function within a company. However,
the underlying set of competencies—knowledge, skills, and abilities—that are needed to effectively perform a job have
been largely overlooked or misdefined outside of the public sector.1 These competencies define the foundation required by
an occupation beyond educational attainment, degrees, or work experience. It is often the case that ignoring competen-
cies in job recruiting can result in a company’s hiring a less-qualified candidate. For example, Company A may decide
that hiring candidates with a bachelor’s degree is preferable to candidates with an associate’s degree. owever, candidates
with an associate’s degree may have a stronger portfolio of knowledge, skills and abilities (due to the practical focus of
their coursework).
1 The federal government and some state governments have now begun to inquire about specific competencies from job applicants.
3
Introduction
Finding a tight fit between an occupation’s KSAs and an individual’s KSAs is tricky for a number of reasons. First, a
company may not follow a common framework of KSAs. Second, a company may not measure KSAs effectively. Third, a
company may simply be asking the wrong questions in its hiring process. At the same time, professionals in the education
and workforce systems have difficulty designing and delivering curricula if they do not have clear insights into the KSAs
demanded by employers.
The findings of this study have multiple uses. The three major uses considered by the research team are as follows: 1) to
develop a process for future data-driven competency research; 2) to identify in-demand workforce competencies that can
be implemented in education and workforce development curricula; and 3) to shed new light on potential job recruit-
ment improvements that will allow companies to select capable workers more quickly and accurately.
4
Background
Background
As described in RWA’s “Competency Study Report: Quick Hit,”2 all of the committees in the Regional Workforce Alli-
ance met in August 2008 and decided to launch the Competency Study Project. Under the official name of “Competency
Study of Driver Occupations,” the newly created Competency Study Task Force was charged with “…developing a pro-
posal about how to undertake a competency study that examines the ‘demand-side’ environment of Southeastern Wiscon-
sin.” In the ensuing proposal, the task force recommended a two-pronged approach. The first prong, called the Quick Hit
Project, utilized the outcomes of a Milwaukee 7/Deloitte study that had already identified two target industries and six
target occupations. The target industries and occupations provided a good launching point for examining competencies.
In May 2009, RWA contracted with Economic Modeling Specialists Inc. (EMSI) to conduct a more comprehensive
study—the second prong—to evaluate competencies across a larger breadth of industries and occupations. The funds
utilized for the development of this study originated from a Workforce Innovation and Regional Economic Development
(WIRED) grant from the U.S. Department of Labor. This study seeks to provide increased scope and analysis to the
work pioneered by RWA and the Competency Study Task Force. Through refining industry and occupation identifica-
tion procedures, as well as refining competency analysis, this study seeks to develop a deeper understanding of in-demand
competencies in the region.
Contents
The main report is intended to summarize the key findings of the team’s research. It makes up a relatively small portion
of the overall report that includes multiple appendices, detailing accounts of the research that the authors conducted. The
appendices are easily accessible for individuals looking for greater detail than what is included in the main report.
The main report condenses the findings to the key KSAs for roughly 26 occupations into two workforce cohorts: produc-
tion and service occupations. For each of these groups we have determined the top five knowledge categories, the top
five skill categories, and the top five ability categories. Tables and graphs that assist in understanding this information are
included in the main report as well.
In the first section, “Methodology Overview,” the main report covers how the industries and occupations were chosen for
the study, what KSAs are and how they were selected for the study, and how to use the KSA analysis. The second section,
“Research Results,” shows how the graphs are to be interpreted, analyzes the differences between the results for produc-
tion and service occupations, supports the study’s results with summaries of feedback from six different local companies,
and makes recommendations for local educators, employers, and workforce development professionals. The recommenda-
tions section, labeled “Implications and Applications,” explores how the research can be used to inform decision making
and develop collaborations.
Appendices E-M exhibit the analysis we completed for each industry group and the subsequent focus occupations.
2 ”Competency Study Report: Quick Hit,” Regional Workforce Alliance, May 22, 2009.
5
Background
Methodology Overview
Selecting the Right Industries and Occupations
In order to identify in-demand competencies, targeted industries and occupations needed to be identified first. To achieve
this, EMSI conducted both industry and staffing pattern research and occupation research. These were undertaken
separately in order to achieve different perspectives regarding the most critical regional drivers. Industry research provided
an indication of potential target industries within the region, which then led to an understanding of key occupations
within the industry. Occupational research revealed which occupations have strong potential, both inside and outside
of the most vital industries. Where significant overlap existed between an industry-driven analysis and an occupation-
driven analysis, the authors identified target occupations. Additional steps were taken after the initial research in order to
ensure that the correct occupations had been selected. Media sources and analysis of online job postings helped to cement
the data-driven findings, and an industry feedback survey provided further support for the findings of this study. Other
research involved evaluating historical occupation information to determine specific trends. For example, historical wage
trends in the region indicate that earnings have declined slightly since 2002. Figure a shows the overall real wage trends
across several occupation groups have declined. In 2008, about 60 percent of the region’s jobs earned less than the average
earnings. In terms of relevancy for this report, the development of a competency-based career pathway approach could
improve the earnings potential of several lower-wage earners and those who have experienced a real decrease in wages over
the past several years.
-$7.00 -$6.00 -$5.00 -$4.00 -$3.00 -$2.00 -$1.00 $0.00 $1.00 $2.00 $3.00
Management
Healthcare Practitioner and Technical
Protective Service
Life Physical and Social Science
Education Training and Library
Arts Design Entertainment Sports and Media
Community and Social Services
Business and Financial
Occupational Categories
6
Background
The data-driven approach evaluated historical information (2001-February 2009) and projected data (2009-2019) for
industries and occupations. Historical information provided a strong foundation of industry and occupation trends, and
projections provided a good basis for identifying future occupational demand and subsequently, competency demand.
The industry groups identified are shown in Table 1, along with their projected 2009-2019 job change and average annual
industry earnings per worker. Detailed industry groups (NAICS code) and occupations (SOC code) can be found in
Appendix A. Taken as a whole, the industry groups represent over one tenth of current regional employment and almost
one third of regional job growth over the next ten years.
2009-19 % Change
Industry Group 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Annual EPW
Change 2009-19
From the industry selection and occupation analyses, target occupations by industry group—67 in all—were identified.3
For simplification of this report, key occupations that contained significant inter-industry overlap were selected from the
list and reported. A total of 26 key occupations were selected and are presented in Table 2. Target occupations by industry
group can be found in Appendices E-M
7
Background
New
2001 2009 2019
SOC Code Description Change & Rep. Education Level
Jobs Jobs Jobs Jobs
Production Occupations
Long-term on-the-job
51-4041 Machinists 11,594 10,259 10,362 103 2,010 training
Long-term on-the-job
51-4121 Welders, cutters, solderers, and brazers 5,617 5,194 5,417 223 1,323 training
Service Occupations
25-2021 Elementary school teachers, except spe- 17,664 17,576 19,143 1,567 5,404 Bachelor's degree
cial education
25-2031 Secondary school teachers, except special 10,004 10,598 10,730 132 3,288 Bachelor's degree
and vocational education
Short-term on-the-job
25-9041 Teacher assistants 11,503 13,304 14,283 979 3,146 training
8
Background
New
2001 2009 2019
SOC Code Description Change & Rep. Education Level
Jobs Jobs Jobs Jobs
Short-term on-the-job
31-1011 Home health aides 7,322 8,942 11,740 2,798 3,598 training
When aggregated across all industries, the identified occupations represent roughly one fifth of the regional jobs, almost
one fifth of regional job growth, and over 85,000 new and replacement jobs in the next 10 years.4
A full description of the steps taken to determine target industries and occupations can be found in a separate addendum
report: “Competency Report Process Development.” For a detailed list of the individual industries and occupations that
the authors identified, see Appendix B. Appendix C provides a list of benchmark measures for interpreting competency
levels. For the detailed industry focus group and target occupation analysis, see Appendices E-M.
Other media coverage of industry and occupation growth in the region was found primarily in the Business Journal of
Milwaukee. Recent headlines such as “Chase Bank Hiring 200 in Milwaukee”; “U.S. Cellular Hiring 100 in Waukesha”;
and “Cambridge Major Laboratories to Dedicate Bigger Manufacturing Plant” support the findings found in the data.
Though areas of the regional economy are still in the process of recovery, other areas are projected to add more jobs to the
4 Please note that the occupation employment data in Table 2 is reported for all industries in the region and not just the focus industries. The
projected change for these occupations within the focus industries will not necessarily match the projected overall change. In other words, there are some
occupations that are declining overall but are projected to add workers within the focus industries and likewise there are some occupations that are pro-
jected to add employment overall but are projected to loose workers within the focus industries.
