Documente Academic
Documente Profesional
Documente Cultură
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ =
N
n
b a R R
a s
(1)
Where Rs is the monthly average daily global radiation,
a
R is the monthly average daily extraterrestrial
radiation, n is the day length, N is the maximum possible sunshine duration, and a andb are empirical
coefficients(Allenet al. 1998). The values of the monthly average daily extraterrestrial radiation (
a
R ) are
calculated for days giving average of each month.
a
R Was calculated from the following equation,
(
|
.
|
\
|
+
(
|
.
|
\
|
+ == o
t
o
t
sin sin
360
. 2
sin cos cos
365
360
cos 033 . 0 1
* 24
s
s
sc
w
w
n I
Ra
(2)
1
I.R.of IRAN METEOROLOGICAL ORG
Intl J Agri Crop Sci. Vol., 5 (21), 2650-2654, 2013
2652
Where
sc
I is the solar constant (=1367 Wm
-2
), is the altitude of the site,
o
is the sun declination and
s
W is
the mean sunrise hour angle for the given month.
The regression models proposed in the literature based on Angstrom and Prescott and other
Parameters are listed in Table 1(Lopez and Rubio 2000).
Table 1. Regression models proposed in the literature
Source Model symbol Regression equation
( 1940)Angstrom and Prescott M1
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ =
N
n
b a R R
a s
Akinoglu and Ecevit (1990) M2
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ + =
2
N
n
c
N
n
b a R R
a s
Alagib and Mansel (2000) M3 |
.
|
\
|
=
N
n
b a R R
a s
exp
Allen (1998) M4
min max
T T a R R
a s
=
Bristol and Kemble (1984) M5 ( ) ( ) ( )
c
a s
T T b a R R
min max
exp 1 =
Chen (2004) M6 ( )
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ |
.
|
\
|
+ = d
N
n
b T T a R R
c
a s min max
ln
Bahel (1987) M7 |
.
|
\
|
+ + + = ) (
min max
T T d RH c
N
n
b a R R
a s
Abdullah (1994) M8
|
|
.
|
\
|
|
.
|
\
|
+ |
.
|
\
|
+ + =
3 2
N
n
d
N
n
c
N
n
b a R R
a s
Comparison Techniques
There are numerous works which deal with the assessment and comparison of monthly mean daily solar
radiation estimation models. The most popular statistical parameters are the mean bias error (MBE) and the
root mean square error (RMSE). In this study, to evaluate the accuracy of the estimated data, from the models
described above, the following statistical tests were used, MBE, RMSE and coefficient of correlation (r), to test
the linear relationship between predicted and measured values. For better data modeling, these statistics
should be closer to zero, but coefficient of correlation, r, should approach to 1 as closely as possible.
The Mean Bias Error
This test provides information on long-term performance. A low MBE value is desired. A negative value gives
the average amount of underestimation in the calculated value. So, one drawback of these two mentioned tests
is that overestimation of an individual observation will cancel underestimation in a separate observation.
n
O P
MBE
n
i i
=
1
) (
(3)
The Root Mean Square Error
The value of RMSE is always positive, representing zero in the ideal case. The normalized root mean square
error gives information on the short term performance of the correlations by allowing a term by term comparison
of the actual deviation between the predicted and measured values. The smaller the value, the better is the
models performance.
n
O P
RMSE
n
i i
=
1
2
) (
(4)
The Coefficient of Correlation
Intl J Agri Crop Sci. Vol., 5 (21), 2650-2654, 2013
2653
The coefficient of correlation, r can be used to determine the linear relationship between the measured and
estimated values.
T-Statistic Test
As defined by Student in one of the tests for mean values, the random variable t with n-1 degrees of freedom
may be written here as follows:
2 2
2
) 1 (
MBE RMSE
MBE n
t
=
(5)
The measured global solar radiation data are checked for errors and inconsistencies. The purpose of
data quality control is to eliminate spurious data and inaccurate measurements. In the database, there are
missing and invalid measurements in the data and they are identified in the data. The missing and invalid
measurements account for approximately 0.5% of the whole database. To complete the data, missing and
atypical data are replaced by estimated values(Almoroxet al. 2005).
Figure2.Correlation of measured and estimated radiation data by Angstrom model,(a): calibration, (b) validation
The objective of this study was to evaluate various models for the estimation of the monthly average
daily global radiation on a horizontal surface from bright sunshine hours and to select the most appropriate
model for Sari station. All available empirical models that can be used to estimate monthly average daily global
solar radiation Sari station in Iran have been collected from literatures to evaluate the applicability of these
models. The collected models were compared on the basis of the statistical error tests such as mean bias error
(MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (r) and the t-test. According to the results,
Angstrom and Prescott model showed the good estimation of the monthly average daily global solar radiation
on a horizontal surface for Sari station. Therefore, based on the statistical results a new simple linear model
Intl J Agri Crop Sci. Vol., 5 (21), 2650-2654, 2013
2654
R/Ra= 0.22 + 0.52 (n/N) based on modified Angstrom model is extremely recommended to estimate monthly
average daily global solar radiation for Terengganu state areas and in elsewhere with similar climatic conditions
areas where the radiation data is missing or unavailable. The present work will help to advance the state of
knowledge of global solar radiation to the point where it has applications in the estimation of daily global solar
radiation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this study, the accuracy among the ten models was determined using the data measured at Sari station
in the periods between 2000 and 2010.
The values of monthly mean daily global solar radiation intensity estimated using the above model were
compared with the corresponding measured values. The statistical tests of MBE, RMSE, r and t-test were
determined for the entire period; the results are summarizes in Table 2.
Table2. Statistical test MBE, RMSE, r and t-test for sari station, in the period of 2000-2010
R
2
RMSE MBE t
calibration 0.8649 2.4648 -0.1368 2.061
validation 0.8683 5.1495 -4.6284 66.17
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This paper is a partial result of the project, supported by the Islamic Azad University, Jouybar branch, Iran
REFERENCES
Allen R, Pereira L, Raes D, 1998.Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and
Drainage, Paper No 56, Rome.
Almorox J, Benito M, Hontoria C, 2005. Estimation of monthly AngstromPrescott equationcoefficients from measured daily datain Toledo,
Spain, Renewable Energy 30: 931936.
Ehnberg J, Bollen M, 2005. Simulation of global solar radiation based on cloud observations. Solar Energy 78, 157162.
Elagib N, BabikerSh, 1998.New empirical models for global solar radiation over Bahrain, Energy Conversion and Management, Mgmt
39(8), 827-835.
Lopez G, Rubio M, 2000. Estimation of hourly direct normal from measured global solar irradiance i n Spain, Renewable Energy, 21, 175-
186.
Sozne A, 2005. Solar energy potential in Turkey, Applied Energy 80, 367-381.
Yang K, Koike T, 2006.Improving estimation of hourly, daily, and monthly solar radiation by importing global data sets, Agric ultural and
Forest Meteorology 137, 4355.