Sunteți pe pagina 1din 10

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

Ratio Analysis of

Sugar Mills

Superior University Lahore

Page 1

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

Submitted To
Sir Younas

Submitted By
Imran Siddique 10149
Waqas Dastageer 10134
Rayyan Ansar 10264
Imran Rasool 10112
Sameul Stephan 10263

Superior University Lahore

Page 2

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

1. Profitability Ratios:

a) Gross Profit Ratio


2011

2010

Gross Profit

= 4,215,670,940

=3,636,032,719

Net Sales

= 24,729,491,207

=20,380,683,879

Gross Profit Ratio

= G.P Net Sales 100

= 4,215,670,94024,729,491,207100 3,636,032,719 20,380,683,879100


= 17.04%

=17.84%

Comment: Gross profit ratio decreases then previous year. Its alarming condition
for company

b) Operating Profit Ratio


2011

2010

Operating Profit

= 3,512,801,651

=3,125,896,458

Net Sales

= 24,729,491,207

=20,380,683,879

Operating Profit Ratio = Operating Profit Net Sales 100


= 3,512,801,651 24,729,491,207 100

=3,125,896,458 20,380,683,879100

= 14.20 %

= 15.34 %

Comment: Operating profit ratio decreases as respected to previous year; its not good for
company.

Superior University Lahore

Page 3

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

c) Net Profit Ratio


2011

2010

Net Profit

1,343,185,766

=1,245,983,556

Net Sales

24,729,491,207

=20,380,683,879

Net Profit Ratio = Net Profit Net Sales 100


=1,343,185,766 24,729,491,207 100
=5.43%

=1,245,983,55620,380,683,879100
= 6.11%

Comment: Net profit ratio is decreases as respected to precious year its not good for company.

d) Return on Capital Employed


2011

PBIT

2010

= 2,179,708,348

Capital Employed

=1,957,456,955

= Total Assets Current Liabilities


= 19,244,044,908 8,320,707,048 =12,179,586,049 4,365,876,854
= 10,923,337,860

ROCE

= 7,813,709,195

PBIT Capital Employed 100

= 2,179,708,348 10,923,337,860 100 =1,957,456,9557,813,709,195100


= 19.96 %

= 25.05%

Comment: ROCE decreases with respect to previous financial year its not good for company

Superior University Lahore

Page 4

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

2. Liquidity and Working Capital Ratios


a) Current Ratios
2011

Current Assets

2010

6,505,191,648

=3,322,456,862

Current Liabilities =

8,320,707,048

=4,365,876,854

Current Ratios

Current Assets Current Liabilities

= 6,505,191,648 8,320,707,048

=3,322,456,8624,365,876,854

= 0.76 Times

0.78 Times

Comment: its increases as respected to previous year its good for company.

b) Quick Ratios
2011

Quick Assets

2010

= Current Assets Inventories Prepaid Expenses


= 6,505,191,648 1,922,057,309 16,176,487
=3,322,456,862-206,682,011-12,637,267
= 4,566,957,852

=3,103,137,584

Current Liabilities = 8,320,707,048


Quick Ratio

= Quick Assets Current Liabilities


= 4,566,957,852 8,320,707,048
= 0.55 Times

=3,103,137,5844,365,876,854
= 0.71 Times

Comment: it decrease then previous year its not good for the company.
Superior University Lahore

Page 5

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

c) Account Receivable Collection Period Ratio


2011

2010

A/R

= 9,298,229

=13,128,930

Net sales

= 24,729,491,207

=20,380,683,879

= A/R Net Sales 365


= 9,298,22924,729,491,207 365

=13,128,93020,380,683,879365

= 0.137 Days

= 0.235 Days

Comment: Collection period ratio decreases it not good for the company.

d) Account Payable Ratio Period


2011

A/P

2010

= 278,027,973

=324,909,679

Net purchases = 20,215,929,565

=13,767,259,901

= A/P Net Purchases 365


= 278,027,973 20,215,929,565 365

=324,909,67913,767,259,901365

5.01 Days

8.61 Days

Comment: Payable period ratio decreases it not good for the company.

Superior University Lahore

Page 6

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

e) Average Inventory turnover Period


2011

2010

Inventory

= 1,922,057,309

= 206,682,011

CGS

= 20,513,820,267

= 15,515,036,266

Av. Inventory turnover Period = inventory CGS 365


= 1,922,057,309 20,922,057,309 365 =206,682,01115,515,036,266365
= 34.2 Times

= 4.86 Times

Comment: it increases too much its very good for the company.

3. Leverage Ratios

a) Debt Equity Ratios


2011

Long term debt

2010

= 4,068,000,001

=2,571,888,890

Shareholders capital = 4,816,905,952


Debt equity ratio

=3,417,492,310

= Long term Debt Shareholders Capital


= 4,068,000,001 4,816,905,952

=2,571,888,8903,417,492,310

= 0.85

= 0.75

Comment: Debt ratio increases so its poor for the company.

Superior University Lahore

Page 7

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills


b) Interest Coverage Ratios

4)

2011

2010

Nill

Nill

Shareholders Investment Ratios


a) Return on Shareholders Equity Ratio

Net profit after tax

= 1,343,185,766

Average shareholder equity = opening shareholder equity + closing shareholder equity 2


= 3,417,492,310 + 4,816,905,957 2

= 0+3,417,492,3102

= 8,234,398,262 2

=1,708,746,155

= 4,117,199,131
= Net profit after tax average shareholder equity
= 1,343,185,766 4,117,199,131

=1,245,983,5561,708,746,155

= 0.33

= 0.73

Comment: its not good for the company.

Superior University Lahore

Page 8

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

b) Earnings per Share


2011

EPS

2010

= Net profit after tax + pr. Dividend number of ordinary shares

N.P after tax = 1,343,185,766


No. of ordinary shares = 54,998,113
= 1,343,185,766 54,998,113
= 24.42 Rs.

22.89 Rs.

Comment: as earning per share increases its in favour of company.

c) Dividend Yield
2011

2010

Nill

Nill

Superior University Lahore

Page 9

Ratio Analysis of JDW Sugar Mills

Limitations of Ratio Analysis


Ratio analysis is a widely used tool of financial analysis. Yet it suffers from various limitations.
12345-

Ratios are not defined in standard form


Interpretation needs careful analysis and should not be considered in isolation
Availability of comparable information
Use of historical data
It can be subject to manipulation

Superior University Lahore

Page 10

S-ar putea să vă placă și