9
Background
economy. An article entitled “Manpower: Milwaukee-Area Hiring to Pick Up” indicates that industry sectors expected to
add employees include the following: financial, financial activities, and professional and business services.
The central goal of utilizing O*NET data is to identify key competencies that are in demand among the overall workforce
in the Milwaukee Seven (M7) and Northeastern Illinois region. There are 120 KSA competencies, a complete list of which
can be viewed in Appendix B.
“The ability components (and requirements) to perform this activity would relate to leg strength, leg length, periph-
eral vision, ability to jump and so on. Skill components would be how high to jump, when to jump and when to
catch the Frisbee. Knowledge components would include teaching the dog that a Frisbee is an item to chase, retrieve
and bring back to the master/owner/pet steward. Combining KSAs gets one to the notion of competency – how
well one can perform a task.”6
The KSA structure is different for each occupation. Some occupations excel in multiple competency categories, and some
occupations excel in just a few competency categories; but all workers should have just the right blend of knowledge,
skills, and abilities to perform their occupational duties. O*NET has a built-in scale for determining the level of any
competency value in verbal terms. All competencies with a level score under 25 are labeled “Basic.” Those with a score
between 25 and 49 are considered “Intermediate,” and those with a score above 50 are thought to be “Advanced.”7 Appen-
dix C provides benchmark descriptions for KSA values. These values are further described in O*NET (http://online.
onetcenter.org/) custom reports.
Another analogy that is helpful in understanding KSA attributes comes in viewing KSAs as “ingredients” that when
compiled together define the flavor, or key characteristics, of each occupation. Many occupations, especially those within
5 http://www.onetcenter.org/content.html
6 “Competency Study Report: Quick Hit,” Regional Workforce Alliance, May 22, 2009.
7 It should be noted that the criteria for measuring competencies are not valued equally across all KSAs. Most occupations have higher ability
scores than knowledge or skill scores. It is safe to make comparisons within each competency category, (e.g., comparing a knowledge score to another
knowledge score) but one should not compare values between knowledge, skills, and abilities (e.g., comparing a knowledge score to an ability score.)
10
Background
the same profession, share similar ingredients with only a few differences. In these cases, it is easy to pinpoint occupations
that are highly “compatible” with other occupations. Identifying these compatibilities is useful because high compatibility
scores provide options for career pathway movement into different occupations either in the same industry or in a dif-
ferent industry. In this research project, EMSI used a proprietary “compatibility index” that is rooted in O*NET data to
determine career pathway potential. In some cases, compatibility is fairly easy to identify, but in other cases it is not. For
instance, it is not difficult to recognize that elementary school teachers and high school teachers have occupations that are
highly compatible. Each occupation requires advanced skills in areas such as education, oral expression, and social percep-
tiveness. However, in other cases, EMSI’s compatibility index is able to identify potential career pathways that are not as
intuitive. For instance, the occupation of an elementary school teacher is highly compatible with that of an employment
interviewer. Though they are occupations in completely different industries, they have similar KSA attributes, includ-
ing high marks in clerical knowledge, active listening skills, and a number of other categories. This compatibility index
is referred to in the main report and the detailed data is contained in Appendix D. For a more detailed perspective than
what is contained in the main report, the occupations according to each industry group along with the full competency
analyses for each industry group can be found in Appendices E-M.
The O*NET system and EMSI’s compatibility index helped to identify shared KSAs. The logic behind this analysis is that
when we understand the key attributes that make up occupations and know which industries and occupations are most
productive in the region, we can begin to see which KSAs drive the most productive aspects of the regional economy.
When properly used, this data will help the regional workforce to become better trained and therefore more competitive
on a national and global scale.
Assessing Competencies
RWA/WIRED funded an initiative to evaluate various skill assessment tools that could be used to assess competencies
and remediate competency deficiencies, if necessary. The evaluation team worked with education providers, workforce
development organizations, and employers to achieve consensus on the tools and terminology to use when measuring
knowledge, skills, and abilities. They conducted focus groups and interviews of employers and educators to determine the
way each segment expresses competencies. The project team is in the process of piloting the use of two tools (WorkKeys
and the Soft Skills portion of Learning Resources, Inc. tools) across the seven counties of southeastern Wisconsin.
WorkKeys is a job skills assessment system that measures real-world skills for specific occupations, while Learning
Resources, Inc., has a program that assesses, develops, and documents “the high-performance interpersonal – or soft –
skills” required by employers.8
The similarities in KSAs give rise to the possibility to compare the occupations and show the potential career pathways or
career transitions. The graphs and descriptions in the following section provide a context for comparing occupations for
8 http://www.learning-resources.com/
11
Background
career pathway and career transition movement. Furthermore, the analysis indicates the level of additional education and
training (indicated by KSAs) that would be required to make the pathway or movement occur.
The competency results in the next section are displayed in graphical format. Even in a reduced format, the number of
occupations and KSA attributes resulted in a table with over 1,000 observations. As a result, the tables are not displayed
in the main report, but they can be made available upon request.
12
Research Results
Research Results
Another step that the team endeavored to do was conduct basic statistical analysis on each of the top 15 competencies
for the production and service occupation groups. For each competency, we determined the average and standard devia-
tion. A standard deviation measures the variability, or “spread,” of data points around their average value. When working
with O*NET scores, it must be understood that each competency category is independent from the other competency
categories. Therefore, even among occupations that are seemingly similar, such as those of elementary school teachers and
high school teachers, there are certain categories in which the two occupations have vastly different scores. By incorpo-
rating standard deviation in the analysis along with average scores, we were able to determine which competency scores
were closely clustered across multiple occupations, which indicates that those competencies are more universally criti-
cal. We also were able to determine which competencies have a wider distribution of scores, which indicates that those
competencies are more specialized for certain types of occupations. It also allowed us to extend the definition of “normal”
beyond just the average competency score, therefore making our results as flexible as the O*NET system itself. This level
of research was conducted behind the scenes to give background understanding of the occupations and competency
components.
In this section, two distinctive types of charts are provided. The first is a “box and whisker plot” chart that displays the
average, the quartile range, and the minimum and maximum of KSA attributes for each group. The goal of this chart is to
exhibit the competencies with the highest averages, along with the normal and abnormal range of values for the dataset.
For reference, see Figure 1.1: “Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Production Occupations.” The boxes represent the
lower and upper quartile range of competency scores for the occupation group. The first and third quartiles represent
the 25th and 75th percentile, respectively; and the number displayed in the middle of the box indicates the average score
for that competency. For example, looking at Figure 1.1 the average value for mechanical knowledge is 53, with a lower
quartile of 41 and an upper quartile of 67. As a result, the box stretches from a value of 41 to a value of 67. The whis-
kers represent those occupations that lay outside of the quartile range. Using the same example, the maximum score for
mechanical knowledge is 79 and the minimum is 25. As a rule of thumb in interpretation, if the boxes and whiskers are
relatively long, then the occupations have wider extremes for that competency; if the whiskers are relatively short, then
the occupations have more closely clustered values for that competency.
The next figures portray the actual competency scores for each occupation in the group. For this type of depiction we use
radar charts. For reference, see Figure 1.2: “Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Production Occupations.” A radar chart is
a useful comparative analysis tool when looking at multiple occupations with a large number of individually measured
variables. Radar charts can seem confusing at first unless one has the proper context for interpretation. It is helpful to
approach a radar chart as a line graph that has been wrapped around a central point. For example in Figure 1.2, machin-
ists have a score of 77 for mechanical knowledge, mechanical engineers have score of 69, and welders have a score of 51.
13
Research Results
This indicates that the occupations are fairly closely clustered in their knowledge of mechanics, but machinists are the
most specialized, and welders are least specialized in this category. By examining the remaining top 15 occupations we can
see that each occupation excels and does not excel in different competency categories. For context, two circular reference
points are provided in the chart. The blue-shaded reference area nearest to the center indicates the boundaries for compe-
tencies that are considered “basic.” The green-shaded area represents competencies that are “intermediate.” Any compe-
tency that is beyond the green shaded area—a score of 50 or higher—is considered “advanced.”
Another advantage of this type of display is that it clearly demonstrates career pathway potential between occupations.
For instance in Figure 1.2, it is apparent that machinists and welders are fairly evenly matched among the top 15 compe-
tencies, but in several categories welders trail machinists by a noteworthy margin. Machinists generally make more money
than do welders, but an average welder could become a machinist if he or she received training in order to improve
knowledge of mechanics, production and processing, and mathematics. Such career transitions are easily visible when
examining the radar charts throughout this report. One way to organize the information is shown in the following flow
chart (Figure b):
• Knowledge: Mechanical, Production & Processing, Mathematics, Education & Training, English Language
• Skills: Learning Strategies, Active Listening, Active Learning, Quality Control and Analysis, Equipment Selection
• Abilities: Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Visualization, Problem Sensitivity, Information Ordering
The box and whisker plot in Figure 1.1 shows that the knowledge and skill categories are fairly similar for the occupations’
key attributes because the boxes are fairly small and the whiskers do not indicate that there are very many extreme outli-
ers. The abilities category shows a few more outlier attributes.
The competencies identified can appear somewhat abstract. For example, research results show relatively high ability
rankings for problem sensitivity in production occupations. Problem sensitivity is not a commonly used term, but it is
defined as follows: The ability to tell when something is wrong or is likely to go wrong. It does not involve solving the
problem, only recognizing there is a problem. O*NET provides definitions for each of the competencies in Appendix B.
Furthermore, the numbered values associated with each competency provide little meaning without some understanding
of the context. Appendix C provides context for understanding the various competency values. For example, the near-
est scale anchor for problem sensitivity states that an occupation with a score of 46 should be able to: “Recognize that an
14
Research Results
In Figure 1.1, two competencies have very low extreme whiskers, which could cause some pause in interpretation. Equip-
ment Selection with a lowest end value of 4 and Visualization with a lowest end value of 8 are represented by the occupa-
tions: Industrial Truck and Tractor Operators and Packers and Packagers, Hand, respectively. Though these occupations
have low values in one competency, their other KSA are in line with the top 15 competencies. To increase the levels of
competencies to the median amount would likely require little additional education and training.
Written Expression
Monitoring
Oral Expression
Reading Comprehension
Written Comprehension
Oral Comprehension
Oral Comprehension
Customer and Personal Service
Active Listening
Service Orientation
English Language
Deductive Reasoning
Mathematics
Clerical
Figures 1.2 through 1.4 use radar charts to exhibit the level of individual competencies for multiple occupations within
the production occupations group. The radar charts are broken into groups of occupations that share similar competency
attribute values, which are reflected in their roughly similar shapes.
The group of occupations in Figure 1.2 represents more of the mechanically oriented workers within the production
industry. Welders are located more at the entry-level of the occupation group, but they have potential career ladder
opportunities as machinists. If one is beginning as a welder and seeking to become a mechanical engineer, that individual
would require significant education, training, and skill development.
The second group of occupations represented in Figure 1.3 embodies the operations side of the production industry. As is
evident in the radar chart, the competency attributes are very compatible in the skills and abilities categories. With each
occupation, varying degrees of knowledge are prevalent in the categories of Mathematics, Production and Processing, and
Mechanical.
The third group represented in Figure 1.4 characterizes workers who specialize in quality control and the movement of
goods. Several similar KSA comparisons are identifiable in this occupation group. These charts provide some additional
insight into potential career pathways or career transition possibilities. For example, with some additional competency
development, a team assembler could transition into a first-line supervisor.
15
Research Results
Figure 1.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Production Occupations, Group One
Figure 1.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Production Occupations, Group Two
Figure 1.4: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Production Occupations, Group Three
16
Research Results
• Knowledge: Customer and Personal Service, Clerical, English Language, Mathematics, Computers and Electronics
• Skills: Active Listening, Monitoring, Reading Comprehension, Service Orientation, Active Learning
• Abilities: Oral Comprehension, Oral Expression, Written Comprehension, Deductive Reasoning, Written Expression
The box and whisker plot in Figure 1.5 displays that overall, the knowledge attributes for service occupations vary some-
what, especially when compared to production occupations. Furthermore, on average, the skill and ability values are
higher than those for production occupations and have a smaller number of outliers. Interestingly, the small number of
“cross-over” abilities (i.e., the abilities that appear in both production and service occupations), Oral Comprehension
and Oral Expression, are higher among service occupations than among production occupations. Other crossover KSAs
also show some distinct differences; English language knowledge shows significantly more outliers in service as compared
to production. The average knowledge for Mathematics is the same between the two occupation categories, though the
service industry has more extreme outliers due to the low scores of service occupations found in Figure 1.8. Additionally,
Active Listening and Active Learning rank very high in service occupations compared to production occupations.
Written Expression
Monitoring
Oral Expression
Reading Comprehension
Written Comprehension
Oral Comprehension
Oral Comprehension
Customer and Personal Service
Active Listening
Service Orientation
English Language
Deductive Reasoning
Mathematics
Clerical
As in the analysis on production occupations, the radar charts show similar groups of occupational shapes, allowing for
insights into possible career transitions and/or pathways. The first set of occupations shown in Figure 1.6 show financial
service, sales, and administrative occupations. Financial managers and sales representatives share very similar KSA values.
Figure 1.7 shows the second set of occupations, which are related to education. These occupations excel in skills such as
Active Listening, Monitoring, and Reading Comprehension.
The third set of occupations represented in Figure 1.8 contains lower knowledge characteristics but fairly high skills and
ability values. Often considered blue-collar jobs, home health aides, personal home care aides, janitors, and landscap-
ing workers have skill and ability requirements that vary from intermediate to advanced. The final group represented in
17
Research Results
Figure 1.9 show the varying degrees of compatibility between customer service representatives, bookkeeping clerks, and
first-line supervisors.
Figure 1.6: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Service Occupations, Group One
Figure 1.7: Top Fifteen KSA Values for Individual Service Occupations, Group Two
18
Research Results
Figure 1.8: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Service Occupations, Group Three
Figure 1.9: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Service Occupations, Group Four
19
Research Results
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
In the pharmaceutical industry, the respondent expressed that the important key occupations were chemists; maintenance
and repair workers; first-line managers; and packaging and filling machine operators. Of the identified KSAs, the abilities
and skills ranked as most critical to the occupations. Knowledge varied between somewhat important to very important,
depending upon the occupation and specific knowledge competency. For example, production and processing knowledge
is very important to packaging and filling machine operators and less important to maintenance and repair workers. The
respondent also expects some company growth over the next 5-10 years.
Plastics Manufacturing
In the plastics sector, several identified occupations were considered important to the respondent’s company, including
the following: maintenance and repair workers; inspectors, testers and sorters; packers and packagers; packaging and
filling machine operators; sales representatives; first-line supervisors; and extruding and drawing machine setters. Within
these occupations, almost all competencies were considered important or very important to the job function. Key com-
petencies that scored lower in importance were those in the knowledge section, where specific specialties become more
apparent. One specific knowledge competency received low scores in customer and personal service for the production
and processing occupations but very high scores for management and sales occupations.
The respondent noted that for most occupations, workers were easy to find and hire, except for some specialty occupa-
tions (e.g., plastic sales representatives). In addition, there was an expectation of company growth over the next 5-10 years,
including the hiring of machine operators.
Occupation
• Electrical and electronic equipment assemblers • Machinists
• Electronics engineers, except computer • Electrical engineers
• Mechanical engineers • Computer software engineers, applications
• Electrical and electronic engineering technicians • Computer software engineers, systems software
• First-line supervisors/managers of production and operat-
• Computer hardware engineers
ing workers
• Industrial engineers
20
Research Results
The identified skill and ability attributes of these occupations ranked from important to very important, while the knowl-
edge attributes were considered very important for all identified occupations. Overall the respondent expressed relative
ease in being able to hire the necessary talent to fill occupational needs, though workers in specific occupations, such as
engineers and electrical and electronic equipment installers, were somewhat difficult to locate. The respondent expects
company growth over the next 5-10 years and would likely hire in all occupations during that timeframe.
Occupation
Within the ability competency, all attributes were ranked as important or very important to the occupation. Similar
responses were given for both skills and knowledge, though social perceptiveness was only moderately important for
home health aides, personal home care aides, and nursing aides. The respondent expressed ease in hiring, due to high
wages and an appealing work environment. Nursing aides and orderlies were noted to have a fast turnover.
Education
The education sector is identified as preschool through 12th grade. The respondent’s education center covered the pre-
school through kindergarten years of the education spectrum. Within the identified occupations, only those of elemen-
tary school teachers and teacher assistants were applicable. Ability attributes ranked important and very important, except
in written comprehension, which ranked as somewhat important. All skill attributes were ranked as very important for
the occupations. Given the diverse nature of the knowledge attributes between preschool and high school, geography
ranked less important as well as mathematics. Psychology, English language, and education and training were considered
important and very important. There was no perceived expectation of growth over the next 5 to 10 years.
21
Research Results
On the one hand, educators may not be privy to how the demands of business are shifting. On the other hand, busi-
ness people often struggle when trying to express the knowledge, skills, and abilities that will power their business in the
future. As Luis Proenza, president of the University of Akron has remarked, “Business people have detailed specifications
for everything that they buy. But they don’t generally have detailed specifications for the people that they hire.” Focusing
on core competencies—the key KSAs that provide a foundation across industries—may help us bridge the gap.
As mentioned earlier, the handful of core competencies are critical for both production and service occupations. These
competencies are Mathematics, English Language, Active Listening, Active Learning, Oral Comprehension and Oral
Expression, and they make up the bedrock of KSAs for workers entering either the production or service sectors. These
competencies should be considered fundamental to the success of workers in all of the industries targeted in this report.
Equally important, we need visual tools with which to communicate. We are confronting complex challenges of a fast-
moving economy undergoing profound changes. The radar charts developed in this report help us communicate the dif-
ferent dimensions of a successful connection between an individual and an occupational opportunity, and they focus on
the different dimensions of a person’s knowledge, skills, and abilities. The charts reinforce the notion that career choices
are not static or simplistic; they are, instead, complex, emergent, and shifting.
Using these visual tools may help us meet another challenge—enhancing the career guidance system in high schools. It
is not uncommon for a high school guidance counselor to handle between 200 and 300 students. Most of the focus goes
to high school students planning to attend four years of college. Yet remarkable business opportunities are open to high
school students willing to extend their education past high school but not necessarily to four years of college. Under-
standing these pathways is not linear or easy. The radar chart, however, can help narrow and focus career choices for
students.
There is a final note worth mentioning. The term “technical education” often seems to be reserved—as it was in times
past—for students unwilling or unable to enter college. The facts driving today’s employment market are different. Tech-
nical education, far from being the refuge for underachieving students, has become a solid preparation for career advance-
ment. The notion of “core competencies” transcends the traditional divide between general and technical education, an
increasingly outdated distinction.
This research opens a door in the wall between secondary educators and the regional business community. A good place
to start would be to integrate competencies and radar charts into a career guidance pilot program involving regional
organizations.
22
Research Results
Time presents another problem. Developing new supplies of talented graduates, equipped with the skills that employ-
ers need, takes time. While we may aspire to a “just-in-time” solution that delivers talented graduates on the doorsteps
of businesses as they need them, the challenges of designing and implementing this solution are formidable. Yet gaining
more flexible coordination between our supply of talent and demand for talent will drive regional competitiveness in the
future. Focusing on competencies can help speed the communication and move us toward a more “just-in-time” coor-
dination. A small group of post-secondary educators and employers might use this report to explore how to speed the
development of new certifications and degree options.
This report may also prompt post-secondary educators to work with the business community to explore how to map
career pathways. These career pathway maps can strengthen the value proposition of post-secondary education. If indi-
viduals can see how their career options will unfold, the decision to invest in higher education becomes easier.
Focusing on core competencies gives employers a clear framework to communicate their needs more effectively. This
report sets the stage for workshops that can bring educators and employers together in smaller groups to define employer
needs more clearly. As employers become more comfortable with the pragmatism of using the framework of knowledge,
skills and abilities, they will become more explicit in defining their needs. This research opens the door to workshops with
professional associations within the region, such as SHRM, to help employers move toward using competencies to define
their talent needs.
Connecting competencies to occupations and clusters provides an effective way to chart these new pathways. Specifically,
the radar charts provide a visual tool that can help an individual understand how to connect their current competencies
to new career opportunities. Workforce development professionals can collaborate with educators and business executives
to develop additional visual tools to illustrate the connections among competencies, occupations, and clusters to commu-
nicate more effectively with displaced workers. By starting small and in a targeted way, workforce development profes-
23
Research Results
sionals can convince educators and business executives to encourage the adoption of the “common language system” of
competencies.
• Replication requires documentation, methodologies, and protocols. If a successful program cannot be replicated eas-
ily, it cannot be driven to regional scale.
• Scale involves primarily questions of cost. The region needs solutions that leverage digital technologies in order to
expand, economically, the scale of a promising program. Education and workforce development are service businesses
that traditionally require high levels of professional, “hands-on” service. The region must consider how to utilize digi-
tal technologies to reduce the pressure to high more people while driving promising initiatives to a regional scale.
• Sustainability involves a market test. Businesses and individuals will only invest in education and training that
generates clear returns. The returns to individuals come in higher earnings. The returns to business appear in higher
productivity, faster and more accurate hiring decisions, and reduced employee turnover.
The following are some ways the region could develop promising pilot programs that emerge from this research:
1. Work with regional entities to define a pilot project to develop the next generation of career guidance in high schools.
2. Establish collaboration among the Regional Workforce Alliance, post-secondary educators, and employers within one
of the industry groups identified in this report. This collaboration would focus on using competencies to chart new “re-
engagement pathways” for displaced workers.
3. Establish an innovative “design shop” among the RWA, post-secondary educators, and employers within one of the
industry groups identified in this report. The design shop would focus on the development of innovative education solu-
tions to meet the emerging needs of employers.
24
Conclusions
The three main goals this study sought to achieve were the following:
1. To further develop the process pioneered by RWA in identifying competencies within the Milwaukee 7 and North-
east Illinois region
2. To explore a wide range of industries and identify target industries and occupations within the region for the purpose
of identifying key “in-demand” competencies
3. To display “in-demand” competencies in a fashion that would show similarities and potential career ladder/lattice
movement.
A wide variety of intertwined industries and occupations that permeate the regional economy were identified as potential
target areas. The characteristics of the industries and accompanying occupations pose opportunities for regional growth
and expansion. Most notably, the degree of compatibility and number of career ladder/lattice opportunities for the
region’s workforce provide compelling reasons to make use of the area’s ability to transform its economy, build a stronger,
more talented workforce, and further compete on a national and global scale.
The study results will help to form the basis of analyzing education and remediation programs within the region for the
purposes of identifying the degree to which each institution is contributing to the region’s talent needs. In addition, the
study results will help to further “streamline” future competency analyses as the region continues to grow, develop, and
position itself as a global player. Lastly, as companies seek to recruit new employees, this study will help to provide insight
into the underlying skill sets that are crucial in occupational performance. When competency understanding is incorpo-
rated into hiring practices, companies can find workers that will more likely fit with the occupation, thereby increasing
productivity and potentially reducing turnover.
The incorporation of employer feedback has added significantly to the study’s findings. Employers on the whole value
the competencies identified for the focus occupations. The feedback provided serves as a backdrop to further engage area
employers to become more involved in the workforce development planning in the region.
Note on Appendices: In Appendices E-M, analysis is completed for each industry group and its focus occupations. As in
the main report, target occupations are shown according to their top five KSAs. Each industry group varies depending on
the target occupations found within the group. An important observation is that the competencies for each target occupa-
tion in each industry group have some overlap, which points to the notion that some competencies are integral to almost
all occupations.
25
Appendix A: Focus Industry Groups and Focus Occupations Summary
Appendix A: Focus
Industry Groups and Focus
Occupations Summary
The following tables exhibit the focus industries and occupations that EMSI selected for this competency study. The
first three columns provide information on the industry clusters, and the last two columns contain information on the
occupations related to each of those industry clusters. Please take note that there are some occupations that are contained
in multiple clusters.
26
Appendix A: Focus Industry Groups and Focus Occupations Summary
27
Appendix A: Focus Industry Groups and Focus Occupations Summary
522320 Financial transaction processing and 43-4131 Loan interviewers and clerks
clearing
522390 Other credit intermediation activities 11-3031 Financial managers
13-2051 Financial analysts
13-2041 Credit analysts
13-2099 Financial specialists, all other
43-3011 Bill and Account Collectors
541611 Administrative management consult- 13-1199 Business operation specialists, all other
Business Services ing services
541613 Marketing consulting services 13-2011 Accountants and auditors
541614 Process and logistics consulting 43-3031 Bookkeeping, accounting, and auditing
services clerks
28
Appendix A: Focus Industry Groups and Focus Occupations Summary
561790 Other services to buildings and 49-9042 Maintenance and repair workers,
dwellings general
623312 Homes for the elderly 39-9021 Personal and home care aides
624120 Services for the elderly and disabled 29-1111 Registered nurses
611110 Elementary and Secondary Schools, 25-2021 Elementary school teachers, except
K-12 Education* (private) special education
920000 State Government 25-9041 Teacher assistants
* As previously mentioned the K-12 education sector is not separated from the state government sector and is therefore hard to differentiate in typical
industry categories. To determine the occupations typically contained in this industry, the authors used the staffing patterns from the private elementary
and secondary schools industry.
29
Appendix B: Knowledge, Skill and Ability Descriptions
The following three tables contain the verbal descriptions for all 120 knowledge, skill, and ability competency categories.9
The shaded rows in the knowledge and skill description tables are sub-headings, or “descriptors,” for a smaller group
of competencies that share similar characteristics. These descriptors are listed solely to form an organizational pattern.
O*NET competency scores do not exist at the descriptor level, only at the competency level.
The abilities table is a little more complex. Because of their sheer numbers, abilities are grouped under four higher-level
descriptor categories, shaded in blue, and a much larger number of lower-level competency types, shaded in light gray.
Knowledge of principles and facts related to business administration and accounting, human and mate-
Business and Management rial resource management in organizations, sales and marketing, economics, and office information and
organizing systems
Knowledge of business and management principles involved in strategic planning, resource allocation,
Administration and human resources modeling, leadership technique, production methods, and coordination of people and
Management resources.
Knowledge of administrative and clerical procedures and systems such as word processing, manag-
Clerical ing files and records, stenography and transcription, designing forms, and other office procedures and
terminology.
Knowledge of economic and accounting principles and practices, the financial markets, banking, and the
Economics and Accounting analysis and reporting of financial data.
Knowledge of principles and methods for showing, promoting, and selling products or services. This
Sales and Marketing includes marketing strategy and tactics, product demonstration, sales techniques, and sales control
systems.
Customer and Personal Knowledge of principles and processes for providing customer and personal services. This includes cus-
Service tomer needs assessment, meeting quality standards for services, and evaluation of customer satisfaction.
Personnel and Human Knowledge of principles and procedures for personnel recruitment, selection, training, compensation
Resources and benefits, labor relations and negotiation, and personnel information systems.
Manufacturing and Knowledge of principles and facts related to the production, processing, storage, and distribution of
Production manufactured and agricultural goods
Knowledge of raw materials, production processes, quality control, costs, and other techniques for maxi-
Production and Processing mizing the effective manufacture and distribution of goods.
Knowledge of techniques and equipment for planting, growing, and harvesting food products (both
Food Production plant and animal) for consumption, including storage/handling techniques.
30
Appendix B: Knowledge, Skill and Ability Descriptions
Engineering and Knowledge of the design, development, and application of technology for specific purposes.
Technology
Knowledge of circuit boards, processors, chips, electronic equipment, and computer hardware and soft-
Computers and Electronics ware, including applications and programming.
Knowledge of the practical application of engineering science and technology. This includes applying
Engineering and principles, techniques, procedures, and equipment to the design and production of various goods and
Technology services.
Knowledge of design techniques, tools, and principles involved in production of precision technical
Design plans, blueprints, drawings, and models.
Knowledge of materials, methods, and the tools involved in the construction or repair of houses, build-
Building and Construction ings, or other structures such as highways and roads.
Mechanical Knowledge of machines and tools, including their designs, uses, repair, and maintenance.
Knowledge of the history, theories, methods, and applications of the physical, biological, social, math-
Mathematics and Science ematical, and geography
Mathematics Knowledge of arithmetic, algebra, geometry, calculus, statistics, and their applications.
Knowledge and prediction of physical principles, laws, their interrelationships, and applications to
Physics understanding fluid, material, and atmospheric dynamics, and mechanical, electrical, atomic and sub-
atomic structures and processes.
Knowledge of the chemical composition, structure, and properties of substances and of the chemical
Chemistry processes and transformations that they undergo. This includes uses of chemicals and their interactions,
danger signs, production techniques, and disposal methods.
Knowledge of plant and animal organisms, their tissues, cells, functions, interdependencies, and interac-
Biology tions with each other and the environment.
Knowledge of human behavior and performance; individual differences in ability, personality, and
Psychology interests; learning and motivation; psychological research methods; and the assessment and treatment
of behavioral and affective disorders.
Sociology and Knowledge of group behavior and dynamics, societal trends and influences, human migrations, ethnic-
Anthropology ity, cultures and their history and origins.
Knowledge of principles and methods for describing the features of land, sea, and air masses, including
Geography their physical characteristics, locations, interrelationships, and distribution of plant, animal, and human
life.
Knowledge of principles and facts regarding diagnosing, curing, and preventing disease, and improving
Health Services and preserving physical and mental health and well-being
Knowledge of the information and techniques needed to diagnose and treat human injuries, diseases,
Medicine and Dentistry and deformities. This includes symptoms, treatment alternatives, drug properties and interactions, and
preventive health-care measures.
Knowledge of principles, methods, and procedures for diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of physi-
Therapy and Counseling cal and mental dysfunctions, and for career counseling and guidance.
Knowledge of principles and methods for curriculum and training design, teaching and instruction for
Education and Training individuals and groups, and the measurement of training effects.
Knowledge of facts and principles related to the branches of learning concerned with human thought,
Arts and Humanities language, and the arts.
Knowledge of the structure and content of the English language including the meaning and spelling of
English Language words, rules of composition, and grammar.
Knowledge of the structure and content of a foreign (non-English) language including the meaning and
Foreign Language spelling of words, rules of composition and grammar, and pronunciation.
31
Appendix B: Knowledge, Skill and Ability Descriptions
Knowledge of the theory and techniques required to compose, produce, and perform works of music,
Fine Arts dance, visual arts, drama, and sculpture.
History and Archeology Knowledge of historical events and their causes, indicators, and effects on civilizations and cultures.
Knowledge of different philosophical systems and religions. This includes their basic principles, values,
Philosophy and Theology ethics, ways of thinking, customs, practices, and their impact on human culture.
Knowledge of regulations and methods for maintaining people and property free from danger, injury,
Law and Public Safety or damage; the rules of public conduct established and enforced by legislation, and the political process
establishing such rules.
Knowledge of relevant equipment, policies, procedures, and strategies to promote effective local, state,
Public Safety and Security or national security operations for the protection of people, data, property, and institutions.
Knowledge of laws, legal codes, court procedures, precedents, government regulations, executive
Law and Government orders, agency rules, and the democratic political process.
Communications Knowledge of the science and art of delivering information
Knowledge of transmission, broadcasting, switching, control, and operation of telecommunications
Telecommunications systems.
Communications and Knowledge of media production, communication, and dissemination techniques and methods. This
Media includes alternative ways to inform and entertain via written, oral, and visual media.
Knowledge of principles and methods for moving people or goods by air, rail, sea, or road, including the
Transportation relative costs and benefits.
SKILLS Developed capacities that facilitate learning or the more rapid acquisition of
knowledge.
Basic Skills Developed capacities that facilitate learning or the more rapid acquisition of knowledge
Background structures needed to work with and acquire more specific skills in a variety of different
Content domains
Reading Comprehension Understanding written sentences and paragraphs in work related documents.
Giving full attention to what other people are saying, taking time to understand the points being made,
Active Listening asking questions as appropriate, and not interrupting at inappropriate times.
Writing Communicating effectively in writing as appropriate for the needs of the audience.
Speaking Talking to others to convey information effectively.
Mathematics Using mathematics to solve problems.
Science Using scientific rules and methods to solve problems.
Procedures that contribute to the more rapid acquisition of knowledge and skill across a variety of
Process Skills domains
Using logic and reasoning to identify the strengths and weaknesses of alternative solutions, conclusions
Critical Thinking or approaches to problems.
Understanding the implications of new information for both current and future problem-solving and
Active Learning decision-making.
Selecting and using training/instructional methods and procedures appropriate for the situation when
Learning Strategies learning or teaching new things.
Monitoring/Assessing performance of yourself, other individuals, or organizations to make improve-
Monitoring ments or take corrective action.
32
Appendix B: Knowledge, Skill and Ability Descriptions
SKILLS Developed capacities that facilitate learning or the more rapid acquisition of
knowledge.
Cross-Functional Skills Developed capacities that facilitate performance of activities that occur across jobs
Social Skills Developed capacities used to work with people to achieve goals
Social Perceptiveness Being aware of others' reactions and understanding why they react as they do.
Coordination Adjusting actions in relation to others' actions.
Persuasion Persuading others to change their minds or behavior.
Negotiation Bringing others together and trying to reconcile differences.
Instructing Teaching others how to do something.
Service Orientation Actively looking for ways to help people.
Complex Problem Solving Developed capacities used to solve novel, ill-defined problems in complex, real-world settings
Skills
Identifying complex problems and reviewing related information to develop and evaluate options and
Complex Problem Solving implement solutions.
Developed capacities used to design, set-up, operate, and correct malfunctions involving application of
Technical Skills machines or technological systems
Operations Analysis Analyzing needs and product requirements to create a design.
Technology Design Generating or adapting equipment and technology to serve user needs.
Equipment Selection Determining the kind of tools and equipment needed to do a job.
Installation Installing equipment, machines, wiring, or programs to meet specifications.
Programming Writing computer programs for various purposes.
Operation Monitoring Watching gauges, dials, or other indicators to make sure a machine is working properly.
Operation and Control Controlling operations of equipment or systems.
Performing routine maintenance on equipment and determining when and what kind of maintenance is
Equipment Maintenance needed.
Troubleshooting Determining causes of operating errors and deciding what to do about it.
Repairing Repairing machines or systems using the needed tools.
Quality Control Analysis Conducting tests and inspections of products, services, or processes to evaluate quality or performance.
Systems Skills Developed capacities used to understand, monitor, and improve socio-technical systems
Judgment and Decision Considering the relative costs and benefits of potential actions to choose the most appropriate one.
Making
Determining how a system should work and how changes in conditions, operations, and the environ-
Systems Analysis ment will affect outcomes.
Identifying measures or indicators of system performance and the actions needed to improve or correct
Systems Evaluation performance, relative to the goals of the system.
Resource Management Developed capacities used to allocate resources efficiently
Skills
Time Management Managing one's own time and the time of others.
Management of Financial Determining how money will be spent to get the work done, and accounting for these expenditures.
Resources
Management of Material Obtaining and seeing to the appropriate use of equipment, facilities, and materials needed to do certain
Resources work.
33
Appendix B: Knowledge, Skill and Ability Descriptions
SKILLS Developed capacities that facilitate learning or the more rapid acquisition of
knowledge.
Management of Personnel Motivating, developing, and directing people as they work, identifying the best people for the job.
Resources
Cognitive Abilities Abilities that influence the acquisition and application of knowledge in problem solving
Verbal Abilities Abilities that influence the acquisition and application of verbal information in problem solving
The ability to listen to and understand information and ideas presented through spoken words and
Oral Comprehension sentences.
Written Comprehension The ability to read and understand information and ideas presented in writing.
Oral Expression The ability to communicate information and ideas in speaking so others will understand.
Written Expression The ability to communicate information and ideas in writing so others will understand.
Idea Generation and Rea- Abilities that influence the application and manipulation of information in problem solving
soning Abilities
The ability to come up with a number of ideas about a topic (the number of ideas is important, not their
Fluency of Ideas quality, correctness, or creativity).
The ability to come up with unusual or clever ideas about a given topic or situation, or to develop cre-
Originality ative ways to solve a problem.
The ability to tell when something is wrong or is likely to go wrong. It does not involve solving the prob-
Problem Sensitivity lem, only recognizing there is a problem.
Deductive Reasoning The ability to apply general rules to specific problems to produce answers that make sense.
The ability to combine pieces of information to form general rules or conclusions (includes finding a
Inductive Reasoning relationship among seemingly unrelated events).
The ability to arrange things or actions in a certain order or pattern according to a specific rule or set of
Information Ordering rules (e.g., patterns of numbers, letters, words, pictures, mathematical operations).
Category Flexibility The ability to generate or use different sets of rules for combining or grouping things in different ways.
Quantitative Abilities Abilities that influence the solution of problems involving mathematical relationships
Mathematical Reasoning The ability to choose the right mathematical methods or formulas to solve a problem.
Number Facility The ability to add, subtract, multiply, or divide quickly and correctly.
Memory Abilities related to the recall of available information
Memorization The ability to remember information such as words, numbers, pictures, and procedures.
Perceptual Abilities Abilities related to the acquisition and organization of visual information
Speed of Closure The ability to quickly make sense of, combine, and organize information into meaningful patterns.
The ability to identify or detect a known pattern (a figure, object, word, or sound) that is hidden in other
Flexibility of Closure distracting material.
The ability to quickly and accurately compare similarities and differences among sets of letters, numbers,
Perceptual Speed objects, pictures, or patterns. The things to be compared may be presented at the same time or one after
the other. This ability also includes comparing a presented object with a remembered object.
Spatial Abilities Abilities related to the manipulation and organization of spatial information
The ability to know your location in relation to the environment or to know where other objects are in
Spatial Orientation relation to you.
34
Appendix B: Knowledge, Skill and Ability Descriptions
The ability to imagine how something will look after it is moved around or when its parts are moved or
Visualization rearranged.
Attentiveness Abilities related to application of attention
Selective Attention The ability to concentrate on a task over a period of time without being distracted.
The ability to shift back and forth between two or more activities or sources of information (such as
Time Sharing speech, sounds, touch, or other sources).
Psychomotor Abilities Abilities that influence the capacity to manipulate and control objects
Fine Manipulative Abilities Abilities related to the manipulation of objects
The ability to keep your hand and arm steady while moving your arm or while holding your arm and
Arm-Hand Steadiness hand in one position.
The ability to quickly move your hand, your hand together with your arm, or your two hands to grasp,
Manual Dexterity manipulate, or assemble objects.
The ability to make precisely coordinated movements of the fingers of one or both hands to grasp,
Finger Dexterity manipulate, or assemble very small objects.
Control Movement Abilities Abilities related to the control and manipulation of objects in time and space
Control Precision The ability to quickly and repeatedly adjust the controls of a machine or a vehicle to exact positions.
The ability to coordinate two or more limbs (for example, two arms, two legs, or one leg and one arm)
Multilimb Coordination while sitting, standing, or lying down. It does not involve performing the activities while the whole body
is in motion.
The ability to choose quickly between two or more movements in response to two or more different
Response Orientation signals (lights, sounds, pictures). It includes the speed with which the correct response is started with the
hand, foot, or other body part.
The ability to time your movements or the movement of a piece of equipment in anticipation of changes
Rate Control in the speed and/or direction of a moving object or scene.
Reaction Time and Speed Abilities related to speed of manipulation of objects
Abilities
The ability to quickly respond (with the hand, finger, or foot) to a signal (sound, light, picture) when it
Reaction Time appears.
Wrist-Finger Speed The ability to make fast, simple, repeated movements of the fingers, hands, and wrists.
Speed of Limb Movement The ability to quickly move the arms and legs.
Physical Abilities Abilities that influence strength, endurance, flexibility, balance and coordination
Static Strength The ability to exert maximum muscle force to lift, push, pull, or carry objects.
The ability to use short bursts of muscle force to propel oneself (as in jumping or sprinting), or to throw
Explosive Strength an object.
The ability to exert muscle force repeatedly or continuously over time. This involves muscular endurance
Dynamic Strength and resistance to muscle fatigue.
The ability to use your abdominal and lower back muscles to support part of the body repeatedly or
Trunk Strength continuously over time without 'giving out' or fatiguing.
Endurance The ability to exert oneself physically over long periods without getting out of breath
Stamina The ability to exert yourself physically over long periods of time without getting winded or out of breath.
Flexibility, Balance, and Abilities related to the control of gross body movements
Coordination
35
Appendix B: Knowledge, Skill and Ability Descriptions
Extent Flexibility The ability to bend, stretch, twist, or reach with your body, arms, and/or legs.
Dynamic Flexibility The ability to quickly and repeatedly bend, stretch, twist, or reach out with your body, arms, and/or legs.
The ability to coordinate the movement of your arms, legs, and torso together when the whole body is in
Gross Body Coordination motion.
Gross Body Equilibrium The ability to keep or regain your body balance or stay upright when in an unstable position.
Sensory Abilities Abilities that influence visual, auditory and speech perception
Visual Abilities Abilities related to visual sensory input
Near Vision The ability to see details at close range (within a few feet of the observer).
Far Vision The ability to see details at a distance.
Visual Color Discrimination The ability to match or detect differences between colors, including shades of color and brightness.
Night Vision The ability to see under low light conditions.
Peripheral Vision The ability to see objects or movement of objects to one's side when the eyes are looking ahead.
The ability to judge which of several objects is closer or farther away from you, or to judge the distance
Depth Perception between you and an object.
Glare Sensitivity The ability to see objects in the presence of glare or bright lighting.
Auditory and Speech Abilities related to auditory and oral input
Abilities
Hearing Sensitivity The ability to detect or tell the differences between sounds that vary in pitch and loudness.
Auditory Attention The ability to focus on a single source of sound in the presence of other distracting sounds.
Sound Localization The ability to tell the direction from which a sound originated.
Speech Recognition The ability to identify and understand the speech of another person.
Speech Clarity The ability to speak clearly so others can understand you.
36
Appendix C: Scores and Scale Anchors for Top Fifteen KSAs
In addition to quantifying the competency scores for each occupation, the O*NET system also provides “scale anchors”10
for each competency value. The scale anchors provide a verbal description of an example task that a person would be
required accomplish in order to rank at the lower middle and highest levels for each competency. In the following tables
the middle scale anchors and their values are displayed in the far-right columns. This information is intended to provide
some real-world basis for the competency scores that are used throughout this report.
37
Appendix C: Scores and Scale Anchors for Top Fifteen KSAs
38
Appendix C: Scores and Scale Anchors for Top Fifteen KSAs
39
Appendix D: Top Occupations with Transferable KSAs
Appendix D: Top
Occupations with
Transferable KSAs
The following two tables display a short list of occupations that are the most compatible with the core targeted occupa-
tions. These occupations were selected based on their aptitude scores within the top 15 KSA categories. The columns to
the right of the occupations exhibit the number of the top five competencies in each KSA sub-division that appeared
among the top five competencies for the compatible occupations. Since there are five competencies within each of the
sub-divisions the maximum score in each category is 5, and the maximum total score is 15. The occupations with the
highest scores are most compatible with the skills required for the production and service sectors. The total out of 15 is
also displayed in the far right column.
PRODUCTION
O*Net SOC Description Knowledge Skills Abilities Total
51-2022.00 Electrical and Electronic Equipment Assemblers 5 4 5 14
51-4192.00 Lay-Out Workers, Metal and Plastic 5 4 5 14
51-9195.07 Molding and Casting Workers 3 5 5 13
Aircraft Structure, Surfaces, Rigging, and Systems
51-2011.00 4 4 5 13
Assemblers
51-2023.00 Electromechanical Equipment Assemblers 5 3 5 13
17-3027.00 Mechanical Engineering Technicians 5 3 5 13
51-2093.00 Timing Device Assemblers, Adjusters, and Calibrators 5 3 5 13
17-3012.01 Electronic Drafters 5 4 4 13
17-2072.00 Electronics Engineers, Except Computer 5 3 5 13
51-9195.03 Stone Cutters and Carvers, Manufacturing 3 5 5 13
SERVICES
O*Net SOC Description Knowledge Skills Abilities Total
11-3011.00 Administrative Services Managers 5 5 5 15
43-6013.00 Medical Secretaries 5 5 5 15
43-4041.01 Credit Authorizers 5 5 5 15
40
Appendix D: Top Occupations with Transferable KSAs
SERVICES
43-3071.00 Tellers 5 5 5 15
43-3041.00 Gaming Cage Workers 5 5 5 15
29-1121.00 Audiologists 5 5 5 15
13-1072.00 Compensation, Benefits, and Job Analysis Specialists 5 5 5 15
43-4031.03 License Clerks 5 5 5 15
29-1124.00 Radiation Therapists 5 5 5 15
13-2061.00 Financial Examiners 5 4 5 14
41
Appendix E: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Appendix E: Pharmaceutical
Manufacturing
This appendix includes analysis for the pharmaceutical manufacturing industry group and subsequent focus occupations.
Box and whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational groups
are also provided.
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
Packaging and filling machine opera-
51-9111 672 712 713 1 0% 5%
tors and tenders
Maintenance and repair workers,
49-9042 557 601 667 66 11% 4%
general
19-2031 Chemists 423 539 539 0 0% 4%
Mixing and blending machine setters,
51-9023 380 431 480 49 11% 3%
operators, and tenders
First-line supervisors/managers of
51-1011 496 398 443 45 11% 3%
production and operating workers
Sales representatives, wholesale and
41-4011 manufacturing, technical and scien- 416 368 410 42 11% 2%
tific products
51-2092 Team assemblers 375 312 347 35 11% 2%
Total 3,319 3,361 3,598 238 7% 22%
42
Appendix E: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Figure e.1: Distribution of Top Fifteen KSA Values for Pharmaceuticals Occupations
Title
90
82 82 82
80 79 77 76 78
75 75 73
70 71
69
64 62 61 64
60 59
60 59 59 57 56
50 51 51
51 49 48 51
49 48 44 44 45 45
45 41 43
40 39 39 41
37
35
30 31 30
20 20
10
0
Coordination
Active Listening
Mechanical
Information
Active Learning
Personal Service
Production and
Monitoring
Oral Expression
Deductive
Reasoning
Education and
Comprehension
Comprehension
Comprehension
Mathematics
Customer and
Ordering
Processing
Training
Reading
Written
Oral
Figure e.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Pharmaceuticals Occupations, Group One
43
Appendix E: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Figure e.3: Fifteen KSA Values for Individual Pharmaceuticals Occupations, Group Two
44
Appendix F: Plastic Manufacturing
Appendix F: Plastic
Manufacturing
This appendix includes analysis for the plastic manufacturing industry group and subsequent focus occupations. Box and
whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational groups are also
provided.
45
Appendix F: Plastic Manufacturing
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
First-line supervisors/managers of
51-1011 645 636 744 108 17% 4%
production and operating workers
Inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers,
51-9061 721 443 493 50 11% 3%
and weighers
Cutting, punching, and press machine
51-4031 setters, operators, and tenders, metal 371 410 435 25 6% 3%
and plastic
Maintenance and repair workers,
49-9042 347 391 461 70 18% 3%
general
53-7051 Industrial truck and tractor operators 347 320 338 18 6% 2%
Computer-controlled machine tool
51-4011 277 295 380 85 29% 2%
operators, metal and plastic
Packaging and filling machine opera-
51-9111 279 269 285 16 6% 2%
tors and tenders
Sales representatives, wholesale and
41-4012 manufacturing, except technical and 271 266 311 45 17% 2%
scientific products
Total 7,187 7,130 7,903 771 11% 48%
Figure f.1: Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Plastic Mfg. Occupations
Title
90
80 79
70 72
69 68
64 63 65 66
63 64
60 61
53 57 57 57
54 54
50 52 52
53
47 48 48
48 45 45
40 43 39 45
43
35 39 35 36
34
32 30 32
30 30 29 30
25 23
20 20
10 9
0
Mechanical
Personal Service
Production and
Oral Expression
Reasoning
Education and
Comprehension
Comprehension
Active Listening
Instructing
Control Precision
Active Learning
Mathematics
Quality Control
Deductive
Strategies
Learning
Customer and
Processing
Training
Analysis
Written
Oral
46
Appendix F: Plastic Manufacturing
Figure f.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Plastic Mfg. Occupations, Group One
Figure f.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Plastic Mfg. Occupations, Group Two
47
Appendix F: Plastic Manufacturing
Figure f.4: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Plastic Mfg. Occupations, Group Three
48
Appendix G: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Appendix G: Industrial
Machinery Manufacturing
This appendix includes analysis for the industrial machinery manufacturing industry group and subsequent focus occupa-
tions. Box and whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational
groups are also provided.
49
Appendix G: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
Cutting, punching, and press machine
51-4031 setters, operators, and tenders, metal 124 213 232 19 9% 2%
and plastic
17-3013 Mechanical drafters 116 175 214 39 22% 2%
Laborers and freight, stock, and mate-
53-7062 122 166 177 11 7% 2%
rial movers, hand
17-2112 Industrial engineers 103 149 217 68 45% 2%
Total 3,328 4,926 6,152 1,227 25% 54%
Figure g.1: Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Industrial Machinery Mfg. Occupations
Title
100
90 89
80 79 81 77 79 80
76 75 77
74 74 70 73
70 72 71
60 55
55
50 56 55 53 56 54
54 50
51 52 51
48 46
47 45 41
40 39 40 41 39 39 38
35 34
30 30
24 23
20
14 14
10
0
Coordination
Mechanical
Engineering and
Production and
Visualization
Oral Expression
Reasoning
Comprehension
Comprehension
Comprehension
Active Listening
Equipment
Active Learning
Mathematics
Deductive
Design
Selection
Processing
Technology
Reading
Written
Oral
Figure g.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Industrial Machinery Mfg. Occupations, Group One
50
Appendix G: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Figure g.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Industrial Machinery Mfg. Occupations, Group Two
Figure g.4: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Industrial Machinery Mfg. Occupations, Group Three
51
Appendix H: Advanced Electronic Systems Manufacturing
Appendix H: Advanced
Electronic Systems
Manufacturing
This appendix includes analysis for the advanced electronic systems manufacturing industry group and subsequent focus
occupations. Box and whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupa-
tional groups are also provided.
52
Appendix H: Advanced Electronic Systems Manufacturing
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
Inspectors, testers, sorters, samplers,
51-9061 670 536 573 37 7% 4%
and weighers
Electromechanical equipment
51-2023 450 507 588 81 16% 4%
assemblers
Electrical and electronic engineering
17-3023 426 432 517 85 20% 3%
technicians
17-2071 Electrical engineers 397 426 520 94 22% 3%
17-2112 Industrial engineers 316 411 642 231 56% 3%
Electronics engineers, except
17-2072 351 368 460 92 25% 3%
computer
17-2141 Mechanical engineers 339 338 400 62 18% 3%
First-line supervisors/managers of
51-1011 281 296 371 75 26% 2%
production and operating workers
Computer software engineers,
15-1031 247 286 411 125 44% 2%
applications
51-4041 Machinists 268 275 354 79 29% 2%
Computer software engineers, sys-
15-1032 173 182 283 101 55% 1%
tems software
17-2061 Computer hardware engineers 99 140 171 31 22% 1%
51-9141 Semiconductor processors 122 129 183 54 42% 1%
Total 6,034 6,169 7,516 1,349 22% 48%
Figure h.1: Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Electronics Mfg. Occupations
Level
120
100 96
91
84 82 84
80 75
74 74
70 68
67 63 66 66 66
64
61
60
61 63 62 62 58
59 56 56
53 52 50 54 54 51
50 48
40 42 42 41 41 40 41 43
39 39 39
28 25
20
0
Troubleshooting
English Language
Engineering and
Critical Thinking
Oral Expression
Reasoning
Education and
Comprehension
Comprehension
Comprehension
Computers and
Information
Active Learning
Mathematics
Quality Control
Deductive
Ordering
Electronics
Technology
Training
Reading
Analysis
Written
Oral
53
Appendix H: Advanced Electronic Systems Manufacturing
Figure h.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Electronics Mfg. Occupations, Group One
Figure h.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Electronics Mfg. Occupations, Group Two
54
Appendix H: Advanced Electronic Systems Manufacturing
Figure h.4: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Electronics Mfg. Occupations, Group Three
55
Appendix I: Financial Services
This appendix includes analysis for the financial services industry group and subsequent focus occupations. Box and
whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational groups are also
provided.
56
Appendix I: Financial Services
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
Bookkeeping, accounting, and audit-
43-3031 671 778 813 35 4% 3%
ing clerks
13-2099 Financial specialists, all other 417 441 469 28 6% 2%
43-3011 Bill and account collectors 370 437 486 49 11% 2%
13-2041 Credit analysts 266 272 267 -5 -2% 1%
13-2051 Financial analysts 211 235 272 37 16% 1%
Total 14,159 15,929 17,273 1,344 8% 64%
Figure i.1: Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Financial Services Occupations
Title
100
90 90
80 79 79
75 76
71 73 74
70 70 70
66 66
63 64 64
68 63 63 62 63
60 60 61
61 57 59
57 54 54 57
50 55 51 52 56 53
48 51 50
47 47 46
47 45
42
40 39
30
22
20
10
0
English Language
Personal Service
Monitoring
Expression
Critical Thinking
Oral Expression
Reasoning
Comprehension
Comprehension
Comprehension
Speaking
Active Listening
Economics and
Mathematics
Deductive
Clerical
Customer and
Written
Accounting
Reading
Written
Oral
57
Appendix I: Financial Services
Figure i.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Financial Services Occupations, Group One
Figure i.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Financial Services Occupations, Group Two
58
Appendix J: Business Services
This appendix includes analysis for the business services industry group and subsequent focus occupations. Box and
whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational groups are also
provided.
59
Appendix J: Business Services
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
Bookkeeping, accounting, and audit-
43-3031 843 1,576 1,879 303 19% 3%
ing clerks
43-9061 Office clerks, general 917 1,290 1,538 248 19% 2%
19-3021 Market research analysts 569 831 1,115 284 34% 1%
Employment, recruitment, and place-
13-1071 455 785 1,029 244 31% 1%
ment specialists
Total 9,145 15,688 19,300 3,612 23% 28%
Figure j.1: Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Business Services Occupations
Title
90
85
80 81
77 77 77
74 73
70 72 72
66 70
66 65 64 66
64 63 64
60 65 62
58 61 60 61 59
56 58 55 57
54 54 56 55
50 48 53 50 48
48
42 41 41 41 45
40 39 39
30
20
10
0
English Language
Personal Service
Expression
Critical Thinking
Oral Expression
Reasoning
Comprehension
Comprehension
Comprehension
Active Listening
Computers and
Management
Active Learning
Mathematics
Deductive
Clerical
Customer and
Written
Electronics
Reading
Time
Written
Oral
Figure j.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Business Services Occupations, Group One
60
Appendix J: Business Services
Figure j.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Business Services Occupations, Group Two
61
Appendix K: Consumer Services (Green Potential)
Appendix K: Consumer
Services (Green Potential)
This appendix includes analysis for the consumer services (green potential) industry group and subsequent focus occupa-
tions. Box and whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational
groups are also provided.
62
Appendix K: Consumer Services (Green Potential)
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
Pesticide handlers, sprayers, and
37-3012 508 636 768 132 21% 2%
applicators, vegetation
37-2021 Pest control workers 348 330 390 60 18% 1%
Maintenance and repair workers,
49-9042 224 250 282 32 13% 1%
general
Total 22,722 25,508 29,967 4,458 17% 76%
Figure k.1: Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Consumer Services Occupations
Title
80
73
70
64 67
64 63 63
62
60
57 57 53
56 54 55 55
52 52
50
51 51 45
49 44 49 47
41 46 42
40 42 42 42
39 38
38 38 34 34 36 36
32
30 30
27 27
20 21 22
17 19
10
0
Coordination
Mechanical
Personal Service
Oral Expression
Education and
Sensitivity
Extent Flexibility
Comprehension
Comprehension
Trunk Strength
Active Listening
Equipment
Chemistry
Management
Public Safety and
Problem
Selection
Customer and
Training
Reading
Time
Security
Oral
Figure k.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Consumer Services Occupations, Group One
63
Appendix K: Consumer Services (Green Potential)
Figure k.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Consumer Services Occupations, Group Two
64
Appendix L: Other Consumer Services
This appendix includes analysis for the other consumer services industry group and subsequent focus occupations. Box
and whisker plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational groups are
also provided.
65
Appendix L: Other Consumer Services
09-'19 09-'19 % % of
SOC Code Description 2001 Jobs 2009 Jobs 2019 Jobs Change Change Industry
29-1111 Registered nurses 490 611 784 173 28% 2%
Licensed practical and licensed voca-
29-2061 379 453 560 107 24% 2%
tional nurses
Social and community service
11-9151 261 452 573 121 27% 2%
managers
Total 9,774 13,650 17,011 3,361 25% 50%
Figure l.1: Distribution of Top 15 KSA Values for Other Consumer Services Occupations
Title
100
90 89
80 82
80 80 77
72 72 73 72
70
68 68
64 61 64 64
67 61
60 61
58
61 59
58 57 57 54 56
50 53 52 52
48 53
46 46 45 46
49 44 45
45 41
40 40
35
30
25 25
20
10 12
0
Perceptiveness
English Language
Personal Service
Therapy and
Oral Expression
Education and
Sensitivity
Comprehension
Comprehension
Comprehension
Speaking
Active Listening
Orientation
Recognition
Psychology
Problem
Counseling
Customer and
Service
Speech
Training
Reading
Written
Social
Oral
66
Appendix L: Other Consumer Services
Figure l.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Other Consumer Services Occupations, Group One
Figure l.3: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Other Consumer Services Occupations, Group Two
67
Appendix M: K-12 Education
This appendix includes analysis for the education industry group and subsequent focus occupations. Box and whisker
plot charts and radar charts showing the distribution of the top KSAs for specific occupational groups are also provided.
68
Appendix M: K-12 Education
90 89
84
82 80 79 83
80 81
74 74 76
73 71
70 70 68 68
65 64 67 59
59 63 59 59
60 57 58 55
57 57 54
55 56 53 56 54 55 52
50 52 50
46 48 46 55 50 46
45
40
30
20
10
0
Perceptiveness
English Language
Monitoring
Oral Expression
Education and
Comprehension
Comprehension
Speech Clarity
Active Listening
Instructing
Recognition
Mathematics
Psychology
Geography
Strategies
Learning
Speech
Training
Written
Social
Oral
Figure m.2: Top 15 KSA Values for Individual Education Occupations, Group One
69
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
Delta Gurnee, IL
Aerotek CE Milwaukee, WI
70
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
71
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
72
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
73
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
74
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
75
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
76
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
77
Appendix N: Current Job Openings (July 2009) by Target Occupation
78